James River Group Holdings Ltd
For the period ended Dec 31, 2024. Filed Mar 4, 2025.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.
FY2024 · Filed Mar 4, 2025
What changed in Risk Factors?
Read the current filingPrevious report: 10-K
Period ended 2023-12-31; filed 2024-02-29.
0001620459-24-000022
Item 1A. RISK FACTORSCurrent report: 10-K
Period ended 2024-12-31; filed 2025-03-04.
0001620459-25-000010
Item 1A. RISK FACTORSThe baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.
Compared 352 previous paragraphs and 324 current paragraphs.
206 unchanged; 97 reworded; 17 added; 48 removed; 1 previous and 4 current paragraphs rearranged.
Tables are not compared: 0 previous and 0 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.
A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.
Added paragraphs (17)
Current report
•Our credit agreement contains financial and other covenants, the breach of which could result in acceleration of payment of amounts due under our credit facility.
Current report
•An adverse outcome of the disputes pertaining to the sale of JRG Re may have a material adverse effect on our financial position.
Current report
•The holder of the Series A Convertible Preferred Shares (the “Series A Preferred Shares”) holds 9.9% of our aggregate voting power and may have significant influence over matters requiring shareholder approval, and additionally, any sales of a significant number of common shares by the holder may have an adverse affect on our share price.
Current report
Examples of these claims and coverage issues include, but are not limited to:
Current report
• Judicial or Legislative Expansion of Coverage Terms or Theories of Liability — Evolving regulations, potential new legislation and emerging expanded theories of liability can adversely impact the application of policy terms, coverage requirements, potential liability, and claims handling processes.
Current report
• Economic and Political Factors, Social Inflation and Litigation Trends — Economic conditions, such as inflation, interest rate fluctuations, and market volatility and changes in the stability of the political environment can influence claim frequency and severity. For example, evolving legal interpretation and a rise in large jury awards can extend coverage beyond our initial underwriting intent, resulting in increased claim costs. Similarly, general economic inflation can increase medical, repair and replacement costs, leading to higher claim payouts.
Current report
• Technological Advancements Leading to Changes in Insured's Business Model — The rapid adoption of technology has caused the continued evolution of business models and fundamental changes in consumer and human behavior leading to unintended and unanticipated expansions in exposure. One such recent example of this phenomenon is claims arising out of the use of personal property in commercial transactions related to the so-called "sharing economy."
Current report
• Advancements in Bioengineering, Life and Food Sciences — The continued rapid advancement in bioengineering, life, food and other sciences may lead to the ingestion of and/or implantation of new compounds into the human body resulting in long-term unintended consequences. Previous and current examples of such exposures include asbestos, benzene, Diethylstilbestrol (DES), implantable medical devices (e.g., metal-on-metal hips), Nanotechnology, Bisphenol A (BPA) and Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS).
Current report
In addition to the complexity of existing laws and regulations, the development of new laws and regulations and changes in application or interpretation of current laws and regulations also increase our legal and regulatory compliance obligations and costs. The new presidential administration has to date proposed or promulgated numerous changes to laws and regulations that may impact our business and operations, the direct or indirect effect of which are not yet known.
Current report
Additionally, on November 11, 2024 we entered into (i) an amendment of the investment agreement with the holder of the Series A Preferred Shares, which provided for the conversion of 37,500 Series A Preferred Shares, having a liquidation value of $37.5 million, into common shares, and (ii) a subscription agreement to issue common shares with a value of $12.5 million. The price per share utilized for the share issuances pursuant to the two agreements was $6.40, resulting in the issuance of 7,812,500 common shares in the aggregate. The closing price of our common shares on November 11, 2024, the last completed trading day prior to our announcement of the share issuances was $6.62 per share. We also announced on November 11, 2024 that our quarterly dividend would be reduced to $0.01 per common shares from the $0.05 per common share that we had paid since March 2022.
Current report
Our credit agreement contains financial and other covenants, the breach of any of which could result in acceleration of payment of amounts due under our credit facility.
Current report
More broadly, our tax positions could be materially adversely affected by several factors, including: new or changing tax laws both domestically and internationally, including regulations and treaties, or the interpretation thereof, tax policy initiatives and reforms under consideration by the international community, the practices of tax authorities in jurisdictions in which we operate, and the resolution of issues arising from tax audits, examinations or assessments and any related interest or penalties. We are currently unable to predict whether such changes or events will occur and, if so, the ultimate impact on our business.
Current report
We are involved in disputes relating to the Stock Purchase Agreement and the sale of JRG Re to Fleming, which closed on April 16, 2024. An adverse outcome to these matters may have a material adverse effect on our financial position.
Current report
In accordance with the Stock Purchase Agreement, the cash portion of the purchase price (the “Closing Date Purchase Price”) received by the Company for the sale of JRG Re on April 16, 2024 (the “Closing Date”) was calculated based on an estimated closing statement, which in turn was based on an estimated balance sheet of JRG Re. Under the Stock Purchase Agreement, the estimated closing statement is subject to a post-closing adjustment process between the Company and Fleming to produce a final closing statement based on a final balance sheet of JRG Re as of the Closing Date.
Current report
Fleming delivered a closing statement to the Company, and pursuant to the procedures in the Stock Purchase Agreement, the Company has given notice of its disagreement with Fleming’s closing statement. In its notice of disagreement, the Company (i) agreed with an $11.4 million downward adjustment to the Closing Date Purchase Price due to the losses recorded on JRG Re's operations between the date of the balance sheet used to produce the estimated closing statement and the Closing Date, which downward adjustment was included in “Other Liabilities” on the Company's Balance Sheet at September 30, 2024 (and was paid to Fleming on October 18, 2024), and (ii) disputed $54.1 million in aggregate downward adjustments to the Closing Date Purchase Price claimed by Fleming, which the Company believes are unsupported by the facts known to the Company and the terms of the Stock Purchase Agreement. The Stock Purchase Agreement provides procedures for resolving disputes between the parties regarding the closing statement and it is possible that the resolution of these disputes could result in a significant reduction to the amount of the purchase price beyond the $11.4 million downward adjustment already paid by the Company to Fleming.
Current report
As described in the Risk Factor below “Litigation and legal proceedings against us or our subsidiaries could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and/or results of operations,” we are involved in litigation with Fleming regarding the Stock Purchase Agreement and related matters. The outcome of the disputes over the post-closing adjustment and the litigation with Fleming cannot be predicted and, if determined adversely, could require us to repay a significant portion of the purchase price paid by Fleming on the Closing Date, as well as significant damage amounts, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial position.
Current report
Developments in accounting practices may require us to incur considerable additional expenses to comply, particularly if we are required to prepare information relating to prior periods for comparative purposes or to apply the new requirements retroactively. The impact of changes in current accounting practices and future pronouncements cannot be predicted but may affect the calculation of net income, shareholders’ equity and other relevant financial statement line items.
Removed paragraphs (48)
Previous report
•Our reinsurance business is subject to loss settlements made by ceding companies and fronting carriers over which we have no control that are binding upon us, which could materially adversely affect our performance.
Previous report
•Our credit agreements contain a number of financial and other covenants, the breach of which could result in acceleration of payment of amounts due under our credit facilities.
Previous report
•There is no guarantee that our evaluation of strategic alternatives will result in any particular outcome, and the perceived uncertainties related to the Company could adversely affect our business and our shareholders.
Previous report
•The sale of JRG Re is subject to closing conditions and there can be no assurance that these conditions will be satisfied on the timeline we expect or at all, the sale of JRG may be terminated in certain circumstances, including the failure of the buyer to obtain required financing, and a portion of the consideration for the sale of JRG Re is a pre-closing dividend that is subject to the availability of unencumbered assets of JRG Re on the closing date.
Previous report
In addition, reinsurance reserve estimates are typically subject to greater uncertainty than insurance reserve estimates, primarily due to reliance on the original underwriting decisions made by the ceding company. As a result, we are subject to the risk that our ceding companies may not have adequately evaluated the risks reinsured by us and the premiums ceded may not adequately compensate us for the risks we assume. Other factors resulting in additional uncertainty in establishing reinsurance reserves include:
Previous report
• The increased lapse of time from the occurrence of an event to the reporting of the claim and the ultimate resolution or settlement of the claim.
Previous report
• The diversity of development patterns among different types of reinsurance treaties.
Previous report
• The necessary reliance on the ceding company for information regarding claims.
Previous report
Our largest customer in 2021, an agent for the Specialty Admitted Insurance segment, accounted for approximately $124.1 million of our gross written premium, representing 9.4% of our consolidated gross written premium from continuing operations in 2021. No insured generated 10.0% or more of consolidated gross written premiums from continuing operations for 2021.
Previous report
Four examples of unanticipated risks that affected the insurance industry are:
Previous report
• Asbestos liability applied to manufacturers of products and contractors who installed those products;
Previous report
• Apportionment of liability for settlement assigned to subcontractors who may have been involved in mundane tasks (such as installing sheetrock in a home);
Previous report
• Court decisions, such as the 1995 Montrose decision in California, that read policy exclusions narrowly so as to expand coverage, thereby requiring insurers to create and write new exclusions; and
Previous report
• Social inflation trends, including higher and more frequent claims, more favorable judgments and legislated increases.
Previous report
The Bermuda insurance and reinsurance regulatory framework has become subject to increased scrutiny in many jurisdictions. The BMA sought “regulatory equivalency” which enables Bermuda’s commercial insurers to transact business with the European Union on a “level playing field”. In connection with its initial efforts to achieve equivalency under Solvency II, the BMA implemented and imposed additional requirements on the companies it regulates, such as JRG Re. On November 26, 2015, via delegated act, the European Commission granted Bermuda’s commercial insurers full equivalence in all areas of Solvency II for an indefinite period of time. The European Commission’s act was reviewed and approved by the European Parliament and Council. On March 4, 2016, the delegated act was published in the official journal of the European Union. The grant of full equivalence came into force on March 24, 2016 and applies from January 1, 2016.
Previous report
Our reinsurance business is subject to loss settlements made by ceding companies and fronting carriers over which we have no control, which could materially adversely affect our performance.
Previous report
Where JRG Re enters into assumed reinsurance contracts with third parties, all loss settlements made by the ceding company will be unconditionally binding upon us, provided they are within the terms of the underlying policies and within the terms of the relevant contract. While we believe the ceding companies will settle such claims in good faith, we are bound to accept the claims settlements agreed to by the ceding companies. Under the underlying policies, each ceding company typically bears the burden of proving that a contractual exclusion applies to a loss, and there may be circumstances where the facts of a loss are insufficient to support the application of an exclusion. In such circumstances, we assume such losses under the reinsured policies, which could materially adversely affect our performance.
Previous report
Our credit agreements contain financial and other covenants, the breach of any of which could result in acceleration of payment of amounts due under our credit facilities.
Previous report
Our ability to implement our business strategy could be delayed or adversely affected by Bermuda employment restrictions relating to the ability to obtain and retain work permits for key employees in Bermuda.
Previous report
Under Bermuda law, non-Bermudians (other than spouses of Bermudians and holders of permanent residents’ certificates) may not engage in any gainful occupation in Bermuda without a valid government work permit. A work permit may be granted or renewed upon showing that, after proper public advertisement, no Bermudian, spouse of a Bermudian or a holder of a permanent resident’s certificate who meets the minimum standards reasonably required by the employer has applied for the job. A work permit is issued with an expiry date (up to five years) and no assurances can be given that any work permit will be issued or, if issued, renewed upon the expiration of the relevant term. If work permits are not obtained or are not renewed for our key employees, we would lose their services, which could materially affect our business.
Previous report
Tax Act. The Tax Act, enacted on December 22, 2017, introduced significant changes to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). The Tax Act contained many provisions that impact us and our shareholders, including provisions that impose a base erosion and anti-abuse tax (“BEAT”) on income of a U.S. corporation determined without regard to certain otherwise deductible payments made to certain foreign affiliates (including premium or other consideration paid or accrued to a related foreign reinsurance company for reinsurance), broaden the definition of United States shareholder for purposes of the controlled foreign corporation (“CFC”) rules, and make it more difficult for a foreign insurance company to avoid being treated as a passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”).
Previous report
There is continued uncertainty regarding how these and other provisions of the Tax Act will be interpreted, although guidance in proposed and final forms has been released with respect to certain provisions of the Tax Act, including certain BEAT and PFIC provisions, that may impact the Company. The ultimate impact of the Tax Act may differ from the Company’s description below due to changes in interpretations, as well as additional regulatory guidance that may be issued. Given the complexity of the Tax Act, you are strongly encouraged to consult your own tax advisor regarding its potential impact on the U.S. federal income tax consequences to you considering your particular circumstances.
Previous report
BEAT. The Tax Act’s BEAT provision imposes a minimum tax on “applicable taxpayers,” which are generally corporations that are part of a group with at least $500 million of applicable annual gross receipts and that make certain payments to related foreign persons, including payments that are deductible for U.S. tax purposes, payments to purchase depreciable or amortizable property, and reinsurance payments. BEAT subjects the “modified taxable income” of an applicable taxpayer to tax at a rate of 10% in 2020-2025, and 12.5% in 2026 and thereafter. In general, modified taxable income is calculated by adding back to a taxpayer’s regular taxable income the amount of certain “base erosion tax benefits” with respect to certain “base erosion payments” to foreign affiliates, as well as the “base erosion percentage” of any net operating loss deductions. BEAT applies to the extent it exceeds a taxpayer’s regular corporate income tax liability (determined without regard to certain tax credits).
Previous report
We have analyzed the regulations released by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) and U.S. Department of the Treasury regarding BEAT and have concluded that we will be subject to additional tax if regular U.S. income tax does not exceed a minimum amount. The applicability of BEAT depends on a number of factors and the extent to which we may be subject to BEAT in future periods as a result of changes in interpretations, as well as additional regulatory guidance that may be issued, is currently unknown.
Previous report
IRA. The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (the “IRA”) contains a number of tax-related provisions, including a 15% corporate alternative minimum tax imposed on certain corporations that meet an income-based test, as well as a 1% nondeductible excise tax on certain stock repurchases. It is unclear how these provisions of the IRA will be applied and what impact the IRA will have on our tax liability. We will continue to evaluate the IRA’s impact as further information becomes available.
Previous report
• market reaction to any strategic alternative transaction that we enter into, rumors regarding the same, or our determination to terminate the review of strategic alternatives without entering into a transaction;
Previous report
We cannot assure you that our evaluation of strategic alternatives will result in any particular outcome, and the perceived uncertainties related to the Company could adversely affect our business and our shareholders.
Previous report
On November 10, 2023, we announced that our board of directors initiated an exploration of strategic alternatives for the Company, including consideration of a wide range of options including, among other things, a potential sale, merger, or other strategic transaction. We have not set a deadline or definitive timetable for the completion of the strategic review process, nor have we made any decisions relating to any strategic alternative at this time. No assurance can be given as to the outcome of the process, including whether the process will result in any particular outcome. Any potential transaction may be dependent on a number of factors that may be beyond our control, for example, market conditions, industry trends or acceptable terms. The process of reviewing potential strategic alternatives may be time consuming, distracting and disruptive to our business operations. In addition, given that the exploration of strategic alternatives may eventually result in a potential sale, merger or other strategic transaction, any perceived uncertainty regarding our future operations or employment needs may limit our ability to retain or hire qualified personnel and may contribute to unplanned loss of highly skilled employees through attrition, and result in the loss of brokers, agents or customers with whom we do business. We may ultimately determine that no transaction is in the best interest of our shareholders. We do not intend to comment further regarding the review of strategic alternatives until we determine disclosure is necessary or advisable. Accordingly, speculation regarding any developments associated with our review of strategic alternatives and any perceived uncertainties related to the Company or its business could cause the price of our shares to fluctuate significantly.
Previous report
The sale of JRG Re is subject to conditions to closing over which we do not have control, and a portion of the consideration is comprised of a pre-closing dividend that is subject to the availability of unencumbered assets at JRG Re.
Previous report
The sale of JRG Re announced on November 8, 2023 (the “Transaction”) is subject to a number of closing conditions and there can be no assurance that these conditions will be satisfied on the timeline we expect or at all. The Transaction may also be terminated in certain circumstances, including termination (A) by either the Company or the Buyer if the Transaction is not completed by June 3, 2024 (subject to one two-month extension in the event closing has not occurred solely because one or more required governmental approvals have not been obtained), or (B) by the Company if (i) all closing conditions have been met, (ii) the Company is ready, willing and able to consummate the closing, and (iii) the Buyer fails to complete the closing solely as a result of the failure to obtain debt financing or alternate financing that is sufficient to finance the consummation of the Transaction.
Previous report
In addition, a portion of the consideration pursuant to the Transaction is comprised of a $139 million dividend or return of capital or surplus by JRG Re to the Company prior to the closing date of the Transaction, which dividend or return of capital or surplus is subject to the availability of unencumbered assets at JRG Re on the closing date. A number of factors may impact the availability of unencumbered assets at JRG Re prior to the closing date, including collateral requirements of JRG Re’s cedents.
Previous report
While the Transaction is pending or if the Transaction is not completed, we may be subject to several risks including:
Previous report
•The current trading price of our common stock may reflect a market assumption that the Transaction will be completed, and may decline if the Transaction is not completed;
Previous report
•We have incurred and expect to incur significant transaction costs in connection with the Transaction whether or not the Transaction is completed;
Previous report
•Under the definitive agreements for the Transaction, we are subject to certain restrictions on the conduct of JRG Re’s business prior to the closing date of the Transaction, which restrictions could adversely affect our ability to realize certain business strategies or take advantage of certain business opportunities;
Previous report
•The negative perception of investors, vendors, trading partners, or employees if the Transaction is not completed;
Previous report
•The attention of our management may be directed toward the completion of the pending Transaction and related matters, and their focus may be diverted from our day-to-day business operations; and
Previous report
•Our inability to cure the financial strength rating default under our credit agreements prior to the expiration of the waiver of such default provided by our lenders (see "Our credit agreements contain financial and other covenants, the breach of any of which could result in accelerations of payment of amounts due under our credit facilities").
Previous report
Any of these risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
Previous report
On July 9, 2021, a purported class action lawsuit was filed in the US District Court, Eastern District of Virginia on behalf of Employees’ Retirement Fund of the City of Fort Worth against the Company and certain of its present and former officers, alleging claims under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. On December 7, 2023 we reached an agreement in principle to settle this purported securities class action lawsuit and on December 22, 2023 the parties submitted the stipulation of settlement to the Court for approval. On January 26, 2024 the Court issued its preliminary approval order of the settlement and scheduled a final settlement hearing for May 24, 2024. A final, non-appealable closure of the litigation could take several months. See “Item 3. Legal Proceedings” for more information.
Showing the first 40 of 48 passages. Open the source sections for the rest.
Reworded paragraphs (97)
Previous wording
•We rely on a select group of customers for a significant portion of our business, and the loss or termination of our relationship with any such customers, or a material reduction in their business, could materially adversely affect our rate of growth, results of operations and financial condition.
Current wording
•We rely on a select group of customers for a significant portion of our business, and the continued loss or termination of our relationship with any such customers, or a material reduction in their business, could materially adversely affect our rate of growth, results of operations and financial condition.
Previous wording
•We, or agents we have appointed, may act based on inaccurate or incomplete information regarding the accounts we underwrite, the result of which may be to cause us to misprice our policies.
Current wording
•We, or agents we have appointed, may act based on inaccurate or incomplete information regarding the accounts we underwrite, which may cause us to misunderstand the level of risk we are insuring.
Previous wording
•Agents may exceed their authority or commit fraud when binding policies on our behalf, causing us to make underwriting decisions on inadequate or inaccurate information.
Current wording
•Agents may exceed their authority or commit fraud when binding policies on our behalf, which may expose us to reputational harm, regulatory intervention or adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Previous wording
•If California, North Carolina, Ohio or any other state in which our insurance companies are admitted significantly increase the assessments our insurance companies are required to pay, our financial condition and results of operations will suffer.
Current wording
•If California, Ohio or any other state in which our insurance companies are admitted significantly increase the assessments our insurance companies are required to pay, our financial condition and results of operations will suffer.
Previous wording
•Changes in U.S. tax laws (including associated regulations) and the interpretation of certain provisions applicable to insurance/reinsurance businesses with U.S. and non-U.S. operations, which may be retroactive, could have a significant impact on the Company and persons who own our shares.
Current wording
•Changes in U.S. tax laws (including associated regulations) and the interpretation of certain provisions applicable to insurance businesses with U.S. operations, which may be retroactive, could have a significant impact on the Company and persons who own our shares.
Previous wording
•The Company, JRG Re and James River Group Holdings UK Limited may be subject to U.S. federal income taxation and our non-U.K. companies may be subject to U.K. taxation, which may have a material adverse effect on our operating results.
Current wording
•The Company and James River Group Holdings UK Limited (“James River UK”) may be (and JRG Re, prior to its disposition, may have been) subject to U.S. federal income taxation and our non-U.K. companies may be subject to U.K. taxation, which may have a material adverse effect on our operating results.
Previous wording
Our financial condition and results of operations depend upon our ability to assess accurately the potential losses and loss adjustment expenses under the terms of the insurance policies or reinsurance contracts we underwrite. Reserves do not represent an exact calculation of liability. Rather, reserves represent an estimate of what we expect the ultimate settlement and administration of claims will cost us, and our ultimate liability may be greater or less than current reserves. These estimates are based on our assessment of facts and circumstances then known, as well as estimates of future trends in claim severity, claim frequency, judicial theories of liability and other factors. These variables are affected by both internal and external events that could increase our exposure to losses, including changes in actuarial projections, claims handling procedures, inflation, climate change, economic and judicial trends, and legislative changes. We continually monitor reserves using new information on reported claims and a variety of statistical techniques.
Current wording
Our financial condition and results of operations depend upon our ability to assess accurately the potential losses and loss adjustment expenses under the terms of the insurance policies we underwrite. Reserves do not represent an exact calculation of liability. Rather, reserves represent an estimate of what we expect the ultimate settlement and administration of claims will cost us, and our ultimate liability may be greater or less than current reserves. These estimates are based on our assessment of facts and circumstances then known, as well as estimates of future trends in claim severity, claim frequency, judicial theories of liability and other factors. These variables are affected by both internal and external events that could increase our exposure to losses, including changes in actuarial projections, claims handling procedures, inflation, climate change, economic and judicial trends, and legislative changes. We believe that the insurance we write is subject to above-average variation in reserve estimates. The Excess and Surplus Lines market is subject to high policyholder turnover and changes in underlying mix of exposures. This turnover and change in underlying mix of exposures can cause actuarial estimates based on prior experience to be less reliable than estimates for more stable, admitted books of business. We continually monitor reserves using new information on reported claims and a variety of statistical techniques.
Previous wording
In the insurance and reinsurance industry, there is always the risk that reserves may prove inadequate, and actual results always differ from our reserve estimates. It is possible for insurance and reinsurance companies to underestimate the cost of claims. Our estimates could prove to be low, and this underestimation could have a material adverse effect on our financial strength. For example, in our subsidiary JRG Re, we experienced adverse development on the reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses of: $35.5 million for the calendar year ended December 31, 2023; $13.4 million for the calendar year ended December 31, 2022; and $137.6 million for the calendar year ended December 31, 2021 primarily in underwriting years 2014 through 2018. In addition, for the commercial auto business in our Excess and Surplus Lines segment, we experienced adverse development on the reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses of: $8.7 million for the calendar year ended December 31, 2023 principally relating to 2021 and prior accident years; $8.9 million for the calendar year ended December 31, 2022 principally relating to the 2020 and prior accident years; and $200.1 million for the calendar year ended December 31, 2021 principally relating to the 2019 and prior accident years for Rasier and its affiliates. Our Core E&S business (excluding commercial auto) in the Excess and Surplus Lines segment experienced adverse development on the reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses of $23.9 million for the calendar year ended December 31, 2023 principally relating to the 2020 and prior accident years. We cannot assure you that we will not have further adverse development in our business.
Current wording
In the insurance industry, there is always the risk that reserves may prove inadequate, and actual results always differ from our reserve estimates. It is possible for insurance companies to underestimate the cost of claims. Our estimates could prove to be low, and this underestimation could have a material adverse effect on our financial strength. For example, in our Excess and Surplus Lines segment, we experienced adverse development on the reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses of: $76.7 million for the calendar year ended December 31, 2024, including a $52.2 million reserve charge upon execution of the E&S ADC (consideration paid in excess of initial reserves), and $32.6 million for the calendar year ended December 31, 2023, with adverse development in accident years 2020 and prior exceeding favorable development on accident years 2022 and 2021. We also previously experienced significant adverse development in our commercial auto business in our Excess and Surplus Lines segment, including $200.1 million for the calendar year ended December 31, 2021, and in our former casualty reinsurance segment, which we disposed of on April 16, 2024.
Previous wording
• When we write “occurrence” policies, we are obligated to pay covered claims, up to the contractually agreed amount, for any covered loss that occurs while the policy is in force. Losses can emerge many years after a policy has lapsed. Accordingly, our first notice of a claim or group of claims may arise many years after a policy has lapsed. Approximately 94% of our Excess and Surplus Lines net casualty loss reserves are associated with “occurrence form” policies at December 31, 2023.
Current wording
• When we write “occurrence” policies, we are obligated to pay covered claims, up to the contractually agreed amount, for any covered loss that occurs while the policy is in force. Losses can emerge many years after a policy has lapsed. Accordingly, our first notice of a claim or group of claims may arise many years after a policy has lapsed. Approximately 96% of our Excess and Surplus Lines net casualty loss reserves are associated with “occurrence form” policies at December 31, 2024.
Previous wording
If any of our insurance or reinsurance reserves should prove to be inadequate for the reasons discussed above, or for any other reason, we will be required to increase reserves, resulting in a reduction in our net income and shareholders’ equity in the period in which the deficiency is identified. Future loss experience substantially in excess of established reserves could also have a material adverse effect on future earnings and liquidity and financial rating, which could affect our ability to attract business, our cost of capital and our ability to retain or hire qualified personnel.
Current wording
If any of our insurance reserves should prove to be inadequate for the reasons discussed above, or for any other reason, we will be required to increase reserves, resulting in a reduction in our net income and shareholders’ equity in the period in which the deficiency is identified. Future loss experience substantially in excess of established reserves could also have a material adverse effect on future earnings and liquidity and financial rating, which could affect our ability to attract business, our cost of capital and our ability to retain or hire qualified personnel.
Previous wording
Small changes in assumptions, which depend heavily on our judgment and foresight, can have a significant impact on the modeled outputs. Although we believe that these probabilistic measures provide a meaningful indicator of the relative risk of certain events and changes to our business over time, these measures do not predict our actual exposure to, nor guarantee our successful management of, future losses that could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Current wording
Small changes in assumptions, which depend heavily on our judgment and foresight, can have a significant impact on the modeled outputs. Although we believe that these probabilistic measures provide a meaningful indicator of the relative risk of certain events and changes to our business over time, these measures do not predict our actual exposure to, nor guarantee our successful management of, risks that could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Previous wording
Companies, insurers and reinsurance brokers use ratings from independent ratings agencies as an important means of assessing the financial strength and quality of insurers and reinsurers. A.M. Best has assigned a financial strength rating of “A-” (Excellent), which is the fourth highest of 13 ratings that A.M. Best issues, to each of James River Insurance, James River Casualty, Falls Lake Fire and Casualty, Falls Lake National and Stonewood Insurance. On December 20, 2023, A.M. Best announced that it revised the outlook on our financial strength rating from stable to negative on such entities. Also, on December 20, 2023, A.M. Best announced that it downgraded the financial strength rating of JRG Re from“A-” (Excellent) with a stable outlook to "B++" (good) with a negative outlook. A.M. Best announced that the ratings actions follow our announcements in November 2023 that we identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, that we entered into an agreement to sell JRG Re, and that we are exploring strategic alternatives for the Company. A.M. Best indicated that the negative outlook reflects the uncertainty that the actions will have on our organization, and reflects the execution risk associated with some of these initiatives. A.M. Best further announced that the ratings actions on JRG Re was based upon A.M. Best's view that JRG Re is less integral to our strategic, operational and financial objectives, as a result of our determination to suspend underwriting in our former casualty reinsurance segment, and our agreement to sell JRG Re at 75% of the book value, valued at September 30, 2023.
Current wording
Companies, insurers and reinsurance brokers use ratings from independent ratings agencies as an important means of assessing the financial strength and quality of insurers and reinsurers. A.M. Best has assigned a financial strength rating of “A-” (Excellent), which is the fourth highest of 13 ratings that A.M. Best issues, to each of James River Insurance, James River Casualty, Falls Lake Fire and Casualty, Falls Lake National and Stonewood Insurance. On December 20, 2023, A.M. Best announced that it revised the outlook on our financial strength rating from stable to negative on such entities. Also, on December 20, 2023, A.M. Best announced that it downgraded the financial strength rating of JRG Re, our former reinsurance subsidiary, from“A-” (Excellent) with a stable outlook to “B++” (good) with a negative outlook. A.M. Best announced that the ratings actions followed our announcements in November 2023 that we identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, that we entered into an agreement to sell JRG Re (which was completed on April 16, 2024), and that we were exploring strategic alternatives for the Company (which have since been completed as announced on November 11, 2024). On January 30, 2025, A.M. Best affirmed our “A-” (Excellent) financial strength rating. The negative outlook remained with a focus on 2025 plan execution.
Previous wording
A.M. Best assigns ratings that are intended to provide an independent opinion of an insurance or reinsurance company’s ability to meet its obligations to policyholders and such ratings are not an evaluation directed to investors. A.M. Best periodically reviews our rating and may revise it downward or revoke it at its sole discretion based primarily on its analysis of our balance sheet strength (including capital adequacy and loss and loss adjustment expense reserve adequacy), operating performance and business profile. Factors that could affect such an analysis include but are not limited to:
Current wording
A.M. Best assigns ratings that are intended to provide an independent opinion of an insurance company’s ability to meet its obligations to policyholders and such ratings are not an evaluation directed to investors. A.M. Best periodically reviews our rating and may revise it downward or revoke it at its sole discretion based primarily on its analysis of our balance sheet strength (including capital adequacy and loss and loss adjustment expense reserve adequacy), operating performance and business profile. Factors that could affect such an analysis include but are not limited to:
Previous wording
These and other factors could result in a downgrade of our rating. A downgrade of our rating could cause our current and future brokers and agents, retail brokers and insureds to choose other, more highly-rated competitors. A downgrade of this rating could also increase the cost or reduce the availability of reinsurance to us, increase collateral required for our assumed reinsurance business, trigger termination of assumed and/or ceded reinsurance contracts, trigger termination rights in certain of our agreements with MGAs in our Specialty Admitted segment, or, as occurred upon the downgrade by A.M. Best of JRG Redescribed above, result in a default under our credit facilities. See the Risk Factor“Our credit agreements contain a number of financial and other covenants, the breach of any of which could result in acceleration of payment of amounts due under our credit facilities.”
Current wording
These and other factors could result in a downgrade of our rating. A downgrade of our rating could cause our current and future brokers and agents, retail brokers and insureds to choose other, more highly-rated competitors. A downgrade of this rating could also increase the cost or reduce the availability of reinsurance to us, trigger termination of reinsurance contracts, trigger termination rights in certain of our agreements with MGAs in our Specialty Admitted segment, or result in a default under our credit facility. See the Risk Factor“Our credit agreement contains financial and other covenants, the breach of any of which could result in acceleration of payment of amounts due under our credit facility.”
Previous wording
In addition, in view of the earnings and capital pressures experienced by many financial institutions, including insurance companies, it is possible that rating organizations will heighten the level of scrutiny that they apply to such institutions, will increase the frequency and scope of their credit reviews, will request additional information from the companies that they rate and may increase the capital and other requirements employed in the rating organizations’ models for maintenance of certain ratings levels. It is possible that such reviews of us may result in adverse ratings consequences, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. A downgrade below “A-” or withdrawal of any rating could severely limit or prevent us from writing new and renewal insurance contracts. See also “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Ratings.”
Current wording
In addition, in view of the earnings and capital pressures experienced by many financial institutions, including insurance companies, it is possible that rating organizations will heighten the level of scrutiny that they apply to such institutions, will increase the frequency and scope of their credit reviews, will request additional information from the companies that they rate and may increase the capital and other requirements employed in the rating organizations’ models for maintenance of certain ratings levels. It is possible that such reviews of us may result in adverse ratings consequences, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. A downgrade below “A-” or withdrawal of any rating could severely limit or prevent us from writing new and renewal insurance contracts or entering into new programs in our Specialty Admitted segment. See also “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Ratings.”
Previous wording
We believe that our future success depends, in large part, on our ability to retain our experienced management team and key employees and on our ability to recruit additional qualified employees to support our growth. For instance, our specialty insurance operations require the services of a number of highly experienced employees, including underwriters, to source quality business and analyze and manage our risk exposure. There can be no assurance that we can attract and retain the necessary employees to conduct our business activities on a timely basis or at all. Our competitors may offer more favorable compensation and/or permanent remote work arrangements to our key management or employees to incentivize them to leave our Company, or alternatively, to make it more difficult for us to recruit and hire new employees. Further, the transition to remote work by employees has allowed competitors that are located in different states or parts of the country to solicit our employees without requiring their relocation. Although we have employment agreements with most members of our senior management team, which include certain post-employment restrictions on engaging in businesses competitive with the Company, we do not have employment agreements with our senior underwriters or claims personnel. The November 2023 announcement that we are evaluating strategic alternatives caused uncertainty among our employees regarding our future operations or employment needs, which may limit our ability to retain or hire qualified personnel, and may contribute to the unplanned loss of highly skilled employees through attrition. Our inability to attract and retain qualified personnel and the loss of services of key personnel could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Current wording
We believe that our future success depends, in large part, on our ability to retain our experienced management team and key employees and on our ability to recruit additional qualified employees to support our growth. For instance, our specialty insurance operations require the services of a number of highly experienced employees, including underwriters, to source quality business and analyze and manage our risk exposure. There can be no assurance that we can attract and retain the necessary employees to conduct our business activities on a timely basis or at all. Our competitors may offer more favorable compensation and/or permanent remote work arrangements to our key management or employees to incentivize them to leave our Company, or alternatively, to make it more difficult for us to recruit and hire new employees. Further, remote work by employees has allowed competitors that are located in different states or parts of the country to solicit our employees without requiring their relocation. Although we have employment agreements with most members of our senior management team, which include certain post-employment restrictions on engaging in businesses competitive with the Company, we do not have employment agreements with our senior underwriters or claims personnel. Our inability to attract and retain qualified personnel and the loss of services of key personnel could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Previous wording
We underwrite a significant portion of our insurance in (i) the Excess and Surplus Lines segment in Florida, California, Texas and New York, and (ii) the fronting and program business of the Specialty Admitted Insurance segment in California, Texas, North Carolina, Florida, and New York. Any economic downturn or reduced business activities in any such state, or other states where we conduct business, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Current wording
We underwrite a significant portion of our insurance in (i) the Excess and Surplus Lines segment in Florida, California, Texas and New York, and (ii) the fronting and program business of the Specialty Admitted Insurance segment in Texas, California, North Carolina, Florida, and Illinois. Any economic downturn or reduced business activities in any such state, or other states where we conduct business, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Previous wording
Higher than expected inflation could adversely affect the adequacy of our reserves by increasing average loss costs over time, negatively impact the values of our investments and our investment returns, and may increase our compensation expenses.
Current wording
Higher than expected inflation could adversely affect the adequacy of our reserves by increasing average loss costs over time, negatively impact the values of our investments and our investment returns, and may increase our compensation expenses. Recent actions by the federal government, including without limitation with respect to international trade regulation, including tariffs, could lead to higher inflation.
Previous wording
• the Excess and Surplus Lines segment conducted business with three brokers that produced an aggregate of $716.3 million in gross written premiums, or 71.1% of that segment’s gross written premiums for the year; and
Current wording
• the Excess and Surplus Lines segment conducted business with three brokers that produced an aggregate of $724.7 million in gross written premiums, or 71.3% of that segment’s gross written premiums for the year; and
Previous wording
• the Specialty Admitted Insurance segment conducted business with two agencies that produced $259.6 million in gross written premiums, representing 51.8% of that segment’s gross written premiums for the year.
Current wording
• the Specialty Admitted Insurance segment conducted business with two agencies that produced $239.5 million in gross written premiums, representing 57.7% of that segment’s gross written premiums for the year.
Previous wording
Certain premiums from policyholders, where the business is produced by brokers or agents, are collected directly by the brokers or agents and forwarded to our insurance subsidiaries. In certain jurisdictions, when the insured pays its policy premium to brokers or agents for payment on behalf of our insurance subsidiaries, the premiums might be considered to have been paid under applicable insurance laws and regulations. Accordingly, the insured would no longer be liable to us for those amounts, whether or not we have actually received the premiums from that broker or agent. Consequently, we assume a degree of credit risk associated with brokers and agents. Where necessary, we review the financial condition of potential new brokers and agents before we agree to transact business with them. Although failures by brokers and agents to remit premiums have not been material to date, there may be instances where brokers and agents collect premiums but do not remit them to us and we may be required under applicable law to provide the coverage set forth in the policy despite the absence of premiums.
Current wording
Certain premiums from policyholders, where the business is produced by brokers or agents, are collected directly by the brokers or agents and forwarded to our insurance subsidiaries. In most jurisdictions, when the insured pays its policy premium to brokers or agents for payment on behalf of our insurance subsidiaries, the premiums will be considered to have been paid under applicable insurance laws and regulations. Accordingly, the insured would no longer be liable to us for those amounts, whether or not we have actually received the premiums from that broker or agent. Consequently, we assume a degree of credit risk associated with brokers and agents. Where necessary, we review the financial condition of potential new brokers and agents before we agree to transact business with them. Although failures by brokers and agents to remit premiums have not been material to date, there may be instances where brokers and agents collect premiums but do not remit them to us and we may be required under applicable law to provide the coverage set forth in the policy despite the absence of premiums.
Previous wording
We rely on a select group of customers for a significant portion of our business, and the loss or termination of our relationship with any of these customers, or a material reduction in business with any of these customers, could materially adversely affect our rate of growth, results of operations and financial condition.
Current wording
We rely on a select group of customers for a significant portion of our business, and the continued loss or termination of our relationship with any such customers, or a material reduction in their business, could materially adversely affect our rate of growth, results of operations and financial condition.
Previous wording
Our largest customer, an agent for the Specialty Admitted Insurance segment, accounted for approximately $163.1 million (10.8%) of our consolidated gross written premium from continuing operations in 2023. No other insured generated 10.0% or more of consolidated gross written premiums from continuing operations for 2023.
Current wording
Our largest customer, an agent for the Specialty Admitted Insurance segment, accounted for approximately $175.7 million (12.3%) of our consolidated gross written premium from continuing operations in 2024. This same agent was our largest customer in 2023, accounting for approximately $163.1 million (10.8%) of our consolidated gross written premium from continuing operations in 2023. No other customer generated 10.0% or more of consolidated gross written premiums from continuing operations in 2024 or in 2023. As of December 31, 2024, this agent had given notice of its decision to non-renew or terminate its remaining programs with the Specialty Admitted Insurance segment, with the last program scheduled to end in mid-2025.
Previous wording
Our two largest customers in 2022, both agents for the Specialty Admitted Insurance segment, accounted for approximately $120.9 million (8.6%) and $110.9 million (7.9%) of our consolidated gross written premium from continuing operations in 2022. No insured generated 10.0% or more of consolidated gross written premiums from continuing operations for 2022.
Current wording
Our two largest customers in 2022, both agents for the Specialty Admitted Insurance segment, accounted for approximately $120.9 million (8.6%) and $110.9 million (7.9%) of our consolidated gross written premium from continuing operations in 2022. No customer generated 10.0% or more of consolidated gross written premiums from continuing operations for 2022.
Previous wording
The loss or termination of our relationship with these customers, or another significant customer, or a material reduction in business with any such party, could materially adversely affect our rate of growth, results of operations and financial condition.
Current wording
The continued loss or termination of our relationship with our customers, or a material reduction in business with any such party, could materially adversely affect our rate of growth, results of operations and financial condition.
Previous wording
We purchase reinsurance in many of our lines of business to help manage our exposure to insurance and reinsurance risks that we underwrite and to reduce volatility in our results. In addition, JRG Re has managed its risk through retrocession arrangements with third-party reinsurers. A retrocession is a practice whereby a reinsurer cedes risk to one or more other reinsurers.
Current wording
We purchase reinsurance in many of our lines of business to help manage our exposure to insurance and reinsurance risks that we underwrite and to reduce volatility in our results.
Previous wording
The availability and cost of reinsurance are subject to prevailing market conditions, both in terms of price and available capacity, each of which can affect our business volume and profitability. The availability of reasonably affordable reinsurance is a critical element of our business plan. One important way we utilize reinsurance is to reduce volatility in claims payments by limiting our exposure to losses from large risks. Another way we use reinsurance is to purchase substantial protection against concentrated losses when we enter new markets. In addition, the ability to obtain reinsurance is critical to our objective to grow our fee-based fronting business. As a result, our ability to manage volatility and avoid significant losses, expand into new markets, grow by offering insurance to new kinds of enterprises, or grow our fronting business may be limited by the unavailability of reasonably priced reinsurance. We may not be able to obtain reinsurance on acceptable terms or from entities with satisfactory creditworthiness. In such event, if we are unwilling to accept the terms or credit risk of potential reinsurers, we would have to reduce the level of our underwriting commitments, which would reduce our revenues. Reinsurance capacity has become more restricted making reinsurance placements more challenging during 2021, 2022 and 2023 than in prior years.
Current wording
The availability and cost of reinsurance are subject to prevailing market conditions, both in terms of price and available capacity, each of which can affect our business volume and profitability. The availability of reasonably affordable reinsurance is a critical element of our business plan. One important way we utilize reinsurance is to reduce volatility in claims payments by limiting our exposure to losses from large risks. Another way we use reinsurance is to purchase substantial protection against concentrated losses when we enter new markets. In addition, the ability to obtain reinsurance is critical to our fee-based fronting business. As a result, our ability to manage volatility and avoid significant losses, expand into new markets, grow by offering insurance to new kinds of enterprises, or grow our fronting business may be limited by the unavailability of reasonably priced reinsurance. We may not be able to obtain reinsurance on acceptable terms or from entities with satisfactory creditworthiness. In such event, if we are unwilling to accept the terms or credit risk of potential reinsurers, we would have to reduce the level of our underwriting commitments, which would reduce our revenues. Reinsurance capacity has become more restricted making reinsurance placements more challenging in recent years.
Previous wording
Many reinsurance companies have begun to exclude certain coverages from, or alter terms in, the reinsurance contracts we enter into with them. Some exclusions relate to risks that we cannot in turn exclude from the policies we write due to business or regulatory constraints. In addition, reinsurers are imposing terms, such as lower per occurrence and aggregate limits, and more exclusions, limiting the protection provided under the reinsurance contract. As a result, we, like other direct insurance companies, write insurance policies which to some extent do not have the benefit of reinsurance protection. These gaps in reinsurance protection expose us to greater risk and greater potential losses. For example, certain reinsurers have excluded coverage for terrorist acts or priced such coverage at unreasonably high rates. Many direct insurers, including us, have written policies without terrorist act exclusions and in many cases we cannot exclude terrorist acts because of regulatory constraints. We may, therefore, be exposed to potential losses as a result of terrorist acts. See also “Item 1. Business — Business Segments—Purchase of Reinsurance.”
Current wording
Many reinsurance companies have begun to exclude certain coverages from, or alter terms in, the reinsurance contracts we enter into with them. Some exclusions relate to risks that we cannot in turn exclude from the policies we write due to business or regulatory constraints. In addition, reinsurers are imposing terms, such as lower per occurrence and aggregate limits, and more exclusions, limiting the protection provided under the reinsurance contract. As a result, we, like other direct insurance companies, write insurance policies which to some extent do not have the benefit of reinsurance protection. These gaps in reinsurance protection expose us to greater risk and greater potential losses. For example, certain reinsurers have excluded coverage for terrorist acts or priced such coverage at unreasonably high rates. Many direct insurers, including us, have written policies without terrorist act exclusions and in many cases we cannot exclude terrorist acts because of regulatory constraints. We may, therefore, be exposed to potential losses as a result of terrorist acts. See also “Item 1. Business — Purchase of Reinsurance.”
Previous wording
Although reinsurance makes the assuming reinsurer liable to us to the extent of the risk ceded, we are not relieved of our primary liability to our insureds as the direct insurer. At December 31, 2023, reinsurance recoverables on unpaid losses from our three largest reinsurers was $606.3 million in the aggregate and represented 44.6% of the total balance. Additionally, prepaid reinsurance premiums ceded to three reinsurers at December 31, 2023 was $100.2 million in the aggregate, or 34.2% of the total balance of prepaid reinsurance premiums. In addition to reinsurance purchased to manage our ongoing business, we have two retroactive reinsurance arrangements on a legacy books of business: the first, a loss portfolio transfer reinsurance transaction on our legacy commercial auto lines business in our Excess & Surplus Lines segment (the “Commercial Auto LPT”), and the second, a loss portfolio transfer retrocession agreement entered into by JRG Re on February 23, 2022 (the "Casualty Re LPT"). At December 31, 2023, reinsurance recoverables on the Commercial Auto LPT were $84.5 million (including $78.1 million of unpaid recoverables and $6.4 million of paid recoverables), and reinsurance recoverables on the Casualty Re LPT were $221.7 million.
Current wording
Although reinsurance makes the assuming reinsurer liable to us to the extent of the risk ceded, we are not relieved of our primary liability to our insureds as the direct insurer. At December 31, 2024, reinsurance recoverables on unpaid losses from our three largest reinsurers was $980.6 million in the aggregate and represented 49.1% of the total balance. Additionally, prepaid reinsurance premiums ceded to three reinsurers at December 31, 2024 was $108.5 million in the aggregate, or 36.6% of the total balance of prepaid reinsurance premiums. In addition to reinsurance purchased to manage our prospective business, we have three retroactive reinsurance arrangements on legacy books of business in the Excess & Surplus Lines segment: the first, a loss portfolio transfer reinsurance transaction on our legacy commercial auto lines business (the “Commercial Auto LPT”); the second, a combined loss portfolio transfer and adverse development cover reinsurance contract entered into in July 2024 on our Excess & Surplus Lines segment casualty portfolio losses attaching to premium earned 2010-2023, excluding, among others, losses related to commercial auto policies issued to a former large insured or its affiliates (the “casualty subject business”) (the “E&S ADC”); and the third, an adverse development cover reinsurance contract entered into in November 2024 also covering the casualty subject business (the “E&S Top Up ADC”). At December 31, 2024, reinsurance recoverables on the Commercial Auto LPT were $36.6 million and reinsurance recoverables on the E&S ADC were $362.0 million. There were no reinsurance recoverables on the E&S Top Up ADC at December 31, 2024.
Previous wording
At December 31, 2023, all of our material reinsurance recoverable amounts are from companies with A.M. Best ratings of “A-” (Excellent) or better, are collateralized by the reinsurer for our benefit through letters of credit or funds held in trust accounts, or represent recoverables from a state residual market for automobile insurance, but we cannot be sure that our reinsurers will pay all reinsurance claims on a timely basis or at all. Similarly, in our fronting business, which we conduct through our Specialty Admitted Insurance segment, we are primarily liable to the insureds because we have issued the policies. While we customarily require a collateral trust arrangement to secure the obligations of the insurance entity for which we are fronting, we do not obtain collateral in every instance. See also “Item 1. Business — Business Segments — Specialty Admitted Insurance Segment — Fronting & Program Business.”Reinsurers or fronting partners may default in their financial obligations to us as the result of insolvency, lack of liquidity, operational failure, fraud, asserted defenses based on agreement wordings or the principle of utmost good faith, asserted deficiencies in the documentation of agreements or for other reasons. The failure of a reinsurer or fronting partner to pay us does not lessen our contractual obligations to insureds. If a reinsurer or fronting partner fails to pay the expected portion of a claim or claims, our net losses might increase substantially and materially adversely affect our financial condition. Any disputes regarding reinsurance contracts, indemnification arrangements and related agreements could be time-consuming, costly and uncertain of success.
Current wording
At December 31, 2024, all of our material reinsurance recoverable amounts are from companies with A.M. Best ratings of “A-” (Excellent) or better, or, if not rated by A.M. Best, have statutory surplus of $100 million or more, are collateralized by the reinsurer for our benefit through letters of credit or funds held in trust accounts, or represent recoverables from a state residual market for automobile insurance, but we cannot be sure that our reinsurers will pay all reinsurance claims on a timely basis or at all. Similarly, in our fronting business, which we conduct through our Specialty Admitted Insurance segment, we are primarily liable to the insureds because we have issued the policies. While we customarily require a collateral trust arrangement to secure the obligations of the insurance entity for which we are fronting, we do not obtain collateral in every instance. See also “Item 1. Business — Business Segments — Specialty Admitted Insurance Segment — Fronting & Program Business.”Reinsurers or fronting partners may default in their financial obligations to us as the result of insolvency, lack of liquidity, operational failure, fraud, asserted defenses based on agreement wordings or the principle of utmost good faith, asserted deficiencies in the documentation of agreements or for other reasons. The failure of a reinsurer or fronting partner to pay us does not lessen our contractual obligations to insureds. If a reinsurer or fronting partner fails to pay the expected portion of a claim or claims, our net losses might increase substantially and materially adversely affect our financial condition. Any disputes regarding reinsurance contracts, indemnification arrangements and related agreements could be time-consuming, costly and uncertain of success.
Previous wording
Downgrades to the credit ratings of our reinsurance counterparties may result in the reduction of rating agency capital credit provided by those reinsurance contracts and could, therefore, result in a downgrade of our own credit ratings. In addition, under the reinsurance regulations, in many states where our U.S. insurance subsidiaries are domiciled, certain reinsurers are required to collateralize their obligations to us and to the extent they do not do so, our ability for regulators to recognize this reinsurance will be impaired. We evaluate each reinsurance claim based on the facts of the case, historical experience with the reinsurer on similar claims and existing case law and include any amounts deemed uncollectible from the reinsurer in our allowance for credit losses on reinsurance balances. See also “Item 1. Business — Business Segments — Purchase of Reinsurance.”
Current wording
Downgrades to the credit ratings of our reinsurance counterparties may result in the reduction of rating agency capital credit provided by those reinsurance contracts and could, therefore, result in a downgrade of our own credit ratings. In addition, under the reinsurance regulations, in many states where our U.S. insurance subsidiaries are domiciled, certain reinsurers are required to collateralize their obligations to us and to the extent they do not do so, our ability for regulators to recognize this reinsurance will be impaired. We evaluate each reinsurance claim based on the facts of the case, historical experience with the reinsurer on similar claims and existing case law and include any amounts deemed uncollectible from the reinsurer in our allowance for credit losses on reinsurance balances. See also “Item 1. Business — Purchase of Reinsurance.”
Previous wording
We are exposed to credit risk relating to a set of insurance contracts previously issued to Rasier, under which the Company pays losses and loss adjustment expenses on the contracts. Rasier is contractually obligated to reimburse us for the losses and loss adjustment expenses paid on their behalf pursuant to indemnification agreements with it. This reimbursement obligation is supported by collateral posted for our benefit in a trust account from time to time. If Rasier fails to reimburse us, and the collateral posted for our benefit to support their reimbursement obligations is insufficient, our financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. See also “Item 1. Business — Business Segments — Purchase of Reinsurance — Amounts Recoverable from an Indemnifying Party.”
Current wording
We are exposed to credit risk relating to a set of insurance contracts previously issued to Rasier, under which the Company pays losses and loss adjustment expenses on the contracts. Rasier is contractually obligated to reimburse us for the losses and loss adjustment expenses paid on their behalf pursuant to indemnification agreements with it. This reimbursement obligation is supported by collateral posted for our benefit in a trust account from time to time. If Rasier fails to reimburse us, and the collateral posted for our benefit to support their reimbursement obligations is insufficient, our financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. See also “Item 1. Business — Purchase of Reinsurance — Amounts Recoverable from an Indemnifying Party and Reinsurer on Legacy Commercial Auto Book.”
Previous wording
As industry practices and legal, judicial, social and other environmental conditions change, unexpected and unintended issues related to claims and coverage may emerge. These issues may materially adversely affect our business by either broadening coverage beyond our underwriting intent or by increasing the number or size of claims. In some instances, these changes may not become apparent until sometime after we have issued insurance or reinsurance contracts that are affected by the changes. As a result, the full extent of liability under our insurance or reinsurance contracts may not be known for many years after a contract is issued.
Current wording
As industry practices and legal, judicial, social and other environmental conditions change, unexpected and unintended issues related to claims and coverage may emerge. These issues may materially adversely affect our business by either broadening coverage beyond our underwriting intent or by increasing the number or size of claims. In some instances, these changes may not become apparent until sometime after we have issued insurance contracts that are affected by the changes. As a result, the full extent of liability under our insurance contracts may not be known for many years after a contract is issued.
Previous wording
Our primary market risk exposures are to changes in interest rates and equity prices. See“Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.” Prior to 2022, interest rates had been at or near historic lows, limiting yields on fixed income investments and negatively impacting investment income. Increases in interest rates during 2022 and for much of 2023, while generating higher investment yields, led to declines in the fair values of our fixed income securities, influenced by the duration of our fixed income investments and the extent of interest rate increases. For example, for the year ended December 31, 2022, we experienced unrealized losses on fixed maturity investments of $193.0 million, which were recognized in other comprehensive loss. During 2023, the fair values of our fixed maturity securities recovered some of the unrealized losses with signs of inflation easing and optimism about future Federal Reserve interest rate cuts. The $99.3 million reduction in accumulated other comprehensive loss in the year ended December 31, 2023 reflects the increase in fair values of our fixed maturity securities as well as $53.2 million of losses recognized on JRG Re's fixed maturities. The Company entered into a definitive agreement on November 8, 2023 to sell JRG Re. The sale is expected to close in the first quarter of 2024 and the Company no longer has the intent or ability to hold securities in an unrealized loss position until a recovery of their fair value could occur. Some fixed income securities have call or prepayment options, which represent possible reinvestment risk in declining rate environments. Other fixed income securities such as mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities carry prepayment risk or, in a rising interest rate environment, may not pre-pay as quickly as expected. In addition, individual securities in our fixed income securities portfolio are subject to credit risk and default. Downgrades in the credit ratings of fixed maturities can have a significant negative effect on the market valuation of such securities.
Current wording
Our primary market risk exposures are to changes in interest rates and equity prices. See also“Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.” A decline in interest rates reduces the return available on short-term investments and new fixed maturity investments (including those purchased for re-investment), thereby negatively impacting our net investment income on a going forward basis, while rising interest rates reduce the market value of existing fixed maturity investments, thereby negatively impacting our book value. Prior to 2022, interest rates had been at or near historic lows, limiting yields on fixed income investments and negatively impacting investment income. Increases in interest rates since 2022, while generating higher investment yields, led to declines in the fair values of our fixed income securities, influenced by the duration of our fixed income investments and the extent of interest rate increases. For example, for the year ended December 31, 2022, we experienced unrealized losses on fixed maturity investments of $193.0 million, which were recognized in other comprehensive loss. During 2023, the fair values of our fixed maturity securities recovered some of the unrealized losses with signs of inflation easing and optimism about future Federal Reserve interest rate cuts. Unrealized gains of $99.3 million were recognized in other comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2023. In 2024, interest rates rose moderately and $6.3 million of unrealized losses were recognized in other comprehensive loss for the year ended December 31, 2024. Some fixed income securities have call or prepayment options, which represent possible reinvestment risk in declining rate environments. Other fixed income securities such as mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities carry prepayment risk or, in a rising interest rate environment, may not pre-pay as quickly as expected. In addition, individual securities in our fixed income securities portfolio are subject to credit risk and default. Downgrades in the credit ratings of fixed maturities can have a significant negative effect on the market valuation of such securities.
Previous wording
In the event of a financial crisis or severe downturn in public debt and equity markets, we could incur substantial realized and unrealized investment losses in future periods, which could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations, debt and financial strength ratings, insurance subsidiaries’ capital liquidity and ability to access capital markets.
Current wording
In the event of a financial crisis, return to a high inflationary environment, or severe downturn in public debt and equity markets, we could incur substantial realized and unrealized investment losses in future periods, which could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations, debt and financial strength ratings, insurance subsidiaries’ capital liquidity and ability to access capital markets.
Previous wording
We hold investments in bank loans (7.9% of the carrying value of our cash and invested assets (excluding restricted cash equivalents) as of December 31, 2023. Most of these loans are issued to sub-investment grade borrowers. While this class of investment has been profitable for us, a severe downturn in the markets could materially adversely affect the value of these investments, including the possibility that we would suffer substantial losses on this portfolio. As of December 31, 2023, the fair value of our investments in bank loans was $156.2 million.
Current wording
We hold investments in bank loans (7.4% of the carrying value of our cash and invested assets (excluding restricted cash equivalents) as of December 31, 2024. Most of these loans are issued to sub-investment grade borrowers. While this class of investment has been profitable for us, a severe downturn in the markets could materially adversely affect the value of these investments, including the possibility that we would suffer substantial losses on this portfolio. As of December 31, 2024, the fair value of our investments in bank loans was $142.4 million.
Previous wording
As of December 31, 2023, we held equity investments of $8.4 million in non-public limited liability companies that have invested in renewable energy investments. We invested in the equity of these projects because we anticipate earning attractive risk-adjusted returns from these investments. However, our investments in these projects are illiquid and the ultimate results from these investments may be unknown for some time.
Current wording
As of December 31, 2024, we held equity investments of $7.7 million in non-public limited liability companies that have invested in renewable energy investments. We invested in the equity of these projects because we anticipate earning attractive risk-adjusted returns from these investments. However, our investments in these projects are illiquid and the ultimate results from these investments may be unknown for some time.
Previous wording
We also invest in marketable equity securities. These securities are carried on the balance sheet at fair market value and are subject to potential losses and declines in market value. Our invested assets also include interests in limited partnerships and privately held debt investments totaling $24.8 million at December 31, 2023. These investments were designed to provide diversification of risk and enhance the return on the overall portfolio. However, these investments entail substantial risks and are generally illiquid. Our investment portfolio is subject to increased valuation uncertainties when investment markets are illiquid. The valuation of investments is more subjective when markets are illiquid, thereby increasing the risk that the estimated fair value (i.e., the carrying amount) does not reflect prices at which actual transactions would occur.
Current wording
We also invest in marketable equity securities. These securities are carried on the balance sheet at fair market value and are subject to potential losses and declines in market value. Our invested assets also include interests in limited partnerships and privately held debt investments totaling $29.0 million at December 31, 2024. These investments were designed to provide diversification of risk and enhance the return on the overall portfolio. However, these investments entail substantial risks and are generally illiquid. Our investment portfolio is subject to increased valuation uncertainties when investment markets are illiquid. The valuation of investments is more subjective when markets are illiquid, thereby increasing the risk that the estimated fair value (i.e., the carrying amount) does not reflect prices at which actual transactions would occur.
Previous wording
Risks for all types of securities are managed through application of our investment policy, which establishes investment parameters that include (but are not limited to) maximum percentages of investment in certain types of securities and minimum levels of credit quality, which we believe are within guidelines established by the NAIC, BMA and various state insurance departments, as applicable.
Current wording
Risks for all types of securities are managed through application of our investment policy, which establishes investment parameters that include (but are not limited to) maximum percentages of investment in certain types of securities and minimum levels of credit quality, which we believe are within guidelines established by the NAIC and various state insurance departments, as applicable.
Previous wording
Market disruptions like those experienced during the credit-driven financial market collapse in 2008, as well as the dramatic increase in the capital allocated to alternative asset management during recent years, have led to increased governmental as well as self-regulatory scrutiny of the insurance industry in general. In addition, certain legislation proposing greater regulation of the industry is periodically considered by governing bodies of some jurisdictions as well as the U.S. federal government. The credit-driven equity market collapse in 2008 or other significant market disruptions may increase the likelihood that some increased regulation of the industry is mandated.
Current wording
Market disruptions like those experienced during the credit-driven financial market collapse in 2008, as well as the significant amount of capital allocated to alternative asset management, have led to increased governmental as well as self-regulatory scrutiny of the insurance industry in general. In addition, certain legislation proposing greater regulation of the industry is periodically considered by governing bodies of some jurisdictions as well as the U.S. federal government. The credit-driven financial market collapse in 2008 or other significant market disruptions may increase the likelihood that some increased regulation of the industry is mandated.
Showing the first 40 of 97 pairs. Open the source sections for the rest.
Rearranged current paragraphs (4)
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
•We operate in a highly competitive environment, and may not be able to continue to compete effectively with larger or more well-established rivals.
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
We cannot assure you that we will not have further adverse development in our business.
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
Code), are subject to change, possibly on a retroactive basis. We are not able to predict if, when or in what form any guidance on such tax laws will be provided and whether such guidance will have a retroactive effect.
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
Shares in common shares, would increase the number of common shares available for public trading, and may adversely affect prevailing market prices of our common shares.
Rearranged previous paragraphs (1)
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
Our admitted insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries are subject to extensive regulation, primarily by California (the domiciliary state for Falls Lake Fire and Casualty Company), Ohio (the domiciliary state for James River Insurance, James