FIRST BANCORP PR
For the period ended Dec 31, 2024. Filed Feb 28, 2025.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.
FY2024 · Filed Feb 28, 2025
Extracted filing text, with the paragraph anchors used by the comparison.
See the whole filing, with its images and exhibitsContents
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Below
is a
about material
risks
and
uncertainties that
could
impact
results
and financial condition,
including by causing
actual results to differ
materially from those projected
in any forward-
looking statements. Other risks
and uncertainties, including those
not currently known to the
Corporation or its management and
those
that
the
or
its management
deems
to
be
immaterial,
could
also
affect
in
future periods. Thus, the following
should not be considered a complete
discussion of all of the risks and
uncertainties the Corporation
may face. See the discussion under “Forward-Looking Statements,” in
this Form 10-K.
THE BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT AND OUR INDUSTRY
The
effect
of
changes
in
the
rate
and
levels
on
the
level,
and
of
the
corresponding effects
on the
income, net
interest margin,
loan
originations, deposit attrition, overall results of operations, and liquidity
position.
income is
the difference
between the
amounts received
by us
on our
interest-earning assets
and the
interest paid
by us
on our interest-bearing
liabilities. Differences in the
repricing structure of
our assets and liabilities may
result in changes in our
profits
when interest rates change. For instance,
lower interest rates for prolonged periods
tend to compress the net interest margin
and reduce
profitability.
higher
rates
the
cost
of
and
other
loans
to
and
and
may
reduce demand
for such loans,
which may
negatively impact
our profits
by reducing
the amount of
interest income due
to declines
in
volume.
This happens
because
the
in
income
from
loans
and
is greater
than
the reduction
in
expense
on
Competitive
pressures
among
banks
to
attract
often
lead
to
higher
due
to
reliance
on
wholesale
further
squeezing
the
net
margin,
even
though
there
is
demand
for
loans.
rates
are
highly
to
many
factors
that
are
beyond
our
general
inflationary
trends,
changes
in
spending
and
debt
and
of
various
and
regulatory agencies, in particular, the
Federal Reserve Board.
basis risk is
the risk of
adverse consequences resulting
from unequal changes
in the difference,
also referred to
as the
“spread” or
basis, between
the rates
for two
or more
instruments with
maturity and
occurs when
market rates
for
different financial
instruments or
the indices
used to
price assets and
liabilities change
at different
times or
by different
amounts. For
example, the interest expense
for liability instruments might
not change by the
same amount as interest income
received from loans
or
investments.
To
the
extent
that
the
rates
on
loans
and
change
at
rates
and
by
the
margin between
our variable rate-based
assets and the cost
of the interest-bearing
liabilities might be
compressed and adversely
affect
net interest income.
Also,
changes
in
rates
may
impact
the
ability
to
attract
and
retain
clients,
as
well
as
gain
acceptance
from
current
and
for
new
and
and
This,
in
turn,
affects
demand
for
new
loan
originations,
the
of the
assets, and
of any
re-shifting between
and interest-
bearing liabilities.
our fixed-rate
securities. Any
unrealized gains
or losses
from
these portfolios
impact other
comprehensive income,
stockholders’ equity,
and the
equity ratio.
Any realized
gains
or losses from these portfolios impact regulatory capital ratios.
Changes in prepayments may adversely affect net interest income.
Net
income
could
also
be
by
of
MBS.
when
rates
rise,
of
and
will
decrease,
and
the
duration
of
MBS
will
increase.
when
rates
fall,
of
and
interest will
and
the duration
of MBS
will decrease.
Such acceleration
in the
of MBS
would
lower yields
on
these
as
the
of
paid
upon
the
of
these
would
accelerate.
acceleration in
the prepayments
of MBS
would increase
yields on
securities purchased
at a
discount, as
the accretion
of the
would
accelerate.
Also,
net
income
in
future
periods
might
be
by
our
in
callable
because
decreases in interest rates might prompt the early redemption of such securities.
The
in
the
which
could
result
in,
among
other
things,
bank
deposit
runoffs,
constraints, and increased regulatory requirements and costs.
The
closure
and
placement
into receivership
with
the
FDIC of
certain
large
U.S.
banks
with
assets over
$100
billion
in
March
and
May
2023,
and
adverse
developments
other
banks,
in
heightened
levels
of
market
and
consequently
negatively
confidence
in
the
safety
and
of
institutions.
These
developments
resulted in certain
regional banks experiencing
higher than normal
deposit outflows and
an elevated level
of competition for
deposits in the
market. The impact
of market volatility
from adverse developments
in the banking
industry such as
this one are highly
uncertain and difficult to predict.
In
the
aftermath
of
these
bank
failures,
the
banking
have
and
costs
that
may
impact
capital
ratios
or
the
FDIC
deposit
premium.
For
in
2023,
the
FDIC
issued
a
final
rule
to
impose
a
special
assessment to recover certain
estimated losses to the Deposit
Insurance Fund (“DIF”) arising
from the closures of Silicon
Valley
Bank
and
Signature
Bank.
The
losses
will
be
recovered
through
special
assessments
from
certain
insured
and
collection began
during
the quarter
ended June
30,
during
ended
31,
and
2023,
the
charges
of
$1.1
million
and
$6.3
in
the
part of
“FDIC deposit
insurance”
expenses. As
total
FDIC
special
to
$7.4
of
which
$2.4
million
has
been
paid.
The
to
monitor the FDIC’s estimated loss to the DIF,
which could affect the amount of its accrued liability.
Difficult market
and general
economic conditions
have affected
industry in
the past
us
in the future.
Given that most of our business is in Puerto Rico and the
U.S. and given the degree of interrelation between
Puerto Rico’s economy
of the
U.S., we
are exposed
to downturns
in the
U.S. economy,
including factors
such as
employment levels
in the
real
estate
valuations.
The
of
these
has
us
in
the
past
and
in
the
future
could
affect
the
credit
of
loans,
and
result
in
write-downs
of
asset
values
by
including U.S. government-sponsored entities (“GSEs”)
as well as major commercial banks and investment banks.
In particular, we may face the following
risks:
Our ability
to assess the
creditworthiness of
may be impaired
if the models
and approaches
we use to
select,
manage, and underwrite the loans become less predictive of future behaviors.
The
models
used
to
losses
in
the
credit
those
under
CECL,
require
difficult,
subjective, and
complex judgments,
including forecasts
how these
economic predictions
might
impair
the
ability
of
the borrowers
to
repay
their
may
no longer
be
accurately estimated
and
which
may,
in
turn, impact the reliability of the models.
Our
ability
to
borrow
from
other
or
to
engage
in
sales
of
loans
to
third
parties
loan
with
GSEs
and
agreements)
on
terms,
or
at
all,
could
be
by
further
disruptions
in
the
capital
or
credit
markets
or
other
events,
deteriorating
Competitive dynamics
in the
industry could
change as
of strategic
growth opportunities
in connection
with current
market conditions.
future
of
our
may
our
costs
and
limit
our
ability
to
pursue
opportunities.
There may be downward pressure on our stock price.
Any deterioration
conditions in
and disruptions
in the
financial markets
access capital,
our business,
financial condition,
and results
of operations.
Unfavorable or
uncertain economic
and market
have
been
and
could
cause
in
growth,
or
or
confidence;
on
the
availability or
increases in
the cost
and capital;
increases in inflation
or interest rates;
high unemployment;
natural disasters;
epidemics and pandemics; or a combination of these or other factors.
the
loan
is
by
home
values
and
has
historically
been
cyclical,
enjoying periods of strong growth and profitability followed by periods of
shrinking volumes and industry-wide losses. During periods
of rising
interest rates,
the series
of interest
rate increases
occurred, the
refinancing
of many
tends to decrease as the economic incentives for borrowers to refinance their
existing mortgage loans are reduced.
Any sustained
period of
increased delinquencies,
foreclosures, or
losses could
to sell
loans, the
prices
we receive
for loans,
the values
of mortgage
for sale,
or residual
interests in
securitizations, which
affect
our
and
results
of
In
any
decline
in
real
estate
values
would
further
weaken the loan-to-value
ratios and increase
the possibility of
loss if a
borrower defaults. In
such event, we
will be subject
to the risk
of loss on such real estate arising from borrower defaults to the extent not covered
by third-party credit enhancements.
We operate in a highly
competitive industry and market area.
We
face
competition
in
all
areas
of
our
from
a
variety
of
competitors,
other
banks,
banking
small
loan
automobile
leasing
brokerage
firms
with
retail
credit
unions,
certain
retailers,
fintech
and
digital
The
ability
to
compete
depends
on
the
relative
of
its
the
degree
to
which
the
of
its
appeal
to
and
the
extent
to
which
the
meets
clients’
needs
and
The
ability
to
compete also depends on its ability to attract and retain professional and other
personnel, and on its reputation.
The
encounters
intense competition
in attracting
and
and
in
its consumer
and
lending
activities. The
competes for
other financial
institutions.
originate loans
depends
primarily on the rates and
fees charged and the
service it provides to its borrowers
in making prompt credit
decisions. There can be
no
assurance that
in the
future the
be able
to increase
its deposit
base, originate
or on
the terms
on
which it has done so in the past, or otherwise compete effectively.
credit quality and
the value of the
portfolio of Puerto
Rico government securities
has been, and
in the future
may
be,
by
Puerto
and
may
be
by
actions
taken
by
the
Puerto
Rico
government or the PROMESA oversight board to address the ongoing fiscal and
economic challenges in Puerto Rico.
A significant portion
of our business activities and
credit exposure is concentrated
in Puerto Rico, which
has faced prolonged
fiscal
challenges
and
debt
efforts
over
the
past
decades.
While
Puerto
economy
showed
growth
in
fiscal
year
2023,
driven
by
and
capital
future
prospects
remain
uncertain.
The
Puerto
Rico
Board (“PRPB”) projected
a real gross national
product (“GNP”) growth
of 0.7% for
fiscal year 2023,
the third consecutive
year with
a positive year-over-year variance.
In addition, the
2024 Fiscal Plan
for Puerto Rico
(the “2024 Fiscal
Plan”) certified by
the PROMESA oversight
board, projects the
GNP
growth
to
be
1.0%
of
in
fiscal
year
2024,
by
of
0.8%
and
0.1%
in
fiscal
year
and
fiscal
year
2026,
reflecting the temporary nature of federal stimulus inflows and structural challenges
in the local economy.
The
fiscal
and
reforms
outlined
in
the
Fiscal
Plan,
infrastructure
tax
reforms,
and
energy
modernization,
aim to
promote
sustainable
growth. However,
delays in
implementing these
reforms or
inefficiencies
execution
could negatively
local economy
and, by
extension,
our business.
while federal
disaster relief
and
COVID-19
aid
have
activity,
these
funds
are
finite,
and
their
gradual
depletion
could
expose
economic weaknesses.
2024,
the Corporation had $288.6
million of direct exposure
to the Puerto Rico government,
its municipalities
and public corporations. As of December 31, 2024, approximately
$195.8 million of the exposure consisted of loans and obligations
of
municipalities in Puerto
Rico that are supported
by assigned property
tax revenues and
for which, in most
cases, the good
faith, credit
and unlimited taxing
power of the applicable
municipality have been
pledged to their
repayment, and $51.1
million consisted of loans
and obligations which
are supported by one
or more specific sources
of municipal revenues. The
municipalities are required
by law to
levy
special
taxes
in
such
amounts
as
are
for
the
payment
of
all
of
their
general
bonds
and
notes. In
municipalities, the
total direct
exposure also
included $8.8
a loan
extended to
an affiliate
of PREPA,
$30.0
million
in
loans
to
public
corporations
of
the
Puerto
Rico
and
of
the
Puerto
Rico
a
MBS issued
by
the PR
Housing
Finance
at
an
cost
of
$2.9
million as part of its available-for-sale debt securities portfolio (fair value
of $1.6 million as of December 31, 2024).
Also,
as
of
31,
2024,
the
balance
of
loans
funded
through
conduit
to
of Low-Income
Housing Tax
Credit (“LIHTC”)
Community Development
Block Grant-
Disaster Recovery (“CDBG-DR”) funding
amounted to $59.2 million. The main
objective of these programs is to spur development
in
new or rehabilitated and affordable
rental housing. PRHFA,
as program subrecipient and conduct
issuer, issues tax-exempt
which
are
by
private
and
are
to
co-underwrite
with
PRHFA
a
mirror
loan
agreement for the specific
project loan to which
the Corporation will serve
as ultimate lender but
where the PRHFA
will be the lender
of
record.
In
as
of
31,
2024,
the
had
$72.5
million
in
to
loans
guaranteed by the PRHFA.
The Corporation operates in various jurisdictions highly dependent
on federal funding programs. On January 27, 2025, the Office
of
and
Budget
(“OMB”)
issued
Memorandum
M-25-13
“Temporary
Pause
of
Agency
Grant,
Loan,
and
Other
Financial Assistance
Programs.” The
Memo directed
every federal
agency to
“temporarily pause all
activities related
to obligation
or
disbursement
of
all
federal
assistance,
and
other
agency
that
may
be
implicated
by
orders,
including, but not
limited to, financial
assistance for foreign
aid, nongovernmental organizations,
DEI, woke gender
ideology,
and the
green
new
deal.”
Lawsuits
challenging
the
pause
were
filed
and
on
January
28,
2025,
the
U.S.
District
Court
for
the
District of
Columbia
enjoined
the
Trump
from
OMB Memorandum
M-25-13
for
disbursements
under
open
awards.
On
January
29,
2025,
OMB
rescinded
the
Memo,
however,
the
that
it
would
still
pursue
a
spending
freeze. It
is uncertain
at
this time
will issue
any
new or
directives
to the
review and/or pause of federal financial assistance in the future, but any such directives
could have a negative effect on our business.
Instability
in
delays
in
the
receipt
of
relief
funds
allocated
to
Puerto
Rico
or
any
or
permanent
pause on
any federal
funds,
and the
potential impact
on asset
values resulting
from past
or future
natural disaster
events,
when added
ongoing fiscal
challenges, could
materially adversely
condition, liquidity,
results of operations and capital position.
A
in
in
the
U.S.
Virgin
Islands
and
British
Virgin
Islands
could
harm
our
results
of
The Corporation has exposure to the USVI and BVI economies,
which remain susceptible to fiscal challenges, natural disasters,
and
reliance on
federal disaster
relief and
recovery funding.
While the
USVI has
shown economic
recovery in
recent years,
persist,
the
pace
of
federal
fund
disbursements,
the
of
public
finances,
and
the
for
legislative actions impacting its debt obligations.
As of
$100.4 million
and $90.5
in loans
to USVI
public
all
of
which
were
as
of
that
date.
a
downturn
in
the
USVI
and
BVI
economies,
delays
in
government funding,
or legal
or regulatory
changes affecting
their financial
stability could
negatively impact
asset
quality, credit performance,
and overall financial condition.
We are subject to ESG risks that
could adversely affect our reputation and the market price of our securities.
the
current
U.S.
administration’s
may
reduce
ESG
burdens,
stakeholder
expectations are not uniform,
and both opponents and proponents
of various ESG-related matters
have increasingly resulted in
a range
of
activism
to
advocate
for
their
positions.
For
in
the
last
several
years,
certain
state
attorneys
treasurers,
and
legislators have
taken various
actions to
extent to which
ESG principles
by financial
to require
or prohibit
the consideration
of various
ESG matters
in certain
contexts. While
anti-ESG sentiment
has gained
momentum
across the
United States,
there is
continued focus
by investors
and certain
other stakeholders
on the
ESG practices
of publicly
traded
like
us,
that
has
or
may
in
the
future
include
expanding
mandatory
and
voluntary
diligence,
and
on
topics
such
as
climate
change,
human
labor
and
risk
oversight,
and
could
expand
the
nature,
scope,
and
complexity
of
matters
that
we
are
to
assess
and
report.
These
would
likely
result
in
increased ESG-
related compliance costs, which could
result in increases to our overall operational
costs. Failure to adapt to or
comply with regulatory
requirements or
investor or stakeholder
expectations and standards
could negatively impact
our reputation,
ability to do
business with
certain partners, and our stock price.
For
we
may
be
exposed
to
publicity
based
on
the
identity
and
of
those
to
whom
we
lend
and
with
otherwise do
business and
the public’s
view of
the approach
and performance
of our
customers and
business partners
with
respect
to ESG matters.
Any
such
publicity
could
arise
from
adverse
news
in
media
and
could
also
spread
through
the
use
of
social
media
The
and
reputation
with
its
and
and
third
parties
with
which
we
do
could
be
damaged
if
we
were
to
become
the
subject
of
any
such
publicity. This,
in turn,
could have
an adverse
effect
on
to
attract
and retain
and
have
a
negative impact
on our
we could
be criticized
by ESG
detractors
for the scope
or nature of
our ESG initiatives
or policies or
for any revisions
to these policies.
We
could also be
subjected to
responses by
governmental actors (such
as anti-ESG legislation
or retaliatory legislative
treatment) or consumers
(such as boycotts
or
negative publicity campaigns) that could adversely affect our reputation,
results of operations and financial condition.
Our results
adversely affected
by natural
disasters,
public health
crises, political
crises, negative
global
climate patterns or other catastrophic events.
Natural disasters,
whose nature
and severity
may be
impacted by
climate change,
such as
hurricanes,
floods, extreme
cold events
adverse weather
conditions; public
health crises;
political crises,
such as
terrorist
attacks, war,
labor unrest,
other political
instability,
trade policies,
tariffs and
sanctions, including
the repercussions
of the ongoing
conflict in
Ukraine, the
ongoing conflict in
the Middle
East, and
expansion of
such conflicts
to surrounding
areas and
potential geopolitical
consequences; negative
global climate
patterns, especially
in water
stressed regions;
catastrophic events,
such as
fires or
other disasters
occurring at
our locations,
whether occurring
U.S., or
internationally,
could cause
on the
economy
and disrupt
our operations.
Certain areas
our business
is concentrated,
including Puerto
the USVI,
are particularly
susceptible
to
earthquakes,
hurricanes,
and
major
storms.
climate
change
may
both
the
frequency
and
of
extreme weather conditions and natural
disasters, which may affect our
business operations, either in a particular region
or globally,
as
well as the activities
of our customers.
is also not able
to predict the
positive or negative
effects that future
events or
changes to the U.S. or global economy,
financial markets, or regulatory and business environment could have on our operations.
Climate
change,
and
efforts
to
its
effects,
may
affect
the
Corporation's
and
Concerns over
the long-term effects
of climate change
have led and
will continue to
lead to governmental
efforts around
the world
to
those
impacts.
Consumers
and
also
may
change
their behavior
as a
result
of
these
concerns.
The
and
its
will
need
to
respond
to
new
laws
and
as
well
as
and
preferences
from
climate
change
concerns.
The
and
its
may
face
cost
increases,
asset
value
reductions
and
operating process
changes. The
impact on
will likely
vary depending
on their
specific attributes,
including reliance
on
our
role in
fossil fuel
activities. Among
the impacts
to the
we could
face reductions
in creditworthiness
on the
part
of
some customers
or in
the value
of assets
securing loans.
efforts to
take these
risks into
account in
making lending
and
other
our
with
climate-responsible
may
not
be
in
protecting
the
Corporation from the negative impact of new laws and regulations or changes in
consumer or business behavior.
Deterioration in collateral values may result in additional losses.
Our business is affected by the value of the assets securing our loans or underlying
our investments.
We
had a
in the
$6.2 billion
as of
Due to
their nature,
entail a
higher credit
risk than
consumer and
loans, since
they are larger
in size,
concentrate
more
risk
in
a
single
and
are
more
to
downturns.
in
the
case
of
a
slowdown
in the
market,
it may
be difficult
to dispose
of the
securing
upon any
of the
properties. We
may incur losses over the near term, either because of continued
deterioration in the quality of loans or because of sales
of
problem
loans,
which
would
likely
accelerate
the
of
losses. Any
such
losses
could
impact
our
overall
financial performance and results of operations.
Deterioration
of
the
value
of
real
estate
securing
our
and
loan
whether
located
in
or elsewhere,
would result
in increased
Whether the
collateral that
underlies our
loans is
located in
Puerto
Rico, the USVI,
the BVI, or the
U.S. mainland, the performance
of our loan portfolio
and the collateral value
backing the transactions
are dependent upon the performance
of, and conditions within, each
specific real estate market. As
of December 31, 2024, $2.8
billion
of our commercial and construction loan portfolio held for investment,
or 22% of the total loan portfolio held for investment, consisted
of commercial mortgage and construction loans, of which $2.0 billion
was in the Puerto Rico region.
We
measure credit
collateral dependent
loans based
on the
of the
collateral, which
obtained from
appraisals, adjusted
for undiscounted
selling costs
as appropriate.
Updated appraisals
are obtained
when we
and
are
updated
thereafter.
In
appraisals
are
also
obtained
for
certain
loans on a spot
basis based on specific
characteristics, such as delinquency
levels, and age of
the appraisal. The appraised
collateral may decrease, or we may
not be able to recover collateral at
its appraised value. A significant decline
in collateral valuations
for
loans
has
and,
in
the
future,
may
require,
in
our
credit
loss
expense
on
loans. Any
such
increase would have an adverse effect on our future financial condition
Labor shortages and constraints in the supply chain could adversely affect
our clients’ operations as well as our operations.
Many
sectors in
Puerto
United
States, the
Virgin
Islands and
around
the world
are experiencing
a shortage
of workers.
Many of our commercial clients have
been impacted by this shortage along with
disruptions and constraints in the supply
chain, which
could
impact
their
and
could
lead
to
reduced
cash
flow
and
in
making
loan
repayments.
The
has
also
been
by
the
shortage
of
workers,
as
well
as
wages
for
entry
level
and
certain
professional roles. This may
lead to open positions remaining
unfilled for longer periods of time,
which may affect the level
of service
provided by the Corporation, or a need to increase wages to attract workers.
The failure of other financial institutions could adversely affect
us.
Our ability to engage in
routine financing transactions could
be adversely affected
by future failures of financial
institutions and the
actions and
commercial soundness
financial institutions.
Financial institutions
are interrelated
of trading,
clearing,
and
other relationships.
We
have
to different
industries
and
and
routinely
execute
with counterparties
in the financial
services industry,
including brokers
and dealers,
commercial banks,
investment banks,
companies and other
institutional clients. In
certain of these transactions,
we are required to
post collateral to secure
the obligations to
the
counterparties.
In the
event
of
a bankruptcy
or
insolvency
proceeding
one of
such counterparties,
we
may
experience
delays in recovering
the assets posted as
collateral, or we
may incur a
loss to the extent
that the counterparty
was holding collateral
in
excess of the obligation to such counterparty or under other circumstances.
In addition, many of these transactions
expose us to credit risk in
the event of a default by our
counterparty or client. The credit
risk
may be exacerbated when
the collateral held by us cannot
be realized or is liquidated
at prices not sufficient
to recover the full amount
of the loan
or derivative
exposure due to
us. Any losses
resulting from
our routine funding
transactions may
materially and adversely
affect our financial condition and results of operations.
THE CORPORATION’S
Certain funding sources may not be available to us, and our funding sources may
prove insufficient and/or costly to replace.
relies
on
the
of
CDs,
and
from
the
FHLB
of
New
York
to
maintain its lending
activities and to replace
certain maturing liabilities.
2024, we had $478.1
million in brokered
CDs outstanding, representing approximately 3% of
our total deposits. Approximately $226.1 million, or 47%
in brokered CDs mature
over the twelve months
ending December 31, 2025, and
the average remaining term to
maturity of the brokered CDs outstanding
as of
December 31, 2024 was approximately 1.5
years.
None of these brokered CDs are callable at the Corporation’s
option. In addition, the
$500.0 million
of long-term
FHLB advances
outstanding as
with an
average remaining
term
to maturity of 1.48 years.
Although FirstBank has historically been
able to replace maturing deposits and
advances, we may not be able
to replace these funds
in the future if our financial condition or general market
conditions change. If we are unable to maintain access to funding
sources, our
results of operations and liquidity would be adversely affected.
Alternate
sources
of
funding
may
carry
higher
costs
than
sources
utilized.
If
we
are
to
rely
heavily
on
more
expensive funding sources, profitability would be adversely affected.
We
may
to
seek
debt
in
the
future
to
achieve
our
objectives.
if
sought, may not be available to us, or if available, may
not be on acceptable terms. The availability of additional
financing will depend
on
a
variety
of
such
as
market
the
general
availability
of
credit,
our
credit
ratings
and
our
credit
capacity.
In
FirstBank may seek to sell loans as an additional source of liquidity.
If additional financing sources are unavailable or are not
available on acceptable terms, our profitability and future prospects could
be adversely affected.
Downgrades in our credit ratings could further increase the cost of borrowing
funds.
The
access new
non-deposit
funding
by downgrades
in our
credit
ratings. The Corporation’s
liquidity is to a
certain extent contingent upon
its ability to obtain
external sources of funding
to finance its
operations. The
current credit
ratings and
any downgrades
in such
can hinder
access to
new
forms
of
funding
and/or
cause
funding
to
be
more
expensive,
which
could
in
turn
affect
results
of
We depend on
cash dividends from FirstBank to meet our cash obligations.
As a holding company,
dividends from FirstBank, our banking subsidiary,
have provided a substantial portion of our cash flow used
to
service
the
on
our
TRuPs
and
other
obligations.
is
limited
by
law
in
its
ability
to
make
to us
its earnings
and
capital position.
A failure
by
to generate
cash
flow to make dividend payments to us may have a negative impact on our results of
operations and financial condition.
Our level of non-performing assets may adversely affect our future results of
Although non-performing
assets decreased by
$7.6 million to $118.3
31, 2024, or 6%,
from $125.9 million
as of
31,
2023,
we continue
to
have
a
amount
of
loans.
If
we
are
unable
to
the
quality of our loan portfolio, our financial condition and results of operations
may be materially and adversely affected.
Our
ACL
may
not
be
to
cover
actual
losses,
and
we
may
be
to
our
ACL,
which
may
adversely affect our capital ratios, financial condition and results of
We are subject, among
other things, to the risk of loss from loan defaults and
foreclosures with respect to the loans we originate and
purchase. We
recognize periodic
expenses on
leads to
reductions in
our income
from operations,
to
our ACL
on loans
at a
level that
our management
deems to
be appropriate
an assessment
of the
quality
of the
loan and lease portfolios.
Management may fail to
accurately estimate the level of
credit losses or may
have to increase our
expense
on
the
future as
a
result
of
new
loans,
future
in
loans
beyond
what
was
forecasted,
actions
and
loan
modifications,
changes
in
current
and
and
other
or
for
other
reasons
beyond
our
control.
In
the
bank
review
the
of
our
ACL
on
loans
and
may
require
an
in
the
credit
loss
expense
on
loans
or
the
of
classified loans and loan charge-offs, based on
judgments that differ from those of management.
The level
of the
ACL reflects
estimates based
upon various
assumptions and
judgments as
to specific
credit risks;
industry concentrations;
loan loss
experience; current
quality; present
economic, political
unidentified
losses inherent
in the
current
and supportable
forecasts. The
of
the
level
of
the
ACL
on
loans
a
high
degree
of
subjectivity
and
to
make
significant estimates and judgments
regarding current credit risks
and future trends, all
of which may undergo
material changes. If our
prove
to
be
incorrect,
our
ACL
on
loans
may
not
be
to
cover
losses
in
our
loan
and
our
credit
loss
expense on loans could increase substantially.
In addition, any increases in our credit loss expense on
loans or any loan losses in excess of our ACL on loans could have a material
adverse effect on our future capital ratios, financial condition
The Corporation’s force-placed
insurance policies could be disputed by the customer.
maintains force-placed
insurance policies
been put
into place
when a
insurance policy
on a
property has been canceled,
lapsed or was deemed
insufficient and the
borrower did not
secure a replacement policy.
A borrower may
make a
claim against
under such
force-placed
insurance policy,
and the
failure of
to resolve
such a
claim
to
the
satisfaction
may
result
in
a
dispute
between
the
and
the
which
if
not
resolved, could have an adverse effect on the Corporation.
Defective and repurchased loans may harm our business and financial condition.
In
with
the
sale
and
of
loans,
we
are
to
make
a
variety
of
customary
representations
and
warranties relating
to the
loans sold
or securitized.
Our obligations
to these
representations and
warranties are
for
the
life
of
the
loan,
and
relate
to,
among
other
things,
the
(i)
with
laws
and
regulations;
(ii)
standards;
(iii)
the
of
in
the
loan
documents
and
loan
files;
and
(iv)
the
and
enforceability of the loan.
A loan that
does not comply
with the representations
and warranties made
may take longer
to sell, may impact
our ability to obtain
for
the
loan,
and
may
not
be
saleable
or
may
be
saleable
only
at
a
discount.
If
such a
loan
is
sold
before
we
detect
non-compliance,
we
may
be
to repurchase
the
loan
and
bear
any
loss directly,
or
we
may
be
to
indemnify
the purchaser
against
any
loss,
either
of
which
could
reduce
our cash
for
and
that
it has
to
ensure
that
loans
are
in
with
the
market’s
requirements, but certain employees may make mistakes or may deliberately
violate our lending policies.
Our controls and procedures
may fail or be circumvented,
our risk management policies and
procedures may be inadequate
and
operational risks could adversely affect our consolidated
We
may fail to
identify and manage
risks related to a
variety of aspects
of our business, including,
but not limited
to, liquidity risk;
risk; market
risk; credit
risk; operational
risk; legal,
regulatory and
compliance risk;
reputational risk;
model risk;
capital
risk;
risk;
and
and cybersecurity
risk.
We
have
adopted
and
improve
various
systems to
monitor
and
manage risk.
Any improvements
to our
and
however,
may not
be adequate
to identify
and manage
the risks in
our various
businesses. If
our risk
framework is
ineffective,
either
because it fails to
keep pace with changes
in the financial markets
or our businesses or
for other reasons,
we could incur losses,
suffer
reputational damage, or find ourselves out of compliance with applicable
regulatory mandates or expectations.
We may also be
subject to disruptions from external events, such as natural disasters and
cyber-attacks, which could cause delays or
disruptions
to
functions,
and
market
settlement
In
our
vendors
and
could
suffer
from
such
events.
Should
these
events
affect
us,
or
the
vendors
or
counterparties with
conduct business,
our consolidated
operations could
be negatively
affected. When
we record
balance
sheet
reserves
for
loss
related
to
losses,
we
may
be
unable
to
our
and
any
reserves
we
establish
to
cover
losses
may
not
be
to
cover
our
actual
exposure, which
may have
impact on
our consolidated
operations or
for the
periods in
which
we recognize the losses.
Our failure to attract and retain a qualified workforce could harm our overall business
success depends,
in large
part, on its
ability to attract
and retain
skilled, experienced personnel.
Competition for
candidates
in
the
and
markets
that
the
and
serves
is
intense,
and
while
the
invests significantly
in the training
and development of
its employees,
it may not
be able to
hire people or
to retain them.
high inflation
has impacted
both cost
structure and
employee demand
for wage
growth, which
may lead
to sustained
higher turnover
rates.
If
the
is
unable
to
retain
its
most
its
and
positioning
could
be
materially adversely affected.
Our businesses may be adversely affected by litigation.
We
have, in
the past,
been party
to claims
and legal
actions by
our customers,
or subject
to regulatory
supervisory actions
by the
government on
behalf of
customers, relating
to our
performance of
fiduciary or
contractual responsibilities.
In the
past, we
have also
been
subject
to
class
action
by
our
and
we
have
also
faced
employment
lawsuits
and
other
legal
claims. In
any future
claims or
actions, demands
for substantial
monetary damages
may be
asserted against
us, resulting
in financial
or
an
adverse
effect
on
our
reputation
among
or
on
demand
for
our
and
A
class
action
suit
against
us
in
the
future
could
result
in
costs,
and
the
diversion
of
attention
and
resources.
We
may
be
unable
to
our
to
risk
when
we
record
balance
sheet
reserves for probable loss contingencies.
As a result, reserves we establish to
cover any settlements or judgments may
not be sufficient
to
cover
our
actual
which
has
in
the
past
and
may
occur
in
the
future,
in
a
adverse
impact on our consolidated results of operations or financial condition.
In
the
course
of
our
we
are
also
subject
to
various
regulatory,
and
law
inquiries,
investigations and
subpoenas. These
may be
directed generally
to participants
in the
businesses in
are involved
or may
be
specifically directed
at us. In
regulatory enforcement
matters, claims for
disgorgement, the
imposition of penalties
and the imposition
of other remedial sanctions are possible.
The resolution
of legal
actions or
regulatory matters,
when unfavorable,
has had,
in the
future have,
adverse
effect on our consolidated results of operations for
the quarter in which such actions or matters are resolved or a reserve is established.
Our businesses may be negatively affected by adverse publicity or
other reputational harm.
Our relationships
with many of
are predicated upon
as a fiduciary
and a service
provider that adheres
to
the
highest
of
ethics,
service
quality
and
compliance.
Adverse
publicity,
actions,
litigation,
operational failures, the failure to meet customer expectations and other
issues with respect to one or more of our businesses, including
FirstBank as our banking
subsidiary, could
materially and adversely affect
our reputation, or our ability
to attract and retain customers
or obtain
funding for
businesses. Preserving
and enhancing
also depends
on maintaining
systems and procedures that
address known risks and regulatory
requirements, as well as our
ability to identify and mitigate
risks
that
arise
due
to
changes
in
our
the
market
places
in
which
we
operate,
the
and
If we
fail to
promptly address
matters that
bear on
our reputation,
may be
materially adversely
and our business may suffer.
Any impairment of our goodwill or other intangible assets may adversely affect
our operating results.
We
review
for
and
assess
other
assets
periodically.
If
or
other
are
to
be
impaired,
we
may
be
to
record
a
charge
to
earnings.
Impairment
risk
factors
include
in
of
the
unit,
declining
market
of
the
or
comparable
and
adverse
impacting
cash
flows.
During
the
fourth
quarter
of
2024,
a
determined that the fair value of our reporting units exceeded their
carrying value; therefore, no quantitative impairment was recorded.
As
of
31,
2024,
our
book
value
was
$38.6
all
at
Future
impairments
could
reduce
and
affect
ability
to
pay
to
the
subject
to
approval.
While
a
goodwill impairment would not impact our tangible book value or regulatory
capital, it could reduce reported earnings.
Recognition of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable
income by the Bank.
As
of
31,
2024,
the
had
a
tax
asset
of
$136.4
million
(net
of
a
of
$119.1
million, including
$98.5 million
of FirstBank).
PR Tax
Code, the
and its
subsidiaries, including
FirstBank, are
treated as
separate taxable
entities and
are not
entitled to
file consolidated
tax returns.
to obtain
a tax
benefit from
a NOL,
a particular
subsidiary must
be able
to demonstrate
taxable
income
within
the
NOL
period.
to
the
PR Tax
Code,
the
period
for
NOLs
incurred during taxable
years commencing after
December 31, 2012
is 10 years. Accounting
for income taxes requires
that companies
assess whether a
should be recorded
against their deferred
tax asset based
on an assessment
of the amount
of the
tax
asset
that
is
more
likely
than
not
to
be
Due
to
in
the
and
the
for
changes
in
facts
and
in
the
future,
the
may
not
be
able
to
reverse
the
remaining valuation allowance or may need to increase its current deferred
tax asset valuation allowance.
judgments regarding tax accounting
policies and the resolution of
tax disputes may impact the
earnings and cash
flow, and
changes in the tax
laws of multiple
jurisdictions can materially
affect our operations,
tax obligations,
and effective tax rate.
is
in
the
tax
rate
and
in
its
tax
positions.
The
for
tax
when
such
tax
do
not
meet
the
thresholds
or
criteria prescribed by applicable generally accepted accounting principles in
the United States (“GAAP”).
Fluctuations in federal,
state, local, and foreign
taxes or a change
to uncertain tax positions,
including related interest
and penalties,
may impact
effective tax
rate. When particular
tax matters arise,
a number
of years may
elapse before such
matters
are audited
and finally
resolved. In
Rico Department
of Treasury
(“PRTD”),
Revenue Service
(“IRS”),
and
the
tax
authorities
in
the
jurisdictions
in
which
we
operate
may
our
tax
and
we
may
and
provide
for
potential liabilities
that may
arise out
of tax
audits to
that uncertain
tax positions
fail to
standard under
applicable GAAP.
Unfavorable resolution
of any
tax matter
could increase
a
material increase in our tax expense. Resolution of a tax issue may require
the use of cash in the year of resolution.
First BanCorp. is subject
to Puerto Rico income
tax on its income
from all sources. FirstBank
is treated as a
foreign corporation for
U.S. and USVI income
tax purposes and is generally
subject to U.S. and
USVI income tax only
on its income from
sources within the
USVI or
income effectively
of a
trade or
business in
those jurisdictions.
The USVI
jurisdiction
imposes
income
taxes
based
on
the
U.S.
Revenue
Code
under
the
“mirror
system”
by
the
Naval
Service
Appropriations Act of 1922. However,
the USVI jurisdiction also imposes an additional 10% surtax on the USVI tax liability,
if any.
These
tax
laws
are
complex
and
subject
to
interpretations.
We
must
make
and
interpretations
about
the
application
of
these
complex
tax
laws
when
our
for
income
taxes,
our
tax
assets
and
our valuation
allowance. In
addition, legislative
changes, particularly
tax laws,
impact our
Changes in applicable
tax laws in
Puerto Rico, the
U.S., or other
jurisdictions or tax
authorities’ new interpretations
could result
in
increases in our overall taxes and the Corporation’s
financial condition or results of operations may be adversely impacted.
Our ability to use our NOL carryforwards may be limited.
has U.S.
sourced NOL
carryforwards. Section
382 of
Internal Revenue
Code (“Section
382”)
limits the
utilize U.S.
NOLs for income
tax purposes,
at such
jurisdictions following
an event
of an
change. Generally,
an “ownership
change” occurs
when
certain shareholders
increase their
aggregate ownership
by more
than 50
percentage points
over their
lowest ownership
percentage over
a three-year
testing period.
Section 1034.04(u)
of the
PR Tax
Code
is significantly
similar
to Section
Ac No.
60 of
2019 amended
the PR
Tax
Code
to repeal
the corporate
NOL
carryover limitations upon change in control for taxable years beginning
after December 31, 2018.
Upon the occurrence of a Section 382 ownership change, the use of NOLs
attributable to the period prior to the ownership change is
subject
to
and
only
a
portion
of
the
U.S.
and
USVI
NOLs,
as
applicable,
may
be
used
by
the
to
offset
the
annual
U.S.
and
USVI
taxable
income,
if
any.
In
2017,
the
a
formal
change
within
the
meaning of Section 382 covering a
comprehensive period, and concluded that
an ownership change, for U.S. and
USVI purposes only,
had
during
such
period.
The
Section
limitation
has
in
higher
U.S.
and
USVI
income
tax
than
we
would have incurred in the absence of such limitation.
It is possible that
the utilization of our
U.S. and USVI NOLs
could be further limited
due to future changes
in our stock ownership,
as
a
result
of
either
sales
of
our
shares
or
of
new
shares
that
could
separately
or
cumulatively
trigger
an
change
and,
consequently,
a
Section
limitation.
Any
further
Section
may
result
in
greater
U.S.
and
USVI tax
than
we would
incur
in the
absence
of such
a limitation
and
any
increased liabilities
could
our
earnings and cash
flow.
We
may be able to
mitigate the adverse
effects associated with
a Section 382
limitation in the U.S.
to the extent that we could credit any resulting
additional U.S. and USVI tax liability against our tax liability
in Puerto Rico. However,
our
ability
to
reduce
our
Puerto
Rico
tax
through
such
a
credit
or
will
depend
on
our
tax
profile
at
each
annual
taxable period, which is dependent on various factors.
CYBERSECURITY AND TECHNOLOGY
Cyber-attacks,
system
risks
and
data
to
our
systems
and
networks
or
those
of
service
providers could adversely
ability to conduct
business, manage our
exposure to risk
or expand our
business, result in
the
or
misuse
of
confidential
or
our
costs
to
and
update
our
and
security systems and infrastructure, and present significant reputational, legal
and regulatory costs.
Our
is
highly
on
the
and
efficacy
of
our
and
data
as
well
as
those
of
our
suppliers,
and
other
third
To
access
our
network,
and
our
customers, suppliers,
third parties,
including downstream
service providers,
services industry
and
data
aggregators,
with
whom
we
interact,
on
whom
we
rely
or
who
have
access
to
our
customers’
or
account
information, increasingly
use personal mobile
devices or computing
devices that are
outside of our
network and control
environments
and
are
subject
to
their
own
risks.
Our
relies
on
access
and
the
secure
transmission,
storage and
retrieval
of confidential,
personal and
other
in our
and data
management systems and networks, and in the computer and data management
systems and networks of third parties.
risks
for
have
in
recent
years,
especially
given
the
sophistication and activities
of organized
computer criminals, hackers,
and terrorists and
our expansion of
online and digital
services to
better meet
our
customer’s
needs.
These threats
may
derive
from fraud
or malice
on the
part of
our employees
or third-
party
providers
or
may
result
from
human
error
or
accidental
failure.
These
threats
include
cyber-attacks,
such
as
computer viruses,
malicious or
destructive code,
phishing attacks,
denial of
service attacks, or
other security
breach tactics
result
in
the
release,
gathering,
monitoring,
misuse,
loss,
destruction,
or
theft
of
confidential,
and
other
information, including
intellectual property,
of ours, our
employees, our customers,
or third parties,
damages to systems,
or otherwise
disruption
to
our
or
our
customers’
or
other
third
parties’
network
access
or
both
domestically
and
internationally.
While we maintain a Corporate
Information Security Program that
continuously monitors cyber-related risks
and ultimately ensures
protection
for
the
transmission,
and
storage
of confidential,
in our
systems
and networks, as well as a
Vendor
Management Program to oversee third
party and vendor risks, there is
no guarantee that we will not
be exposed to or be affected by a cybersecurity incident.
Cyber threats are rapidly
changing, and future attacks or
breaches could lead to
other security breaches of
the networks, systems, or
devices that
use to
access our
integrated products
and services,
which, in
turn, could
unauthorized disclosure,
release, gathering,
monitoring, misuse,
loss or
destruction of
confidential, proprietary,
information (including
account data
information) or
data security
compromises. As
cyber threats
evolve, we
may be
expend significant
to
modify
or
enhance
our
protective
investigate,
and
remediate
any
vulnerabilities
or
and
develop
our
capabilities
to
respond
and
recover.
The
full
extent
of
a
cyberattack,
and
the
steps
that
the
Corporation may
need to take
to investigate
such attack, may
not be immediately
clear, and
it could take
considerable additional
time
for
us
to
the complete
scope
of information
compromised,
at which
time
on the
and
to
recover and restore to
a business-as-usual state may
be difficult to assess.
These factors may also
inhibit our ability to provide
full and
reliable information about the cyberattack to our customers, third-party
vendors, regulators, and the public.
A successful penetration or circumvention of our system security,
or the systems of our customers, suppliers, and other third parties,
could cause us serious negative consequences, including significant
operational, reputational, legal, and regulatory costs and concerns.
Any of these
adverse consequences could
adversely impact our
and financial condition.
our
may
not
be
to
compensate
us
for
the
costs
and
other
losses
arising
from
cyber-attacks,
failures of
systems, or
security breaches,
and such
insurance policies
may not
be available
to us in
on
economically
terms, or
at
all.
Insurers
may
also
deny
us
as to
any
future
claim.
Any of
these
results
could
harm our growth prospects, financial condition, business, and reputation.
Our
or
systems
or
or
those
of
third
parties,
could
fail
or
be
breached.
Any
such
future
incidents could
potentially disrupt
our business
and adversely
impact our
operations, liquidity,
and financial
as well as cause legal or reputational harm.
The potential
for operational
risk exposure
exists throughout our
business and,
of our
interactions with, and
reliance on,
third
parties,
is
not
limited
to
our
own
Our
and
systems
and
including our computer systems,
data management, and internal
processes, as well as those
of third parties that
perform key aspects of
our
such
as
data
recording
and
transactions,
online
banking
interfaces and services,
internet connections, and
network access are
integral to our
performance. We
rely on our
employees and third
parties in
our day-to-day
and ongoing
who may,
because of
human error,
misconduct,
malfeasance,
failure, or
breach of
our or of third-party systems or infrastructure, expose us to risk.
Our ability to
implement backup systems
and other safeguards
with respect to
third-party systems is more
limited than with
respect
to
our
own
systems.
In
our
financial,
accounting,
data
backup,
or
other
or
systems
and
infrastructure may fail to
operate properly or become disabled,
damaged, or otherwise compromised
as a result of a number
of factors,
including events that are wholly or partially beyond
our control. We
may need to take our systems offline if they
become infected with
malware or
a computer
virus or
because of
another form
of cyberattack.
If backup
systems are
utilized, they
may not
process data
as
quickly as
our primary
systems and
some data
might not
have been
saved to
backup systems,
potentially resulting
in a
or
permanent loss of such data.
We
frequently update
our systems
to support
our operations
and growth
and to
remain compliant
laws, rules,
and
In
we
review
and
strengthen
our
systems
in
to any
cyber
incident.
Such
strengthening
may
entail
costs
and
risks
with
new
systems
and
integrating
them
with
ones,
interruptions
and
the
risk
that
this
strengthening
may
not
be
entirely
effective.
Implementation
and
testing
of
related
to
our
monitoring,
and
and
training personnel
to
operate our
systems
also entail significant
costs. Such operational
risk exposures could
adversely impact
our operations,
and financial condition,
cause reputational
harm. In
addition, we may
not have adequate
insurance coverage
to compensate
for losses from
a major
interruption.
We
must respond
to
rapid
changes,
and these
changes
may
be
more difficult
or
expensive
than
anticipated.
We
may also be negatively
affected if we fail
to identify and address
operational risks associated
with the introduction of
or changes to
products and services, or if we fail to respond to emerging technologies that seek to
displace traditional financial services.
Like
most
depends
on
to
deliver
its
and
other
and
to
otherwise conduct
business. To
remain technologically
competitive and
operationally efficient,
FirstBank invests
in system
upgrades,
new
solutions,
and
other
initiatives.
If
competitors
introduce
new
and
embodying
new
technologies,
or if
new industry
standards and
practices emerge,
our existing
product
and service
offerings,
technology and
systems
may become obsolete.
Furthermore, if we fail
to adopt or develop
new technologies or
to adapt our products
and services to emerging
industry standards,
we may
lose current
and future
customers, which
could have
on our
operations. The
financial services
industry is
changing rapidly
and, in
order to
remain competitive,
we must
to
enhance
and
improve
the
functionality
and
of
our
and
technologies.
These
changes
may
be
more difficult or expensive to implement than we anticipate.
We
may
not
be
able
to
new
technology-driven
and
or
be
successful
in
these
and
services to
our
customers.
Failure to
successfully
keep
pace with
change
industry could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
some
recent
innovations
may
trend
toward
replacing
banks
as
service
providers
rather
than
merely
augmenting
those
For
which
claim
to
offer
applications
and
based
on
artificial
intelligence
are
beginning
to compete
much
more
with
in
areas
advice, including
high-margin services
such as
financial planning
and wealth
management. The
low-cost, high-speed
nature of
these
“robo-advisor” services can
be especially attractive
to younger,
less-affluent clients
and potential clients,
persons interested
in “self-service” investment
management. Similarly,
inventions based on
blockchain technology
eventually may be
the foundation for
greatly enhancing
transactional security throughout
the banking industry,
but also eventually
may reduce the
need for banks
as secure
deposit-keepers
and
intermediaries.
Any
of
the
foregoing
could
and
affect
our
and
The Corporation is subject
to stringent and changing
privacy laws, regulations,
and standards as well
as policies, contracts, and
other
related
to
data
privacy
and
security.
Our
failure
to
comply
with
privacy
as
well as
other
legal obligations, could have a material adverse effect on our business.
State,
federal,
and
foreign
governments
are
increasingly
enacting
laws
and
governing
the
use,
retention,
sharing, transfer,
and security
of personally
identifiable information
and data.
A variety
of federal,
state, local,
and foreign
orders,
rules,
codes,
guidance,
and
certain
privacy,
data
protection,
protection,
and
the
of
and
other
data
apply
to
our
State
laws
are
changing
rapidly,
and
new
proposed
or
enacted
in
a
number
of
other
states
imposes,
or
has
the
to
impose,
additional obligations
on companies
that process
confidential, sensitive
and personal
information, and
will continue
to shape
the data
privacy
nationally.
The
U.S.
federal
is
also
focused
on
privacy
matters.
Any
failure
by
us
or
any
of
our
partners
to
comply
with
laws,
rules,
and
may
result
in
investigations
or
actions
against
us
by
governmental entities, private
claims and litigation, fines,
penalties or other liabilities.
Such events may increase
our expenses, expose
us to
impair our reputation,
which could have
on our business.
While we
aim to comply
with
applicable data protection
laws and obligations
in all material
respects, there
is no assurance
that we will
not be subject
to claims that
we
have
violated
such
laws
and
will
be
able
to
successfully
defend
against
such
claims,
or
will
not
be
subject
to
significant fines
and penalties
in the
non-compliance. Additionally,
to the
extent multiple
state-level laws
are introduced
in
the U.S. with
inconsistent or conflicting
standards and there
is no federal
law to preempt
such laws, compliance
with such laws
could
be difficult and costly,
or impossible, to achieve, and we could be subject to fines and penalties in the event
of non-compliance.
The
current
U.S.
has
advocated
for
of
regulation.
This
may
include
amendments to
the Dodd-Frank Act
and other federal
banking laws, as
well as structural
changes to, or
the elimination of,
the CFPB.
Consequently,
rulemaking and regulatory
guidance previously issued
by such
agencies or prior
administrations may
be rolled back
or
modified. The
ultimate impact
of new
or amended
federal banking
statutes, or
certain federal
agencies, like
the CFPB,
is
uncertain at this time.
RISK RELATING
TO THE REGULATION
OF OUR INDUSTRY
We are subject to certain regulatory
restrictions that may adversely affect our operations.
We
and regulation
by the
Board and
We
are a
bank holding
company and
a
company under
Holding Company
Act of
1956, as
amended. The
Bank is
also subject
and
regulation by OCIF.
Under
federal
law,
holding
are
to
engage
in
a
broader
range
of
“financial”
than
those
to
bank
holding
that
are
not
holding
A
holding
company
that
ceases
to
meet
certain
is
subject
to
a
variety
of
restrictions,
on
the
the
prohibition
from
undertaking
new activities
or acquiring
shares or
control of
other companies.
If we
fail to
comply with
the requirements
from our
regulators,
we
may
become
subject
to
action
and
other
adverse
actions
that
might
have
a
and
adverse
effect on our operations.
The FDIC insures
deposits at
FDIC-insured depository
institutions up
to certain limits
(currently,
$250,000 per depositor
account).
The FDIC charges insured
depository institutions premiums to maintain
In the event of a bank
failure, the FDIC takes control
of a failed
bank and, if
pays all insured
deposits up to
the statutory deposit
insurance limits using
the resources of
by law to
maintain adequate
funding of
the DIF,
and the
FDIC may
increase premium
assessments to
such
The
Dodd-Frank
Wall
Street
Reform
and
Protection
Act
(the
“Dodd-Frank
Act”)
the
FDIC
to
increase the DIF’s
reserves against future losses, which will
require institutions with assets greater
than $10 billion, such as FirstBank,
to bear an increased responsibility for funding the prescribed reserve to support
may further
increase FirstBank’s
premiums or
impose additional
assessments or
prepayment requirements
in the
future.
The Dodd-Frank Act removed the statutory cap for the reserve ratio, leaving
the FDIC free to set this cap going forward.
Our
are
subject
to
by
the
Federal
Reserve
Board
and
the
FDIC.
Any
deficiencies
in
our
may
be
into
our
ratings,
which
can
affect
our
ability
to
make
acquisitions
or
perform other actions.
Our compensation
practices are
by the
Federal
Reserve
Board
and
As discussed
in Part
I, Item
1,
“Business” of this
Form 10-K,
currently is subject
to the interagency
guidance governing
the incentive compensation
activities of regulated
banks and bank
holding companies,
and other financial
regulators have also
implemented regulations
Our
failure
to
satisfy
these
restrictions
and
could
expose
us
to
adverse
criticism,
lowered supervisory ratings, and restrictions on our operations and acquisition activities.
We
are
subject
to
capital
guidelines,
and,
if
we
fail
to
meet
these
guidelines,
our
and
condition will be adversely affected.
We
to stringent
capital requirements.
met general
capital ratios
as of
2024, and
we expect
both companies
will continue
to exceed
the minimum
risk-based and
leverage
capital
ratio
for
status
under
the
current
capital
rules,
we
cannot
assure
that
we
will
remain
at
such
levels.
If
we
fail
to
meet
these
minimum
capital
and
other
our
and
will be materially and adversely affected.
If we fail to maintain certain capital
levels or are deemed not well managed under
exam procedures,
or if we
experience certain
regulatory violations,
our status as
a financial
holding company,
and our ability
to offer
certain financial products will be compromised and our financial condition
and results of operations could be adversely affected.
Monetary
and
of
the
Federal
Reserve
Board
could
affect
our
and
to being
by general
economic conditions,
our earnings
and growth
are affected
by the
policies of
Reserve Board. An important
function of the Federal
Reserve Board is to regulate
the money supply and
credit conditions. Among the
used
by
the
Federal
Reserve
Board
to
these
objectives
are
open
market
in
U.S.
of
the
rate
and
changes
in
reserve
for
bank
These
are
used
in
varying combinations to
influence overall economic
growth and the
distribution of credit,
bank loans, investments
and deposits. Their
use also affects interest rates charged on loans or paid
on deposits.
The monetary policies
and regulations of
the Federal Reserve
Board, which include
d, but were
not limited to,
multiple increases in
the federal
funds rate
to reduce inflation,
have had
a significant effect
on the
operating results
of commercial
banks and
to do
so in
the future.
The effects
of such
policies upon
our business,
and results
have
been adverse in the past and may be adverse in the future.
We
to numerous
laws designed
to protect
consumers, including
the Community
Reinvestment Act
and fair
lending
laws, and failure to comply with these laws could lead to a wide variety of sanctions.
The
Reinvestment
Act,
the
Equal
Credit
Opportunity
Act,
the
Fair
Housing
Act
and
other
fair
lending
laws
and
regulations impose nondiscriminatory
lending requirements on financial
institutions. The U.S. Department
of Justice and other
federal
are
for
enforcing
these
A successful
to
an
institution's performance
under the Community Reinvestment
Act, the Equal Credit
Opportunity Act, the Fair
Housing Act or any
of the other fair lending
laws
and regulations
could result in
a wide variety
of sanctions, including
damages and civil
money penalties, injunctive
relief, restrictions
on mergers and acquisitions
activity, restrictions
on expansion and restrictions on entering
new business lines. Private parties may
also
have the
challenge an
institution's performance
under fair
lending laws
in private
class action
litigation. Such
actions could
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition
We
face
a
risk
of
noncompliance
and
action
related
to
the
Bank
Secrecy
Act
and
other
statutes and regulations.
The
Bank
Secrecy
Act,
the
USA
PATRIOT
Act,
and
other
laws
and
require
to
institute
and
an
program
and
file
suspicious
and
currency
reports
as
among
other
duties.
The
Crimes
Enforcement
Network
is
to
impose
civil
money
penalties
for
violations
of
those
and
has
recently
engaged
in
coordinated
efforts
with
the
federal
banking
regulators, as well
as the U.S. Department
of Justice’s
Drug Enforcement Administration.
We
are also subject
to increased scrutiny
of
our compliance with
trade and economic sanctions
requirements and rules enforced
by OFAC.
If our policies, procedures
and systems
are deemed
deficient, we
including fines
actions, which
may include
restrictions on
our
ability to pay dividends and the necessity to obtain regulatory
approvals to proceed with certain aspects of our business
plan, including
our acquisition plans. Failure
to maintain and implement adequate
programs to combat money laundering
and terrorist financing could
also have serious reputational consequences
for us. Any of these results
could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.