Titan Mining Corp
For the period ended Dec 31, 2025. Filed Mar 19, 2026.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
The yearly report of certain Canadian companies, filed under a joint US and Canadian system. It is the main yearly account these companies give US investors, largely as filed in Canada.
FY2025 · Filed Mar 19, 2026
Use the contents to explore the available documents and sections.
Contents
EX-99.3 · NOTES TO READER
NOTES TO READER
Cautionary note regarding forward-looking information
Certain information contained in this document constitutes forward-looking statements. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, are forward looking statements, including but not limited to that Titan believes that the district surrounding ESM remains underexplored despite the long operating history of ESM; the nature, extent, location, and timing of future exploration and testing at ESM; that testing at targets prioritized for surface sampling, mapping and drilling occurs as scheduled, if at all; production guidance; anticipated head grade; anticipated zones that will be mined, and timing of such mining; that the Company continues to examine various financing options to bolster the Company’s treasury; that the Company may require additional funding in the next twelve months; and that the Company expects that it will continue to obtain funding through similar or other means depending on market conditions and other relevant factors at the time; anticipated recommencement of mining at N2D, and timing and results therefrom; anticipated construction of the Facility and timing and results therefrom; the Company is focused on discovering and developing additional high-grade, low-cost mineral resources to feed the mill at ESM; ESM’s #4 mine is connected to its #2 mine, and there is potential for significant mineral resource expansion which is expected to support production growth; and exploration results indicating further potential mineral resource growth; the Company is targeting production from the Facility by the first quarter of 2026; and the key objectives of the Facility are to obtain product for commencement of qualification sales and to develop a commercialization strategy for Kilbourne. Forward-looking statements are often, but not always, identified by the use of words such as may, will, seek, anticipate, believe, plan, estimate, budget, schedule, forecast, project, expect, intend, or similar expressions.
The Company cautions readers that forward-looking statements involve and are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by such forward looking statements and forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future results, performance or achievement. These risks, uncertainties and factors include risks related to general business, economic, competitive, political, regulatory and social uncertainties; actual results of exploration activities and economic evaluations being different than modelled; fluctuations in currency exchange rates; changes in project parameters; changes in costs, including labour, infrastructure, operating and production costs in respect of both the Company’s zinc and graphite operations; future prices of zinc, graphite and other minerals; variations of mineral grade or recovery rates; operating or technical difficulties in connection with exploration, development or mining activities, including the failure of plant, equipment or processes to operate as anticipated in respect of both the Company’s zinc and graphite operations; delays in completion of exploration, development or construction activities in respect of both the Company’s zinc and graphite operations; changes in government legislation and regulation; the ability to maintain and renew existing licenses and permits or obtain required licenses and permits in a timely manner; the ability to obtain financing on acceptable terms in a timely manner; contests over title to properties; employee relations and shortages of skilled personnel and contractors; the speculative nature of, and the risks involved in, the exploration, development and mining business; and the factors discussed in the section entitled “Risks Factors” in the Company’s most recent annual information form filed on SEDAR+. Although the Company has attempted to identify important risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual performance, achievements, actions, events, results or conditions to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by the forward-looking information, there may be other risks, uncertainties and other factors that cause performance, achievements, actions, events, results or conditions to differ from those anticipated, estimated or intended.
Page 25
Such forward-looking statements are based on various assumptions, including assumptions made with regard to our forecasts and expected cash flows; our projected capital and operating costs in respect of both the Company’s zinc and graphite operations; our expectations regarding mining and metallurgical recoveries in respect of both the Company’s zinc and graphite operations; mine life and production rates in respect of both the Company’s zinc and graphite operations; that laws or regulations impacting mining activities will remain consistent; our approved business plans; our mineral resource estimates and results of the PEA; our experience with regulators; political and social support of the mining industry in New York State; our experience and knowledge of the New York State mining industry and our expectations of economic conditions and the price of zinc and graphite; demand for graphite; exploration results; the ability to secure adequate financing (as needed); the Company maintaining its current strategy and objectives; and the Company’s ability to achieve its growth objectives. While the Company considers these assumptions to be reasonable, based on information currently available, they may prove to be incorrect.
Unless otherwise indicated, forward-looking statements contained herein are as of the date hereof and the Company disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or results or otherwise, except as required by applicable law.
Risk Factors
The Company’s activities and related results are subject to a number of different risks at any given time. Exploration and development of mineral resources involves a high degree of risk. A summary of the Company’s financial instruments risk exposure is provided in the Financial Instruments section of the Company’s 2025 Annual Financial Statements. The following are additional risk factors which the Company’s management believes are most important in the context of the Company’s business. It should be noted that this list is not fully comprehensive and that other risk factors may apply.
The Company has a limited operating history and there are risks with new production
The Kilbourne Project has a limited operating history, and prior to the successful production of natural flake graphite concentrate from the Kilbourne Project Facility in January 2026, the Company did not have a history of graphite production. Further, ESM’s zinc operations were on care and maintenance since 2008 until recommencing operations in 2017. If the Company is unable to generate significant revenues from the Kilbourne Project and ESM’s zinc operations, it may not be able to earn profits or continue operations. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in achieving or maintaining profitable operations. While the Company has been in commercial production from its zinc operations for over five years, the Company has a limited operating history from which its business and prospects can be evaluated, and forecasts of any potential growth of the business of the Company are difficult to evaluate. In addition, the Company has not made a decision to advance the Kilbourne Project to commercial production and may never do so.
The Company’s prospects must be considered in light of the risks, expenses and difficulties frequently encountered by companies in similar stages of development, including under-capitalization, cash shortages, limitations with respect to personnel, financial and other resources, and lack of revenues. The advancement of these projects requires the dedication of considerable time and resources by the Company and its management team, along with the associated risk of strains arising on managerial, human and other resources. The Company’s ability to successfully manage each of these processes will depend on a number of factors, including its ability to manage competing demands on time and other resources, financial or otherwise, and to successfully retain personnel and recruit new personnel to support its growth and the advancement of its projects.
There may be requirements for additional capital in the future
Any future mining, production, processing, development and exploration by the Company may require substantial additional financing, including capital for the continuation or expansion of mining operations at the Kilbourne Project and ESM’s zinc operations. Failure to obtain sufficient financing may result in delaying or indefinite postponement of the Company’s business plans. There can be no assurance that additional capital or other types of financing will be available if needed or that, if available, the terms of such financing will be favourable to the Company. This uncertainty casts doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Page 26
Financial leverage and restrictive covenants may restrict our current and future operations
The Company and its subsidiaries have agreed to various restrictive covenants with its lenders under its existing loan arrangements, including to maintain certain leverage and fixed charge ratios as well as minimum cash balances, make payments of interest and principal when due, to conduct its operations subject to certain restrictions and to comply with restrictions governing current and future indebtedness.
These restrictions prohibit or limit the Company’s and its subsidiaries’ ability to, among other things, incur most forms of additional debt, provide guarantees for indebtedness, create liens, dispose of assets, liquidate, dissolve, wind up, or assign or surrender a material contract. These restrictions may restrict the Company’s ability to refinance its existing indebtedness. If the Company defaults in respect of its obligations under its loan arrangements, including without limitation servicing existing indebtedness, or if it is unable to refinance any such indebtedness, its lenders may be entitled to demand repayment and enforce their security against certain assets.
If there is any event of default under its existing loan arrangements, the principal amount owing, plus accrued and unpaid interest, may be declared immediately due and payable. If such an event occurs, or if any extended default under such agreements is ongoing, it could have a material negative impact on the Company financially.
In addition, the degree to which the Company and its subsidiaries are leveraged could have important consequences to shareholders, including: (i) the Company’s ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or other project developments in the future may be limited; (ii) a significant portion of the Company’s cash flows from operations may be dedicated to the payment of the principal and interest on their indebtedness, thereby reducing funds available for future operations and flexibility to take advantage of business opportunities; (iii) the Company may be unable to refinance its existing indebtedness on terms favourable to the Company, if at all, and the consequences arising therefrom; and (iv) the Company may be more vulnerable to economic downturns and be limited in its ability to withstand competitive pressures. The inability to meet these debt covenants or to obtain waivers or lenders’ consent for technical breaches to carry out restricted activities could result in the acceleration of the Company’s indebtedness and materially and adversely affect the business and results of operations of the Company.
The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the successful execution of its business plan, raising additional capital and/or evaluating strategic alternatives for its mineral property interests. The Company expects to continue to raise necessary funds through securing additional debt or equity in support of its business objectives. There can be no guarantees that debt/equity financing or strategic alternative will be available on acceptable terms to the Company or at all, and therefore, a material uncertainty exists that may cast significant doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
United States-Canada Tariffs
Recent executive orders have been issued by the U.S. President, including to direct the U.S. to impose new or increased tariffs on certain imports from its trading partners, including Canada, Mexico and China, and on certain other imports regardless of origin. The current U.S.-Canada tariff environment remains highly dynamic and uncertain. Legislative or regulatory changes by the U.S. administration could materially impact the Company’s operations and financial condition. The executive orders contemplated the imposition of 25% tariffs on most goods imported from Mexico and Canada (excluding certain energy resources from Canada, which were set to face a lesser tariff) and a 10% additional tariff on all goods from China, with originally planned implementation dates of February 4, 2025 and March 4, 2025. In March 2025, the United States imposed a series of tariffs on goods imported from Canada and other countries, triggering a de facto global trade war, and prompting Canada and several trading partners to implement retaliatory measures. Since then, tariff policies have continued to evolve, creating ongoing uncertainty regarding U.S. support for existing trade agreements, including the USMCA. At present, the United States maintains tariffs on a range of Canadian exports and Canada has implemented certain reciprocal tariffs.
It remains unclear the extent to which additional duties, tariffs and/or other trade restrictions or other similar measures may be imposed by the United States or other countries, whether and if any changes to the currently announced tariffs will be applied, how long they may be in effect, the extent to which further retaliatory measures will be imposed, and whether other factors will support a pass through of all or a part of the tariffs to the market. On February 20, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Trump administration lacked legal authority to impose certain tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act and the Trump administration indicated that it intends to impose alternative tariffs or adopt other trade measures. Changes to existing tariffs or new trade restrictions could materially impact the Canadian economy and the Company.
Page 27
If high US tariffs are imposed on Canadian products and the products of other countries and Canada and the other countries retaliate with import tariffs on US products, the consequences on global supply chains could adversely impact the Company’s ability to source the supplies the Company relies on to perform its planned work programs or operations or, if available, the cost of such supplies could increase, potentially impairing the Company’s ability to complete work programs or conduct its operations.
Fluctuations in demand for, and prices of, graphite and zinc
Graphite is considered an industrial mineral, and the sales prices are not public. The price of the Company’s securities, its financial results and its exploration, development and mining activities have previously been, or may in the future be, significantly adversely affected by declines in the price of graphite. Industrial mineral prices fluctuate widely and are affected by numerous factors beyond the Company’s control such as the sale or purchase of industrial minerals by various dealers, interest rates, exchange rates, inflation or deflation, currency exchange fluctuation, global and regional supply and demand, production and consumption patterns, speculative activities, increased production due to improved mining and production methods, government regulations relating to prices, taxes, royalties, land tenure, land use, importing and exporting of minerals, environmental protection, the degree to which a dominant producer uses its market strength to bring supply into equilibrium with demand, and international political and economic trends, conditions and events. The prices of industrial minerals have fluctuated widely in recent years, and future price declines could cause continued exploration and development of the Company’s assets to be impracticable and the Company’s operations to become unprofitable.
As a significant source of the Company’s revenue is the sale of zinc in separated and/or mixed form, changes in demand for, and the market price of, zinc are expected to have a significant effect on the Company’s revenues and results of operations. The value and price of the Common Shares and the Company’s financial results may be significantly adversely affected by declines in the prices of zinc. The price of zinc is influenced by many factors beyond the control of the Company. The level of interest rates, the rate of inflation, global and regional consumption patterns, the world supply of and demand for zinc, including zinc’s intermediate and end product uses, market behaviour of current supply sources for zinc and the variation in exchange rates can all cause significant fluctuations in prices of zinc. Such external economic factors are in turn influenced by changes in international investment patterns, monetary systems and political developments. The effect of these factors cannot be accurately predicted. The price of zinc and mineral commodities more generally has fluctuated widely in the past decade and future declines in the price of zinc received could cause commercial production to become uneconomic, thereby having a material adverse effect on the Company’s business and financial condition and the value and price of the Common Shares. ESM’s zinc operations were closed and placed on care and maintenance in the fall of 2008 in the face of a general economic turndown and resulting fall in zinc prices.
The Company’s results of operations will also be heavily dependent on the costs of consumables, particularly fuel, energy, chemical reagents and other products which may be required to be used in future exploration, development, mining and treatment operations.
A prolonged or significant economic contraction worldwide could put further downward pressure on market prices of zinc or graphite. Protracted periods of low prices for zinc could significantly reduce revenues and the availability of required development funds in the future. This could impair asset values and reduce the Company’s mineral resources. In contrast, extended periods of high commodity prices may create economic dislocations that may be destabilizing to supply and demand of zinc, graphite and ultimately to the broader markets. Strong prices for zinc or graphite may create economic pressure to identify or create alternate technologies using substitutes for zinc or graphite that ultimately could depress future long-term demand for zinc or graphite, and at the same time may incentivize development of otherwise marginal mining properties that would compete with the Company.
Ramping up mining operations
As Titan continues to ramp up and maintain production at its ESM zinc operations and the Kilbourne Project Facility, several risks remain for the Company, including:**(**i) Titan may encounter unforeseen obstacles or costs in operating the mine, some of which may be material and could cause Titan’s estimates of time and costs to ramp up production to be significantly understated, (ii) certain lower levels of the mine are considered unsafe, (iii) some equipment may be more unreliable as operations ramp-up, and (iv) production rates and ore grades may not be as predicted. Any of these factors may adversely affect Titan’s ability to ramp up or maintain production and could place Titan in a position where it has insufficient cash resources to continue mining operations, or which could result in mining operations being uneconomic. These risks will be more significant if the Company makes a decision to proceed to commercial development of its Kilbourne Project.
Page 28
Limited supplies, supply chain disruptions, and inflation
The Company’s exploration, development and mining activities require skilled personnel and a reliable supply of resources and consumables, including fuel, energy, reagents, equipment, spare parts and other materials. The availability of such inputs may be interrupted or constrained due to shortages, increased global demand, transportation and logistics challenges (including those associated with remote locations), labour disruptions, or government restrictions or regulations that delay or restrict the importation of necessary items.
Global supply chains have experienced, and may continue to experience, disruption as a result of geopolitical conflicts, regional instability, trade tensions, sanctions, tariffs, border controls, pandemics and other international or regional events beyond the Company’s control, including the ongoing conflicts involving Ukraine, Russia, Israel, Palestine and Iran. Such disruptions may adversely affect the availability, timing and cost of critical inputs and services.
In addition, inflationary pressures may increase the cost of labour, energy, materials, equipment, transportation and services required for the Company’s operations. Any interruption to the procurement and supply of resources or skilled personnel, or sustained increases in costs due to inflation or supply chain constraints, could have an adverse impact on the Company’s cash flows, results of operations and financial condition.
Risks related to future sale of graphite products
The viability of the Company’s Kilbourne Project is dependent on future sales of graphite-based products. No assurance can be given that the Company will be able to sell graphite-based products at such terms and conditions as are favourable for, or necessary to sustain the operations of the Company.
The Company has not entered into any binding agreements for the sale of graphite-based products. There can be no guarantee that the Company will be able to secure sales agreements, including offtake agreements for future sales and, if so, there can be no guarantee as to the amount of purchase orders or commitments, the quantity of graphite represented by such orders and commitments or the timing for receiving same. Factors that may impact such orders and commitments include the ability of the Company to reliably and consistently produce graphite meeting client specifications and confidence of clients in such ability, market conditions and demand for products requiring graphite, overall market conditions and the strength of the economy.
If the Company, for whatever reason, is not able to produce the products in accordance with the terms and specifications of any sales agreements, such noncompliance or violation, resulting in termination or damages, may have an adverse effect on the Company’s operations and financial position. Even if the Company is able to meet the requirements set out therein, there is no assurance that the contract counterparties will be willing or able to purchase the production at the prices or quantities they have agreed to in a particular offtake agreement.
Graphite supply, demand,macroeconomic conditions
Global graphite supply is concentrated in a limited number of countries, particularly China, which accounts for a substantial portion of global production. Geopolitical tensions, export restrictions, trade policies, and environmental regulations in key producing regions may disrupt supply chains, leading to price volatility and potential shortages. Additionally, the development of new graphite projects is capital-intensive and subject to permitting delays, technological challenges, and infrastructure limitations, which may constrain future supply. Given that graphite is not a publicly traded commodity like base and precious metals, and sales agreements are negotiated privately, actual sales prices may differ from the Company’s assumptions. This opacity in pricing can further contribute to uncertainty in forecasting and financial performance.
The demand for graphite is influenced by several factors, including the growth of the electric vehicle (EV) and renewable energy sectors, as graphite is a critical component in lithium-ion batteries. Changes in government policies, technological advancements, or slower-than-anticipated adoption of EVs and energy storage systems could reduce graphite demand. Conversely, rapid adoption could drive increased competition for graphite resources and escalate input costs for the Company. Additionally, a limited number of existing producers may seek to protect their market position by increasing production capacity or lowering prices, which could create competitive pressures and impact the Company’s ability to secure favorable sales agreements.
Page 29
Broader economic conditions, including inflation, currency fluctuations, and global economic slowdowns, could impact graphite prices and availability. Economic uncertainty or recessions may reduce industrial activity and the demand for graphite across multiple sectors, while inflationary pressures could increase operational costs and capital expenditures. Furthermore, global supply chain disruptions stemming from pandemics, natural disasters, or geopolitical conflicts may affect the availability and cost of graphite. Foreign currency fluctuations may also influence the cost structure and profitability of graphite operations, particularly when sales agreements are denominated in foreign currencies.
Factors such as foreign currency fluctuation, supply and demand, industrial disruption and actual graphite market sale prices could have an adverse impact on operating costs and stock market prices and on the Company’s ability to fund its activities. In each case, the economics of the Kilbourne Project could be materially adversely affected, even to the point of being rendered uneconomic.
Geopolitical tensions in the Middle East and related market instability
Ongoing and escalating geopolitical tensions in the Middle East, including the current conflict involving Iran and related regional developments, have contributed to heightened volatility in global financial, commodity and energy markets. Any further escalation of such conflict, expansion to additional countries, or involvement of global powers could adversely affect international trade, capital markets, investor confidence and global economic conditions.
Instability arising from geopolitical conflict may result in disruptions to energy markets, increased commodity price volatility, inflationary pressures, higher interest rates, supply chain interruptions and increased costs of financing. Such conditions could adversely affect the Company’s ability to raise capital on acceptable terms, increase operating and capital costs, and negatively impact market valuations of mining companies generally, regardless of the Company’s underlying operating performance.
While the Company does not have operations in the Middle East, the indirect effects of regional conflict and related global market instability could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
The Company’s current production projections and cost estimates for ESM’s zinc operations may prove to be inaccurate
A reduction in the amount of, or a change in the timing of, the zinc production as compared to the Company’s current projections for ESM’s zinc operations may have a material adverse impact on the Company’s anticipated future cash flows. The actual effect of such a reduction of the Company’s cash flow from operations would depend on the quantity and timing of any such changes in production and on actual prices and costs. A change in the timing of these projected cash flows due to production shortfalls or labour disruptions would result in delays in receipt of such cash flows and in using such cash to fund operating activities and, as applicable, reduce debt levels or fund capital expenditures. This could result in the Company being required to raise additional equity capital or incur additional indebtedness to finance capital expenditures in the future.
The level of production and capital and operating cost estimates which are used for determining and obtaining financing and other purposes are based on certain assumptions and are subject to considerable uncertainties. Actual results of operations at ESM’s zinc operations are likely to differ from the Company’s current estimates, and these differences may be significant. Moreover, experience from actual mining or processing operations may identify new or unexpected conditions that could decrease production below, and/or increase capital and/or operating costs above, the current estimates. If actual results are less favourable than the Company currently estimates, the Company’s business, results from operations, financial condition and liquidity could be materially adversely affected.
Profitability of the Company
There can be no assurance that the Company’s business and strategy will enable it to become profitable or sustain profitability in future periods. The Company’s future operating results will depend on various factors, many of which are beyond the Company’s direct control, including the Company’s ability to develop its mining projects and commercialize its mineral resources, its ability to control its costs, the demand and price for graphite or zinc, and general economic conditions. If the Company is unable to generate profits in the future, the market price of the Common Shares could decline.
Page 30
Mining is inherently risky and subject to conditions or events beyond the Company’s control
The development and operation of a mine or mine property is inherently dangerous and involves many risks that the Company may not be able to overcome, including:
| ● | unusual or unexpected geological formations; |
| ● | metallurgical and other processing problems; |
| ● | metal losses; |
| ● | environmental hazards; |
| ● | power outages; |
| ● | labour disruptions; |
| ● | industrial accidents; |
| ● | periodic interruptions due to inclement or hazardous weather conditions; |
| ● | flooding, explosions, fire, rockfalls, rockbursts, cave-ins and landslides; |
| ● | ground or soil conditions including seismic activity; |
| ● | mechanical equipment and facility performance problems; |
| ● | poor ventilation in all or part of ESM; and |
| ● | the availability of materials and equipment. |
These risks could result in damage to, or destruction of, mineral properties, production facilities or other properties, personal injury or death, including to the Company’s employees, environmental damage, delays in mining, increased production costs, asset write downs, monetary losses and legal liability. The Company may not be able to obtain insurance to cover these risks at economically feasible premiums, or at all, or it may choose not to insure against these risks. Insurance against certain environmental risks, including potential liability for pollution and other hazards as a result of the disposal of waste products occurring from production, is not generally available to companies in the mining industry. The Company may suffer a material adverse effect on its business if the Company incurs losses related to any significant events that are not covered by the Company’s insurance policies.
Mineral resource calculations are only estimates based on interpretation and assumptions
Any figures presented for mineral resources will only be estimates. There is a degree of uncertainty attributable to the calculation of mineral resources. Until mineralized material is actually mined and processed, the quantity of metal and grades must be considered as estimates only and no assurances can be given that the indicated levels of metals will be recovered. In making determinations about whether to advance any of its projects to development, the Company must rely upon such estimated calculations as to the mineral resources and grades of mineralization on its properties.
The estimation of mineral resources is a subjective process that relies on the judgment of the persons preparing the estimates. The process relies on the quantity and quality of available data and is based on knowledge, mining experience, analysis of drilling results and industry practices. Estimates made at a given time may significantly change when new information becomes available. By their nature, mineral resource estimates are imprecise and depend, to a certain extent, upon analysis of drilling results and statistical inferences that may ultimately prove to be inaccurate.
Estimated mineral resources may have to be recalculated based on changes in mineral prices, further exploration or development activity or actual production experience. This could materially and adversely affect estimates of the volume or grade of mineralization, estimated recovery rates or other important factors that influence mineral resource estimates. The extent to which mineral resources may ultimately be reclassified as mineral reserves is dependent upon the demonstration of their profitable recovery. Any material changes in mineral resource estimates and grades of mineralization will affect the economic viability of placing a property into production and a property’s return on capital. The Company cannot provide assurance that mineralization can be mined and processed profitably.
Page 31
The Company’s mineral resource estimates have been determined and valued based on assumed future prices, cut-off grades and operating costs that may prove to be inaccurate. Extended declines in market price for zinc or graphite may render portions of the Company’s mineralization uneconomic and result in a reduction in reported mineral resources, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial condition or the market price of the Common Shares. The Company cannot provide assurance that mineral recovery rates achieved in small scale tests will be duplicated in large scale tests under on-site conditions or in production scale. In addition, if the Company’s projects produce concentrate for which there is no market, this may have an impact on the economic model for ESM.
Production based on mineral resources
The Company based its production decision for its ESM zinc operations and its Kilbourne Project Facility on the results of a preliminary economic assessment and not on a feasibility study of mineral reserves demonstrating economic and technical viability, and as a result there is increased uncertainty and there are multiple technical and economic risks of failure which are associated with this production decision. These risks, among others, include areas that would be analysed in more detail in a feasibility study, such as applying deeper economic analysis to mineral reserves and mineral resources, more detailed metallurgy and a number of specialized studies in areas such as mining and recovery methods, market analysis, and environmental and community impacts.
Uncertainty exists related to inferred mineral resources
There is a risk that inferred mineral resources referred to in the ESM Technical Report cannot be converted into measured or indicated mineral resources as there may be limited ability to assess geological continuity. Due to the uncertainty related to inferred mineral resources, there is no assurance that inferred mineral resources will be upgraded to mineral resources with sufficient geological continuity to constitute mineral reserves as a result of continued exploration and economic evaluation.
Need for Mineral Resources
As mines have limited lives based on Mineral Resources, the Company must continually develop, replace and expand its mineral resources as its mines produce zinc or graphite concentrates. The Company’s ability to maintain or increase its annual production and its aggregate mineral resources will be significantly dependent on its ability to expand its mineral resources base both at its existing mines and new mines it intends to bring into production in the future.
Construction and Commissioning of Processing and Demonstration Facilities
The design and construction of efficient processing and demonstration facilities, such as the Kilbourne Project Facility, the cost and availability of suitable machinery, supplies, equipment and skilled labor, the existence of competent operational management and prudent financial administration, as well as the availability and reliability of appropriately skilled and experienced employees can affect successful project development.
Commissioning of the Company’s Kilbourne Project Facility is ongoing. It is common in new processing facilities to experience unexpected problems and delays during start-up and commissioning activities. The costs, timing and complexities of commissioning the Kilbourne Project Facility may be significantly higher than anticipated which can add to the cost of development, production and operation and/or impair production and activities.
Title
There is no guarantee that the Company’s title to its properties will not be challenged or impugned. The Company’s claims may be subject to prior unregistered agreements or transfers and title may be affected by unidentified or unknown defects. If title to the Company’s properties is disputed, it may result in the Company paying substantial costs to settle the dispute or clear title and could result in the loss of the property, which events may affect the economic viability of the Company.
Page 32
Surface Access
In some cases, the Company has ownership title or leasehold rights only to the minerals of certain properties (the mineral estate), while other parties own the non-mineral or surface rights of the properties (the surface estate). In such cases, the Company has the legal right to access the property, and conduct activities on the property to the fullest extent necessary to realize its rights to the mineral estate, subject only to an obligation to avoid unreasonably impacting the surface estate and the activities of owners of the surface estate, and with due regard to their physical safety. Nonetheless, the owners of the surface estate may prove unwilling to coordinate with the Company regarding the timing and other parameters of the Company’s access and activities on the property or may obstruct the Company’s representatives while they are on the property. In addition, the owners of the surface estate may use or allow others to use the property for hunting or other activities that risk the safety of the Company’s representatives while they are on the property. Such factors could delay or otherwise hinder the Company’s ability to realize its rights to the mineral estate and give rise to legal claims.
The Company may experience difficulty attracting and retaining qualified management and employees to sustain and grow its business
The Company is dependent on the services of key executives and its skilled employees to advance its corporate objectives and to identify new opportunities for growth and funding. The loss of any executive of the Company and the Company’s inability to attract and retain a suitable replacement, or additional highly skilled employees required for the Company’s activities, would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business and financial condition.
Competition
The Company competes with other mining companies, many of which are better capitalized, have greater financial resources, operational experience and technical capabilities or are further advanced in their development or are significantly larger and have access to mineral reserves, for the acquisition of mineral claims, leases and other mineral interests as well as for the recruitment and retention of qualified employees and other personnel. If the Company requires and is unsuccessful in acquiring additional mineral properties or qualified personnel, the Company will not be able to grow at the rate it desires, or at all.
Significant governmental regulations
The Company’s mining activities are subject to extensive federal, state and local laws, regulations and policies governing various matters, including:
| ● | environmental protection, including regulations with respect to processing concentrates; |
| ● | the management and use of toxic substances and explosives; |
| ● | the management of natural resources and land; |
| ● | the exploration of mineral properties; |
| ● | exports; |
| ● | price controls; |
| ● | taxation and mining royalties; |
| ● | labour standards and occupational health and safety, including mine safety; and |
| ● | historic and cultural preservation. |
Failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations may result in civil or criminal fines or penalties or enforcement actions, including orders issued by regulatory or judicial authorities enjoining or curtailing operations or requiring corrective measures, installation of additional equipment or remedial actions, any of which could result in significant expenditures. The Company may also be required to compensate private parties suffering loss or damage by reason of a breach of such laws, regulations or permitting requirements. It is also possible that future laws and regulations, or more stringent enforcement of current laws and regulations by governmental authorities, could cause the Company to incur additional expenses or capital expenditure restrictions, or suspensions of the Company’s activities and delays in the exploration and development of its properties.
Page 33
Market events and general economic conditions
Adverse events in global financial markets can have profound impacts on the global economy. Many industries, including the mining industry, are affected by these market conditions. Some of the key effects of the financial market turmoil experienced over the past decade include contraction in credit markets resulting in a spread of credit risk, devaluations, high volatility in global equity, commodity, foreign exchange and precious metal markets, and a lack of market liquidity. A continued or worsened slowdown in the financial markets or other economic conditions, including but not limited to, consumer spending, employment rates, business conditions, inflation, fuel and energy costs, consumer debt levels, lack of available credit, the state of the financial markets, interest rates and tax rates, may adversely affect the Company’s growth and profitability, financial liabilities and results of operations.
Environmental laws and regulations (including in respect of climate change)
All of the Company’s exploration, development and production activities are subject to regulation by governmental agencies under various environmental laws. These laws address emissions into the air, discharges into water, management of waste, management of hazardous substances, protection of natural resources, antiquities and endangered species, reclamation of lands disturbed by mining operations and climate change. Environmental legislation is evolving, and the general trend has been towards stricter standards and enforcement, increased fines and penalties for non-compliance, more stringent environmental assessments of proposed projects and increasing responsibility for companies and their officers, directors and employees. Compliance with environmental laws and regulations may require significant capital outlays on the Company’s behalf and may cause material changes or delays in the Company’s intended activities. Future changes in these laws or regulations could have a significant adverse impact on some portion of the Company’s business, requiring the Company to re-evaluate those activities at that time. Non-compliance thereof may result in significant penalties, fines and/or sanctions imposed on the Company by the relevant environmental regulatory authority resulting in a material adverse effect on the Company’s reputation and results of its operations.
Threat of legal proceedings
Due to the nature of its business, the Company may be subject to numerous regulatory investigations, civil claims, lawsuits and other proceedings in the ordinary course of its business. The results of these legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty due to the uncertainty inherent in litigation, the difficulty of predicting decisions of regulators, judges and juries and the possibility that decisions may be reversed on appeal. The Company’s efforts to respond to the legal proceedings could result in a diversion of management time and attention from revenue-generating activities. There can be no assurances that these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business. See “Title” above.
Rights, concessions and permits
The Company’s current and anticipated future operations, including further exploration, development and production on its mineral properties, including ESM’s zinc operations and the Kilbourne Project, require concessions and permits from various governmental authorities.
Obtaining or renewing governmental concessions and permits is a complex and time-consuming process. The duration and success of efforts to obtain and renew permits are contingent upon many variables not within the Company’s control. The Company cannot provide assurance that all rights, concessions and permits that it requires for its operations will be obtainable or renewable on reasonable terms, or at all. Delays or a failure to obtain or renew such required concessions and permits, or the expiry, revocation or failure to comply with the terms of any such concessions and permits that the Company has obtained, would adversely affect the Company’s business.
Social and environmental activism can have a negative effect on exploration, development and mining activities
There is an increasing level of public concern relating to the effects of mining on the natural landscape, on communities and on the environment. Certain non-governmental organizations, public interest groups and reporting organizations (“NGOs”) who oppose resource development can be vocal critics of the mining industry. In addition, there have been many instances in which local community groups have opposed resource extraction activities, which have resulted in disruption and delays to the relevant operation. Local communities in St. Lawrence County, NGOs or local community organizations could direct adverse publicity and/or disrupt the operations of the Company in respect of ESM or another of the Company’s properties, regardless of its successful compliance with social and environmental best practices, due to political factors, activities of unrelated third parties on lands in which the Company has an interest or the Company’s operations specifically. Any such actions and the resulting media coverage could have an adverse effect on the reputation and financial condition of the Company or its relationships with the communities in which it operates, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or prospects.
Page 34
Land reclamation requirements for the Company’s properties may be burdensome
Land reclamation requirements are generally imposed on companies with mining operations or mineral exploration companies in order to minimize long term effects of land disturbance. Reclamation may include requirements to:
| ● | control dispersion of potentially deleterious effluents; and |
| ● | reasonably re-establish pre-disturbance land forms and vegetation. |
In order to carry out reclamation obligations imposed on the Company in connection with exploration, development and production activities, the Company must allocate financial resources that might otherwise be spent on exploration and contemplated development programs. If the Company is required to carry out unanticipated reclamation work or provide security for further reclamation work, the Company’s financial position could be adversely affected.
Tailings management facility and environmental reclamation
The embankment for the tailings management facility (“TMF”) at ESM’s zinc operations will need to be raised to fully contain the estimated tonnage for ESM’s zinc operations as set out in the current mine plan. The Company is not certain how the native surface of the TMF was prepared, what design features were included, what sub-surface conditions existed prior to construction or the material properties of the fill used for construction. If the Company is unable to complete the embankment raise at the TMF, or if the TMF were to subsequently breach, the Company would be required to delay or cease operations at ESM’s zinc operations for a significant period of time. This may also necessitate extensive response and rehabilitation activities. The Company may not receive approvals and consents necessary to proceed with the remaining rehabilitation plans in a timely manner. The Company cannot anticipate the timing and amount of the costs and the liabilities relating to any such TMF failure, or whether such failure would result in the Company being subject to regulatory charges or claims, fines and penalties or the potential quantum thereof.
Insurance
The Company’s operations are subject to numerous risks and hazards. Such risks could result in personal injury, environmental damage, damage to and destruction of the facilities, delays in production and liability. For some of these risks, the Company maintains insurance to protect against these losses at levels consistent with industry practice. However, the Company may choose not to insure certain risks or may not be able to maintain current or desired levels of insurance coverage, particularly if there is a significant increase in the cost of premiums. The Company’s current policies may not cover all losses and the Company currently does not have specific coverage for environmental risk. Moreover, in the event that the Company is unable to fully pay for the cost of remedying damages, particularly environmental problems, the Company might be required to suspend or significantly curtail its activities or enter into other interim compliance measures.
Health & safety
Mining, like many other extractive natural resource industries, is subject to potential risks and liabilities due to accidents that could result in serious injury or death. The impact of such accidents could affect the profitability of the operations, cause an interruption to operations, lead to a loss of licenses, affect the reputation of the Company and its ability to obtain further licenses, damage community relations and reduce the perceived appeal of the Company as an employer.
There is no assurance that the Company has been or will at all times be in full compliance with all laws and regulations or hold, and be in full compliance with, all required health and safety permits. The potential costs and delays associated with compliance with such laws, regulations and permits could prevent the Company from proceeding with the development of a project or the operation or further development of a project, and any non-compliance therewith may adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
Amendments to current laws, regulations and permits governing operations and activities of mining companies, or more stringent implementation thereof, could have a material adverse impact on the Company and cause increases in exploration expenses, capital expenditures or production costs, reduction in levels of production at producing properties, or abandonment or delays in development of new mining properties.
Page 35
The Company is dependent on information technology systems
The Company’s operations depend, in part, upon information technology systems. The Company’s cybersecurity risk management and strategy processes for assessing, identifying, and managing material risks from cybersecurity threats are managed by members of our management team, primarily our SVP Corporate Affairs. Cybersecurity incidents are to be immediately reported to the Company’s management team for resolution with outsourced information technology support team. Information technology controls are included with management’s testing of internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s information technology systems are subject to disruption, damage or failure from a number of sources, including, but not limited to, computer viruses, security breaches, natural disasters, power loss and defects in design. Although to date the Company has not experienced any material losses relating to information technology system disruptions, damage or failure, there can be no assurance that it will not incur such losses in future. Any of these and other events could result in information technology systems failures, operational delays, production downtimes, destruction or corruption of data, security breaches or other manipulation or improper use of the Company’s systems and networks, any of which may result in a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or prospects.
Fixed Zinc Pricing Arrangements and Other Pricing Hedges
The Company may from time to time enter into fixed zinc pricing arrangements or other hedges in respect of a material amount of its forecasted zinc production. The use of these arrangements involves certain inherent risks including the risk of default on amounts owing to the Company by the counterparties with which the Company has entered into such transactions. In the event that such risks materialize, the Company’s future cash flows, profitability, results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.
Conflicts of interest
Certain of the Company’s directors also serve or may serve as directors or officers of, or have significant shareholdings in, other companies involved in natural resource exploration, development and production or mining-related activities, including in other companies involved in the exploration, development and production of zinc. To the extent that such other companies may participate in ventures in which the Company may participate, or in ventures which the Company may seek to participate in, the Company’s directors and officers may have a conflict of interest in negotiating and concluding terms respecting the extent of such participation. In all cases where the Company’s directors and officers have an interest in other companies, such other companies may also compete with the Company for the acquisition of mineral property investments. Such conflicts of the Company’s directors and officers may result in a material and adverse effect on the Company’s profitability, results of operation and financial condition. As a result of these conflicts of interest, the Company may miss the opportunity to participate in certain transactions, which may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position.
Risks inherent in acquisitions
The Company may actively pursue the acquisition of exploration, development and production assets consistent with its acquisition and growth strategy. From time to time, the Company may also acquire securities of or other interests in companies with respect to which it may enter into acquisitions or other transactions. Acquisition transactions involve inherent risks, including but not limited to:
| ● | accurately assessing the value, strengths, weaknesses, contingent and other liabilities and potential profitability of acquisition candidates; |
| ● | ability to achieve identified and anticipated operating and financial synergies; |
| ● | unanticipated costs; |
| ● | diversion of management’s attention from existing business; |
| ● | potential loss of the Company’s key employees or key employees of any business acquired; |
| ● | unanticipated changes in business, industry or general economic conditions that affect the assumptions underlying the acquisition; and |
| ● | decline in the value of acquired properties, companies or securities. |
Any one or more of these factors or other risks could cause the Company not to realize the anticipated benefits of an acquisition of properties or companies, and could have a material adverse effect on its financial condition.
Page 36
Labour and employment retention relations
Production at ESM’s zinc operations and the Kilbourne Project will be dependent upon the ability of the Company to hire qualified employees and to maintain good relations with its employees. In addition, relations between the Company and its employees may be impacted by changes in the scheme of labour relations which may be introduced by the relevant governmental authorities in the United States. Adverse changes in such legislation or in the relationship between the Company and its employees or the ability to attract employees may have a negative impact on the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition.
Anti-corruption and bribery regulation, including the Canadian Extractive Sector Transparency Measures Act (“ESTMA”) reporting
The Company is required to comply with anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws in Canada and the United States. In recent years, there has been a general increase in both the frequency of enforcement and the severity of penalties under such laws, resulting in greater scrutiny and punishment of companies convicted of violating anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws. Furthermore, a company may be found liable for violations by not only its employees, but also by its contractors and third-party agents. Although the Company has adopted a Code of Conduct that addresses these matters, no assurance can be given that the Company, or its employees, contractors or third-party agents will comply strictly with such laws. If the Company is the subject of an enforcement action or in violation of such laws, it may result in significant penalties, fines and/or sanctions imposed on the Company resulting in a material adverse effect on the Company’s reputation and results of its operations.
In addition, ESTMA requires public disclosure of payments to governments by mining and oil and gas companies engaged in the commercial development of oil, gas and minerals who are either publicly listed in Canada or with business or assets in Canada. Mandatory annual reporting is required for extractive companies with respect to payments made to foreign and domestic governments at all levels, including entities established by two or more governments, and including aboriginal groups. ESTMA requires reporting on the payments of any taxes, royalties, fees, production entitlements, bonuses, dividends, infrastructure improvement payments, and any other prescribed payment over C$100,000. Failure to report, false reporting or structuring payments to avoid reporting may result in fines of up to C$250,000 (which may be concurrent). The Company commenced reporting in 2017. If the Company finds itself subject to an enforcement action or in violation of ESTMA, this may result in significant penalties, fines and/or sanctions imposed on the Company resulting in a material adverse effect on its reputation.
Infrastructure
Mining, processing, development and exploration activities depend on the availability of adequate infrastructure. Reliable roads, bridges and power sources are important factors that affect capital and operating costs. Sabotage, government or other interference in the maintenance or provision of such infrastructure could adversely affect the Company’s operations, financial condition and results of operations.
Enforceability of judgments
Certain directors of the Company reside outside of Canada. As a result, holders of Common Shares may not be able to effect service of process within Canada to such directors, or to enforce Canadian court judgments obtained against such directors in jurisdictions outside of Canada, including those predicated upon the civil liability provisions of applicable Canadian securities laws. Furthermore, it may be difficult for the holders of Common Shares to enforce, in original actions brought in courts in jurisdictions outside of Canada, liabilities predicated upon Canadian securities laws.
Global outbreaks and Coronavirus
The risk of global outbreaks has the potential to significantly and adversely impact the Company’s operations and business. There can be no certainty that an outbreak of infectious illness and the restrictive measures implemented to slow the spread of the virus will not materially impact the Company’s operations or personnel. It is not possible for the Company to predict the duration or magnitude of the adverse results of the outbreak and its effects on the Company’s business, results of operations or ability to raise funds at this time.
Reliance on Management and Experts
The success of the Company will be largely dependent upon the performance of its senior management and directors. Due to the relatively small size of the Company, the loss of these persons or the inability of the Company to attract and retain additional highly skilled employees may adversely affect its business and future operations. The Company has not purchased any “key-man” insurance nor has it entered into any non-competition or non-disclosure agreements with any of its directors, officers or key employees and has no current plans to do so.
Page 37
Public Corporation Obligations
As a publicly listed corporate entity, the Company is subject to evolving rules and regulations promulgated by a number of governmental and self-regulated organizations, including the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA), the TSX, the NYSE American, and the International Accounting Standards Board, which govern corporate governance and public disclosure regulations. These rules and regulations continue to evolve in scope and complexity creating many new requirements, which increase compliance costs and the risk of non-compliance. The Company’s efforts to comply with these rules and obligations could result in increased general and administration expenses and a diversion of management time and attention from financing, development, operations and, eventually, revenue-generating activities.
We cannot assure you that an active market will develop for our Common Shares on the NYSE American*.*
Our Common Shares began trading on the NYSE American LLC (the “NYSE American”) on November 20, 2025, under the symbol “TII”. Prior to this listing, there had been no prior public trading market for the Common Shares on the NYSE American. We cannot assure you that our listing of the Common Shares on the NYSE American will be maintained, or that an active trading market for the Common Shares will develop on the NYSE American or elsewhere or, if developed, that any market will be sustained. Accordingly, we cannot assure you of the liquidity of any trading market, the ability for shareholders to sell Common Shares when desired or the prices that may be obtained for sales of Common Shares.
United States investors may not be able to obtain enforcement of civil liabilities against us.
The enforcement by investors of civil liabilities under the United States federal or state securities laws may be affected adversely by the fact that we are governed by theBusiness Corporations Act (British Columbia), that the majority of our officers and certain of our directors are residents of Canada or otherwise reside outside the United States, and that all, or a substantial portion of their assets are located outside the United States. It may not be possible for investors to effect service of process within the United States on certain of our directors and officers or enforce judgments obtained in the United States courts against certain of our directors and officers based upon the civil liability provisions of United States federal securities laws or the securities laws of any state of the United States.
There is some doubt as to whether a judgment of a United States court based solely upon the civil liability provisions of United States federal or state securities laws would be enforceable in Canada against our directors and officers. There is also doubt as to whether an original action could be brought in Canada against us or our directors and officers to enforce liabilities based solely upon United States federal or state securities laws.
As a foreign private issuer, we are subject to different U.S. securities laws and rules than a domestic U.S. issuer, which may limit the information publicly available to our U.S. shareholders.
We are a foreign private issuer under applicable U.S. federal securities laws and, therefore, we are not be required to comply with all the periodic disclosure and current reporting requirements of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and related rules and regulations, as U.S. domestic issuers. As a result, we do not file the same reports that a U.S. domestic issuer files with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), although we are required to file with or furnish to the SEC the continuous disclosure documents that we are required to file in Canada under Canadian securities laws. In addition, as a foreign private issuer, we are exempt from the proxy rules under the Exchange Act. As a Canadian issuer, our insiders are also exempt under the Exchange Act Section 16 requirements applicable to insiders of foreign private issuers.
Page 38
We may lose our foreign private issuer status in the future, which could result in significant additional costs and expenses to us.
In order to maintain our current status as a foreign private issuer, a majority of our Common Shares must be either directly or indirectly owned by non-residents of the United States unless we also satisfy one of the additional requirements necessary to preserve this status. We may in the future lose our foreign private issuer status if a majority of the Common Shares are held in the United States and we fail to meet the additional requirements necessary to avoid loss of foreign private issuer status. The regulatory and compliance costs to us under U.S. federal securities laws as a U.S. domestic issuer would be significantly more than the costs we incur as a Canadian foreign private issuer eligible to use the multijurisdictional disclosure system. If we are not a foreign private issuer, we would not be eligible to use the multijurisdictional disclosure system or other foreign issuer forms and would be required to file periodic and current reports and registration statements on U.S. domestic issuer forms with the SEC, which are more detailed and extensive than the forms available to a foreign private issuer. We would also lose the ability to rely upon exemptions from NYSE American corporate governance requirements that are available to foreign private issuers.
Qualified Person
The technical and scientific information in this MD&A is based on the technical report titled “Empire State Mines 2025 NI 43-101 Technical Report” with an effective date of December 1, 2025, filed on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca on December 15, 2025, and prepared by Donald R. Taylor, MSc, PG; Todd McCracken, P. Geo.; Bahareh Asi, P. Eng., David Willock, P. Eng.; Deepak Malhotra, SME Registered Member; Oliver Peters, MSc, P.Eng.; Derick de Wit, FAusIMM; and Steven M. Trader, PG, CPG, each of whom is a “Qualified Person” as defined by NI 43-101. All are independent of Titan, other than Mr. Donald Taylor, who is Vice Chair of the Company.
The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.