Immunovant, Inc.

Current report

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Current report

From time to time, we may publicly disclose interim, preliminary or topline data from our clinical trials, which are based on a preliminary analysis of then-available data. These results and related findings and conclusions are subject to change following a full analysis of all data related to the particular trial.

Current report

We also make assumptions, estimations, calculations and conclusions as part of our analyses of data, and we may not have received or had the opportunity to fully and carefully evaluate all data. As a result, the interim, preliminary and topline results that we report may differ from future results of the same trials, or different conclusions or considerations may qualify such results, once additional data have been received and fully evaluated. Topline data also remain subject to audit and verification procedures that may result in the final data being materially different from the topline data we previously reported. As a result, interim, preliminary and topline data should be viewed with caution until the final data are available. Interim data are subject to the risk that one or more of the clinical outcomes may materially change as patient enrollment continues and more patient data become available. Adverse differences between interim, preliminary or topline data and final data could significantly harm our business prospects. Further, disclosure of preliminary or interim data by us or by our competitors could result in increased volatility in the price of our shares.

Current report

Further, other parties, including our collaborators or regulatory agencies, may not accept or agree with our assumptions, estimates, calculations, conclusions or analyses or may interpret or weigh the importance of data differently, which could impact the value of the particular program, the approvability or commercialization of a particular product candidate and our business in general.

Current report

In addition, our analyses, interpretations and presentation of clinical trial data may evolve over time, including through changes to primary or secondary endpoints, statistical methods, endpoint hierarchies, or the methodologies used to calculate or present them. We may make these changes to ongoing studies. We may also conduct post-hoc, retrospective, subgroup or other modified data or statistical analyses after database lock or unblinding of a clinical trial. Regulatory authorities may give less weight to, or decline to accept, results based on such changes or analyses conducted thereafter, including on the basis that such changes in endpoints or analytical methodology are not adequately justified, which could adversely affect our ability to obtain regulatory approval.

Current report

In addition, the information we choose or are required to publicly disclose regarding a particular study or clinical trial is based on what is typically extensive information, and you or others may not agree with what we determine is the material or otherwise appropriate information to include in our disclosure. Any information we determine not to disclose may ultimately be deemed significant with respect to future decisions, conclusions, views, activities or otherwise regarding a particular product, product candidate or our business. If the interim, preliminary or topline data that we report differ from later, final or actual results, or if others, including our collaborators or regulatory authorities, disagree with the conclusions reached, our ability to obtain approval for and commercialize our product candidates and our business, operating results, prospects or financial condition may be harmed.

Current report

Our biopharmaceutical product candidates that are in clinical development or preclinical studies will require, as applicable, extensive clinical testing before a New Drug Application (“NDA”) or other similar application for regulatory approval, such as a Biologics License Application (“BLA”) or an application for marketing authorization in the European Union (“E.U.”) or United Kingdom (“U.K.”), may be submitted, or extensive preclinical testing before an Investigational New Drug application (“IND”) or an application for authorization to conduct a clinical trial in the E.U. or U.K. may be submitted, a Clinical Trial Application (“CTA”). We cannot provide any assurance that we will submit an IND, NDA, CTA or other similar application for regulatory approval for our product candidates within projected timeframes or whether any such application will be accepted for review or ultimately approved by the relevant regulatory authorities.

Current report

We cannot provide any assurance that any clinical trials will be conducted as planned or completed on schedule, if at all. Clinical trials and preclinical studies are very expensive, time-consuming and difficult to design and implement, in part because they are subject to rigorous regulatory requirements. The clinical trial process is also time-consuming and costly and is dependent upon collaboration with many contract research organizations (“CROs”) and clinical trial sites. For instance, the FDA, an institutional review board (“IRB”), an Ethics Committee (“EC”) or other regulatory authorities may not agree with the proposed analysis plans or trial design for the clinical trials of our product candidates, and during any such review, may identify unexpected efficacy or safety concerns, which may delay the effective date of an IND or approval of an NDA, BLA or similar application. The FDA, the European Medicines Agency (“EMA”), the European Commission, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (“MHRA”) or other relevant regulatory authority may also find that the benefits of any product candidate in any applicable indication do not outweigh its risks in a manner sufficient to grant regulatory approval.

Current report

The FDA or other regulatory authorities may also not agree with the scope of our proposed investigational plan. For example, they may find that our proposed development program is not sufficient to support a marketing authorization application, or that the proposed indication is considered to be too broad. Moreover, the FDA or other regulatory authorities may also refuse or impose certain restrictions on our reliance on data supporting our clinical trial application or marketing authorization application should such data originate from studies outside of the relevant jurisdiction or be affected by regulatory non-compliance, including issues of data integrity. In the E.U., data derived from clinical trials that were conducted outside the E.U. cannot be used to support a CTA unless the clinical trial was registered on a relevant database. In each case, this could delay the clinical development and authorization timeline for a given product candidate.

Current report

•the inability to generate sufficient data to support the initiation or continuation of clinical trials;

Current report

•difficulty identifying patients and enrolling them in clinical trials and other studies, including as a result of competing trials run by other pharmaceutical companies;

Current report

•the failure by our CROs or other third parties to adhere to clinical trial agreements;

Current report

•a lack of clinical benefit or effectiveness being demonstrated during clinical trials;

Current report

•changes in the market that render continued development of a product candidate no longer reasonable or commercially attractive;

Current report

•the cost of clinical trials of our product candidates being greater than we anticipated;

Current report

•changes to our statistical analysis plans or the method of calculating primary or secondary endpoints, including changes required by, or subsequently rejected by, the FDA or other regulatory authorities;

Current report

•changes in the approval policies or regulations of the FDA or other regulatory authorities;

Current report

•other regulatory issues, including the receipt of any inspectional observations on FDA’s Form-483, Warning or Untitled Letters, clinical holds or complete response letters or similar communications/objections by other regulatory authorities.

Current report

We, the FDA or other regulatory authorities may suspend our clinical trials in an entire country at any time, or an IRB/EC may suspend our clinical trial sites within any country, if it appears that we or our collaborators, or the principal investigator, are failing to conduct a trial in accordance with the protocol, applicable regulatory requirements, including Good Clinical Practice (“GCP”) regulations, that we are exposing participants to unacceptable health risks, or if the FDA or other regulatory authority finds deficiencies in our IND or equivalent applications for other countries or in the manner in which clinical trials are conducted. Such authorities may suspend or terminate a clinical trial due to a number of factors, including failure to conduct the clinical trial in accordance with regulatory requirements or our clinical protocols, inspection of the clinical trial operations or trial site by the FDA, the competent authorities of the E.U. Member States and the U.K. or other regulatory authorities resulting in the imposition of a clinical hold, unforeseen safety issues or adverse side effects, failure to demonstrate a clinical benefit from using a product candidate, changes in governmental regulations or administrative actions, developments on trials conducted by us or our competitors for related technology that raises regulatory concerns about risk to patients of the technology broadly, or lack of adequate funding to continue the clinical trial. Therefore, we cannot predict with any certainty the schedule for commencement and completion of future clinical trials.

Current report

Moreover, principal investigators for our clinical trials may serve as scientific advisors or consultants to us from time to time and receive compensation in connection with such services. Under certain circumstances, we may be required to report some of these relationships to the FDA or other regulatory authorities. The FDA or other regulatory authorities may conclude that a financial relationship between us and a principal investigator has created a conflict of interest or otherwise affected the integrity of the study. The FDA or other regulatory authorities may therefore question the integrity of the data generated at the applicable clinical trial site and the utility of the clinical trial itself may be jeopardized. This could result in a delay in approval, or rejection, of our marketing and authorization applications by the FDA or other regulatory authorities, as the case may be, and may ultimately lead to the denial of marketing approval of any of our product candidates.

Current report

In addition, for our product candidates that are in clinical development, prior to our acquisition of the rights to those product candidates we had no involvement with or control over the preclinical or clinical development of those product candidates. We are therefore dependent on our licensing and other transaction partners having conducted such research and development in accordance with the applicable protocols and legal, regulatory and scientific standards, having used appropriately regulated and compliant equipment and devices during the preclinical or clinical development, having accurately reported the results of all clinical trials and other research they conducted prior to our acquisition of the rights to those product candidates, having correctly collected and interpreted the data from these trials and other research and having supplied us with complete information, data sets and reports required to adequately demonstrate the results reported through the date of our acquisition of these product candidates. Problems associated with the pre-acquisition development of our product candidates could result in increased costs and delays in the commercialization or development of our product candidates, which could harm our ability to generate any future revenue from sales of our product candidates following regulatory approval.

Current report

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

Current report

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

Current report

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Current report

Item 5. Other Information.

Current report

During the three months ended June 30, 2026, none of our directors or Section 16 reporting officers adopted, modified orterminated any Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement or non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement (as such terms are defined in Item 408 of the SEC’s Regulation S-K) with respect to the trading of Immunovant common stock.

Previous report

Risks Related to Our Business, Financial Position and Capital Requirements

Previous report

We rely on the HanAll Agreement to provide us rights to the core intellectual property relating to IMVT-1402 and batoclimab. Any termination or loss of significant rights under the HanAll Agreement would adversely affect our development and commercialization of IMVT-1402 and batoclimab.

Previous report

We have licensed our core intellectual property relating to IMVT-1402 and batoclimab from HanAll under the HanAll Agreement. The HanAll Agreement imposes a variety of obligations on us, including those relating to exclusivity, territorial rights, development, commercialization, funding, payment, diligence, sublicensing, insurance, intellectual property protection and other matters. If we materially breach any of our obligations under the HanAll Agreement and are unable to cure that breach within the time frame specified under the HanAll Agreement, we may be required to pay damages to HanAll and they may have the right to terminate the HanAll Agreement, which would result in us being unable to develop or manufacture our products. We have commenced discussions with HanAll regarding the potential return of certain rights for batoclimab.

Previous report

Biotechnology and pharmaceutical license agreements are complex and certain provisions in the HanAll Agreement may be susceptible to multiple interpretations. The resolution of any dispute or disagreement involving contract interpretation that may arise in relation to the HanAll Agreement could affect the scope of our rights to our product candidates or affect financial or other obligations under the HanAll Agreement or other agreements related to the development and commercialization of our product candidates, either of which could harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Previous report

We continue to anticipate sharing top-line results from the two batoclimab Phase 3 TED studies concurrently in the first half of calendar year 2026. HanAll has a variety of interests in the licensed products including under the HanAll Agreement and outside of our Licensed Territories and may as a result of those interests disagree with, or initiate a dispute with respect to, our development or commercialization plans for batoclimab. While the HanAll Agreement gives us final control over development and regulatory decisions relating to batoclimab in our Licensed Territories, HanAll may disagree with our future plans for batoclimab and we may not reach an agreement with respect to batoclimab, which could result in HanAll initiating a dispute for alleged breach of the HanAll Agreement and such a dispute could result in arbitration or litigation. In the event that HanAll asserts a breach, we do not believe there would be any basis for such a claim, and we would vigorously contest such a claim if made. Any potential dispute with HanAll could be very expensive and time-consuming, may divert our management’s attention from our core business, and may result in unfavorable results that materially impact our business. In addition, discontinuing further development of and regulatory submissions for batoclimab could impact and result in disputes with third parties such as with respect to the contract manufacturing of batoclimab which may be time consuming and expensive to resolve.

Previous report

Risks Related to Development, Regulatory Approval and Commercialization

Previous report

Our product candidates are still in clinical development and will require extensive clinical testing before we are prepared to submit a BLA or other similar application for regulatory approval. For example, we initiated potentially registrational trials for IMVT-1402 in Graves’ disease (“GD”), difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (“D2T RA”), myasthenia gravis (“MG”), chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (“CIDP”) and Sjögren’s disease (“SjD”) and a proof-of-concept trial in cutaneous lupus erythematosus (“CLE”). Except for D2T RA and CLE, the first top-line data for any of the studies is not expected until sometime in calendar year 2027, assuming we can fully enroll and successfully complete the relevant trials according to our anticipated timelines. We cannot provide any assurance that any clinical trials will be conducted as planned or completed on schedule, if at all. Clinical trials are very expensive and difficult to design and implement, in part because they are subject to rigorous regulatory requirements. The clinical trial process is also time-consuming and costly and is dependent upon collaboration with many contract research organizations (“CROs”) and clinical trial sites.

Previous report

•continuation of previously identified safety issues;

Previous report

•lack of effectiveness during clinical trials;

Previous report

•slower than expected rates of patient recruitment or failure to recruit suitable patients to participate in a trial;

Previous report

•imposition of a temporary or permanent clinical hold by regulatory agencies for a number of reasons, including after review of an investigational new drug application (“IND”) or amendment, a clinical trial application (“CTA”) or amendment, or equivalent application or amendment; as a result of a new safety finding that presents unreasonable risk to clinical trial participants; a negative finding from a GCP inspection of our clinical trial operations or trial sites; developments in trials conducted by in-class competitors that raise regulatory concerns about risk to patients of the class broadly; or if the regulator finds that the investigational protocol or plan is clearly deficient to meet its stated objectives;

Previous report

•failure to perform in accordance with the FDA’s or any other regulatory authority’s current good clinical practices (“cGCPs”) requirements, or other regulatory guidelines in other countries;

Previous report

•ethics committees issuing negative opinions regarding a clinical trial or requiring substantial modifications of a proposed clinical trial;

Previous report

Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property

Previous report

If we fail to comply with our obligations under any license, collaboration or other agreements, including the HanAll Agreement, we may be required to pay damages and could lose intellectual property rights that are necessary for developing and protecting our product candidates.

Previous report

We have licensed certain intellectual property rights, including certain intellectual property rights covering IMVT-1402 and batoclimab from HanAll. We depend, and will continue to depend, on the HanAll Agreement for the rights to develop, manufacture and commercialize our product candidates. If, for any reason, the rights granted to us under the HanAll Agreement are terminated or we otherwise lose those rights, it would adversely affect our business. The HanAll Agreement also imposes, and any future collaboration agreements or license agreements we enter into are likely to impose, various development, commercialization, funding, milestone payment, royalty, diligence, sublicensing, insurance, patent prosecution and enforcement or other obligations on us.

Previous report

If we materially breach any of those obligations, or use the intellectual property licensed to us in an unauthorized manner, we may be required to pay damages and HanAll, as the licensor, may have the right to terminate the HanAll Agreement, which could result in us being unable to develop, manufacture and sell products that are covered by the HanAll Agreement or having to negotiate new or reinstated licenses on less favorable terms or enable a competitor to gain access to the licensed technology.

Previous report

General Risks Related to an Investment in Our Securities

Previous report

The intended tax effects of our corporate structure and intercompany arrangements depend on the application of the tax laws of various jurisdictions and on how we operate our business.

Previous report

Our wholly-owned subsidiary, ISL, and our controlling stockholder, RSL, are incorporated under the laws of Bermuda and are tax residents of the U.K. Further, we currently have other subsidiaries that are domiciled in the U.K., Switzerland and the U.S. If any of our product candidates receives approval by applicable regulatory bodies, we expect to conduct increased operations through our subsidiaries in various countries and tax jurisdictions where such approvals have been granted, in part through intercompany service agreements between us, our parent company and our subsidiaries. In that case, we anticipate that our corporate structure and intercompany transactions, including the manner in which we develop and use our intellectual property, will be organized so that we can achieve our business objectives in a tax-efficient manner and in compliance with applicable transfer pricing rules and regulations. If two or more affiliated companies are located in different countries or tax jurisdictions, the tax laws and regulations of each country generally will require that transfer prices be the same as those between unrelated companies dealing at arms’ length and that appropriate documentation be maintained to support the transfer prices. While we believe that we operate in compliance with applicable transfer pricing laws and intend to continue to do so, our transfer pricing procedures and determinations are not binding on applicable tax authorities. If tax authorities in any country were to successfully challenge our transfer pricing procedures and determinations as not reflecting arms’ length transactions, they could require us to adjust our transfer pricing procedures and determinations and thereby could require us to reallocate our income to reflect these revised transfer prices, which could result in a higher tax liability to us. In addition, if the country from which the income is reallocated does not agree with the reallocation, both countries could tax the same income, potentially resulting in double taxation. If tax authorities were to allocate income to a higher tax jurisdiction, subject our income to double taxation or assess interest and penalties, it could increase our consolidated tax liability, which could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Previous report

Significant judgment is required in evaluating our tax positions and determining our provision for income taxes. During the ordinary course of business, there are many transactions and calculations for which an ultimate tax determination is uncertain. For example, in January 2026, we engaged in certain internal transactions in connection with the internal reorganization and transfer of intellectual property rights related to the Company’s product candidates between two wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company. We intend for such transactions to qualify as transactions that are generally tax-free for U.S. federal income tax purposes and non-U.S. tax purposes. The anticipated tax consequences of such transactions depend upon facts and assumptions regarding the value of the Company’s intellectual property, the past and future conduct of our subsidiaries and certain other matters that may prove to be incorrect or incomplete. As such, there can be no assurance that the relevant taxing authorities will not assert that the actual tax treatment of such transactions differs from our intended tax treatment. The application of tax laws across countries and taxing jurisdictions can be subject to diverging and sometimes conflicting interpretations by tax authorities of these jurisdictions. It is not uncommon for taxing authorities in different countries to have conflicting views for instance with respect to, among other things, the manner in which the arms’ length standard is applied for transfer pricing purposes or with respect to the valuation of intellectual property. In addition, tax laws are dynamic and subject to change as new laws are passed and new interpretations of the law are issued or applied. Moreover, certain relevant tax, accounting and other laws have special application with respect to “affiliated,” “combined” or similar groups, which may include RSL, ISL and their respective subsidiaries and which may impact the tax liabilities of the companies. We continue to assess the impact of such changes in tax laws on our business and may determine that changes to our structure, practice or tax positions are necessary in light of such changes and developments in the tax laws of other jurisdictions in which we operate. Such changes may nevertheless be ineffective in avoiding an increase in our consolidated tax liability, which could harm our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Previous report

During the quarter ended December 31, 2025, no director or officer (as defined in Rule 16a-1 under the Exchange Act)adopted orterminated any Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement or non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement (in each case, as defined in Item 408(a) of Regulation S-K), except as disclosed below.

Previous report

(1) Contract, instruction, or written plan to satisfy the affirmative defense of Rule 10b5-1(c) under the Exchange Act.