Skip to main content

Shattuck Labs, Inc.

For the period ended Jun 30, 2026. Filed Aug 11, 2026.

View on SEC.gov

About this filing

A company's report for each of its first three quarters. The financial statements are not audited. It shows how the business has moved since the last annual report, and what management says changed.

Jun 30, 2026 · Filed Aug 11, 2026

STTK$4.62+2.9%Stored close · as of Nov 6, 2026

What changed in Management’s Discussion and Analysis?

Read the current filing

Previous report: 10-Q

Period ended 2026-03-31; filed 2026-05-07.

0001628280-26-031661

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Current report: 10-Q

Period ended 2026-06-30; filed 2026-08-11.

0001628280-26-055483

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.

Compared 109 previous paragraphs and 115 current paragraphs.

62 unchanged; 24 reworded; 28 added; 22 removed; 1 previous and 1 current paragraphs rearranged.

Tables are not compared: 3 previous and 4 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.

A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.

Added paragraphs (28)

Current report

We have completed a single ascending dose (“SAD”) and multiple ascending dose (“MAD”) Phase 1 clinical trial evaluating SL-325 in healthy volunteers. The Phase 1 trial was a first-in-human, randomized, placebo-controlled trial evaluating the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (“PK”), receptor occupancy (“RO”), pharmacodynamics (“PD”), and immunogenicity of SL-325 in healthy volunteers. The study enrolled 72 participants, across six SAD cohorts, with doses ranging from 0.1 mg/kg to 30.0 mg/kg, and three MAD cohorts, with doses ranging from 1 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg.

Current report

In June 2026, we shared the following data from our Phase 1 trial of SL-325. SL-325 was well-tolerated by all participants in the trial, with only mild (Grade 1) treatment-related adverse events observed in 12 participants. The favorable safety and tolerability profile is consistent with that of the TL1A class. In addition, no evidence of DR3 agonism was observed, confirming that SL-325 is a pure DR3 blocking antibody.

Current report

The PK profile for SL-325 demonstrated dose-proportional increases in Cmax and AUC across all dose levels, with an estimated half-life of approximately 16 days. Accumulation of SL-325 was observed with repeated dosing, at a ratio of 1.64-1.75. Complete inhibition of TL1A binding to DR3 was observed at all dose levels, including the lowest dose of 0.1 mg/kg. The durability of RO exceeded 1 month at all dose levels, and exceeded 76 days (the longest timepoint measured) at doses of 1 mg/kg or greater. Using our Phase 1 PK data, our PK and QSP modeling predicts that complete RO will be maintained for 90 days or longer at doses of 1 mg/kg or greater, which may enable quarterly maintenance dosing of SL-325 in patients with IBD.

Current report

Treatment emergent anti-drug antibodies ("ADA") were detected in 3.7% (2/54) of study participants, and ADA titers remained low in these individuals (maximum titers of 8 and 16). The validated ADA assay has a sensitivity of 5.0 ng/ml and drug tolerance of up to SL-325 concentrations of 160 µg/ml in the serum. Serum samples were tested over a time-course, to ensure that SL-325 concentrations were within the dynamic range of the assay for all study participants, and each participant has had at least three valid negative ADA assay results, including after the last dose. Collectively, these data position SL-325 as a potentially best-in-mechanism inhibitor of the TL1A/DR3 axis due to a superior immunogenicity profile. For reference, anti-TL1A antibodies (afimkibart, tulisokibart, SPY-002, and XmAb942) reported treatment emergent ADA in between 48-82% of study participants in similar Phase 1 healthy volunteer studies.

Current report

In addition, a high-concentration formulation of SL-325 has been developed, and the Phase 1 data indicate the potential feasibility of administering quarterly doses of SL-325 which maintain complete receptor occupancy in volumes compatible with a self-administered subcutaneous autoinjector pen device.

Current report

We expect to initiate RECEPTIVE-CD1, an international, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded Phase 2b clinical trial evaluating SL-325 in patients with Crohn’s Disease (“CD”) in the third quarter of 2026. In this study, approximately 232 patients with moderately-to-severely active Crohn’s disease (CDAI score between 220-450) will be randomized 1:1:1:1 to receive high-dose SL-325, middle-dose SL-325, low-dose SL-325 or placebo. The induction phase of treatment is expected to be 12 weeks, followed by a 38-week maintenance period, and patients will also be eligible for a long-term extension study thereafter using a treat-through design. Patients who are randomized to the placebo arm during induction will be eligible to switch to high-dose SL-325 after the 12-week induction period. The primary endpoint of the study is endoscopic response at 12 weeks, and the key secondary endpoint is clinical remission. Data from the induction portion of the trial are expected in the first half of 2028.

Current report

We believe that SL-325 could demonstrate superior efficacy to TL1A blocking antibodies in the RECEPTIVE-CD1 study as a result of two key advantages. First, TL1A blocking antibodies reported anti-drug antibody formation in 48-82% of subjects in similarly designed Phase 1 clinical trials where SL-325 had an ADA rate of 3.7%. In subsequent Phase 2 clinical trials, the leading TL1A blocking antibodies (tulisokibart, duvakitug and afimkibart) all demonstrated potentially best-in-disease clinical remission rates at the time of induction, however the absolute number of patients in clinical remission did not increase between induction and maintenance. We believe that this limitation is due to the underlying immunogenicity of anti-TL1A antibodies, leading to accelerated drug clearance and secondary non-response over time. Because SL-325 has a superior immunogenicity profile, we believe that improved remission rates could be observed both at the induction and maintenance time points relative to the TL1A class.

Current report

Second, DR3 is a more stably expressed target than TL1A. The complete and durable inhibition of TL1A binding observed in our Phase 1 study, at low doses of SL-325 is distinct from what has been reported for TL1A blocking antibodies. Instead, TL1A blocking antibodies lead to multi-log increases in the serum concentration of total TL1A, which may contribute to persistent signaling and incomplete suppression of DR3 activation, particularly in tissues. The RECEPTIVE-CD1 study may provide evidence that, in addition to an immunogenicity advantage, SL-325 could provide enhanced efficacy relative to TL1A blocking antibodies as a result of more complete suppression of DR3 activation.

Current report

SL-846: Our Dual DR3 and IL-23 Receptor Blocking Bispecific Antibody

Current report

SL-846 is our lead bispecific product candidate and is designed to simultaneously bind to DR3 and to IL-23 receptors, blocking the interaction with TL1A and IL-23, respectively, while avoiding the risk of immune complex formation and resulting ADA challenges of the TL1A-based bispecifics.

Current report

SL-846 is an Fc-silenced, half-life extended, IgG1 bispecific antibody. Preclinical data demonstrated that SL-846 was equipotent, or more potent, than sequence equivalents of risankizumab and icotrokinra controls in multiplein vitro and cell-based potency assays. A GLP acute and chronic toxicology study in cynomolgus macaques investigating the safety, PK, RO and immunogenicity profile of SL-846 is currently underway.

Current report

We expect to share additional pre-clinical data, including data from our ongoing non-human primate toxicology study for SL-846, in the second half of 2026, and to share initial Phase 1 clinical data for SL-846 in 2027.

Current report

•initiate Phase 2 clinical development for SL-325 in additional potential indications, if any;

Current report

Research and development expenses increased by $3.0 million, or 34.8%, to $11.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026 from $8.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025. The increase in research and development expenses was primarily a result of an increase of $3.2 million in clinical and non-clinical expenses for SL-325 and SL-846 and an increase of $0.4 million in compensation and related benefit expenses due to additional headcount to support a Phase 2 study in SL-325, partially offset by a decrease of $0.9 million as a result of the discontinuation of SL-172154.

Current report

Other income increased by $0.4 million, or 74.7%, to $1.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026 from $0.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025. The increase was a result of increased overall balances in investments and funds held in our money market accounts as a result of our recent financings.

Current report

General and administrative expenses were relatively flat for the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025.

Current report

Other income increased by $0.5 million, or 41.2%, to $1.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 from $1.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The increase was primarily a result of increased balances in investments and funds held in our money market accounts.

Current report

In June 2026, we issued and sold 13,691,876 shares of common stock, including the full exercise of the underwriters' option to purchase an additional 2,812,500 shares, and pre-funded warrants to purchase up to 7,870,624 shares of common stock, in a public offering for gross proceeds of $86.2 million. The purchase price of shares of common stock was $4.00 and the purchase price of each pre-funded warrant was $3.999 which was the purchase price per share of common stock less the $0.0001 per share exercise price of the pre-funded warrants.

Current report

During the six months ended June 30, 2026, net cash used in investing activities was $121.1 million, and primarily consisted of purchases of investments net of maturities of investments during the period.

Current report

During the six months ended June 30, 2025, net cash used in financing activities was $0.1 million and primarily consisted of taxes paid related to net share settlement of equity awards.
Removed paragraphs (22)

Previous report

TL1A is the sole known signaling ligand for DR3, and TL1A does not signal through any other receptors. Thus, we believe that the clinical safety profile of TL1A blocking antibodies generated to date in clinical trials conducted by other parties derisks the clinical safety profile for DR3 blockade. The lack of toxicity of SL-325 in our recently completed non-human primate (“NHP”) acute toxicology study also suggests a potentially favorable clinical safety profile. We engineered SL-325 to lack any Fc gamma receptor binding function, and SL-325 has not shown any evidence in our preclinical studies to date of antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity or cellular phagocytosis, which further supports a potentially derisked safety profile. We have demonstrated that SL-325 binds an epitope on DR3 that does not trigger receptor-mediated endocytosis, and the binding of SL-325 to DR3 was shown to be highly durable in our preclinical assays and in our NHP studies. Because DR3 is expressed on circulating, peripheral blood lymphocytes, we are able to directly measure DR3 receptor occupancy (“RO”), and our nonclinical studies suggest that blockade is durable for at least two months as a result of the properties of SL-325 and the stable expression of DR3. In our preclinical studies, including our acute NHP toxicology study, the RO and pharmacokinetic (“PK”) profile of SL-325 suggest extended dosing intervals, which are being further characterized in our ongoing Phase 1 clinical trial.

Previous report

DR3 has a distinct expression pattern from TL1A, and, consequently, blocking the receptor may allow a more complete and durable blockade of the axis, which we believe will translate to improved efficacy in patients with IBD. DR3 and TL1A have distinct expression patterns within the gastrointestinal tract (“GI”) of patients with IBD, including both ulcerative colitis (“UC”) and Crohn’s disease (“CD”). The cells within the GI tract that are capable of expressing TL1A include tissue resident antigen presenting cells and other non-hematopoietic cells. While TL1A is not usually expressed, when antigen presenting cells are exposed to inflammatory signals, a wave of TL1A mRNA expression begins, which peaks within 12 hours and ceases within 24 hours. In contrast, DR3 is stably expressed, primarily by lymphocytes both in the peripheral blood and in tissues. Direct comparison of TL1A and DR3 expression in the GI tracts of patients with IBD shows that TL1A is only upregulated in the actively inflamed areas of the GI tract. In contrast, DR3 is more abundant than TL1A and is upregulated in both actively inflamed parts of the GI tissue and in the adjacent non-inflamed tissue. The absence of TL1A in the non-inflamed areas of the bowel eliminates the mechanism through which TL1A blocking antibodies would be retained in non-inflamed areas of the GI tract. Because inflammation observed in UC and CD can wax and wane in different areas of the bowel over time, stable blockade of DR3 may reduce the spread of inflammation and may contribute to higher rates of clinical and endoscopic remission than what TL1A blocking antibodies have achieved to date.

Previous report

A source of immunogenicity shared by all TL1A blocking antibodies is the formation of immune complexes between soluble TL1A in the blood and the anti-TL1A antibodies. Binding of soluble TL1A in the blood by anti-TL1A antibodies leads to a significant increase in the concentration of total TL1A in the blood. These immune complexes have contributed to ADA formation in more than 64% of subjects treated with afimkibart, tulisokibart, or duvakitug in third-party clinical trials. A third-party Phase 2 trial testing the efficacy of afimkibart in CD patients demonstrated that ADA caused accelerated clearance of afimkibart, which reduced efficacy in an ADA titer dependent manner. Because DR3 is a membrane-restricted receptor, and SL-325 was engineered to bind an epitope on DR3 that is not found on DcR3, immune complex formation is not expected with SL-325. Data generated from our GLP acute NHP toxicology study, along within silico assessment of immunogenicity risk, consistently suggest that SL-325 may have single digit ADA rates in humans. Thus, we expect that SL-325 has the potential to demonstrate a best-in-mechanism immunogenicity profile, and we expect that this superior immunogenicity profile alone will lead to improved efficacy as a monotherapy, at both the induction and maintenance time points.

Previous report

Additionally, there is a high degree of sequence identity between certain third-party anti-TL1A antibodies, including tulisokibart, afimkibart, and duvakitug, and potential third-party combination agents, including vedolizumab, risankizumab, mirikizumab, and guselkumab. This overlap in sequence identity introduces a risk that ADAs generated against TL1A antibodies may cross-bind to these potential combination agents and could cause accelerated clearance of both the anti-TL1A antibody and other antibodies included in a coformulation, and that this may impact the efficacy of each agent. Because of this, we believe that SL-325 may allow for improved efficacy in combination with other agents, compared to TL1A targeting antibodies.

Previous report

We are planning initial clinical development of SL-325 in patients with CD. The clinical success of several TL1A blocking antibodies to date suggests that SL-325 may have monotherapy disease modifying activity early in clinical development. As described above, we believe that targeting DR3 may be more efficacious than targeting TL1A in patients with IBD. We have completed enrollment in the ongoing Phase 1 clinical trial for SL-325 in healthy volunteers in the second quarter of 2026, with participant follow-up, data collection, and data analysis ongoing. We expect to initiate our Phase 2 clinical trial in patients with CD in the third quarter of 2026.

Previous report

We maintain a strong research organization that has developed a diverse pipeline of preclinical compounds. One of our guiding principles for considering additional pipeline candidates is a preference for compounds that we expect to have monotherapy activity early in clinical development.

Previous report

In addition to SL-325 and SL-425, we are developing a series of bispecific antibodies targeting DR3 and other clinically validated targets. The future of biologic therapy for both UC and CD is widely believed to include blockade of multiple inflammatory pathways, and the mechanism of DR3/TL1A inhibition is known to be non-redundant with the mechanism of other clinically validated targets.

Previous report

Several attempts have been made to develop bispecific antibodies targeting TL1A, including a TL1A and TNFα blocking antibody known as AMG966. As discussed above, TL1A blocking antibodies stabilize serum TL1A as a result of immune complex formation between soluble TL1A and anti-TL1A antibodies. These immune complexes are believed to contribute to the high rates of ADA formation with TL1A blocking monoclonal antibodies. In the case of AMG966, the bispecific antibody was shown to stabilize both soluble TL1A and TNFα, which led to large immune complex formation and the rapid development of high-titer neutralizing ADA responses in patients treated in a third-party Phase 1 clinical trial. AMG966 was discontinued as a result of this immunogenicity. A second TL1A directed bispecific antibody, RO7837195, targets TL1A and IL-23 p40. This antibody was also tested in a third-party Phase 1 clinical trial in healthy volunteers. Like AMG966, RO7837195 also induced ADA in nearly 100% of treated subjects after a single dose, and most of these ADA were also neutralizing. These two clinical trials suggest high rates of ADA may be unavoidable for TL1A-directed bispecific antibodies. The emerging clinical data for TL1A-directed bispecific antibodies is similar to the prior failure of multiple TNFα-directed bispecific antibodies. Both TNFα and TL1A are soluble trimeric proteins, and binding of bispecific antibodies to these proteins is known to cause large immune complex formation which results in the formation of ADA in nearly all treated subjects. Because DR3 is a membrane-restricted target, immune complex formation is not expected either for SL-325, SL-425, or DR3 directed bispecific antibodies.

Previous report

Revenue recognized in 2025 was a result of an exclusive license agreement (the "Kayak Agreement") with Kayak Therapeutics, Inc. (“Kayak”) for our oncology-focused TRIM7 program, which we entered into in August 2025. Pursuant to the Kayak Agreement, we received preferred stock of Kayak with a fair market value of $1.0 million as upfront consideration for entering into the agreement and recognized the consideration as license revenue.

Previous report

Other income increased by $0.1 million, or 13.2%, to $0.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026 from $0.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 primarily as a result of an increase in our average investment balance.

Previous report

During the three months ended March 31, 2026, net cash provided by investing activities was $23.8 million as a result of investment maturities.

Previous report

During the three months ended March 31, 2025, minimal cash was used in financing activities.

Previous report

Emerging Growth Company and Smaller Reporting Company Status

Previous report

We were previously an “emerging growth company” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, as amended ("JOBS Act"). The JOBS Act provides that an emerging growth company can take advantage of an extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards. Thus, an emerging growth company can delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies.
Reworded paragraphs (24)

Previous wording

You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations together with our unaudited condensed financial statements and related notes appearing in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as well as the audited financial statements, notes and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025. This discussion and other parts of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, such as statements of our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in these forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in the “Risk Factors” section of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. You should carefully read the “Cautionary Note About Forward-Looking Statements” of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the “Risk Factors” section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025 to gain an understanding of the important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results described below.

Current wording

You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations together with our unaudited condensed financial statements and related notes appearing in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as well as the audited financial statements, notes and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025. This discussion and other parts of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to, statements of our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions. Our actual results or outcomes, and the timing of our results or outcomes, could differ materially from those discussed in these forward-looking statements. Risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in the “Risk Factors” section of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, in the “Risk Factors” section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025 and in our other filings with the SEC. You should carefully read the “Cautionary Note About Forward-Looking Statements” of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the “Risk Factors” section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025 to gain an understanding of the important factors that could cause actual results or outcomes, and the timing of results or outcomes, to differ materially from the results or outcomes described below.

Previous wording

SL-325 is a high-affinity DR3 blocking monoclonal antibody. DR3 is the sole known receptor for tumor necrosis factor like ligand 1A ("TL1A"). In our head-to-head preclinical studies, SL-325 blocked TL1A binding to DR3 better than sequence equivalents of leading TL1A blocking antibodies. We believe that the underlying biological differences in the expression of DR3 and TL1A, and the design characteristics of SL-325, may allow SL-325 to achieve best-in-class clinical remission rates in patients with inflammatory bowel disease ("IBD") due to a more complete and durable blockade of the clinically validated DR3/TL1A pathway. Additionally, we expect that SL-325 has the potential to demonstrate a superior immunogenicity profile in comparison to TL1A blocking antibodies. By targeting DR3 instead of TL1A, we expect to avoid the formation of immune complexes, which we believe are the primary source of immunogenicity for all TL1A blocking antibodies, and lead to high rates of anti-drug antibody (“ADA”) formation toward TL1A targeting antibodies. ADA to TL1A targeting antibodies has been shown to reduce efficacy in IBD patients. We are currently conducting a single ascending dose (“SAD”) and multiple ascending dose (“MAD”) Phase 1 clinical trial evaluating SL-325 in healthy volunteers. We expect this Phase 1 clinical trial to be completed in the second quarter of 2026. We expect to initiate a randomized, placebo-controlled Phase 2 clinical trial evaluating SL-325 in patients with Crohn’s Disease (“CD”) in the third quarter of 2026.

Current wording

SL-325 is a high-affinity DR3 blocking monoclonal antibody. DR3 is the sole known receptor for tumor necrosis factor like ligand 1A ("TL1A"). In our head-to-head preclinical studies, SL-325 blocked TL1A binding to DR3 better than sequence equivalents of leading TL1A blocking antibodies. We believe that the underlying biological differences in the expression of DR3 and TL1A, and the design characteristics of SL-325, may allow SL-325 to achieve best-in-mechanism clinical remission rates in patients with inflammatory bowel disease ("IBD") due to a more complete and durable blockade of the clinically validated DR3/TL1A pathway, and a potentially best-in-mechanism immunogenicity profile.

Previous wording

In addition to SL-325 and SL-425 (a half-life extended version of SL-325), we are developing bispecific antibodies which co-target DR3 and other clinically validated targets in immune mediated and inflammatory diseases. Inhibition of the TL1A/DR3 axis may be mechanistically distinct from the IL-23/IL-23R, IL-17/IL-17R, TSLP/TSLP-R or α4β7/MADCAM-1 axes (as examples). Thus, dual inhibition of the TL1A/DR3 axis with coformulated or bispecific antibodies may provide additive clinical benefit in a variety of immune mediated and inflammatory diseases. As seen with TL1A directed antibodies, two third-party TL1A-directed bispecific antibodies, AMG966 and RO7837195, have also demonstrated nearly 100% ADA formation following a single dose in Phase 1 clinical trials. The mechanism of ADA formation was reported to be secondary to large immune complex formation for AMG966, which we believe is also true for RO7837195. The emerging clinical data from TL1A-directed bispecific antibodies is similar to the prior failure of TNFα-directed bispecific antibodies, which we believe is because both TNFα and TL1A are soluble trimeric proteins found in the blood, and cause immunogenicity secondary to large immune complex formation. We expect that our DR3-directed bispecific antibodies to be less immunogenic than TL1A-directed bispecifics. DR3 may thus provide a differentiated target in a bispecific antibody format, providing advantages over TL1A-directed bispecific antibodies. Additionally, development of bispecific antibodies may enable more efficient clinical development than is expected for multi-antibody coformulations, and may avoid some of the challenges associated with potential immunogenicity in certain coformulations, as described above.

Current wording

As seen with TL1A directed monoclonal antibodies, two third-party TL1A-directed bispecific antibodies, AMG966 and RO7837195, have also demonstrated nearly 100% ADA formation following a single dose in Phase 1 clinical trials. The mechanism of ADA formation was reported to be secondary to immune complex formation for AMG966, which we believe could also be true for RO7837195. Both of these antibodies utilized monovalent, ‘1x1’, bispecific antibody formats, similar to other TL1A directed bispecific antibodies which are continuing in clinical development, including XmAb412 and CLD-423. The emerging clinical data from TL1A-directed bispecific antibodies is similar to the prior failure of TNFα-directed bispecific antibodies, which we believe is because both TNFα and TL1A are soluble trimeric proteins found in the blood, and cause immunogenicity secondary to immune complex formation. We expect our DR3-directed bispecific antibodies to be less immunogenic than TL1A-directed bispecifics. DR3 may thus provide a differentiated target in a bispecific antibody format, potentially providing advantages over TL1A-directed bispecific antibodies. Additionally, development of bispecific antibodies may enable more efficient clinical development than is expected for multi-antibody coformulations, and may avoid some of the challenges associated with potential immunogenicity in certain coformulations.

Previous wording

For the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, our net loss was $14.8 million and $13.7 million, respectively. We have not been profitable since inception, and as of March 31, 2026, we had an accumulated deficit of $445.3 million and $90.4 million in cash and cash equivalents. We expect to continue to incur significant expenses and operating losses in the near term in connection with our ongoing activities, as we:

Current wording

For the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, our net loss was $29.9 million and $26.2 million, respectively. We have not been profitable since inception, and as of June 30, 2026, we had an accumulated deficit of $460.4 million and $208.3 million in cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments. We expect to continue to incur significant expenses and operating losses in the near term in connection with our ongoing activities, as we:

Previous wording

•continue Phase 1 clinical development of our lead product candidate, SL-325;

Current wording

•initiate and advance through Phase 2 clinical development for our lead product candidate, SL-325, in Crohn's disease;

Previous wording

•initiate nonclinical studies and clinical trials for additional product candidates that we may identify in the future, including potential DR3 based bispecific antibodies targeting DR3 together with another biologically relevant target;

Current wording

•initiate nonclinical studies and clinical trials for SL-846, including our planned Phase 1 clinical trial, and any additional product candidates that we may identify in the future, including other potential DR3 based bispecific antibodies targeting DR3 together with another biologically relevant target;

Previous wording

The global macroeconomic environment is uncertain, and could be negatively affected by, among other things, inflation, slower growth or recession, changes in trade policies, including tariffs or other trade restrictions or the threat of such actions, instability or volatility in the global capital and credit markets, supply chain weaknesses, financial institution instability, changes to fiscal and monetary policy or government budget dynamics and instability in the geopolitical environment. Such challenges have caused, and may continue to cause, recession fears, high interest rates, foreign exchange volatility, and inflationary pressures. At this time, we are unable to quantify the potential effects of this economic instability on our future operations.

Current wording

The global macroeconomic environment is uncertain, and could be negatively affected by, among other things, inflation, slower growth or recession, changes in trade policies, including tariffs or other trade restrictions or the threat of such actions, instability or volatility in the global capital and credit markets, supply chain weaknesses, financial institution instability, changes to fiscal and monetary policy or government budget dynamics, military conflicts, and instability in the geopolitical environment. Such challenges have caused, and may continue to cause, recession fears, high interest rates, foreign exchange volatility, and inflationary pressures. At this time, we are unable to quantify the potential effects of this economic instability on our future operations.

Previous wording

•expenses incurred to conduct our clinical trials, including expenses associated with clinical trials of SL-325 and any potential product candidates we may advance in the future;

Current wording

•expenses incurred to conduct our clinical trials, including expenses associated with clinical trials of SL-325, future planned clinical trials of SL-846, and any potential product candidates we may advance in the future;

Previous wording

1 Expenses for SL-325 that were incurred prior to it being nominated as a product candidate are included in "other pipeline compounds” in the table above.

Current wording

1 Expenses for SL-325 and SL-846 that were incurred prior to nomination as a product candidate are included in “other pipeline compounds”.

Previous wording

Research and development activities are central to our business model. We are focused on the preclinical and clinical development of SL-325 and other DR3 targeted assets, and conducting additional research on other potential product candidates. Product candidates in earlier stages of development generally have lower development costs than those in later stages of development. In 2026, we anticipate initiating Phase 2 clinical trial(s) for SL-325. Accordingly, we expect an increase in research and development and expense year-over-year, as we incur incremental clinical trial expenses and additional costs associated with commensurate increases in our workforce to support these efforts.

Current wording

Research and development activities are central to our business model. We are focused on the preclinical and clinical development of SL-325 and SL-846 and other DR3 targeted assets, including SL-425, and conducting additional research on other potential product candidates. Product candidates in earlier stages of development generally have lower development costs than those in later stages of development. In the third quarter of 2026, we anticipate initiating a Phase 2 clinical trial for SL-325, and continuing to advance SL-846 into Phase 1 clinical development in 2027. Additionally, we may initiate Phase 2 clinical trial(s) for SL-325 in indications outside of IBD. Accordingly, we expect an increase in research and development expenses year-over-year, as we incur incremental clinical trial expenses and additional costs associated with commensurate increases in our workforce to support these efforts.

Previous wording

Other income consists of interest earned on our cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments, which consists of amounts held in a money market fund and government obligations as well as investment fees and realized gain or losses on short-term investments (if any).

Current wording

Other income consists of interest earned on our cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments, which consists of amounts held in a money market fund and government obligations as well as investment fees and realized gains or losses on short-term investments (if any).

Previous wording

General and administrative expenses remained relatively unchanged for the three months ended March 31, 2026 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2025.

Current wording

General and administrative expenses were relatively flat for the three months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2025.

Previous wording

Research and development expenses increased by $1.0 million, or 10.4%, to $10.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026 from $9.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025. The increase in research and development expenses was primarily due to an increase of $0.6 million in SL-325 expenses primarily as a result of moving SL-325 into clinical development in 2025, an increase in personnel related costs of $0.7 million partially offset by a decrease of $0.3 million in other pipeline compounds cost.

Current wording

Research and development expenses increased by $4.0 million, or 21.8%, to $22.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 from $18.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The increase in research and development expenses was primarily due to an increase of $6.0 million in expenses related to clinical and pre-clinical activities for SL-325 and SL-846 and an increase of $1.1 million in compensation and related benefits due to added headcount in support of SL-325 and SL-846, partially offset by a decrease of $3.4 million as a result of the discontinuation of SL-172154.

Previous wording

Since our inception, our primary sources of liquidity have been generated by sales of our common stock, pre-funded warrants, common stock warrants, convertible preferred stock, and convertible notes, and through collaboration agreements. As of March 31, 2026, we had an accumulated deficit of $445.3 million and $90.4 million of cash and cash equivalents.

Current wording

Since our inception, our primary sources of liquidity have been generated by sales of our common stock, pre-funded warrants, common stock warrants, convertible preferred stock, and convertible notes, and through collaboration agreements. As of June 30, 2026, we had an accumulated deficit of $460.4 million and $208.3 million of cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments.

Previous wording

In August 2025, we issued and sold 15,225,158 shares of common stock, pre-funded warrants to purchase up to 37,410,188 shares of common stock, and accompanying common stock warrants to purchase up to 52,635,346 shares of common stock for gross proceeds of $45.7 million. In 2026, 5,019,719 common stock warrants have been exercised for gross proceeds of $5.4 million and we may receive an additional $51.5 million in gross proceeds if the remaining common stock warrants are exercised.

Current wording

In August 2025, we issued and sold 15,225,158 shares of common stock, pre-funded warrants to purchase up to 37,410,188 shares of common stock, and accompanying common stock warrants to purchase up to 52,635,346 shares of common stock for gross proceeds of $45.7 million. During the six months ended June 30, 2026, 48,665,670 common stock warrants were exercised for gross proceeds of $52.8 million. Subsequently, in July 2026, we received an additional $4.2 million in gross proceeds when the remaining 3,841,622 common stock warrants were exercised in July 2026.

Previous wording

In January 2026, we entered into a sales agreement (the “Sales Agreement”) with Leerink Partners LLC (the “Sales Agent”), pursuant to which we may offer and sell up to $75.0 million of shares of our common stock from time to time through our ATM Facility. The Sales Agent is generally entitled to compensation at a commission equal to up to 3.0% of the aggregate gross sales price per share sold under the Sales Agreement. For the three months ended March 31, 2026, we sold 5,000,000 shares of common stock at $4.28 per share for gross proceeds of $21.4 million.

Current wording

In January 2026, we entered into a sales agreement (the “Sales Agreement”) with Leerink Partners LLC (the “Sales Agent”), pursuant to which we may offer and sell up to $75.0 million of shares of our common stock from time to time through our ATM Facility. The Sales Agent is generally entitled to compensation at a commission equal to up to 3.0% of the aggregate gross sales price per share sold under the Sales Agreement. For the six months ended June 30, 2026, we sold 5,000,000 shares of common stock at $4.28 per share for gross proceeds of $21.4 million.

Previous wording

We believe that our cash and cash equivalents as of March 31, 2026, and assuming the full exercise of the outstanding common stock warrants, are sufficient to fund projected operations into 2029.

Current wording

We believe that our cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments as of June 30, 2026 are sufficient to fund projected operations into 2029.

Previous wording

During the three months ended March 31, 2026, net cash used in operating activities was $13.4 million and primarily reflected our net loss of $14.8 million and a $2.0 million decrease in our operating assets and liabilities partially offset by net non-cash operating charges of $3.4 million for stock-based compensation, depreciation expense, accretion of investments and non-cash operating lease expense. We expect to continue to use cash in our operating activities as we conduct our clinical trials and nonclinical studies, incur costs of manufacturing clinical trial and nonclinical study materials and continue process development activities to optimize our manufacturing processes.

Current wording

During the six months ended June 30, 2026, net cash used in operating activities was $23.6 million and primarily reflected our net loss of $29.9 million, partially offset by net noncash operating charges of $6.2 million for stock-based compensation, depreciation expense, accretion of investments, and non-cash operating lease expense and $0.3 million in net changes to our operating assets and liabilities. We expect to continue to use cash in our operating activities as we conduct our clinical trials and nonclinical studies, incur costs of manufacturing clinical trial and nonclinical study materials, and continue development activities to optimize our manufacturing processes.

Previous wording

During the three months ended March 31, 2025, net cash used in operating activities was $12.0 million and primarily reflected our net loss of $13.7 million and a $1.1 million decrease in our operating assets and liabilities partially offset by non-cash operating charges of $2.8 million for stock-based compensation, depreciation expense, accretion of investments and non-cash operating lease expense.

Current wording

During the six months ended June 30, 2025, net cash used in operating activities was $22.5 million and primarily reflected our net loss of $26.2 million and a $2.0 million net change in our operating assets and liabilities, partially offset by noncash charges of $5.7 million in stock-based compensation, depreciation expense, accretion of investments, and operating lease expense.

Previous wording

During the three months ended March 31, 2025, net cash provided by investing activities was $15.6 million, as a result of investment maturities.

Current wording

During the six months ended June 30, 2025, net cash provided by investing activities was $15.6 million, and primarily consisted of investments that matured during the period.

Previous wording

During the three months ended March 31, 2026, net cash provided by financing activities was $25.8 million and was primarily a result of proceeds from the sale of common stock and exercise of common stock warrants for $26.0 million.

Current wording

During the six months ended June 30, 2026, net cash provided by financing activities was $153.8 million and primarily consisted of proceeds from the sale of common stock, pre-funded warrants and common stock warrants for $100.8 million, the exercise of common stock warrants for $52.8 million and the exercise of stock options for $0.3 million.

Previous wording

Our management’s discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these condensed financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, and expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities in our financial statements. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and judgments, including those related to revenue recognition, the accrual for research and development expenses, and the valuation of stock-based awards. We base our estimates on historical experience, known trends and events, and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Current wording

Our management’s discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these condensed financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, and expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities in our financial statements. We regularly evaluate our estimates and judgments, including those related to revenue recognition, the accrual for research and development expenses, and the valuation of stock-based awards. We base our estimates on historical experience, known trends and events, and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Previous wording

As of December 31, 2025, we ceased to qualify as an emerging growth company. We continue to qualify as a “smaller reporting company” as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the 1934 Securities and Exchange Act (the "Exchange Act") and thus will continue to be permitted to make certain reduced disclosures in the Annual Report on Form 10-K and other periodic reports.

Current wording

We qualify as a “smaller reporting company” as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act") and are permitted to make use of certain reduced disclosure requirements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and certain other filings.

Previous wording

We will continue to be a smaller reporting company so long as (i) the market value of our stock held by non-affiliates is less than $250.0 million or (ii) our annual revenue is less than $100.0 million during the most recently completed fiscal year and the market value of our stock held by non-affiliates is less than $700.0 million. As long as we remain a smaller reporting company we may continue to rely on exemptions from certain disclosure requirements that are available to smaller reporting companies. Specifically, as a smaller reporting company we may choose to present only the two most recent fiscal years of financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and, similar to emerging growth companies, smaller reporting companies have reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation.

Current wording

We will continue to be a smaller reporting company so long as (i) the market value of our stock held by non-affiliates is less than $250.0 million or (ii) our annual revenue is less than $100.0 million during the most recently completed fiscal year and the market value of our stock held by non-affiliates is less than $700.0 million. As long as we remain a smaller reporting company, we may continue to rely on exemptions from certain disclosure requirements that are available to smaller reporting companies.
Rearranged current paragraphs (1)

Current report — wording carried from elsewhere

The following table sets forth our results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025.
Rearranged previous paragraphs (1)

Previous report — wording carried elsewhere

Net Cash Provided by Investing Activities