Skip to main content

Orion Properties Inc.

For the period ended Jun 30, 2025. Filed Aug 6, 2025.

View on SEC.gov

About this filing

A company's report for each of its first three quarters. The financial statements are not audited. It shows how the business has moved since the last annual report, and what management says changed.

Jun 30, 2025 · Filed Aug 6, 2025

ONL$2.69+14.5%Stored close · as of Nov 6, 2026

What changed in Risk Factors?

Read the current filing

Previous report: 10-Q

Period ended 2025-03-31; filed 2025-05-07.

0001873923-25-000082

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Current report: 10-Q

Period ended 2025-06-30; filed 2025-08-06.

0001873923-25-000117

Item 1A. Risk Factors

The baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.

Compared 4 previous paragraphs and 16 current paragraphs.

2 unchanged; 0 reworded; 14 added; 2 removed; 0 previous and 0 current paragraphs rearranged.

Tables are not compared: 0 previous and 0 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.

A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.

The current filing states there were no material changes to risk factors.

This is the filer’s own statement, not a conclusion from the comparison. Read its qualifications and the report it references.

Current filing’s statement

There have been no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, except as set forth below.
Added paragraphs (14)

Current report

We have existing debt and refinancing risks that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations, including the risk that we will be unable to extend or refinance some or all of our debt, including substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern due to uncertainty with regard to our ability to extend or refinance the Revolving Facility which matures on May 12, 2026.

Current report

We have both fixed and variable rate indebtedness and may incur additional indebtedness in the future, including borrowings under our Revolving Facility. Our Revolving Facility under which we had $119.0 million borrowed as of December 31, 2024 is scheduled to mature on May 12, 2026. We are dependent upon the Revolving Facility, which is a fully recourse borrowing facility guaranteed in full by us, for liquidity to execute our business strategies. When preparing the consolidated financial statements for each annual and interim reporting period, management evaluates whether there are conditions or events that, when considered in aggregate, raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date the accompanying consolidated financial statements are issued as set forth in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 205-40, “Presentation of Financial Statements - Going Concern.” Substantial doubt exists about our ability to continue as a going concern for at least one year from the issuance of the consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q due to uncertainty with regard to our ability to extend or refinance the Revolving Facility. The Revolving Facility has no remaining extension options and we do not expect to generate sufficient cash from operations to repay the principal outstanding under the Revolving Facility on its scheduled maturity date. Management is evaluating strategies to extend or refinance the borrowings under the Revolving Facility and has had preliminary discussions with the administrative agent of the Revolving Facility to potentially amend the Credit Agreement to extend the maturity date and/or refinance all or a portion of the Revolving Facility with replacement debt. If an agreement is not reached with one or more of the lenders to extend and/or refinance the Revolving Facility, management’s plans include, but are not limited to, obtaining funding through alternative debt or equity instruments, disposing of properties and continuing our leasing efforts on existing properties. As of August 6, 2025, no such agreements have been reached and there can be no assurance we will be able to extend the Revolving Facility maturity date and/or refinance all or a portion of the Revolving Facility or obtain additional liquidity when needed or under acceptable terms, if at all. Because no agreements have been reached, such outcomes are not within the control of the Company; therefore, for accounting purposes, management is unable to conclude that such an outcome is probable. Accordingly, ASC 205-40 requires management to disclose that there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for at least one year following the date of issuance of the consolidated financial statements accompanying this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Current report

If we are unable to extend or refinance the Revolving Facility, we might be forced to sell assets to generate cash, which might be on unfavorable terms, if at all, or we might not be able to make all required payments of principal and interest on our debt, which could result in default, result in our lenders foreclosing on our assets, or otherwise have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Any inability to continue to operate as a going concern or the occurrence of an event of default under our outstanding indebtedness would be expected to have a material adverse effect on the price of our common stock.

Current report

Our $355.0 million CMBS Loan is scheduled to mature on February 11, 2027. Our CMBS Loan provides cross-collateralized financing for a total of 19 properties in our portfolio, and therefore the lender will have recourse to any and all of the assets that secure the debt in the event we default. We cannot provide assurance we will be able to extend, refinance or repay these debt obligations at maturity. Our ability to extend or refinance debt will be affected by our financial condition and various other factors existing at the relevant time, including factors beyond our control, such as capital and credit market conditions, the state of the national and regional economies, local real estate conditions and the equity in and value of the related collateral. We may be required to make significant principal repayments to extend or refinance our debt obligations. Following the Arch Street Joint Venture’s exercise of the first extension option and satisfaction of the related conditions in November 2024, the non-recourse mortgage notes associated with the Arch Street Joint Venture of $131.6 million as of

Current report

December 31, 2024 are scheduled to mature on November 27, 2025, and the Arch Street Joint Venture has one remaining one-year option to extend the maturity until November 27, 2026. Our proportionate share of the mortgage notes was $26.0 million as of June 30, 2025. The extension option is subject to satisfaction of certain conditions, including satisfaction of certain financial and operating covenants. The Arch Street Joint Venture may be unable to satisfy the extension conditions, and we cannot provide any assurance the Arch Street Joint Venture will be able to satisfy the extension conditions or otherwise extend or refinance the mortgage notes. If the Arch Street Joint Venture is unable to extend or refinance the mortgage notes, our investment in the Arch Street Joint Venture could be materially adversely affected. As a result of the indebtedness we incur, we are, and expect to be, subject to the risks normally associated with debt financing including:

Current report

•that we will be unable to extend, refinance or repay our debt as it becomes due or increase the availability of overall debt on terms as favorable as those of our existing debt, or at all;

Current report

•that interest rates may rise;

Current report

•that our cash flow could be insufficient to make required payments of principal and interest;

Current report

•that required payments on mortgages and on our other debt are not reduced if the economic performance of any property declines;

Current report

•that debt service obligations will reduce funds available for distribution to our stockholders;

Current report

•that any default on our debt, due to non-compliance with financial covenants or otherwise, could result in acceleration of those obligations;

Current report

•that we may be unable to extend, refinance or repay the debt as it becomes due; and

Current report

•that if our degree of leverage is viewed unfavorably by lenders or potential joint venture partners, it could affect our ability to obtain additional financing.

Current report

If we are unable to extend, refinance or repay our indebtedness as it becomes due, we may need to sell assets or to seek protection from our creditors under applicable law, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Removed paragraphs (2)

Previous report

Government budgetary pressures and priorities, and trends in government employment and office leasing may adversely impact our business.

Previous report

We believe that recent government budgetary and spending priorities and enhancements in technology have resulted in a decrease in government office use for employees. Furthermore, over the past several years, government tenants have reduced their space utilization per employee and consolidated government tenants into existing government owned properties. Persistent remote and hybrid work practices have also reduced space utilization at many of our government properties. These factors have reduced the demand for government leased space, and may continue to do so. The Trump Administration’s initiative to dramatically cut government spending introduces additional uncertainty for our portfolio of properties leased to the United States Government. The Department of Government Efficiency (“DOGE”) has begun to look at ways to increase government office utilization and shrink the federal government’s real estate portfolio. This could lead to the General Services Administration (“GSA”) exercising termination options under, or otherwise seeking to terminate, our leases with the United States Government, or make it more likely that the United States Government decides not to renew the applicable lease at lease expiration. As of March 31, 2025, approximately 88,000 of our occupied square feet leased to the GSA were within periods during which the tenant has the right to terminate their space without a termination fee, or “non-firm terms,” and 6,000 square feet were in “month-to-month” terms. The GSA recently announced a suspension of the execution of substantially all GSA funded obligations, including new leases and lease amendments. This action by the GSA has resulted in delays in lease negotiations at certain other properties leased to the United States Government. It also resulted in an approximately 50-day delay in obtaining authorization to proceed with landlord work at our property in Lincoln, Nebraska the substantial completion of which is a condition to lease commencement of our lease with the United States Government at this property. We received this authorization during March 2025. We do not know how long the GSA suspension will continue to impact us and cannot provide any assurance as to how ongoing developments with respect to DOGE and the Trump Administration’s efforts to reduce government spending may impact our portfolio of properties leased to the United States Government. Efforts to manage space utilization rates and reduce government spending may result in the government tenants exercising early termination rights under our leases, vacating our properties upon expiration of our leases in order to relocate, or renewing their leases for less space than they currently occupy. Also, our government tenants’ desire to reconfigure leased office space to manage utilization per employee may require us to spend significant amounts for tenant improvements, and tenant relocations are often more prevalent in those circumstances. Compared to our histori…

Excerpt shortened here; the source contains the full paragraph.