PEDEVCO CORP
For the period ended Dec 31, 2025. Filed Mar 31, 2026.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.
FY2025 · Filed Mar 31, 2026
What changed in Risk Factors?
Read the current filingPrevious report: 10-K
Period ended 2024-12-31; filed 2025-03-31.
0001654954-25-003703
Item 1A. Risk FactorsCurrent report: 10-K
Period ended 2025-12-31; filed 2026-03-31.
0001654954-26-003098
Item 1A. Risk FactorsThe baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.
Compared 245 previous paragraphs and 281 current paragraphs.
183 unchanged; 50 reworded; 47 added; 11 removed; 1 previous and 1 current paragraphs rearranged.
Tables are not compared: 29 previous and 40 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.
A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.
Added paragraphs (47)
Current report
As of the date of this Report, we owe $98.0 million under our A&R Credit Agreement, which amounts are due and payable on October 31, 2029. Such funds may not be available when needed or may not be available on favorable terms.
Current report
Our business operations may be affected by worldwide economic, political and miliary events, including certain ongoing conflicts.
Current report
Worldwide economic, political and military events, including tax, trade and tariff policies of the United States and other countries involved in global energy markets, war, terrorist activity, events in the Middle East and initiatives by OPEC+, have contributed, and are likely to continue to contribute, to oil and natural gas price volatility. For example, recent events in Venezuela, the ongoing armed conflicts between Russia and Ukraine, and escalating tensions involving the United States, Israel and Iran, including direct military engagements and retaliatory actions, have led to heightened regional instability and increased global economic uncertainty. In particular, recent hostilities involving Iran have resulted in attacks on commercial shipping and energy infrastructure, as well as an effective disruption and, at times, near-total suspension of maritime traffic through the Strait of Hormuz, a critical chokepoint through which approximately 20% of the world’s oil supply transits.
Current report
The disruption of shipping lanes in and around the Persian Gulf, including congestion, rerouting and the anchoring of vessels outside the Strait of Hormuz, has caused significant delays in the transportation of crude oil, liquefied natural gas and refined products, and has contributed to increased freight, insurance and security costs, as well as volatility in global energy prices. In addition, damage to or disruption of key regional ports and infrastructure, including Iranian port facilities, and the risk of further military strikes or blockades, have exacerbated supply chain challenges and increased uncertainty regarding the availability and cost of energy commodities. The potential for broader regional conflict involving Iran, including possible prolonged closure or continued disruption of the Strait of Hormuz, as well as escalating hostilities involving the Houthi movement in Yemen, Hezbollah in Lebanon and other regional actors, has increased significantly.
Current report
Any continuation or escalation of these conflicts, including sustained disruptions to critical global shipping routes or energy infrastructure, could materially and adversely affect global supply and demand for oil and natural gas, increase commodity price volatility, disrupt our operations or those of our customers, suppliers or partners, and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Current report
Volatility in oil and gas prices makes it hard for us to plan and project our operations, capital expenditures, and financial performance.
Current report
Volatility in oil and natural gas prices, including for the reasons discussed in the risk factors above, significantly impairs our ability to accurately plan and project our operations, capital expenditures, and financial performance. These commodity prices are inherently unpredictable due to factors such as global supply and demand imbalances, geopolitical events, economic conditions, and regulatory changes, making it extremely difficult to forecast future price movements with any certainty. As a result, prolonged periods of low or highly volatile prices can lead to the reduction, deferral, or cancelation of exploration, development, and production activities, including but us or our operators. This uncertainty may force us to adjust our own capital spending plans, delay projects, revise budgets, and recalibrate internal projections and forecasts, which may result in reduced operational efficiency, impairments to proved reserves or other assets, and challenges in meeting financial targets or liquidity needs. For instance, sharp declines in prices can render certain development projects uneconomic, leading to lower-than-anticipated production volumes and cash flows, while sudden spikes may create inflationary pressures on costs without corresponding revenue gains in the near term. Ultimately, such price volatility contributes to greater unpredictability in our business planning, potentially materially and adversely affecting our results of operations, financial condition, and ability to execute our long-term strategy.
Current report
Approximately 49% of our total proved reserves are classified as proved undeveloped and may ultimately prove to be less than estimated.
Current report
On December 31, 2025, approximately 49% of our total proved reserves of oil, natural gas and NGLs were classified as proved undeveloped. It will take substantial capital to drill our non-producing and undeveloped locations. Our estimate of proved reserves on December 31, 2025 assumes that we will need to spend significant development capital expenditures to develop these reserves. Further, our drilling efforts may be delayed or unsuccessful, and actual reserves may prove to be less than current reserve estimates, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, future cash flows and the results of operations.
Current report
If actual reserves are lower than anticipated, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company could be adversely affected.
Current report
The Company’s ability to achieve anticipated production levels depends on the accuracy of its reserve estimates, which are inherently uncertain. Actual reserves may differ materially from estimates due to future development timing, development expenditures, operating costs, and reservoir performance as well as commodity price factors. If actual reserves are lower than anticipated, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company could be adversely affected.
Current report
Approximately 181,093 net acres in the PRB are located on federal lands as of December 31, 2025, which are subject to administrative permitting requirements, current and potential federal legislation, regulation and orders and pending litigation that may limit or restrict oil and natural gas operations on federal lands.
Current report
At December 31, 2025, approximately 181,093 net acres in the PRB were on federal lands administered by the Bureau of Land Management. In addition to permits issued by state and local authorities, oil and natural gas activities on federal lands also require permits from the BLM. Permitting for oil and natural gas activities on federal lands can take significantly longer than the permitting process for oil and natural gas activities not located on federal lands. In addition, the advancement of presidential administrative priorities and government disruptions, such as a shutdown of the U.S. federal government resulting from the failure to pass budget appropriations, adopt continuing funding resolutions or raise the debt ceiling, could delay or halt the availability of federal leases or the granting and renewal of permits or other licenses, approvals or certificates required to conduct our operations. Delays in making federal acreage available for leasing by oil and gas operators or obtaining necessary permits or other approvals can disrupt our operations and have a material adverse effect on our business. Under certain circumstances, the BLM may require operations on federal leases to be suspended or terminated. Any such suspension or termination could materially and adversely affect our interests on federal lands.
Current report
In addition, litigation related to leasing and permitting of federal lands could also restrict, delay or limit our ability to conduct operations on our federal leasehold or acquire additional federal leasehold. For example, in 2022, two environmental advocacy groups filed suit against the U.S. Department of Interior and the BLM challenging certain lease sales by the BLM beginning in December of 2017 (the “BLM Litigation”). On January 17, 2025, a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld vacatur of various leases sold by the BLM, on grounds that the BLM violated the NEPA (defined herein) and the Federal Land Planning and Management Act when selling certain leases. It remains unclear whether parties involved in the BLM Litigation will seeken banc review of the decision. While the Company is not named in the BLM Litigation (as defendants, intervenors or otherwise), certain of the leases owned by the Company in the PRB covering approximately 82,804 acres (as of December 31, 2025) have been “placed in suspense” pending a ruling by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in the BLM Litigation. It is possible that the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling could result in the cancellation of these leases. In addition, as part of the BLM Litigation, on September 13, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia issued a ruling temporarily enjoining further applications for permits to drill with respect to certain of the Company’s BLM leases, citing erroneous data that overstated the amount of available groundwater in the Converse County Oil and Gas Project’s (the “Project’s”) Environmental Impact Statement. This ruling had the effect of halting federal APD approvals within the area of the Project until the court “determines the appropriate final remedy” to correct the deficiency being alleged in the case. It is possible that the BLM’s review and ultimate approval of our APDs could be impacted by this federal court ruling. If the January 17, 2025 Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision remains final, or if a final judgment on any similar future litigation results in the cancellation of leases or otherwise restricts production of our oil, natural gas or NGLs assets, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be materially and adversely affected; however, we could also receive the return of up to $79 million of total lease bonuses previously paid in certain circumstances, which would have a positive effect on working capital.
Current report
Our hedging activities may prevent us from fully benefiting from increases in crude oil, natural gas and NGLs prices and may expose us to other risks, including counterparty risk, and our future production may not be sufficiently protected from any declines in commodity prices by our existing or future hedging arrangements.
Current report
We use financial derivative instruments (primarily financial fixed price swaps and collar contracts) to hedge the impact of fluctuations in commodity prices on our results of operations and cash flows. In connection with the entry into the A&R Credit Agreement, the Company was required to hedge at least 75% of its projected proved developed producing reserves (PDP) oil and gas production at the time of entry into the A&R Credit Agreement, for the first 24 months of the agreement, and 50% of its projected PDP of oil and gas production for months 25–36. Afterward, within 60 days after each fiscal quarter, the Company must show it has hedged at least 50% of expected oil and gas production for the next 18 months. The Company may hedge crude oil, natural gas, or natural gas liquids (on a barrel of oil equivalent basis) to meet these requirements, but may not hedge more than 75% of anticipated production (on a barrel of oil equivalent basis) for any month. As of the date of this report, the Company currently has approximately 75% of its crude oil production hedged through November 2027 and approximately 51% hedged from December 2027 through November 2028, and ~75% of its natural gas production hedged through November 2027 and approximately 50% hedged from December 2027 through November 2028, at various prices.
Current report
Our hedging activities may expose us to the risk of financial loss in certain circumstances, including instances in which the counterparties to our hedging contracts fail to perform under the contracts. Our hedges may in the future result in losses and reduce the amount of revenue we would otherwise obtain upon the sale of our oil and natural gas production and may also decrease our margins and net revenues.
Current report
Our actual future production may be significantly higher or lower than we estimate at the time we enter into derivative contracts for the relevant period. If the actual amount of production is higher than we estimated, we will have greater commodity price exposure than we intended. If the actual amount of production is lower than the notional amount that is subject to our derivative instruments, we might be forced to satisfy all or a portion of our derivative transactions without the benefit of the cash flow from our sale of the underlying physical commodity, resulting in a substantial diminution of our liquidity. As a result of these factors, our hedging activities may not be as effective as we intend in reducing the volatility of our cash flows, and in certain circumstances may actually increase the volatility of our cash flows.
Current report
To the extent that we have engaged, or in the future engage, in hedging activities to protect ourselves against commodity price declines, we may be prevented from fully realizing the benefits of increases in commodity prices above the prices established by our hedging contracts. In addition, our hedging activities may expose us to the risk of financial loss in certain circumstances, including instances in which the counterparties to our hedging contracts fail to perform under the contracts.
Current report
In addition, depending on the type of derivative arrangements we enter into, the agreements could limit the benefit we would receive from increases in oil and gas prices. It cannot be assumed that the hedging transactions we have entered into, or will enter into, will adequately protect us from fluctuations in commodity prices.
Current report
Increases in the differential between the ceiling value for oil and natural gas prices set forth in our commodity derivative contracts and commodity derivative collar contracts is anticipated to affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Current report
For more information regarding our current derivative instruments see “Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” – “Note 10 – Derivatives”.
Current report
Additionally, pursuant to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Formation, the Juniper Shareholder and its affiliates (the “Juniper Investor Group”, which term includes the Juniper Directors) and Dr. Simon Kukes and his affiliates (collectively, the “PED Investor Group”), may each engage in other business ventures, including those that compete with or overlap with our business. Each group may hold positions, invest in, or develop opportunities related to other entities (“Other Investments”), potentially creating conflicts of interest. Pursuant to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Formation, the Company explicitly waives any right or expectation to participate in certain described corporate opportunities including businesses that may compete with, overlap with, complement, or otherwise be suitable for the Company or its subsidiaries and agrees that neither the investor groups, nor their representatives or directors, are obligated to share or offer these opportunities to the Company, unless the opportunity arises solely from their role as a director of the Company or through specific information rights in the Shareholder Agreement (“Renounced Business Opportunities”). However, the Company remains free to pursue any such renounced opportunities on its own.
Current report
The provisions in our Amended and Restated Certificate of Formation permitting the Juniper Investor Group and the PED Investor Group to engage in other business activities, including those that may compete with or overlap with our business, could result in conflicts of interest and limit our access to attractive business opportunities. Because these investors and their affiliated directors are not restricted from pursuing competing ventures or investments, they may allocate time, resources and opportunities to other entities in which they have an interest, which could adversely affect our ability to compete effectively or pursue strategic initiatives.
Current report
The Shareholder Agreement provides that the Board will consist of six directors or such other number as approved by the Board in accordance with the organizational documents of the Company and the Shareholder Agreement and be constituted as follows:
Current report
The right of the Juniper Shareholder to nominate Juniper Directors pursuant to the Shareholder Agreement will depend on its, together with its affiliates’, ownership of 3,181,818 shares of Company common stock issued to the Juniper Shareholder and its affiliates on February 27, 2026, on the applicable date of determination, as measured relative to a total of 13,300,815 shares of common stock issued and outstanding on February 27, 2026 (“Juniper Beneficial Ownership”), as follows: if Juniper Beneficial Ownership is 50% or more, the Juniper Shareholder may nominate three Juniper Directors, including one which must be an independent director; if Juniper Beneficial Ownership is between 30% and 49.9%, the Juniper Shareholder may nominate two Juniper Directors; if Juniper Beneficial Ownership is between 10% and 29.9%, the Juniper Shareholder may nominate one Juniper Director; and if Juniper Beneficial Ownership is less than 10%, the Juniper Shareholder loses the right to nominate any Juniper Directors.
Current report
The nomination of such Juniper Directors is subject to such persons not being prohibited from serving as a member of the Board. In the event any Juniper Director ceases serving as a member of the Board for any reason, the Juniper Shareholder has the right to designate a replacement, and subject to certain customary exceptions, the Board is required to take all reasonable actions within its control to appoint such replacement person as a member of the Board of the Company to fill such vacancy. The Juniper Shareholder also has the right to remove any Juniper Director at any time for any reason.
Current report
The Board is prohibited from increasing or decreasing the number of members of the Board without the affirmative vote of a majority of the independent directors then on the Board that are not Juniper Directors, and the written consent of the Juniper Shareholder.
Current report
New or revised rules, regulations and policies may be issued, and new legislation may be proposed, that could impact the oil and gas exploration and production industry.
Current report
New or revised rules, regulations and policies may be issued, and new legislation may be proposed, that could impact the oil and gas exploration and production industry. Such rules, regulations, policies and legislation may affect, among other things, (i) permitting for oil and gas drilling on state, tribal and federal lands; (ii) the leasing of state, tribal and federal lands for oil and gas development; (iii) the regulation and disclosure of greenhouse gas emissions and/or other climate change-related matters associated with oil and gas operations (e.g., the development, implementation and carrying out of carbon capture and storage activities, including associated financial or tax incentives); (iv) the use of hydraulic fracturing on state, tribal and federal lands; (v) the calculation of royalty payments in respect of oil and gas production from state, tribal and federal lands (including, but not limited to, an increase in applicable royalty percentages); (vi) U.S. federal income tax laws applicable to oil and gas exploration and production companies; and (vii) the use of financial derivative instruments to hedge the financial impact of fluctuations in crude oil, natural gas and NGLs prices.
Current report
Further, drilling long lateral wells in Wyoming typically involves interception and development of multiple federal leases. However, for several years, the federal government, through the BLM, has limited the number of minerals acres made available for lease. As a result, many operators suffer from leasehold “gaps” in their drilling units, which effectively prohibit these operators from developing their existing federal leasehold at no-fault of the operator. Section 39 allows for the suspension of operations and production on leases when the necessary federal tracts for exploration and development are not yet available. Section 39 suspense must be requested annually. Certain of the leases owned by the Company in the PRB have been “placed in suspense” under Section 39. The ability of the Company to effectively develop these leases is subject to its ability to close existing “gaps” in its federal leasehold by leasing additional acreage from the BLM.
Current report
As previously disclosed, on March 28, 2025, the Audit Committee of the Board, after discussion with the Company’s senior management and the Company’s then independent registered public accounting firm, Marcum LLP (“Marcum”), concluded that the Company’s previously issued audited financial statements included in the Company’s (i) audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, originally included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 (the “2023 10-K”), and (ii) audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, originally included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 (the “2022 10-K”)(collectively, the “Form 10-Ks”) filed with the Commission on March 18, 2024 and March 29, 2023, respectively, should no longer be relied upon and should be restated due to errors in the accounting for the depletion expense related to the Company’s oil and gas properties. These errors led to an overstatement of depletion expense during the impacted periods. Additionally, on October 27, 2025, the Audit Committee, after discussion with the Company’s senior management and the Company’s former independent registered public accounting firm, Marcum, which audited the Company’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2024, concluded that the Company’s previously issued audited financial statements included in the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, originally included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 filed with the Commission on March 31, 2025, should no longer be relied upon and should be restated due to an error in the accounting for the prior period net operating losses in the calculation of the tax provision for the impacted period. This error resulted in an overstatement of the Company’s tax benefit and deferred income tax account during the impacted period. All of the prior financial statements which included errors have since been restated and such restatements have been included in the financial statements included in this Annual Report.
Current report
Combining the businesses of NPOG and COG with the Company may be more difficult, costly or time-consuming than expected and the Company may fail to realize the anticipated synergies and other benefits of the Mergers, which may adversely affect the Company’s business results and negatively affect the value of our Common Stock.
Current report
The Company and each of the Acquired Companies have operated prior to the closing of the Mergers, independently. The success of the Mergers will depend on, among other things, the ability of the Company and the Acquired Companies to combine their businesses in a manner that facilitates growth opportunities and realizes expected cost savings. We entered into the Merger Agreement because we believe that the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement are fair to and in the best interests of our shareholders and that combining the businesses of the Company and the Acquired Companies will produce benefits as well as cost savings and other cost and capital expenditure synergies.
Current report
The Company and the Acquired Companies must successfully combine their respective businesses in a manner that permits these benefits to be realized. For example, the following issues, among others, must be addressed in integrating the operations of the companies in order to realize the anticipated benefits of the Mergers:
Current report
It is possible that the integration process could result in the loss of key employees of the Company or the Acquired Companies, the disruption of either the Company’s or the Acquired Companies’ ongoing businesses, inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures and policies, unexpected integration issues, higher than expected integration costs and an overall post-completion integration process that takes longer than originally anticipated. In addition, the actual integration may result in additional and unforeseen expenses. If the Company is not able to adequately address integration challenges, we may be unable to successfully integrate operations and the anticipated benefits of the integration plan may not be realized.
Current report
In addition, the Company must achieve the anticipated growth and cost savings without adversely affecting current revenues and investments in future growth. If the Company is not able to successfully achieve these objectives, the anticipated synergies and other benefits of the Mergers may not be realized fully, or at all, or may take longer to realize than expected. Additionally, we may inherit from the Acquired Companies legal, regulatory, and other risks that occurred prior to the Mergers, whether known or unknown to us, which may be material to the Company. Actual growth, cost and capital expenditure synergies and other cost savings, if achieved, may be lower than what we expect and may take longer to achieve than anticipated. Moreover, at times the attention of the Company’s management and resources may be focused on the integration of the businesses of the company and diverted from day-to-day business operations or other opportunities that may have been beneficial to such company, which may disrupt the Company’s ongoing businesses.
Current report
An inability to realize the full extent of the anticipated benefits of the Mergers, as well as any delays encountered in the integration process, could have an adverse effect upon the revenues, level of expenses and operating results of the Company, which may adversely affect the value of the Company’s common stock following the consummation of the Mergers. Moreover, if the Company is unable to realize the full strategic and financial benefits currently anticipated from the Mergers, PEDEVCO shareholders will have experienced substantial dilution of their ownership interests without receiving any commensurate benefit, or only receiving part of the commensurate benefit to the extent the Company is able to realize only part of the strategic and financial benefits currently anticipated from the Mergers.
Showing the first 40 of 47 passages. Open the source sections for the rest.
Removed paragraphs (11)
Previous report
Our industry and the broader US economy have experienced higher than expected inflationary pressures in 2022, related to continued supply chain disruptions, labor shortages and geopolitical instability. Should these conditions persist our business, results of operations and cash flows could be materially and adversely affected.
Previous report
Year 2022 saw significant increases in the costs of certain services and materials, including steel, sand and fuel, as a result of availability constraints, supply chain disruption, increased demand, labor shortages associated with a fully employed US labor force, high inflation, interest rates and other factors, with supply and demand fundamentals being further aggravated by disruptions in global energy supply caused by multiple geopolitical events, including the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine and the current armed conflict in Israel and the Gaza Strip, all resulting in an estimated cost increase of approximately 25% to 30% per well on our Permian Asset and 10% to 20% on our D-J Basin Asset, based on costs we experienced commencing in the third quarter of 2021 and continuing throughout 2022. Service and materials costs also increased accordingly through 2022, stabilizing in 2023 in 2024, with general supply chain and inflation issues seen throughout the industry leading to increased operating costs. While the Company is cautiously optimistic that such costs have plateaued and will hold at current levels as we have not seen significant cost increases in 2024 and thus far in 2025, supply chain constraints, the effect of tariffs, and inflationary pressures may adversely impact our operating costs and may negatively impact our ability to procure materials and equipment in a timely and cost-effective manner, if at all, which could result in reduced margins and production delays and, as a result, our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be materially and adversely affected.
Previous report
We may not be able to generate sufficient cash flow to meet any future debt service and other obligations due to events beyond our control.
Previous report
Our ability to generate cash flows from operations, to make payments on or refinance potential future indebtedness and to fund working capital needs and planned capital expenditures will depend on our future financial performance and our ability to generate cash in the future. Our future financial performance will be affected by a range of economic, financial, competitive, business and other factors that we cannot control, such as general economic, legislative, regulatory and financial conditions in our industry, the economy generally, the price of oil and other risks described below. A significant reduction in operating cash flows resulting from changes in economic, legislative or regulatory conditions, increased competition or other events beyond our control could increase the need for additional or alternative sources of liquidity and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, prospects and our ability to service future potential debt and other obligations. If we are unable to service future potential indebtedness or to fund our other liquidity needs, we may be forced to adopt an alternative strategy that may include actions such as reducing or delaying capital expenditures, selling assets, restructuring or refinancing such indebtedness, seeking additional capital, or any combination of the foregoing. If we raise debt, it would increase our interest expense, leverage and our operating and financial costs. We cannot assure you that any of these alternative strategies could be affected on satisfactory terms, if at all, or that they would yield sufficient funds to make required payments on future potential indebtedness or to fund our other liquidity needs. Reducing or delaying capital expenditures or selling assets could delay future cash flows. In addition, the terms of future debt agreements may restrict us from adopting any of these alternatives. We cannot assure you that our business will generate sufficient cash flows from operations or that future borrowings will be available in an amount sufficient to enable us to pay such future potential indebtedness or to fund our other liquidity needs.
Previous report
If for any reason we are unable to meet our future potential debt service and repayment obligations, we may be in default under the terms of the agreements governing such indebtedness, which could allow our creditors at that time to declare such outstanding indebtedness to be due and payable. Under these circumstances, our lenders could compel us to apply all of our available cash to repay our borrowings. In addition, the lenders under our credit facilities or other secured indebtedness could seek to foreclose on any of our assets that are their collateral. If the amounts outstanding under such indebtedness were to be accelerated, or were the subject of foreclosure actions, our assets may not be sufficient to repay in full the money owed to the lenders or to our other debt holders.
Previous report
If we do not hedge our exposure to reductions in oil and natural gas prices, we may be subject to significant reductions in prices. Alternatively, we may use oil and natural gas price hedging contracts, which involve credit risk and may limit future revenues from price increases and result in significant fluctuations in our profitability.
Previous report
In the event that we continue to choose not to hedge our exposure to reductions in oil and natural gas prices by purchasing futures and/or by using other hedging strategies, we may be subject to a significant reduction in prices which could have a material negative impact on our profitability. Alternatively, we may elect to use hedging transactions with respect to a portion of our oil and natural gas production to achieve more predictable cash flow and to reduce our exposure to price fluctuations. While the use of hedging transactions limits the downside risk of price declines, their use also may limit future revenues from price increases. Hedging transactions also involve the risk that the counterparty may be unable to satisfy its obligations.
Previous report
The $1.1 million owed to us under a secured convertible promissory note due from Tilloo in the Milnesand Sale may not be repaid.
Previous report
On November 9, 2023, pursuant to the terms of the Milnesand Sale, the Company entered into a five-year secured promissory note (the “Note”) with Tilloo, bearing interest at 10% per annum, with no payments due until January 8, 2025, and fully-amortized payments due monthly over the remaining four years of the term thereafter until maturity. The Note contains customary events of default and is secured by a lien over all the assets and capital shares of EOR Operating Company (“EOR”), our prior wholly-owned subsidiary which was sold to Tilloo, created under a Security Agreement, a Security Agreement (Pledge of Corporate Securities), and a Mortgage entered into by and between the Company and Tilloo. Tilloo failed to make the initial installment payment due under the Tilloo Note on January 8, 2025. The Company issued a notice of default under the Tilloo Note to Tilloo in mid-January 2025, and the Company intends to pursue all available avenues and remedies, including potential foreclosure under the security agreement and mortgages securing the secured obligation, to resolve these matters. However, Tilloo may not make any payments under the Note and the Company may not be able to recover amounts due under the Note. Furthermore, litigation relating to the repayment of the Note, if initiated, may take away time and resources that management would otherwise have spent on other matters, which may adversely affect our results of operations and ultimately the value of our common stock.
Previous report
We have in the past been significantly dependent on capital provided to us by Dr. Simon G. Kukes and may rely on Dr. Kukes for additional funding in the future.
Previous report
In 2018 and 2019, Dr. Simon G. Kukes, the Company’s former Chief Executive Officer and director and current Executive Chairman of the Company's Board of Directors, loaned us an aggregate of $51.7 million to support our operations and for acquisitions through an entity owned and controlled by him, all of which loans were evidenced by promissory notes. The promissory notes generally had terms which were more favorable to us than we would have been able to obtain from third parties, including, generally favorable interest rates, no restrictions on further borrowing or financial covenants and no security interests in our assets. All of such notes have to date been converted into 29.5 million shares of common stock at conversion prices which were above the then-trading prices of our common stock. Additionally, pursuant to subscription agreements, Dr. Kukes’ entity purchased an additional aggregate of 15.0 million shares of common stock from the Company in private transactions for $28.0 million in 2019, also on substantially more favorable terms to us than could be obtained with third parties. Subsequent to September 2019, we have not received any additional capital from Dr. Kukes, instead funding our operations primarily through the sale of securities in public offerings, the sale of oil and gas properties, and sales of crude oil and natural gas. While Dr. Kukes has verbally advised us that he intends to provide us additional funding as needed, nothing has been documented to date, and such future funding, if any, may not ultimately be provided on favorable terms, if at all. In the event that we are forced to obtain funding from parties other than Dr. Kukes, such funding terms will likely not be as favorable to the Company as the funding provided by Dr. Kukes, and may not be available in such amounts as previously provided by Dr. Kukes. In the event Dr. Kukes fails to provide us future funding, when and if needed, it could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, results of operations and could force us to borrow funds from outside sources on less favorable terms than our prior debt or sell equity to outside investors on less favorable terms than the equity we issued to Dr. Kukes.
Reworded paragraphs (50)
Previous wording
The price we receive for our oil and, to a lesser extent, natural gas and NGLs, heavily influences our revenue, profitability, cash flows, liquidity, access to capital, present value and quality of our reserves, the nature and scale of our operations and future rate of growth. Oil, NGL and natural gas are commodities and, therefore, their prices are subject to wide fluctuations in response to relatively minor changes in supply and demand. In recent years, the markets for oil and natural gas have been volatile. These markets will likely continue to be volatile in the future. Further, oil prices and natural gas prices do not necessarily fluctuate in direct relation to each other. Because approximately 60% of our estimated proved reserves as of December 31, 2024 were oil, our financial results are more sensitive to movements in oil prices. The price of crude oil has experienced significant volatility over the last five years, with the price per barrel of West Texas Intermediate (“WTI”) crude, dropping below $20 per barrel in 2020 due in part to reduced global demand stemming from the global COVID-19 outbreak, and surging to over $120 a barrel in early March 2022, following Russia’s invasion of the Ukraine, to the $70s in recent months. A prolonged period of low market prices for oil and natural gas, or further declines in the market prices for oil and natural gas, will likely result in capital expenditures being further curtailed and will adversely affect our business, financial condition and liquidity and our ability to meet obligations, targets or financial commitments and could ultimately lead to restructuring or filing for bankruptcy, which would have a material adverse effect on our stock price and indebtedness. Additionally, lower oil and natural gas prices have, and may in the future, cause, a decline in our stock price. The below table highlights the recent volatility in oil and gas prices by summarizing the high and low daily NYMEX WTI oil spot price and daily NYMEX natural gas Henry Hub spot price for the periods presented:
Current wording
The price we receive for our oil and, to a lesser extent, natural gas and NGLs, heavily influences our revenue, profitability, cash flows, liquidity, access to capital, present value and quality of our reserves, the nature and scale of our operations and future rate of growth. Oil, NGL and natural gas are commodities and, therefore, their prices are subject to wide fluctuations in response to relatively minor changes in supply and demand. In recent years, the markets for oil and natural gas have been volatile. These markets will likely continue to be volatile in the future. Further, oil prices and natural gas prices do not necessarily fluctuate in direct relation to each other. Because approximately 72% of our estimated proved reserves as of December 31, 2025 were oil, our financial results are more sensitive to movements in oil prices. The price of crude oil has experienced significant volatility over the last five years, with the price per barrel of West Texas Intermediate (“WTI”) crude, dropping below $48 per barrel in 2021 and surging to over $120 a barrel in early March 2022, following Russia’s invasion of the Ukraine, to the $90s in early 2026, and more recently increasing again to the mid-$90s per barrel following the initiation of the recent conflict in Iran . A prolonged period of low market prices for oil and natural gas, or further declines in the market prices for oil and natural gas, will likely result in capital expenditures being further curtailed and will adversely affect our business, financial condition and liquidity and our ability to meet obligations, targets or financial commitments and could ultimately lead to restructuring or filing for bankruptcy, which would have a material adverse effect on our stock price and indebtedness. Additionally, lower oil and natural gas prices have, and may in the future, cause, a decline in our stock price. The below table highlights the recent volatility in oil and gas prices by summarizing the high and low daily NYMEX WTI oil spot price and daily NYMEX natural gas Henry Hub spot price for the periods presented:
Previous wording
We have a limited operating history and are engaged in the initial stages of exploration, development and exploitation of our leasehold acreage and will continue to be so until commencement of substantial production from our oil and natural gas properties, which will depend upon successful drilling results, additional and timely capital funding, and access to suitable infrastructure. Companies in their initial stages of development face substantial business risks and may suffer significant losses. We have generated substantial net losses in the past and may continue to incur net losses as we continue our drilling program. In considering an investment in our common stock, you should consider that there is only limited historical and financial operating information available upon which to base your evaluation of our performance. We have incurred net losses of $106,002,000 from the date of inception (February 9, 2011) through December 31, 2024. Additionally, we may be dependent on obtaining additional debt and/or equity financing to roll-out and scale our planned principal business operations. Management’s plans in regard to these matters consist principally of seeking additional debt and/or equity financing combined with expected cash flows from current oil and gas assets held and additional oil and gas assets that we may acquire. Our efforts may not be successful, and funds may not be available on favorable terms, if at all.
Current wording
We have a limited operating history and are engaged in the initial stages of exploration, development and exploitation of our leasehold acreage and will continue to be so until commencement of substantial production from our oil and natural gas properties, which will depend upon successful drilling results, additional and timely capital funding, and access to suitable infrastructure. Companies in their initial stages of development face substantial business risks and may suffer significant losses. We have generated substantial net losses in the past and may continue to incur net losses as we continue our drilling program. In considering an investment in our common stock, you should consider that there is only limited historical and financial operating information available upon which to base your evaluation of our performance. We have incurred net losses of $121,860,000 from the date of inception (February 9, 2011) through December 31, 2025. Additionally, we may be dependent on obtaining additional debt and/or equity financing to roll-out and scale our planned principal business operations. Management’s plans in regard to these matters consist principally of seeking additional debt and/or equity financing combined with expected cash flows from current oil and gas assets held and additional oil and gas assets that we may acquire. Our efforts may not be successful, and funds may not be available on favorable terms, if at all.
Previous wording
We may need additional capital to complete future acquisitions, conduct our operations and fund our business beyond 2025, and our ability to obtain the necessary funding is uncertain.
Current wording
We may need additional capital to complete future acquisitions and conduct our operations and fund our business in and beyond 2026, and will need to raise additional capital to repay outstanding liabilities, and our ability to obtain the necessary funding is uncertain.
Previous wording
We may need to raise additional funding to complete future potential acquisitions and may be required to raise additional funds through public or private debt or equity financing or other various means to fund our operations and complete exploration and drilling operations beyond 2025 and acquire assets. In such a case, adequate funds may not be available when needed or may not be available on favorable terms. If we need to raise additional funds in the future by issuing equity securities, including sales of common stock under our December 2024 Sales Agreement entered into with Roth Capital Partners, LLC and A.G.P./Alliance Global Partners, pursuant to which we can sell up to $8 million in at-the-market offerings, dilution to existing stockholders will result, and such securities may have rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of our common stock. If funding is insufficient at any time in the future and we are unable to generate sufficient revenue from new business arrangements, to complete planned acquisitions or operations, our results of operations and the value of our securities could be adversely affected.
Current wording
We may need additional capital to complete future acquisitions and conduct our operations and fund our business in and beyond 2026, and will need to raise additional capital to repay outstanding liabilities, and may be required to raise additional funds through public or private debt or equity financing or other various means to repay outstanding liabilities, fund our operations and complete exploration and drilling operations in and beyond 2026 and acquire assets. In such a case, adequate funds may not be available when needed or may not be available on favorable terms. If we need to raise additional funds in the future by issuing equity securities, including sales of common stock under our December 2024 Sales Agreement entered into with Roth Capital Partners, LLC and A.G.P./Alliance Global Partners, pursuant to which we can sell up to $8 million in at-the-market offerings, dilution to existing stockholders will result, and such securities may have rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of our common stock, and/or through drawing debt under our A&R Credit Agreement. If funding is insufficient at any time in the future and we are unable to generate sufficient revenue from new business arrangements, to complete planned acquisitions or operations, our results of operations and the value of our securities could be adversely affected.
Previous wording
Recent increases in inflation have had an adverse effect on us. Current and future inflationary effects may be driven by, among other things, supply chain disruptions and governmental stimulus or fiscal policies, and geopolitical instability, including the ongoing conflict between the Ukraine and Russia and the current armed conflict in Israel and the Gaza Strip, and the effect of tariffs. Increases in inflation, have in the past, and could in the future, impact our costs of labor, equipment and services and the margins we are able to realize on our wells, all of which could have an adverse impact on our business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows. Inflation has also resulted in higher interest rates in the past, which in turn raises our cost of debt borrowing.
Current wording
Recent increases in inflation have had an adverse effect on us. Current and future inflationary effects may be driven by, among other things, supply chain disruptions and governmental stimulus or fiscal policies, and geopolitical instability, including the recent armed conflict in Israel and the Gaza Strip, and the ongoing conflicts between the Ukraine and Russia and the United States and Iran, and the effect of tariffs. Increases in inflation, have in the past, and could in the future, impact our costs of labor, equipment and services and the margins we are able to realize on our wells, all of which could have an adverse impact on our business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows. Inflation has also resulted in higher interest rates in the past, which in turn raises our cost of debt borrowing.
Previous wording
Global economic conditions continue to be volatile and uncertain due to, among other things, consumer confidence in future economic conditions, fears of recession and trade wars, the effect of tariffs, the price of energy, fluctuating interest rates, the availability and cost of consumer credit, the availability and timing of government stimulus programs, levels of unemployment, increased inflation, and tax rates. These conditions remain unpredictable and create uncertainties about our ability to raise capital in the future. In the event required capital becomes unavailable in the future, or more costly, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Current wording
Global economic conditions continue to be volatile and uncertain due to, among other things, consumer confidence in future economic conditions, ongoing wars and conflicts, including the ongoing conflict between the United States and Iran, fears of recession and trade wars, the effect of tariffs, the price of energy, fluctuating interest rates, the availability and cost of consumer credit, the availability and timing of government stimulus programs, levels of unemployment, increased inflation, and tax rates. These conditions remain unpredictable and create uncertainties about our ability to raise capital in the future. In the event required capital becomes unavailable in the future, or more costly, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Previous wording
The Company has entered into an SFO with the OCD through RAZO, the Company’s New Mexico operating subsidiary, which requires, among other things, that the Company reimburse the OCD for actual costs incurred by the OCD for plugging and abandoning approximately 299 inactive legacy wells in the Permian Basin Asset at a rate of $2.00 per gross barrel of oil sold by RAZO during any production reporting period, subject to a minimum payment of $30,000 per month by RAZO. .RAZO has been timely paying each reimbursement invoice received from the OCD in accordance with the SFO and is in full compliance with the SFO. Such required payments and reimbursements may be significant, and may reduce our cash flows and funds available for our business plan and/or require us to raise additional funding in the future. Additionally, in the event the Company is unable to fully comply with the terms of the SFO, then the Company could be subject to significant civil penalties and sanctions, which would likely have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations, could require us to raise additional funding which may not be available on commercially reasonable terms, if at all, and may negatively affect our drilling plans in the future, and may cause the value of our securities to decline in value.
Current wording
The Company has entered into an SFO with the OCD through RAZO, the Company’s New Mexico operating subsidiary, which requires, among other things, that the Company reimburse the OCD for actual costs incurred by the OCD for plugging and abandoning approximately 299 inactive legacy wells in the Permian Basin Asset (of which seven have been plugged to date) at a rate of $2.00 per gross barrel of oil sold by RAZO during any production reporting period, subject to a minimum payment of $30,000 per month by RAZO. RAZO has been timely paying each reimbursement invoice received from the OCD in accordance with the SFO and is in full compliance with the SFO. Such required payments and reimbursements may be significant, and may reduce our cash flows and funds available for our business plan and/or require us to raise additional funding in the future. Additionally, in the event the Company is unable to fully comply with the terms of the SFO, then the Company could be subject to significant civil penalties and sanctions, which would likely have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations, could require us to raise additional funding which may not be available on commercially reasonable terms, if at all, and may negatively affect our drilling plans in the future, and may cause the value of our securities to decline in value.
Previous wording
All of our crude oil, natural gas and NGLs production is located in the Permian Basin and the D-J Basin, making us vulnerable to risks associated with operating in only two geographic areas. In addition, we have a large amount of proved reserves attributable to a small number of producing formations.
Current wording
All of our crude oil, natural gas and NGLs production is located in the Permian Basin, the Powder River Basin and the D-J Basin, making us vulnerable to risks associated with operating in only three geographic areas. In addition, we have a large amount of proved reserves attributable to a small number of producing formations.
Previous wording
Our current operations are focused solely in the Permian Basin located in Chaves and Roosevelt Counties, New Mexico, and the D-J Basin of Weld and Morgan Counties, Colorado, with potential future operations extending into Laramie County, Wyoming, which means our current producing properties and new drilling opportunities are geographically concentrated in those two areas. Because our operations are not as diversified geographically as many of our competitors, the success of our operations and our profitability may be disproportionately exposed to the effect of any regional events, including:
Current wording
Our current operations are focused solely in the Permian Basin located in Chaves and Roosevelt Counties, New Mexico, and the D-J Basin of Weld and Morgan Counties, Colorado, with future operations extending into the Powder River Basin in Campbell and Laramie Counties, Wyoming, as a result of our October 2025 Mergers, with which means our current producing properties and new drilling opportunities are geographically concentrated in those three areas. Because our operations are not as diversified geographically as many of our competitors, the success of our operations and our profitability may be disproportionately exposed to the effect of any regional events, including:
Previous wording
For example, bottlenecks in processing and transportation that have occurred in some recent periods in the Permian Basin and D-J Basin may negatively affect our results of operations, and these adverse effects may be disproportionately severe to us compared to our more geographically diverse competitors. Similarly, the concentration of our assets within a small number of producing formations exposes us to risks, such as changes in field-wide rules that could adversely affect development activities or production relating to those formations. Such an event could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. In addition, in areas where exploration and production activities are increasing, as has been the case in recent years in the Permian Basin and D-J Basin, the demand for, and cost of, drilling rigs, equipment, supplies, personnel and oilfield services increase. Shortages or the high cost of drilling rigs, equipment, supplies, personnel or oilfield services could delay or adversely affect our development and exploration operations or cause us to incur significant expenditures that are not provided for in our capital forecast, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Current wording
For example, bottlenecks in processing and transportation that have occurred in some recent periods in the Permian Basin, Powder River Basin, and D-J Basin may negatively affect our results of operations, and these adverse effects may be disproportionately severe to us compared to our more geographically diverse competitors. Similarly, the concentration of our assets within a small number of producing formations exposes us to risks, such as changes in field-wide rules that could adversely affect development activities or production relating to those formations. Such an event could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. In addition, in areas where exploration and production activities are increasing, as has been the case in recent years in the Permian Basin, the Powder River Basin, and D-J Basin, the demand for, and cost of, drilling rigs, equipment, supplies, personnel and oilfield services increase. Shortages or the high cost of drilling rigs, equipment, supplies, personnel or oilfield services could delay or adversely affect our development and exploration operations or cause us to incur significant expenditures that are not provided for in our capital forecast, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Previous wording
The prices we receive for our oil, NGLs and natural gas heavily influence our revenue, profitability, cash flow available for capital expenditures, access to capital and future rate of growth. Oil, NGLs and natural gas are commodities and, therefore, their prices are subject to wide fluctuations in response to relatively minor changes in supply and demand. Historically, the commodities market has been volatile. For example, the price of crude oil has experienced significant volatility over the last five years, with the price per barrel of West Texas Intermediate (“WTI”) crude, dropping below $20 per barrel in 2020 due in part to reduced global demand stemming from the global COVID-19 outbreak, and surging to over $120 a barrel in early March 2022, following Russia’s invasion of the Ukraine, to the $70s in recent months. Prices for natural gas and NGLs experienced declines of similar magnitude. An extended period of continued lower oil prices, or additional price declines, will have further adverse effects on us. The prices we receive for our production, and the levels of our production, will continue to depend on numerous factors, including the following:
Current wording
The prices we receive for our oil, NGLs and natural gas heavily influence our revenue, profitability, cash flow available for capital expenditures, access to capital and future rate of growth. Oil, NGLs and natural gas are commodities and, therefore, their prices are subject to wide fluctuations in response to relatively minor changes in supply and demand. Historically, the commodities market has been volatile. For example, the price of crude oil has experienced significant volatility over the last five years, with the price per barrel of West Texas Intermediate (“WTI”) crude, dropping below $48 per barrel in 2021, and surging to over $120 a barrel in early March 2022, following Russia’s invasion of the Ukraine, to the $60s in early 2026, to around $98 more recently following the initiation of the recent conflict in Iran. Prices for natural gas and NGLs experienced declines of similar magnitude. An extended period of continued lower oil prices, or additional price declines, will have further adverse effects on us. The prices we receive for our production, and the levels of our production, will continue to depend on numerous factors, including the following:
Previous wording
Declines in oil, NGL or natural gas prices have not, and will not, only reduce our revenue, but have and will reduce the amount of oil, NGL and natural gas that we can produce economically. Should natural gas, NGL or oil prices decline from current levels and remain there for an extended period of time, we may choose to shut-in our operated wells, (similar to our shut-in of our operated wells in 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic), delay some or all of our exploration and development plans for our prospects, or to cease exploration or development activities on certain prospects due to the anticipated unfavorable economics from such activities, and, as a result, we may have to make substantial downward adjustments to our estimated proved reserves, each of which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Current wording
Declines in oil, NGL or natural gas prices have not, and will not, only reduce our revenue, but have and will reduce the amount of oil, NGL and natural gas that we can produce economically. Should natural gas, NGL or oil prices decline from current levels and remain there for an extended period of time, we may choose to shut-in our operated wells, (similar to our shut-in of our operated wells in the Permian Basin and the D-J Basin in 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic), delay some or all of our exploration and development plans for our prospects, or to cease exploration or development activities on certain prospects due to the anticipated unfavorable economics from such activities, and, as a result, we may have to make substantial downward adjustments to our estimated proved reserves, each of which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Previous wording
We review our long-lived tangible and intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. For example, for the year ended December 31, 2020, due to falling oil and gas prices, we incurred a $19.3 million impairment of our oil and gas properties. No impairment was incurred for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023. In the past we have been required to impair our assets and, if conditions in any of the businesses in which we compete were to deteriorate in the future, we could determine that certain of our assets were impaired and we would then be required to write-off all or a portion of our costs for such assets. Prior write-offs have adversely affected our balance sheet and results of operations and any future significant write-offs would similarly adversely affect our balance sheet and results of operations.
Current wording
We review our long-lived tangible and intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. For example, for the year ended December 31, 2020, due to falling oil and gas prices, we incurred a $19.3 million impairment of our oil and gas properties with respect to our D-J Basin properties, and during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Acquired Companies recorded impairment charges of $3.9 million and $21.1 million, respectively, with respect to their proved and unproved oil and natural gas properties in the PRB for 2024 and both the PRB and D-J Basin for 2023. Aside from certain lease expirations, no significant impairment was incurred for the year ended December 31, 2025. We could be at risk for proved and unproved property impairments if we experience adverse market conditions for an extended period of time. The carrying values of our properties are sensitive to declines in oil, natural gas and NGL prices as well as increases in various development and operating costs and expenses. If oil, natural gas and NGL prices remain depressed for extended periods of time or decline materially from current levels, we may be required to record additional write-downs of the carrying value of our proved oil and natural gas properties. Further, we periodically evaluate our unproved oil and natural gas properties to determine the recoverability of our costs. Prior write-offs have adversely affected balance sheet assets and results of operations and any future significant write-offs would similarly adversely affect our balance sheet and results of operations.
Previous wording
Concerns over global economic conditions, the duration and effects of future pandemics, and the results thereof, energy costs, geopolitical issues (including, but not limited to the current Ukraine/Russia and Israel/Gaza Strip conflicts), inflation, increasing interest rates and the availability and cost of credit have contributed to increased economic uncertainty and diminished expectations for the global economy. These factors, combined with volatile prices of oil and natural gas, and declining business and consumer confidence, have precipitated an economic slowdown, which could expand to a recession or global depression. If the economic climate in the United States or abroad deteriorates, demand for petroleum products could diminish, which could further impact the price at which we can sell our oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids, affect the ability of our vendors, suppliers and customers to continue operations, and ultimately adversely impact our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition to a greater extent that it has already.
Current wording
Concerns over global economic conditions, the duration and effects of future pandemics, and the results thereof, energy costs, geopolitical issues (including, but not limited to the Israel/Gaza Strip conflict, the Ukraine/Russia conflict and the current Iran conflict), inflation, increasing interest rates and the availability and cost of credit have contributed to increased economic uncertainty and diminished expectations for the global economy. These factors, combined with volatile prices of oil and natural gas, and declining business and consumer confidence, have precipitated an economic slowdown, which could expand to a recession or global depression. If the economic climate in the United States or abroad deteriorates, demand for petroleum products could diminish, which could further impact the price at which we can sell our oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids, affect the ability of our vendors, suppliers and customers to continue operations, and ultimately adversely impact our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition to a greater extent that it has already.
Previous wording
In addition, future events, such as terrorist attacks, wars, threat of wars, or combat peace-keeping missions, financial market disruptions, general economic recessions, oil and natural gas industry recessions, large company bankruptcies, accounting scandals, pandemic diseases, overstated reserves estimates by major public oil companies and disruptions in the financial and capital markets have caused financial institutions, credit rating agencies and the public to more closely review the financial statements, capital structures and earnings of public companies, including energy companies. Such events have constrained the capital available to the energy industry in the past, and such events or similar events could adversely affect our access to funding for our operations in the future.
Current wording
In addition, future events, such as terrorist attacks, wars and conflicts, threat of wars and conflicts, or combat peace-keeping missions, financial market disruptions, general economic recessions, oil and natural gas industry recessions, large company bankruptcies, accounting scandals, pandemic diseases, overstated reserves estimates by major public oil companies and disruptions in the financial and capital markets have caused financial institutions, credit rating agencies and the public to more closely review the financial statements, capital structures and earnings of public companies, including energy companies. Such events have constrained the capital available to the energy industry in the past, and such events or similar events could adversely affect our access to funding for our operations in the future.
Previous wording
Our current operations are concentrated in the states of New Mexico and Colorado, with future operations potentially extending into Wyoming. This concentration may increase the potential impact of many of the risks described in this Annual Report. For example, we may have greater exposure to regulatory actions impacting New Mexico, Colorado and/or Wyoming, adverse weather and natural disasters in New Mexico, Colorado and/or Wyoming, competition for equipment, services and materials available in, and access to infrastructure and markets in, these states.
Current wording
Our current operations are concentrated in the states of New Mexico, Colorado, and Wyoming. This concentration may increase the potential impact of many of the risks described in this Annual Report. For example, we may have greater exposure to regulatory actions impacting New Mexico, Colorado, and/or Wyoming, adverse weather and natural disasters in New Mexico, Colorado, and/or Wyoming, competition for equipment, services and materials available in, and access to infrastructure and markets in, these states.
Previous wording
We are not the operator on some of our properties located in our D-J Basin Asset, and, as a result, our ability to exercise influence over the operations of these properties or their associated costs is limited. Our dependence on the operators and other working interest owners of these projects and our limited ability to influence operations and associated costs or control the risks could materially and adversely affect the realization of our targeted returns on capital in drilling or acquisition activities. The success and timing of our drilling and development activities on properties operated by others therefore depends upon a number of factors, including:
Current wording
We are not the operator on all of our properties located in our D-J Basin and PRB Asset, and, as a result, our ability to exercise influence over the operations of these properties or their associated costs is limited. Our dependence on the operators and other working interest owners of these projects and our limited ability to influence operations and associated costs or control the risks could materially and adversely affect the realization of our targeted returns on capital in drilling or acquisition activities. The success and timing of our drilling and development activities on properties operated by others therefore depends upon a number of factors, including:
Previous wording
A substantial percentage of our Colorado and New Mexico properties, and all of our Wyoming properties, are undeveloped; therefore, the risk associated with our success is greater than would be the case if the majority of such properties were categorized as proved developed producing.
Current wording
Approximately 50% of our Colorado, New Mexico, and Wyoming properties, are undeveloped; therefore, the risk associated with our success is greater than would be the case if the majority of such properties were categorized as proved developed producing.
Previous wording
Because a substantial percentage of our Colorado and New Mexico properties, and all of our Wyoming properties, are undeveloped, we will require significant additional capital to develop such properties before they may become productive. Further, because of the inherent uncertainties associated with drilling for oil and gas, some of these properties may never be developed to the extent that they result in positive cash flow. Even if we are successful in our development efforts, it could take several years for a significant portion of our undeveloped properties to be converted to positive cash flow.
Current wording
Because approximately 50% of our Colorado, New Mexico, and Wyoming properties, are undeveloped, we will require significant additional capital to develop such properties before they may become productive. Further, because of the inherent uncertainties associated with drilling for oil and gas, some of these properties may never be developed to the extent that they result in positive cash flow. Even if we are successful in our development efforts, it could take several years for a significant portion of our undeveloped properties to be converted to positive cash flow.
Previous wording
Our operations in the Permian Basin in Chaves and Roosevelt Counties, New Mexico, and the D-J Basin in Weld and Morgan Counties, Colorado, and potentially extending into Laramie County, Wyoming, involve utilizing the latest drilling and completion techniques in order to maximize cumulative recoveries and therefore generate the highest possible returns. The additional risks that we face while drilling horizontally include, but are not limited to, the following:
Current wording
Our operations in the Permian Basin in Chaves and Roosevelt Counties, New Mexico, the D-J Basin in Weld and Morgan Counties, Colorado, and the PRB in Laramie and Campbell Counties, Wyoming, involve utilizing the latest drilling and completion techniques in order to maximize cumulative recoveries and therefore generate the highest possible returns. The additional risks that we face while drilling horizontally include, but are not limited to, the following:
Previous wording
The requirements, restrictions and covenants in our RBL, including interest payable thereunder, may restrict our ability to operate our business and might lead to a default under such agreement.
Current wording
The requirements, restrictions and covenants in our A&R Credit Agreement, including interest payable thereunder, may restrict our ability to operate our business and might lead to a default under such agreement.
Previous wording
Borrowings under the RBL may be alternate base rate (“ABR”) loans or SOFR loans, at the election of the Company. Interest is payable quarterly for ABR loans and at the end of the applicable interest period for SOFR loans. SOFR loans bear interest at the forward-looking term rate based on the secured overnight financing rate as administered by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (“SOFR”) for a one, three or six-month interest period plus an applicable margin ranging from 300 to 400 basis points, depending on the percentage of the borrowing base utilized, plus an additional 10 basis point credit spread adjustment (the “SOFR Rate”). ABR loans bear interest at a rate per annum equal to the greatest of: (i) the prime rate as publicly announced by Citibank; (ii) the federal funds effective rate plus 50 basis points; and (iii) the adjusted forward-looking term rate based on SOFR for a one-month interest period plus 100 basis points, plus an applicable margin ranging from 200 to 300 basis points, depending on the percentage of the borrowing base utilized (the “ABR Rate”). The Company also pays a commitment fee on unused commitment amounts under its facility of 37.5 basis points or 50 basis points, depending on the percentage of the borrowing base utilized. The Company may repay any amounts borrowed under the RBL prior to the maturity date without any premium or penalty, and is required to repay certain portions of the amounts borrowed under the RBL upon the occurrence of certain events.
Current wording
Borrowings under the A&R Credit Agreement may be alternate base rate (“ABR”) loans or SOFR loans, at the election of the Company. Interest is payable quarterly for ABR loans and at the end of the applicable interest period for SOFR loans. SOFR loans bear interest at the forward-looking term rate based on the secured overnight financing rate as administered by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (“SOFR”) for a one, three or six-month interest period plus an applicable margin ranging from 300 to 400 basis points, depending on the percentage of the borrowing base utilized, plus an additional 10 basis point credit spread adjustment (the “SOFR Rate”). ABR loans bear interest at a rate per annum equal to the greatest of: (i) the prime rate as publicly announced by Citibank; (ii) the federal funds effective rate plus 50 basis points; and (iii) the adjusted forward-looking term rate based on SOFR for a one-month interest period plus 100 basis points, plus an applicable margin ranging from 200 to 300 basis points, depending on the percentage of the borrowing base utilized (the “ABR Rate”). The Company also pays a commitment fee on unused commitment amounts under its facility of 37.5 basis points or 50 basis points, depending on the percentage of the borrowing base utilized. The Company may repay any amounts borrowed under the A&R Credit Agreement prior to the maturity date without any premium or penalty, and is required to repay certain portions of the amounts borrowed under the A&R Credit Agreement upon the occurrence of certain events.
Previous wording
The RBL includes customary representations and warranties, and affirmative and negative covenants of the Company for a facility of that size and type, including prohibiting the Loan Parties from creating any indebtedness without the consent of the lenders, subject to certain exceptions, and requiring the Company to have a net leverage ratio (the ratio of (a) total net debt to (b) EBITDAX) of no less than 1.0 to 1.0 and a current ratio (the ratio of (i) consolidated current assets to (ii) consolidated current liabilities) of no less than 1.0 to 1.0. EBITDAX is defined as 'Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation (or Depletion), Amortization, and Exploration Expense
Current wording
The A&R Credit Agreement includes customary representations and warranties, and affirmative and negative covenants of the Company for a facility of that size and type, including prohibiting the Company from creating any indebtedness without the consent of the Lenders, subject to certain exceptions, and the maintenance of the following financial ratios: (i) a current ratio, which is the ratio of the Company’s consolidated current assets (including unused commitments under the A&R Credit Agreement and excluding non- cash derivative assets) to its consolidated current liabilities (excluding the current portion of long-term debt under the A&R Credit Agreement and non-cash derivative liabilities), of not less than 1.0 to 1.0; and (ii) a leverage ratio, which is the ratio of Total Net Debt to EBITDAX (each as defined in the A&R Credit Agreement) for the prior four fiscal quarters, of not greater than 3.0 to 1.0. The Company is required to hedge at least 75% of its projected proved developed producing reserves (PDP) oil and gas production at the time of entry into the A&R Credit Agreement, for the first 24 months of the agreement, and 50% of its projected PDP of oil and gas production for months 25-36. Afterward, within 60 days after each fiscal quarter, the Company must show it has hedged at least 50% of expected oil and gas production for the next 18 months. The Company may hedge crude oil, natural gas, or natural gas liquids (on a barrel of oil equivalent basis) to meet these requirements, but may not hedge more than 75% of anticipated production (on a barrel of oil equivalent basis) for any month.
Previous wording
In addition, the RBL is subject to customary events of default for a facility of that size and type, including a change in control. If an event of default occurs and is continuing, the administrative agent may, with the consent of majority lenders, or shall, at the request of the majority lenders, accelerate any amounts outstanding and terminate lender commitments and declare the entire amount of obligations owed under the RBL immediately due and payable and take certain other actions provided for under the RBL.
Current wording
In addition, the A&R Credit Agreement is subject to customary events of default for a facility of that size and type, including a change in control. If an event of default occurs and is continuing, the administrative agent may, with the consent of majority lenders, or shall, at the request of the majority lenders, accelerate any amounts outstanding and terminate lender commitments and declare the entire amount of obligations owed under the A&R Credit Agreement immediately due and payable and take certain other actions provided for under the A&R Credit Agreement.
Previous wording
As a result of these requirements, covenants and limitations, we may not be able to respond to changes in business and economic conditions and to obtain additional financing, if needed, and we may be prevented from engaging in transactions that might otherwise be beneficial to us. The breach of any of these requirements or covenants could result in a default under the RBL or future credit facilities. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, the lenders could elect to declare all amounts outstanding under such RBL or future debt facilities, including accrued interest or other obligations, to be immediately due and payable. If amounts outstanding under such RBL or future debt facilities were to be accelerated, our assets might not be sufficient to repay in full that indebtedness and our other indebtedness.
Current wording
As a result of these requirements, covenants and limitations, we may not be able to respond to changes in business and economic conditions and to obtain additional financing, if needed, and we may be prevented from engaging in transactions that might otherwise be beneficial to us. The breach of any of these requirements or covenants could result in a default under the A&R Credit Agreement or future credit facilities. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, the lenders could elect to declare all amounts outstanding under such A&R Credit Agreement or future debt facilities, including accrued interest or other obligations, to be immediately due and payable. If amounts outstanding under such A&R Credit Agreement or future debt facilities were to be accelerated, our assets might not be sufficient to repay in full that indebtedness and our other indebtedness.
Previous wording
As of the date of this Report, the RBL has a balance of $0. Amounts, if any, that we borrow under the RBL, are due on September 11, 2028.
Current wording
As of the date of this Report, the A&R Credit Agreement has a balance of $98.0 million. Amounts, if any, that we borrow under the A&R Credit Agreement, are due on October 31, 2029.
Previous wording
Our obligations under the RBL are secured by a first priority security interest in substantially all of our assets and various Company guarantees.
Current wording
Our obligations under the A&R Credit Agreement are secured by a first priority security interest in substantially all of our assets and various Company guarantees.
Previous wording
The amounts borrowed pursuant to the terms of the RBL are secured by substantially all of the present and after-acquired assets of the Company and its subsidiaries. Additionally, certain of our subsidiaries have guaranteed the amounts due, and obligations under, the RBL.
Current wording
The amounts borrowed pursuant to the terms of the A&R Credit Agreement are secured by substantially all of the present and after-acquired assets of the Company and its subsidiaries. Additionally, certain of our subsidiaries have guaranteed the amounts due, and obligations under, the A&R Credit Agreement.
Previous wording
As a result of the above, our creditors, in the event of the occurrence of a default under the RBL, may enforce their security interests over our assets and/or our subsidiaries which secure such obligations, may take control of our assets and operations, force us to seek bankruptcy protection, or force us to curtail or abandon our current business plans and operations. If that were to happen, any investment in the Company (including, but not limited to any investment in our common stock) could become worthless.
Current wording
As a result of the above, our creditors, in the event of the occurrence of a default under the A&R Credit Agreement, may enforce their security interests over our assets and/or our subsidiaries which secure such obligations, may take control of our assets and operations, force us to seek bankruptcy protection, or force us to curtail or abandon our current business plans and operations. If that were to happen, any investment in the Company (including, but not limited to, any investment in our common stock) could become worthless.
Previous wording
The amounts borrowed under the RBL bear interest at either the SOFR Rate or the ABR Rate. Interest rates have recently been subject to increasing volatility and any increase in the interest rates associated with our floating-rate debt would increase our debt service costs and affect our results of operations. In addition, a future increase in interest rates could adversely affect our future ability to obtain financing or materially increase the cost of any additional financing.
Current wording
The amounts borrowed under the A&R Credit Agreement bear interest at either the SOFR Rate or the ABR Rate. Interest rates have recently been subject to increasing volatility and any increase in the interest rates associated with our floating-rate debt would increase our debt service costs and affect our results of operations. In addition, a future increase in interest rates could adversely affect our future ability to obtain financing or materially increase the cost of any additional financing.
Previous wording
Dr. Simon G. Kukes, our former CEO and newly appointed Executive Chairman of the Company's Board of Directors, J. Douglas Schick, our President and newly appointed Chief Executive Officer and a member of the board, and Clark R. Moore, our Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, hold various other management positions with privately-held companies, some of which are involved in the oil and gas industry, and Dr. Kukes is the trustee and beneficiary of The SGK 2018 Revocable Trust, the Company’s largest stockholder. Dr. Kukes also beneficially owns 65.4% of our voting securities. We believe these positions require only an immaterial amount of each officer’s time and will not conflict with their roles or responsibilities with our company. If any of these companies enter into one or more transactions with our company, or if the officer’s position with any such company requires significantly more time than currently anticipated, potential conflicts of interests could arise from the officers performing services for us and these other entities.
Current wording
Mr. J. Douglas Schick, our President and Chief Executive Officer and a member of the board, Clark R. Moore, our Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, and Mr. Reagan Dukes, our Chief Operating Officer, and various of our directors, including Josh Schmidt, our Chairman and Edward Geiser, hold various other management positions with privately-held companies, some of which are involved in the oil and gas industry. We believe these positions require only an immaterial amount of each applicable officer’s time and will not conflict with the roles of our officers or directors, their or responsibilities with our company. If any of these companies enter into one or more transactions with our company, or if the officer’s or director’s position with any such company requires significantly more time than currently anticipated, potential conflicts of interests could arise from the officers or directors performing services for us and these other entities.
Previous wording
We depend to a significant degree upon the involvement of our management, specifically, our former Chief Executive Officer and newly appointed Executive Chairman of the Company's Board of Directors, Dr. Simon G. Kukes and our President and newly appointed Chief Executive Officer and a member of the board, Mr. J. Douglas Schick. Our performance and success are dependent to a large extent on the efforts and continued employment of Dr. Kukes and Mr. Schick. We do not believe that Dr. Kukes or Mr. Schick could be quickly replaced with personnel of equal experience and capabilities, and their successor(s) may not be as effective. If Dr. Kukes, Mr. Schick, or any of our other key personnel resign or become unable to continue in their present roles and if they are not adequately replaced, our business operations could be adversely affected. We have no employment or similar agreement in place with Dr. Kukes. Mr. Schick is party to an employment agreement with us which has no stated term and can be terminated by either party without cause.
Current wording
We depend to a significant degree upon the involvement of our management, specifically, our President and Chief Executive Officer, and member of the board, Mr. J. Douglas Schick. Our performance and success are dependent to a large extent on the efforts and continued employment of Mr. Schick. We do not believe that Mr. Schick could be quickly replaced with personnel of equal experience and capabilities, and his successor(s) may not be as effective. If Mr. Schick or any of our other key personnel resign or become unable to continue in their present roles and if they are not adequately replaced, our business operations could be adversely affected. Mr. Schick is party to an employment agreement with us which has no stated term and can be terminated by either party without cause.
Previous wording
Dr. Simon G. Kukes, our former Chief Executive Officer and newly appointed Executive Chairman of the Company's Board of Directors, beneficially owns 65.4% of our common stock, which gives him majority voting control over stockholder matters and his interests may be different from your interests; and as a result of such ownership, we are a “controlled company” under applicable NYSE American rules.
Current wording
Juniper beneficially owns 52% of our common stock, which gives Juniper majority voting control over stockholder matters and Juniper’s interests may be different from your interests; and as a result of such ownership, we are a “controlled company” under applicable NYSE American rules.
Previous wording
Dr. Simon G. Kukes, our former Chief Executive Officer and newly appointed Executive Chairman of the Company's Board of Directors, through his individual ownership of the Company and through his position as trustee and beneficiary of The SGK 2018 Revocable Trust, which beneficially owns approximately 56.7% of our issued and outstanding common stock and Dr. Kukes, together with the ownership of The SGK 2018 Revocable Trust, beneficially owns approximately 65.4% of our issued and outstanding common stock. As such, Dr. Kukes can control the outcome of all matters requiring a stockholder vote, including the election of directors, the adoption of amendments to our certificate of formation or bylaws and the approval of mergers and other significant corporate transactions. Subject to any fiduciary duties owed to the stockholders generally, while Dr. Kukes’ interests may generally be aligned with the interests of our stockholders, in some instances Dr. Kukes may have interests different than the rest of our stockholders, including but not limited to, future potential company financings in which Dr. Kukes or The SGK 2018 Revocable Trust may participate, or his leadership at the Company. Dr. Kukes’ influence or control of our company as a stockholder may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control of our company and may adversely affect the voting and other rights of other stockholders. Because Dr. Kukes controls the stockholder vote, investors may find it difficult to replace Dr. Kukes (and such persons as he may appoint from time to time) as members of our management if they disagree with the way our business is being operated. Additionally, the interests of Dr. Kukes may differ from the interests of the other stockholders and thus result in corporate decisions that are adverse to other stockholders. of Dr. Kukes’ ownership of the Company, as discussed above, we are a “controlled company” under the rules of the NYSE American. Under these rules, a company of which more than 50% of the voting power is held by an individual, a group or another company is a “controlled company” and, as such, can elect to be exempt from certain corporate governance requirements, including requirements that:
Current wording
Juniper beneficially owns approximately 52% of our issued and outstanding common stock. As such, Juniper can control the outcome of all matters requiring a stockholder vote, including the election of directors, the adoption of amendments to our certificate of formation or bylaws and the approval of mergers and other significant corporate transactions. In addition, Juniper is entitled to appoint, and has appointed, three of the six members of the Company's Board of Directors pursuant to the Shareholder Agreement. Subject to any fiduciary duties owed to the stockholders generally, while Juniper’s interests may generally be aligned with the interests of our stockholders, in some instances Juniper may have interests different than the rest of our stockholders, including but not limited to, future potential company financings in which Juniper may participate. Juniper also has significant influence on our Board of Directors due to appointment of three of the six current members of the Company’s Board. Juniper’s influence or control of our company as a stockholder and through its Board appointments may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control of our company and may adversely affect the voting and other rights of other stockholders. Because Juniper controls the stockholder vote, investors will not be able to replace its appointees to the Board of Directors and may also not be able to replace other appointees, if they disagree with the way our business is being operated. Additionally, the interests of Juniper may differ from the interests of the other stockholders and thus result in corporate decisions that are adverse to other stockholders. Due to Juniper’s ownership of the Company, as discussed above, we are a “controlled company” under the rules of the NYSE American. Under these rules, a company of which more than 50% of the voting power is held by an individual, a group or another company is a “controlled company” and, as such, can elect to be exempt from certain corporate governance requirements, including requirements that:
Previous wording
As a “controlled company,” we may elect to rely on some or all of these exemptions, provided that we have to date not taken advantage of any of these exemptions and do not currently intend to take advantage of any of these exemptions moving forward. Notwithstanding that, should the interests of Dr. Kukes differ from those of other stockholders, the other stockholders may not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are subject to all of the NYSE American corporate governance standards. Even if we do not avail ourselves of these exemptions, our status as a controlled company could make our common stock less attractive to some investors or otherwise harm our stock price.
Current wording
As a “controlled company,” we may elect to rely on some or all of these exemptions, provided that we have to date not taken advantage of any of these exemptions and do not currently intend to take advantage of any of these exemptions moving forward. Notwithstanding that, should the interests of Juniper differ from those of other stockholders, the other stockholders may not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are subject to all of the NYSE American corporate governance standards. Even if we do not avail ourselves of these exemptions, our status as a controlled company could make our common stock less attractive to some investors or otherwise harm our stock price.
Previous wording
In addition, this concentration of ownership might adversely affect the market price of our common stock by: (1) delaying, deferring or preventing a change of control of our Company; (2) impeding a merger, consolidation, takeover or other business combination involving our Company; or (3) discouraging a potential acquirer from making a tender offer or otherwise attempting to obtain control of our Company. Because of the ownership of securities of Dr. Kukes, investors may find it difficult to replace our current directors (and such persons as they may appoint from time to time) as members of our management if they disagree with the way our business is being operated. Additionally, the interests of Dr. Kukes may differ from the interests of the other stockholders and thus result in corporate decisions that are adverse to other stockholders.
Current wording
In addition, this concentration of ownership might adversely affect the market price of our common stock by: (1) delaying, deferring or preventing a change of control of our Company; (2) impeding a merger, consolidation, takeover or other business combination involving our Company; or (3) discouraging a potential acquirer from making a tender offer or otherwise attempting to obtain control of our Company. Because of the ownership of securities of Juniper, investors may find it difficult to replace our current directors (and such persons as they may appoint from time to time) as members of our management if they disagree with the way our business is being operated. Additionally, the interests of Juniper may differ from the interests of the other stockholders and thus result in corporate decisions that are adverse to other stockholders.
Previous wording
Our business is subject to various forms of government regulation, including laws, regulations and federal orders concerning the location, spacing and permitting of the oil and natural gas wells we drill, among other matters. In particular, our business in the D-J Basin of Colorado utilizes a methodology available in Colorado known as “forced pooling,” which refers to the ability of a holder of an oil and natural gas interest in a particular prospective drilling spacing unit to apply to the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission for an order forcing all other holders of oil and natural gas interests in such area into a common pool for purposes of developing that drilling spacing unit. In addition, our Permian Basin operations require significant salt water disposal capacity, with the permitting of necessary salt water disposal wells being regulated by the New Mexico State Land Office. In recent quarters, we have encountered significant delays in receiving such permits, and increasing difficulty in obtaining required permits, from the New Mexico State Land Office, which has delayed completion operations and the bringing of new wells on to full production. Changes in the legal and regulatory environment governing our industry, particularly any changes to Colorado’s forced pooling procedures that make forced pooling more difficult to accomplish and changes in minimum set-backs distances for drilling operations from buildings (including those recently adopted), or increased regulation in New Mexico or Wyoming with respect to salt water disposal well permitting, could result in increased compliance costs and operational delays, and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Current wording
For example, our business in the D-J Basin of Colorado utilizes a methodology available in Colorado known as “forced pooling,” which refers to the ability of a holder of an oil and natural gas interest in a particular prospective drilling spacing unit to apply to the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission for an order forcing all other holders of oil and natural gas interests in such area into a common pool for purposes of developing that drilling spacing unit. In addition, our Permian Basin operations require significant salt water disposal capacity, with the permitting of necessary salt water disposal wells being regulated by the New Mexico State Land Office. In recent quarters, we have encountered significant delays in receiving such permits, and increasing difficulty in obtaining required permits, from the New Mexico State Land Office, which has delayed completion operations and the bringing of new wells on to full production. Changes in the legal and regulatory environment governing our industry, particularly any changes to Colorado’s forced pooling procedures that make forced pooling more difficult to accomplish and changes in minimum set-backs distances for drilling operations from buildings (including those recently adopted), or increased regulation in New Mexico or Wyoming with respect to salt water disposal well permitting, could result in increased compliance costs and operational delays, and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Previous wording
In addition, approximately 17% of the Company’s acreage in New Mexico, 1% of the Company’s acreage in Colorado, and 4% of the Company’s acreage in Wyoming is located on federal lands, which may be subject to federal laws, regulations and orders that could limit our ability to operate. For example, on January 20, 2021, the Acting Secretary of the Interior issued Order Number 3395 (“Order No. 3395”) which contained a directive to temporarily halt all federal permitting activity for 60 days in an effort to study environmental impacts of oil and gas drilling and development, which a federal court blocked with a preliminary injunction in June 2021. President Biden subsequently announced that his administration will resume onshore oil and gas lease sales on federal lands effective April 18, 2022. While this had no impact on existing or ongoing operations, potentially subsequent federal orders could restrict our ability to develop our leases on federal lands, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Current wording
In addition, approximately 17% of the Company’s acreage in New Mexico, 1% of the Company’s acreage in Colorado, and 66% of the Company’s acreage in Wyoming is located on federal lands, which may be subject to federal laws, regulations and orders that could limit our ability to operate. For example, on January 20, 2021, the Acting Secretary of the Interior issued Order Number 3395 (“Order No. 3395”) which contained a directive to temporarily halt all federal permitting activity for 60 days in an effort to study environmental impacts of oil and gas drilling and development, which a federal court blocked with a preliminary injunction in June 2021. President Biden subsequently announced that his administration will resume onshore oil and gas lease sales on federal lands effective April 18, 2022. While this had no impact on existing or ongoing operations, potentially subsequent federal orders could restrict our ability to develop our leases on federal lands, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Previous wording
For example, in 2014, 2016 and 2018, opponents of hydraulic fracturing sought statewide ballot initiatives in Colorado that would have restricted oil and gas development in Colorado and could have had materially adverse impacts on us. One of the proposed initiatives would have made the vast majority of the surface area of the state ineligible for drilling, including substantially all of our planned future drilling locations. By further example, in April 2019, Colorado Senate Bill 19-181 (the “Bill”) was passed into law, which prioritizes the protection of public safety, health, welfare, and the environment in the regulation of the oil and gas industry by modifying the State’s oil and gas statutes and clarifying, reinforcing, and establishing local governments’ regulatory authority over the surface impacts of oil and gas development in Colorado. This Bill, among other things, gives more power to local government entities in making land use decisions about oil and gas development and regulation, and directs the Energy & Carbon Management Commission (“ECMC”) (formerly the Colorado Oil & Gas Conservation Commission (“COGCC”)) to promulgate rules to ensure, among other things, proper wellbore integrity, allow public disclosure of flowline information, and evaluate when inactive or shut-in wells must be inspected before being put into production or used for injection. In addition, the Bill requires that owners of more than 50% of the mineral interests in lands to be pooled must have joined in the application for a pooling order and that the application must include proof that the applicant received approval for the facilities from the affected local government or that the affected local government does not regulate such facilities. In addition, the Bill provides that an operator cannot use the surface owned by a nonconsenting owner without permission from the nonconsenting owner, and increases nonconsenting owners’ royalty rates during a well’s pay-back period from 12.5% to 13.0%. Pursuant to the Bill, the COGCC (now the ECMC) conducted a series of rulemaking hearings during 2020 which resulted in updated regulatory and permitting requirements, including siting requirements. The COGCC (now the ECMC) commissioners determined that locations with residential or high occupancy building units within 2,000 feet would be subject to additional siting requirements, but also supported “off ramps” allowing oil and gas operators to site their drill pads as close as 500 feet from building units in certain circumstances. We anticipate that the Bill may make it more difficult and more costly for us to undertake oil and gas development activities in Colorado, although the Company has not experienced any significant additional difficulties or costs to date as a result of the Bill.
Current wording
For example, in 2014, 2016 and 2018, opponents of hydraulic fracturing sought statewide ballot initiatives in Colorado that would have restricted oil and gas development in Colorado and could have had materially adverse impacts on us. One of the proposed initiatives would have made the vast majority of the surface area of the state ineligible for drilling, including substantially all of our planned future drilling locations. By further example, in April 2019, Colorado Senate Bill 19-181 (the “Bill”) was passed into law, which prioritizes the protection of public safety, health, welfare, and the environment in the regulation of the oil and gas industry by modifying the State’s oil and gas statutes and clarifying, reinforcing, and establishing local governments’ regulatory authority over the surface impacts of oil and gas development in Colorado. This Bill, among other things, gives more power to local government entities in making land use decisions about oil and gas development and regulation, and directs the ECMC (formerly the COGCC)) to promulgate rules to ensure, among other things, proper wellbore integrity, allow public disclosure of flowline information, and evaluate when inactive or shut-in wells must be inspected before being put into production or used for injection. In addition, the Bill requires that owners of more than 50% of the mineral interests in lands to be pooled must have joined in the application for a pooling order and that the application must include proof that the applicant received approval for the facilities from the affected local government or that the affected local government does not regulate such facilities. In addition, the Bill provides that an operator cannot use the surface owned by a nonconsenting owner without permission from the nonconsenting owner, and increases nonconsenting owners’ royalty rates during a well’s pay-back period from 12.5% to 13.0%. Pursuant to the Bill, the COGCC (now the ECMC) conducted a series of rulemaking hearings during 2020 which resulted in updated regulatory and permitting requirements, including siting requirements. The COGCC (now the ECMC) commissioners determined that locations with residential or high occupancy building units within 2,000 feet would be subject to additional siting requirements, but also supported “off ramps” allowing oil and gas operators to site their drill pads as close as 500 feet from building units in certain circumstances. We anticipate that the Bill may make it more difficult and more costly for us to undertake oil and gas development activities in Colorado, although the Company has not experienced any significant additional difficulties or costs to date as a result of the Bill.
Previous wording
On January 20, 2021, the Acting U.S. Interior Secretary, instituted a moratorium on new oil and gas leases and permits on federal onshore and offshore lands, which a federal court blocked with a preliminary injunction in June 2021. President Biden subsequently announced that his administration will resume onshore oil and gas lease sales on federal lands effective April 18, 2022. A total of approximately 17% of the Company’s acreage in New Mexico, 1% of the Company’s acreage in Colorado, and 4% of the Company’s acreage in Wyoming is located on federal lands. It is currently unclear whether the moratorium will be reinstated, or whether such moratorium is the start of a change in federal policies regarding the grant of oil and gas permits on federal lands. If such prior moratorium was to become permanent, or the federal government in the future were to grant less permits on federal lands, make such permitting process more difficult, costly, or to institute more stringent rules relating to such permitting process, it could have a material adverse effect on the value of the Company’s leases and/or its ability to undertake oil and gas operations on such the portion of its leases on federal lands.
Current wording
On January 20, 2021, the Acting U.S. Interior Secretary, instituted a moratorium on new oil and gas leases and permits on federal onshore and offshore lands, which a federal court blocked with a preliminary injunction in June 2021. President Biden subsequently announced that his administration will resume onshore oil and gas lease sales on federal lands effective April 18, 2022. A total of approximately 17% of the Company’s acreage in New Mexico, 1% of the Company’s acreage in Colorado, and 66% of the Company’s acreage in Wyoming is located on federal lands. It is currently unclear whether the moratorium will be reinstated, or whether such moratorium is the start of a change in federal policies regarding the grant of oil and gas permits on federal lands. If such prior moratorium was to become permanent, or the federal government in the future were to grant less permits on federal lands, make such permitting process more difficult, costly, or to institute more stringent rules relating to such permitting process, it could have a material adverse effect on the value of the Company’s leases and/or its ability to undertake oil and gas operations on such the portion of its leases on federal lands.
Showing the first 40 of 50 pairs. Open the source sections for the rest.
Rearranged current paragraphs (1)
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
In some instances, affiliates of Juniper may have interests different than the rest of our shareholders. The influence or control of our Company by such persons may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control of our Company and may adversely affect the voting and other rights of other shareholders. Additionally, the interests of such persons may differ from the interests of the other shareholders and thus result in corporate decisions that are adverse to other shareholders.
Rearranged previous paragraphs (1)
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
Changes in the legal and regulatory environment governing the oil and natural gas industry, particularly changes in the current Colorado forced pooling system and drilling operation set-back rules, salt water disposal permitting regulations in New Mexico or Wyoming, and new federal orders restricting operations on federal lands, could have a material adverse effect on our business.