Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc.

Previous wording

Our business involves significant risks and uncertainties, some of which are described below. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below as well as in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Legal Proceedings, and Controls and Procedures and of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The realization of any of these risks and uncertainties could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, financial condition, results of operations, growth, and future prospects as well as our ability to accomplish our strategic objectives. In that event, the market price of our common stock could decline and you could lose part or all of your investment.

Current wording

Our business involves significant risks and uncertainties, some of which are described below. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below as well as in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Legal Proceedings, and Controls and Procedures and of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The realization of any of these risks and uncertainties could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, financial condition, results of operations, growth, and future prospects as well as our ability to accomplish our strategic objectives. In that event, the market price of our common stock could decline and you could lose part or all of your investment.

Previous wording

•Increases in component costs, long lead times, and supply shortages and changes could disrupt our supply chain.

Current wording

•Increases in component costs, long lead times, supply shortages and changes, or volatility in tariffs could disrupt our supply chain.

Previous wording

•If our products fail or are perceived to fail to detect threats, or if our products contain undetected errors or defects, these failures or errors could result in injury or loss of life.

Current wording

•If our products fail or are perceived to fail to detect threats, or if our products contain undetected errors or defects, this could have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

Previous wording

If our customers are unable to implement our products successfully, or if we fail to effectively assist our customers in installing our products and provide effective ongoing support and training, customer perceptions of our products may be impaired, or our reputation and brand may suffer.

Current wording

•Customers may be unable to implement our products successfully, or we may fail to effectively assist our customers in installing our products and provide effective ongoing support and training.

Previous wording

•Our products collect and store personal data about individuals.

Current wording

•Our products and operations collect and store personal data about individuals, which exposes us to privacy, cybersecurity, and regulatory risks.

Previous wording

“We are subject to government regulation and other legal obligations, particularly related to privacy, data protection, information security, and product marketing and our actual or perceived failure to comply with such obligations could harm our business.”

Current wording

•We are subject to government regulation and other legal obligations, related to data privacy, anti-corruption legislation, export controls, economic sanctions, tax laws, and use of AI, among other government regulations.

Previous wording

Our Senior Secured Credit Facilities contain affirmative and negative covenants, including financial covenants, that may limit our operating flexibility.

Current wording

•Our debt instrument contains affirmative and negative covenants, including financial covenants, that may limit our operating flexibility.

Previous wording

•The market price of our common stock and warrants has been highly and may continue to be highly volatile.

Current wording

•The market price of our common stock and warrants has been and may continue to be highly volatile.

Previous wording

•Certain of our warrants, earn-out shares, and founders shares are accounted for as liabilities and the changes in value of such securities could have a material effect on our financial results.

Current wording

•Certain of our warrants, earn-out shares, and founder shares are accounted for as liabilities and the changes in value of such securities could have a material effect on our financial results.

Previous wording

Our business operations are vulnerable to disruption due to natural or other disasters, including climate-related events, strikes and other events beyond our control.

Current wording

•Our business operations are vulnerable to disruption due to natural or other disasters.

Previous wording

As disclosed in Part I, Item 4 – Controls and Procedures, of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, management determined that material weaknesses in the control environment, including the lack of a sufficient complement of personnel, risk assessment and information and communication components of internal control, as well as the material weakness related to revenue control activities, resulted in the restatement of the consolidated financial statements for the annual periods ended December 31, 2022 and 2023, and the quarterly periods included in such fiscal years beginning with the second quarter of 2022, and for the quarterly periods as of and for the periods ended March 31, 2024 and June 30, 2024; as well as adjustments to the consolidated financial statements for the annual period ended December 31, 2024 and the condensed consolidated quarterly financial statements for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2024, that were recorded prior to the issuance of those financial statements. These material weaknesses are in addition to previously disclosed material weaknesses, which had resulted in adjustments and certain immaterial misstatements in the consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, and 2024, as well as certain quarterly periods within those years and the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024; the revision of the Company's previously issued 2020 annual financial statements, 2021 quarterly and annual financial statements, and quarterly financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2022; as well as the restatement of the Company’s financial statements as of and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023.

Current wording

As disclosed in Part I, Item 4 – Controls and Procedures, of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting contributed to the restatement of our consolidated financial statements for the annual periods ended December 31, 2022 and 2023, and the quarterly periods included in such fiscal years beginning with the second quarter of 2022, and for the quarterly periods as of and for the periods ended March 31, 2024 and June 30, 2024.

Previous wording

The material weaknesses will not be considered remediated until management completes the design and implementation of such measures and the controls operate for a sufficient period of time, and we have concluded, through testing, that these controls are operating effectively. At this time, we cannot predict the success of our remediation efforts or the outcome of our assessment of such efforts. We can give no assurance that our efforts will remediate these material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, or that additional material weaknesses will not be identified in the future. The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting is subject to various inherent limitations, including cost limitations, judgments used in decision making, assumptions about the likelihood of future events, the possibility of human error and the risk of fraud. If we are unable to remediate the material weaknesses, our ability to record, process, and report financial information accurately, and to prepare financial statements within the time periods specified by the rules and regulations of the SEC, could continue to be adversely affected which, in turn, may result in future misstatements, revisions, and/or restatements or adversely affect our reputation and business and the trading price of our common stock. In addition, any such failures could result in litigation or regulatory actions by the SEC or other regulatory authorities, which could further result in loss of investor confidence, a decline in the price of our common stock, delisting of our securities, harm to our reputation and financial condition and/or diversion of financial and management resources from the operation of our business.

Current wording

The material weaknesses will not be considered remediated until management completes the design and implementation of corrective measures, the controls operate for a sufficient period of time, and we have concluded, through testing, that these controls are operating effectively. As detailed in Item 9A, Controls and Procedures, we are working to remediate the material weaknesses, and at this time, we cannot predict the success of our remediation efforts or the outcome of our assessment of such efforts. Further, such remediation efforts may be difficult, time consuming and involve substantial costs, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.We can give no assurance that our efforts will remediate these material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, or that additional material weaknesses will not be identified in the future. The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting is subject to various inherent limitations, including cost limitations, judgments used in decision making, assumptions about the likelihood of future events, the possibility of human error and the risk of fraud. If we are unable to remediate the material weaknesses, our ability to record, process, and report financial information accurately, and to prepare financial statements within the time periods specified by the rules and regulations of the SEC, could continue to be adversely affected which, in turn, may result in future misstatements, revisions, and/or restatements or adversely affect our reputation and business and the trading price of our common stock. In addition, any such failures could result in litigation or regulatory actions by the SEC or other regulatory authorities, which could further result in loss of investor confidence, a decline in the price of our common stock, delisting of our securities, harm to our reputation and financial condition and/or diversion of financial and management resources from the operation of our business.

Previous wording

We have a history of losses. We have incurred net losses of $44.0 million and $38.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively. As of September 30, 2025, we had an accumulated deficit of $398.7 million. Our ability to forecast our future operating results is subject to a number of uncertainties, including our ability to plan for and model future growth. We have encountered and will continue to encounter risks and uncertainties frequently experienced by growing companies in rapidly evolving industries. If our assumptions regarding these risks and uncertainties, which we use to plan our business, are incorrect or change in reaction to changes in our markets, or if we do not address these risks successfully, our operating and financial results could differ materially from expectations, our business could suffer, and the trading price of our stock may decline.

Current wording

We have a history of losses. We have incurred net losses of $5.9 million and $1.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively. As of March 31, 2026, we had an accumulated deficit of $393.7 million. Our ability to forecast our future operating results is subject to a number of uncertainties, including our ability to plan for and model future growth. We have encountered and will continue to encounter risks and uncertainties frequently experienced by growing companies in rapidly evolving industries. If our assumptions regarding these risks and uncertainties, which we use to plan our business, are incorrect or change in reaction to changes in our markets, or if we do not address these risks successfully, our operating and financial results could differ materially from expectations, our business could suffer, and the trading price of our stock may decline.

Previous wording

A meaningful portion of our revenue is generated by product sales to new customers and sales of additional products to existing customers. The timing of certain large volume opportunities can impact our results from quarter to quarter. In addition, the sales cycle can last several months from initial engagement to contract negotiation and execution, culminating in delivery of our products to our customers, and this sales cycle can be even longer, less predictable and more resource-intensive for both larger volume sales as well as sales to customers in certain market segments. Customers may also require additional internal approvals or seek to pilot our products for a longer trial period before deciding to purchase our solutions. As a result, the timing of individual sales can be difficult to predict. In some cases, sales have occurred in a quarter subsequent to when anticipated, or have not occurred at all, which can significantly impact our quarterly financial results and make it more difficult to meet market expectations. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Critical Accounting Policies — Revenue Recognition.”

Current wording

A meaningful portion of our revenue is generated by product sales to new customers and sales of additional products to existing customers. The timing of certain large volume opportunities can impact our results from quarter to quarter. In addition, the sales cycle can last several months from initial engagement to contract negotiation and execution, culminating in delivery of our products to our customers, and this sales cycle can be even longer, less predictable and more resource-intensive for both larger volume sales as well as sales to customers in certain market segments. Customers may also require additional internal approvals or seek to pilot our products for a longer trial period before deciding to purchase our solutions. As a result, the timing of individual sales can be difficult to predict. In some cases, sales have occurred in a quarter subsequent to when anticipated, or have not occurred at all, which can significantly impact our quarterly financial results and make it more difficult to meet market expectations. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Revenue Recognition.”

Previous wording

•changes in financial markets or macroeconomic conditions, including, for example, due to the effects of recessionary trends, slow economic growth, or political elections in the United States and abroad, inflation and high interest rates, fuel prices, international currency fluctuations, tariffs, corruption, political instability, continuing social concerns and divisions in the United States and abroad, acts of war, including the conflicts in Europe and the Middle East, and acts of terrorism, both domestic and international;

Current wording

•changes in financial markets or macroeconomic conditions, including, for example, due to the effects of recessionary trends, slow economic growth, or political elections in the U.S. and abroad, inflation and high interest rates, fuel prices, international currency fluctuations, tariffs, corruption, political instability, continuing social concerns and divisions in the U.S. and abroad, acts of war, including the conflicts in Europe and the Middle East, and acts of terrorism, both domestic and international;

Previous wording

Increases in component costs, long lead times, supply shortages, and supply changes could disrupt our supply chain and have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and operating results.

Current wording

Increases in component costs, long lead times, supply shortages, supply changes, and tariffs could disrupt our supply chain and have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and operating results.

Previous wording

We acquire certain of our materials, which are critical to the ongoing operation and future growth of our business, from several third parties, both foreign and domestic. Generally, our third-party contract manufacturers contract directly with component suppliers, and we rely on our contract manufacturers to manage their supply chains. Our contract manufacturers have experienced, and may in the future experience, supply chain disruptions as a result of health crises, geopolitical tensions, trade restrictions, as well as other global economic impacts or other changes in macroeconomic trends. In the event our contract manufacturers are unable to adequately manage their supply chain or our relationships with our contract manufacturers terminate or are restricted, we could experience delays, which could negatively impact our business, customer relationships, and margins. We also source some materials and components directly from suppliers. While most components and materials for our products are available from multiple suppliers, certain of those items are only available from limited or sole sources. Should any of these suppliers become unavailable or inadequate, or impose terms unacceptable to us, such as increased pricing terms, we could be required to spend a significant amount of time and expense to develop alternate sources of supply, and may not be successful in doing so on terms acceptable to it, or at all. As a result, the loss of a limited or sole source supplier could adversely affect our manufacturing capacity, and relationships with our customers, as well as our results of operations and financial condition.

Current wording

We acquire certain of our materials, which are critical to the ongoing operation and future growth of our business, from several third parties, both foreign and domestic. Generally, our third-party contract manufacturers contract directly with component suppliers, and we rely on our contract manufacturers to manage their supply chains. Our contract manufacturers have experienced, and may in the future experience, supply chain disruptions as a result of health crises, geopolitical tensions, trade restrictions, as well as other global economic impacts or other changes in macroeconomic trends. In the event our contract manufacturers are unable to adequately manage their supply chain or our relationships with our contract manufacturers terminate or are restricted, we could experience delays, which could negatively impact our business, customer relationships, and margins. We also source some materials and components directly from suppliers. While most components and materials for our products are available from multiple suppliers, certain of those items are only available from limited or sole sources. Should any of these suppliers become unavailable or inadequate, or impose terms unacceptable to us, such as increased pricing terms, we could be required to spend a significant amount of time and expense to develop alternate sources of supply, and may not be successful in doing so on terms acceptable to it, or at all. In addition, global acceleration in the adoption of AI technologies has increased worldwide demand for semiconductor components, including memory and computer components, which has strained manufacturing capacity and supplier availability and may exacerbate existing supply shortages, lead times, allocation practices, and cost volatility affecting components used in our products.

Previous wording

In 2025, the United States government has imposed sweeping tariffs on almost all imports into the United States and certain countries have imposed retaliatory tariffs. Although the administration has announced several trade agreements, there continues to be significant uncertainty regarding these recent changes and potential future developments. Increased trade restrictions, tariffs or taxes on imports or exports relating to countries where we manufacture, source, or sell materials or products, could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial results. If we cannot find ways to mitigate the potential impacts from tariffs or trade restrictions successfully or in a timely manner, these additional tariffs and policies could have a significant impact on our business and results of operations. The exact magnitude of any potential impact remains uncertain, as there may be further changes to tariffs and policies and, consequently, potential increased tension between the U.S. and targeted countries. For example, our risk exposure may increase further if any countries levy additional retaliatory tariffs, taxes, or other trade restrictions or penalties against the United States or U.S. companies.

Current wording

Recent changes in U.S. trade policy, including judicial, legislative, and executive actions, have created significant uncertainty with respect to the imposition and duration of tariffs and other trade restrictions. In February 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that certain tariffs previously imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act were invalid. However, the future direction of U.S. trade policy remains uncertain, and new tariffs, duties, trade restrictions or taxes could be imposed under other statutory authorities or as a result of congressional action, trade negotiations, or retaliatory measures by foreign governments. Increased trade restrictions, tariffs or taxes on imports or exports relating to countries where we manufacture, source, or sell materials or products, could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial results. If we cannot find ways to mitigate the potential impacts from tariffs or trade restrictions successfully or in a timely manner, including through pricing actions, sourcing changes or other measures, these additional tariffs and policies could have a significant impact on our business and results of operations.

Previous wording

We depend on our primary third-party contract manufacturer for the production of our security screening systems. While there are several potential contract manufacturers for most of these products, all our systems are currently manufactured, assembled, tested, and packaged by Columbia Tech. On November 5, 2025, we entered into a non-exclusive contract manufacturing agreement with Plexus Corp. In most cases, we rely on these manufacturers to procure components and, in some cases, provide manufacturing engineering work. Our current and future reliance on these contract manufacturers involves several risks, including:

Current wording

We depend on our primary third-party contract manufacturer for the production of our security screening systems. While there are several potential contract manufacturers for most of these products, all our systems are currently manufactured, assembled, tested, and packaged by Columbia Tech. On November 5, 2025, we entered into a non-exclusive contract manufacturing agreement with Plexus Corp which we expect will help us diversify contract manufacturers. While we anticipate reduced product costs and improved gross margin over time, such results may not materialize. Onboarding a new supplier involves various inherent risks that could adversely affect our production capacity and product quality, and negatively impact revenue, gross profits and field service costs.

Previous wording

•potential labor unrest or unavailability affecting the ability of the third-party manufacturers to produce our systems; and

Current wording

•potential labor unrest or unavailability affecting the ability of the third-party manufacturers to produce our systems;

Previous wording

We also use a third-party contract manufacturer located in Massachusetts and the U.K. as a second source for the production of a key sensor component used in our security screening systems. If our third-party contract manufacturers experience a delay, disruption, or quality control problems in their operations or if the third-party contract manufacturers do not renew or terminate our agreement with them, our operations could be significantly disrupted and our product shipments could be delayed. Qualifying new manufacturers and commencing volume production is expensive and time consuming. Ensuring that a contract manufacturer is qualified to manufacture our products or components to our standards is time consuming. In addition, if our contract manufacturers cannot scale their production of our products or components at the volumes and in the quality that we require, we may have to move production for the products or components to a new or existing third-party manufacturer, which would take significant effort and our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

Current wording

We also use a third-party contract manufacturer located in Massachusetts and the U.K. as a second source for the production of a key sensor component used in our security screening systems. If our third-party contract manufacturers experience a delay, disruption, or quality control problems in their operations or if the third-party contract manufacturers do not renew or terminate our agreement with them, our operations could be significantly disrupted and our product shipments could be delayed. Qualifying new manufacturers and commencing volume production is expensive and time consuming. Ensuring that a contract manufacturer is qualified to manufacture our products or components to our standards is time consuming. In addition, if our contract manufacturers cannot scale their production of our products or components at the volumes and in the quality that we require, we may have to move production for the products or components to a new or existing third-party manufacturer, which would take significant effort and our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.

Previous wording

As we contemplate moving manufacturing into different jurisdictions, we may be subject to additional and significant challenges in ensuring that quality, processes, and costs, among other issues, are consistent with our expectations. For example, we may not be able to collect reimbursements from our third-party contract manufacturers for penalties assessed on us because of excessive failures of products or warranty claims, which causes us to take on additional risk for potential failures of our products.

Current wording

As we contemplate moving manufacturing into different jurisdictions, we may be subject to additional and significant challenges in ensuring that quality, processes, and costs, among other issues, are consistent with our expectations. For example, we may not be able to collect reimbursements from our third-party contract manufacturers for penalties assessed on us because of excessive failures of products or warranty claims, which causes us to take on additional risk for potential failures of our products. Additionally, the benefits of diversifying contract manufacturers may not materialize and any such transition involves inherent onboarding risks and potential shifts in pricing dynamics and cost allocations.

Previous wording

We recognize a substantial portion of our revenue ratably over the terms of our agreements with customers, which generally occurs over a four-year period. As a result, a substantial portion of the revenue that we report in each period will be derived from the recognition of deferred revenue relating to agreements entered into during previous periods. Consequently, a decline in new sales or renewals in any one period may not be immediately reflected in our revenue results for that period. This decline, however, will negatively affect our revenue in future periods. Accordingly, the effect of significant downturns in sales and market acceptance of our products, and potential changes in our rate of renewals may not be fully reflected in our results of operations until future periods. Our model also makes it difficult to rapidly increase our revenue through additional sales in any period, as revenue from new customers generally will be recognized over the term of the applicable agreement.

Current wording

We recognize a substantial portion of our revenue ratably over the terms of our agreements with customers, which generally occurs over a four-year period. As a result, a substantial portion of the revenue that we report in each period will be derived from the recognition of deferred revenue relating to agreements entered into during previous periods. Consequently, a decline in new sales or renewals in any one period may not be immediately reflected in our revenue results for that period. This decline, however, would negatively affect our revenue in future periods. Accordingly, the effect of significant downturns in sales and market acceptance of our products, and potential changes in our rate of renewals may not be fully reflected in our results of operations until future periods. Our model also makes it difficult to rapidly increase our revenue through additional sales in any period, as revenue from new customers generally will be recognized over the term of the applicable agreement.

Previous wording

The sales prices for our products and services may decline for a variety of reasons, including competitive pricing pressures, discounts, a change in our mix of products and services, anticipation of the introduction of new products or promotional programs. Competition continues to increase in the market segments in which we participate, and we expect competition to further increase in the future, thereby leading to increased pricing pressures. Larger competitors with more diverse product and service offerings may reduce the price of products that compete with theirs or may bundle them with other products and services. Additionally, currency fluctuations in certain countries and regions may negatively impact prices that partners and customers are willing to pay in those countries and regions. We cannot be certain that we will be successful in developing and introducing new products with enhanced functionality on a timely basis, or that our new product offerings, if introduced, will enable it to maintain our prices and gross profits at levels that will allow us to maintain positive gross margins and achieve profitability.

Current wording

The sales prices for our products and services may decline for a variety of reasons, including competitive pricing pressures, discounts, a change in our mix of products and services, anticipation of the introduction of new products or promotional programs. Competition continues to increase in the market segments in which we participate, and we expect competition to further increase in the future, thereby leading to increased pricing pressures. Larger competitors with more diverse product and service offerings may reduce the price of products that compete with theirs or may bundle them with other products and services. Further, if we are not able to maintain and enhance our brand or reputation as an industry leader, our business and operating results may be adversely affected. Additionally, currency fluctuations in certain countries and regions may negatively impact prices that partners and customers are willing to pay in those countries and regions. We cannot be certain that we will be successful in developing and introducing new products with enhanced functionality on a timely basis, or that our new product offerings, if introduced, will enable it to maintain our prices and gross profits at levels that will allow us to maintain positive gross margins and achieve profitability.

Previous wording

Selling to government entities can be highly competitive, expensive, and time-consuming, and often requires significant upfront time investment and expense without any assurance of winning a sales contract. Government demand and payment for our solutions may also be impacted by changes in fiscal or contracting policies, changes in government programs or applicable requirements, the adoption of new laws or regulations or changes to existing laws or regulations, public sector budgetary cycles and funding authorizations, with funding reductions or delays adversely affecting public sector demand for our solutions. Accordingly, increasing sales of our products to government entities may be more challenging than selling to commercial organizations, especially given extensive certification, compliance, clearance, and security requirements. Government agencies may have statutory, contractual, or other legal rights to terminate contracts with us or reseller partners. Further, in the course of providing our solutions to government entities, our employees and those of our reseller partners may be exposed to sensitive government information. Any failure by us or our reseller partners to safeguard and maintain the confidentiality of such information could subject us to liability and reputational harm, which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and financial performance. Governments routinely investigate and audit government contractors’ administrative processes, and any unfavorable audit may cause the government to shift away from our solutions and may result in a reduction of revenue, fines or civil or criminal liability if the audit uncovers improper or illegal activities, which could adversely impact our results or operations.

Current wording

Selling to government entities can be highly competitive, expensive, and time-consuming, and often requires significant upfront time investment and expense without any assurance of winning a sales contract. Government demand and payment for our solutions may also be impacted by changes in fiscal or contracting policies, changes in government programs or applicable requirements, lapses in appropriations, the adoption of new laws or regulations or changes to existing laws or regulations, public sector budgetary cycles and funding authorizations, with funding reductions or delays adversely affecting public sector demand for our solutions. Accordingly, increasing sales of our products to government entities may be more challenging than selling to commercial organizations, especially given extensive certification, compliance, clearance, and security requirements. Government agencies may have statutory, contractual, or other legal rights to terminate contracts with us or reseller partners. Further, in the course of providing our solutions to government entities, our employees and those of our reseller partners may be exposed to sensitive government information. Any failure by us or our reseller partners to safeguard and maintain the confidentiality of such information could subject us to liability and reputational harm, which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and financial performance. Governments routinely investigate and audit government contractors’ administrative processes, and any unfavorable audit may cause the government to shift away from our solutions and may result in a reduction of revenue, fines or civil or criminal liability if the audit uncovers improper or illegal activities, which could adversely impact our results or operations.

Previous wording

We may also be subject to liability claims for damages related to errors or defects in our products. For example, if our products fail to detect weapons or explosive devices that are subsequently used by terrorists, criminals, or unbalanced individuals to cause casualties at a high profile, public venue, we could incur financial damages and our reputation could also be significantly harmed. A material liability claim or other occurrence that harms our reputation or decreases market acceptance of our products may harm our business and operating results. The limitation of liability provisions in our terms and conditions of sale may not fully or effectively protect us from claims as a result of federal, state, or local laws or ordinances, or unfavorable judicial decisions in the United States or other countries. The sale and support of our products also entails the risk of product liability claims. Our insurance coverage may not adequately cover any claim asserted against us. In addition, even claims that ultimately are unsuccessful could result in our expenditure of funds in litigation, divert or distract management’s time and other resources, and harm our business and reputation.

Current wording

We may also be subject to liability claims for damages related to errors or defects in our products. For example, if our products fail to detect weapons or explosive devices that can be used to cause casualties at a high profile, public venue, we could incur financial damages and our reputation could also be significantly harmed. A material liability claim or other occurrence that harms our reputation or decreases market acceptance of our products may harm our business and operating results. The limitation of liability provisions in our terms and conditions of sale may not fully or effectively protect us from claims as a result of federal, state, or local laws or ordinances, or unfavorable judicial decisions in the U.S. or other countries. The sale and support of our products also entails the risk of product liability claims. Our insurance coverage may not adequately cover any claim asserted against us. In addition, even claims that ultimately are unsuccessful could result in our expenditure of funds in litigation, divert or distract management’s time and other resources, and harm our business and reputation.

Previous wording

We use AI and machine learning in our development process and in our AI-based weapon detection products.

Current wording

We use AI and machine learning in our development process and in our AI-based weapon detection products, which could present risks and challenges to our business.

Previous wording

We use AI and machine learning technologies, including propriety AI and machine learning algorithms, in the development and operation of our AI-based weapons detection products for security screening. There are significant risks involved in developing, maintaining, and deploying AI and machine learning technologies and there can be no assurance that the usage of such technologies will always enhance our products or services or be beneficial to our business, including our efficiency or profitability. Furthermore, the rapid pace of AI development may require the continued investment of significant resources for us to remain competitive, and we may not receive commensurate returns if we are not successful in achieving the outcomes we expect (either on the timelines we expect or at all). In addition, our competitors may incorporate AI into their products more quickly or more successfully than us, which could impair our ability to compete effectively.

Current wording

We use machine learning technologies and artificial intelligence (“AI”), including generative AI, in the development and operation of our AI-based weapons detection products for security screening. There are significant risks involved in developing, maintaining, and deploying AI and machine learning technologies and there can be no assurance that the usage of such technologies will always enhance our products or services or be beneficial to our business, including our efficiency or profitability. Furthermore, the rapid pace of AI development may require the continued investment of significant resources for us to remain competitive, and we may not receive commensurate returns if we are not successful in achieving the outcomes we expect (either on the timelines we expect or at all). In addition, our competitors may incorporate AI into their products more quickly or more successfully than us, which could impair our ability to compete effectively.

Previous wording

Some uses of AI pose emerging ethical issues and present a number of risks that cannot be fully mitigated. Using AI while the technology is still developing may expose us to additional liability, reputational harm and threats of litigation, in particular, if these AI or machine learning models are incorrectly designed, developed or implemented, produce errors, AI bias, discrimination or AI hallucinations, result in intellectual property infringement or misappropriation or are adversely impacted by unforeseen defects, technical challenges, data privacy issues, cyber security threats, material performance issues, or otherwise do not function as intended. For example, AI technologies are highly reliant on the collection and analysis of large amounts of data, which may be overbroad, incomplete, inadequate, inaccurate, biased, or otherwise of poor quality. The accuracy of these data inputs and their subsequent effects on the outputs of AI technologies cannot always be verified, potentially leading to outputs that incorporate or are based on inaccurate or erroneous information. If any of the foregoing were to occur, the performance of our products, services, and business, as well as our reputation and the reputations of our customers, could suffer or we could incur liability.

Current wording

Some uses of AI pose emerging ethical issues and present a number of risks that cannot be fully mitigated. Using AI while the technology is still developing may expose us to additional liability, reputational harm and threats of litigation, in particular, if these AI or machine learning models are incorrectly designed, developed or implemented, produce errors, AI bias, discrimination or AI hallucinations, result in intellectual property infringement or misappropriation or are adversely impacted by unforeseen defects, technical challenges, open source software issues, data privacy issues, cyber security threats, material performance issues, or otherwise do not function as intended. For example, AI technologies are highly reliant on the collection and analysis of large amounts of data, which may be overbroad, incomplete, inadequate, inaccurate, biased, or otherwise of poor quality. The accuracy of these data inputs and their subsequent effects on the outputs of AI technologies cannot always be verified, potentially leading to outputs that incorporate or are based on inaccurate or erroneous information. If any of the foregoing were to occur, the performance of our products, services, and business, as well as our reputation and the reputations of our customers, could suffer or we could be subject to claims (including product liability claims), litigation (including class actions) or incur liability.

Previous wording

Because AI is a developing technology in its infancy, legal frameworks for AI governance are unsettled, quickly developing, and unpredictable. The use of AI could also lead to legal and regulatory investigations and enforcement actions, or may give rise to specific obligations, including required notices, consents and opt-outs, under various data privacy, protection and cybersecurity laws and regulations in a number of jurisdictions. Further, there is no assurance that new laws and regulations will not restrict the ways we can use the AI we have adopted, including by limiting or changing global AI adoption trends that may impede our strategy. For example, Florida has proposed legislation designed to ban the use of AI for firearm detection in certain public spaces. If such legislation is adopted in Florida or similar legislation is proposed and adopted in any other states, our operations in such states could be disrupted, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Moreover, regulations relating to AI technologies may also impose certain obligations on organizations, and the costs of monitoring and responding to such regulations, as well as the consequences of non-compliance, could have an adverse effect on our operations or financial condition. Unfavorable legal and regulatory developments could also impact our vendors, suppliers and industry as a whole, and we may be exposed to increased risk of liability, reputational harm, and other significant costs if we need to make business and operational changes in response to such developments.

Current wording

Because AI is a developing technology in its infancy, legal frameworks for AI governance are unsettled, quickly developing, and unpredictable. The use of AI could also lead to legal and regulatory investigations and enforcement actions, or may give rise to specific obligations, including required notices, consents and opt-outs, under various data privacy, protection and cybersecurity laws and regulations in a number of jurisdictions. Further, there is no assurance that new laws and regulations will not restrict the ways we can use the AI we have adopted, including by limiting or changing global AI adoption trends that may impede our strategy. Moreover, regulations relating to AI technologies may also impose certain obligations on organizations, and the costs of monitoring and responding to such regulations, as well as the consequences of non-compliance, could have an adverse effect on our operations or financial condition. Unfavorable legal and regulatory developments could also impact our vendors, suppliers and industry as a whole, and we may be exposed to increased risk of liability, reputational harm, and other significant costs if we need to make business and operational changes in response to such developments.

Previous wording

In particular, many U.S. federal, state, and foreign government bodies and agencies have introduced, and are currently considering, additional laws and regulations, including related to the development and integration of AI, machine learning, and additional emerging data technologies while mitigating or controlling for bias and discrimination in the context of AI and machine learning. For example, the California Privacy Protection Agency is currently in the process of finalizing regulations under the California Consumer Privacy Act (as amended by the California Privacy Rights Act) (“CCPA”), regarding the use of automated decision making, which focuses on notice and transparency requirements, opt-out and access rights and performance of risk assessments. Additionally, Colorado and California have recently passed legislation, and legislation is pending in Virginia, that, among other obligations, will require disclosure and transparency obligations with respect to certain AI systems. Furthermore, in Europe, the Artificial Intelligence Act (“EU AI Act”), which entered into force on August 1, 2024, provides rights and duties designed to ensure the safe and ethical deployment of AI. The EU AI Act categorizes AI systems based on their level of risk, prohibiting certain uses of AI (which provisions applied as of February 2, 2025), and introduces strict requirements for high-risk AI applications (which provisions apply from August 2, 2027). It is intended to apply to companies that develop, use and/or provide AI in the EU and includes requirements around transparency, conformity assessments and monitoring, risk assessments, human oversight, security and accuracy and introduces significant fines for noncompliance. There are also specific rules on the use of automated decision making under the General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) that provide the data subject the right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing, including profiling, which produces legal effects concerning him or her or similarly significantly affects him or her. Additionally, the existence of automated decision making must be disclosed to the data subject with a meaningful explanation of the logic used in such decision making in certain circumstances and safeguards must be implemented to safeguard individual rights, including the right to obtain human intervention and to contest any decision. We will likely incur additional expenses and costs associated with complying with existing and evolving laws, as well as face heightened potential liability if we are unable to comply with such laws. While we strive to minimize any physical bias in our product’s identification of threats because our product’s AI does not process or analyze an individual’s physical characteristics, we may not be able to identify such issues in advance, or if identified, we may not be able to identify mechanisms for effectively mitigating such issues.

Current wording

In particular, many U.S. federal, state, and foreign government bodies and agencies have introduced, and are currently considering, additional laws and regulations, including related to the development and integration of AI, machine learning, and additional emerging data technologies while mitigating or controlling for bias and discrimination in the context of AI and machine learning. For example, in the U.S., while the White House signed an Executive Order Removing Barriers to American Leadership in Artificial Intelligence which prioritizes deregulation, several states are considering enacting or have already enacted regulations concerning the use of AI technologies. These include the California Generative Artificial Intelligence: Training Data Transparency Act, the Utah Artificial Intelligence Consumer Protection Amendments, the updated California Consumer Privacy Act and the Colorado Consumer Protections for Artificial Intelligence Act (effective June 30, 2026). Furthermore, in Europe, the Artificial Intelligence Act (“EU AI Act”), which entered into force on August 1, 2024, provides rights and duties designed to ensure the safe and ethical deployment of AI. The EU AI Act categorizes AI systems based on their level of risk, prohibiting certain uses of AI, introduces strict requirements for high-risk AI applications (which provisions apply from August 2, 2027), and includes requirements around transparency, conformity assessments and monitoring, risk assessments, human oversight, security and accuracy and introduces significant fines for non-compliance. In addition, AI regulations may require us to conduct complex impact assessments, risk evaluations or other compliance reviews and audits prior to deploying AI tools for certain high-risk applications, including automated decision-making that affects individuals, and may also require us to disclose information regarding data sets used to train AI tools or regarding users who are interacting with AI or to obtain consents or provide opt-out rights to individuals. We will likely incur additional expenses and costs associated with complying with existing and evolving laws, as well as face heightened potential liability if we are unable to comply with such laws. While we strive to minimize any physical bias in our product’s identification of threats because our product’s AI does not process or analyze an individual’s physical characteristics, we may not be able to identify such issues in advance, or if identified, we may not be able to identify mechanisms for effectively mitigating such issues.

Previous wording

Further, our ability to continue to develop or use such technologies may be dependent on access to specific third-party software and infrastructure, such as processing hardware or third-party AI models, and we cannot control the availability or pricing of such third party software and infrastructure, especially in a highly competitive environment. In addition, market acceptance and consumer perceptions of AI and machine learning technologies are uncertain.

Current wording

Further, our ability to continue to develop or use such technologies may be dependent on access to specific third-party software and infrastructure, such as processing hardware or third-party AI models, and we cannot control the availability or pricing of such third party software and infrastructure, especially in a highly competitive environment. In addition, market acceptance and consumer perceptions of AI and machine learning technologies are uncertain. Further, our usage of open source AI technologies may lead to compliance issues, obligations to disclose the source code of our software, and security risks. See –“Our use of “open source” software could subject our proprietary software to certain disclosure obligations, expose us to security risks, and negatively affect our ability to offer our products and subject us to possible litigation.”

Previous wording

A number of aspects of intellectual property protection in the field of AI and machine learning are currently under development, and there is uncertainty and ongoing litigation in different jurisdictions as to the degree and extent of protection warranted for the output of AI and machine learning systems. See – “Our intellectual property rights are valuable and any inability to protect our proprietary technology and intellectual property rights substantially harm our business and operating results.”

Current wording

A number of aspects of intellectual property protection in the field of AI and machine learning are currently under development, and there is uncertainty and ongoing litigation in different jurisdictions as to the degree and extent of protection warranted for the output of AI and machine learning systems. See – “Our intellectual property rights are valuable and any inability to protect our proprietary technology and intellectual property rights could substantially harm our business and operating results.”

Previous wording

We have incorporated, and may in the future incorporate, technology and components from third parties into our products. We cannot be certain that our suppliers and licensors are not infringing the intellectual property rights of third parties or that the suppliers and licensors have sufficient rights to the technology in all jurisdictions in which it may sell our products. We may not be able to rely on indemnification obligations of third parties, to the extent they offer them. If our implementation or ongoing use of such technology is limited because of intellectual property infringement claims brought by third parties against our suppliers or licensors or against us, or if we are unable to continue to obtain such technology or enter into new agreements therefor on commercially reasonable terms, our ability to develop and sell products, subscriptions, and services containing such technology could be severely limited, and our business could be harmed. Disputes with suppliers and licensors could result in the payment of additional royalties or penalties by us, cancellation or non-renewal of the underlying license or litigation. In the event that we cannot renew existing licenses, or enter into new licenses of comparable technology, we may be required to discontinue or limit our use of the operations, products, or offerings that include or incorporate the licensed intellectual property. Any such discontinuation or limitation could have a material and adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operation. Additionally, if we are unable to obtain necessary technology and components from third parties at all, including certain sole suppliers, we may be forced to acquire or develop alternative technology or components, which may require significant time, cost, and effort and may be of lower quality or performance standards. This could limit or delay our ability to offer new or competitive products and increase our costs of production. If alternative technology or components cannot be obtained or developed, we may not be able to offer certain functionality as part of our products, subscriptions, and services. As a result, our margins, market share and results of operations could be significantly harmed.

Current wording

We have incorporated, and may in the future incorporate, technology and components from third parties into our products. We cannot be certain that our suppliers and licensors are not infringing the intellectual property rights of third parties or that the suppliers and licensors have sufficient rights to the technology in all jurisdictions in which it may sell our products. We may not be able to rely on indemnification obligations of third parties, to the extent they offer them. If our implementation or ongoing use of such technology is limited because of intellectual property infringement claims brought by third parties against our suppliers or licensors or against us, or if we are unable to continue to obtain such technology or enter into new agreements therefor on commercially reasonable terms, our ability to develop and sell products, subscriptions, and services containing such technology could be severely limited, and our business could be harmed. Disputes with suppliers, licensors, or intellectual property owners could result in the payment of additional royalties or penalties by us, infringement damages, cancellation or non-renewal of the underlying license or litigation, or require us to indemnify third parties (including our customers). In the event that we cannot renew existing licenses, or enter into new licenses of comparable technology, we may be required to discontinue or limit our use of the operations, products, or offerings that include or incorporate the licensed intellectual property. Any such discontinuation or limitation could have a material and adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operation. Additionally, if we are unable to obtain necessary technology and components from third parties at all, including certain sole suppliers, we may be forced to acquire or develop alternative technology or components, which may require significant time, cost, and effort and may be of lower quality or performance standards. This could limit or delay our ability to offer new or competitive products and increase our costs of production. If alternative technology or components cannot be obtained or developed, we may not be able to offer certain functionality as part of our products, subscriptions, and services. As a result, our margins, market share and results of operations could be significantly harmed.

Previous wording

•Our use of “open source” software could subject our proprietary software to certain disclosure obligations, negatively affect our ability to offer our products and subject us to possible litigation.

Current wording

Our use of “open source” software could subject our proprietary software to certain disclosure obligations, expose us to security risks, and negatively affect our ability to offer our products and subject us to possible litigation.

Previous wording

We have used “open source” software in connection with the development and deployment of our software products, and we expect to continue to use open source software in the future. Open source software is licensed by its authors or other third parties under open source licenses, which in some instances may subject us to certain unfavorable conditions, including requirements that we offer the software that incorporates, is based on or that links to the open source software for no cost, that we make publicly available all or part of the source code for any modifications or derivative works we create based upon or that incorporate, link to or otherwise use the open source software, or that we license such modifications or derivative works under the terms of the particular open source license. Additionally, the AI technologies used to develop or write software used operations may be trained on data sets that include open source software or may draw from sources that might subject such software developed using AI technologies to certain license restrictions or other obligations. Additionally, if we decide to use AI technologies to develop or write software in our product offerings the AI may be trained on data sets that include open source software or may draw from sources that might subject such software developed using AI technologies to certain license restrictions or other obligations.

Current wording

We have used “open source” software in connection with the development and deployment of our software products, and we expect to continue to use open source software in the future. Open source software is licensed by its authors or other third parties under open source licenses, which in some instances may subject us to certain unfavorable conditions, including requirements with respect to proprietary software that incorporates, is based on or that links to the open source software, to (i) distribute such software for no cost, (ii) make publicly available all or part of its source code, or (iii) license such software under the terms of the particular open source license. Additionally, the AI technologies used to develop or write software used in our product offerings and operations may be trained on data sets that include open source software or may draw from sources that might subject such software developed using AI technologies to certain license restrictions or other obligations. Additionally, if we decide to use AI technologies to develop or write software in our product offerings the AI may be trained on data sets that include open source software, which may be subject the software generated using such AI to similar open source requirements.

Previous wording

Companies that incorporate or use open source software in their products have, from time to time, faced claims challenging the use of open source software and compliance with open source license terms. As a result, we could be subject to suits by parties claiming ownership of what we believe to be open source software or claiming noncompliance with open source licensing terms. While we monitor our use of open source software and try to ensure that none is used in a manner that would subject our proprietary software to open source licensing terms (including requiring us to disclose our proprietary source code) or that would otherwise breach the terms of an open source agreement, we cannot guarantee that we will be successful, that all open source software is reviewed prior to use in our products, that our developers have not incorporated open source software into our products that we are unaware of or that they will not do so in the future. Further, use of open source AI technologies poses additional risks relating to the underlying training data sets, including an increased risk in intellectual property infringement or non-compliance with open source license terms as a result of such training data sets potentially derived from data sourced without permission or outside the scope of the underlying open source license.

Current wording

Companies that incorporate or use open source software in their products have, from time to time, faced claims challenging the use of open source software and compliance with open source license terms. As a result, we could be subject to suits by parties claiming ownership of what we believe to be open source software or claiming non-compliance with open source licensing terms. While we monitor our use of open source software and try to ensure that none is used in a manner that would subject our proprietary software to open source licensing terms (including requiring us to disclose our proprietary source code) or that would otherwise breach the terms of an open source agreement, we cannot guarantee that we will be successful, that all open source software is reviewed prior to use in our products, that our developers have not incorporated open source software into our products that we are unaware of or that they will not do so in the future. Further, use of open source AI technologies poses additional risks relating to the underlying training data sets, including an increased risk in intellectual property infringement or non-compliance with open source license terms as a result of such training data sets potentially derived from data sourced without permission or outside the scope of the underlying open source license.

Previous wording

Furthermore, there are an increasing number of open source software license types, almost none of which have been interpreted by U.S. or foreign courts, resulting in a dearth of guidance regarding the proper legal interpretation of such licenses. As a result, there is a risk that open source software licenses could be construed in a manner that imposes unanticipated conditions or restrictions on our ability to market or provide our products and services. If we are held to have breached or failed to fully comply with all the terms and conditions of an open source software license, we could face infringement claims or other liability, or be required to seek costly licenses from third parties to continue providing our offerings on terms that are not economically feasible, if at all, to re-engineer all or a portion of our products, to discontinue or delay the provision of our offerings if re-engineering could not be accomplished on a timely basis or to make generally available, in source code form, our proprietary code. Further, in addition to risks related to license requirements, use of certain open source software carries greater technical and legal risks than does the use of third-party commercial software. For example, open source software is generally provided without any support or warranties or other contractual protections regarding infringement or the quality of the code, including the existence of security vulnerabilities. To the extent that our products depend upon the successful operation of open source software, any undetected errors or defects in open source software that we use could prevent the deployment or impair the functionality of our systems and injure our reputation. In addition, the public availability of such software may make it easier for others to compromise our products. Any of the foregoing risks could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Current wording

Furthermore, there are an increasing number of open source software license types, almost none of which have been interpreted by U.S. or foreign courts, resulting in a dearth of guidance regarding the proper legal interpretation of such licenses. As a result, there is a risk that open source software licenses could be construed in a manner that imposes unanticipated conditions or restrictions on our ability to market or provide our products and services. If we are held to have breached or failed to fully comply with all the terms and conditions of an open source software license, we could face infringement claims or other liability, or be required to seek costly licenses from third parties to continue providing our offerings on terms that are not economically feasible, if at all, to re-engineer all or a portion of our products, to discontinue or delay the provision of our offerings if re-engineering could not be accomplished on a timely basis or to make generally available, in source code form, our proprietary code. Further, in addition to risks related to license requirements, use of certain open source software carries greater technical and legal risks than does the use of third-party commercial software. For example, open source software is generally provided without any support or warranties or other contractual protections regarding infringement or the quality of the code. For example, open source software often contains undetected errors or other defects, which could prevent the deployment or impair the functionality of our systems, delay the introduction of new solutions, and injure our reputation. In addition, the public availability of such software may make it easier for others to compromise our products. Moreover, open source software may also contain security vulnerabilities, malware and other exploits, which may render our software and product offerings more vulnerable to breaches or security attacks. Any of the foregoing risks could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Previous wording

Our products collect and store personal data about individuals, including our customers, their visitors, and our employees, as well as other proprietary business and confidential information.

Current wording

Our products and operations collect and store personal data about individuals, including our customers, their visitors, and our employees, as well as other proprietary business and confidential information, which exposes us to cybersecurity risks that could result in additional costs and liabilities or inhibit sales of our products.

Previous wording

Despite measures designed to prevent, detect, address, and mitigate cybersecurity incidents (including our cybersecurity risk management program and processes, such as our policies, controls, or procedures), we cannot guarantee that such measures will be implemented, complied with or effective in protecting our systems and information. Incidents such as spam, spyware, ransomware, viruses, worms, malware, DDoS attacks, password attacks, impersonation of employees or officers, and other threats may nevertheless occur to us or our third-party providers and, depending on their nature and scope, could potentially result in the misappropriation, destruction, corruption or unavailability of critical data and confidential or proprietary information (our own or that of third parties, including personal data of our customers, our customers’ visitors and our employees) and the disruption of our business operations.

Current wording

Cybersecurity incidents affecting us or our third-party vendors can vary widely, from errors on the part of our personnel, to uncoordinated individual attempts to gain unauthorized access to information technology (“IT”) systems, to sophisticated and targeted measures known as advanced persistent threats. These incidents could be caused by insiders (acting inadvertently or maliciously) or malicious third parties (including nation-states or nation-state supported actors). Attack methods can include sophisticated, targeted methods to circumvent firewalls, encryption, and other security defenses, including hacking, fraud, trickery (such as phishing or social engineering), or other forms of deception. Despite measures designed to prevent, detect, address, and mitigate cybersecurity incidents (including our cybersecurity risk management program and processes, such as our policies, controls, or procedures), we cannot guarantee that such measures will be implemented, complied with or be effective in protecting our systems and information. We or our third-party providers may experience cybersecurity incidents and, depending on their nature and scope, could potentially result in the misappropriation, destruction, corruption or unavailability of critical data and confidential or proprietary information (our own or that of third parties, including personal data of our customers, our customers’ visitors and our employees) and the disruption of our business operations.