BLUE OWL CAPITAL INC
For the period ended Dec 31, 2024. Filed Feb 21, 2025.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.
FY2024 · Filed Feb 21, 2025
OWL$10.37+5.6%Stored close · as of Nov 9, 2026
What changed in Risk Factors?
Read the current filingPrevious report: 10-K
Period ended 2023-12-31; filed 2024-02-23.
0001823945-24-000016
Item 1A. Risk FactorsCurrent report: 10-K
Period ended 2024-12-31; filed 2025-02-21.
0001823945-25-000013
Item 1A. Risk FactorsThe baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.
Compared 389 previous paragraphs and 410 current paragraphs.
233 unchanged; 138 reworded; 35 added; 12 removed; 6 previous and 4 current paragraphs rearranged.
Tables are not compared: 0 previous and 0 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.
A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.
Added paragraphs (35)
Current report
Our failure to comply with investment guidelines set by our clients and/or investors could negatively impact our client and investor relationships, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Current report
When clients retain us to manage assets on their behalf, they specify certain guidelines regarding investment allocation and strategy that we are required to observe in the management of their portfolios. Similarly, investors in our products often require certain investment restrictions or limitations be included in their side letters or related governing documents that we are contractually obligated to observe in the management of such investors’ interests in the applicable products. Our failure to comply with these guidelines, restrictions and other limitations could result in clients terminating their investment management agreement with us or investors seeking to withdraw from our products, as well as regulatory scrutiny. Clients or investors could also sue us for breach of contract and seek to recover damages from us, which could negatively impact our reputation. In addition, such guidelines may restrict our ability to pursue certain investments and strategies on behalf of our clients or limit an investor’s exposure to such investments and strategies that we believe are economically desirable, which could similarly result in losses to a client account or investor capital account or termination or potential withdrawal of the account or investor and a corresponding reduction in AUM. Even if we comply with all applicable investment guidelines, restrictions and limitations, a client or investor may be dissatisfied with its investment performance or our services or fees, and may terminate their customized separate accounts or advisory accounts, seek to withdraw from our funds or be unwilling to commit new capital to our specialized funds, customized separate accounts or advisory accounts. Any of these events could cause our earnings to decline and materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Current report
Our alternative credit products may expose us to incremental risks and complexities.
Current report
We engage in various forms of alternative credit structured finance arrangements that are collateralized by various asset classes. Asset-based financing investments are generally structured as loans or securities that represent the purchase or participation in, or are collateralized by and payable from, a stream of payments generated by pools of financial, physical or other assets. Specifically, our alternative credit portfolio targets investments in markets that are underserved by traditional lenders, including, without limitation, secured and unsecured consumer credit receivables, less established companies (including startups and emerging growth companies), consumer leases, residential and commercial real estate, hard assets (such as equipment leases), aviation assets, shipping assets, transportation and storage assets and financial assets such as factoring receivables, litigation claims, financial claims, trade claims and other receivables. These forms of alternative credit generally expose a lender to a greater degree of business and credit risks than traditional lending, as repayment of the loans often depends upon the performance of credit or credit-related assets, the successful operation of the businesses, greater exposure of less established companies to market volatility and potential for fraud and the income stream of the borrower. Additionally, investments in such markets expose our business to additional regulations promulgated by state and federal regulators, including the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”), which may impact our business in new and unexpected ways. The CFPB has broad powers to administer, investigate compliance with and, in some cases, enforce U.S. federal financial consumer protection laws. The CFPB has broad rule-making authority for a wide range of financial consumer protection laws that apply to investments our products make in markets, products or services that serve consumers, including laws that regulate "unfair, deceptive or abusive" consumer acts and practices.
Current report
The CFPB and other federal or state regulators may examine, investigate and take enforcement actions against the companies that our products invest in that offer consumer financial services and products, as well as financial institutions and other third parties upon which such companies rely to provide consumer financial services and products. State regulators also have certain authority in enforcing and promulgating financial consumer protection laws. As a result, some states have issued new and broader financial consumer protection laws and others may in the future, which are more comprehensive than existing U.S. federal regulations. In addition, state attorneys general may in some cases bring actions to enforce federal consumer protection laws. Depending on how governmental authorities elect to exercise their statutory authority, it could increase the compliance costs for the companies that our alternative credit products invest in, potentially delay their ability to respond to marketplace changes, result in requirements to alter products and services that would make them less attractive to consumers, and experience other negative impacts on their business condition and results of operations that in turn impact their ability to repay loans and negatively affect our products' investments in such companies.
Current report
More generally, investments in real estate-related businesses and assets are subject to risks including the following:
Current report
Following completion of the IPI Acquisition, we expect our products will have and increasingly make investments in infrastructure assets such as data center and logistics hubs. The acquisition of infrastructure assets involves substantial and continual involvement by, or an ongoing commitment to, regulatory agencies, which often have considerable discretion to change or increase regulation of the operations of infrastructure assets. In many instances, the operation or acquisition of infrastructure assets may involve an ongoing commitment to or from municipal, state, federal or foreign government, regulatory agencies or governing bodies. The nature of these obligations exposes the owners of infrastructure assets to a higher level of regulatory control than is typically imposed on other businesses, which could impair or prevent operation of a facility owned by an infrastructure asset, the completion of a previously announced acquisition or sale to third parties, or could otherwise result in additional costs and material adverse consequences to an infrastructure asset and investments in such assets. In addition, revenues for such investments may rely on contractual agreements for the provision of services with a limited number of counterparties and are consequently subject to heightened counterparty default risk.
Current report
Any of these factors may cause the value of the investments in our Real Assets products to decline, which may have a material impact on our results of operations. In connection with obtaining commercial loans backed by real estate, the lender will typically require a “bad boy” guarantee, in which our investment vehicles and we may guarantee liability for environmental liabilities and bad acts including fraud, intentional misrepresentation, voluntary bankruptcy and other acts. It is expected that commercial real estate financing arrangements generally will require “bad boy” guarantees and in the event such guarantee is called, a fund’s or our assets could be materially and adversely affected.
Current report
Our equity investments and some of our debt investments rank junior to investments made by others, exposing us to greater risk of losing our investment.
Current report
In addition, in many cases, the portfolio companies in which we or our products invest have, or are permitted to have, outstanding indebtedness or equity securities that rank senior to our or our products’ investment. By their terms, such instruments may provide that their holders are entitled to receive payments of distributions, interest or principal on or before the dates on which payments are to be made in respect of our or our investment products’ investment. Also, in the event of insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or bankruptcy of a portfolio company in which an investment is made, holders of securities ranking senior to our investment would typically be entitled to receive payment in full before distributions could be made in respect of our investment. In addition, debt investments made by us or our investment products in our portfolio companies may rank junior to the senior debt investments made by third parties in our portfolio companies. After repaying senior security holders, the portfolio company may not have any remaining assets to use for repaying amounts owed in respect of our investment. To the extent that any assets remain, holders of claims that rank equally with our investment would be entitled to share on an equal and ratable basis in distributions that are made out of those assets. Also, during periods of financial distress or following insolvency, the ability of us or our products to influence a portfolio company’s affairs and to take actions to protect an investment will likely be substantially less than that of the senior creditors.
Current report
Under the Dodd-Frank Act, a 10 voting-member Financial Stability Oversight Council (“FSOC”) has the authority to review the activities of certain nonbank financial firms engaged in financial activities and designate them as systemically important financial institutions (“SIFI”), evaluating, among other things, evaluating the impact of the distress of the financial firm on the stability of the U.S. economy. Currently, there are no non-bank financial companies with a non-bank SIFI designation. The FSOC has, however, designated certain non-bank financial companies as SIFIs in the past, and additional non-bank financial companies, which may include large asset management companies such as us, may be designated as SIFIs in the future. In November 2023, FSOC adopted amendments to its guidance regarding procedures for designating non-bank financial companies as SIFIs which eliminated the prior guidance’s prioritization of an “activities-based” approach for identifying, assessing and addressing potential risks to financial stability. Under the previous guidance’s “activities-based” approach, FSOC indicated that it would primarily focus on regulating activities that pose systemic risk rather than focusing on individual firm-specific determinations. The elimination of an “activities-based” approach over designation of an individual firm as a non-bank SIFI may increase the likelihood of FSOC designating one or more firms as a non-bank SIFI. If we were designated as such, it would result in increased regulation of our businesses, including the imposition of capital, leverage, liquidity and risk management standards, credit exposure reporting and concentration limits, enhanced public disclosures, restrictions on acquisitions and annual stress tests by the Federal Reserve. Requirements such as these, which were designed to regulate banking institutions, would likely need to be modified to be applicable to an asset manager, although no proposals have been made indicating how such measures would be adapted for asset managers.
Current report
In some circumstances, certain Blue Owl entities may be considered non-EEA managers under AIFMD. Non-EEA managers are expected to be subject to reporting and disclosure requirements under AIFMD II as well as the prohibition in respect of “high risk” jurisdictions for anti-money laundering and tax purposes. The application of other AIFMD II requirements may depend on how far individual Member States elect to apply AIFMD II to non-EEA managers, and whether any Blue Owl entities market products into the EEA. This may affect certain Blue Owl products from implementing their strategy, and/or lead to increased legal and compliance costs, in one or more EEA Member States.
Current report
Our provision of asset management services to the insurance industry subjects us to a variety of risks and uncertainties.
Current report
In July 2024, we acquired KAM and established Blue Owl Insurance Solutions (“Insurance Solutions”). This platform offers insurance-focused strategies across a wide range of asset classes and risk spectrum, including asset-backed finance, commercial real estate lending, private corporate credit and structured products. Insurance Solutions currently manages assets for a number of insurance and reinsurance companies and their affiliates pursuant to several investment management agreements and has developed, and may continue to develop, other capital-efficient products for insurance and reinsurance companies.
Current report
The growth and performance of our Insurance Solutions platform will depend on our ability to obtain and maintain asset management arrangements and other investment partnerships with current and new insurance and/or reinsurance company clients. As we only recently began offering products focused on insurance and reinsurance company client balance sheets through Insurance Solutions as a result of our acquisition of KAM in July 2024, there is no assurance of whether or when we will be able to achieve the growth we expect, if at all. If we fail to deliver high-quality, high-performing products and strategies that help our insurance and reinsurance company clients meet long-term policyholder obligations, we may not be successful in retaining existing investment partnerships, developing new investment partnerships or originating or selling capital-efficient assets or products and such failure may have a material adverse effect on the growth of our Insurance Solutions platform, and on our overall business, results and financial condition.
Current report
The U.S. and non-U.S. insurance and reinsurance industries are subject to significant regulatory oversight. Regulatory authorities in many relevant jurisdictions have broad regulatory (including through certain regulatory support organizations), administrative, and in some cases discretionary, authority with respect to insurance and reinsurance companies and/or their investment advisors, which may include, among other things, the investments insurance and reinsurance companies may acquire and hold, marketing practices, affiliate transactions, reserve requirements and capital adequacy. These requirements are primarily concerned with the protection of policyholders, and regulatory authorities often have wide discretion in applying the relevant restrictions and regulations to insurance and reinsurance companies, which may indirectly affect us as a result of our relationships with our insurance and reinsurance company clients. We may be the target or subject of, or may have indemnification obligations related to, litigation (including class action litigation by policyholders), enforcement investigations or regulatory scrutiny. Regulators and other authorities generally have the power to bring administrative or judicial proceedings against insurance and/or reinsurance companies, which could result in, among other things, suspension or revocation of licenses, cease-and-desist orders, fines, civil penalties, criminal penalties or other disciplinary action. To the extent we are involved in such regulatory actions, our reputation could be harmed, we may become liable for indemnification obligations and we could potentially be subject to enforcement actions, fines and penalties.
Current report
Insurance and reinsurance regulatory authorities and regulatory support organizations in the U.S. and outside the U.S. have increased scrutiny of alternative asset managers’ involvement in the insurance and reinsurance industries, including with respect to the ownership by such managers or their affiliated funds of, and the management of assets on behalf of, insurance companies. For example, insurance regulators, including the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (“NAIC”) — the U.S. standard-setting and regulatory support organization for the insurance industry — have increasingly focused on the terms and structure of investment management agreements, including whether they are at arms’ length, establish a control relationship with the insurance company, grant the asset manager excessive authority or oversight over the investment strategy of the insurance company or provide for management fees that are not fair and reasonable or termination provisions that make it difficult or costly for the insurer to terminate the agreement. Regulators have also increasingly focused on the risk profile of certain investments held by insurance and reinsurance companies (including, without limitation, all or certain tranches of collateralized loan obligations and other structured securities), appropriateness of investment ratings and potential conflicts of interest, including affiliated investments, and potential misalignment of incentives and any potential risks from these and other aspects of an insurance or reinsurance company’s relationship with alternative asset managers that may impact the insurance or reinsurance company’s risk profile. This enhanced scrutiny may increase the risk of regulatory actions against us and could result in new or amended regulations that limit our ability, or make it more burdensome or costly, to enter into new investment management agreements with insurance or reinsurance companies and thereby grow our insurance strategy. Some of the arrangements we have or will develop with insurance and reinsurance companies involve complex U.S. and non-U.S. tax structures for which no clear precedent or authority may be available. Such structures may be subject to potential regulatory, legislative, judicial or administrative change, scrutiny or differing interpretations and any adverse regulatory, legislative, judicial or administrative changes, scrutiny or interpretations may result in substantial costs to insurance or reinsurance companies or us.
Current report
Insurance company investment portfolios are often subject to internal and regulatory requirements governing the categories and ratings of investment products and assets they may acquire and hold. Many of the insurance-focused strategies we originate or develop for, or other assets or investments we include in, insurance company portfolios will be rated and a ratings downgrade or any other negative action by a rating agency or the NAIC’s Securities Valuation Office (“SVO”), as applicable, with respect to such products, assets or investments could make them less attractive and limit our ability to invest or deploy capital on behalf of insurers. Furthermore, insurance and reinsurance companies are subject to certain minimum capital and surplus requirements that vary by the jurisdiction where the insurance or reinsurance company is domiciled and are generally subject to change over time. In the United States, our insurance company clients are subject to risk-based capital (“RBC”) standards and other minimum capital and surplus requirements imposed by state laws. The RBC standards are based upon the Risk-Based Capital for Insurers Model Act promulgated by the NAIC, as adopted by applicable clients’ insurance regulators. Our Bermuda reinsurance company clients are subject to Bermuda Solvency Capital Requirements standards and other minimum capital and surplus requirements imposed by the Bermuda Monetary Authority.
Current report
New statutory accounting guidance or changes or clarifications in interpretations of existing guidance may adversely impact our ability to originate, or invest in, such assets on behalf of our insurance and reinsurance company clients or cause such clients to increase their required capital in respect of such assets, thus making such assets less attractive to insurers, which may adversely affect our business. Certain proposals or exposure drafts released by insurance regulatory authorities, including the NAIC or the SVO, may result in changes to the risk-based capital treatment and/or ratings or re-ratings processes of certain assets or investments that are, or may be, held by our insurance company clients.
Current report
For example, in the United States, in March 2024, the SEC adopted final rules intended to enhance and standardize climate-related disclosures; however, these rules are stayed pending the outcome of consolidated legal challenges in the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. Further, the SEC sometimes reviews compliance with ESG commitments in examinations, and it has taken enforcement actions against registered investment advisers for not establishing adequate or consistently implementing ESG policies and procedures to meet ESG commitments to investors.
Current report
There are a variety of other regulatory initiatives related to ESG-specific topics that may be applicable to us, our products or our products’ portfolio companies. For example, on January 5, 2023, the CSRD came into effect. The CSRD amends and strengthens the rules introduced on sustainability reporting for companies, banks and insurance companies under the Non-Financial Reporting Directive (2014/95/EU) (“NFRD”). The CSRD requires a much broader range of companies, including non-EU companies with significant turnover and a legal presence in EU markets, to produce detailed and prescriptive reports on sustainability-related matters within their financial statements. Although we are not currently directly in-scope of CSRD, it is possible that we may become subject to CSRD. This may result in additional compliance burdens and increased legal, accounting and compliance costs and enhanced disclosure obligations.
Current report
Many jurisdictions in which we operate have laws and regulations relating to data protection, privacy, cybersecurity and/or information security to which we may be subject (collectively, “Privacy Laws”). Compliance with applicable Privacy Laws may require adhering to stringent legal and operational requirements, which could increase compliance costs for us and require the dedication of additional time and resources to compliance. A failure to comply with applicable Privacy Laws could result in fines, sanctions, enforcement actions or other penalties or reputational damage. In addition, the SEC has indicated in recent periods that one of its examination priorities for the Division of Examinations is to continue to examine cybersecurity procedures and controls, including testing the implementation of these procedures and controls.
Current report
There may be substantial financial penalties or fines for a failure to comply with applicable Privacy Laws (which may include insufficient security for our personal or other sensitive information). For example, failure to comply with Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (the “GDPR”) and the GDPR as it forms part of the laws of England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland (the “UK GDPR”) could (in the worst case) attract regulatory penalties up to the greater of (i) 20 million Euros in respect of the GDPR / £17.5 million in respect of the UK GDPR (as applicable), and (ii) 4% of group annual worldwide turnover, as well as the possibility of other enforcement actions (such as suspension of processing activities and audits), and liabilities from third-party claims.
Current report
Our operations will be impacted by a growing movement to adopt comprehensive privacy and data protection laws similar to the GDPR, including in the U.S., where such laws focus on privacy as an individual right in general. For example, the State of California passed the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (as amended, the “CCPA”), which took effect on January 1, 2020. The CCPA generally applies to businesses that collect personal information about California consumers and meet certain thresholds with respect to revenue or buying and/or selling consumers’ personal information. The CCPA imposes stringent legal and operational obligations on such businesses as well as certain affiliated entities that share common branding. The CCPA is enforceable by the California Attorney General. Additionally, if unauthorized access, theft, or disclosure of a consumer’s personal information occurs, and the business did not maintain reasonable security practices, consumers could file a civil action (including a class action) without having to prove actual damages. Statutory damages range from $100 to $750 per consumer per incident, or actual damages, whichever is greater. The California Attorney General also may impose civil penalties ranging from $2,500 to $7,500 per violation. Further, California passed the California Privacy Rights Act of 2020 (the “CPRA”) to amend and extend the protections of the CCPA. Under the CPRA, which became effective on January 1, 2023, California established a new state agency focused on the enforcement of its privacy laws, leading to greater levels of enforcement and greater costs related to compliance with the CCPA and CPRA.
Current report
Other jurisdictions, including other states in the United States, have either passed, proposed, adopted or are considering similar laws and regulations to the CCPA, CPRA and GDPR, which could impose similarly significant costs, potential liabilities and operational and legal obligations. Further, the fund’s portfolio companies and/or each of their affiliates are subject to regulations related to privacy, data protection and information security in the jurisdictions in which they do business. Such laws and regulations vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, thus increasing costs, operational and legal burdens and the potential for significant liability on regulated entities.
Current report
Further, we may not be able to control how third-party AI technologies that we choose to use are developed or maintained, or how data we input is used or disclosed, even where we have sought contractual protections with respect to these matters. The misuse or misappropriation of our data could have an adverse impact on our reputation and could subject us to legal and regulatory investigations and/or actions.
Current report
We are committed to complying with all applicable anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws. As a result, we may forgo investment opportunities because of our unwillingness to participate in transactions that may expose us to risks under applicable anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws. In recent years, law enforcement agencies in the European Union, the United States and elsewhere have devoted significant resources to enforcement of anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws and regulations, including with respect to investments made by private equity investors. Any failure to comply with anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws and regulations could have serious legal, financial and reputational consequences, including operational disruptions and significant financial penalties.
Current report
Certain of our products and accounts that we manage or advise are subject to ERISA and/or Section 4975 of the Code. Failure to comply with the requirements of ERISA and/or Section 4975 could subject us to consequences including the imposition of excise taxes, disgorgement of profits, and personal liability.
Current report
Some of our products and accounts are subject to ERISA and/or Section 4975 of the Code, and we act as a fiduciary under ERISA and Section 4975 of the Code with respect to the plan assets invested in such products and accounts. In the management and operation of such products and accounts, we seek to comply with the applicable provisions of ERISA and Section 4975 of the Code, and do not engage in any transactions which we know or should know are “prohibited transactions” for which no exemption applies. We have adopted and comply with customary ERISA policies and procedures to avoid violating ERISA or Section 4975 of the Code, including engaging in a non-exempt “prohibited transaction.” However, if we were to cause a product or account subject to ERISA or Section 4975 of the Code to violate ERISA or engage in a prohibited transaction, we could, among other consequences, be subject to an excise tax on prohibited transactions, be required to disgorge profits and/or make the affected plans whole, or be held personally liable for breach of fiduciary duties.
Current report
•the financial performance of our products’ portfolio companies, whether or not material to Blue Owl;
Current report
Sales of Class A Shares resulting from exchanges of Common Units pledged by our directors and officers could cause the price of our Class A Shares to decrease.
Current report
Under our Insider Trading Policy, our directors, officers and employees may seek approval to pledge our securities under loan arrangements that meet requirements established by our audit committee, including with respect to the pledge amount, the minimum loan to value ratio and the minimum unencumbered net asset value. Each of Messrs. Ostrover and Lipschultz has pledged 43,409,692 and 33,000,000 Common Units, respectively, as security for loans. Failure or delay by a borrower to promptly meet a margin call under his loan documents or other default under these financing arrangements could result in the foreclosure on some or all of the pledged Common Units by the applicable third-party lender. Although these arrangements provide for the borrowers to pledge alternative collateral in lieu of the pledged Common Units in the event of a margin call, upon any foreclosure on Common Units and subsequent sale of the corresponding Class A Shares the price of our Class A Shares could decline materially.
Removed paragraphs (12)
Previous report
•Fulfilling our obligations incident to being a public company, including compliance with the Exchange Act and the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the Dodd-Frank Act, are expensive and time-consuming, and there can be no assurance that we will satisfy these obligations.
Previous report
Fulfilling our obligations incident to being a public company, including compliance with the Exchange Act and the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the Dodd-Frank Act, are expensive and time-consuming, and there can be no assurance that we will satisfy these obligations.
Previous report
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires us, among other things, to maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting. In order to maintain and improve the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting, we have expended, and anticipate that we will continue to expend, significant resources, including accounting-related costs and significant management oversight.
Previous report
In addition, our internal resources and personnel may in the future be insufficient to avoid accounting errors, and our auditors may identify deficiencies, significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in our internal control environment in the future. Any failure to develop or maintain effective controls or any difficulties encountered implementing required new or improved controls could harm our operating results or cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations and may result in a restatement of our financial statements for prior periods. Any failure to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting also could adversely affect the results of periodic management evaluations and annual independent registered public accounting firm attestation reports regarding the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Ineffective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting could also cause investors in our common stock or investors in our products to lose confidence in our reported financial and other information, which would likely have a negative effect on the trading price of our common stock and/or investors’ confidence in our products. In addition, if we are unable to continue to meet these requirements, we may not be able to remain listed on the NYSE.
Previous report
The expenses associated with being a public company include auditing, accounting and legal fees and expenses, investor relations expenses, increased directors’ fees and director and officer liability insurance costs, registrar and transfer agent fees and listing fees. In addition, as a public company, we are required to institute comprehensive compliance and investor relations functions. These obligations and constituents require significant attention from our senior management and could divert their attention away from the day-to-day management of our business. Failure to comply with the requirements of being a public company could potentially subject us to sanctions or investigations by the SEC or other regulatory authorities.
Previous report
Moreover, changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure are creating uncertainty for public companies, increasing legal and financial compliance costs and making some activities more time consuming. We must invest resources to comply with evolving laws, regulations and standards, and such investment may result in increased general and administrative expenses. If our efforts to comply with new laws, regulations and standards differ from the activities intended by regulatory or governing bodies due to ambiguities related to their application and practice, regulatory authorities may initiate legal proceedings against us, and there could be a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.
Previous report
As a result of the onshoring of EU legislation in the UK, UK firms are currently subject to substantially many of the same rules and regulations as prior to Brexit. However, the UK Government has begun the process of revising certain areas of onshored EU legislation as part of UK financial services legislation and regulation, which could result in substantive changes to regulatory requirements in the UK. It remains to be seen to what extent the UK may elect to diverge from the current EU-influenced regime over time, either through actively legislating to replace onshored EU rules or by passively not implementing or mirroring EU legislative changes. It is possible that the EU may respond to UK initiatives by restricting third country access to EU markets. If the regulatory regimes for EU and UK financial services change or diverge further, this could have an adverse impact on certain of our products and their investments, including the ability of those products to achieve their investment objectives in whole or in part (for example, owing to increased costs and complexity and/or new restrictions in relation to cross-border access between the EU and non-EU jurisdictions).
Previous report
On March 21, 2022, the SEC issued a proposed rule regarding the enhancement and standardization of mandatory climate-related disclosures. The proposed rule would mandate extensive disclosure of climate-related data, risks, and opportunities, including financial impacts, physical and transition risks, related governance and strategy, and greenhouse gas emissions, for certain public companies. Although the ultimate date of effectiveness and the final form and substance of the requirements for this proposed rule is not yet known and the ultimate scope and impact on our business is uncertain, compliance with this proposed rule, if finalized, may result in increased legal, accounting and financial compliance costs, make some activities more difficult, time-consuming and costly, and place strain on our personnel, systems and resources. Further, on May 25, 2022, the SEC proposed amendments to rules and reporting forms concerning, among other things, enhanced disclosure requirements for investment managers regarding the ability to market products as green, sustainable or ESG-focused and the incorporation of ESG factors by registered investment companies and advisers. On August 23, 2023, the SEC adopted its final rule enhancing the regulation of private fund advisers, which includes requirements with respect to the disclosure of certain information to investors that could affect the way certain ESG-related information is shared. In addition, in 2021 the SEC established an enforcement task force to look into ESG practices and disclosures by public companies and investment managers and has begun to bring enforcement actions based on ESG disclosures not aligning with actual investment processes.
Previous report
Outside of the EU, the U.K. Government’s stated policy goal is to introduce economy-wide mandatory Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (“TCFD”) reporting by 2025. The U.K. has introduced mandatory TCFD-aligned disclosure requirements for certain U.K. regulated firms. The regime captures (amongst others) any firm providing portfolio management (which includes managing investments or private equity or other private market activities consisting of either advising on investments or managing investments on a recurring or ongoing basis in connection with an arrangement which aims to invest in unlisted securities) where the assets under management exceed £5.0 billion calculated as a 3-year rolling average.
Previous report
Since 2022, our BDCs’ have been transitioning their investments to SOFR, the Secured Overnight Financing Rate, published by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Our Partner Managers and their respective portfolio companies also amended their credit agreements to replace LIBOR with SOFR.
Reworded paragraphs (138)
Previous wording
•Elevated interest rates and persistent inflation could have a material adverse effect on our business and that of our products’ portfolio companies and investments.
Current wording
•Fluctuations in interest rates and future increases in inflation could have a material adverse effect on our business and that of our products’ portfolio companies and investments.
Previous wording
•Intense competition among alternative asset managers may make fundraising and the deployment of capital more difficult, thereby limiting our ability to grow or maintain our FPAUM. Such competition may be amplified by changes in fund investor allocations away from alternative asset managers.
Current wording
•Intense competition among alternative asset managers may make fundraising and the deployment of capital more difficult, thereby limiting our ability to grow or maintain our FPAUM. Such competition may be amplified by changes in product investor allocations away from alternative asset managers.
Previous wording
The anticipated benefits of future acquisitions that we may pursue may not be realized or may take longer than expected to realize.
Current wording
•The anticipated benefits of recent or future acquisitions may not be realized or may take longer than expected to realize.
Previous wording
Employee misconduct could harm us by impairing our ability to attract and retain fund investors and subjecting us to significant legal liability, regulatory scrutiny and reputational harm.
Current wording
•Employee misconduct could harm us by impairing our ability to attract and retain product investors and subjecting us to significant legal liability, regulatory scrutiny and reputational harm.
Previous wording
We and our products are subject to increasing scrutiny from certain investors, third party assessors, our stockholders and other stakeholders with respect to ESG-related topics.
Current wording
•We, our products and our products’ portfolio companies are subject to increasing scrutiny from certain investors, third party assessors, our stockholders and other stakeholders with respect to ESG-related topics.
Previous wording
•The Registrant is a holding company and its only material source of cash is its indirect interest (held through Blue Owl GP) in the Blue Owl Operating Partnerships, and it is accordingly dependent upon distributions made by its subsidiaries to pay taxes, make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement and pay dividends.
Current wording
•Blue Owl Capital Inc. is a holding company and its only material source of cash is its indirect interest (held through Blue Owl GP) in the Blue Owl Operating Partnerships, and it is accordingly dependent upon distributions made by its subsidiaries to pay taxes, make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement and pay dividends.
Previous wording
Our business is affected by conditions and trends in the global financial markets and the global economic and political climate relating to, among other things, elevated and rising interest rates, the availability and cost of credit, persistent inflation, economic uncertainty, changes in laws (including laws and regulations relating to our taxation, taxation of our clients and applicable to alternative asset managers), trade policies, commodity prices, tariffs, currency exchange rates and controls, political elections and administration transitions, and national and international political events (including wars and other forms of conflict, terrorist acts, and security operations), work stoppages, labor shortages and labor disputes, supply chain disruptions and catastrophic events such as fires, floods, earthquakes, tornadoes, hurricanes and global health pandemics. These factors are outside of our control and may affect the level and volatility of credit and securities prices and the liquidity and value of fund investments, and we and our products may not be able to or may choose not to manage our exposure to these conditions. Global financial markets have experienced heightened volatility in recent periods, including as a result of economic and political events in or affecting the world’s major economies, such as the conflict between Russia and Ukraine and more recently between Israel and Hamas. Concerns over increasing inflation, economic recession, as well as interest rate volatility and fluctuations in oil and gas prices resulting from global production and demand levels, as well as geopolitical tension, have exacerbated market volatility.
Current wording
Our business is affected by conditions and trends in the global financial markets and the global economic and political climate relating to, among other things, fluctuations in interest rates, the availability and cost of credit, future increases in inflation, economic uncertainty, changes in laws (including laws and regulations relating to our taxation, taxation of our clients and applicable to alternative asset managers), trade policies, commodity prices, tariffs, currency exchange rates and controls, political elections and administration transitions, and national and international political events (including wars and other forms of conflict, terrorist acts, and security operations), work stoppages, labor shortages and labor disputes, supply chain disruptions and catastrophic events such as fires, floods, earthquakes, tornadoes, hurricanes and global health pandemics. The United States has recently enacted and proposed to enact significant new tariffs. Additionally, the new Presidential administration has directed various federal agencies to further evaluate key aspects of U.S. trade policy and there has been ongoing discussion and commentary regarding potential significant changes to U.S. trade policies, treaties and tariffs. These factors are outside of our control and may affect the level and volatility of credit and securities prices and the liquidity and value of fund investments, and we and our products may not be able to or may choose not to manage our exposure to these conditions. Global financial markets have experienced heightened volatility in recent periods, including as a result of economic and political events in or affecting the world’s major economies, such as the ongoing wars and conflicts between Russia and Ukraine, as well as political and social unrest in the Middle East and North Africa region. Concerns over economic recession, future increases in inflation, interest rate volatility, fluctuations in oil and gas prices resulting from global production and demand levels and geopolitical tension, have exacerbated market volatility. Additionally, social unrest and other political and security concerns may not abate, may worsen and could spread. Our business and financial performance could be adversely affected by political, economic or related developments both within and outside of regions experiencing ongoing conflicts because of interrelationships within the global financial markets.
Previous wording
During periods of difficult market conditions or slowdowns, which may be across one or more industries, sectors or geographies, our products’ portfolio companies may experience decreased revenues, financial losses, credit rating downgrades, difficulty in obtaining access to financing and increased funding costs. During such periods, those companies may also have difficulty in pursuing growth strategies, expanding their businesses and operations (including to the extent that they are Partner Managers, raising additional capital) and be unable to meet their debt service obligations or other expenses as they become due, including obligations and expenses payable to our products. Negative financial results in our products’ portfolio companies may reduce the net asset value of our products, result in the impairment of assets and reduce the investment returns for our products, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and cash flow or ability to raise additional capital through new or successor products. In addition, such conditions would increase the risk of default with respect to credit-oriented or debt investments by our products. Our products may be adversely affected by reduced opportunities to exit and realize value from their investments, by lower than expected returns on investments made prior to the deterioration of the credit markets and by our inability to find suitable investments for our products to effectively deploy capital, which could adversely affect our ability to raise new products and thus adversely impact our prospects for future growth.
Current wording
During periods of difficult market conditions or slowdowns, which may be across one or more industries, sectors or geographies, our products’ portfolio companies may experience decreased revenues, financial losses, credit rating downgrades, difficulty in obtaining access to financing and increased funding costs. During such periods, those companies may also have difficulty in pursuing growth strategies, expanding their businesses and operations (including raising additional capital for those that are Partner Managers) and be unable to meet their debt service obligations or other expenses as they become due, including obligations and expenses payable to our products. Negative financial results in our products’ portfolio companies may reduce the net asset value of our products, result in the impairment of assets and reduce the investment returns for our products, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and cash flow or ability to raise additional capital through new or successor products. In addition, such conditions would increase the risk of default with respect to credit-oriented or debt investments by our products or their portfolio companies, which could require our products, or their portfolio companies, to write down investments or foreclose upon the associated assets. Our products may be adversely affected by reduced opportunities to exit and realize value from their investments, by lower than expected returns on investments made prior to the deterioration of the credit markets and by our inability to find suitable investments for our products to effectively deploy capital, which could adversely affect our ability to raise new products and thus adversely impact our prospects for future growth.
Previous wording
Inflation may adversely affect the business, results of operations and financial condition of our products and their portfolio companies.
Current wording
Fluctuations in interest rates and future increases in inflation may adversely affect the business, results of operations and financial condition of our products and their portfolio companies.
Previous wording
Certain of our products and their portfolio companies operate in industries that have been impacted by inflation. Although the U.S. inflation rate has decreased in the fourth quarter, it remains well above the historic levels over the past several decades. Such inflationary pressures have increased the costs of labor, energy and raw materials and have adversely affected consumer spending, economic growth and our products’ portfolio companies’ operations. If such portfolio companies are unable to pass any increases in the costs of their operations along to their customers, it could adversely affect their operating results. Such conditions would increase the risk of default on their obligations as a borrower. In addition, any projected future decreases in the operating results of our products’ portfolio companies due to inflation could adversely impact the fair value of those investments. Any decreases in the fair value of our products’ investments could result in future realized or unrealized losses.
Current wording
Certain of our products and their portfolio companies operate in industries that have been impacted by inflation. Recent inflationary pressures have increased the costs of labor, energy and raw materials and have adversely affected consumer spending, economic growth and our products’ portfolio companies’ operations. If such portfolio companies are unable to pass any increases in the costs of their operations along to their customers, it could adversely affect their operating results. Such conditions would increase the risk of default on their obligations as a borrower. In addition, any projected future decreases in the operating results of our products’ portfolio companies due to inflation could adversely impact the fair value of those investments. Any decreases in the fair value of our products’ investments could result in future realized or unrealized losses.
Previous wording
Elevated and rising interest rates could have a material adverse effect on our business and that of our products’ portfolio companies.
Current wording
Fluctuations in interest rates could have a material adverse effect on our business and that of our products’ portfolio companies.
Previous wording
Elevated and rising interest rates could have a dampening effect on overall economic activity, the financial condition of our customers and the financial condition of the end customers who ultimately create demand for the capital we supply, all of which could negatively affect demand for our products’ capital. The Federal Reserve increased the federal funds rate four times in 2023, increasing the federal funds rate by 1% since the start of 2023 and 5.25% since the start of 2022. Although the Federal Reserve has signaled the potential for federal funds rate cuts in 2024, the rate and timing of such decreases remains unknown. Persistently high interest rates and uncertainty surrounding future Federal Reserve actions may have a material effect on our business making it particularly difficult for us to obtain financing at attractive rates, impacting our ability to execute on our growth strategies or future acquisitions.
Current wording
Fluctuations in interest rates could have a dampening effect on overall economic activity, the financial condition of our customers and the financial condition of the end customers who ultimately create demand for the capital we supply, all of which could negatively affect demand for our products’ capital. The Federal Reserve decreased the federal funds rate twice in 2024. Although the Federal Reserve has signaled the potential for additional federal funds rate cuts, there remains uncertainty around the rate and timing of decreases, including as a result of the transition to the new U.S presidential administration. Uncertainty surrounding future Federal Reserve actions may have a material effect on our business making it particularly difficult for us to obtain financing at attractive rates, impacting our ability to execute on our growth strategies or future acquisitions.
Previous wording
The investment advisory and management agreements we have with each of our BDCs categorize the fees we receive as: (a) base management fees, which are paid quarterly and generally increase or decrease based on the average fair value of our BDC’s gross assets (excluding cash and cash equivalents) or average fair value of gross assets (excluding cash) plus undrawn commitments, (b) Part I Fees and (c) Part II Fees. We classify the Part I Fees as management fees because they are predictable and recurring in nature, not subject to contingent repayment and generally cash-settled each quarter. If any of our BDCs’ gross assets or net investment income (before Part I Fees and Part II Fees) were to decline significantly for any reason, including, without limitation, due to fair value accounting requirements, the poor performance of its investments or the inability or increased cost to obtain or maintain borrowings for each of our BDCs, the amount of the fees we receive from our BDCs, including the base management fee and the Part I Fees, would also decline significantly, which could have an adverse effect on our revenues and results of operations. Our investment advisory and management agreements typically provide that the rates at which we earn advisory fees from certain of our BDCs increase after our BDCs are publicly listed (where before the listing the advisory fees typically are a reduced base management fee with a reduced or no Part I or II Fees). If our BDCs do not become publicly listed on anticipated timeframes or at all for any reason, including the NAV performance of our BDCs, Blue Owl will not benefit from this increase, and those BDCs may need to return their capital to investors, further reducing our management fees. We may also, from time to time, (a) waive or voluntarily defer any fees payable to us by our BDCs or any BDCs that we may manage after the date hereof and (b) restructure any existing fee waivers in place with our BDCs so that such of our BDCs will be obligated to pay fee amounts that are less than the full fee amounts owed to us pursuant to the terms of the applicable investment advisory and management agreements between us and such BDC, and the duration and extent of such waivers and deferrals in each of (a) and (b) may need to be significant to support continued fundraising. In addition to those arrangements, we have entered into and in the future may enter into expense supporting arrangements with certain of our BDCs where we pay or reimburse certain expenses of our BDCs in order to support their target dividend payments.
Current wording
The investment advisory and management agreements we have with each of our BDCs categorize the fees we receive as: (a) base management fees, which are paid quarterly and generally increase or decrease based on the average fair value of our BDC’s gross assets (excluding cash and cash equivalents) or average fair value of gross assets (excluding cash) plus undrawn commitments, (b) Part I Fees and (c) Part II Fees. We classify the Part I Fees as management fees because they are predictable and recurring in nature, not subject to contingent repayment and generally cash-settled each quarter. If any of our BDCs’ gross assets or net investment income (before Part I Fees and Part II Fees) were to decline significantly for any reason, including, without limitation, due to fair value accounting requirements, the poor performance of its investments or the inability or increased cost to obtain or maintain borrowings for each of our BDCs, the amount of the fees we receive from our BDCs, including the base management fee and the Part I Fees, would also decline significantly, which could have an adverse effect on our revenues and results of operations. Our investment advisory and management agreements typically provide that the rates at which we earn advisory fees from certain of our BDCs increase after such BDCs are publicly listed (where before the listing the advisory fees typically are a reduced base management fee with a reduced or no Part I or II Fees). If these BDCs do not become publicly listed on anticipated timeframes or at all for any reason, including the NAV performance of our BDCs, Blue Owl will not benefit from this increase, and those BDCs may need to return their capital to investors, further reducing our management fees. We may also, from time to time, (a) waive or voluntarily defer any fees payable to us by our BDCs or any BDCs that we may manage after the date hereof and (b) restructure any existing fee waivers in place with our BDCs so that such of our BDCs will be obligated to pay fee amounts that are less than the full fee amounts owed to us pursuant to the terms of the applicable investment advisory and management agreements between us and such BDC, and the duration and extent of such waivers and deferrals in each of (a) and (b) may need to be significant to support continued fundraising. In addition to those arrangements, we have entered into and in the future may enter into expense supporting arrangements with certain of our BDCs under which we pay or reimburse certain expenses of our BDCs in order to support their target dividend payments.
Previous wording
For our other non-BDC Credit products, as well as GP Strategic Capital and certain Real Estate products, which we refer to as our private funds, we enter into investment advisory and management agreements whereby we generally receive base management fees from the inception of such fund through the liquidation of such fund or for most of our GP Strategic Capital products for a set period. Non-BDC Credit products generally have a base management fee that is typically based on a percentage of gross asset value (which, if applicable, includes the portion of such investments purchased with leverage), whereas our GP Strategic Capital products generally have a management fee that is initially a set percentage of capital committed by investors, and then, following a step down event (generally either the end of the investment period or, for certain funds, when the fund’s commitments become substantially invested or drawn), is adjusted to a lower percentage of the fund’s cost of unrealized investments, subject to impairment losses for certain funds. With respect to our Real Estate products, our Permanent Capital vehicles have a management fee that is typically based on a percentage of net asset value, and our closed-end vehicles generally have a management fee that is initially a set percentage of capital committed by investors, and then, following a step down event (generally the end of the investment period or commencement of a successor fund), is adjusted to the same or in some cases a lower percentage of the fund’s cost of unrealized investments. Following a management fee step down event, the management fee we receive will be reduced when a fund realizes investments or in certain cases when there are permanent changes to the cost basis of unrealized investments. While those funds are not required to realize assets as of any date, there is an obligation to explore liquidity strategies with respect to a fund, and should a liquidity strategy event occur prior to the management fee end date, it could cause a reduction in the amount of management fees we are otherwise entitled to receive. Further, any realization of assets will be within the control of certain of our employees who own an interest in a portion of the carried interest that does not belong to us and who may have an incentive to effect a realization earlier than one otherwise would expect had carried interest not been applicable.
Current wording
For our other non-BDC Credit products, as well as GP Strategic Capital and certain Real Assets products, which we refer to as our private funds, we enter into investment advisory and management agreements whereby we generally receive base management fees from the inception of such fund through the liquidation of such fund or for certain of our GP Strategic Capital products for a set period. Non-BDC Credit products generally have a base management fee that is typically based on a percentage of gross asset value (which, if applicable, includes the portion of such investments purchased with leverage) although our alternative credit products generally have a management fee that is typically based on net invested capital, whereas our GP Strategic Capital products generally have a management fee that is initially a set percentage of capital committed by investors, and then, following a step down event (generally either the end of the investment period or, for certain funds, when the fund’s commitments become substantially invested or drawn), is adjusted to a lower percentage of the fund’s cost of unrealized investments, subject to impairment losses for certain funds. While GP Strategic Capital funds are not required to realize assets as of any date, if and to the extent a liquidity strategy event occurs prior to the management fee end date, this could cause a reduction in the amount of management fees we are otherwise entitled to receive. Further, any realization of assets will be within the control of certain of our employees who separately own an interest in a portion of the carried interest and who therefore may have an incentive to effect a realization earlier than one otherwise would expect without such carried interest ownership. With respect to our Real Assets products, our Permanent Capital vehicles have a management fee that is typically based on a percentage of net asset value, and our closed-end vehicles generally have a management fee that is initially a set percentage of capital committed by investors plus a set percentage of the fund’s invested capital with respect to unrealized investments, and then, following a step down event (generally the end of the investment period or commencement of a successor fund), is adjusted to the same or in some cases a lower percentage of the fund’s invested capital with respect to unrealized investments. Following a management fee step down event, the management fee we receive will be reduced when a fund realizes investments or in certain cases when there are permanent changes to the cost basis of unrealized investments.
Previous wording
As our private funds generally have end dates for paying management fees, our revenues will decline in respect of such funds if we are unable to successfully raise successor funds that replace the management fee payments that terminate on the older funds or such successor funds do not generate fees at the same rate due to their size and/or fee structure. Further, to the extent we are unable to meet anticipated fundraising targets or if there are significant redemptions, our ability to collect management fees will be impaired. Additionally, given that such management fees are often based on gross asset value, acquisition costs or invested capital, either throughout the fund term or the portion of the term following the investment period, the management fee received in respect of such fund will be reduced when a fund realizes investments or if the value of an investment is impaired. During the investment period of many funds, the fund expects to actively recycle capital into new investments, which would have the impact of replacing investments that have been realized during the investment period, but there are many factors that may limit our ability to effectively recycle capital and realize the full fee potential of any particular fund.
Current wording
As our private funds generally have end dates for paying management fees, our revenues will decline in respect of such funds if we are unable to successfully raise successor funds to replace the management fee payments that terminate on the older funds or such successor funds do not generate fees at the same rate due to their size and/or fee structure. Further, to the extent we are unable to meet anticipated fundraising targets or if there are significant redemptions, our ability to collect management fees will be impaired. Additionally, given that such management fees are often based on gross asset value, acquisition costs or invested capital, either throughout the fund term or the portion of the term following the investment period, the management fee received in respect of such fund will be reduced when a fund realizes investments or if the value of an investment is impaired. During the investment period of many funds, the fund expects to actively recycle capital into new investments, which would have the impact of replacing investments that have been realized during the investment period, but there are many factors that may limit our ability to effectively recycle capital and realize the full fee potential of any particular fund, including availability of new investments suitable to a particular fund’s strategy.
Previous wording
Further, our right to receive management fees can be impaired by certain actions of investors in a private fund. Our private funds generally provide investors with: (1) the right to terminate such fund on both a cause basis and a no fault basis; (2) the right to remove us as manager of a fund for cause or on a no-fault basis; and (3) the right to create an early step down event with respect to a fund on a cause basis. If the investors exercised their right to vote for an early termination, we would typically continue to receive management fee through the liquidation of such fund, but we could face pressure to liquidate investments earlier than we otherwise believe is appropriate to maximize the value of such investment. Certain funds also provide investors with the right to remove the general partner of such fund for cause or on a no-fault basis. Upon the removal of the general partner of a fund becoming effective, the investment advisory and management agreement in respect of such fund will cease to exist and our rights to payment of management fee will terminate. In some cases, investors may also have the right to redeem after certain periods of time or following regulatory or key person concerns, which would also reduce the base on which fees are charged. In other cases, after an initial lock up period, investors may issue redemption notices with respect to their interests; as such interests are redeemed, the fees will decrease unless we are able to find new investors to replace those redeeming.
Current wording
Further, our right to receive management fees can be impaired by certain actions of investors in a private fund. Our private funds generally provide investors with the right to terminate such fund on both a for-cause basis and a no-fault basis, and may also provide for the right to remove us as manager of a fund for cause or on a no-fault basis and/or the right to create an early step down event with respect to a fund on a for cause basis. If investors in a private fund exercised their right to vote for an early termination, we would typically continue to receive management fee through the liquidation of such fund, but we could face pressure to liquidate investments earlier than we otherwise believe is appropriate to maximize the value of such investment. Certain funds also provide investors with the right to remove the general partner of such fund for cause or on a no-fault basis. Upon the removal of the general partner of a fund becoming effective, the investment advisory and management agreement in respect of such fund will cease to exist and our rights to payment of management fees will terminate. In some cases, investors may also have the right to redeem after certain periods of time or following regulatory or key person concerns, which would also reduce the base on which fees are charged. In other cases, after an initial lock up period, investors may issue redemption notices with respect to their interests; as such interests are redeemed, the fees will decrease unless we are able to find new investors to replace those redeeming.
Previous wording
Notwithstanding the formulas for calculating management fees provided in the governing documents for our products, Blue Owl has provided (and expects to provide in the future) discounts to investors on such fees based on the size of their commitments to the fund (or Blue Owl products generally), the timing of their commitments to the fund or other factors that Blue Owl deems relevant. Certain investors are effectively given management fee discounts through specified interests and discounts with respect to carried interest or performance income through the grant of participation rights, fee rebates or revenue shares. Although such discounts will typically be awarded in circumstances where Blue Owl management believes there will ultimately be long-term benefits to Blue Owl, there can be no assurance that the ultimate benefit attained will be commensurate with the discount awarded, or as to how long it may take to recoup such value. Additionally, Blue Owl may not be able to maintain its current fee structure as a result of increased transparency required by SEC rules or industry pressure from fund investors to reduce fees. More recently, institutional investors have been increasing pressure to reduce management and incentive fees charged by external managers, whether through direct fee discounts as described in this paragraph, deferrals, rebates or by other means. As a result, Blue Owl may need to provide discounts more broadly to investors or reduce fees to meet such industry pressures, which reduction in fees may be further exacerbated by discount expectations of existing investors.
Current wording
Notwithstanding the formulas for calculating management fees provided in the governing documents for our products, Blue Owl has provided (and expects to provide in the future) discounts or fee holidays to investors on such fees based on the size of their commitments to the fund (or Blue Owl products generally), the timing of their commitments to the fund or other factors that Blue Owl deems relevant. Certain investors are effectively given management fee discounts through specified interests and discounts with respect to carried interest or performance income through the grant of participation rights, fee rebates or revenue shares. Although such discounts will typically be awarded in circumstances where Blue Owl management believes there will ultimately be long-term benefits to Blue Owl, there can be no assurance that the ultimate benefit attained will be commensurate with the discount awarded, or as to how long it may take to recoup such value. Additionally, Blue Owl may not be able to maintain its current fee structure as a result of increased transparency required by SEC rules or industry pressure from product investors to reduce fees. More recently, institutional investors have been increasing pressure to reduce management and incentive fees charged by external managers, whether through direct fee discounts as described in this paragraph, deferrals, rebates or by other means. As a result, Blue Owl may need to provide discounts more broadly to investors or reduce fees to meet such industry pressures, which reduction in fees may be further exacerbated by discount expectations of existing investors.
Previous wording
We also receive fee income for providing services to certain portfolio companies of our products. Such services include arrangement, syndication, origination, structuring analysis, capital structure and business plan advice and other services. Certain types of transaction-related fees are required to be distributed to Blue Owl products and other products under the terms of our Co-investment Exemptive Order, as discussed in“—Risks Related to Our Products—Conflicts of Interest—Conflicts of interest may arise in our allocation of capital and co-investment opportunities.” below, or are required to be distributed to investors in our products or offset against management fees that would otherwise be payable pursuant to the terms of the governing agreements of the relevant vehicles, while other types of related fees may be retained by us with no offset against management fees and contribute to our revenues and, ultimately, to our net income. We may decide not to seek those fees for any reason, including market conditions and expectations. Our ability to receive and retain those fees, and to continue to receive and retain those fees in the future, is dependent on the terms we negotiate with investors in our products, our ability to successfully negotiate for those fees with underlying portfolio companies, the permissibility of receiving and retaining those fees under the relevant legal and regulatory frameworks, and our business determination to negotiate for those fees. As a result, any change to the willingness of portfolio companies to bear those fees, the terms of our products that permit us to receive and retain those fees, the legal and regulatory framework in which we operate or our willingness to negotiate for those fees with portfolio companies of our products, could result in a decrease to our revenues and net income, and ultimately decrease the value of our common stock and our dividends to our stockholders. In addition, the fees generated are typically dependent on transaction frequency and volume, and a slowdown in the pace or size of investments by our products could adversely affect the amount of fees generated.
Current wording
We also receive fee income for providing services to certain portfolio companies of our products. Such services include arrangement, syndication, origination, structuring analysis, capital structure and business plan advice and other services. Certain types of transaction-related fees are required to be distributed to Blue Owl products and other products under the terms of our Co-investment Exemptive Order, as discussed below in“—Conflicts of Interest—Conflicts of interest may arise in our allocation of capital and co-investment opportunities,” or are required to be distributed to investors in our products or offset against management fees that would otherwise be payable pursuant to the terms of the governing agreements of the relevant vehicles, while other types of related fees may be retained by us with no offset against management fees and contribute to our revenues and, ultimately, to our net income. We may decide not to seek those fees for any reason, including market conditions and expectations. Our ability to receive and retain those fees, and to continue to receive and retain those fees in the future, is dependent on the terms we negotiate with investors in our products, our ability to successfully negotiate for those fees with underlying portfolio companies, the permissibility of receiving and retaining those fees under the relevant legal and regulatory frameworks, and our business determination to negotiate for those fees. As a result, any change to the willingness of portfolio companies to bear those fees, the terms of our products that permit us to receive and retain those fees, the legal and regulatory framework in which we operate or our willingness to negotiate for those fees with portfolio companies of our products, could result in a decrease to our revenues and net income, and ultimately decrease the value of our common stock and our dividends to our stockholders. In addition, the fees generated are typically dependent on transaction frequency and volume, and a slowdown in the pace or size of investments by our products could adversely affect the amount of fees generated.
Previous wording
•Volatile economic and market conditions, which could cause fund investors to delay making new commitments to alternative investment funds or limit the ability of our existing products to deploy capital;
Current wording
•Volatile economic and market conditions, which could cause product investors to delay making new commitments to alternative investment funds or limit the ability of our existing products to deploy capital;
Previous wording
•Intense competition among alternative asset managers may make fundraising and the deployment of capital more difficult, thereby limiting our ability to grow or maintain our FPAUM. Competition may be amplified by changes in fund investors allocating increased amounts of capital away from alternative asset managers; and
Current wording
•Intense competition among alternative asset managers may make fundraising and the deployment of capital more difficult, thereby limiting our ability to grow or maintain our FPAUM. Competition may be amplified by changes in product investors allocating increased amounts of capital away from alternative asset managers; and
Previous wording
•Poor performance of one or more of our products, either relative to market benchmarks or in absolute terms (e.g., based on market value or net asset value of our BDCs’ shares), or compared to our competitors may cause fund investors to regard our products less favorably than those of our competitors, thereby adversely affecting our ability to raise new or successor products.
Current wording
•Poor performance of one or more of our products, either relative to market benchmarks or in absolute terms (e.g., based on market value or net asset value of our BDCs’ shares), or compared to our competitors may cause product investors to regard our products less favorably than those of our competitors, thereby adversely affecting our ability to raise new or successor products.
Previous wording
The investment management business is intensely competitive, with competition based on a variety of factors, including investment performance, business relationships, quality of service provided to clients, fund investor liquidity, fund terms (including fees and economic sharing arrangements), brand recognition and business reputation. Maintaining our reputation is critical to attracting and retaining fund investors and for maintaining our relationships with our regulators, sponsors, Partner Managers, potential co-investors and joint venture partners, as applicable. Negative publicity regarding our company, our personnel or our Partner Managers could give rise to reputational risk that could significantly harm our existing business and business prospects. We are also currently subject to and may be subject in the future to litigation between ourselves and our Partner Managers, which may harm our reputation.
Current wording
The investment management business is intensely competitive, with competition based on a variety of factors, including investment performance, business relationships, quality of service provided to clients, product investor liquidity, fund terms (including fees and economic sharing arrangements), brand recognition and business reputation. Maintaining our reputation is critical to attracting and retaining product investors and for maintaining our relationships with our regulators, sponsors, Partner Managers, potential co-investors and joint venture partners, as applicable. Negative publicity regarding our company, our personnel or our Partner Managers could give rise to reputational risk that could significantly harm our existing business and business prospects. We are also currently subject to and may be subject in the future to litigation between ourselves and our Partner Managers, which may harm our reputation.
Previous wording
Similarly, events could occur that damage the reputation of our industry generally, such as the insolvency or bankruptcy of large funds or a significant number of funds or highly publicized incidents of fraud or other scandals, any one of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, regardless of whether any of those events directly relate to our products or the investments made by our products.
Current wording
Similarly, events could occur that damage the reputation of our industry generally, such as the insolvency or bankruptcy of large funds or a significant number of funds, or their portfolio companies, or highly publicized incidents of fraud or other scandals, any one of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, regardless of whether any of those events directly relate to our products or the investments made by our products. See also“— Risks Related to Macroeconomic Factors — Difficult market and geopolitical conditions may reduce the value or hamper the performance of the investments made by our products or impair the ability of our products to raise or deploy capital.”
Previous wording
Our products compete with a number of specialized funds, corporate buyers, traditional asset managers, real estate companies, commercial banks, investment banks, other investment managers and other financial institutions, including certain of our stockholders, as well as domestic and international pension funds and sovereign wealth funds, and we expect that competition will continue to increase.
Current wording
Our products compete with a number of specialized funds, corporate buyers, traditional asset managers, real estate companies, insurance companies, commercial banks, investment banks, other investment managers and other financial institutions, including certain of our stockholders, as well as domestic and international pension funds and sovereign wealth funds, and we expect that competition will continue to increase.
Previous wording
•A number of our competitors may have or are perceived to have more expertise or financial, technical, marketing and other resources and more personnel than we do;
Current wording
•Some of our competitors may have or are perceived to have more expertise or financial, technical, marketing and other resources and more personnel than we do;
Previous wording
•Several of our competitors have raised significant amounts of capital, and many of them have similar investment objectives to ours, which may create additional competition for investment opportunities;
Current wording
•Some of our competitors have raised significant amounts of capital, and many of them have similar investment objectives to ours, which may create additional competition for investment opportunities;
Previous wording
•Some of our competitors may be subject to less regulation or conflicts of interest and, accordingly, may have more flexibility to undertake and execute certain businesses or investments than we do, bear less compliance expense than we do or be viewed differently in the marketplace;
Current wording
•Some of our competitors may be subject to less regulation or fewer conflicts of interest and, accordingly, may have more flexibility to undertake and execute certain businesses or investments than we do, bear less compliance expense than we do or be viewed differently in the marketplace;
Previous wording
•Some of our competitors may have more flexibility than us in raising and deploying certain types of products under the investment management contracts they have negotiated with their fund investors;
Current wording
•Some of our competitors may have more flexibility than us in raising and deploying certain types of products under the investment management contracts they have negotiated with their product investors;
Previous wording
Certain of our strategic relationship investors (including early-stage investors in new products) may be granted the right to participate in the net profits or revenues of certain products.
Current wording
Certain of our strategic relationship investors (including early-stage investors in new products) may be granted the right to participate in the net profits or gross revenues or receive rebates.
Previous wording
•the attractive returns of certain of our products have been driven by the rapid return on invested capital, which has not occurred with respect to all of our products and we believe is less likely to occur in the future;
Current wording
•the attractive returns of certain of our products have been driven by the rapid return on invested capital, which has not occurred with respect to all of our products;
Previous wording
Many of the investments in our products are illiquid and thus have no readily ascertainable market prices. We value these investments based on our estimate, or an independent third party’s estimate, of their value as of the date of determination. The determination of fair value, and thus the amount of unrealized appreciation or depreciation our products may recognize in any reporting period, is to a degree subjective. Our products generally value their investments quarterly at fair value, based on, among other things, the input of third party valuation firms and taking into account the nature and realizable value of any collateral, the portfolio company’s ability to make payments and its earnings, the markets in which the portfolio company operates, comparison to publicly traded companies, discounted cash flow, current market interest rates and other relevant factors. Because such valuations, and particularly valuations of private securities, private companies and privately owned real estate, are inherently uncertain, the valuations may fluctuate significantly over short periods of time due to changes in current market conditions. A fund’s net asset value could be adversely affected if the determinations regarding the fair value of the investments were materially higher than the values that are ultimately realized upon the disposal of such investments. These valuations could, in turn, affect the management fees or performance income that our business receives.
Current wording
Many of the investments in our products are illiquid and thus have no readily ascertainable market prices. We value these investments based on our estimate, or an independent third party’s estimate, of their value as of the date of determination. The determination of fair value, and thus the amount of unrealized appreciation or depreciation our products may recognize in any reporting period, is to a degree subjective. Our products generally value their investments quarterly at fair value, based on, among other things, the input of third party valuation firms and taking into account the nature and realizable value of any collateral, the portfolio company’s ability to make payments and its earnings, the markets in which the portfolio company operates, comparison to publicly traded companies, discounted cash flow, current market interest rates and other relevant factors. Because such valuations, and particularly valuations of private securities, private companies and privately owned real estate, are inherently uncertain, the valuations may fluctuate significantly over short periods of time due to changes in current market conditions. A fund’s net asset value could be adversely affected if the determinations regarding the fair value of the investments were materially higher than the values that are ultimately realized upon the disposal of such investments. These valuations could, in turn, affect the management fees or performance income that we receive.
Previous wording
Our products, particularly our Credit and Real Estate products, use leverage as part of their respective investment programs and in certain products regularly borrow a substantial amount of their capital. The use of leverage poses a significant degree of risk and enhances the possibility of a significant loss in the value of the investment portfolio. A fund may borrow money from time to time to purchase or carry securities or may enter into derivative transactions with counterparties that have embedded leverage. The use of leverage by our products increases the volatility of investments by magnifying the potential for gain or loss on invested equity capital. If the value of a fund’s assets were to decrease, leverage would cause net asset value to decline more sharply than it otherwise would if the fund had not employed leverage. Similarly, any decrease in the fund’s income would cause net income to decline more sharply than it would have if it had not borrowed and employed leverage. Such a decline could negatively affect the fund’s ability to service its debt, which could have a material adverse effect on our products, and as a result, on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flow.
Current wording
Our products, particularly our Credit and Real Assets products, use leverage as part of their respective investment programs and certain products regularly borrow a substantial amount of their capital. The use of leverage poses a significant degree of risk and enhances the possibility of a significant loss in the value of the investment portfolio. A fund may borrow money from time to time to purchase or carry securities or may enter into derivative transactions with counterparties that have embedded leverage. The use of leverage by our products increases the volatility of investments by magnifying the potential for gain or loss on invested equity capital. If the value of a fund’s assets were to decrease, leverage would cause net asset value to decline more sharply than it otherwise would if the fund had not employed leverage. Similarly, any decrease in the fund’s income would cause net income to decline more sharply than it would have if it had not borrowed and employed leverage. Such a decline could negatively affect the fund’s ability to service its debt, which could have a material adverse effect on our products, and as a result, on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flow.
Previous wording
In recent periods we have launched a number of non-traded products, including BDCs and REITs. Non-traded products often conduct share redemption programs or tender offers to provide liquidity to investors in such vehicles. While such share redemption programs and tender offers may contain restrictions that limit the amount of shares that may be redeemed or purchased in particular periods, an increased number of investors requesting redemptions or participating in tender offers of our non-traded products could lead to a decline in the management fees and incentive fees we receive. Economic events affecting the U.S. economy, such as volatility in the financial markets, inflation, higher interest rates or global or national events that are beyond our control, could cause investors to request redemption of an increased number of shares pursuant to the share redemption programs of our non-traded products, potentially in excess of established limits. Such prolonged economic disruptions have caused a number of similar products to deny redemption requests or to suspend or partially suspend their share redemption programs and tender offers and such suspension may have a negative reputational impact on the manager or on its ability to continue fundraising. Our non-traded products may redeem or purchase fewer shares than investors request due to a lack of readily available funds due to a number of factors, including adverse market conditions beyond our control or the need to maintain liquidity for operations. Certain of our non-traded products may amend or suspend share repurchase programs during periods of market dislocation. This may further limit the amount of cash available to immediately satisfy redemption requests. Any redemptions or purchases of less than amounts requested could undermine investor confidence in our non-traded products and harm our reputation.
Current wording
In recent periods we have launched a number of non-traded products, including BDCs and REITs. Non-traded products often conduct share redemption programs or tender offers to provide liquidity to investors in such vehicles. While such share redemption programs and tender offers may contain restrictions that limit the amount of shares that may be redeemed or purchased in particular periods, an increase in the number of investors requesting redemptions or participating in tender offers, or an increase in the amount of shares redeemed or purchased through such redemption programs or tender offers, of our non-traded products could lead to a decline in the management fees and incentive fees we receive. Economic events affecting the U.S. economy, such as volatility in the financial markets, inflation, fluctuations in interest rates or global or national events that are beyond our control, could cause investors to request redemption of an increased number of shares pursuant to the share redemption programs of our non-traded products, potentially in excess of established limits. Such prolonged economic disruptions have caused a number of similar products to deny redemption requests or to suspend or partially suspend their share redemption programs and tender offers and such suspension may have a negative reputational impact on the manager or on its ability to continue fundraising. Our non-traded products may redeem or purchase fewer shares than investors request due to a lack of readily available funds due to a number of factors, including adverse market conditions beyond our control or the need to maintain liquidity for operations. Certain of our non-traded products may amend or suspend share repurchase programs during periods of market dislocation. This may further limit the amount of cash available to immediately satisfy redemption requests. Any redemptions or purchases of less than amounts requested could undermine investor confidence in our non-traded products and harm our reputation.
Previous wording
As our GP Strategic Capital products’ investments in Partner Managers are intended to be held for an indefinite duration, we are dependent upon the ability of our Partner Managers to execute successfully their investment program and grow their assets under management. In the event that a Partner Manager is unable to grow their assets under management or such Partner Manager’s investment returns fail to meet expectations, the returns attributable to such investment may be reduced or our products may suffer a loss on such investment. A Partner Manager’s failure to grow assets under management may result from a range of factors common to asset managers, including factors to which we are subject ourselves, or specific factors attributable to its business including the departure of key persons, the inability of such Partner Manager to diversify into new investment strategies, investment performance and regulatory enforcement actions.
Current wording
As our GP Strategic Capital products’ investments in Partner Managers are intended to be held for an indefinite duration, we are dependent upon the ability of our Partner Managers to successfully execute their investment program and grow their assets under management. In the event that a Partner Manager is unable to grow their assets under management or such Partner Manager’s investment returns fail to meet expectations, the returns attributable to such investment may be reduced or our products may suffer a loss on such investment. A Partner Manager’s failure to grow assets under management may result from a range of factors common to asset managers, including factors to which we are subject ourselves, or specific factors attributable to its business including the departure of key persons, the inability of such Partner Manager to diversify into new investment strategies, investment performance and regulatory enforcement actions.
Previous wording
Our Real Estate products are subject to the risks inherent in the ownership and operation of real estate and the construction and development of real estate.
Current wording
Our Real Assets products are subject to the risks inherent in the ownership and operation of real estate and the construction and development of real estate.
Previous wording
Investments in our Real Estate products will be subject to the risks inherent in the ownership and operation of real estate and real estate-related businesses and assets. These risks include the following:
Current wording
Investments in our Real Assets products are subject to the risks inherent in the ownership and operation of real estate and real estate-related businesses and assets. These investments are subject to the potential for deterioration of real estate fundamentals and the risk of adverse changes in local market and economic conditions, which may include changes in supply of and demand for competing properties in an area, fluctuating occupancy rates and changes in demand for commercial office properties (including as a result of an increased prevalence of remote work). Additionally, our products’ properties are generally self-managed by the tenant or managed by a third party, which makes us dependent upon such third parties and subjects us to risks associated with the actions and financial resources of such third parties.
Previous wording
•changes in government regulations (such as rent control and tax laws);
Current wording
•changes in government regulations (such as rent control, digital infrastructure regulation and tax laws);
Previous wording
•terrorist attacks and similar conflicts (including in the Middle East), war (including between Russia and Ukraine) and other factors that are beyond our control.
Current wording
•terrorist attacks and conflicts and other factors that are beyond our control.
Previous wording
Our professional sports minority stakes strategy is small and may be difficult to grow.
Current wording
Our professional sports minority stakes strategy is small, but may have a disproportionate effect on our reputation.
Previous wording
Our professional sports minority stakes strategy is small and may be difficult to grow. Our Blue Owl HomeCourt Fund makes minority investments in NBA franchises. The NBA provides certain services with respect to the Blue Owl HomeCourt Fund and receives a share of management fees and incentive allocations attributable to the fund. There is no assurance that we will be able to raise sufficient funds to continue to execute this strategy in the future. As adviser to the Blue Owl HomeCourt Fund, we may be exposed to liability to the NBA or one or more NBA teams in which we invest in a range of circumstances, including as a result of a violation of rules applicable to NBA franchise owners by us or investors in our Blue Owl HomeCourt Fund or, in certain circumstances, by our co-owners of a team (regardless of whether such persons were acting under our direction or control). In addition, the NBA may terminate its relationship with the adviser for a variety of reasons, including the departure of certain key persons or the occurrence of certain events constituting cause.The Blue Owl HomeCourt Fund may also evoke a high profile in the marketplace relative to its economic significance to our business. Therefore, any failure in the growth or performance of the professional sports minority stakes strategy could not only result in a decrease in our FPAUM growth potential but could also have a disproportionately adverse effect on our reputation.
Current wording
Our professional sports minority stakes strategy is small and has been difficult to grow. Our Blue Owl HomeCourt Fund makes minority investments in NBA franchises and may also invest in entities with exposure to other sports leagues or franchises outside of the NBA. The NBA provides certain services with respect to the Blue Owl HomeCourt Fund and receives a share of management fees and incentive allocations attributable to the fund. There is no assurance that we will be able to raise sufficient funds to continue to execute this strategy in the future. As adviser to the Blue Owl HomeCourt Fund, we may be exposed to liability to the NBA, other sports leagues or one or more NBA or other league teams in which we invest in a range of circumstances, including as a result of a violation of rules applicable to NBA or other league franchise owners by us or investors in our Blue Owl HomeCourt Fund or, in certain circumstances, by our co-owners of a team (regardless of whether such persons were acting under our direction or control). In addition, the NBA may terminate its relationship with us for a variety of reasons, including the departure of certain key persons or the occurrence of certain events constituting cause.The Blue Owl HomeCourt Fund may also evoke a high profile in the marketplace relative to its economic significance to us. Therefore, any failure in the growth or performance of the professional sports minority stakes strategy could not only result in a decrease in our FPAUM growth potential but could also have a disproportionately adverse effect on our reputation.
Showing the first 40 of 138 pairs. Open the source sections for the rest.
Rearranged current paragraphs (4)
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
Alternatively, if we are able to find a replacement service provider to act as AIFM, the replacement service provider may demand terms that are unfavorable to the relevant product.
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
exception under the “plan assets” regulation under ERISA. We are not, therefore subject to the requirements of ERISA (or the parallel provision of the Code) with respect to the management of those products. However, if those products fail to satisfy that exception for any reason and if no other exception is available, that failure could materially interfere with our activities in relation to those products or expose us to risks related to our failure to comply with the applicable requirements. For example, the governing documents of a fund generally impose certain obligations on the general partner or manager of the fund to cause the assets of the fund to not be treated as “plan assets” and a breach of that obligation could create liability for us.
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
Further, if the assets of a fund that is not intended to hold plan assets become plan assets (whether because of our breach, a change in law or otherwise), the application of ERISA-related requirements on our product may prevent us from operating the fund as intended and may cause the fund to breach its obligations with Partner Managers or other investments, which would create significant liabilities for our products and could significantly impact the fund’s ability to make any further investments.
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
In addition to the products and accounts described above, we have formed a small number of holding vehicles to facilitate co-investments alongside our products by ERISA investors, the assets of which holding vehicles constitute “plan assets” and with respect to which we serve as a fiduciary. While we may be required to satisfy applicable fiduciary standards and avoid engaging in prohibited transactions with respect to such holding vehicles and their assets, in each case, our authority with respect to the management and control of those vehicles is limited by contract with the relevant product investor. Accordingly, we do not anticipate any liabilities with respect to our serving as a fiduciary with respect to such vehicles.
Rearranged previous paragraphs (6)
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
•changes in supply of and demand for competing properties in an area (as a result, for example, of overbuilding);
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
Additionally, our products’ properties are generally self-managed by the tenant or managed by a third party, which makes us dependent upon such third parties and subjects us to risks associated with the actions of such third parties. Any of these factors may cause the value of the investments in our Real Estate products to decline, which may have a material impact on our results of operations.
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
Accordingly, there can be no assurance that any conflict arising from these allocations of expenses will be resolved in a manner responsive to the interests of all of our clients, which could damage our reputation.
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
subject to legal challenge from private fund industry groups and others, result in changes to our operations and could materially impact our products and/or their investments, including by causing us to incur additional expenses.
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
At the same time, various stakeholders may have differing approaches to responsible investing activities or divergent views on the consideration of ESG topics, including in the countries in which Blue Owl operates and invests, as well as in the states and localities where Blue Owl serves public sector clients. These differing views increase the risk that any action or lack thereof with respect to our consideration of responsible investing or ESG-related practices will be perceived negatively. “Anti-ESG” sentiment has gained momentum across the U.S., with several states having enacted or proposed “anti-ESG” policies, legislation or issued related legal opinions. For example: (i) boycott bills target financial institutions that “boycott” or
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
In particular, pursuant to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development’s (the “OECD”) BEPS Project, many jurisdictions have introduced domestic legislation implementing certain of the BEPS Actions. Several of the areas of tax law