Skip to main content

Dutch Bros Inc.

For the period ended Sep 30, 2026. Filed Nov 5, 2026.

View on SEC.gov

About this filing

A company's report for each of its first three quarters. The financial statements are not audited. It shows how the business has moved since the last annual report, and what management says changed.

Sep 30, 2026 · Filed Nov 5, 2026

BROS$36.01+6.6%Stored close · as of Nov 9, 2026

What changed in Risk Factors?

Read the current filing

Previous report: 10-Q

Period ended 2026-06-30; filed 2026-08-06.

0001866581-26-000133

ITEM 1A. Risk Factors

Current report: 10-Q

Period ended 2026-09-30; filed 2026-11-05.

0001866581-26-000180

ITEM 1A. Risk Factors

The baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.

Compared 11 previous paragraphs and 11 current paragraphs.

10 unchanged; 1 reworded; 0 added; 0 removed; 0 previous and 0 current paragraphs rearranged.

Tables are not compared: 0 previous and 0 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.

A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.

Reworded paragraphs (1)

Previous wording

For example, a number of states, counties, and cities have enacted menu labeling laws requiring multi-unit restaurant operators to disclose certain nutritional information to customers, or have enacted legislation restricting the use of certain types of ingredients in food sold at restaurants. Furthermore, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (the PPACA) establishes a uniform, federal requirement for certain restaurants to post certain nutritional information on their menus. Specifically, the PPACA amended the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act to require certain chain restaurants to publish the total number of calories of standard menu items on menus and menu boards, along with a statement that puts this calorie information in the context of a total daily calorie intake. The PPACA also requires covered restaurants to provide to consumers, upon request, a written summary of detailed nutritional information for each standard menu item, and to provide a statement on menus and menu boards about the availability of this information. The PPACA further permits the Food and Drug Administration to require covered restaurants to make additional nutrient disclosures, such as disclosure of trans-fat content. More recently, U.S. regulatory authorities, including the Food and Drug Administration, have indicated their intent to restrict or prohibit the use of certain food dyes currently permitted for lawful use in food. In May 2026, the Food and Drug Administration announced it had finalized its new post-market assessment program for chemicals in the food supply and launched its first reassessments under the program, with further reviews expected on an ongoing basis. Such assessments may be initiated by external petitions or the agency’s own initiative. In addition, the Food and Drug Administration is developing a proposed rule to increase oversight of food ingredients deemed Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS), which, if finalized, would require mandatory submission of GRAS notices for food ingredients. GRAS reform legislation has also been introduced in Congress. Furthermore, an increasing number of states have proposed or enacted laws intended to prohibit or limit the use of certain food and color additives and states have initiated actions and investigations into the use of certain additives by companies. For example, in 2025, the Texas Attorney General’s Office initiated multiple investigations into major food companies regarding the marketing of products containing artificial dyes, resulting in public commitments to remove such additives in the near term and, in one case, a legally binding agreement. Should such regulatory change affect the ingredients currently used in our products and we are unable to identify or secure comparable and cost-effective alternative ingredients, such change could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial position. An unfavorable report on, or reaction to, our current or future menu…

Excerpt shortened here; the source contains the full paragraph.

Current wording

For example, a number of states, counties, and cities have enacted menu labeling laws requiring multi-unit restaurant operators to disclose certain nutritional information to customers, or have enacted legislation restricting the use of certain types of ingredients in food sold at restaurants. Furthermore, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (the PPACA) establishes a uniform, federal requirement for certain restaurants to post certain nutritional information on their menus. Specifically, the PPACA amended the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act to require certain chain restaurants to publish the total number of calories of standard menu items on menus and menu boards, along with a statement that puts this calorie information in the context of a total daily calorie intake. The PPACA also requires covered restaurants to provide to consumers, upon request, a written summary of detailed nutritional information for each standard menu item, and to provide a statement on menus and menu boards about the availability of this information. The PPACA further permits the Food and Drug Administration to require covered restaurants to make additional nutrient disclosures, such as disclosure of trans-fat content. More recently, U.S. regulatory authorities, including the Food and Drug Administration, have indicated their intent to restrict or prohibit the use of certain food dyes currently permitted for lawful use in food. In May 2026, the Food and Drug Administration announced it had finalized its post-market assessment program for chemicals in the food supply and launched its first reassessments under the program, and has since added additional chemicals to its list of substances under review with further reviews expected on an ongoing basis. Such assessments may be initiated by external petitions or the agency’s own initiative. Separately, in August 2026, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced the submission, for final review by the Office of Management and Budget, of a white paper proposing a uniform federal definition of “ultra-processed food,” developed with input from the Food and Drug Administration and the U.S. Department of Agriculture; the substance of any resulting definition remains unknown. Also in August 2026, the Food and Drug Administration published a proposed rule to increase oversight of food ingredients deemed Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS), which, if finalized, would require mandatory submission of GRAS notices for food ingredients. GRAS reform legislation has also been introduced in Congress. Furthermore, an increasing number of states have proposed or enacted laws intended to prohibit or limit the use of certain food and color additives and states have initiated actions and investigations into the use of certain additives by companies. For example, in 2025, the Texas Attorney General’s Office initiated multiple investigations into major food companies regarding the marketing of products con…

Excerpt shortened here; the source contains the full paragraph.