Skip to main content

ARTIVION, INC.

For the period ended Dec 31, 2025. Filed Feb 18, 2026.

View on SEC.gov

About this filing

A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.

FY2025 · Filed Feb 18, 2026

AORT$20.21-20.2%Stored close · as of Nov 6, 2026

What changed in Risk Factors?

Read the current filing

Previous report: 10-K

Period ended 2024-12-31; filed 2025-02-28.

0000784199-25-000029

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Current report: 10-K

Period ended 2025-12-31; filed 2026-02-18.

0001628280-26-009046

Item 1A. Risk Factors

The baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.

Compared 180 previous paragraphs and 183 current paragraphs.

155 unchanged; 25 reworded; 3 added; 0 removed; 0 previous and 0 current paragraphs rearranged.

Tables are not compared: 0 previous and 0 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.

A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.

Added paragraphs (3)

Current report

•Timely receive and process tissues;

Current report

Recent healthcare and tax legislation could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Current report

On July 4, 2025 President Trump signed into law the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act,” which introduces comprehensive changes to U.S. tax and healthcare laws. Some of the provisions in this legislation have delayed effective dates, and we are still assessing the impact of those provisions. Many of its provisions will require interpretation and implementing regulations from federal agencies, including the Department of the Treasury. The law’s provisions include, but are not limited to, changes in corporate income tax rates and other business deductions, as well as changes to healthcare-related programs. The effect of interpretive guidance on these and other provisions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. We will continue to evaluate the impact of the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” as additional information and guidance becomes available.
Reworded paragraphs (25)

Previous wording

•Potential adverse consequences from unexpected global regulatory and trade developments.

Current wording

•Potential adverse consequences from unexpected global regulatory or tariff and trade developments.

Previous wording

As an example of this risk, via a Ministerial Decree of July 6, 2022, published September 15, 2022, the Italian government stated that the spending ceiling for medical devices at the national and regional levels had been exceeded, requiring medical device companies to pay back alleged overpayments the government claims companies received between 2015 and 2018. Ultimately, we were subject to an immaterial payment obligation following the conclusion of judicial challenges and negotiations between us, industry, US government representatives, and the Italian government.

Current wording

As an example of this risk, via a Ministerial Decree of July 6, 2022, published September 15, 2022, the Italian government stated that the spending ceiling for medical devices at the national and regional levels had been exceeded, requiring medical device companies to pay back alleged overpayments the government claims companies received between 2015 and 2018. Ultimately, following the conclusion of judicial challenges, in August 2025, the Italian parliament agreed to a 75% reduction in the amounts due for the 2015–2018 period. The Italian government is currently assessing the amounts due for the 2019–2024 period, and while there are ongoing challenges and negotiations between industry and the government regarding these amounts, our potential repayment exposure for the entire 2019–2025 period is estimated at approximately $2.3 million, which is reflected in accrued expenses in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2025.

Previous wording

Our operations and performance have been, and may continue to be, impacted by regional and global geopolitical conditions, domestic and foreign trade and monetary policies, and other factors beyond our control, such as Russia’s war with Ukraine and instability in the Middle East. To date, sanctions and other disruptions in the Eastern European region have not materially impacted our business or ability to supply products to Russia, Belarus, Ukraine, and the region generally; however, continuation or escalation of the wars in Ukraine or instability in the Middle East, or increased export controls or additional sanctions imposed on or by impacted countries, their allies, or related entities could adversely affect our financial performance. Although we do not have any direct operations in Russia, Ukraine, Israel, Gaza, or Syria, the NEXUS family of products are solely manufactured by Endospan in Herzliya, Israel. Although we have not experienced any material disruption of supply from Endospan, it is difficult to predict the ultimate course of these conflicts and we may face business operations and supply chain disruptions as a result, including disruptions related to shortages of materials and finished goods, higher costs of materials and freight, freight delays, increased energy costs or energy shortages, travel disruptions, currency fluctuation, and disruptions to banking systems or capital markets.

Current wording

Our operations and performance have been, and may continue to be, impacted by regional and global geopolitical conditions, domestic and foreign trade and monetary policies, and other factors beyond our control, such as Russia’s war with Ukraine and instability in the Middle East. To date, sanctions and other disruptions in the Eastern European region have not materially impacted our business or ability to supply products to Russia, Belarus, Ukraine, and the region generally; however, continuation or escalation of the wars in Ukraine or instability in the Middle East, and in particular Iran, or increased export controls or additional sanctions imposed on or by impacted countries, their allies, or related entities could adversely affect our financial performance. Although we do not have any direct operations in Russia, Ukraine, Israel, Gaza, or Syria, the NEXUS family of products are solely manufactured by Endospan in Herzliya, Israel. We have not experienced any material disruption of supply from Endospan; however, it is difficult to predict the ultimate course of these conflicts and we may face business operations and supply chain disruptions as a result, including disruptions related to shortages of materials and finished goods, higher costs of materials and freight, freight delays, increased energy costs or energy shortages, travel disruptions, currency fluctuation, and disruptions to banking systems or capital markets.

Previous wording

The market for our products and services is competitive and affected by new product introductions and activities of other industry participants, including the introduction of novel products and therapies aimed at unrelated disease states or even overall patient health. In addition, such products and therapies like GLP-1 drugs, which we believe have or will have little to no actual impact on demand for our products, can lead to investor and customer confusion, can change investor focus, and can impact the perceived demand for our products, which may affect our stock price even if actual demand for our products is unaffected. We face intense competition in virtually all of our product lines. A significant percentage of market revenues from competitive products are generated by Baxter, Ethicon (a Johnson & Johnson Company), Medtronic, Abbott Laboratories, Edwards Lifesciences, C.R. Bard (a subsidiary of Becton, Dickinson and Company), Integra Life Sciences, LifeNet, Corcym, Anteris Technologies, Elutia (formerly Aziyo Biologics), Cook Medical, Gore & Associates, Terumo, LeMaitre Vascular, Maquet, Pfizer, and BioCer Entwicklungs-GmbH. Several of our competitors enjoy competitive advantages over us, including:

Current wording

The market for our products and services is competitive and affected by new product introductions and activities of other industry participants, including the introduction of novel products and therapies aimed at unrelated disease states or even overall patient health. In addition, such products and therapies like GLP-1 drugs, which we believe have or will have little to no actual impact on demand for our products, can lead to investor and customer confusion, can change investor focus, and can impact the perceived demand for our products, which may affect our stock price even if actual demand for our products is unaffected. We face intense competition in virtually all of our product lines, from, among others, Baxter, Ethicon (a Johnson & Johnson Company), Medtronic, Abbott Laboratories, Edwards Lifesciences, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Integra Life Sciences, LifeNet Health, Corcym, Anteris Technologies, Elutia (formerly Aziyo Biologics), Cook Medical, Gore & Associates, Terumo, LeMaitre Vascular, Maquet, Pfizer, BioCer Entwicklungs-GmbH, and Grena Limited. Several of our competitors enjoy competitive advantages over us, including:

Previous wording

As an example of this risk, in January 2025, the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (“CBER”) of the FDA issued two “final” guidance documents directed at the reduction of the risk of transmission of tuberculousis (Mtb) in processed human tissue (the “Guidances”), which is already exceedingly low. We believe these Guidances, if implemented as written, could significantly reduce the supply of safe implantable human tissue without simultaneously reducing the risk of Mtb transmission. Although some industry advocates and health care practitioners have expressed strong opposition to these new Guidances, and their implementation has been paused until at least May 2025, if and how they may ultimately be implemented and enforced, and how they may actually impact the availability of our donated tissue, remains to be seen and is difficult to predict.

Current wording

As an example of this risk, in January 2025, the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (“CBER”) of the FDA issued two “final” guidance documents directed at the reduction of the risk of transmission of tuberculousis (Mtb) in processed human tissue (the “Guidances”), which is already exceedingly low. In May 2025, the “final” Guidances were withdrawn and re-issued as drafts, with a public comment period that ended in July 2025. We and a number of other parties filed comments, the vast majority of which sought substantial modifications of the Guidances. We believe these Guidances, if implemented as written, could significantly reduce the supply of safe implantable human tissue without simultaneously reducing the risk of Mtb transmission sufficient to offset the harm to patients caused by reduced safe-tissue supply. Although some industry advocates and health care practitioners have expressed strong opposition to these new Guidances, and a number of them submitted comments regarding the Guidances during the recent comment period, if and how they may ultimately be implemented and enforced, and how they may actually impact the availability of our donated tissue, remains to be seen and is difficult to predict.

Previous wording

•We may be unable to obtain approval to commercialize BioGlue in certain non-US countries as fast as our competitors do or at all. We also may not be able to capitalize on new BioGlue approvals, including for new indications, in non-US countries; and

Current wording

•We may be unable to obtain approval to commercialize BioGlue in certain non-US countries as fast as our competitors do or at all. We also may not be able to capitalize on new BioGlue approvals, including for new indications, in non-US countries; BioGlue contains a bovine blood protein. Animal-based products are subject to increased scrutiny from the public and regulators, who may seek to impose additional regulations, regulatory hurdles or product bans in certain countries on such products; and

Previous wording

•BioGlue contains a bovine blood protein. Animal-based products are subject to increased scrutiny from the public and regulators, who may seek to impose additional regulations, regulatory hurdles or product bans in certain countries on such products; BioGlue is a mature product and other companies may use the inventions disclosed in expired BioGlue patents to develop and make competing products.

Current wording

•BioGlue is a mature product and other companies may use the inventions disclosed in expired BioGlue patents to develop and make competing products.

Previous wording

As an example of this risk, our regulatory approval for BioGlue in China took significantly longer and required significant additional investment, at least in part, due to BioGlue’s animal of origin components. Although we received approval to market BioGlue in China during the third quarter of 2024, we do not expect any revenue until at least the second half of 2025.

Current wording

As an example of this risk, our regulatory approval for BioGlue in China took significantly longer and required significant additional investment, at least in part, due to BioGlue’s animal of origin components. Although we received approval to market BioGlue in China during the third quarter of 2024, we did not recognize any revenue until the second quarter of 2025.

Previous wording

Our aortic stent graft systems consist of two main product components: the stent graft and the delivery system. The stent graft is manufactured from several different raw materials that are manufactured internally or at various external suppliers, including single suppliers. The delivery systems we manufacture are comprised of several different raw materials and subassemblies. Our internal manufacturing processes include machining of plastic parts, suturing of stent grafts, processing of Nitinol, and weaving of textiles. Our conventional polyester grafts consist of two main product components: polyester fabric and collagen coating. The polyester fabric is woven from a few different yarns that are supplied by an external supplier. The collagen suspension we manufacture is comprised of a collagenous tissue that is supplied by a single supplier. The conventional ePTFE grafts we manufacture are comprised of various raw materials supplied by several suppliers. For some products the ePTFE grafts are heparin coated. For these products, the heparin suspension we manufacture is comprised of a heparin solution that is also supplied by an external supplier.

Current wording

Our aortic stent graft systems consist of two main product components: the stent graft and the delivery system. The stent graft is manufactured from several different raw materials that are manufactured internally or at various external suppliers, including single suppliers. The delivery systems we manufacture are comprised of several different raw materials and subassemblies, some of which are sourced from external suppliers, including single suppliers. Our internal manufacturing processes include machining of plastic parts, suturing of stent grafts, processing of Nitinol, and weaving of textiles. Our conventional polyester grafts consist of two main product components: polyester fabric and collagen coating. The polyester fabric is woven from a few different yarns that are supplied by an external supplier. The collagen suspension we manufacture is comprised of a collagenous tissue that is supplied by a single supplier. The conventional ePTFE grafts we manufacture are comprised of various raw materials supplied by several suppliers. For some products the ePTFE grafts are heparin coated. For these products, the heparin suspension we manufacture is comprised of a heparin solution that is also supplied by an external supplier.

Previous wording

As an example of this risk, we fully impaired the value of our original securities purchase option agreement with Endospan (“Endospan Option”) in the fourth quarter of 2021 and fully wrote-down the value of our loan to Endospan in the second quarter of 2023, primarily driven by a decrease in forecasted operating results. Although the Endospan Option and our loan to Endospan were partially written back up to fair value in the third quarter of 2024, similar impairments, and other potential risks like those mentioned above, may adversely affect the market value of our common stock.

Current wording

As an example of this risk, we fully impaired the value of our original securities purchase option agreement with Endospan (“Endospan Option”) in the fourth quarter of 2021 and fully wrote-down the value of our loan to Endospan in the second quarter of 2023, primarily driven by a decrease in forecasted operating results. Although the Endospan Option and our loan to Endospan were partially written back up to fair value in the third quarter of 2024 and subsequent quarters, similar impairments, and other potential risks like those mentioned above, may adversely affect the market value of our common stock.

Previous wording

•Drive adoption of the NEXUS family of products and AMDS in the European and other markets, including our ability to manage the substantial product training, implant support, and proctoring requirements for NEXUS procedures;

Current wording

•Drive adoption of the NEXUS family of products and AMDS in the US, European, and other markets, including our ability to manage the substantial product training, implant support, and proctoring requirements for NEXUS procedures;

Previous wording

Additionally, our ability to realize the anticipated business opportunities, growth prospects, synergies, and other benefits of our 2019 Endospan transaction depends on a number of additional factors including Endospan’s ability to: (a) comply with the Endospan Loan and other debt obligations, and avoid an event of default; (b) successfully commercialize the NEXUS family of products, raise capital and drive adoption in markets in and outside of Europe; (c) meet demand for the NEXUS family of products; (d) meet quality and regulatory requirements for the NEXUS family of products; (e) manage any intellectual property risks and uncertainties associated with the NEXUS family of products; (f) obtain FDA approval of the NEXUS family of products; (g) remain a going concern; and (h) develop the NEXUS family of products, and other product improvements to meet competitive threats and physician demand. As an example of this risk, the forecasted operating results related to NEXUS ONE decreased, resulting in an impairment to the carrying value of the Endospan Option, and a full write-down of the value of our original loan to Endospan, reflecting decreased expectations with respect to the anticipated benefits of the Endospan transaction. Similarly, our ability to realize the anticipated benefits of the Baxter Transaction depends on factors beyond our control, including Baxter's performance against Baxter's originally anticipated demand.

Current wording

Additionally, our ability to realize the anticipated business opportunities, growth prospects, synergies, and other benefits of our 2019 Endospan transaction depends on a number of additional factors including Endospan’s ability to: (a) comply with the Endospan Loan and other debt obligations, and avoid an event of default; (b) successfully commercialize the NEXUS family of products, raise capital, and drive adoption in markets in and outside of Europe; (c) meet demand for the NEXUS family of products; (d) meet quality and regulatory requirements for the NEXUS family of products; (e) manage any intellectual property risks and uncertainties associated with the NEXUS family of products; (f) obtain FDA approval of the NEXUS family of products; (g) remain as a going concern; and (h) develop the NEXUS family of products, and other product improvements to meet competitive threats and physician demand. As an example of this risk, the forecasted operating results related to NEXUS ONE decreased, resulting in an impairment to the carrying value of the Endospan Option, and a full write-down of the value of our original loan to Endospan, reflecting decreased expectations with respect to the anticipated benefits of the Endospan transaction. Similarly, our ability to realize the anticipated benefits of the Baxter Transaction depends on factors beyond our control, including Baxter’s performance against Baxter’s originally anticipated demand.

Previous wording

We have experienced, and expect to continue to be subject to the risk of, cybersecurity threats and incidents. For example, we experienced a previously-disclosed cyber-attack in the fourth quarter of 2024 that temporarily disrupted our business operations, including our ERP systems, and had an impact on revenue, manufacturing, order processing, shipping, and other corporate operations (the “Cybersecurity Incident”). Our claims for reimbursement with our insurer remain outstanding and we continue to incur expenses in connection with improving our global infrastructure and cybersecurity posture, additionally, we remain subject to other risks and uncertainties as a result of the incident, including those related to scrap, inventory levels, and timely shipping releases, as well as the potential to incur additional expenses.

Current wording

We have experienced, and expect to continue to be subject to the risk of, cybersecurity threats and incidents. For example, we experienced a previously-disclosed cybersecurity incident in the fourth quarter of 2024 that temporarily disrupted our business operations, including our ERP systems, and had an impact on revenue, manufacturing, order processing, shipping, and other corporate operations. Our claims for reimbursement with our insurer remain outstanding and we continue to incur expenses in connection with improving our global infrastructure and cybersecurity posture. Additionally, we remain subject to other risks and uncertainties as a result of the incident, including those related to scrap, inventory levels, and timely shipping releases, as well as the potential to incur additional expenses.

Previous wording

Our business could be impacted by environmental, social, and governance matters.

Current wording

Our business could be impacted by environmental, workforce, and governance-related matters.

Previous wording

Governments, investors, customers, employees and other stakeholders are continuing to focus on areas of corporate responsibility, and particularly matters related to environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) factors. Stakeholders are looking to companies that demonstrate strong ESG and sustainability practices as an indicator of long-term resilience. Keeping up with and meeting these sometimes contradictory and evolving expectations can be difficult and expensive, and may disrupt our business and divert the attention of our management. We may be unable to make the investments in ESG programs that our competitors with greater financial resources are able to make or we may be challenged by governmental authorities if we choose to make such investments. Failure to meet the expectations of investors, other stakeholders, or certain governmental authorities in these areas may damage our reputation, impact employee retention, impact the willingness of our customers to do business with us, or otherwise impact our financial results and stock price.

Current wording

Certain governments, investors, customers, employees and other stakeholders are continuing to focus on areas of corporate responsibility, including matters related to environmental impacts, workforce practices, and governance and risk oversight. In some cases, stakeholders are looking to companies that demonstrate strong performance in these areas as being better positioned for long-term resilience. However, there is an increasing number of state-level and federal legislation, executive orders, and other backlash against such matters that may conflict with other regulatory requirements or our various stakeholders’ expectations. Keeping up with and meeting these sometimes contradictory and evolving expectations can be difficult and expensive, may disrupt our business, and may divert the attention of our management. We may be unable to make the investments related to environmental, workforce, or governance initiatives at the same level as our competitors with greater financial resources, or we may be challenged by governmental authorities if we choose to make such investments. Failure to meet the expectations of investors, other stakeholders, or certain governmental authorities in these areas may damage our reputation, impact employee retention, impact the willingness of our customers to do business with us, or otherwise impact our financial results and stock price.

Previous wording

•Our Existing CE Marks: The extended timeline for the MDR transition has resulted in certain MDD-based CE Marks expiring prior to the completion of the transition. Our MDD-based CE Mark for BioGlue expired in December 2021, and for Chord-X in September 2022. We have since been able to successfully renew the CE Mark for BioGlue and Chord-X under the MDR;

Current wording

•Our Existing CE Marks: In the past, the extended timeline for the MDR transition has resulted in certain MDD-based CE Marks expiring prior to the completion of the transition; however, we were able to successfully renew such CE Marks under the MDR;

Previous wording

•Our Notified Bodies: The combination of the increased regulatory framework under the MDR and the UK’s exit from the European Union have both had an impact on notified bodies. The MDR has significantly increased the workload on existing notified bodies and as a result, many have elected to leave the space, including our Notified Body in the UK, LRQA. Although we were able to transition our LRQA-issued certification for BioGlue to a new notified body, DEKRA, we are still in the process of transitioning the LRQA-issue certification for PhotoFix; and

Current wording

•Our Notified Bodies: The combination of the increased regulatory framework under the MDR and the UK’s exit from the European Union have both had an impact on notified bodies. The MDR has significantly increased the workload on existing notified bodies and as a result, many have elected to leave the space, including our Notified Body in the UK, LRQA. We have been able to transition our LRQA-issued certification for BioGlue and PhotoFix to a new notified body, DEKRA; and

Previous wording

As an example of this risk, in September 2022 we halted the PROACT Xa clinical trial based on the recommendation of the trial’s Data and Safety Monitoring Board (“DSMB”) due to insufficient evidence to support non-inferiority of apixaban to warfarin for valve thrombosis and thromboembolism. Similarly, in November 2023 we announced that we were no longer pursuing a labeling change for our On-X mitral valve in connection with our PROACT Mitral trial due to additional investments that would be required to do so. Finally, although we recently received regulatory approval to market BioGlue in China, it was only after a significantly longer and more expensive regulatory approval process than likely could reasonably have been anticipated when the program began.

Current wording

As an example of this risk, in September 2022 we halted the PROACT Xa clinical trial based on the recommendation of the trial’s Data and Safety Monitoring Board (“DSMB”) due to insufficient evidence to support non-inferiority of apixaban to warfarin for valve thrombosis and thromboembolism. Similarly, in November 2023 we announced that we were no longer pursuing a labeling change for our On-X mitral valve in connection with our PROACT Mitral trial due to additional investments that would be required to do so. Finally, although we have received regulatory approval to market BioGlue in China, it was only after a significantly longer and more expensive regulatory approval process than likely could reasonably have been anticipated when the program began.

Previous wording

We cannot give assurance that regulatory agencies will clear or approve these products and services or indications, or any new products and services or new indications, on a timely basis, if ever, or that the products and services or new indications will adequately meet the requirements of the market or achieve market acceptance. Pre- and post-market clinical studies may also be delayed or halted due to many factors beyond our control.

Current wording

We cannot give assurance that regulatory agencies will clear or approve these products and services or indications, or any new products and services or new indications, on a timely basis, if ever, or that the products and services or new indications will adequately meet the requirements of the market or achieve market acceptance. Pre- and post-market clinical studies may also be delayed or halted due to many factors beyond our control, including, for example, reductions in FDA staff that may affect the agency’s response time.

Previous wording

The per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (“PFAS”) are used in a wide variety of consumer and industrial products, including medical devices and product packaging. PFAS have been subject to increasing regulations, and in some cases bans, by the Environmental Protection Agency and numerous states. These requirements impose a high compliance burden, and further regulation of PFAS-containing products is expected. Although we have yet to experience any material impact from this activity or identify any of our products materially impacted by PFAS-related regulation, the ultimate impact and associated cost of current and future rulemaking cannot be predicted at this time.

Current wording

The per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (“PFAS”) are used in a wide variety of consumer and industrial products, including medical devices and product packaging. PFAS have been subject to increasing global regulations, and in some cases bans, by the Environmental Protection Agency and numerous states. These requirements impose a high compliance burden, and further regulation of PFAS-containing products is expected. Although we have yet to experience any material impact from this activity or identify any of our products materially impacted by PFAS-related regulation, the ultimate impact and associated cost of current and future rulemaking cannot be predicted at this time.

Previous wording

The transition to a new presidential administration in the US brings several potential risks that could impact our business operations and financial performance. Changes in policy regarding international trade, including import and export regulation and international trade agreements, could negatively impact our business. The US has imposed tariffs and export controls on certain goods and products imported from abroad, which has resulted in retaliatory tariffs. Additional tariffs imposed by the US on a broader range of imports, or further retaliatory trade measures taken by other countries in response, could result in an increase in supply chain costs that we may not be able to offset or that otherwise adversely impact our results of operations. In addition, political tensions between the US and certain other countries have escalated in recent years between and among these countries. Changes in foreign policy and the imposition of new sanctions could impact our ability to distribute products in certain regions. This could limit our market reach and affect our revenue streams. The new administration may introduce regulatory changes that could impact the speed to market and our ability to obtain timely reviews for our products. This could delay clinical trials and product launches, impact the regulatory status of current products or services, or affect our competitive position. Changes in tax policy, including changes to corporate tax rates or changes in tax incentives that we currently benefit from, could negatively impact our results of operations and financial condition.

Current wording

The policies of the current presidential administration in the US continues to bring several potential risks that could impact our business operations and financial performance. Changes in policy regarding international trade, including import and export regulation and international trade agreements, along with resulting volatility, could negatively impact our business. The US has imposed tariffs and export controls on certain goods and products imported from abroad, which has resulted in retaliatory tariffs. Additional tariffs imposed by the US on a broader range of imports, or further retaliatory trade measures taken by other countries in response, could result in an increase in supply chain costs that we may not be able to offset or that otherwise adversely impact our results of operations. In addition, political tensions between the US and certain other countries have escalated in recent years. Changes in foreign policy and the imposition of new sanctions could impact our ability to distribute products in certain regions. This could limit our market reach and affect our revenue streams. Changes in tax policy, including changes to corporate tax rates or changes in tax incentives that we currently benefit from, could also negatively impact our results of operations and financial condition.

Previous wording

The new administration has already taken numerous steps impacting federal spending and the federal workforce. Policies relating to reductions in spending, reductions in staff, and mandated return-to-office policies, could impact the capabilities of regulatory agencies which could affect the timeliness and efficiency of regulatory reviews and approvals that are critical to our operations. Regulatory focus, particularly with respect to sustainability matters, may change, reducing or changing regulations relating to ethylene oxide (EtO), per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAs), or other sustainability initiatives, potentially requiring us to make additional expenditures to comply with new regulations, or abandon programs we have already invested in.

Current wording

The new administration has taken steps that have impacted federal spending and the federal workforce. Policies relating to reductions in spending, reductions in staff, and mandated return-to-office policies, could impact the capabilities of regulatory agencies which could affect the timeliness and efficiency of regulatory reviews and approvals that are critical to our operations. Regulatory focus, particularly with respect to sustainability matters, may change, reducing or changing regulations relating to ethylene oxide (EtO), PFAS, or other sustainability initiatives, potentially requiring us to make additional expenditures to comply with new regulations, or abandon programs we have already invested in.

Previous wording

In response to perceived increases in healthcare costs in recent years, there have been, and continue to be, proposals by the governmental authorities, third-party payors, and elected office holders and candidates to impact public health, control healthcare costs and, more generally, to reform the healthcare systems. These changes may impact costs and reimbursement, as well as potential changes to the regulatory environment and healthcare generally. Many US healthcare laws, including the Affordable Care Act and the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetics Act, are complex, subject to change particularly during a change in administrations, and dependent on interpretation and enforcement decisions from government agencies with broad discretion. Changes in federal funding or staffing at administrative agencies like the FDA may impact, for example, the speed at which we are able to obtain regulatory approvals, and changes in the focus of those administrative agencies may result in the repeal of applicable regulations or guidance or impact us in other ways we can not anticipate. The impact of this uncertainty on us, our customers, or the specific services and relationships we have with our customers is not always clear. Our failure to anticipate accurately these changes, or our failure to comply with changes to legal and regulatory frameworks, could create liability for us, result in adverse publicity and negatively affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

Current wording

In response to perceived increases in healthcare costs in recent years, there have been, and continue to be, proposals by the governmental authorities, third-party payors, and elected office holders and candidates to impact public health, control healthcare costs and, more generally, to reform the healthcare systems. These changes may impact costs and reimbursement, as well as potential changes to the regulatory environment and healthcare generally. Many US healthcare laws, including the Affordable Care Act and the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetics Act, are complex, subject to change, and dependent on interpretation and enforcement decisions from government agencies with broad discretion. Changes in regulations, federal funding or staffing at administrative agencies like the FDA may impact, for example, the speed at which we are able to obtain regulatory reviews and approvals. In addition, changes in the focus of those administrative agencies may result in the repeal of applicable regulations or guidance or impact us in other ways we cannot anticipate. This could delay clinical trials and product launches, impact the regulatory status of current products or services, or affect our competitive position. The impact of this uncertainty on us, our customers, or the specific services and relationships we have with our customers is not always clear. Our failure to accurately anticipate these changes, or our failure to comply with changes to legal and regulatory frameworks, could create liability for us, result in adverse publicity and negatively affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

Previous wording

Our products and processed tissues allegedly have caused, and may in the future cause, injury or result in other serious complications that may result in product or other liability claims from our customers or their patients. If our products are defectively designed, manufactured, or labeled, or contain inadequate warnings, defective components, or are misused, or are used contrary to our warnings, instructions, and approved indications, we may become subject to costly litigation that can have unpredictable and sometimes extreme outcomes.

Current wording

Our products and processed tissues allegedly have caused, and may in the future cause, injury or result in other serious complications that may result in product or other liability claims from our customers or their patients. If our products are defectively designed, manufactured, or labeled, or contain inadequate warnings, defective components, or are misused, or are used contrary to our warnings, instructions, and approved indications, we may become subject to costly litigation that can have unpredictable and potentially extreme outcomes.

Previous wording

We are subject to an increasing number of federal, state, and foreign laws and regulations to address topics relating to data privacy, sustainability, and artificial intelligence. These regulations, some of which can be enforced by private parties or governmental entities, have been or are being promulgated and are constantly evolving and becoming increasingly complex and rigorous. These laws and regulations may include new compliance or disclosure requirements which increases our operating costs and requires significant management investment. Many of these laws and regulations, including the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) also include significant penalties for noncompliance. Although our practices, policies, and procedures are intended to comply with relevant laws and regulations, there can be no assurance that regulatory or enforcement authorities will view our arrangements as being in compliance, or that one or more of our employees or agents will not disregard aspects of our compliance programs. Any resulting government enforcement activities may be costly, result in negative publicity, or subject us to significant penalties.

Current wording

We are subject to an increasing number of federal, state, and foreign laws and regulations to address topics relating to data privacy, sustainability, and artificial intelligence. These regulations, some of which can be enforced by private parties or governmental entities, have been or are being promulgated and are constantly evolving and becoming increasingly complex and rigorous. These laws and regulations may include new compliance or disclosure requirements which increases our operating costs and requires significant management investment. Many of these laws and regulations, including, but not limited to, the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) also include significant penalties for noncompliance. Although our practices, policies, and procedures are intended to comply with relevant laws and regulations, there can be no assurance that regulatory or enforcement authorities will view our arrangements as being in compliance, or that one or more of our employees or agents will not disregard aspects of our compliance programs. Any resulting government enforcement activities may be costly, result in negative publicity, or subject us to significant penalties.