STIFEL FINANCIAL CORP

The Committee seeks to utilize a balanced mix of compensation elements to achieve its goals, with total compensation for our executive officers heavily weighted towards variable elements that reward performance. The following table describes each component of our executive compensation program, how it is determined, and the purpose or purposes we believe it accomplishes. “Realized” compensation is paid (or vests) to the executive officer either during or on account of the year and is of fixed realizable value and ordinarily available to the executive officer.“At-Risk” compensation, by contrast, is delayed and subject to future conditions. An executive officer risks losing this compensation on account of these conditions not being met.

The Committee’s Perspective on the Compensation Elements

The following section describes the Committee’s views on how each element of compensation fits within the Committee’s perspective on short-term versus long-term incentives and within the Committee’s framework of “Realized” versus“At-risk” compensation.

Base Salary, Cash

The Committee views cash base salary as a short-term incentive and a component of “Realized” annual compensation. As such, we pay relatively low levels of cash base salary compared to the market due to our variablepay-for-performance philosophy. The Committee does not emphasize cash base salary; cash base salary for our executive officers has not materially increased in recent years. The cash base salary for our CEO has not increased since he joined Stifel as Chief Executive Officer in 1997.

Annual Incentive Compensation

The Committee has established an annual incentive compensation program for the named executive officers that provides a significant portion of the total annual compensation paid to each of the named executive officers. The objective of the annual incentive compensation portion of the executive compensation program is to provide cash and deferred compensation (PRSUs, RSUs, RSAs, debentures and restricted cash), each component of which is variable and awarded based on the Committee’s assessments and discretion, using the process and framework described below, and in view of, first, the financial performance of our company and the business units in which the executive officer serves and, second, a qualitative evaluation of the individual executive officer’s performance for the year. No specific target levels of performance are set by the Committee to determine the annual incentive compensation of our named executive officers. Instead, the Committee determines the amount of each named executive officer’s annual incentive compensation based on the Committee’s subjective assessment of the Company (and in some cases, a particular business unit’s) performance relative to the qualitative and quantitative performance indicators used by the Committee to evaluate performance.

Collectively, the above three compensation elements comprise Annual Incentive Compensation, which is the most important part of compensation determined by the Committee each year. In making that annual determination, the Committee has developed a facts-based, performance-focused framework by which it assesses named executive officer performance and sets compensation against clearly stated and measured Company and business goals.

For 2023, these objectives include the quantitative and qualitative criteria identified in the table on page 25 in the section “Incentive Assessment Framework Results”, which reflect financial performance, operating performance and strategic achievements. These criteria were informed by the Committee’s review of overall progress for the Company periodically during the past year. The Committee made its final determinations atyear-end when information for each factor was available. Individual performance for each named executive officer was also reviewed in this context of overall performance.

Primary performance goals – achievement of revenue, pre-tax income, and EPS goals – are generally more heavily weighted in the Committee’s decisions. Taking into consideration all factors, the Committee then evaluated each major category – primary, other considerations, strategic – and assigned an overall evaluation to Company performance in making final awards. The Committee understands the importance to shareholders of total stock returns and, therefore, takes into consideration the stock ownership of the CEO

and the other named executive officers when determining the compensation system because the Committee views share ownership as an important factor that already aligns the senior management with shareholders. The Committee has also made total shareholder returns a significant part of the formula that determines PRSUs earned.

Benefits

The Committee provides executives with only limited perquisites and other personal benefits. The Committee periodically reviews the dollar amount of perquisites provided and may make adjustments as it deems necessary. Other benefits, including retirement plans and health and welfare plans, are made available to the CEO and other named executive officers on the same basis as they are made available to other employees.