Skip to main content

ACM Research Inc

For the period ended Mar 31, 2025. Filed May 12, 2025.

View on SEC.gov

About this filing

A company's report for each of its first three quarters. The financial statements are not audited. It shows how the business has moved since the last annual report, and what management says changed.

Mar 31, 2025 · Filed May 12, 2025

ACMR$44.61+13.5%Stored close · as of Nov 6, 2026

What changed in Risk Factors?

Read the current filing

Previous report: 10-Q

Period ended 2024-09-30; filed 2024-11-07.

0001680062-24-000020

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Current report: 10-Q

Period ended 2025-03-31; filed 2025-05-12.

0001680062-25-000010

Item 1A. Risk Factors

The baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.

Compared 8 previous paragraphs and 7 current paragraphs.

2 unchanged; 0 reworded; 5 added; 6 removed; 0 previous and 0 current paragraphs rearranged.

Tables are not compared: 0 previous and 0 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.

A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.

Added paragraphs (5)

Current report

We may be subject to risks related to recent U.S. tariffs on the semiconductor industry

Current report

On April 5, 2025, the Trump administration imposed sweeping new “reciprocal” tariffs on most imported items, including a “baseline” rate of 10% on most countries. This baseline 10% rate was scheduled to increase on various countries on April 9, 2025, but was subject to a 90-day “pause” for the administration to negotiate agreements with affected countries. However, full reciprocal tariffs did go into effect on China, which currently stand at 125%. Earlier 20% tariffs against China imposed under an executive order targeting the fentanyl import trade “stack” on top of the reciprocal tariffs, such that China is subject to 145% tariffs. Additional 25% tariffs may also apply to goods from China that are subject to earlier duties imposed by the first Trump Administration under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974.

Current report

Semiconductors are currently exempted from coverage of the reciprocal tariffs (including the 125% reciprocal tariffs on China). This exemption was later clarified to include certain electronic items incorporating semiconductors. However, this exemption may be temporary as the U.S. Department of Commerce on April 1, 2025, initiated an investigation under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 to assess the national security implication of imports of semiconductors, semiconductor manufacturing equipment, and derivative products. Under Section 232, the Department of Commerce has 270 days (by December 27, 2025) to complete its investigation, although the Trump administration has indicated a desire to finish on a timeline of a few months. After that, the administration may take measures to address national security concerns, such as imposing specific tariffs on semiconductors or taking other actions to curtail imports.

Current report

As a company that designs and manufactures equipment and products used in the semiconductor industry, we are exposed to risks arising from these proposed tariffs due to our reliance on global supply chains. Tariffs may also disrupt the global electronics supply chain, as semiconductors are critical components in products such as servers, smartphones, and automotive systems. Increased costs for our customers could lead to reduced demand for our products, particularly in price-sensitive markets, which may adversely affect our revenue and market share. Furthermore, the Section 232 national security investigation into semiconductors (as well as the overall tariff regime) introduces additional uncertainty, as it could result in broader trade restrictions or changes to import policies that further impact our ability to source raw materials and sell our products efficiently.

Current report

The uncertainty surrounding the current semiconductor Section 232 investigation, its implementation timeline, and other issues, combined with the potential for retaliatory trade actions from key markets like China, poses a significant risk to our financial condition, results of operations, and competitive position in the global market.
Removed paragraphs (6)

Previous report

Regulatory Risks

Previous report

The U.S. Government will implement an outbound investment review mechanism in early 2025, which may prevent us from taking advantage of investment opportunities outside the United States that could otherwise be advantageous to our stockholders

Previous report

On October 28, 2024, the Office of Investment Security of the U.S. Department of the Treasury issued a final rule to implement President Biden’s August 2023 Executive Order on Addressing United States Investments in Certain National Security Technologies and Products in Countries of Concern (the EO). The EO provided for the establishment of a new and targeted national security regulatory framework directed at controlling outbound investment from the United States in certain sensitive industry sectors in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and the Special Administrative Regions of Hong Kong and Macau (collectively, China). This rule is scheduled to be effective January 2, 2025.

Previous report

As implemented by the final rule, the new framework would impose notification requirements and prohibitions on specified investments by U.S. persons in the semiconductor and microelectronics sector, quantum information technologies, and artificial intelligence (AI) systems.

Previous report

Within the semiconductor and microelectronics sector, prohibited investments will include certain covered investments in electronic design automation software; certain fabrication and advanced packaging tools; the design, fabrication, or packaging of certain advanced integrated circuits, and supercomputers. Notifiable investments will include any covered investments related to the design, fabrication, or packaging of integrated circuits not otherwise covered by the prohibition.

Previous report

Given the breadth of the notification requirement as applicable within the semiconductor industry, we will likely be subject to increased regulatory burden to engage in certain investments in the PRC. Such a mechanism could negatively impact our ability to realize value from certain existing and future investments, including by limiting exit opportunities or causing us to favor buyers that may avoid complex notification requirements, even in circumstances where other buyers may offer better terms or more consideration. There can be no assurances that we will be able to maintain or proceed with investments on terms acceptable to us. It is possible that the outbound investment reporting requirements and prohibitions could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and operating results.