COUSINS PROPERTIES INC

Previous wording

Set forth below are the risks we believe investors should consider carefully in evaluating an investment in the securities of Cousins Properties Incorporated.

Current wording

Below are the risks we believe investors should consider carefully in evaluating an investment in our securities.

Previous wording

•the need to periodically repair, renovate, and re-lease properties,

Current wording

•the need to periodically repair, renovate, and re-lease properties, and

Previous wording

•the immediate and long-term impact of a public health crisis and the governmental and third party response to such a crisis;

Current wording

•the immediate and long-term impact of a public health crisis, such as a pandemic, epidemic, or outbreak of a contagious disease and the governmental and third party response to such a crisis;

Previous wording

Leasing risk. Our operating office properties were 91.6% leased at December 31, 2024. Our 20 largest tenants account for a meaningful portion of our revenues. Our operating revenues are dependent upon entering into leases with, and collecting rents from, our tenants. Tenants whose leases are expiring may want to decrease the space they lease and/or may be unwilling to continue their lease. When leases expire or are terminated, replacement tenants may not be available upon acceptable terms and market rental rates may be lower than the previous contractual rental rates. Also, our tenants may approach us for additional concessions in order to remain open and operating. The granting of these concessions may adversely affect our results of operations and cash flows to the extent that they result in reduced rental rates, additional capital improvements, or allowances paid to, or on behalf of, the tenants.

Current wording

Leasing risk. Our operating office properties were 90.7% leased at December 31, 2025. Our 20 largest tenants account for a meaningful portion of our revenues. Our operating revenues are dependent upon entering into leases with, and collecting rents from, our tenants. Tenants whose leases are expiring may want to decrease the space they lease and/or may be unwilling to continue their lease. When leases expire or are terminated, replacement tenants may not be available upon acceptable terms and market rental rates may be lower than the previous contractual rental rates. Also, our tenants may approach us for additional concessions in order to remain open and operating. The granting of these concessions may adversely affect our results of operations and cash flows to the extent that they result in reduced rental rates, additional capital improvements, or allowances paid to, or on behalf of, the tenants.

Previous wording

Tenant and market concentration risk. As of December 31, 2024, our top 20 tenants represented 39.5% of total annualized rent with our largest single tenant accounting for 8.1% ofannualized rent. The inability or refusal of any of our significant tenants to pay rent or a decision by a significant tenant to vacate their premises prior to, or at the conclusion of, their lease term (including as a result of a bankruptcy proceeding) could have a significant negative impact on our results of operations or financial condition if a suitable replacement tenant is not secured in a timely manner.

Current wording

Tenant and market concentration risk. As of December 31, 2025, our top 20 tenants represented 38.6% of total annualized rent with our largest single tenant accounting for 8.9% ofannualized rent. The inability or refusal of any of our significant tenants to pay rent or a decision by a significant tenant to terminate their lease prior to, or at the conclusion of, their lease term (including as a result of a bankruptcy proceeding) could have a significant negative impact on our results of operations or financial condition if a suitable replacement tenant is not secured in a timely manner.

Previous wording

For the three months ended December 31, 2024, 35.7% of our net operating income for properties owned was derived from the Atlanta area, 32.4% was derived from the Austin area, 9.0% was derived from the Charlotte area, 8.6% was derived from the Tampa area, 8.1% was derived from the Phoenix area, and 2.4% was derived from the Dallas area. Any adverse economic conditions impacting Atlanta, Austin, Tampa, Charlotte, Phoenix, or Dallas could adversely affect our overall results of operations and financial condition. Because our portfolio consists primarily of lifestyle office buildings (as opposed to a more diversified real estate portfolio), a decrease in demand for this type of workplace could adversely affect our overall results of operations and financial condition. Additionally, some of our markets (and the submarkets within which we operate) have an outsized concentration of a limited number of industries. For example, as of December 31, 2024, in Austin, technology companies represent 52.0% of our annualized rent, in Charlotte, banking and other financial sector companies represent 32.9% of our annualized rent, and in Tampa, biotechnology and health science companies represent 26.6% of our our annualized rent. A significant downturn in one or more of the foregoing sectors and/or sustained changes in space utilization due to remote or hybrid work models could result in decreased leasing demand and have an adverse effect on our overall results of operations and financial condition.

Current wording

For the three months ended of December 31, 2025, 36.1% of our net operating income was derived from the Austin area, 31.3% was derived from the Atlanta area, 9.2% was derived from the Charlotte area, 7.8% was derived from the Tampa area, 7.5% was derived from the Phoenix area, and 4.8% was derived from the Dallas area. These percentages represent net operating income from operating properties, which excludes our Neuhoff joint venture mixed-use development which has commenced initial operations but is not yet stabilized. Any adverse economic conditions impacting Austin, Atlanta, Charlotte, Tampa, Phoenix, Dallas, could adversely affect our overall results of operations and financial condition. Because our portfolio consists primarily of lifestyle office buildings (as opposed to a more diversified real estate portfolio), a decrease in demand for this type of workplace could adversely affect our overall results of operations and financial condition. Additionally, some of our markets (and the submarkets within which we operate) have an outsized concentration of a limited number of industries. For example, as of December 31, 2025, in Austin, technology companies represent 53.1% of our annualized rent, in Charlotte, banking and other financial sector companies represent 19.2% of our annualized rent, and in Tampa, biotechnology and health science companies represent 25.0% of our annualized rent. A significant downturn in one or more of our markets could result in decreased leasing demand and have an adverse effect on our overall results of operations and financial condition.

Previous wording

The bankruptcy or insolvency of a major tenant may adversely affect the income produced by our properties. For example, major tenants such as Silicon Valley Bank Financial and WeWork have previously filed for bankruptcy protection. Other major tenants could file for bankruptcy protection or become insolvent in the future and we cannot evict a tenant on this basis alone. On the other hand, a bankrupt tenant may reject and terminate its lease with us. In such a case, our claim against the bankrupt tenant for unpaid and future rent would be subject to a statutory cap that might be substantially less than the remaining rent actually owed under the lease, and, even so, our claim for unpaid rent would likely not be paid in full. This shortfall could adversely affect our cash flow and results of operations.

Current wording

The bankruptcy or insolvency of a major tenant may adversely affect the income produced by our properties. Major tenants could file for bankruptcy protection or become insolvent in the future and we cannot evict a tenant on this basis alone. On the other hand, a bankrupt tenant may reject and terminate its lease with us. In such a case, our claim against the bankrupt tenant for unpaid and future rent would be subject to a statutory cap that might be substantially less than the remaining rent actually owed under the lease, and, even so, our claim for unpaid rent would likely not be paid in full. This shortfall could adversely affect our cash flow and results of operations.

Previous wording

Uninsured losses and condemnation costs. Accidents, earthquakes, hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, droughts, ice storms, wind storms, terrorism incidents, and other physical losses at our properties could adversely affect our operating results and financial condition. Casualties may occur that significantly damage an operating property or property under development, insurance deductibles or co-insurance limits may be significant (including with respect to damage from named wind storms, where available co-insurance limits are significantly in excess of deductibles for most other casualty losses), and insurance proceeds may be less than the total loss incurred by us. Although we, or our joint venture partners where applicable, maintain casualty insurance under policies we believe to be adequate and appropriate, including commercial general liability, fire, flood, and rent loss insurance on operating properties, as well as cyber coverage, some types of losses, such as those related to the termination of longer-term leases and other contracts, generally are not insured. Property ownership also involves potential liability to third parties for such matters as personal injuries occurring on the property. There may be certain losses that are not generally insured against or that are not generally fully insured against because it is not deemed economically feasible or prudent to do so, including losses due to floods, wind, earthquakes, acts of war, acts of terrorism, riots, or pandemics. A number of our properties are located in areas that are known to be subject to hurricane or flood risk. We carry hurricane and flood hazard insurance on all of our properties located in areas historically subject to such activity, subject to coverage limitations and deductibles, if we believe it is commercially reasonable. In Tampa and Houston, our wind storm insurance is subject to deductibles from 2% to 5% of the value of the affected building. We evaluate our insurance coverage annually in light of current industry practice through an analysis prepared by outside consultants. If an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of insured limits occurs with respect to one or more of our properties, then we could lose the capital we invested in the properties, as well as the anticipated future revenue from the properties. We continue to monitor the state of the insurance market in general, but we cannot anticipate what insurance coverage will be available on commercially reasonable terms in future policy years. Such losses may not be fully insured. In addition to uninsured losses, various government authorities may condemn all or parts of operating properties. Such condemnations could adversely affect the viability of such projects.

Current wording

Uninsured losses and condemnation costs. Accidents, earthquakes, hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, droughts, ice storms, wind storms, hail storms, terrorism incidents, and other physical losses at our properties could adversely affect our operating results and financial condition. Casualties may occur that significantly damage an operating property or property under development, insurance deductibles or co-insurance limits may be significant (including with respect to damage from named wind storms or hail storms in certain markets, where available co-insurance limits are significantly in excess of deductibles for most other casualty losses), and insurance proceeds may be less than the total loss incurred by us. Although we, or our joint venture partners where applicable, maintain casualty insurance under policies we believe to be adequate and appropriate, including commercial general liability, fire, flood, and rent loss insurance on operating properties, as well as cyber coverage, some types of losses, such as those related to the termination of longer-term leases and other contracts, generally are not insured. Property ownership also involves potential liability to third parties for such matters as personal injuries occurring on the property. There may be certain losses that are not generally insured against or that are not generally fully insured against because it is not deemed economically feasible or prudent to do so, including losses due to floods, wind, earthquakes, acts of war, acts of terrorism, riots, or pandemics. A number of our properties are located in areas that are known to be subject to hurricane, hail, or flood risk. We carry hurricane, hail, or flood hazard insurance on all of our properties located in areas historically subject to such activity, subject to coverage limitations and deductibles, if we believe it is commercially reasonable. In Tampa and Houston, our wind storm insurance is subject to deductibles from 2% to 5% of the value of the affected building. We evaluate our insurance coverage annually in light of current industry practice through an analysis prepared by outside consultants. If an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of insured limits occurs with respect to one or more of our properties, then we could lose the capital we invested in the properties, as well as the anticipated future revenue from the properties. We continue to monitor the state of the insurance market in general, but we cannot anticipate what insurance coverage will be available on commercially reasonable terms in future policy years. In addition to uninsured losses, various government authorities may condemn all or parts of operating properties. Such condemnations could adversely affect the viability of such projects.

Previous wording

Environmental issues. Federal, state, and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment may require a current or previous owner or operator of real estate to investigate and clean up hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum products or other chemicals which are discovered at or migrating from a property, simply because of our past ownership or operation of the real estate. If determined to be liable, the owner or operator may have to pay a governmental entity or third parties for property damage and for investigation and clean-up costs incurred by such parties in connection with the contamination, or perform such investigation and clean up itself. Although certain legal protections may be available to prospective purchasers of property, these laws typically impose remediation responsibility and liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of or caused the presence of the regulated substances. Even if more than one person may have been responsible for the release of regulated substances at the property, each person covered by the environmental laws may be held responsible for all of the remediation costs incurred. In addition, third parties may sue the owner or operator of a site for damages and costs resulting from regulated substances emanating from that site. We manage this risk through Phase I Environmental Site Assessments and, as necessary, Phase II Environmental Site Assessments, which may include environmental sampling on properties we acquire or develop. Most of our properties are located in urban or previously developed areas, and the historic use of some sites may have resulted in contamination.

Current wording

Environmental issues. Federal, state, and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment may require a current or previous owner or operator of real estate to investigate and clean up hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum products or other chemicals which are discovered at or migrating from a property, simply because of our past ownership or operation of the real estate. If determined to be liable, the owner or operator may have to pay a governmental entity or third parties for property damage and for investigation and clean-up costs incurred by such parties in connection with the contamination, or perform such investigation and clean up itself. Although certain legal protections may be available to prospective purchasers of property, these laws typically impose remediation responsibility and liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of or caused the presence of the regulated substances. Even if more than one person may have been responsible for the release of regulated substances at the property, each person covered by the environmental laws may be held responsible for all of the remediation costs incurred. In addition, third parties may sue the owner or operator of a site for damages and costs resulting from regulated substances emanating from that site. We manage this risk through Phase I Environmental Site Assessments and, as necessary, Phase II Environmental Site Assessments, which may include environmental sampling on properties we acquire or develop. Most of our properties are located in urban or previously developed areas, and the historic use of some sites may have resulted in contamination. Although we generally seek "brown fields" designation where available, this designation may not be available for all urban properties in our portfolio or for properties we may acquire in the future.

Previous wording

We are not currently aware of any environmental liabilities at locations that we believe could have a material adverse effect on our business, assets, financial condition, or results of operations. Unidentified environmental liabilities could arise, however, including as a result of our new or more stringent environmental laws and regulations, and could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Current wording

We are not currently aware of any environmental liabilities at locations that we believe could have a material adverse effect on our business, assets, financial condition, or results of operations. Unidentified environmental liabilities could arise, however, including as a result of new or more stringent environmental laws and regulations, and could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Previous wording

Sustainability strategies. Our sustainability strategy is to develop and maintain resilient buildings that are operated in an environmentally and socially responsible manner, encouraging office users to select us for their corporate operations while enhancing the communities in which our buildings are located. Failure to develop and maintain sustainable and resilient buildings relative to our peers could adversely impact our ability to lease space at competitive rates and negatively impact our results of operations and portfolio attractiveness.

Current wording

Sustainability strategies. Our sustainability strategy is to develop and maintain resilient buildings that are operated in an environmentally and socially responsible manner, encouraging office users to select us for their corporate operations while enhancing the communities in which our buildings are located. Failure to develop and maintain sustainable and resilient buildings (including as reflected by energy or water consumption intensity, greenhouse gas emissions intensity, or through obtaining and maintaining key sustainability certifications) relative to our peers could adversely impact our ability to lease space at competitive rates and negatively impact our results of operations and portfolio attractiveness.

Previous wording

Climate change and severe weather event risks. The physical effects of climate change could have a material adverse effect on our properties, operations, and business. To the extent climate change causes changes in weather patterns or severity, our markets could experience increases in storm intensity (including floods, fires, tornadoes, hurricanes, droughts, wind storms, ice storms, and earthquakes), rising sea-levels, and changes in precipitation, temperature, air quality, and quality and availability of water. Over time, these conditions could result in physical damage to, or declining demand for, our properties or our inability to operate the buildings efficiently or at all. Climate change may also indirectly affect our business by increasing the cost of (or making unavailable) property insurance on terms we find acceptable, increasing the cost of required resources, including energy, other fuel sources, water, and waste removal services, and increasing the risk and severity of floods, fires, tornadoes, hurricanes, droughts, wind storms, ice storms, and earthquakes at our properties. Should the impact of climate change be severe or occur for lengthy periods of time, our financial condition or results of operations could be adversely impacted. In addition, compliance with new or more stringent laws or regulations or stricter interpretations of existing laws may require material expenditure by us. For example, various federal, state, and local laws and regulations have been implemented or are under consideration to mitigate the effects of climate change caused by greenhouse gas emissions. Among other things, "green" building codes may seek to reduce emissions through the imposition of standards for design, construction materials, water and energy usage and efficiency, and waste management. Such codes could require us to make improvements to our existing properties, increase the costs of maintaining or improving our existing properties or developing new properties, or increase taxes and fees assessed on us or our properties. We have historically voluntarily disclosed relevant information regarding our sustainability practices; however, federal, state, and local laws and regulations are evolving and future regulation may require more stringent data reporting. We face transition risks in the event of the implementation of any such federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and codes. Expenditures required for compliance with such codes may affect our cash flow and results of operations. Additionally, although we pursue a robust sustainability strategy, new approaches and trends regarding building resiliency emerge from time to time in this rapidly evolving focus area. Our approaches and priorities may differ from those of our peers, and the perception of the public or investors of these differences may adversely impact our portfolio attractiveness of our ability to lease space at competitive rates.

Current wording

Climate change and severe weather event risks. The physical effects of climate change could have a material adverse effect on our properties, operations, and business. To the extent climate change causes changes in weather patterns or severity, our markets could experience increases in storm intensity (including floods, fires, tornadoes, hurricanes, droughts, wind storms, ice storms, hail storms, and earthquakes), rising sea-levels, and changes in precipitation, temperature, air quality, and quality and availability of water. Over time, these conditions could result in physical damage to, or declining demand for, our properties or our inability to operate the buildings efficiently or at all. Climate change may also indirectly affect our business by increasing the cost of (or making unavailable) property insurance on terms we find acceptable, increasing the cost of required resources, including energy, other fuel sources, water, and waste removal services, and increasing the risk and severity of floods, fires, tornadoes, hurricanes, droughts, wind storms, ice storms, hail storms, and earthquakes at our properties. Should the impact of climate change be severe or occur for lengthy periods of time, our financial condition or results of operations could be adversely impacted. In addition, compliance with new or more stringent laws or regulations or stricter interpretations of existing laws may require material expenditure by us. For example, various federal, state, and local laws and regulations have been implemented or are under consideration to mitigate the effects of climate change caused by greenhouse gas emissions. Among other things, "green" building codes may seek to reduce emissions through the imposition of standards for design, construction materials, water and energy usage and efficiency, and waste management. Such codes could require us to make improvements to our existing properties, increase the costs of maintaining or improving our existing properties or developing new properties, or increase taxes and fees assessed on us or our properties. We have historically voluntarily disclosed relevant information regarding our sustainability practices; however, federal, state, and local laws and regulations are evolving and future regulation may require more stringent data reporting. We may face transition risks in the event of the implementation of any such federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and codes. Expenditures required for compliance with such codes may affect our cash flow and results of operations. Additionally, although we pursue a robust sustainability strategy, new approaches and trends regarding building resiliency emerge from time to time in this rapidly evolving focus area. Our approaches and priorities may differ from those of our peers, and the perception of the public or investors of these differences may adversely impact our portfolio attractiveness and our ability to lease space at competitive rates.

Previous wording

Joint venture structure risks. We hold ownership interests in a number of joint ventures with varying structures and may in the future invest in additional real estate through such structures. We currently have joint ventures that are and are not consolidated within our financial statements. Our venture partners may have rights to take actions over which we have no control, or the right to withhold approval of actions that we propose (including with respect to the decision to commence development of or to sell a project), either of which could adversely affect our interests in the related joint ventures, and in some cases, our overall financial condition and results of operations. A venture partner may have economic and/or other business interests or goals that are incompatible with our business interests or goals and that venture partner may be in a position to take action contrary to our interests, including declining to sell at a time or price that we find attractive or determining to sell at a time or price that we do not find attractive. In addition, such venture partners may default on their obligations, including loans secured by property owned by the joint venture that could have an adverse impact on the financial condition and operations of the joint venture. Such defaults may result in our fulfilling the defaulting partners' obligations that may, in some cases, require us to contribute additional capital to the ventures. Furthermore, the success of a project may be dependent upon the expertise, business judgment, diligence, and effectiveness of our venture partners in matters that are outside our control. Thus, the involvement of venture partners could adversely impact the development, operation, ownership, financing, or disposition of the underlying properties.

Current wording

Joint venture structure risks. We hold ownership interests in a number of joint ventures with varying structures and may in the future invest in additional real estate through joint ventures. We currently have joint ventures that are and are not consolidated within our financial statements. Our venture partners may have rights to take actions over which we have no control, or the right to withhold approval of actions that we propose (including with respect to the decision to commence development of or to finance or sell a project), either of which could adversely affect our interests in the related joint ventures, and in some cases, our overall financial condition and results of operations. A venture partner may have economic and/or other business interests or goals that are incompatible with our business interests or goals and that venture partner may be in a position to take action contrary to our interests, including declining to sell at a time or price that we find attractive or determining to sell at a time or price that we do not find attractive or making a comparable decision regarding financing. In addition, such venture partners may default on their obligations, including loans secured by property owned by the joint venture that could have an adverse impact on the financial condition and operations of the joint venture. Such defaults may result in our fulfilling the defaulting partners' obligations that may, in some cases, require us to contribute additional capital to the ventures. Furthermore, the success of a project may be dependent upon the expertise, business judgment, diligence, and effectiveness of our venture partners in matters that are outside our control. Thus, the involvement of venture partners could adversely impact the development, operation, ownership, financing, or disposition of the underlying properties.

Previous wording

Ground lease risks. As of December 31, 2024, we had interests in eight land parcels in various markets that we lease individually on a long-term basis. As of December 31, 2024, we had 2.4 million aggregate square feet of rental space located on these leased parcels, from which we generated 14% of our total Net Operating Income ("NOI") in the fourth quarter of 2024. In the future, we may invest in additional properties on some of these parcels or additional parcels subject to ground leases. Many of these ground leases and other restrictive agreements impose significant limitations on our uses of the subject property and restrict our ability to sell or otherwise transfer our interests in the property. These restrictions may limit our ability to timely sell or exchange the property, may impair the property's value, or may negatively impact our ability to find suitable tenants for the property. In addition, if we default under the terms of any particular lease, we may lose the ownership rights to the property subject to the lease. Upon expiration of a lease, we may not be able to renegotiate a new lease on favorable terms, if at all. The loss of the ownership rights to these properties or an increase of rental expense could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results.

Current wording

Ground lease risks. As of December 31, 2025, we had ground lease interests in eight land parcels at four of our properties in various markets that we lease individually on a long-term basis. As of December 31, 2025, we had 2.4 million aggregate square feet of rental space located on these leased parcels, from which we generated 12.3% of our total Net Operating Income ("NOI") in the three months ended December 31, 2025. In the future, we may invest in additional properties on some of these parcels or additional parcels subject to ground leases. Many of these ground leases and other restrictive agreements impose significant limitations on our uses of the subject property and restrict our ability to sell or otherwise transfer our interests in the property. These restrictions may limit our ability to timely sell or exchange the property, may impair the property's value, or may negatively impact our ability to find suitable tenants for the property. In addition, if we default under the terms of any particular lease, we may lose the ownership rights to the property subject to the lease. Upon expiration of a lease, we may not be able to renegotiate a new lease on favorable terms, if at all. The loss of the ownership rights to these properties or an increase of rental expense could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results.

Previous wording

The Americans with Disabilities Act generally requires that certain buildings, including office buildings, be made accessible to disabled persons. We believe that we are currently in compliance with these requirements. Noncompliance could result in the imposition of fines by the federal government or the award of damages to private litigants. If, under the Americans with Disabilities Act, we are required to make substantial alterations and capital expenditures in one or more of our properties, including the removal of access barriers or the addition of access enhancements, it could adversely impact our earnings and cash flows, thereby impacting our ability to service debt and make distributions to our stockholders.

Current wording

The Americans with Disabilities Act Compliance risks. The Americans with Disabilities Act generally requires that certain buildings, including office buildings, be made accessible to disabled persons. We believe that we are currently in compliance with these requirements. Noncompliance could result in the imposition of fines by the federal government or the award of damages to private litigants. If, under the Americans with Disabilities Act, we are required to make substantial alterations and capital expenditures in one or more of our properties, including the removal of access barriers or the addition of access enhancements, it could adversely impact our earnings and cash flows, thereby impacting our ability to service debt and make distributions to our stockholders.

Previous wording

•Credit Facility. Terms and conditions available in the marketplace for unsecured credit facilities vary over time. We can provide no assurance that the amount we need from our Credit Facility will be available at any given time, or at all, or that the rates and fees charged by the lenders will be reasonable. We incur interest under our Credit Facility at a variable rate. Variable rate debt creates higher debt service requirements if market interest rates increase, which would adversely affect our cash flow and results of operations. Our Credit Facility contains customary covenants, requirements, and other limitations on our ability to incur indebtedness, including covenants on unsecured debt outstanding, restrictions on secured recourse debt outstanding, and requirements to maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio. Our continued ability to borrow under our Credit Facility is subject to compliance with these covenants.

Current wording

•Credit Facility. Terms and conditions available in the marketplace for unsecured credit facilities vary over time. We can provide no assurance that the amount we need from our Credit Facility will be available at any given time, or at all, or that the rates and fees charged by the lenders will be reasonable. We incur interest under our Credit Facility at a variable rate. Variable rate debt creates higher debt service requirements if market interest rates increase, which would adversely affect our cash flow and results of operations. Our Credit Facility contains customary covenants, requirements, and other limitations on our ability to incur indebtedness, including covenants on unsecured debt outstanding, restrictions on secured recourse debt outstanding, and requirements to maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio. Our continued ability to borrow under our Credit Facility is subject to compliance with these covenants. Our credit facility has a scheduled maturity, and there can be no assurances regarding our ability to extend that maturity or enter into a replacement credit facility, and the terms and conditions of such extension or replacement and the covenants thereunder may be less favorable to us than the existing terms covenants and conditions.

Previous wording

As of December 31, 2024, we had $3.1 billion of outstanding indebtedness. The incurrence of additional indebtedness could have adverse consequences on our business, such as:

Current wording

As of December 31, 2025, we had $3.3 billion of outstanding indebtedness. The incurrence of additional indebtedness could have adverse consequences on our business, such as:

Previous wording

Credit ratings are subject to ongoing review by rating agencies, which consider a number of factors, including our financial strength, performance, prospects, and operations as well as factors not under our control. Other factors that influence our credit ratings include changes to the rating agencies' methodologies for our industry or certain security types; the rating agencies' assessment of the general operating environment for financial services companies; our relative positions in the markets in which we compete; our various risk exposures and risk management policies and activities; pending litigation and other contingencies; our reputation; our liquidity position, diversity of funding sources and funding costs; the current and expected level and volatility of our earnings; our capital position and capital management practices; our corporate governance; current or future regulatory and legislative initiatives; and the agencies' views on whether the U.S. government would provide meaningful support to us or our subsidiaries in a crisis. Rating agencies could make adjustments to our credit ratings at any time, and there can be no assurance that they will maintain our ratings at current levels or that downgrades will not occur.

Current wording

Credit ratings are subject to ongoing review by rating agencies, which consider a number of factors, including our financial strength, performance, prospects, risk exposures, and our corporate and operating governance policies and practices, as well as factors not under our control. Rating agencies could make adjustments to our credit ratings at any time, and there can be no assurance that they will maintain our ratings at current levels or that downgrades will not occur.

Previous wording

Credit rating downgrades or negative watch warnings could negatively impact our reputation with lenders, investors, and other third parties, which could also impair our ability to compete in certain markets or engage in certain transactions. In particular, holders of securities or debt instruments may perceive such a downgrade or warning negatively and pursue divestment of all or a portion of such securities or debt instruments. While certain aspects of a credit rating downgrade are quantifiable, the impact that such a downgrade would have on our liquidity, business, and results of operations in future periods is inherently uncertain and would depend on a number of interrelated factors, including, among other things, the magnitude of the downgrade, the rating relative to peers, the rating assigned by the relevant agency pre-downgrade, individual client behavior, and future mitigating actions we might take.

Current wording

Credit rating downgrades or negative watch warnings could negatively impact our reputation with lenders, investors, and other third parties, which could also impair our ability to compete in certain markets or engage in certain transactions. In particular, holders of securities or debt instruments may perceive such a downgrade or warning negatively and pursue divestment of all or a portion of such securities or debt instruments. While certain aspects of a credit rating downgrade are quantifiable, the impact that such a downgrade would have on our liquidity, business, and results of operations in future periods is inherently uncertain and would depend on a number of factors.

Previous wording

•the costs and timing of repositioning or redeveloping the acquired property;

Current wording

•the need for, along with the costs and timing of, repositioning or redeveloping the acquired property;

Previous wording

•the inability to obtain financing for acquisitions on favorable terms, or at all;

Current wording

•the inability to obtain financing or other sources of capital for acquisitions on favorable terms, or at all;

Previous wording

Our acquisition process requires that we pursue a large number of opportunities; we may incur significant costs related to the pursuit of acquisitions that do not close, which could directly or indirectly affect our results of operations. We have procedures and controls in place that are intended to minimize this risk, but it is likely that we will continue to incur costs related to pursuing acquisitions on projects that we do not successfully acquire or complete.

Current wording

Our acquisition and investment process requires that we pursue a large number of opportunities, with a smaller number actually being acquired or completed; we may incur significant costs related to the pursuit of acquisitions that do not close, which could directly or indirectly affect our results of operations. We have procedures and controls in place that are intended to minimize this risk, but it is likely that we will continue to incur costs related to pursuing acquisitions on projects or other investments that we do not successfully acquire or complete.

Previous wording

•Construction delays. Development activity carries the risk that a project could be delayed due to, but not limited to, weather and other forces of nature, availability of materials, availability of skilled labor, supply chain disruption, the financial health of general contractors or sub-contractors, and the competing demands on plan-approving authorities. Construction delays could cause adverse financial impacts to us which could include incurring more interest and other carrying costs than originally budgeted, monetary penalties from tenants pursuant to their leases, and higher construction costs. Delays could also result in a violation of terms of construction loans that could increase fees, interest, or trigger additional recourse of a construction loan.

Current wording

•Construction delays. Development activity carries the risk that a project could be delayed due to, but not limited to, weather and other forces of nature, availability of materials, availability of skilled labor, supply chain disruption, the financial health and project capacity of general contractors or sub-contractors, and the competing demands on plan-approving authorities. Construction delays could cause adverse financial impacts to us which could include incurring more interest and other carrying costs than originally budgeted, monetary penalties from tenants pursuant to their leases, and higher construction costs. Delays could also result in a violation of terms of construction loans that could increase fees, interest, or trigger additional recourse of a construction loan.

Previous wording

•Risks associated with the development of mixed-use properties. We operate, are currently developing, and may in the future develop properties, either alone or through joint ventures, that are known as "mixed-use" developments. This means that in addition to the development of office space, the project may also include space for retail, residential, or other commercial purposes. We may seek to develop the non-office component ourselves, sell the right to that component to a third-party developer, or we may partner with a third party who has more non-office real estate experience. If we do choose to develop other components ourselves, we would be exposed not only to those risks typically associated with the development of commercial real estate generally, but also to specific risks associated with the development and ownership of non-office real estate. In addition, even if we sell the rights to develop the other components or elect to participate in the development through a joint venture, we may be exposed to the risks associated with the failure of the other party to complete the development as expected. These include the risk that the other party would default on its obligations necessitating that we complete the other component ourselves, including potential financing of the project. If we decide to hire a third-party manager, we would be dependent on them and their key personnel to provide services to us, and we may not find a suitable replacement if the management agreement is terminated or if key personnel leave or otherwise become unavailable to us.

Current wording

•Risks associated with the development of mixed-use properties. We operate, are currently developing, and may in the future develop properties, either alone or through joint ventures, that are known as "mixed-use" developments. This means that in addition to the development of office space, the project may also include space for retail, residential, or other commercial purposes. We may seek to develop the non-office component ourselves, sell the right to that component to a third-party developer, or we may partner with a third party who has more non-office real estate experience. If we do choose to develop other components ourselves, we would be exposed not only to those risks typically associated with the development of commercial real estate generally, but also to specific risks associated with the development and ownership of non-office real estate. In addition, even if we sell the rights to develop the other components or elect to participate in the development through a joint venture, we may be exposed to the risks associated with the failure of the other party to complete the development as expected. These include the risk that the other party would default on its obligations necessitating that we complete the other component ourselves, including potential financing of the project. If we decide to hire a third-party manager, we would be dependent on them and their key personnel to provide services to us, and we may not find a suitable replacement if the management agreement is terminated or if key personnel leave or otherwise become unavailable to us. Due to the complexity of mixed use projects, they may be more difficult to finance or sell, or the terms and conditions may be less favorable than is customary for non-mixed-use properties.

Previous wording

Mortgage loans secured by commercial properties and are subject to risks of delinquency and foreclosure. The ability of a borrower to repay a loan secured by an income-producing property typically is dependent primarily upon the successful operation of such property rather than upon the existence of independent income or assets of the borrower. If the net operating income of the property is reduced, the borrower’s ability to repay the loan may be impaired. Net operating income of an income-producing property can be affected by, among other things: tenant mix and tenant bankruptcies, success of tenant businesses, property management decisions, including with respect to capital improvement, particularly in older building structures, property location and condition, competition from comparable types of properties offering the same or similar services, changes in laws that increase operating expenses or limit rents that may be charged, changes in interest rates, and in the state of the credit markets and the debt and equity capital markets, including diminished availability or lack of debt financing for commercial real estate, any need to address environmental contamination at the property, the occurrence of any uninsured casualty at the property, changes in national, regional, or local economic conditions or specific industry segments, declines in regional or local real estate values, declines in regional, or local rental or occupancy rates, increases in real estate tax rates, tax credits and other operating expenses, changes in governmental rules, regulations, and fiscal policies, including environmental legislation, natural disasters, terrorism, social unrest, and civil disturbances, and adverse changes in zoning laws.

Current wording

Mortgage loans secured by commercial properties are subject to risks of delinquency and foreclosure. The ability of a borrower to repay a loan secured by an income-producing property typically is dependent primarily upon the successful operation of such property rather than upon the existence of independent income or assets of the borrower. If the net operating income of the property is reduced, the borrower’s ability to repay the loan may be impaired. Net operating income of an income-producing property can be affected by, among other things: tenant mix and tenant bankruptcies, success of tenant businesses, property management decisions, including with respect to capital improvement, particularly in older building structures, property location and condition, competition from comparable types of properties offering the same or similar services, changes in laws that increase operating expenses or limit rents that may be charged, changes in interest rates, and in the state of the credit markets and the debt and equity capital markets, including diminished availability or lack of debt financing for commercial real estate, any need to address environmental contamination at the property, the occurrence of any uninsured casualty at the property, changes in national, regional, or local economic conditions or specific industry segments, declines in regional or local real estate values, declines in regional, or local rental or occupancy rates, increases in real estate tax rates, tax credits and other operating expenses, changes in governmental rules, regulations, and fiscal policies, including environmental legislation, natural disasters, terrorism, social unrest, and civil disturbances, and adverse changes in zoning laws.

Previous wording

In recent years, numerous legislative, judicial, and administrative changes have been made in the provisions of federal and state income tax laws applicable to investments similar to an investment in our shares. In particular, the comprehensive tax reform legislation enacted in December 2017 and commonly known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act ("TCJA") made many significant changes to the U.S. federal income tax laws that have profoundly impacted the taxation of individuals and corporations (including both regular C corporations and corporations that have elected to be taxed as REITs). A number of changes that affect noncorporate taxpayers will expire at the end of 2025 unless Congress acts to extend them. Among other changes, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, or CARES Act, signed into law in March 2020, makes certain changes to the TCJA. These changes have impacted us and our stockholders in various ways, some of which are adverse or potentially adverse compared to prior law. Additional changes to tax laws were enacted with the Inflation Reduction Act ("IRA") of 2022, signed into law in August 2022. Many of the material provisions of the IRA exempt REITs. To date, the IRS has issued only limited guidance with respect to certain of the new provisions, and there are numerous interpretive issues that will require further guidance. It is highly likely that technical corrections of legislation will be needed to clarify certain aspects of the new law and give proper effect to Congressional intent. There can be no assurance, however, that technical clarifications or changes needed to prevent unintended or unforeseen tax consequences will be enacted by Congress in the near future. Additional changes to tax laws are likely to continue to occur in the future, and we cannot assure investors that any such changes will not adversely affect the taxation of our stockholders. Any such changes could have an adverse effect on an investment in shares or on the market value or the resale potential of our properties. Investors are urged to consult with their own tax advisor with respect to the impact of recent legislation on ownership of shares and the status of legislative, regulatory, or administrative developments and proposals, and their potential effect on ownership of shares.

Current wording

In recent years, numerous legislative, judicial, and administrative changes have been made in the provisions of federal and state income tax laws applicable to investments similar to an investment in our shares. In particular, the comprehensive tax reform legislation enacted in December 2017 and commonly known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act ("TCJA") made many significant changes to the U.S. federal income tax laws that have profoundly impacted the taxation of individuals and corporations (including both regular C corporations and corporations that have elected to be taxed as REITs). A number of changes that affect noncorporate taxpayers will expire at the end of 2025 unless Congress acts to extend them. Among other changes, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, or CARES Act, signed into law in March 2020, makes certain changes to the TCJA. These changes have impacted us and our stockholders in various ways, some of which are adverse or potentially adverse compared to prior law. Additional changes to tax laws were enacted with the Inflation Reduction Act ("IRA") of 2022, signed into law in August 2022. Many of the material provisions of the IRA exempt REITs. Additionally, on July 4, 2025, the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act (“OBBBA”) was enacted in the United States. The OBBBA includes significant provisions, such as the permanent extension of certain expiring provisions of the TCJA and the restoration of favorable tax treatment for certain business provisions, including 100% bonus depreciation and the business interest expense limitation. The legislation has multiple effective dates beginning in 2025.

Previous wording

•material changes in any significant tenant industry concentration;

Current wording

•material changes in any significant tenant industry concentration or in market concentration;

Previous wording

•changes in the market valuations of our properties;

Current wording

•changes in tax laws, our dividend policy, or in the market valuations of our properties;

Previous wording

•general market and economic conditions; in particular, market and economic conditions of Atlanta, Austin, Tampa, Charlotte, Phoenix, Dallas, and Nashville; and

Current wording

•general market and economic conditions; in particular, market and economic conditions of Austin, Atlanta, Charlotte, Tampa, Phoenix, Dallas, and Nashville; and

Previous wording

We face risks associated with security breaches or disruptions, whether through cyber attacks or cyber intrusions over the internet, malware, computer viruses, attachments to emails, persons inside our organization, persons with access to systems inside our organization, and other significant disruptions of our IT networks and related systems. The risk of a security breach or disruption, particularly through cyber attacks or cyber intrusion, including by computer hackers, foreign governments, and cyber terrorists, has generally increased as the number, intensity, and sophistication of attempted attacks and intrusions from around the world have increased. Our IT networks and related systems are essential to the operation of our business and our ability to perform day-to-day operations (including managing our building systems) and, in some cases, may be critical to the operations of certain of our tenants. While, to date, we have not had a significant cyber breach or attack that had a material impact on our business or results of operations, there can be no assurance that our efforts to maintain the security and integrity of these types of IT networks and related systems will be effective or that attempted security breaches or disruptions will not be successful or damaging. A security breach or other significant disruption involving our IT networks and related systems could adversely impact our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, liquidity, and the market price of our common stock and would require significant management attention and resources to remedy any resulting damages. A security breach or other significant disruption involving our IT networks and systems could result in our inability to maintain the building systems relied upon by our customers for their efficient use of their leased space, and the continuation of that circumstance could entitle the affected tenants to abate a portion of their rent. Further, our vendors or partners could experience a cyber incident which could impact their operations and ability to meet their obligations to us. Similarly, one or more of our tenants could experience a cyber incident which could impact their operations and ability to perform under the terms of their contracts with us. While we maintain insurance coverage that may, subject to policy terms and conditions including deductibles, cover specific aspects of cyber risks, such insurance coverage may be insufficient to cover all losses. As cyber threats continue to evolve, we may be required to expend additional resources to continue to enhance our information security measures and to investigate and remediate any information security vulnerabilities.

Current wording

Even non-material cyberattacks can affect us by requiring significant management attention and resources to investigate, comply with any applicable reporting requirements, and (if necessary) remedy any potential or actual resulting damages. For example, a cyberattack impacting a building system could result in our inability to maintain that system (or related systems), and if any impacted system is relied upon by our customers for their efficient use of their leased space, then the continuation of that circumstance could entitle the affected tenants to abate a portion of their rent. Further, our vendors or partners could experience a cyberattack which could impact their operations and ability to meet their obligations to us, including their obligations to maintain the security of any of our data they possess or systems on which we rely. Similarly, one or more of our tenants could experience a cyberattack which could impact their operations and ability to perform under the terms of their leases with us. While we maintain insurance coverage that may, subject to policy terms and conditions including deductibles, cover specific aspects of cyberattacks, such insurance coverage may be insufficient to cover all losses.

Previous wording

One of our objectives is to develop and maintain a strong management group at all levels. At any given time, we could lose the services of key executives, members of the Board of Directors, and other employees, including the managing directors and other leaders of our respective markets. None of our Board members, key executives, or other employees are subject to employment contracts. Further, we do not carry key person insurance on any of our executive officers or other key employees. While we believe that we could find replacements for these key personnel, the loss of services of any of these key persons could diminish relationships with investors, lendors, prospective customers, joint venture partners, and others in the industry, and therefore such a loss could have an adverse effect upon our results of operations, financial condition, and our ability to execute our business strategy.

Current wording

One of our objectives is to develop and maintain a strong management group at all levels. At any given time, we could lose the services of key executives, members of the Board of Directors, and other employees, including the managing directors and other leaders of our respective markets. None of our Board members, key executives, or other employees are subject to employment contracts. Further, we do not carry key person insurance on any of our executive officers or other key employees. While we believe that we could find replacements for these key personnel, the loss of services of any of these key persons could diminish relationships with investors, lenders, prospective customers, joint venture partners, and others in the industry, and therefore such a loss could have an adverse effect upon our results of operations, financial condition, and our ability to execute our business strategy.

Previous wording

Increased public attention to corporate responsibility matters may expose us to negative public perception, impose additional costs on our business, or impact our stock price.

Current wording

Corporate responsibility matters may expose us to negative public perception, impose additional costs on our business, or impact our stock price.

Previous wording

Recently, more attention is being directed towards publicly-traded companies regarding Corporate Responsibility ("CR") matters. Our efforts to improve our CR profile and practices, including reducing emissions and improving the efficiency of our building operations and the resiliency of our buildings, may require capital expenditures and may result in short- or long-term increases in our operating costs, all of which could adversely impact our financial condition or results of operations. Our ability to achieve our CR goals and objectives and to accurately and transparently report our progress presents numerous operational, financial, legal, and other risks and are partially dependent on the actions of our customers and vendors. A failure, or a perceived failure, to respond to investor, customer, employee, or other stakeholder expectations related to CR concerns, or to comply with regulatory requirements, including a failure, or a perceived failure, to achieve any voluntarily adopted goals or initiatives, could negatively impact our reputation, ability to do business with certain partners, access to capital, stock price, and customer and employee attraction and retention. In addition, organizations that provide information to investors on corporate governance and other matters have developed rating systems for evaluating companies on their approach to CR. Unfavorable CR ratings may lead to negative investor sentiment, which could have a negative impact on our stock price. As the nature, scope, and complexity of CR reporting, diligence, and disclosure requirements expand, we may have to undertake additional costs to control, assess, and report on CR metrics. Any failure or perceived failure, whether or not valid, to pursue or fulfill our CR goals, targets, and objectives or to satisfy various CR reporting standards within the timelines we announce, or at all, could increase the risk of litigation.

Current wording

Our efforts to improve our CR profile and practices may require capital expenditures and may result in short- or long-term increases in our operating costs, all of which could adversely impact our financial condition or results of operations. Our ability to achieve our CR goals and objectives and to accurately and transparently report our progress presents numerous operational, financial, legal, and other risks and are partially dependent on the actions of our customers and vendors. A failure, or a perceived failure, to respond to investor, customer, employee, or other stakeholder expectations related to CR concerns, or to comply with regulatory requirements, including a failure, or a perceived failure, to achieve any voluntarily adopted goals or initiatives, could negatively impact our reputation, ability to do business with certain partners, access to capital, stock price, and customer and employee attraction and retention. In addition, organizations that provide information to investors on corporate governance and other matters have developed rating systems for evaluating companies on their approach to CR. Unfavorable CR ratings may lead to negative investor sentiment, which could have a negative impact on our stock price. As the nature, scope, and complexity of CR reporting, diligence, and disclosure requirements expand, we may have to undertake additional costs to control, assess, and report on CR metrics. Any failure or perceived failure, whether or not valid, to pursue or fulfill our CR goals, targets, and objectives or to satisfy various CR reporting standards within the timelines we announce, or at all, could increase the risk of litigation.

Previous wording

Additionally, while we strive to create and maintain an inclusive culture and a diverse workforce where everyone is valued and respected, a failure, or a perceived failure, to properly address matters of culture, including inclusivity and diversity matters, could result in reputational harm or an inability to attract and retain customers or employees. Similarly, our approach to and description of our culture, policies, and practices could be perceived by some investors or third parties as failing to meet regulatory or best practices, which could negatively impact our reputation, ability to do business with certain partners, access to capital, and stock price.

Current wording

Additionally, while we strive to create and maintain an inclusive culture where everyone is valued and respected, a failure, or a perceived failure, to properly address matters of culture could result in reputational harm or an inability to attract and retain customers or employees. Similarly, our approach to and description of our culture, policies, and practices could be perceived by some investors or third parties as failing to meet regulatory or best practices, which could negatively impact our reputation, ability to do business with certain partners, access to capital, and stock price.