Skip to main content

ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.

For the period ended Apr 30, 2026. Filed Jun 8, 2026.

View on SEC.gov

About this filing

A company's report for each of its first three quarters. The financial statements are not audited. It shows how the business has moved since the last annual report, and what management says changed.

Apr 30, 2026 · Filed Jun 8, 2026

CHPT$12.39+6.9%Stored close · as of Nov 9, 2026

What changed in Risk Factors?

Read the current filing

Previous report: 10-Q

Period ended 2025-10-31; filed 2025-12-05.

0001777393-25-000193

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Current report: 10-Q

Period ended 2026-04-30; filed 2026-06-08.

0001777393-26-000044

Item 1A. Risk Factors

The baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.

Compared 367 previous paragraphs and 369 current paragraphs.

283 unchanged; 69 reworded; 13 added; 9 removed; 6 previous and 4 current paragraphs rearranged.

Tables are not compared: 0 previous and 0 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.

A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.

Added paragraphs (13)

Current report

ChargePoint’s business, operating efficiency and competitive position may be adversely affected if it does not successfully identify, develop, integrate and deploy artificial intelligence and other advanced automation technologies in a timely, effective and compliant manner.

Current report

The EV charging industry, energy infrastructure markets and enterprise software ecosystems in which ChargePoint operates are experiencing rapid technological change, including increased adoption of artificial intelligence (“AI”), machine learning, advanced analytics and automation across product development, network operations, customer support, billing, fraud detection, cybersecurity, manufacturing, logistics and other business processes. To remain competitive and operate efficiently at scale, ChargePoint may need to incorporate such technologies into its products, services and internal systems. Failure to do so could place ChargePoint at a competitive disadvantage, reduce operating efficiency, increase costs, limit the functionality or performance of its solutions, or impair its ability to meet customer, regulatory or partner expectations.

Current report

ChargePoint has implemented, and intends to implement in the future, initiatives to deploy AI technologies, agentic AI solutions and AI-enabled capabilities in its ChargePoint Platform, eMSP driver application, customer support solutions and in internal enterprise systems. However, successfully adopting and implementing AI technologies involves significant operational, technical, financial and organizational challenges, including assessing appropriate use cases; ensuring data quality, availability and governance; integrating AI‑enabled capabilities into legacy systems and complex workflows; managing dependencies on third‑party technology providers; recruiting and retaining specialized personnel; and establishing appropriate oversight, controls and risk management processes. ChargePoint may incur substantial costs and devote significant management attention to these efforts, and AI‑related initiatives may not be completed on schedule, operate as intended or deliver anticipated benefits. In addition, evolving cybersecurity, data privacy, regulatory and stakeholder requirements may constrain or delay deployment or require costly modifications. If ChargePoint is unable to successfully implement AI‑enabled capabilities while competitors or partners do so more effectively, it may experience reduced demand for its solutions, pricing pressure, loss of market share, higher operating costs, reduced margins or slower growth, any of which could adversely affect its business, results of operations and financial condition.

Current report

ChargePoint’s business depends on the secure and continuous operation of a distributed, connected ecosystem that includes (i) Networked Charging Systems deployed at third-party locations and operated by site hosts; (ii) embedded firmware and operating systems within charging equipment, including over-the-air (OTA) update and device authentication processes; (iii) its cloud-based software solutions or “ChargePoint Platform” and associated cloud services, application programming interfaces, and integrations with utilities, roaming partners and fleet systems; and (iv) payment and billing infrastructure used by drivers and enterprise customers. As a result, ChargePoint faces cybersecurity and data protection risks that span both operational technology (OT) at the edge (the charger and related hardware/firmware) and information technology (IT) in its cloud and enterprise systems, including risks arising from the increasing use of artificial intelligence, machine learning and other automated technologies within such systems and workflows, which may expand attack surfaces, introduce novel vulnerabilities or failure modes, and increase the complexity of detecting, investigating and remediating security incidents.

Current report

Because many Networked Charging Systems are installed in public or semipublic environments and physically accessible, inadequate site level protections by site hosts or third parties can enable tampering or theft that, in turn, may facilitate unauthorized access to ChargePoint’s systems, manipulation of billing or pricing at the point of interaction, or operational disruptions that reduce uptime and driver confidence. Further, most of the Networked Charging Systems ChargePoint sells are owned and operated by third parties who are responsible for the physical safety and day-to-day oversight of those charging stations.

Current report

Any attempts by cyber attackers to disrupt ChargePoint’s services or systems—if successful—could (among other impacts) reduce charger uptime and network reliability, manipulate pricing or billing at the point of interaction, misappropriate funds, exfiltrate confidential information or intellectual property, and degrade driver and customer trust. Security incidents involving AI‑enabled systems may be more difficult to detect, attribute or remediate, and may increase the risk of cascading operational, legal or reputational impacts. Such events could be expensive to remedy; subject ChargePoint to substantial fines, penalties, damages and other liabilities under applicable laws and regulations; lead to a loss of protection of ChargePoint’s intellectual property or trade secrets; and damage ChargePoint’s reputation or brand. While ChargePoint maintains cyber-insurance, that coverage may not be sufficient to compensate for all liability relating to any actual or potential disruption or other security breach or incident, coverage might not be available on commercially reasonable terms (or at all), and insurers may deny coverage for certain claims. The successful assertion of one or more large claims that exceed available insurance coverage—or material changes to ChargePoint’s insurance (including premium increases, lower limits, exclusions, or large deductibles or coinsurance)—could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, operating results and reputation.

Current report

If ChargePoint fails to maintain an effective system of internal controls, its ability to produce timely and accurate financial statements or comply with applicable regulations could be impaired.

Current report

ChargePoint is subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes-Oxley”), and the rules and regulations of the applicable listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). Sarbanes-Oxley requires, among other things, that ChargePoint maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures, and internal control, over financial reporting. ChargePoint is continuing to develop and refine its disclosure controls, internal control over financial reporting, and other procedures that are designed to ensure information required to be disclosed in its financial statements and in the reports that it files with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and information required to be disclosed in reports under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to ChargePoint’s principal executive and financial officers. In order to maintain and improve the effectiveness of ChargePoint internal controls and procedures, ChargePoint has expended, and will continue to expend, significant resources, including accounting-related costs and significant management oversight.

Current report

ChargePoint has previously identified material weaknesses in its internal controls over financial reporting and further, weaknesses in ChargePoint internal controls may be discovered in the future. ChargePoint’s current controls and any new controls it develops may become inadequate because of changes in conditions in its business. Any failure to develop or maintain effective controls, or any difficulties encountered in their implementation or improvement, could harm ChargePoint’s operating results, result in a restatement of ChargePoint’s financial statements for prior periods, cause ChargePoint to fail to meet its reporting obligations, and adversely affect the results of periodic management evaluations and annual independent registered public accounting firm attestation reports regarding the effectiveness of ChargePoint’s internal control over financial reporting that it will be required to include in the periodic reports filed with the SEC. Ineffective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting could also cause investors to lose confidence in ChargePoint’s reported financial and other information, which would likely have a negative effect on the trading price of ChargePoint’s Common Stock.

Current report

Impairment of goodwill may require ChargePoint to record a significant charge to earnings.

Current report

ChargePoint is required under generally accepted accounting principles to review its intangible assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. Goodwill is required to be tested for impairment at least annually. Factors that may be considered a change in circumstances indicating that the carrying value of ChargePoint’s intangible assets and/or goodwill may not be recoverable include a decline in stock price and market capitalization, slower growth rates in ChargePoint’s industry or ChargePoint’s operations, and/or other materially adverse events that have implications on the profitability of ChargePoint’s business. ChargePoint may be required to record additional charges to earnings during the period in which any impairment of its goodwill or other intangible assets is determined which could adversely impact its results of operations.

Current report

ChargePoint is subject to evolving technical, safety, metrology (weights and measures), labeling and payment requirements for EV charging equipment and services; failure to comply with, or changes in, these requirements could increase costs, delay deployments, limit revenue recognition, reduce utilization of existing assets, or lead to enforcement actions.

Current report

ChargePoint’s Networked Charging Systems and the ChargePoint Platform operate in a regulatory environment that imposes technical and commercial metering requirements when commercial transactions are the basis for sale (e.g., price per kWh), including those embodied in National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Handbook 44 Section 3.40 for EV fueling equipment; compliance is enforced primarily at the state level and through the National Type Evaluation Program (NTEP) certifications or California Type Evaluation Program (CTEP) in California. In certain jurisdictions, these regulations are enforced through county and municipal governments. Additionally, publicly available charging stations in many states must meet payment and disclosure rules (e.g., labeling and fee disclosure requirements). Changes in how these standards are interpreted, phased in, or enforced—or how eligibility rules under government programs are tied to them—could result in additional testing, certification, software changes, retrofits, field “placed in service” procedures, incremental costs or operating expenses, temporary site shutdowns, refunds, penalties, or delayed revenue. If ChargePoint fails to meet these standards, its reputation and brand could be damaged, and its business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely impacted.
Removed paragraphs (9)

Previous report

•ChargePoint previously identified material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting. If ChargePoint identifies additional material weaknesses in the future or otherwise fails to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting, this may result in material misstatements contained within ChargePoint’s consolidated financial statements or cause ChargePoint to fail to meet its periodic reporting obligations.

Previous report

For example, beginning in calendar year 2020, in response to the worldwide COVID-19 pandemic, ChargePoint modified its business practices by recommending that all non-essential personnel work from home and cancelling or reducing physical participation in sales activities, meetings, events and conferences. Subsequently, in May 2022, ChargePoint commenced a “return-to-office” plan, which included shifting to a hybrid model where employees have the flexibility to work from home or from the office. In the spring of 2023, ChargePoint further refined its hybrid model to require most employees to return to office at least three days a week, which ChargePoint has maintained. A hybrid work model may create challenges, including challenges maintaining ChargePoint’s corporate culture, increasing attrition or limiting ChargePoint’s ability to attract employees if individuals prefer to continue working full time at home. Future challenges related to ChargePoint’s hybrid work model or workplace practices could lead to attrition and difficulty attracting high-quality employees.

Previous report

The effect of future health pandemics on ChargePoint’s business, prospects and results of operations will depend on their duration and sustained impact. Difficult macroeconomic conditions, such as supply shortages, increased inflation, increased and prolonged unemployment or a decline in consumer confidence as a result of pandemics, as well as reduced spending by businesses, could have a material adverse effect on the demand for ChargePoint’s products and services. The effect of, or even the threats of, a new global pandemic can also vary over time and across the geographies in which ChargePoint operates. For example, variations in “work-from-home” or “return-to-office” policies can cause fluctuations in ChargePoint’s revenues because conditions caused by global pandemics, such as more permanent work-from-home policies, are likely to continue affecting the rate of global infrastructure spending, and thus to adversely impact ChargePoint’s gross margins as ChargePoint’s commercial business tends to contribute higher gross margins than its residential and fleet businesses. Even after the acute impact from any pandemic has subsided, ChargePoint may continue to experience an adverse impact to its business as a result of the pandemic’s global economic impact, including any recession that has occurred or may occur in the future.

Previous report

ChargePoint’s business may be subject to heightened risks of cyber intrusion as nation-state hackers seek access to technology used by the U.S. government and as criminal enterprise hackers, which may or may not be affiliated with foreign governments, use ransomware attacks to disable critical infrastructure and extort companies for ransom payments. Cyber security organizations in many countries have in the past published warnings of increased cybersecurity threats to U.S. businesses, and external events, like the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, conflicts in the Middle East, or rising political tensions with China may increase the likelihood of cybersecurity attacks, particularly directed at energy, fueling or infrastructure service providers. ChargePoint has also been targeted by spear phishing attacks, in which an email directed at a specific individual or department is disguised to appear to be from a trusted source to obtain sensitive information. Any attempts by cyber attackers to disrupt ChargePoint’s services or systems, if successful, could harm its business, introduce liability to data subjects, result in the misappropriation of funds, be expensive to remedy, subject ChargePoint to substantial fines, penalties, damages and other liabilities under applicable laws and regulations, lead to a loss of protection of its intellectual property or trade secrets and damage its reputation or brand.

Previous report

ChargePoint’s cyber-insurance coverage may not be sufficient to compensate for all liability relating to any actual or potential disruption or other security breach or incident. ChargePoint cannot be certain that its coverage will be adequate for liabilities actually incurred, that insurance will continue to be available to it on economically reasonable terms, or at all, or that any insurer will not deny coverage as to any future claim. The successful assertion of one or more large claims against ChargePoint that exceed available insurance coverage, or the occurrence of changes in ChargePoint’s insurance policies, including premium increases or the imposition of large deductible or co-insurance requirements, could have a material adverse effect on our business, including our financial condition, operating results, and reputation.

Previous report

ChargePoint previously identified material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting. If ChargePoint identifies additional material weaknesses in the future or otherwise fails to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting, this may result in material misstatements contained within ChargePoint’s consolidated financial statements or cause ChargePoint to fail to meet its periodic reporting obligations.

Previous report

ChargePoint has previously identified material weaknesses in its internal controls over financial reporting. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of ChargePoint’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. For instance, in connection with the preparation and audit of ChargePoint’s consolidated financial statements, material weaknesses were identified in its internal control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2022, and January 31, 2023. Although such material weaknesses were remediated in part as of January 31, 2023, and remediated in full as of January 31, 2024, there can be no assurance that similar internal control over financial reporting issues will not be identified in the future. If ChargePoint cannot remediate future material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in a timely manner, or if ChargePoint identifies additional control deficiencies or material weaknesses over financial reporting that individually or together constitute significant deficiencies or material weaknesses, ChargePoint’s ability to accurately record, process, and report financial information and its ability to prepare financial statements within required time periods, could be adversely affected.

Previous report

While the material weaknesses related to internal controls over financial reporting previously disclosed by ChargePoint have since been remediated, the process of designing and implementing an effective financial reporting system is a continuous effort that requires ChargePoint to anticipate and react to changes in its business, to economic and regulatory environments and to expend significant resources to maintain a financial reporting system that satisfies its reporting obligations.

Previous report

ChargePoint may be unable to meet the ongoing reporting demands as a public company, including the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2022 (“Sarbanes-Oxley”), and may be unable to accurately report its financial results, or report them within the timeframes required by law or stock exchange regulations. Failure to comply with Sarbanes-Oxley, when and as applicable, could also potentially subject ChargePoint to sanctions or investigations by the SEC or other regulatory authorities. Any failure to maintain or implement required new or improved controls, or any difficulties ChargePoint encounters in their implementation, could result in additional material weaknesses, cause ChargePoint to fail to meet its reporting obligations or result in material misstatements in its financial statements which could result in violations of applicable securities laws, stock exchange listing requirements, and the covenants under ChargePoint’s debt agreements, subject ChargePoint to litigation and investigations, negatively affect investor confidence in ChargePoint’s financial statements, and adversely impact its stock price and its ability to access capital markets. Furthermore, if ChargePoint cannot provide reliable financial reports, provide management’s attestation on internal controls pursuant to Section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley, or prevent material misstatements due to fraud or error, its business and results of operations could be harmed, and investors could lose confidence in its reported financial information. ChargePoint can give no assurance that any additional material weaknesses or restatements of financial results will not arise in the future due to a failure to implement and maintain adequate internal control over financial reporting or any circumvention of these controls. In addition, even if ChargePoint is successful in strengthening its internal controls and procedures, in the future those internal controls and procedures may not be adequate to prevent or sufficiently identify irregularities or errors or to facilitate the fair presentation of ChargePoint’s financial statements.
Reworded paragraphs (69)

Previous wording

•ChargePoint is highly reliant on its networked charging solution and information technology systems and data, and those of its service providers and component suppliers, any of which systems and data may be subject to cyber-attacks, service disruptions or other security incidents, which could result in data breaches, loss or interruption of services, intellectual property theft, claims, litigation, regulatory investigations, significant liability, reputational damage and other adverse consequences.

Current wording

•ChargePoint is highly reliant on its networked charging solution and information technology systems and data, and those of its service providers and component suppliers; any of these systems and data may be subject to cyber-attacks, service disruptions or other security incidents, which could result in data breaches, loss or interruption of services, intellectual property theft, claims, litigation, regulatory investigations, significant liability, reputational damage and other adverse consequences.

Previous wording

•ChargePoint may need to raise additional funds and these funds may not be available when needed or may not be available on terms that are favorable to ChargePoint.

Current wording

•ChargePoint may need to raise additional funds to support its operations and these funds may not be available when needed or may not be available on terms that are favorable to ChargePoint.

Previous wording

ChargePoint incurred net losses of $277.1 million for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2025 and had net loss of $175.8 million for the nine months ended October 31, 2025. As of October 31, 2025, ChargePoint had an accumulated deficit of $2,067.2 million. ChargePoint incurred negative cash flows from operating activities of $61.6 million for the nine months ended October 31, 2025. ChargePoint believes it will continue to incur significant operating expenses and net losses in future quarters for the near term. There can be no assurance that it will be able to achieve or maintain profitability in the future. ChargePoint’s potential profitability is particularly dependent upon the continued adoption of EVs by consumers and fleet operators and the widespread adoption of electric fleets and other electric transportation modalities, each of which are still in the early stages of widespread adoption and may not occur with the volume and timing that ChargePoint expects.

Current wording

ChargePoint believes it will continue to incur significant operating expenses and net losses in future quarters for the near term. There can be no assurance that it will be able to achieve or maintain profitability in the future. ChargePoint’s potential profitability is particularly dependent upon the continued adoption of EVs by consumers and fleet operators and the widespread adoption of electric fleets and other electric transportation modalities, each of which are still in the early stages of widespread adoption and may not occur with the volume and timing that ChargePoint expects. For instance, the North American EV market has recently suffered a substantial decline in the sale of new EVs since the termination of the $7,500 U.S. federal tax credit in September 2025, resulting in quarterly declines of new EVs sold as compared to the same quarters in the prior year. Any prolonged decrease in demand for new EVs or networked charging systems (“Networked Charging Systems”), or any delays in discretionary purchases of EV infrastructure, such as charging stations, by commercial, fleet or residential consumers may result in slowing growth or decreased revenue for ChargePoint which may adversely affect its gross margins and could materially adversely affect ChargePoint’s business and results of operations.

Previous wording

ChargePoint operates in the evolving EV mobility industry that is characterized by rapid and unpredictable shifts in technological innovation and leaders, intense competition, changing EV adoption rates and customer preferences, evolving and shifting production and manufacturing plans from EV manufacturers and frequent introductions of new products, technologies, and services. ChargePoint may not be able to adapt to the dynamic nature of the evolving EV mobility industry, sustain the pace of improvements to its products successfully, manage its growth successfully or implement systems, processes, and controls in an efficient or timely manner or in a manner that does not negatively affect the results of its operations. ChargePoint has a relatively short history operating its business at its current scale. The growth and expansion of its business has placed and continues to place a significant strain on management, operations, financial infrastructure and corporate culture.

Current wording

ChargePoint operates in the evolving EV mobility industry that is characterized by rapid and unpredictable shifts in technological innovation and leaders, intense competition, changing EV adoption rates and customer preferences, evolving and shifting production and manufacturing plans from EV manufacturers and frequent introductions of new products, technologies, and services. ChargePoint may not be able to adapt to the dynamic nature of the evolving EV mobility industry, sustain the pace of improvements to its products successfully, manage its growth successfully or implement systems, processes, and controls in an efficient or timely manner or in a manner that does not negatively affect the results of its operations. The growth and expansion of its business has placed and continues to place a significant strain on management, operations, financial infrastructure and corporate culture.

Previous wording

In addition, there are other means for charging EVs, which could affect the level of demand for onsite charging capabilities at businesses. For example, Tesla, Inc. has opened its supercharger network up to non-Tesla EVs, which could reduce overall demand for EV charging at other sites, including those using ChargePoint’s networked charging systems (“Networked Charging Systems”). In addition to competition from established EV charging station network providers, third-party contractors can provide basic electric charging capabilities to potential customers seeking to have on-premises EV charging capability or individual customers seeking home charging. Finally, many EV charging manufacturers, including ChargePoint, are offering home charging equipment, which could reduce demand for on-premise charging capabilities of potential customers and reduce the demand for onsite charging capabilities if EV owners find charging at home to be sufficient.

Current wording

There are other means for charging EVs, which could affect the level of demand for onsite charging capabilities at businesses. In addition to competition from established EV charging station network providers, third-party contractors can provide basic electric charging capabilities to potential customers seeking to have on-premises EV charging capability or individual customers seeking home charging. Finally, many EV charging manufacturers, including ChargePoint, are offering home charging equipment, which could reduce demand for commercial charging capabilities of potential customers and reduce the demand for commercial charging capabilities if EV owners find charging at home to be sufficient.

Previous wording

ChargePoint derives a substantial portion of its overall revenue from the sale of Networked Charging Systems. ChargePoint believes the penetration of EVs in the United States and Europe is heavily reliant on EV availability, consumer adoption of EVs, the availability and reliability of EV infrastructure and government mandates and incentive programs tied to EV adoption. Any sustained downturn in demand for EVs or EV infrastructure, such as decreased demand in EV charging stations, would harm ChargePoint’s business. For example, increased interest rates, an overall slowdown in economic activity, a recession or the possibility of a recession in the United States or Europe, and increased tariffs, especially those targeted at the automotive industry may decrease the overall demand for EVs or EV infrastructure such as ChargePoint’s Networked Charging Systems. Any prolonged decrease in demand for Networked Charging Systems, or any delays in discretionary purchases of EV infrastructure, such as charging stations, by commercial, fleet or residential consumers may result in slowing growth or decreased revenue for ChargePoint which may adversely affect its gross margins and could materially adversely affect ChargePoint’s business and results of operations.

Current wording

ChargePoint derives a substantial portion of its overall revenue from the sale of its Networked Charging Systems. ChargePoint believes the penetration of EVs in the United States and Europe is heavily reliant on EV availability, consumer adoption of EVs, the availability and reliability of EV infrastructure and government mandates and incentive programs tied to EV adoption. Any sustained downturn in demand for EVs or EV infrastructure, such as decreased demand in EV charging stations, would harm ChargePoint’s business. For example, increased interest rates, an overall slowdown in economic activity, a recession or the possibility of a recession in the United States or Europe, elimination of government mandates and incentive programs, and increased tariffs, especially those targeted at the automotive industry may decrease the overall demand for EVs or EV infrastructure such as ChargePoint’s Networked Charging Systems. For instance, the North American EV market has recently suffered a substantial decline in the sale of new EVs since the termination of the $7,500 U.S. federal tax credit in September 2025, resulting in quarterly declines of new EVs sold as compared to the same quarters in the prior year. Any prolonged decrease in demand for new EVs or Networked Charging Systems, or any delays in discretionary purchases of EV infrastructure, such as charging stations, by commercial, fleet or residential consumers may result in slowing growth or decreased revenue for ChargePoint which may adversely affect its gross margins and could materially adversely affect ChargePoint’s business and results of operations.

Previous wording

ChargePoint seeks to maintain sufficient levels of inventory in order to avoid supply interruptions and keep sufficient amounts of finished products on hand while also avoiding accumulating excess inventory which increases working capital needs and lowers gross margin. To ensure adequate inventory supply and manage ChargePoint's operations with its third-party manufacturers and suppliers, ChargePoint forecasts material requirements and demand for its products in order to predict future inventory needs and then places orders with its suppliers based on these predictions. ChargePoint's ability to accurately forecast demand for its products could be negatively affected by many factors, including rapid or slowing growth, failure to accurately manage ChargePoint's expansion strategy, new product introductions by ChargePoint or its competitors, an increase or decrease in customer demand for ChargePoint products, ChargePoint's failure to accurately forecast customer acceptance of new products, unanticipated changes in general market conditions or regulatory matters, and the weakening of economic conditions or consumer confidence in future economic conditions. In addition, the majority of ChargePoint’s products are sold through its channel partners, distributors and resellers and, as a result, ChargePoint is highly reliant on the sales forecasting, sell-through activities and inventory management of its channel partners. If ChargePoint’s channel partners are not effective or efficient in forecasting sales, or sales of particular products, or managing their inventory levels or sell-through expectations then ChargePoint’s management of inventory levels, sales forecasts and parts ordering may be adversely affected which may harm ChargePoint’s financial conditions and results of operations.

Current wording

ChargePoint seeks to maintain sufficient levels of inventory in order to avoid supply interruptions and keep sufficient amounts of finished products on hand while also avoiding accumulating excess inventory which increases working capital needs and lowers gross margin. In recent quarters, ChargePoint has maintained elevated levels of inventory, and ChargePoint is also preparing for the introduction of its next generation AC and DC Networked Charging System models, which increases the complexity of inventory management and heightens the risk that certain existing products or components may become excess, obsolete, or subject to inventory write‑downs. To ensure adequate inventory supply and manage ChargePoint's operations with its third-party manufacturers and suppliers, ChargePoint forecasts material requirements and demand for its products in order to predict future inventory needs and then places orders with its suppliers based on these predictions. ChargePoint's ability to accurately forecast demand for its products could be negatively affected by many factors, including rapid or slowing growth, failure to accurately manage ChargePoint's expansion strategy, new product introductions by ChargePoint or its competitors, an increase or decrease in customer demand for ChargePoint products, ChargePoint's failure to accurately forecast customer acceptance of new products, unanticipated changes in general market conditions or regulatory matters, and the weakening of economic conditions or consumer confidence in future economic conditions. The introduction of new AC and DC products may further increase these risks, as demand for legacy products may decline more rapidly than anticipated, channel partners or customers may delay purchases in anticipation of newer offerings, or certain components or finished goods may not be usable across product generations. In addition, the majority of ChargePoint’s products are sold through its channel partners, distributors and resellers and, as a result, ChargePoint is highly reliant on the sales forecasting, sell-through activities and inventory management of its channel partners. If ChargePoint’s channel partners are not effective or efficient in forecasting sales, or sales of particular products, or managing their inventory levels or sell-through expectations then ChargePoint’s management of inventory levels, sales forecasts and parts ordering may be adversely affected which may harm ChargePoint’s financial conditions and results of operations.

Previous wording

Inventory levels in excess of customer demand may result in a portion of ChargePoint's inventory becoming obsolete, as well as inventory write-downs or write-offs. Conversely, if ChargePoint underestimates customer demand for its products or its own requirements for components, sub-assemblies, and materials, ChargePoint's third-party manufacturers and suppliers may not be able to deliver components, sub-assemblies, and materials to meet ChargePoint's standards, lead times or requirements, which could result in inadequate inventory levels or interruptions, delays, or cancellations of deliveries to ChargePoint's customers, any of which would damage its reputation, customer relationships, and business. In addition, components, sub-assemblies, and materials incorporated into ChargePoint products may require lengthy order lead times. As a result, additional supplies or materials may not be available on terms that are acceptable to ChargePoint or at all, and ChargePoint's third-party manufacturers and suppliers may not be able to allocate sufficient capacity in order to meet ChargePoint's increased requirements, any of which could have an adverse effect on ChargePoint’s ability to meet customer demand for its products and results of operations. ChargePoint has in the past experienced fluctuating demand for certain product lines which led to excess inventory that caused ChargePoint to write down, sell at prices lower than expected or discard such inventory. If ChargePoint is not successful in managing its inventory, ChargePoint's business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

Current wording

Inventory levels in excess of customer demand may result in a portion of ChargePoint's inventory becoming obsolete, as well as inventory write-downs or write-offs. Conversely, if ChargePoint underestimates customer demand for its products or its own requirements for components, sub-assemblies, and materials, ChargePoint's third-party manufacturers and suppliers may not be able to deliver components, sub-assemblies, and materials to meet ChargePoint's standards, lead times or requirements, which could result in inadequate inventory levels or interruptions, delays, or cancellations of deliveries to ChargePoint's customers, any of which would damage its reputation, customer relationships, and business. In addition, components, sub-assemblies, and materials incorporated into ChargePoint products may require lengthy order lead times. As a result, additional supplies or materials may not be available on terms that are acceptable to ChargePoint or at all, and ChargePoint's third-party manufacturers and suppliers may not be able to allocate sufficient capacity in order to meet ChargePoint's increased requirements, any of which could have an adverse effect on ChargePoint’s ability to meet customer demand for its products and results of operations. ChargePoint has in the past experienced fluctuating demand for certain product lines which led to excess inventory that caused ChargePoint to write down, sell at prices lower than expected or discard such inventory and similar outcomes could occur in the future. If ChargePoint is not successful in managing its inventory, ChargePoint's business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

Previous wording

ChargePoint’s agreements with its channel partners are non-exclusive and do not prohibit them from working with ChargePoint’s competitors or offering competing solutions, and some of ChargePoint’s channel partners may have more established relationships with ChargePoint’s competitors. Similarly, ChargePoint’s channel partners have no obligations to renew their agreements with ChargePoint on commercially reasonable terms or at all, and certain of the agreements governing these relationships may be terminated by either party at any time, with no or limited notice. Further, in May 2025, ChargePoint announced a strategic partner relationship with an industry leading power management company to co-develop new products and facilitate sales and distribution of ChargePoint’s products and services through such partner’s channel network. If ChargePoint fails to execute or perform its obligations under the strategic relationship or the strategic partner fails to meet sales targets, execute marketing strategies, or successfully execute sales processes, ChargePoint’s reputation, customer relationships, revenue and financial performance could be adversely affected.

Current wording

ChargePoint’s agreements with its channel partners are non-exclusive and do not prohibit them from working with ChargePoint’s competitors or offering competing solutions, and some of ChargePoint’s channel partners may have more established relationships with ChargePoint’s competitors. Similarly, ChargePoint’s channel partners have no obligations to renew their agreements with ChargePoint on commercially reasonable terms or at all, and certain of the agreements governing these relationships may be terminated by either party at any time, with no or limited notice. Further, in May 2025, ChargePoint announced a strategic partner relationship with Eaton Corporation (“Eaton”), an industry leading power management company, to facilitate sales and distribution of ChargePoint’s products and services through Eaton’s channel network, as well as collaborate on new product development to optimize value to end users. The utilization of the Eaton’s channel network may result in higher concentration of a material amount of channel sales through Eaton’s network, with ChargePoint continuing to maintain relationships with channel distributors, including in training and sales support. If ChargePoint fails to execute or perform its obligations under the strategic relationship or Eaton fails to meet its sales targets, execute marketing strategies, or successfully execute sales processes, ChargePoint’s reputation, customer relationships, revenue and financial performance could be adversely affected.

Previous wording

The U.S. government has implemented a general 10% tariff on all imports from countries not exempted under certain trade reciprocity criteria. In addition, elevated tariffs have been imposed on imports from major trading partners, including China, Mexico, Canada, and members of the EU. Impacted countries have and in the future may impose retaliatory tariffs, and such actions could give rise to an escalation of other trade measures by the countries subject to such tariffs. While the application of certain previously announced tariffs have been delayed, there is no guarantee that the tariffs will not go into effect and there is the possibility that additional United States tariffs may be imposed on Canada, Mexico, China, members of the EU and other countries. Trade restrictions and increased tariffs between the United States and countries like Canada, Mexico, China and members of the EU may result in adverse economic conditions, increase the costs of goods sold and result in a recession or the threat of a recession. For example, the United States automotive manufacture industry is particularly sensitive to the impact of tariffs on the increased costs of manufacturing and selling vehicles, which may result in substantial increases to the cost of vehicles to consumers, including EVs. Because ChargePoint is substantially reliant on the increased adoption and sales of new EVs, if there is any downturn in the sales of EVs or consumers reduce their purchases of new EVs, either because the vehicles are more expensive or as the result of a general downturn in the overall economy, ChargePoint’s customers may reduce their need for EV infrastructure development and ChargePoint’s business, financial results and results of operations may be harmed.

Current wording

In February 2026, the United States Supreme Court issued a ruling striking down certain tariffs previously imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (“IEEPA”). Following the Supreme Court’s decision, the U.S. federal government announced its intention to implement new tariffs and surcharges of up to 15% on imports from many of the same countries previously subject to IEEPA under separate authority, including Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. There remains substantial uncertainty regarding the duration of existing and newly announced tariffs and surcharges, potential changes or pauses to such tariffs, tariff levels, and whether further additional tariffs or other retaliatory actions may be imposed, modified, or suspended, and the impacts of such actions on ChargePoint’s business. Trade restrictions and increased tariffs between the United States and countries like Canada, Mexico, China and members of the EU may result in adverse economic conditions, increase the costs of goods sold and result in a recession or the threat of a recession. For example, the United States automotive manufacture industry is particularly sensitive to the impact of tariffs on the increased costs of manufacturing and selling vehicles, which may result in substantial increases to the cost of vehicles to consumers, including EVs. Because ChargePoint is substantially reliant on the increased adoption and sales of new EVs, if there is any downturn in the sales of EVs or consumers reduce their purchases of new EVs, either because the vehicles are more expensive or as the result of a general downturn in the overall economy, ChargePoint’s customers may reduce their need for EV infrastructure development and ChargePoint’s business, financial results and results of operations may be harmed.

Previous wording

A downturn in macroeconomic conditions, including a resumption in the rise of inflation and interest rates; increases or changes in U.S. or global tariff policies and programs and any corresponding supply chain disruptions; global political and economic uncertainty; geopolitical tensions, such as the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict, conflicts in the Middle East and conflict or sanctions between the United States and China; a lack of availability of credit; financial services sector instability; a reduction in business confidence and activity; and other factors have in the past, and may in the future, negatively affect the industries to which ChargePoint sells its products and services. ChargePoint’s customers may suffer from reduced operating budgets, which could cause them to defer, reduce, or forego purchases of ChargePoint’s products or services. Moreover, competitors may respond to market conditions by lowering prices, which may make the prices for ChargePoint’s products and services less competitive or cause ChargePoint to reduce its prices, which in turn may reduce ChargePoint’s gross margins and adversely affect ChargePoint’s growth. Uncertainty about global and regional economic conditions, a downturn in the sale or delivery of EVs, or a reduction in EV infrastructure spending even if economic conditions are stable, could adversely impact ChargePoint’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Current wording

A downturn in macroeconomic conditions, including a resumption in the rise of inflation and interest rates; increases or changes in U.S. or global tariff policies and programs and any corresponding supply chain disruptions; global political and economic uncertainty; geopolitical tensions, such as the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict, ongoing conflicts in the Middle East involving the United States, Iran, Israel and other Gulf States and conflict or sanctions between the United States and China; a lack of availability of credit; financial services sector instability; a reduction in business confidence and activity; and other factors have in the past, and may in the future, negatively affect the industries to which ChargePoint sells its products and services. ChargePoint’s customers may suffer from reduced operating budgets, which could cause them to defer, reduce, or forego purchases of ChargePoint’s products or services. Moreover, competitors may respond to market conditions by lowering prices, which may make the prices for ChargePoint’s products and services less competitive or cause ChargePoint to reduce its prices, which in turn may reduce ChargePoint’s gross margins and adversely affect ChargePoint’s growth. Uncertainty about global and regional economic conditions, a downturn in the sale or delivery of EVs, or a reduction in EV infrastructure spending even if economic conditions are stable, could adversely impact ChargePoint’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Previous wording

•geopolitical turmoil, including the ongoing invasion of Ukraine by Russia and conflicts in the Middle East, rising political tensions with China or increased trade restrictions between the United States, Russia, China and other countries, social unrest, political instability, terrorism, or other acts of war which may further adversely impact supply chains, shipping, transportation and logistics disruptions.

Current wording

•geopolitical turmoil, including the ongoing Ukraine-Russia conflict and ongoing conflicts in the Middle East involving the United States, Iran, Israel and other Gulf States, rising political tensions with China or increased trade restrictions between the United States, Canada, Mexico, Russia, China and other countries, social unrest, political instability, terrorism, or other acts of war which may further adversely impact supply chains, shipping, transportation and logistics disruptions.

Previous wording

In addition to the tariffs recently imposed on China, the United States has imposed extensive export controls, targeted primarily at the semiconductor industry, in China. China has in the past and may in the future retaliate to such measures. If China imposes retaliatory tariffs, or if there is a conflict between China and Taiwan, which is a leading producer of semiconductors, there could be further disruption to the semiconductor industry and global supply chains. ChargePoint or the suppliers it procures components from may be unable to manufacture products at prices ChargePoint’s customers would accept, or at all. Any inability to pass on future increased costs to customers would put downward pressure on ChargePoint’s gross margins and adversely affect ChargePoint’s business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, while ChargePoint has not yet experienced a direct impact to its supply chain due to the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, conflicts in the Middle East or rising political tensions with China, ChargePoint may experience an impact in the future due to increased fuel and shipping costs, limited supply of, or tariffs imposed on, components or replacement parts used by ChargePoint in its manufacturing process or the automotive industry in general, and delays caused by changes to global shipping routes and logistics. Such adverse impacts on ChargePoint’s supply chain could limit its ability to manufacture and sell its products on a timely and cost-effective basis and adversely affect its gross margins, which could materially adversely affect ChargePoint’s business and results of operations.

Current wording

In addition to the tariffs, the United States has imposed extensive export controls, targeted primarily at the semiconductor industry, in China. China has in the past and may in the future retaliate to such measures. If China imposes retaliatory tariffs, or if there is a conflict between China and Taiwan, which is a leading producer of semiconductors, there could be further disruption to the semiconductor industry and global supply chains. ChargePoint or the suppliers it procures components from may be unable to manufacture products at prices ChargePoint’s customers would accept, or at all. Any inability to pass on future increased costs to customers would put downward pressure on ChargePoint’s gross margins and adversely affect ChargePoint’s business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, while ChargePoint has not yet experienced a direct impact to its supply chain due to geopolitical conflicts, ChargePoint may experience an impact in the future due to increased fuel and shipping costs, limited supply of, or tariffs imposed on, components or replacement parts used by ChargePoint in its manufacturing process or the automotive industry in general, and delays caused by changes to global shipping routes and logistics. Such adverse impacts on ChargePoint’s supply chain could limit its ability to manufacture and sell its products on a timely and cost-effective basis and adversely affect its gross margins, which could materially adversely affect ChargePoint’s business and results of operations.

Previous wording

In recent quarters ChargePoint announced a series of reorganization plans that were independently adopted (collectively, the “Reorganizations”) and intended to improve operational efficiencies and operating costs and better align ChargePoint’s workforce with current business needs, top strategic priorities, and key growth opportunities. ChargePoint may not realize, in full or in part, the anticipated benefits and savings from the Reorganizations due to unforeseen difficulties, delays or unexpected costs. If ChargePoint is unable to realize the expected operational efficiencies and cost savings from the Reorganizations, its operating results and financial condition would be adversely affected. In addition, ChargePoint may need to undertake additional workforce reductions or restructuring activities in the future.

Current wording

In recent quarters, ChargePoint has announced a series of reorganization plans that were independently adopted (the “Reorganizations”), including the March 2026 Reorganization described in Note 5, Restructuring in Part I, Item 1, “Financial Statements” of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The March 2026 Reorganization was intended to improve operational efficiencies and operating costs and better align ChargePoint’s workforce with current business needs, top strategic priorities, and key growth opportunities. ChargePoint may not realize, in full or in part, the anticipated benefits and savings from the Reorganizations due to unforeseen difficulties, delays or unexpected costs. If ChargePoint is unable to realize the expected operational efficiencies and cost savings from the Reorganizations, its operating results and financial condition would be adversely affected. In addition, ChargePoint may need to undertake additional workforce reductions or restructuring activities in the future.

Previous wording

ChargePoint’s primary operations are in the United States and Europe and it maintains contractual relationships with parts and manufacturing suppliers in the Asia-Pacific region, Mexico and other locations. Also, ChargePoint maintains research and development teams in Gurgaon and Bangalore, India, Reading, England and Radstadt, Austria. Managing these operations requires additional resources and controls, and could subject ChargePoint to risks associated with international operations, including:

Current wording

ChargePoint’s primary operations are in the United States, Europe and India and it maintains contractual relationships with parts and manufacturing suppliers in the Asia-Pacific region, Europe, Mexico and other locations. Managing

Previous wording

•compliance with multiple, potentially conflicting and changing governmental laws, regulations, certifications, and permitting processes including environmental, banking, employment, tax, information security, privacy, and data protection laws and regulations such as the EU General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”), national legislation implementing the same, the United Kingdom Data Protection Act 2018 (“UK GDPR”), and certain other changing requirements for legally transferring data out of the European Economic Area;

Current wording

•compliance with multiple, potentially conflicting and changing governmental laws, regulations, certifications, and permitting processes including environmental, banking, employment, tax, information security, privacy, and data protection laws and regulations such as the EU General Data Protection Regulation (“EU GDPR”), national legislation implementing the same, the United Kingdom Data Protection Act 2018 (“UK GDPR”), and certain other changing requirements for legally transferring data out of the European Economic Area;

Previous wording

•ChargePoint’s business is subject to risks associated with natural disasters and the adverse effects associated with climate change, including earthquakes, wildfires or other types of natural disasters or resource shortages, including public safety power shut-offs that have occurred and may continue to occur in California, the effects of which could disrupt and harm its operations and those of ChargePoint’s customers.

Current wording

ChargePoint’s business is subject to risks associated with natural disasters, global epidemics, health pandemics and the adverse effects associated with climate change, including earthquakes, wildfires, or other types of natural disasters or resource shortages, including public safety power shut-offs that have occurred and may continue to occur in California, the effects of which could disrupt and harm its operations and those of ChargePoint’s customers.

Previous wording

ChargePoint faces risks related to global epidemics and health pandemics, like what was experienced worldwide during the COVID-19 pandemic, which may create significant volatility in the global economy and may have a long-lasting adverse impact on ChargePoint and its industry. For instance, such epidemics may cause local, regional or national governments to implement measures to contain pandemic risks, such as travel restrictions, quarantines, shelter in place orders or business shutdowns. Any of these measures may adversely affect ChargePoint’s employees and operations and the operations of its customers, suppliers, vendors and business partners, and may negatively impact demand for EV charging stations, particularly at workplaces, or the supply of components necessary for the manufacture of charging stations.

Current wording

ChargePoint faces risks related to global epidemics and health pandemics, like what was experienced worldwide during the COVID-19 pandemic, which may create significant volatility in the global economy and may have a long-lasting adverse impact on ChargePoint and its industry. For instance, such epidemics have in the past caused and may in the future cause local, regional or national governments to implement measures to contain pandemic risks, such as travel restrictions, quarantines, shelter in place orders or business shutdowns. Any of these measures, as was experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic, may adversely affect ChargePoint’s employees and operations and the operations of its customers, suppliers, vendors and business partners, and may negatively impact demand for EV charging stations, particularly at workplaces, or the supply of components necessary for the manufacture of charging stations.

Previous wording

Further, there has been in the past an increased focus, including by governmental and nongovernmental organizations, investors, customers, and other stakeholders, on climate change matters, including increased pressure to expand disclosures related to the physical and transition risks related to climate change or to establish sustainability goals, such as the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, which could expose ChargePoint to market, operational and execution costs or risks. ChargePoint’s failure to establish such sustainability targets or targets that are perceived to be appropriate, as well as to achieve progress on those targets on a timely basis, or at all, could adversely affect the reputation of its brand and sales of and demand for its products.

Current wording

Further, in the past there has been an increased focus, including by governmental and nongovernmental organizations, investors, customers, and other stakeholders, on climate change matters, including increased pressure to expand disclosures related to the physical and transition risks related to climate change or to establish sustainability goals, such as the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, which could expose ChargePoint to market, operational and execution costs or risks. ChargePoint’s failure to establish such sustainability targets or targets that are perceived to be appropriate, as well as to achieve progress on those targets on a timely basis, or at all, could adversely affect the reputation of its brand and sales of and demand for its products.

Previous wording

•volatility in the cost of oil and gasoline, including as a result of trade restrictions;

Current wording

•volatility in the cost of oil and gasoline, including as a result of trade restrictions and ongoing conflicts in the Middle East involving the United States, Iran, Israel and other Gulf States;

Previous wording

•relaxation or elimination of government mandates or quotas regarding the sale of EVs; and

Current wording

•relaxation or elimination of government mandates or quotas regarding the sale of EVs or Zero-Emission Vehicle (“ZEV”) mandates; and

Previous wording

The U.S. federal government, foreign governments and some state and local governments provide incentives to end users and purchasers of EVs and EV charging stations in the form of rebates, tax credits and regulations like clean fuel programs, which can provide other financial incentives. The U.S. federal government, and some foreign and state governments, have proposed changing or ending these incentives. These proposals create uncertainty and if adopted and implemented may have a material adverse impact on the EV market, which benefits from these financial incentives to significantly lower the effective price of EVs and EV charging stations to customers.

Current wording

The U.S. federal government, foreign governments and some state and local governments provide incentives to end users and purchasers of EVs or EV charging stations in the form of rebates, tax credits and regulations like clean fuel programs, which can provide other financial incentives. The U.S. federal government, and some foreign and state governments, have proposed changing or ending these incentives. These proposals create uncertainty and if adopted and implemented may have a material adverse impact on the EV market, which benefits from these financial incentives to significantly lower the effective price of EVs and EV charging stations to customers.

Previous wording

Separately, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act was signed into law which set new end dates for the EV charging infrastructure tax credits previously made available under Section 30C and Section 30D of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) Any other reduction in rebates, tax credits or other financial incentives for EVs or EV charging stations could materially reduce the demand for EVs and ChargePoint’s solutions and, as a result, may adversely impact ChargePoint’s business and expansion potential.

Current wording

Separately, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (“OBBBA”), which was signed into law in July 2025, set new end dates for the EV charging infrastructure tax credits previously made available under Section 30C and Section 30D of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). In particular, the OBBBA terminated the $7,500 new clean vehicle tax credit for all new EVs sold after September 30, 2025. This reduction and any other reduction in rebates, tax credits or other financial incentives for EVs or EV charging stations could materially reduce the demand for EVs and ChargePoint’s solutions and, as a result, may adversely impact ChargePoint’s business and expansion potential.

Previous wording

As regulations have required an increase in the mileage capabilities of cars, consumption of renewable transportation fuels, such as ethanol and biodiesel, and the prevalence of other alternative vehicles has been increasing. If federal or state fuel efficiency regulations and standards are reduced or eliminated, or if fuel efficiency of non-electric vehicles continues to rise, whether as the result of regulations or otherwise, and affordability of vehicles using renewable transportation fuels improves, the demand for EVs could diminish. In addition, the EV fueling model is different than gas or other fuel models, requiring behavior change and education of influencers, consumers and others such as regulatory bodies. Developments in alternative technologies, such as advanced diesel, ethanol, fuel cells or compressed natural gas, or improvements in the fuel economy of the internal combustion engine, may materially and adversely affect demand for EVs and EV charging stations. For example, fuel which is abundant and relatively inexpensive in the United States, such as compressed natural gas, may emerge as a preferred alternative to petroleum-based propulsion. Regulatory bodies may also adopt rules that substantially favor certain alternatives to petroleum-based propulsion over others, which may not necessarily be EVs, or may adopt rules to eliminate, modify or reduce penalties or incentives to maintain minimum fuel economy standards. Any of these changes may impose additional obstacles to the purchase of EVs or the development of a more ubiquitous EV market. If any of the above influence consumers or businesses to no longer purchase EVs or purchase them at a lower rate, it would materially and adversely affect ChargePoint’s business, operating results, financial condition and prospects.

Current wording

Changes in federal or state fuel‑economy standards and emissions regulations present material risks to the EV market and, consequently, to the demand for our products and services. For instance, the OBBA eliminated the civil penalty for violation of the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards which reduces incentives for automakers to improve fleet fuel efficiency. Separately, the U.S. federal government has taken efforts to rescind California’s Clean Air Act waiver which may weaken state frameworks driving adoption of ZEV standards across multiple states. Reductions in fuel‑efficiency requirements, improvements in the fuel economy of internal‑combustion vehicles, or increased adoption of alternative fuels such as ethanol, biodiesel, fuel cells or compressed natural gas could diminish EV demand. In addition, the EV fueling model is different than gas or other fuel models, requiring behavior change and education of influencers, consumers and others such as regulatory bodies. Developments in alternative technologies, such as advanced diesel, ethanol, fuel cells or compressed natural gas, or improvements in the fuel economy of the internal combustion engine, may materially and adversely affect demand for EVs and EV charging stations. For example, fuel which is abundant and relatively inexpensive in the United States, such as compressed natural gas, may emerge as a preferred alternative to petroleum-based propulsion. Regulatory bodies may also adopt rules that substantially favor certain alternatives to petroleum-based propulsion over others, which may not necessarily be EVs. Any of these changes may impose additional obstacles to the purchase of EVs or the development of a more ubiquitous EV market. If any of the above influence consumers or businesses to no longer purchase EVs or purchase them at a lower rate, it would materially and adversely affect ChargePoint’s business, operating results, financial condition and prospects.

Previous wording

ChargePoint’s future growth depends on penetrating new markets, adapting existing products to new applications and customer requirements, and introducing new products that achieve market acceptance. ChargePoint plans to incur significant research and development costs in the future as part of its efforts to design, develop, manufacture and introduce new products and enhance existing products. ChargePoint’s research and development expenses were $104.7 million during the nine months ended October 31, 2025, and $141.3 million, $220.8 million, and $195.0 million during the fiscal years ended January 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively, and may grow in the future. Further, ChargePoint’s research and development program may not produce successful results, and its new products may not achieve market acceptance, create additional revenue or become profitable.

Current wording

ChargePoint’s future growth depends on penetrating new markets, adapting existing products to new applications and customer requirements, and introducing new products that achieve market acceptance. ChargePoint plans to incur significant research and development costs in the future as part of its efforts to design, develop, manufacture and introduce new products and enhance existing products. ChargePoint’s research and development expenses were $35.6 million during the three months ended April 30, 2026, and $139.3 million, $141.3 million million, and $220.8 million during the fiscal years ended January 31, 2026, 2025 and 2024, respectively, and may grow in the future. Further, ChargePoint’s research and development program may not produce successful results, and its new products may not achieve market acceptance, create additional revenue or become profitable.

Previous wording

ChargePoint is highly reliant on its networked charging solution and information technology systems and data, and those of its service providers and component suppliers, any of which systems and data may be subject to cyber-attacks, service disruptions or other security incidents, which could result in data breaches, loss or interruption of services, intellectual property theft, claims, litigation, regulatory investigations, significant liability, reputational damage and other adverse consequences.

Current wording

ChargePoint is highly reliant on its networked charging solution and information technology systems and data, and those of its service providers and component suppliers; any of these systems and data may be subject to cyber-attacks, service disruptions or other security incidents, which could result in data breaches, loss or interruption of services, intellectual property theft, claims, litigation, regulatory investigations, significant liability, reputational damage and other adverse consequences.

Previous wording

ChargePoint continues to expand its information technology systems in support of its networked charging solutions, and as its operations grow, its internal information technology systems, such as product data management, procurement, inventory management, production planning and execution, sales, services and logistics, financial, tax and regulatory compliance systems. This includes the implementation of new internally developed systems and the deployment of such systems in the United States and abroad. The implementation, maintenance, segregation and improvement of these systems require significant management time, support and cost, and there are inherent risks associated with developing, improving and expanding ChargePoint’s core systems as well as implementing new systems and updating current systems, including disruptions to the related areas of business operations. These risks may affect ChargePoint’s ability to manage its data and inventory, procure parts or supplies or manufacture, sell, deliver and service products, adequately protect its intellectual property or achieve and maintain compliance with, or realize available benefits under, tax laws and other applicable regulations.

Current wording

ChargePoint continues to expand its information technology systems in support of its networked charging solutions, and as its operations grow, its internal information technology systems—such as product data management, procurement, inventory management, production planning and execution, sales, services and logistics, financial, tax and regulatory compliance systems—are evolving. This includes the implementation of new internally developed systems and the deployment of such systems in the United States and abroad, including systems that incorporate or rely on artificial intelligence, automated decision‑making, data analytics or third‑party AI‑enabled tools and services. The implementation, maintenance, segregation and improvement of these systems require significant management time, support and cost, and there are inherent risks associated with developing, improving and expanding ChargePoint’s core systems as well as implementing new systems and updating current systems, including disruptions to related areas of business operations. AI‑enabled systems may amplify these risks by increasing system interdependencies, accelerating the scale and speed at which errors or misuse can occur, and creating additional data governance, cybersecurity and compliance challenges. These risks may affect ChargePoint’s ability to manage its data and inventory; procure parts or supplies; manufacture, sell, deliver and service products; adequately protect its intellectual property; or achieve and maintain compliance with, or realize available benefits under, tax laws and other applicable regulations.

Previous wording

While ChargePoint maintains information technology measures designed to protect it against intellectual property theft, data breaches, sabotage and other external or internal cyber-attacks or misappropriation, its systems and those of its service providers are potentially vulnerable to malware, ransomware, viruses, denial-of-service attacks, phishing attacks, social engineering, computer hacking, unauthorized access, exploitation of bugs, defects and vulnerabilities, breakdowns, damage, interruptions, system malfunctions, power outages, terrorism, acts of vandalism, security breaches, security incidents, inadvertent or intentional actions by employees or other third parties, and other cyber-attacks. Further, most of the Networked Charging Systems ChargePoint sells are owned and operated by third-parties who are responsible for the physical safety of the charging stations. Failure on the part of ChargePoint’s customers to adequately assure the physical safety of charging stations may result in unauthorized access to ChargePoint’s systems or network. To the extent any security incident results in unauthorized access, or damage to, acquisition, use, corruption, loss, destruction, alteration or dissemination of ChargePoint data, including intellectual property and personal information, or ChargePoint products, or for it to be believed or reported that any of these occurred, it could disrupt ChargePoint’s business, harm its reputation, compel it to comply with applicable data breach notification laws, subject it to time consuming, distracting and expensive litigation, regulatory investigation and oversight, mandatory corrective action, require it to verify the correctness of database contents, or otherwise subject it to liability under laws, regulations and contractual obligations, including those that protect the privacy and security of personal information. This could result in increased costs to ChargePoint and result in significant legal and financial exposure and/or reputational harm.

Current wording

To the extent any security incident results in unauthorized access to, or damage to, acquisition, use, corruption, loss, destruction, alteration or dissemination of, ChargePoint data (including intellectual property and personal information) or ChargePoint products—or for it to be believed or reported that any of these occurred—it could disrupt ChargePoint’s business, harm ChargePoint’s reputation, compel ChargePoint to comply with applicable data breach notification and consumer protection laws, including those increasingly applicable to the use of artificial intelligence and automated processing of personal or sensitive data, subject ChargePoint to time consuming, distracting and expensive litigation, regulatory investigation and oversight, mandatory corrective action and third-party audits, require ChargePoint to verify the correctness of database contents, or otherwise subject ChargePoint to liability under laws, regulations and contractual obligations (including those that protect the privacy and security of personal information). Any of the foregoing could result in significant legal and financial exposure, increased costs (including for fines, defense, remediation, customer support and complimentary services) and/or reputational harm.

Previous wording

Because ChargePoint also relies on third-party service providers, it cannot guarantee that its service providers’ and component suppliers’ systems have not been breached or that they do not contain exploitable defects, bugs, or vulnerabilities that could result in a security incident, or other disruption to, ChargePoint’s or ChargePoint’s service providers’ or component suppliers’ systems. ChargePoint’s ability to monitor its service providers’ and component suppliers’ security measures is limited, and, in any event, malicious third parties may be able to circumvent those security measures.

Current wording

Because ChargePoint also relies on third-party service providers and component suppliers, ChargePoint cannot guarantee that those parties’ systems have not been breached or that they do not contain exploitable defects, bugs, or vulnerabilities that could result in a security incident or other disruption to ChargePoint’s systems or operations. This risk may be heightened where ChargePoint relies on third‑party providers of artificial intelligence models, data, software components, cloud infrastructure or development tools, including where ChargePoint has limited visibility into such providers’ security practices, data handling, model training or update processes. ChargePoint’s ability to monitor its service providers’ and component suppliers’ security measures is limited and, in any event, malicious actors may circumvent such measures. In addition, as EV charging standards, interoperability requirements and industry practices evolve, stakeholders (including regulators, utilities, customers and program administrators) may increase security expectations, including AI‑specific governance, testing, transparency or certification requirements, which may require us to implement and maintain additional controls, testing and certifications, further increasing costs and diverting management attention.

Previous wording

If ChargePoint does not successfully implement, maintain or expand its information technology systems as planned, its operations may be disrupted, its ability to accurately and/or timely report its financial results could be impaired and deficiencies may arise in its internal control over financial reporting, which may impact its ability to certify its financial results (see also “Financial, Tax and Accounting-Related Risks--ChargePoint previously identified material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting. If ChargePoint identifies additional material weaknesses in the future or otherwise fails to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting, this may result in material misstatements contained within ChargePoint’s consolidated financial statements or cause ChargePoint to fail to meet its periodic reporting obligations.” for more detail). Moreover, ChargePoint’s proprietary information, including intellectual property and personal information, could be compromised or misappropriated, its reputation may be adversely affected if these systems or their functionality do not operate as expected and ChargePoint may be required to expend significant resources to make corrections or find alternative sources for performing these functions.

Current wording

If ChargePoint does not successfully implement, maintain or expand its information technology systems as planned, or if ChargePoint experiences a significant cybersecurity or data protection incident, its operations may be disrupted; its intellectual property and personal information, could be compromised or misappropriated; its reputation may be adversely affected; its ability to accurately and/or timely report its financial results could be impaired; and deficiencies may arise in its internal control over financial reporting, which may impact its ability to certify its financial results and as a result its business, operations and financial results may be adversely affected.

Previous wording

From time to time, ChargePoint has experienced cyberattacks on its information technology infrastructure and systems. Computer malware, viruses, physical or electronic break-ins and similar disruptions could lead to interruption and delays in ChargePoint’s services and operations and loss, misuse or theft of data. Computer malware, viruses, ransomware, hacking and phishing attacks against online networks have become more prevalent and may occur on ChargePoint’s systems in the future.

Current wording

From time to time, ChargePoint has experienced cyberattacks on its information technology infrastructure and systems. Computer malware, viruses, physical or electronic break-ins and similar disruptions could lead to interruption and delays in ChargePoint’s services and operations and loss, misuse or theft of data. The increasing use of artificial intelligence by both ChargePoint and threat actors may further heighten these risks, as attackers may leverage AI‑enabled tools to automate, scale or enhance the sophistication of attacks, including social engineering, phishing, credential harvesting, malware development or exploitation of software vulnerabilities. Threat actors—including financially motivated criminal groups and nation-state or state aligned actors—may target critical infrastructure providers and EV charging networks, attempt to extort companies through ransomware, or seek to compromise software supply chains and firmware signing keys. External events, such as the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, conflicts in the Middle East involving the United States, Iran, Israel and other Gulf States, and heightened geopolitical tensions, have been accompanied by warnings from cybersecurity organizations about increased threat activity against U.S. businesses and infrastructure providers, which could increase the likelihood or severity of attacks aimed at energy, fueling or infrastructure service providers. ChargePoint has also been targeted by spear phishing campaigns directed at specific individuals or departments that masquerade as trusted sources to obtain sensitive information or initiate unauthorized transactions, and such campaigns may increasingly incorporate AI‑generated content designed to evade detection or increase their effectiveness.

Previous wording

Efforts to prevent cyber attackers from entering computer systems are expensive to implement, and ChargePoint may not be able to cause the implementation or enforcement of such preventions with respect to its third-party vendors. Though it is difficult to determine what, if any, harm may directly result from any specific interruption or attack, any failure to maintain performance, reliability, security and availability of systems and technical infrastructure may, in addition to other losses, harm ChargePoint’s reputation, brand and ability to attract customers.

Current wording

Efforts to prevent cyber attackers from entering computer systems are costly to implement and operate, and ChargePoint may be unable to cause the implementation or enforcement of equivalent measures at its third-party vendors, site hosts or component suppliers. As ChargePoint integrates additional AI‑enabled tools, services or automated processes, it may be required to implement new controls, monitoring, training and governance frameworks, which may not be fully effective in preventing misuse, error or attack. Although it is difficult to determine what, if any, harm may directly result from any specific interruption or attack, any failure to maintain performance, reliability, security and availability of systems and technical infrastructure may, in addition to other losses, harm ChargePoint’s reputation, brand and ability to attract and retain customers.

Previous wording

ChargePoint has previously experienced, and may in the future experience, service disruptions, outages and other performance problems due to a variety of factors, including infrastructure changes, third-party service providers, component supplier and manufacturer disruptions, human or software errors and capacity constraints. If ChargePoint’s services are unavailable when users attempt to access them, they may seek other services, which could reduce demand for ChargePoint’s solutions from target customers.

Current wording

ChargePoint has previously experienced, and may in the future experience, service disruptions, outages and other performance problems due to a variety of factors, including infrastructure changes, third-party service provider or component supplier disruptions, human or software errors, capacity constraints and cybersecurity events. The introduction or expansion of

Previous wording

ChargePoint has processes and procedures in place designed to enable it to quickly recover from a disaster or catastrophe and continue business operations and has tested this capability under controlled circumstances. However, there are several factors ranging from human error to data corruption that could materially impact the efficacy of such processes and procedures, including by lengthening the time services are partially or fully unavailable to customers and users. It may be difficult or impossible to perform some or all recovery steps and continue normal business operations due to the nature of a particular disaster or catastrophe, especially during peak periods, which could cause additional reputational damages, or loss of revenue, any of which could adversely affect its business and financial results.

Current wording

AI‑enabled systems may increase the risk or severity of such disruptions, particularly if such systems malfunction, are misused, or depend on third‑party data or infrastructure. If ChargePoint’s services are unavailable when users attempt to access them, they may seek alternatives, which could reduce demand for ChargePoint’s solutions. Although ChargePoint maintains business continuity and disaster recovery processes designed to enable it to recover from a disaster or catastrophe and continue business operations—and has tested these capabilities under controlled circumstances—human error, data corruption, third-party failures or the nature and timing of a particular event could materially impact the efficacy of such processes, extend the time services are partially or fully unavailable, and cause additional reputational damage or loss of revenue, any of which could adversely affect ChargePoint’s business and financial results.

Previous wording

Furthermore, ChargePoint’s software platform is complex, developed for over a decade by many developers, and includes a number of licensed third-party commercial and open-source software libraries. ChargePoint’s software has contained defects and errors and may in the future contain undetected defects or errors. ChargePoint is continuing to evolve the features and functionality of its platform through updates and enhancements, and as it does, it may introduce additional defects or errors that may not be detected until after deployment to customers. In addition, if ChargePoint’s products and services, including any updates or patches, are not implemented or used correctly or as intended, inadequate performance and disruptions in service may result.

Current wording

Furthermore, the ChargePoint Platform is complex, developed for over a decade by many developers, and includes a number of licensed third-party commercial and open-source software libraries. ChargePoint’s software has contained defects and errors and may in the future contain undetected defects or errors. ChargePoint is continuing to evolve the features and functionality of the ChargePoint Platform through updates and enhancements, and as it does, it may introduce additional defects or errors that may not be detected until after deployment to customers. In addition, if ChargePoint’s products and services, including any updates or patches, are not implemented or used correctly or as intended, inadequate performance and disruptions in service may result.

Previous wording

The ChargePoint software platform is used to connect EV drivers with charging station hosts to pay for public and private charging. These payment connections can be made via the ChargePoint mobile application or via OEM “in-dash” applications powered by ChargePoint software. ChargePoint also enables the payment of public charging sessions with third-party charging stations via software integration which ChargePoint refers to as “roaming.” In addition, ChargePoint’s software platform enables third-party e-mobility services providers, or “eMSPs”, to build and publish their own proprietary mobility and roaming services for the sale of charging sessions, particularly in Europe.

Current wording

The ChargePoint Platform, ChargePoint’s software platform, is used to connect EV drivers with charging station hosts to pay for public and private charging. These payment connections can be made via the ChargePoint mobile application or via OEM “in-dash” applications powered by ChargePoint software. ChargePoint also enables the payment of public charging sessions with third-party charging stations via software integration which ChargePoint refers to as “roaming.” In addition, the ChargePoint Platform enables third-party e-mobility services providers, or “eMSPs”, to build and publish their own proprietary mobility and roaming services for the sale of charging sessions, particularly in Europe.

Previous wording

In each of these charging cases, ChargePoint accepts payments from EV drivers for charging sessions using a variety of different payment methods or receives reimbursements from its roaming partners, which may subject ChargePoint to additional regulations and compliance requirements, and may also increase ChargePoint’s exposure to payment fraud, criminal activity, and other risks. Further, since the methods and schemes utilized by perpetrators of fraud are constantly evolving or, in some cases, not immediately detectable, ChargePoint cannot be certain that its policies, and controls and procedures for detecting third-party payment fraud, will be effective over time or of its ability to update these measures to address emerging fraud risks. If illicit or fraudulent activity levels involving ChargePoint’s software services were to rise, it could lead to regulatory intervention, adversely impact ChargePoint’s finances, operations and customer relationships, and cause reputational and financial harm.

Current wording

In each of these charging cases, ChargePoint accepts payments from EV drivers for charging sessions using a variety of different payment methods or receives reimbursements from its roaming partners, which may subject ChargePoint to additional regulations and compliance requirements, and may also increase ChargePoint’s exposure to payment fraud, criminal activity, and other risks. ChargePoint has in the past, and may again in the future, be subjected to fraudulent activities related to its ChargePoint Platform and related charging payment services. Further, since the methods and schemes utilized by perpetrators of fraud are constantly evolving or, in some cases, not immediately detectable, ChargePoint cannot be certain that its policies, and controls and procedures for detecting third-party payment fraud, will be effective over time or of its ability to update these measures to address emerging fraud risks. If illicit or fraudulent activity levels involving ChargePoint’s software services were to rise, it could lead to regulatory intervention, adversely impact ChargePoint’s finances, operations and customer relationships, and cause reputational and financial harm.

Previous wording

ChargePoint currently serves customers from third-party data center facilities operated by Amazon Web Services (“AWS”) located in the United States, Europe and Canada. Any outage or failure of such data centers could negatively affect ChargePoint’s product connectivity and performance. ChargePoint’s primary environments are behind the Content Delivery Network operated by Cloudflare, Inc. (“Cloudflare”), and any interruptions of Cloudflare’s services could negatively affect ChargePoint’s product connectivity and performance. Furthermore, ChargePoint depends on connectivity from its charging stations to its data centers through several cellular service providers, such as Verizon, AT&T, Vodafone, and Semtech Corporation. Any incident affecting a data center facility’s or a cellular service provider’s infrastructure or operations, whether caused by fire, flood, severe storm, earthquake, or other natural disasters, power loss, telecommunications failures, breach of security protocols, computer viruses and disabling devices, failure of access control mechanisms, war, criminal act, military actions, terrorist attacks and other similar events could negatively affect the use, functionality or availability of ChargePoint’s services.

Current wording

ChargePoint currently serves customers from third-party data center facilities operated by Amazon Web Services and Google Cloud located in the United States, Europe and Canada. Any outage or failure of such data centers could negatively affect ChargePoint’s product connectivity and performance. ChargePoint’s primary environments are behind the Content Delivery Network operated by Cloudflare, Inc. (“Cloudflare”), and any interruptions of Cloudflare’s services could negatively affect ChargePoint’s product connectivity and performance. Furthermore, ChargePoint depends on connectivity from its charging stations to its data centers through several cellular service providers, such as Verizon, AT&T, Vodafone, and Semtech Corporation. Any incident affecting a data center facility’s or a cellular service provider’s infrastructure or operations, whether caused by fire, flood, severe storm, earthquake, or other natural disasters, power loss, telecommunications failures, breach of security protocols, computer viruses and disabling devices, failure of access control mechanisms, war, criminal act, military actions, terrorist attacks and other similar events could negatively affect the use, functionality or availability of ChargePoint’s services.

Previous wording

ChargePoint believes that the successful use of its Networked Charging Systems and its cloud-based software solutions or “ChargePoint Platform” requires a high level of support and engagement for many of its customers, particularly its fleet and commercial customers. In order to deliver appropriate customer support and engagement, ChargePoint must successfully assist its customers in deploying and continuing to use ChargePoint’s Networked Charging Systems and ChargePoint Platform tools, resolving performance issues, addressing interoperability challenges with a customers’ existing information technology or fuel management platforms and responding to Networked Charging Systems component failures or replacement parts, as well as charging station performance and reliability issues that may arise from time to time.

Current wording

ChargePoint believes that the successful use of its Networked Charging Systems and its ChargePoint Platform requires a high level of support and engagement for many of its customers, particularly its fleet and commercial customers. In order to deliver appropriate customer support and engagement, ChargePoint must successfully assist its customers in deploying and continuing to use ChargePoint’s Networked Charging Systems and ChargePoint Platform tools, resolving performance issues, addressing interoperability challenges with a customers’ existing information technology or fuel management platforms and responding to Networked Charging Systems component failures or replacement parts, as well as charging station performance and reliability issues that may arise from time to time.

Previous wording

ChargePoint provides support to its commercial, fleet and residential Networked Charging Systems owners and operators. Such support services are generally provided under its extended warranty program (“Assure”), including proactive charging station monitoring, guaranteed service response times and labor and parts warranties. ChargePoint further provides support for EV drivers connecting to and utilizing ChargePoint’s software platform and its network of EV charging stations, including customer support services and mobile services. ChargePoint’s support organization faces additional challenges associated with its international operations, including those associated with delivering support, training, and documentation in languages other than English. If ChargePoint fails to maintain high-quality customer support or comply with support requirements under its software platform or Assure warranty program, ChargePoint may incur additional costs, be obligated to provide refunds, rebates or pay performance penalties to its customers and EV charging station owners, or suffer the cancellation of software and Assure warranty agreements, the occurrence of any of which may increase ChargePoint’s expenses and costs or result in less revenue for ChargePoint, which may adversely affect ChargePoint’s reputation, business, results of operations, and financial condition.

Current wording

ChargePoint provides support to its commercial, fleet and residential Networked Charging Systems owners and operators. Such support services are generally provided under its extended warranty program (“Assure”), including proactive charging station monitoring, guaranteed service response times and labor and parts warranties. ChargePoint further provides support for EV drivers connecting to and utilizing the ChargePoint Platform and its network of EV charging stations, including customer support services and mobile services. ChargePoint’s support organization faces additional challenges associated with its international operations, including those associated with delivering support, training, and documentation in languages other than English. If ChargePoint fails to maintain high-quality customer support or comply with support requirements under its software platform or Assure warranty program, ChargePoint may incur additional costs, be obligated to provide refunds, rebates or pay performance penalties to its customers and EV charging station owners, or suffer the cancellation of software and Assure warranty agreements, the occurrence of any of which may increase ChargePoint’s expenses and costs or result in less revenue for ChargePoint, which may adversely affect ChargePoint’s reputation, business, results of operations, and financial condition.

Showing the first 40 of 69 pairs. Open the source sections for the rest.

Rearranged current paragraphs (4)

Current report — wording carried from elsewhere

ChargePoint incurred net losses of$220.2 million for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2026 and had net loss of $43.2 million for the three months ended April 30, 2026. As of April 30, 2026, ChargePoint had an accumulated deficit of $2,154.8 million. ChargePoint incurred negative cash flows from operating activities of $36.6 million for the three months ended April 30, 2026.

Current report — wording carried from elsewhere

ChargePoint’s international operations requires additional resources and controls, and could subject ChargePoint to risks associated with international operations, including:

Current report — wording carried from elsewhere

Convertible Notes. In addition, under Accounting Standards Update 2020-06, Debt--Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging--Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40), diluted earnings per share is generally calculated assuming that all the 2028 Convertible Notes were converted solely into shares of Common Stock at the beginning of the reporting period, unless the result would be anti-dilutive. The application of this “if-converted” method may reduce ChargePoint’s reported diluted earnings per share.

Current report — wording carried from elsewhere

ChargePoint’s Common Stock. The issuance of authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock could be used to deter a potential takeover of ChargePoint that may otherwise be beneficial to stockholders by diluting the shares held by a potential suitor or issuing shares to a stockholder that will vote in accordance with the Board’s desires. A takeover may be beneficial to independent stockholders because, among other reasons, a potential suitor may offer such stockholders a premium for their shares of stock compared to the then-existing market price. ChargePoint does not have any plans or proposals to adopt provisions or enter into agreements that may have material anti-takeover consequences.
Rearranged previous paragraphs (6)

Previous report — wording carried elsewhere

ChargePoint faces risks related to global epidemics and health pandemics which could have a material and adverse effect on its business and results of operations.

Previous report — wording carried elsewhere

ChargePoint’s business is subject to risks associated with natural disasters and the adverse effects associated with climate change, including earthquakes, wildfires, or other types of natural disasters or resource shortages, including public safety power shut-offs that have occurred and may continue to occur in California, the effects of which could disrupt and harm its operations and those of ChargePoint’s customers.

Previous report — wording carried elsewhere

ChargePoint’s business faces increasing regulation and disclosure obligations related to environmental, social and governance issues, including supply chain management, climate change, safety, diversity and inclusion, workplace conduct, and human rights. For example, in October 2023, the State of California adopted SB 253, the Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act, which require companies to annually disclose Scope 1, Scope 2, and Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions and

Previous report — wording carried elsewhere

In addition, ChargePoint previously filed a Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-265986), which permitted ChargePoint to offer up to $1.0 billion of shares of ChargePoint Common Stock, preferred stock, debt securities, warrants and rights in one or more offerings and in any combination, including in units from time to time, and simultaneously entered into an

Previous report — wording carried elsewhere

Convertible Notes and declare 100% of the outstanding principal of, and accrued and unpaid interest, if any, on the 2028 Convertible Notes to become due and payable immediately.

Previous report — wording carried elsewhere

Item 1, “Financial Statements” of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, under “Legal Proceedings” for more information related to ChargePoint’s existing securities class action and stockholder derivative actions.