OP Bancorp
For the period ended Mar 31, 2026. Filed May 15, 2026.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's report for each of its first three quarters. The financial statements are not audited. It shows how the business has moved since the last annual report, and what management says changed.
Mar 31, 2026 · Filed May 15, 2026
OPBK$14.76-0.1%Stored close · as of Nov 6, 2026
What changed in Risk Factors?
Read the current filingPrevious report: 10-Q
Period ended 2025-09-30; filed 2025-11-07.
0001722010-25-000014
Item 1A. Risk FactorsUnregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of ProceedsCurrent report: 10-Q
Period ended 2026-03-31; filed 2026-05-15.
0001722010-26-000014
Item 1A. Risk FactorsUnregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of ProceedsThe baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.
Compared 84 previous paragraphs and 111 current paragraphs.
40 unchanged; 17 reworded; 54 added; 26 removed; 1 previous and 0 current paragraphs rearranged.
Tables are not compared: 0 previous and 0 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.
A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.
Added paragraphs (54)
Current report
In addition, many of our agreements with third‑party service providers limit our ability to recover damages, even for negligent actions that may result in customer harm, regulatory scrutiny, or enforcement actions. Regulatory requirements generally apply directly to financial institutions rather than to their service providers, and we expect that our regulators would hold us responsible for deficiencies in or failures of our third‑party relationships, including deficiencies related to the use of AI technologies by those providers. Such deficiencies could result in supervisory findings, enforcement actions, civil money penalties, litigation, customer remediation obligations, reputational harm, or other administrative or judicial penalties or fines, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Current report
Volatility and uncertainty in interest rates, combined with Iran-related energy concerns that may contribute to higher inflation and operating costs, could adversely affect our loan portfolio, interest income, and financial condition, and may result in increased credit losses or higher provision expense.
Current report
A federal government shutdown could adversely affect customers that depend on government contracts, grants, or other government-related revenue, which may impair their ability to service loans or increase deposit withdrawals. In addition, shutdowns may delay the processing of government‑backed loans and the recognition of related income. In particular, the SBA typically suspends approvals under its core programs, including the 7(a) and 504 programs, during a shutdown, delaying loan closings and creating uncertainty for borrowers and lenders. Although we may continue internal processing and underwriting, final approvals and disbursements depend on SBA system availability. The timing, duration, and frequency of government shutdowns are unpredictable, and prolonged disruptions could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Current report
The small- and medium-sized businesses that we lend to may have fewer resources to weather adverse business developments, which may impair a borrower’s ability to repay a loan, and such impairment could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Current report
We target our business development and marketing strategy primarily to serve the banking and financial services needs of small- to medium-sized businesses. These businesses generally have fewer financial resources in terms of capital or borrowing capacity than larger entities, frequently have smaller market shares than their competition, may be more vulnerable to economic downturns, often need significant additional capital to expand or compete and may experience substantial volatility in operating results, any of which may impair a borrower’s ability to repay a loan. In addition, the success of a small- and medium-sized business often depends on the management talents and efforts of one or two people or a small group of people, and the death, disability or resignation of one or more of these people could have a material adverse impact on the business and its ability to repay its loan. If general economic conditions negatively impact the markets in which we operate and our borrowers are otherwise affected by adverse business developments, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected.
Current report
Our single family residential loan product consists primarily of non-qualified single family home mortgage loans which may be considered less liquid and more risky.
Current report
The non-qualified single-family home mortgage loans that we originate are designed to assist mainly Korean-Americans who have recently immigrated to the United States and those Korean-Americans without sufficient documentation to qualify for a traditional home mortgage loan and as such are willing to provide higher down payment amounts and pay higher interest rates and fees in return for reduced documentation requirements. Non-qualified single-family home mortgage loans are considered to have a higher degree of risk and are less liquid than qualified single-family home mortgage loans because non-qualified loans are not able to be securitized and can only be sold directly to other financial institutions. Qualified loans require a minimum of two years of tax returns for borrowers to demonstrate their ability to repay the loan and other standard documentation to qualify for securitization. For non-qualified loans we do not require the standard documentation required for qualified loans. For example, we will typically require only one year of tax returns and only pay-stub verification of employment. We attempt to address this enhanced risk through our underwriting process, including requiring larger down payments and, in some cases, interest reserves.
Current report
As a result of the organic growth of our loan portfolio over the past five years, a large portion of our loans and of our lending relationships are of relatively recent origin. In general, loans do not begin to show signs of credit deterioration or default until they have been outstanding for some period of time, a process referred to as “seasoning.” As a result, a portfolio of older loans will usually behave more predictably than a newer portfolio.
Current report
Because a large portion of our portfolio is relatively new, the current level of delinquencies and defaults may not represent the level that may prevail as the portfolio becomes more seasoned. If delinquencies and defaults increase, we may be required to increase our provision for credit losses, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. For information about the average age of our loans, see MD&A. Financial Condition — Nonperforming Loans inthe 2025 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Current report
Recent changes to the requirements for new SBA loans may significantly reduce our ability to participate in these programs.
Current report
In February 2026, SBA announced revisions to its SBA loan program eligibility requirements, effective March 1, 2026, eliminating the prior exception that permitted limited ownership by certain non‑U.S. persons. Because a substantial portion of the Company’s banking activities involves SBA lending, this change could reduce the pool of eligible borrowers and adversely affect SBA loan originations, secondary market activity, and customer relationships. While management has evaluated the potential impact of this rule change on its SBA lending operations to date, the Company cannot predict the full effect on future lending volumes, asset quality, results of operations, or financial condition, particularly if SBA requirements or related federal policies continue to evolve.
Current report
SBA lending is an important part of our business. Our SBA lending program is dependent upon the U.S. federal government, and we face specific risks associated with originating SBA loans.
Current report
Our SBA lending program is dependent upon the U.S. federal government. As an approved participant in the SBA Preferred Lender’s Program (an “SBA Preferred Lender”), we enable our clients to obtain SBA loans without being subject to the potentially lengthy SBA approval process necessary for lenders that are not SBA Preferred Lenders. The SBA periodically reviews the lending operations of participating lenders to assess, among other things, whether the lender exhibits prudent risk management. When weaknesses are identified, the SBA may request corrective actions or impose enforcement actions, including revocation of the lender’s SBA Preferred Lender status. If we lose our status as an SBA Preferred Lender, we may lose some or all of our customers to lenders who are SBA Preferred Lenders, and as a result we could experience a material adverse effect to our financial results. Further, any changes to the SBA program in addition to those described in the preceding risk factor, such as changes to the level of guarantee provided by the federal government on SBA loans, changes to program specific rules impacting volume eligibility under the guaranty program, as well as changes to the program amounts authorized by Congress, may also have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, any default by the U.S. government on its obligations or any prolonged government shutdown could, among other things, impede our ability to originate SBA loans or sell such loans in the secondary market, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Current report
Our deposit portfolio includes significant concentrations and a large percentage of our deposits is attributable to a relatively small number of clients.
Current report
As a commercial bank, we provide services to a number of clients whose deposit levels vary considerably and have some seasonality. The loss of any combination of these depositors, or a significant decline in the deposit balances due to ordinary course fluctuations related to these customers’ businesses, would adversely affect our liquidity and require us to raise deposit rates to attract new deposits, purchase federal funds or borrow funds on a short-term basis to replace such deposits. Depending on the interest rate environment and competitive factors, low cost deposits may need to be replaced with higher cost funding, resulting in a decrease in net interest income and net income. While these events could have a material impact on our results, we expect, in the ordinary course of business, that these deposits will fluctuate and believe we are capable of mitigating this risk, as well as the risk of losing one of these depositors, through additional liquidity, and business generation in the future. However, should a significant number of these customers leave, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Current report
We maintain an allowance for credit losses based on our estimate of current expected credit losses in our loan portfolio, which relies on analytical models incorporating portfolio composition, growth, economic forecasts, and other assumptions. These models involve significant judgment and may be inaccurate, particularly during periods of market stress, unforeseen events, or due to design or implementation limitations. If our models used for credit loss estimation, interest rate risk, asset‑liability management, or fair value measurements are inadequate, our allowance for credit losses may be insufficient, or the value of financial instruments may fluctuate unexpectedly, resulting in increased losses. In addition, we may not identify all deteriorating loans in a timely manner, and credit quality could decline more rapidly than anticipated, requiring additional provisions for credit losses. Regulatory review of our allowance and related valuations may also result in required adjustments. Any of these factors could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Current report
Environmental liabilities could materially and adversely affect our business and financial condition.
Current report
In the course of our business, we may foreclose and take title to real estate, and could be subject to environmental liabilities with respect to these properties. We may be held liable to a governmental entity or to third parties for property damage, personal injury, investigation and clean-up costs incurred by these parties in connection with environmental contamination, or we may be required to investigate or clear up hazardous or toxic substances, or chemical releases at a property. The costs associated with investigation or remediation activities could be substantial. In addition, as the owner or former owner of any contaminated site, we may be subject to common law claims by third parties based on damages, and costs resulting from environmental contamination emanating from the property. If we ever become subject to significant environmental liabilities, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
Current report
From time to time, we may implement or may acquire new lines of business or offer new products and services within existing lines of business. There are substantial risks and uncertainties associated with these efforts, particularly in instances where the markets are not fully developed. In developing and marketing new lines of business and new products and services we may invest significant time and resources. We may not achieve target timetables for the introduction and development of new lines of business and new products or services and price and profitability targets may not prove feasible. External factors, such as regulatory compliance obligations, competitive alternatives, and shifting market preferences, may also impact the successful implementation of a new line of business or a new product or service. Furthermore, any new line of business and/or new product or service could have a significant impact on the effectiveness of our system of internal controls. Failure to successfully manage these risks in the development and implementation of new lines of business or new products or services could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Current report
We face significant capital and other regulatory requirements as a financial institution. Although management believes that the Company has sufficient capital to fund operations and growth initiatives, we may need to raise additional capital in the future to business needs, growth, or regulatory requirements. Our ability to raise additional capital will depend on a number of factors, including market conditions, investor perceptions of the banking industry, regulatory environment, and our financial condition and operating performance. During 2025, the Company demonstrated access to the capital markets through the issuance of subordinated debt. However, there can be no assurance that additional capital will be available when needed or that such capital could be raised on terms acceptable to us. Any limitation on our ability to access the capital markets could adversely affect our financial condition, liquidity, results of operations, and ability to maintain regulatory capital compliance.
Current report
Processes that management uses to estimate our expected credit losses and to measure the fair value of financial instruments, as well as the processes used to estimate the effects of changing interest rates and other market measures on our financial condition and results of operations, depend upon the use of analytical and forecasting models and, ultimately, on the judgment of our executive leadership and our management-level accounting and credit analysis personnel. These models reflect assumptions that may not be accurate, particularly in times of market stress or other unforeseen circumstances. Even if these assumptions are accurate, the models may prove to be inadequate or inaccurate because of other flaws in their design or their implementation.
Current report
We have a significant deferred tax asset and we cannot assure that it will be fully realized.
Current report
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are the expected future tax amounts for the temporary differences between the carrying amounts and tax basis of assets and liabilities computed using enacted tax rates and may depend, upon other things, on the likelihood and timing of the recognition of taxable income against which accrued operating loss carryforwards may be offset. We regularly assess available positive and negative evidence to determine whether it is more likely than not that our net deferred tax asset will be realized. Realization and valuation of a deferred tax asset requires us to apply significant judgment and is inherently speculative because it requires estimates that cannot be made with certainty. If we were to determine at some point in the future that we will not achieve sufficient future taxable income to realize our net deferred tax asset, we would be required, under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, to establish a full or partial valuation allowance which would require us to incur a charge to operations for the period in which the determination was made.
Current report
As a public company, we are required to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting and to assess, and obtain auditor attestation on, its effectiveness under Section 404 of the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act. We may identify control deficiencies that we are unable to remediate on a timely basis, and the testing and remediation of internal controls may divert management attention from other business priorities. If we are unable to conclude, or our independent auditor is unable to attest, that our internal control over financial reporting is effective, we may be unable to file timely and accurate reports with the SEC, face regulatory scrutiny, lose investor confidence, or experience a decline in the trading price of our common stock, any of which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Current report
Federal and state regulators periodically examine our business, and adverse examination findings could materially affect our operations.
Current report
The Federal Reserve, the FDIC, and the DFPI regularly examine our business and compliance with applicable laws and regulations. If regulators determine that any aspect of our operations is unsafe, unsound, or noncompliant, they may impose corrective actions or enforcement measures, including capital requirements, growth restrictions, civil money penalties, or removal of officers or directors. In extreme circumstances, regulators could terminate deposit insurance or place us into receivership or conservatorship. Any such action could materially affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Current report
We are subject to extensive anti-money laundering laws, and failures to comply could result in significant penalties and reputational harm.
Current report
We are subject to the BSA, the USA PATRIOT Act. OFAC regulations, and related anti-money laundering requirements, which require us to maintain effective compliance program and reporting systems. If our policies, procedures, or controls are deemed inadequate, we could be subject to enforcement actions, substantial fines, restrictions on dividends or growth activities, and reputational harm, any of which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Current report
Privacy, information security and data protection regulations could increase our costs and limit our business activities.
Current report
We are subject to numerous federal and state privacy, data protection, and information security laws, including the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 and data breach notification requirements. Compliance with existing or future requirements may increase operational and technology costs and restrict how we collect, use, share, and safeguard customer and employee information. Failure to comply could result in regulatory investigations, litigation, fines, reputational damage, and other adverse consequences that could materially affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Current report
Although our common stock is listed for trading on The Nasdaq Global Market its trading volume is generally less than that of other, larger financial services companies, and investors are not assured that a liquid market will exist at any given time for our common stock. A public trading market having the desired characteristics of depth, liquidity and orderliness depends on the presence in the marketplace at any given time of willing buyers and sellers of our common stock. This presence depends on the individual decisions of investors and general economic and market conditions over which we have no control. Given the lower trading volume of our common stock, significant sales of our common stock, or the expectation of these sales, could cause our stock price to fall.
Current report
The provisions of our subordinated debt documents restrict our ability to pay dividends or repurchase our stock in certain circumstances.
Current report
On November 7, 2025, we issued a 7.50% fixed-to-floating subordinated note (“Note”) in the amount of $25.0 million. The Note matures on November 1, 2035 and the interest rate thereunder will reset to a floating rate as of November 1, 2030. The Note prohibits our payment of dividends or the repurchase of our capital stock at any time when an event of default has occurred and is continuing under the Note. Thus, at times when we are not in material compliance with the terms of the Note we will be required to suspend the payment of dividends and other distributions on our capital stock, and we may not engage in stock repurchase programs. These factors, alone or in combination with other events or circumstances, may adversely affect the price or trading volumes of our capital stock.
Current report
The trading price of our common stock could be volatile.
Showing the first 40 of 54 passages. Open the source sections for the rest.
Removed paragraphs (26)
Previous report
There have been a number of recent and well-publicized incidents involving various types of cybersecurity lapses, some of which have had substantial adverse impacts upon targeted businesses and on customers of even some of the world’s most prominent cybersecurity and financial services firms. Similarly, extremely sophisticated criminal and nation-state organizations routinely target and exploit information technology networks, data systems, and other critical infrastructure. One of the most prominent recent events resulted in a widespread failure of a large cybersecurity platform, some of the consequences of which are not yet, and may not soon be, fully known or estimable.
Previous report
We devote significant resources and management focus to ensuring the integrity of our systems against cybercriminals and similar actors, as well as against threats from fires and other natural disasters; power or telecommunications failures; acts of terrorism or wars or other catastrophic events; breaches, physical break-ins or errors resulting in interruptions and unauthorized disclosure of confidential information, through information security and business continuity programs. Likewise, we have made, and we continue to make, substantial investments in systems that are intended to protect against these vulnerabilities, including real-time threat detection and warning, security programs and protocols, backup and alternative-access systems, virus and malware protection programs, and a wide variety of other protective measures.
Previous report
We may not keep pace with technological developments in the financial services industry.
Previous report
The financial services industry is subject to rapid technological changes, the effect of which on our business are difficult to predict. We expect that new services and technologies applicable to our industry will continue to emerge and evolve, and these new services and technologies may be superior to, or may render obsolete, the technologies we currently utilize in our products and services. These technologies often are expensive, and many of them are unproven, as a result of which we may delay adoption or implementation of these products. Further, as these technologies develop, they may pose a greater than ordinary risk of additional cybersecurity breaches. However, customers are often drawn to these products and services, which poses both a competitive risk and a cybersecurity risk to us. If we cannot adopt and implement financial services technologies at a cost and with a level of security that allows us to keep pace with our competitors and with customer expectations, we may face challenges to our revenues, and we may lose customers or fail to attract new customers. Further, if these products were to fail to perform as expected, we may face increase cybersecurity risks and customer dissatisfaction. These outcomes, alone or in combination with other factors, may have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Previous report
Increasing challenges in credit markets and the effects on our current and future borrowers have adversely affected, and in the future may adversely affect, our loan portfolio and may result in losses or increasing provision expense.
Previous report
As of September 30, 2025, we had$1.56 billion of commercial loans, consisting of$1.09 billion of CRE loans,$256.2 million of SBA loans, and$214.4 million of C&I loans, including trade finance loans, for which real estate is not the primary source of collateral. Commercial loans represented 73% of our total loan portfolio as of September 30, 2025. Commercial loans are often larger and involve greater risks than other types of lending. Because payments on such loans are often dependent on the successful operation or development of the property or business involved, repayment of such loans is often more sensitive than other types of loans to adverse conditions in the real estate market or the general business climate and economy. Accordingly, a downturn in the real estate market and a challenging business and economic environment may increase our risk related to commercial loans, particularly CRE loans. Unlike home mortgage loans, which generally are made on the basis of the borrowers’ ability to make repayment from their employment and other income and which are secured by real property whose value tends to be more easily ascertainable, commercial loans typically are made on the basis of the borrowers’ ability to make repayment from the cash flow of the commercial venture. Our C&I loans are primarily made based on the identified cash flow of the borrower and secondarily on the collateral underlying the loans. Most often, collateral consists of accounts receivable, inventory and equipment. Inventory and equipment may depreciate over time, may be difficult to appraise and may fluctuate in value based on the success of the business. Accounts receivable may be uncollectable and inventory may become obsolete or otherwise unsalable. If the cash flow from business operations is reduced, the borrower’s ability to repay the loan may be impaired. Due to the larger average size of each commercial loan as compared with other loans such as residential loans, as well as collateral that is generally less readily-marketable, losses incurred on a small number of commercial loans could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Previous report
The ongoing shutdown of the United States federal government may have an adverse impact on our customers, who may, in certain instances, be dependent upon contracts with federal agencies, federal grants, or other sources of revenue or income from the government. This could adversely affect those clients’ ability to perform in accordance with the terms of their loans or increase customers’ need for deposit withdrawals. Additionally, the processing of government-backed mortgages and other loans may be delayed in ways that may delay our recognition of income from loans currently being processed. In particular, the SBA, which is not classified as an essential agency during a shutdown, typically suspends the processing and approval of new loans under its core programs, including the 7(a) and 504 loan programs. During such shutdown, SBA loan applications are placed on hold, and no new loan authorizations or loan numbers are issued. This suspension can delay the closing of SBA- guaranteed loan, disrupt funding timeline, and create uncertainty for borrowers and lenders. While we continue to process and underwrite SBA loan applications internally, final approvals and disbursements are contingent upon SBA system availability. The duration and frequency of government shutdowns remain unpredictable, and extended disruptions could materially impact our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Previous report
We are vulnerable to reputational harm because we operate in an industry in which integrity and the confidence of our customers are of paramount importance. If one or more of our employees were to engage in fraudulent, illegal, wrongful or suspicious activities, and/or activities resulting in consumer harm that adversely affects our customers and/or our business. The precautions we take to detect and prevent such misconduct may not always be effective, and in some circumstances could result in financial losses or losses of protected information concerning our customers. These circumstances may jeopardize our reputation with the affected customers or, in certain situations, may result in a public erosion of confidence in our Bank or in our management team. Moreover, may types of employee misconduct can expose us to regulatory sanctions such as fines, regulatory orders, and restrictions on our operations. Public disclosure of such events also may affect our ability to attract new customers or to maintain positive relationships with existing customers. Employee misconduct is not always insured, and certain types of conduct are not insurable. Even where insurance is in force, the results may exceed the scope or financial limits of our insurance coverage, Substantial losses as a result of employee misconduct could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Previous report
The operation of our business requires us to manage credit risk. As a lender, we are exposed to the risk that our borrowers will be unable to repay their loans according to their terms, and that the collateral securing repayment of their loans, if any, may not be sufficient to ensure repayment. In addition, there are risks inherent in making any loan, including risks with respect to the period of time over which the loan may be repaid, risks relating to proper loan underwriting, risks resulting from changes in economic and industry conditions and risks inherent in dealing with individual borrowers. To manage credit risk successfully, we must, among other things, maintain disciplined and prudent underwriting standards and ensure that our bankers follow those standards. The weakening of these standards for any reason, such as an attempt to attract higher yielding loans, a lack of discipline or diligence by our employees in underwriting and monitoring loans, the inability of our employees to adequately adapt policies and procedures to changes in economic or any other conditions affecting borrowers and the quality of our loan portfolio, may result in loan defaults, foreclosures and additional charge-offs and may necessitate that we significantly increase our allowance for credit losses, each of which could adversely affect our net income. As a result, our inability to successfully manage credit risk could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Previous report
Nonperforming assets consist of nonaccrual loans and OREO. As of September 30, 2025, total nonperforming assets were$13.2 million or 0.50% of total assets. This amount includes $12.3 million in nonaccrual loans and $845 thousand in OREO.
Previous report
Our nonperforming assets adversely affect our net income in various ways. We do not record interest income on nonaccrual loans or OREO, thereby adversely affecting our net interest income, net income and returns on assets and equity, and our loan administration costs increase, which together with reduced interest income adversely affects our efficiency ratio. When we take collateral in foreclosure and similar proceedings, we are required to mark the collateral to its then-fair market value, which may result in a loss, and we may be exposed to environmental risks associated with the ownership of OREO properties. These nonperforming loans and OREO also increase our risk profile and the level of capital our regulators believe is appropriate for us to maintain in light of such risks. The resolution of nonperforming assets requires significant time commitments from management and can be detrimental to the performance of their other responsibilities. If we experience increases in nonperforming loans and nonperforming assets, our net interest income may be negatively impacted and our loan administration costs could increase, each of which would have an adverse effect on our net income and related ratios, such as return on assets and equity.
Previous report
Our allowance for credit losses on loans may prove to be insufficient to absorb potential losses in our loan portfolio.
Previous report
In addition, we evaluate all loans identified as individually evaluated loans and allocate an allowance based upon our estimation of the potential loss associated with those problem loans. While we strive to carefully manage and monitor credit quality and to identify loans that may be deteriorating, at any time there are loans included in the portfolio that may result in losses, but that have not yet been identified as nonperforming or potential problem loans. Through established credit practices, we attempt to identify deteriorating loans and adjust the allowance for credit losses on loans accordingly. However, because future events are uncertain and because we may not successfully identify all deteriorating loans in a timely manner, there may be loans that deteriorate in an accelerated time frame. We cannot be sure that we will be able to identify deteriorating loans before they become nonperforming assets, or that we will be able to limit losses on those loans that have been so identified.
Previous report
Although management believes that the allowance for credit losses on loans is adequate to absorb losses on any existing loans that may become uncollectible, we may be required to take additional provisions for credit losses on loans in the future to further supplement the allowance for credit losses on loans, either due to management’s decision to do so or because our banking regulators require us to do so. Our bank regulatory agencies will periodically review our allowance for credit losses on loans and the value attributed to nonaccrual loans or to real estate acquired through foreclosure and may require us to adjust our determination of the value for these items. If our allowance for credit losses on loans is inaccurate, for any of the reasons discussed above (or other reasons), and is inadequate to cover the loan losses that we actually experience, the resulting losses could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Previous report
We seek to expand our franchise safely and consistently. A successful growth strategy requires us to manage multiple aspects of our business simultaneously, such as following adequate loan underwriting standards, balancing loan and deposit growth without increasing interest rate risk or compressing our net interest margin, maintaining sufficient capital, maintaining proper systems and controls, and recruiting, training and retaining qualified professionals. As part of our general growth strategy we may expand into additional communities or attempt to strengthen our position in our current markets by opening new offices, subject to any regulatory constraints on our ability to open new offices. We also may experience a lag in profitability associated with new branch openings, the establishment of new loan production offices, or other growth initiatives. To the extent that we are able to open additional offices, we are likely to experience the effects of higher operating expenses relative to operating income from the new operations for a period of time which would have a material adverse effect on our levels of reported net income, return on average equity and return on average assets.
Previous report
We face significant capital and other regulatory requirements as a financial institution. Although management believes that the Company has sufficient capital to fund operations and growth initiatives for at least the next twenty-four months based on our estimated future operations, we may need to raise additional capital in the future to provide us with sufficient capital resources and liquidity to meet our commitments and business needs. For example, on November 7, 2025, shortly after the period covered by this report, we raised $25 million in addition capital upon the issuance of 7.50% fixed-to-floating subordinated note. Our ability to raise additional capital depends on conditions in the capital markets, economic conditions and a number of other factors, including investor perceptions regarding the banking industry, market conditions and governmental activities, and on our financial condition and performance. Any occurrence that may limit our access to the capital markets may adversely affect our capital costs and our ability to raise capital. Moreover, if we need to raise additional capital in the future, we may have to do so when many other financial institutions are also seeking to raise capital and would have to compete with those institutions for investors. We, therefore, may not be able to raise additional capital in the amounts needed or on terms acceptable to us.
Previous report
We face strong competition from financial services companies and other companies that offer commercial banking services, which could harm our business.
Previous report
Our operations consist of offering commercial banking services to generate both interest and noninterest income. Many of our competitors offer the same, or a wider variety of, banking and related financial services within our market areas. These competitors include national banks, regional banks and other community banks. We also face competition from many other types of financial institutions, including savings and loan institutions, finance companies, brokerage firms, insurance companies, credit unions, mortgage banks and other financial intermediaries. In addition, a number of out-of-state financial intermediaries have opened production offices or otherwise solicit deposits in our market areas. Additionally, we face growing competition from so-called “online businesses” with few or no physical locations, including online banks, lenders and consumer and commercial lending platforms, as well as automated retirement and investment service providers. Many of these competing institutions have much greater financial and marketing resources than we have. Due to their size, many competitors can achieve larger economies of scale and may offer a broader range of products and services than we can. If we are unable to offer competitive products and services, our business may be negatively affected. Some of the financial services organizations with which we compete are not subject to the same degree of regulation as is imposed on bank holding companies and federally insured financial institutions or are not subject to increased supervisory oversight arising from regulatory examinations. As a result, these non-bank competitors have certain advantages over us in accessing funding and in providing various services and they may be subject to lower regulatory costs.
Previous report
New technology and other changes are allowing parties to effectuate financial transactions that previously required the involvement of banks. For example, consumers can maintain funds in brokerage accounts or mutual funds that would have historically been held as bank deposits. Consumers can also complete transactions such as paying bills and transferring funds directly without the assistance of banks. The process of eliminating banks as intermediaries, known as “disintermediation,” could result in the loss of fee income, as well as the loss of customer deposits and the related income generated from those deposits. The loss of these revenue streams and access to lower cost deposits as a source of funds could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Previous report
Increased competition in our markets may result in reduced loans, deposits and commissions and brokers’ fees, as well as reduced net interest margin and profitability. Ultimately, we may not be able to compete successfully against current and future competitors. If we are unable to attract and retain banking and mortgage loan customers and expand our sales market for such loans, we may be unable to continue to grow our business, and our financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.
Previous report
We may from time to time become involved in a variety of litigation, investigations or similar matters arising out of our business. It is inherently difficult to assess the outcome of these matters, and we may not prevail in any proceedings or litigation. Any claims and lawsuits, and the disposition of such claims and lawsuits, whether through settlement or litigation, could be time-consuming and expensive to resolve, divert management attention from executing our business plan, and lead to attempts on the part of other parties to pursue similar claims. Any claims asserted against us, regardless of merit or eventual outcome may harm our reputation. Any adverse determination related to pending or other litigation could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Previous report
We are generally not restricted from issuing additional shares of our common stock, up to the 50 million shares of voting common stock and 10 million shares of preferred stock authorized in our articles of incorporation (subject to Nasdaq shareholder approval rules), which in each case could be increased by a vote of a majority of our shares. We may issue additional shares of our common stock in the future pursuant to current or future equity compensation plans, upon conversions of preferred stock or debt, upon exercise of warrants or in connection with future acquisitions or financings. If we choose to raise capital by selling shares of our common stock for any reason, the issuance could have a dilutive effect on the holders of our common stock and could have a material negative effect on the market price of our common stock.
Previous report
Although there are currently no shares of our preferred stock issued and outstanding, our articles of incorporation authorize us to issue up to 10 million shares of one or more series of preferred stock. Our board of directors also has the power, without shareholder approval (subject to Nasdaq shareholder approval rules), to set the terms of any series of preferred stock that may be issued, including voting rights, dividend rights, preferences over our common stock with respect to dividends or in the event of a dissolution, liquidation or winding up and other terms. In the event that we issue preferred stock in the future that has preference over our common stock with respect to payment of dividends or upon our liquidation, dissolution or winding up, or if we issue preferred stock with voting rights that dilute the voting power of our common stock, the rights of the holders of our common stock or the market price of our common stock could be adversely affected. In addition, the ability of our board of directors to issue shares of preferred stock without any action on the part of our shareholders (subject to Nasdaq shareholder approval rules) may impede a takeover of the Company and prevent a transaction perceived to be favorable to our shareholders.
Reworded paragraphs (17)
Previous wording
Interruptions, cyberattacks, fraudulent activity or other security breaches may have a material adverse effect on our business.
Current wording
Interruptions, cyber-attacks, fraudulent activity or other security breaches could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Previous wording
Our business is highly dependent on the collection, storage, transmittal, sharing, processing and retention of information about our customers and employees. To accomplish these activities, we rely heavily upon electronic infrastructure that we own or that we obtain via license or other contractual arrangements with third parties. These technologies affect, among other things, our customers’ ability to access and transfer funds, initiate and pay loans and leases, communicate with our customer service teams, and engage in a variety of other activities that form the foundation of modern financial services businesses. Likewise, our employee data and related technologies allow us to communicate with our employees, compensate our staff, maintain timekeeping, payroll and benefits records, and comply with an increasingly complex web of labor and employment laws and regulations. The loss, interruption or disruption of these systems may damage our relationships with customers and correspondingly may harm our reputation. Compromises or interruptions in our employment-related systems may cause challenges in our relationships with our employees, upon whom we are heavily dependent in the conduct of our business and the development and maintenance of our relationships with customers and prospective customers, and in certain circumstances may expose us to liabilities under certain federal and state employment laws.
Current wording
Our business is highly dependent on the collection, storage, transmittal, sharing, processing and retention of information about our customers and employees. To accomplish these activities, we rely heavily upon electronic infrastructure that we own or that we obtain via license or other contractual arrangements with third parties. These technologies affect, among other things, our customers’ ability to access and transfer funds, initiate and pay loans and leases, communicate with our customer service teams, and engage in a variety of other activities that form the foundation of modern financial services businesses. Likewise, our employee data and related technologies allow us to communicate with our employees, compensate our staff, maintain timekeeping, payroll and benefits records, and comply with an increasingly complex web of labor and employment laws and regulations. Further, the increasing perpetration of cybersecurity attacks by nation-state actors and sponsored groups, coupled with the ongoing military conflict between the United States and Iran and by the United States against certain paramilitary or terrorist groups believed to be sponsored by Iran, may have the effect of increasing the risk, frequency or intensity of such incidents. The loss, interruption or disruption of these systems may damage our relationships with customers and correspondingly may harm our reputation. Compromises or interruptions in our employment-related systems may cause challenges in our relationships with our employees, upon whom we are heavily dependent in the conduct of our business and the development and maintenance of our relationships with customers and prospective customers, and in certain circumstances may expose us to liabilities under certain federal and state employment laws.
Previous wording
Notwithstanding these investments, cybersecurity measures are, by their nature, largely reactive, and threats are constantly evolving. We expect that the development of AI-based technologies will accelerate both the number and the sophistication of these threats. We routinely experience attempts to exploit our networks and systems, and we must continue investing in increasingly advanced (and concomitantly expensive) technology to counteract these threats. Further, if our systems cannot timely detect and mitigate vulnerabilities, or cannot promptly respond to threats, we may experience damage to or interruptions in the availability of our computer networks, or we may experience a loss of data, unauthorized use or disclosure of customer information, or a loss of customer funds as a result of unauthorized access to customer accounts. Likewise, breaches of our payroll, benefits, and other employee-related systems may give rise to liability under employment and privacy laws and may damage our relationships with our employees. Further, we may have a limited ability to enforce warranties, indemnities or other remedies against the providers of these systems in the event we incur a loss.
Current wording
Cybersecurity measures are, by their nature, largely reactive, and threats are constantly evolving. We expect that the development of AI-based technologies will accelerate both the number and the sophistication of these threats. We routinely experience attempts to exploit our networks and systems, and we must continue investing in increasingly advanced (and concomitantly expensive) technology to counteract these threats. Further, if our systems cannot timely detect and mitigate vulnerabilities, or cannot promptly respond to threats, we may experience damage to or interruptions in the availability of our computer networks, or we may experience a loss of data, unauthorized use or disclosure of customer information, or a loss of customer funds as a result of unauthorized access to customer accounts. Likewise, breaches of our payroll, benefits, and other employee-related systems may give rise to liability under employment and privacy laws and may damage our relationships with our employees. Further, we may have a limited ability to enforce warranties, indemnities or other remedies against the providers of these systems in the event we incur a loss.
Previous wording
Our operations could be disrupted by our third-party service providers experiencing difficulty in providing their services, terminating their services or failing to comply with banking regulations.
Current wording
Our operations could be disrupted by our third‑party service providers, including risks arising from their use of artificial intelligence technologies, experiencing difficulty in providing their services, terminating their services, or failing to comply with banking regulations.
Previous wording
We depend to a significant extent on relationships with third-party service providers. Specifically, we utilize third-party core banking services and receive credit card and debit card services, branch capture services, Internet banking services and services complementary to our banking products from various third- party service providers. These types of third-party relationships are subject to increasingly demanding regulatory requirements that require us to maintain and continue to enhance our due diligence and ongoing monitoring and control over our third-party vendors. We may be required to renegotiate our agreements to meet these enhanced requirements, which could increase our costs or which may be impracticable. If our service providers experience difficulties, fail to perform accordingly to expectation, or terminate their services and we are unable to replace them, our operations could be interrupted. It may be difficult for us to timely replace some of our service providers, which may be at a higher cost due to the unique services they provide. A third-party provider may fail to provide the services we require, or meet contractual requirements, comply with applicable laws and regulations, or suffer a cyberattack or other security breach. Further, many of our agreements with these providers limit our ability to recover for even negligent actions that may result in customer losses or regulatory actions. Regulatory requirements typically apply to financial institutions rather than to the service providers, and we expect that our regulators would hold us responsible for deficiencies of or failures by our third-party relationships which could result in enforcement actions, including civil money penalties or other administrative or judicial penalties or fines, or client remediation, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Current wording
We depend to a significant extent on relationships with third‑party service providers. Specifically, we utilize third‑party core banking services and receive credit card and debit card services, branch capture services, Internet banking services and services complementary to our banking products from various third‑party service providers. Certain of these third‑party service providers may incorporate or rely on artificial intelligence (“AI”), machine learning, automated decision‑making technologies or similar emerging technologies in the development or delivery of their products and services, including technologies that are evolving rapidly and for which regulatory expectations are continuing to develop. These third‑party relationships are subject to increasingly demanding regulatory requirements that require us to maintain and continue to enhance our due diligence, contractual controls, and ongoing monitoring and oversight of our vendors, including with respect to their information security practices, data governance, model risk management, operational resilience and compliance with applicable laws and regulations. The use of AI by our third‑party service providers may increase the complexity of these oversight obligations and may expose us to additional risks, including risks related to data privacy and security, model performance, bias or discrimination, explainability, intellectual property, and regulatory compliance. We may be required to renegotiate or modify our agreements to address these enhanced requirements or evolving supervisory expectations, which could increase our costs or may be impracticable. If our service providers experience operational difficulties, fail to perform in accordance with expectations, experience disruptions related to AI system failures or errors, suffer a cyberattack or other security breach, fail to comply with applicable laws or regulations, or terminate their services, and we are unable to replace them in a timely manner, our operations could be interrupted. It may be difficult for us to replace certain service providers promptly, particularly where the services involve specialized technologies or proprietary platforms, including AI‑enabled systems, and replacement services may be available only at higher cost or on less favorable terms.
Previous wording
Although the Federal Reserve Open Markets Committee (commonly referred to as “the Fed”) has recently made modest incremental reductions in benchmark interest rates, the current interest rate environment remains significantly elevated from that of the recent past, and recent indications as of the date of this report are that further reductions are uncertain as to both timing and degree. Interest rates affect both our ability to reprice variable-rate loans and to originate new fixed-rate loans, and in times of significant uncertainty about interest rates, such as the present, clients and prospective investors often reduce their borrowing levels, which tends to have a deflating effect on our outstanding loan balances and thus on our interest income.
Current wording
Although the Federal Reserve Open Markets Committee (commonly referred to as “the Fed”) has recently made modest incremental reductions in benchmark interest rates, the current interest rate environment remains significantly elevated from that of the recent past, and recent indications as of the date of this report are that further reductions are uncertain as to both timing and degree. Interest rates affect both our ability to reprice variable-rate loans and to originate new fixed-rate loans, and in times of significant uncertainty about interest rates, such as the present, clients and prospective investors often reduce their borrowing levels, which tends to have a deflating effect on our outstanding loan balances and thus on our interest income. In addition, geopolitical conflicts, including tensions in the Middle East, may contribute to volatility in global energy prices, which could increase inflationary pressures and operating costs across the economy and indirectly affect our borrowers' financial condition, credit quality, and demand for loans.
Previous wording
Although the Fed has indicated in recent public statements that economic conditions appeared to have stabilized, the committee has made only limited downward adjustments to benchmark rates, and, and, as a result, we are unable to predict changes in future interest rates. Further, even if further adjustments are made, the effect on overall markets remains uncertain. If rates resume increasing, or if they continue to remain at relatively elevated levels for prolonged periods, our borrowers may experience increasing difficulty in repaying their loans or, may defer additional borrowing decisions pending the resolution of both the political and market uncertainties.
Current wording
Although the Fed has indicated in recent public statements that economic conditions appeared to have stabilized, the committee has made only limited downward adjustments to benchmark rates, and, as a result, we are unable to predict changes in future interest rates. Further, even if further adjustments are made, the effect on overall markets remains uncertain. If rates resume increasing, or if they continue to remain at relatively elevated levels for prolonged periods, our borrowers may experience increasing difficulty in repaying their loans or, may defer additional borrowing decisions pending the resolution of both the political and market uncertainties.
Previous wording
Changes in interest rates also can affect the value of loans, investment securities and other assets head in our portfolio or originated for sale. For example, rising interest rates would result in a decline in value of the fixed-rate debt securities we hold in our investment securities portfolio. The unrealized losses resulting from holding these securities would be recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income and would reduce total shareholders’ equity. Unrealized losses do not negatively impact our regulatory capital ratios. However, tangible common equity and the associated ratios would be reduced. If debt securities in an unrealized loss position are sold, such losses become realized and will reduce our regulatory capital ratios.
Current wording
Changes in interest rates also can affect the value of loans, investment securities and other assets held in our portfolio or originated for sale. For example, rising interest rates would result in a decline in value of the fixed-rate debt securities we hold in our investment securities portfolio. The unrealized losses resulting from holding these securities would be recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income and would reduce total shareholders’ equity. Unrealized losses do not negatively impact our regulatory capital ratios. However, tangible common equity and the associated ratios would be reduced. If debt securities in an unrealized loss position are sold, such losses become realized and will reduce our regulatory capital ratios.
Previous wording
As of September 30, 2025, approximately 89% of our loan portfolio was comprised of loans with real estate as a primary or secondary component of collateral. As a result, adverse developments affecting real estate values in our market areas could increase the credit risk associated with our real estate loan portfolio. The market value of real estate can fluctuate significantly and rapidly as a result of market conditions in the geographic area in which the real estate is located. Real estate values and real estate markets are generally affected by changes in national, regional or local economic conditions, the rate of unemployment, fluctuations in interest rates and the availability of loans to potential purchasers, changes in tax laws and other governmental statutes, regulations and policies and acts of nature, such as earthquakes and other natural disasters. Adverse changes affecting real estate values and the liquidity of real estate in one or more of our markets could increase the credit risk associated with our loan portfolio, significantly impair the value of property pledged as collateral on loans and affect our ability to sell the collateral upon foreclosure without a loss or additional losses, which could result in losses that would adversely affect profitability. Moreover, a substantial portion of the collateral underlying our real estate loans is located in the Los Angeles Metropolitan Area, which is subject to elevated risk of loss from fire, earthquakes, flooding and other nature disasters. These events and any declines or losses that result from could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Current wording
Adverse developments affecting real estate values in our market areas could increase the credit risk associated with our real estate loan portfolio. The market value of real estate can fluctuate significantly and rapidly as a result of market conditions in the geographic area in which the real estate is located. Real estate values and real estate markets are generally affected by changes in national, regional or local economic conditions, the rate of unemployment, fluctuations in interest rates and the availability of loans to potential purchasers, changes in tax laws and other governmental statutes, regulations and policies and acts of nature, such as earthquakes and other natural disasters. Adverse changes affecting real estate values and the liquidity of real estate in one or more of our markets could increase the credit risk associated with our loan portfolio, significantly impair the value of property pledged as collateral on loans and affect our ability to sell the collateral upon foreclosure without a loss or additional losses, which could result in losses that would adversely affect profitability. Moreover, a substantial portion of the collateral underlying our real estate loans is located in the Los Angeles Metropolitan Area, which is subject to elevated risk of loss from fire, earthquakes, flooding and other nature disasters. These events and any declines or losses that result from could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Previous wording
Our success depends, in large degree, on the skills of our management team and our ability to retain, recruit and motivate key officers and employees. Our senior management team has significant industry experience, and their knowledge and relationships would be difficult to replace. Further, we believe that our focus on particular aspects of our communities, including the Korean culture and language and our Christian leadership principles, would call for any replacements to embody these same traits, which may make it more difficult to replace management team members and other employees who leave the Company or who retire. Beginning in August 2024, we announced a leadership transition plan, which has progressed satisfactorily to date. As part of this plan, the Company completed the retirement of its Chair of the Board and Chief Executive Officer with a new Chief Executive Officer assuming the role, and our retiring Chief Executive Officer assuming the role of Chair of the Board, effective July 2025. Additionally, new appointments for Chief Operations Officer and Chief Financial Officer resulted from internal promotions in recent months, in alignment with the transition strategy. Although most of the individual successors have many years of experience with the Company and the Bank, each of them has transitioned to new roles. We cannot predict whether any or all of these changes will be successful or that we will be able to recruit additional qualified personnel as our business continues to evolve. Competition for senior executives and skilled personnel in the financial services and banking industry is intense, which means the cost of hiring, incentivizing and retaining talent may continue to increase. We need to continue to attract and retain key employees and to recruit qualified individuals to succeed existing key personnel to ensure the continued growth and successful operation of our business. In addition, as a provider of relationship-based commercial banking services, we must attract and retain qualified banking personnel to continue to grow our business, and competition for such personnel can be intense. Our ability to compete effectively for senior executives and other qualified personnel by offering competitive compensation and benefit arrangements may be restricted by applicable banking laws and regulations. In addition, to attract and retain personnel with appropriate skills and knowledge to support our business, we may offer a variety of benefits, which could reduce our earnings. The loss of the services of any senior executive, or the inability to recruit and retain qualified personnel in the future, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Current wording
Our success depends, in large degree, on the skills of our management team and our ability to retain, recruit and motivate key officers and employees. Our senior management team has significant industry experience, and their knowledge and relationships would be difficult to replace. Further, we believe that our focus on particular aspects of our communities, including the Korean culture and language and our Christian leadership principles, would call for any replacements to embody these same traits, which may make it more difficult to replace management team members and other employees who leave the Company or who retire. We need to continue to attract and retain key employees and to recruit qualified individuals to succeed existing key personnel to ensure the continued growth and successful operation of our business. In addition, as a provider of relationship-based commercial banking services, we must attract and retain qualified banking personnel to continue to grow our business, and competition for such personnel can be intense. Our ability to compete effectively for senior executives and other qualified personnel by offering competitive compensation and benefit arrangements may be restricted by applicable banking laws and regulations. In addition, to attract and retain personnel with appropriate skills and knowledge to support our business, we may offer a variety of benefits, which could reduce our earnings. The loss of the services of any senior executive, or the inability to recruit and retain qualified personnel in the future, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Previous wording
We grew our consolidated assets to$2.61 billion as of September 30, 2025 from$2.37 billion as of December 31, 2024. Our deposits have grown to$2.27 billion as of September 30, 2025 from$2.03 billion as of December 31, 2024. Our ability to continue to grow successfully will depend to a significant extent on our capital resources. It also will depend, in part, upon our ability to attract deposits and grow our loan portfolio and investment opportunities and on whether we can continue to fund growth while maintaining cost controls and asset quality, as well on other factors beyond our control, such as national, regional and local economic conditions and interest rate trends. To support our growth strategy, we recently expanded our geographic footprint by opening a new branch in Garden Grove, California in July 2025. However, our efforts to establish new locations may prove less successful or more expensive than we have estimated, and in certain cases could materially and adversely affect our results of operation or our financial condition.
Current wording
Our ability to continue to grow successfully will depend to a significant extent on our capital resources. It also will depend, in part, upon our ability to attract deposits and grow our loan portfolio and investment opportunities and on whether we can continue to fund growth while maintaining cost controls and asset quality, as well on other factors beyond our control, such as national, regional and local economic conditions and interest rate trends. To support our growth strategy, we recently expanded our geographic footprint by opening a new branch in Garden Grove, California in July 2025. However, our efforts to establish new locations may prove less successful or more expensive than we have estimated, and in certain cases could materially and adversely affect our results of operation or our financial condition.
Previous wording
The intellectual property rights to the use of our name “Open Bank” will continue to be one of the components of our strategy to build a relationship community bank focused on the Korean-American population base. We have not registered the trademark “Open Bank” under the trademark laws of the United States. Open Bank, S.A., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Spain with its principal office located in Ciudad Grupo Santander, Av. Catabria Boadilla del Monte Madrid Spain (“Open Bank S.A.”) originally registered the trademark “Open Bank” (U.S. Registration No. 3397518) in 2008 with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Open Bank S.A. provides financial services in Spain and solicits certain financial services in the United States through the internet. Open Bank S.A. is not licensed to engage in banking services in the United States or California and to our knowledge in any other state in the United States. In February 2014, we entered into a Coexistence Agreement with Open Bank S.A. (the “Coexistence Agreement”), under which both parties agreed that we may use the name “Open Bank” in connection with banking and banking related services in the state of California and the cities of New York, Dallas, Atlanta, Chicago, Seattle and Fort Lee, New Jersey (the “Permitted Markets”).
Current wording
The intellectual property rights to the use of our name “Open Bank” will continue to be one of the components of our strategy to build a relationship community bank focused on the Korean-American population base. We have not registered the trademark “Open Bank” under the trademark laws of the United States. Open Bank S.A. originally registered the trademark “Open Bank” (U.S. Registration No. 3397518) in 2008 with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Open Bank S.A. provides financial services in Spain and solicits financial services in the United States through the internet. In February 2014, we entered into a Coexistence Agreement with Open Bank S.A. (the “Coexistence Agreement”), under which both parties agreed that we may use the name “Open Bank” in connection with banking and banking related services in the state of California and the cities of New York, Dallas, Atlanta, Chicago, Seattle and Fort Lee, New Jersey (the “Permitted Markets”).
Previous wording
We agreed to limit all of the Bank’s marketing, advertising, publicity, soliciting and or media efforts using the “Open Bank” name to primarily the Korean-American community in the Permitted Markets, however, we have the right under the Coexistence Agreement to market through the internet subject to certain limitations. The Coexistence Agreement states that these limitations are not intended to mean that we should in any way engage in discriminatory tactics or policy or in any way discriminate against non-Korean-American customers or potential customers. Under the Coexistence Agreement, Open Bank S.A. retains the right to use and market its services in relation to its registered trademark in any state or territory in the United States. The Bank further agreed not to challenge Open Bank, S.A.’s trademark registration or any future applications by Open Bank S.A. The Coexistence Agreement has no termination date and is perpetual. If Open Bank S.A. decides to become a licensed bank in California or in any of the other Permitted Markets, depending on its business and marketing plan, there could be confusion created by the use of the name “Open Bank” which could have a material adverse impact on our ability to build our brand in the Permitted Markets. In addition, if Open Bank, S.A. were to assert that we breached the Coexistence Agreement, whether based upon our operations outside Permitted Markets or by virtue of our activities on the internet or within such matters, Open Bank, S.A. could file for an injunction, seek to have us change our name or seek monetary damages, all of which could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations. There are no approval rights of either party for any of the actions or omissions that either party may take under the Coexistence Agreement.
Current wording
We agreed to limit all of the Bank’s marketing, advertising, publicity, soliciting and or media efforts using the “Open Bank” name to primarily the Korean-American community in the Permitted Markets, however, we have the right under the Coexistence Agreement to market through the internet. The Coexistence Agreement states that these limitations are not intended to mean that we should in any way engage in discriminatory tactics or policy or in any way discriminate against non-Korean-American customers or potential customers. Under the Coexistence Agreement, Open Bank S.A. retains the right to use and market its services in relation to its registered trademark in any state or territory in the United States. The Bank further agreed not to challenge Open Bank S.A.’s trademark registration or any future applications by Open Bank S.A. The Coexistence Agreement has no termination date and is perpetual. If Open Bank S.A. decides to become a licensed bank in California or in any of the other Permitted Markets, depending on its business and marketing plan, there could be confusion created by the use of the name “Open Bank” which could have a material adverse impact on our ability to build our brand in the Permitted Markets. In addition, if Open Bank S.A. were to assert that we breached the Coexistence Agreement, Open Bank S.A. could file for an injunction, seek to have us change our name or seek monetary damages, all of which could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations. There are no approval rights of either party for any of the actions or omissions that either party may take under the Coexistence Agreement.
Previous wording
To date we have not received notice that we are in breach of the Coexistence Agreement or that our business cannot be operated as currently conducted and as proposed to be conducted. Additionally, to our knowledge, Open Bank S.A. had not undertaken any actions to engage in any business or marketing activities in the United States other than have a presence on the internet through their website. However, the Coexistence Agreement restricts our potential geographic expansion beyond the Permitted Markets, which could affect our overall growth over the long term.
Current wording
To date we have not received notice that we are in breach of the Coexistence Agreement or that our business cannot be operated as currently conducted and as proposed to be conducted. It is our understanding that Open Bank S.A. has not undertaken any actions to engage in any business or marketing activities in the United States other than have through their website. However, the Coexistence Agreement restricts our potential geographic expansion beyond the Permitted Markets, which could affect our overall growth over the long term.
Previous wording
We maintain an allowance for credit losses on loans to provide for loan defaults and non-performance, which reflects our estimate of the current expected credit losses in our loan portfolio at the relevant balance sheet date. Our allowance for credit losses was $27.3 million, or 1.27% expressed as a percentage of loans, as of September 30, 2025. Allowance for credit losses on loans is funded from a provision for credit losses on loans, which is a charge to our income statement. The Company had a provision for credit losses on loans of $1.2 million and $3.1 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025. The processes we use to estimate the allowance for credit losses on loans and to measure the fair value of financial instruments, as well as the processes used to estimate the effects of changing interest rates and other market measures on our financial condition and results of operations, depends upon the use of analytical models which takes into account known risks, composition and growth of the loan portfolio and economic forecasts. These models may not be accurate, particularly in times of market stress, unforeseen circumstances or due to flaws in the model’s design or implementation. If the models we use for interest rate risk and asset-liability management are inadequate, we may incur increased or unexpected losses upon changes in market interest rates or other market measures. If the models we use for determining the allowance for credit losses on loans are inadequate, the allowance for credit losses on loans may not be sufficient to support future charge-offs. If the models we use to measure the fair value of financial instruments are inadequate, the fair value of such financial instruments may fluctuate unexpectedly or may not accurately reflect what we could realize upon sale or settlement of such financial instruments. Any such failure in our analytical models could result in losses that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Current wording
If the models that management uses for interest rate risk and asset liability management are inadequate, we may incur increased or unexpected losses upon changes in market interest rates or other market measures. If the models that management uses for determining our probable credit losses are inadequate, the allowance for credit losses may not be sufficient to support future charge offs. If the models that management uses to measure the fair value of financial instruments are inadequate, the fair value of such financial instruments may fluctuate unexpectedly or may not accurately reflect what we could realize upon sale or settlement of such financial instruments. Any such failure in management’s analytical or forecasting models could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Previous wording
Under the California Financial Code, no person shall, directly or indirectly, acquire control of a California state bank or its holding company unless the DFPI has approved such acquisition of control. A person would be deemed to have acquired control of the Company if such person, directly or indirectly, has the power (i) to vote 25% or more of the voting power of the Company or (ii) to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of the Company. For purposes of this law, a person who directly or indirectly owns or controls 10% or more of our outstanding common stock would be presumed to control the Company.
Current wording
Under the California Financial Code, no person shall, directly or indirectly, acquire control of a California state bank or its holding company unless the DFPI has approved such acquisition of control. A person would be deemed to have acquired control of OP Bancorp if such person, directly or indirectly, has the power (i) to vote 25% or more of the voting power of OP Bancorp or (ii) to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of OP Bancorp. For purposes of this law, a person who directly or indirectly owns or controls 10% or more of our outstanding common stock would be presumed to control OP Bancorp.
Previous wording
Federal regulators generally would prohibit any company that is not engaged in financial activities and activities that are permissible for a bank holding company or a financial holding company from acquiring control of the Company. “Control” is generally defined as ownership of 25% or more of the voting stock or other exercise of a controlling influence. In addition, any existing bank holding company would need the prior approval of the Federal Reserve before acquiring 5% or more of our voting stock. The Change in Bank Control Act of
Current wording
Federal regulators generally would prohibit any company that is not engaged in financial activities and activities that are permissible for a bank holding company or a financial holding company from acquiring control of OP Bancorp. “Control” is generally defined as ownership of 25% or more of the voting stock or other exercise of a controlling influence. In addition, any existing bank holding company would need the prior approval of the Federal Reserve before acquiring 5% or more of our voting stock. The Change in Bank Control Act of 1978, as amended, prohibits a person or group of persons from acquiring control of a bank holding company unless the Federal Reserve has been notified and has not objected to the transaction. Under a rebuttable presumption established by the Federal Reserve, the acquisition of 10% or more of a class of voting stock of a bank holding company with a class of securities registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act, such as OP Bancorp, could constitute acquisition of control of the bank holding company.
Rearranged previous paragraphs (1)
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
1978, as amended, prohibits a person or group of persons from acquiring control of a bank holding company unless the Federal Reserve has been notified and has not objected to the transaction. Under a rebuttable presumption established by the Federal Reserve, the acquisition of 10% or more of a class of voting stock of a bank holding company with a class of securities registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act, such as the Company, could constitute acquisition of control of the bank holding company.