Pennant Group Inc
For the period ended Dec 31, 2024. Filed Feb 27, 2025.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.
FY2024 · Filed Feb 27, 2025
What changed in Risk Factors?
Read the current filingPrevious report: 10-K
Period ended 2023-12-31; filed 2024-02-28.
0001766400-24-000022
Item 1A. Risk Factors -Current report: 10-K
Period ended 2024-12-31; filed 2025-02-27.
0001766400-25-000024
Item 1A. Risk Factors -The baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.
Compared 64 previous paragraphs and 46 current paragraphs.
19 unchanged; 25 reworded; 1 added; 20 removed; 0 previous and 1 current paragraphs rearranged.
Tables are not compared: 0 previous and 0 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.
A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.
Added paragraphs (1)
Current report
Changes to immigration law or enforcement could adversely affect our results from operations. Changes to immigration laws and policies, or increased enforcement of existing laws and regulations, could impact our employees or the labor pool from which we hire future employees. Such changes could reduce the number of eligible workers and increase wage costs, including for skilled workers who may work or receive professional training in the United States under various visa programs, making it more difficult or impossible for us to staff our operations.
Removed paragraphs (20)
Previous report
A Medicare overpayment audit of one of our independent operating subsidiaries could result in a material loss. From June 2021 to May 2022, a united program integrity contractor (“UPIC”) for the Medicare program suspended one of our independent operating subsidiary’s rights to submit claims to and obtain reimbursement from Medicare for its hospice agency services. The suspension concluded in May 2022 and Medicare has resumed payment on new claims submitted by the agency. The payments suspended as of June 30, 2022 totaled $5.2 million and represented all Medicare payments due to that independent operating subsidiary’s provider number during the suspension. During the suspension, the UPIC reviewed 107 patient records from a 10-month period to determine whether a Medicare overpayment was made to this independent operating subsidiary and whether repayment of any identified overpayment is due. Based on the results of its claim review, the UPIC alleged actual overpayments of $0.4 million and extrapolated overpayments of $5.2 million based upon its sampled and extrapolated data. In September and October 2022, the Company submitted requests for redetermination of the alleged overpayments. The UPIC’s redetermination decision was partially favorable, reducing the alleged overpayment from $5.2 million to $1.9 million. The Company plans to continue to contest the UPIC’s initial overpayment determination for the claim samples redetermined adversely to the Company.
Previous report
This suspension and overpayment allegation may increase the likelihood that this or other of our independent operating subsidiaries may be subjected to additional scrutiny in the future. A Medicare contractor may review patient records from one or more of our other independent operating subsidiaries, which may lead to those agencies having their Medicare payments suspended, whether temporarily or on an indefinite or permanent basis, potentially leading to their closure and resulting adverse impacts on our revenues and profits.
Previous report
COVID-19 has created new regulatory risks that impact our operations. COVID-19 generated dramatic and rapid changes in the laws affecting our operations, and the unwinding of pandemic-related activities may continue to affect our business in the foreseeable future. U.S. Federal, state, and local regulators implemented new laws, rules, regulations, and orders, or waived or modified existing laws, rules and regulations for the duration of the COVID-19 public health emergency (“PHE”). The PHE concluded on May 11, 2023, which required us to navigate the termination of federal and state waivers and flexibilities. The resumption of pre-COVID-19 regulatory requirements at the conclusion of the public health emergency may continue to require significant operational changes on short notice.
Previous report
COVID-19 and related risks have affected and could materially affect our results of operations, financial position and/or liquidity. The global spread of COVID-19 and the various attempts to contain it created significant volatility, uncertainty and economic disruption, and we continue to see the after-effects of these changes today. Many of the direct and indirect consequences of COVID-19 on our business are now known; however, new developments in the wake of the PHE’s termination, as well as legacy consequences from the COVID-19 pandemic including COVID-19 variants, second-order effects such as inflation, consumer demand, and labor supply issues are ongoing. Similarly, not all the risks and consequences of the COVID-19 PHE’s termination and conclusion of emergency responses to COVID-19 in states and localities where we operate are not yet fully known, and may yet adversely affect our business in ways that are evolving or may only be evident with the passage of time. Risks presented by the effects of COVID-19 include the following:
Previous report
•Disruption caused by repeated waves of COVID-19 variants, including breakthrough infections of fully vaccinated individuals, poses a risk to the Company for the foreseeable future due to the potential consequences of such variants on Company personnel, labor pool participants, availability of necessary supplies, continued adverse impact on move-in rates within senior living, and consequences for the broader economy.
Previous report
•Decreased home health and hospice volumes and senior living occupancy, which may lead to decreased revenue.
Previous report
•Increased costs and staffing requirements related to implementation of COVID-19 infection prevention protocols, including increased utilization of personal protective equipment (“PPE”), COVID-19 diagnostic testing and vaccination for staff and residents, and additional labor and cleaning supplies to frequently sterilize equipment and surfaces.
Previous report
•Increased labor costs due to increased overtime or premium pay, paid leave, reduced labor force participation, wage pressure from competitors, workers becoming ineligible for employment due to COVID-19 vaccination requirements, mandatory testing costs, reduction of the qualified workforce due to burnout and qualified personnel leaving the caregiving field, and the increased need for temporary labor to supplement our existing staffing as our front-line employees may become unable to work while awaiting the results of COVID-19 tests or as they recover from a COVID-19 infection.
Previous report
•Increased scrutiny by regulators of visitation requirements, infection control and prevention measures, including imposition of new COVID-19 disease and mortality reporting requirements, and increased enforcement of resident rights’ violations related to visitation.
Previous report
•Disruptions to supply chains which could negatively impact consistent and reliable delivery of PPE, sanitizing supplies, food, pharmaceuticals, and other goods.
Previous report
•COVID-19 related illnesses in staff may impact the quality of care, which could lead to temporary staffing shortages or reliance on less experienced personnel.
Previous report
•Employee concerns related to workplace safety, including potential for increase in workers’ compensation claims.
Previous report
•Potential increase in insurance premiums and COVID-19 related claims.
Previous report
•Inconsistent application or interpretation of modifications to regulatory requirements by surveyors, including both COVID-19 survey standards and the resumption of pre-COVID-19 survey standards and practices.
Previous report
•Potential for continued inflation and price increases of certain goods or services resulting from changes in economic conditions and steps taken by the federal government and the Federal Reserve, which could lead to higher inflation rates or longer-lasting inflation than anticipated, which could in turn lead to an increase in expenses, including payroll, insurance, and rent expense under our triple net leases. All of the triple net leases in our senior living business contain annual rent escalators tied to year-over-year increases in various consumer price indices. While these leases contain provisions capping the increased rent expense each year, increased inflation could cause our rent expense in our senior living business to increase at a greater rate than in prior years.
Previous report
•Potential for future investigations, sanctions, fines, or other penalties arising from the conclusion of the COVID-19 PHE and the expiration of waivers and flexibilities enacted at the federal and state levels as a result of the PHE, and the need to update and amend policies and procedures to timely acknowledge the expiration of these waivers and flexibilities and meet new standards concerning visitation and infection control that arose from the COVID-19 PHE.
Previous report
COVID-19 could lead to future litigation. COVID-19 has affected virtually all businesses in the country, and healthcare providers have been acutely impacted due to direct involvement with the virus. The challenges of dealing with a global pandemic have been amplified by supply shortages (including testing supplies) and evolving information. Healthcare companies, including those in the post-acute care and senior living industries in which we operate, may become targets of plaintiffs’ litigation, alleging negligence, wrongful death, and similar claims resulting from where cases of COVID-19 occurred in senior living communities and through the direct contact with COVID-19 positive patients of our home health and hospice providers. If we or our operations are subject to litigation of this nature based on pandemic-era activity, such litigation may result in legal fees, damages, fines or settlements in amounts that could be material.
Previous report
Although CMS and the states where we operate have rescinded, withdrawn, or discontinued their requirements for our employees to be vaccinated against COVID-19, we may face risk for monitoring and ensuring compliance with these mandates while they were in effect during 2022 and the applicable portions of 2023.
Previous report
The Company may be subject to fines, penalties or judgments, or may otherwise be negatively impacted, if it is found not to have complied with these vaccination requirements when they were in effect. These consequences may include fines, penalties, and other administrative sanctions. Current or prospective employees may oppose vaccination, and the prior existence of these federal, state, and local vaccination mandates may make it more difficult to recruit or retain staff.
Reworded paragraphs (25)
Previous wording
Our revenue could be impacted by federal changes to reimbursement and other aspects of Medicare. We derived 48.4% of our revenue from the Medicare program for the year ended December 31, 2023, which is typical. In addition, other payors may use published Medicare rates as a basis for reimbursements. The Medicare program and its reimbursement rates, caps, deductibles and rules are subject to frequent change for a variety of reasons, which is discussed in Item 1., Government Regulation. Budget pressures also frequently lead the federal government to reduce or limit reimbursement rates under Medicare, and to adjust when or how those reductions or limitations are implemented. Additionally, Medicare payments can be delayed or denied (including retroactively) due to determinations that certain costs, services or providers are not covered. Accordingly, if Medicare reimbursement rates are reduced or fail to increase as quickly as our costs, if we do not realize an adequate percentage of billed Medicare charges, or if there are changes in the way these programs pay for services or what services or providers are covered, our business and results of operations would be adversely affected. CMS has also introduced in the past, and will likely introduce in the future, new payment models, such as value-based arrangements or payment models that look to numerous factors in order to issue full payment, in markets in which we operate. Those models may depend on the formation of preferred provider relationships among payors and providers. Our operations may not successfully implement or adapt to these changes and our operations could be materially impacted. Medicare reimbursement and participation may also be tied to the vaccination of employees against COVID-19 pursuant to a CMS rule which took effect in March 2022 and was in effect until August of 2023 when CMS withdrew this requirement. When CMS’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate was in effect, it required employees of certain Medicare-participating facilities and services including home health agencies and hospices to be vaccinated, which affected our businesses and employees during that time period.
Current wording
Our revenue could be impacted by federal changes to reimbursement and other aspects of Medicare. We derived 48.3% of our revenue from the Medicare program for the year ended December 31, 2024, which is typical. In addition, other payors may use published Medicare rates as a basis for reimbursements. The Medicare program and its reimbursement rates, caps, deductibles and rules are subject to frequent change for a variety of reasons, which is discussed in Item 1., Government Regulation. Budget pressures also frequently lead the federal government to reduce or limit reimbursement rates under Medicare, and to adjust when or how those reductions or limitations are implemented, including sometimes doing so retroactively. Additionally, Medicare payments can be delayed or denied (including retroactively) due to determinations that certain costs, services or providers are not covered. Accordingly, if Medicare reimbursement rates are reduced or fail to increase as quickly as our costs, if we do not realize an adequate percentage of billed Medicare charges, or if there are changes in the way these programs pay for services or what services or providers are covered, our business and results of operations would be adversely affected. CMS has also introduced in the past, and will likely introduce in the future, new payment models, such as value-based arrangements or payment models that look to numerous factors in order to issue full payment, in markets in which we operate. Those models may depend on the formation of preferred provider relationships among payors and providers. Our operations may not successfully implement or adapt to these changes and our operations could be materially impacted.
Previous wording
Reductions in Medicaid reimbursement rates or changes in the rules governing the Medicaid program could have a material, adverse effect on our revenues, financial condition and results of operations. We derived 14.2% of our revenue from Medicaid programs for the year ended December 31, 2023, which is typical. Any budget reductions or funding restrictions, discontinuance or reduction of federal matching, change in payment methodology or delays in states in which we operate could adversely affect our net patient service revenue and profitability, including the reduction of federal funds contributed to state Medicaid budgets during the COVID-19 public health emergency. Like Medicare payments, Medicaid payments can be delayed due to budgetary constraints of the state or state agencies responsible for making such payments, and Medicaid payments may be declined (including retroactively) due to determinations that certain costs, services or providers are not covered by the state Medicaid agency or its intermediary organizations. We can expect continuing cost containment pressures on Medicaid outlays for our services.
Current wording
Reductions in Medicaid reimbursement rates or changes in the rules governing the Medicaid program could have a material, adverse effect on our revenues, financial condition and results of operations. We derived 13.2% of our revenue from Medicaid programs for the year ended December 31, 2024, which is typical. Any budget reductions or funding restrictions, discontinuance or reduction of federal matching, change in payment methodology or delays in states in which we operate could adversely affect our net patient service revenue and profitability. Like Medicare payments, Medicaid payments can be delayed due to budgetary constraints of the state or state agencies responsible for making such payments, and Medicaid payments may be declined (including retroactively) due to determinations that certain costs, services or providers are not covered by the state Medicaid agency or its intermediary organizations. Additionally, in many states where we operate Medicaid benefits are administered through Medicaid Managed Care Organizations (“MCOs”), which are operated by private insurance companies. These MCOs may apply different, stricter standards for reimbursement and prior authorization of our services, which may further adversely affect our ability to be paid for our services. We can expect continuing cost containment pressures on Medicaid outlays, whether administered directly by a state program or through an MCO, for our services.
Previous wording
Reforms to the U.S. healthcare system continue to impose new requirements upon us and may lower our reimbursements. Health care reform is a key political and legislative focal point. We cannot predict what effect legislative or regulatory changes (including, for instance, proposals for Medicare-for-All or public option insurers operated by one or more individual states), will have on our business, including the demand for our services or the amount of reimbursement available for those services. The consequences of elections are not yet fully known for this industry, and our industry may be affected by the Presidential primary campaigns that began in 2023 and will continue this year, culminating with the presidential election in November of 2024. It is possible new laws may lower reimbursement or increase the cost of doing business and adversely affect our business.
Current wording
Reforms to the U.S. healthcare system continue to impose new requirements upon us and may lower our reimbursements. Healthcare reform is a key political and legislative focal point. We cannot predict what effect legislative or regulatory changes (including, for instance, proposals for Medicare-for-All or public option insurers operated by one or more individual states), will have on our business, including the demand for our services or the amount of reimbursement available for those services. The consequences of elections are not yet fully known for this industry, and our industry may be affected by presidential and congressional election outcomes. It is possible new laws may lower reimbursement or increase the cost of doing business and adversely affect our business.
Previous wording
We are subject to various government reviews, audits and investigations that could adversely affect our business, including an obligation to refund amounts previously paid to us, potential criminal charges, the imposition of fines, and/or the loss of our right to participate in Medicare and Medicaid programs. As discussed in greater detail in Item 1., Government Regulation, as a result of our participation in the Medicaid and Medicare programs, we are frequently subject to various governmental reviews, audits and investigations to verify our compliance with these programs. Private pay sources also reserve the right to conduct audits. Disagreements about billing and reimbursement are common in our industry due in part to the subjectivity inherent in patient diagnosis and care, record keeping, claims processing and other aspects of the patient service and reimbursement processes. An adverse review, audit or investigation could result in (1) an obligation to refund amounts previously paid to us by payors in amounts that could vastly exceed the revenue derived from claims actually reviewed in the audit, and could be material to our business; (2) state or federal agencies imposing fines, penalties and other sanctions on us; (3) suspension of Medicare or Medicaid payments (4) loss of our right to participate in the Medicare or Medicaid programs or one or more private payor networks; (5) an increase in private litigation against us; and (6) damage to our reputation with potential residents, referral sources, and others in various markets.
Current wording
We are subject to various government reviews, audits and investigations that could adversely affect our business, including an obligation to refund amounts previously paid to us, potential criminal charges, the imposition of fines, and/or the loss of our right to participate in Medicare and Medicaid programs. As discussed in greater detail in Item 1., Government Regulation, as a result of our participation in the Medicaid and Medicare programs, we are frequently subject to various governmental reviews, audits and investigations to verify our compliance with these programs. In addition to routine audits, in its November 2023 Final Rule, CMS finalized a provisional period of enhanced oversight, including prepayment medical reviews, for all hospice providers that are newly enrolled or undergo a change of ownership, which expanded in June 2024 to include reactivated hospice providers in states where we operate. Private pay sources also reserve the right to conduct audits. Disagreements about billing and reimbursement are common in our industry due in part to the subjectivity inherent in patient diagnosis and care, record keeping, claims processing and other aspects of the patient service and reimbursement processes. An adverse review, audit or investigation could result in (1) an obligation to refund amounts previously paid to us by payors in amounts that could vastly exceed the revenue derived from claims actually reviewed in the audit, and could be material to our business; (2) state or federal agencies imposing fines, penalties and other sanctions on us; (3) suspension of Medicare or Medicaid payments (4) loss of our right to participate in the Medicare or Medicaid programs or one or more private payor networks; (5) an increase in private litigation against us; and (6) damage to our reputation with potential residents, referral sources, and others in various markets.
Previous wording
In cases where claim and documentation review by any CMS contractor results in repeated poor performance, an operation can be subjected to protracted oversight. Sustained failure to demonstrate improvement towards meeting all claim filing and documentation requirements could ultimately lead to Medicare decertification. Additionally, both federal and state government agencies have heightened and coordinated civil and criminal enforcement efforts as part of numerous ongoing investigations of healthcare companies. The focuses of these investigations includes, among other things: cost reporting and billing practices; quality of care; financial relationships with referral sources; and medical necessity of services provided. If any of our affiliated operations is decertified, loses its license(s), or is subject to criminal charges or civil claims, administrative sanctions or penalties, our revenue, financial condition or results of operations would be adversely affected. We or some of the key personnel of our independent operating subsidiaries could also be temporarily or permanently excluded from future participation in state and federal healthcare reimbursement programs such as Medicaid and Medicare. In addition, the report of such issues at any of our affiliated operations could harm our reputation for quality care and could cause us to be in default under some of our agreements, including agreements governing outstanding indebtedness. Responding to audits, litigation or enforcement efforts diverts material time, resources and attention, and could have a materially detrimental impact on our results of operations during and after any such investigation or proceedings, regardless of whether we prevail.
Current wording
In cases where claim and documentation review by any CMS contractor results in repeated poor performance, an operation can be subjected to protracted oversight. Sustained failure to demonstrate improvement towards meeting all claim filing and documentation requirements could ultimately lead to Medicare decertification. Additionally, both federal and state government agencies have heightened and coordinated civil and criminal enforcement efforts as part of numerous ongoing investigations of healthcare companies. The focuses of these investigations include among other things: cost reporting and billing practices; quality of care; financial relationships with referral sources; and medical necessity of services provided. If any of our affiliated operations is decertified, loses its license(s), or is subject to criminal charges or civil claims, administrative sanctions or penalties, our revenue, financial condition or results of operations would be adversely affected. We or some of the key personnel of our independent operating subsidiaries could also be temporarily or permanently excluded from future participation in state and federal healthcare reimbursement programs such as Medicaid and Medicare. In addition, the report of such issues at any of our affiliated operations could harm our reputation for quality care and could cause us to be in default under some of our agreements, including agreements governing outstanding indebtedness. Responding to audits, litigation or enforcement efforts diverts material time, resources and attention, and could have a materially detrimental impact on our results of operations during and after any such investigation or proceedings, regardless of whether we prevail.
Previous wording
Public and government calls for increased survey and enforcement efforts toward our industries could result in increased scrutiny and potential sanctions or costly remedies. Government authorities have increased the scope or number of inspections or surveys and the severity of consequent citations for alleged failure to comply with regulatory requirements. As discussed in Item 1., Government Regulation, from time to time in the ordinary course of business, we receive deficiency reports from state and federal regulatory bodies resulting from such inspections or surveys. Although most inspection deficiencies are resolved through an agreed-upon plan of corrective action, the reviewing agency typically has the authority to take further action against a licensed or certified operation, which could result in the imposition of fines and penalties, imposition of a provisional or conditional license, suspension or revocation of a license, suspension of new admission or bed holds, loss of certification as a provider under state or federal healthcare programs or termination of the operations’ payment relationships with those programs, or imposition of other sanctions, including criminal penalties. Furthermore, in some states, citations issued against one operation can affect other operations in the state, particularly where there is any element of common or affiliated ownership. Revocation of a license or decertification at a given operation could therefore impair our ability to obtain new licenses or to renew existing licenses at other operations, which may also trigger defaults or cross-defaults under our leases and our credit arrangements, or adversely affect our ability to operate in the future. If state or federal regulators were to determine, formally or otherwise, that one operation’s regulatory history ought to impact another of our existing or prospective communities, this could also increase costs, result in additional fines or penalties, result in increased scrutiny by state and federal survey agencies, and impact our expansion plans as well as our ongoing operations. In addition, from time to time, we may opt to voluntarily stop accepting new patients pending completion of a new state survey, to avoid straining staff and other resources while retraining staff, upgrading operating systems or making other operational improvements, all of which can impact our financial results.
Current wording
Public and government calls for increased survey and enforcement efforts toward our industries could result in increased scrutiny and potential sanctions or costly remedies. Government authorities have increased the scope or number of inspections or surveys and the severity of consequent citations for alleged failure to comply with regulatory requirements. As discussed in Item 1., Government Regulation, from time to time in the ordinary course of business, we receive deficiency reports from state and federal regulatory bodies resulting from such inspections or surveys. Although most inspection deficiencies are resolved through an agreed-upon plan of corrective action, the reviewing agency typically has the authority to take further action against a licensed or certified operation, which could result in the imposition of fines and penalties, reports to the national practitioner data bank, imposition of a provisional or conditional license, suspension or revocation of a license, suspension of new admission or bed holds, loss of certification as a provider under state or federal healthcare programs or termination of the operations’ payment relationships with those programs, or imposition of other sanctions, including criminal penalties. Furthermore, in some states, citations issued against one operation can affect other operations in the state, particularly where there is any element of common or affiliated ownership. Revocation of a license or decertification at a given operation could therefore impair our ability to obtain new licenses or to renew existing licenses at other operations, which may also trigger defaults or cross-defaults under our leases and our credit arrangements, or adversely affect our ability to operate in the future. If state or federal regulators were to determine, formally or otherwise, that one operation’s regulatory history ought to impact another of our existing or prospective businesses, this could also increase costs, result in additional fines or penalties, result in increased scrutiny by state and federal survey agencies, and impact our expansion plans as well as our ongoing operations. In addition, from time to time, we may opt to voluntarily stop accepting new patients pending completion of a new state survey, to avoid straining staff and other resources while retraining staff, upgrading operating systems or making other operational improvements, all of which can impact our financial results.
Previous wording
Future cost containment initiatives undertaken by payors may limit our future revenue and profitability. Our managed care revenue and profitability may be affected by continuing efforts of third-party payors to maintain or reduce costs of healthcare by lowering payment rates, narrowing the scope of covered services and network providers, increasing case management review of services and negotiating pricing. In addition, sustained unfavorable economic conditions may affect the number of patients enrolled in managed care programs and the profitability of managed care companies, which could result in reduced revenue due to reduced reimbursement for our services. There can be no assurance that third-party payors will make timely payments for our services, not seek recoupment of payments on grounds that may or may not be valid, or that we will continue to maintain our current payor or revenue mix. We are continuing our efforts to develop our private pay sources of revenue. Any changes in payment levels from current or future third-party payors could have a material adverse effect on our business financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. In addition, enrollment in Medicare Advantage programs continues to grow nationwide, and an increasing proportion of Medicare and Medicaid funds are managed by companies that are also third-party payors who may seek to reduce reimbursement as described above.
Current wording
Future cost containment initiatives undertaken by payors may limit our future revenue and profitability. Our managed care revenue and profitability may be affected by continuing efforts of third-party payors to maintain or reduce costs of healthcare by lowering payment rates, narrowing the scope of covered services and network providers, increasing case management review of services and negotiating pricing. In addition, sustained unfavorable economic conditions may affect the number of patients enrolled in managed care programs and the profitability of managed care companies, which could result in reduced revenue due to reduced reimbursement for our services. There can be no assurance that third-party payors will make timely payments for our services, not seek recoupment of payments on grounds that may or may not be valid, or that we will continue to maintain our current payor or revenue mix. We are continuing our efforts to develop our private pay sources of revenue. Any changes in payment levels from current or future third-party payors could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. In addition, enrollment in Medicare Advantage programs continues to grow nationwide, and an increasing proportion of Medicare and Medicaid funds are managed by MCOs that also act as third-party payors who may seek to reduce reimbursement as described above.
Previous wording
Any economic downturn, deepening of an economic downturn, continued deficit spending by the Federal Government or state budget pressures may result in a reduction in payments and covered services. Adverse economic developments in the United States could lead to a reduction in Federal Government expenditures, including government-funded programs in which we participate, such as Medicare and Medicaid. In addition, if at any time the Federal Government is not able to meet its debt payments due to Congress failing to appropriate funds for the payment of these obligations, the Federal Government may stop or delay making payments on its obligations, including funding for government programs in which we participate, such as Medicare and Medicaid. Failure of the government to make payments under these programs could have a material adverse effect on our business and consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Further, any failure by the United States Congress to complete the federal budget process and fund government operations may result in a Federal Government shutdown, potentially causing us to incur substantial costs without reimbursement under the Medicare program, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. As an example, the failure of the 2011 Joint Select Committee to meet its Deficit Reduction goal resulted in an automatic reduction in Medicare home health and hospice payments of 2% beginning April 1, 2013 ("sequestration" - suspended from May 1, 2020 through March 31, 2022; reinstated at 1% for the period April 1, 2022 through June 30, 2022 and at 2% thereafter). In addition, the Federal Reserve has increased interest rates repeatedly and significantly in recent quarters and may further increase or decrease interest rates in future quarters, impacting our cost of capital, our operating costs, and the economy as a whole.
Current wording
Any economic downturn, deepening of an economic downturn, continued deficit spending by the Federal Government or state budget pressures may result in a reduction in payments and covered services. Adverse economic developments in the United States could lead to a reduction in Federal Government expenditures, including government-funded programs in which we participate, such as Medicare and Medicaid. In addition, if at any time the Federal Government is not able to meet its debt payments due to Congress failing to appropriate funds for the payment of these obligations, the Federal Government may stop or delay making payments on its obligations, including funding for government programs in which we participate, such as Medicare and Medicaid. Failure of the government to make payments under these programs could have a material adverse effect on our business and consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Further, any failure by the United States Congress to complete the federal budget process and fund government operations may result in a Federal Government shutdown, potentially causing us to incur substantial costs without reimbursement under the Medicare program, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. As an example, the failure of the 2011 Joint Select Committee to meet its Deficit Reduction goal resulted in an automatic reduction in Medicare home health and hospice payments of 2% beginning April 1, 2013 (“sequestration” - suspended from May 1, 2020 through March 31, 2022; further extended by the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act of 2023, the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2023, and the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2024; the continuing resolution for further spending passed in the American Relief Act of 2025 (“ARA”) did waive the 4% pay-as-you-go sequestration, but the ARA did not halt reductions found in Medicare payment rules that took effect for fiscal year 2025, including those reductions that exceeded 2%). In addition, the Federal Reserve has increased interest rates repeatedly and significantly in recent quarters and may further increase or decrease interest rates in future quarters, impacting our cost of capital, our operating costs, and the economy as a whole.
Previous wording
Our hospice independent operating subsidiaries are subject to annual Medicare caps calculated by Medicare. With respect to our hospice independent operating subsidiaries, overall payments made by Medicare for each Medicare beneficiary are subject to caps calculated by Medicare, as discussed in greater detail in Item 1., Government Regulation. If payments received by any one of our hospice provider numbers exceeds the caps for the beneficiary, we are required to reimburse Medicare for payments received in excess of the caps, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. Additionally, the annual increase in Medicare beneficiary caps may not keep pace with the rate of inflation or increased operating costs as it applies to the costs of caring for such patients, potentially resulting in our hospice independent operating subsidiaries treating these patients at a loss.
Current wording
Our hospice independent operating subsidiaries are subject to annual Medicare caps calculated by Medicare. With respect to our hospice independent operating subsidiaries, overall payments made by Medicare for each Medicare beneficiary are subject to caps calculated by Medicare, as discussed in greater detail in Item 1., Government Regulation. If payments received by any one of our hospice provider numbers exceeds the caps for the beneficiary, we are required to reimburse Medicare for payments received in excess of the caps, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. Additionally, the annual increase in
Previous wording
Security breaches and other cyber-security incidents could subject us to significant liability. Data breaches and leaks, which represent a material risk to our business, are reported to have occurred with greater frequency in 2023 than in 2022 and 2021. Our business depends on the proper functioning and availability of our computer systems and networks. Our security measures designed to protect our information systems, data and patient health information and disaster recovery plan may not prevent damage, interruption, or breach of our information systems and operations. In addition, hardware, software or applications we use may contain defects in design or manufacture or other problems that could unexpectedly compromise the security of our information systems. Unauthorized parties may attempt to gain access to our systems or operations, or those of third parties with whom we do business, through fraud or other forms of deceiving our employees or contractors. In addition, costs and potential problems and interruptions associated with the implementation of new or upgraded systems and technology or with maintenance or support of existing systems also could disrupt or reduce the efficiency of our operations. If a cyber-security attack or other unauthorized attempt to access our systems, such as a ransomware attack, were to be successful, the incident could result in the theft, destruction, loss, misappropriation or release of confidential information or intellectual property, and could cause delays or disruptions that may materially impact our ability to provide various healthcare services. Any successful cyber-security attack or other unauthorized attempt to access our systems or operations also could result in negative publicity which could damage our reputation or brand with our patients, referral sources, payors or other third parties and could subject us to substantial regulatory, civil or criminal penalties, fines, investigations and enforcement actions, including under HIPAA and other federal and state privacy laws, including, for example, the California Consumer Privacy Act and Nevada Privacy Law, which includes a private right of action that may expose us to private litigation regarding our privacy practices and significant damages awards or settlements in civil litigation.
Current wording
Security breaches and other cyber-security incidents could subject us to significant liability. Data breaches and leaks, which represent a material risk to our business, are reported to have occurred with greater frequency and severity in 2024 than in prior years. Our business depends on the proper functioning and availability of our computer systems and networks. Our security measures designed to protect our information systems, data and patient health information and disaster recovery plan may not prevent damage, interruption, or breach of our information systems and operations. In addition, hardware, software or applications we use may contain defects in design or manufacture or other problems that could unexpectedly compromise the security of our information systems. Unauthorized parties may attempt to gain access to our systems or operations, or those of third parties with whom we do business, through fraud or other forms of deceiving our employees or contractors. In addition, costs and potential problems and interruptions associated with the implementation of new or upgraded systems and technology or with maintenance or support of existing systems also could disrupt or reduce the efficiency of our operations. If a cyber-security attack or other unauthorized attempt to access our systems, such as a ransomware attack, were to be successful, the incident could result in the theft, destruction, loss, misappropriation or release of confidential information or intellectual property, and could cause delays or disruptions that may materially impact our ability to provide various healthcare services. Any successful cyber-security attack or other unauthorized attempt to access our systems or operations also could result in negative publicity which could damage our reputation or brand with our patients, referral sources, payors or other third parties and could subject us to substantial regulatory, civil or criminal penalties, fines, investigations and enforcement actions, including under HIPAA and other federal and state privacy laws, including, for example, the California Consumer Privacy Act and Nevada Privacy Law, which includes a private right of action that may expose us to private litigation regarding our privacy practices and significant damages awards or settlements in civil litigation.
Previous wording
State efforts to regulate or deregulate the healthcare services industry or the construction or expansion of the number of home health, hospice or senior living operations could impair our ability to expand or result in increased competition. As discussed in greater detail in Item 1., Government Regulation, our ability to acquire or establish new home health, hospice or senior living operations or expand or provide new services at existing operations would be adversely affected if we are unable to obtain the necessary approvals, if there are changes in the standards applicable to those approvals, new laws or changes in applicable laws governing CON requirements (or increasing the circumstances where a CON is needed), or if we experience delays and increased expenses associated with obtaining those approvals. We may not be able to obtain licensure, CON approval, Medicare or Medicaid certification, Attorney General approval or other necessary approvals for future expansion projects. Conversely, and specific to the highly competitive senior living industry, the elimination or reduction of state regulations that limit the construction, expansion or renovation of new or existing communities could result in increased competition to us. In general, regulatory and other barriers to entry in the senior living industry are not prohibitive. Over the last several years, there has been a significant increase in the construction of new senior living communities, including in the markets where we provide services. This has resulted in increased competition in many of our markets. Such new competition may limit our ability to attract new residents, raise rents or otherwise expand our senior living business, which could have a material adverse effect on our revenues, results of operations and cash flow.
Current wording
State efforts to regulate or deregulate the healthcare services industry or the construction or expansion of the number of home health, hospice or senior living operations could impair our ability to expand or result in increased competition. As discussed in greater detail in Item 1., Government Regulation, our ability to acquire or establish new home health, hospice or senior living operations or expand or provide new services at existing operations would be adversely affected if we are unable to obtain the necessary approvals, if there are changes in the standards applicable to those approvals, new laws or changes in applicable laws governing CON requirements (or increasing the circumstances where a CON is needed), or if we experience delays and increased expenses associated with obtaining those approvals. We may not be able to obtain licensure, CON approval, Medicare or Medicaid certification, Attorney General approval or other necessary approvals for future expansion projects. In recent years, states including, but not limited to, California and Oregon have introduced additional regulatory reviews and other barriers to health care transactions. Conversely, and specific to the highly competitive senior living industry, the elimination or reduction of state regulations that limit the construction, expansion or renovation of new or existing communities could result in increased competition to us. In general, regulatory and other barriers to entry in the senior living industry are not prohibitive. Over the last several years, there has been a significant increase in the construction of new senior living communities, including in the markets where we provide services. This has resulted in increased competition in many of our markets. Such new competition may limit our ability to attract new residents, raise rents or otherwise expand our senior living business, which could have a material adverse effect on our revenues, results of operations and cash flow.
Previous wording
Required regulatory approvals could delay or prohibit transfers of our healthcare operations, which could result in periods in which we are unable to receive reimbursement for such properties. Our independent operating subsidiaries must be licensed under applicable state law and, depending upon the type of operation, certified or approved as providers under the Medicare and/or Medicaid programs. In the process of acquiring or transferring operating assets, our operations must receive change of ownership approvals from state licensing agencies, Medicare and Medicaid, and third party payors. If there are any delays in receiving regulatory approvals from the applicable federal, state or local government agencies, or from independent accreditation authorities that may be required by federal, state or local government agencies, or the inability to receive such approvals, such delays could result in delayed or lost reimbursement related to periods of service prior to the receipt of such approvals. By way of example, in 2022 California passed Assembly Bill 2673 which prohibits issuance of new hospice licenses and limits transfer of existing licenses.
Current wording
Required regulatory approvals could delay or prohibit transfers of our healthcare operations, which could result in periods in which we are unable to receive reimbursement for such properties. Our independent operating subsidiaries must be licensed under applicable state law and, depending upon the type of operation, certified or approved as providers under the Medicare and/or Medicaid programs. In the process of acquiring or transferring operating assets, our operations must receive change of ownership approvals from state licensing agencies, Medicare and Medicaid, and third-party payors. If there are any delays in receiving regulatory approvals from the applicable federal, state or local government agencies, or from independent accreditation authorities that may be required by federal, state or local government agencies, or the inability to receive such approvals, such delays could result in delayed or lost reimbursement related to periods of service prior to the receipt of such approvals. By way of example, in 2022 California passed Assembly Bill 2673 which prohibits issuance of new hospice licenses and limits transfer of existing licenses, and other states where we operate may introduce similar legislation in the future. In 2024, CMS implemented a rule prohibiting hospice ownership from being transferred more than once in a 36-month period.
Previous wording
Our revenue, financial condition and results of operations could be negatively impacted by any changes in the acuity mix of patients in our affiliated operations as well as payor mix and payment methodologies. Our revenue is determined in part by the acuity of home health and hospice patients and senior living residents. Changes in the acuity level of patients we attract, as well as our payor mix among Medicare, Medicaid, managed care organizations and private payors, significantly affect our profitability because we generally receive higher reimbursement rates for high acuity patients and because the payors reimburse us at different rates. For the year ended December 31, 2023, 62.6% of our revenue was provided by government payors that reimburse us at predetermined rates, which is typical. If we fail to maintain our proportion of high acuity patients or if there is any significant increase in the percentage of the patients of our independent operating subsidiaries for whom we receive Medicaid reimbursement, our results of operations may be adversely affected. Among other initiatives, these payors attempt to control healthcare costs by contracting with healthcare providers to obtain services on a discounted basis. We believe that this trend will continue and may limit reimbursements for healthcare services. If insurers or managed care companies from whom we receive substantial payments were to reduce the amounts they pay for services, we may lose patients if we choose not to renew our contracts with these insurers at lower rates.
Current wording
Our revenue, financial condition and results of operations could be negatively impacted by any changes in the acuity mix of patients in our affiliated operations as well as payor mix and payment methodologies. Our revenue is determined in part by the acuity of home health and hospice patients and senior living residents. Changes in the acuity level of patients we attract, as well as our payor mix among Medicare, Medicaid, managed care organizations and private payors, may significantly affect our profitability because we generally receive higher reimbursement rates for high acuity patients and because the payors reimburse us at different rates. For the year ended December 31, 2024, 61.5% of our revenue was provided by government payors that reimburse us at predetermined rates, which is typical. If we fail to maintain our proportion of high acuity patients or if there is any significant increase in the percentage of the patients of our independent operating subsidiaries for whom we receive Medicaid reimbursement, our results of operations may be adversely affected. Among other initiatives, these payors attempt to control healthcare costs by contracting with healthcare providers to obtain services on a discounted basis. We believe that this trend will continue and may limit reimbursements for healthcare services. If insurers or managed care companies from whom we receive substantial payments were to reduce the amounts they pay for services, we may lose patients if we choose not to renew our contracts with these insurers at lower rates.
Previous wording
We are subject to litigation that could result in significant legal costs and large settlement amounts or damage awards. Our business involves a significant risk of liability given the age and health of the patients and residents of our independent operating subsidiaries and the services we provide. The frequency and severity of litigation in the healthcare industry has increased, due in part to large verdicts and punitive damage awards. Claims are filed based upon a wide variety of assertions and theories, including deficiencies in conditions of participation under certain state and federal healthcare programs and wage and hour class actions. Plaintiffs’ attorneys have become increasingly aggressive in their pursuit of claims against healthcare providers, including home health, hospice and senior living providers, employing a wide variety of advertising and solicitation activities to generate more claims. Additionally, California, through its passage of AB 35, has increased the non-economic (i.e., pain and suffering) damages that may be recovered by attorneys on claims of professional negligence or malpractice in healthcare cases filed in California, and may embolden plaintiff’s attorneys to be more aggressive in their pursuit of facilities operated by our independent operating subsidiaries and the services provided through them. Since California’s passage of AB 35, Iowa and Nevada have enacted similar laws that increase the non-economic damages that may serve as the basis for the recovery for attorney’s fees in those states, which may stimulate additional litigation in those states and could have an adverse material affect on our financial performance. The defense of lawsuits may result in significant legal costs, regardless of the outcome. Further, such litigation against us or our independent operating subsidiaries may result in increased liability insurance premiums and/or a decline in available insurance coverage levels, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Current wording
We are subject to litigation that could result in significant legal costs and large settlement amounts or damage awards. Our business involves a significant risk of liability given the age and health of the patients and residents of our independent operating subsidiaries and the services we provide. The frequency and severity of litigation in the healthcare industry has increased, due in part to large verdicts and punitive damage awards. Claims are filed based upon a wide variety of assertions and theories, including deficiencies in conditions of participation under certain state and federal healthcare programs and wage and hour class actions. Plaintiffs’ attorneys have become increasingly aggressive in their pursuit of claims against healthcare providers, including home health, hospice and senior living providers, employing a wide variety of advertising and solicitation activities to generate more claims. Additionally, California, through its passage of AB 35, has increased the non-economic (i.e., pain and suffering) damages that may be recovered by attorneys on claims of professional negligence or malpractice in healthcare cases filed in California, and may embolden plaintiff’s attorneys to be more aggressive in their pursuit of facilities operated by our independent operating subsidiaries and the services provided through them. Since California’s passage of AB 35, Iowa and Nevada have enacted similar laws that increase the non-economic damages that may serve as the basis for the recovery for attorney’s fees in those states, which may stimulate additional litigation in those states and could have an adverse material effect on our financial performance. The defense of lawsuits may result in significant legal costs, regardless of the outcome. Further, such litigation against us or our independent operating subsidiaries may result in increased liability insurance premiums and/or a decline in available insurance coverage levels, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Previous wording
If our referral sources fail to view us as an attractive provider, or if our referral sources otherwise refer fewer patients or residents, our patient or resident base may decrease. We rely on appropriate referrals from physicians, hospitals and other healthcare providers in the communities we serve to attract appropriate residents and patients to our affiliated operations. Our referral sources are not obligated to refer business to us and may refer business to other healthcare providers. If we lose, or fail to maintain, existing relationships with our referral resources, fail to develop new relationships, or if we are perceived by our referral sources as not providing high quality patient care, our census could decline and our patient mix could change. In addition, if any of our referral sources have a reduction in patients whom they can refer due to a decrease in their business, our census could decline and patient mix could change.
Current wording
If our referral sources fail to view us as an attractive provider, or if our referral sources otherwise refer fewer patients or residents, our patient or resident base may decrease. We rely on appropriate referrals from physicians, hospitals and other healthcare providers in the communities we serve to attract appropriate residents and patients to our affiliated operations. Our referral sources are not obligated to refer business to us and may refer business to other healthcare providers. If we lose, or fail to maintain, existing relationships with our referral resources, fail to develop new relationships, or if we are perceived by our referral sources as not providing high quality patient care, our independent subsidiaries’ respective censuses could decline and our patient mix could change. In addition, if any of our referral sources have a reduction in patients whom they can refer due to a decrease in their business, our census could decline and patient mix could change.
Previous wording
If we are unable to obtain insurance, or if insurance becomes more costly for us to obtain, our business may be adversely affected. It may become more difficult and costly for us to obtain coverage for patient care liabilities and other risks, including property and casualty insurance. Our claims history, asset mix, or other factors may adversely affect our ability to obtain insurance at favorable rates. Recent legislation in Nevada that prohibits the reduction of available funds based on the costs of defending claims or litigation may result in higher premiums for our operations within that state. Our insurance carriers may require us to pay substantially higher premiums for the same or reduced coverage for insurance, including workers compensation, property and casualty, automobile, employment practices liability, directors and officers liability, employee healthcare and general and professional liability coverages. Further, many claims and other risks we face are not insurable. Attributable to the COVID-19 pandemic, insurers may increase their exclusions of infectious diseases or raise costs of coverage significantly affecting our ability to obtain insurance coverage.
Current wording
If we are unable to obtain insurance, or if insurance becomes more costly for us to obtain, our business may be adversely affected. It may become more difficult and costly for us to obtain coverage for patient care liabilities and other risks, including property and casualty insurance. Our claims history, asset mix, or other factors may adversely affect our ability to obtain insurance at favorable rates. Recent legislation in Nevada that prohibits the reduction of funds available to pay claims based on the costs of defending claims or litigation may result in higher premiums for our operations within that state. Similarly, recent legislation in California and Nevada increasing the amounts of non-economic damages recoverable in actions based on professional negligence against healthcare providers may also result in higher premiums for our operations within those states and limit the options for available coverage. Our insurance carriers may require us to pay substantially higher premiums for the same or reduced coverage for insurance, including workers compensation, property and casualty, automobile, employment practices liability, directors and officers liability, employee healthcare insurance benefits, and general and professional liability coverages. Further, many claims and other risks we face are not insurable. Climate change and the proliferation of natural disasters may increase the cost of coverage or make coverage impossible to obtain.
Previous wording
We retain certain risks related to our insurance coverage. Under its insurance policies, the Company bears the risk of loss up to specified deductible limits, which may be substantial if there is a surge in the volume of claims subject to the deductible. The Company recognizes obligations associated with these costs in the period in which a claim is incurred, including with respect to both reported claims and claims incurred but not reported. These costs generally are estimated based on our historical claims experience. Projections of self-insured retention losses are estimates that are subject to significant variability, and as a result, actual losses and expenses may be more or less than recorded liabilities.
Current wording
We retain certain risks related to our insurance coverage. Under our insurance policies, we bear the risk of loss up to specified deductible limits, which may be substantial if there is a surge in the volume of claims subject to the deductible. We recognize obligations associated with these costs in the period in which a claim is incurred, including with respect to both reported claims and claims incurred but not reported. These costs generally are estimated based on our historical claims experience. Projections of self-insured retention losses are estimates that are subject to significant variability, and as a result, our actual losses and expenses may be more or less than recorded liabilities.
Previous wording
Our self-insurance programs may expose us to significant and unexpected costs and losses. Our general liability and workers compensation insurance policies include self-insured retentions under which we are responsible to pay for a portion of each claim. We establish insurance loss reserves based on an estimation process that use information obtained from both company-specific and industry data. The estimation process requires us to continually monitor and evaluate the life cycle of claims. Using data obtained from this monitoring and our assumptions about emerging trends, we, along with an independent actuary, develop information about the size of ultimate claims based on historical experience and other available industry information. The most significant assumptions used in the estimation process include determining the trend in costs, the expected cost of claims incurred but not reported and the expected costs to settle or pay damages with respect to unpaid claims. It is possible, however, that the actual liabilities may exceed our estimates of loss. We may also experience an unexpectedly large number of successful claims or claims that result in costs or liability significantly in excess of our projections. For these and other reasons, our self-insurance reserves could prove to be inadequate, resulting in liabilities in excess of our available insurance and self-insurance. If a successful claim is made against us and it is not covered by our insurance or exceeds the insurance policy limits, our business may be negatively and materially impacted. Further, because our self-insured retentions under our general and professional liability and workers’ compensation program apply on a per claim basis, there is no limit to the maximum number of claims or the total amount for which we could be responsible in any policy period. We also self-insure our employee health benefits. With respect to our health benefits self-insurance, our reserves and premiums are computed based on a mix of company specific and general industry data. Even with a combination of limited company-specific loss data and general industry data, our loss reserves are based on actuarial estimate that may not correlate to actual loss experience in the future. Therefore, our reserves may prove to be insufficient and we may be exposed to significant and unexpected losses.
Current wording
Our self-insurance programs may expose us to significant and unexpected costs and losses. Our general liability and workers compensation insurance policies include self-insured retentions under which we are responsible to pay for a portion of each claim. We establish insurance loss reserves based on an estimation process that use information obtained from both company-specific and industry data. The estimation process requires us to continually monitor and evaluate the life cycle of claims. Using data obtained from this monitoring and our assumptions about emerging trends, we, along with an independent actuary, develop information about the size of ultimate claims based on historical experience and other available industry information. The most significant assumptions used in the estimation process include determining the trend in costs, the expected cost of claims incurred but not reported and the expected costs to settle or pay damages with respect to unpaid claims. It is possible, however, that the actual liabilities may exceed our estimates of loss. We may also experience an unexpectedly large number of successful claims or claims that result in costs or liability significantly exceeding our projections. For these and other reasons, our self-insurance reserves could prove to be inadequate, resulting in liabilities exceeding our available insurance and self-insurance reserves. If a successful claim is made against us and it is not covered by our insurance or exceeds the insurance policy limits, our business may be negatively and materially impacted. Further, because our self-insured retentions under our general and professional liability and workers’ compensation program apply on a per claim basis, there is no limit to the maximum number of claims or the total amount for which we could be responsible during any policy period. We also self-insure our employee health benefits. With respect to our health benefits self-insurance, our reserves and premiums are computed based on a mix of company-specific and general industry data. Even with a combination of limited company-specific loss data and general industry data, our loss reserves are based on actuarial estimates that may not correlate to actual loss experience in the future. Therefore, our reserves may prove to be insufficient, and we may be exposed to significant and unexpected losses.
Previous wording
The unionization of our workers may adversely affect our revenue and profitability. To date, with the exception of one preexisting bargaining unit at an operation acquired as part of a joint venture, our employees have chosen not to unionize. Throughout 2022 and 2023, however, there has been a nationwide trend of increasing union activity, including strikes in the health care industry and in locations, such as California, in which we operate. Increasing trends of service workers successfully organizing to unionize their workplaces, may increase the likelihood of our employees seeking to unionize their activities at one or more additional locations controlled by our independent operating subsidiaries. If union activity among our employees increases, our cost of doing business could increase, our operations could experience disruption, and affected operations may no longer be economical to continue operating. Further, labor disputes and unionization efforts, among our own employees or among the employees of our referral partners, payors, vendors, joint venture partners, acquisition targets, or other parties, could lead to work stoppages, slowdown, strikes, lockouts, and increased costs, which could materially impact our operations.
Current wording
The unionization of our workers may adversely affect our revenue and profitability. To date, with the exception of one joint venture, where certain employees had elected to unionize prior to our acquisition, our employees have chosen not to unionize. Throughout 2023 and 2024, however, there has been a nationwide trend of increasing union activity, including strikes in the healthcare industry and in states, such as California, in which we operate. Increasing trends of service workers successfully organizing to unionize their workplaces may increase the likelihood of our employees seeking to unionize their activities at one or more additional locations controlled by our independent operating subsidiaries. If union activity among our employees increases, our cost of doing business could increase, our operations could experience disruption, and affected operations may no longer be economical to continue operating. Further, labor disputes and unionization efforts, among our own employees or among the employees of our referral partners, payors, vendors, joint venture partners, acquisition targets, or other parties, could lead to work stoppages, slowdown, strikes, lockouts, and increased costs, which could materially and adversely impact our operations.
Previous wording
Because we lease most of our affiliated senior living communities, we could experience risks associated with leased property, including risks relating to lease termination, lease extensions and special charges, which could adversely affect our business, financial position or results of operations. As of December 31, 2023, we leased all of our senior living communities, except for one. We also leased all of our administrative offices. Most of our leases are triple-net leases, which means that, in addition to rent, we are required to pay for the costs related to the property (including property taxes, insurance, and maintenance and repair costs), the cost of which have increased since 2020 and may adversely affect us with future increases and operating expense reconciliations due for prior years. Under certain master leases, a breach at a single community could subject one or more of the other communities covered by the same master lease to the same default risk. Failure to comply with provider requirements is a default under several of the leases and master lease agreements. In addition, lease defaults could trigger cross-default provisions in our outstanding debt arrangements and other leases. With an indivisible lease, it is difficult to restructure the composition of the portfolio or economic terms of the lease without the consent of the landlord.
Current wording
Because we lease most of our affiliated senior living communities, we could experience risks associated with leased property, including risks relating to lease termination, lease extensions and special charges, which could adversely affect our business, financial position or results of operations. As of December 31, 2024, we leased all of our senior living communities, except for three. We also leased all of our administrative offices. Most of our leases are triple-net leases, which means that, in addition to rent, we are required to pay for the costs related to the property (including property taxes, insurance, and maintenance and repair costs), the cost of which tend to increase year-over year and may adversely affect us with future increases and operating expense reconciliations due for prior years. Under certain master leases, a breach at a single community could subject one or more of the other communities covered by the same master lease to the same default risk. Failure to comply with provider requirements is a default under several of the leases and master lease agreements. In addition, lease defaults could trigger cross-default provisions in our outstanding debt arrangements and other leases. With an indivisible lease, it is difficult to restructure the composition of the portfolio or economic terms of the lease without the consent of the landlord.
Previous wording
A housing downturn could decrease demand for assisted living services. Seniors often use the proceeds of home sales to fund their admission to assisted living communities. A downturn in the housing markets, such as the downturn that was ongoing in 2022 and 2023 as a result of higher than normal mortgage interest rates, could adversely affect seniors’ ability to afford our resident fees and entrance fees. If national or local housing markets enter a persistent decline in prices or transaction activity, our occupancy rates, revenues, results of operations and cash flow could be negatively impacted.
Current wording
A housing downturn could decrease demand for assisted living services. Seniors often use the proceeds of home sales to fund their admission to assisted living communities. A downturn in the housing markets, such as the slowdown in activity that was ongoing in 2023 and 2024 as a result of higher-than-normal mortgage interest rates, could adversely affect seniors’ ability to afford our resident fees and entrance fees. If national or local housing markets enter a persistent decline in prices or transaction activity, our occupancy rates, revenues, results of operations and cash flow could be negatively impacted.
Previous wording
Failure to generate sufficient cash flow to cover required payments or meet operating covenants under our long-term debt and operating leases could result in defaults under such agreements and cross-defaults under other debt or operating lease arrangements, which could harm our independent operating subsidiaries and cause us to lose operations or experience foreclosures. We have significant future operating lease obligations. We intend to continue financing operations through long-term operating leases, mortgage financing and other types of financing, including borrowings under our future credit facilities we may obtain. We may not generate sufficient cash flow from operations to cover required interest, principal and lease payments. If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow from operations in the future to service our debt or to make lease payments on our operating leases, we may be required, among other things, to seek additional financing in the debt or equity markets, refinance or restructure all or a portion of our indebtedness, sell selected assets, reduce or delay planned capital expenditures or delay or abandon desirable acquisitions. Such measures might not be sufficient to enable us to service our debt or to make lease payments on our operating leases. The failure to make required payments on our debt or operating leases or the delay or abandonment of our planned growth strategy could result in an adverse effect on our future ability to generate revenue and sustain profitability and subject us to foreclosure. In addition, any such financing, refinancing or sale of assets might not be available on terms that are economically favorable to us, or at all. Our financing arrangements contain restrictions, covenants and events of default that, among other things, could limit our ability to respond to market conditions, provide for capital investment needs or take advantage of business opportunities by restricting our ability to incur or guarantee additional indebtedness or requiring us to offer to repurchase such indebtedness in the event of a change of control or a change of control triggering event; pay dividends or make distributions; make investments or acquisitions; sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of certain assets; create liens; consolidate or merge; enter into transactions with affiliates; and prepay and repurchase or redeem certain indebtedness.
Current wording
Failure to generate sufficient cash flow to cover required payments or meet operating covenants under our long-term debt and operating leases could result in defaults under such agreements and cross-defaults under other debt or operating lease arrangements, which could harm our independent operating subsidiaries and cause us to lose operations or experience foreclosures. We have significant future operating lease obligations. We intend to continue financing operations through long-term operating leases, mortgage financing and other types of financing, including borrowings under future credit facilities we may obtain. We may not generate sufficient cash flow from operations to cover required interest, principal and lease payments. If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow from operations in the future to service our debt or to make lease payments on our operating leases, we may be required, among other things, to seek additional financing in the debt or equity markets, refinance or restructure all or a portion of our indebtedness, sell selected assets, reduce or delay planned capital expenditures or delay or abandon desirable acquisitions. Such measures might not be sufficient to enable us to service our debt or to make lease payments on our operating leases. The failure to make required payments on our debt or operating leases or the delay or abandonment of our planned growth strategy could adversely affect our future ability to generate revenue and sustain profitability and subject us to foreclosure. In addition, any such financing, refinancing or sale of assets might not be available on terms that are economically favorable to us, or at all. Our financing arrangements contain restrictions, covenants and events of default that, among other things, could limit our ability to respond to market conditions, provide for capital investment needs or take advantage of business opportunities by restricting our ability to incur or guarantee additional indebtedness or requiring us to offer to repurchase such indebtedness in the event of a change of control or a change of control triggering event; pay dividends or make distributions; make investments or acquisitions; sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of certain assets; create liens; consolidate or merge; enter into transactions with affiliates; and prepay and repurchase or redeem certain indebtedness.
Previous wording
Inflation may negatively impact profitability. The annual inflation rate in 2023 has impacted our operations, placing upward pricing pressure on all things from wages to supplies to energy costs. Inflation is expected to remain relatively consistent in 2024, but may continue to affect the Company’s profit in providing services. We have historically derived a substantial portion of our revenue from the Medicare program. We also derive revenue from state Medicaid and similar reimbursement programs. Payments under these programs generally provide for reimbursement levels that are adjusted for inflation annually. These adjustments may not continue in the future, and even if continued, such adjustments may not reflect the actual increase in our costs for providing healthcare services. Labor and supply expenses make up a substantial portion of our cost of services. Those expenses are subject to increase in periods of rising inflation and when labor shortages occur in the marketplace. Inflation has led, and may continue to lead, to increased interest rates, which have and could continue to increase our cost of capital, impair consumers’ ability to purchase our services, or otherwise harm us financially.
Current wording
Inflation may negatively impact profitability. The annual inflation rate in recent years has impacted our operations, placing upward pricing pressure on all things from wages to supplies to energy costs. Inflation is expected to ease in 2025 but may continue to affect the Company’s profit in providing services. We have historically derived a substantial portion of our revenue from the Medicare program. We also derive revenue from state Medicaid and similar reimbursement programs. Payments under these programs generally provide for reimbursement levels that are adjusted for inflation annually. These inflation-based increases may not continue in the future, such as in the case of Medicare payments subject to reduction under sequestration required by prior legislation. Even if these reimbursement rate increases continued, such adjustments may not reflect the actual increase in our costs for providing healthcare services. Labor and supply expenses make up a substantial portion of our cost of services. Those expenses are subject to increase in periods of rising inflation and when labor shortages occur in the marketplace. Inflation has led, and may continue to lead, to increased interest rates, which have and could continue to increase our cost of capital, impair consumers’ ability to purchase our services, or otherwise harm us financially.
Previous wording
Extreme weather, natural disasters, or other catastrophic events could adversely effect our results from operations. We operate and are subject to long term leases in areas particularly susceptible to damage or losses caused by catastrophic or extreme weather and other natural events, including fires, snow, rain or ice storms, windstorms, tornadoes, hurricanes, earthquakes, flooding and other severe weather. Many of our services require our employees to travel to patients’ homes by car. Adverse weather events could impair our ability to provide services and could cause substantial damages or losses to our communities or operations, which may not be covered by insurance. These events may also indirectly effect our business by increasing the cost of (or making unavailable) insurance on terms we find acceptable. Changes in regulations relating to climate change could require us to change the way we provide services and could result in increased costs without a corresponding increase in revenue.
Current wording
Extreme weather, natural disasters, or other catastrophic events could adversely affect our results from operations. We operate and are subject to long term leases in areas particularly susceptible to damage or losses caused by catastrophic or extreme weather and other natural events, including fires, snow, rain or ice storms, windstorms, tornadoes, hurricanes, earthquakes, landslides or mudslides, flooding and other severe weather. Many of our services require our employees to travel to patients’ homes by car. Adverse weather events could impair our ability to provide services and could cause substantial damages or losses to our communities or operations, which may not be covered by insurance. These events may also indirectly affect our business by increasing the cost of (or making unavailable) insurance on terms we find acceptable. Changes in regulations relating to climate change could require us to change the way we provide services and could result in increased costs without a corresponding increase in revenue.
Previous wording
Compliance with the regulations of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) may require us to make unanticipated expenditures which could increase our costs. Seventeen of our affiliated senior living communities are currently subject to regulatory agreements with HUD that give the Commissioner of HUD broad authority to require us to be replaced as the operator of those communities in the event that the Commissioner determines there are operational deficiencies at such communities under HUD regulations. Compliance with HUD’s requirements can often be difficult because these requirements are not always consistent with the requirements of other federal and state agencies and, in some instances, may require us to make additional capital expenditures to meet HUD’s heightened requirements. Appealing a failed inspection can be costly and time-consuming and, if we do not successfully remediate the failed inspection, we could be precluded from obtaining HUD financing in the future or we may encounter limitations or prohibitions on our operation of HUD-insured communities.
Current wording
Compliance with the regulations of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) may require us to make unanticipated expenditures which could increase our costs. Seventeen of our affiliated senior living communities are currently subject to regulatory agreements with HUD that give the Commissioner of HUD broad authority to have us replaced as the operator of those communities in the event that the Commissioner determines there are operational deficiencies at such communities under HUD regulations. Compliance with HUD’s requirements can often be difficult because these requirements are not always consistent with the requirements of other federal and state agencies and, in some instances, may require us to make additional capital expenditures to meet HUD’s heightened requirements. Appealing a failed inspection can be costly and time-consuming and, if we do not successfully remediate the failed inspection, we could be precluded from obtaining HUD financing in the future or we may encounter limitations or prohibitions on our operation of HUD-insured communities.
Rearranged current paragraphs (1)
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
Medicare beneficiary caps may not keep pace with the rate of inflation or increased operating costs as it applies to the costs of caring for such patients, potentially resulting in our hospice independent operating subsidiaries treating these patients at a loss.