Skip to main content

WINNEBAGO INDUSTRIES INC

For the period ended Dec 17, 2024. Filed Nov 5, 2024.

View on SEC.gov

About this filing

What shareholders are asked to vote on at a company's meeting. It is where to find what directors and top executives are paid, and who owns the most shares.

Dec 17, 2024 · Filed Nov 5, 2024

Use the contents to explore the available documents and sections.

WGO$31.34-5.5%Stored close · as of Nov 6, 2026
See the whole filing, with its images and exhibits
Contents

Determination of Compensation

Role of the Human Resources Committee

The Human Resources Committee is responsible for reviewing and approving, on an annual basis, the corporate goals and objectives with respect to the compensation of all of our executive officers, as described in the committee’s charter. The committee relies on its own review and the advice of its independent compensation consultant in establishing executive officer pay. The committee seeks the input of the CEO in making executive officer pay decisions for all executives other than himself, with the committee approving all compensation decisions. In October 2023, the committee approved annual incentive performance objectives for fiscal 2024 based upon the business plan for the year. In October 2023, the committee granted long-term incentive awards to our executive officers under the Amended and Restated 2019 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the 2019 Plan), which was approved by the shareholders at the 2023 annual meeting of shareholders, including annual LTIP performance share units, stock options, and restricted stock units. After the completion of fiscal 2024, the committee (i) approved the 2024 annual incentives for our NEOs based on achievement of the performance objectives established at the beginning of the year and (ii) certified achievement of performance objectives with respect to the LTIP performance share unit awards granted to then-current executives in fiscal 2022 that had a performance period running from fiscal 2022-2024.

Role of the Compensation Consultant

The Human Resources Committee retained Semler Brossy as its independent executive compensation consultant for fiscal 2024. Retained by and reporting directly to the committee, Semler Brossy provided the committee with assistance in evaluating our executive compensation programs and policies, and, where appropriate, assisted with the revision of elements of the programs. Additionally, Semler Brossy performed the following activities to support the committee:

⯀Reviewed annual and long-term incentive designs and assisted with determination of annual and long-term incentive awards, including fiscal 2024 payouts
⯀Reviewed the total compensation program, including competitive peer group analysis and analysis of executive pay levels in relation to broader market survey data
⯀Reviewed information provided to the committee by management
⯀Developed recommendations with respect to CEO compensation decisions and provided advice to the committee on the compensation decisions affecting all executives, including the NEOs
⯀Attended and participated in committee meetings as requested by the committee
⯀Reported on compensation trends and best practices, plan design, and the reasonableness of individual compensation awards
⯀Assisted the committee in reviewing the Board’s compensation and assessing its competitiveness relative to market
⯀Assisted the committee in assessing the extent to which the Company’s compensation policies and practices promote reasonable and appropriate risk-taking behavior by management and avoid excessive risk-taking behavior
⯀Provided a consultant independence and conflicts of interest assessment
⯀Met with the committee and/or its members without management present

Semler Brossy did not provide any services to us other than those detailed above. The committee determined that no conflicts of interest exist with respect to Semler Brossy serving as an advisor to the committee. In making this determination, the committee considered various factors, including those set forth in the SEC’s and NYSE’s rules.

Role of Management

Our CEO and our other executive officers do not set their own compensation nor are they present when the committee sets their specific individual compensation. Our CEO provides his evaluation of each executive officer’s performance to the committee, and makes recommendations with respect to base salary and target incentives, incentive awards and equity awards for each executive officer other than himself. These recommendations are considered by the committee, which ultimately makes its own determinations. Our human resources department provides additional analysis and guidance as requested by the committee related to NEO compensation, including the following:

⯀Developing, summarizing and presenting information and analyses to enable the committee to execute its responsibilities, as well as addressing specific requests for information from the committee
⯀Attending committee meetings as requested to provide information, respond to questions and otherwise assist the committee
⯀Assisting the CEO in making preliminary recommendations of base salary structure, annual and long-term (equity) program design and target award levels for the NEOs and other employees eligible to receive annual incentive awards
⯀Preparing tally sheets outlining current pay opportunities and potential value of severance under various termination scenarios

Market Competitiveness Review

When setting fiscal 2024 compensation, the Human Resources Committee focused on trying to set pay levels, in the aggregate, within a competitive range of the market median. Some roles may be higher or lower in the competitive range based on performance, tenure in role, or other internal considerations. Competitive market data is only one of several factors considered by the committee in setting executive compensation levels.

The committee establishes an individual annual bonus and equity incentive target opportunity for each NEO based on the committee’s evaluation of the executive’s experience, level and scope of responsibility and individual performance. Actual cash compensation may be more or less than the target opportunity as a result of performance under the incentive plan. Realized compensation from our equity-based awards may be more or less than the target opportunity as a result of our performance relative to the LTIP measures and our stock price performance.

In setting compensation, the committee compares base salaries, annual incentive opportunities and long-term compensation for the NEOs to a peer group of similarly sized companies (which we refer to collectively as our compensation peers). For fiscal 2024, the committee used the following set of companies that were determined to have similarly sized revenues and market values as our compensation peers.

Compensation Peers
Altra Industrial MotionLCI Industries – LCII (NYSE)
American Axle – AXL (NYSE)Oshkosh Corporation – OSK (NYSE)
Brunswick Corporation – BC (NYSE)Patrick Industries – PATK (NASDAQ)
Crane Co. – CR (NYSE)Polaris – PII (NYSE)
Dana Incorporated – DAN (NYSE)REV Group – REVG (NYSE)
​Donaldson Company, Inc. – DCI (NYSE)The Timken Company – TKR (NYSE)
Harley-Davidson, Inc. – HOG (NYSE)The Toro Company – TTC (NYSE)
Hyster-Yale – HY (NYSE)​Wabash National – WNC (NYSE)

Based on a review conducted by Semler Brossy, the committee removed Altra Industrial Motion from the peer group for setting compensation levels for fiscal 2025, after that company was acquired in 2023.

In addition to peer group data, Semler Brossy collected market data from compensation surveys for executive positions where the scope of responsibilities for the Company’s executives was not comparable to the peer group named executive officers and where general industry survey data provided a better match for comparable positions in the market.

ContentsView on SEC.gov

The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.