Skip to main content

FLYEXCLUSIVE INC.

For the period ended Dec 31, 2025. Filed Mar 5, 2026.

View on SEC.gov

About this filing

A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.

FY2025 · Filed Mar 5, 2026

FLYX$1.11-4.3%Stored close · as of Nov 10, 2026

Extracted filing text, with the paragraph anchors used by the comparison.

See the whole filing, with its images and exhibits
Contents

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

Wheels Up Partners LLC v. Exclusive Jets, LLC

On June 30, 2023, Exclusive Jets, LLC (“Exclusive”) served Wheels Up Partners, LLC (“WUP”) a Notice of Termination of the parties’ Fleet Guaranteed Revenue Program Agreement, dated November 1, 2021 (the “GRP Agreement”) following material breaches of the GRP Agreement by WUP, including WUP’s failure to pay outstanding amounts owed to Exclusive under the GRP Agreement. Subsequently, on July 5, 2023, WUP filed a lawsuit against Exclusive in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Initial Lawsuit”), alleging that Exclusive breached the GRP Agreement and the implied duty of good faith and fair dealing therein by wrongfully terminating the GRP Agreement. WUP contends that Exclusive did not have a right to terminate the GRP Agreement, that the termination was thus ineffective, and instead constituted a material breach of the GRP Agreement. WUP alleges this gave WUP the right to terminate the GRP Agreement, which WUP alleges it has done. WUP seeks compensatory damages in an unspecified amount and attorney’s fees and costs.

On August 23, 2023, prior to Exclusive filing a responsive pleading in the Initial Lawsuit, WUP voluntarily dismissed the Initial Lawsuit. That same day, WUP re-filed the same lawsuit against Exclusive in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York (the “State Lawsuit”). On September 12, 2023, Exclusive removed the State Lawsuit to the Southern District of New York (the “Court”), as case number 1:23-cv-08077-VSB. On September 19, 2023, Exclusive filed a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction or, in the alternative, motion to transfer the lawsuit to the U.S District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina (“Motion to Dismiss”). On October 9, 2023, WUP filed a motion to remand the State Lawsuit back to state court (“Motion to Remand”) contending that the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction because there is not complete diversity of citizenship between the parties.

On October 31, 2024, Exclusive filed an answer denying that WUP is entitled to any of the relief sought by WUP, and also filed a counterclaim for breach of contract against WUP seeking damages in excess of $75,000. On March 28, 2025, WUP’s Motion to Remand was granted and Exclusive’s Motion to Dismiss was denied as moot. The action accordingly was remanded to and reinstated in the New York Supreme Court (Commercial Division) as Index No. 654094/2023 (“NY State Lawsuit”). Exclusive re-filed its counterclaim for damages against WUP and re-filed its motion to dismiss WUP’s complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction over Exclusive. On July 23, 2025, WUP filed an Amended Complaint in the NY State Lawsuit.

WUP asserted six new claims in the Amended Complaint: (1) breach of contract based on Exclusive’s alleged failure to comply with WUP’s purported audit rights under Section 18 of the GRP Agreement; (2) Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices under N.C.G.S. § 75-1.1 based on Exclusive’s alleged wrongful termination of the GRP Agreement and retention of deposits paid by WUP; (3) fraudulent misrepresentation that Exclusive would return a significant portion of WUP’s deposits arising from Thomas J. Segrave, Jr.’s (“Mr. Segrave”) allegedly false statement that Exclusive would apply a certain portion of WUP’s deposits towards future invoices per month; (4) conversion of WUP’s deposits; (5) money had and received based on Exclusive’s alleged wrongful retention of WUP’s deposits; and (6) piercing the corporate veil of Exclusive to hold Mr. Segrave liable for Exclusive’s alleged liabilities. On September 9, 2025, Exclusive and Mr. Segrave filed their Answer to WUP’s Amended Complaint, re-filed Exclusive’s counterclaim, and filed a motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction over Exclusive and Mr. Segrave. On December 2, 2025, Exclusive’s and Mr. Segrave’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction was granted. On December 23, 2025, Exclusive and WUP stipulated to a dismissal of all claims in the NY State Lawsuit without prejudice.

On December 30, 2025, WUP filed a complaint (“NC Complaint”) against Exclusive and Mr. Segrave in the Superior Court Division of the General Courts of Justice of Wake County, North Carolina (“NC State Lawsuit”). The NC Complaint alleges the same claims as the Amended Complaint in the NY State Lawsuit. The NC State Lawsuit is currently pending as case number 25CV047093-910.

Other Litigation

The Company is subject to certain claims and contingent liabilities that arise in the normal course of business. While we do not expect that the ultimate resolution of any of these pending actions will have a material effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial position, or cash flows, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties. As such, there can be no assurance that any pending legal action, which we currently believe to be immaterial, does not become material in the future.

ContentsView on SEC.gov

The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.