Clearway Energy, Inc.

Previous wording

•The Company’s ability to effectively consummate future investments or acquisitions will also depend on the Company’s ability to arrange the required or desired financing for investments or acquisitions.

Current wording

•The Company’s ability to effectively consummate future investments or acquisitions will also depend on the Company’s ability to arrange the required or desired financing for such transactions.

Previous wording

•Risks that are beyond the Company’s control, including but not limited to acts of terrorism or related acts of war, natural disasters, severe weather, changes in weather patterns, flooding, wildfires, pandemics, inflation, supply chain disruptions, hostile cyber intrusions or other catastrophic events, could have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Current wording

•Risks that are beyond the Company’s control, including but not limited to acts of terrorism or related acts of war, natural disasters, severe weather, changes in weather patterns, flooding, wildfires, pandemics, inflation, supply chain disruptions, hostile cyber intrusions or other catastrophic events, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Previous wording

•The Company depends on key personnel and its ability to attract and retain additional skilled management and other personnel, the loss of any of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

Current wording

•The Company depends on key personnel and its and CEG’s ability to attract and retain additional skilled management and other personnel, the loss of any of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

Previous wording

Risks Related to the Company’s Relationship with GIP, TotalEnergies and CEG

Current wording

Risks Related to the Company’s Relationship with CEG

Previous wording

GIP and TotalEnergies, through their equal ownership of CEG, the Company’s controlling stockholder, exercise substantial influence over the Company. The Company is highly dependent on CEG.

Current wording

•CEG exercises substantial influence over the Company, and the Company is highly dependent on CEG.

Previous wording

•Changes in U.S. foreign trade policies may materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, operations and financial condition.

Current wording

•Changes in U.S. foreign trade policies may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, operations and financial condition.

Previous wording

•Changes in tax laws or policies, including but not limited to changes in corporate income tax rates, as well as judgments and estimates used in the determination of tax-related asset and liability amounts, could materially adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Current wording

•Changes in tax laws or policies, including but not limited to changes in corporate income tax rates, as well as judgments and estimates used in the determination of tax-related asset and liability amounts, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Previous wording

The Company’s business strategy includes growth through the investments in, and acquisitions of, additional generation assets (including through corporate acquisitions). This strategy depends on the Company’s ability to successfully identify and evaluate investment and acquisition opportunities and consummate investments and acquisitions on favorable terms. However, the number of investment and acquisition opportunities is limited. In addition, the Company will compete with other companies for these limited investment and acquisition opportunities, which may increase the Company’s cost of making investments or acquisitions or cause the Company to refrain from making investments or acquisitions at all. Some of the Company’s competitors for investments and acquisitions are much larger than the Company with substantially greater resources. These companies may be able to pay more for investments or acquisitions and may be able to identify, evaluate, bid for and purchase a greater number of assets than the Company’s financial or human resources permit. If the Company is unable to identify and consummate future investments or acquisitions, it will impede the Company’s ability to execute its growth strategy and limit the Company’s ability to increase the amount of dividends paid to holders of the Company’s common stock.

Current wording

The Company’s business strategy includes growth through investments in, and acquisitions of, additional generation assets (including through corporate acquisitions). This strategy depends on the Company’s ability to successfully identify and evaluate investment and acquisition opportunities and consummate investments and acquisitions on favorable terms. However, the number of investment and acquisition opportunities is limited. In addition, the Company will compete with other companies for these limited investment and acquisition opportunities, which may increase the Company’s cost of making investments or acquisitions or cause the Company to refrain from making investments or acquisitions at all. Some of the Company’s competitors for investments and acquisitions are much larger than the Company with substantially greater financial or human resources. These companies may be able to pay more for investments or acquisitions and may be able to identify, evaluate, bid for and purchase a greater number of assets than the Company’s financial or human resources permit. If the Company is unable to identify and consummate future investments or acquisitions, its ability to execute its growth strategy and increase the amount of dividends paid to holders of the Company’s common stock may be limited.

Previous wording

The Company’s ability to invest in or acquire future renewable facilities may depend on the financial viability of renewable energy assets generally. The financial viability of these assets may, from time to time, be impacted by public policy mechanisms, including PTCs, ITCs, cash grants, loan guarantees, accelerated depreciation, RPS and carbon trading plans. These mechanisms have been implemented at the state and federal levels to support the development of renewable generation, demand-side and smart grid and other clean infrastructure technologies. The availability and continuation of public policy support mechanisms will drive a significant part of the economics and viability of the Company’s growth strategy and expansion into clean energy investments.

Current wording

The Company’s ability to invest in or acquire future renewable facilities may also depend on the financial viability of renewable energy assets generally. The financial viability of these assets may, from time to time, be impacted by public policy mechanisms, including PTCs, ITCs, cash grants, loan guarantees, accelerated depreciation, RPS and carbon trading plans. These mechanisms have been implemented at the state and federal levels to support the development and ongoing viability of renewable generation, demand-side and smart grid and other clean infrastructure technologies. The availability and continuation of public policy support mechanisms will drive a significant part of the economics and viability of the Company’s growth strategy and expansion into clean energy investments.

Previous wording

The investment in, or acquisition of, companies and assets are subject to substantial risks, including the failure to identify material problems during due diligence (for which the Company may not be indemnified post-closing) and the risk of overpaying for assets (or not making investments or acquisitions on an accretive basis). The integration and consolidation of acquisitions requires substantial human, financial and other resources and, ultimately, the Company’s acquisitions may divert management’s attention from the Company’s existing business concerns, disrupt the Company’s ongoing business or not be successfully integrated. There can be no assurances that any future investments or acquisitions will perform as expected or that the returns from such investments or acquisitions will support the financing utilized to invest in, acquire or maintain them. A failure to achieve the financial returns the Company expects when it invests in or acquires generation assets could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s ability to grow its business and make cash distributions to its stockholders. Any failure of the Company’s acquired generation assets to be accretive or difficulty in integrating such acquisition into the Company’s business could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s ability to grow its business and make cash distributions to its stockholders. As a result, the consummation of acquisitions could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and ability to pay dividends to holders of the Company’s common stock.

Current wording

The investment in, or acquisition of, companies and assets are subject to substantial risks, including the failure to identify material problems during due diligence (for which the Company may not be indemnified post-closing) and the risk of overpaying for assets (or not making investments or acquisitions on an accretive basis). The integration and consolidation of acquisitions requires substantial human, financial and other resources and, ultimately, the Company’s acquisitions may divert management’s attention from the Company’s existing business operations, disrupt the Company’s ongoing business or not be successfully integrated. There can be no assurances that any future investments or acquisitions will perform as expected or that the returns from such investments or acquisitions will support the financing utilized to invest in, acquire or maintain them. A failure to achieve the financial returns the Company expects when it invests in or acquires generation assets could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s ability to grow its business and make cash distributions to its stockholders. Any failure of the Company’s acquired generation assets to be accretive or difficulty in integrating such acquisition into the Company’s business could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s ability to grow its business and make cash distributions to its stockholders. As a result, the consummation of acquisitions could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and ability to pay dividends to holders of the Company’s common stock.

Previous wording

The majority of the electric power the Company generates within the Renewables segment is sold under long-term offtake agreements with public utilities or industrial or commercial end-users, with a weighted average remaining duration, based on CAFD, of approximately 12 years. As of December 31, 2024, the largest customers of the Company’s power generation and BESS assets, including assets in which the Company has less than a 100% membership interest, were SCE and PG&E, which represented 24% and 17%, respectively, of total consolidated revenues generated by the Company during the year ended December 31, 2024.

Current wording

The majority of the electric power the Company generates within the Renewables & Storage segment is sold under long-term offtake agreements with public utilities or industrial or commercial end-users, with a weighted average remaining duration, based on CAFD, of approximately 12 years. As of December 31, 2025, the largest customers of the Company’s power generation and BESS assets, including assets in which the Company has less than a 100% membership interest, were SCE and PG&E, which represented 22% and 16%, respectively, of total consolidated revenues generated by the Company during the year ended December 31, 2025.

Previous wording

The Company’s ability to effectively consummate future investments or acquisitions will also depend on the Company’s ability to arrange the required or desired financing for investments or acquisitions.

Current wording

The Company’s ability to effectively consummate future investments or acquisitions will also depend on the Company’s ability to arrange the required or desired financing for such transactions.

Previous wording

The Company may not have sufficient credit availability under the Company’s financing arrangements or have access to facility-level financing on commercially reasonable terms when investment or acquisition opportunities arise. An inability to obtain the required or desired financing could significantly limit the Company’s ability to consummate future investments or acquisitions and effectuate the Company’s growth strategy. If financing is available, utilization of the Company’s credit available under its financing arrangements or facility-level financing for all or a portion of the purchase price of an investment or acquisition could significantly increase the Company’s interest expense, impose additional or more restrictive covenants and reduce CAFD. Similarly, the issuance of additional equity securities as consideration for investments or acquisitions could cause significant stockholder dilution and reduce the Company’s dividends if the investments or acquisitions are not sufficiently accretive. The Company’s ability to consummate future investments or acquisitions may also depend on the Company’s ability to obtain any required regulatory approvals for such investments or acquisitions.

Current wording

The Company may not have sufficient credit availability under the Company’s financing arrangements or have access to facility-level financing on commercially reasonable terms when investment or acquisition opportunities arise. An inability to obtain the necessary or desired financing could significantly limit the Company’s ability to consummate future investments or acquisitions and effectuate the Company’s growth strategy. If financing is available, utilization of the Company’s credit available under its financing arrangements or facility-level financing for all or a portion of the purchase price of an investment or acquisition could significantly increase the Company’s interest expense, impose additional or more restrictive covenants and reduce CAFD. Similarly, the Company’s issuance of additional equity securities as consideration for investments or acquisitions could cause significant stockholder dilution and reduce the Company’s per share dividends, particularly if the investments or acquisitions are not sufficiently accretive. The Company’s ability to consummate future investments or acquisitions may also depend on the Company’s ability to obtain any required regulatory approvals or other third-party approvals for such investments or acquisitions.

Previous wording

As of December 31, 2024, the Company had approximately $7,235 million of total consolidated indebtedness, $5,110 million of which was incurred by the Company’s non-guarantor subsidiaries. In addition, the Company’s share of its unconsolidated affiliates’ total indebtedness and letters of credit outstanding as of December 31, 2024, totaled approximately $282 million and $39 million, respectively (calculated as the Company’s unconsolidated affiliates’ total indebtedness as of such date multiplied by the Company’s percentage membership interest in such assets).

Current wording

As of December 31, 2025, the Company had approximately $8,674 million of total consolidated indebtedness, $6,188 million of which was incurred by the Company’s non-guarantor subsidiaries. In addition, the Company’s share of its unconsolidated affiliates’ total indebtedness and letters of credit outstanding as of December 31, 2025 totaled approximately $259 million and $42 million, respectively (calculated as the Company’s unconsolidated affiliates’ total indebtedness as of such date multiplied by the Company’s percentage membership interest in such assets).

Previous wording

If solar or wind conditions are unfavorable, the Company’s electricity generation and revenue from renewable generation facilities may be substantially below the Company’s expectations. The electricity produced and revenues generated by a solar or wind energy generation facility is highly dependent on suitable solar or wind conditions, as applicable, and associated weather conditions, which are beyond the Company’s control. Disruption in the generation of solar or wind energy could limit a facility’s ability to generate electricity at its desired level. Should a generation facility fail to perform at the required levels, or other unplanned disruptions occur, the facility may be forced to fulfill an underlying contractual obligation by purchasing electricity at higher prices. In addition, the Company’s facilities may be exposed, based on specific contractual terms, to a locational basis risk resulting from a difference in the price received for generation sold at the location where the power is generated and the price paid for generation purchased at the contracted delivery point, which could lead to potential lower revenues in circumstances where the price received is lower than the price that is paid. Furthermore, components of the Company’s systems, such as solar panels and inverters, could be damaged by severe weather, such as wildfires, hailstorms, lightning, tornadoes or freezing temperatures and other winter weather conditions. Unfavorable weather and atmospheric conditions could impair the effectiveness of the Company’s assets or reduce their output beneath their rated capacity or require shutdown of key equipment, impeding operation of the Company’s renewable energy assets. For example, in February 2021, many electricity generating assets, including the Company’s wind facilities in Texas, were unable to operate and experienced outages for a few days as a result of the extreme winter weather conditions. In addition, climate change may have the long-term effect of changing wind patterns at the Company’s facilities. Changing wind patterns could cause changes in expected electricity generation. These events could also degrade equipment or components and the interconnection and transmission facilities’ lives or maintenance costs.

Current wording

If solar or wind conditions are unfavorable, the Company’s electricity generation and revenue from renewable generation facilities may be substantially below the Company’s expectations. The electricity produced and revenues generated by a solar or wind energy generation facility is highly dependent on suitable solar or wind conditions, as applicable, and associated weather conditions, which are beyond the Company’s control. Disruption in the generation of solar or wind energy could limit a facility’s ability to generate electricity at its desired level. Should a generation facility fail to perform at the required levels, or other unplanned disruptions occur, the facility may be forced to fulfill an underlying contractual obligation by purchasing electricity at higher prices. In addition, the Company’s facilities may be exposed, based on specific contractual terms, to a locational basis risk resulting from a difference in the price received for generation sold at the location where the power is generated and the price paid for generation purchased at the contracted delivery point, which could lead to potential lower revenues in circumstances where the price received is lower than the price that is paid. Furthermore, components of the Company’s systems, such as solar panels and inverters, could be damaged by severe weather, such as wildfires, hailstorms, lightning, tornadoes, floods or freezing temperatures and other winter weather conditions. Unfavorable weather and atmospheric conditions could impair the effectiveness of the Company’s assets or reduce their output beneath their rated capacity or require shutdown of key equipment, impeding operation of the Company’s renewable energy assets. For example, in February 2021, many electricity generating assets, including the Company’s wind facilities in Texas, were unable to operate and experienced outages for a few days as a result of the extreme winter weather conditions. In addition, climate change may have the long-term effect of changing wind patterns at the Company’s facilities. Changing wind patterns could cause changes in expected electricity generation. These events could also degrade equipment or components and the interconnection and transmission facilities’ lives or maintenance costs.

Previous wording

Although the Company bases its investment decisions with respect to each renewable generation facility on the findings of related wind and solar studies conducted on-site prior to construction or based on historical conditions at existing facilities, actual climatic conditions at a facility site, particularly wind conditions, may not conform to the findings of these studies and may be affected by variations in weather patterns, including any potential impact of climate change. Therefore, the Company’s solar and wind energy facilities may not meet anticipated production levels or the rated capacity of the Company’s generation assets, which could adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Current wording

Although the Company bases its investment decisions with respect to each renewable generation facility on the findings of related wind and solar studies conducted on-site prior to construction or based on historical conditions at existing facilities, actual climatic conditions at a facility site, particularly wind conditions, may not conform to the findings of these studies and may be affected by variations in weather patterns, including any potential impact of climate change. Therefore, the Company’s solar and wind energy facilities may not meet anticipated production levels or the rated capacity of the Company’s generation assets, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Previous wording

The ongoing operation of the Company’s facilities involves risks that include the breakdown or failure of equipment or processes or performance below expected levels of output or efficiency due to wear and tear, latent defect, design error, operator error or force majeure events, among other things. The Company’s facilities are subject to the risks inherent with power generation facilities, including, but not limited to, degradation of equipment in excess of the Company’s expectations, system failures and outages, which could impair the ability of the facilities to meet the Company’s performance expectations. In addition, replacement and spare parts for key components may be difficult or costly to acquire or may be unavailable. Operation of the Company’s facilities also involves risks that the Company will be unable to transport its products to its customers in an efficient manner due to a lack of transmission capacity. Unplanned outages of generating units, including extensions of scheduled outages due to mechanical failures or other problems, occur from time to time and are an inherent risk of the business. Unplanned outages typically increase operation and maintenance expenses, capital expenditures and may reduce revenues as a result of selling fewer MWh or require the Company to incur significant costs as a result of obtaining substitute RA or replacement power from third parties in the open market to satisfy forward power sales obligations. The Company’s inability to operate its electric generation assets efficiently, manage capital expenditures and costs and generate earnings and cash flow from the Company’s asset-based businesses could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. While the Company maintains insurance, obtains warranties from vendors and obligates contractors to meet certain performance levels, the proceeds of such insurance, warranties or performance guarantees may not cover the Company’s lost revenues, increased expenses or liquidated damages payments should it experience equipment breakdown or non-performance by contractors or vendors. The Company maintains an amount of insurance protection that it considers adequate but cannot provide any assurance that the Company’s insurance will be sufficient or effective under all circumstances and against all hazards or liabilities to which the Company may be subject. Furthermore, the Company’s insurance coverage is subject to deductibles, caps, exclusions and other limitations. A loss for which the Company is not fully insured (which may include a significant judgment against any facility or facility operator) could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. Further, due to rising insurance costs and changes in the insurance markets, the Company cannot provide any assurance that its insurance coverage will continue to be available at all …

Excerpt shortened here; the source contains the full paragraph.

Current wording

The ongoing operation of the Company’s facilities involves risks that include the breakdown or failure of equipment or processes or performance below expected levels of output or efficiency due to wear and tear, latent defect, design error, operator error or force majeure events, among other things. The Company’s facilities are subject to the risks inherent with power generation facilities, including, but not limited to, degradation of equipment in excess of the Company’s expectations, system failures and outages, which could impair the ability of the facilities to meet the Company’s performance expectations. In addition, replacement and spare parts for key components may be difficult or costly to acquire or may be unavailable. Operation of the Company’s facilities also involves risks that the Company will be unable to transport its products to its customers in an efficient manner due to a lack of transmission capacity. Unplanned outages of generating units, including extensions of scheduled outages due to mechanical failures or other problems, occur from time to time and are an inherent risk of the business. Unplanned outages typically increase operation and maintenance expenses, capital expenditures and may reduce revenues as a result of selling fewer MWh or require the Company to incur significant costs as a result of obtaining substitute RA or replacement power from third parties in the open market to satisfy forward power sales obligations. The Company’s inability to operate its electric generation assets efficiently, manage capital expenditures and costs and generate earnings and cash flow from the Company’s asset-based businesses could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. While the Company maintains insurance, obtains warranties from vendors and obligates contractors to meet certain performance levels, the proceeds of such insurance, warranties or performance guarantees may not cover the Company’s lost revenues, increased expenses or liquidated damages payments should it experience equipment breakdown or non-performance by contractors or vendors. Additionally, the proceeds of any such insurance, warranties or performance guarantees may not be received in a timely manner. The Company maintains an amount of insurance protection that it considers adequate but cannot provide any assurance that the Company’s insurance will be sufficient or effective under all circumstances and against all hazards or liabilities to which the Company may be subject. Furthermore, the Company’s insurance coverage is subject to deductibles, caps, exclusions and other limitations. A loss for which the Company is not fully insured (which may include a significant judgment against any facility or facility operator) could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. Further, securing adequate insurance coverage has become…

Excerpt shortened here; the source contains the full paragraph.

Previous wording

Power generation involves hazardous activities, including acquiring, transporting and unloading fuel, operating large pieces of rotating equipment and delivering electricity to transmission and distribution systems. In addition to natural risks such as earthquakes, floods, lightning, hurricanes and strong wind, other hazards, such as fire, explosion, structural collapse and machinery failure are inherent risks in the Company’s operations. These and other hazards can cause significant personal injury or loss of life, severe damage to and destruction of property, plant and equipment and contamination of, or damage to, the environment and suspension of operations. To the extent an event was not covered by insurance policies, such incidents could subject the Company to substantial liabilities arising from emergency response, environmental cleanup and restoration costs, claims made by neighboring landowners and other third parties for personal injury and property damage, and fines or penalties for any related violations of environmental laws or regulations.

Current wording

Power generation involves hazardous activities, including acquiring, transporting and unloading fuel, operating large pieces of rotating equipment and delivering electricity to transmission and distribution systems. In addition to natural risks such as earthquakes, floods, lightning, hurricanes, wildfires and strong wind, other hazards, such as fire, explosion, structural collapse and machinery failure are inherent risks in the Company’s operations. These and other hazards can cause significant personal injury or loss of life, severe damage to and destruction of property, plant and equipment and contamination of, or damage to, the environment and suspension of operations. To the extent an event was not covered by insurance policies, such incidents could subject the Company to substantial liabilities arising from emergency response, environmental cleanup and restoration costs, claims made by neighboring landowners and other third parties for personal injury and property damage, and fines or penalties for any related violations of environmental laws or regulations.

Previous wording

The Company often relies on a single contracted supplier or a small number of suppliers for the provision of fuel, transportation of fuel, equipment, technology and/or other services required for the operation of certain facilities. In addition, certain of the Company’s suppliers provide long-term warranties with respect to the performance of their products or services. If any of these suppliers cannot perform under their agreements with the Company, or satisfy their related warranty obligations, the Company will need to utilize the marketplace to provide or repair these products and services. There can be no assurance that the marketplace can provide these products and services as, when and where required. The Company may not be able to enter into replacement agreements on favorable terms or at all. If the Company is unable to enter into replacement agreements to provide for fuel, equipment, technology and other required services, it would seek to purchase the related goods or services at market prices, exposing the Company to market price volatility and the risk that fuel and transportation may not be available during certain periods at any price. The Company may also be required to make significant capital contributions to remove, replace or redesign equipment that cannot be supported or maintained by replacement suppliers, which could have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition, results of operations, credit support terms and cash flows.

Current wording

The Company often relies on a single contracted supplier or a small number of suppliers for the provision of fuel, transportation of fuel, equipment, technology and/or other services required for the operation of certain facilities. In addition, certain of the Company’s suppliers provide long-term warranties with respect to the performance of their products or services. If any of these suppliers cannot perform under their agreements with the Company, or satisfy their related warranty obligations, the Company will need to utilize the marketplace to provide or repair these products and services. There can be no assurance that the marketplace can provide these products and services as, when and where required. The Company may not be able to enter into replacement agreements on favorable terms or at all. If the Company is unable to enter into replacement agreements to provide for fuel, equipment, technology and other required services, it would seek to purchase the related goods or services at market prices, exposing the Company to market price volatility and the risk that fuel and transportation may not be available during certain periods at any price. The Company may also be required to make significant capital contributions to remove, replace or redesign equipment that cannot be supported or maintained by replacement suppliers, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations, credit support terms and cash flows.

Previous wording

The Company uses interest rate swaps to manage interest rate risk and uses energy-related financial instruments to manage variability in earnings due to fluctuations in market prices. As a result, changes in the underlying assumptions or use of alternative valuation methods could affect the reported fair value of these contracts. If the values of these financial contracts change in a manner that the Company does not anticipate, or if a counterparty fails to perform under a contract, it could harm the business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Current wording

The Company uses interest rate swaps to manage interest rate risk and uses energy-related financial instruments to manage variability in earnings due to fluctuations in market prices. As a result, changes in the underlying assumptions or use of alternative valuation methods could affect the reported fair value of these contracts. If the values of these financial contracts change in a manner that the Company does not anticipate, or if a counterparty fails to perform under a contract, it could harm the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Previous wording

Risks that are beyond the Company’s control, including but not limited to acts of terrorism or related acts of war, natural disasters, severe weather, changes in weather patterns, flooding, wildfires, pandemics, inflation, supply chain disruptions, hostile cyber intrusions or other catastrophic events, could have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Current wording

Risks that are beyond the Company’s control, including but not limited to acts of terrorism or related acts of war, natural disasters, severe weather, changes in weather patterns, flooding, wildfires, pandemics, inflation, supply chain disruptions, hostile cyber intrusions or other catastrophic events, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Previous wording

The Company’s generation facilities that were acquired or those that the Company otherwise acquires or constructs and the facilities of third parties on which they rely may be targets of terrorist activities, as well as events occurring in response to or in connection with them, that could cause environmental repercussions and/or result in full or partial disruption of the facilities ability to generate, transmit, transport or distribute electricity or natural gas. Strategic targets, such as energy-related facilities, may be at greater risk of future terrorist activities than other domestic targets. Inflation, disruption in global and domestic supply chains, and other economic conditions could negatively impact the Company’s business in a manner that could adversely affect the Company’s results of operations and financial condition. Hostile cyber intrusions, including those targeting information systems as well as electronic control systems used at the generating plants and for the related distribution systems, could severely disrupt business operations and result in loss of service to customers, as well as create significant expense to repair security breaches or system damage.

Current wording

The Company’s generation facilities that were acquired or those that the Company otherwise acquires or constructs and the facilities of third parties on which they rely may be targets of terrorist activities, as well as events occurring in response to or in connection with them, that could cause environmental repercussions and/or result in full or partial disruption of the facilities ability to generate, transmit, transport or distribute electricity or natural gas. Strategic targets, such as energy-related facilities, may be at greater risk of future terrorist activities than other domestic targets. Inflation, disruption in global and domestic supply chains, and other economic conditions could negatively impact the Company’s business in a manner that could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition. Hostile cyber intrusions, including those targeting information systems as well as electronic control systems used at the generating plants and for the related distribution systems, could severely disrupt business operations and result in loss of service to customers, as well as create significant expense to repair security breaches or system damage.

Previous wording

Furthermore, certain of the Company’s assets are located in active earthquake zones in California and Arizona, and certain facilities and suppliers conduct their operations in the same region or in other locations that are susceptible to natural disasters. In addition, California and some of the locations where certain suppliers are located, from time to time, have experienced shortages of water, electric power and natural gas. Catastrophic events, such as an earthquake, wildfire, drought, flood, pandemics or localized extended outages of critical utilities or transportation systems, or any critical resource shortages, affecting the Company or its suppliers, could cause a significant interruption in the business, damage or destroy the Company’s facilities or those of its suppliers or the manufacturing equipment or inventory of the Company’s suppliers. The Company has a limited number of highly skilled employees for some of its operations and relies on certain independent contractors and other service providers. If a large proportion of the Company’s employees in those critical positions, or independent contractors or other service providers to the Company or its customers were to be negatively impacted by a catastrophic event at the same time, the Company would rely upon its business continuity plans in an effort to continue operations at its facilities, but there is no certainty that such measures will be sufficient to mitigate the adverse impact to its operations that could result from shortages of highly skilled employees, independent contractors or service providers. Any such terrorist acts, environmental repercussions or disruptions or natural disasters could result in a significant decrease in revenues or significant reconstruction or remediation costs, beyond what could be recovered through insurance policies, which could have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Current wording

Furthermore, certain of the Company’s assets are located in active earthquake zones in California and Arizona, and certain facilities and suppliers conduct their operations in the same region or in other locations that are susceptible to natural disasters. In addition, California and some of the locations where certain suppliers are located, from time to time, have experienced shortages of water, electric power and natural gas. Catastrophic events, such as an earthquake, wildfire, drought, flood, pandemics or localized extended outages of critical utilities or transportation systems, or any critical resource shortages, affecting the Company or its suppliers, could cause a significant interruption in the business, damage or destroy the Company’s facilities or those of its suppliers or the manufacturing equipment or inventory of the Company’s suppliers. The Company relies on a limited number of highly skilled personnel for some of its operations, as well as certain independent contractors and other service providers. If a large proportion of the Company’s or CEG’s personnel in those critical positions, or independent contractors or other service providers to the Company or its customers, were to be negatively impacted by a catastrophic event at the same time, the Company would rely upon its business continuity plans in an effort to continue operations at its facilities, but there is no certainty that such measures will be sufficient to mitigate the adverse impact to its operations that could result from shortages of highly skilled personnel, independent contractors or service providers. Any such terrorist acts, environmental repercussions or disruptions or natural disasters could result in a significant decrease in revenues or significant reconstruction or remediation costs, beyond what could be recovered through insurance policies, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Previous wording

Numerous functions affecting the efficient operation of the Company’s businesses depend on the secure and reliable storage, processing and communication of electronic data and the use of sophisticated computer hardware and software systems. The operation of the Company’s generating assets relies on cyber-based technologies and has been the target of disruptive actions. In addition, the Company’s business is dependent upon the computer systems of third-party providers to process certain data necessary to conduct business, including sensitive employee information, credit card transaction information and other sensitive data.

Current wording

Numerous functions affecting the efficient operation of the Company’s businesses depend on the secure and reliable storage, processing and communication of electronic data and the use of sophisticated computer hardware and software systems. The operation of the Company’s generating assets relies on cyber-based technologies and has been the target of disruptive actions. In addition, the Company is dependent upon the computer systems of third-party providers to process certain data necessary to conduct its business, including sensitive employee information, credit card transaction information and other sensitive data.

Previous wording

Potential disruptive actions could result from cyberspace breaches, ransomware or other malware, phishing or social engineering schemes or attacks or other cybersecurity threats, attacks or intrusions, including by computer hackers, foreign governments and cyber terrorists, or otherwise be compromised by unintentional events with respect to the Company or any of its contractors or customers. If the Company or its third-party providers’ systems for protecting against cyber incidents prove to be insufficient, current or planned business operations could be interrupted, property could be damaged and confidential, proprietary or other sensitive information, including employee, customer or supplier information could be lost, stolen, or corrupted, causing the Company to incur significant losses of revenues, other substantial liabilities and damages, costs to replace or repair damaged equipment and damage to the Company’s reputation. The Company’s insurance may not fully protect it against such losses, and costs for insurance may also increase as a result of cybersecurity threats. In addition, the Company may experience increased capital and operating costs to implement increased security for its cyber systems and generating assets.

Current wording

Potential disruptive actions could result from cyberspace breaches, ransomware or other malware, phishing or social engineering schemes or attacks or other cybersecurity threats, attacks or intrusions, including by computer hackers, foreign governments and cyber terrorists, or otherwise be compromised by unintentional events with respect to the Company or any of its contractors or customers. If the Company or any of its third-party providers’ systems for protecting against such cybersecurity threats prove to be insufficient, current or planned business operations could be interrupted, property could be damaged and confidential, proprietary or other sensitive information, including employee, customer or supplier information, could be lost, stolen or corrupted, which may cause the Company to incur significant losses of revenues, other substantial liabilities and damages, costs to replace or repair damaged equipment and damage to the Company’s reputation. The Company’s insurance may not fully protect it against such losses, and costs for insurance may also increase as a result of cybersecurity threats. In addition, the Company may experience increased capital and operating costs to implement increased security for its cyber systems and generating assets.

Previous wording

The Company depends on electric distribution and transmission facilities owned and operated by others to deliver the wholesale power it will sell from its electric generation assets to its customers. A failure or delay in the operation or development of these facilities or a significant increase in the cost of the development of such facilities could result in lost revenues. Such failures or delays could limit the amount of power the Company’s operating facilities deliver or delay the completion of the Company’s facilities under construction. Additionally, such failures, delays or increased costs could have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition and results of operations. If a region’s power transmission infrastructure is inadequate, the Company’s recovery of wholesale costs and profits may be limited. If restrictive transmission price regulation is imposed, the transmission companies may not have a sufficient incentive to invest in expansion of transmission infrastructure. The Company also cannot predict whether distribution or transmission facilities will be expanded in specific markets to accommodate competitive access to those markets. In addition, certain of the Company’s operating facilities’ generation of electricity may be curtailed without compensation due to transmission limitations or limitations on the electricity grid’s ability to accommodate intermittent and other electricity generating sources, reducing the Company’s revenues and impairing its ability to capitalize fully on a particular facility’s generating potential. Such curtailments could have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Furthermore, economic congestion on transmission networks in certain of the markets in which the Company operates may occur and the Company may be deemed responsible for congestion costs. If the Company were liable for such congestion costs, its financial results could be adversely affected.

Current wording

The Company depends on electric distribution and transmission facilities owned and operated by others to deliver the wholesale power it will sell from its electric generation assets to its customers. A failure or delay in the operation or development of these facilities or a significant increase in the cost of the development of such facilities could result in lost revenues. Such failures or delays could limit the amount of power the Company’s operating facilities deliver or delay the completion of the Company’s facilities under construction. Additionally, such failures, delays or increased costs could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. If a region’s power transmission infrastructure is inadequate, the Company’s recovery of wholesale costs and profits may be limited. If restrictive transmission price regulation is imposed, the transmission companies may not have a sufficient incentive to invest in expansion of transmission infrastructure. The Company also cannot predict whether distribution or transmission facilities will be expanded in specific markets to accommodate competitive access to those markets. In addition, certain of the Company’s operating facilities’ generation of electricity may be curtailed without compensation due to transmission limitations or limitations on the electricity grid’s ability to accommodate intermittent and other electricity generating sources, reducing the Company’s revenues and impairing its ability to capitalize fully on a particular facility’s generating potential. Such curtailments could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Furthermore, economic congestion on transmission networks in certain of the markets in which the Company operates may occur and the Company may be deemed responsible for congestion costs. If the Company were liable for such congestion costs, its financial results could be adversely affected.

Previous wording

Delivery of fuels to fuel the facilities in the Flexible Generation segment is dependent upon the infrastructure (including natural gas pipelines) available to serve each such generation facility as well as upon the continuing financial viability of contractual counterparties. As a result, the Company is subject to the risks of disruptions or curtailments in the production of power at these generation facilities if a counterparty fails to perform or if there is a disruption in the fuel delivery infrastructure.

Current wording

Delivery of fuel supplies to the Company’s facilities in the Flexible Generation segment is dependent upon the infrastructure (including natural gas pipelines) available to serve each such generation facility as well as upon the continuing financial viability of contractual counterparties. As a result, the Company is subject to the risks of disruptions or curtailments in the production of power at these generation facilities if a counterparty fails to perform or if there is a disruption in the fuel delivery infrastructure.

Previous wording

The Company depends on key personnel and its ability to attract and retain additional skilled management and other personnel, the loss of any of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

Current wording

The Company depends on key personnel and its and CEG’s ability to attract and retain additional skilled management and other personnel, the loss of any of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

Previous wording

The Company believes its current operations and future success depend largely on the continued services of key personnel employed by the Company and CEG. Although the Company currently has access to the resources of CEG, the loss of key personnel employed by the Company or CEG could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

Current wording

The Company does not have employees of its own and instead depends solely on the services provided by or under the direction of CEG under the CEG Master Services Agreement to carry out its operations. The Company therefore believes its current operations and future success depend largely on the continued services of key personnel employed by CEG, including those individuals who provide management, operational, technical and other services to the Company under the CEG Master Services Agreement. The expertise, industry knowledge and experience of these individuals are critical to the Company’s ability to operate its business, execute its growth strategy and maintain effective internal controls and compliance. Although the Company currently has access to the resources of CEG, the loss of one or more key personnel of the Company or CEG, or the inability of the Company or CEG to attract, retain or adequately replace qualified individuals in a timely manner, could disrupt the Company’s operations, delay or impair the execution of its business plans and negatively impact its relationships with customers, suppliers and other third parties. In addition, because CEG personnel and support staff that provide services to the Company under the CEG Master Services Agreement are not solely responsible for the management and administration of the Company, and the CEG Master Services Agreement does not require any specific individuals to be provided by CEG, there can be no assurance that the Company will have continued access to the same level of expertise or attention from CEG personnel in the future. Any significant reduction in the quality or quantity of services provided by CEG personnel could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

Previous wording

Risks Related to the Company’s Relationships with GIP, TotalEnergies and CEG

Current wording

Risks Related to the Company’s Relationships with CEG

Previous wording

•GIP and TotalEnergies, through their equal ownership of CEG, the Company’s controlling stockholder, exercise substantial influence over the Company. The Company is highly dependent on GIP, TotalEnergies and CEG.

Current wording

CEG exercises substantial influence over the Company, and the Company is highly dependent on CEG.

Previous wording

CEG owns all of the Company’s outstanding Class B and Class D common stock. The Company’s outstanding Class B and Class D common stock is entitled to one vote per share and 1/100th of a vote per share, respectively. As a result of its ownership of the Class B and Class D common stock, CEG owns 54.91% of the combined voting power of the Company’s common stock as of December 31, 2024. CEG is equally owned by GIP and TotalEnergies. On October 1, 2024, BlackRock acquired 100% of the business and assets of GIM, which is the investment manager of the GIP funds that own an interest in CEG.

Current wording

CEG owns all of the Company’s outstanding Class B and Class D common stock. The Company’s outstanding Class B and Class D common stock is entitled to one vote per share and 1/100th of a vote per share, respectively. As a result of its ownership of the Class B and Class D common stock, CEG owns 54.89% of the combined voting power of the Company’s common stock as of December 31, 2025.

Previous wording

Furthermore, effective January 1, 2025, the Company effected a reorganization pursuant to which all of the employees of the Company transferred to CEG. As a result, the Company depends solely on the services provided by or under the direction of CEG under the CEG Master Services Agreement to carry out its operations. CEG personnel and support staff that provide services to the Company under the CEG Master Services Agreement are not required to, and the Company does not expect that they will, have as their primary responsibility the management and administration of the Company or to act exclusively for the Company, and the CEG Master Services Agreement does not require any specific individuals to be provided by CEG. Under the CEG Master Services Agreement, CEG has the discretion to determine which of its employees perform assignments required to be provided to the Company. Any failure to effectively manage the Company’s processes related to internal controls over financial reporting, operations or to implement its strategy could have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. The CEG Master Services Agreement will continue in perpetuity, until terminated in accordance with its terms.

Current wording

Furthermore, effective January 1, 2025, the Company effected a reorganization pursuant to which all of the employees of the Company transferred to CEG. As a result, the Company does not have employees of its own and instead depends solely on the services provided by or under the direction of CEG under the CEG Master Services Agreement to carry out its operations. CEG personnel and support staff that provide services to the Company under the CEG Master Services Agreement are not solely responsible for the management and administration of the Company, and the CEG Master Services Agreement does not require any specific individuals to be provided by CEG. Under the CEG Master Services Agreement, CEG has the discretion to determine which of its employees perform assignments required to be provided to the Company. Any failure to effectively manage the Company’s processes related to internal controls over financial reporting, operations or to implement its strategy could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. The CEG Master Services Agreement will continue in perpetuity, until terminated in accordance with its terms.

Previous wording

The Company also depends upon CEG and third parties for the provision of management, administration, O&M and certain other services at certain of the Company’s facilities. Any failure by CEG or third parties to perform its requirements under these arrangements or the failure by the Company to identify and contract with replacement service providers, if required, could adversely affect the operation of the Company’s facilities and have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Current wording

The Company also depends upon CEG and third parties for the provision of management, administration, O&M and certain other services at certain of the Company’s facilities. Any failure by CEG or third parties to perform its requirements under these arrangements or the failure by the Company to identify and contract with replacement service providers, if required, could adversely affect the operation of the Company’s facilities and have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Previous wording

Due to CEG’s approximate 54.91% combined voting power in the Company, the ability of other holders of the Company’s Class A and Class C common stock to exercise control over the corporate governance of the Company is limited. CEG has a substantial influence on the Company’s affairs and CEG’s voting power constitutes a large percentage of any quorum of the Company’s stockholders voting on any matter requiring the approval of the Company’s stockholders. It is possible that the interests of CEG and its affiliates may in certain circumstances differ from the interests of the Company or other holders of the Company’s Class A and Class C common stock.

Current wording

Due to CEG’s approximate 54.89% combined voting power in the Company, the ability of other holders of the Company’s Class A and Class C common stock to exercise control over the corporate governance of the Company is limited. CEG has a substantial influence on the Company’s affairs and CEG’s voting power constitutes a large percentage of any quorum of the Company’s stockholders voting on any matter requiring the approval of the Company’s stockholders. It is possible that the interests of CEG and its affiliates may in certain circumstances differ from the interests of the Company or other holders of the Company’s Class A and Class C common stock.

Previous wording

The Company relies on CEG to provide certain services under the CEG Master Services Agreement, including the provision of information technology services. The CEG Master Services Agreement provides that CEG may terminate the agreement upon 180 days prior written notice of termination to the Company (i) if the Company defaults in the performance or observance of any material term, condition or covenant contained in the agreement in a manner that results in material harm to CEG and the default continues unremedied for a period of 30 days after written notice of the breach is given; or (ii) upon the happening of certain events relating to the bankruptcy or insolvency of the Company. If CEG terminates the CEG Master Services Agreement or defaults in the performance of its obligations under the agreement, the Company may be unable to contract with CEG or a substitute service provider on similar terms or at all, and the costs of substituting service providers may be substantial. In addition, in light of CEG’s familiarity with the Company’s assets, a substitute service provider may not be able to provide the same level of service due to lack of pre-existing synergies. In connection with the provision of services under the CEG Master Services Agreement, CEG is in the process of implementing an enterprise resource planning, or ERP, application to support its core business processes and data. The implementation of an ERP application requires significant human resources, which could impact CEG’s ability to provide services to the Company under the CEG Master Services Agreement. In addition, the Company will rely on CEG’s ERP application to support its core business processes, data, financial accounting, financial reporting and internal controls. If CEG is unable to complete an effective implementation of its ERP application in a timely manner, it could adversely impact the Company and its ability to meet its financial reporting and internal control requirements.

Current wording

The Company relies on CEG to provide certain services under the CEG Master Services Agreement, including the provision of information technology services. The CEG Master Services Agreement provides that CEG may terminate the agreement upon 180 days prior written notice of termination to the Company (i) if the Company defaults in the performance or observance of any material term, condition or covenant contained in the agreement in a manner that results in material harm to CEG and the default continues unremedied for a period of 30 days after written notice of the breach is given; or (ii) upon the happening of certain events relating to the bankruptcy or insolvency of the Company. If CEG terminates the CEG Master Services Agreement or defaults in the performance of its obligations under the agreement, the Company may be unable to contract with CEG or a substitute service provider on similar terms or at all, and the costs of substituting service providers may be substantial. In addition, in light of CEG’s familiarity with the Company’s assets, a substitute service provider may not be able to provide the same level of service due to lack of pre-existing synergies. In connection with the provision of services under the CEG Master Services Agreement, during January 2026, CEG began the use of a new enterprise resource planning, or ERP, application to support its core business processes and data. The implementation of the new ERP application will continue to require significant human resources, which could impact CEG’s ability to provide services to the Company under the CEG Master Services Agreement. CEG expects the new ERP application to be fully implemented by the end of the first quarter of 2026. In addition, the Company is relying on CEG’s new ERP application to support its core business processes, data, financial accounting, financial reporting and internal controls. If CEG is unable to complete an effective implementation of its ERP application in a timely manner during the first quarter of 2026, it could adversely impact the Company and its ability to meet its financial reporting and internal control requirements.

Previous wording

As of December 31, 2024, CEG controls 54.91% of the Company’s combined voting power and is able to elect all of the Company’s Board of Directors. As a result, the Company is considered a “controlled company” for the purposes of the NYSE listing requirements. As a “controlled company,” the Company is permitted to, and the Company may, opt out of the NYSE listing requirements that would require (i) a majority of the members of the Company’s Board of Directors to be independent, (ii) that the Company establish a compensation committee and a nominating and governance committee, each comprised entirely of independent directors, or (iii) an annual performance evaluation of the nominating and governance and compensation committees. The NYSE listing requirements are intended to ensure that directors who meet the independence standards are free of any conflicting interest that could influence their actions as directors. While the Company has elected to have a Corporate Governance, Conflicts and Nominating Committee consisting entirely of independent directors and to conduct an annual performance evaluation of this committee, the majority of the members of the Company’s Board of Directors are not considered independent and the Company’s compensation committee is not comprised entirely of independent directors. Therefore, the Company’s stockholders may not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are subject to all of the applicable NYSE listing requirements.

Current wording

As of December 31, 2025, CEG controls 54.89% of the Company’s combined voting power and is able to elect all of the Company’s Board of Directors. As a result, the Company is considered a “controlled company” for the purposes of the NYSE listing requirements. As a “controlled company,” the Company is permitted to, and the Company may, take advantage of certain exemptions from corporate governance provisions in the NYSE listing requirements, including provisions that would require (i) a majority of the members of the Company’s Board of Directors to be independent, (ii) that the Company establish a compensation committee and a nominating and governance committee, each comprised entirely of independent directors, or (iii) an annual performance evaluation of the nominating and governance and compensation committees. The NYSE listing requirements are intended to ensure that directors who meet the independence standards are free of any conflicting interest that could influence their actions as directors. While the Company has elected to have a Corporate Governance, Conflicts and Nominating Committee consisting entirely of independent directors and to conduct an annual performance evaluation of this committee, the majority of the members of the Company’s Board of Directors are not considered independent and the Company’s compensation committee is not comprised entirely of independent directors. Therefore, the Company’s stockholders may not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are subject to all of the applicable NYSE listing requirements.

Previous wording

Local, state and federal regulations may focus on areas such as monitoring and restricting GHG emissions, regulating methane emissions and transitioning away from reliance on fossil fuels. Alternatively, local, state and federal regulations may also target restricting the development of renewable energy capacity through restrictions on land use, interconnection and removal of government incentives for renewable energy. Significant changes to local, state and federal regulations may have material impacts on the Company’s cost of compliance with these regulations on the Company’s ability to operate its existing assets economically. In addition, the Company may be adversely affected by changes to regulations that restrict the Company’s ability to acquire or invest in new facilities. The effect on the Company of any new legislative or regulatory measures will depend on the particular provisions that are ultimately adopted. In addition, sudden changes to local, state or federal regulations may result in the Company’s inability to quickly react and respond to these changes.

Current wording

Local, state and federal regulations may focus on areas such as monitoring and restricting GHG emissions, which could prove unfavorable to the Company’s segments depending on their form. Alternatively, local, state and federal regulations may also target restricting the development of renewable energy capacity through restrictions on land use, interconnection and removal of government incentives for renewable energy. Significant changes to local, state and federal regulations may have material impacts on the Company’s cost of compliance with these regulations on the Company’s ability to operate its existing assets economically. In addition, the Company may be adversely affected by changes to regulations that restrict the Company’s ability to acquire or invest in new facilities. The effect on the Company of any new legislative or regulatory measures will depend on the particular provisions that are ultimately adopted. In addition, sudden changes to local, state or federal regulations may result in the Company’s inability to quickly react and respond to these changes.

Previous wording

Companies across all industries may face increased scrutiny from the public, stakeholders and government agencies related to their environmental, social, and governance, or ESG, practices and commitments to address climate change. For example, in March 2024, the SEC adopted new rules that would require a wide range of climate-related disclosures in SEC filings, including certain climate-related risks, climate-related metrics and GHG emissions, information about climate-related targets and goals, transition plans, if any, and extensive attestation requirements. Although the SEC issued an order in April 2024 staying implementation of the new rules pending the resolution of certain legal challenges, the outcome of these legal challenges is uncertain, including with respect to the content of any portion of the rules that may be upheld and the ultimate timing of required compliance with such rules. On February 11, 2025, however, the SEC notified the U.S. Court of Appeals of a statement issued by the SEC’s Acting Chairman regarding, among other things, the fact that the majority of current SEC Commissioners had previously voted against adopting the rules and requested that the U.S. Court of Appeals not schedule the case for argument to provide time for the SEC to deliberate and determine the appropriate next steps in the cases. Additionally, in September 2023, California passed climate-related disclosure mandates, which are broader than the SEC’s proposed rules. In the event the SEC’s climate disclosure rules go into effect or states in which the Company operates or does business adopt climate disclosure requirements, the Company could incur significant additional costs relating to the assessment and disclosure of climate-related risks.

Current wording

Companies across all industries may face increased scrutiny from the public, stakeholders and government agencies related to their environmental, social, and governance, or ESG, practices and commitments to address climate change. For example, in March 2024, the SEC adopted a new set of rules that would require a wide range of climate-related disclosures, including material climate-related risks, information on any climate-related targets or goals that are material to the registrant’s business, results of operations or financial condition, Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions on a phased-in basis by certain large registrants when those emissions are material and the filing of an attestation report covering the same and disclosure of the financial statement effects of severe weather events and other natural conditions, including costs and losses. Litigation challenging the rules was filed by multiple parties in multiple jurisdictions, which was consolidated and assigned to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. On April 4, 2024, the SEC announced that it was voluntarily delaying the implementation of the climate disclosure rules while the U.S. Court of Appeals considered the litigation. On March 27, 2025, the SEC voted to end the defense of the rules in the litigation. On September 12, 2025, the U.S. Court of Appeals denied the SEC’s request to proceed with the case and indicated that the case would be held in abeyance until the SEC either renews its defense of the rules or revises the rules through notice-and-comment rulemaking. Additionally, in September 2023, California passed climate-related disclosure mandates, which are broader than the SEC’s proposed rules. In the event the SEC’s climate disclosure rules go into effect or states in which the Company operates or does business adopt climate disclosure requirements, the Company could incur significant additional costs relating to the assessment and disclosure of climate-related risks.

Previous wording

All of the Company’s generating assets are operating either as EWGs as defined under the PUHCA, or as QFs as defined under the PURPA, as amended, and therefore are exempt from certain regulation under the PUHCA and the FPA. If a facility fails to maintain its status as an EWG or a QF or there are legislative or regulatory changes revoking or limiting the exemptions to the PUHCA and/or the FPA, then the Company may be subject to significant accounting, record-keeping, access to books and records and reporting requirements, and failure to comply with such requirements could result in the imposition of penalties and additional compliance obligations.

Current wording

All of the Company’s generating assets are operating either as EWGs as defined under the PUHCA, or as QFs as defined under the PURPA, as amended, and are not required to comply with certain regulation under the PUHCA and the FPA. If a facility fails to maintain its status as an EWG or a QF or there are legislative or regulatory changes revoking or limiting the exemptions to the PUHCA and/or the FPA, then the Company may be subject to significant accounting, record-keeping, access to books and records and reporting requirements, and failure to comply with such requirements could result in the imposition of penalties and additional compliance obligations.