Granite Ridge Resources Inc

Previous wording

These risks are heightened in a low commodity price environment, which may present significant challenges to our operators. The challenges and risks faced by our operators may be similar to or greater than our own, including with respect to their ability to service their debt, remain in compliance with their debt instruments and, if necessary, access additional capital. Commodity prices and/or other conditions have in the past and may in the future cause oil and gas operators to file for bankruptcy. The insolvency of an operator of any of the Properties, the failure of an operator of any of the Properties to adequately perform operations or an operator’s breach of applicable agreements could reduce our production and revenue and result in our liability to governmental authorities for compliance with environmental, safety, and other regulatory requirements, to the operator’s suppliers and vendors and to royalty owners under oil and gas leases jointly owned with the operator or another insolvent owner. Finally, an operator of the Properties may have the right, if another non-operator fails to pay its share of costs because of its insolvency or otherwise, to require us to pay its proportionate share of the defaulting party’s share of costs.

Current wording

These risks are heightened in a low commodity price environment, which may present significant challenges to our operators. The challenges and risks faced by our operators may be similar to or greater than our own, including with respect to their ability to service their debt, remain in compliance with their debt instruments and, if necessary, access additional capital. Commodity prices and/or other conditions have in the past and may in the future cause oil and gas operators to file for bankruptcy. The insolvency of an operator of any of the Properties, the failure of an operator of any of the Properties to adequately perform operations or an operator’s breach of applicable agreements (including failure to spud or place wells into production) could result in penalties, reduce our production and revenue and result in our liability to governmental authorities for compliance with environmental, safety, and other regulatory requirements, to the operator’s suppliers and vendors and to royalty owners under oil and gas leases jointly owned with the operator or another insolvent owner. Finally, an operator of the Properties may have the right, if another non-operator fails to pay its share of costs because of its insolvency or otherwise, to require us to pay its proportionate share of the defaulting party’s share of costs.

Previous wording

•worldwide and regional economic, political and social conditions impacting the global supply and demand for oil and natural gas, which may be driven by various risks including war, terrorism, political unrest, or health epidemics (such as the global COVID-19 coronavirus outbreak);

Current wording

•worldwide and regional economic, political and social conditions impacting the global supply and demand for oil and natural gas, which may be driven by various risks including war, terrorism, political unrest, or health epidemics;

Previous wording

•the outbreak or escalation of military hostilities, including between Russia and Ukraine, Israel and Hamas, continued instability in the Middle East, including from the Houthi rebels in Yemen, and the potential destabilizing effect such conflicts may pose for the European continent or the global oil and natural gas markets;

Current wording

•the outbreak or escalation of military hostilities, including between Russia and Ukraine, Israel and Hamas, continued instability in the Middle East, and the potential destabilizing effect such conflicts may pose for the European continent or the global oil and natural gas markets;

Previous wording

•declines in oil or natural gas prices, as occurred in 2020 in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic;

Current wording

•declines in oil or natural gas prices;

Previous wording

A portion of our acreage is not currently held by production or held by operations. Unless production in paying quantities is established or operations are commenced on units containing these leases during their terms, the leases will expire. If our leases expire and we are unable to renew the leases, we will lose our right to participate in the development of the related Properties. Drilling plans for these areas are generally in the discretion of third-party operators and are subject to change based on various factors that are beyond our control, such as: the availability and cost of capital, equipment, services and personnel; seasonal conditions; regulatory and third-party approvals; oil and natural gas prices; results of title work; gathering system and other transportation constraints; drilling costs and results; and production costs. As of December 31, 2023, we had leases that were not developed that represented 5,498 net acres potentially expiring in 2024, 1,459 net acres potentially expiring in 2025 and 491 net acres potentially expiring in 2026 and beyond.

Current wording

A portion of our acreage is not currently held by production or held by operations. Unless production in paying quantities is established or operations are commenced on units containing these leases during their terms, the leases will expire. If our leases expire and we are unable to renew the leases, we will lose our right to participate in the development of the related Properties. Drilling plans for these areas are generally in the discretion of third-party operators and are subject to change based on various factors that are beyond our control, such as: the availability and cost of capital, equipment, services and personnel; seasonal conditions; regulatory and third-party approvals; oil and natural gas prices; results of title work; gathering system and other transportation constraints; drilling costs and results; and production costs. As of December 31, 2024, we had leases that were not developed that represented 6,160 net acres potentially expiring in 2025, 3,208 net acres potentially expiring in 2026 and 1,844 net acres potentially expiring in 2027 and beyond.

Previous wording

We routinely make estimates of oil and natural gas reserves in connection with managing our business and preparing reports to our lenders and investors, including estimates prepared by our independent reserve engineering firm. Although the reserve information contained herein is reviewed by our independent reserve engineers, estimates of crude oil and natural gas reserves are inherently imprecise. The process also requires economic assumptions about matters such as oil and natural gas prices, development schedules, drilling and operating expenses, capital expenditures, taxes and availability of funds. Some of these assumptions are inherently subjective, and the accuracy of our estimated reserves relies in part on the ability of the Manager’s reserve engineers to make accurate assumptions. Any significant variance from these assumptions by actual figures could greatly affect our estimated reserves, the economically recoverable quantities of oil and natural gas attributable to any particular group of properties, the classifications of reserves based on risk of recovery, and estimates of the future net cash flows. Numerous changes over time to the assumptions on which our estimated reserves are based result in the actual quantities of oil and natural gas our operating partners ultimately recover being different from our estimated reserves. Any significant variance could materially affect the estimated quantities and present value of reserves shown in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, subsequent reports we file with the SEC or other Company materials.

Current wording

We routinely make estimates of oil and natural gas reserves in connection with managing our business and preparing reports to our lenders and investors, including estimates prepared by our independent reserve engineering firm. Although the reserve information contained herein is reviewed by our independent reserve engineers, estimates of crude oil and natural gas reserves are inherently imprecise. The process also requires economic assumptions about matters such as oil and natural gas prices, development schedules, drilling and operating expenses, capital expenditures, taxes and availability of funds. Some of these assumptions are inherently subjective, and the accuracy of our estimated reserves relies in part on the ability of the Manager’s reserve engineers to make accurate assumptions. Any significant variance from these assumptions by actual figures could greatly affect our estimated reserves, the economically recoverable quantities of oil and natural gas attributable to any particular group of properties, the classifications of reserves based on risk of recovery, and estimates of the future net cash flows. Numerous changes over time to the assumptions on which our estimated reserves are based result in the actual quantities of oil and natural gas our operating partners ultimately recover being different from our estimated reserves. Any significant variance could materially affect the estimated quantities and present value of reserves shown in this Annual Report, subsequent reports we file with the SEC or other Company materials.

Previous wording

Approximately 42% of our estimated net proved reserves volumes were classified as proved undeveloped as of December 31, 2023. Development of these reserves may take longer and require higher levels of capital expenditures than we currently anticipate. Delays in the development of our reserves or increases in costs to drill and develop such reserves will reduce the PV-10 value of our estimated proved undeveloped reserves and future net revenues estimated for such reserves and may result in some projects becoming uneconomic. In addition, delays in the development of reserves could cause us to have to reclassify our proved reserves as unproved reserves.

Current wording

Approximately 28% of our estimated net proved reserves volumes were classified as proved undeveloped as of December 31, 2024. Development of these reserves may take longer and require higher levels of capital expenditures than we currently anticipate. Delays in the development of our reserves or increases in costs to drill and develop such reserves will reduce the PV-10 value of our estimated proved undeveloped reserves and future net revenues estimated for such reserves and may result in some projects becoming uneconomic. In addition, delays in the development of reserves could cause us to have to reclassify our proved reserves as unproved reserves.

Previous wording

Our operating partners depend on computer and telecommunications systems, and failures in those systems or cybersecurity threats, attacks and other disruptions could significantly disrupt our business operations.

Current wording

We and our operating partners depend on computer and telecommunications systems, and failures in those systems or cybersecurity threats, attacks and other disruptions could significantly disrupt our business operations.

Previous wording

We and the Manager have entered into agreements with third parties for hardware, software, telecommunications and other information technology services in connection with our business. In addition, we and the Manager have developed or may develop proprietary software systems, management techniques and other information and operational technologies incorporating software licensed from third parties. It is possible that we, the Manager, or these third parties, could incur interruptions from cybersecurity attacks, computer viruses or malware, user error, or that third-party service providers could cause a breach of our data. We believe that we and the Manager have positive relations with their information and operational technology vendors; however, any interruptions to our or the Manager’s arrangements with third parties for their computing, communications, or operational infrastructure or any other interruptions to, or breaches of, their information or operational systems could lead to data corruption, communication interruption, corruption or loss of sensitive or confidential information, misdirected wire transfers, and an inability to perform services for our customers; complete or settle transactions; maintain our books and records; prevent environmental damage; and maintain communications or operations; or otherwise significantly disrupt our business operations. Although we and the Manager utilize various procedures and controls designed to monitor these threats and mitigate their exposure to such threats, there can be no assurance that these procedures and controls will be sufficient in preventing security threats from materializing. Furthermore, various third-party resources that we or the Manager rely on, directly or indirectly, in the operation of our business (such as pipelines and other infrastructure) could suffer interruptions or breaches from cyberattacks or similar events that are entirely outside the control of us or the Manager, and any such events could significantly disrupt our business operations and/or have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. We have not, to our knowledge, experienced any material losses relating to cyberattacks; however, there can be no assurance that we will not suffer material losses in the future.

Current wording

We and the Manager have entered into agreements with third parties for hardware, software, telecommunications and other information technology services in connection with our business. In addition, we and the Manager have developed or may develop proprietary software systems, management techniques and other information and operational technologies incorporating software licensed from third parties. It is possible that we, the Manager, or these third parties, could incur interruptions from cybersecurity attacks, computer viruses or malware, user error, or that third-party service providers could cause a breach of our systems or our data. We believe that we and the Manager have positive relations with their information and operational technology vendors; however, any interruptions to our or the Manager’s arrangements with third parties for their computing, communications, or operational infrastructure or any other interruptions to, or breaches of, their information or operational systems could lead to data corruption, communication interruption, corruption or loss of sensitive or confidential information, misdirected wire transfers, and an inability to perform services for our customers; complete or settle transactions; maintain our books and records; prevent environmental damage; and maintain communications or operations; or otherwise significantly disrupt our business operations. Although we and the Manager utilize various procedures and controls designed to monitor these threats and mitigate exposure to such threats, there can be no assurance that these procedures and controls will be sufficient in preventing security threats from materializing. Furthermore, various third-party resources that we or the Manager rely on, directly or indirectly, in the operation of our business (such as pipelines and other infrastructure) could suffer interruptions or breaches from cyberattacks or similar events that are entirely outside the control of us or the Manager, and any such events could significantly disrupt our business operations and/or have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. As of the date of this Annual Report, we have not, to our knowledge, experienced any material losses relating to cyberattacks; however, there can be no assurance that we will not suffer material losses in the future.

Previous wording

We are not able to anticipate, detect or prevent all cyberattacks, particularly because the methodologies used by attackers change frequently or may not be recognized until an attack is already underway or significantly thereafter, and because attackers are increasingly using technologies designed to circumvent cybersecurity measures and avoid detection. Cybersecurity attacks are also becoming more sophisticated and include, but are not limited to, ransomware, credential stuffing, spear phishing, social engineering, use of deepfakes (i.e., highly realistic synthetic media generated by artificial intelligence) and other attempts to gain unauthorized access to data for purposes of extortion or other malfeasance.

Current wording

We are not able to anticipate, detect or prevent all cyberattacks, particularly because the methodologies used by attackers change frequently or may not be recognized until an attack is already underway or significantly thereafter, and because attackers are increasingly using technologies designed to circumvent cybersecurity measures and avoid detection. Cybersecurity attacks are also becoming more sophisticated and include, but are not limited to, ransomware, credential stuffing, spear phishing, social engineering, use of deepfakes (i.e., highly realistic synthetic media generated by artificial intelligence) and other attempts to gain unauthorized access to data for purposes of extortion or other malfeasance. Additionally, as cyberattacks become more sophisticated, we may incur significant cost to upgrade or enhance our security measures and procedures to protect against such cyberattacks.

Previous wording

Environmental laws and regulations change frequently and tend to become more stringent over time, and the implementation of new, or the modification of existing, laws or regulations could adversely affect our business. For example, in recent years, the EPA published final rules that establish new air emission control requirements, among other requirements, for oil and natural gas production, processing, transportation, and storage activities to address emissions of methane and VOCs. Among these requirements is the reduction of methane and VOC emissions from oil and gas wells through the use of reduced emission completions or “green completions” on all hydraulically fractured wells subject to the rule. These NSPSs, as so referred, also impose requirements for leak detection and repair at well sites and natural gas transmission compressor stations and professional engineer certifications of emission control systems installed to comply with the rule. These rules have been heavily litigated and some aspects of them continue to be subject to various challenge, rescission, and proposal actions. Accordingly, the final implementation and scope of these requirements remains uncertain, but the imposition of these requirements on certain sources of air emissions in the oil and gas industry that were constructed, reconstructed, or modified on or after August 23, 2011, will likely result in increased costs for oil and natural gas exploration and production activities. In December 2023, the EPA finalized more stringent methane rules for new, modified, and reconstructed facilities, known as OOOOb, as well as standards for existing sources for the first time ever, known as OOOOc. Under the final rules, states have two years to prepare and submit their plants to impose methane emission controls on existing sources. The presumptive standards established under the final rule are generally the same for both new and existing sources and include enhanced leak detection survey requirements using optical gas imaging and other advanced monitoring to encourage the deployment of innovative technologies to detect and reduce methane emissions, reduction of emissions by 95% through capture and control systems, zero-emission requirements for certain devices, and the establishment of a “super emitter” response program that would allow third parties to make reports to EPA of large methane emission events, triggering certain investigation and repair requirements. Fines and penalties for violations of these rules can be substantial. It is likely, however, that the final rule and its requirements will be subject to legal challenges. The requirements of the EPA’s final methane rules have the potential to increase the operating costs of our operators and thus may adversely affect our financial results and cash flows. Moreover, failure to comply with these CAA requirements can result in the imposition of substantial fines and penalties as well as costly injunctive relief. These rules …

Excerpt shortened here; the source contains the full paragraph.

Current wording

Environmental laws and regulations change frequently and tend to become more stringent over time, and the implementation of new, or the modification of existing, laws or regulations could adversely affect our business. For example, the regulation of methane from oil and gas facilities has been subject to uncertainty in recent years. Most recently, in December 2023, the EPA finalized more stringent methane rules for new, modified, and reconstructed facilities, known as OOOOb, as well as standards for existing sources for the first time ever, known as OOOOc. Under the final rules, states have two years to prepare and submit their plants to impose methane emission controls on existing sources. The presumptive standards established under the final rule are generally the same for both new and existing sources and include enhanced leak detection survey requirements using optical gas imaging and other advanced monitoring to encourage the deployment of innovative technologies to detect and reduce methane emissions, reduction of emissions by 95% through capture and control systems, zero-emission requirements for certain devices, and the establishment of a “super emitter” response program that would allow third parties to make reports to EPA of large methane emission events, triggering certain investigation and repair requirements. Fines and penalties for violations of these rules can be substantial. The rules have been subject to legal challenge, and in February 2025, the D.C. Circuit granted the EPA’s motion to hold the cases in abeyance while the agency reviews the final rules. While the Trump Administration may take action to repeal or modify the final rules, we cannot predict the substance or timing of such changes, if any. However, the requirements of the EPA’s final methane rules have the potential to increase the operating costs of our operators and thus may adversely affect our financial results and cash flows. Moreover, failure to comply with these CAA requirements can result in the imposition of substantial fines and penalties as well as costly injunctive relief. These rules could further increase the cost of development and operation of the Properties.

Previous wording

Additionally, some states in which the Properties are located, such as Colorado and New Mexico, have adopted stringent rules and regulations to reduce methane emissions and emissions of other hydrocarbons, VOCs, and nitrogen oxides associated with oil and gas facilities. For example, the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment’s Air Quality Control Commission (“AQCC”) recently adopted more stringent standards for leak detection and repair inspection frequency, pipeline and compressor station inspection and maintenance frequencies, the development of pre-production air monitoring plans at certain oil and gas facilities, enclosed combustion device testing, a methane intensity reduction requirement based on statewide volume of production and additional measures for reducing and eliminating emissions from pneumatic devices. AQCC is expected to undertake several additional rulemaking efforts to further reduce emissions over the next several years. Additionally, the Colorado Energy and Carbon Management Commission is currently reviewing draft rules that would consider the cumulative impacts of air emissions from oil and gas projects in permitting decisions. State rules and regulations such as these could significantly increase the costs to develop and operate the Properties, result in a delay in operations or decreased production, and may affect acquisition costs.

Current wording

Additionally, some states in which the Properties are located, such as Colorado and New Mexico, have adopted stringent rules and regulations to reduce methane emissions and emissions of other hydrocarbons, VOCs, and nitrogen oxides associated with oil and gas facilities. For example, the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment’s Air Quality Control Commission (“AQCC”) have adopted more stringent standards for leak detection and repair inspection frequency, pipeline and compressor station inspection and maintenance frequencies, the development of pre-production air monitoring plans at certain oil and gas facilities, enclosed combustion device testing, a methane intensity reduction requirement based on statewide volume of production and additional measures for reducing and eliminating emissions from pneumatic devices. AQCC is expected to undertake several additional rulemaking efforts to further reduce emissions over the next several years. Additionally, the Colorado Energy and Carbon Management Commission in October 2024 finalized rules that consider the cumulative impacts of air emissions from oil and gas projects in permitting decisions. State rules and regulations such as these could significantly increase the costs to develop and operate the Properties, result in a delay in operations or decreased production, and may affect acquisition costs.

Previous wording

The energy industry is affected from time to time in varying degrees by political developments and a wide range of federal, tribal, state and local statutes, rules, orders and regulations that may, in turn, affect the operations and costs of the companies engaged in the energy industry. In response to findings that emissions of carbon dioxide, methane, and other GHGs present an endangerment to public health and the environment, the EPA has adopted regulations under existing provisions of the CAA that, among other things, require preconstruction and operating permits for GHG emissions from certain large stationary sources that already emit conventional pollutants above a certain threshold. In addition, the EPA has adopted rules requiring the monitoring and reporting of GHG emissions from specified onshore and offshore oil and gas production sources in the United States on an annual basis, which may include operations on the Properties. Further, the IRA, which the U.S. Congress passed in August 2022, includes a charge for methane emissions from specific types of facilities that emit 25,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent or more per year, and although the IRA generally provides for a conditional exemption under certain circumstances, the charge applies to emissions that exceed an established emissions threshold for each type of covered facility. The charge starts at $900 per metric ton of methane in 2025 (using 2024 data), and increases to $1,500 after two years. Additional GHG regulation could also result from the agreement crafted during the United Nations climate change conference in Paris, France in December 2015 (the “Paris Agreement”). Under the Paris Agreement, the United States committed to reducing its GHG emissions by 26-28% by the year 2025 as compared with 2005 levels. Moreover, in November 2021, at the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change 26th Conference of the Parties, the U.S. and the European Union advanced a Global Methane Pledge to reduce global methane emissions at least 30% from 2020 levels by 2030, which over 100 countries have signed. Additionally, in December 2023, the United Arab Emirates hosted COP28 where parties signed onto an agreement to transition "away from fossil fuels in energy systems in a just, orderly and equitable manner" and increase renewable energy capacity so as to achieve net zero by 2050, although no timeline for doing so was set.

Current wording

The energy industry is affected from time to time in varying degrees by political developments and a wide range of federal, tribal, state and local statutes, rules, orders and regulations that may, in turn, affect the operations and costs of the companies engaged in the energy industry. In response to findings that emissions of carbon dioxide, methane, and other GHGs present an endangerment to public health and the environment, the EPA has adopted regulations under existing provisions of the CAA that, among other things, require preconstruction and operating permits for GHG emissions from certain large stationary sources that already emit conventional pollutants above a certain threshold. In addition, the EPA has adopted rules requiring the monitoring and reporting of GHG emissions from specified onshore and offshore oil and gas production sources in the United States on an annual basis, which may include operations on the Properties. Further, the IRA, which the U.S. Congress passed in August 2022, includes a charge for methane emissions from specific types of facilities that emit 25,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent or more per year, and although the IRA generally provides for a conditional exemption under certain circumstances, the charge applies to emissions that exceed an established emissions threshold for each type of covered facility. The charge starts at $900 per metric ton of methane in 2025 (using 2024 data), and increases to $1,500 after two years.

Previous wording

In addition, spurred by increasing concerns regarding climate change, the oil and natural gas industry faces growing demand for corporate transparency and a demonstrated commitment to sustainability goals. ESG goals and programs, which may include extralegal targets related to environmental stewardship, social responsibility, and corporate governance, have become an increasing focus of investors and stakeholders across the industry, and companies without robust ESG programs may find access to capital and investors more challenging in the future. Further, while reporting on most ESG information is currently voluntary, in March 2022, the SEC issued a proposed rule that would require public companies to disclose certain climate-related information, including climate-related risks, impacts, oversight and management, financial statement metrics and emissions, targets, goals and plans. While the proposed rule is not yet effective, compliance with the proposed rule as drafted could result in increased legal, accounting and financial compliance costs, make some activities more difficult, time-consuming and costly, and place strain on our personnel, systems and resources.

Current wording

In addition, spurred by increasing concerns regarding climate change, the oil and natural gas industry faces demand for corporate transparency and a demonstrated commitment to sustainability goals. ESG programs and goals, which are often aspirational, and which may include voluntary targets related to environmental stewardship, social responsibility, and corporate governance, have become an increasing, and sometimes conflicting, focus of certain investors and stakeholders, and companies that are perceived to be ESG laggards or are without robust ESG programs may find access to capital and investors more challenging in the future. Further, while reporting on most ESG information is, generally, currently voluntary, in March 2024, the SEC finalized rules establishing a framework for the reporting of climate risks, targets, and metrics. However, the future of the rule is uncertain at this time given that its implementation has been stayed pending the outcome of legal challenges as well as changed priorities under the new Presidential administration that could impact the fate of the final rules, though the timing and impact of any such changes are difficult to predict at this time.

Previous wording

Increasing attention to climate change, fuel conservation measures, alternative fuel requirements, incentives to conserve energy or use alternative energy sources, increasing consumer demand for alternatives to oil and natural gas, and technological advances in fuel economy and energy generation devices may result in increased costs, reduced demand for our products, reduced profits, increased investigations and litigation, and negative impacts on our access to capital markets. Increasing attention to climate change and any related negative public perception regarding us and/or our industry, for example, may result in demand shifts for our products, increased litigation risk for us, and increased regulatory, legislative and judicial scrutiny, which may, in turn, lead to new state, local, tribal and federal safety and environmental laws, regulations, guidelines and enforcement interpretations.

Current wording

Increased attention to climate change, fuel conservation measures, alternative fuel requirements, incentives to conserve energy or use alternative energy sources, increasing consumer demand for alternatives to oil and natural gas, and technological advances in fuel economy and energy generation devices may result in increased costs, reduced demand for our products, reduced profits, increased investigations and litigation, and negative impacts on our access to capital markets. Increased attention to climate change and any related negative public perception regarding us and/or our industry, for example, may result in demand shifts for our products, increased litigation risk for us, and increased, and sometimes conflicting, regulatory, legislative and judicial scrutiny, which may, in turn, lead to new state, local, tribal and federal safety and environmental laws, regulations, guidelines and enforcement interpretations.

Previous wording

In addition, organizations that provide information to investors on corporate governance and related matters have developed ratings processes for evaluating companies on their approach to ESG matters. Such ratings are used by some investors to inform their investment and voting decisions. Unfavorable ESG ratings and recent activism directed at shifting funding away from companies with energy-related assets could lead to increased negative investor sentiment toward us and our industry and to the diversion of investment to other industries, which could have a negative impact on our access to and costs of capital. Also, institutional lenders may, of their own accord, elect not to provide or place additional restrictions on funding for fossil fuel energy companies based on climate change related concerns, which could affect our access to capital for potential growth projects.

Current wording

In addition, certain organizations that provide information to investors on corporate governance and related matters have developed ratings processes for evaluating companies on their approach to ESG matters. Such ratings are used by some investors to inform their investment and voting decisions. While such ratings do not impact all investors’ investment or voting decisions, unfavorable ESG ratings and recent activism directed at shifting funding away from companies with energy-related assets could lead to increased negative investor sentiment toward us and our industry and to the diversion of investment to other industries, which could have a negative impact on our access to and costs of capital. Also, institutional lenders may, of their own accord, elect not to provide or place additional restrictions on funding for fossil fuel energy companies based on climate change related concerns, which could affect our access to capital for potential growth projects.

Previous wording

The MSA provides for the Manager to offer us the opportunity to participate in certain investments made by funds affiliated with the Manager and for us to offer such funds the opportunity to participate in certain investments made by us. The Manager may make investments on behalf of its funds that are not a part of our Company or in which such funds may co-invest with us, any such transactions may involve conflicts of interest among us, the Manager, and their affiliates, some or all of which may not be thought of or taken into account in reviewing and approving such transactions. In certain events, the Manager may not be in a position unilaterally to control such investments or exercise certain rights associated with such investments. We may be subject to conflicts of interest involving the Manager and its affiliates, and the Manager may enter into relationships with developers, co-owners or other affiliates, some of which may give rise to conflicts of interest. To the extent not addressed by the MSA, we and the Manager intend to implement policies as necessary or appropriate to deal with such potential conflicts.

Current wording

The MSA provides for the Manager to offer us the opportunity to participate in certain investments made by funds affiliated with the Manager and for us to offer such funds the opportunity to participate in certain investments made by us. The Manager may make investments on behalf of its funds that are not a part of our Company or in which such funds may co-invest with us, any such transactions may involve conflicts of interest among us, the Manager, and their affiliates, some or all of which may not be thought of or taken into account in reviewing and approving such transactions. In certain events, the Manager may not be in a position unilaterally to control such investments or exercise certain rights associated with such investments. We may be subject to conflicts of interest involving the Manager and its affiliates, and the Manager may enter into relationships with developers, co-owners or other affiliates, some of which may give rise to conflicts of interest. To the extent not addressed by the MSA, we and the Manager have implemented policies as necessary or appropriate to deal with such potential conflicts.

Previous wording

Under the terms of the MSA, we must rely to a large extent on the internal controls and financial reporting controls of the Manager, and the Manager’s failure to maintain effective controls or comply with applicable standards may adversely affect us. On March 3, 2023, the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors concluded that our previously issued unaudited condensed combined financial statements as of and for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2022, included in the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 14, 2022 were materially misstated. In addition, the Company did not have effective controls over ITGC pertaining to user access management. In connection with the material misstatement and lack of effective user access controls, our Company’s management identified material weaknesses in our disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting.

Current wording

Under the terms of the MSA, we must rely to a large extent on the internal controls and financial reporting controls of the Manager, and the Manager’s failure to maintain effective controls or comply with applicable standards may adversely affect us. On March 3, 2023, the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors concluded that our previously issued unaudited condensed combined financial statements as of and for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2022, included in the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 14, 2022 were materially misstated. In addition, the Company did not have effective controls over Information Technology General Controls pertaining to user access management. In connection with the material misstatement and lack of effective user access controls, our Company’s management identified material weaknesses in our disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting.

Previous wording

In addition, the shares of our common stock reserved for future issuance under the Granite Ridge 2022 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Incentive Plan”) will become eligible for sale in the public market once those shares are issued, subject to provisions relating to various vesting requirements and, in some cases, limitations on volume and manner of sale applicable to affiliates under Rule 144. The maximum number of shares of our common stock reserved for issuance to directors, officers, employees and consultants or advisors employed by or providing service to the Company under our equity incentive plans is 6.5 million, which represented approximately 4.9% of the shares of our common stock outstanding following the consummation of the Business Combination. As of December 31, 2023, the Company had 5.7 million shares of common stock remaining available for future awards under the Incentive Plan. We have filed a registration statement on Form S-8 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act") to register shares of our common stock or securities convertible into or exchangeable for shares of our common stock issued pursuant to the Incentive Plan. Accordingly, shares registered under such registration statements are available for sale in the open market.

Current wording

In addition, the shares of our common stock reserved for future issuance under the Granite Ridge 2022 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Incentive Plan”) will become eligible for sale in the public market once those shares are issued, subject to provisions relating to various vesting requirements and, in some cases, limitations on volume and manner of sale applicable to affiliates under Rule 144. The maximum number of shares of our common stock reserved for issuance to directors, officers, employees and consultants or advisors employed by or providing service to the Company under our equity incentive plans is 6.5 million, which represented approximately 4.9% of the shares of our common stock outstanding following the consummation of the Business Combination. As of December 31, 2024, the Company had 5.0 million shares of common stock remaining available for future awards under the Incentive Plan. We have filed a registration statement on Form S-8 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act") to register shares of our common stock or securities convertible into or exchangeable for shares of our common stock issued pursuant to the Incentive Plan. Accordingly, shares registered under such registration statements are available for sale in the open market.

Previous wording

We are a “controlled company” under the corporate governance rules of the NYSE and, as a result, qualifies for exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements. We rely on certain of these exemptions, which means you will not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are subject to such requirements.

Current wording

We are a “controlled company” under the corporate governance rules of the NYSE and, as a result, qualify for exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements. We rely on certain of these exemptions, which means you will not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are subject to such requirements.

Previous wording

Grey Rock Energy Fund III-A, LP, Grey Rock Energy Fund III-B, LP, and Grey Rock Energy Fund III-B Holdings, LP and their affiliates (collectively, “Grey Rock Fund III”) collectively own a majority of our voting common stock. As a result, following the Business Combination, we are a “controlled company” within the meaning of the corporate governance standards of the rules of the NYSE. Under these rules, a listed company of which more than 50% of the voting power is held by an individual, group or another company is a “controlled company” and may elect not to comply with certain corporate governance requirements, including:

Current wording

Grey Rock Energy Partners GP III, L.P. ("Grey Rock Fund III"), pursuant to a Voting Agreement, dated as of August 25, 2023, by and among Grey Rock Fund III, Grey Rock Energy Partners GP II, L.P., and the other stockholders party thereto, controls a majority of our voting common stock. As a result, following the Business Combination, we are a “controlled company” within the meaning of the corporate governance standards of the rules of the NYSE. Under these rules, a listed company of which more than 50% of the voting power is held by an individual, group or another company is a “controlled company” and may elect not to comply with certain corporate governance requirements, including:

Previous wording

The ongoing military conflicts between Ukraine and Russia, Israel and Hamas, and continued instability in the Middle East, including from the Houthi rebels in Yemen, has caused unstable market and economic conditions and is expected to have additional global consequences, such as heightened risks of cyberattacks. Our business, financial condition, and results of operations may be materially adversely affected by the negative global and economic impact resulting from these conflicts or any other geopolitical tensions.

Current wording

The ongoing military conflicts between Ukraine and Russia, Israel and Hamas, and continued instability in the Middle East has caused unstable market and economic conditions and is expected to have additional global consequences, such as heightened risks of cyberattacks. Our business, financial condition, and results of operations may be materially adversely affected by the negative global and economic impact resulting from these conflicts or any other geopolitical tensions.

Previous wording

In addition, the United States and other countries have imposed sanctions on Russia which increases the risk that Russia, as a retaliatory action, may launch cyberattacks against the United States, its government, infrastructure and businesses. On March 21, 2022, the Biden Administration issued warnings about the potential for Russia to engage in malicious cyber activity against the United States in response to the economic sanctions that have been imposed.

Current wording

In addition, the United States and other countries have imposed sanctions on Russia which increases the risk that Russia, as a retaliatory action, may launch cyberattacks against the United States, its government, infrastructure and businesses.

Previous wording

Events involving limited liquidity, defaults, non-performance or other adverse developments that affect financial institutions, transactional counterparties or other companies in the financial services industry or the financial services industry generally, or concerns or rumors about any events of these kinds or other similar risks, have in the past and may in the future lead to market-wide liquidity problems. Most recently, on March 10, 2023, Silicon Valley Bank (“SVB”) was closed by the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation, which appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) as receiver. Similarly, on March 12, 2023, Signature Bank and Silvergate Capital Corp. were each swept into receivership. Although a statement by the Department of the Treasury, the Federal Reserve and the FDIC indicated that all depositors of SVB would have access to all of their money after only one business day of closure, including funds held in uninsured deposit accounts, borrowers under credit agreements, letters of credit and certain other financial instruments with SVB, Signature Bank or any other financial institution that is placed into receivership by the FDIC may be unable to access undrawn amounts thereunder. Access to funding sources and other credit arrangements could be significantly impaired by factors that affect the financial services industry or economy in general. These factors could include, among others, events such as liquidity constraints or failures, the ability to perform obligations under various types of financial, credit or liquidity agreements or arrangements, disruptions or instability in the financial services industry or financial markets, or concerns or negative expectations about the prospects for companies in the financial services industry.

Current wording

Events involving limited liquidity, defaults, non-performance or other adverse developments that affect financial institutions, transactional counterparties or other companies in the financial services industry or the financial services industry generally, or concerns or rumors about any events of these kinds or other similar risks, have in the past and may in the future lead to market-wide liquidity problems. Most recently, on March 10, 2023, Silicon Valley Bank (“SVB”) was closed by the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation, which appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) as receiver. Similarly, on March 12, 2023, Signature Bank and Silvergate Capital Corp. were each swept into receivership. Borrowers under credit agreements, letters of credit and certain other financial instruments with any financial institution that is placed into receivership by the FDIC may be unable to access undrawn amounts thereunder. Access to funding sources and other credit arrangements could be significantly impaired by factors that affect the financial services industry or economy in general. These factors could include, among others, events such as liquidity constraints or failures, the ability to perform obligations under various types of financial, credit or liquidity agreements or arrangements, disruptions or instability in the financial services industry or financial markets, or concerns or negative expectations about the prospects for companies in the financial services industry.