RIO TINTO LTD
For the period ended Dec 31, 2025. Filed Feb 19, 2026.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
The yearly report of a company based outside the US. It covers much of what a 10-K does, and may follow accounting rules other than US ones.
FY2025 · Filed Feb 19, 2026
Contents
Implementation report
This Implementation report is presented to shareholders for approval at our AGMs. It outlines how our
Remuneration Policy was implemented in 2025, and the intended operation in 2026.
About our reporting
As our shares are listed on both the Australian Securities Exchange
and the London Stock Exchange, the information provided within our
Remuneration report must comply with the reporting requirements of
both countries.
Our regulatory responsibilities impact the volume of information we
provide, as well as the complexity. In Australia, we need to report on
a wider group of executives, as described in the following
paragraph. In addition, as set out in the summary table below, the 2
reporting regimes follow different methodologies
for calculating remuneration.
In the UK, disclosure is required for the Board, including the
Executive Directors. The Australian legislation requires disclosures
in respect of key management personnel (KMP), being those
persons having authority and responsibility for planning, directing
and controlling the activities of the Group. In 2025, our KMP
comprise the Board, and all product group Chief Executives.
Executive KMP are listed on pages 140 and 141, with details of
the positions held during the year and dates of appointment to
those roles.
The single total figure of remuneration table on page 131 shows
remuneration for our Executive Directors, gross of tax and in the
relevant currency of award or payment.
In table 1a on page 145, we report information regarding executives in
accordance with Australian statutory disclosure requirements. The
information is shown gross of tax and in US dollars. The remuneration
details in table 1a include accounting values relating to various parts of
the remuneration package, most notably LTIP awards, and require a
different methodology for calculating the pension value. The figures in
the single total figure of remuneration table are therefore not directly
comparable with those in table 1a. Where applicable, amounts have
been converted using the relevant average exchange rates included in
the notes to table 1a.
In table 1b on page 146, we report the remuneration of the Chair
and the Non-Executive Directors.
Shareholder voting
As required under UK legislation, the current Remuneration Policy
was subject to a binding vote and approved at our 2024 AGMs. The
Implementation report, together with the annual statement by the
People & Remuneration Committee Chair, is subject to an advisory
vote each year as required by UK legislation. Under Australian
legislation, the Remuneration report as a whole is subject to an
advisory vote. All remuneration-related resolutions will be voted on
at the AGMs as Joint Decision Matters by Rio Tinto plc and
Rio Tinto Limited shareholders.
The differing approaches explained
As well as the difference in methodology for measuring
remuneration, there are key differences in how remuneration is
reported in the UK and Australia.
UK
For reporting purposes, remuneration is divided into fixed and
variable elements.
We report remuneration in the currency it is paid. For example,
where a UK executive is paid in pounds sterling, remuneration is
reported in pounds sterling.
For reporting purposes, remuneration is divided into short- and
long-term elements.
All remuneration is reported in US dollars, so using the previous
example, the UK executives’ remuneration would be converted to
US dollars using the average exchange rate for the financial year
(except STIP, which is converted at the year-end exchange rate).
The table below summarises the elements of each component of
remuneration, as well as the significant differences in the
approaches to measurement.
UK
FixedBase salary
Benefits
PensionThe value of the pension contribution and payment in lieu of pension paid during the year
VariableSTIP – cash element
STIP – deferred share element
LTIPValued at point of vesting
Total remuneration
Australia
Short-termBase salary
STIP – cash element
Cash benefits
Non-monetary benefits
Long-termSTIP – deferred share element Based on the amortised IFRS fair value of deferred shares at the time of grant
LTIP Based on the amortised IFRS fair value of the award at time of grant
Pension and superannuation valued on an accounting basis
Total remuneration
People & Remuneration Committee
Responsibilities
The Committee’s responsibilities are set out in our Terms of
Reference, which is reviewed annually, and published at
riotinto.com/corporategovernance.
Our responsibilities include:
People
reviewing strategic workforce planning, including talent,
succession and development planning within the Group
developing leaders’ skills
overseeing and implementing the Board’s workforce engagement
plan and implementation.
Culture
progressing implementation of the 2022 Everyday Respect Report
recommendations and the monitoring of broader cultural change
developing strategies, initiatives and performance measures
around organisational culture and desired behaviours
assessing the effectiveness of respect and inclusion policies.
Remuneration
determining the Group’s remuneration strategy, policy
and framework
determining the remuneration of the Chair, Executive Directors
and other members of the Executive Committee
determining the mix and operation of the Group’s STIP and LTIP,
ensuring alignment with the company’s strategic objectives
overseeing the operation of the Group’s STIP and LTIP for
executives, including approving awards, setting performance
criteria, and determining any outcomes or vesting, and, where
necessary, applying the consequence management framework to
current and prior awards
determining contractual notice periods and termination
commitments, and setting retention and termination arrangements
for executives
overseeing awards under the Group’s all-employee share plans
the annual Directors’ Remuneration report, shareholder
engagement on the Remuneration Policy, including its
implementation, and other related matters including gender pay
reviewing workforce remuneration and related policies, and the
alignment of incentives and rewards with culture and taking these
into account when setting the Policy for Executive Director
remuneration
engaging independent external remuneration advisers.
We consider the level of pay and conditions for all employees
across the Group when determining executive remuneration.
Committee membership
The members of the Committee during the year and to the date of
this report were:
| Ben Wyatt (Committee Chair from 2 May 2025) | Sam Laidlaw (member and Committee Chair to 1 May 2025) |
|---|---|
| Dominic Barton | Susan Lloyd-Hurwitz |
| Dean Dalla Valle | Jennifer Nason |
How we work
The Group Company Secretary (or their delegate) attends meetings
as secretary to the Committee. The Chief Executive, Chief People
Officer, Head of Reward and Head of Talent attend appropriate parts
of the meetings at the invitation of the Committee Chair. No
individual is in attendance during discussions about their own
remuneration.
| During 2025, the Committee met 7 times. We fulfilled our responsibilities as set out in our Terms of Reference.Our work in 2025 included:•reviewing culture maturity metrics•reviewing people development and talent management•determining any base salary adjustments and LTIP grants for executives•reviewing performance against the 2024 STIP and 2020 PSA targets, including assessing applicable outcomes•determining targets for the 2025 STIP and 2025 PSA•reviewing the strategy and report on the Group’s global benefit plans | •consulting with shareholders and proxy advisers on executive pay matters•finalising terms for the departures of Jakob Stausholm, Chief Executive, Sinead Kaufman, Chief Executive, Minerals and Kellie Parker, Chief Executive, Australia•setting terms of appointment of Simon Trott, Chief Executive and Matthew Holcz, Chief Executive, Iron Ore•reviewing executives’ progress towards the Group’s share ownership requirements•reviewing performance of the accountable executives for Global Industry Standard on Tailings Management (GISTM) implementation. |
Independent advisers
The Committee has a protocol for engaging and working with
remuneration consultants to ensure that “remuneration
recommendations” (being advice relating to the elements of
remuneration for KMP, as defined under the Australian Corporations Act
- are made free from undue influence by KMP to whom they may
relate. We monitored compliance with these requirements throughout
- Deloitte, the appointed independent advisers to the Committee,
gave declarations to the effect that any remuneration recommendations
were made free from undue influence by KMP to whom they related.
The Board has received assurance from the Committee and is satisfied
that this was the case.
Deloitte are members of the Remuneration Consultants’ Group, and
voluntarily operate under its Code of Conduct (the Code) in relation to
executive remuneration consulting in the UK. The Code is based
upon principles of transparency, integrity, objectivity, competence,
due care and confidentiality. Deloitte has confirmed that they
adhered to the Code throughout 2025 for all remuneration services
provided to Rio Tinto. The Code is available online at
remunerationconsultantsgroup.com.
The Committee is satisfied that the Deloitte team is independent. During
2025, Deloitte’s services also included attending Committee meetings,
providing support on executive changes in the year and giving advice in
relation to management proposals and shareholder consultations.
Deloitte was paid$520,856 for these services. Fees were charged on
the basis of time and expenses incurred. We received other services
and publications relating to remuneration data from a range of sources.
During the year, Deloitte also provided internal audit, tax compliance and
other non-audit advisory services. These services were provided under
separate engagement terms and the Committee is satisfied that there
were no conflicts of interest.
Executive Directors
Single total figure of remuneration - Realised pay (£’000)
The single total figure of remuneration reflects the value of remuneration actually realised in respect of the 2025 financial year. As described on page
129, this may differ from the statutory values shown in table 1a. Realised pay can vary significantly from both statutory and target remuneration
because a substantial proportion of executive pay is performance based and influenced by share price movements.
| Incentive - STIP payment · Value of LTIP awards vesting3 | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Executive Director | Year | Base salary | Benefits | Pension | Total fixed | Cash | Deferred shares | Face value | Share price appreciation | Total variable | Single total figure |
| Simon Trott (Chief Executive)1 | 2025 | 472 | 636 | 66 | 1,174 | 352 | 352 | – | – | 704 | 1,878 |
| Jakob Stausholm (former Chief Executive)2 | 2025 | 891 | 109 | 125 | 1,125 | 1,085 | – | – | – | 1,085 | 2,210 |
| Jakob Stausholm (former Chief Executive) | 2024 | 1,277 | 168 | 179 | 1,624 | 636 | 636 | 449 | 229 | 1,950 | 3,574 |
| Peter Cunningham (Chief Financial Officer) | 2025 | 780 | 30 | 109 | 919 | 466 | 466 | – | – | 932 | 1,851 |
| Peter Cunningham (Chief Financial Officer) | 2024 | 756 | 44 | 106 | 906 | 376 | 377 | 45 | 23 | 821 | 1,727 |
Values in the table and sections supporting the table reflect remuneration from appointment as Executive Director and Chief Executive on 25 August 2025.
Values in the table reflect remuneration to 24 August 2025 when he stepped down as Chief Executive and includes an apportionment of the 2025 STIP award for the period served as an
Executive Director. The STIP award for the full performance year is £1,678,733.
- Dividend equivalent shares are applied on the vesting of the LTIP awards and, for the purposes of this table, are valued at the share price when the LTIP was awarded and included in
the face-value figure. The impact of share price change for LTIP awards vesting is included under the heading “Share price appreciation”. The value of the LTIP awards reported in 2024
has been restated to reflect the actual vested value.
The 2021 PSA, which had a performance period that ended on 31 December 2025, vested at nil. No value is therefore shown under LTIP
face value or share price appreciation for 2025.
Fixed remuneration
The Chief Executive’s salary on appointment in August 2025 was set below that of his predecessor with the intention to make higher increases as he
develops in the role. The Committee has assessed his performance and development since commencing as Chief Executive and feel it is appropriate
to award him a salary increase of 5%, slightly above the average UK employee rate. The Chief Financial Officer’s 2026 base salary increase is in line
with that to be awarded to the wider UK employee population of 2.7%. Base salaries are reviewed with a 1 March effective date.
| Executive Director | Annual base salary 1 March 2025 £'000 | Annual base salary 1 March 2026 £'000 | % change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simon Trott | 1,3401 | 1,407 | 5% |
| Jakob Stausholm | 1,411 | – | –% |
| Peter Cunningham | 784 | 805 | 2.7% |
1.£1,340,000 represents his salary on appointment on 25 August 2025.
Benefits (2025)
Include healthcare, allowance for professional tax compliance services, occasional spouse travel in support of the business which is deemed
to be taxable to the individual, and non-performance based awards under the all-employee share plans.
The benefits value for Simon Trott includes relocation benefits of circa £610,000 in connection with his transfer from Australia to the UK
on becoming Chief Executive and in line with our international transfer policy that applies to executives across the business.
Pension (2025)
Pension benefits can be paid either as contributions to Rio Tinto’s company pension fund, as a cash allowance, or both.
| Executive Director | Pension contributions paid tothe Rio Tinto pension fund £'000 | Cash in lieu of pension contributions paid £'000 | Total £'000 | Pension provision (% of base salary) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simon Trott | 10 | 56 | 66 | 14% |
| Jakob Stausholm | 7 | 118 | 125 | 14% |
| Peter Cunningham | 10 | 99 | 109 | 14% |
Short-term incentive plan (2025)
2025 outcome
For an executive’s STIP outcome, the weighted STIP financial and strategic scorecard results are added to determine the total result.
For executives remaining in role, the resulting STIP is delivered equally in cash and deferred shares.
| Executive Director · Weighted result (out of 100%) · Fatality deduction · Final scorecard result (%) · Individual performance multiplier · STIP outcome £’000 · Delivered in · Percentage of | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial (50%)1 · Strategic(50%)2 · Group scorecard result · Cash £’000 · Deferred shares £’000 · Max awarded · Max forfeited · Target awarded | ||||||||||||
| Simon Trott | 32.2% | 33.8% | 66% | (10%) | 59.5% | 125% | 704 | 352 | 352 | 74.4% | 25.6% | 149% |
| Jakob Stausholm | 32.2% | 33.8% | 66% | (10%) | 59.5% | 100% | 1,085 | 1,085 | – | 59.5% | 40.5% | 119% |
| Peter Cunningham | 32.2% | 33.8% | 66% | (10%) | 59.5% | 100% | 932 | 466 | 466 | 59.5% | 40.5% | 119% |
- The financial scorecard includes flexed financials (underlying EBITDA and STIP free cash flow), focusing on the achievement of financial plan commitments and unflexed financials
(underlying EBITDA and STIP free cash flow) aligned to market conditions for our commodities.
- The strategic scorecard includes Excel in Development (exploration progression, studies progression and project execution metrics), Impeccable ESG (safety and decarbonisation
metrics), People and Culture (gender diversity and culture change progress metrics) and Social Licence (reputation and Local Voices metric).
Maximum STIP award is capped at 200% of base salary. Target performance represents 50% of maximum, and outstanding performance
represents 100% of maximum. The cash component of the STIP award will be paid in March 2026, and the remainder will be delivered in
deferred shares as a BDA, vesting in December 2028. On cessation of employment, any unvested deferred shares will lapse unless the
Committee decides the executive is an eligible leaver.
Under the STIP, an individual multiplier can be applied to reflect exceptional performance. This structure applies to all participants in the plan and is
used sparingly. A multiplier was applied to reflect Simon Trott’s exceptional performance in the year to significantly advance our operational
excellence, as summarised in the 2025 outcome table. In particular the Committee noted that in his previous role, the Iron Ore product group
delivered exceptional performance including recovery from the impacts of cyclones in Q1 followed by record rates of production. There were notable
uplifts in operational improvements allowing him to hand over a business that is in its best operational shape in many years. Since being appointed as
Chief Executive, Simon Trott has led and facilitated the Group’s most impactful transformation for many years. His revamped strategy was well
received by investors and is already reaping rewards with exceptional production performance in which production guidance was met or exceeded on
most commodities. The outcome following the application of the multiplier to his 2025 STIP is set out in the table on page 131 and on page 142.
Calculation of 2025 short-term incentive plan award
The following table summarises the calculation of the 2025 STIP award against the Group scorecard applicable to all STIP participants.
Group scorecard outcome
| Weighting(out of 100%) · 2025 performance1 · Outcome · Result (% of maximum) · Weighted result(out of 100%) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Threshold · Target · Maximum | ||||||||
| Underlying EBITDA | Unflexed | 12.5% | $16.2 billion | $21.9 billion | $30.1 billion | $25.9 billion | 75% | 9.3% |
| Flexed | 12.5% | $18.6 billion | $25.1 billion | $34.5 billion | 55% | 6.8% | ||
| STIP free cash flow | Unflexed | 12.5% | $8.3 billion | $11.0 billion | $15.5 billion | $13.2 billion | 75% | 9.4% |
| Flexed | 12.5% | $9.7 billion | $12.9 billion | $18.0 billion | 54% | 6.7% | ||
| Total Financial | 50% | 64.4% | 32.2% | |||||
| Impeccable ESG | AIFR2 | 2% | 0.44 | 0.38 | 0.3 | 0.37 | 50% | 1.0% |
| SMM3 | 8% | 5.2 | 5.7 | 6.7 | 5.7 | 50% | 4.0% | |
| Decarbonisation4 | 10% | 2.1 Mt CO2e | 3 Mt CO2e | 4 Mt CO2e | 3.37 Mt CO2e | 69% | 6.9% | |
| Excel in Development | Exploration progression5 | 2.5% | 1 credit | 2 credits | 3 credits | 2.5 credits | 75% | 1.9% |
| Studies progression | 2.5% | 3 studies | 4 studies | 6 studies | 7 studies | 100% | 2.5% | |
| Project execution | 5% | 25% of projects | 50% of projects | 75% of projects | 85% | 100% | 5.0% | |
| People and Culture | Gender diversity | 5% | 26.2% | 26.7% | 27.2% | 26.3% | 30% | 1.5% |
| Culture change | 5% | 70 | 71 | 72 | 71 | 50% | 2.5% | |
| Social Licence | Reputation | 7% | 57.8 or below | 58.8 to 60.8 | 62.8 or above | 64.1 | 100% | 7.0% |
| Local Voices | 3% | 80% in 6 months | 80% in 4 months | 90% in 4 months | 80% in 4 months | 50% | 1.5% | |
| Total Strategic | 50% | 67.5% | 33.8% | |||||
| Total Group | 100% | 66.0% | ||||||
| Fatality deduction | 10% reduction to STIP outcome | |||||||
| Adjusted Group scorecard outcome | 59.5% | |||||||
- No payout below threshold. Threshold payout is nil for financial measures and Social Licence and 25% of maximum for the other strategic measures. Payout for achieving target
corresponds to 50% of maximum, going up in a straight line to outstanding, which represents 100% of maximum.
- AIFR assesses the number of injuries per 200,000 hours worked by employees and contractors at managed operations. It includes medical treatment cases, restricted workday and lost-
day injuries. Outcome has been capped at target due to a permanent damage injury occurring in 2025.
The Safety Maturity Model (SMM) result is the average of the SMM scores achieved by the individual assets included in the safety maturity program.
For Decarbonisation, the progress of carbon abatement projects against incremental stages of development is calculated as the expected 2030 carbon reduction, measured in tonnes of
CO 2 e, contributed by each abatement project that passes a stage-gate during the calendar year. The scope is restricted to direct abatement initiatives under the Global Decarbonisation
Programs, including approved renewable energy, abatement and energy efficiency projects. Nature-based solution (NbS) offset projects are not in scope.
- One Conceptual Study (CS) project was completed in 2025 and assigned a value of 1 credit. One project advanced to CS and is assigned a value of 0.5 credits. Also, 4 projects
progressed from Target Testing to Project of Merit and each is assigned a value of 0.25 credits.
2025 STIP financial measures and Group scorecard commentary
| Financial | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| For 2025, the financial measures were underlying EBITDA and STIP free cash flow. The first, underlying EBITDA, gives insight to cost management, production, performance efficiency and the market environment. This is further described on page 171 along with a reconciliation of Profit after Tax for the year to underlying EBITDA. STIP free cash flow demonstrates our efficiency in converting EBITDA and underlying earnings to cash and provides further insight into our working capital and sustaining capital efficiency. STIP free cash flow comprises free cash flow (as reported on page 273), adjusted to exclude dividends paid to holders of non-controlling interests in subsidiaries (of $0.3 billion) and development capital expenditure (of $7.8 billion), including development capital expenditure associated with decarbonisation. This adjusted metric excludes the impact of those components of free cash flow that are not directly related to performance in the year and therefore better represents underlying business performance. | |||
| Weighting 50% | Outcome | Above target (at 64.4% of maximum) | |
| Unflexed performance was underpinned by tailwinds from higher than target prices and the stronger US dollar, and reflected delivery of target volumes with cost and working capital discipline. There was operational improvement delivered across our operations, underpinning the 8% increase in CuEq production from 2024. Notably, the ramp-up of the Oyu Tolgoi underground and our bauxite operations performed better than target. These factors contributed to above target unflexed outcomes for EBITDA of 75% and STIP free cash flow of 75%.Flexed performance to remove the impact of commodity prices and foreign exchange rates gives us an indication of underlying business performance. | On removing the impact of prices and the stronger US dollar, the flexed component is above target for EBITDA at 55% and STIP free cash flow at 54%.Financial outcomes were normalised to align to the basis on which the original targets were set and to ensure the outcomes fairly reflect underlying business performance in the period. In line with our standard STIP principles, adjustments were made to exclude the impact of the acquisition of Arcadium (which was not in the Group's target; including acquisition and integration costs), the impact of legislative changes and tax matters, along with the impact of exceptional weather events (cyclones) on our Pilbara operations in Q1 2025. | ||
| Commentary on strategic measures | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Impeccable ESG | |||
| Impeccable ESG aims to promote safety in all its aspects and progress decarbonisation efforts as we work towards achieving our ambitious Scope 1 and 2 emissions reduction targets by 2030.Safety measures a combination of our Safety Maturity Model (SMM) and all-injury frequency rate (AIFR). The safety outcome is underpinned by an assessment of conformance with the GISTM for “high” and “very high” classification tailings facilities. Decarbonisation measures progress of carbon abatement projects against incremental stages of development. | |||
| Weighting 20% | Outcome | Above target (at 59.3% of maximum) | |
| Safety is our number one priority, and we are immensely saddened to have tragically lost a colleague during the year. In 2025, our AIFR performance was 0.37, exceeding the annual target of 0.38. However, we had a permanent damage injury in 2025 and as such AIFR performance is capped at target.As part of our continual improvement, we have also seen an uplift of 0.5 in our SMM assessments score, aligned to target improvement of 0.5, resulting in a SMM global score of 5.7. The Safety underpin relating to GISTM implementation plans for all classifications of tailings facilities was met in 2025. We have had no significant incidents with tailings releases at any of our facilities. | Decarbonisation measures the progress of carbon abatement projects against incremental stages of development. Climate change and the low-carbon transition is at the heart of our strategy. We have set ambitious commitments to reduce carbon emissions (CO2e) from our business by 50% relative to 2018 levels by 2030, and achieve net zero Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 2050. Progress continued in 2025 with adjusted Scope 1 and 2 emissions reducing by 0.2 Mt CO2e during the year. A total of 21 projects representing 3.37 Mt CO2e of carbon abatement progressed through a development stage during the year, resulting in an outcome above the target of 3 Mt CO2e. | ||
| Excel in Development | |||
| Excel in Development aims to incentivise a growth mindset by focusing on exploring new opportunities, prospecting new sites, technology, and innovation. It measures performance in exploration, studies and project execution.Exploration progress focuses on the opportunities coming out of the exploration pipeline and moving into formal studies. Studies progression assesses the number of studies approved to progress through stage-gates. Project execution measures our execution progress in creating growth opportunities and closure projects across the Rio Tinto portfolio. | |||
| Weighting 10% | Outcome | Above target (at 94% of maximum) | |
| Exploration progression develops a dynamic portfolio of projects that are rigorously prioritised and rapidly tested. Exploration progression focuses on the opportunities coming out of the exploration pipeline and moving into formal studies, including conceptual studies completed with a decision to hold, divest or advance to Order of Magnitude (OoM), studies advancing from Projects of Merit (PoM) to Conceptual Studies (CS) phase, and studies advancing from Target Testing (TT) to PoM. One CS project was completed this year, one project advanced to CS and 4 projects progressed from TT to PoM, resulting in an above target weighted score of 2.5. | Studies progression of 7 studies in 2025, with 2 studies obtaining Notice to Proceed, feasibility studies completed for 4 projects and pre-feasibility studies completed for another. This result achieved maximum performance. Project execution refers to the percentage of in-flight and completed projects on track against the Investment Committee plan. Throughout 2025, we made strong progress on a range of projects with 11 out of 13 projects (85%) remaining on track with the approved Investment Committee plans achieving maximum performance. A significant milestone was also achieved with the start of operations at Simandou and first ore through Primary Crusher 2 at Oyu Tolgoi. | ||
| People and Culture | |||
| People and Culture aims to improve diversity, and create an inclusive work environment in which people can thrive, accelerate our culture change and reinforce our values. It encompasses gender diversity and culture change metrics. Gender diversity measures the year-on-year increase in representation of women in our organisation. Culture progress reflects the change in organisational culture as indicated by our employee engagement survey. | |||
| Weighting 10% | Outcome | Above threshold (at 40% of maximum) | |
| Gender diversity in 2025 was focused on increasing the number of women across our business. While progress was made in 2025, there is further opportunity for improvement in 2026. We were able to increase the representation of women in 2025 from 25.2% to 26.3%, slightly above threshold of 26.2%. | Culture is measured using results from our biannual, externally benchmarked employee engagement survey. The result from the second of our biannual employee engagement surveys at the end of 2025 was 71, which represented target performance. | ||
| Social Licence | |||
| Social Licence is included as an indicator of our ability to build trust and acceptance with external stakeholders. This measure assesses changes in general public perceptions using RepTrak, and community perceptions local to operations through Voconiq’s Local Voices program. | |||
| Weighting 10% | Outcome | Above target (at 85% of maximum) | |
| Reputation provides an indication of Rio Tinto’s social licence within the communities where we operate. The general public perception in selected countries is reflected by a reputation score measured by RepTrak. The 2025 result was 64.1, above the maximum range of 62.8 and a significant improvement on the score of 60.9 in the prior year. This score is a weighted, global aggregate made up of results from Australia, Canada, Mongolia, New Zealand, South Africa, the UK and the US. | Local Voices was introduced as a standalone measure in the scorecard in 2025, representing a significant step forward in how we evaluate and strengthen our social licence. The program provides asset teams with valuable insights to build trust-based relationships with communities by listening to their priorities and concerns and responding in meaningful ways. In 2025, 80% of assets deploying Local Voices shared community summaries within 4 months of survey completion, resulting in target performance. | ||
| Fatality deduction | |||
| A 10% deduction was applied to the overall STIP scorecard result, covering all components of the STIP scorecard, to reflect the tragic work-related fatality in 2025. | |||
Performance review process for executives
The Committee conducts annual performance reviews for all executives. The key objectives for the performance review process are to:
improve organisational effectiveness by creating alignment between the executive’s objectives, Rio Tinto’s strategy, the individual’s
leadership behaviours and the company’s values
provide a consistent, transparent and balanced approach to measure, recognise and reward executive performance.
The Chief Executive conducts the review for members of the Executive Committee and recommends the performance outcomes to the Committee.
The Chief Executive’s performance is assessed by the Chair of the Board and is discussed and considered with the Committee and the Board.
Performance reviews for all executives took place in 2025 and early 2026.
Commentary on individual performance
Individual STIP multiplier outcome: +25% multiplier applied.
| Strategic objectives | Performance assessment |
|---|---|
| Best OperatorStrong financial performance and prioritisation of Best Operator to enhance competitiveness(Outcome: Above target) | •Rolled out a transformative operating model and restructured the executive team to drive the company’s next chapter of growth.•Simplified the product group structure to 3 world class businesses: Aluminium & Lithium, Copper and Iron Ore.•Achieved record production in the Pilbara in the second half of 2025, demonstrating exceptional operational recovery and resilience following the significant disruptions from the cyclones in Q1.•Copper production achieved strong full-year results, supported by a robust second-half performance.•Exceeded full-year targets for bauxite production, driven by sustained performance above nameplate capacity at Amrun. |
| Impeccable ESGMaintain relentless focus on safety, and advance our decarbonisation strategy(Outcome: Above target) | •Progressed the pathway for achieving a 50% reduction in Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 2030 with strong progress in advancing viable solutions for our Pacific Aluminium smelters (Boyne Smelters Limited and Tomago), which will be critical for achieving our ambitions.•Launched trial of battery swap electric haul truck technology at Oyu Tolgoi in Mongolia with China’s State Power Investment Corporation.•Successful start-up of ELYSISTM 450 kiloampere designed inert anode cell, a defining moment in the transition toward large-scale, low-carbon aluminium production.•First copper produced at Johnson Camp Mine in Arizona using Nuton technology, Rio Tinto’s proprietary bioleaching technology. |
| Excel in DevelopmentGrow and diversify our portfolio(Outcome: Above target) | •All necessary state and federal government approvals received to develop the West Angelas Sustaining Project.•Implementation of Iron Ore product strategy.•Feasibility study commenced at Rhodes Ridge, one of the world’s best undeveloped iron ore deposits.•Integration of Rio Tinto Lithium progressed as planned.•First ore shipped from Simandou operations in Guinea, Africa’s largest greenfield integrated mine and infrastructure project. |
| Social LicenceImprove our social licence to operate by strengthening engagement with key stakeholders(Outcome: Above target) | •Comprehensive external stakeholder engagement program undertaken in key jurisdictions.•Maintained commitments to local communities, strong sustainability and social licence, including Indigenous and local procurement spend.•First modernised Traditional Owner agreement signed with Karlka Nyiyaparli Aboriginal Corporation.•Interim modernised agreement signed with Yinhawangka Aboriginal Corporation.•Extensive collaboration with local stakeholders on futures of Tomago and Boyne Smelters in Australia. |
Jakob Stausholm
Individual STIP multiplier outcome: Not applied
| Strategic objectives | Performance assessment |
|---|---|
| Best OperatorStrong financial performance and prioritisation of Best Operator to enhance competitiveness(Outcome: At target) | •Delivered progress towards stable operating performance in line with long-term strategy to deliver profitable growth and build a stronger, more diversified business.•Achieved H1 record performance in bauxite production and from our Oyu Tolgoi copper mine in Mongolia.•Officially opened Western Range in the year, enabling work to continue to progress at Brockman Syncline 1 and commencement of construction works at Hope Downs 2.•Key contribution in enabling a seamless transition, providing thoughtful guidance and unwavering support which was instrumental in maintaining momentum through Q4. |
| Impeccable ESGMaintain relentless focus on safety, and advance our decarbonisation strategy(Outcome: At target) | •Delivered a 0.2 Mt CO₂e reduction in adjusted Scope 1 and 2 emissions in 2025, despite higher underlying emissions arising from increased production.•Delivered 3rd tranche of our Gladstone operations energy solution, signing 2 new agreements on provision of solar and battery storage capacity. |
| Excel in DevelopmentGrow and diversify our portfolio(Outcome: Above target) | •Completed acquisition of Arcadium Lithium plc.•Signed binding agreements with Codelco to form a joint venture to develop and operate a lithium project in Salar de Maricunga.•Signed a binding agreement with Empresa Nacional de Minería to form a joint venture to develop the Salares Altoandinos Lithium project in Chile. |
| Social LicenceImprove our social licence to operate by strengthening engagement with key stakeholders(Outcome: At target) | •Signed a Co-Management Agreement with the Puutu Kunti Kurrama and Pinikura (PKKP) Aboriginal Corporation to support a lasting and trusted partnership, and the overarching framework for Rio Tinto’s iron ore operations on PKKP Country.•Supported targeted stakeholder engagement in the final quarter of the year, including with the US Business Council and the European Roundtable. |
Individual STIP multiplier outcome: Notapplied
| Strategic objectives | Performance assessment |
|---|---|
| Best OperatorStrong financial performance and prioritisation of Best Operator to enhance competitiveness(Outcome: Above target) | •Led a detailed review of the Group’s financial performance to identify opportunities to materially improve financials. •Successfully integrated the business improvement agenda into the planning process.•Restructured parts of the Finance organisation to support improved performance. •Led improvement work around the Group’s risk management framework and preparations for enhanced external risk management reporting. •Ensured capital discipline around the Group’s overall level of capital expenditure. |
| Impeccable ESGMaintain relentless focus on safety, and advance our decarbonisation strategy(Outcome: At target) | •Financially strengthened the decarbonisation pathway by leveraging third-party investment without compromising on achieving the 2030 target for 50% reduction. •Projects progressed, including phase 3 of repowering Boyne Smelter; progress towards execution of power purchase agreements (PPAs) in the Pilbara, Richards Bay Minerals and Kennecott; and commencement of execution at several major projects. |
| Excel in DevelopmentGrow and diversify our portfolio(Outcome: At target) | •Led a successful strategy review in 2025 and the development of the subsequent communications to the market at the Capital Markets Day. •Oversaw the financial evaluation and execution of the Arcadium Lithium plc acquisition, ensuring disciplined valuation and executing funding for the transaction.•Played a key role in critical capital allocation decisions. •Supported the Board’s response to the resolution at the 2025 AGMs with respect to an independent review of the Group’s dual-listed structure. |
| Social LicenceImprove our social licence to operate by strengthening engagement with key stakeholders(Outcome: At target) | •Enhanced enterprise-wide risk review systems to integrate social licence considerations into capital allocation and project planning. •Active participation in CFO Roundtable events fostering dialogue with government representatives, financial institutions and local business owners on sustainable business practice and local economic development.•Engagement with external government and regulatory leaders to uphold sustainable business practices and address complex financial matters. |
2026 short-term incentive plan
This section outlines the operation of the 2026 STIP. For 2026, the STIP scorecard has increased the weight of the safety measure and
retained focus on key short-term decarbonisation elements.
2026 short-term incentive plan measures and weightings
| Financial scorecard dimension | Weighting | What does it measure? | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Underlying EBITDAUnflexed | 12.5% | Underlying EBITDA is an alternative performance measure and represents profit before tax, net finance items, depreciation and amortisation. | Underlying EBITDA is the prominent financial measure of underlying business performance on an income statement basis. The core objectives of robust operational performance and disciplined cost management are well reflected in underlying EBITDA. The underlying EBITDA target for STIP purposes is based on the Group’s annual plan, calibrated to reflect production guidance communicated at the start of the year. |
| Underlying EBITDAFlexed | 12.5% | Underlying EBITDA, adjusted for the impact of commodity prices and foreign exchange rates. | Removing the impact of commodity prices and foreign exchange rates gives us a stronger indication of the underlying EBITDA outcome of our underlying business performance, aligned to the core objective of operational excellence. |
| STIP free cash flowUnflexed | 12.5% | STIP free cash flow comprises free cash flow adjusted to exclude dividends paid to holders of non-controlling interests in subsidiaries and development capital expenditure (including development capital expenditure on decarbonisation projects). | STIP free cash flow demonstrates how we convert underlying EBITDA to cash and provides further insight into how we are managing efficiency and productivity, including working capital and sustaining capital. The STIP free cash flow target is based on the Group’s annual plan, calibrated to reflect production guidance communicated at the start of the year. |
| STIP free cash flowFlexed | 12.5% | STIP free cash flow, adjusted for the impact of commodity prices and foreign exchange rates. | Removing the impact of commodity prices and foreign exchange rates gives us a stronger indication of the free cash flow outcome of our underlying business performance, aligned to the core objective of operational excellence. |
| Total weighting | 50% | ||
| Strategic scorecard dimension | Weighting | What does it measure? | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|
| People and Safety (25%) | |||
| Gender representation | 5% | Strengthening inclusive leadership and talent practices, as reflected in improved gender representation outcomes at Rio Tinto. | These remain an important contributor to advancing our culture-change agenda. Using trends in responses and scores from our engagement survey, we also demonstrate to what extent our culture is changing. Both of these are important factors as we continue to transform our culture. |
| Culture change | 5% | Measuring progress in our culture-change journey. | |
| Safety index | 15% | AIFR as a lag indicator and a Safety Maturity extract from the Integrated Maturity Model which was introduced to reinforce the link between strong safety performance, well-maintained assets and operational excellence. Conformance to GISTM is set as an underpin. | Safety is at the heart of everything we do. The safety index provides focus on the importance of continuing to embed and strengthen our safety culture. |
| Excel in Development (10%) | |||
| Exploration, studies and project execution | 10% | Performance in exploration, studies and project delivery. | Exploration, studies and project execution identifies opportunities for growth and enhancing orebody reserves across our portfolio, while keeping focus on the importance of executing to time and budget. |
| Sustainability and Social Licence (15%) | |||
| Decarbonisation | 5% | Progress of moving carbon abatement projects through the various stages of development all the way to execution to meet our decarbonisation ambition. | Provides focus on progressing at pace and optimising the resource deployment of decarbonisation projects. |
| Reputation | 5% | Indicators of Rio Tinto’s social licence across a broad set of stakeholders, including, but not only, communities, governments, customers, suppliers and civil society. | General public perception through a reputation score and local community perception, measured through the Voconiq Local Voices program. These social licence measures continue to form a key part of our strategy to build trust and meaningful relationships with our external stakeholders and communities neighbouring our operations. |
| Meaningful Engagement - Local Voices | 5% | Community perception of meaningful engagement - how communities perceive our decision‑making processes, including whether they are respectful, transparent, inclusive and responsive to local values. | |
| Total weighting | 50% | ||
A fatality deduction of at least 10% will be applied in the event of work-related fatalities. This deduction, combined with the higher 15%
weighting of the safety index, ensures the prominence of safety in the STIP structure. The specific targets for the 2026 STIP are considered
by the Board to be commercially sensitive and will be disclosed alongside the outturn retrospectively in the 2026 Implementation report.
Long-term incentive plan
PSA granted in 2021 were based on 2 performance conditions, both measured over a 5-year performance period:
TSR relative to the EMIX Global Mining Index – 50%
TSR relative to the MSCI World Index – 50%
Calculation of 2021 PSA vesting
The dual TSR measures recognise that the company competes in the global market for investors as well as within the mining sector, and
rewards executives for returns over the long term that outperform both the broader market and the mining sector. Over the 5-year
performance period to 31 December 2025, Rio Tinto’s TSR was 66.4%, which was below the TSR of both indices, resulting in a below
threshold outcome and nil vesting.
| Index | Threshold(22.5% of maximum) | Maximum(100% of maximum) | Actual TSRperformance | Weighting | Vestingoutcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S&P Global Mining Index1 | Equal to Index | Above index by 6% p.a. | Below index by 5.5% p.a. | 50% | 0% |
| MSCI World Index | Equal to Index | Above index by 6% p.a. | Below index by 6.0% p.a. | 50% | 0% |
- The EMIX Global Mining Index was decommissioned on 31 July 2023 and therefore it was necessary to identify a replacement index for the remainder of the performance period. The
Committee considered a range of alternative indices and determined that S&P’s replacement index (the S&P Global Mining Index) was the most suitable, given the overlap in
constituents and close correlation in performance. TSR performance was calculated by our independent remuneration consultants tracking the EMIX Global Mining Index to 31 July 2023
and the S&P Global Mining Index thereafter. This methodology will apply to all relevant outstanding PSA.
For reference, the 2020 PSA vested at 12.75% on 20 February 2025 at Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited share prices of £50.76 and
A$119.66 respectively (closing share price on the day prior to vesting). Dividend equivalents for the Executive Directors were equal to 40% of
the vested awards.
Long-term incentive plan awards granted in 2025
These awards are subject to TSR performance relative to the constituents of the S&P Global Mining Index (53.3%) and MSCI World Index
(26.7%), and a decarbonisation scorecard (20%) as set out in the Performance measures section below.
| Executive Director | Type of award | Grant date | Face valueof award(% of base salary) | Face value of award(’000) | % of vestingat thresholdperformance | Grant price1 | Conditionalsharesawarded | End of the periodover which theperformanceconditions have tobe fulfilled | End of holding period |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simon Trott | PSA | 19 March 2025 | 500% | A$7,040 | 22.5% | A$121.69 | 57,851 | 31 December 2027 | February 2030 |
| Jakob Stausholm | PSA | 19 March 2025 | 500% | £7,054 | 22.5% | £51.35 | 137,361 | 31 December 2027 | February 2030 |
| Peter Cunningham | PSA | 19 March 2025 | 500% | £3,918 | 22.5% | £51.35 | 76,299 | 31 December 2027 | February 2030 |
- In line with the Policy, the grant price for PSA is determined by reference to the average share price for the financial year prior to the year of grant. The grant price of £51.35 and
A$121.69 represents the Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited average share prices for 2024.
Long-term incentive plan awards due to be granted in 2026
| Executive Director | Type of award | Face valueof award(% of base salary) | Face valueof award(’000) | % of vestingat thresholdperformance | Grant price1 | Conditionalshares to beawarded | End of the periodover which the performanceconditions have tobe fulfilled | End of holding period |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simon Trott | PSA | 500% | £7,035 | 22.5% | £48.18 | 146,011 | 31 December 2028 | February 2031 |
| Peter Cunningham | PSA | 500% | £4,024 | 22.5% | £48.18 | 83,518 | 31 December 2028 | February 2031 |
- In line with Policy, and as we have done since 1998, awards are calculated using the average share price over the previous financial year to mitigate the impact of short-term volatility in
the share price. The PSA granted in 2026 will therefore be calculated using the average share price for Rio Tinto plc over 2025, which was£48.18.
Performance measures
For PSA granted in 2025 and 2026, 80% of the award is based on relative TSR measured on a weighted ranked basis, with two-thirds of the
TSR element measured relative to sector peers (constituents of the S&P Global Mining Index) and one-third measured against a broader
market reference point (constituents of the MSCI World Index). The remaining 20% of the awards will be based on strategic measures,
which, for PSA granted in 2025, are linked to decarbonisation and, for PSA to be granted in 2026, will be assessed against both
decarbonisation progress and achievement against broader strategic objectives.
| Performance measures | Threshold(22.5% of maximum) | Maximum(100% of maximum) | Weighting for 2025 and 2026 awards |
|---|---|---|---|
| Relative TSR vs constituents of the S&P Global Mining Index | Median | Upper quartile | 53.3% |
| Relative TSR vs constituents of the MSCI World Index | Median | Upper quartile | 26.7% |
| Strategic scorecard | see page 139 | see page 139 | 20.0% |
Decarbonisation (LTIP awards granted in 2024 and 2025)
Given the scale and complexity of our emissions portfolio, our decarbonisation ambitions, and the multi-year nature of this transition,
performance and progress will be assessed through a balanced scorecard approach. This scorecard incorporates a combination of metrics
designed to capture both opportunities and risks associated with the energy transition, with the aim of incentivising long-term competitive
advantage. The balanced scorecard comprises equally weighted elements assessed over a 3-year performance period.
Measures and targets for the 2024 and 2025 awards, including an update on performance tracking, are summarised below.
| Residual emissions | 5% weighting | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Measure and targets | Progress | ||
| Assesses reduction in Scope 1 and 2 emissions. Targets are aligned to the Group’s 2030 ambition of delivering a 50% reduction relative to our 2018 baseline, with the maximum outcome consistent with the linear trajectory required to meet this goal. When assessing performance, the relative contribution of nature-based offsets will be capped at 10% of the reduction. Any contribution from offsets will be disregarded for outcomes that exceed target. | 2024-2026 - tracking around thresholdProjected net reduction of 4.1 Mt over the performance period, including nature-based offsets. Projected emissions reductions to 2030 are expected to be weighted to the end of the decade.2025-2027 - tracking below thresholdProjected net reduction of 1.8 Mt over the performance period including nature-based offsets. Projected emissions reductions to 2030 are expected to be weighted to the end of the decade. | ||
| Threshold(22.5% of maximum) | Target(50% of maximum) | Maximum(100% of maximum) | |
| 3.95 Mt CO2e | 5.52 Mt CO2e | 7.1 Mt CO2e | |
| Project delivery | 5% weighting | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Measure and targets | Progress | ||
| Successful delivery of abatement projects that are fundamental to achieving our decarbonisation objectives. Each year capex-funded priority decarbonisation projects will be identified for which investment approval has or will be granted. At the end of the 3-year performance period, each project will be evaluated for conformance to its approved plan in terms of both spend and schedule. A score out of 10 will be assigned to each project based on a predetermined framework. | 2024-2026 - tracking around threshold4 projects have been included in the assessment of this metric and 3 of these remain largely on track for both cost and schedule, noting one project has been paused to resolve technical and design challenges. 2025-2027 - tracking at maximumOne project is included in the assessment of this metric which is on track from a budget and schedule perspective. | ||
| Threshold(22.5% of maximum) | Target(50% of maximum) | Maximum(100% of maximum) | |
| Average score of at least 6 out of 10 being less than 25% deviation from planned cost and schedule | Average score of at least 8 out of 10 being less than 15% deviation from planned cost and schedule | Average score of at least 9 out of 10 being less than 10% deviation from planned cost and schedule | |
| Technology development | 5% weighting | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Measure and targets | Progress | ||
| Assessing technology advancement and research and development breakthroughs by measuring Group research and development spend, and the successful implementation of projects that have a meaningful impact on the abatement of emissions (including spend associated with reducing Scope 3 emissions). | 2024-2026 - tracking at targetSpend on research and development is tracking within target range, with projects expected to proceed into implementation later in the performance period delivering annual abatement over 500 kt.2025-2027 - tracking at thresholdProjects expected to proceed into implementation later in the performance period are delivering annual abatement over 500 kt, however spend on research and development is tracking below target. | ||
| Threshold(22.5% of maximum) | Target(50% of maximum) | Maximum(100% of maximum) | |
| 0.2% of Group revenue on decarbonisation research and development spend. At least 1 project into implementation totalling 250 kt annual abatement | 0.4% of Group revenue on decarbonisation research and development spend. At least 1 project into implementation totalling 500 kt annual abatement | 0.5% of Group revenue on decarbonisation research and development spend. At least 2 projects into implementation totalling 750 kt annual abatement | |
| Transition strategy | 5% weighting | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Measure and targets | Progress | ||
| This measure aligns decarbonisation activity with our value creation strategy, focusing on building new capabilities and commitments towards future growth assets. During the 2024-2026 performance period, the focus areas include Pacific Operations (PacOps) decarbonisation, aluminium recycling and ELYSISTM implementation. For 2025-2027, the measures cover PacOps decarbonisation, aluminium recycling and lithium growth. Any initiative retained on the scorecard across multiple years will be assessed solely on performance achieved within the relevant performance period. | 2024-2026 - tracking above thresholdProgress has been made on the PacOps repowering strategy, with new power purchase agreements signed in the year. Discussions on both Tomago and BSL repowering solutions are continuing. For ELYSIS™ implementation, our Arvida smelter in Canada remains on track to achieve capacity to produce up to 2,500 tonnes of commercial quality aluminium without direct greenhouse gas emissions from 2027. We are seeing lower recycling volumes at Matalco, primarily due to external market factors.2025-2027 - tracking around targetProgress for PacOps remains broadly aligned with the 2024-2026 period. Matalco volumes remain lower than plan. For Lithium growth, based on the 2025 volumes and assuming similar performance trends, outcomes are expected to be at plan. | ||
| Threshold(22.5% of maximum) | Target(50% of maximum) | Maximum(100% of maximum) | |
| Average score of at least 6 out of 10, representing more limited progress | Average score of at least 8 out of 10, representing good progress towards strategic goals, some areas of outperformance, substantially achieved or on track to deliver major objectives, or progress with no major failures or impacts on broader performance of the Group | Average score of at least 9 out of 10, representing significant outperformance of expectations, implementation achieved or a major new advancement with scope for material benefits | |
The Committee will retain discretion in determining vesting outcomes and where required will adjust targets or baselines in relation to any
material changes to the portfolio, such as following acquisitions, divestments orclosure.
Strategic scorecard (LTIP awards granted in 2026)
The December 2025 Capital Markets Day unveiled a refreshed strategy with the aim of delivering industry-leading returns by implementing a
stronger, sharper and simpler way of working. The refreshed strategy has 3 strategic priorities focused on driving step change in
performance and returns for shareholders. These priorities place strategic focus around operational excellence, project execution and capital
discipline, with our ambitious decarbonisation goal of 50% emissions reductions remaining a key priority. For 2026, changes to the LTIP
strategic scorecard will be made to incentivise for progress against the 3 strategic priorities, while retaining the most critical and relevant
decarbonisation linked metrics.
The scorecard and scoring matrix that will apply to 20% of the 2026 LTIP awards and which will be assessed over a 3-year performance
period is set out below. The remaining 80% of the 2026 LTIP awards will continue to be subject to TSR measures.
| Strategic scorecard (20%) | Commentary |
|---|---|
| Decarbonisation - Residual emissions (5%) | This provides a measure of actual reduction in Scope 1 and 2 emissions with targets set taking into account the Group’s stated ambition of a 50% reduction by 2030 (relative to our 2018 baseline). Achieving the maximum outcome would be consistent with the linear trajectory required to meet this goal. The Committee will take into account the relative contribution of nature-based offsets when assessing performance. The contribution will be capped at 10% of the reduction. Any contribution from offsets will be disregarded for outcomes that exceed target. |
| Decarbonisation - Transition strategy (5%) | This measure aligns decarbonisation activity with our value creation strategy, specifically in building new capabilities or commitments towards new growth assets. For the 2026-2028 performance period, transition strategy outcomes that are significant to Group value were selected, with PacOps decarbonisation, aluminium recycling and lithium growth chosen. As these initiatives have been retained on the scorecard from prior years, they will be assessed solely on performance achieved within the relevant performance period. At the end of the 3-year performance period, each transition strategy will be assigned a score out of 10 using a predetermined framework and vesting will be determined based on the average score of the transition objectives. |
| Delivering Industry Leading Value (10%) | This measure is directly linked to the objectives set out at the December 2025 Capital Markets Day. It will be based on goals linked to Operational Excellence, Project Execution and Capital Discipline. The targets are linked to 3-year goals which support delivery of long-term competitive advantage and shareholder value. Operational Excellence objectives will be focused on achievement of enhanced production at lower cost. The specific factors taken into account in the assessment would include delivery of cost reductions (both absolute and on average unit cost basis) and delivery of consistent and sustained delivery of production volumes across each of our product groups. The Committee would also consider more detailed aspects of performance, including relevant market context to capture the underlying improvement in competitive positioning relative to the market. The Project Execution and Capital Discipline aspects of the strategy will be captured via production improvements at key growth initiatives (Oyu Tolgoi, Simandou and Rincon) that are critical to long-term growth, increases in return on capital employed and improvements in working capital ratio and sustaining capital intensity. At the end of the 3-year performance period, progress under the various elements will be given a score out of 10 using a predetermined framework and vesting will be determined based on the overall score under this element. Although the detailed objectives under this element are commercially sensitive, the Committee intends to provide enhanced disclosure regarding the basis of vesting at the end of the performance period. |
| Threshold | Target | Maximum | |
| Decarbonisation - Residual emissions (5%)Reduction in residual emissions relative to 2018 baseline | 3.95 Mt CO2e | 5.52 Mt CO2e | 7.1 Mt CO2e |
|---|---|---|---|
| Decarbonisation – Transition strategy (5%)Alignment of decarbonisation activity with value creation | Average score – 6 out of 10 •Good performance but with more limited progress | Average score – 8 out of 10 •Good progress towards strategic goals •Some areas of outperformance •Substantially achieved or on track to deliver major objectives •Progress with no major failures or impacts on broader performance of the Group | Average score – at least 9 out of 10•Implementation achieved or a major new advancement with scope for material benefits •Significant outperformance of expectations |
| Delivering Industry Leading Value (10%)Operational Excellence elements - enhanced production at lower costProject Execution and Capital Discipline – disciplined capex to invest in growth and return opportunities | |||
Executive Directors’ shareholding
In line with our share ownership policy, Executive Directors’ shareholdings are set based on owning a fixed number of Rio Tinto shares,
which can be met through a holding of Rio Tinto plc shares, Rio Tinto Limited shares or a combination thereof.
| Executive Director · Year requirementto be met · Effective holding of Rio Tinto plc ordinary shares · Effective holding of Rio Tinto Limited ordinary shares · % of requirement held | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Requirement · 31 December 2025 · 31 December 2024 · Requirement · 31 December 2025 · 31 December 2024 | ||||||||
| Simon Trott | 2030 | 120,000 | 7,671 | 441 | 105,000 | 38,735 | 35,354 | 43% |
| Jakob Stausholm | 2025 | 120,000 | 218,410 | 193,740 | 105,000 | – | – | 182% |
| Peter Cunningham | 2027 | 60,000 | 87,373 | 81,601 | 50,000 | – | – | 146% |
The shareholdings shown above include 50% of the number of unvested BDA held by each executive. We operate a post-employment
shareholding requirement for Executive Directors and Jakob Stausholm will be subject to this requirement for 2 years following his
termination of employment.
| Executive Director | Position held during 2025 | Date of appointment to position | Notice period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simon Trott | Chief Executive | 25 August 2025 | 12 months |
| Jakob Stausholm | Chief Executive | 1 January 2021 | 12 months |
| Peter Cunningham | Chief Financial Officer | 17 June 2021 | 12 months |
Either party can terminate their contract with notice in writing, or immediately in the case of the company by paying the base salary only in lieu of any
unexpired notice.
Executives’ external and other appointments
None of the Executive Directors currently has an external directorship.
Loss of office payments
Jakob Stausholm stepped down from his role as an Executive Director and Chief Executive on 24 August 2025. His employment will cease at
the end of his 12 month notice period on 23 May 2026, and he will continue to receive his base salary and contractual benefits up to his
termination date, participating in the STIP for the 2025 performance period but not for 2026. He will also receive payment for any accrued
and unused annual leave in line with relevant legislation and policy. Outstanding LTIP and all-employee share awards will be treated in
accordance with eligible leaver provisions of each plan and in accordance with our Policy, with pro-rating for service where applicable. All
LTIP awards will vest on their normal vesting dates with the PSA remaining subject to achievement of applicable performance conditions. He
will remain subject to a 2-year post-employment shareholding requirement.
Past director payments
There were no payments to past directors in excess of the de minimis threshold of £15,000.
Chief Executive’s remuneration over time
| Year | Chief Executive | Single total figureof remuneration(’000) | Annual STIPaward againstmaximum opportunity | Long-term incentivevesting against maximumopportunity (PSA) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Sam Walsh1 | A$5,772 | 68.2% | 50.5% |
| 2016 | Jean-Sébastien Jacques | £3,116 | 82.4% | 50.5% |
| 2017 | Jean-Sébastien Jacques | £3,821 | 73.4% | 66.7% |
| 2018 | Jean-Sébastien Jacques | £4,551 | 70.1% | 43.0% |
| 2019 | Jean-Sébastien Jacques | £5,999 | 74.8% | 76.0% |
| 2020 | Jean-Sébastien Jacques | £8,670 | 0.0% | 66.7% |
| 2021 | Jakob Stausholm2 | £2,788 | 61.3% | 0.0% |
| 2022 | Jakob Stausholm | £5,010 | 48.7% | 100.0% |
| 2023 | Jakob Stausholm | £8,311 | 56.0% | 94.1% |
| 2024 | Jakob Stausholm3 | £3,574 | 49.5% | 12.75% |
| 2025 | Jakob Stausholm4 | £2,210 | 59.5% | 0.0% |
| 2025 | Simon Trott4 | £1,878 | 74.4% | 0.0% |
STIP award and PSA vesting percentages restated following release from the deed of deferral as described in prior Directors’ Remuneration reports.
Jakob Stausholm joined Rio Tinto in September 2018 and became Chief Executive on 1 January 2021. Therefore, he did not participate in the 2017 LTIP which vested at 66.7% of maximum.
The 2024 single total figure of remuneration for Jakob Stausholm reported in the 2024 Directors’ Remuneration report was £3.564 million, based on the estimated value of the 2020 PSA
which vested at 12.75%. The single total figure of remuneration for 2024 shown above is restated and based on the actual vesting share price of £50.76.
- Jakob Stausholm stepped down as Chief Executive on 24 August 2025 and Simon Trott became Chief Executive on 25 August 2025
The effect of performance on the value of shareholdings, as measured by TSR delivered over the past 5 years, based on the sum of
dividends paid and share price movements during each calendar year, is detailed in the table below.
| Year · Underlying earnings · Underlying EBITDA · Dividends paid per share · Share price –Rio Tinto plc pence · Share price –Rio Tinto Limited A$ · TSR | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $ millions · $ millions · $ cents · 1 Jan · 31 Dec · 1 Jan · 31 Dec · Group % | ||||||||
| 2021 | 21,401 | 37,720 | 963 | 5,470 | 4,892 | 113.8 | 100.1 | (3.8)% |
| 2022 | 13,359 | 26,272 | 746 | 4,892 | 5,798 | 100.1 | 116.4 | 18.3% |
| 2023 | 11,755 | 23,892 | 402 | 5,798 | 5,842 | 116.4 | 135.7 | 15.8% |
| 2024 | 10,867 | 23,314 | 435 | 5,842 | 4,723 | 135.7 | 117.5 | (15.4)% |
| 2025 | 10,868 | 25,363 | 373 | 4,723 | 5,994 | 117.5 | 146.8 | 43.7% |
The data presented in this table reflects the dual corporate structure of Rio Tinto. We weight the 2 Rio Tinto listings to produce a Group TSR
figure in line with the weighting methodology used for the 2021 PSA. The TSR figure has been calculated using spot Return Index data from
DataStream as at the last trading day for the year, which is a different methodology than used to calculate the PSA outcome.
Total shareholder return
The vesting of the PSA granted in 2021 was subject to a relative
TSR measure against the S&P Global Mining Index (transitioned
from the EMIX Global Mining Index following its decommissioning in
July 2023) and the MSCI World Index.
The graph below shows Rio Tinto’s TSR performance for the 2021
PSA using the same methodology as that used to calculate the
vesting for the PSA granted in 2021, with a performance period that
ended on 31 December 2025.
Total shareholder return - 5 year
- TSR for the MSCI and EMIX/S&P indices has been calculated using 12-month average
Return Index data for the year sourced from DataStream.
- Rio Tinto's Group TSR has been calculated using a weighted average for Rio Tinto plc
and Rio Tinto Limited. The weighting is based on the free-float market capitalisation of
each entity as at the start of the period.
The following graph illustrates the TSR performance of the Group
against the S&P Global Mining Index (and for periods to 31 July
2023 against the EMIX Global Mining Index) and the MSCI World
Index over the 10 years to the end of 2025.
The graph meets the requirements of Schedule 8 of the UK Large
and Medium-sized Companies and Groups (Accounts and Reports)
Regulations 2008 (as amended) and is not an indication of the
vesting of PSA granted in 2021.
Total shareholder return - 10 year
- TSR has been calculated using spot Return Index data as at the last trading day for the
year sourced from DataStream.
- Rio Tinto's Group TSR has been calculated using a weighted average for Rio Tinto plc
and Rio Tinto Limited. The weighting is based on the free-float market capitalisation of
each entity as at the start of the period.
Other executive key management personnel
This section sets out remuneration information pertaining to
executive key management personnel (KMP) excluding the Chief
Executive and the Chief Financial Officer. The Policy applicable to
the Executive Directors is also applicable to the other executive
KMP with variances specified in this section.
The remuneration mix for other executive KMP under this Policy is
set out in the chart below.
2025 remuneration mix
Maximum
Target
| l | Fixed pay | l | STIP – Cash | l | STIP – BDA | l | LTIP |
|---|
2025 assumptions
Fixed pay includes base salary, pension and benefits. The value of
benefits is estimated at 7% of base salary.
| Performance-related (at risk) | |
|---|---|
| Target STIP and LTIP performance | •STIP award of 50% of the maximum award (equates to 100% of base salary)•PSA expected value of 50% of face value, calculated as 250% of base salary |
| Maximum STIP and LTIP performance | •Maximum STIP award of 200% of base salary•Maximum PSA face value of 500% of base salary |
No assumption has been made for growth in share price and
payment of dividend equivalents.
The table below outlines the positions held by the other executive KMP and their respective dates of appointment:
| Name | Position(s) held during 2025 | Date of appointment | |||||
| 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | |||
| Matthew Holcz | Chief Executive, Iron Ore | 27 August 2025 | |||||
| Katie Jackson | Chief Executive, Copper | 1 September 2024 | |||||
| Sinead Kaufman1 | Chief Executive, Minerals | 1 March 2021 | |||||
| Jérôme Pécresse | Chief Executive, Aluminium | 23 October 2023 | |||||
| Simon Trott2 | Chief Executive, Iron Ore | 1 March 2021 | |||||
| 1.Sinead Kaufman was a KMP until 26 August 2025.2.Simon Trott was appointed Chief Executive from 25 August 2025. | |||||||
Base salaries for executive KMP members are reviewed annually by the Committee, with increases generally aligned with the wider
employee population in the relevant jurisdiction. Variations may occur in instances in which an individual has changed position, or the
position’s duties and responsibilities have been enlarged, for example as a result of a reorganisation or acquisition, or where an individual’s
remuneration has fallen below comparable positions in the market.
Short-term incentive plan
Overview of 2025 short-term incentive plan weightings and measures
The measures and weightings used to determine STIP awards for executives in 2025 are set out on page 131.
The 2025 STIP awards are detailed in the table below. The amounts reflect the application of a 10% fatality deduction to the overall
STIP outcome.
| Percentage of: | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 STIP award ('000) | Maximum STIPawarded | Maximum STIPforfeited | Target STIP awarded | |
| Matthew Holcz1 | A$555 | 59.5% | 40.5% | 119% |
| Katie Jackson | £750 | 59.5% | 40.5% | 119% |
| Sinead Kaufman2 | A$956 | 59.5% | 40.5% | 119% |
| Jérôme Pécresse | C$2,135 | 74.4% | 25.6% | 149% |
| Simon Trott3 | A$1,354 | 74.4% | 25.6% | 149% |
For the period from 27 August 2025 when Matthew Holcz became KMP.
For the period to 26 August 2025 during which Sinead Kaufman was KMP.
For the period to 24 August 2025 during which Simon Trott was Chief Executive, Iron Ore.
Share ownership
The following table shows the share ownership level for other
executive KMP as a percentage of their overall requirement. Share
ownership levels are set for each individual based on a fixed
number of shares and range between 48,000 to 54,000 Rio Tinto plc
shares or 40,000 to 46,000 Rio Tinto Limited shares.
Each executive KMP listed below is relatively new in role and will
continue to build up to their requirement over time.
| Share ownership level at31 December 2025 as a percentage of requirement | |
|---|---|
| Matthew Holcz | 16% |
| Katie Jackson | 21% |
| Jérôme Pécresse | 19% |
KMP service contracts can be terminated by the company or
executive with 12 months’ notice in writing, or immediately by the
company by paying base salary only in lieu of any unexpired notice.
Other KMP appointments
All newly appointed executives have received a remuneration
package that is aligned with our Policy and comprises: base salary
in line with market benchmarks; target STIP opportunity of 100% of
base salary (with maximum opportunity of 200% of base salary);
LTIP awards of up to 500% of base salary; company pension
contributions of 14% of base salary; and other benefits such as
company-provided healthcare coverage, and continued eligibility to
participate in the all-employee share plans. A minimum shareholding
requirement applies on appointment to be built up over
subsequent years.
Executive departures
Sinead Kaufman ceased to be a KMP on 26 August 2025 and will
leave the Group in 2026. She will continue to receive base salary,
pension contributions and contractual benefits up until the cessation
of her employment. Should her employment cease before the end of
her 12 month notice period, she will be paid base salary in lieu of
any remaining notice period. She will also receive payment for any
accrued but unused annual leave and long service leave on
cessation of employment in line with relevant legislation and policy.
She will be treated as an eligible leaver for the purposes of STIP,
LTIP and all-employee share awards.
Broader employee disclosures
Chief Executive pay ratio
The ratio of the single total figure of remuneration for the
Chief Executive to the lower quartile, median and upper quartile of
the Rio Tinto UK employee population for 2025 is set out in the table
below.
| Method | Lower quartile | Median | Upper quartile | |
| 2025 1 | A | 31:1 | 23:1 | 15:1 |
| 2024 2 | A | 30:1 | 21:1 | 14:1 |
- The 2025 data is based on a consolidation of the remuneration data of both Chief
Executives who served in 2025.
- The 2024 pay ratio data has been restated based on actual pay outcomes for the Chief
Executive in 2024.
The ratios have been calculated using the option ‘A’ methodology for
UK employees at 31 December 2025. The median Chief Executive
pay ratio of 23:1 is slightly higher than the prior year, primarily due to
the benefits provided in relation to the relocation of the new Chief
Executive from Australia to the UK. The Committee continues to be
mindful of the relationship between executive remuneration and that
of our broader workforce, and the Committee’s decision-making will
continue to be supported by regular and detailed reporting on these
matters.
Relative spend on remuneration
The table below shows our relative spend on remuneration across
our global employee population and distributions to shareholders in
the year. We have also shown other significant disbursements of the
company’s funds for comparison.
| Stated in $m | 2025 | 2024 | Differencein spend |
|---|---|---|---|
| Remuneration paid1 | 7,605 | 7,055 | 550 |
| Distributions to shareholders2 | 6,145 | 7,025 | (880) |
| Purchase of property, plant and equipment, and intangible assets3 | 12,335 | 9,621 | 2,714 |
| Corporate income tax paid3 | 4,215 | 4,165 | 50 |
Total employment costs for the financial year as per note 7 to the financial statements.
Distributions to shareholders include equity dividends paid to owners of Rio Tinto shares
as per the consolidated cash flow statement.
- Purchase of property, plant and equipment, and intangible assets, and corporate income
tax paid during the financial year are as per the consolidated cash flow statement.
Change in Director and employee pay
In the table below, we compare the annual changes in salary and annual incentives of the Directors for the past 5 years, to that of the
Australian employee population. Column “a” represents the percentage change in salary and fees; values in column “b” represent the
percentage change in annual incentive outcomes for performance periods in respect of each financial year.
| 2020 to 2021 · 2021 to 2022 · 2022 to 2023 · 2023 to 2024 · 2024 to 2025 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a1 · b · a1 · b · a1 · b · a1 · b · a1 · b2 | ||||||||||
| Executive Directors | ||||||||||
| Simon Trott3 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Jakob Stausholm | 46% | 25% | 2% | (18)% | 4% | 20% | 4% | (8)% | 9% | 32% |
| Peter Cunningham | – | – | – | 47% | 4% | 28% | 4% | (8)% | 3% | 24% |
| Non-Executive Directors | ||||||||||
| Dominic Barton | – | – | – | – | 50% | – | 8% | – | 1% | – |
| Simon Henry | – | – | (6)% | – | (7)% | – | 18% | – | (4)% | – |
| Sam Laidlaw | – | – | – | – | – | – | 15% | – | 3% | – |
| Jennifer Nason | – | – | (6)% | – | (8)% | – | 14% | – | 20% | – |
| Ngaire Woods | – | – | – | – | – | – | 8% | – | (3)% | – |
| Ben Wyatt | – | – | 12% | – | – | – | 21% | – | 30% | – |
| Dean Dalla Valle | – | – | – | – | – | – | 34% | – | 9% | – |
| Kaisa Hietala | – | – | – | – | – | – | 28% | – | 9% | – |
| Susan Lloyd-Hurwitz | – | – | – | – | – | – | 9% | – | 9% | – |
| Joc O’Rourke | – | – | – | – | – | – | 39% | – | 14% | – |
| Martina Merz | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0% | – |
| Sharon Thorne | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 32% | – |
| Australian workforce4 | 4% | (18)% | 7% | 15% | 8% | 16% | 6% | (19)% | 7% | 22% |
Change in salary and fees compared on an annualised basis to smooth the impact of part-year appointments or departures.
The percentage change in annual incentive compares the incentive outcomes for the 2024 performance year to those for the 2025 performance year.
No prior year data as appointed as an Executive Director in 2025.
Since Rio Tinto plc, the statutory entity for which this disclosure is required, does not have any employees, we have included voluntary disclosure of the change in employee salary and
incentives for our Australian employees who make up more than 40% of our employee population. The disclosure does not include benefits as there have been no changes in the benefit
entitlements.
“–” in the table signifies no reported change as a result of the absence of comparable data.
Non-Executive Directors
Annual fees payable
The table below shows the annual fee structure as at 1 March 2025
and 1 March 2026 for the Chair and Non-Executive Directors. This
reflects an increase to the fees for Nominations & Governance
Committee members effective 1 January 2026 in recognition of the
increased scope of the Committee for governance.
| 2026 | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
| Director fees | ||
| Chair’s fee | £800,000 | £800,000 |
| Non-Executive Director base | £115,000 | £115,000 |
| Senior Independent Director | £45,000 | £45,000 |
| Committee fees | ||
| Audit & Risk Committee Chair | £50,000 | £50,000 |
| Audit & Risk Committee member | £30,000 | £30,000 |
| People & Remuneration Committee Chair | £45,000 | £45,000 |
| People & Remuneration Committee member | £25,000 | £25,000 |
| Sustainability Committee Chair | £45,000 | £45,000 |
| Sustainability Committee member | £25,000 | £25,000 |
| Nominations & Governance Committee member | £17,500 | £8,000 |
| Meeting allowances | ||
| Long distance (flights over 10 hours per journey) | £10,000 | £10,000 |
| Medium distance (flights of 5-10 hours per journey) | £5,000 | £5,000 |
The Chair and Non-Executive Directors’ letters of appointment from
the company stipulate their terms of appointment, including their
duties and responsibilities as Directors. Each Non-Executive
Director is appointed subject to their election and annual
re-election by shareholders.
The Chair’s appointment may be terminated by either party giving
12 months’ notice, and Non-Executive Directors’ appointments may
be terminated by either party giving 3 months’ notice.
Positions held and share ownership
Rio Tinto has a policy that encourages Non-Executive Directors to
build up a Rio Tinto shareholding. The shareholding target in 2025 is
1,800 Rio Tinto Limited shares or 2,200 Rio Tinto plc shares or
2,100 Rio Tinto ADRs (or a combination thereof), and will be
reviewed every 2 years. A higher target of 12,700 Rio Tinto Limited
shares applies to the Chair. Details of Non-Executive Directors’
shareholdings in the Group, are set out in table 2 on page 146.
We list in the table below the Non-Executive Directors who held
office during 2025 and their shareholdings as a percentage of their
2025 requirement. Each held office for the whole of 2025 unless
otherwise indicated. Their years of appointment are reported in
“Board of Directors” on pages 104-105.
| Shareholding vs requirement | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Director | Title | 31 December 2025 | 31 December 2024 |
| Dominic Barton | Chair | 100% | 94% |
| Dean Dalla Valle | Non-Executive Director | 105% | 32% |
| Simon Henry | Non-Executive Director | 100% | 100% |
| Kaisa Hietala | Non-Executive Director | 45% | 45% |
| Sam Laidlaw | Non-Executive Director | 341% | 341% |
| Susan Lloyd-Hurwitz | Non-Executive Director | 137% | 79% |
| Martina Merz | Non-Executive Director | 80% | –% |
| Jennifer Nason | Non-Executive Director | 100% | 89% |
| Joc O’Rourke | Non-Executive Director | 136% | –% |
| Sharon Thorne | Non-Executive Director | 118% | 118% |
| Ngaire Woods | Non-Executive Director | 100% | 67% |
| Ben Wyatt | Non-Executive Director | 50% | 22% |
- Sam Laidlaw and Kaisa Hietala stepped down from the Board at the conclusion of the
2025 AGM on 1 May 2025.
- Simon Henry and Martina Merz stepped down from the Board on 23 October 2025.
We set out details of each element of remuneration, and the
single total figure of remuneration, paid to the Chair and Non-
Executive Directors during 2025 and 2024, in US dollars in table 1b
on page 146. No termination or share-based payments were made
in the year. Statutory minimum superannuation contributions for
Non-Executive Directors are deducted from the Director’s overall fee
entitlements when these are required by Australian superannuation
law.
The total fee and allowance payments made to the Chair and
Non-Executive Directors in 2025 were within the maximum
aggregate annual amount of £4 million set out in the Group’s
constitutional documents, approved by shareholders at the
2024 AGMs.
Other statutory disclosures
Other share plans
All-employee share plans
The Committee believes that all employees should be given the
opportunity to become shareholders in our business, and that share
plans help engage, retain and motivate employees over the long
term. Rio Tinto’s share plans are therefore part of its standard
remuneration practice to encourage employee share ownership and
create alignment with the shareholder experience. Executives may
participate in broad-based share plans that are available to
employees generally and to which performance conditions do not
apply.
A global employee share purchase plan is normally offered to all
eligible employees unless there are local jurisdictional restrictions.
Under the plan, employees may acquire shares up to the value of
$5,250 (or equivalent in other currencies) per year or capped at 15%
of their base salary, if lower. Each share purchased will be matched
by the company, providing the participant holds the shares, and is
still employed, at the end of the 3-year vesting period.
Approximately 37,000 of our employees (70% of those eligible) are
shareholders as a result of participating in these plans. In the UK,
these arrangements are partially delivered through the UK Share
Plan which is a UK tax-approved arrangement. Under this plan,
eligible participants may also receive an annual award of Free
Shares up to the limits prescribed under UK tax legislation.
Management Share Awards
Management Share Awards (MSA) are designed to help the Group
attract the best employees in a competitive labour market, and to
retain key individuals as we deliver our long-term strategy. MSA are
conditional share awards that are not subject to a performance
condition. They typically vest at the end of 3 years, subject to
continued employment. Shares to satisfy the awards are bought in
the market, issued or reissued from Treasury.
Shareholder voting
In the table below, we set out the results of the remuneration-related
resolutions voted on at the Group’s 2025 AGMs including the most
recent voting outcomes of the Remuneration Policy.
| Resolution | Votesfor | Votesagainst | Voteswithheld1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Approval of the Directors’ Remuneration report: Implementation report | 98% | 2% | 26,622,923 |
| Approval of the Remuneration Policy (2024) | 97% | 3% | 3,469,190 |
| Approval of the Directors’ Remuneration report | 97% | 3% | 26,246,816 |
- A vote “withheld” is not a vote in law and is not counted in the calculation of the
proportion of votes for and against the resolution.
Table 1a – Executive KMP remuneration
The table below reports remuneration in line with Australian statutory requirements. See page 129 for a description of how disclosure in this
table differs from realised pay.
| Stated in US$‘0001 | Short-term benefits | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Base salary · Cash bonus2 · Other cash-basedbenefits3 · Non-monetarybenefits4 · Totalshort-term benefits | ||||||
| Executive Directors | ||||||
| Simon Trott5 | 2025 | 1,205 | 929 | 1,088 | 142 | 3,364 |
| 2024 | 833 | 419 | 98 | 89 | 1,439 | |
| Jakob Stausholm6 | 2025 | 1,175 | 1,463 | 156 | 138 | 2,932 |
| 2024 | 1,632 | 796 | 215 | 207 | 2,850 | |
| Peter Cunningham | 2025 | 1,028 | 628 | 131 | 35 | 1,822 |
| 2024 | 966 | 471 | 122 | 49 | 1,608 | |
| Other executives | ||||||
| Matthew Holcz6 | 2025 | 298 | 186 | 37 | 36 | 557 |
| Katie Jackson | 2025 | 831 | 505 | 101 | 58 | 1,495 |
| 2024 | 268 | 130 | 222 | 50 | 670 | |
| Sinead Kaufman6 | 2025 | 512 | 640 | 57 | 29 | 1,238 |
| 2024 | 753 | 356 | 86 | 113 | 1,308 | |
| Jérôme Pécresse | 2025 | 948 | 780 | 179 | 87 | 1,994 |
| 2024 | 876 | 516 | 167 | 63 | 1,622 | |
| Stated in US$’0001 · Long-term benefits: Value of share-based awards7 · Post-employment benefits10 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BDA8 · PSA · MSA · Others9 · Pension and superannuation · Other post-employment benefits · Termination benefits · Total remuneration11 · Currency of actual payment | ||||||||||
| Executive Directors | ||||||||||
| Simon Trott5 | 2025 | 558 | 2,413 | – | – | 27 | – | – | 6,362 | A$ & £ |
| 2024 | 442 | 1,721 | – | – | 19 | – | – | 3,621 | A$ | |
| Jakob Stausholm6 | 2025 | 547 | 4,122 | – | 8 | 9 | – | – | 7,618 | £ |
| 2024 | 843 | 3,281 | – | 8 | 13 | – | – | 6,995 | £ | |
| Peter Cunningham | 2025 | 519 | 2,363 | – | 7 | 13 | – | – | 4,724 | £ |
| 2024 | 445 | 1,315 | 19 | 7 | 13 | – | – | 3,407 | £ | |
| Other executives | ||||||||||
| Matthew Holcz6 | 2025 | 42 | 248 | 122 | – | 5 | – | – | 974 | A$ |
| Katie Jackson | 2025 | 150 | 734 | 532 | 1 | 16 | – | – | 2,928 | £ |
| 2024 | 31 | 69 | 333 | – | 7 | – | – | 1,110 | £ | |
| Sinead Kaufman6 | 2025 | 181 | 1,400 | – | 2 | 15 | – | 2,836 | A$ | |
| 2024 | 364 | 1,378 | – | 3 | 19 | – | 3,072 | A$ | ||
| Jérôme Pécresse | 2025 | 339 | 1,400 | – | 1 | 24 | – | – | 3,758 | C$ |
| 2024 | 151 | 480 | – | – | 24 | – | – | 2,277 | C$ | |
Notes to table 1a – Executives’ remuneration
1.“Table 1a – Executives KMP remuneration” is reported in US$ using A$1 = US$0.64492; £1 = US$1.31854; C$1 = US$0.71574 which are average rates for 2025, except for the cash
element of the STIP which use 31 December 2025 year-end rates of A$1 = US$0.67005; £1 = US$1.3474; C$1 = US$0.73086.
2.“Cash bonus” relates to the cash portion of the 2025 STIP award to be paid in March 2026.
3.“Other cash-based benefits” typically include cash in lieu of company pension or superannuation contributions. For Simon Trott this also includes benefits related to his relocation from
Australia to the UK following his appointment as Chief Executive, in line with the company’s international transfer policy.
4.“Non-monetary benefits” for executives typically include healthcare coverage, professional tax compliance services/advice, flexible perquisites and, where applicable, leave accruals and
mobility-related benefits. For Simon Trott this also includes benefits related to his relocation from Australia to the UK.
The figures for Simon Trott reflect his remuneration for the full financial year covering both roles served in the year of Chief Executive, Iron Ore and Group Chief Executive.
The figures for Jakob Stausholm reflect his remuneration up until he ceased to be a KMP on 24 August 2025. His total remuneration up until 31 December 2025 was $9.17 million. The
figures for Matthew Holcz reflect his remuneration from the date he commenced being a KMP on 27 August 2025. His total remuneration for the year ended 31 December 2025 was
$1.72 million. The figures for Sinead Kaufman reflect her remuneration up until she ceased to be a KMP on 26 August 2025. Her total remuneration up until 31 December 2025 was
$3.38 million.
- The “Value of share-based awards” has been determined in accordance with the recognition and measurement requirements of IFRS 2 "Share-based Payment". The fair value of awards
granted as BDA, PSA and MSA have been calculated at their dates of grant using valuation models provided by external consultants, Lane Clark and Peacock LLP, including an
independent Monte Carlo valuation model, which take into account the constraints on vesting attached to these awards. Further details of the valuation methods and assumptions used
for these awards are included in note 28 (Share-based Payments) in the financial statements. The fair value of other share-based awards is measured at the purchase cost of the shares
from the market. The share-based values disclosed in this table do not reflect amounts actually paid in 2025 or the value of shares that will ultimately vest.
8.“BDA” represents the portion of the 2022–2025 STIP awards deferred into Rio Tinto shares.
9.“Others” includes the Global Employee Share Plan (myShare) and the UK Share Plan.
- Any costs related to defined benefit pension plans and post-retirement medical benefits are the service costs attributable to the individual, calculated in accordance with IAS 19. The cost
for defined contribution pension plans is the amount contributed in the year by the company.
11.“Total remuneration” represents the disclosure of total emoluments and compensation required under the Australian Corporations Act 2001 and applicable accounting standards.
Further details in relation to aggregate remuneration for executives, including Directors, are included in note 30 (Directors’ and key
management remuneration).
Table 1b – Non-Executive Directors’ remuneration
| Stated in US$’0001 · Fees and allowances2 · Non-monetary benefits3 · Post-employment benefits4 · Single total figure of remuneration5 · Currency of actual payment | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chair | ||||||
| Dominic Barton | 2025 | 1,055 | 44 | – | 1,099 | £ |
| 2024 | 1,008 | 94 | – | 1,102 | £ | |
| Non-Executive Directors | ||||||
| Dean Dalla Valle | 2025 | 315 | 51 | 19 | 385 | A$ |
| 2024 | 285 | 13 | 19 | 317 | A$ | |
| Simon Henry6 | 2025 | 194 | 13 | – | 207 | £ |
| 2024 | 253 | 8 | – | 261 | £ | |
| Kaisa Hietala7 | 2025 | 82 | 14 | – | 96 | £ |
| 2024 | 226 | 8 | – | 234 | £ | |
| Sam Laidlaw8 | 2025 | 156 | 13 | – | 169 | £ |
| 2024 | 335 | 5 | – | 340 | £ | |
| Susan Lloyd-Hurwitz | 2025 | 238 | 48 | 6 | 292 | A$ |
| 2024 | 225 | 8 | 5 | 238 | A$ | |
| Martina Merz6 | 2025 | 169 | 21 | – | 190 | £ |
| 2024 | 164 | 8 | – | 172 | £ | |
| Jennifer Nason | 2025 | 259 | 47 | – | 306 | £ |
| 2024 | 235 | 13 | – | 248 | £ | |
| Joc O'Rourke | 2025 | 253 | 13 | – | 266 | £ |
| 2024 | 239 | 5 | – | 244 | £ | |
| Sharon Thorne | 2025 | 306 | 5 | – | 311 | £ |
| 2024 | 105 | 7 | – | 112 | £ | |
| Ngaire Woods | 2025 | 228 | 23 | – | 251 | £ |
| 2024 | 234 | 7 | – | 241 | £ | |
| Ben Wyatt | 2025 | 339 | 66 | – | 405 | A$ |
| 2024 | 268 | 12 | – | 280 | A$ | |
- Remuneration is reported in US$. The amounts have been
converted using the 2025 annual average exchange rates
of £1 = US$1.31854 and A$1 = US$0.64492.
2.“Fees and allowances” comprises the total fees for the
Chair and all Non-Executive Directors (NED), and travel
allowances for the NED.
3.“Non-monetary benefits” include, as in previous years,
amounts that are deemed by the UK tax authorities to be
benefits in kind relating largely to the costs of Directors’
expenses in attending Board meetings held at the
company’s UK-registered office (including associated
accommodation and subsistence expenses) and
professional tax compliance services/advice. Given these
expenses are incurred by Directors in the fulfilment of their
duties, the company pays the tax on them.
- The statutory minimum superannuation contributions
required by the Australian superannuation law and paid for
the Australia-based NEDs are included in “Post-
employment benefits”.
- Represents disclosure of the single total figure of
remuneration under Schedule 8 of the Large- and
Medium-sized Companies and Groups (Accounts and
Reports) Regulations 2008 (as amended) and total
remuneration under the Australian Corporations Act
2001 and applicable accounting standards.
- The amounts reported for Simon Henry and Martina
Merz reflect the period of active Board membership from
1 January 2025 to 23 October 2025.
- The amounts reported for Kaisa Hietala reflect
the period of active Board membership from
1 January 2025 to 1 May 2025.
- The amounts reported for Sam Laidlaw reflect
the period of active Board membership from
1 January 2025 to 1 May 2025, as well as consulting fees
paid for the period from 2 May 2025 to 12 June 2025.
For more information, further details in relation to aggregate remuneration for executives, including Directors, are included in note 30 (Directors’ and key management remuneration).
Table 2 – Directors’ and executives’ beneficial interests in Rio Tinto shares
| Rio Tinto plc1 · Rio Tinto Limited · Movements | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Jan20252 · 31 Dec20253 · 5 Feb20264 · 1 Jan20252 · 31 Dec20253 · 5 Feb20264 · Compensation5 · Other6 | ||||||||
| Directors | ||||||||
| Dominic Barton | – | – | – | 11,900 | 12,700 | 12,700 | – | 800 |
| Peter Cunningham | 74,480 | 79,211 | 79,217 | – | – | – | 8,089 | (3,352) |
| Dean Dalla Valle | – | – | – | 579 | 1,885 | 1,885 | – | 1,306 |
| Simon Henry7 | 2,200 | 2,200 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Kaisa Hietala7 | 1,000 | 1,000 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Sam Laidlaw7 | 7,500 | 7,500 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Susan Lloyd-Hurwitz | – | – | – | 1,421 | 2,458 | 2,458 | – | 1,037 |
| Martina Merz7 | – | 1,750 | – | – | – | – | – | 1,750 |
| Jennifer Nason | 1,877 | 2,100 | 2,100 | – | – | – | – | 223 |
| Joc O'Rourke | – | 3,000 | 3,000 | – | – | – | – | 3,000 |
| Jakob Stausholm7 | 181,391 | 195,924 | – | – | – | – | 13,508 | 1,025 |
| Sharon Thorne | 2,593 | 2,593 | 2,593 | – | – | – | – | – |
| Simon Trott | 441 | 7,671 | 7,671 | 29,499 | 32,351 | 32,351 | 14,679 | (4,597) |
| Ngaire Woods | 1,482 | 2,199 | 2,199 | – | – | – | – | 717 |
| Ben Wyatt | – | – | – | 400 | 900 | 900 | – | 500 |
| Executives | ||||||||
| Katie Jackson | 1,044 | 9,136 | 9,156 | – | – | – | 14,978 | (6,866) |
| Sinead Kaufman7 | – | – | – | 36,564 | 37,436 | 37,436 | 1,480 | (608) |
| Jérôme Pécresse | 5,043 | 5,109 | 5,121 | – | – | – | – | 78 |
| Matthew Holcz7 | 642 | 656 | 656 | 6,807 | 6,930 | 6,930 | – | 137 |
Rio Tinto plc ordinary shares or American Depositary Receipts.
Or date of appointment, if later.
Or date of retirement/date stepped down from the Board or Executive Committee, if earlier.
Latest practicable date prior to the publication of the 2025 Annual Report, in accordance with LR 9.8.6A.
Shares obtained through awards under the Rio Tinto UK Share Plan, the Global Employee Share Plan and/or vesting of the PSA, MSA and BDA granted under the Group’s LTIP arrangements.
Share movements due to the sale or purchase of shares, or shares received under dividend reinvestment plans.
Simon Henry and Martina Merz retired as Non-Executive Directors on 23 October 2025. Kaisa Hietala and Sam Laidlaw retired as Non-Executive Directors on 1 May 2025. Jakob
Stausholm stepped down from the Executive Committee on 24 August 2025. Matthew Holcz was appointed to the Executive Committee from 27 August 2025. Sinead Kaufman stepped
down from the Executive Committee on 26 August 2025.
Interests in outstanding BDA, MSA and PSA, the UK Share Plan and the Global Employee Share Plan are set out in table 3 and 3a on pages
147-149.
Table 3 – Plan interests (awards of shares under long-term incentive plans)
| Name | Award/grant date | Market price at award1,2 | 1 January 2025 | Awarded | Lapsed/ cancelled | Dividend units | Vested | 31 December 2025 | 5 February 2026 | Performance period concludes/vesting date | Date of release | Market price on release | Monetary value of award at release US$3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter Cunningham | |||||||||||||
| Bonus Deferral Award | 22 Mar 2023 | £53.19 | 5,827 | – | – | 820 | (6,647) | – | – | 1 Dec 2025 | 1 Dec 2025 | £54.64 | 478,886 |
| 20 Mar 2024 | £49.41 | 8,415 | – | – | – | – | 8,415 | 8,415 | 1 Dec 2026 | – | – | – | |
| 19 Mar 2025 | £49.07 | – | 7,907 | – | – | – | 7,907 | 7,907 | 1 Dec 2027 | – | – | – | |
| Performance Share Award | 16 Mar 2020 | £33.58 | 7,426 | – | (6,480) | 382 | (1,328) | – | – | 31 Dec 2024 | 20 Feb 2025 | £50.76 | 88,882 |
| 18 Mar 2021 | £55.58 | 9,564 | – | – | – | – | 9,564 | 9,564 | 31 Dec 2025 | – | – | – | |
| 23 Mar 2022 | £58.00 | 50,405 | – | – | – | – | 50,405 | 50,405 | 31 Dec 2026 | – | – | – | |
| 22 Mar 2023 | £53.19 | 55,134 | – | – | – | – | 55,134 | 55,134 | 31 Dec 2027 | – | – | – | |
| 9 May 2024 | £55.84 | 71,195 | – | – | – | – | 71,195 | 71,195 | 31 Dec 2026 | – | – | – | |
| 19 Mar 2025 | £49.07 | – | 76,299 | – | – | – | 76,299 | 76,299 | 31 Dec 2027 | – | – | – | |
| Matthew Holcz4 | |||||||||||||
| Management Share Award | 22 Mar 2023 | A$115.45 | 3,772 | – | – | – | – | 3,772 | 3,772 | 20 Feb 2026 | – | – | – |
| 19 Mar 2025 | A$118.70 | – | 2,131 | – | – | – | 2,131 | 2,131 | 1 Mar 2026 | – | – | – | |
| 19 Mar 2025 | A$118.70 | – | 2,131 | – | – | – | 2,131 | 2,131 | 1 Mar 2027 | – | – | – | |
| 19 Mar 2025 | A$118.70 | – | 2,131 | – | – | – | 2,131 | 2,131 | 1 Mar 2028 | – | – | – | |
| Performance Share Award | 18 Mar 2021 | A$110.80 | 4,991 | – | – | – | – | 4,991 | 4,991 | 31 Dec 2025 | – | – | – |
| 23 Mar 2022 | A$113.68 | 5,457 | – | – | – | – | 5,457 | 5,457 | 31 Dec 2026 | – | – | – | |
| 22 Mar 2023 | A$115.45 | 7,544 | – | – | – | – | 7,544 | 7,544 | 31 Dec 2027 | – | – | – | |
| 9 May 2024 | A$130.23 | 20,787 | – | – | – | – | 20,787 | 20,787 | 31 Dec 2026 | – | – | – | |
| 19 Mar 2025 | A$118.70 | – | 23,442 | – | – | – | 23,442 | 23,442 | 31 Dec 2027 | – | – | – | |
| Katie Jackson | |||||||||||||
| Bonus Deferral Award | 19 Mar 2025 | £49.07 | – | 2,182 | – | – | – | 2,182 | 2,182 | 1 Dec 2027 | – | – | – |
| Management Share Award | 5 Sept 2024 | £45.91 | 3,547 | – | – | – | (3,547) | – | – | 1 Mar 2025 | 3 Mar 2025 | £48.70 | 227,765 |
| 5 Sept 2024 | £45.91 | 10,954 | – | – | 418 | (11,372) | – | – | 1 Sept 2025 | 1 Sept 2025 | £45.78 | 686,449 | |
| Performance Share Award | 5 Sept 2024 | £45.91 | 18,883 | – | – | – | – | 18,883 | 18,883 | 31 Dec 2026 | – | – | – |
| 19 Mar 2025 | £49.07 | – | 61,343 | – | – | – | 61,343 | 61,343 | 31 Dec 2027 | – | – | – | |
| Sinead Kaufman5 | |||||||||||||
| Bonus Deferral Award | 22 Mar 2023 | A$115.45 | 4,278 | – | – | 488 | (4,766) | – | – | 1 Dec 2025 | 1 Dec 2025 | A$132.87 | 408,401 |
| 20 Mar 2024 | A$121.30 | 5,060 | – | – | – | – | 5,060 | 5,060 | 1 Dec 2026 | – | – | – | |
| 19 Mar 2025 | A$118.70 | – | 4,879 | – | – | – | 4,879 | 4,879 | 1 Dec 2027 | – | – | – | |
| Performance Share Award | 16 Mar 2020 | A$77.65 | 8,579 | – | (7,486) | 341 | (1,434) | – | – | 31 Dec 2024 | 20 Feb 2025 | A$119.66 | 110,663 |
| 18 Mar 2021 | A$110.80 | 41,207 | – | – | – | – | 41,207 | 41,207 | 31 Dec 2025 | – | – | – | |
| 23 Mar 2022 | A$113.68 | 36,042 | – | – | – | – | 36,042 | 36,042 | 31 Dec 2026 | – | – | – | |
| 22 Mar 2023 | A$115.45 | 40,045 | – | – | – | – | 40,045 | 40,045 | 31 Dec 2027 | – | – | – | |
| 9 May 2024 | A$130.23 | 49,145 | – | – | – | – | 49,145 | 49,145 | 31 Dec 2026 | – | – | – | |
| 19 Mar 2025 | A$118.70 | – | 50,599 | – | – | – | 50,599 | 50,599 | 31 Dec 2027 | – | – | – | |
| Name | Award/grant date | Market price at award1,2 | 1 January 2025 | Awarded | Lapsed/ cancelled | Dividend units | Vested | 31 December 2025 | 5 February 2026 | Performance period concludes/vesting date | Date of release | Market price on release | Monetary value of award at release US$3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jérôme Pécresse | |||||||||||||
| Bonus Deferral Award | 20 Mar 2024 | £49.41 | 1,533 | – | – | – | – | 1,533 | 1,533 | 1 Dec 2026 | – | – | – |
| 19 Mar 2025 | £49.07 | – | 8,384 | – | – | – | 8,384 | 8,384 | 1 Dec 2027 | – | – | – | |
| Performance Share Award | 9 May 2024 | £55.84 | 66,928 | – | – | – | – | 66,928 | 66,928 | 31 Dec 2026 | – | – | – |
| 19 Mar 2025 | £49.07 | – | 71,780 | – | – | – | 71,780 | 71,780 | 31 Dec 2027 | – | – | – | |
| Jakob Stausholm | |||||||||||||
| Bonus Deferral Award | 22 Mar 2023 | £53.19 | 10,488 | – | – | 1,476 | (11,964) | – | – | 1 Dec 2025 | 1 Dec 2025 | £54.71 | 863,056 |
| 20 Mar 2024 | £49.41 | 14,211 | – | – | – | – | 14,211 | 14,211 | 1 Dec 2026 | – | – | – | |
| 19 Mar 2025 | £49.07 | – | 13,354 | – | – | – | 13,354 | 13,354 | 1 Dec 2027 | – | – | – | |
| Performance Share Award | 16 Mar 2020 | £33.58 | 74,711 | – | (65,186) | 3,854 | (13,379) | – | – | 31 Dec 2024 | 20 Feb 2025 | £50.76 | 895,450 |
| 18 Mar 2021 | £55.58 | 103,510 | – | – | – | – | 103,510 | 103,510 | 31 Dec 2025 | – | – | – | |
| 23 Mar 2022 | £58.00 | 85,126 | – | – | – | – | 85,126 | 85,126 | 31 Dec 2026 | – | – | – | |
| 22 Mar 2023 | £53.19 | 93,114 | – | – | – | – | 93,114 | 93,114 | 31 Dec 2027 | – | – | – | |
| 9 May 2024 | £55.84 | 120,232 | – | – | – | – | 120,232 | 120,232 | 31 Dec 2026 | – | – | – | |
| 19 Mar 2025 | £49.07 | – | 137,361 | – | – | – | 137,361 | 137,361 | 31 Dec 2027 | – | – | – | |
| Simon Trott | |||||||||||||
| Bonus Deferral Award | 22 Mar 2023 | A$115.45 | 4,683 | – | – | 534 | (5,217) | – | – | 1 Dec 2025 | 1 Dec 2025 | A$132.87 | 447,047 |
| 20 Mar 2024 | A$121.30 | 7,027 | – | – | – | – | 7,027 | 7,027 | 1 Dec 2026 | – | – | – | |
| 19 Mar 2025 | A$118.70 | – | 5,741 | – | – | – | 5,741 | 5,741 | 1 Dec 2027 | – | – | – | |
| Performance Share Award | 16 Mar 2020 | £33.58 | 52,838 | – | (46,102) | 2,726 | (9,462) | – | – | 31 Dec 2024 | 20 Feb 2025 | £50.76 | 633,287 |
| 18 Mar 2021 | £55.58 | 49,571 | – | – | – | – | 49,571 | 49,571 | 31 Dec 2025 | – | – | – | |
| 23 Mar 2022 | £113.68 | 38,204 | – | – | – | – | 38,204 | 38,204 | 31 Dec 2026 | – | – | – | |
| 22 Mar 2023 | A$115.45 | 44,488 | – | – | – | – | 44,488 | 44,488 | 31 Dec 2027 | – | – | – | |
| 9 May 2024 | A$130.23 | 52,091 | – | – | – | – | 52,091 | 52,091 | 31 Dec 2026 | – | – | – | |
| 19 Mar 2025 | A$118.70 | – | 57,851 | – | – | – | 57,851 | 57,851 | 31 Dec 2027 | – | – | – | |
- Awards denominated in pounds sterling were for Rio Tinto plc ordinary shares of 10 pence each and awards denominated in Australian dollars were for Rio Tinto Limited shares.
All awards are granted over ordinary shares.
- The weighted fair value per share of Bonus Deferral Awards and Management Share Awards granted in March 2025 was £49.07 for Rio Tinto plc and A$119.53 for Rio Tinto Limited. For
Performance Share Awards granted in March 2025, the values were £30.45 for Rio Tinto plc and A$74.02 for Rio Tinto Limited. Conditional awards are awarded at no cost to the
recipient and no amount remains unpaid on any shares awarded.
The amount in US dollars has been converted at the rate of US$1.32 = £1 and US$0.64 = A$1, being the average exchange rates for 2025.
Matthew Holcz was appointed as KMP on 27 August 2025.
Sinead Kaufman and Jakob Stausholm stepped down from the Executive Committee on 26 August 2025 and 24 August 2025 respectively.
For the Performance Share Awards granted on 18 March 2021 with a performance period that concluded on 31 December 2025, 0% of the award vested.
The closing price at 31 December 2025 was £59.94 for Rio Tinto plc ordinary shares and was A$146.82 for Rio Tinto Limited ordinary shares. The high and low prices during 2025 of Rio
Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited shares were £60.47 and £40.25 and A$148.80 and A$100.75 respectively.
- As of 5 February 2026, the above members of the Executive Committee held 1,631,196 shares awarded and not vested under long-term incentive plans. No Executive Committee
member held any options.
Table 3a – Plan interests (award of shares under all-employee share arrangements)
| myShare · UK Share Plan · Total activity in 2025 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plan interests at 1 January 20251 · Value of Matching shares awarded in year2 ('000) · Value of Matching shares vested in year3 ('000) · Value of Matching shares awarded in year2 ('000) · Value of Matching shares vested in year3 ('000) · Value of Free shares awarded in year4 ('000) · Value of Free shares vested in year4 ('000) · Grants in year ('000) · Vesting in year ('000) · Plan interests at 31 December 20251 | ||||||||||
| Peter Cunningham | 284 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 303 |
| Katie Jackson | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 81 |
| Sinead Kaufman | 147 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 143 |
| Jérôme Pécresse | 42 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 104 |
| Jakob Stausholm | 370 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 6 | 391 |
All shares shown are Rio Tinto plc shares except in the case of Sinead Kaufman which are Rio Tinto Limited shares.
myShare and UK Share Plan Matching share awards are granted on a quarterly basis (January, April, July and October) throughout the year.
The vesting of a Matching share is dependent on continued employment with Rio Tinto and the retention of the associated Investment share purchased by the participant for
3 years.
UK Share Plan Free shares vest after 3 years.
UK Share Plan awards shown above and the vested Matching shares under myShare are included, where relevant, in the executive’s share interests in table 2.
All currency figures are shown in USD and rounded.
Both Matthew Holcz and Simon Trott hold no unvested awards across myShare and/or UK Share Plan and also have not received or had awards vest during 2025.
This Directors’ Remuneration report is delivered in accordance
with a resolution of the Board, and has been signed on behalf of
the Board by:
People & Remuneration Committee Chair
The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.