Sable Offshore Corp.
For the period ended Mar 31, 2025. Filed May 9, 2025.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's report for each of its first three quarters. The financial statements are not audited. It shows how the business has moved since the last annual report, and what management says changed.
Mar 31, 2025 · Filed May 9, 2025
What changed in Management’s Discussion and Analysis?
Read the current filingPrevious report: 10-Q
Period ended 2024-09-30; filed 2024-11-14.
0001831481-24-000011
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsCurrent report: 10-Q
Period ended 2025-03-31; filed 2025-05-09.
0001831481-25-000033
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsThe baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.
Compared 105 previous paragraphs and 92 current paragraphs.
50 unchanged; 28 reworded; 13 added; 22 removed; 5 previous and 1 current paragraphs rearranged.
Tables are not compared: 3 previous and 2 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.
A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.
Added paragraphs (13)
Current report
Public Warrant Exercises
Current report
SYU Assets
Current report
The U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (“PHMSA”), on February 11, 2025, delivered notices to the California Office of the State Fire Marshal (the “OSFM”) that PHMSA does not object to the OSFM’s December 17, 2024 Letter of Decision approving the implementation of enhanced integrity standards for the Pipeline through OSFM’s granting of state waivers of certain regulatory requirements related to cathodic protection and seam weld corrosion for the Pipeline.
Current report
Coastal Commission
Current report
On September 27, 2024, the Coastal Commission (“Commission”) issued Notice of Violation No. V-9-24-0152 to the Company, which asserted that certain maintenance and repair activities undertaken by the Company on the Pipelines in the Coastal Zone to address identified anomalies and install safety valves constituted unpermitted development activities under the California Coastal Act (Cal. Pub. Res. Code Section 30000, et seq. (the “Coastal Act”) and the County of Santa Barbara’s (“County”) Local Coastal Program (“LCP”). Sable undertook the subject repair and maintenance work, including the safety valve installation work, based on its understanding that no new coastal development permit or other Coastal Act authorization was required, consistent with the County’s practice of authorizing certain repair work on the Pipelines since they were first permitted and built over 30 years ago, as well as the County’s acknowledgement that it does not have permit authority or jurisdiction over the Company’s installation of the new safety valves in the County along the Pipelines. Following good faith negotiations with Commission staff, on November 12, 2024, the Coastal Commission issued Executive Director Cease and Desist Order No. ED-24-CD-02 to the Company requiring the Company to, among other requirements, prepare and submit an Interim Restoration Plan and submit an application either to the Commission or the County to obtain a coastal development permit for the valve installation and other maintenance and repair work. In compliance with the Order, Sable prepared, submitted, and implemented the Interim Restoration Plan as approved by Commission staff. Sable separately submitted certain applications to the County related to some of the maintenance and repair work that was subject to Notice of Violation No. V-9-24-0152. The Order expired on February 10, 2025.
Current report
On February 12, 2025 the County Planning and Development Department delivered a letter to Sable confirming that certain pipeline repair work on the Pipelines was “authorized by the existing permits (Final Development Plan, Major Conditional Use Permit, and associated Coastal Development Permits) and was analyzed in the prior Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (EIR/EIS).” The letter states in part that “[t]he County previously exercised its authority under its Local Coastal Program and delegated Coastal Act authority in approving the permits and the requested anomaly repair work is within the scope of those approved permits.” Sable subsequently recommenced the repair and maintenance activities which were subject to Notice of Violation V-9-24-0152.
Current report
Also on February 12, 2025, the County, acting under its certified Local Coastal Program authority under the Coastal Act, delivered a letter to the Commission. In this letter, the County states that the anomaly repair work as described in the attachments is “authorized by the existing permits (Final Development Plan, Major Conditional Use Permit, and associated Coastal Development Permits) and was analyzed in the prior Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement. Thus, no further application to or action by the County is required.”
Current report
On February 14, 2025, Sable submitted a written response to the Coastal Commission’s Notice of Violation V-9-24-0152 detailing that, consistent with the County’s letters, certain of the alleged unpermitted development subject to the Notice of Violation was previously approved and that no further coastal development permit is required.
Current report
On February 16, 2025, the Coastal Commission sent Sable a “Notice Prior to Issuance of Executive Director Cease and Desist Order” related to certain of Sable’s Pipeline repair and maintenance activities and safety valve installation work. On
Current report
February 17, 2025, Sable replied to the Coastal Commission with a letter stating that the “Coastal Act does not authorize the issuance of an [Executive Director Cease and Desist Order] under the present circumstances” and that “Sable intends to proceed with the anomaly repair work authorized by the County in its February 12, 2025 letter.”
Current report
On February 18, 2025, Sable filed a complaint against the Commission in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Santa Barbara (Case No. 25CV00974). In the complaint, Sable challenges the Commission’s prior Notices of Violations and Executive Director Cease and Desist Order as procedurally improper and asserts that Commission lacks authority to prohibit work authorized by existing permits. Sable seeks a declaration that the Commission's actions are unlawful, an injunction prohibiting further enforcement actions by the Commission, damages for the alleged taking of property rights, and attorneys' fees and costs. The Commission proceeded to issue an Executive Director Cease and Desist Order to Sable on February 18, 2025. Sable pipeline repair operations remain unaffected.
Current report
Cash Flows from Financing Activities. The net cash used in financing activities for the Company was less than $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 (Successor), consisting of a vendor payment associated with Second PIPE Investment. The net cash provided by financing activities for the period January 1, 2024 through February 13, 2024 (Predecessor) was $22.5 million and net cash provided by financing activities for the period February 14, 2024 through March 31, 2024 (Successor) was $396.0 million, respectively, or a combined $418.5 million.
Current report
Critical Accounting Estimates
Removed paragraphs (22)
Previous report
SYU
Previous report
On June 27, 2024, the Center for Biological Diversity and the Wishtoyo Foundation filed a complaint against Debra Haaland, Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior; the Bureau of Environmental Safety and Enforcement (“BSEE”); and Bruce Hesson, BSEE Pacific Regional Director in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California (Case No. 2:24-cv-05459). In the complaint, plaintiffs allege that BSEE violated the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”), the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (“OCSLA”), and the Administrative Procedure Act in November 2023 by approving an extension to resume operations associated with 16 oil and gas leases Sable holds in the Santa Ynez Unit in federal waters offshore of California in the Santa Barbara Channel. The complaint asks for the Court to issue an order finding that BSEE violated NEPA and OCSLA by approving the extension, to vacate and remand the extension to BSEE, to prohibit BSEE from authorizing further extensions until it complies with NEPA and OCSLA, and for an award of costs and attorneys’ fees. Although not named as a party to the case, Sable has moved to intervene to become a party to the lawsuit and to vigorously contest the plaintiffs’ allegations. Separately, BSEE has confirmed that Sable’s recent completion of lease-holding activities serves to maintain all 16 leases within the Santa Ynez Unit to October 9, 2025.
Previous report
On July 29, 2024, PPC submitted restart plans for the Pipelines (the “Restart Plans”) to the OSFM as required by the Consent Decree. PPC is required to submit the Restart Plans to the OSFM for approval at least sixty (60) days prior to returning the Pipelines to service.
Previous report
On July 31, 2024, the OSFM approved an extension request previously submitted by PPC, setting a new deadline for implementation of the approved 2021 Plan to July 1, 2025.
Previous report
On July 30, 2024, the County of Santa Barbara (the "County") determined Sable’s applications for the Change of Owner, Change of Operator, and Guarantor of the SYU, Pacific Offshore Pipeline Company Gas Plant, and the Pipelines were complete.
Previous report
On August 30, 2024, the County acknowledged that it does not have jurisdiction over PPC’s installation of sixteen new safety valves in the County along the Pipelines in accordance with Assembly Bill 864. The County's acknowledgement was delivered in the form of a conditional settlement agreement dated August 30, 2024 (the "Safety Valve Settlement Agreement"), among the County, PPC and the Company, and a subsequent acknowledgement by the County’s planning and development staff.
Previous report
Pursuant to the Safety Valve Settlement Agreement, PPC agreed to the following additional surveillance and
Previous report
response enhancements in the County:
Previous report
i. PPC will create a Santa Barbara County-based Surveillance and Response Team, trained in PPC’s Tactical Response Plan, which will be responsible for timely initial incident response and equipped with key resources to deploy in early containment, particularly for those regions of the Pipeline between Gaviota and Las Flores Canyon;
Previous report
ii. PPC will provide Santa Barbara first responders with additional training and equipment to assist in PPC’s incident response efforts; and
Previous report
iii. PPC will undertake the following Pipeline system enhancements: (1) install and operate and maintain primary and secondary Operations Control Centers in Santa Barbara County, and (2) refurbish the Gaviota pump in its existing station.
Previous report
PPC, the Company and the County have further agreed, in the Safety Valve Settlement Agreement, to file a stipulation to dismiss the pending lawsuit, Pacific Pipeline Company and Sable Of shore Corp. v. Santa Barbara County Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors (Case No. 2:23-cv-09218-DMG-MRW) within 15 days of final installation of all sixteen underground safety valves in the County.
Previous report
On September 27, 2024, the California Coastal Commission (the “Coastal Commission”) notified the Company that it believed that the Company’s maintenance and repair activities on the Pipelines in the Coastal Zone may constitute unpermitted development activities under the California Coastal Act (Cal. Pub. Res. Code Section 30000, et seq.) (the “Coastal Act”). Maintenance and repair activities that are exempt from additional Coastal Act permitting requirements have been conducted on the Las Flores Pipeline system under the pipeline’s existing coastal development permits for the last 35+ years, and the Company believes the recent work is within the scope of those historic activities. Following good faith negotiations with Coastal Commission staff, on November 12, 2024 the Company received an Executive Director Cease and Desist Order from the Coastal Commission requiring the filling and closing of open sites within the Coastal Zone without completion of pipeline repairs at those sites. The Coastal Commission and the Company are now working towards an interim work plan to allow for the restoration of the excavations. The Company and the Coastal Commission agree that this work will protect the environment against concerns regarding erosion or other damage that could occur in case of inclement weather. Once the Coastal Commission approves the Company’s interim work plan, the Company expects to commence work immediately and expects the work will take approximately seven days to complete. This work will allow the Coastal Commission to complete their analysis and for the Coastal Commission and the Company to progress their discussions regarding how to proceed with the remaining pipeline maintenance and repair work in the Coastal Zone. The Company continues to actively engage with Coastal Commission staff in an attempt to agree on a consensual path forward for the remaining maintenance and repair activities in the Coastal Zone.
Previous report
As of September 30, 2024, warrant holders had exercised 6,315,977 Warrants for approximately $72.5 million in cash proceeds. On October 3, 2024, Sable issued a press release announcing the redemption of all of its outstanding Public Warrants to purchase shares of Common Stock that were issued under the Warrant Agreement, as part of the units sold in the Company IPO.
Previous report
On October 3, 2024, Sable Aviation, LLC (“Sable Aviation”), an entity controlled by our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Sable entered into an Agreement of Purchase and Sale, pursuant to which Sable Aviation sold transportation assets and related equipment to Sable in exchange for 600,000 shares of Common Stock, valued at $15.2 million.
Previous report
Operating and maintenance expenses. Operating and maintenance expenses were $25.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2024 (Successor), representing an increase of $11.4 million, or 79.8%, compared to $14.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2023 (Predecessor). The increase in operating and maintenance expenses was primarily attributable to timing of maintenance expenses incurred in connection with restart efforts. Operations and maintenance expenses are expected to increase over the next several years as production is restarted.
Previous report
Comparison of the periods from January 1, 2024 through February 13, 2024 (Predecessor) and February 14, 2024 through September 30, 2024 (Successor) to the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2023 (Predecessor).
Previous report
For the nine months ended September 30, 2023 (Predecessor), the $54.6 million cash used in operating activities was related to maintenance and operational readiness expenses for SYU.
Previous report
For the nine months ended September 30, 2023 (Predecessor), the net cash used in investing activities for the Predecessor period was zero since SYU has been shut in since 2015, without investing activities, but has been maintained in an operation-ready state.
Previous report
For the nine months ended September 30, 2023 (Predecessor), the net cash used in financing activities was $54.6 million. Predecessor financing activities consists of EM capital contributions financing the maintenance and operational readiness activities for SYU.
Previous report
Pursuant to the Transition Services Agreement with EM, EM provided to Sable certain operational, accounting, cash management, information technology and other general transition services with respect to the Assets (as such term is defined in the Sable-EM Purchase Agreement) for three months following the Closing Date, or until May 14, 2024.
Previous report
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Reworded paragraphs (28)
Previous wording
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations and projections about future events. These forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions about us that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “continue,” or the negative of such terms or other similar expressions. A number of factors could cause actual events, performance or results to differ materially from the events, performance and results discussed in the forward-looking statements. For information identifying important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements, please refer to the risk factors described in Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors” included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023 (the “Form 10-K”), and those described in our other SEC filings. The Company’s securities filings can be accessed on the EDGAR section of the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Except as expressly required by applicable securities law, the Company disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Current wording
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations and projections about future events. These forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions about us that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “continue,” or the negative of such terms or other similar expressions. A number of factors could cause actual events, performance or results to differ materially from the events, performance and results discussed in the forward-looking statements. For information identifying important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements, please refer to the risk factors described in Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors” included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, and those described in our other SEC filings. The Company’s securities filings can be accessed on the EDGAR section of the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Except as expressly required by applicable securities law, the Company disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Previous wording
On February 14, 2024, in connection with the Busienss Combination, the Company issued 44,024,910 shares of Common Stock, at a price of $10.00 per share for aggregate gross proceeds of $440.2 million (the "First PIPE Investment"). The shares of Common Stock issued in the First PIPE Investment were offered in a private placement under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). Upon the closing of the Business Combination, an associated marketing fee of $10.1 million was paid in full, and is recognized as an offset to the proceeds from the First PIPE Investment.
Current wording
On February 14, 2024, in connection with the Business Combination, the Company issued 44,024,910 shares of Common Stock, at a price of $10.00 per share for aggregate gross proceeds of $440.2 million (the “First PIPE Investment”). The shares of Common Stock issued in the First PIPE Investment were offered in a private placement under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). Upon the closing of the Business Combination, an associated marketing fee and legal fees of approximately $22.9 million was paid in full, and was recognized as an offset to the proceeds from the First PIPE Investment.
Previous wording
On September 26, 2024, the Company issued 7,500,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company, at a price of $20.00 per share for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $150.0 million (the "Second PIPE Investment"). The shares of Common Stock issued in the Second PIPE Investment were offered in a private placement under the Securities Act. Upon the closing of the Second PIPE Investment, an associated marketing fee and legal fees of approximately $7.5 million was accrued in full, and was recognized as an offset to the proceeds from the Second PIPE Investment.
Current wording
On September 26, 2024, the Company issued 7,500,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company, at a price of $20.00 per share for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $150.0 million (the “Second PIPE Investment”). The shares of Common Stock issued in the Second PIPE Investment were offered in a private placement under the Securities Act. An associated marketing fee and legal fees of approximately $7.8 million was recognized as an offset to the proceeds from the Second PIPE Investment.
Previous wording
On October 31, 2024, the Public Warrants ceased trading on the New York Stock Exchange. As of November 4, 2024, (the "Redemption Date"), 15,957,820 shares of Common Stock were issued upon the exercise of 99.8% of the then outstanding Public Warrants by the holders thereof at an exercise price of $11.50 per share, resulting in aggregate proceeds to the Company of $183.5 million. All outstanding Public Warrants that were not exercised by 5:00 p.m. New York City time on November 4, 2024 were redeemed by the Company for $0.01 per Public Warrant (the "Redemption"). Warrants to purchase Common Stock that were issued under the Warrant Agreement in a private placement simultaneously with the Company's initial public offering and that are still held by the initial holders thereof or their permitted transferees were not subject to the Redemption and remain outstanding. Refer to Note 7 — Warrantsfor additional details regarding the warrant exercises.
Current wording
As of November 4, 2024 (the “Redemption Date”), approximately 99.8% of the Company’s outstanding Public Warrants were exercised by the holders thereof to purchase fully paid and non-assessable shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $11.50 per share. As a result, holders of the Public Warrants received an aggregate of 15,957,820 shares of the Company’s Common Stock in exchange for $183.5 million in cash proceeds to the Company. All unexercised and outstanding Public Warrants as of 5:00 p.m. New York City time on the Redemption Date were redeemed at a price of $0.01 per Public Warrant and, as a result, no Public Warrants currently remain outstanding and the Public Warrants have ceased trading on the New York Stock Exchange. The private placement warrants and working capital warrants to purchase Common Stock that were issued under the Warrant Agreement and that are still held by the initial holders thereof or their permitted transferees were not subject to this redemption and remain outstanding.
Previous wording
Beginning in 1968 and over the course of 14 years, EM consolidated more than a dozen offshore federal oil leases and organized them into a streamlined production unit known as SYU. SYU consists of three offshore platforms and a wholly owned onshore processing facility located along the Gaviota Coast at Las Flores Canyon in Santa Barbara County, California. SYU’s onshore facilities and the three offshore platforms remained in continuous operation until 2015. In May 2015, a pipeline operated by Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. (“Plains”) that transported produced oil from SYU experienced a leak, as further described in the section of the Form 10-K titled“Business—Pipeline 901 Incident.” The SYU platforms and facilities suspended production after the incident, the SYU Assets were shut in and the facilities were placed in a safe state. The facilities are not currently producing oil and gas; however, all equipment remains in place in an operation-ready state, requiring ongoing inspections, maintenance and surveillance. As part of these suspension efforts, all SYU equipment was drained, flushed and purged in 2016. All hydrocarbon pipelines within SYU have been placed in a safe state and remain under regular monitoring. In 2020, Plains entered into a Consent Decree, described further in the section of the Form 10-K titled“Business—Pipeline 901 Incident,” that provides a path for a potential restart of the Pipelines.
Current wording
Beginning in 1968 and over the course of 14 years, EM consolidated more than a dozen offshore federal oil leases and organized them into a streamlined production unit known as SYU. SYU consists of three offshore platforms and a wholly owned onshore processing facility located along the Gaviota Coast at Las Flores Canyon in Santa Barbara County, California. SYU’s onshore facilities and the three offshore platforms remained in continuous operation until 2015. In May 2015, a pipeline operated by Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. (“Plains”) that transported produced oil from SYU experienced a leak, as further described under“Business—Pipeline 901 Incident.” The SYU platforms and facilities suspended production after the incident, the SYU Assets were shut in and the facilities were placed in a safe state. The facilities are not currently producing oil and gas; however, all equipment remains in place in an operation-ready state, requiring ongoing inspections, maintenance and surveillance. As part of these suspension efforts, all equipment was drained, flushed and purged in 2016. All hydrocarbon pipelines within SYU have been placed in a safe state and remain under regular monitoring. In 2020, Plains entered into a Consent Decree, described further under“Business—Pipeline 901 Incident,” that provides a path for a potential restart of the Pipelines.
Previous wording
In a letter dated July 10, 2024, the California Office of the State Fire Marshal (“OSFM”) re-affirmed that Pacific Pipeline Company’s (“PPC”) April 2021 Risk Analysis and Implementation Plan (the “2021 Plan”) remains in effect and complies with California State Assembly Bill 864. PPC had filed a supplemental Revised Risk Analysis and Implementation Plan (the “Supplemental Plan”) after the County of Santa Barbara denied permits requested to comply with the 2021 Plan. While OSFM acknowledged PPC’s efforts to reduce spill response times and releases, it determined that the Supplemental Plan is not considered as effective in mitigating potential environmental impacts compared to the 2021 Plan. Consequently, the 2021 Plan, which uses the best available technology, remains in effect.
Current wording
Office of the State Fire Marshal
Previous wording
•Depreciation, depletion, amortization, and accretion. Depreciation, depletion and amortization are primarily determined under either the unit-of-production method or the straight-line method, which is based on estimated asset service life taking obsolescence into consideration. Since being shut in, no depletion or amortization has been recorded for the Successor periods presented. An immaterial amount of depreciation was reflected for idle plants in the historical Predecessor financial statements. Also included in the Successor and Predecessor financial statements is the accretion associated with the Company's estimated asset retirement obligations (“ARO”). The ARO liabilities are initially recorded at their fair value and then are accreted using the Company’s applicable discount rate over the period for the change in their present value until the estimated retirement of the asset.
Current wording
•Depreciation, depletion, amortization, and accretion. Depreciation, depletion and amortization are primarily determined under either the unit-of-production method, which is based on estimated asset service life taking obsolescence into consideration. Since being shut in, no depletion or amortization has been recorded for the Successor periods presented. An immaterial amount of depreciation was reflected for idle plants in the historical Predecessor financial statements. Also included in the Successor and Predecessor financial statements is the accretion associated with the Company's estimated asset retirement obligations (“ARO”). The ARO liabilities are initially recorded at their fair value and then are accreted using the Company’s applicable discount rate over the period for the change in their present value until the estimated retirement of the asset.
Previous wording
•General and administrative. General and administrative (“G&A”) costs are comprised of overhead expenditures directly and indirectly associated with operating the assets. These support services include information technology, risk management, corporate planning, accounting, cash management, human resources, and other general corporate services. General and administrative expenses that were not specifically identifiable to SYU were allocated to SYU for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2023 and for the period from January 1, 2024 to February 13, 2024. To calculate a reasonable allocation, aggregated historical benchmarking data from comparable companies with similar operated upstream assets was used to identify general and administrative expenses as a proportion of operating expenses. SYU may also require increased services in the future, commensurate with planned activity levels.
Current wording
•General and administrative. General and administrative (“G&A”) costs are comprised of overhead expenditures directly and indirectly associated with operating the assets. These support services include information technology, risk management, corporate planning, accounting, cash management, human resources, and other general corporate services. For the Predecessor period, any general and administrative expenses that were not specifically identifiable to SYU were allocated to SYU for the period from January 1, 2024 to February 13, 2024. To calculate a reasonable allocation, aggregated historical benchmarking data from comparable companies with similar operated upstream assets was used to identify general and administrative expenses as a proportion of operating expenses. Increased general and administrative services may be required in the future, commensurate with planned operations activity levels.
Previous wording
The comparability of our operating results for the three months ended September 30, 2024 (Successor), the period February 14, 2024 through September 30, 2024 (Successor), the period January 1, 2024 through February 13, 2024 (Predecessor), and the three and nine months ended September 30, 2023 (Predecessor) was impacted by the Business Combination. In the discussion of our results of operations for these periods, we may quantitatively disclose the impacts of the Business Combination to the extent they remain ascertainable. The entirety of our activity since inception through the Closing Date were related to our formation, the preparation for our initial public offering, and since the closing of our initial public offering, the search for a target for our initial business combination (Refer to Note 1 — Organization, Business Operations, and Going Concern). Following the Closing Date, all of our operations have focused on restarting production of the SYU Assets. We lack the ability to generate any operating revenues until we receive the necessary regulatory approvals and complete the repairs necessary to restart production. Our only source of non-operating income is generated in the form of interest income on cash and cash equivalents. Post the Business Combination, we expect to incur additional expenses as a result of being an operating public company, for legal, accounting and compliance expenses.
Current wording
The comparability of our operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2025 (Successor), for the period February 14, 2024 through March 31, 2024 (Successor), and for the period January 1, 2024 through February 13, 2024 (Predecessor) was impacted by the Business Combination. In the discussion of our results of operations for these periods, we may quantitatively disclose the impacts of the Business Combination to the extent they remain ascertainable. The entirety of our activity since inception through the Closing Date were related to our formation, the preparation for our initial public offering, and since the closing of our initial public offering, the search for a target for our initial business combination (Refer to Note 1 — Organization, Business Operations, and Going Concern). Following the Closing Date, all of our operations have focused on restarting production of the SYU Assets. We lack the ability to generate any operating revenues until we receive the necessary regulatory approvals and complete the repairs necessary to restart production. Our only source of non-operating income is generated in the form of interest income on cash and cash equivalents. We also expect to continue to incur additional expenses as a result of being an operating public company, including for legal, accounting and compliance expenses.
Previous wording
The following table presents selected consolidated financial results of operations for the Successor and Predecessor periods presented.
Current wording
The following table presents selected unaudited condensed consolidated financial results of operations for the Successor and Predecessor periods presented.
Previous wording
Operating and maintenance expenses. Operating and maintenance expenses were $7.3 million and $59.2 million for the periods from January 1, 2024 through February 13, 2024 (Predecessor) and February 14, 2024 through September 30, 2024 (Successor), respectively, or a combined $66.6 million, representing an increase of $23.4 million, or 54.2%, compared to $43.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2023 (Predecessor). The increase in operating and maintenance expenses was primarily attributable to timing of maintenance expenses incurred in connection with restart efforts. Operations and maintenance expenses are expected to increase over the next several years as production is restarted.
Current wording
Operating and maintenance expenses. Operating and maintenance expenses were $34.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 (Successor), representing an increase of $19.8 million, or 135.3%, compared to $7.3 million for both periods from January 1, 2024 through February 13, 2024 (Predecessor) and February 14, 2024 through March 31, 2024 (Successor), respectively, or a combined $14.6 million. The increase in operating and maintenance expenses is primarily attributable to additional maintenance expenses incurred in connection with restart efforts, which includes a 90% increase in operations employee headcount since the Closing Date. Operations and maintenance expenses are expected to increase over the next several quarters as production is restarted.
Previous wording
Depletion, depreciation, amortization and accretion. Depletion, depreciation, amortization and accretion was $2.6 million and $6.9 million for the periods from January 1, 2024 through February 13, 2024 (Predecessor) and February 14, 2024 through September 30, 2024 (Successor), respectively, or a combined $9.5 million, representing a decrease of $6.3 million, or 39.8%, compared to $15.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2023 (Predecessor). The decrease in depletion, depreciation, amortization and accretion was primarily attributable to the Company not recognizing depreciation expense following the Business Combination, as the Company determined the assets were not in service since repairs are necessary prior to achieving production restart. Depreciation will resume once the assets are placed in service. The $6.9 million depletion, depreciation, amortization and accretion expense recognized for the period February 14, 2024 through September 30, 2024 (Successor) solely represents the recognition of ARO accretion for the period. Depletion, depreciation, amortization and accretion expense is expected to increase over the next several years as production is restarted.
Current wording
Depletion, depreciation, amortization and accretion. Depletion, depreciation, amortization and accretion was $3.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 (Successor), representing a decrease of $1.0 million, or 24.6%, compared to $2.6 million for the period January 1, 2024 through February 13, 2024 (Predecessor) and $1.4 million for the period February 14, 2024 through March 31, 2024 (Successor), respectively, or a combined $4.0 million. The decrease in depletion, depreciation, amortization and accretion is primarily attributable to the Company not recognizing depreciation expense following the Business Combination, as the Company determined the assets were not in service since repairs are necessary prior to achieving production restart. The depletion, depreciation, amortization and accretion expense recognized for the three months ended March 31, 2025 (Successor) primarily represents the recognition of ARO accretion for the period but depreciation will resume once the assets are placed in service. Depletion, depreciation, amortization and accretion expense is expected to increase over the next several quarters as production is restarted.
Previous wording
General and administrative expenses. G&A expenses were $1.7 million and $209.9 million for the periods from January 1, 2024 through February 13, 2024 (Predecessor) and February 14, 2024 through September 30, 2024 (Successor), respectively, or a combined $211.6 million, representing an increase of $202.5 million compared to $9.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2023 (Predecessor). The increase in G&A expenses was primarily attributable to the $70.0 million settlement of the Grey Fox Matter (Refer to Note 8 — Commitments and Contingencies), $82.3 million in share-based compensation expense following the Business Combination, $16.8 million in legal expenses and professional fees related to the Business Combination, and the recognition of salaries and wages following the Company's commencement of operations following the Business Combination. Predecessor G&A expenses were allocated to SYU as a portion of certain other operating costs based on aggregated historical benchmarking data as previously noted.
Current wording
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses (“G&A expenses”) were $22.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 (Successor), representing a decrease of $129.8 million compared to $1.7 million for the period January 1, 2024 through February 13, 2024 (Predecessor) and $150.4 million for the period February 14, 2024 through March 31, 2024 (Successor), respectively, or a combined $152.2 million. The decrease in G&A expenses is primarily attributable to the $70.0 million accrued settlement of the Grey Fox Matter (Refer to Note 8 — Commitments and Contingencies), $46.4 million in share-based compensation expense following the Business Combination, $16.8 million in legal expenses and professional fees related to the Business Combination, and the recognition of salaries and wages following the Company’s commencement of operations following the Business Combination. Predecessor G&A expenses were allocated to SYU as a portion of certain other operating costs based on aggregated historical benchmarking data as previously noted.
Previous wording
Total other expense, net. Total other expense, net was $0.1 million and $305.7 million for the periods from January 1, 2024 through February 13, 2024 (Predecessor) and February 14, 2024 through September 30, 2024 (Successor), respectively, or a combined $305.8 million, representing an increase of $305.3 million compared to $0.5 million in other expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2023 (Predecessor). The increase in total other expense, net was primarily attributable to an increase of $257.6 million in fair value of the warrants and $48.1 million in interest expense, partially offset by interest income. The increase during the Successor period is also due to the fact that the Predecessor did not have any debt or associated interest expense, warrants, or interest income.
Current wording
Total other expense, net. Total other expense, net was $38.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 (Successor), representing an increase of $31.2 million compared to other expense of $0.1 million for the period January 1, 2024 through February 13, 2024 (Predecessor) and other expense of $7.5 million for the period February 14, 2024 through March 31, 2024 (Successor), respectively, or a combined expense of $7.7 million. The increase in total other expense, net was primarily attributable to an increase of $23.1 million in the fair value of the warrants and $11.2 million in interest expense due to higher debt balance over the comparative periods offset partially by an increase in other income of $3.1 million of other income related interest earned on cash balances. The Predecessor did not have any debt or associated interest expense, warrants, or interest income.
Previous wording
Income tax expense. Income tax expense was zero and $19.4 million for the periods from January 1, 2024 through February 13, 2024 (Predecessor) and February 14, 2024 through September 30, 2024 (Successor), respectively, representing an increase of $19.4 million compared to zero for the nine months ended September 30, 2023 (Predecessor). Based on our ongoing assessment of our ability to recover our deferred tax assets, we concluded that it was more likely than not that our deferred tax assets in excess of deferred tax liabilities would not be realized. For the Successor period, we concluded that certain deferred tax liabilities in future periods do not have deferred tax assets available to offset, which is primarily due to our net operating losses being limited to 80% of taxable income. Therefore, a further valuation allowance of our deferred tax assets is necessary, which results in deferred tax expense for the Successor period. Our judgment regarding the likelihood of realization of these deferred tax assets could change in future periods, which could result in a material impact to our income tax provision in the period of change.
Current wording
Income tax expense. Income tax expense for the three months ended March 31, 2025 (Successor) was $10.9 million, representing a decrease of $2.5 million compared to zero for the period January 1, 2024 through February 13, 2024 (Predecessor) and $13.4 million for the period February 14, 2024 through March 31, 2024 (Successor), respectively, or a combined $13.4 million. Based on our ongoing assessment of our ability to recover our deferred tax assets, we concluded that it was more likely than not that our deferred tax assets in excess of deferred tax liabilities would not be realized. For the Successor period, we concluded that certain deferred tax liabilities in future periods do not have deferred tax assets available to offset, which is primarily due to our net operating losses being limited to 80% of taxable income. Therefore, a further valuation allowance of our deferred tax assets is necessary, which results in deferred tax expense for the Successor period. Our judgment regarding the likelihood of realization of these deferred tax assets could change in future periods, which could result in a material impact to our income tax provision in the period of change.
Previous wording
Overview. Our plans for restarting production, including restarting the existing wells and facilities and recommencing transportation through the Pipelines, will require significant capital expenditures in excess of current operational cash flow. Historically, SYU’s primary source of liquidity has been its operational cash flow and, since the shut-in, capital contributions from its parent. While SYU’s production is in the process of being restarted and prior to generating positive cash flow from production, SYU’s capital expenditure needs will be substantial and are expected to come from cash on hand. Prior to the Business Combination, Flame had approximately $62.2 million in its trust account, which consisted of proceeds from the public stockholders and the private placement investors in connection with the Company’s initial public offering, less redemptions. Sable raised $440.2 million in gross proceeds from the First PIPE Investment in connection with the Business Combination, $150.0 million in gross proceeds from the Second PIPE Investment, and approximately $72.5 million from the exercise of 6,315,977 warrants for 6,315,977 shares of Common Stock in the nine months ended September 30, 2024. Additionally, more than $600 million of the Purchase Price was seller-financed through a secured Senior Secured Term Loan with EM (the “Senior Secured Term Loan”). Based on its current financial plan, Sable management expects production to restart in the fourth quarter 2024, after which its operating cash flows are expected to be sufficient to service Sable’s indebtedness.
Current wording
Overview. Our plans for restarting production, including restarting the existing wells and facilities and recommencing transportation through the Pipelines, will require significant capital expenditures in excess of current operational cash flow. Historically, SYU’s primary source of liquidity has been its operational cash flow and, since the shut-in, capital contributions from its parent. While production is in the process of being restarted and prior to generating positive cash flow from production, capital expenditure needs will be substantial and are expected to come from cash on hand. Prior to the Business Combination, Flame had approximately $62.2 million in its trust account, which consisted of proceeds from the public stockholders and the private placement investors in connection with the Company’s initial public offering, less redemptions. Sable raised $440.2 million in gross proceeds from the First PIPE Investment in connection with the Business Combination, $150.0 million in gross proceeds from the Second PIPE Investment, and approximately $183.5 million from the exercise of 15,957,820 warrants for 15,957,820 shares of Common Stock. Additionally, more than $600 million of the Purchase Price was seller-financed through a secured Senior Secured Term Loan with EM (the “Senior Secured Term Loan”). Based on its current financial plan, Sable management expects production to restart in the second quarter 2025, after which its operating cash flows are expected to be sufficient to service Sable’s operating expenses and indebtedness.
Previous wording
Capital Requirements. Sable currently estimates start-up expenses of approximately $197.0 million in order to restart production in the fourth quarter 2024. Management evaluates its cost estimates on an ongoing basis. The expenditures will primarily be directed toward obtaining the necessary regulatory approvals and completing the pipeline repairs and bringing the shut-in assets back online in the fourth quarter 2024. After production restarts, Sable management expects a rapid increase in operating cash flows that should allow Sable to fund further capital expenditures. If Sable is unable to obtain funds or provide funds as needed for the planned capital expenditure program, Sable may not be able to finance the capital expenditures necessary to restart production or sustain production thereafter.
Current wording
Capital Requirements. Sable currently estimates remaining start-up expenses of approximately $44.1 million in order to restart production in the second quarter 2025. Management evaluates its cost estimates on an ongoing basis. The expenditures will primarily be directed toward obtaining the necessary regulatory approvals and completing the pipeline repairs and bringing the shut-in assets back online in the second quarter 2025. After production restarts, Sable management expects a rapid increase in operating cash flows that should allow Sable to fund further capital expenditures. If Sable is unable to obtain funds or provide funds as needed for the planned capital expenditure program, Sable may not be able to finance the capital expenditures necessary to restart production or sustain production thereafter.
Previous wording
Prior to the Business Combination, EM funded the Predecessor SYU operational expenses. Since the consummation of the Business Combination, Sable has addressed near-term capital funding needs with the First PIPE Investment, the Second PIPE Investmentand proceeds from the exercise of Warrants (refer to Note 7 — Warrantsfor additional details regarding the warrant exercises) and believes the Company has sufficient capital to maintain operations and complete the repairs necessary to restart production at SYU. However, the Company’s plans for production restart are contingent upon approvals from federal, state and local regulators. Additionally, if the Company’s estimates of the costs of restarting production are less than the actual amounts necessary to do so, the Company may have insufficient funds available to operate its business prior to first production and will need to raise additional capital. If the Company is unable to raise additional capital, it may be required to take additional measures to conserve liquidity, which could include, among other things, reducing overhead expenses. The Company cannot provide any assurance that new financing will be available to it on commercially acceptable terms, if at all.
Current wording
Prior to the Business Combination, EM funded the Predecessor SYU operational expenses. Since the consummation of the Business Combination, Sable has addressed near-term capital funding needs with the First PIPE Investment, the Second PIPE Investmentand proceeds from the exercise of Warrants (refer to Note 7 — Warrantsfor additional details regarding the warrant exercises) and believes the Company has sufficient capital to maintain operations and complete the repairs necessary to restart production. However, the Company’s plans for production restart are contingent upon approvals from federal, state and local regulators. Additionally, if the Company’s estimates of the costs of restarting production are less than the actual amounts necessary to do so, the Company may have insufficient funds available to operate its business prior to first production and will need to raise additional capital. If the Company is unable to raise additional capital, it may be required to take additional measures to conserve liquidity, which could include, among other things, reducing overhead expenses. The Company cannot provide any assurance that new financing will be available to it on commercially acceptable terms, if at all.
Previous wording
Cash Flows from Operating Activities. SYU has been shut in since 2015 and therefore SYU had no production and associated revenues for the comparative periods. The net cash used in operating activities for the Company was $22.5 million and $125.5 million for the periods from January 1, 2024 through February 13, 2024 (Predecessor) and February 14, 2024 through September 30, 2024 (Successor), respectively, or a combined $148.0 million, representing an increase of $93.4 million, or 170.9% compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2023 (Predecessor). The primary use of cash can be attributed to maintenance and operational readiness activities for SYU in the Predecessor and Successor periods, with additional general and administrative costs incurred post the Business Combination in the Successor period. For the period from February 14, 2024 through September 30, 2024 (Successor), we had a net loss of $601.1 million, partially offset by a non-cash increase of $257.6 million in fair value of the warrants, non-cash stock-based compensation of $86.0 million, changes in accounts payable of $54.5 million, non-cash paid-in-kind interest $47.3 million, non-cash deferred tax expense of $19.4 million, and a non-cash effect from the First Amendment to the Senior Secured Term Loan of $5.0 million. Changes in accounts payable for that period is primarily attributable to the Grey Fox Matter settlement, with $35.0 million remaining in Accounts payable and accrued expenses as of September 30, 2024 (Refer to Note 2 — Significant Accounting Policies), approximately $7.5 million in marketing and legal fees associated with the Second PIPE Investment, and other vendor payables associated with the SYU restart. Future cash flow from operations for SYU will depend on our ability to bring the associated oil and gas production of the assets back online, as well as the prices of oil, NGLs and natural gas.
Current wording
For the three months ended March 31, 2025 (Successor), we had a net loss of $109.5 million, which consists of a non-cash increase of $21.3 million in fair value of the warrants, non-cash stock-based compensation of $6.1 million, non-cash paid-in-kind interest of $20.9 million, changes in accounts payable of $1.3 million, non-cash depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion of $3.0 million, and non-cash tax expense of $10.9 million. Changes in accounts payable for the period is primarily attributable to the increase in vendor payables associated with the restart efforts. For the period January 1, 2024 through February 13, 2024 (Predecessor), SYU incurred a net loss of $11.8 million and for the period February 14, 2024 through March 31, 2024 (Successor) the Company incurred a net loss of $180.1 million, respectively, or a combined $191.9 million. Our combined net loss was partially offset by non-cash stock based compensation of $46.4 million, non-cash paid-in-kind interest $9.6 million, and changes in accounts payable of $77.0 million. Changes in accounts payable is primarily attributable to the Grey Fox Matter settlement, with $70.0 million in accounts payable and accrued expenses as of March 31, 2024 (Refer to Note 2 — Significant Accounting Policies). Future cash flow from operations will depend on our ability to bring the associated oil and gas production of the assets back online, as well as the prices of oil, NGLs and natural gas.
Previous wording
Cash Flows from Investing Activities. The net cash used in investing activities for the Company was zero and $222.7 million for the periods from January 1, 2024 through February 13, 2024 (Predecessor) and February 14, 2024 through September 30, 2024 (Successor), respectively. The Successor investing cash flow is primarily comprised of $204.2 million paid to EM at Closing for the SYU Assets, with the remaining $18.6 million cash paid for capital expenditures associated with restart efforts.
Current wording
Cash Flows from Investing Activities. The net cash used in investing activities for the Company was $63.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 (Successor), representing a decrease in cash used in investing activities of $140.8 million, or 69.0%, compared to the net cash used investing activities of zero for the period January 1, 2024 through February 13, 2024 (Predecessor) and $204.1 million for the period February 14, 2024 through March 31, 2024 (Successor), or a combined $204.1 million. The Successor investing cash flow for the three months ended March 31, 2025 (Successor) consists of cash paid for capital expenditures associated with restart efforts and for the period February 14, 2024 through March 31, 2024 (Successor) is entirely comprised of $204.1 million paid to EM at Closing per settlement statement. The net cash used in investing activities for the Predecessor period was zero since the SYU Assets have been shut in since 2015, without investing activities.
Previous wording
Cash Flows from Financing Activities. The net cash provided by financing activities for the Company was $22.5 million and $618.4 million for the periods from January 1, 2024 through February 13, 2024 (Predecessor) and February 14, 2024 through September 30, 2024 (Successor), respectively. The Successor financing activities for the period are comprised of the aggregate $590.2 million in gross proceeds received from the First PIPE Investment and the Second PIPE Investment, less $22.9 million of capitalized transaction expenses, or approximately $567.4 million net, cash received from Warrant exercises of $72.5 million, less the deposit paid to EM for the Senior Secured Term Loan of $18.8 million, payment of debt issuance costs of $1.6 million and associated with the First Amendment to the Senior Secured Term Loan (refer to Note 6 — Debt for additional disclosures regarding the First Amendment to the Senior Secured Term Loan), and repayment of Flame's non-convertible promissory notes—related parties for $1.1 million.
Current wording
The Predecessor financing activities for the period January 1, 2024 through February 13, 2024 (Predecessor) consists of EM capital contributions financing the maintenance and operational readiness activities. The Successor financing activities for the period February 14, 2024 through March 31, 2024 (Successor) are comprised of the aggregate $440.2 million, net of $22.9 million of capitalized Business Combination transaction expenses, or $417.4 million net, less deposit paid to EM for the Term Loan of $18.8 million, payment of debt issuance costs of $1.5 million, and repayment of Flame non-convertible promissory notes - related parties for $1.1 million.
Previous wording
Pursuant to the Senior Secured Term Loan, which financed most of the Purchase Price (as defined in the Senior Secured Term Loan), Sable will pay interest at ten percent (10%) per annum compounded annually, payable in arrears on January 1st of each year. At Sable’s election, accrued but unpaid interest may be deemed paid on each interest payment date by adding the amount of interest owed to the outstanding principal (paid-in-kind) amount under the Senior Secured Term Loan. Refer to Note 6 — Debt for additional disclosures regarding the Senior Secured Term Loan.
Current wording
Pursuant to the Senior Secured Term Loan, which financed most of the Purchase Price (as defined in the Senior Secured Term Loan), Sable will pay interest at ten percent (10%) per annum compounded annually, payable in arrears on January 1st of each year. At Sable’s election, accrued but unpaid interest may be deemed paid on each interest payment date by adding the amount of interest owed to the outstanding principal (paid-in-kind) amount under the Senior Secured Term Loan. On December 13, 2024, the Company entered into the Fourth Amendment to the Sable-EM Purchase Agreement, pursuant to which the following definitions were amended. “Restart Production” was redefined as 150 days after first production, extending the maturity date of the EM Term Loan by 60 days. “Restart Failure Date” was extended an additional 60 days to March 1, 2026. In the absence of further negotiations, Restart Production must take place prior to March 1, 2026, and the Senior Secured Term Loan must be refinanced within 240 days following such first production date. Refer to Note 6 — Debt for additional disclosures regarding the Senior Secured Term Loan.
Previous wording
The preparation of combined financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the combined financial statements, and income and expenses during the periods reported. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates.
Current wording
The preparation of unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the combined financial statements, and income and expenses during the periods reported. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates.
Previous wording
Other Property and Equipment. Other property and equipment primarily consist of onshore midstream facilities. Due to the nature of the other property and equipment, it is presented with oil and gas properties in the combined financial statements.
Current wording
Other Property and Equipment. Other property and equipment primarily consist of onshore midstream facilities and transportation assets. Due to the natural of such assets, the onshore midstream facilities are presented within oil and gas properties, while the transportation assets are presented within other assets on the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets.
Previous wording
SYU has been shut in since 2015 due to a pipeline incident but has been maintained by EM to preserve it in an operation-ready state and thus no depletion has been recorded for the periods presented.
Current wording
The SYU Assets have been shut in since 2015 due to a pipeline incident but had been maintained by EM to preserve it in an operation-ready state and thus no depletion has been recorded for the periods presented. The recognition of depletion expense will commence upon restart and related production.
Previous wording
The SYU assets undergo a process that monitors for indicators of potential impairment throughout the year. This process is aligned with the requirements of ASC 360—Property, Plant, and Equipment and ASC 932 Extractive Activities—Oil and Gas. Asset valuation analysis, profitability reviews and other periodic control processes assist in assessing whether events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amounts of any of the assets may not be recoverable.
Current wording
We monitor for indicators of potential impairment throughout the year. This process is aligned with the requirements of ASC 360—Property, Plant, and Equipment and ASC 932 Extractive Activities—Oil and Gas. Asset valuation analysis, profitability reviews and other periodic control processes assist in assessing whether events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amounts of any of the assets may not be recoverable.
Previous wording
Asset Retirement Obligations. The Company’s asset retirement obligations primarily relate to the future plugging and abandonment of oil and gas properties and related facilities. The fair values of these obligations are recorded as liabilities on a discounted basis, which is typically at the time the assets are installed. In the estimation of fair value, the Company uses assumptions and judgments regarding such factors as the existence of a legal obligation for an asset retirement obligation, technical assessments of the assets, estimated amounts and timing of settlements, discount rates, and inflation rates.
Current wording
Asset Retirement Obligations. The Company’s ARO primarily relate to the future plugging and abandonment of oil and gas properties and related facilities. The fair values of these obligations are recorded as liabilities on a discounted basis, which is typically at the time the assets are installed. In the estimation of fair value, the Company uses assumptions and judgments regarding such factors as the existence of a legal obligation for an asset retirement obligation, technical assessments of the assets, estimated amounts and timing of settlements, discount rates, and inflation rates.
Previous wording
All of our outstanding warrants are recognized as derivative liabilities in accordance with ASC 815-40. Accordingly, we recognize the warrant instruments as liabilities at fair value and adjust the instruments to fair value at each reporting period. The liabilities are subject to re-measurement at each balance sheet date until exercised, and any change in fair value is recognized in our statement of operations. The public warrants are measured at the Observable Quoted Price in Active Markets. The private placement warrants and the working capital warrants are measured at fair value using the Modified Black-Scholes Optional Pricing Model.
Current wording
All of our outstanding warrants are recognized as derivative liabilities in accordance with ASC 815-40. Accordingly, we recognize the warrant instruments as liabilities at fair value and adjust the instruments to fair value at each reporting period. The liabilities are subject to re-measurement at each balance sheet date until exercised, and any change in fair value is recognized in our statement of operations. The private placement warrants and the working capital warrants are measured at fair value using the Modified Black-Scholes Optional Pricing Model.
Rearranged current paragraphs (1)
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
Cash Flows from Operating Activities. The SYU Assets have been shut in since 2015 and therefore there has been no production and associated revenues for the comparative periods. The net cash used in operating activities for the Company was $47.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 (Successor), representing a decrease in cash used in operating activities of $10.7 million, or 18.2%, compared to net cash used in operating activities of $22.5 million from January 1, 2024 through February 13, 2024 (Predecessor) and $36.1 million net cash used in operating activities from February 14, 2024 through March 31, 2024 (Successor), respectively, or a combined $58.6 million. The primary use of cash can be attributed to maintenance and operational readiness activities in the Predecessor and Successor periods, with additional general and administrative costs incurred post the Business Combination in the Successor period.
Rearranged previous paragraphs (5)
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
Depletion, depreciation, amortization and accretion. Depletion, depreciation, amortization and accretion was $2.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2024 (Successor), representing a decrease of $2.5 million, or 47.6%, compared to $5.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2023 (Predecessor). The decrease in depletion, depreciation, amortization and accretion was primarily attributable to the Company not recognizing depreciation expense following the Business Combination, as the Company determined the assets were not in service since repairs are necessary prior to achieving production restart. The depletion, depreciation, amortization and accretion expense recognized for the three months ended September 30, 2024 (Successor) solely represents the recognition of ARO accretion for the period but depreciation will resume once the assets are placed in service. Depletion, depreciation, amortization and accretion expense is expected to increase over the next several years as production is restarted.
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses ("G&A expenses") were $26.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2024 (Successor), representing an increase of $23.2 million compared to $3.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2023 (Predecessor). The increase in G&A expenses was primarily attributable to the $15.0 million in share-based compensation expense and the recognition of salaries and wages following the Business Combination. Predecessor G&A expenses were allocated to SYU as a portion of certain other operating costs based on aggregated historical benchmarking data, as previously noted.
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
Total other expense, net. Total other expense, net was $200.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2024 (Successor), representing an increase of $199.6 million compared to other expense of $0.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2023 (Predecessor). The increase in total other expense, net was primarily attributable to an increase of $178.2 million in the fair value of the warrants, $19.2 million in interest expense and $5.0 million of other expense related to the First Amendment to the Senior Secured Term Loan (Refer to Note 6 — Debt for additional details regarding the First Amendment to the Senior Secured Term Loan), partially offset by interest income. The increase during the Successor period is due to the fact that the Predecessor did not have any debt or associated interest expense, warrants, or interest income.
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
Income tax expense. Income tax expense for the three months ended September 30, 2024 (Successor) was $0.9 million, representing an increase of $0.9 million compared to zero income tax expense for the three months ended September 30, 2023 (Predecessor). Based on our ongoing assessment of our ability to recover our deferred tax assets, we concluded that it was more likely than not that our deferred tax assets in excess of deferred tax liabilities would not be realized. For the Successor period, we concluded that certain deferred tax liabilities in future periods do not have deferred tax assets available to offset, which is primarily due to our net operating losses being limited to 80% of taxable income. Therefore, a further valuation allowance of our deferred tax assets is necessary, which results in deferred tax expense for the Successor period. Our judgment regarding the likelihood of realization of these deferred tax assets could change in future periods, which could result in a material impact to our income tax provision in the period of change.
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
The following table presents selected consolidated financial results of operations for the Successor and Predecessor periods presented.