Richmond Mutual Bancorporation, Inc.
For the period ended Dec 31, 2025. Filed Mar 23, 2026.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.
FY2025 · Filed Mar 23, 2026
RMBI$15.680.0%Stored close · as of Nov 6, 2026
What changed in Risk Factors?
Read the current filingPrevious report: 10-K
Period ended 2024-12-31; filed 2025-03-27.
0001767837-25-000006
Item 1A. Risk FactorsCurrent report: 10-K
Period ended 2025-12-31; filed 2026-03-23.
0001628280-26-020414
Item 1A. Risk FactorsThe baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.
Compared 79 previous paragraphs and 85 current paragraphs.
50 unchanged; 25 reworded; 10 added; 4 removed; 0 previous and 0 current paragraphs rearranged.
Tables are not compared: 0 previous and 0 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.
A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.
Added paragraphs (10)
Current report
Economic conditions in our market area are influenced by broad macroeconomic and policy factors, including inflation or deflation, changes in monetary policy, interest rate volatility, fiscal and trade policies, geopolitical conflicts, market instability, supply-chain disruptions, and adverse weather events. Although inflation has moderated, many borrowers continue to face higher operating costs, including increased costs of materials, goods, and labor. Changes in monetary policy may also affect borrowing behavior, asset values, and credit performance. Trade disputes, tariffs, and shifts in global supply chains may further increase costs for certain commercial borrowers, particularly those dependent on construction materials, raw materials, component parts, or exports.
Current report
•Reduced demand for our products and services, potentially leading to lower loan originations, deposits, and other revenues;
Current report
Risks Related to the Proposed Merger with The Farmers Bancorp, Frankfort, Indiana
Current report
The completion of the merger with The Farmers Bancorp, Frankfort Indiana (“Farmers Bancorp”) is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties that could materially affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and stock price.
Current report
We have entered into a definitive agreement pursuant to which Farmers Bancorp will be merged with and into Richmond Mutual Bancorporation, with Richmond Mutual Bancorporation as the surviving entity. Promptly thereafter, Farmers Bancorp’s wholly owned bank subsidiary, The Farmers Bank, will be merged with and into First Bank Richmond, the wholly owned bank subsidiary of Richmond Mutual Bancorporation, with First Bank Richmond as the surviving bank. These transactions (collectively, the “merger”), if completed, will substantially increase the size of the Company.
Current report
Successfully integrating the operations, technologies, systems, personnel, and corporate cultures of the two companies may be complex, time-consuming, and costly. We may not achieve any or all of the anticipated strategic, operational, or financial benefits of the merger, including projected cost savings and revenue synergies. Disruptions related to integration could result in delays, inefficiencies, or the loss of key personnel, customers, or suppliers, any of which could adversely affect our business.
Current report
The merger also involves significant financial and accounting risks. The transaction requires valuation of acquired assets and liabilities, recognition of goodwill and other intangible assets, and may result in increased balance sheet complexity. Future impairment of goodwill, if any, or intangible assets could adversely affect our results of operations. Changes in our capital structure or increased leverage resulting from the transaction could also affect our liquidity, financial condition, and ability to access capital.
Current report
Completion of the merger is subject to regulatory approvals and other conditions. Failure to obtain or delays in obtaining such approvals could prevent or delay the merger or require us to comply with conditions that could adversely affect the combined company. Litigation or claims arising in connection with the merger could also result in unanticipated costs or obligations.
Current report
Market and business conditions following the merger may differ from expectations, and the combined company may face increased competition or changes in customer, supplier, or employee relationships. The anticipated benefits of the merger, including cost savings and revenue synergies, may not be realized in full or within the expected timeframe. These factors, individually or in combination, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and stock price.
Current report
In recent years, the commercial real estate market has experienced periods of stabilization, and selective improvement in certain property types and markets have occurred; however, many segments, particularly office and other properties sensitive to broader economic trends, continue to experience pressure. Elevated interest rates and shifts in market demand have contributed to elevated vacancies, reduced rental income, and continued valuation risk. These trends could adversely affect the performance of our commercial real estate loan portfolio and may prompt regulatory scrutiny or heightened supervisory expectations.
Removed paragraphs (4)
Previous report
Our financial condition and results of operations are affected by credit policies of monetary authorities, particularly the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, or the Federal Reserve. Actions by monetary and fiscal authorities, including the Federal Reserve, could lead to inflation, deflation, or other economic phenomena that could adversely affect our financial performance. Higher U.S. tariffs on imported goods could exacerbate inflationary pressures by increasing the cost of goods and materials for businesses and consumers. This may particularly affect small to medium-sized businesses, as they are less able to leverage economies of scale to mitigate cost pressures compared to larger businesses. Consequently, our business clients may experience increased financial strain, reducing their ability to repay loans and adversely impacting our results of operations and financial condition. Furthermore, a prolonged period of inflation could cause wages and other costs to us to increase, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. Virtually all our assets and liabilities are monetary in nature and, as a result, market interest rates tend to have a more significant impact on our performance than general levels of inflation or deflation. However, interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or magnitude as the prices of goods and services, creating additional uncertainty in the economic environment.
Previous report
In recent years, the commercial real estate market has experienced substantial growth, with increased competition contributing to historically low capitalization rates and rising property values. However, the economic disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted this market. The pandemic also accelerated the adoption of remote work, which has led many companies to re-evaluate their long-term real estate needs. While some businesses are returning to traditional office environments, others are downsizing or shifting to hybrid models, creating uncertainty in demand for office spaces and other commercial properties. This trend could result in prolonged vacancies, declining rental income, and reduced property values, adversely affecting the performance of our commercial real estate loan portfolio. Federal banking regulators also have raised concerns about weaknesses in the commercial real estate market.
Previous report
The effects of climate change continue to raise significant concerns about the state of the environment. However, under the new Trump administration, federal policy may shift to reduce the emphasis on climate change initiatives and environmental regulations. This could include scaling back federal participation in international agreements, such as the Paris Agreement, and reducing regulatory pressures on businesses, including banks, to address climate-related risks. Legislative and regulatory proposals aimed at combating climate change may face greater scrutiny or diminished priority.
Previous report
Recent changes in the regulatory landscape under the new administration have moved toward a reduction in emphasis on certain ESG priorities, particularly around climate change and diversity, equity, and inclusion ("DEI"). This shift is leading to the rollback of regulations that mandate specific disclosures and operational practices in these areas. However, some stakeholder groups continue to demand greater transparency and action, resulting in a complex and potentially conflicting environment for companies. If regulatory enforcement of ESG-related policies becomes less stringent, companies may face reputational risks if their practices are seen as insufficient or inconsistent with broader societal expectations, especially related to DEI and environmental stewardship. As a result, navigating this evolving regulatory and public opinion landscape may require us to balance compliance with regulatory requirements against maintaining investor, customer, and stakeholder trust.
Reworded paragraphs (25)
Previous wording
Local economic conditions have a significant impact on the ability of our borrowers to repay loans and the value of the collateral securing loans. Adverse economic conditions in our market areas could impact our growth rate, reduce our customers' ability to repay loans, and adversely impact our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Broader economic factors such as inflation, unemployment, and money supply fluctuations also may adversely affect our profitability. Trade wars, tariffs, or shifts in trade policies between the United States and other nations could disrupt supply chains, increase costs for businesses, and reduce export opportunities for our customers. These developments may, in turn, negatively impact these businesses and, by extension, our financial condition and results of operations.
Current wording
Local economic conditions have a significant impact on the ability of our borrowers to repay loans and the value of the collateral securing loans. Adverse economic conditions in our market areas, including declining employment, reduced consumer spending, business failures, or adverse weather events, could adversely affect our growth, customers’ ability to repay loans, and, consequently, our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Previous wording
A deterioration in economic conditions in the market areas we serve, be it due to inflation, a recession, war, geopolitical conflicts, adverse weather conditions, or other factors could result in the following consequences, any of which could have a materially adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations:
Current wording
A deterioration in economic conditions in the market areas we serve, whether due to recessionary conditions, inflation or deflation, interest rate volatility, geopolitical conflicts, market instability, adverse weather events, or other factors could have a materially adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations. Any of these conditions could lead to:
Previous wording
A decline in local economic conditions may have a greater effect on our earnings and capital than on the earnings and capital of larger financial institutions whose real estate loan portfolios are geographically diverse. Many of the loans in our portfolio are secured by real estate. Real estate values are affected by various factors, including economic conditions, governmental rules or policies, natural disasters such as earthquakes, and trade-related pressures that may affect construction costs or materials availability. If we are required to liquidate a significant amount of collateral during a period of reduced real estate values, our financial condition and profitability could be adversely affected.
Current wording
A decline in local economic conditions may have a greater effect on our earnings and capital than on the earnings and capital of larger financial institutions whose real estate loan portfolios are geographically more diverse. Many of the loans in our portfolio are secured by real estate. Real estate values are affected by various factors, including economic conditions, governmental rules or policies, natural disasters, and trade-related pressures that may affect construction costs or availability of materials. If we are required to liquidate a significant amount of collateral during a period of reduced real estate values, our financial condition and profitability could be adversely affected.
Previous wording
The yields we earn on our assets and the rates we pay on our liabilities are generally fixed for a contractual period of time. Like many financial institutions, our liabilities generally have shorter contractual maturities than our assets. This mismatch exposes us to significant earnings volatility as market interest rates fluctuate. Shifts in interest rates can also impact the average lifespan of loans and mortgage-backed securities. In periods of rising interest rates, the growth rate of interest income from our assets might lag behind the accelerating interest expenses on liabilities. Conversely, declining interest rates can trigger increased loan prepayments and mortgage-backed security redemptions as borrowers seek lower borrowing costs through refinancing. This introduces reinvestment risk, where the challenge lies in reinvesting prepayments at rates comparable to those initially earned on the prepaid loans or securities. Moreover, an inverted interest rate yield curve, wherein short-term interest rates (which are usually the rates at which financial institutions borrow funds) surpass long-term rates (which are usually the rates at which financial institutions lend funds for fixed-rate loans), can compress a financial institution's net interest margin. This occurrence poses financial risks, particularly for institutions that originate longer-term, fixed-rate mortgage loans. As of December 31, 2024, approximately 38.6% of our loan and lease portfolio consisted of fixed-rate loans and leases, potentially exposing us to these risks.
Current wording
The yields we earn on our assets and the rates we pay on our liabilities are generally fixed for a contractual period of time. Like many financial institutions, our liabilities generally have shorter contractual maturities than our assets. This mismatch exposes us to significant earnings volatility as market interest rates fluctuate. Shifts in interest rates can also impact the average lifespan of loans and mortgage-backed securities. In periods of rising interest rates, the growth rate of interest income from our assets might lag behind the accelerating interest expenses on liabilities. Conversely, declining interest rates can trigger increased loan prepayments and mortgage-backed security redemptions as borrowers seek lower borrowing costs through refinancing. This introduces reinvestment risk, where the challenge lies in reinvesting prepayments at rates comparable to those initially earned on the prepaid loans or securities. Moreover, an inverted interest rate yield curve, wherein short-term interest rates (which are usually the rates at which financial institutions borrow funds) surpass long-term rates (which are usually the rates at which financial institutions lend funds for fixed-rate loans), can compress a financial institution's net interest margin. This occurrence poses financial risks, particularly for institutions that originate longer-term, fixed-rate mortgage loans. As of December 31, 2025, approximately 35.9% of our loan and lease portfolio consisted of fixed-rate loans and leases, potentially exposing us to these risks.
Previous wording
As of December 31, 2024, our deposit composition included $366.8 million in certificates of deposit maturing within one year and $546.7 million in noninterest-bearing, NOW checking, savings, and money market accounts. In a rising rate environment, retaining deposits can become costlier. If deposit and borrowing rates rise faster than loan and investment yields, our net interest income and overall earnings could decline. Additionally, adjustable-rate residential mortgage loans and home equity lines of credit may face increased default risks in a rising rate environment.
Current wording
As of December 31, 2025, our deposit composition included $411.7 million in certificates of deposit maturing within one year and $563.3 million in noninterest-bearing, NOW checking, savings, and money market accounts. In a rising rate environment, retaining deposits can become costlier. If deposit and borrowing rates rise faster than loan and investment yields, our net interest income and overall earnings could decline. Additionally, adjustable-rate residential mortgage loans and home equity lines of credit may face increased default risks in a rising rate environment.
Previous wording
We have a substantial portfolio of commercial and multi-family real estate, as well as commercial and industrial loans, and intend to continue increasing originations of these loan types. These loans carry credit risks that could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Current wording
We have a substantial portfolio of commercial and multi-family real estate, as well as commercial and industrial loans, and we intend to continue increasing originations of these loan types. These loans carry credit risks that could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Previous wording
As of December 31, 2024, our portfolio included commercial real estate, multi-family real estate, and commercial and industrial loans totaling $683.9 million, constituting approximately 58.2% of our total loans and leases. Commercial loans typically involve larger principal amounts than other types of loans, and some of our commercial borrowers have more than one loan outstanding with us. Consequently, an adverse development related to a single commercial loan or credit relationship poses a significantly greater risk of loss compared to one-to-four family residential mortgage loans. Repayment of commercial loans often depends on the cash flow generated by the business or property involved, making them more sensitive to adverse conditions in the real estate market, business climate, or economy. For loans secured by non-owner-occupied properties, repayments rely heavily on tenant rent payments, and downturns in the real estate market or economic conditions heighten repayment risks. In addition, many of our commercial real estate loans are not fully amortizing and require large balloon payments upon maturity, which may necessitate the borrower to sell or refinance the property, increasing the risk of default.
Current wording
As of December 31, 2025, our portfolio included commercial real estate, multi-family real estate, and commercial and industrial loans totaling $765.7 million, constituting approximately 64.1% of our total loans and leases. Commercial loans typically involve larger principal amounts than other types of loans, and some of our commercial borrowers have more than one loan outstanding with us. Consequently, an adverse development related to a single commercial loan or credit relationship poses a significantly greater risk of loss compared to one-to-four family residential mortgage loans. Repayment of commercial loans often depends on the cash flow generated by the business or property involved, making them more sensitive to adverse conditions in the real estate market, business climate, or broader economic environment. For loans secured by non-owner-occupied properties, repayments rely heavily on tenant rent payments, and softening real estate conditions or weaker economic activity heighten repayment risks. In addition, many of our commercial real estate loans are not fully amortizing and require large balloon payments upon maturity, which may necessitate the borrower to sell or refinance the property, increasing the risk of default.
Previous wording
Commercial business loans typically are made based on the cash flow of the borrower and secondarily on the underlying collateral provided by the borrower. A borrower's cash flow can be unpredictable, and collateral securing these loans may fluctuate in value. For loans secured by accounts receivable, repayment is often dependent on the borrower's ability to collect from clients, while other forms of collateral may be difficult to appraise, illiquid, or affected by business success. Increases in reserves and charge-offs related to our commercial and industrial loan portfolio could materially impact our business, financial condition, operations, and prospects.
Current wording
Commercial and industrial loans typically are made based on the cash flow of the borrower and secondarily on the underlying collateral provided by the borrower. A borrower's cash flow can be unpredictable, and collateral securing these loans may fluctuate in value. For loans secured by accounts receivable, repayment often depends on the borrower's ability to collect from clients, while other forms of collateral may be difficult to appraise, illiquid, or subject to risks tied to the borrower's operating performance. Increases in reserves and charge-offs related to our commercial and industrial loan portfolio could materially impact our business, financial condition, operating results, and prospects.
Previous wording
As of December 31, 2024, our construction and development loans totaled $132.6 million, accounting for approximately 11.3% of our total loan portfolio. This comprises $126.2 million in commercial construction loans and $6.3 million in residential real estate construction loans, reflecting a substantial increase from the $58.4 million, constituting 7.8% of total loans, reported at December 31, 2020.
Current wording
As of December 31, 2025, our construction and development loans totaled $71.7 million, accounting for approximately 6.0% of our total loan portfolio. This portfolio is comprised of $65.2 million in commercial construction loans and $6.5 million in residential real estate construction loans, reflecting a substantial increase from the $58.4 million, constituting 7.8% of total loans, reported at December 31, 2020.
Previous wording
Our commercial loan portfolio, which includes commercial and multi-family real estate loans, commercial and industrial loans, and construction loans, has increased to $816.5 million, or 69.5% of total loans and leases, at December 31, 2024 from $226.9 million, or 48.5% of total loans and leases, at December 31, 2016. A significant portion of this portfolio is composed of unseasoned loans, meaning they were recently originated. Due to our limited history with these borrowers, we lack a comprehensive payment history to effectively assess the likelihood of future collectability. Furthermore, many of these loans have not yet been tested under adverse economic conditions. As a result, predicting the future performance of this segment of our loan portfolio remains challenging. These loans may experience higher delinquency or charge-off rates compared to our historical averages, which could negatively impact our future performance.
Current wording
Our commercial loan portfolio, which includes commercial and multi-family real estate loans, commercial and industrial loans, and construction loans, has increased to $837.4 million, or 70.2% of total loans and leases, at December 31, 2025 from $436.3 million, or 58.7% of total loans and leases, at December 31, 2020. A significant portion of this portfolio is composed of unseasoned loans, meaning they were recently originated. Due to our limited history with these borrowers, we lack a comprehensive payment history to effectively assess the likelihood of future collectability. Furthermore, many of these loans have not yet been tested under adverse economic conditions. As a result, predicting the future performance of this segment of our loan portfolio remains challenging. These loans may experience higher delinquency or charge-off rates compared to our historical averages, which could negatively impact our future performance.
Previous wording
Our lease financing operation consists of direct financing leases which are used by commercial customers to finance purchases such as medical, computer and manufacturing equipment, audio/visual equipment, industrial assets, construction and transportation equipment, and a wide variety of other commercial equipment. Revenue generated from our leasing business accounted for 13.5% and 15.3% of our total revenue for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
Current wording
Our lease financing operation consists of direct financing leases which are used by commercial customers to finance purchases such as medical, computer and manufacturing equipment, audio/visual equipment, industrial assets, construction and transportation equipment, and a wide variety of other commercial equipment. Revenue generated from our leasing business accounted for 13.3% and 13.5% of our total revenue for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.
Previous wording
We rely solely on brokers and other third-party originators to generate our lease transactions. To generate deal flow, we work with over 100 brokers and third-party originators across the country, some of which are one-person shops and others more established companies, with most of the volume coming from fewer than 25 referral sources. None of our relationships are exclusive and any may be terminated at any time. During 2024, of our $61.6 million in lease originations, the top five brokers/third party originators accounted for approximately 52.0% of our total volume of lease originations, one of whom accounted for approximately 14.4% of our total volume of lease originations. At December 31, 2024, our top 25 brokers/third party originators collectively accounted for 83.6% of our total direct financing lease portfolio, with our largest broker/third party originator accounting for 12.2% of the portfolio. Losing top brokers or third-party originators, or their customers, without finding comparable alternatives, could decrease leasing volume, leading to potential revenue decline, materially impacting our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Current wording
We rely solely on brokers and other third-party originators to generate our lease transactions. To generate deal flow, we work with over 100 brokers and third-party originators across the country, some of which are one-person shops and others more established companies, with most of the volume coming from fewer than 25 referral sources. None of our relationships are exclusive and any may be terminated at any time. During 2025, of our $69.4 million in lease originations, the top five brokers/third party originators accounted for approximately 46.1% of our total volume of lease originations, one of whom accounted for approximately 11.8% of our total volume of lease originations. At December 31, 2025, our top 25 brokers/third party originators collectively accounted for 82.7% of our total direct financing lease portfolio, with our largest broker/third party originator accounting for 12.0% of the portfolio. Losing top brokers or third-party originators, or their customers, without finding comparable alternatives, could decrease leasing volume, leading to potential revenue decline, materially impacting our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Previous wording
At December 31, 2024, direct financing leases totaled $148.1 million, or 12.6% of our total loan and lease portfolio. Our direct financing leases, while short term in nature, are inherently risky as they are secured by assets that depreciate rapidly. In some cases, repossessed collateral may not provide an adequate source of repayment for the outstanding lease balance and the remaining deficiency may not warrant further substantial collection efforts against the borrower. Also, if a lessee under a defaulted lease files for protection under the bankruptcy laws, then: (i) we may experience difficulties and delays in recovering the equipment from the defaulting party; (ii) the equipment may be returned in poor condition; and (iii) we may be unable to enforce important contract provisions against the insolvent party. We do not expect to be able to recover software that we lease or finance for a customer that is not on a computer’s hard drive and, even if we could do so, we generally would not be able to lease or sell the same software again under the terms of use required by the software vendors.
Current wording
At December 31, 2025, direct financing leases totaled $145.8 million, or 12.2% of our total loan and lease portfolio. Our direct financing leases, while short term in nature, are inherently risky as they are secured by assets that depreciate rapidly. In some cases, repossessed collateral may not provide an adequate source of repayment for the outstanding lease balance and the remaining deficiency may not warrant further substantial collection efforts against the borrower. Also, if a lessee under a defaulted lease files for protection under the bankruptcy laws, then: (i) we may experience difficulties and delays in recovering the equipment from the defaulting party; (ii) the equipment may be returned in poor condition; and (iii) we may be unable to enforce important contract provisions against the insolvent party. We do not expect to be able to recover software that we lease or finance for a customer that is not on a computer’s hard drive and, even if we could do so, we generally would not be able to lease or sell the same software again under the terms of use required by the software vendors.
Previous wording
Moreover, approximately $51.1 million or 34.4% of our total lease portfolio is to customers located in California, New York, Florida, and Arkansas. Adverse economic conditions within these market areas may reduce our leasing volume and affect our customers' ability to make lease payments, resulting in higher defaults, which may result in our inability to fully recover our investment in the related equipment and adversely impact our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Current wording
Moreover, approximately $55.1 million or 37.7% of our total lease portfolio is to customers located in California, New York, Florida, and Texas. Adverse economic conditions within these market areas may reduce our leasing volume and affect our customers' ability to make lease payments, resulting in higher defaults, which may result in our inability to fully recover our investment in the related equipment and adversely impact our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Previous wording
We participate in loan participation agreements in which we are not the lead lender and rely on lead institutions to provide timely and accurate updates on changes in the credit quality of the underlying loans. If these institutions fail to deliver such updates in a timely manner, we may misstate our allowance for credit losses, which could result in unanticipated credit losses. Additionally, our dependence on lead institutions exposes us to counterparty risk, as financial distress or operational failures on their part may impair our ability to assess and manage credit risk effectively. Inadequate reporting of credit quality changes could also result in non-compliance with regulatory requirements, potentially leading to regulatory scrutiny, fines, or other enforcement actions. Moreover, delays or inaccuracies in credit updates could damage our reputation, eroding investor and stakeholder confidence in our risk management practices. Failure to properly assess and disclose risks associated with loan participations may further expose us to legal liabilities, including litigation from investors or regulatory agencies alleging mismanagement or inadequate disclosures. At December 31, 2024, we held $104.4 million in loan participations in which we were not the lead lender.
Current wording
We participate in loan participation agreements in which we are not the lead lender and rely on lead institutions to provide timely and accurate updates on changes in the credit quality of the underlying loans. If these institutions fail to deliver such updates in a timely manner, we may misstate our allowance for credit losses, which could result in unanticipated credit losses. Additionally, our dependence on lead institutions exposes us to counterparty risk, as financial distress or operational failures on their part may impair our ability to assess and manage credit risk effectively. Inadequate reporting of credit quality changes could also result in non-compliance with regulatory requirements, potentially leading to regulatory scrutiny, fines, or other enforcement actions. Moreover, delays or inaccuracies in credit updates could damage our reputation, eroding investor and customer confidence in our risk management practices. Failure to properly assess and disclose risks associated with loan participations may further expose us to legal liabilities, including litigation from investors or regulatory agencies alleging mismanagement or inadequate disclosures. At December 31, 2025, we held $83.4 million in loan participations in which we were not the lead lender.
Previous wording
Our securities portfolio is impacted by fluctuations in market value, potentially reducing accumulated other comprehensive income and/or earnings. Fluctuations in market value may be caused by changes in market interest rates, lower market prices for securities and limited investor demand. Management evaluates securities for impairment on a quarterly basis, with more frequent evaluation for selected issues. In analyzing a debt issuer’s financial condition, management considers whether the securities are issued by the federal government or its agencies, whether downgrades by bond rating agencies have occurred, industry analysts’ reports and, to a lesser extent given the relatively insignificant levels of depreciation in our debt portfolio, spread differentials between the effective rates on instruments in the portfolio compared to risk-free rates. In analyzing an equity issuer’s financial condition, management considers industry analysts’ reports, financial performance and projected target prices of investment analysts within a one-year time frame. If this evaluation shows impairment to the actual or projected cash flows associated with one or more securities, a potential loss to earnings may occur. Changes in interest rates can also have an adverse effect on our financial condition, as our available-for-sale securities are reported at their estimated fair value, and therefore are impacted by fluctuations in interest rates. We increase or decrease our stockholders’ equity by the amount of change in the estimated fair value of the available-for-sale securities, net of taxes. Declines in market value could result in impairments of these assets, which would lead to accounting charges that could have a material adverse effect on our net income and capital levels. As of December 31, 2024, we had no securities that were deemed impaired.
Current wording
Our securities portfolio is impacted by fluctuations in market value, potentially reducing accumulated other comprehensive income and/or earnings. Fluctuations in market value may be caused by changes in market interest rates, lower market prices for securities and limited investor demand. Management evaluates securities for impairment on a quarterly basis, with more frequent evaluation for selected issues. In analyzing a debt issuer’s financial condition, management considers whether the securities are issued by the federal government or its agencies, whether downgrades by bond rating agencies have occurred, industry analysts’ reports, and spread differentials between the effective rates on instruments in the portfolio compared to risk-free rates. In analyzing an equity issuer’s financial condition, management considers industry analysts’ reports, financial performance and projected target prices of investment analysts within a one-year time frame. If this evaluation shows impairment to the actual or projected cash flows associated with one or more securities, a potential loss to earnings may occur. Changes in interest rates can also have an adverse effect on our financial condition, as our available-for-sale securities are reported at their estimated fair value, and therefore are impacted by fluctuations in interest rates. We increase or decrease our stockholders’ equity by the amount of change in the estimated fair value of the available-for-sale securities, net of taxes. Declines in market value could result in impairments of these assets, which would lead to accounting charges that could have a material adverse effect on our net income and capital levels. As of December 31, 2025, we had no securities that were deemed impaired.
Previous wording
We sell a portion of our one- to four-family loans in the secondary market. We generally retain the right to service these loans through First Bank Richmond. At December 31, 2024, the book value of our MSRs was $2.0 million. We use a financial model that uses, wherever possible, quoted market prices to value our MSRs. This model is complex and also uses assumptions related to interest and discount rates, prepayment speeds, delinquency and foreclosure rates and ancillary fee income. Valuations are highly dependent upon the reasonableness of our assumptions and the predictability of the relationships that drive the results of the model. The primary risk associated with MSRs is that they will lose a substantial portion of their value as a result of higher than anticipated prepayments occasioned by declining interest rates. Conversely, these assets generally increase in value in a rising interest rate environment to the extent that prepayments are slower than anticipated. If prepayment speeds increase more than estimated, or delinquency and default levels are higher than anticipated, we may be required to write down the value of our MSRs which could have a material adverse effect on our net income and capital levels. We obtain independent valuations quarterly to determine if impairment in the asset exists.
Current wording
We sell a portion of our one- to four-family loans in the secondary market. We generally retain the right to service these loans through First Bank Richmond. At December 31, 2025, the book value of our MSRs was $1.9 million. We utilize a financial model that uses, wherever possible, quoted market prices to value our MSRs. This model is complex and also uses assumptions related to interest and discount rates, prepayment speeds, delinquency and foreclosure rates and ancillary fee income. Valuations are highly dependent upon the reasonableness of our assumptions and the predictability of the relationships that drive the results of the model. The primary risk associated with MSRs is that they will lose a substantial portion of their value as a result of higher than anticipated prepayments occasioned by declining interest rates. Conversely, these assets generally increase in value in a rising interest rate environment to the extent that prepayments are slower than anticipated. If prepayment speeds increase more than estimated, or delinquency and default levels are higher than anticipated, we may be required to write down the value of our MSRs, which could have a material adverse effect on our net income and capital levels. We obtain independent valuations quarterly to determine if impairment in the asset exists.
Previous wording
Our size makes it more difficult for us to compete.
Previous wording
Our asset size makes it more difficult to compete with other financial institutions that are larger and can more easily afford to invest in the marketing and technologies needed to attract and retain customers. Because our principal source of income is the net interest income we earn on our loans and investments after deducting interest paid on deposits and other sources of funds, our ability to generate the revenues needed to cover our expenses and finance such investments is limited by the size of our loan and investment portfolios. Accordingly, we are not always able to offer new products and services as quickly as our competitors. Our lower earnings may also make it more difficult to offer competitive salaries and benefits. In addition, our smaller customer base may make it difficult to generate meaningful non-interest income from such activities as securities brokerage or the sale of insurance products. Finally, as a smaller institution, we are disproportionately affected by the continually increasing costs of compliance with new banking and other regulations.
Current wording
Our asset size makes it difficult to compete with other financial institutions that are larger and can more easily afford to invest in the marketing and technologies needed to attract and retain customers. Because our principal source of income is the net interest income we earn on our loans and investments after deducting interest paid on deposits and other sources of funds, our ability to generate the revenues needed to cover our expenses and finance such investments is limited by the size of our loan and investment portfolios. Accordingly, we are not always able to offer new products and services as quickly as our competitors. Our lower earnings may also make it more difficult to offer competitive salaries and benefits. In addition, our smaller customer base may make it difficult to generate meaningful non-interest income from such activities as securities brokerage or the sale of insurance products. Finally, as a smaller institution, we are disproportionately affected by the continually increasing costs of compliance with new banking and other regulations.
Previous wording
Our business requires us to collect, process, transmit and store significant amounts of confidential information regarding our customers, employees and our own business, operations, plans and business strategies. Our operational and security systems infrastructure, including our computer systems, data management and internal processes, as well as those of third parties, are integral to our performance. Our operational risks include the risk of malfeasance by employees or persons outside our company, errors relating to transaction processing and technology, systems failures or interruptions, breaches of our internal control systems and compliance requirements, and business continuation and disaster recovery. Insurance coverage may not be available for such losses, or where available, such losses may exceed insurance limits. This risk of loss also includes the potential legal actions that could arise as a result of operational deficiencies or as a result of non-compliance with applicable regulatory standards or customer attrition due to potential negative publicity.
Current wording
Our business requires us to collect, process, transmit and store significant amounts of confidential information regarding our customers, employees and our own business, operations, plans and business strategies. Our operational and security systems infrastructure, including our computer systems, data management and internal processes, as well as those of third parties, are integral to our performance. Our operational risks include the risk of malfeasance by employees or persons outside our company, errors relating to transaction processing and technology, systems failures or interruptions, breaches of our internal control systems and compliance requirements, and business continuation and disaster recovery. Insurance coverage may not be available for such losses, or where available, such losses may exceed insurance limits. This risk of loss also includes the potential for legal actions that could arise as a result of operational deficiencies or as a result of non-compliance with applicable regulatory standards or customer attrition due to potential negative publicity.
Previous wording
Our business heavily relies on electronic communication and information systems, serving as the backbone for our operations and storage of sensitive data. Any disruption, failure, or breach in the security of these systems could significantly disrupt our operations. Cybersecurity threats encompass a range of incidents, including unauthorized access attempts, data breaches, computer viruses, and denial-of-service attacks. These events may lead to data theft, misuse, loss, or destruction, compromising confidential customer information, account takeovers, or service unavailability. These threats can stem from multiple sources, ranging from human errors to deliberate acts of malice from internal or external parties, or even unforeseen technological failures. Despite our proactive measures, including encryption, authentication technologies, and extensive education initiatives for both employees and customers, the expanding use of cloud services and remote work technologies exposes us to heightened vulnerability to cyber-attacks. The risk associated with security breaches or disruptions, especially those stemming from cyber-attacks, has become more pronounced due to the increasing sophistication and frequency of global intrusion attempts. Despite our continuous efforts to maintain the security and integrity of our information systems and implement robust risk management strategies, there's an inherent challenge. Cyber-attacks often evolve at a pace that makes it difficult to proactively anticipate and mitigate them effectively. The dynamic nature of these threats means it's nearly impossible to entirely eliminate the risk. In the unfortunate event of a cyber-attack, delayed identification or response to the breach could significantly worsen its impact on our business, financial standing, and operational integrity. While we maintain specialized cyber insurance coverage, it may not cover every potential breach scenario, leaving certain instances uncovered.
Current wording
Our business heavily relies on electronic communication and information systems, serving as the backbone for our operations and storage of sensitive data. Any disruption, failure, or breach in the security of these systems could significantly disrupt our operations. Cybersecurity threats encompass a range of incidents, including unauthorized access attempts, data breaches, computer viruses, and denial-of-service attacks. These events may lead to data theft, misuse, loss, or destruction, compromising confidential customer information, account takeovers, or service unavailability. These threats can stem from multiple sources, ranging from human errors to deliberate acts of malice from internal or external parties, or even unforeseen technological failures. The expanding use of cloud services and remote work technologies exposes us to heightened vulnerability to cyber-attacks. The risk associated with security breaches or disruptions, especially those stemming from cyber-attacks, has become more pronounced due to the increasing sophistication and frequency of global intrusion attempts. Despite our continuous efforts to maintain the security and integrity of our information systems and implement robust risk management strategies, there is an inherent challenge. Cyber-attacks often evolve at a pace that makes it difficult to proactively anticipate and mitigate them effectively. The dynamic nature of these threats means it's nearly impossible to entirely eliminate the risk. In the unfortunate event of a cyber-attack, delayed identification or response to the breach could significantly worsen its impact on our business, financial standing, and operational integrity. While we maintain specialized cyber insurance coverage, it may not cover every potential breach scenario, leaving certain instances uncovered.
Previous wording
Our business operations are significantly influenced by the extensive body of accounting regulations in the United States. Regulatory bodies periodically issue new guidance, altering accounting rules and reporting requirements, which can substantially affect the preparation and reporting of our financial statements. These changes might necessitate retrospective application, potentially leading to restatements of prior period financial statements.
Current wording
Our business operations are significantly influenced by the extensive body of accounting regulations in the United States. Regulatory bodies periodically issue new guidance, altering accounting rules and reporting requirements, which can substantially affect the preparation and reporting of our financial statements. These changes may necessitate retrospective application, potentially leading to restatements of prior period financial statements.
Previous wording
One such significant change in 2023 was the implementation of the Current Expected Credit Losses (“CECL”) model, which we adopted on January 1, 2023. Under the CECL model, financial assets carried at amortized cost, such as loans and held-to-maturity debt securities, will be presented at the net amount expected to be collected. This forward-looking approach in estimating expected credit losses contrasts starkly with the former GAAP's "incurred loss" model, delaying recognition until a loss is probable. CECL mandates considering historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable forecasts affecting collectability, leading to periodic adjustments of financial asset values. However, this forward-looking methodology, reliant on macroeconomic variables, introduces the potential for increased earnings volatility due to unexpected changes in these indicators between periods.
Current wording
One such recent significant change was the implementation of the Current Expected Credit Losses (“CECL”) model, which we adopted on January 1, 2023. Under the CECL model, financial assets carried at amortized cost, such as loans and held-to-maturity debt securities, are presented at the net amount expected to be collected. This forward-looking approach in estimating expected credit losses contrasts starkly with the former GAAP's "incurred loss" model, delaying recognition until a loss is probable. CECL mandates considering historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable forecasts affecting collectability, leading to periodic adjustments of financial asset values. However, this forward-looking methodology, reliant on macroeconomic variables, introduces the potential for increased earnings volatility due to unexpected changes in these indicators between periods.
Previous wording
Companies are facing increasing scrutiny from customers, regulators, investors, and other stakeholders related to their environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) practices and disclosure. Investor advocacy groups, investment funds, and influential investors are also increasingly focused on these practices, especially as they relate to the environment, health and safety, diversity, labor conditions, and human rights. Increased ESG-related compliance costs could result in increases to our overall operational costs. Failure to adapt to or comply with regulatory requirements, or investor or stakeholder expectations and standards, could negatively impact our reputation, ability to do business with certain partners, and our stock price.
Current wording
In recent years, companies have faced scrutiny from customers, regulators, investors, and other stakeholders related to their environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) practices and disclosure. Investor advocacy groups, investment funds, and influential investors are also focused on these practices, especially as they relate to the environment, health and safety, diversity, labor conditions, and human rights. ESG-related compliance costs could result in increases to our overall operational costs. Failure to adapt to or comply with regulatory requirements, or investor or stakeholder expectations and standards, could negatively impact our reputation, ability to do business with certain partners, and our stock price.
Previous wording
Holders of our common stock are only entitled to receive such dividends as our board of directors may declare out of funds legally available for such payments. The declaration and payment of future cash dividends will be subject to, among other things, regulatory restrictions, our then current and projected consolidated operating results, financial condition, tax considerations, future growth plans, general economic conditions, and other factors our board of directors deems relevant. Richmond Mutual Bancorporation will depend primarily upon the proceeds it retained from the initial public offering as well as earnings of First Bank Richmond to provide funds to pay dividends on our common stock. The payment of dividends by First Bank Richmond is also subject to certain regulatory restrictions. Federal law generally prohibits a depository institution from making any capital distributions (including payment of a dividend) to its parent holding company if the depository institution would thereafter be or continue to be undercapitalized, and dividends by a depository institution are subject to additional limitations. As a result, any payment of dividends in the future by Richmond Mutual Bancorporation may depend on First Bank Richmond’s ability to satisfy these regulatory restrictions and its earnings, capital requirements, financial condition and other factors.
Current wording
Holders of our common stock are only entitled to receive such dividends as our board of directors may declare out of funds legally available for such payments. The declaration and payment of future cash dividends will be subject to, among other things, regulatory restrictions, our then current and projected consolidated operating results, financial condition, tax considerations, future growth plans, general economic conditions, and other factors our board of directors deems relevant. Richmond Mutual Bancorporation depends primarily upon the proceeds it retained from its initial public offering as well as earnings of First Bank Richmond to provide funds to pay dividends on our common stock. The payment of dividends by First Bank Richmond is also subject to certain regulatory restrictions. Federal law generally prohibits a depository institution from making any capital distributions (including payment of a dividend) to its parent holding company if the depository institution would thereafter be or continue to be undercapitalized, and dividends by a depository institution are subject to additional limitations. As a result, any payment of dividends in the future by Richmond Mutual Bancorporation may depend on First Bank Richmond’s ability to satisfy these regulatory restrictions and its earnings, capital requirements, financial condition and other factors.