Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc.
For the period ended Dec 31, 2025. Filed Mar 31, 2026.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.
FY2025 · Filed Mar 31, 2026
What changed in Risk Factors?
Read the current filingPrevious report: 10-K
Period ended 2024-12-31; filed 2025-03-31.
0001628280-25-015543
Item 1A. Risk FactorsCurrent report: 10-K
Period ended 2025-12-31; filed 2026-03-31.
0001844971-26-000011
Item 1A. Risk FactorsThe baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.
Compared 267 previous paragraphs and 277 current paragraphs.
158 unchanged; 76 reworded; 41 added; 30 removed; 3 previous and 2 current paragraphs rearranged.
Tables are not compared: 0 previous and 0 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.
A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.
Added paragraphs (41)
Current report
Management has concluded that there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern, as our current projected operating cash flows are not sufficient in the near term to satisfy our short-term debt obligations, including the October 2026 maturity of certain of our senior unsecured indebtedness, and we may not be successful in our debt restructuring efforts. Accordingly, an investment in our common stock is highly speculative and investors could suffer a total loss of their investment.
Current report
The ability to meet our existing short-term debt obligations, including the October 2026 maturity of certain of our senior unsecured indebtedness, is dependent upon our ability to successfully execute on our debt restructuring efforts, generate profitable operations and/or obtain necessary financing to meet our obligations when they come due. Our ability to obtain such financing from potential lenders is, in turn, dependent in part on our ability to generate or demonstrate a path to sustainable operating cash flows. Although our cash flow projections indicate that we will have sufficient liquidity to meet our cash requirements through the third quarter of 2026, such cash flows will not be sufficient to satisfy debt payments due in October 2026, including the remaining $36.7 million aggregate principal amount of the Senior Notes (see Note 5, “Debt”).
Current report
During the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2025, we took certain actions to improve our liquidity, including divesting certain non-core assets located in South Carolina and Mississippi, entering into privately negotiated exchange agreements, completing public tender/exchange offers pursuant to which we repurchased outstanding Senior Notes for cash or exchanged them for a new series of 10.00% Senior Notes due 2030 (the “New Notes”), conducting open market debt repurchases and raising capital through equity financing. See “Business—Corporate History and Structure,” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations —Liquidity and Capital Resources.” While we continue to pursue strategies to improve liquidity, we can provide no assurance that these efforts will be successful.
Current report
In addition, our ability to successfully implement debt restructuring efforts to resolve our near-term debt obligations could be negatively impacted by other items outside of our control which may negatively impact our operating cash flows, including significant decreases in the price of bitcoin, regulatory changes concerning cryptocurrency or AI and HPC datacenters, increases in energy costs or broader macroeconomic conditions. Our operating cash flows are affected by several factors including the price of bitcoin and cost of electricity and natural gas and emissions credits, in addition to our ability to obtain and comply with required permits and licenses, including the Title V Air Permit for our New York facility. While this permit is subject to the Stipulation, it may still face legal challenges from third-party environmental groups (see Note 10, “Commitments and Contingencies”), which could adversely affect our operations and ability to generate operating cash flows sufficient to obtain necessary any financing we may require to meet our October 2026 debt obligations. As a result, management has concluded that there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern for the next 12 months.
Current report
As of December 31, 2025, we had $36.7 million and $2.3 million in aggregate principal amount of our Senior Notes and New Notes outstanding, respectively, excluding capitalized contractual interest payments, all of which was unsecured. Given our current financial condition and liquidity position, we may not have sufficient resources to repay the Senior Notes, in whole or in part, upon their maturity on October 31, 2026, and our ability to redeem or repurchase the Senior Notes prior to maturity is also uncertain. Any failure to repay or refinance the Senior Notes when due could result in a default under the Senior Notes and the acceleration of our indebtedness, and could materially and adversely affect our liquidity and financial condition, potentially requiring us to pursue restructuring alternatives, including bankruptcy, dissolution or liquidation.
Current report
An active trading market for our New Notes may not be sustained, which could limit the market price of the New Notes or holders' ability to sell them.
Current report
As of December 31, 2025, we had issued $2.3 million in aggregate principal amount of New Notes. We have submitted an application to list the New Notes on the OTC Markets platform and facilitate trading; however, such listing is subject to review and approval by OTC Markets and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), and there can be no assurance that the New Notes will be approved for trading. Even if approved, we cannot provide any assurances that an active trading market for the New Notes will develop or be maintained or that holders will be able to sell their New Notes. If a market does develop, the New Notes may trade at prices that are lower than their initial offering price, depending on prevailing interest rates, the market for similar securities, our credit ratings, general economic conditions, our financial condition, performance and prospects and other factors. Accordingly, we cannot assure holders that a liquid trading market for the New Notes will be sustained, that holders will be able to sell their New Notes at a particular time or that the price holders receive when they sell will be favorable. To the extent an active trading market is not sustained, the liquidity and trading price for the New Notes may be harmed. Accordingly, holders may be required to bear the financial risk of an investment in the New Notes for an indefinite period of time. In addition, there may be a limited number of buyers when holders decide to sell their New Notes. This may affect the price, if any, offered for their New Notes or holders ability to sell their New Notes when desired or at all.
Current report
Our strategy to expand into AI and HPC datacenter development may not be successful and could adversely affect our existing operations and financial condition.
Current report
We are evaluating opportunities to develop datacenter infrastructure capable of supporting AI and HPC workloads. These markets are highly competitive and rapidly evolving, and our ability to successfully develop or participate in such projects will depend on a number of factors, including access to sufficient power capacity, availability of capital, the ability to secure customers or strategic partners, technical and operational expertise, regulatory and land use approvals, and the development of suitable sites and infrastructure. If we are unable to successfully execute this strategy, our anticipated growth opportunities may not materialize.
Current report
The development of AI and HPC infrastructure may also require significant capital investment and could affect the timing of our cash flows. AI and HPC datacenters typically require substantial upfront capital expenditures for infrastructure, equipment and site development, while revenues from hosting, leasing or related services generally materialize only after construction completion and customer onboarding. As a result, there may be a delay between capital investment and revenue generation, which could increase our short-term liquidity needs. We may need to seek additional financing through debt, equity or other sources to support these investments or to preserve liquidity during periods of market volatility, which may not be available on favorable terms or at all.
Current report
In addition, allocating resources to support AI and HPC initiatives may divert capital, personnel, infrastructure and power capacity from our existing bitcoin mining operations. In particular, the use of available power capacity for AI and HPC workloads may reduce the power available for bitcoin mining, which is a highly competitive and capital-intensive industry. As a result, we may be unable to expand our deployed hashrate at the pace of our competitors, potentially diminishing our market share and profitability. Expanding into AI and HPC may also increase operational complexity and place additional demands on our management, technical and support teams.
Current report
Furthermore, our AI and HPC business strategy may not perform as anticipated. The success of such initiatives may be affected by factors including the reliability and timing of power supply, supply chain disruptions (including labor availability), tariffs or trade restrictions, technological changes, the existing regulatory environment and changes thereto (including increased public opposition to datacenter projects), and our ability to develop or retain specialized expertise required to operate AI and HPC infrastructure. If we are unable to successfully develop and operate AI and HPC datacenter projects, our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects could be adversely affected.
Current report
Our potential expansion into AI and HPC datacenter development would expose us to supply, pricing, performance and export‑control risks associated with specialized hardware, networking and software ecosystems.
Current report
We are evaluating opportunities to develop or participate in infrastructure supporting AI and HPC workloads. If we pursue such opportunities, we would be required to procure and deploy specialized hardware, including advanced accelerators (such as high-end GPUs or custom AI chips), as well as high-performance networking and compatible software stacks. These components are subject to global supply constraints, long lead times and pricing volatility.
Current report
If we enter this market, we would likely depend on a limited number of suppliers and original equipment manufacturers for critical components. Any disruption in supply, allocation decisions favoring larger or more established customers, manufacturing or packaging issues, or delays in delivery could impair our ability to timely develop or scale AI/HPC infrastructure. In addition, export controls, trade restrictions, or other regulatory measures affecting advanced computing technologies could limit our ability to procure necessary equipment or serve certain customers. As a result, any expansion into AI/HPC infrastructure could require significant capital expenditures, expose us to increased operational and regulatory risks, and may not be successful, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Current report
Halving reduces the amount of bitcoin miners receive for each successfully mined block, and our revenue from cryptocurrency mining is directly tied to these rewards. Historically, bitcoin’s market price has experienced volatility around halving events, and we can provide no assurance that any future price change will be favorable or would compensate for the reduction in bitcoin mining rewards in connection with a halving. In addition, bitcoin mining revenue is affected by network difficulty, which adjusts approximately every 2,016 blocks based on total computational power on the network. If bitcoin prices do not rise sufficiently or if mining difficulty increases in a way that reduces our share of network rewards, the revenue we earn from our cryptocurrency datacenter operations could decline materially, which may reduce the incentive to continue bitcoin mining.
Current report
We are actively evaluating opportunities to improve our existing assets for datacenter operations and develop additional sites to support cryptocurrency, AI and HPC workloads. These efforts may be delayed or hindered by a variety of factors, including challenges in obtaining suitable land to build new datacenter facilities, coordinating with local power suppliers, obtaining required permits and approvals, or engaging with local communities. Delays in any of these areas may negatively impact our construction timelines and budget or prevent completion of new datacenters entirely. Our ability to operate datacenters effectively depends on maintaining facilities that are technologically advanced, energy-efficient, properly climate-controlled and capable of supporting high-density computing workloads. Failure to achieve these operational standards could reduce efficiency, increase operating costs and negatively impact profitability. The development and operation of datacenters also requires substantial and reliable power. Any significant delays or interruptions in the supply of power needed to support expansion or new construction could disrupt project timelines and adversely affect our revenue growth, operational performance and profitability. In addition, unexpected increases in power costs, supply constraints or interruptions could negatively affect our financial results. We may also encounter challenges related to permitting, environmental compliance or community opposition, including potential disputes with local governments or residents, which could delay or prevent the development of new sites or the expansion of existing facilities. Further, any material delays, cost overruns or quality issues in connection with these projects could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and strategic objectives. Our ability to manage these risks effectively will be critical to sustaining growth and maintaining profitability.
Current report
Our operations, strategy and business depend to a significant degree on the skills and services of our management team and senior operating personnel. In 2024 and 2025, we experienced turnover in our senior operating personnel. While we have taken steps to transition responsibilities, reallocate functions among existing personnel and recruit replacement talent, and utilize external consultants and independent contractors in the absence of such replacement talent, such turnover may result in a temporary loss of institutional knowledge and operational continuity, increased demands on remaining personnel and additional time and resources required to onboard and integrate new hires, which could adversely affect our ability to execute our strategy and maintain effective internal controls. However, we do not believe that such turnover has resulted in material disruption to our operations to date.
Current report
We may face risks related to labor relations, including increased labor costs, operational constraints, or disruptions associated with our collective bargaining agreement.
Current report
In January 2025, we received a notice of petition filed with the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) by IBEW Local 10 seeking to represent certain employees at our New York Facility, including operators, maintenance technicians, crypto technicians and an electrical engineer. In February 2025, these employees voted to unionize. In February 2026, we entered into a four-year collective bargaining agreement with IBEW Local 10 covering such employees. While the collective bargaining agreement establishes the terms and conditions of employment for the covered employees, it may result in increased labor costs, limit our operational flexibility in managing the workforce, and require us to devote management resources to administering the agreement and responding to union-related matters. In addition, disputes may arise regarding the interpretation or application of the agreement, which could result in grievances, arbitration proceedings, or other labor-related claims. Although we have not experienced significant disruptions related to unionization as of the date of this Annual Report, labor relations matters could adversely affect our operations, productivity, and ability to meet operational objectives. Labor disputes, including potential work stoppages, strikes, or other job actions, could further disrupt our operations and negatively impact our relationships with employees and our ability to attract and retain personnel.
Current report
Like most corporations, we have experienced cyberattacks, including phishing or ransomware attacks, from time to time, and we expect to be the target of such cyberattacks in the future. In October 2025, we became aware of a fraudulent scheme in which unknown third parties impersonated our company and attempted to solicit funds from members of the public through unauthorized communications and websites. Upon learning of this activity, we promptly issued a public warning on our website to alert potential victims and reported the matter to relevant authorities. Although this activity did not involve a breach of our internal systems, such schemes may nevertheless cause confusion among customers, partners or investors and could negatively impact our reputation, brand and business relationships.
Current report
Our future success will depend significantly on the economics of bitcoin mining, including the price of bitcoin, the mining payouts we receive from third-party mining pools and the value of our bitcoin holdings, all of which are subject to change and may adversely affect our results of operations.
Current report
Our operating results will depend significantly on the economics of bitcoin. Specifically, our revenues from our cryptocurrency datacenter operations are based principally on two factors: (1) the amount of bitcoin we are able to mine, including the mining payouts we receive from third-party mining pools, which are based on our proportionate contribution of computational power relative to other participants; and (2) the market price of bitcoin. Declines in the fair market value of our bitcoin holdings would reduce the cash value we could realize if we sold our bitcoin, which could negatively impact our liquidity and financial position.
Current report
These factors are influenced by a number of variables, including network difficulty, total network hash rate, transaction fees, pool fee structures and periodic halving events that reduce the block reward. A decrease in the price of bitcoin, a reduction in mining payouts or changes in these network variables will result in a decrease in our revenues and could materially affect our financial performance.
Current report
In addition, the economics of bitcoin mining are also affected by changes in network conditions. Network difficulty adjusts periodically based on the total computational power devoted to the network and may increase as more miners participate, which can reduce the amount of bitcoin earned per unit of computational power. In addition, periodic halving events reduce the block reward by 50%, and unless offset by increases in the market price of bitcoin or transaction fees, such reductions may materially decrease mining revenues.
Current report
As a result, our revenues and operating results may be subject to significant variability. Any sustained decrease in the price of bitcoin, increase in network difficulty, reduction in mining payouts, increase in competition or other adverse change in the economics of bitcoin mining could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Current report
•the presence of legacy equipment at our power generation facility, including a steam turbine originally installed in 1953, the age and condition of which may increase the risk of mechanical failure, heightened maintenance requirements or operational disruptions, which could contribute to unplanned outages or reduced generation capacity.
Current report
For example, as previously disclosed in our filings with the SEC, in November 2025, we experienced an electrical switchgear failure at our New York Facility that resulted in a fire and operational disruption, causing us to shut down the New York Facility for several weeks, incur repair costs and expend management time. Similar incidents could occur in the future.
Current report
•structural changes in generation portfolios and pricing dynamics due to increased renewable and storage penetration;
Current report
The regulatory environment for electric power markets continues to evolve in response to changing energy policies, increased electricity demand from datacenters and high-performance computing infrastructure, and the continued development of renewable energy generation and transmission infrastructure. Federal and state regulators have increasingly focused on issues relating to grid reliability, energy market design, transmission planning, and environmental impacts associated with electricity generation and large-scale electricity consumption. These developments may result in new rules governing market participation, dispatch, emissions standards, or energy consumption that could affect the economics of our operations. We cannot predict the future design of wholesale power markets or the ultimate effect that these regulatory developments may have on our business.
Current report
Additionally, the regulatory framework governing digital assets, cryptocurrency infrastructure, and related technologies continues to evolve in the United States and globally. Various governmental and regulatory bodies, including legislative and executive bodies, in the United States and in other countries may adopt new laws, regulations, or enforcement policies relating to digital assets, cryptocurrency markets, datacenter operations supporting blockchain networks, or related financial activities. While the regulatory landscape surrounding digital assets has continued to develop since the market disruptions experienced in the cryptocurrency industry in prior years, uncertainty remains regarding the scope and application of future regulations affecting digital asset infrastructure, including potential oversight by financial regulators, energy regulators, or other governmental bodies. New or expanded regulatory requirements could increase compliance costs, restrict certain activities, or otherwise adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, or the market value of our common stock.
Current report
In addition, certain policymakers, market participants, and regulatory authorities have proposed changes to wholesale electricity market design, including modifications to pricing mechanisms, capacity market structures, and resource participation rules. Other proposals have considered structural changes to electricity markets, including increased regulation of generation ownership or changes to competitive market frameworks. If competitive restructuring of electricity markets is reversed, delayed, or materially altered, our business prospects and financial results could be adversely affected.
Current report
Furthermore, regulatory reforms affecting derivatives and commodity markets, including changes to margin requirements, position limits, or collateral eligibility, could affect our ability to hedge energy price exposure in an efficient and cost-effective manner. Such regulations, or further changes thereto, could reduce liquidity in forward commodity and derivatives markets or limit our ability to utilize certain forms of collateral in connection with hedging activities, which could adversely affect our risk management strategies and financial results.
Current report
Companies across all industries and around the globe have faced scrutiny relating to their ESG policies. Investors, lenders, and other market participants increasingly consider ESG policies in their investment and financing decisions, with some linking access to capital, credit terms, or other financial arrangements directly to ESG performance or climate-related risk disclosures. This focus on ESG could limit or delay our access to capital or increase the cost of capital if our ESG practices are deemed insufficient relative to evolving market expectations.
Current report
The SEC adopted a rule that requires climate disclosures in periodic and other filings with the SEC covering fiscal years beginning in 2025. That rule was subsequently stayed pending judicial review, and as of the date of this Annual Report, remains subject to ongoing legal uncertainty regarding its ultimate enforceability and applicability. Regardless of the rule’s timing, ESG and climate disclosure expectations are evolving globally, including through initiatives such as the ISSB, the EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive, and other regional standards. Compliance with these expectations may require us to establish additional internal controls, engage consultants, implement new reporting processes and incur additional costs related to evaluating, managing, and reporting on environmental and climate-related risks and opportunities. Even in the absence of mandatory SEC disclosure requirements, we may choose or be expected to provide ESG reporting to meet investor or stakeholder expectations, which could divert management resources and increase costs. Failure to meet such expectations or accurately disclose ESG-related information could harm our reputation and materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Current report
In February 2026, the EPA finalized a rule rescinding the 2009 Greenhouse Gas Endangerment Finding, which had previously established the legal basis for regulating GHG emissions under the Clean Air Act, and repealed certain GHG emissions standards for motor vehicles that relied on such finding. This action reflects a revised interpretation of the EPA’s statutory authority; however, it has introduced significant legal and regulatory uncertainty, as it is subject to ongoing and expected legal challenges and may be reconsidered or reversed by future administrations or as a result of judicial review. In addition, this development may result in increased regulatory activity at the state and regional level, potentially leading to a more fragmented and complex regulatory landscape.
Current report
In the United States, the Federal Reserve Board, U.S. Congress and certain U.S. agencies (e.g., the CFTC, the SEC, FinCEN, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation) have begun to examine the operations of the bitcoin network, bitcoin users and the bitcoin exchange market. The current presidential administration has signaled a more favorable posture toward the cryptocurrency industry, including through executive orders establishing a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and a U.S. Digital Asset Stockpile, the appointment of senior officials with stated goals of positioning the United States as a global leader in digital assets, and the enactment of the GENIUS Act in July 2025, which establishes the first comprehensive federal regulatory framework for payment stablecoins.
Current report
On March 17, 2026, the SEC, together with the CFTC, issued the Interpretation to clarify the application of the federal securities laws and the Commodity Exchange Act to crypto assets and blockchain-related activities. The Interpretation introduces a taxonomy that categorizes crypto assets into several types, including digital commodities, digital collectibles, digital tools, payment stablecoins and digital securities, and is intended to delineate the respective jurisdictional boundaries of the SEC and the CFTC. According to the Interpretation, only certain digital assets characterized as “digital securities” would fall within the definition of a security, although the SEC reaffirmed that transactions involving crypto assets that are not themselves securities may nonetheless constitute “investment contracts” depending on the facts and circumstances. The Interpretation also provides guidance regarding when crypto assets may separate from associated investment contracts and indicates that certain foundational blockchain activities, such as protocol mining and staking, may not, in and of themselves, involve the offer or sale of securities. While the Interpretation does not create new law, it reflects the current views of the SEC and CFTC and may influence how existing laws are applied.
Current report
Equipment necessary for digital asset mining and related datacenter infrastructure is largely manufactured outside of the United States. As a result, our business may be significantly affected by U.S. trade policies, including tariffs, import restrictions, customs duties, export controls, or other trade measures affecting equipment manufactured abroad. The United States has imposed tariffs on certain imported technology and industrial equipment, including items manufactured in China and other jurisdictions, and the current presidential administration has announced or implemented additional tariffs affecting a broad range of imports from key trading partners. These measures may increase the cost of importing digital asset mining equipment, computing hardware, cooling systems, electrical infrastructure, and other components necessary for our operations. A substantial portion of the specialized ASIC mining equipment used in digital asset mining is manufactured by a limited number of suppliers located outside the United States, including manufacturers based in China and other Asian jurisdictions. Tariffs, export controls, or other trade restrictions affecting these manufacturers or the jurisdictions in which they operate could increase equipment costs, limit the availability of new hardware, or delay our ability to procure or deploy mining equipment. Tariffs or other trade restrictions may apply directly to digital asset mining equipment or indirectly to components used in datacenter infrastructure, including steel, aluminum, semiconductors, electrical equipment, or other materials used in the manufacture of mining rigs and related systems. These measures could increase our capital expenditures, raise the cost of maintaining or expanding our datacenter infrastructure, or limit the availability of equipment from certain suppliers. In addition, affected countries may respond with retaliatory trade measures, which could further disrupt global supply chains and increase equipment costs. U.S. trade policy and tariff regimes have been subject to change in recent years and may continue to evolve in response to geopolitical developments, economic conditions, or policy priorities. Changes in tariffs, trade restrictions, or other import controls may occur with limited advance notice and could make long-term planning for capital expenditures and infrastructure procurement more difficult. Any significant increase in tariffs, import restrictions, or other trade barriers could materially increase our operating or capital costs, disrupt supply chains, delay the deployment of new equipment, and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Current report
Upon the automatic conversion of all Class B common stock into Class A common stock, which is expected to occur in September 2026, Atlas and its affiliates’ voting power is expected to fall below 50%, and we anticipate that we will no longer qualify as a “controlled company” under Nasdaq rules. At that time, we would be required to comply with all corporate governance requirements applicable to non-controlled companies, including those noted above.
Showing the first 40 of 41 passages. Open the source sections for the rest.
Removed paragraphs (30)
Previous report
The ability to meet our existing long-term debt obligations is dependent upon generating profitable operations, obtaining necessary financing to meet our obligations, repaying our liabilities when they come due and/or successfully executing on our debt restructuring efforts . Our operating cash flows are affected by several factors including the price of bitcoin and cost of electricity and natural gas and emissions credits. During the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2024, we took certain actions to improve our liquidity, including the settlement of our debt with NYDIG, selling the South Carolina Facility, entering into a definitive agreement to sell the remaining 152 acres in South Carolina to Data Journey, completing an equity financing with Armistice Capital Master Fund Ltd. ("Armistice"), and executing certain privately negotiated debt-for-equity exchange agreements. See “Business—Corporate History and Structure,” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations —Liquidity and Capital Resources."
Previous report
Depending on our assumptions regarding the timing of and our ability to achieve more normalized levels of operating revenue, the estimated amount of required liquidity will vary significantly. Similarly, while bitcoin prices have risen in the fourth quarter of 2024 and remain relatively high as of the first quarter of 2025, we cannot predict if bitcoin prices will continue to rise or remain at recent levels, or volatility in energy costs. While we continue to work to implement the options to improve liquidity, we can provide no assurance that these efforts will be successful. Our ability to successfully implement these options could be negatively impacted by items outside of our control, in particular, significant decreases in the price of bitcoin, regulatory changes concerning cryptocurrency, ongoing adjudicatory proceedings with respect to the New York Facility's Title V Air Permit, increases in energy costs or other macroeconomic conditions. There is uncertainty regarding our financial condition in the long term if we are not able to increase our current projected operating cash flows sufficiently.
Previous report
We have a single hosting customer in the cryptomining industry, and we remain substantially dependent on
Previous report
Bitcoin has had a history of price fluctuations around the halving of its rewards, and we can provide no assurance that any price change will be favorable or would compensate for the reduction in bitcoin mining reward in connection with a halving. If the award of bitcoin or a proportionate decrease in bitcoin mining difficulty does not follow these anticipated halving events, the revenue we earn from our cryptocurrency datacenter operations would see a corresponding decrease, and we may not have an adequate incentive to continue bitcoin mining.
Previous report
We are in the process of developing other sites and expanding our existing locations to deploy our mining equipment, and any disruption in developing such sites may delay our efforts. We may face challenges in obtaining suitable land to build new cryptocurrency datacenter facilities, as we require close cooperation with local power suppliers and local governments of the places where our proposed facilities are located. Delays in actions that require the assistance of such third parties, in receiving required permits and approvals or in mediations with local communities, if any, may negatively impact our construction timelines and budget or result in any new datacenters not being completed at all. Any delay in developing other sites could delay our ability to deploy mining equipment that we own and is currently idle, and materially and adversely affect our results of operations, strategy, and financial performance. Our business will be negatively impacted if we are unable to run our datacenter operations in a way that is technologically advanced, economically and energy efficient and temperature controlled. If we are unsuccessful, we may damage our miners and the profitability of our datacenter operations. If we experience significant delays in the supply of power required to support any datacenter expansion or new construction, the progress of such projects could deviate from our original plans, which could cause material and negative effects on our revenue growth, profitability, and results of operations. Any material delay in completing these projects, or any substantial cost increases or quality issues in connection with these projects, could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Previous report
Our operations, strategy and business depend to a significant degree on the skills and services of our senior management team. In 2023 and 2024, we experienced significant turnover in our senior management team, including the termination of our General Counsel in May 2023, the appointment of a new Chief Financial Officer as part of a management restructuring in October 2023, the appointment of another new Chief Executive Officer in November 2023, the termination of our Chief Strategy Officer in April 2024 and the termination of our Chief Technology Officer in December 2024. Our business may be adversely affected by turnover in our senior management team, which may create instability within the Company and impede our day-to-day operations and internal controls. In addition, we reduced our employee headcount significantly in 2023.
Previous report
At present, our management team is small, with our Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Financial Officer playing key roles. We will need to continue to grow our management in order to alleviate pressure on our existing management team and in order to continue to develop our business and execute on any future identification and expansion into other potential opportunities. If our management, including any new hires that we may make, fails to work together effectively or to execute our plans and strategies on a timely basis, our business could be harmed.
Previous report
We may face risks related to labor union efforts and employee relations that could lead to increased labor costs, disruptions to our operations or legal challenges.
Previous report
In January 2025, we received a notice of petition to hold an election to form a union filed by IBEW Local 10 of the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB") on behalf of our operators, maintenance technicians, crypto technicians and electrical engineer at the New York Facility. The vote to unionize such workers held in late February 2025 was approved. The formation of the union means that we have to negotiate a collective bargaining agreement in good faith with the NLRB on behalf of such employees and to respond to certain information requests which may be made by the NLRB in furtherance thereof, a process that we anticipate will not be completed until later this year. While we have not experienced significant disruptions due to such unionization efforts to date, such efforts could lead to increased labor costs, disruptions to our operations, or legal challenges. Additionally, any labor disputes or strikes could negatively impact our ability to meet operational targets or maintain productivity. The outcome of any union-related activity could also affect our public image, relationships with employees, our ability to attract and retain talent, and challenges in negotiating labor agreements that are acceptable to both parties and could potentially increase our operating costs and reduce flexibility in managing workforce-related matters.
Previous report
Our future success will depend significantly on the price of bitcoin, which is subject to risk and has historically been subject to wide swings and significant volatility.
Previous report
Our operating results will depend significantly on the price of bitcoin. Specifically, our revenues from our cryptocurrency datacenter operations are based principally on two factors: (1) our mining payouts from our third-party mining pools; and (2) the price of bitcoin. Accordingly, a decrease in the price of bitcoin will result in a decrease in our revenues. Moreover, the price of bitcoin has historically been subject to wide swings and significant volatility. This means that our operating results may be subject to significant volatility.
Previous report
Bitcoin prices have historically been volatile and impacted by a variety of factors, including market perception, the degree to which bitcoin is accepted as a means of payment, the volume of purchases and sales of bitcoin by market participants, real or perceived competition from alternative cryptocurrencies as well as other risks and uncertainties described in this Annual Report.
Previous report
We are exposed to the impact of market price changes in bitcoin on our bitcoin holdings.
Previous report
We hold a significant amount of bitcoin and are exposed to the impact of market price changes in bitcoin on our bitcoin holdings. Declines in the fair market value of bitcoin will impact the cash value that would be realized if we were to sell our bitcoin for cash, therefore having a negative impact on our liquidity.
Previous report
The regulatory environment has undergone significant changes in the last several years due to state and federal policies affecting wholesale competition and the creation of incentives for the addition of large amounts of new renewable generation and, in some cases, transmission. These changes are ongoing, and we cannot predict the future design of the wholesale power markets or the ultimate effect that the changing regulatory environment will have on our business.
Previous report
Various governmental and regulatory bodies, including legislative and executive bodies, in the United States and in other countries may adopt new laws and regulations, the direction and timing of which may be influenced by changes in the governing administrations and major events in the cryptocurrency industry. For example, following the failure of several prominent crypto trading venues and lending platforms, such as FTX, BlockFi, Celsius Networks, Voyager and Three Arrows Capital in 2022 (the “2022 Events”), the U.S. Congress expressed the need for both greater federal oversight of the cryptocurrency industry and comprehensive cryptocurrency legislation. In the near future, various governmental and regulatory bodies, including in the United States, may introduce new policies, laws, and regulations relating to crypto assets and the cryptocurrency industry generally, and crypto asset platforms in particular. The failures of risk management and other control functions at other companies that played a role in the 2022 Events could accelerate an existing regulatory trend toward stricter oversight of crypto asset platforms and the cryptocurrency industry. It is uncertain as to what effect stricter oversight and increased regulation on the cryptocurrency industry may have on the prices of bitcoin or the costs of regulatory compliance, both of which may impact our results of operations in the future and the market value of our common stock.
Previous report
In addition, in some of these markets, interested parties have proposed material market design changes, including the elimination of a single clearing price mechanism, as well as proposals to reinstate the vertically-integrated monopoly model of utility ownership or to require divestiture by generating companies to reduce their market share. If competitive restructuring of the electric power markets is reversed, discontinued, delayed, or materially altered, our business prospects and financial results could be negatively impacted. In addition, since 2010, there have been a number of reforms to the regulation of the derivatives markets, both in the United States and internationally. These regulations, and any further changes thereto, or adoption of additional regulations, including any regulations relating to position limits on futures and other derivatives or margin for derivatives, could negatively impact our ability to hedge our portfolio in an efficient, cost-effective manner by us, among other things, potentially decreasing liquidity in the forward commodity and derivatives markets or limiting our ability to utilize non-cash collateral for derivatives transactions.
Previous report
Companies across all industries and around the globe have faced scrutiny relating to their ESG policies. Investors, lenders, and other market participants continue to evaluate ESG practices, with some placing greater importance on the implications and social cost of their investments. This focus and activism related to ESG may hinder our access to capital, as investors and lenders may reconsider their capital investment allocation as a result of their assessment of our ESG practices. If we do not adapt to or comply with investor, lender, or other industry stakeholder expectations and standards and potential government regulations, which are evolving but may relate to the suitable deployment of electric power, or which are perceived to have not responded appropriately to the growing concern for ESG issues, our reputation may suffer, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Previous report
The SEC adopted a rule that requires climate disclosures in periodic and other filings with the SEC covering fiscal years beginning in 2025, however, this rule has been stayed pending the completion of a judicial review. If the rule takes effect in its current form, we may be required to establish additional internal controls, engage additional consultants and incur additional costs related to evaluating, managing and reporting on our environmental impact and climate-related risks and opportunities. If we fail to implement sufficient oversight or accurately capture and disclose on environmental matters, our reputation, business, operating results and financial condition may be materially and adversely affected. Furthermore, increased public awareness and concern regarding environmental risks, including global climate change, may result in increased public scrutiny of our business and our industry, and our management team may divert significant time and energy away from our operations and towards responding to such scrutiny.
Previous report
If bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies are determined to be investment securities, and we hold a significant portion of our assets in such cryptocurrency, investment securities or non-controlling equity interests of other entities, we may inadvertently violate the Investment Company Act or other securities laws. We could incur large losses to modify our operations to avoid the need to register as an investment company or could incur significant expenses to register as an investment company or could terminate operations altogether.
Previous report
Under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "Investment Company Act"), a company may be deemed an investment company if the value of our investment securities is more than 40% of its total assets (exclusive of government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis. At the present time, the SEC does not deem the bitcoin that we own, acquire or mine as an investment security, and we do not believe any of the bitcoin we own, acquire, or mine to be securities. However, SEC rules and applicable law are subject to change, especially in the evolving world of cryptocurrency, and further, the Investment Company Act analysis may not be uniform across all forms of cryptocurrency that we might mine or hold.
Previous report
If the SEC or other regulatory body were to determine that bitcoin, or any other cryptocurrency that we may mine or hold in the future, constitutes an investment security subject to the Investment Company Act, and if we were to hold a significant portion of our total assets in such bitcoin or other cryptocurrency as a result of our cryptocurrency datacenter activities and/or in investments in which we do not have a controlling interest, the investment securities we hold could exceed 40% of our total assets, exclusive of cash items. Such a situation could be hastened if we choose to hold more of our mined bitcoin or other cryptocurrency rather than converting our mined bitcoin or cryptocurrency in significant part to U.S. dollars.
Previous report
In such an event, we may determine that we have become an investment company. Limited exemptions are available under the Investment Company Act, including an exemption granting an inadvertent investment company a one-year grace period from registration as an investment company. In that year, we would be required to take actions to cause the investment securities held by us to be less than 40% of our total assets, which could include acquiring assets with our cash and bitcoin or other cryptocurrency on hand, liquidating our investment securities or bitcoin or seeking a no-action letter from the SEC if we are unable to acquire sufficient assets or liquidate sufficient investment securities in a timely manner. Such actions could require significant cost, disruption to our operations or growth plans, and diversion of management time and attention.
Previous report
If we were unable to qualify for an exemption from registration as an investment company, or fail to take adequate steps within the one-year grace period for inadvertent investment companies, we would need to register with the SEC as an investment company under the Investment Company Act or cease almost all business, and our contracts would become voidable. Investment company registration is time-consuming and would require a restructuring of our business.
Previous report
Moreover, the operation of an investment company is very costly and restrictive, as investment companies are subject to substantial regulation concerning management, operations, transactions with affiliated persons and portfolio composition, and Investment Company Act filing requirements. The cost of such compliance would result in us incurring substantial additional expenses, and the failure to register if required would have a materially adverse impact on our operations.
Previous report
The Commodity Exchange Act, as amended (the "CEA"), does not currently impose any direct obligations on us related to the mining or exchange of bitcoins. Generally, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission ("CFTC"), the federal agency that administers the CEA, regards bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies as commodities. This position has been supported by decisions of federal courts.
Previous report
Equipment necessary for digital asset mining is almost entirely manufactured outside of the United States. There is currently significant uncertainty about the future relationship between the United States and various other countries, including China, members of the European Union, Canada, and Mexico, with respect to trade policies, treaties, tariffs and customs duties, and taxes. In recent years, the U.S. government has imposed import tariffs of up to 25% on certain digital asset mining equipment manufactured overseas, increasing our costs of acquiring essential infrastructure. The presidential administration has proposed or enacted additional tariffs on key trading partners, including China, Canada, Mexico, and the European Union, which could further impact the cost and availability of mining equipment. Additionally, the recent expansion of tariffs on steel, aluminum, and other critical components may indirectly raise the cost of mining rigs, cooling systems and other necessary infrastructure. The scope and amount of these tariffs have fluctuated based on governmental actions, and there is a risk of further escalations, including counter-tariffs from affected countries. Any new or increased tariffs, trade restrictions or retaliatory measures could materially increase our capital expenditures, disrupt supply chains and reduce our ability to scale operations efficiently. Additionally, regulatory uncertainty surrounding trade policy makes long-term planning more difficult, which may have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Previous report
On March 26, 2025, we received a letter from the Nasdaq listing qualifications department notifying us that for the prior 30 consecutive business days, our Market Value of Publicly Held Shares ("MVPHS") had been below the listing requirement of $15 million. The Nasdaq rules provide us with an initial compliance period of 180 calendar days to regain compliance with the minimum MVPHS requirement. We can provide no assurance of our ability to take the appropriate actions within the 180 day cure period to regain compliance with Nasdaq listing requirements.
Previous report
due to the introduction of several spot bitcoin exchange-traded products, which have received billions of dollars of inflows.
Reworded paragraphs (76)
Previous wording
We may not have sufficient resources to repay our Senior Notes upon their maturity in October 2026, and we will face additional risks if we incur additional indebtedness.
Current wording
We may not have sufficient resources to repay our Senior Notes upon their maturity in October 2026, and the incurrence of additional indebtedness, including the issuance of our New Notes, increases the risks we face in meeting our debt obligations.
Previous wording
As of December 31, 2024, we had $68.5 million of 8.50% Senior Notes due 2026 (the "Senior Notes") outstanding. Given our current financial condition and liquidity position, we may not have sufficient resources to repay the Senior Notes, in whole or in part, upon their maturity on October 31, 2026, and our ability to earlier redeem or repurchase the Senior Notes, is uncertain. The indenture for the Senior Notes does not limit the amount of indebtedness that we or our subsidiaries may issue. As a result, we and our subsidiaries may be able to incur significant additional indebtedness. If we and our subsidiaries incur new indebtedness, the related risks that we face would be increased, and we may not be able to meet all our debt obligations, including repayment of the Senior Notes in 2026. If we incur any additional debt that is secured, the holders of that debt will be entitled to share in the proceeds distributed in connection with any enforcement against the collateral or an insolvency, liquidation, reorganization, dissolution, or other winding-up of the applicable obligor prior to applying any such proceeds to the Senior Notes. As of December 31, 2024, we had $68.5 million of indebtedness, all of which was unsecured.
Current wording
In addition, the indentures governing the Senior Notes and the New Notes do not limit the amount of indebtedness that we or our subsidiaries may incur. As a result, we and our subsidiaries may be able to incur significant additional indebtedness, which would increase the risks associated with our debt obligations and could impair our ability to meet the repayment obligations under both the Senior Notes and the New Notes. If we incur any additional debt that is secured, the holders of such debt will be entitled to share in the proceeds distributed in connection with any enforcement against the collateral or an insolvency, liquidation, reorganization, dissolution, or other winding-up of the applicable obligor prior to applying any such proceeds to the Senior Notes and the New Notes.
Previous wording
We may need to raise additional capital in the future, including to expand our operations and pursue our growth strategies, to respond to competitive pressures or to meet capital needs in response to operating losses or unanticipated working capital requirements. We may not be able to obtain additional debt or equity financing on favorable terms in the future, if at all, which could impair our growth and adversely affect our existing operations.
Current wording
We may need to raise additional capital in the future to, among other things, expand our operations, pursue our growth strategies, respond to competitive pressures, meet working capital needs or reduce outstanding debt obligations. We may not be able to obtain additional debt or equity financing on favorable terms in the future, if at all, which could impair our ability to execute on our business plan and adversely affect our existing operations.
Previous wording
If, among other things, the price of bitcoin does not continue its recovery, which has continued during the fourth quarter of 2024 and first quarter of 2025, or mining economics do not return to profitability, we will continue to incur losses. Such losses could be significant as we incur costs and expenses associated with recent investments and potential future acquisitions, as well as legal and administrative related expenses. While we are closely monitoring our cash balances, cash needs and expense levels, significant expense increases may not be offset by a corresponding increase in revenue or a significant decline in bitcoin prices could significantly impact our financial performance. Due to our current projected operating cash flows being insufficient in the long term to meet our long-term debt obligations, an investment in our common stock is highly speculative. See "General Risks—Because our current projected operating cash flows are not sufficient in the long term to meet our current long-term debt obligations, an investment in our common stock is highly speculative. Holders of our common stock could suffer a total loss of their investment."
Current wording
If, among other things, the price of bitcoin does not improve, mining economics do not return to increased profitability, or we are unable to generate profits by entering into other potential business ventures, we will continue to incur losses. Such losses could be significant as we incur costs and expenses associated with recent investments and potential future acquisitions, as well as legal and administrative related expenses. While we are closely monitoring our cash balances, cash needs and expense levels, significant expense increases may not be offset by a corresponding increase in revenue or a significant decline in bitcoin prices could significantly impact our financial performance. Due to our current projected operating cash flows being insufficient in the short and long term to meet our short-term and long-term debt obligations, an investment in our common stock is highly speculative. See “General Risks—Because our current projected operating cash flows are not sufficient in the long term to meet our current long-term debt obligations, an investment in our common stock is highly speculative. Holders of our common stock could suffer a total loss of their investment.”
Previous wording
We currently are substantially dependent on our sole hosting services customer to generate most of our revenue, which exposes us to the risk of nonperformance by such customer, whether contractual or otherwise. The nonperformance of our hosting services customer would have a material impact on our liquidity and ability to operate the business. Risk of nonperformance includes inability or refusal of a counterparty to perform because of a counterparty’s financial condition and liquidity or for any other reason. For further details, see "Business—Overview—Hosting Agreements" for further details. Any significant nonperformance by our customer, could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, and operating results.
Current wording
We currently are substantially dependent on our sole hosting services customer to generate most of our revenue, which exposes us to the risk of nonperformance by such customer, whether contractual or otherwise. The nonperformance of our hosting services customer would have a material impact on our liquidity and ability to operate the business. Risk of nonperformance includes inability or refusal of a counterparty to perform because of a counterparty’s financial condition and liquidity or for any other reason. See“Business—Overview—Hosting Agreements” for further details. Any significant nonperformance by our customer, could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, and operating results.
Previous wording
this customer. The cryptomining industry is subject to various risks which could adversely affect our customer’s ability to continue to operate their businesses, including, but not limited to:
Current wording
The cryptomining industry is subject to various risks which could adversely affect our ability to continue to operate our business, including, but not limited to:
Previous wording
The bitcoin reward for successfully uncovering a block most recently halved in April 2024 and will halve again several times in the future, and bitcoin value may not adjust to compensate us for the reduction in the rewards we receive from our bitcoin mining efforts.
Current wording
The bitcoin reward for successfully mining a block most recently halved in April 2024 and will continue to halve at predetermined intervals in the future, and bitcoin value may not adjust to compensate us for the reduction in the rewards we receive from our bitcoin mining efforts.
Previous wording
Halving is a mechanism designed to regulate the total supply, and mitigate inflation, of cryptocurrencies using a proof of work consensus algorithm. At a predetermined block, the bitcoin mining reward is cut in half, hence the term "halving." For bitcoin, the reward was initially set at 50 bitcoin currency rewards per block, which was cut in half to 25 on November 28, 2012 at block 210,000, then to 12.5 on July 9, 2016 at block 420,000, and then again to 6.25 on May 11, 2020 at block 630,000. The most recent halving for bitcoin occurred on April 19, 2024 at block 840,000 and the reward was reduced to 3.125. The next halving is expected to occur in Spring 2028. This process will recur until the total amount of bitcoin currency rewards issued reaches 21 million, which is expected to occur around the year 2140.
Current wording
Bitcoin uses a proof-of-work consensus algorithm in which miners are rewarded with newly minted bitcoin for successfully adding a block to the blockchain. The reward for mining a block is cut in half at predetermined intervals, a process known as “halving,” which is designed to regulate the total supply of bitcoin and mitigate inflation. For bitcoin, the reward was initially set at 50 bitcoin currency rewards per block, which was cut in half to 25 on November 28, 2012 at block 210,000, to 12.5 on July 9, 2016 at block 420,000, to 6.25 on May 11, 2020 at block 630,000, and most recently to 3.125 on April 19, 2024 at block 840,000. The next halving is expected to occur in Spring 2028. This process will continue until the total amount of bitcoin currency rewards issued reaches 21 million, which is expected to occur around the year 2140.
Previous wording
Any disruption in developing our datacenter sites may delay the deployment of our miners, which may adversely affect our results of operations and financial performance.
Current wording
Any disruption in improving our existing assets for datacenter operations or potentially developing new datacenter sites may adversely affect our results of operations and financial performance.
Previous wording
It may take significant time, expenditure, or effort for us to grow our business, including our cryptocurrency datacenter operations, through acquisitions, and our efforts may not be successful.
Current wording
It may take significant time, expenditure, or effort for us to grow our business, including our datacenter operations, through acquisitions, and our efforts may not be successful.
Previous wording
The number of bitcoin and other cryptocurrency datacenter companies has greatly increased in recent years. As we and other bitcoin/cryptocurrency datacenter companies seek to grow their mining or hosting capacity or access additional sources of electricity to power growing datacenter operations, the acquisition of existing cryptocurrency datacenter companies and standalone electricity production facilities may become an attractive avenue of growth. Currently, we source most of our electricity for our cryptocurrency datacenter operations from our captive power generation facility located in Torrey, New York. If we determine to expand our operations, we may want to do so through the acquisition of additional bitcoin or other cryptocurrency datacenter businesses or electricity generating power plants. Further attractive acquisition targets may not be available to us for a number of reasons, such as growing competition for attractive targets, economic or industry sector downturns, geopolitical tensions, regulatory changes, environmental challenges, increases in the cost of additional capital needed to close business combination or operate targets post-business combination. Our inability to identify and consummate acquisitions of attractive targets could have a material and adverse impact on our long-term growth prospects, which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations, strategy, and financial performance.
Current wording
The number of AI/HPC and other cryptocurrency datacenter companies has significantly increased in recent years. As we and other AI/HPC or cryptocurrency datacenter companies seek to grow capacity or access additional sources of electricity to power growing datacenter operations, the acquisition of suitable land with access to low-cost power or standalone electricity production facilities may become an attractive avenue of growth. Currently, we source most of our electricity for our cryptocurrency datacenter operations from our captive power generation facility located in Torrey, New York. If we determine to expand our operations, we may do so through the acquisition of additional powered land assets or electricity generating power plants. Attractive acquisition targets may not be available to us for a number of reasons, such as growing competition for attractive targets, economic or industry sector downturns, geopolitical tensions, regulatory changes, environmental challenges, increases in the cost of additional capital needed to close asset purchases or business combinations or operate targets post-acquisition or business combination. Our inability to identify and consummate acquisitions of attractive assets or targets could have a material and adverse impact on our long-term growth prospects, which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations, strategy, and financial performance.
Previous wording
Failure to successfully integrate businesses or assets we have acquired or may acquire in the future could negatively impact our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Current wording
Failure to successfully integrate assets we have acquired or may acquire in the future could negatively impact our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Previous wording
Acquisitions are an important element of our growth strategy and the success of any acquisition we make depends in part on our ability to integrate the acquired business or assets and realize anticipated synergies and benefits. Integrating acquired businesses and assets may involve unforeseen difficulties, may require a disproportionate amount of our management’s attention, and may require us to reallocate our resources, financial or otherwise.
Current wording
Acquisitions, including, without limitation, of suitable land with access to low-cost power, are an important element of our growth strategy and the success of any acquisition we make depends in part on our ability to integrate the acquired assets and realize anticipated synergies and benefits. Integrating acquired assets may involve unforeseen difficulties, may require a disproportionate amount of our management’s attention, and may require us to reallocate our resources, financial or otherwise.
Previous wording
For example, we may encounter challenges in the integration process such as: difficulties associated with managing the resulting larger and more complex company; conforming administrative and corporate structures and standards, controls, procedures and policies, business cultures, hiring and retention of key employees, and compensation and benefits structures, coordinating geographically dispersed operations; and our ability to deliver on our strategy going forward.
Current wording
For example, we may encounter challenges in the integration process such as difficulties associated with managing the resulting larger and more complex company, coordinating geographically dispersed operations, and our ability to deliver on our strategy going forward.
Previous wording
Further, our existing and any potential future acquisitions may subject us to increased costs and compliance burdens and new liabilities and risks, some of which may be unknown. Although we and our advisors conduct due diligence on the operations of businesses and assets we acquire, we can provide no assurance that we are aware of all liabilities associated with acquired businesses or assets. These liabilities, and any additional risks and uncertainties not known to us or that we may deem immaterial or unlikely to occur at the time of the acquisition, could negatively impact our future business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Current wording
Further, our existing and any potential future acquisitions may subject us to increased costs and compliance burdens and new liabilities and risks, some of which may be unknown. Although we and our advisors conduct due diligence on the operations of assets we acquire, we can provide no assurance that we are aware of all liabilities associated with acquired assets. These liabilities, and any additional risks and uncertainties not known to us or that we may deem immaterial or unlikely to occur at the time of the acquisition, could negatively impact our future business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Previous wording
We can provide no assurance that we will ultimately be able to effectively integrate and manage the operations of any business or assets we have acquired or may acquire in the future or realize the anticipated synergies or benefits. The failure to successfully integrate such businesses or assets could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Current wording
We can provide no assurance that we will ultimately be able to effectively integrate and manage the operations of any assets we have acquired or may acquire in the future or realize the anticipated synergies or benefits. The failure to successfully integrate such assets could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Previous wording
We have experienced turnover in our senior management team, and reduced our employee headcount significantly in 2023 and 2024. If we fail to retain key talent or are unable to attract and retain other qualified personnel, our results of operations, strategy, and financial performance could be adversely affected.
Current wording
We experienced turnover in our senior operating personnel in 2024 and 2025. If we fail to retain key talent or are unable to attract and retain other qualified personnel, our results of operations, strategy, and financial performance could be adversely affected.
Previous wording
If we fail to execute an effective contingency or succession plan with the loss of any member of management, the loss of such management personnel may significantly disrupt our business. Our future success also depends in large part on our ability to attract, retain, and motivate key management and operating personnel. As we continue to develop and expand our operations, we may require personnel with different skills and experiences, and who have a sound understanding of our business and the bitcoin industry. The market for highly qualified personnel in the industries in which we operate is very competitive, and we may be unable to attract and retain such personnel. If we are unable to attract and retain such personnel, our business could be harmed.
Current wording
If we fail to execute an effective contingency or succession plan with the loss of any member of management or senior operating personnel, such loss may significantly disrupt our business, including our operations and strategic initiatives. Our future success also depends in large part on our ability to attract, retain, and motivate our management team and operating personnel. As we continue to develop and expand our operations, we may require personnel with different skills and experiences, including individuals with a sound understanding of our business and cryptocurrency, AI and HPC datacenter industries. The market for highly qualified personnel in the industries in which we operate is very competitive, and we may be unable to attract and retain such personnel. Our failure to attract, retain and effectively utilize such personnel could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Previous wording
Cyber-attacks and security breaches of our own or our third-party providers may disrupt or adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition, and damage our reputation or otherwise materially harm our business.
Current wording
Cyberattacks and security breaches of our own or our third-party providers may disrupt or adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition, and damage our reputation or otherwise materially harm our business.
Previous wording
Like most corporations, we have experienced cyberattacks, including phishing or ransomware attacks, from time to time, and we expect to be the target of such cyberattacks in the future. Failure to effectively prevent, detect and recover from security breaches, including attacks on information technology and infrastructure by hackers; viruses; breaches due to employee error or actions; or other disruptions could seriously harm our operations, as well as the operations of our customers and suppliers. Such serious harm can involve, among other things, misuse of our assets, business disruptions, loss of data, unauthorized access to trade secrets and confidential business information, unauthorized access to personal information, legal claims or proceedings, reporting errors, processing inefficiencies, negative media attention, reputational harm, loss of business, remediation and increased insurance costs, and interference with regulatory compliance. In the event of an attack, our costs and any impacted assets may not be partially or fully recoverable. Threats can come from a variety of sources, including criminal hackers, hacktivists, state-sponsored intrusions, industrial espionage, and insiders. In addition, certain types of attacks could harm us even if our systems are left undisturbed. For example, certain threats are designed to remain dormant or undetectable, sometimes for extended periods of time, or until launched against a target, and we may not be able to implement adequate preventative measures. To date, we have not experienced a material cyber-event. However, we have experienced, and expect to continue to experience, these types of cybersecurity threats and risks.
Current wording
Failure to effectively prevent, detect and recover from security breaches, including attacks on information technology and infrastructure by hackers; viruses; breaches due to employee error or actions; or other disruptions could seriously harm our operations, as well as the operations of our customers and suppliers. Such serious harm can involve, among other things, misuse of our assets, business disruptions, loss of data, unauthorized access to trade secrets and confidential business information, unauthorized access to personal information, legal claims or proceedings, reporting errors, processing inefficiencies, negative media attention, reputational harm, loss of business, remediation and increased insurance costs, and interference with regulatory compliance. In the event of an attack, our costs and any impacted assets may not be partially or fully recoverable. Threats can come from a variety of sources, including criminal hackers, hacktivists, state-sponsored intrusions, industrial espionage, and insiders. In addition, certain types of attacks could harm us even if our systems are left undisturbed. For example, certain threats are designed to remain dormant or undetectable, sometimes for extended periods of time, or until launched against a target, and we may not be able to implement adequate preventative measures. To date, we have not experienced a material cyber-event. However, we have experienced, and expect to continue to experience, these types of cybersecurity threats and risks.
Previous wording
We and our affiliates are subject to extensive environmental regulation by governmental authorities, including the United States Environmental Protection Agency (the "EPA"), and state environmental agencies such as the NYSDEC and/or attorneys general, and have material environmental liabilities, including a coal combustion ("CCR") residual liability of $17.3 million as of December 31, 2024 associated with the closure of a coal ash point located on the New York Facility property and an environmental liability of $13.4 million as of December 31, 2024 associated with the Lockwood Hills Landfill. See "Business—Governmental Regulation—Environmental Liability" and Note 10, "Commitments and Contingencies—Environmental Liabilities", in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. We may incur significant additional costs beyond those currently contemplated to comply with these regulatory requirements. If we fail to comply with these and future regulatory requirements, we could be forced to reduce or discontinue operations or become subject to administrative, civil, or criminal liabilities and fines.
Current wording
We and our affiliates are subject to extensive environmental regulation by governmental authorities, including the EPA, and state environmental agencies such as the NYSDEC and/or attorneys general, and have material environmental liabilities, including a CCR liability of $17.3 million as of December 31, 2025 associated with the closure of a coal ash pond located on the New York Facility property and an environmental liability of $13.7 million as of December 31, 2025 associated with the Lockwood Hills Landfill. See “Business—Governmental Regulation—Environmental Liability” and Note 10, “Commitments and Contingencies—Environmental Liabilities,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. We may incur significant additional costs beyond those currently contemplated to comply with these regulatory requirements. If we fail to comply with these and future regulatory requirements, we could be forced to reduce or discontinue operations or become subject to administrative, civil, or criminal liabilities and fines.
Previous wording
In 2015, EPA finalized federal regulations (the “CCR Rule”) that establish technical requirements for the disposal of CCR. The EPA recently published revisions to the CCR Rule, effective November 8, 2024 (the “revised CCR regulations”). The revised CCR regulations impose certain compliance and other obligations on certain previously unregulated CCR sites. The revised CCR regulations require, among other things, electric utilities and independent power producers to investigate and identify previously unregulated CCR sites and demonstrate that the sites were closed in accordance with the closure performance standards in the CCR Rule. The required investigation is conducted in phases, with the Phase 1 report due on February 9, 2026. Any required closure obligation would commence on May 8, 2029, unless exceptions apply that would defer the closure obligation to a permitting process. In accordance with the revised CCR regulations, phased evaluations of the Lockwood Hills and Greenidge Generation facilities will be conducted to determine if any previously unregulated CCR sites must be addressed under the new regulation. We make no assurances as to the status of any CCR sites at either facility that could be subject to regulation under the revised CCR regulations.
Current wording
In 2015, the EPA finalized the CCR Rule that establish technical requirements for the disposal of CCR. The EPA subsequently published revisions to the CCR Rule, effective November 8, 2024 (as amended, modified or supplemented, the “revised CCR regulations”). The revised CCR regulations impose certain compliance and other obligations on certain previously unregulated CCR sites. The revised CCR regulations require, among other things, electric utilities and independent power producers to investigate and identify previously unregulated CCR sites and demonstrate that the sites were closed in accordance with the closure performance standards in the CCR Rule. Pursuant to the revised CCR regulations, the required investigation is conducted in phases, and owners and operators may opt to submit the required facility evaluation reports for each of Phase 1 and Phase 2 concurrently on the Phase 2 deadline of February 9, 2027 enumerated in the revised CCR regulations. Any required closure obligation would commence on August 8, 2030, unless exceptions apply that would defer the closure obligation to a permitting process. In accordance with the revised CCR regulations, phased evaluations of the Lockwood Hills and Greenidge Generation facilities will be conducted to determine if any previously unregulated CCR sites must be addressed under the new regulation. We make no assurances as to the status of any CCR sites at either facility that could be subject to regulation under the revised CCR regulations.
Previous wording
We may not be able to obtain or maintain all required environmental regulatory approvals. For example, we continue to challenge NYSDEC's efforts to the renewal of our Title V Air Permit for the continued operation of our natural gas power generation facility in Torrey, New York in administrative and state judicial proceedings. There can be no assurance that our efforts will be successful. If there is a delay in obtaining any required environmental regulatory approvals, if we fail to obtain, maintain, or comply with any such approval, or if an approval is retroactively disallowed or adversely modified, the operation of our generation facilities could be stopped, disrupted, curtailed, or modified or become subject to additional costs. Any such stoppage, disruption, curtailment, modification, or additional costs could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
Current wording
We may not be able to obtain or maintain all required environmental regulatory approvals. For example, although we have entered into the Stipulation with NYSDEC regarding the renewal of our Title V Air Permit for the continued operation of the New York Facility, such renewal may become the subject of further administrative and state judicial proceedings brought by third-party environmental groups. There can be no assurance that our efforts to secure or maintain such approvals will be successful. If there is a delay in obtaining any required environmental regulatory approvals, if we fail to obtain, maintain, or comply with any such approval, or if an approval is retroactively disallowed or adversely modified, the operation of our generation facilities could be stopped, disrupted, curtailed, or modified or become subject to additional costs. Any such stoppage, disruption, curtailment, modification, or additional costs could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
Previous wording
We rely on a well-known U.S. based third-party digital asset-focused custodian to safeguard our bitcoin, but our holdings are not insured by us or protected by FDIC or SIPC.
Current wording
We rely on a well-known U.S.-based third-party digital asset-focused custodian to safeguard our bitcoin, but our holdings are not insured by us and are not protected by the FDIC or SIPC.
Previous wording
Our Custodian, Coinbase, safeguards our bitcoin using cold storage. The Custodian holds our digital assets and any cash we may choose to custody, though we currently have no cash held with the Custodian and have no plans to do so. Under the Coinbase Prime Broker Agreement, the Custodian covenants to hold our digital assets in segregated accounts, identifiable as belonging to us, with no rights, interest, or title in those assets. Cash, if held, would be placed in "for benefit of customers" accounts at U.S. insured depository institutions. The agreement ensures our digital assets are not commingled with other holdings, other than to facilitate transfers (typically under 12 hours, but never more than 72 hours). While we believe this agreement offers reasonable protections, storing assets with any custodian involves risks. If the Custodian breaches its agreement, ceases operations, declares insolvency, or files for bankruptcy, our digital assets could be delayed or unrecoverable — even if held in segregated accounts. Insolvency laws regarding digital assets are still evolving. If our bitcoin were deemed part of the Custodian's bankruptcy estate, we could be treated as general unsecured creditors, limiting or delaying our ability to recover assets. While the Custodian maintains limited insurance against certain losses like theft, this coverage is shared among all their clients — likely falling short of the total value of custodied assets. If our bitcoin is lost, stolen, or destroyed, recovery may be limited or unavailable, and any insurance proceeds would likely be insufficient. Losses could materially impact our financial condition and stock value. We currently do not have a backup custodian. If Coinbase were to cease operations or face insolvency, we would need to self-custody our digital assets using cold storage until a suitable replacement is found, which could disrupt our business. In the meantime, our mined bitcoin would continue accumulating in our proprietary wallet. Our limited rights of legal recourse and our lack of insurance protection over our bitcoin expose us and our stockholders to the risk of loss of our bitcoin for which there may be no adequate remedy.
Current wording
Under the Coinbase Prime Broker Agreement, Coinbase covenants to hold our digital assets in segregated accounts, identifiable as belonging to us, with no rights, interest, or title in those assets. Cash, if any, would be placed in “for benefit of customers” accounts at U.S. insured depository institutions. Currently, we have no cash held with Coinbase and have no plans to do so. The agreement ensures our digital assets are not commingled with other holdings, other than to facilitate transfers (typically under 12 hours, but never more than 72 hours). While we believe this agreement offers reasonable protections, storing digital assets with any custodian involves risks. If Coinbase breaches its agreement, ceases operations, declares insolvency, or files for bankruptcy, our digital assets could be delayed or unrecoverable — even if held in segregated accounts. Insolvency laws regarding digital assets are still evolving. If our bitcoin were deemed part of the custodian’s bankruptcy estate, we could be treated as general unsecured creditors, limiting or delaying our ability to recover assets. While Coinbase maintains limited insurance against certain losses like theft, this coverage is shared among all their clients — likely falling short of the total value of custodied assets. If our bitcoin is lost, stolen, or destroyed, recovery may be limited or unavailable, and any insurance proceeds would likely be insufficient. Losses could materially impact our financial condition and stock value. We currently do not have a backup custodian. If Coinbase were to cease operations or face insolvency, we would need to self-custody our digital assets using cold storage until a suitable replacement is found, which could disrupt our business. In the meantime, our mined bitcoin would continue accumulating in our proprietary wallet. Our limited rights of legal recourse and our lack of insurance protection over our bitcoin expose us and our stockholders to the risk of loss of our bitcoin for which there may be no adequate remedy.
Previous wording
We may not be able to compete effectively against present or future competitors. The bitcoin industry has attracted various high-profile and well-established competitors, some of whom have substantially greater liquidity and financial resources than us. With the limited resources we have available, we may experience great difficulties in expanding and improving our network of computers to remain competitive. In addition, new ways for investors and market participants to invest in bitcoin and cryptocurrencies continue to develop. For example, in January 2024, a decade after initial applications were filed, the SEC approved a series of spot bitcoin exchange-traded products, which have received billions of dollars of inflows. We may be adversely affected by competition from other methods of investing in bitcoin. Competition from existing and future competitors, particularly those that have access to competitively priced energy, could result in our inability to secure acquisitions and partnerships and to successfully execute our business plan. If we are unable to compete effectively, our business could be negatively affected.
Current wording
We may not be able to compete effectively against present or future competitors. The cryptocurrency and AI/HPC datacenter industries have attracted various high-profile and well-established competitors, some of whom have substantially greater liquidity and financial resources than us. With the limited resources we currently have available, we may experience great difficulties in expanding and improving our network of computers, datacenter infrastructure or power capacity to remain competitive. In addition, new ways for investors and market participants to gain exposure to bitcoin and cryptocurrencies continue to emerge. For example, in January 2024, a decade after initial applications were filed, the SEC approved a series of spot bitcoin exchange-traded products, which have since attracted substantial inflows. Competition from such financial products,as well as from existing and potential datacenter operators, cloud service providers and other energy-intensive computing companies, could result in our inability to secure acquisitions, partnerships and power contracts, and to successfully execute our business plan. In particular, competition for access to low-cost and reliable power, a critical input for both cryptocurrency mining and AI/HPC workloads, may intensify. If we are unable to compete effectively for such resources or deploy our infrastructure efficiently, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be negatively affected.
Previous wording
While some retail and commercial outlets accept bitcoin as a means of payment, consumers’ payment by bitcoin to such retail and commercial outlets remains limited. Conversely, a significant portion of bitcoin demand is generated by speculators and investors seeking to profit from the short- or long-term holding of bitcoin. Many industry commentators believe that bitcoin’s best use case is as a store of wealth, rather than as a currency for transactions, and that other cryptocurrencies having better scalability and faster settlement times will better serve as currency. This could limit bitcoin’s acceptance as transactional currency. A lack of expansion by bitcoin into retail and commercial markets, or a contraction of such use, may result in increased volatility or a reduction in the price of bitcoin, either of which could adversely affect our results of operations.
Current wording
Bitcoin prices have historically been highly volatile and may continue to fluctuate significantly due to factors such as market perception, investor demand, adoption as a means of payment, trading activity, competition from alternative cryptocurrencies, technological developments, macroeconomic conditions and regulatory actions, as well as other risks and uncertainties described in this Annual Report. While some retail and commercial outlets accept bitcoin as a means of payment, consumers’ payment by bitcoin to such retail and commercial outlets remains limited. Conversely, a significant portion of bitcoin demand is generated by speculators and investors seeking to profit from the short- or long-term holding of bitcoin. Many industry commentators believe that bitcoin’s best use case is as a store of wealth, rather than as a currency for transactions, and that other cryptocurrencies having better scalability and faster settlement times will better serve as currency. This could limit bitcoin’s acceptance as transactional currency. A lack of expansion by bitcoin into retail and commercial markets, or a contraction of such use, may result in increased volatility or a reduction in the price of bitcoin, either of which could adversely affect our results of operations.
Previous wording
The properties utilized by us in our cryptocurrency datacenter and hosting may experience damage, including damage not covered by insurance.
Current wording
The properties utilized by us in our cryptocurrency datacenter and hosting operations may experience damage, including damage not covered by insurance.
Previous wording
Our current cryptocurrency datacenter operations in Torrey, New York are, and any future cryptocurrency datacenter operations that we establish or host will be, subject to a variety of risks relating to physical condition and operation, including:
Current wording
Our current cryptocurrency datacenter operations in Torrey, New York are, and any future datacenter operations that we establish or host will be, subject to a variety of risks relating to physical condition and operation, including:
Previous wording
•damage caused by criminal actors, such as cyberattacks, vandalism, sabotage or terrorist attacks; and
Current wording
•damage caused by criminal actors, such as cyberattacks, vandalism, sabotage or terrorist attacks;
Previous wording
Any of these could render our cryptocurrency datacenter, hosting and/or power generation operations inoperable, temporarily, or permanently, and the potential impact on our business is currently magnified because we operate the majority of our cryptocurrency datacenter operations from a single location. The security and other measures we take to protect against these risks may be insufficient or unavailable. Apart from $15 million in coverage of our bitcoin mining equipment, which is subject to certain deductibles, our power plant property is not insured by any third-party insurance provider and our ability to self-insure may not be adequate to cover the losses we suffer as a result of the aforementioned risks, which could materially and adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition.
Current wording
Any of these could render our datacenter, hosting and/or power generation operations inoperable, temporarily or permanently, and the potential impact on our business is currently magnified because we operate the majority of our cryptocurrency datacenter operations from a single location. The security and other measures we take to protect against these risks may be insufficient or unavailable. In addition, our power plant property is not insured by any third-party insurance provider, and our ability to self-insure may not be adequate to cover the losses we suffer as a result of the aforementioned risks, which could materially and adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition.
Previous wording
Additionally, as technology evolves, we may need to acquire newer models of miners to remain competitive in the market. New miners can be costly and may be in short supply. Given the long production period to manufacture and assemble bitcoin miners and the current global semiconductor chip shortage, we can provide no assurance that we can acquire enough bitcoin mining computers or replacement parts on a cost-effective basis – or at all – for the maintenance and expansion of our cryptocurrency datacenter operations. We rely on third parties to supply us with bitcoin miners, and shortages of bitcoin miners or their component parts, material increases in bitcoin miner costs, or delays in delivery of our orders, including due to trade restrictions, and other global events that may create supply chain disruptions, could significantly interrupt our plans for expanding our bitcoin mining capacity in the near-term and future.
Current wording
Additionally, as technology evolves, we may need to acquire newer models of miners to remain competitive in the market. New miners can be costly, may be in short supply and may require upgrades to our electrical or cooling infrastructure due to increased power consumption or heat generation. Given the long production period to manufacture and assemble bitcoin miners, we can provide no assurance that we can acquire enough bitcoin mining computers or replacement parts on a cost-effective basis – or at all – for the maintenance and expansion of our cryptocurrency datacenter operations. We rely on third parties to supply us with bitcoin miners, and shortages of bitcoin miners or their component parts, material increases in bitcoin miner costs, or delays in delivery of our orders, including due to trade restrictions, sanctions and other global events that may create supply chain disruptions, could significantly interrupt our plans for expanding our bitcoin mining capacity in the near-term and future. Semiconductor and microchip supply constraints, particularly for high-performance ASICs or GPUs, may further delay procurement.
Previous wording
This upgrading and replacement process requires substantial capital investment and we may face challenges in doing so on a timely and cost-effective basis. Shortages of bitcoin mining computers could result in reduced bitcoin mining capacity and increased operating costs, which could materially delay the completion of our planned cryptocurrency datacenter capacity expansion and put us at a competitive disadvantage.
Current wording
Moreover, miners may become technologically obsolete quickly due to rapid innovation in ASIC efficiency, potentially reducing our ability to mine profitably. Cybersecurity vulnerabilities in miner firmware or software could also cause operational disruptions or downtime. The upgrading and replacement process requires substantial capital investment and we may face challenges in doing so on a timely and cost-effective basis. Shortages of bitcoin mining computers could result in reduced bitcoin mining capacity and increased operating costs, which could materially delay the completion of any planned cryptocurrency datacenter capacity expansion and put us at a competitive disadvantage.
Previous wording
Our power generation depends on our purchases of fuel and other products consumed during the production of electricity from a number of suppliers. Our operations and financial performance generally may be impacted by changes in the supply of fuel and other required products, price fluctuations in the wholesale power and natural gas markets, and other market factors beyond our control.
Current wording
Our power generation depends on our purchases of fuel and other products consumed during the production of electricity from a number of suppliers. Our operations and financial performance generally may be impacted by changes in the supply of fuel and other required products, including disruptions arising from geopolitical tensions affecting global energy markets or changes in export/import flows of liquefied natural gas and related commodities, price fluctuations in the wholesale power and natural gas markets, and other market factors beyond our control.
Previous wording
Delivery of these fuels to our facilities is dependent upon fuel transmission or transportation infrastructure, storage, and inventory of fuel stocks, as well as the continuing financial viability of contractual counterparties. As a result, we are subject to the risks of disruptions or curtailments in the production of power at our generation facility if fuel is limited or unavailable at any price, if a counterparty fails to perform, or if there is a disruption in the fuel delivery infrastructure. Disruption in the delivery of fuel, including disruptions as a result of weather, transportation difficulties, global demand and supply dynamics, labor relations, environmental regulations or the financial viability of fuel suppliers, could adversely affect our ability to operate our facilities, which could result in lower power sales and/or higher costs to our cryptocurrency datacenter operations and thereby adversely affect our results of operations.
Current wording
Delivery of these fuels to our facilities is dependent upon fuel transmission or transportation infrastructure, storage, and inventory of fuel stocks, as well as the continuing financial viability of contractual counterparties. As a result, we are subject to the risks of disruptions or curtailments in the production of power at our generation facility if fuel is limited or unavailable at any price, if a counterparty fails to perform, or if there is a disruption in the fuel delivery infrastructure. Disruption in the delivery of fuel, including disruptions as a result of weather, transportation difficulties, global demand and supply dynamics, labor relations, environmental regulations or the financial viability of fuel suppliers, could adversely affect our ability to operate our facilities, which could result in lower power sales and/or higher costs to our datacenter operations and thereby adversely affect our results of operations.
Previous wording
Separate from supply, market prices for power, capacity, ancillary services, natural gas, and oil are volatile, unpredictable and tend to fluctuate substantially. Disruptions in our fuel supplies may require us to find alternative fuel sources at higher costs, to find other sources of power to deliver to counterparties at a higher cost, or to pay damages to counterparties for failure to deliver power as contracted. Unlike most other commodities, electric power can only be stored on a very limited basis and generally must be produced concurrently with its use. As a result, power prices and our costs are subject to significant volatility due to supply and demand imbalances, especially in the day-ahead and spot markets. We buy significant quantities of fuel on a short-term or spot market basis. Prices for the natural gas that we purchase fluctuate, sometimes rising or falling significantly over a relatively short period of time. The price we can obtain for the sale of power may not rise at the same rate, or may not rise at all, to match a rise in fuel or delivery costs. Further, any changes in the costs of natural gas or transportation rates, changes in the relationship between such costs and the market prices of power, or an inability to procure fuel for physical delivery at prices that we consider favorable could all adversely affect our operations, the costs of meeting our obligations, and the profitability of our cryptocurrency datacenter, and thus, our operations and financial performance. Volatility in market prices for fuel and electricity may result from a number of factors outside of our control, including:
Current wording
Separate from supply, market prices for power, capacity, ancillary services, natural gas, and oil are volatile, unpredictable and tend to fluctuate substantially. Disruptions in our fuel supplies may require us to find alternative fuel sources at higher costs, to find other sources of power to deliver to counterparties at a higher cost, or to pay damages to counterparties for failure to deliver power as contracted. Unlike most other commodities, electric power can only be stored on a very limited basis and generally must be produced concurrently with its use. As a result, power prices and our costs are subject to significant volatility due to supply and demand imbalances, especially in the day-ahead and spot markets. We buy significant quantities of fuel on a short-term or spot market basis. Prices for the natural gas that we purchase fluctuate, sometimes rising or falling significantly over a relatively short period of time. In recent periods, broader commodity market dynamics and structural shifts in electric generation portfolios — including increased reliance on intermittent renewable resources and energy storage in key regions — have contributed to less predictable power pricing patterns and greater volatility in basis differentials between natural gas and power prices. The price we can obtain for the sale of power may not rise at the same rate, or may not rise at all, to match a rise in fuel or delivery costs. Further, any changes in the costs of natural gas or transportation rates, changes in the relationship between such costs and the market prices of power, or an inability to procure fuel for physical delivery at prices that we consider favorable could all adversely affect our operations, the costs of meeting our obligations, and the profitability of our datacenter, and thus, our operations and financial performance. Volatility in market prices for fuel and electricity may result from a number of factors outside of our control, including:
Previous wording
Such factors and the associated fluctuations in power and natural gas prices have affected our wholesale power generation profitability and cost of power for cryptocurrency datacenter activities in the past and will continue to do so in the future.
Current wording
Such factors and the associated fluctuations in power and natural gas prices have affected our wholesale power generation profitability and cost of power for datacenter activities in the past and will continue to do so in the future.
Previous wording
Research and development activities are ongoing in the industry to provide alternative and more efficient technologies to produce power. There are alternate technologies to supply electricity, most notably fuel cells, micro turbines, batteries, windmills, and photovoltaic (solar) cells, the development of which are currently being subsidized and expanded by the State of New York, where we currently operate (as well as by state or local governments in areas where we may operate in the future), to address global climate change concerns. It is possible that technological advances will reduce the cost of alternative generation to a level that is equal to or below that of certain central station production. Also, as new technologies are developed and become available, the quantity and pattern of electricity usage by customers could decline, with a corresponding decline in revenues derived by generators. These alternative energy sources could result in a decline to the dispatch and capacity factors of our New York Facility. As a result of these factors, we may experience material declines in our power generation revenue.
Current wording
Research and development activities are ongoing in the industry to provide alternative and more efficient technologies to produce power. There are alternate technologies to supply electricity, most notably fuel cells, microturbines, batteries, wind turbines, and photovoltaic (solar) cells. These technologies are actively being supported by the State of New York (where we currently operate) and other state or local governments in areas (where we may operate in the future) through ambitious energy storage and renewable deployment goals, including plans to install multiple gigawatts of energy storage by 2030 and substantially increase solar and wind generation by 2040, which can alter grid dynamics and dispatch priorities. Advances in energy storage technologies, including long‑duration and fire‑safe battery systems, aim to improve grid reliability and support intermittent renewable supply, further accelerating renewable adoption. As alternative technologies become more cost‑competitive or prevalent, they could reduce the demand for electricity produced by central station generators like our New York Facility, shift patterns of electricity consumption, and increase the frequency of renewable curtailments or negative pricing events as storage and renewables capture a larger share of grid capacity. As a result of these developments and technology shifts, the dispatch and capacity factors of our New York Facility may decline, and we may experience material declines in our power generation revenue, the economic value of our facilities and our overall financial performance.
Previous wording
Our facilities require periodic maintenance and repair. Any unexpected failure, including failure associated with breakdowns or forced outages, and any related unanticipated capital expenditures could result in reduced profitability from both loss of cryptocurrency datacenter operations and power generation. Such unexpected outages have occurred in the past, and may occur in the future, due to factors both within and outside of our control. We can provide no assurance that outages involving our power plant will not occur in the future, or that any such outage would not have a negative effect on our business and results of operations. In addition, we cannot be certain of the level of capital expenditures that will be required due to changing environmental laws (including changes in the interpretation or enforcement thereof), needed facility repairs and unexpected events (such as natural disasters or terrorist attacks). Unexpected capital expenditures could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and financial condition. If we significantly modify power generation equipment, we may be required to install the best available control technology or to achieve the lowest achievable emission rates, as such terms are defined under the new source review provisions of the Clean Air Act of 1963, which would likely result in substantial additional capital expenditures.
Current wording
Our facilities require periodic maintenance and repair. Any unexpected failure, including failure associated with breakdowns or forced outages such as the November 2025 fire at the New York Facility, and any related unanticipated capital expenditures could result in reduced profitability from both loss of cryptocurrency datacenter operations and power generation. Such unexpected outages have occurred in the past, and may occur in the future, due to factors both within and outside of our control. We can provide no assurance that outages involving our power plant will not occur in the future, or that any such outage would not have a negative effect on our business and results of operations. In addition, we cannot be certain of the level of capital expenditures that will be required due to changing environmental laws (including changes in the interpretation or enforcement thereof), needed facility repairs and unexpected events (such as natural disasters or terrorist attacks). Unexpected capital expenditures could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and financial condition. If we significantly modify power generation equipment, we may be required to install the best available control technology or to achieve the lowest achievable emission rates, as such terms are defined under the new source review provisions of the Clean Air Act of 1963, which would likely result in substantial additional capital expenditures.
Previous wording
Our business is subject to substantial energy regulation and may be adversely affected by legislative or regulatory changes relating to climate change or policies regarding cryptocurrency mining, as well as liability under, or any future inability to comply with, existing or future energy regulations or requirements.
Current wording
Our business is subject to substantial energy, environmental, and digital asset-related regulation and may be adversely affected by legislative or regulatory changes relating to power generation, datacenter operations, climate policy, or digital asset activities, as well as liability under, or any future inability to comply with, existing or future regulatory requirements.
Showing the first 40 of 76 pairs. Open the source sections for the rest.
Rearranged current paragraphs (2)
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
Federal and state courts continue to see climate-related litigation, with cases asserting damage claims related to greenhouse gas emissions, the rulings of which could establish adverse precedent that may apply to companies (including us) that produce greenhouse gas emissions. Our results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected if new federal and/or state legislation or regulations are adopted to address global climate change or if we are subject to lawsuits for alleged damage to persons or property resulting from greenhouse gas emissions attributable to our operations.
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
Geopolitical crises may motivate large-scale purchases of bitcoin and other cryptoassets, which could increase the price of bitcoin and other cryptoassets rapidly. Our business and the infrastructure on which our business relies is vulnerable to damage or interruption from catastrophic occurrences, such as war, civil unrest, terrorist attacks, geopolitical events, disease, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, and similar events. Specifically, the uncertain nature, magnitude, and duration of hostilities stemming from the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine, including the potential effects of sanctions limitations, heightened and evolving conflicts in the Middle East (including the Israel–Hamas conflict and broader regional tensions involving Iran and non-state actors), risks of regional escalation, disruptions to energy infrastructure, and instability in global oil and natural gas markets, potential conflicts in the Asia-Pacific region, retaliatory cyber-attacks on the world economy and markets, including potential attacks on energy grids, data centers, and other critical infrastructure and potential shipping delays (including disruptions to key shipping routes such as the Red Sea, Suez Canal and Strait of Hormuz), have contributed to increased market volatility and uncertainty, which could have an adverse impact on macroeconomic factors that affect our business.
Rearranged previous paragraphs (3)
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
Because our current projected operating cash flows are not sufficient in the long term to meet our existing long-term debt obligations, an investment in our common stock is highly speculative. Holders of our common stock could suffer a total loss of their investment.
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
Greenidge, could deprive our stockholders of an opportunity to receive a premium for their capital stock as part of a sale of Greenidge, and might have a negative effect on the market price of shares of our Class A common stock.
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
Class A common stock in exchange for our debt pursuant to certain privately negotiated exchange agreements, as described under Note 5, "Debt", Note 6, "Stockholders' Deficit", and Note 17, “Subsequent Events—Debt Exchange Agreements".