ENSIGN GROUP, INC

Previous wording

•Anticipated changes in the U.S. political environment, including those as a result of the current Presidential administration and Congress, potential changes in control of one or both houses of Congress due to mid-term elections to occur in November 2026, and to regulatory agencies, particularly HHS, may result in significant changes to regulatory framework, enforcements, reimbursements and our business.

Current wording

•Anticipated changes in the U.S. political environment, including those as a result of the current Presidential administration and Congress, and to regulatory agencies, particularly HHS, may result in significant changes to regulatory framework, enforcements, reimbursements, tariff and trade policy, and our business.

Previous wording

•Increased competition for, or a shortage of, nurses and other skilled personnel, could increase our staffing and labor costs and subject us to monetary fines resulting from a failure to maintain minimum staffing requirements under state law, or may affect reimbursement.

Current wording

•Increased competition for, or a shortage of, nurses and other skilled personnel, including as a result of federal immigration policy, could increase our staffing and labor costs, reduce the pool of available healthcare workers, and subject us to monetary fines resulting from a failure to maintain minimum staffing requirements under state law, or may affect reimbursement.

Previous wording

We derived 24.3% and 24.7% of our service revenue from the Medicare programs for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively. In addition, many other payors may use published Medicare rates as a basis for reimbursements. Accordingly, if Medicare reimbursement rates are reduced or fail to increase as quickly as our costs, if there are changes in the rules governing the Medicare program that are disadvantageous to our business or industry, or if there are delays in Medicare payments, our business and results of operations will be adversely affected.

Current wording

We derived 23.7% and 24.0% of our service revenue from the Medicare programs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, respectively, and 23.8% and 24.2% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, respectively. In addition, many other payors may use published Medicare rates as a basis for reimbursements. Accordingly, if Medicare reimbursement rates are reduced or fail to increase as quickly as our costs, if there are changes in the rules governing the Medicare program that are disadvantageous to our business or industry, or if there are delays in Medicare payments, our business and results of operations will be adversely affected.

Previous wording

Reductions in reimbursement rates or the scope of services being reimbursed could have a material, adverse effect on our revenue, financial condition and results of operations or even result in reimbursement rates that are insufficient to cover our operating costs. Although the FY 2027 PPS proposes an overall increase in SNF reimbursement rates, the proposed rule also sets forth provisions that, if finalized and implemented in future fiscal years, would expand the data that must be reported as part of the QRP, shortens the time for reporting, and require the reduction of reimbursements to SNFs participating in the VBP during FY 2027. In addition, CMS may make future adjustments to reimbursement levels and underlying reimbursement formulae as it continues to monitor the impact of current payments system on patient outcomes and budget neutrality. Previous Presidential Administrations focused on studying the nursing home industry and directed HHS to issue proposed rules based on those studies, including changes to SNF facility reimbursement and specifically, the SNF VBP Program, which may also adversely affect our reimbursement. The current Presidential Administration's policy directives and priorities regarding the nursing home industry and SNFs in particular are not yet fully known. As of July 4, 2025, Congress passed and the current Presidential Administration signed into law the OBBB, which reversed and limited the efficacy of certain parts of the ACA, including expansion of the Medicaid program in participating states. Congress's passage of CAA 2026 and its signing into law also preserved certain telehealth flexibilities beneficial to our business and financial performance, and deferred sequestration of Medicare reimbursement rates.

Current wording

Reductions in reimbursement rates or the scope of services being reimbursed could have a material, adverse effect on our revenue, financial condition and results of operations or even result in reimbursement rates that are insufficient to cover our operating costs. Although the FY 2027 PPS PR proposes an overall increase in SNF reimbursement rates, the proposed rule also sets forth provisions that, if finalized and implemented in future fiscal years, would expand the data that must be reported as part of the QRP, shortens the time for reporting, and require the reduction of reimbursements to SNFs participating in the VBP during FY 2027. In addition, CMS may make future adjustments to reimbursement levels and underlying reimbursement formulae as it continues to monitor the impact of current payments system on patient outcomes and budget neutrality. Previous Presidential Administrations focused on studying the nursing home industry and directed HHS to issue proposed rules based on those studies, including changes to SNF facility reimbursement and specifically, the SNF VBP Program, which may also adversely affect our reimbursement. The current Presidential Administration's policy directives and priorities regarding the nursing home industry and SNFs in particular are not yet fully known. As of July 4, 2025, Congress passed and the current Presidential Administration signed into law the OBBB, which reversed and limited the efficacy of certain parts of the ACA, including expansion of the Medicaid program in participating states. Congress's passage of CAA 2026 and its signing into law also preserved certain telehealth flexibilities beneficial to our business and financial performance, and deferred sequestration of Medicare reimbursement rates.

Previous wording

A significant portion of reimbursement for skilled nursing services comes from Medicaid. In fact, Medicaid is our largest source of revenue, accounting for 44.8% of our revenue for both the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively., respectively. Medicaid is a state-administered program financed by both state funds and matching federal funds. Medicaid spending has increased rapidly in recent years, becoming a significant component of state budgets, which has led both the federal government and many states to institute measures aimed at controlling the growth of Medicaid spending, and in some instances reducing aggregate Medicaid spending. Since a significant portion of our revenue is generated from our skilled nursing independent subsidiaries in California, Texas and Arizona, any budget reductions or delays in these states could adversely affect our net patient service revenue and profitability. Due to recent fluctuations in state budgets many of the states in which we operate (including those with current budget surpluses), are seeking to contain costs on Medicaid outlays for SNFs, and any such decline could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Current wording

A significant portion of reimbursement for skilled nursing services comes from Medicaid. In fact, Medicaid is our largest source of revenue, accounting for 45.2% and 45.0% of our revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, respectively, and 46.0% and 45.4% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, respectively. Medicaid is a state-administered program financed by both state funds and matching federal funds. Medicaid spending has increased rapidly in recent years, becoming a significant component of state budgets, which has led both the federal government and many states to institute measures aimed at controlling the growth of Medicaid spending, and in some instances reducing aggregate Medicaid spending. Since a significant portion of our revenue is generated from our skilled nursing independent subsidiaries in California, Texas and Arizona, any budget reductions or delays in these states could adversely affect our net patient service revenue and profitability. Due to recent fluctuations in state budgets many of the states in which we operate (including those with current budget surpluses), are seeking to contain costs on Medicaid outlays for SNFs, and any such decline could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Previous wording

To generate funds to pay for the increasing costs of the Medicaid program, many states utilize financial arrangements commonly referred to as provider taxes. The OBBB’s passage prohibits the imposition of new provider taxes or increase of existing provider taxes, except for intermediate care facilities and nursing homes. Under provider tax arrangements, states collect taxes from healthcare providers and then use the revenue to pay the providers as a Medicaid expenditure, which allows the states to then claim additional federal matching funds on the additional reimbursements. Current federal law provides for a cap on the maximum allowable provider tax as a percentage of the providers' total revenue. There can be no assurance that federal law will continue to provide matching federal funds on state Medicaid expenditures funded through provider taxes, or that the current caps on provider taxes will not be reduced. CMS's recent rulemaking to carry provisions of the OBBB into effect have made it more difficult for states to obtain waivers in enacting taxes on Medicaid-participating providers in order to fund that state's share of its Medicaid obligations. To the extent the Company operates in states that restructure or reduce provider tax programs to achieve compliance, supplemental Medicaid payments to the Company's skilled nursing facilities could be reduced, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's revenues, results of operations, and financial condition.

Current wording

To generate funds to pay for the increasing costs of the Medicaid program, many states utilize financial arrangements commonly referred to as provider taxes. The OBBB’s passage prohibits the imposition of new provider taxes or increase of existing provider taxes, except for intermediate care facilities and nursing homes. Under provider tax arrangements, states collect taxes from healthcare providers to generate non-federal share of Medicaid, which allows the states to then claim additional federal matching funds to help offset cost of care by providing additional reimbursements. CMS's recently proposed Hold Harmless Provider Tax rule would not appear to directly impact nursing homes.

Previous wording

Certain states where the Company operates have implemented direct spending requirements requiring SNFs to spend a portion of their revenue, particularly including Medicaid-derived revenue, on expenses directly relating to care. These spending requirements could affect our operational results and place the Company at higher risk of suffering non-compliance consequences, such as penalties, pay-backs, restrict admissions and/or operational/financial penalties.

Current wording

Certain states where the Company operates have implemented direct spending requirements requiring SNFs to spend a portion of their revenue, particularly including Medicaid-derived revenue, on expenses directly relating to care. These spending requirements could affect our operational results and place the Company at higher risk of suffering non-compliance consequences, such as penalties, pay-backs, restricted admissions and/or operational/financial penalties.

Previous wording

For example, Washington state incorporates the costs of direct care, indirect care, and capital expenditures for SNF services in computing the State’s Medicaid payments to nursing facilities. Using periodically updated calculations that account for factors including case acuity, fair market value of capital expenditures, inflation, and facility performance, Washington sets facility compensation so that the majority of Medicaid reimbursement paid to a skilled nursing facility is used for care-related activities, with limitations on how much a facility’s reimbursement may increase from year to year. Washington state first adopted this care-based payment model in 2015 and has periodically updated it since, including in 2020, 2022, and 2023; it is expected that Washington will continue to amend this law in the future. For state fiscal year 2024, Texas requires all nursing facilities must show that a portion of funds paid to SNFs by Texas’s Medicaid program, including both fee-for-service and managed care reimbursement, were expended for direct care activities, including direct care staff wages and benefits. For state fiscal year 2025, Texas replaced the previous spending requirement with the patient care expense ratio (PCER) which measures the proportion of a facility's Medicaid revenue that is spent on patient care expenses. The PCER is a financial accountability metric and will be reported annually. If our independent subsidiaries in Texas fail to meet the specified PCER thresholds, Texas may recoup Medicaid payments and persistent non-compliance may affect Medicaid participation.

Current wording

For example, Washington state incorporates the costs of direct care, indirect care, and capital expenditures for SNF services in computing the State’s Medicaid payments to nursing facilities. Using periodically updated calculations that account for factors including case acuity, fair market value of capital expenditures, inflation, and facility performance, Washington sets facility compensation so that the majority of Medicaid reimbursement paid to a skilled nursing facility is used for care-related activities, with limitations on how much a facility’s reimbursement may increase from year to year. Washington state first adopted this care-based payment model in 2015 and has periodically updated it since, including in 2020, 2022, and 2023; it is expected that Washington will continue to amend this law in the future. For state fiscal year 2024, Texas requires all nursing facilities to show that a portion of funds paid to SNFs by Texas’s Medicaid program, including both fee-for-service and managed care reimbursement, were expended for direct care activities, including direct care staff wages and benefits. For state fiscal year 2025, Texas replaced the previous spending requirement with the patient care expense ratio (PCER) which measures the proportion of a facility's Medicaid revenue that is spent on patient care expenses. The PCER is a financial accountability metric and will be reported annually. If our independent subsidiaries in Texas fail to meet the specified PCER thresholds, Texas may recoup Medicaid payments and persistent non-compliance may affect Medicaid participation.

Previous wording

With the passage of the IRA in 2022, Congress expanded and supplemented the ACA, including through the continuation of federally funded insurance premium subsidies. This modification of the ACA by the IRA indicates that Congress may continue to change and expand the ACA in the future. Since the commencement of the current Presidential Administration in January of 2025, there have been executive actions and proposed legislation, including the enactment of the OBBB, which undoes or limits the effect of portions of the ACA, including its Medicaid expansion provisions. The OBBB’s provisions may also affect the availability of Medicaid for potential beneficiaries due to work requirements, limit eligibility for our independent subsidiaries’ services due to caps on home equity that may be disregarded for eligibility purposes and limit the reimbursement available for our services under Medicaid. These legislative changes, and the effects of the current Presidential Administration’s executive orders, are not yet fully realized in terms of their effects on our business.

Current wording

With the passage of the IRA in 2022, Congress expanded and supplemented the ACA, including through the continuation of federally funded insurance premium subsidies. This modification of the ACA by the IRA indicates that Congress may continue to change and expand the ACA in the future. Since the commencement of the current Presidential Administration in January of 2025, there have been executive actions and proposed legislation, including the enactment of the OBBB, which undoes or limits the effect of portions of the ACA, including its Medicaid expansion provisions. The OBBB’s provisions may also affect the availability of Medicaid for potential beneficiaries due to work requirements, limit eligibility for our independent subsidiaries’ services due to caps on home equity that may be disregarded for eligibility purposes and limit the reimbursement available for our services under Medicaid. These legislative changes, and the effects of the current Presidential Administration’s executive orders, are not yet fully realized in terms of their effects on our business. For example, on June 1, 2026, CMS issued an interim final rule setting forth the framework for states to follow in ensuring certain adults participating in Medicaid satisfy a requirement to spend at least 80 hours per month in prescribed forms of community engagement, which include education, employment, work programs, or community service, as a condition of eligibility for benefits under that state plan. Under this interim final rule, each State must generally implement this requirement by January 1, 2027.

Previous wording

While it is not possible to predict whether and when any such changes will occur, proposals discussed by the current Presidential Administration, including a repeal or material amendment of the ACA, could harm our business, operating results and financial condition. The ACA continues to be a salient political topic and proposed changes to it may become the subject of campaign promises, litigation, administrative action, or legislation under the current Presidential Administration, and the Senate, where the Republican party now holds a majority of seats. In addition, even if the ACA is not amended or repealed, the President and the executive branch of the federal government, as well as CMS and HHS, have a significant impact on the implementation of the provisions of the ACA. It is expected that the current Presidential Administration will make changes affecting the implementation and enforcement of the ACA, which could harm our business, operating results and financial condition. We have seen such changes with the current Presidential Administration's impacts to the Biden-Harris Administration's regulatory activity promulgating rules regarding anti-discrimination under Section 1557 of the ACA and rulemaking requiring SNFs to disclose their ownership and the ownership of service providers under Section 6101 of the ACA. It is not possible to know whether, when, or how any or all these regulations or their implementation will be changed, the manner in which any change may be effected, and the ultimate effects of such changes on our business. If we are slow or unable to adapt to any such changes, our business, operating results and financial condition could be adversely affected.

Current wording

We may not be able to predict whether and when any such changes will occur, and proposals discussed by the current Presidential Administration, including a repeal or material amendment of the ACA, could harm our business, operating results and financial condition. The ACA continues to be a salient political topic and proposed changes to it may become the subject of campaign promises, litigation, administrative action, or legislation under the current Presidential Administration, and the Senate, where the Republican party now holds a majority of seats. In addition, even if the ACA is not amended or repealed, the President and the executive branch of the federal government, as well as CMS and HHS, have a significant impact on the implementation of the provisions of the ACA. It is expected that the current Presidential Administration will make changes affecting the implementation and enforcement of the ACA, which could harm our business, operating results and financial condition. We have seen such changes with the current Presidential Administration's impacts to the Biden-Harris Administration's regulatory activity promulgating rules regarding anti-discrimination under Section 1557 of the ACA and rulemaking requiring SNFs to disclose their ownership and the ownership of service providers under Section 6101 of the ACA. It is not possible to know whether, when, or how any or all these regulations or their implementation will be changed, the manner in which any change may be effected, and the ultimate effects of such changes on our business. If we are slow or unable to adapt to any such changes, our business, operating results and financial condition could be adversely affected.

Previous wording

On April 2, 2025, President Trump signed an executive order to impose a variety of tariffs on the global trading partners of the United States. In the months since then, the tariffs with various countries have been increased, decreased, paused, and been reinstated as part of a broader trade negotiation strategy that has caused uncertainty in various product markets. These tariffs have the potential to increase costs on goods that are imported into the United States. As it pertains to our independent subsidiaries, tariffs on medical supplies may lead to higher costs to providers and the federal government through the Medicare and Medicaid programs and may impact the formulas used to calculate federal reimbursements.

Current wording

On April 2, 2025, President Trump signed an executive order to impose a variety of tariffs on the global trading partners of the United States. In the months since then, the tariffs with various countries have been increased, decreased, paused, and been reinstated as part of a broader trade negotiation strategy that has caused uncertainty in various product markets. These tariffs have the potential to increase costs on goods that are imported into the United States. As it pertains to our independent subsidiaries, tariffs on medical supplies, pharmaceuticals, and medical equipment may lead to higher costs to providers and the federal government through the Medicare and Medicaid programs and may impact the formulas used to calculate federal reimbursements. To the extent that tariff-driven cost increases are not reflected in corresponding adjustments to Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement rates, our operating margins could be adversely affected. Additionally, supply chain disruptions arising from trade policy, foreign conflicts, and materials shortages uncertainty could impair our ability to obtain necessary medical supplies and equipment in a timely and cost-effective manner. The tariff levels described above are subject to legal challenge, and judicial decisions regarding the scope of executive tariff authority, including challenges to tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, could result in modifications, suspensions, or invalidations of existing tariffs, creating additional uncertainty regarding the cost and availability of imported medical supplies and equipment on which our independent subsidiaries depend.

Previous wording

We continually monitor these developments in order to respond to the changing regulatory environment impacting our business. While it is not possible to predict whether and when any such changes will occur, specific proposals made by the current Administration or others in anticipation of mid-term elections in the U.S., including a repeal or material amendment of the ACA, potential cuts to the Medicare or Medicaid programs by Congress through the budget reconciliation process, or other laws affecting the provision of healthcare services, could harm our business, operating results and financial condition. If we are slow or unable to adapt to any such changes, our business, operating results and financial condition could be adversely affected.

Current wording

We continually monitor these developments in order to respond to the changing regulatory environment impacting our business. We don't know whether and when any such changes will occur, and specific proposals made by the current Administration or others in anticipation of mid-term elections in the U.S., including a repeal or material amendment of the ACA, potential cuts to the Medicare or Medicaid programs by Congress through the budget reconciliation process, or other laws affecting the provision of healthcare services, could harm our business, operating results and financial condition. If we are slow or unable to adapt to any such changes, our business, operating results and financial condition could be adversely affected.

Previous wording

Although we have always been subject to post-payment audits and reviews, more intensive “probe reviews” performed by Medicare administrative contractors in recent years appear to be a regular procedure with our fiscal intermediaries. All findings of overpayment from CMS contractors are eligible for appeal. With the exception of rare findings of overpayment related to objective errors in Medicare payment methodology or claims processing, we utilize all defenses reasonably available to us to demonstrate that the services provided meet all clinical and regulatory requirements for reimbursement.

Current wording

We have and will continue to be subject to post-payment audits and reviews, and may be subject to more intensive “probe reviews” performed by Medicare administrative contractors, which in recent years appear to be a regular procedure with our fiscal intermediaries. All findings of overpayment from CMS contractors are eligible for appeal. Excepting rare findings of overpayment related to objective errors in Medicare payment methodology or claims processing, we utilize all defenses reasonably available to us to demonstrate that the services provided meet all clinical and regulatory requirements for reimbursement.

Previous wording

In cases where claim and documentation review by a CMS contractor yields repeated unsatisfactory results, an operation can be subjected to protracted regulatory oversight. This CMS oversight may include education and sampling of claims, extended pre-payment review, referral of the operating business to recovery audit or integrity contractors, or extrapolation of an error rate to other reimbursement made outside of specifically reviewed claims. Ongoing failure to demonstrate improvement towards meeting all claim filing and documentation requirements could ultimately lead to Medicare decertification. As of March 31, 2026 and through the filing date of this report, 22 of our independent subsidiaries had multi-claim reviews scheduled or in process, either pre- or post-payment. We anticipate that these reviews could increase in frequency in the future.

Current wording

In cases where claim and documentation review by a CMS contractor yields repeated unsatisfactory results, an operation can be subjected to protracted regulatory oversight. This CMS oversight may include education and sampling of claims, extended pre-payment review, referral of the operating business to recovery audit or integrity contractors, or extrapolation of an error rate to other reimbursement made outside of specifically reviewed claims. Ongoing failure to demonstrate improvement towards meeting all claim filing and documentation requirements could ultimately lead to Medicare decertification. As of June 30, 2026 and through the filing date of this report, 18 of our independent subsidiaries had multi-claim reviews scheduled or in process, either pre- or post-payment. We anticipate that these reviews could increase in frequency in the future.

Previous wording

These anti-fraud and abuse laws and regulations are complex, and we do not always have the benefit of significant regulatory or judicial interpretation of these laws and regulations. While we do not believe we are in violation of these prohibitions, we cannot assure you that governmental officials charged with the responsibility for enforcing these prohibitions will not assert that we are violating the provisions of such laws and regulations.

Current wording

These anti-fraud and abuse laws and regulations are complex, and we do not always have the benefit of significant regulatory or judicial interpretation of these laws and regulations. While we do not believe we are in violation of these prohibitions, it may be asserted that we are violating the provisions of such laws and regulations.

Previous wording

CMS's efforts to enhance its enforcement powers and increase enforcement activities towards SNFs, as discussed in Item 2., under Government Regulation, result in state survey agencies having more accountability for their survey and enforcement efforts. Within the FY 2025 PPS, CMS obtained greater ability to impose monetary penalties upon SNFs for incident-based and day-based violations of CMS’s conditions of participation. Further, the enhanced penalties against SFFs under the Biden-Harris Administration represented further federal calls for transparency, oversight and penalties for low-ranked and underperforming SNFs. These policies may prove to be popular, effective, or otherwise desirable and might not change with a new Presidential Administration, including under new leadership of HHS and CMS. These enhanced penalties and enforcement activities precedes greater focus by CMS in obtaining oversight over SFFs, and continuing that oversight even after those SFFs improve as recommended by the OIG in its October 24, 2025 report and recommendations regarding the SFF program, and subjecting them to more exacting and routine oversight. The likely result may be more frequent surveys of our independent subsidiaries, with more substantial penalties, fines and other consequences if they do not perform well.

Current wording

CMS's efforts to enhance its enforcement powers and increase enforcement activities towards SNFs, as discussed in Item 2., under Government Regulation, result in state survey agencies having more accountability for their survey and enforcement efforts. Within the FY 2025 PPS, CMS obtained greater ability to impose monetary penalties upon SNFs for incident-based and day-based violations of CMS’s conditions of participation. Further, the enhanced penalties against SFFs under the Biden-Harris Administration represented further federal calls for transparency, oversight and penalties for low-ranked and underperforming SNFs. These policies may prove to be popular, effective, or otherwise desirable and might not change with a new Presidential Administration, including under new leadership of HHS and CMS. These enhanced penalties and enforcement activities precede greater focus by CMS in obtaining oversight over SFFs, and continuing that oversight even after those SFFs improve as recommended by the OIG in its October 24, 2025 report and recommendations regarding the SFF program, and subjecting them to more exacting and routine oversight. The likely result may be more frequent surveys of our independent subsidiaries, with more substantial penalties, fines and other consequences if they do not perform well. For low-performing facilities in the SFF program, the standards for successfully emerging from that program and not being subject to ongoing and enhanced government oversight will be higher and measured over a longer period of time, prolonging the risks of monetary penalties, fines and potential suspension or exclusion from the Medicare and Medicaid programs.

Previous wording

We have received notices of potential sanctions and remedies based upon alleged regulatory deficiencies from time to time, and such sanctions have been imposed on some of our independent subsidiaries. We have had independent subsidiaries placed on SFF status in the past and other independent subsidiaries may be identified for such status in the future. We currently have one facility placed on SFF status.

Current wording

We have received notices of potential sanctions and remedies based upon alleged regulatory deficiencies from time to time, and such sanctions have been imposed on some of our independent subsidiaries. We have had independent subsidiaries placed on SFF status in the past and other independent subsidiaries may be identified for such status in the future. We currently have no facilities placed on SFF status.

Previous wording

This three-year look-back for sustained improvements by facilities that graduate the SFF program poses risk for our independent subsidiaries, specifically those that may be subject to the SFF program or that have been subject to the SFF program in the past. As of March 31, 2026 and through the filing date of this report, we have one facility that graduated from the SFF program within the past three years. First, for SNFs that are selected by CMS for participation in the SFF program, or which currently are in the SFF program, even graduation from the program is no longer an assurance that the SNF will be able to continue its operations. Even one survey with a significant compliance deficiency, such as actual harm or an immediate jeopardy deficiency, may result in CMS—acting solely within its discretion—terminating the SNF’s Medicare or Medicaid participation, likely triggering the termination of other payor contracts and rendering the facility economically unviable. Second, for SNFs that have graduated from the SFF program, they are subject to a three-year period of enhanced scrutiny where adverse findings by a SA and a single survey’s finding of poor compliance may result in CMS discretionally terminating that facility’s Medicare and/or Medicaid participation, which would likely cause other payors to terminate their agreements with the facility as well. As a result, the financial and manpower resources needed for graduation from the SFF program may be for nothing if, in the three years following graduation from the SFF program, a SNF receives a poor survey result and CMS imposes fines and penalties up to the termination of the facility’s Medicare and Medicaid participation.

Current wording

This three-year look-back for sustained improvements by facilities that graduate the SFF program poses risk for our independent subsidiaries, specifically those that may be subject to the SFF program or that have been subject to the SFF program in the past. As of June 30, 2026, and through the filing date of this report, we have two facilities that graduated from the SFF program within the past three years. First, for SNFs that are selected by CMS for participation in the SFF program, or which currently are in the SFF program, graduation from the program is not guaranteed and the SNF may not be able to continue its operations. Even one survey with a significant compliance deficiency, such as actual harm or an immediate jeopardy deficiency, may result in CMS—acting solely within its discretion—terminating the SNF’s Medicare or Medicaid participation, likely triggering the termination of other payor contracts and rendering the facility economically unviable. Second, for SNFs that have graduated from the SFF program, they are subject to a three-year period of enhanced scrutiny where adverse findings by a SA and a single survey’s finding of poor compliance may result in CMS discretionally terminating that facility’s Medicare and/or Medicaid participation, which would likely cause other payors to terminate their agreements with the facility as well. As a result, the resources needed for graduation from the SFF program may be for nothing if, in the three years following graduation from the SFF program, a SNF receives a poor survey result and CMS imposes fines and penalties up to the termination of the facility’s Medicare and Medicaid participation.

Previous wording

HIPAA, as amended by the HITECH Act, requires us to adopt and maintain business procedures and systems designed to protect the privacy, security and integrity of patients' individual health information, in addition to state laws governing the privacy of patient information. We must comply with these state privacy laws to the extent that they are more protective of healthcare information or provide additional protections not afforded by HIPAA. The regulations enacting HIPAA periodically change and the last proposed change was issued in late 2022. In 2024, CMS published the Interoperability Final Rule, which affects the data standards and APIs that entities may use. Additionally, the 42 CFR Part 2 final rule issued in 2024 updating the separate confidentiality requirements for substance use disorder (SUD) records requires compliance by February 16 ,2026. Changes to these regulations may require our independent subsidiaries to modify certain policies, procedures and practices regarding the disclosure of residents’ information to the extent such records would be considered SUD records. If we fail to comply with these state and federal laws, we could be subject to criminal penalties, civil sanctions, litigation, and be forced to modify our policies and procedures, in addition to undertaking costly breach notification and remediation efforts, as well as sustaining reputational harm.

Current wording

HIPAA, as amended by the HITECH Act, requires us to adopt and maintain business procedures and systems designed to protect the privacy, security and integrity of patients' individual health information, in addition to state laws governing the privacy of patient information. We must comply with these state privacy laws to the extent that they are more protective of healthcare information or provide additional protections not afforded by HIPAA. The regulations enacting HIPAA periodically change and the last proposed change was issued in late 2022. In 2024, CMS published the Interoperability Final Rule, which affects the data standards and APIs that entities may use. Additionally, the 42 CFR Part 2 final rule issued in 2024 updating the separate confidentiality requirements for substance use disorder (SUD) records requires compliance by February 16, 2026.

Previous wording

Healthcare businesses are increasingly the target of cyberattacks whereby hackers disrupt business operations or obtain protected health information, often demanding large ransoms. For years, healthcare has been among the most-breached sector of the economy based on publicly disclosed information. This trend of healthcare as a vulnerable cybersecurity target continues in 2026 and is expected to remain a significant risk in the future. The frequency of this activity has increased precipitously over the last five years. Our business is dependent on the proper functioning and availability of our computer systems and networks. We cannot assure you that our safety and security measures and disaster recovery plan will prevent damage, interruption or breach of our information systems and operations. Additionally, we cannot control the safety and security of our information held by third-party vendors with whom we contract. The techniques used to obtain unauthorized access, disable or degrade service, or sabotage systems change frequently and may be difficult to detect, and as such we (or third-party vendors) may be unable to anticipate these techniques or implement adequate preventive measures. In addition, hardware, software or applications we (or third-party vendors) develop or procure from third parties may contain defects in design or manufacture or other problems that could unexpectedly compromise the security of information systems. Unauthorized parties may attempt to gain access to our systems or facilities, or those of third parties with whom we do business, through fraud or other forms of deception. Additionally, the rapid ongoing evolution and increased adoption of emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence and machine learning may make it more difficult to anticipate and implement protective measures to recognize, detect and prevent the occurrence of data breaches, including but not limited to cybersecurity breaches.

Current wording

Healthcare businesses are increasingly the target of cyberattacks whereby hackers disrupt business operations or obtain protected health information, often demanding large ransoms. For years, healthcare has been among the most-breached sector of the economy based on publicly disclosed information. This trend of healthcare as a vulnerable cybersecurity target continues in 2026 and is expected to remain a significant risk in the future. The frequency of this activity has increased precipitously over the last five years. Our business is dependent on the proper functioning and availability of our computer systems and networks. Our safety and security measures and disaster recovery plan may not prevent damage, interruption or breach of our information systems and operations. Additionally, we cannot control the safety and security of our information held by third-party vendors with whom we contract. The techniques used to obtain unauthorized access, disable or degrade service, or sabotage systems change frequently and may be difficult to detect, and as such we (or third-party vendors) may be unable to anticipate these techniques or implement adequate preventive measures. In addition, hardware, software or applications we (or third-party vendors) develop or procure from third parties may contain defects in design or manufacture or other problems that could unexpectedly compromise the security of information systems. Unauthorized parties may attempt to gain access to our systems or facilities, or those of third parties with whom we do business, through fraud or other forms of deception. Additionally, the rapid ongoing evolution and increased adoption of emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning may intensify cybersecurity threats, as threat actors increasingly leverage these tools to craft more sophisticated attacks, while also creating new challenges related to the use of AI in our own operations, including risks related to algorithmic accuracy, data integrity, regulatory compliance with evolving AI governance frameworks, and potential liability arising from AI-assisted clinical or operational decision-making.

Previous wording

Laws and regulations may increase our costs of maintaining qualified nursing and skilled personnel, or make it more difficult for us to attract or retain qualified nurses and skilled staff members. Proposed legislation, such as the Nurses Belong in Nursing Homes Act and Safe Staffing Saves Lives Act, may make it more expensive to compete for, hire, and retain nursing staff, if passed into law in substantially the same form as previously introduced to Congress. Although the likelihood of the enactment of such legislation is unclear and the current administration's abandonment of implementation of any minimum staffing requirements, future presidential administrations may revive this concept and seek to restore that rule or impose new staffing rules that are equally or more stringent.

Current wording

Laws and regulations may increase our costs of maintaining qualified nursing and skilled personnel, or make it more difficult for us to attract or retain qualified nurses and skilled staff members. Proposed legislation, such as the Nurses Belong in Nursing Homes Act and Safe Staffing Saves Lives Act, may make it more expensive to compete for, hire, and retain nursing staff, if passed into law in substantially the same form as previously introduced to Congress. Despite the current administration's abandonment of implementation of any minimum staffing requirements, the likelihood of the enactment of such legislation remains unclear. The current or future presidential administrations may revive this concept and seek to restore that rule or impose new staffing rules that are equally or more stringent.

Previous wording

Increased competition for, or a shortage of, nurses or other trained personnel, or general ongoing inflationary pressures may require that we enhance our pay and benefits packages to compete effectively for such personnel. Recent changes in federal immigration policy have exacerbated these issues at all levels of the wage and skill spectrum. For example, the cost of a H-1B visa can be up to $0.1 million which has changed the economic viability of a visa commonly used for skilled care providers to work in the United States and increasing the cost of engaging skilled labor from outside of the United States. This indirectly increases the wage pressure for skilled workers such as physicians and NPs eligible to work in the United States. Increased scrutiny of other visa types, such as H-4 visas and reviews of applicants' presence and activities on their social media accounts, has also affected the availability and ability to participate in the workforce by other workers who have provided care in other less-skilled positions. This, too, increases the cost of delivering care, reduces the pool of skilled and eligible workers, and like the issues posed by H-1B visa costs and competitiveness, may affect or our operations, financial performance, and profitability. Turnover rates and the magnitude of the shortage of nurses or other trained personnel vary substantially from operation to operation and may adversely affect those operations' quality ratings based on data reported to CMS. In addition, state laws regarding minimum wage increases, such as California’s minimum wage increases for both healthcare and fast-food workers, may intensify competition for unskilled labor in both skilled and unskilled settings. For skilled workers within the skilled care market where we operate, the costs of skilled labor, which are already greater than unskilled labor, could increase further. Similarly, the increased minimum wage of unskilled labor will not only increase the cost of unskilled labor but may also have effects that dissuade workers from training to join the skilled workforce to earn higher wage growth, resulting in a smaller pool of available skilled workers and further increased competition—and higher wages—for them. If we fail to attract and retain qualified and skilled personnel, our ability to conduct our business operations could be harmed.

Current wording

Increased competition for, or a shortage of, nurses or other trained personnel, or general ongoing inflationary pressures may require that we enhance our pay and benefits packages to compete effectively for such personnel. Recent changes in federal immigration policy have exacerbated these issues at all levels of the wage and skill spectrum. For example, the cost of an H-1B visa can be up to $0.1 million which has changed the economic viability of a visa commonly used for skilled care providers to work in the United States and increasing the cost of engaging skilled labor from outside of the United States. This indirectly increases the wage pressure for skilled workers such as physicians and NPs eligible to work in the United States. Increased scrutiny of other visa types, such as H-4 visas and reviews of applicants' presence and activities on their social media accounts, has also affected the availability and ability to participate in the workforce by other workers who have provided care in other less-skilled positions. This, too, increases the cost of delivering care, reduces the pool of skilled and eligible workers, and like the issues posed by H-1B visa costs and competitiveness, may affect our operations, financial performance, and profitability. Turnover rates and the magnitude of the shortage of nurses or other trained personnel vary substantially from operation to operation and may adversely affect those operations' quality ratings based on data reported to CMS. In addition, state laws regarding minimum wage increases, such as California’s minimum wage increases for both healthcare and fast-food workers, may intensify competition for labor in both skilled and unskilled settings. For skilled workers within the skilled care market where we operate, the costs of skilled labor, which are already greater than unskilled labor, could increase further. Similarly, the increased minimum wage of unskilled labor will not only increase the cost of unskilled labor but may also have effects that dissuade workers from training to join the skilled workforce to earn higher wage growth, resulting in a smaller pool of available skilled workers and further increased competition—and higher wages—for them. If we fail to attract and retain qualified and skilled personnel, our ability to conduct our business operations could be harmed.

Previous wording

As discussed in greater detail in Item 2., under Government Regulation, Civil and Criminal Fraud and Abuse Laws and Enforcement, the OIG regularly conducts investigations regarding certain payment or compliance issues within the healthcare industry. The OIG continued to identify SNF compliance as an issue of concern in its 2025 semi-annual reports to Congress. The OIG's November 2025 report to Congress indicated that quality of resident care in nursing facilities was an enforcement concern for that office, and also identified SNFs that had failed to properly repay to HHS provider relief funds they had received during the COVID-19 PHE. In March of 2025, OIG found that, over a 3-year period, Medicare Part D improperly paid approximately $465 million for drugs that should have been reimbursed under Medicare Part A through its SNF benefits. This issue was also added to the OIG's work plan, with a focus on SNFs' compliance with Medicare Part A billing requirements for drugs that the OIG found were improperly paid by Medicare Part D. In June 2024, the OIG continued to focus on SNFs, adding the SFF Program to its Work Plan. Among other things, the OIG recommended attention to the rate of reimbursement for professional services rendered within facilities. The OIG’s reports to Congress have also recommended a reduction in the use of psychotropic drugs in nursing homes and urged CMS to evaluate the appropriateness of psychotropic drug use among residents, including the use of data to identify nursing homes with higher rates of use for potential further scrutiny and action. Based on this information, SNFs in particular are potential targets for more robust scrutiny and examination by regulators.

Current wording

As discussed in greater detail in Item 2., under Government Regulation, Civil and Criminal Fraud and Abuse Laws and Enforcement, the OIG regularly conducts investigations regarding certain payment or compliance issues within the healthcare industry. The OIG continued to identify SNF compliance as an issue of concern in its 2025 semi-annual reports to Congress. The OIG's November 2025 report to Congress indicated that quality of resident care in nursing facilities was an enforcement concern for that office, and also identified SNFs that had failed to properly repay HHS provider relief funds they had received during the COVID-19 PHE. In March of 2025, OIG found that, over a 3-year period, Medicare Part D improperly paid approximately $465 million for drugs that should have been reimbursed under Medicare Part A through its SNF benefits. This issue was also added to the OIG's work plan, with a focus on SNFs' compliance with Medicare Part A billing requirements for drugs that the OIG found were improperly paid by Medicare Part D. In June 2024, the OIG continued to focus on SNFs, adding the SFF Program to its Work Plan. Among other things, the OIG recommended attention to the rate of reimbursement for professional services rendered within facilities. The OIG’s reports to Congress have also recommended a reduction in the use of psychotropic drugs in nursing homes and urged CMS to evaluate the appropriateness of psychotropic drug use among residents, including the use of data to identify nursing homes with higher rates of use for potential further scrutiny and action. Based on this information, SNFs in particular are potential targets for more robust scrutiny and examination by regulators.

Previous wording

Another example, California’s adoption of the Skilled Nursing Facility Ownership and Management Reform Act of 2022, discussed in Item 2., under Government Regulation, imposes new requirements for obtaining licenses to operate SNFs. These new requirements may delay or limit the ability to obtain new SNF licenses within that state, whether through acquisition of existing facilities or opening a new facility. This new law's obligations may increase the costs of obtaining licensure, make applications more time-consuming and complex, and may result in civil penalties and other sanctions against our independent subsidiaries in the event they are not compliant with these new licensure application requirements. As a result, this new law may delay or impede growth within California. As with the bill that increases the cap of non-economic damages for medical malpractice litigation, California’s influence on other states may result in this legislation becoming a model for other states and having similar, potentially adverse effects within those jurisdictions as well.

Current wording

To provide another example, California’s adoption of the Skilled Nursing Facility Ownership and Management Reform Act of 2022, discussed in Item 2., under Government Regulation, imposes new requirements for obtaining licenses to operate SNFs. These new requirements may delay or limit the ability to obtain new SNF licenses within that state, whether through acquisition of existing facilities or opening a new facility. This new law's obligations may increase the costs of obtaining licensure, make applications more time-consuming and complex, and may result in civil penalties and other sanctions against our independent subsidiaries in the event they are not compliant with these new licensure application requirements. As a result, this new law may delay or impede growth within California. As with the bill that increases the cap of non-economic damages for medical malpractice litigation, California’s influence on other states may result in this legislation becoming a model for other states and having similar, potentially adverse effects within those jurisdictions as well.

Previous wording

Our independent subsidiaries are subject to a variety of federal and state employment-related laws and regulations, including, but not limited to, the U.S. Fair Labor Standards Act that governs such matters as minimum wages, overtime and other working conditions and similar state laws such as the California Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA), the ADA and similar state laws that provide civil rights protections to individuals with disabilities in the context of employment, public accommodations and other areas, the National Labor Relations Act, regulations of the EEOC, regulations of the Office of Civil Rights, regulations of state attorney generals, family leave mandates and a variety of similar laws enacted by the federal and state governments that govern these and other employment law matters. Changes to federal and state regulations and laws are discussed in more detail in Item 2., under Government Regulation.

Current wording

Our independent subsidiaries are subject to a variety of federal and state employment-related laws and regulations, including, but not limited to, the U.S. Fair Labor Standards Act that governs such matters as minimum wages, overtime and other working conditions and similar state laws such as the California Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA), the ADA and similar state laws that provide civil rights protections to individuals with disabilities in the context of employment, public accommodations and other areas, the National Labor Relations Act, regulations of the EEOC, regulations of the Office for Civil Rights, regulations of state attorneys general, family leave mandates and a variety of similar laws enacted by the federal and state governments that govern these and other employment law matters. Changes to federal and state regulations and laws are discussed in more detail in Item 2., under Government Regulation.

Previous wording

Our revenue is affected by the percentage of the patients of our independent subsidiaries who require a high level of skilled nursing and rehabilitative care, whom we refer to as high acuity patients, and by our mix of payment sources. Changes in the acuity level of patients we attract, as well as our payor mix among Medicaid, Medicare, private payors and managed care companies, significantly affect our profitability. Changes to federal law affecting Medicaid funding and availability, including the enactment of the OBBB, may materially affect our business and the operations of our independent subsidiaries. We generally receive higher reimbursement rates for high acuity patients, and payors reimburse us at different rates. For the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, 69.1% and 69.5% of our revenue was provided by government payors that reimburse us at predetermined rates, respectively. If our labor or other operating costs increase, we will be unable to recover such increased costs from government payors. Accordingly, if we fail to maintain our proportion of high acuity patients or if there is any significant increase in the percentage of the patients of our independent subsidiaries for whom we receive Medicaid reimbursement, our results of operations may be adversely affected.

Current wording

Our revenue is affected by the percentage of the patients of our independent subsidiaries who require a high level of skilled nursing and rehabilitative care, whom we refer to as high acuity patients, and by our mix of payment sources. Changes in the acuity level of patients we attract, as well as our payor mix among Medicaid, Medicare, private payors and managed care companies, significantly affect our profitability. Changes to federal law affecting Medicaid funding and availability, including the enactment of the OBBB, may materially affect our business and the operations of our independent subsidiaries. We generally receive higher reimbursement rates for high acuity patients, and payors reimburse us at different rates. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, 68.9% and 69.0% of our revenue, respectively, was provided by government payors that reimburse us at predetermined rates. If our labor or other operating costs increase, we will be unable to recover such increased costs from government payors. Accordingly, if we fail to maintain our proportion of high acuity patients or if there is any significant increase in the percentage of the patients of our independent subsidiaries for whom we receive Medicaid reimbursement, our results of operations may be adversely affected.

Previous wording

Our ancillary businesses also are susceptible to general liability claims based on facts and circumstances that are specific to their activities and operations, such as claims for automobile-involved accidents against our non-emergent ground transportation business. The defense of claims and lawsuits relating to our ancillary businesses in the past, and may in the future, result in significant legal costs, regardless of the outcome. As our ancillary businesses grow, the independent subsidiaries may be subject to increased frequency and/or severity of losses from such claims and suits which may result in increased liability insurance premiums and decline in available coverage as described above, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Current wording

Our ancillary businesses also are susceptible to general liability claims based on facts and circumstances that are specific to their activities and operations, such as claims for automobile-involved accidents against our non-emergent ground transportation business. The defense of claims and lawsuits relating to our ancillary businesses has resulted in the past, and may result in the future, in significant legal costs, regardless of the outcome. As our ancillary businesses grow, the independent subsidiaries may be subject to increased frequency and/or severity of losses from such claims and suits which may result in increased liability insurance premiums and decline in available coverage as described above, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Previous wording

Our independent subsidiaries have used arbitration agreements where permissible by law, which have generally been favored by the courts, to streamline the dispute resolution process and reduce our exposure to legal fees and excessive jury awards. CMS previously identified these arbitration agreements as an area of focus and issued guidance to state surveyors regarding federal requirements for the use of arbitration agreements in nursing home care, with non-compliance potentially resulting in fines and other sanctions. Absent some judicial or legislative intervention, or other ability to potentially resolve claims without the cost and unpredictability of a jury trial (for example, obtaining a jury trial waiver if and where permitted by state law), our litigation exposure and costs of defense in patient liability actions could increase, our liability insurance premiums could increase, and our business may be adversely affected.

Current wording

Our independent subsidiaries have used arbitration agreements where permissible by law, which historically have been favored by the courts in the absence of legal authority limiting or curtailing their use, to streamline the dispute resolution process and reduce our exposure to legal fees and excessive jury awards. CMS previously identified these arbitration agreements as an area of focus and issued guidance to state surveyors regarding federal requirements for the use of arbitration agreements in nursing home care, with non-compliance potentially resulting in fines and other sanctions. Absent some judicial or legislative intervention, or other ability to potentially resolve claims without the cost and unpredictability of a jury trial (for example, obtaining a jury trial waiver if and where permitted by state law), our litigation exposure and costs of defense in patient liability actions could increase, our liability insurance premiums could increase, and our business may be adversely affected.

Previous wording

During the three months ended March 31, 2026, we expanded our operations through a combination of a long-term lease and real estate purchases, with the addition of five stand-alone skilled nursing operations. This growth has placed and will continue to place significant demands on our current management resources. Our ability to manage our growth effectively and to successfully integrate new acquisitions into our existing business will require us to continue to expand our operational, financial and management information systems and to continue to retain, attract, train, motivate and manage key employees, including facility-level leaders and our local directors of nursing. We may not be successful in attracting qualified individuals necessary for future acquisitions to be successful, and our management team may expend significant time and energy working to attract qualified personnel to manage operations we may acquire in the future. Also, the newly acquired operations may require us to spend significant time improving services that have historically been substandard, and if we are unable to improve such operations quickly enough, we may be subject to litigation and/or loss of licensure or certification. If we are not able to successfully overcome these and other integration challenges, we may not achieve the benefits we expect from any of our acquisitions, and our business may suffer.

Current wording

During the six months ended June 30, 2026, we expanded our operations through a combination of a long-term lease and real estate purchases, with the addition of 21 stand-alone skilled nursing operations and two campus operations. This growth has placed and will continue to place significant demands on our current management resources. Our ability to manage our growth effectively and to successfully integrate new acquisitions into our existing business will require us to continue to expand our operational, financial and management information systems and to continue to retain, attract, train, motivate and manage key employees, including facility-level leaders and our local directors of nursing. We may not be successful in attracting qualified individuals necessary for future acquisitions to be successful, and our management team may expend significant time and energy working to attract qualified personnel to manage operations we may acquire in the future. Also, the newly acquired operations may require us to spend significant time improving services that have historically been substandard, and if we are unable to improve such operations quickly enough, we may be subject to litigation and/or loss of licensure or certification. If we are not able to successfully overcome these and other integration challenges, we may not achieve the benefits we expect from any of our acquisitions, and our business may suffer.

Previous wording

Further, we may incur post-acquisition compliance risk due to the difficulty or impossibility of immediately or quickly bringing non-compliant operations into full compliance. Diligence materials pertaining to acquisition targets, especially the underperforming facilities that often represent the greatest opportunity for return, are often inadequate, inaccurate or impossible to obtain, sometimes requiring us to make acquisition decisions with incomplete information. Despite our due diligence procedures, operations that we have acquired or may acquire in the future may generate unexpectedly low returns, may cause us to incur substantial losses, may require unexpected levels of management time, expenditures or other resources, or may otherwise not meet a risk profile that our investors find acceptable.

Current wording

In undertaking acquisitions, we also may be adversely impacted by unforeseen liabilities attributable to the prior providers who operated those businesses, against whom we may have little or no recourse. Many operations we have historically acquired were underperforming financially and had clinical and regulatory issues prior to and at the time of acquisition. Even where we have improved independent subsidiaries and patient care, we still may face post-acquisition regulatory issues related to pre-acquisition events. These may include, without limitation, payment recoupment related to our predecessors' prior noncompliance, the imposition of fines, penalties, operational restrictions or special regulatory status. Further, we may incur post-acquisition compliance risk due to the difficulty or impossibility of immediately or quickly bringing non-compliant operations into full compliance. Diligence materials pertaining to acquisition targets, especially the underperforming facilities that often represent the greatest opportunity for return, are often inadequate, inaccurate or impossible to obtain, sometimes requiring us to make acquisition decisions with incomplete information. Despite our due diligence procedures, operations that we have acquired or may acquire in the future may generate unexpectedly low returns, may cause us to incur substantial losses, may require unexpected levels of management time, expenditures or other resources, or may otherwise not meet a risk profile that our investors find acceptable.

Previous wording

As of July 30, 2025, the Nursing Home Compare updates have been temporarily paused until October 2025 due to CMS's transition to a cloud-based system for survey data. During this pause, CMS indicated it will validate data integrity and engage in verification of reporting information for meeting quality standards. This impacts existing viewpoint of SNFs because there is no opportunity to provide new data to update scores. Further it increases the chance of audit by CMS if there are potential findings of data integrity or verification issues. Beginning in January 2026, CMS's change to the reporting of its long-stay antipsychotic medication quality measure reflecting both Medicare and Medicaid claims data, as well as Medicare Advantage data. The consequences of this measurement is expected by industry observers to cause an upward shift in reported rates of antipsychotic medication usage, with CMS applying more scrutiny to data within the MDS excluded from this specific measure.

Current wording

As of July 30, 2025, the Nursing Home Compare updates were temporarily paused until October 2025 due to CMS's transition to a cloud-based system for survey data. During this pause, CMS indicated it will validate data integrity and engage in verification of reporting information for meeting quality standards. This impacts existing viewpoint of SNFs because there is no opportunity to provide new data to update scores. Further it increases the chance of audit by CMS if there are potential findings of data integrity or verification issues. Beginning in January 2026, CMS's change to the reporting of its long-stay antipsychotic medication quality measure reflecting both Medicare and Medicaid claims data, as well as Medicare Advantage data. The consequences of this measurement are expected by industry observers to cause an upward shift in reported rates of antipsychotic medication usage, with CMS applying more scrutiny to data within the MDS excluded from this specific measure.

Previous wording

The FY 2027 PPS proposes further changes that may affect our independent subsidiaries' abilities to be more competitive in these rankings in the future. First, the FY 2027 PPS proposes removing two rankings in the FY 2028 SNF QRP; if finalized, such a removal may adversely affect our SNFs that ranked highly and performed well in those categories. Second, the FY 2027 PPS proposes accelerating the timeframe for data submission from 4.5 months to approximately 45 days following the end of a reportable calendar quarter. If this proposal is finalized and implemented, if may increase the costs and administrative requirements to collect, authenticate, and submit such data to CMS, and may make it more difficult, or impose more expense, for our SNFs to maintain high star ratings while complying with these deadlines. Finally, the FY 2027 PPS proposes that SNFs submit MDS data for all SNF residents and patients, and not just those receiving skilled services within the SNF, regardless of payor. This requirement too, if finalized, would create a new obligation for our SNFs that would impose financial and administrative cost, and the collection of more data used in making star ratings under the QRP program may result in the SNFs operated by our independent subsidiaries experiencing reduced ratings, or finding it more difficult or expensive to maintain high ratings under the program's five-star rating measure.

Current wording

The FY 2027 PPS PR proposes further changes that may affect our independent subsidiaries' abilities to be more competitive in these rankings in the future. First, the FY 2027 PPS PR proposes removing two rankings in the FY 2028 SNF QRP; if finalized, such a removal may adversely affect our SNFs that ranked highly and performed well in those categories. Second, the FY 2027 PPS proposes accelerating the timeframe for data submission from 4.5 months to approximately 45 days following the end of a reportable calendar quarter. If this proposal is finalized and implemented, its implementation may increase the costs and administrative requirements to collect, authenticate, and submit such data to CMS, and may make it more difficult, or impose more expense, for our SNFs to maintain high star ratings while complying with these deadlines. Finally, the FY 2027 PPS proposes that SNFs submit MDS data for all SNF residents and patients, and not just those receiving skilled services within the SNF, regardless of payor. This requirement too, if finalized, would create a new obligation for our SNFs that would impose financial and administrative cost, and the collection of more data used in making star ratings under the QRP program may result in the SNFs operated by our independent subsidiaries experiencing reduced ratings, or finding it more difficult or expensive to maintain high ratings under the program's five-star rating measure.

Previous wording

Further, because our self-insurance reimbursements under our general and professional liability and workers compensation programs applies on a per claim basis, there is no limit to the maximum number of claims or the total amount for which we could incur liability in any policy period.

Current wording

Further, because our self-insurance reimbursements under our general and professional liability and workers compensation programs apply on a per claim basis, there is no limit to the maximum number of claims or the total amount for which we could incur liability in any policy period.

Previous wording

Our independent subsidiaries located in Arizona, California, and Texas account for the majority of our total revenue. As a result of this concentration, the conditions of local economies and real estate markets, changes in governmental rules, presence and participation of insurers, regulations and reimbursement rates or criteria, changes in demographics, state funding, natural disasters and acts of nature (such as fires, flooding, hurricanes and tornadoes), and other factors that may result in a decrease in demand and/or reimbursement for skilled nursing services in these states could have a disproportionately adverse effect on our revenue, costs and results of operations. Moreover, since over 22% of our independent subsidiaries are located in California, we are particularly susceptible to revenue loss, cost increase or damage caused by natural disasters such as electrical power shortages, fires, earthquakes or mudslides, or increased liabilities that may arise from regulations as discussed within Item 2., under Government Regulation.

Current wording

Our independent subsidiaries located in Arizona, California, and Texas account for the majority of our total revenue. As a result of this concentration, the conditions of local economies and real estate markets, changes in governmental rules, presence and participation of insurers, regulations and reimbursement rates or criteria, changes in demographics, state funding, natural disasters and acts of nature (such as fires, flooding, hurricanes and tornadoes), and other factors that may result in a decrease in demand and/or reimbursement for skilled nursing services in these states could have a disproportionately adverse effect on our revenue, costs and results of operations.

Previous wording

As of March 31, 2026, our independent subsidiaries operated 254 of our 378 facilities under long term lease arrangements. Most of our leases are triple-net leases, which means that, in addition to rent, we are required to pay for the costs related to the property (including property taxes, insurance, and maintenance and repair costs). We are responsible for paying these costs notwithstanding the fact that some of the benefits associated with paying these costs accrue to the landlords as owners of the associated facilities.

Current wording

As of June 30, 2026, our independent subsidiaries operated 254 of our 396 facilities under long term lease arrangements. Most of our leases are triple-net leases, which means that, in addition to rent, we are required to pay for the costs related to the property (including property taxes, insurance, and maintenance and repair costs). We are responsible for paying these costs notwithstanding the fact that some of the benefits associated with paying these costs accrue to the landlords as owners of the associated facilities.

Previous wording

Each lease provides that the landlord may terminate the lease for a variety of reasons, including the default in any payment of rent, taxes or other payment obligations or the breach of any other covenant or agreement in the lease. Termination of a lease could result in a default under our debt agreements and could adversely affect our business, financial position or results of operations. There can be no assurance that we will be able to comply with all of our obligations under the leases in the future.

Current wording

Each lease provides that the landlord may terminate the lease for a variety of reasons, including the default in any payment of rent, taxes or other payment obligations or the breach of any other covenant or agreement in the lease. Termination of a lease could result in a default under our debt agreements and could adversely affect our business, financial position or results of operations. We may not be able to comply with all of our obligations under the leases in the future.

Previous wording

Our Credit Facility has a borrowing capacity of up to $600.0 million in aggregate principal amount. As of March 31, 2026 and through the filing date of this report, we had no outstanding borrowings under our Credit Facility. Twenty-three of our subsidiaries have mortgage loans insured with the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for an aggregate amount of $142.6 million, which subjects these subsidiaries to HUD oversight and periodic inspections. The terms of the mortgage loans range from 25- to 35-years. We also have one outstanding promissory note with an aggregate principal amount of approximately $0.7 million as of March 31, 2026. The term of the note is 12 years.

Current wording

Our Credit Facility has a borrowing capacity of up to $600.0 million in aggregate principal amount. As of June 30, 2026 and through the filing date of this report, we had no outstanding borrowings under our Credit Facility. Twenty-three of our subsidiaries have mortgage loans insured with the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for an aggregate amount of $141.7 million, which subjects these subsidiaries to HUD oversight and periodic inspections. The terms of the mortgage loans range from 25- to 35-years. We also have one outstanding promissory note with an aggregate principal amount of approximately $0.6 million as of June 30, 2026. The term of the note is 12 years.

Previous wording

As of March 31, 2026, we lease 36 of our properties to third-party operators. In the future, we might expand our leasing property portfolio to additional tenants. We have very limited control over the success or failure of our tenants’ and operators’ businesses and, at any time, a tenant or operator may experience a downturn in its business that weakens its financial condition. If that happens, the tenant or operator may fail to make its payments to us when due. Although our lease agreements give us the right to exercise certain remedies in the event of default on the obligations owing to us, we may determine not to do so if we believe that enforcement of our rights would be more detrimental to our business than seeking alternative approaches.

Current wording

As of June 30, 2026, we lease 39 of our properties to third-party operators. In the future, we might expand our leasing property portfolio to additional tenants. We have very limited control over the success or failure of our tenants’ and operators’ businesses and, at any time, a tenant or operator may experience a downturn in its business that weakens its financial condition. If that happens, the tenant or operator may fail to make its payments to us when due. Although our lease agreements give us the right to exercise certain remedies in the event of default on the obligations owing to us, we may determine not to do so if we believe that enforcement of our rights would be more detrimental to our business than seeking alternative approaches.

Previous wording

Investments in and acquisitions of healthcare properties entail risks associated with real estate investments generally, including risks that the investment will not achieve expected returns, that the cost estimates for necessary property improvements will prove inaccurate or that the tenant or operator will fail to meet performance expectations. Income from properties and yields from investments in our properties may be affected by many factors, including changes in governmental regulation (such as licensing and government payment), general or local economic conditions (such as fluctuations in interest rates, senior savings, and employment conditions), the available local supply of and demand for improved real estate, a reduction in rental income as the result of an inability to maintain occupancy levels, natural disasters (such as hurricanes, earthquakes and floods) or similar factors. Furthermore, healthcare properties are often highly customized, and the development or redevelopment of such properties may require costly tenant-specific improvements. As a result, we cannot assure you that we will achieve the economic benefit we expect from acquisition or investment opportunities.

Current wording

Investments in and acquisitions of healthcare properties entail risks associated with real estate investments generally, including risks that the investment will not achieve expected returns, that the cost estimates for necessary property improvements will prove inaccurate or that the tenant or operator will fail to meet performance expectations. Income from properties and yields from investments in our properties may be affected by many factors, including changes in governmental regulation (such as licensing and government payment), general or local economic conditions (such as fluctuations in interest rates, senior savings, and employment conditions), the available local supply of and demand for improved real estate, a reduction in rental income as the result of an inability to maintain occupancy levels, natural disasters (such as hurricanes, earthquakes and floods) or similar factors. Furthermore, healthcare properties are often highly customized, and the development or redevelopment of such properties may require costly tenant-specific improvements. As a result, we may not achieve the economic benefit we expect from acquisition or investment opportunities.

Previous wording

No prediction can be made regarding whether new legislation or regulation (including new tax measures) will be enacted by legislative bodies or governmental agencies, nor can we predict what consequences would result from this legislation or regulation. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that the currently anticipated tax treatment of an investment will not be modified by legislative, judicial or administrative changes, possibly with retroactive effect.

Current wording

No prediction can be made regarding whether new legislation or regulation (including new tax measures) will be enacted by legislative bodies or governmental agencies, nor can we predict what consequences would result from this legislation or regulation. Accordingly, in the future, the currently anticipated tax treatment of an investment may be modified by legislative, judicial or administrative changes, possibly with retroactive effect.