Skip to main content

enCore Energy Corp.

For the period ended Mar 31, 2026. Filed May 14, 2026.

View on SEC.gov

About this filing

A company's report for each of its first three quarters. The financial statements are not audited. It shows how the business has moved since the last annual report, and what management says changed.

Mar 31, 2026 · Filed May 14, 2026

EU$0.63-0.2%Stored close · as of Nov 6, 2026

What changed in Management’s Discussion and Analysis?

Read the current filing

Previous report: 10-Q

Period ended 2025-09-30; filed 2025-11-10.

0001628280-25-050914

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Current report: 10-Q

Period ended 2026-03-31; filed 2026-05-14.

0001628280-26-035003

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.

Compared 129 previous paragraphs and 105 current paragraphs.

39 unchanged; 45 reworded; 21 added; 42 removed; 3 previous and 0 current paragraphs rearranged.

Tables are not compared: 7 previous and 5 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.

A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.

Added paragraphs (21)

Current report

•In January 2026, the DOE awarded $900 million each to Centrus Energy Corp., General Matter, Inc. and Orano. Distribution of the $2.7 billion award is contingent on specific milestones and is aimed at supporting the expansion of US domestic enrichment capacity. According to DOE’s task order, most of the funds will be directed toward construction of high-assay low enriched uranium enrichment capacity while also providing funds for additional low-enriched uranium capacity.

Current report

•On January 15, 2026, U.S. Senators Jeanne Shaheen and Todd Young alongside U.S. Representatives Rob Wittman and John Moolenaar, introduced new bipartisan, bicameral legislation to support domestic supply chains for critical minerals to meet national and economic security needs through the creation of a new Strategic Resilience Reserve (SRR). This announcement along with President Donald Trump’s signing the proclamation on January 14, 2026 to also address national security threats posed by imports of processed critical minerals and their derivative products, shows a coordinated policy push toward strengthening the U.S. critical mineral security.

Current report

•During the three months ended March 31, 2026, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) formally announced a major agency-wide reorganization to streamline decision making, consolidate functions, and align with national goals for a more efficient licensing and deployment of safe and innovative nuclear technology. The agency will reorganize around three core business lines, new reactors, operating reactors, and nuclear materials and waste.

Current report

•In January 2026, U.S based tech company Meta signed deals with existing and new nuclear power providers to supply up to 6.6 giga watt of nuclear power by 2035. Meta stated the deals will provide ongoing collaboration with electric utility companies and power providers to meet the electricity demand for data centers it intends to bring online and will create in the next decade.

Current report

•U.S. energy company Vistra has entered into 20-year power purchase agreement to provide more than 2,600 mega watts of zero-carbon energy from a combination of three different Vistra nuclear power plants to support Meta's operations. Meta said its deal with Vistra involves more than 2.1 giga watts of power from Vistra’s Beaver Valley Nuclear Power Plant in the state of Pennsylvania and its Perry and David-Besse Nuclear Power Plants in Ohio, in addition to uprates at the Ohio plants. Meta's purchases under the agreements will begin in late 2026, with additional capacity added to the grid through 2034, when the full 2,609 mega watts of power will be online.

Current report

•On January 26, 2026, U.S. nuclear fuel supplier Centrus Energy, along with the state of Tennessee, announced the planned expansion in the state, transitioning its Oak Ridge facility to a "high-rate manufacturing plant." As part of the expansion, Centrus plans to invest more than $560 million in Anderson County, Tennessee over the next several years to support the investment in the production of thousands of advanced centrifuges.

Current report

•U.S. based nuclear services company, Energy Solutions has submitted a notice of intent to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission confirming plans to apply for a “major licensing action” for new nuclear generation at the shuttered Kewaunee Power Station in the state of Wisconsin.

Current report

•U.S. based Solstice Advanced Materials announced plans to expand uranium conversion production at its Metropolis Works Facility, in the state of Illinois, the sole United States uranium conversion facility. The additional production will bring the plant capacity to 10,000 tonnes of uranium fluorine.

Current report

•For the first time in a decade, the NRC has approved the construction of a new commercial nuclear reactor—Unit 1 at TerraPower’s Kemmerer Power Station in the state of Wyoming.

Current report

•Centrus Energy and Palantir Technologies Inc. have announced a partnership that will apply Palantir's artificial intelligence software to Centrus' expansion of its uranium enrichment capacity in the state of Ohio.

Current report

•Arizona Public Service has officially notified the NRC of its intent to renew the operating licenses for all three units at its Palo Verde Generating Station in Arizona, which could extend operations from the mid-2040s through the mid-2060s.

Current report

•On March 14, 2026, GE Vernova and Hitachi, Ltd. have entered a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to explore opportunities to deploy the BWRX-300 small modular reactor in Southeast Asia.

Current report

•Japan announced that it is scrapping the safety screening for two reactors at the Hamaoka Nuclear Power Plant in central Japan, after plant operator Chubu Electric Power Co. was found to have fabricated data about earthquake risks.

Current report

Exploration activities are currently being conducted on properties located adjacent to, and to the east of, the Alta Mesa mine site as part of our Alta Mesa East exploration project. The Alta Mesa East prospect consists of 5,900 acres of private, trust-owned mineral lease with approximately 4,897 acres of individual surface leases.

Current report

The Company’s exploration plan utilizes wide-spaced (800-1600 feet) drill spacing for regional assessment, and closer-spaced drillholes (400-500 feet) with closer offsets in areas of discovered mineralization. Uranium mineralization has been discovered within five primary sands beneath the site. Drilling is expected to continue throughout 2026 and beyond. Completed drilling results, geologic interpretation, and mineral resource assessments are pending.

Current report

We are a “smaller reporting company” as defined in Regulation S-K under the Securities Act and may elect to take advantage of certain of the scaled disclosures available to smaller reporting companies.
Removed paragraphs (42)

Previous report

On January 20, 2025, President Trump issued two Executive Orders that specifically referenced nuclear power and uranium as key parts to expanding energy production in the U.S. The Executive Order titled, “Unleashing American Energy,” in addition to directing federal agencies to advance permitting for energy projects also called for uranium to be designated as a “critical mineral” by the U.S. Geological Survey. The Executive Order titled, “Declaring a National Energy Emergency,” directs federal agencies, under emergency authority, to advance permit and license approvals for the production of energy and energy resources. In that Executive Order, uranium is defined as an “energy resource” and subject to the emergency declaration. The U.S. Senate, on February 3, 2025, confirmed Chris Wright, former CEO of Denver-based Liberty Energy, to serve as Energy Secretary. The following day, Wright issued his first Secretarial Order, which directs the Department of Energy (“DOE”) to take immediate action to unleash energy produced in the U.S. in accordance with President Trump’s executive orders. See updates below related to President Trump’s Executive Orders.

Previous report

•The DOE has announced the launch of a new pilot program aimed at accelerating the development of advanced nuclear reactors and strengthening domestic nuclear fuel supply chains. As part of this initiative, the DOE has issued a Request for Applications seeking qualified U.S. companies to build and operate nuclear fuel production lines under the DOE’s authorization process. The program is designed to support the growth of advanced reactor technologies while enhancing national energy security and reducing reliance on foreign nuclear fuel sources.

Previous report

•The Idaho National Laboratory and Microsoft Corp. have entered into a collaboration to modernize and accelerate the U.S. nuclear permitting and licensing process. The partnership will leverage Microsoft’s Azure cloud and artificial intelligence technologies to improve efficiency, enhance data management, and reduce administrative bottlenecks in regulatory reviews. The initiative supports broader national efforts to advance the deployment of next-generation nuclear technologies and strengthen the clean energy infrastructure.

Previous report

•U.S. Department of the Interior (“DOI”) announced during the three months ended September 30, 2025, that it will take “decisive steps” to boost domestic recovery of critical minerals from mine waste, coal refuse, tailings, and abandoned uranium mines. This initiative is part of a broader national effort to reduce U.S. dependence on foreign sources of critical minerals such as lithium, cobalt, nickel, and rare earth elements, which are vital for technologies like electric vehicle batteries, renewable energy systems, and national defense applications.

Previous report

•U.S. Senators Andy Kim and Tim Sheehy introduced the bipartisan Advanced Reactor Modernization for Operational Resilience (ARMOR) Act of 2025 to boost energy resilience and security using nuclear energy at military installations and further spur U.S. nuclear energy innovation.

Previous report

•In September 2025, President Trump signed an executive order that exempted graphite, tungsten, uranium, gold bullion, and other metals from his country-based tariffs.

Previous report

•U.S. Secretary of Energy Chris Wright noted in September 2025, that the United States should consider expanding its strategic uranium reserve, emphasizing the importance of securing long-term uranium supplies to support the nation’s nuclear energy program. The remark reflects growing concerns over energy security, geopolitical risks, and reliance on foreign uranium sources, particularly from Russia and its allies.

Previous report

•The DOE has made a third loan disbursement to Holtec International to assist with the company’s plan to restart the shuttered Palisades Nuclear Power Plant (805 MWe PWR) in the state of Michigan. The Biden administration finalized a loan guarantee of up to $1.52 billion for the project in September of 2024. Per the DOE, the most recent disbursement occurred in April 2025 and totals about $46.7 million. The fourth disbursement was made to Holtec in the amount of $100.5 million. Holtec is on track to restart operations at the Palisades location in October 2025. During the three months ended September 30, 2025, the DOE announced the fifth and sixth loan disbursements. The fifth loan disbursement was made on August 7, 2025, in the amount of $83.2 million and the sixth disbursement was made on September 16, 2025 in the amount of $155.9 million.

Previous report

•Centrus Energy officials announced plans for an expansion of Centrus' uranium enrichment plant in Piketon, Ohio in boosting low-enriched uranium and high-assay, low-enriched uranium (“HALEU”) production.

Previous report

•U.S. Senators in both Democratic and Republican parties are working to advance a bipartisan Russian sanctions package. The package is being referred to as The Sanctioning Russia Act of 2025 (S. 1241) and has more than 80 co-sponsors in the Senate. The package in question would implement some of the harshest sanctions possible on some of Moscow’s top trading partners, including a 500% tariff on nations that purchase oil, gas, uranium, and other goods from Russia.

Previous report

•Since March 30, 2025, the United States has implemented a series of aggressive tariff measures that have reshaped global trade relations. On March 24, President Trump issued Executive Order 14245, imposing a 25% tariff on all goods imported from countries that continue purchasing Venezuelan oil. This was followed by a broader escalation during what the administration termed “Liberation Day,” from April 2 to April 5. The United States enacted a sweeping 10% baseline tariff on nearly all imports, with reciprocal rates reaching as high as 34% on Chinese goods and 20–24% on products from the European and Japan. Steel and aluminum tariffs were also significantly increased during this period, rising to 50% globally. Legal challenges quickly followed: On May 28, the United States Court of International Trade ruled that the Liberation Day tariffs exceeded presidential authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), issuing an injunction to block enforcement. However, the tariffs remain in effect pending appeal, with oral arguments scheduled for July 31. Tariffs based on Section 232 (national security) and Section 301 (China-related trade practices) remain legally intact and enforceable. As of September 30, 2025, the sweeping 10% baseline tariff on nearly all imports is paused or stayed pending litigation. A permanent injunction has been issued by the Court of International Trade for the IEEPA‐based tariffs, but the Federal Circuit granted a stay of that injunction (thus collection continues) while the appeal proceeds.

Previous report

•President Trump signed an Executive Order on February 14, 2025, to establish the National Energy Dominance Council, which is chaired by the Secretary of Interior, Doug Burgum, and vice-chaired by Energy Secretary, Chris Wright. The council's members also include the Secretary of State, Secretary of the Treasury, Secretary of Defense, the Attorney General, Secretary of Agriculture, Secretary of Commerce, and Secretary of Transportation. The Council was expected to present President Trump with a plan for how to raise awareness of the American energy dominance plan within 100 days. As of September 30, 2025, the council has actively advanced its agenda with the following:

Previous report

•Encouragement for power plants to increase output by 10% to 15% to support rising electricity demand, especially from artificial intelligence systems.

Previous report

•Advancing the reversal of the Biden era Liquefied Natural Gas (“LNG”) export clause. The reversal of the export clause has led to the approval of record levels of future U.S. LNG exports in an effort to position the U.S. as the leading LNG exporter in the world.

Previous report

•The Council has also outlined the initiative to re-open closed power plants, expanding energy infrastructure, launching small modular nuclear reactors, and fast tracking mining/mineral projects.

Previous report

The Council met during the three months ended September 30, 2025, however, no public version of the meeting notes and/or strategy has been made available.

Previous report

•Texas-based energy company Vistra has received approval from the NRC to extend the operation of its Perry Nuclear Power Plant (1,268 MWe BWR) through 2046, an additional 20 years beyond its original license.

Previous report

•Global Laser Enrichment (“GLE”) has submitted its Safety Analysis Report to the NRC, marking a milestone for the planned Paducah Laser Enrichment Facility in the state of Kentucky. GLE also announced that it has completed a large-scale enrichment demonstration testing campaign at its Test Loop facility in Wilmington, North Carolina. The program has collected extensive performance data providing confidence that its laser-based uranium enrichment process can be commercially deployed. GLE has noted that it will continue its demonstration program throughout this year, producing hundreds of kilograms of low-enriched uranium, while continuing toward building a domestic manufacturing base and supply chain to support deployment of U.S. domestic enrichment capacity.

Previous report

•California-based General Matter announced plans to build a privately developed facility to enrich uranium in the state of Kentucky. The company, which is backed by investor Peter Thiel, said it intends to make a “historic investment in American nuclear infrastructure” by restoring a shuttered facility in Paducah, Kentucky. General Matter was one of four companies selected in October 2024 by the DOE to provide enrichment services to help establish a U.S. supply of high-assay low-enriched uranium for advanced reactor designs.

Previous report

•Uranium Energy Corporation launched the United States Uranium Refining and Conversion Corp., a wholly owned subsidiary that will engage in the feasibility of developing a new state-of-the-art American uranium refining and conversion facility.

Previous report

•During the three months ended September 30, 2025, Urenco USA started producing low-enriched uranium with its second new cascade of gas centrifuges at its uranium enrichment facility in New Mexico.

Previous report

•Holtec International, which began the decommissioning process for the Indian Point Nuclear Power Plant five years ago, said recently that the plant could be restarted at an estimated cost of $10 billion.

Previous report

•The state of Texas is moving toward the creation of a taxpayer funded nuclear power incentive fund. About 80% of the fund’s $350 million would be dedicated toward reimbursing construction costs for functional nuclear reactors. The remainder would be used for research and development. As of October 2025, several companies and projects have expressed interest in Texas’s $350 million nuclear incentive fund, established under House Bill 14. The fund is administered by the Texas Advanced Nuclear Energy Office, which was created to support the development of advanced nuclear reactors and associated industries in the state.

Previous report

•According to the latest edition of the biennial Uranium 2024: Resources, Production and Demand, commonly known as the “Red Book,” published at the beginning of April 2025 by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (“OECD”), Nuclear Energy Agency and the International Atomic Energy Agency, there are sufficient uranium resources to support both the continued use of nuclear power and its significant growth through 2050 and beyond. However, timely investments in new exploration, extraction operations, and processing techniques will be essential to ensure that uranium becomes available to the market when needed.

Previous report

•Japan’s Nuclear Regulation Authority has approved a safety screening report for Hokkaido Electric’s Tomari Unit 3 (866 MWe PWR), which states that the unit meets the country’s safety standards.

Previous report

•The Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission has renewed Ontario Power Generation’s (OPG) license for the Darlington Nuclear Station for a 20-year term, which authorizes OPG to operate the facility to November 30, 2045. The renewal by the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission makes the OPG license the longest nuclear operating license granted in Canada.

Previous report

•On August 22, 2025, the Company issued $115,000 aggregate principal amount of the Company’s 5.50% Convertible Senior Notes due 2030 (the “Convertible Senior Notes”). See Note 14 - Debt for additional information.

Previous report

The Company holds a number of other Exploration Stage Properties that the Company has determined are not material to its business. In total the properties total an aggregate ofapproximately 360,000 acres of mineral claims, mineral leases, and fee minerals.

Previous report

As the Company has been increasing its operational pace to meet our targets for uranium extraction rates, we have successfully increased our drill rig capacity to facilitate replacing mineral resource depletion and adding mineral resources in South Texas. The Company started with 6 active drill rigs in South Texas at the beginning of 2024, and by December 31, 2024, the number increased to 17. As of September 30, 2025, the Company had 30 active rigs in South Texas.

Previous report

•Stock option expense - Stock option expense decreased for the three months ended September 30, 2025 at $477 compared to $1,628 for the same period in 2024. Stock option expense is driven by the issuance, exercise, expiration and forfeiture of issued options and common shares.

Previous report

•Revenue - Revenue from uranium sales for thenine months ended September 30, 2025, was$30,780 compared to revenue of$44,972 for the nine months ended September 30, 2024, a decrease of $14,192. The decrease was due to lower contracted sales volume resulting in completed sales of 480,000 pounds of uranium, compared to completed sales of 530,000 pounds of uranium for the nine months ended September 30, 2024. Sales prices decreased by $20.73 or 24%. The realized sales prices per pound of uranium for the nine months ended September 30, 2025, and 2024 were $64.13 and $84.85, respectively, and included the contractual sales price less sales-related costs such as transfer fees. The realized sales price per pound is dictated by the market for uranium, which is a commodity.

Previous report

•Operating expenses - Operating expenses include selling, general and administrative expenses. Operating expenses, excluding stock option expenses, for thenine months ended September 30, 2025, were $51,836 ascompared to $42,345 for thenine months ended September 30, 2024. This increase primarily reflects the growth and increased activity levels the Company is experiencing in 2025, which is driven primarily by the increased extraction of uranium at Alta Mesa and Rosita which commenced during the latter part of 2024, combined with increased professional fees related to the new Convertible Senior Notes and increased staff costs.

Previous report

•Stock option expense - Stock option expense decreased for the nine months ended September 30, 2025, at $2,106 compared to $3,340 for the same period in 2024. Stock option expense is driven by the issuance, exercise, expiration and forfeiture of issued options and common shares.

Previous report

•Interest income - Interest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2025, and September 30, 2024, was $1,022 and $1,999, respectively. The decrease was primarily driven by the decrease in cash held in the brokerage and bank accounts.

Previous report

•Interest expense - Interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2025, and September 30, 2024, was $1,639 and $1,289, respectively. The increase is primarily driven by interest expense on the Uranium Loan in 2025 and interest expense related to the new Convertible Senior Notes, offset by the conversion of the $60,000 convertible promissory note in February 2024. See Note 14 - Debt for more information.

Previous report

•Gain (Loss) on marketable securities, unrealized- The Company recognized a gain of $1,092 on the fair value of marketable securities, unrealized for the nine months ended September 30, 2025, compared to a loss of $3,691 for the nine months ended September 30, 2024. Unrealized gains for the nine months ended September 30, 2025, are due to favorable market conditions during the nine months ended September 30, 2025.

Showing the first 40 of 42 passages. Open the source sections for the rest.

Reworded paragraphs (45)

Previous wording

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our unaudited consolidated financial statements and related notes, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Additionally, the following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the audited consolidated financial statements included in Part II of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024. This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements and forward-looking information that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated, projected, forecasted or expected in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including, but not limited to, those discussed below and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report. See “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” in this Quarterly Report and the information under the heading “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item IA, “Risk Factors” of our Annual Report. Our management believes the assumptions underlying the Company’s financial statements and accompanying notes are reasonable. However, the Company’s financial statements and accompanying notes may not be an indication of our financial condition and results of operations in the future.

Current wording

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our unaudited consolidated financial statements and related notes, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Additionally, the following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the audited consolidated financial statements included in Part II of our Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2025. This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements and forward-looking information that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated, projected, forecasted or expected in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including, but not limited to, those discussed below and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report. See “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” in this Quarterly Report and the information under the heading “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item IA, “Risk Factors” of our Annual Report. Our management believes the assumptions underlying the Company’s financial statements and accompanying notes are reasonable. However, the Company’s financial statements and accompanying notes may not be an indication of our financial condition and results of operations in the future.

Previous wording

enCore Energy Corp., America’s Clean Energy Company™, was incorporated on October 30, 2009, under the Laws of British Columbia and is a reporting issuer in all of the provinces and territories of Canada. As of January 1, 2025, the Company ceased to be a “foreign private issuer” and has become a “domestic issuer” and a large accelerated filer within the meanings under the Exchange Act. As a result, the Company must comply with the filing deadlines and disclosure obligations of a domestic issuer and large accelerated filer as set forth in the Exchange Act. This classification impacts the timing of our periodic filings, internal control assessments, and other regulatory requirements. The Company’s common shares are listed on The Nasdaq Capital Market LLC (“Nasdaq”) and the TSX Venture Exchange (“TSX-V”) under the trading symbol EU.

Current wording

enCore Energy Corp., America’s Clean Energy Company™, was incorporated on October 30, 2009, under the Laws of British Columbia and is a reporting issuer in all of the provinces and territories of Canada. As of January 1, 2025, the Company ceased to be a “foreign private issuer” and has become a “domestic issuer” within the meanings under the Exchange Act. As a result, the Company must comply with the filing deadlines and disclosure obligations of a domestic issuer and non-accelerated filer as set forth in the Exchange Act. This classification impacts the timing of our periodic filings, internal control assessments, and other regulatory requirements. The Company’s common shares are listed on Nasdaq Capital Market LLC (“Nasdaq”) and the TSX Venture Exchange (“TSX-V”) under the trading symbol EU.

Previous wording

We are an Exploration Stage Issuer as defined by S-K 1300, and as required by the SEC, as we have not established proven or probable mineral reserves, through the completion of a pre-feasibility or feasibility study for any of our uranium projects. Even though we commenced extraction of uranium at our Rosita Project and our Alta Mesa Project, the Company remains classified as an Exploration Stage Issuer and will continue to remain an Exploration Stage Issuer until such time as proven or probable mineral reserves have been established at one of our uranium projects.

Current wording

We are an Exploration Stage Issuer as defined by S-K 1300 as we have not established proven or probable mineral reserves, through the completion of a pre-feasibility or feasibility study for any of our uranium projects, as required by the SEC to be defined as a Development Stage Issuer. Even though we commenced extraction of uranium at our Rosita Project and our Alta Mesa Project, the Company remains classified as an Exploration Stage Issuer and will continue to remain an Exploration Stage Issuer until such time as proven or probable mineral reserves have been established at one of our uranium projects.

Previous wording

The Company is focused on extracting domestic uranium within the United States. The Company utilizes only proven ISR technology to provide necessary fuel for the generation of clean, reliable, and carbon-free nuclear energy. In 2024, the Company commenced uranium extraction at the Rosita Central ISR Uranium Processing Plants (“CPPs”) and at the Alta Mesa CPP in South Texas. enCore’s strategy is to build uranium extraction capacity by developing and placing into operation a series of uranium extraction facilities in South Texas, followed by a future pipeline of exploration projects in South Dakota and Wyoming, becoming a leading supplier of domestic uranium to fuel a growing demand for clean energy generation using nuclear power.

Current wording

The Company is focused on extracting domestic uranium within the United States. The Company utilizes only proven ISR technology to provide necessary fuel for the generation of clean, reliable, and carbon-free nuclear energy. In 2023, the Company commenced uranium extraction in South Texas. The Company’s strategy is to build uranium extraction capacity by developing and placing into operation a series of uranium extraction facilities in South Texas, followed by a future pipeline of exploration projects in South Dakota and Wyoming, becoming a leading supplier of domestic uranium to fuel a growing demand for clean energy generation using nuclear power.

Previous wording

The primary use of uranium is to fuel nuclear power plants for the generation of carbon and emission free electricity. According to the World Nuclear Association (“WNA”), as of May 2025, there were 439 operable nuclear reactors world-wide, which required approximately 175 to 180 million pounds of U 3 O 8 annually at full operation. According to data from TradeTech LLC (“TradeTech”), the world continues to require more uranium than it produces from primary extraction. The gap between demand and primary supply is being filled by stockpiled inventories and secondary supplies, which the Company believes have dwindled significantly in recent years.

Current wording

The primary use of uranium is to fuel nuclear power plants for the generation of carbon and emission free electricity. According to the World Nuclear Association (“WNA”), as of April 2026, there were 438 operable nuclear reactors world-wide, which required approximately 178 to 180 million pounds of U 3 O 8 annually at full operation. According to data from TradeTech LLC (“TradeTech”), the world continues to require more uranium than it produces from primary extraction. The gap between demand and primary supply is being filled by stockpiled inventories and secondary supplies, which the Company believes have dwindled significantly in recent years.

Previous wording

Expanding the current reactor fleet to meet that level of electrical generating capacity remains a significant challenge to the nuclear industry. To meet those goals, the global industry must protect existing capacity, and there have been multiple public pronouncements from several countries, including the U.S. to protect existing nuclear generating capacity. In the U.S., as a result of clean energy credits granted by several states and the production tax credit for nuclear power provided in the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, several nuclear utilities have announced operating life extensions and capacity expansions within their existing operating fleet. Also, the industry has seen an unprecedented trend in reactor recommissioning. In the U.S., where just a few years ago reactors were being shut down prematurely, nuclear plants such as Diablo Canyon, Palisades, Three Mile Island, and Duane Arnold are positioned to re-enter service.

Current wording

Expanding the current reactor fleet to meet the levels of electrical generating capacity remains a significant challenge to the nuclear industry. To meet those goals, the global industry must protect existing capacity, and there have been multiple public pronouncements from several countries, including the United States to protect existing nuclear generating capacity. In the United States, as a result of clean energy credits granted by several states and the production tax credit for nuclear power provided in the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, several nuclear utilities have announced operating life extensions and capacity expansions within their existing operating fleet. Also, the industry has seen an unprecedented trend in reactor recommissioning. In the United States, where just a few years ago reactors were being shut down prematurely, nuclear plants such as Palisades, Three Mile Island, and Duane Arnold are positioned to re-enter service.

Previous wording

During the nine months ended September 30, 2025, the Company completed uranium sales totaling 480,000 pounds of U 3 O 8, not including converter and transaction costs, for an average sales price of $64.13 per pound of U 3 O 8.

Current wording

During the three months ended March 31, 2026, the Company completed uranium sales totaling 270,000 pounds of U 3 O 8, not including converter and transaction costs, for an average sales price of $67.78 per pound of U 3 O 8.

Previous wording

Our website is located at www.encoreuranium.com. From time to time, we may use our website as a distribution channel for material company information.

Current wording

Our website is located at www.encoreuranium.com. From time to time, we may use our website as a distribution channel for ongoing updates for the company and material company information.

Previous wording

enCore controls key mineral properties within the United States, in Texas, South Dakota, and Wyoming. Our operations are designed and permitted to process uranium from a mix of satellite plants and primary sources within South Texas.

Current wording

enCore controls key mineral properties within the United States, in Texas, South Dakota, Wyoming and New Mexico. Our plants’ operations are designed and permitted to process uranium from a mix of satellite plants and primary sources within south Texas.

Previous wording

The Alta Mesa Uranium Project (“Alta Mesa”) is an Exploration Stage Property and is a fully licensed and constructed ISR project and central processing facility, located on over 4,597 acres of private land in the state of Texas

Current wording

The Alta Mesa Uranium Project (“Alta Mesa”) is an Exploration Stage Property, as defined by S-K 1300, and is a fully licensed and constructed ISR project and central processing facility, located on over 4,597 acres of private land in the state of Texas.

Previous wording

The Mesteña Grande Uranium Project (“Mesteña Grande”) is an Exploration Stage Property that is located in Brooks and Jim Hogg Counties, Texas and is on land located adjacent to, and to the south, north, and west of the Alta Mesa Uranium Project. The property covers an approximate area of 35 miles in a north-south direction by 30 miles in an east-west direction.

Current wording

The Mesteña Grande Uranium Project (“Mesteña Grande”) is an Exploration Stage Property, as defined by S-K 1300, located in Brooks and Jim Hogg Counties, Texas and is on land located adjacent to, and to the south, north, and west of the Alta Mesa Uranium Project. The Company owns a 100% interest in the Mesteña Grande project. The property consists of over 200,000 mostly contiguous acres over an approximate area of 35 miles in a north-south direction by 30 miles in an east-west direction.

Previous wording

The Dewey-Burdock Project is an Exploration Stage Property located in southwest South Dakota and is part of the northwestern extension of the Edgemont Uranium Mining District. The Dewey-Burdock Project includes federal claims, private mineral rights and private surface rights controlling the entire area within the licensed project permit boundary as well as surrounding areas. The Company currently controls approximately 16,962 acres of net mineral rights and 12,613 acres of surface rights.

Current wording

The Dewey Burdock Project is an Exploration Stage Property, as defined by S-K 1300, located in southwest South Dakota and is part of the northwestern extension of the Edgemont Uranium Mining District. The Company owns 100% interest in the Dewey Burdock Project. The project includes federal claims, private mineral rights and private surface rights controlling the entire area within the licensed project permit boundary as well as surrounding areas. The Company currently controls approximately 16,962 acres of net mineral rights and 12,613 acres of surface rights.

Previous wording

The Gas Hills Project is an Exploration Stage Property located in Wyoming. The Company owns a 100% interest in the Gas Hills Exploration Project located in the historic Gas Hills Uranium District 45 miles east of Riverton, Wyoming. The Gas Hills Project consists of approximately 1,280 surface acres and 12,960 net mineral acres of unpatented lode claims, a State of Wyoming mineral lease, and private mineral leases, within a brownfield site which has experienced extensive development including extraction and mill site production.

Current wording

The Gas Hills Project, as defined by S-K 1300, is an Exploration Stage Property located in Wyoming. The Company owns a 100% interest in the Gas Hills Project located in the historic Gas Hills Uranium District 45 miles east of Riverton, Wyoming. The Gas Hills Project consists of approximately 1,280 surface acres and 12,960 net mineral acres of unpatented lode claims, a State of Wyoming mineral lease, and private mineral leases, within a brownfield site which has experienced extensive uranium development including extraction and mill site production.

Previous wording

The Company is focused on producing uranium in the United States and delivering that uranium to customers. The Company currently utilizes only the proven ISR technology to provide necessary fuel for the generation of clean, reliable, and carbon-free nuclear energy.

Current wording

The Company is focused on extracting uranium in the United States and delivering that uranium to customers. The Company currently utilizes only the proven ISR technology to provide necessary fuel for the generation of clean, reliable, and carbon-free nuclear energy.

Previous wording

The Company’s strategy over the next three years is centered around two of its fully licensed Texas CPPs: Rosita and Alta Mesa. The CPPs located at the Rosita and Alta Mesa projects are designed for, and fully capable of, processing feed resin from relocatable satellite IX plants employed at various deposits within a 100-mile radius of each plant. The Rosita CPP was the starting point for enCore’s Texas extraction strategy. In 2024, the Company announced it had commenced uranium extraction operations at Rosita from the Rosita Extension wellfield, PAA-5. Rosita is located approximately 60 miles from Corpus Christi, Texas and has an 800,000-pound U 3 O 8 per year production capacity. The Rosita CPP will act as the central processing site for the Rosita South - Cadena, Upper Spring Creek- Brown, Upper Spring Creek – Brevard, and Butler Ranch Projects.

Current wording

The Company’s strategy over the next three years is centered around two of its fully licensed Texas CPPs: Rosita and Alta Mesa. The CPPs located at the Rosita and Alta Mesa projects are designed for processing feed resin from relocatable satellite IX plants employed at various deposits within several hundreds of miles of each plant. The Rosita CPP was the starting point for the Company’s Texas extraction strategy. The Rosita CPP facility is in partial standby while feeding solution from active groundwater reclamation. Rosita is located approximately 60 miles from Corpus Christi, Texas and has an 800,000-pound U 3 O 8 per year processing capacity.

Previous wording

In February 2023, the Company acquired 100% of the Alta Mesa Uranium Project and the Mesteña Grande Uranium Project from Energy Fuels for $120 million. enCore’s fully licensed Alta Mesa CPP is located approximately 100 miles southwest of Corpus Christi, Texas, and has a production capacity of 1.5 million pounds of U 3 O 8 per year through its IX system located at the plant. The facility has elution, precipitation, drying, and packaging capacity for 2.0 million pounds of U 3 O 8 per year. This plant is designed to accept direct production feed to the IX columns in the plant and concurrently accept loaded resin from satellite locations, once the resin transfer system has been installed. The Alta Mesa Project includes existing and near-term production areas, including fully permitted and authorized production areas 6 and 7. The Mesteña Grande Uranium Project has additional inferred mineral resource areas that will require significant additional exploration drilling and permitting prior to being able to be brought online. In total, the Alta Mesa Uranium Project combined with the Mesteña Grande Uranium Project encompasses mineral leases on over 200,000 acres of private land. In February 2024, the Company sold a 30% interest in the Alta Mesa and Mesteña Grande projects to Boss for $60 million.

Current wording

In February 2023, the Company acquired 100% of the Alta Mesa Uranium Project and the Mesteña Grande Uranium Project from Energy Fuels Inc., for $120 million. The Company’s fully licensed Alta Mesa CPP is located approximately 100 miles southwest of Corpus Christi, Texas, and has a production capacity of 1.5 million pounds of U 3 O 8 per year through its IX system located at the plant. The facility has elution, precipitation, drying, and packaging capacity for 2.0 million pounds of U 3 O 8 per year. This plant is designed to accept direct production feed to the IX columns in the plant and concurrently accept loaded resin from satellite locations, once the resin transfer system has been installed and permitted. The Alta Mesa Project includes existing and near-term Production Area Authorization (“PAA”), including fully permitted and authorized PAA-6 and PAA-7. The Mesteña Grande Uranium Project has additional inferred mineral resource areas that will require significant additional exploration drilling. In total, the Alta Mesa Uranium Project combined with the Mesteña Grande Uranium Project encompasses mineral leases on over 200,000 acres of private land.

Previous wording

In June 2024, the Company announced the successful startup of uranium extraction operations at the Alta Mesa Project. With the restart of the previously operating Alta Mesa Project, the Company is now the only uranium producer in the United States with multiple production facilities in operation as of September 30, 2025. The initial ramp-up was a progressive process to advance and continue increased uranium extraction via direct feed to the Alta Mesa CPP. Exploration drilling and wellfield installation continues at PAA-7 and is showing positive results. The second IX circuit at the Alta Mesa CPP was brought online in early 2025 and production continues through both IX circuits. During the nine months ended September 30, 2025, the head grade through the South train peaked at 110mg/L and averaged 38mg/L, and the West train peaked at 141mg/L for an average grade of 67mg/L. Additional production wells are being brought online regularly which has brought both processing trains to near maximum flow capacity. Utilizing the Pathcad software, the Company is able to adjust wellfield flow patterns to more optimally recover the mineralization and are adjusting patterns and flow to help improve wellfield performance.

Current wording

In June 2024, the Company announced the successful startup of uranium extraction operations at the Alta Mesa Project. The initial ramp-up was a progressive process to advance and continue increased uranium extraction via direct feed to the Alta Mesa CPP. Final installation of PAA-7 was fully completed during the three months ended March 31, 2026 and extraction is continuing from this wellfield. The second IX circuit at the Alta Mesa CPP was brought online in early 2025 and extraction continues through both IX circuits

Previous wording

Subsequent to September 30, 2025, the Company announced new uranium discoveries made in areas in or near existing wellfields. These discoveries have been made as a result of a major ongoing re-analysis of thousands of historic drill holes that began in April 2025 across the Alta Mesa ISR Uranium Project. This more granular and detailed evaluation has identified uranium mineralized roll fronts in at least three areas to date. Follow up drilling by the Company has delineated these new roll fronts with drilling continuing to determine the extents of each.

Current wording

In 2025, the Company announced new uranium discoveries made in areas in or near existing wellfields. These discoveries have been made as a result of a major ongoing re-analysis of thousands of historic drill holes that began in April 2025 across the Alta Mesa ISR Uranium Project. This more granular and detailed evaluation has identified uranium mineralized roll fronts. Follow up delineation drilling by the Company has identified new areas of mineralization which will require additional permitting prior to uranium extraction.

Previous wording

This additional roll front uranium mineralization has been discovered in close proximity to known and already exploited roll fronts. One of these new roll fronts has progressed sufficiently that it has now advanced to permitting as a Wellfield 3 extension. Mineralized roll fronts have also been found overlying the past productive mineralization in Wellfield 4 with at least two new roll fronts discovered to date, each extending more than 2,500 feet in length with both included in the existing permit authorization. This newly discovered mineralization lies at a depth of 320 to 345 feet, almost 200 feet above the previously exploited roll front. This shallow mineralization makes for shorter drill times with less footage required, less cement and shorter casing intervals resulting in significant cost savings in delineation and extraction versus deeper mineralization. A third area extending south from the previously exploited mineralization in Wellfield 1 continues to expand with additional ongoing drilling. This granular re-analysis of previous drill data is expected to continue through the end of the year with follow-up delineation drilling continuing into 2026.

Current wording

This additional roll front uranium mineralization has been discovered in close proximity to known and already exploited roll fronts. One of these new roll fronts has progressed to the point that monitor wells have now been installed and completed. Installation of the extraction wells and infrastructure are ongoing and expected to be online as soon as permitting is completed. Mineralized roll fronts have also been found overlying the past productive mineralization in PAA-4 with at least two new roll fronts discovered to date. This newly discovered mineralization lies at a depth of 320 to 345 feet, almost 200 feet above the previously exploited roll front. This shallow mineralization makes for shorter drill times with less footage required, less cement and shorter casing intervals resulting in significant cost savings in delineation and extraction versus deeper mineralization. Monitor wells have also been installed in this wellfield which will be designated as PAA-8. Permitting activities are continuing as well as delineation drilling activity. This granular re-analysis of previous drill data is expected to continue through 2026.

Previous wording

The Kingsville Dome CPP is currently maintained in a standby condition and will require refurbishment prior to commencement of operations. This facility, similar in size and design to the Rosita CPP facility, has a capacity of 800,000 pounds of U 3 O 8 per year.

Current wording

The Kingsville Dome CPP will require refurbishment and licensing prior to commencement of operations.

Previous wording

enCore has an experienced technical team with years of experience in ISR operations in Texas, Wyoming, and Nebraska supporting and managing our operations. We have been able to utilize our experience to self-execute the refurbishment of the Rosita and Alta Mesa CPPs, along with the design, construction and installation of infrastructure for three wellfields and two satellite IX facilities over a period of three years.

Current wording

The Company has an experienced technical team with years of experience in ISR operations in Texas, Wyoming, and Nebraska supporting and managing our operations. We have been able to utilize our experience to self-execute the refurbishment of the Rosita and Alta Mesa CPPs, along with the design, construction and installation of infrastructure for three wellfields and two satellite IX facilities over a period of three years.

Previous wording

Currently, at Alta Mesa, the RML and the Class III UIC Area Permit are in timely renewal and under technical review by the TCEQ, but those do not affect current expansion activities. At Upper Spring Creek, the TCEQ has issued the Class III UIC Area Permit, and the agency has approved the expansion of the Rosita RML to incorporate the Upper Spring Creek wellfield and satellite IX facility into the current license activities. Construction of the satellite and wellfield at Upper Spring Creek has commenced. Remaining permits needed to begin operations are the Production Area Authorization and the Class I Waste Disposal Well permit, both of which are under review by the TCEQ as of September 30, 2025.

Current wording

Currently, at Alta Mesa, the RML and the Class III UIC Area Permit are in timely renewal and under technical review by the TCEQ, but those do not affect current activities. At Upper Spring Creek, the TCEQ has issued the Class III UIC Area Permit, and the agency has approved the expansion of the Rosita RML to incorporate the Upper Spring Creek wellfield and satellite IX facility into the current license activities. Construction of the satellite and wellfield at Upper Spring Creek is near completion. Remaining permits needed to begin operations are the PAA and the Class I Waste Disposal Well permit, both of which are under review by the TCEQ as of March 31, 2026.

Previous wording

In addition to the Company’s operations in South Texas, it is also developing pipeline projects in other states. Notably, the advanced stage Dewey-Burdock Uranium Project in South Dakota has demonstrated ISR resources, including a 2024 S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary and Canadian National Instrument 43-101 Technical Report and PEA citing robust economics. The project has its source material license from the NRC and its underground injection permits and aquifer exemption from the EPA. In April 2024, the Company submitted its application to renew the ten year old Source Material License, SUA-1600. The NRC has confirmed that the Dewey-Burdock Source Material License is in timely renewal. The underground injection permits were appealed to the EPA’s Environmental Appeals Board (“EAB”) and the aquifer exemption was appealed to the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals. In September 2024, the Company provided an update regarding the EAB appeal, including a ruling denying the intervenors’ contentions on the merits, and remanding to the EPA to review and complete, if necessary, the administrative record for its permit decisions. Based on a successful outcome for the Company of the appeal of the NRC license, the Company also believes it will be successful in appeals related to the EPA’s underground injection permits and aquifer exemption. Currently, the NRC is scheduled to finalize the renewal by April of 2026.

Current wording

In addition to the Company’s operations in South Texas, it is also developing pipeline projects in other states. The advanced stage Dewey Burdock Uranium Project in South Dakota has demonstrated ISR resources, including a 2024 S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary and Canadian National Instrument 43-101 Technical Report and Preliminary Economic Analysis. The project has its source material license from the NRC and its underground injection permits and aquifer exemption from the EPA. In April 2024, the Company submitted its application to renew the ten-year-old Source Material License, SUA-1600. The NRC has confirmed that the Dewey Burdock Source Material License is in timely renewal. The underground injection permits were appealed to the EPA’s Environmental Appeals Board (“EAB”) and the aquifer exemption was appealed to the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals. On September 16, 2025, the Company announced that the EAB denied in full a petition for review filed by the Oglala Sioux Tribe, Black Hills Clean Water Alliance, and NDN Collective against the EPA’s issuance of Class III and Class V UIC permits for the Dewey Burdock Project in South Dakota.

Previous wording

•On September 2, 2025, the Company announced that its Dewey-Burdock Project, located in South Dakota, was approved for inclusion in the Fast-41 Program by the U.S. Federal Permitting Improvement Steering Council (“Permitting Council”). This is a component of the implementation of President Trump’s Executive Order on Immediate Measures to Increase American Mineral Production. The Company’s Dewey-Burdock Project received its Source and Byproduct Materials License in 2014, from the NRC, now under timely renewal, and will work with the NRC as the lead agency for federal permitting. The Company’s objective is to advance the Dewey Burdock Project into development and operation utilizing the ISR uranium extraction process.

Current wording

In September 2025, the Company announced the Dewey Burdock Project had been approved for inclusion in the Fast-41 Program by the Permitting Council. This is a component of the implementation of President Trump’s Executive Order on Immediate Measures to Increase American Mineral Production. The Dewey Burdock Project received its Source and Byproduct Materials License in 2014, from the NRC, now under timely renewal, and will work with the NRC as the lead agency for federal permitting. The Company’s objective is to advance the Dewey Burdock Project into development and operation utilizing the ISR uranium extraction process.

Previous wording

The Company has commenced the initial permitting work to advance the Gas Hills Project as an ISR uranium recovery operation located in central Wyoming, approximately 60 miles west of Casper. As part of the initial data collection for project permitting, the Company initiated core drilling during 2024. Our Gas Hills Project is located in the historic Gas Hills Uranium District in the brownfield area of extensive previous extraction.

Current wording

The Gas Hills Project is an advanced uranium project located in central Wyoming, approximately 60 miles west of Casper. Our Gas Hills Project is located in the historic Gas Hills Uranium District in the brownfield area of previous extensive production.

Previous wording

In 2024, we disclosed that the Company initiated exploration drilling on the Dewey Terrace Project area. The near term goal of this drilling is designed to not only define the extent of the Dewey Terrace project mineralization, but also determine its eastern extent and potential to connect with our Dewey-Burdock deposit just across the state line in South Dakota. The drilling at both the Gas Hills and the Dewey Terrace Projects remain ongoing.

Current wording

In 2024, we disclosed that the Company initiated exploration drilling on the Dewey Terrace Project area. The near term goal of this drilling is designed to not only define the extent of the Dewey Terrace project mineralization but also determine its eastern extent and potential to connect with our Dewey Burdock deposit just across the state line in South Dakota.

Previous wording

•Revenue - Revenue from uranium sales for the three months ended September 30, 2025, was $8,876 compared to revenue of $9,258 for the three months ended September 30, 2024, a decrease of $382. While the Company recognized an increase in volumes sold, the increase was offset by lower sales prices. The realized sales prices per pound of uranium for the three months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024 were $68.28 and $77.15, respectively, and included the contractual sales price less sales-related costs such as transfer fees. The realized sale price per pound decrease is dictated by the market for uranium, which is a commodity.

Current wording

•Revenue - Revenue from uranium sales for the three months ended March 31, 2026, was $18,301 compared to revenue of $18,239 for the three months ended March 31, 2025, an increase of $62 or 0%. Revenue recognized for the three months ended March 31, 2026 was consistent with the same period in 2025, as an approximately 7% decrease in sales volume was largely offset by an approximately 8% increase in sales prices. The realized sales prices per pound of uranium for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025 were $67.78 and $62.89, respectively, and included the contractual sales price less sales-related costs. The realized sale price per pound increase is dictated by the market for uranium, which is a commodity.

Previous wording

•Cost of Sales - Costs applicable to uranium sales were $4,985 for the three months ended September 30, 2025, related to the completed sale of 130,000 pounds of uranium at a weighted average cost of $38.35 per pound compared to uranium costs of $10,600 for the sale of 120,000 pounds at a weighted average cost of $88.33 per pound for the three months ended September 30, 2024. The decrease in costs was the result of more sales placed on extracted uranium at a lower market price and less purchased uranium. The Company’s weighted average cost components include the cost of purchased uranium and uranium from extraction.

Current wording

•Cost of Sales - Costs applicable to uranium sales were $18,365 for the three months ended March 31, 2026, related to the completed sale of 270,000 pounds of uranium at a weighted average cost of $68.02 per pound compared to uranium costs of $18,262 for the sale of 290,000 pounds at a weighted average cost of $62.97 per pound for the three months ended March 31, 2025. The increase in costs was the result of more sales placed of purchased uranium at a higher price versus extracted uranium at a lower market price. The Company’s weighted average cost components include the cost of purchased uranium and uranium from extraction. See Costs of U 3 O 8 Sold table below for more information.

Previous wording

•Operating expenses - Operating expenses include selling, general and administrative expenses. Operating expenses, excluding stock option expenses, for the three months ended September 30, 2025, were $17,454 as compared to $14,385 for the three months ended September 30, 2024. This increase primarily reflects the growth and increased activity levels the Company is experiencing in 2025, which is driven primarily by the increased extraction of uranium at Alta Mesa and Rosita which commenced during the latter part of 2024, combined with increased professional fees related to the new Convertible Senior Notes and increased staff costs.

Current wording

•Operating expenses - Operating expenses include selling, general and administrative and stock compensation expense. Operating expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2026, were $10,021 as compared to $15,603 for the three months ended March 31, 2025. This decrease primarily reflects the gain on sale of mineral properties as a result of the sale of NM Energy Canada’s mineral properties and intangible assets in 2026 offset by increased activity levels the Company is experiencing in 2026. The increased activity levels is driven primarily by the increased drilling at Alta Mesa and Upper Spring Creek.

Previous wording

•Interest income - Interest income for the three months ended September 30, 2025, and September 30, 2024, was $542 and $651, respectively. The decrease was primarily driven by the decrease in cash held in brokerage and bank accounts.

Current wording

•Interest income - Interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2026, and March 31, 2025, was $386 and $279, respectively. The increase was primarily driven by the increase in cash held in brokerage and bank accounts.

Previous wording

•Interest expense - Interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2025, and September 30, 2024, was $1,053 and $445, respectively. The increase is primarily driven by the interest expense related to the new Convertible Senior Notes. See Note 14 - Debt for more information.

Current wording

•Interest expense - Interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and March 31, 2025, was $1,815 and $346, respectively. The increase is primarily driven by the interest expense related to the new Convertible Senior Notes. See Note 15 - Debt for more information.

Previous wording

•Gain/(Loss) on marketable securities, unrealized - The Company recognized a gain of $8,158 on the fair value of marketable securities, unrealized for the three months ended September 30, 2025, compared to a loss of $1,474 for the three months ended September 30, 2024. Unrealized gains and losses for the three months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, are due to favorable and unfavorable market conditions for the respective periods.

Current wording

•Loss on marketable securities, unrealized - The Company recognized a loss of $10,048 on the fair value of marketable securities, unrealized for the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to a loss of $9,876 for the three months ended March 31, 2025. Unrealized losses for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025 are due to unfavorable market conditions for the respective periods.

Previous wording

•Gain on marketable securities, realized - The Company recognized a gain of $62 on the fair value of marketable securities, realized for the three months ended September 30, 2025, as a result of the sale of common shares compared to no gain on marketable securities for the three months ended September 30, 2024.

Current wording

•Gain on marketable securities, realized - The Company recognized a gain of $3,840 on the fair value of marketable securities, realized for the three months ended March 31, 2026, as a result of the sale of common shares compared to no gain on marketable securities for the three months ended March 31, 2025.

Previous wording

We present non-GAAP financial measures of the total cost of extracted pounds and uranium cost per extracted pound during the reporting period. Total cost of extracted pounds is the cost of sales less the cost of sales of purchased goods, which includes the aggregate purchase price of uranium sourced from purchased uranium. Uranium cost per extracted pound is the total cost of extracted pounds divided by the pounds of uranium extracted during the period. We believe the total cost of extracted pounds and uranium cost per extracted pound, including allocation of cash and non-cash costs, assist investors in evaluating the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of the Company’s extraction process and overall cost structure and financial performance. In addition, management uses these non-GAAP measures to evaluate the ongoing operations for internal planning and forecasting.

Current wording

The table below presents total cost of extracted pounds and uranium costs per extracted pound during the reporting period. Total cost of extracted pounds is the cost of sales less the cost of sales of purchased goods, which includes the aggregate purchase price of uranium sourced from purchased uranium. Uranium cost per extracted pound is the total cost of extracted pounds divided by the pounds of uranium extracted during the period. Total cost of extracted pounds and uranium costs per extracted pound, includes the allocation of cash and non-cash costs

Previous wording

During thenine months ended September 30, 2025, the Company continued its uranium extraction activities at its South Texas operations.

Current wording

During thethree months ended March 31, 2026, the Company continued its uranium extraction activities at Alta Mesa.

Previous wording

Our short-term cash requirements are primarily driven by exploration and development activities aimed at advancing properties for uranium extraction. We expect to meet our short-term cash requirements generally through existing working capital. As of September 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024, the Company had cash and cash equivalentsof $91,933 and$39,701, respectively, and working capital of $119,670 and$57,334, respectively. Operations, prior to the three months ended September 30, 2025, have been funded primarily from the issuance of share capital and the sale of non-controlling interest to Boss in February 2024.

Current wording

Our short-term cash requirements are primarily driven by exploration and development activities aimed at advancing properties for uranium extraction. We expect to meet our short-term cash requirements generally through existing working capital. As of March 31, 2026, and December 31, 2025, the Company had cash and cash equivalentsof $41,562 and$52,403, respectively, and working capital, of$121,466 and$96,134, respectively.

Previous wording

Our long-term cash requirements are also primarily driven by exploration and development activities aimed at advancing properties for uranium extraction. We expect to meet our long-term cash requirements through various sources of capital, which may include a revolving credit facility or line of credit and future debt or equity issuances, existing working capital, and net cash provided by operations and property dispositions. However, there are a number of factors that may have a material adverse effect on our ability to access these capital sources, including the state of overall equity and credit markets, our degree of leverage, our unencumbered asset base and borrowing restrictions imposed by lenders (including as a result of any failure to comply with financial covenants in future indebtedness), general market conditions for uranium mining companies and other energy companies, our operating performance and liquidity and market perceptions about us. The success of our business strategy will depend, in part, on our ability to access these various capital sources.

Current wording

Our long-term cash requirements are also primarily driven by exploration and development activities aimed at advancing properties for uranium extraction. We expect to meet our long-term cash requirements through various sources of capital, which may include a revolving credit facility or line of credit and future debt or equity issuances, existing working capital, and net cash provided by operations and property dispositions. However, there are a number of factors that may have a material adverse effect on our ability to access these capital sources, including the state of overall equity and credit markets, our degree of leverage, our unencumbered asset base and borrowing restrictions imposed by lenders (including as a result of any failure to comply with financial covenants in future indebtedness), general market conditions for uranium mining companies and other energy companies, issuance of required permits which may delay the Company’s ongoing or future projects, our operating performance and liquidity and market perceptions about us. The success of our business strategy will depend, in part, on our ability to access these various capital sources.

Previous wording

The proceeds of which were used, among other things, to pay down and terminate the Uranium Loan.

Current wording

The proceeds were used, among other things, to pay down and terminate the Uranium Loan.

Previous wording

The net proceeds from the offering of the Notes were approximately $109,200, after deducting the initial purchasers’ discounts and commissions and offering expenses.

Current wording

The net proceeds from the offering of the Notes were approximately $109,657, after deducting the initial purchasers’ discounts and commissions and offering expenses.

Showing the first 40 of 45 pairs. Open the source sections for the rest.

Rearranged previous paragraphs (3)

Previous report — wording carried elsewhere

The following table summarizes the results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2025, and 2024:

Previous report — wording carried elsewhere

The following table sets forth selected operating data and financial metrics for uranium sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2025, and 2024.

Previous report — wording carried elsewhere

•Cost of Sales - Costs applicable to uranium sales were$25,781 for thenine months ended September 30, 2025, related to the completed sale of 480,000 pounds of uranium at a weighted average cost of $53.71 per pound compared to uranium costs of $51,891 for the sale of 530,000 pounds at a weighted average cost of $97.91 per pound for the nine months ended September 30, 2024. The decrease in costs was due to the decrease in purchases of uranium at market price. The Company’s weighted average cost components include the cost of purchased uranium and uranium from extraction.