SEI INVESTMENTS CO
For the period ended Dec 31, 2024. Filed Feb 20, 2025.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.
FY2024 · Filed Feb 20, 2025
What changed in Risk Factors?
Read the current filingPrevious report: 10-K
Period ended 2023-12-31; filed 2024-02-20.
0000350894-24-000024
Item 1A. Risk FactorsCurrent report: 10-K
Period ended 2024-12-31; filed 2025-02-20.
0000350894-25-000028
Item 1A. Risk FactorsThe baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.
Compared 140 previous paragraphs and 130 current paragraphs.
85 unchanged; 28 reworded; 15 added; 25 removed; 2 previous and 2 current paragraphs rearranged.
Tables are not compared: 0 previous and 0 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.
A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.
Added paragraphs (15)
Current report
Product development in the asset management arena has experienced significant growth in alternative investments, including private equity, hedge funds, real estate, and infrastructure. The growing focus on alternatives reflects increasing demand for diversification beyond traditional asset classes; however, new alternative products often require three or more years in the market to generate the track records necessary to attract significant asset inflows. In addition, alternatives present significant operational challenges for asset managers, primarily due to the lack of widely adopted and trusted technological solutions in this space. Unlike traditional investments, which benefit from well-established operational infrastructures and automated processes, alternative investments often require more manual intervention and bespoke operational support. Failure to effectively manage the risks associated with these new products could lead to reputational damage, regulatory scrutiny, and potential financial losses.
Current report
Our outsourcing strategy may affect our business operations and financial performance. We have recently implemented a new outsourcing strategy that leverages a Global Capability Center (GCC) in India. While this strategy aims to enhance operational efficiency and access a skilled talent pool, it also introduces new risks that could materially affect our business operations and financial performance. The establishment and management of a GCC in India involves complex operational, regulatory, and compliance challenges. We may face difficulties in navigating local laws, cultural differences, and communication barriers, which could impede effective collaboration and oversight. Additionally, the GCC's operations may be subject to geopolitical risks, changes in local regulations, or economic instability in India, potentially disrupting our business processes or increasing operational costs. Our GCC relies heavily on local infrastructure and technology systems, which may be vulnerable to cybersecurity threats, natural disasters, or other disruptions. Any significant interruption in the GCC's operations could adversely affect our ability to deliver services to clients, potentially resulting in reputational damage and financial losses. Furthermore, the transfer of certain business functions to the GCC may involve the handling of sensitive data, raising concerns about data privacy and security. Despite our efforts to implement robust security measures, we cannot guarantee that our GCC will be immune to data breaches or cyber-attacks, which could expose us to legal liabilities and regulatory scrutiny.
Current report
The success of our GCC strategy depends on our ability to attract and retain skilled talent in India. However, the competitive labor market for technology professionals in India may lead to increased attrition rates or higher compensation costs, potentially eroding the cost benefits of our outsourcing strategy. Moreover, any failure to effectively integrate the GCC's operations with our global processes or to manage the quality of services provided by the GCC could negatively impact our operational efficiency and client satisfaction. If we are unable to realize the anticipated benefits of our GCC strategy or if we face significant challenges in its implementation and management, it could have a material adverse effect on our business operations, financial condition, and results of operations.
Current report
Certain regulatory requirements, while aimed at enhancing cybersecurity, significantly restrict our ability to allocate resources based solely on our own risk assessments. The mandatory nature of these requirements, coupled with the potential for severe penalties for non-compliance, forces us to divert resources that might otherwise be allocated to areas we deem higher risk or more critical to our specific business needs.
Current report
The success of our merger and acquisition (M&A) activity and strategy also depends on our ability to protect our proprietary technology and solutions, defend against infringement claims, and effectively manage intellectual property assets acquired through M&A activities. Failure to maintain the confidentiality and exclusivity of our intellectual property, or inadequate due diligence in M&A transactions may have a material adverse effect on our business and financial results. Additionally, the complexity of IP issues in M&A deals may impact our ability to close transactions or realize their full value.
Current report
We are at risk of failing to keep pace with significant new technologies. The financial services industry is undergoing rapid technological change, and financial institutions and fintech companies are investing significantly in new and disruptive technologies, such as artificial intelligence, machine learning, blockchain and other distributed ledger technologies. The failure to develop new solutions or enhancements to our existing solutions that incorporate or interact with new technologies, or doing so at a slower pace than our competition, could cause our solutions to be less competitive and adversely impact our business. Further, such technologies are complex and changing rapidly, and there are technical challenges associated with achieving desired levels of accuracy, efficiency, and reliability. The algorithms and models used may have limitations, including biases, errors, or inability to handle certain data types or scenarios. Furthermore, the use of new technologies introduces additional risks of system failures, disruptions, or vulnerabilities that could compromise the integrity, security, or privacy of data. These limitations or failures could result in reputational damage, legal liabilities, or loss of user confidence.
Current report
Our investment management business may be affected by the performance of our AI-driven investment strategies, changing client preferences for sustainable and digital assets, and the increasing demand for hyper-personalized solutions. Poor investment returns, whether due to market conditions or underperformance relative to AI-powered competitors or ESG benchmarks, could impact our ability to retain assets and attract new clients.
Current report
The rise of alternative investments, including private credit and infrastructure, presents both opportunities and risks. Failure to effectively integrate these assets into our offerings could lead to outflows as clients seek diversification beyond traditional asset classes.
Current report
Poor investment performance could lead to the loss of clients and may cause AUM, revenue and earnings to decline. Investment performance is one of the most important factors for the growth and retention of AUM. Poor investment performance relative to applicable portfolio benchmarks or competitors may cause AUM, revenue and earnings to decline as a result of client withdrawals in favor of better performing products offered by competitors or diminished ability to attract additional funds from existing and new clients.
Current report
Failure to identify errors in quantitative investment models could adversely affect product performance and client relationships. We employ quantitative models to support certain of our investment processes, including with respect to risk assessment and portfolio management. Any errors or limitations in these models, including model inputs or assumptions, as well as any failure of our governance and validation in respect of such models, the failure to timely update such models, or errors in how such models are used, could have adverse effects on our business and reputation.
Current report
The expansion of services in subsidiaries that do not have a primary regulator but are still supervised as part of the SEC-regulated public company and the FFIEC from a technology governance perspective presents unique challenges. These entities may face increased scrutiny and potential regulatory gaps, as they fall under the umbrella of consolidated supervision. Our technology infrastructure and operations must align with these regulatory expectations, which may require significant investments and operational changes as regulation in this space continues to evolve. Our corporate governance structure and enterprise risk functions are replied upon to mitigate and control these risks.
Current report
These risks could result in decreased earnings and harm to our competitive position in the investment management industry. Additionally, failure to effectively manage these risks could lead to regulatory sanctions, financial losses, and damage to our reputation in an increasingly competitive and rapidly evolving financial services landscape.
Current report
The expansion of our GCC and the outsourcing of technology and global operations functions currently performed onshore introduce additional risks. Outsourcing to the GCC may lead to a loss of direct control over critical business functions and create dependencies on third-party providers. This could result in unexpected service disruptions, particularly if the GCC faces technical failures or operational challenges. The distance and potential cultural differences may also complicate communication and oversight, potentially leading to missed deadlines or mistakes that could subject us to claims or regulatory scrutiny.
Current report
We may become subject to stockholder activism efforts that each could cause material disruption to our business. Industry trends indicate activists are targeting operational enhancements and strategic demands, with a notable increase in CEO scrutiny. The global expansion of activism increases risks for multinational companies. Large institutional investors are more actively engaging in governance issues, often supporting or initiating activist campaigns. This evolving landscape, coupled with ongoing regulatory changes, has led companies to a higher likelihood of becoming subject to stockholder activism, potentially leading to more significant disruptions to business operations and strategy. The costs and diversion of management attention could be more substantial, and the impact on stock prices more pronounced.
Current report
Increased geopolitical unrest and other events could adversely affect the global economy or specific international, regional and domestic markets, which may cause our revenue and earnings to decline. Global conflicts and tensions continue to pose significant risks to the financial services industry and our operations. State-based armed conflicts have emerged as the top immediate global risk, with geopolitical instability driven by ongoing conflicts such as the Russia-Ukraine war and the Israel-Hamas confrontation in Gaza creating substantial economic uncertainty. The prolonged nature of these conflicts has contributed to increased volatility in commodity and energy prices, disrupted global supply chains, and created significant instability in financial markets. Sanctions and trade tensions have escalated geoeconomic confrontation, potentially exacerbating market instability. While our direct exposure to these conflicts remains limited, the broader economic consequences present complex challenges for our business. The potential for increased cyberattacks, particularly from state-affiliated actors, poses a significant threat to our operational infrastructure. The export of disruption by major global powers like the United States and China is accelerating geoeconomic fragmentation, creating an increasingly unpredictable business environment. Our exposure to these geopolitical risks is particularly pronounced in regions where we currently operate or seek to expand, potentially impacting our revenue, earnings, and strategic growth initiatives. The global economic recovery remains fragile, with the risk of biological, chemical, or nuclear weapons escalating in the geopolitical risk rankings. These multifaceted challenges require continuous monitoring and adaptive strategies to mitigate potential adverse effects on our operations, financial performance, and long-term strategic objectives. As the geopolitical landscape continues to evolve, we must remain vigilant in assessing and responding to emerging risks that could materially impact our business and the broader financial services industry.
Removed paragraphs (25)
Previous report
The cost of managing cyber and information security risks and attacks along with complying with new and increasingly expansive regulatory requirements could adversely affect our business.
Previous report
If our management fails to develop and execute effective business strategies, and to anticipate changes affecting those strategies, our results could suffer. Our business strategies significantly affect our results of operations. These strategies relate to:
Previous report
•the counterparties with which we do business; and
Previous report
•the manner in which we deploy our capital resources to take advantage of perceived opportunity in the short and long-term.
Previous report
If management makes choices about these strategies and goals that prove to be incorrect, do not accurately assess the competitive landscape, the head winds and tailwinds affecting our business, or fail to address changing regulatory and market environments, then our growth prospects may suffer and our earnings could decline.
Previous report
Our growth and prospects also depend on management’s ability to develop and execute effective business plans to address these strategic priorities, both in the near term and over longer time horizons. Management’s effectiveness in this regard will affect our ability to develop and enhance our resources, control expenses and return capital to shareholders. Each of these objectives could be adversely affected by any failure on the part of management to:
Previous report
•devise effective business plans and strategies;
Previous report
•institute controls that appropriately address the risks associated with business activities and any changes in those activities;
Previous report
•offer products and services that are appropriately priced, meet the changing expectations of clients and customers and are delivered in ways that enhance client satisfaction;
Previous report
•allocate capital in a manner that promotes long-term stability to enable us to build and invest in market-leading technologies and products, even in a highly-stressed environment;
Previous report
•react quickly to changes in market conditions or market structures, or
Previous report
•develop and enhance the operational, technology, risk, financial and managerial resources necessary to grow and manage our business.
Previous report
Additionally, our Board of Directors plays an important role in exercising appropriate oversight of management’s strategic decisions, and a failure by our Board of Directors to perform this function could also impair our results of operations.
Previous report
Our businesses may be adversely affected if we are unable to hire and retain qualified employees. Our performance is largely dependent on the talents and efforts of highly-skilled people; therefore, our continued ability to compete effectively in our businesses, to manage our businesses effectively and to expand into new businesses and geographic areas depends on our ability to attract new talented and diverse employees and to retain and motivate our existing employees. Factors that affect our ability to attract and retain such employees include our compensation and benefits, and our reputation as a successful business with a culture of fairly hiring, training and promoting qualified employees. Declines in our profitability, or in the outlook for our future profitability, as well as regulatory limitations on compensation levels and terms, can negatively impact our ability to hire and retain highly-qualified employees.
Previous report
Competition from within the financial services and technology industries and from businesses outside the financial services and technology industries for qualified employees has often been intense. Employment markets continue to grow in competitive intensity leading to higher costs.
Previous report
Changes in law or regulation in jurisdictions in which our operations are located that affect taxes on employees’ income, or the amount/composition of compensation, may also adversely impact our ability to hire and retain qualified employees in those jurisdictions. As a global financial services and technology company, we are subject to limitations on compensation practices (which may or may not affect our competitors) by regulators worldwide. These limitations, including any imposed by or as a result of future legislation or regulation, may require us to alter our compensation practices in ways that could adversely affect our ability to attract and retain talented employees.
Previous report
Increased geopolitical unrest and other events could adversely affect the global economy or specific international, regional and domestic markets, which may cause our revenue and earnings to decline. Geopolitical risks, including those arising from trade tension and/or the imposition of trade tariffs, European fragmentation, military conflicts and terrorist activity, political conflict and economic sanctions involving Russia, China and other countries, as well as acts of civil or international hostility, are increasing. In particular, the military conflict between Russia and Ukraine, the war between Israel and Hamas in the Gaza region, and the attacks on Western military and commercial targets in the Middle East and related reprisals, have resulted in and may continue to increase geopolitical instability and adversely affect the global economy or specific markets, which could continue to have an adverse impact or cause volatility in the financial services industry generally or on our results of operations and financial conditions. In addition, these geopolitical tensions can cause an increase in volatility in commodity and energy prices, creating supply chain issues, and causing instability in financial markets. Sanctions imposed by the United States and other countries in response to such conflict could further adversely impact the financial markets and the global economy, and any economic countermeasures by the affected countries or others, could exacerbate market and economic instability. While we do not have any operations in Russia or any clients with significant Russian operations and we have minimal market risk related to securities of companies either domiciled or operating in Russia, the specific consequences of the conflict in Ukraine and its potential spread on our business is difficult to predict at this time. In addition to inflationary pressures affecting our operations, we, and the infrastructure we rely upon, may also experience an increase in cyberattacks against us and our third-party service providers from Russia or its allies. Any such events, and responses thereto, may cause significant volatility and declines in the global markets, disruptions to commerce (including to economic activity, travel and supply chains), loss of life and property damage, and may adversely affect the global economy or capital markets, as well as our products, clients, vendors and employees, which may cause our revenue and earnings to decline. Our exposure to geopolitical risks may be heightened to the extent such risks arise in countries in which we currently operate or are seeking to expand our presence.
Previous report
A growing interest on the part of investors and regulators in ESG factors, and increased demand for, and scrutiny of, ESG-related disclosures by companies and asset managers, has increased the risk that we could be accused of making inaccurate or misleading statements regarding our ESG efforts or initiatives, commonly referred to as “greenwashing.” Further, certain government officials have suggested that ESG-related investing practices may result in breaches of fiduciary duty or violations of law, including antitrust laws. Such perceptions or accusations could damage our reputation, result in litigation or regulatory enforcement actions, and adversely affect our business. Regardless of the outcome of any governmental enforcement or litigation matter, responding to such matters is time-consuming and expensive and can divert the attention of senior management.
Previous report
Certain U.S. states have adopted laws or regulations that provide that asset managers that have adopted policies that restrict investing in certain industries or sectors, such as traditional energy, may not be permitted to manage money belonging to these states and their pension funds. If such a state deems our policies to contain such restrictions, whether accurate or not, it could impair our ability to access capital from certain clients and investors.
Reworded paragraphs (28)
Previous wording
Our revenues and earnings are affected by changes in capital markets and significant changes in the value of financial instruments. A majority of our revenues are earned based on the value of assets invested in investment products that we manage or administer. A decrease in the value of these assets, whether due to general market movements or as a consequence of various products’ unique investment performance, would cause a decline in our assets under administration or management, and a corresponding decline in our revenue and earnings. And, in certain investment programs, a portion of our clients’ cash is swept into insured deposit accounts at third party banks on which we earn fees, which fees may be significant. A material change in interest rates could affect our profitability. Significant fluctuations in securities prices may also influence an investor’s decision to invest in and maintain an investment in a mutual fund or other investment products. Declining or adverse economic conditions and adverse changes in investor, consumer and business sentiment generally result in reduced business activity, which may decrease the demand for our products and services. Geopolitical events, market volatility, illiquid market conditions and other disruptions in the financial markets may make it extremely difficult to value or monetize certain financial instruments, particularly during periods of market displacement. Subsequent valuations of financial instruments in future periods, in light of factors then prevailing, may result in significant changes in the value of these instruments. Additionally, periods of extreme market dislocation may require us to monetize our assets or those of our clients at a significant loss. As a result, our revenues and earnings derived from assets under management or administration, or our profitability or value as a firm, could be adversely affected.
Current wording
Our revenues and earnings are affected by changes in capital markets and significant changes in the value of financial instruments. A majority of our revenues are earned based on the value of assets invested in investment products that we manage or administer. A decrease in the value of these assets, whether due to general market movements or as a consequence of various products’ unique investment performance, would cause a decline in our assets under administration or management, and a corresponding decline in our revenue and earnings. And, in certain investment programs, a portion of our clients’ cash is swept into insured deposit accounts at third party banks on which we earn fees, which fees may be significant. A material change in interest rates or a significant number of clients opting out of these programs could affect our profitability. Significant fluctuations in securities prices may also influence an investor’s decision to invest in and maintain an investment in a mutual fund or other investment products. Declining or adverse economic conditions and adverse changes in investor, consumer and business sentiment generally result in reduced business activity, which may decrease the demand for our products and services. Geopolitical events, market volatility, illiquid market conditions and other disruptions in the financial markets may make it extremely difficult to value or monetize certain financial instruments, particularly during periods of market displacement. Subsequent valuations of financial instruments in future periods, in light of factors then prevailing, may result in significant changes in the value of these instruments. Additionally, periods of extreme market dislocation may require us to monetize our assets or those of our clients at a significant loss. As a result, our revenues and earnings derived from assets under management or administration, or our profitability or value as a firm, could be adversely affected.
Previous wording
We are exposed to product development risk. We continually strive to increase revenues and meet our customers' needs by introducing new products and services as well as maintaining and improving our existing products and services. As a result, we are subject to product development risk, which may result in loss if we are unable to develop and deliver products to our target markets that address our clients' needs, that are developed on a timely basis, or that reflect an attractive value proposition. We are also subject to the risk that new products and solutions we develop may not function as expected or may be prone to error or disruption, which may result in material losses or harm to our reputation and ability to market such solutions. The majority of our technology product development risk pertains to the evolution of the SEI Wealth Platform SM, TRUST 3000®, our platform for the Investment Managers segment, and our other proprietary technology platforms.
Current wording
We are exposed to product development risk. We continually strive to increase revenues and meet our customers' needs by introducing new products and services as well as maintaining and improving our existing products and services. As a result, we are subject to product development risk, which may result in loss if we are unable to develop and deliver products to our target markets that address our clients' needs, that are developed on a timely basis, or that reflect an attractive value proposition. The implementation of many product innovation and development opportunities, particularly cloud-based solutions, requires us to obtain client consent and/or vendor consent, which may be withheld or be obtainable only if we incur a cost that is disproportionate to the revenue opportunity. We are also subject to the risk that new products and solutions we develop may not function as expected or may be prone to error or disruption, which may result in material losses or harm to our reputation and ability to market such solutions. The majority of our technology product development risk pertains to the evolution of the SEI Wealth Platform SM, TRUST 3000®, our platform for the Investment Managers segment, and our other proprietary technology platforms.
Previous wording
The development and introduction of new products and services in the markets in which we operate requires continued innovative efforts on our part and may require significant time and resources as well as ongoing support and investment. Substantial risk and uncertainties are associated with the introduction of new products and services, including the implementation of new and appropriate operational controls and procedures, shifting client and market preferences, the introduction of competing products or services and compliance with regulatory requirements.
Current wording
The development and introduction of new products and services in the markets in which we operate requires continued innovative efforts on our part and may require significant time and resources as well as ongoing support and investment. Expansion of Business-to-Consumer products and services presents unique risks as it increases direct interaction with individual consumers, exposing us to heightened cybersecurity threats and data privacy concerns. Growth in Business-to-Consumer models may increase operational risk due to higher transaction volumes, potentially increasing operational costs and fraud risks.
Previous wording
Product development in the asset management arena has had significant growth in newer areas where investment criteria and performance metrics have not yet been fully defined or developed, such as Environmental, Social and Governance, or “ESG” products, Sustainable Investing products, and Tax Harvesting programs. New products often must be in the market place for three or more years in order to generate track records required to attract significant asset inflows. A failure to continue to innovate, to introduce successful new products and services, or to manage effectively the risks associated with such products and services, may impact our market share and may cause our revenues and earnings derived from assets under management and administration to decline.
Current wording
Product development in the asset management arena has had significant growth in newer areas where investment criteria and performance metrics have not yet been fully defined or developed, such as Tax Harvesting programs. New products often must be in the marketplace for three or more years in order to generate track records required to attract significant asset inflows. A failure to continue to innovate, to introduce successful new products and services, or to manage effectively the risks associated with such products and services, may impact our market share and may cause our revenues and earnings derived from assets under management and administration to decline.
Previous wording
We rely on third parties to provide products and services that may be difficult to replace or which could cause errors or failures in the services we provide. We rely on third parties we do not control to provide us with products and services, including software development, licensed software, software as a service, cloud services, hosting, web hosting, and the Automated Clearing House (ACH) network which transmit transaction data, process chargebacks and refunds, and perform clearing services in connection with our settlement activities. In the event these third parties fail to provide these services adequately or in a timely manner, including as a result of errors in their systems or events beyond their control, or refuse to provide these services on terms acceptable to us or at all, and we are not able to find and implement timely suitable alternatives, we may no longer be able to provide certain services to customers, which could expose us and our clients to information security, financial, compliance and reputational risks, among others, and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. In addition, if we are unable to renew our existing contracts or licenses with key vendors, technology providers or service providers, we might not be able to replace the related product, application or service at all or at the same cost, which would negatively impact our offerings and our results of operations.
Current wording
We rely on third parties to provide products and services that may be difficult to replace or which could cause errors or failures in the services we provide. We rely on third parties we do not control to provide us with products and services, including software development, licensed software, software as a service, business process outsourcing services, cloud services, hosting, web hosting, and the Automated Clearing House (ACH) network, which transmit transaction data, process chargebacks and refunds, and perform clearing services in connection with our settlement activities. In the event these third parties fail to provide these services adequately or in a timely manner, including as a result of errors in their systems or events beyond their control, or refuse to provide these services on terms acceptable to us or at all, and we are not able to find and implement timely suitable alternatives, we may no longer be able to provide certain services to customers, which could expose us and our clients to information security, financial, compliance and reputational risks, among others, and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. In addition, if we are unable to renew our existing contracts or licenses with key vendors, technology providers or service providers, we might not be able to replace the related product, application or service at all or at the same cost, which would negatively impact our offerings and our results of operations.
Previous wording
Pricing pressure from increased competition and disruptive technology may affect our revenues and earnings. The investment management industry is highly competitive and has relatively low barriers to entry. In recent years, we have experienced, and continue to experience, pricing pressures from the introduction of new, lower-priced investment products and services and the growth of passive investing, as well as from competitor firms offering automated portfolio management and other services based on technological innovations. These new investment products and technological innovations available to both institutional and retail investors have led to a general trend towards lower fees in some segments of the investment management industry. We believe price competition and pricing pressures in these and other areas will continue as investors continue to reduce the amounts they are willing to pay and financial services firms seek to obtain market share by reducing fees or margins.
Current wording
Pricing pressure from increased competition and disruptive technology may affect our revenues and earnings. The investment management industry is highly competitive and has relatively low barriers to entry. In recent years, we have experienced, and continue to experience, pricing pressures from the introduction of new, lower-priced investment products and services and the growth of passive investing, as well as from competitor firms offering automated portfolio management and other services based on technological innovations. Companies that successfully implement artificial intelligence (AI)-driven pricing could gain a significant advantage in optimizing revenues and responding to market dynamics. These new investment products and technological innovations, available to both institutional and retail investors, have led to a general trend towards lower fees in some segments of the investment management industry. We believe price competition and pricing pressures in these and other areas will continue as investors continue to reduce the amounts they are willing to pay and financial services firms seek to obtain market share by reducing fees or margins.
Previous wording
Financial technology companies and other non-traditional competitors may not be subject to banking regulation, or may be supervised by a national or state regulatory agency that does not have the same resources or regulatory priorities as those regulatory agencies that supervise more diversified financial services firms such as us, or the financial services regulatory framework in a particular jurisdiction may favor financial institutions that are based in that jurisdiction. These types of differences in regulatory status and framework may result in losing market share to competitors that have a lower cost of compliance due to being less regulated than we are or not subject to regulation, especially with respect to unregulated financial products.
Current wording
The competitive landscape is rapidly evolving with the entry of fintech firms and big tech companies into asset management. Our ability to compete effectively against these new entrants, who may have superior technological capabilities, is crucial for maintaining market share. Furthermore, these financial technology companies and other non-traditional competitors may not be subject to banking regulation, or may be supervised by a national or state regulatory agency that does not have the same resources or regulatory priorities as those regulatory agencies that supervise more diversified financial services firms such as us, or the financial services regulatory framework in a particular jurisdiction may favor financial institutions that are based in that jurisdiction. These types of differences in capabilities and regulatory status may result in losing market share to competitors that have a lower cost of compliance due to being less regulated than we are or not subject to regulation, especially with respect to unregulated financial products.
Previous wording
We may experience software defects, development delays or installation difficulties, which would harm our business and reputation and expose us to potential liability. A significant portion of our revenue is dependent upon our ability to develop, implement, maintain and enhance sophisticated software and computer systems. We may encounter delays when developing new applications and services. Further, the software underlying our services may contain undetected errors or defects when first introduced or when new versions are released. We may also experience difficulties in installing or integrating our technology on systems or with other programs used by our clients. Likewise, our clients may make a determination to delay or cancel the integration of our new applications and services. Defects in our software, failure to adequately maintain and enhance our software products, errors or delays in the processing of electronic transactions or other difficulties could result in interruption of business operations, delay in market acceptance, additional development and remediation costs, diversion of technical and other resources, loss of clients or client data, negative publicity or exposure to liability claims. Although we attempt to limit our potential liability through disclaimers and limitation of liability provisions in our license and client agreements, we cannot be certain that these measures will successfully limit our liability.
Current wording
We may experience software defects, development delays or installation difficulties, which would harm our business and reputation and expose us to potential liability. A significant portion of our revenue is dependent upon our ability to develop, implement, maintain and enhance sophisticated software and computer systems. We may encounter delays when developing new applications and services. Further, the software underlying our services may contain undetected errors, vulnerabilities or defects when first introduced or when new versions are released. We may also experience difficulties in installing, integrating or supporting our technology on systems or with other programs used by our clients. Likewise, our clients may make a determination to delay or cancel the integration of our new applications and services. Defects in our software, failure to adequately maintain and enhance our software products, errors or delays in the processing of electronic transactions or other difficulties could result in interruption of business operations, delay in market acceptance, additional development and remediation costs, diversion of technical and other resources, loss of clients or client data, negative publicity or exposure to liability claims. Although we attempt to limit our potential liability through disclaimers and limitation of liability provisions in our license and client agreements, we cannot be certain that these measures will successfully limit our liability.
Previous wording
We are exposed to data and cyber security risks. Like other global financial service providers, we experience millions of cyber-attacks on our computer systems, software, networks and other technology assets on a daily basis. Cyber security and information risks for financial institutions have significantly increased in recent years in part because of the proliferation of new technologies, the use of the internet and mobile telecommunications technologies to conduct financial transactions, and the increased sophistication and activities of organized crime, hackers, terrorists and other external parties, including foreign state actors, in some circumstances as a means to promote political ends. In addition to the growing sophistication of certain parties, the commoditization of cyber tools which are able to be weaponized by less sophisticated actors has led to an increase in the exploitation of technological vulnerabilities. Any of these parties may also attempt to fraudulently induce employees, customers, clients, vendors or other third parties or users of our systems to disclose sensitive information in order to gain access to our data or that of our employees or clients. Cyber security and information security risks may also derive from:
Current wording
We are exposed to data and cyber security risks. Like other global financial service providers, we experience millions of cyber-attacks on our computer systems, software, networks and other technology assets on a daily basis. Cyber security and information risks for financial institutions have significantly increased in recent years in part because of the proliferation of new technologies, the use of the internet and mobile telecommunications technologies to conduct financial transactions, and the increased sophistication and activities of organized crime, hackers, terrorists and other external parties, including foreign state actors, in some circumstances as a means to promote political ends. In addition to the growing sophistication of certain parties, the commoditization of AI and cyber tools which are able to be weaponized by less sophisticated actors has led to an increase in the exploitation of technological vulnerabilities. Any of these parties may also attempt to fraudulently induce employees, customers, clients, vendors or other third parties or users of our systems to disclose sensitive information in order to gain access to our data or that of our employees or clients. Cyber security and information security risks may also derive from:
Previous wording
The failure to upgrade or maintain our computer systems, software and networks could also make us susceptible to breaches and unauthorized access and misuse. We may be required to expend significant additional resources to modify, investigate or remediate vulnerabilities or other exposures arising from data and cyber security risks. Furthermore, even if not directed at us specifically, attacks on other financial institutions could disrupt the overall functioning of the financial system. As a result of the importance of communications and information systems to our business and our reliance on the services provided to us by third parties, we could also be adversely affected if attacks affecting our third-party service providers impair our ability to process transactions and communicate with clients and counterparties.
Current wording
The failure to upgrade or maintain our technology infrastructure including our, computer systems, software and networks could also make us susceptible to breaches, unauthorized access and misuse. We may be required to expend significant additional resources to modify, investigate or remediate vulnerabilities or other exposures arising from data and cyber security risks. Furthermore, even if not directed at us specifically, attacks on other financial institutions could disrupt the overall functioning of the financial system. As a result of the importance of communications and information systems to our business and our reliance on the services provided to us by third parties, we could also be adversely affected if attacks affecting our third-party service providers impair our ability to process transactions and communicate with clients and counterparties.
Previous wording
Given our global footprint and the high volume of transactions we process, the large number of clients, partners, vendors and counterparties with which we do business, and the increasing sophistication of cyber-attacks, a cyber-attack or information security breach could occur and persist for an extended period of time without detection. We expect that any investigation of a cyber-attack would be inherently unpredictable and that it would take time before the completion of any investigation and before there is availability of full and reliable information. During such time we would not necessarily know the extent of the harm or how best to remediate it, and certain errors or actions could be repeated or compounded before they are discovered and remediated, all or any of which would further increase the costs and consequences of a cyber-attack.
Current wording
Given our extensive global operations, expansion through acquisitions, and the substantial volume of transactions we process daily, coupled with our vast network of clients, partners, vendors, and counterparties, we face an elevated risk of sophisticated and persistent cyber-attacks. The complexity of our systems and the evolving nature of cyber threats mean that a breach could potentially remain undetected for an extended period, potentially compromising sensitive data and disrupting critical operations. We expect that any investigation of a cyber-attack would be inherently unpredictable and that it would take time before the completion of any investigation and before there is availability of full and reliable information. During such time we would not necessarily know the extent of the harm or how best to remediate it, and certain errors or actions could be repeated or compounded before they are discovered and remediated, all or any of which would further increase the costs and consequences of a cyber-attack.
Previous wording
We are exposed to risk of the disclosure and misuse of personal data. We store and process large amounts of personally identifiable information of our customers. It is possible our security controls over personal data, our training of employees on data security, our vendor due diligence and oversight processes, and other practices we follow may not prevent the improper disclosure or misuse of personal data that we or our vendors store and/or manage. Improper disclosure or misuse of personal data could harm our reputation, lead to legal exposure, or subject us to liability under laws that protect personal data, resulting in increased costs or loss of revenue. Perceptions that the collection, use, and retention of personal information is not satisfactorily protected could inhibit sales of our products or services. Additional security measures we may take to address customer concerns may cause higher operating expenses or hinder growth of our products and services.
Current wording
We are exposed to risk of the disclosure and misuse of personal data. We store, transfer and process large amounts of personally identifiable information of our customers to deliver our products and services. It is possible our security controls over personal data, our training of employees on data security, our vendor due diligence and oversight processes, and other practices we follow may not prevent the improper disclosure or misuse of personal data that we or our vendors store and/or manage. Improper disclosure or misuse of personal data could harm our reputation, lead to legal exposure, or subject us to liability under laws that protect personal data, resulting in increased costs or loss of revenue. Perceptions that the collection, use, and retention of personal information is not satisfactorily protected could inhibit sales of our products or services. Additional security measures we may take to address customer concerns may cause higher operating expenses or hinder growth of our products and services.
Previous wording
We are exposed to intellectual property risks. Our continued success also depends in part on our ability to protect our proprietary technology and solutions and to defend against infringement claims of others. We primarily rely upon trade secret law, software security measures, copyrights and confidentiality restrictions in contracts with employees, vendors and customers. Our industry is characterized by the existence of a large number of trade secrets, copyrights and the rapid issuance of patents, as well as frequent litigation based on allegations of infringement or other violations of intellectual property rights of others. A successful assertion by others of infringement claims or a failure to maintain the confidentiality and exclusivity of our intellectual property may have a material adverse effect on our business and financial results.
Current wording
We are exposed to intellectual property risks. Our continued success also depends in part on our ability to protect our proprietary technology and solutions and to defend against infringement claims of others. We primarily rely upon trade secret law, software security measures, copyrights and confidentiality restrictions in contracts with employees, vendors and customers. Our industry is characterized by the existence of a large number of trade secrets, copyrights and the rapid issuance of patents, as well as frequent litigation based on allegations of infringement or other violations of intellectual property (IP) rights of others. A successful assertion by others of infringement claims or a failure to maintain the confidentiality and exclusivity of our intellectual property may have a material adverse effect on our business and financial results.
Previous wording
The financial services industry is subject to extensive regulations that impact our business. Legal, regulatory and compliance risk includes the risk of legal or regulatory sanctions, material financial loss including fines, penalties, judgments, damages and/or settlements, or loss to reputation we may suffer as a result of our failure to comply with laws, regulations, rules, related self-regulatory organization standards and codes of conduct applicable to our business activities. This risk also includes contractual and commercial risk, such as the risk that a counterparty’s performance obligations will be unenforceable. It also includes compliance with privacy, anti-money laundering, anti-corruption and terrorist financing rules and regulations.
Current wording
The financial services industry is subject to extensive regulations that impact our business. Legal, regulatory and compliance risk includes the risk of legal or regulatory sanctions, material financial loss including fines, penalties, judgments, damages and/or settlements, or loss to reputation we may suffer as a result of our failure to comply with laws, regulations, rules, related self-regulatory organization standards and codes of conduct applicable to our business activities. This risk also includes contractual and commercial risk, such as the risk that a counterparty’s performance obligations will be unenforceable. It also includes compliance with privacy, anti-money laundering (AML), anti-corruption and terrorist financing rules and regulations.
Previous wording
As a major financial services firm, we are subject to extensive regulation by U.S. federal and state regulatory agencies and securities exchanges and by regulators and exchanges in each of the major markets where we conduct our business. Our parent company, SEI Investments Company, is regulated by the FFIEC as a significant service provider to the financial industry and subject to SEC oversight as a publicly traded company. Our various business activities in the United States are conducted through entities such as an investment advisor, broker-dealer, commodity pool operator, transfer agent, investment company, national bank and trust company which may be registered with or regulated by the SEC, FINRA, CFTC, NFA, DOL, OCC, and the PA Department of Banking. In addition, some of our foreign subsidiaries are registered with, and subject to the oversight of, regulatory authorities primarily in the United Kingdom, Ireland, Canada, Luxembourg, South Africa, and the Cayman Islands. Many of our clients are subject to substantial regulation by federal and state banking, securities, insurance or employee benefit authorities. Compliance with existing and future regulations, responding to and complying with regulatory activity (new requirements, examinations and supervisory activity) affecting our financial intermediary clients and their service providers could have a significant impact on our operations or business or our ability to provide certain products or services.
Current wording
As a major financial services firm, we are subject to extensive regulation by U.S. federal and state regulatory agencies and securities exchanges and by regulators and exchanges in each of the major markets where we conduct our business. Our parent company, SEI Investments Company, is regulated by the FFIEC as a significant service provider to the financial industry and subject to SEC oversight as a publicly traded company. Our various business activities in the United States are conducted through entities such as an investment advisor, broker-dealer, commodity pool operator, swap dealer, transfer agent, investment company, national bank and trust company which may be registered with or regulated by the SEC, FINRA, CFTC, NFA, DOL, OCC, and the PA Department of Banking. In addition, some of our foreign subsidiaries are registered with, and subject to the oversight of, regulatory authorities primarily in the United Kingdom, Ireland, Canada, Luxembourg, South Africa, and the Cayman Islands. Many of our clients are subject to substantial regulation by federal and state banking, securities, insurance or employee benefit authorities. Compliance with existing and future regulations, responding to and complying with regulatory activity (new requirements, examinations and supervisory activity) affecting our financial intermediary clients and their service providers could have a significant impact on our operations or business or our ability to provide certain products or services or could adversely impact a portfolio’s ability to achieve its investment strategies or make certain investments.
Previous wording
We offer financial services technology products and services that also are subject to regulation by the federal and state securities and banking authorities, as well as foreign regulatory authorities, where applicable. Existing or future regulations that affect these products could lead to a reduction in sales of these products or an increase in the cost of providing these products. There can also be significant differences in the ways that similar regulatory initiatives affecting the financial services industry are implemented in the United States and in other countries. For example, when adopting rules that are intended to implement a global regulatory standard, a national regulator may introduce additional or more restrictive requirements, which can create competitive disadvantages for financial services firms such as ours that are subject to those enhanced regulations as a consequence of multi-jurisdictional operations.
Current wording
We offer financial services technology products and services that also are subject to regulation by the federal and state securities and banking authorities, as well as foreign regulatory authorities, where applicable. Existing or future regulations that affect these products could lead to a reduction in sales of these products or an increase in the cost of providing these products. There can also be significant differences in the ways that similar regulatory initiatives affecting the financial services industry are implemented in the United States and in other countries. For example, regulations like the EU's Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) are intended to implement a global regulatory standard, may introduce additional or more restrictive requirements for non-EU affiliates, which can create competitive disadvantages for multi-jurisdictional operations. In addition, the regulatory environment is increasingly influenced by geopolitical factors and technological advancements. For instance, the implementation of Basel 3.1 in the United Kingdom has been delayed, partly due to uncertainties in the US regulatory landscape. The interconnectedness of global financial markets means that regulatory initiatives often have cross-border implications. Firms must navigate potential regulatory divergences and the related tensions and irreconcilable policies between jurisdictions, which can create regulatory risk, operational challenges and competitive dynamics.
Previous wording
In the United States, the Bank Secrecy Act, as amended by the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 and the Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020, imposes significant obligations on financial institutions to detect and deter money laundering and terrorist financing activity, including requiring banks, bank holding companies and their subsidiaries, broker-dealers, futures commission merchants, introducing brokers and mutual funds to implement anti-money laundering programs, verify the identity of customers that maintain accounts, and monitor and report suspicious activity to appropriate law enforcement or regulatory authorities. Outside the United States, applicable laws, rules and regulations similarly require designated types of financial institutions to implement compliance programs to address regulatory requirements related to money laundering, financial crime and the financing of terrorist activities. Failure to implement comprehensive anti-money laundering programs across our globally-regulated businesses poses regulatory risk including fines for noncompliance.
Current wording
In the United States, the Bank Secrecy Act, as amended by the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 and the Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020, imposes significant obligations on financial institutions to detect and deter money laundering and terrorist financing activity, including requiring banks, bank holding companies and their subsidiaries, broker-dealers, futures commission merchants, introducing brokers and mutual funds to implement anti-money laundering programs, verify the identity of customers that maintain accounts, and monitor and report suspicious activity to appropriate law enforcement or regulatory authorities. Recent regulatory developments have also introduced new obligations for registered investment advisers (RIAs), aligning them with other financial institutions under AML frameworks. RIAs must now establish formal AML programs with written policies, a designated compliance officer, ongoing training, and independent testing which extends our AML obligations to subsidiaries that were previously not require to maintain a standalone AML Program.
Previous wording
We are also subject to sanctions, such as regulations and economic sanctions programs administered by the U.S. government, including the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) and the U.S. Department of State, and similar sanctions programs imposed by foreign governments or global or regional multilateral organizations. In addition, we are subject to anti-corruption laws, such as the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the U.K. Bribery Act, in the jurisdictions in which we operate. Anti-corruption laws generally prohibit offering, promising, giving or authorizing others to give anything of value, either directly or indirectly, to a government official or private party in order to influence official action or otherwise gain an unfair business advantage, such as to obtain or retain business. We can incur higher costs and face greater compliance risks in structuring and operating our businesses to comply with these requirements. Furthermore, a violation of a sanction or embargo program or anti-corruption or anti-money laundering laws and regulations could subject us and our subsidiaries, and individual employees, to regulatory enforcement actions as well as significant civil and criminal penalties.
Current wording
We are also subject to sanction regulations, such as regulations and economic sanctions programs administered by the U.S. government, including the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) and the U.S. Department of State, and similar sanctions programs imposed by foreign governments or global or regional multilateral organizations. In addition, we are subject to anti-corruption laws, such as the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the U.K. Bribery Act, in the jurisdictions in which we operate. Anti-corruption laws generally prohibit offering, promising, giving or authorizing others to give anything of value, either directly or indirectly, to a government official or private party in order to influence official action or otherwise gain an unfair business advantage, such as to obtain or retain business. We can incur higher costs and face greater compliance risks in structuring and operating our businesses to comply with these requirements. Furthermore, a violation of a sanction or embargo program or anti-corruption or anti-money laundering laws and regulations could subject us and our subsidiaries, and individual employees, to regulatory enforcement actions as well as significant civil and criminal penalties.
Previous wording
Many aspects of our businesses are subject to legal requirements concerning the use and protection of certain customer information. These include those adopted pursuant to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003 in the U.S., as well as the privacy and cybersecurity laws referenced above. We have adopted measures designed to comply with these and related applicable requirements in all relevant jurisdictions. Well-publicized allegations involving the misuse or inappropriate sharing of personal information have led to expanded governmental scrutiny of practices relating to the use or sharing of personal data by companies in the United States and other countries. That scrutiny has in some cases resulted in, and could in the future lead to, the adoption of stricter laws and regulations relating to the use and sharing of personal information. These types of laws and regulations could prohibit or significantly restrict financial services firms from sharing information among affiliates or with third parties such as vendors, and thereby increase compliance costs, or restricting the use of personal data when developing or offering products or services to customers. These restrictions could inhibit our development or marketing of certain products or services, or increase the costs of offering them to customers.
Current wording
Many aspects of our businesses are subject to legal requirements concerning the use and protection of certain customer information. These include those adopted pursuant to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003 in the United States, as well as the privacy and cybersecurity laws referenced above. We have adopted measures designed to comply with these and related applicable requirements in all relevant jurisdictions. Well-publicized allegations involving the misuse or inappropriate sharing of personal information have led to expanded governmental scrutiny of practices relating to the use or sharing of personal data by companies in the United States and other countries. That scrutiny has in some cases resulted in, and could in the future lead to, the adoption of stricter laws and regulations relating to the use and sharing of personal information. These types of laws and regulations could prohibit or significantly restrict financial services firms from sharing information among affiliates or with third parties such as vendors, and thereby increase compliance costs, or restricting the use of personal data when developing or offering products or services to customers. These restrictions could inhibit our development or marketing of certain products or services, or increase the costs of offering them to customers.
Previous wording
The fees and assessments imposed on our regulated subsidiaries by federal, national, state and foreign regulatory authorities could have a significant impact on us. The frequency and scope of regulatory reform in the current regulatory environment may lead to an increase in fees and assessments resulting in increased expense, or an increase or change in regulatory requirements which could affect our operations and business.
Current wording
Compliance with existing and emerging regulations, as well as responding to regulatory examinations and supervisory activities, continues to have a significant impact on our operations globally. This includes, without limitation, adapting to new requirements for consumer protection, operational resilience, and sustainable finance. The fees, assessments and operational restrictions that may be imposed on our regulated subsidiaries by federal, national, state, and foreign regulatory authorities could have a significant impact on us, including, without limitation, materially affecting our ability to do business and generated revenue in a particular jurisdiction. The frequency and scope of regulatory reform in the current regulatory environment may lead to an increase in fees, assessments and operational restrictions resulting in increased expense, or an increase or change in regulatory requirements which could affect our operations and business. Moreover, maintaining adequate staffing levels to address these evolving regulatory demands presents an ongoing challenge. The complexity and volume of new regulations require specialized expertise, and there is a risk that we may face difficulties in attracting, retaining, and training qualified personnel to manage compliance effectively. Insufficient staffing in compliance and risk management roles could expose us to regulatory breaches, financial penalties, and reputational damage. As regulatory requirements continue to evolve rapidly, particularly in areas such as operational resilience, second line functions, ESG reporting, cybersecurity, and digital asset management, the pressure on our human resources to keep pace with these changes remains a significant operational risk.
Previous wording
A failure to address conflicts of interest appropriately could adversely affect our business and reputation. As a global financial services firm that provides products and services to a diversified group of clients, including public and private entities, financial institutions and individuals, we face potential conflicts of interest in the normal course of business. For example, potential conflicts can occur when there is a divergence of interests between us and a client, among clients, between an employee on the one hand and us or a client on the other, or situations in which we may be a creditor of a client. Moreover, we utilize multiple business channels, including those resulting from our acquisitions, and continue to enhance the collaboration across business segments, which may heighten the potential conflicts of interest or the risk of improper sharing of information. We have policies, procedures and controls that are designed to identify and address potential conflicts of interest, and we utilize various measures, such as the use of disclosure, to manage these potential conflicts. However, identifying and mitigating potential conflicts of interest can be complex and challenging and can become the focus of media and regulatory scrutiny. It is possible that potential conflicts could give rise to litigation or enforcement actions, which may lead to our clients being less willing to enter into transactions in which a conflict may occur and could adversely affect our businesses and reputation.
Current wording
A failure to address conflicts of interest appropriately could adversely affect our business and reputation. As a global financial services firm that provides products and services to a diversified group of clients, including public and private entities, financial institutions and individuals, we face potential conflicts of interest in the normal course of business. For example, potential conflicts can occur when there is a divergence of interests between us and a client, among clients, between an employee on the one hand and us or a client on the other, or situations in which we may be a creditor of a client. Moreover, we utilize multiple business channels, including those resulting from our acquisitions, and continue to enhance the collaboration across business segments, which may heighten the potential conflicts of interest or the risk of improper sharing of information. We have policies, procedures and controls that are designed to identify and address potential conflicts of interest, and we utilize various measures, such as the use of disclosure, to manage these potential conflicts. However, identifying and mitigating potential conflicts of interest can be complex and challenging and can become the focus of media and regulatory scrutiny. The regulatory landscape has evolved, with bodies like the SEC placing greater emphasis on conflicts disclosure, particularly for dual registrants and advisers with affiliated broker-dealers. It is possible that potential conflicts could give rise to litigation or enforcement actions, which may lead to our clients being less willing to enter into transactions in which a conflict may occur and could adversely affect our businesses and reputation. The global nature of our operations also means we must navigate potentially conflicting regulatory requirements across different jurisdictions, adding another layer of complexity to our conflict management efforts.
Previous wording
We are subject to litigation and regulatory examinations and investigations. The financial services industry faces substantial regulatory risks and litigation. Like many firms operating within the financial services industry, we are experiencing a difficult and continuously evolving regulatory environment across our markets. Our current scale and reach as a provider to the financial services industry, the increased regulatory oversight of the financial services industry generally, new laws and regulations affecting the financial services industry and ever-changing regulatory interpretations of existing laws and regulations, have made this an increasingly challenging and costly regulatory environment in which to operate. Examinations or investigations could result in the identification of matters that may require remediation activities or enforcement proceedings by the regulator. The direct and indirect costs of responding to these examinations, or of defending ourselves in any enforcement investigation or litigation could be significant. Additionally, actions brought against us may result in settlements, awards, injunctions, fines and penalties. Litigation or regulatory action could also harm our reputation with clients and prospects, have an adverse effect on our ability to offer some of our products and services, or impede our ability to maintain operations in certain jurisdictions.
Current wording
We are subject to litigation and regulatory examinations and investigations. The financial services industry faces substantial regulatory risks and litigation. Like many firms operating within the financial services industry, we are experiencing a difficult and continuously evolving regulatory environment across our markets and jurisdictions in which we operate. Our current scale and reach as a provider to the financial services industry, the increased regulatory oversight of the financial services industry generally, new laws and regulations affecting the financial services industry and ever-changing regulatory interpretations of existing laws and regulations, have made this an increasingly challenging and costly regulatory environment in which to operate.
Previous wording
Growth of our business could increase costs and regulatory risks. Providing a platform for new businesses, integrating acquired businesses, and partnering with other firms involve a number of risks and present financial, managerial, and operational challenges. We may incur significant expenses in connection with further expansion of our existing businesses or in connection with strategic acquisitions or investments, if and to the extent they arise from time to time. Our overall profitability would be negatively affected if investments and expenses associated with such growth are not matched or exceeded by the revenues that are derived from such investment or growth. Expansion may also create a need for additional compliance, risk management and internal control procedures, and often involves the hiring of additional personnel to monitor such procedures. To the extent such procedures are not adequate to appropriately monitor any new or expanded business, we could be exposed to a material loss or regulatory sanction.
Current wording
Growth of our business could increase costs and regulatory risks. Providing platforms for existing and new businesses, expanding our operational services, integrating acquired businesses, and partnering with other firms involves a number of risks and present financial, managerial, and operational challenges. We may incur significant expenses in connection with further expansion of our existing businesses or in connection with strategic acquisitions or investments, if and to the extent they arise from time to time. Our overall profitability would be negatively affected if investments and expenses associated with such growth are not matched or exceeded by the revenues that are derived from such investment or growth. As we expand our business-to-consumer offerings, we face heightened cybersecurity and fraud risks. The rapid growth in digital payments introduces increased threats of data breaches, identity theft, and sophisticated hacking attempts. These risks could lead to significant financial losses and reputational damage if not adequately addressed. Expansion may also create a need for additional compliance, risk management and internal control procedures, and often involves the hiring of additional personnel to monitor such procedures. To the extent such procedures are not adequate to appropriately monitor any new or expanded business, we could be exposed to a material loss or regulatory sanction.
Previous wording
Moreover, to the extent we pursue strategic acquisitions, we may be exposed to a number of risks, including additional demands on our existing employees; additional or new regulatory requirements, operating facilities and technologies; adverse effects in the event acquired goodwill or intangible assets become impaired; and the existence of liabilities or contingencies not disclosed to or otherwise known by us prior to closing a transaction. These risks could result in decreased earnings and harm to our competitive position in the investment management industry.
Current wording
Moreover, to the extent we pursue strategic acquisitions, we may be exposed to a number of risks, including additional demands on our existing employees; additional or new regulatory requirements, operating facilities and technologies; adverse effects in the event acquired goodwill or intangible assets become impaired; and the existence of liabilities or contingencies not disclosed to or otherwise known by us prior to closing a transaction.
Previous wording
Our businesses are highly dependent on our ability to process and report, on a daily basis, a large number of transactions across numerous and diverse markets and asset classes in many currencies. Operational efficiency is modeled on defined and strict timelines which present inherent risk. In the event of a breakdown or improper operation of systems, human error or improper action by employees or consultants, we could suffer significant financial loss, regulatory sanctions or damage to our reputation. Additionally, we may introduce new products or services or change processes or reporting, including in connection with new regulatory requirements, resulting in new operational risk that we may not fully appreciate or identify.
Current wording
Our businesses are highly dependent on our ability to process and report, on a daily basis, a large number of transactions across numerous and diverse markets and asset classes in many currencies. Operational efficiency is modeled on defined and strict timelines which present inherent risk. Our operations rely on the competence and trustworthiness of our employees and consultants, as well as of our contractors and third parties, including vendors, custodians and financial intermediaries. Should we experience any significant operational breakdown or failure, theft, fraud or other unlawful conduct, or other negative outcomes caused by poor judgment, human error or misconduct on the part of one of our employees or contractors or those of a third party on which our operations rely, we could suffer significant financial loss, regulatory sanctions or damage to our reputation. Additionally, we may introduce new products or services or change processes or reporting, including in connection with new regulatory requirements, resulting in new operational risk that we may not fully appreciate or identify.
Previous wording
We may become subject to stockholder activism efforts that each could cause material disruption to our business. Certain influential institutional investors and hedge funds have taken steps to involve themselves in the governance and strategic direction of certain companies due to governance or strategic related disagreements between such companies and such stockholders. If we become subject to such stockholder activism efforts, it could result in substantial costs and a diversion of management's attention and resources, which could harm our business and adversely affect the market price of our common stock. In addition, third party organizations that place ESG ratings on companies may create brand impact as a result of a rating that we do not control.
Current wording
If we become subject to such stockholder activism efforts, it could result in substantial costs and a diversion of management's attention and resources, which could harm our business and adversely affect the market price of our common stock. In addition, third party organizations that place ESG ratings on companies may create brand impact as a result of a rating that we do not control.
Previous wording
We are subject to risks relating to environmental, social, and governance (ESG) matters that could adversely affect our reputation, business, financial condition, and results of operations, as well as the price of our stock. We are subject to increasing scrutiny from clients, investors, regulators, elected officials, shareholders and other stakeholders with respect to ESG matters. Our various stakeholders hold diverse and often conflicting views on ESG topics, including the role of ESG in the investment process. This increases the risk that any action or lack thereof with respect to ESG matters will be perceived negatively by at least some stakeholders. Views on ESG practices, particularly those related to climate issues, have also become political issues, which can amplify these risks. Any adverse publicity or reaction in connection with ESG issues could damage our reputation, ability to attract and retain clients and employees, compete effectively, and grow our business.
Current wording
We are subject to risks relating to environmental, social, and governance (ESG) matters that could adversely affect our reputation, business, financial condition, and results of operations, as well as the price of our stock. We are subject to increasing scrutiny from clients, investors, regulators, elected officials, shareholders and other stakeholders with respect to ESG matters. A lack of harmonization globally in relation to ESG laws and regulations leads to a risk of fragmentation across global jurisdictions. This may create conflicts across our global business, which could impact our competitiveness in the market and damage our reputation resulting in a material adverse effect on our business. For example, the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) introduced stringent guidelines on ESG-related fund names, aiming to eliminate ambiguity in the use of sustainability-related terminology in financial products. As we navigate this complex and global ESG landscape, we recognize that our various stakeholders hold diverse and often conflicting views on ESG topics. Additionally, in the United States, there are numerous state and federal investigation and enforcement actions that are directed at investment managers related to the actual or apparent use of ESG-related investment screens.
Previous wording
We may, from time to time, communicate certain initiatives, targets, or goals regarding environmental matters, diversity, responsible sourcing, or other ESG matters. These initiatives, targets, or goals could be difficult and expensive to implement, and we may not be able to accomplish them within the timelines we announce or at all. Our reputation, business, financial performance, and growth could be adversely affected if stakeholders react negatively to the targets or goals that we set, or if our ESG-related data, processes, and reporting are incomplete or inaccurate, or if we fail to achieve progress with respect to ESG targets or goals.
Current wording
The growing interest in ESG factors has increased the risk of accusations of "greenwashing" and potential litigation or regulatory enforcement actions. The lack of global harmonization in ESG laws and regulations has led to fragmentation across jurisdictions, creating conflicts across global businesses and potentially impacting competitiveness and reputation. We may, from time to time, communicate certain initiatives, targets, or goals regarding environmental matters, diversity, responsible sourcing, or other ESG matters. These initiatives, targets, or goals could be difficult and expensive to implement, and we may not be able to accomplish them within the timelines we announce or at all. Our reputation, business, financial performance, and growth could be adversely affected if stakeholders react negatively to the targets or goals that we set, or if our ESG-related data, processes, and reporting are incomplete or inaccurate, or if we fail to achieve progress with respect to ESG targets or goals. The politicization of ESG practices, particularly those related to climate issues, has amplified these risks. We acknowledge that any action or lack thereof with respect to ESG matters may be perceived negatively by at least some stakeholders, potentially damaging our reputation, ability to attract and retain clients and employees, compete effectively, and grow our business.
Rearranged current paragraphs (2)
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
Outside the United States, applicable laws, rules and regulations similarly require designated types of financial institutions to implement compliance programs to address regulatory requirements related to money laundering, financial crime and the financing of terrorist activities. Failure to implement comprehensive anti-money laundering programs across our globally-regulated businesses poses regulatory risk including fines for noncompliance.
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
Examinations or investigations could result in the identification of matters that may require remediation activities or enforcement proceedings by the regulator. Regulators in the jurisdictions in which we operate are increasingly focused on the experience and staffing levels of control functions, technology infrastructure and operational resilience, areas which can be more costly and specialized to remediate and deviate from the types of regulatory remediations we are accustomed to. This shift in regulatory focus may require substantial investments in advanced technologies and specialized expertise to ensure compliance. The direct and indirect costs of responding to these examinations, undertaking remediation activities or of defending ourselves in any enforcement investigation or litigation could be significant. Additionally, actions brought against us may result in settlements, awards, injunctions, fines, penalties and operational changes. Litigation or regulatory action could also harm our reputation with clients and prospects, have an adverse effect on our ability to offer some of our products and services, or impede our ability to maintain operations in certain jurisdictions. Moreover, the increasing complexity of regulatory requirements, especially in areas like AI governance and cybersecurity, may lead to higher compliance costs and operational challenges. Failure to adequately address these emerging regulatory priorities could result in significant financial and reputational damage
Rearranged previous paragraphs (2)
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
Our operations depend on the competence and integrity of our employees and third parties. Our ability to operate our businesses efficiently and profitably, and to offer products and services that meet the expectations of our clients, is highly dependent on the competence and trustworthiness of our employees and contractors, as well as those of third parties on which our operations rely, including vendors, custodians and financial intermediaries. Our businesses could be materially and adversely affected by a significant operational breakdown or failure, theft, fraud or other unlawful conduct, or other negative outcomes caused by poor judgement, human error or misconduct on the part of one of our employees or contractors or those of a third party on which our operations rely.
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
A lack of harmonization globally in relation to ESG laws and regulations leads to a risk of fragmentation across global jurisdictions. This may create conflicts across our global business, which could impact our competitiveness in the market and damage our reputation resulting in a material adverse effect on our business.