Skip to main content

SoFi Technologies, Inc.

For the period ended Sep 30, 2026. Filed Nov 5, 2026.

View on SEC.gov

About this filing

A company's report for each of its first three quarters. The financial statements are not audited. It shows how the business has moved since the last annual report, and what management says changed.

Sep 30, 2026 · Filed Nov 5, 2026

SOFI$16.75+3.3%Stored close · as of Nov 9, 2026

What changed in Risk Factors?

Read the current filing

The baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.

Compared 15 previous paragraphs and 22 current paragraphs.

11 unchanged; 4 reworded; 6 added; 0 removed; 0 previous and 1 current paragraphs rearranged.

Tables are not compared: 0 previous and 0 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.

A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.

Added paragraphs (6)

Current report

We have recently issued a proprietary stablecoin named SoFiUSD. The design, issuance, and operation of a stablecoin could expose us to a range of significant risks, including regulatory, operational, liquidity, technological, and reputational risks. The legal and regulatory framework governing stablecoins remains uncertain and is evolving rapidly in the United States and internationally. The Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act (the “GENIUS Act”) was enacted on July 18, 2025, and will become effective on January 18, 2027. In October 2026, the OCC issued a final rule implementing the GENIUS Act for payment stablecoin issuers subject to its jurisdiction, which also takes effect on January 18, 2027. The OCC rule establishes requirements for, among other things, permitted activities, reserve assets, redemption, capital and operational backstops, custody, risk management, reporting, and licensing. Other implementing regulations remain in proposed form. These include rules addressing anti-money laundering and sanctions compliance program requirements proposed by FinCEN, OFAC and the OCC, and rules proposed by the U.S. Department of the Treasury, the Federal Reserve and the FDIC. These proposals may not be finalized before the GENIUS Act's effective date, and they may be adopted in forms that differ materially from their proposed form. The OCC has also indicated that it expects to update its regulations as the industry evolves.

Current report

For example, beginning on January 18, 2027, subject to limited waiver provisions, only a permitted payment stablecoin issuer (“PPSI”) may lawfully issue a payment stablecoin in the United States. Issuing a payment stablecoin without that approval may result in civil and criminal penalties. A PPSI includes a subsidiary of an insured depository institution that has been approved by its primary Federal payment stablecoin regulator to issue payment stablecoins. For the Bank, that regulator is the OCC. Payment stablecoin issuance activities conducted before the effective date are not grandfathered. Accordingly, the Bank's payment stablecoin activities will need to transition to a subsidiary of the Bank that is approved as a PPSI. This will require, among other things, the submission and approval of an application to the OCC.

Current report

The OCC has stated that it will separately announce when it will begin accepting applications and waiver requests. Under the GENIUS Act and the OCC's rule, the OCC may waive certain requirements for up to 12 months after January 18,

Current report

2027 for an issuer with a substantially complete application pending on or before that date. We intend to submit such an application and request a waiver. However, we cannot assure you that the OCC will begin accepting applications in time, that our application will be deemed substantially complete, or that a waiver will be granted, or granted on acceptable terms. We also cannot assure you that the OCC will approve our application within any particular time frame, or at all, or without conditions that restrict our activities, products, or arrangements with distribution partners.

Current report

If we are unable to obtain timely approval or a waiver, we may be required to suspend or cease issuing SoFiUSD, which could adversely affect our business. In addition, the OCC's rule requires PPSIs to maintain minimum capital and operational backstops and submit weekly and quarterly reports to the OCC. It also restricts the payment of interest or yield to holders solely in connection with holding, using, or retaining a payment stablecoin. These requirements may limit how we structure SoFiUSD, related rewards, and our partner arrangements. Violations could result in enforcement action, including civil money penalties, and could ultimately require the orderly wind-down of the PPSI. The issuance and operation of SoFiUSD also presents unique compliance challenges. We are already subject to anti-money laundering, sanctions, and related compliance obligations under the Bank Secrecy Act, the USA PATRIOT Act, and regulations administered by FinCEN and OFAC. The GENIUS Act provides that PPSIs are treated as financial institutions for Bank Secrecy Act purposes. Rules proposed by FinCEN and OFAC, and separately by the OCC, would require PPSIs to maintain specific anti-money laundering and sanctions compliance programs. These programs would include risk assessment processes and independent testing. PPSIs would also need to have the technical capability to comply, and to actually comply, with lawful orders to block, freeze, or reject specific or impermissible transactions. The final form and timing of these rules is uncertain, and complying with them may require significant changes to our systems, smart contract functionality, and controls.

Current report

Our issuance of SoFiUSD also exposes us to counterparty, operational and liquidity risks. We engage a third party sub-servicer to provide technical and operational services, including for reserve management, and a portion of SoFiUSD reserve assets may be held in custodial accounts at other regulated financial institutions. The OCC's rule requires that reserve assets be identifiable and segregated, and that reserves equal or exceed outstanding issuance at all times. It requires that at least 5% of reserve assets be held in highly liquid forms such as demand deposits, and it limits exposure to any single counterparty to 40% of reserves, subject to exceptions. It also requires stress testing and a demonstrated ability to monetize reserve assets under stressed conditions. Where warranted, PPSIs must hold reserves in excess of outstanding issuance. Meeting these requirements may constrain our selection of reserve assets, custodians, and counterparties, and reduce the income we earn on reserves. A PPSI that fails to meet reserve requirements for 15 consecutive business days must begin liquidating reserve assets and redeeming outstanding stablecoins. A failure, insolvency, misappropriation, or other inability to perform by our sub-servicer, a custodian, or another counterparty could limit our access to reserve assets and impair our ability to satisfy redemptions or maintain the value and liquidity of SoFiUSD. We also face risks related to redemption demands and market stress. Under the OCC's rule, a PPSI must generally complete redemptions within two business days of receiving a request from an onboarded customer. It must notify the OCC within 24 hours if redemption requests exceed 10% of outstanding issuance, and only the OCC may approve limits or extensions on redemptions. As a result, we may have limited ability to manage liquidity during periods of extreme stress. Failure to maintain a stable value or to meet redemption requests on time could result in financial losses, customer claims, regulatory action, and reputational harm.
Reworded paragraphs (4)

Previous wording

We have recently issued a proprietary stablecoin named SoFiUSD. The design, issuance, and operation of a stablecoin could expose us to a range of significant risks, including regulatory, operational, liquidity, technological, and reputational risks. The legal and regulatory framework governing stablecoins remains uncertain and is evolving rapidly in the United States and internationally. New or changing laws, regulations, or supervisory expectations, including the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act of 2025 (the “GENIUS Act”), could restrict or prohibit our ability to issue or offer a stablecoin, require us to obtain licenses or approvals, impose capital or reserve requirements, or subject us to additional compliance, audit and disclosure obligations, any of which could delay, limit, or prevent the delivery of SoFiUSD or materially increase its cost. In addition, the GENIUS Act requires us to establish and migrate SoFiUSD to a separately licensed or regulated entity.

Current wording

To date, and prior to the GENIUS Act taking effect, SoFi Bank has conducted its issuance and related payment stablecoin activities under its current national bank authority. New or changing laws, regulations, interpretations, or supervisory expectations, including the GENIUS Act and its implementing regulations, could have several effects. They could restrict or prohibit our ability to issue or offer a stablecoin, require us to obtain licenses or approvals, impose capital, liquidity, or reserve requirements, or subject us to additional compliance, audit, reporting, and disclosure obligations. Any of these could delay, limit, or prevent the delivery of SoFiUSD or materially increase its cost.

Previous wording

The issuance and operation of SoFiUSD also presents unique compliance challenges. Although we are already subject to anti-money laundering, sanctions, and related compliance obligations under the Bank Secrecy Act, the USA PATRIOT Act, and regulations administered by FinCEN and OFAC, the nature of blockchain-based transactions, including the speed of transfers and the potential for pseudonymous activity, creates complexities in monitoring transactions, screening for sanctioned parties, and detecting illicit activity that differ from our traditional banking operations. Once SoFiUSD is transferred on-chain, we may have limited visibility into subsequent transfers or the identity of holders. If SoFiUSD is used in connection with money laundering, terrorist financing, sanctions evasion, or other illicit activity—whether or not we have actual knowledge of such use—we could face regulatory enforcement actions, fines, reputational harm, and restrictions on our stablecoin operations.

Current wording

The nature of blockchain-based transactions creates complexities in monitoring transactions, screening for sanctioned parties, and detecting illicit activity that differ from our traditional banking operations. These include the speed of transfers and the potential for pseudonymous activity. Once SoFiUSD is transferred on-chain, we may have limited visibility into subsequent transfers or the identity of holders. If SoFiUSD is used in connection with money laundering, terrorist financing, sanctions evasion, or other illicit activity, we could face regulatory enforcement actions, fines, reputational harm, and restrictions on our stablecoin operations. This is so whether or not we have actual knowledge of such use. The same consequences could follow if we fail to implement the technical capabilities required to block or freeze transactions. Conversely, blocking, freezing, or rejecting transactions, addresses, wallets, or accounts could subject us to claims, litigation, regulatory scrutiny, fines, reputational harm, or other adverse consequences from parties alleging that our actions were unauthorized, erroneous, or caused them harm. We may also be unable to reverse those actions or recover affected assets promptly.

Previous wording

Our issuance of SoFiUSD also exposes us to counterparty, operational and liquidity risks. We engage a third party sub-servicer to provide technical and operational services, including for reserve management, and a portion of SoFiUSD reserve assets may be held in custodial accounts at other regulated financial institutions. We also face risks related to redemption demands and market stress, including the possibility that we may need to implement temporary limits on redemption amounts or timing to manage liquidity in extreme circumstances. Failure to maintain a stable value or to meet redemption requests could result in financial losses, customer claims, and reputational harm. In addition, operating a stablecoin requires robust technology infrastructure and controls, and could expose us to cybersecurity threats, fraud, operational failures, or disruptions in third-party service providers. Any such events, or negative perceptions of SoFiUSD or stablecoins generally, could adversely affect customer adoption, attract regulatory scrutiny, and harm our brand and business.

Current wording

In addition, operating a stablecoin requires robust technology infrastructure and controls. It could expose us to cybersecurity threats, fraud, smart contract vulnerabilities, operational failures, or disruptions in third-party service providers, including those whose services we rely on to satisfy regulatory requirements. Any such events, or negative perceptions of SoFiUSD or stablecoins generally, could adversely affect customer adoption, attract regulatory scrutiny, and harm our brand and business. Because blockchain transactions may be irreversible or difficult to reverse, we may be unable to correct errors or fraud or recover affected assets.

Previous wording

Furthermore, the accounting rules and regulations that we must comply with are complex and subject to interpretation by FASB, the SEC, and various bodies formed to promulgate and interpret appropriate accounting principles. A change in these principles or interpretations could have a significant effect on our reported financial results and may even affect the reporting of transactions completed before the announcement or effectiveness of a change. Further, there have been limited precedents for the financial accounting of stablecoins and other digital assets and related valuation and revenue recognition considerations. As such, there remains significant uncertainty on how companies should account for stablecoin and other digital asset transactions, value, and related revenue. Uncertainties in or changes to regulatory or financial accounting standards could result in the need to change our accounting methods and/or restate our financial statements and impair our ability to provide timely and accurate financial information, which could adversely affect our financial statements, result in a loss of investor confidence, and more generally impact our business, results of operations, financial condition, and prospects.

Current wording

Furthermore, the accounting rules and regulations that we must comply with are complex and subject to interpretation by FASB, the SEC, and various bodies formed to promulgate and interpret appropriate accounting principles. A change in these principles or interpretations could have a significant effect on our reported financial results. It may even affect the reporting of transactions completed before the announcement or effectiveness of a change. There have been limited precedents for the financial accounting of stablecoins and other digital assets and related valuation and revenue recognition considerations. As such, there remains significant uncertainty on how companies should account for stablecoin and other digital asset transactions, value, and related revenue.
Rearranged current paragraphs (1)

Current report — wording carried from elsewhere

The transition of our stablecoin activities to a PPSI subsidiary may also raise new accounting, consolidation, and regulatory capital considerations. So may the new requirements for segregated reserves, capital and backstops, and regulatory reporting. These matters may affect how we present SoFiUSD liabilities, reserve assets, and related income in our financial statements. Uncertainties in or changes to regulatory or financial accounting standards could result in the need to change our accounting methods and/or restate our financial statements. They could also impair our ability to provide timely and accurate financial information. Any of these outcomes could adversely affect our financial statements, result in a loss of investor confidence, and more generally impact our business, results of operations, financial condition, and prospects.