UNIVERSAL INSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC.
For the period ended Sep 30, 2026. Filed Oct 29, 2026.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's report for each of its first three quarters. The financial statements are not audited. It shows how the business has moved since the last annual report, and what management says changed.
Sep 30, 2026 · Filed Oct 29, 2026
What changed in Management’s Discussion and Analysis?
Read the current filingPrevious report: 10-Q
Period ended 2026-06-30; filed 2026-07-30.
0000891166-26-000088
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsCurrent report: 10-Q
Period ended 2026-09-30; filed 2026-10-29.
0000891166-26-000094
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsThe baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.
Compared 314 previous paragraphs and 321 current paragraphs.
173 unchanged; 117 reworded; 29 added; 24 removed; 0 previous and 2 current paragraphs rearranged.
Tables are not compared: 11 previous and 11 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.
A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.
Added paragraphs (29)
Current report
Looking ahead, management expects business trends to be shaped by competition for new business and policy growth, retention rates for renewal business, the impact of rate changes, insured-value growth, claim frequency and severity, reinsurance costs, and operating efficiency. In Florida, market improvements due to statutory reforms in 2022 have resulted in increased competition and are moderating or reducing pricing. Although increased competition can affect renewal retention rates, this effect is offset by a broader underwriting appetite for new business opportunities and by improved claim trends. Outside of Florida, we expect to continue expanding selectively as we develop agent relationships, refine pricing and underwriting criteria and gain market experience. The pace and profitability of growth will depend on competitive conditions in these markets and whether expected returns continue to meet our underwriting objectives after considering catastrophe exposure and reinsurance costs.
Current report
Capital Requirements
Current report
The Insurance Entities’ capital requirements are influenced by market conditions, catastrophe exposure and events, business expansion, changes in insured values, reinsurance costs, rating agency requirements and regulatory requirements. These factors may increase the amount of capital needed to support policyholder obligations, underwriting capacity and planned growth. Historically, the Company has met these needs through holding company resources, operating results and distributions from the service companies, and debt capital-raising activities. Management expects to continue evaluating the timing, amount and form of capital support based on the Insurance Entities’ operating performance, growth opportunities, catastrophe exposure and overall capital position. Accordingly, management considers the availability and cost of capital, including potential debt financing and distributions from subsidiaries, when evaluating the pace of business expansion and the capital resources available to the Insurance Entities.
Current report
Regulatory oversight of the Insurance Entities extends to transactions and arrangements with the affiliated service companies that are part of our vertically integrated group. We continue to observe increased political and regulatory focus on affiliate relationships, protection of policyholders, and transparency of intercompany transactions. This could affect the timing, structure, terms or availability of transactions between the holding company, the Insurance Entities and other affiliates, including distributions and other sources of capital support.
Current report
Our ability to write and retain policies is influenced by local, national and global factors, with state regulatory requirements playing a significant role in our underwriting appetite, pricing flexibility, product design and growth opportunities. The Florida personal residential insurance market has undergone significant transition following a series of legislative changes enacted in December 2022 to address prior market disruption. We evaluate the continuing effects of these changes, together with competitive, claims and economic conditions, when determining where and how to deploy underwriting capacity.
Current report
Prior to the 2022 reforms, litigation activity and reinsurance costs contributed to capacity constraints among authorized insurers and significant growth in Citizens, Florida’s statutorily created insurer that generally is intended to be the state’s market of last resort. Since the reforms, however, the Florida residential property insurance market has steadily improved, as reflected in moderating rate levels, increased product availability and competition, and a substantial reduction in Citizens’ policy count. The durability and long-term effect of these improvements remain uncertain as political developments, policymaker and public concerns regarding inflation and the cost of living, and economic factors beyond insurers’ control could reduce the reforms’ perceived benefits or lead to legislative proposals to alter or repeal them. Any such changes could affect claim and litigation trends, insurance costs, product availability and the attractiveness of future growth in Florida.
Current report
Improved claim trends since the statutory reforms and broader participation by authorized insurers have increased the range of Florida opportunities that may meet our underwriting objectives. We intend to expand in Florida selectively by territory and policy type based on expected risk-adjusted returns and catastrophe exposure. The Florida residential property insurance market is now characterized by heightened competition, broader product availability and greater consumer choice. The Insurance Entities continue to maintain strong policyholder retention while competing for new business through rate filings providing for average rate decreases, expanded coverage and pricing options, refined underwriting criteria and a broader appetite across territories and policy types. These actions are intended to support profitable growth and strengthen the Insurance Entities’ competitive position while maintaining underwriting discipline and managing catastrophe exposure.
Current report
Approximately 20 new insurers have entered the Florida market in recent years and established insurers have increased their writings. This greater participation by authorized insurers has increased coverage and pricing options for consumers, contributed to declining average rate levels and supported the reduction in Citizens’ policy count. In response, the Insurance Entities have reduced rates for three consecutive years, adjusted underwriting criteria, and targeted additional territories, policy types and coverage options to support profitable growth. During 2026, management also launched targeted commission incentives for appointed agencies to compete for new business and increase awareness of the Company’s products and appetite across its agency network. These strategic efforts have produced positive results by improving the Insurance Entities’ competitive position and expanding opportunities to write business that meets their underwriting objectives. At the same time, continued competition may affect new business volumes, policyholder retention, pricing and the pace of future growth.
Current report
The Company continues to incur higher costs associated with claims arising under pre-reform laws. However, these claims represent a declining exposure and are not indicative of current claim and litigation trends. Some remaining legacy claims may be resolved only through litigation and therefore may remain pending for months or longer. Accordingly, the timing and cost of resolving these claims may continue to create variability in reported results even as the underlying claims environment improves.
Current report
Our business is affected by evolving domestic and global economic conditions, including tariffs and other inflationary pressures. Inflation and shortages of labor and materials can increase repair and replacement costs, which can contribute to higher claim severity, increased insured property values, and corresponding impacts on premium levels. In turn, this can affect policyholder affordability and obscure otherwise favorable claim and litigation trends. We monitor these factors when evaluating rate adequacy, underwriting criteria, coverage options and growth opportunities across our markets, and we may adjust our strategy as economic conditions develop.
Current report
Reinsurance is a central component of our catastrophe risk management and supports the Insurance Entities’ underwriting capacity, capital efficiency and ability to pursue profitable growth. The global reinsurance market generally is not subject to the same degree of product and pricing regulation as the Insurance Entities. Reinsurers therefore can adjust availability, pricing and program structure quickly following significant weather events, changes in loss expectations, capital-market developments or other events. Current reinsurance market conditions are favorable, supported by improved capacity and pricing dynamics. These conditions contributed favorably to the mid-year renewal of our catastrophe reinsurance program and provide a constructive backdrop for our underwriting and growth plans. Although the outlook for the global reinsurance market remains favorable at this time, management continues to monitor market developments because future events can cause conditions to change rapidly and may influence rate needs, underwriting appetite and the pace of business expansion.
Current report
As AI becomes more prominent in insurance markets, regulators are continuing to develop and interpret requirements addressing governance, data privacy, cybersecurity, transparency, consumer protection and the use of automated decision-making. These developments are increasing the Company’s compliance, documentation, testing, and oversight activities, as well as associated costs, and may influence the timing and manner in which AI-enabled capabilities are implemented. Regulators also may increasingly use AI and advanced analytics to evaluate filings, market conduct, consumer outcomes and financial and operational information, which could improve the speed and scope of regulatory monitoring and responses to emerging market and business trends. Because Florida remains our largest market and the domiciliary state of our Insurance Entities, evolving regulatory requirements in Florida and broader standards developed by insurance regulators may have a significant influence on our technology strategy. We continue to evaluate these developments as we invest in appropriately governed technologies intended to strengthen analytical capabilities, improve customer and agent experiences and support our response to market opportunities.
Current report
•Minnesota: +15.0%, effective November 1, 2026, for new business and renewal business
Current report
•New York: +10.0%, effective February 1, 2027, for new business and renewal business
Current report
•New Hampshire: +7.9%, the effective date for new and renewal business is pending approval
Current report
•Virginia: +15.6%, the effective date for new and renewal business is pending approval
Current report
•Maryland: +9.5%, the effective date for new and renewal business is pending approval
Current report
•Michigan: +7.5%, the effective date for new and renewal business is pending approval
Current report
•The Company continued to execute its expansion strategy in 2026, with direct premiums written increasing 2.7% year over year in the third quarter. Growth reflected selective expansion of the homeowners insurance book in Florida and other attractive markets, supported by disciplined risk selection, rate adequacy, product design, and targeted marketing. Favorable claim and litigation trends and continued investments in operating capabilities provide a strong foundation for sustained, profitable growth. These factors also enhance the Company’s ability to compete in Florida and other states.
Current report
•Competition in the Florida market has increased, and the Company continues to refine its market strategy, product development, underwriting rules, and marketing approach to address competitive pressures and support disciplined new business production.
Current report
•The lower water-limit policy option introduced in 2025 continues to attract homeowners and was a significant driver of new business production in Florida during 2026.
Current report
•The Company launched a new credit-based underwriting homeowners policy in Georgia, targeting the preferred homeowners market through a limited group of key agents and its internal agency, Clovered. The Company is gradually expanding the program and evaluating its performance to inform potential expansion into other markets.
Current report
•The lower reinsurance costs announced in the second quarter of 2026 are expected to continue benefiting results as the related costs are recognized ratably over the June 1, 2026 through May 31, 2027 contract period.
Current report
•Kroll Bond Rating Agency, LLC (KBRA) affirmed the insurance financial strength ratings of A- for UPCIC and APPCIC, the BBB issuer rating for UVE and the BBB long-term credit rating on the 2031 Notes. The Outlook for all ratings is Stable.
Current report
•Hurricane Isaias did not affect the Company’s results, financial condition, or liquidity for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2026, but is expected to materially affect fourth-quarter underwriting results. The Company’s preliminary estimate of the storm loss is above the Insurance Entities’ $45 million retention but may remain below the $111 million consolidated retention. Ultimate gross and net losses cannot yet be reasonably estimated. See “Item 1—Note 16 (Subsequent Events)”.
Current report
For the three months ended September 30, 2026, commission revenue was $11.8 million, compared with $14.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2025, a decrease of $2.8 million, or 18.9%. Commission revenue declined primarily due to lower ceded written premium under the 2026–27 reinsurance program, as discussed above, which reduced the premium base on which related reinsurance brokerage commissions are earned.
Current report
Interest and amortization of debt issuance costs were $2.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2026, and $1.6 million for the same period in 2025. The increase primarily reflected the higher interest rate on the 7.75% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2031 issued in June 2026, which replaced the 5.625% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2026, partially offset by lower amortization of debt issuance costs and the repayment of the Surplus Note in September 2026.
Current report
Results of Operations— Nine Months Ended September 30, 2026 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2025
Current report
For the nine months ended September 30, 2026, commission revenue was $40.4 million compared with $46.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2025, a decrease of $6.4 million, or 13.6%. The majority of commissions earned in both periods were earned by Blue Atlantic for placing reinsurance with our Insurance Entities and reflects the level and cost of third-party reinsurance coverage obtained during each period, including reinstatement premiums, if any. Reinstatement premiums are additional reinsurance premiums that may be payable after catastrophe losses and are intended to restore or maintain reinsurance coverage under the applicable treaties.
Removed paragraphs (24)
Previous report
Our ability to write and retain policies is influenced by a range of local, national and global factors. Among these, the amount and types of policies we write depend on the regulatory environments in the states in which the Insurance Entities write policies. In particular, the Florida personal residential insurance market has experienced and continues to experience significant transitions due to a series of law changes passed in December 2022 that were intended to address previous market disruption.
Previous report
Prior to the law changes, the Florida residential property insurance market suffered from declining availability and increasing premiums among authorized insurers. This was attributable to elevated loss and LAE levels and related impacts on insurers’ operating results and reinsurance pricing and availability. During this period, Citizens, Florida’s statutorily-created insurer that generally is intended to be the state’s market of last resort, instead became a market of choice as authorized insurers limited writings and Citizens’ rate levels were suppressed by statutory limitations on its rate changes.
Previous report
The overall residential property insurance market in Florida has steadily improved since the reforms were enacted. Even so, the long-term benefits of Florida’s statutory reforms remain unknown and difficult to predict. The Florida political environment, prevailing sentiment among policymakers or the public such as growing concerns with inflation and costs of living, and economic factors beyond insurers’ control may directly or indirectly mitigate the impact of the reforms. These influences can mask the reforms’ benefits or diminish their perceived effectiveness even when the market shows objective signs of improvement through moderating rate levels, increased product availability and competition, and reductions in Citizens’ policy count. Over time, political or external influences attributing broader rising costs or other market conditions to deficiencies in the reforms rather than other causes can result in policymakers questioning the merits of the reforms, considering proposals to reverse them, or pursuing other law changes or interpretations that could negate improvements in the Florida market and renew concerns with rising costs and reduced availability.
Previous report
Prior to the 2022 reforms, most residential property insurers in Florida, including the Insurance Entities, sought to limit their exposure to rising losses and LAE. Although the Insurance Entities faced little competition from authorized insurers during this period, the Insurance Entities’ own exposure management considerations led them to limit their new business intake. The Insurance Entities historically have enjoyed a high policyholder retention rate from year to year, both prior to the reforms and currently. Nonetheless, the Company’s limited appetite for new business prior to the reforms led to a decline in its in-force Florida policy count. As other insurers similarly limited their writings during this time, Citizens grew to become the largest insurer of residential property in Florida by a wide margin.
Previous report
Since 2023, the Insurance Entities have gradually increased their appetite for new business in Florida. In both 2024 and 2025, the Insurance Entities filed and gained regulatory approval of statewide average rate decreases for their homeowners’ insurance programs. In addition, the Insurance Entities began to expand, and have continued to expand, the areas in Florida and the types of policies they seek to write. The Insurance Entities also implemented optional product updates for consumers seeking to evaluate their coverage and price options in Florida’s improving market.
Previous report
Other insurers also are expanding new business writings. Established insurers are increasingly expanding their writings by location and policy type. In addition, approximately 20 new insurers have entered the Florida market in recent years. Unlike the Insurance Entities, some new and established insurers write business predominantly by assuming risks from Citizens. Altogether, increased activity among authorized insurers has led to a decrease in Citizens’ policy count by approximately one million policies since the reforms. The current Florida residential property insurance market therefore is characterized by increased competition among authorized insurers, expanded coverage options for consumers, declining average rate levels and a significantly smaller residual insurance market.
Previous report
The Company continues to experience higher costs associated with claims that pre-date the reforms. The remaining pre-reform claims typically are litigated claims that have resisted formal and informal efforts at dispute resolution. Although the number of claims subject to pre-reform laws has declined substantially, some might be resolved only through litigation and therefore might remain pending for months or longer.
Previous report
Our business is affected by evolving domestic, national or global economic conditions, including the potential impact from tariffs and other inflationary pressures. Increased labor and materials costs can increase our claims costs. They can also have other direct effects on our business, such as increasing the values of properties we insure and the corresponding premium levels, as well as indirect effects such as offsetting and diminishing the perceived benefits of the statutory reforms. We will continue to monitor our business model and strategy as economic conditions develop.
Previous report
We also rely on global reinsurance markets to mitigate our exposure under policies we write. The availability and pricing of reinsurance can be influenced by global economic conditions such as inflation. Our ability to purchase desired levels of reinsurance at competitive prices also can be influenced by severe weather in Florida and elsewhere. Florida did not suffer a landfalling hurricane in 2025, which contributed to favorable reinsurance market conditions for the mid-year renewal of our catastrophe reinsurance program. However, the benefit of short-term weather or economic conditions can be tempered by reinsurers’ assessments of past and potential future events.
Previous report
The use of AI and other automated technologies is subject to evolving legal and regulatory scrutiny and changing market expectations regarding data privacy, cybersecurity, transparency, governance and compliance with insurance, information security and consumer protection requirements. These requirements may vary by jurisdiction and could affect our ability to implement or expand AI-enabled tools, increase compliance costs, or expose us to regulatory, litigation or reputational risks if such tools are alleged to produce inaccurate, unfair or unexplained outcomes. If we are unable to adopt, implement or manage emerging technologies effectively, or if competitors are able to use them more effectively, we could experience higher operating costs, process inefficiencies, customer or agent service disadvantages, regulatory concerns, reputational harm or other competitive disadvantages. Additionally, because Florida remains our largest market and the domiciliary state of our Insurance Entities, changes in Florida regulatory expectations related to the use of AI or other technologies could have a disproportionate impact on our operations. Conversely, if appropriately implemented and governed, these technologies may support our efforts to improve operational efficiency, strengthen analytical capabilities, enhance customer and agent experiences, and respond to market opportunities and risks.
Previous report
•New York: +10.0%, the effective date for new and renewal business is pending approval
Previous report
•Minnesota: +15.0%, the effective date for new and renewal business is pending approval
Previous report
Core Loss Ratio ― an operational metric used in the insurance industry to describe the ratio of current year losses and LAE, excluding current accident year weather and prior year development, to premiums earned. Core loss ratio is an important measure identifying profitability trends of premiums in force. Core losses consist of losses and LAE excluding current year weather events and prior years’ reserve development and is net of estimated subrogation recoveries. The financial benefit from the management of claims, including claim fees ceded to reinsurers, is also recorded in the condensed consolidated financial statements as a reduction to core losses. The core loss ratio can be measured on a direct basis, using direct earned premiums, or on a net basis, using premiums earned, net (i.e., direct premiums earned less ceded premiums earned).
Previous report
DPW (Florida) ―includes only DPW in the state of Florida. This measure allows management to analyze growth in our primary market and is also a measure of business concentration risk.
Previous report
Monthly Weighted Average Renewal Retention Rate ―measures the monthly average of policyholders that renew their policies over the period of a calendar year. This measure allows management to assess customer retention.
Previous report
•The Company delivered continued top-line growth in 2026, with direct premiums written increasing 4.1% year over year in the second quarter and 6% year to date. Growth was supported by management’s strategy to selectively expand the homeowners insurance book in Florida and other states where market conditions are improving or otherwise attractive, while maintaining underwriting discipline through risk selection, rate adequacy, product design, and targeted marketing initiatives.
Previous report
•The Insurance Entities secured their combined UPCIC and APPCIC 2026–27 catastrophe reinsurance program to manage catastrophe exposure across their homeowners insurance book and support continued underwriting capacity in Florida and other states. The program maintains continuity with historical reinsurance partners and includes no material changes to key terms or conditions. It provides a combined single-event All States reinsurance tower, including Florida, of $2.623 billion, an increase of approximately $50 million over the expiring program. In the second quarter of 2026, ceded written premium declined 12.1% to $612.6 million, from $696.8 million in the second quarter of 2025, reflecting lower reinsurance costs for June 1, 2026 through May 31, 2027 contract period.
Previous report
•On June 16, 2026, the Company issued and sold $100.0 million of 7.75% Senior Unsecured Notes due June 30, 2031 (the “2031 Notes”), and used the net proceeds to redeem its $100.0 million of 5.625% Senior Unsecured Notes due November 30, 2026 (the “2026 Notes”). This refinancing extends the Company’s debt maturity profile to 2031, preserves financial flexibility, and supports its capital strategy to maintain liquidity, manage refinancing risk, and fund opportunities in an improving Florida homeowners’ market and across its multi-state platform.
Previous report
•In connection with its $100.0 million debt financing, KBRA assigned UVE a BBB issuer rating and a BBB long-term credit rating on its 2031 Notes, each with a Stable Outlook. These investment-grade ratings support the Company’s access to capital and reflect an independent assessment of UVE’s financial strength and credit profile. The 2031 Notes rank equally with UVE’s current and future senior unsecured indebtedness and remain structurally subordinated to policyholder obligations and other liabilities of UVE’s subsidiaries.
Previous report
•On May 29, 2026, the Company entered a committed, unsecured $50.0 million revolving credit facility with JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., replacing its prior facility of the same size. The facility has been maintained since 2021 through annual 364-day renewal terms, with each renewal subject to customary annual review and adjustment. The current facility matures on May 28, 2027. The facility supports the Company’s capital strategy by providing committed liquidity and financial flexibility to manage working capital needs, support operating requirements, and pursue strategic opportunities across its homeowner’s insurance platform.
Previous report
For the three months ended June 30, 2026, commission revenue was $13.8 million, compared with $15.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025, a decrease of $2.1 million, or 13.1%. The decrease was primarily due to commissions earned in the prior-year period on reinstatement premiums related to Hurricanes Helene and Milton. Reinstatement premiums are additional reinsurance premiums that may be payable after catastrophe losses and are intended to restore or maintain reinsurance coverage under the applicable treaties. Because the Company did not earn comparable reinstatement premium commissions in the 2026 period, commission revenue decreased year over year. Commission revenue also declined modestly due to lower ceded written premium under the 2026–27 reinsurance program, as discussed below, which reduced the premium base on which related reinsurance brokerage commissions are earned.
Previous report
Interest and amortization of debt issuance costs were $2.0 million for three months ended June 30, 2026, and $1.6 million for the same period in 2025. The 2026 period included the effect of the June 2026 refinancing of the Company’s senior unsecured notes, including the write-off of $295 thousand in unamortized debt issuance costs associated with the redeemed 2026 Notes. The new 2031 Notes also carry a higher interest rate, which modestly increased interest expense after the debt issuance in June 2026. These increases were offset by lower interest expense earlier in the quarter before the refinancing.
Previous report
Results of Operations— Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2025
Previous report
For the six months ended June 30, 2026, commission revenue was $28.5 million, compared with $32.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025, a decrease of $3.6 million, or 11.3%. The decrease was primarily due to commissions earned in the prior-year period on reinstatement premiums related to Hurricanes Helene and Milton. Reinstatement premiums are additional reinsurance premiums that may be payable after catastrophe losses and are intended to restore or maintain reinsurance coverage under the applicable treaties. Because the Company did not earn comparable reinstatement premium commissions in the 2026 period, commission revenue decreased year over year. Commission revenue also declined modestly due to lower ceded written premium under the 2026–27 catastrophe reinsurance program, as discussed below, which reduced the premium base on which related reinsurance brokerage commissions are earned.
Reworded paragraphs (117)
Previous wording
Unless the context otherwise requires, all references to “we,” “us,” “our,” and “Company” refer to Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. (“UVE”) and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. You should read the following discussion together with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements (“Financial Statements”) and the related notes thereto included in “Part I, Item 1—Financial Statements,” and our audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto included in “Part II, Item 8—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025. Operating results for any one quarter are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for any quarter or for the year.
Current wording
Unless the context otherwise requires, all references to “we,” “us,” “our,” and “Company” refer to Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. (“UVE”) and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. You should read the following discussion together with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements (“Financial Statements”) and the related notes thereto included in “Part I, Item 1—Financial Statements,” and our audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto included in “Part II, Item 8—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025. Operating results for any one quarter are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for any other quarter or for the year.
Previous wording
We are a vertically integrated insurance holding company focused primarily on personal residential homeowners insurance. Our insurance subsidiaries, Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Company (“UPCIC”) and American Platinum Property and Casualty Insurance Company (“APPCIC” and, together with UPCIC, the “Insurance Entities”), write homeowners and related property insurance through appointed independent agents and online distribution channels across 19 states. Our integrated operating model allows us to manage underwriting, product design, distribution, risk management and claims handling through affiliated service companies, which supports consistency in execution and provides additional fee-based revenue streams.
Current wording
We are a vertically integrated insurance holding company focused primarily on personal residential homeowners insurance. Our insurance subsidiaries, Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Company (“UPCIC”) and American Platinum Property and Casualty Insurance Company (“APPCIC” and, together with UPCIC, the “Insurance Entities”), write homeowners and related property insurance through appointed independent agents and online distribution channels across 19 states. Our vertically integrated operating model includes the Insurance Entities and affiliated service companies that support key aspects of the insurance value chain, including product design, distribution, underwriting, risk management, claims administration and other operational functions. This structure supports the Company’s operations by integrating key insurance and service functions, promoting consistent execution and providing operating and claims information that facilitates underwriting, pricing and claims decisions, and can enhance holding company liquidity. This liquidity is a primary source of capital available to support the Insurance Entities when needed, subject to the considerations described in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors of our Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Previous wording
During 2026, we continued to pursue selective growth in Florida and other states where market conditions have improved or otherwise support attractive risk-adjusted returns. In Florida, legislative reforms enacted in late 2022 have contributed to improved claim and litigation trends on policies issued or renewed after the reforms, supporting our decision to expand new homeowners writings in most territories, introduce new coverage options and adjust rates. Outside Florida, we continued to refine rates, coverage offerings and underwriting criteria in response to inflation, weather risk, reinsurance costs and other market conditions. These actions are intended to support growth while maintaining underwriting discipline and geographic diversification.
Current wording
During 2026, we continued to pursue disciplined growth in Florida and other states where market conditions support attractive risk-adjusted returns. In Florida, the combination of improved claim and litigation trends attributable to the 2022 statutory reforms, increased product availability, and a more competitive authorized market supported our decision to expand new homeowners’ writings in most territories, introduce additional coverage options and adjust rates, resulting in an overall average rate decrease. Outside of Florida, we continued to refine the Insurance Entities’ rates, coverage offerings and underwriting criteria in response to inflation, weather risk, reinsurance costs and other market conditions. These actions are intended to foster profitable growth while maintaining underwriting discipline and managing geographic and catastrophe exposure.
Previous wording
Although Florida represented approximately 72.9% of direct premiums written for the six months ended June 30, 2026, it represented approximately 47.1% of total insured value as of June 30, 2026. This difference reflects the higher premium levels associated with Florida’s catastrophe exposure, reinsurance costs and market conditions, while also demonstrating the Company’s continued diversification of insured exposure outside Florida. Management views this diversification as an important component of its long-term strategy to balance growth, underwriting profitability and catastrophe risk across its multi-state homeowners insurance platform.
Current wording
Although Florida represented approximately 70.7% of direct premiums written for the nine months ended September 30, 2026, it represented approximately 46.2% of total insured value as of September 30, 2026. This difference reflects the higher premium levels associated with Florida’s catastrophe exposure, reinsurance costs and market conditions. These metrics demonstrate that the Company maintains meaningful insured exposure outside Florida while selectively pursuing growth opportunities in its largest market. Management seeks to balance profitable growth, underwriting performance, geographic diversification and catastrophe risk across its multi-state homeowners insurance platform.
Previous wording
We seek to achieve long-term rate adequacy and earnings for the Insurance Entities while managing our risks through market cycles and looking to take advantage of what we believe to be market opportunities. We currently write insurance policies in 19 states. Although the majority of our policies cover properties in Florida, our business in other states continues to grow as a percentage of our total policies in force and premium volume.
Current wording
We seek to achieve long-term rate adequacy and underwriting profitability while managing risk through market cycles and pursuing opportunities that meet our risk-adjusted return objectives. We currently write insurance policies in 19 states and evaluate each market based on factors including rate adequacy, expected loss and LAE, reinsurance costs, catastrophe exposure, regulatory conditions, and competitive dynamics. Although a majority of our policies cover properties in Florida, our business in other states continues to grow as a percentage of our total policies in force and premium volume. We use this multi-state platform to pursue profitable growth while maintaining underwriting discipline and managing concentration risk.
Previous wording
Other states have experienced less disruption than Florida. The Insurance Entities therefore face a high but stable degree of competition when entering and expanding into other states. In these states, the Insurance Entities often compete with national or regional insurers with greater experience in the specific markets. Our growth plan therefore includes developing relationships with the states’ independent agents and gradually expanding our presence as we gain familiarity with new markets. Over time, this has allowed our business outside of Florida to steadily increase as a percentage of our overall business.
Current wording
Other states have experienced less disruption than Florida and generally present a high but stable degree of competition. In these markets, the Insurance Entities often compete with national or regional insurers that have greater local experience, established distribution relationships, and longstanding market presence. Our approach is therefore to develop relationships with independent agents, refine rates and underwriting criteria as we gain market experience, and expand gradually where expected returns meet our objectives. This measured approach has allowed our business outside Florida to increase steadily as a percentage of our overall business while supporting geographic diversification and disciplined deployment of capital.
Previous wording
The Insurance Entities’ loss and LAE experience on Florida claims has improved significantly for policies written after the statutory reforms. This is attributable to reduced incentives for policyholders, vendors and their representatives to pursue questionable, inflated and litigated claims. In addition, the Company’s own initiatives, coupled with enhanced claim-handling standards included in the reforms, have resulted in faster claims-handling times, process improvements and greater customer satisfaction.
Current wording
The Insurance Entities’ loss and LAE experience on Florida claims has improved significantly for policies written after the statutory reforms. This improvement is attributable to reduced incentives for policyholders, vendors and their representatives to pursue questionable, inflated and litigated claims. In addition, the Company’s initiatives and enhanced claim-handling standards have resulted in faster claim-handling times, process improvements and greater customer satisfaction. These trends support the Company’s ability to evaluate additional growth opportunities in Florida, although the Company continues to monitor the potential impacts of weather activity, claim frequency and severity, inflation and changes in the legal and regulatory environment on its growth appetite.
Previous wording
The Company has increasingly used video and other technology to facilitate review of damaged property and improve efficiency in the claims process. As technologies evolve, the Company continually evaluates and implements enhancements to streamline workflows and enhance the customer experience. The Company also regularly monitors regulatory developments pertaining to uses of technology, including oversight of AI in claims processes and other aspects of our operations.
Current wording
The Company increasingly uses video and other technology to facilitate review of damaged property, shorten claim-handling times and improve efficiency in the claims process. As technologies evolve, the Company evaluates and implements enhancements intended to streamline workflows, support claim administration, and improve the customer experience. These capabilities may also improve the timeliness and quality of claims data used to assess loss trends and inform underwriting and pricing decisions.
Previous wording
Across the United States, third-party financing contributes to expansion of claims litigation and vendors’ efforts to solicit claims. Some states have enacted laws intended to curtail or require disclosure of litigation financing. The largest state in which we write business, Florida, does not currently have any such laws. It is difficult to quantify the impact on losses, LAE and ultimately premium attributable to vendor-related financing and litigation financing.
Current wording
Across the United States, third-party financing contributes to the expansion of claims litigation and vendors’ efforts to solicit claims. Some states have enacted laws intended to curtail or require disclosure of litigation financing, while Florida, our largest market, does not currently have such laws. Although the effect of vendor-related and litigation financing on losses, LAE and premiums is difficult to quantify, these activities may affect claim frequency, severity and settlement patterns. We consider these trends when evaluating loss expectations, rate adequacy and underwriting opportunities across our markets.
Previous wording
Data analytics, artificial intelligence (“AI”) and other emerging technologies are increasingly affecting the property and casualty insurance industry. Insurers, technology providers, vendors and other market participants continue to invest in tools intended to improve the speed, accuracy and cost-effectiveness of insurance operations. These technologies may create opportunities to improve underwriting and risk selection, claims handling, fraud detection, customer service, operational efficiency and analytical capabilities. In the residential property insurance market, emerging technologies are increasingly used to evaluate property characteristics, model catastrophe and non-catastrophe risk, support inspection and underwriting processes, triage or estimate claims, detect potentially questionable claim activity, and assist with communications. The effective use of these technologies depends on the quality of underlying data, governance structures in place, integration with existing systems, vendor performance and continued human oversight.
Current wording
Data analytics, AI, and other emerging technologies are increasingly affecting how insurers operate and compete for business and how consumers evaluate insurance products. In the residential property insurance market, insurers and other market participants are increasingly using these technologies to evaluate property characteristics, model catastrophe and non-catastrophe risk, support inspection and underwriting processes, triage or estimate claims, detect potentially questionable claim activity and assist with communications. Consumers also increasingly may use AI-enabled search, comparison and advisory tools to evaluate insurers, coverage combinations, deductibles, pricing and other policy features and to identify offerings that meet their preferences. These developments may increase comparison shopping and place greater importance on clear product design, competitive coverage options, digital accessibility and consistent customer and agent experiences. The effectiveness of AI-enabled tools depends on data quality, governance, systems integration, vendor performance and continued human oversight.
Previous wording
In 2024, for Florida, UPCIC implemented new homeowners policy rates, resulting in an average rate decrease of 1.5% compared to previous rates, effective for new policies August 15, 2024 and renewal policies May 17, 2025. In October 2025, UPCIC implemented new homeowners policy rates for new and renewal business policies, resulting in an average rate decrease of 5.1% compared to previous rates with an effective date of October 16, 2025. These Florida rate changes were implemented under use and file rating laws and subsequently received regulatory approval.
Current wording
In October 2025, for Florida, UPCIC implemented new homeowners policy rates for new and renewal business policies, resulting in an average rate decrease of 5.1% compared to previous rates with an effective date of October 16, 2025. These Florida rate changes were implemented under use and file rating laws and subsequently received regulatory approval. In October 2026, UPCIC implemented new homeowners policy rates for new and renewal business policies in Florida, pending regulatory approval, resulting in an average rate decrease of 5.0% compared to previous rates with an effective date of October 16, 2026.
Previous wording
Book Value Per Common Share ―total stockholders’ equity, adjusted for preferred stock liquidation, divided by the number of common shares outstanding as of a reporting period. Book value per common share is the excess of assets over liabilities at a reporting period attributed to each share of common stock. Changes in book value per common share informs shareholders of retained equity in the Company on a per share basis, which may assist in understanding market value trends for the Company’s stock.
Current wording
Book Value Per Common Share ―total stockholders’ equity, adjusted for preferred stock liquidation, divided by the number of common shares outstanding as of a reporting period. Book value per common share is the excess of assets over liabilities at a reporting period attributed to each share of common stock. Changes in book value per common share inform shareholders of retained equity in the Company on a per share basis, which may assist in understanding market value trends for the Company’s stock.
Previous wording
Debt-to-Equity Ratio ― debt, including current portion divided by stockholders’ equity. This ratio helps management measure the amount of financing leverage in place in relation to equity and allows investors to evaluate future leverage capacity.
Current wording
Debt-to-Equity Ratio ― debt, net of issuance costs, including current portion divided by stockholders’ equity. This ratio helps management measure the amount of financing leverage in place in relation to equity and allows investors to evaluate future leverage capacity.
Previous wording
Reinsurance enables our Insurance Entities to limit potential exposures to catastrophic events. Developing and implementing our reinsurance strategy to adequately protect our policyholders, balance sheet, and Insurance Entities in the event of one or more catastrophes while maintaining efficient reinsurance costs has been our key strategic priority. To limit the Insurance Entities’ potential exposure to catastrophic events, we purchase significant reinsurance from third-party reinsurers and the FHCF. The FLOIR requires the Insurance Entities, like all residential property insurance companies doing business in Florida, to have a certain amount of capital and reinsurance coverage to cover losses upon the occurrence of a single catastrophic event and a series of catastrophic events occurring in the same hurricane season. The Insurance Entities’ 2026-2027 catastrophic reinsurance program meets the FLOIR’s requirements, which are based on, among other things, successfully demonstrating cohesive and comprehensive reinsurance coverages that protect the policyholders of our Insurance Entities under a series of stress test catastrophe loss scenarios. Similarly, the Insurance Entities’ 2026-2027 catastrophic reinsurance programs meet the stress test and review requirements of Demotech, Inc., for maintaining Financial Stability Ratings® of “A” (Exceptional) and of Kroll for maintaining insurer financial strength rating of “A-”.
Current wording
Reinsurance enables our Insurance Entities to limit potential exposures to catastrophic events. Developing and implementing our reinsurance strategy to adequately protect our policyholders, balance sheet, and Insurance Entities in the event of one or more catastrophes while maintaining efficient reinsurance costs has been our key strategic priority. To limit the Insurance Entities’ potential exposure to catastrophic events, we purchase significant reinsurance from third-party reinsurers and the FHCF. The FLOIR requires the Insurance Entities, like all residential property insurance companies doing business in Florida, to have a certain amount of capital and reinsurance coverage to cover losses upon the occurrence of a single catastrophic event and a series of catastrophic events occurring in the same hurricane season. The Insurance Entities’ 2026-2027 catastrophe reinsurance program meets the FLOIR’s requirements, which are based on, among other things, successfully demonstrating cohesive and comprehensive reinsurance coverages that protect the policyholders of our Insurance Entities under a series of stress test catastrophe loss scenarios. Similarly, the Insurance Entities’ 2026-2027 catastrophe reinsurance programs meet the stress test and review requirements of Demotech, Inc., for maintaining Financial Stability Ratings® of “A” (Exceptional) and of Kroll for maintaining insurer financial strength ratings of “A-”.
Previous wording
•All States first event tower extends to $2.623 billion with no co-participation in any of the layers, no limitation on loss adjustment expenses and no accelerated deposit premiums.
Current wording
•All States first event tower extends to $2.768 billion with no co-participation in any of the layers, no limitation on loss adjustment expenses and no accelerated deposit premiums.
Previous wording
•Assuming a first event completely exhausts the $2.623 billion tower, the second event exhaustion point would be $1.209 billion.
Current wording
•Assuming a first event completely exhausts the $2.768 billion tower, the second event exhaustion point would be $1.209 billion.
Previous wording
•First event layer of 100% of$66 million in excess of$45 million is established by Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc (“UIH”) in captive insurance arrangement. See“Item 1—Note 14 (Variable Interest Entities).”
Current wording
•First event layer of 100% of$66 million in excess of$45 million is established by UVE in a captive insurance arrangement. See“Item 1—Note 14 (Variable Interest Entities).”
Previous wording
•For the FHCF Reimbursement Contracts effective June 1, 2026, both UPCIC and APPCIC have continued the election of the 90% coverage level. We estimate the total mandatory FHCF layer will provide approximately$1.39 billion of coverage for UPCIC, which inures to the benefit of the open market coverage secured from private reinsurers and we estimate the total mandatory FHCF layer will provide approximately$25.0 million of coverage for APPCIC, which inures to the benefit of the open market coverage secured from private reinsurers.
Current wording
•For the FHCF Reimbursement Contracts effective June 1, 2026, both UPCIC and APPCIC have continued the election of the 90% coverage level. We estimate the total mandatory FHCF layer will provide approximately$1.53 billion of coverage for UPCIC, which inures to the benefit of the open market coverage secured from private reinsurers and we estimate the total mandatory FHCF layer will provide approximately$26.4 million of coverage for APPCIC, which inures to the benefit of the open market coverage secured from private reinsurers.
Previous wording
Results of Operations for the three months ended June 30, 2026, or second quarter, are compared to the same period last year, unless stated otherwise
Current wording
Results of Operations for the three months ended September 30, 2026, or third quarter, are compared to the same period last year, unless stated otherwise.
Previous wording
•As of June 30, 2026, total policies in force increased 62,028, or 7.1%, to 934,371, compared with June 30, 2025. The increase included 31,722 policies, or 5.7%, in Florida and 30,306 policies, or 9.7%, in other states.
Current wording
•As of September 30, 2026, total policies in force increased 69,723, or 7.9%, to 953,611, compared with September 30, 2025. The increase included 36,558 policies, or 6.5%, in Florida and 33,165 policies, or 10.3%, in other states.
Previous wording
•Net investment income increased $2.96 million, or 17.1%, to $20.2 million in the second quarter of 2026, compared with $17.3 million in the second quarter of 2025, driven by higher book yields and increased invested assets.
Current wording
•Net investment income increased $3.1 million, or 17.1%, to $21.5 million in the third quarter of 2026, compared with $18.3 million in the third quarter of 2025, driven by higher book yields and increased invested assets.
Previous wording
•During the three months ended June 30, 2026, the Company repurchased 121,808 shares for $4.5 million at an average price of $37.19 per share. As of June 30, 2026,$8.6 million remains under the share repurchase plan, which expires January 8, 2028.
Current wording
•During the three months ended September 30, 2026, the Company repurchased 173,725 shares for $7.4 million at an average price of $42.75 per share. As of September 30, 2026, $1.1 million remains under the share repurchase plan, which expires January 8, 2028.
Previous wording
•The combined ratio was 91.6% for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 90.7% year to date, compared with 97.8% for the three months ended 2025 and 96.4% year to date as of June 30, 2025, reflecting operating improvements.
Current wording
•The combined ratio was 91.0% for the three months ended September 30, 2026 and 90.8% year to date, compared with 96.4% for the three months ended September 30, 2025 and 96.4% year to date as of September 30, 2025, reflecting operating improvements and reduced loss activity, bolstered by diminished storm activity in 2025 and the first three quarters of 2026.
Previous wording
•Book value per share was $22.89 at June 30, 2026, compared to $19.67 at December 31, 2025, an increase of 16.4%.
Current wording
•Book value per common share was $23.37 at September 30, 2026, compared to $19.67 at December 31, 2025, an increase of 18.8%.
Previous wording
•On April 10, 2026, the Company declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.16 per share of common stock, payable on May 15, 2026, to shareholders of record on May 8, 2026.
Current wording
•On July 8, 2026, the Company declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.16 per share of common stock, paid on August 7, 2026, to shareholders of record on July 31, 2026.
Previous wording
For the three months ended June 30, 2026, net income was $59.2 million compared to $35.1 million in 2025, with diluted EPS increasing to $2.04 from $1.21. Growth in premiums earned, net, investment income, and unrealized gains contributed to improved performance. Lower realized gains and commission revenue partially offset these increases. While losses and LAE costs were reduced, these were partially offset by increases in acquisition costs and other operating costs and expenses. The net loss ratio declined to 64.8% from 72.3% in 2025, and the combined ratio was 91.6%, down from 97.8% in 2025. No catastrophe events or prior-year reserve developments occurred in either period. See the“Overview—Trends and Geographical Distribution—Florida Trends”section for more information.
Current wording
For the three months ended September 30, 2026, net income was $52.5 million compared to $39.8 million in 2025, with diluted EPS increasing to $1.80 from $1.38. Growth in premiums earned, net, investment income, and realized gains contributed to improved performance. Unrealized losses and lower commission revenue partially offset these increases, as well as increases in losses and loss adjustment expenses, acquisition costs, and other operating costs and expenses. The net loss ratio declined to 64.6% from 70.2% in 2025, and the combined ratio was 91.0%, down from 96.4% in 2025. No catastrophe events or prior-year reserve development occurred in 2026, compared with $3.9 million of prior year development in 2025. See the“Overview—Trends and Geographical Distribution—Florida Trends”section for more information.
Previous wording
The Company’s 2026 premium growth reflects management’s strategy to expand the homeowner’s insurance book in Florida and other states while responding to market conditions through targeted underwriting, product, rate, and marketing actions. In Florida, the Insurance Entities resumed writing new homeowners and dwelling business in most areas, introduced water damage coverage options, and filed for an overall 5.1% homeowners rate reduction, which helped improve competitiveness and supported new business production. Outside Florida, the Insurance Entities continued to pursue rate increases and refine coverage offerings to address inflation, claim cost trends, reinsurance costs, weather risk, and other market forces. Policies in force, premium in force, and total insured value increased year over year, reflecting organic growth, expanded marketing initiatives, new product offerings, and additional open territories. Management remains focused on disciplined growth, risk selection, geographic diversification, rate adequacy, and product design to support profitable expansion across the Company’s multi-state homeowner’s platform.
Current wording
The Company’s 2026 premium growth reflects management’s strategy to expand the homeowners insurance book in Florida and other states while responding to market conditions through targeted underwriting, product, rate, and marketing actions. In Florida, the Insurance Entities resumed writing new homeowners and dwelling business in most areas, introduced water damage coverage options, and filed for an overall 5.1% homeowners rate reduction in October 2025, which helped improve competitiveness and supported new business production. Outside Florida, the Insurance Entities continued to pursue rate increases and refine coverage offerings to address inflation, claim cost trends, reinsurance costs, weather risk, and other market forces. Policies in force, premium in force, and total insured value increased year over year, reflecting organic growth, expanded marketing initiatives, new product offerings, and additional open territories. Management remains focused on disciplined growth, risk selection, geographic diversification, rate adequacy, and product design to support profitable expansion across the Company’s multi-state homeowners platform.
Previous wording
For the three months ended June 30, 2026, direct premiums written totaled $621.3 million, representing an increase of $24.6 million or 4.1%. This growth was due to a $21.1 million, or 14.4%, increase from other states and a $3.5 million or 0.8%, increase in Florida compared to the same period in 2025. Direct premiums written have increased in 14 states we operate in since June 30, 2025.
Current wording
For the three months ended September 30, 2026, direct premiums written totaled $608.9 million, representing an increase of $16.1 million or 2.7%. This growth was due to a $30.3 million, or 18.5%, increase from other states and a $14.2 million, or 3.3%, decrease in Florida compared to the same period in 2025. Direct premiums written have increased in 17 states we operate in compared to September 30, 2025.
Previous wording
As of June 30, 2026, policies in force rose by 62,028 or 7.1%, premium in force increased by $90.5 million or 4.3%, and total insured value grew by $39.6 billion or 10.5%, compared to June 30, 2025, as noted in the following table (in thousands, except policies in force data):
Current wording
As of September 30, 2026, policies in force rose by 69,723 or 7.9%, premium in force increased by $93.7 million or 4.4%, and total insured value grew by $44.6 billion, or 11.6%, compared to September 30, 2025, as noted in the following table (in thousands, except policies in force data):
Previous wording
Direct premiums earned increased $21.4 million, or 4.1%, for the three months ended June 30, 2026, compared with the same period in 2025, primarily reflecting the recognition of premiums written over the applicable policy terms. Premiums are generally earned ratably over the policy coverage period, so changes in direct premiums earned reflect policies written in both the current and prior periods as coverage is provided.
Current wording
Direct premiums earned increased $22.6 million, or 4.2%, for the three months ended September 30, 2026, compared with the same period in 2025, primarily reflecting the recognition of premiums written over the applicable policy terms. Premiums are generally earned ratably over the policy coverage period, so changes in direct premiums earned reflect policies written in both the current and prior periods as coverage is provided.
Previous wording
Policies in force were 934,371 on June 30, 2026, an increase of 38,444 or 4.3%, from 895,927 on December 31, 2025. As of June 30, 2026, we have policies in 19 states and are authorized to do business in Tennessee with a rate filing underway. Details on recent rate changes impacting premiums are discussed in“Overview—Trends and Geographical Distribution—Florida Trends.”
Current wording
Policies in force were 953,611 on September 30, 2026, an increase of 57,684 or 6.4%, from 895,927 on December 31, 2025. As of September 30, 2026, we have policies in 19 states and are authorized to do business in Tennessee with a rate filing underway. Details on recent rate changes impacting premiums are discussed in“Overview—Trends and Geographical Distribution—Other Trends—Summary of Recent Rate Changes.”
Previous wording
Reinsurance is a critical component of the Company’s risk management, capital, and liquidity strategy, particularly for its catastrophe-exposed Florida homeowners business. The Insurance Entities use reinsurance to reduce exposure to hurricanes and other significant insured events, protect statutory capital, support policyholder obligations, and maintain underwriting capacity in Florida and other states. Because reinsurance is integral to managing catastrophe risk, changes in pricing, availability, coverage limits, retention levels, and program structure can materially affect the Company’s results of operations, financial ratios, statutory capital position, and ability to write business. Reinsurance costs are recognized ratably over the annual contract period from June 1 through May 31.
Current wording
Reinsurance is a critical component of the Company’s risk management, capital, and liquidity strategy, particularly for its catastrophe-exposed Florida homeowners business. The Insurance Entities use reinsurance to reduce exposure to hurricanes and other significant insured events, protect statutory capital, support policyholder obligations, and maintain underwriting capacity in Florida and other states. Because reinsurance is integral to managing catastrophe risk, changes in pricing, availability, coverage limits, retention levels, and program structure can materially affect the Company’s results of operations, financial ratios, statutory capital position, and ability to write business. Reinsurance costs are reflected in ceded premiums and recognized (earned) ratably over the annual contract period from June 1 through May 31.
Previous wording
For the three months ended June 30, 2026, ceded premiums earned increased $4.3 million, or 2.6%, compared with the same period in 2025. Ceded earned premiums represented 30.8% of direct earned premiums in 2026, compared with 31.2% in 2025. Second quarter results include ceded premiums earned from the 2025–26 reinsurance program, which concluded on May 31, 2026, as well as the initial ceded premiums earned under the new 2026–27 reinsurance program beginning June 1, 2026.
Current wording
For the three months ended September 30, 2026, ceded premiums earned decreased $20.9 million, or 12.0%, compared with the same period in 2025, reflecting lower costs for the 2026-2027 treaty period compared to the 2025-2026 treaty period, which ended on May 31, 2026. Ceded earned premiums represented 27.6% of direct earned premiums in 2026, compared with 32.7% in 2025.
Previous wording
On June 1, 2026, the Insurance Entities entered into the 2026–27 catastrophic reinsurance program with lower ceded written premium, under which ceded written premium declined 12.1% to $612.6 million from $696.8 million in the prior-year period. Because reinsurance costs are earned ratably over the June 1 through May 31 contract period, the majority of the benefit of the lower-cost 2026–27 reinsurance program is expected to be recognized in ceded premiums earned over future periods.
Current wording
On June 1, 2026, the Insurance Entities entered into the 2026–27 catastrophe reinsurance program, under which ceded written premium was 12.0% lower than ceded written premium written on June 1, 2025. Because reinsurance costs are earned ratably over the June 1 through May 31 contract period, the benefit of the lower-cost 2026–27 reinsurance program will continue to be recognized in ceded premiums earned over the remaining period through May 31, 2027.
Previous wording
The 2026–27 reinsurance program provides $2.623 billion of single-event All States catastrophe capacity, including Florida, an increase of approximately $50 million over the 2025–26 treaty period. The program also includes $352 million of forward catastrophe capacity extending into the 2027–28 treaty period, including $277 million below the Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund layer. As of June 30, 2026, Florida represented less than 50% of the Company’s total insured value, reflecting management’s strategy to diversify catastrophe exposure by expanding the homeowners insurance book in other states while maintaining underwriting discipline in Florida. The Insurance Entities’ combined $45 million first-event statutory retention remained unchanged from the prior year.
Current wording
The 2026–27 reinsurance program provides $2.768 billion of single-event All States catastrophe capacity, including Florida, an increase of approximately $268 million over the 2025–26 treaty period. The program also includes $352 million of forward catastrophe capacity extending into the 2027–28 treaty period, including $277 million below the Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund layer. As of September 30, 2026, Florida represented less than 50% of the Company’s total insured value, reflecting management’s strategy to diversify catastrophe exposure by expanding the homeowners insurance book in other states while maintaining underwriting discipline in Florida. The Insurance Entities’ combined $45 million first-event statutory retention remained unchanged from the prior year.
Previous wording
Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. (“UIH”) established a captive insurance arrangement to assume the first-event layer of $66 million in excess of the Insurance Entities’ $45 million retention as part of the 2026–27 reinsurance program. The captive is consolidated by UIH; therefore, premiums ceded to the captive and related recoveries are eliminated in UIH’s consolidated financial statements. Although the captive arrangement does not result in net ceded premium expense or reinsurance recoveries at the consolidated level, it allows the Company to retain a defined layer of catastrophe risk within the consolidated group. Management believes this structure supports the overall efficiency of the reinsurance program by helping align retained risk with the Company’s capital position, reduce reliance on third-party reinsurance for that layer, and preserve external reinsurance capacity for higher layers of catastrophe protection. See“Item 1—Note 14 (Variable Interest Entities).”
Current wording
UVE established a captive insurance arrangement to assume the first-event layer of $66 million in excess of the Insurance Entities’ $45 million retention as part of the 2026–27 reinsurance program. The captive is consolidated by UVE; therefore, premiums ceded to the captive and related recoveries are eliminated in UVE’s consolidated financial statements. Although the captive arrangement does not result in net ceded premium expense or reinsurance recoveries at the consolidated level, it allows the Company to retain a defined layer of catastrophe risk within the consolidated group. Management believes this structure supports the overall efficiency of the reinsurance program by helping align retained risk with the Company’s capital position, reduce reliance on third-party reinsurance for that layer, and preserve external reinsurance capacity for higher layers of catastrophe protection. See“Item 1—Note 14 (Variable Interest Entities).”
Previous wording
Net investment income was $20.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $17.3 million for the same period in 2025, an increase of $3.0 million, or 17.1%. The increase was primarily driven by growth in average invested assets and higher average book yields, as operating cash flows and maturities were reinvested into securities with higher yields than the assets they replaced. The benefit was partially offset by lower yields on cash and cash equivalents compared with 2025, although higher cash balances in the 2026 period mitigated a portion of that decline. See“Item 1—Note 3 (Investments)” for additional information regarding investment income.
Current wording
Net investment income was $21.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2026, compared to $18.3 million for the same period in 2025, an increase of $3.1 million, or 17.1%. The increase was primarily driven by growth in average invested assets and higher average book yields, as operating cash flows and maturities were reinvested into securities with higher yields than the assets they replaced. The benefit was partially offset by lower yields on cash and cash equivalents compared with 2025, although higher cash balances in the 2026 period mitigated a portion of that decline. See“Item 1—Note 3 (Investments)” for additional information regarding investment income.
Previous wording
The net change in unrealized gains and losses during the quarter primarily reflected increases in the fair value of equity securities held at June 30, 2026, together with the recognition in earnings of previously unrealized gains or losses on equity securities sold during the period. Changes in the fair value of fixed-maturity securities were primarily affected by interest rate movements, credit spreads, and portfolio duration. See“Analysis of Financial Condition” for additional information regarding changes in total invested assets during 2026.
Current wording
The net change in unrealized gains and losses during the quarter primarily reflected the decrease in the fair value of equity securities and other investments held at September 30, 2026, together with the recognition in earnings of previously unrealized gains or losses on equity securities sold during the period.
Previous wording
As discussed above, on June 1, 2026, the Insurance Entities entered into the 2026–27 reinsurance program with lower ceded written premium. Ceded written premium under the program decreased 12.1% year over year, reducing the premium base on which related reinsurance brokerage commissions are earned. As a result, the lower ceded premium volume under the 2026–27 reinsurance program is expected to reduce related commission revenue ratably over the remaining contract period from July 1, 2026 through May 31, 2027.
Current wording
As discussed above, on June 1, 2026, the Insurance Entities entered into the 2026–27 reinsurance program with lower ceded written premium. Ceded written premium under the program decreased 12.0% year over year, reducing the premium base on which related reinsurance brokerage commissions are earned. As a result, the lower ceded premium volume under the 2026–27 reinsurance program is expected to reduce related commission revenue ratably over the remaining contract period from October 1, 2026 through May 31, 2027.
Previous wording
Policy fee revenue represents managing general agent fees earned in connection with policies written in states where the Company is permitted to charge such fees. Policy fee revenue was $6.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, compared with $5.6 million for the same period in 2025, an increase of $0.4 million, or 7.8%. The increase was primarily driven by policy growth and reflects the geographic mix of policies written in states where such fees are permitted.
Current wording
Policy fee revenue represents managing general agent fees earned in connection with policies written in states where the Company is permitted to charge such fees. Policy fee revenue was $5.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2026, compared with $5.4 million for the same period in 2025, an increase of $0.2 million, or 4.5%. The increase was primarily driven by policy growth and reflects the geographic mix of policies written in states where such fees are permitted.
Showing the first 40 of 117 pairs. Open the source sections for the rest.
Rearranged current paragraphs (2)
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
Changes in the fair value of fixed-maturity securities, reflected in other comprehensive income, net of taxes, were primarily affected by interest rate movements, particularly the Federal Reserve’s increase in rates during the quarter, credit spreads, and portfolio duration. See“Analysis of Financial Condition” for additional information regarding changes in total invested assets during 2026.
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
On October 29, 2026, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to an additional $20.0 million of the Company’s common stock under the January 2028 Share Repurchase Program.