PJT Partners Inc.
For the period ended Dec 31, 2024. Filed Apr 29, 2025.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
What shareholders are asked to vote on at a company's meeting. It is where to find what directors and top executives are paid, and who owns the most shares.
Dec 31, 2024 · Filed Apr 29, 2025
Contents
Benchmarking Process
In developing our compensation programs, our Compensation Committee commissions a
compensation benchmarking analysis to ensure that our programs are competitive with those of other
independent investment banks, including consideration of the cost of equivalent talent in the markets in which
we operate. Our Compensation Committee reviews our Named Executive Officer compensation in relation to
other financial institutions, working with Willis Towers Watson, which provides market data and practices for
consideration, as well as executive compensation trends and developments. One of the challenges for our
company when establishing its peer group is the limited number of directly comparable organizations. Part of
our Compensation Committee’s overall review of the executive compensation program over the past several
years has included developing underlying principles for identifying peers. These principles include operating in
similar or comparable industry segments: investment banking, comparable in size and scope and competitors
for talent. The full peer group of independent investment banking firms considered for the 2023 market data
benchmarking set for the purposes of 2024 executive compensation decisions is Evercore Inc., Houlihan
Lokey Inc., Jefferies Financial Group Inc., Lazard Ltd., Moelis & Company and Perella Weinberg Partners and
Rothschild & Co. The most relevant public competitors considered within the independent investment bank
benchmarking data for 2024 did not change from the prior year andincluded:
| Lazard LtdEvercore Inc. Houlihan Lokey, Inc. | Moelis & Company Perella Weinberg Partners |
For purposes of determining our overall level of executive compensation (i.e., base salary and annual
incentive compensation), our Compensation Committee generally reviews compensation in light of peer group
compensation ranges but does not limit target setting to a particular peer group percentile.
Our Compensation Committee also takes into account other factors, including the executive’s role
and experience, as compared to our peers’ executives. Ultimately, our Compensation Committee believes that
appropriate compensation for a particular executive should be made based on the full review of company and
individual performance, while also considering market data.
Overall, as set forth below in “Elements of Our Compensation Program,” Willis Towers Watson
determined that our executive compensation programs, as structured, are appropriately competitive relative
to our peers.
The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.