VALERO ENERGY CORP/TX
For the period ended May 7, 2026. Filed Mar 19, 2026.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
What shareholders are asked to vote on at a company's meeting. It is where to find what directors and top executives are paid, and who owns the most shares.
May 7, 2026 · Filed Mar 19, 2026
Contents
EC Pay Versus Performance
Table of Contents
SEC PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE
In accordance with SEC rules, we are providing the following disclosure regarding executive compensation for Valero’s principal executive officer (“PEO”) and Non-PEO NEOs and company performance for the fiscal years listed below. These SEC rules require the below disclosures and calculations with respect to executive compensation metrics (such as “Compensation Actually Paid”) and company performance measures that are separate and different from the disclosures and calculations required by the SEC in other areas of this proxy statement. The Human Resources and Compensation Committee did not consider the pay versus performance disclosure or calculations reflected below in making its compensation decisions for any of the years shown.
| Value of InitialFixed $100InvestmentBased On: (4) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year | SummaryCompensationTable Total forMr. Riggs (1)($) | SummaryCompensationTable Total forMr. Gorder (1)($) | CompensationActually Paidto Mr. Riggs(1)(2)(3) ($) | CompensationActually Paidto Mr. Gorder(1)(2)(3) ($) | AverageSummaryCompensationTable Total forNon-PEONEOs (1) ($) | AverageCompensationActually Paidto Non-PEONEOs(1)(2)(3) ($) | TSR($) | PeerGroupTSR($) | NetIncome(5)($MM) | AdjustedEPS (5)($) |
| (a) | (b) | (b) | (c) | (c) | (d) | (e) | (f) | (g) | (h) | (i) |
| 2025 | 34,228,523 | (1) | 31,442,695 | (1) | 9,531,365 | 9,911,318 | 346.01 | 251.49 | 2,246 | 10.61 |
| 2024 | 22,412,292 | (1) | 18,428,247 | (1) | 6,191,270 | 6,336,935 | 252.46 | 253.25 | 3,006 | 8.48 |
| 2023 | 20,140,932 | 30,041,532 | 15,025,453 | 30,270,251 | 9,269,079 | 7,376,951 | 260.04 | 278.17 | 9,149 | 24.90 |
| 2022 | (1) | 20,145,093 | (1) | 35,823,343 | 5,814,701 | 10,262,307 | 245.61 | 256.82 | 11,879 | 29.16 |
| 2021 | (1) | 22,691,886 | (1) | 26,024,576 | 8,393,358 | 7,384,101 | 140.33 | 153.44 | 1,288 | 2.81 |
Footnotes to SEC Pay Versus Performance Table:
(1)Two individuals served as PEO during 2023. R. Lane Riggs was elected as our CEO and President effective as of the close of business on June 30, 2023. Joseph W. Gorder served as our CEO (i) in 2023 until the close of business on June 30, 2023, the effective date of his retirement as CEO; and (ii) for each of the years prior to 2023 shown in the table above. The individuals comprising the Non-PEO NEOs for each year presented are listed below.
| 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
| Jason W. Fraser | Jason W. Fraser | Jason W. Fraser | Jason W. Fraser | Jason W. Fraser |
| R. Lane Riggs | R. Lane Riggs | Gary K. Simmons | Gary K. Simmons | Gary K. Simmons |
| Gary K. Simmons | Gary K. Simmons | Richard J. Walsh | Richard J. Walsh | Richard J. Walsh |
| Cheryl L. Thomas | Cheryl L. Thomas | Cheryl L. Thomas | Eric A. Fisher | Eric A. Fisher |
(2)The amounts shown for Compensation Actually Paid are calculated in accordance with Item 402(v) of SEC Regulation S-K and do not reflect compensation actually earned, realized, or received. These amounts reflect the Summary Compensation Table Total with certain adjustments in accordance with Item 402(v) of SEC Regulation S-K as described in footnote (3) below.
(3)Compensation Actually Paid reflects the exclusions and inclusions of certain amounts for each PEO and the Non-PEO NEOs as set forth below. Equity values are calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 and Item 402(v) of SEC Regulation S-K. Amounts in the Exclusion of Stock Awards and the Exclusion of Change in Pension Value columns, respectively, are the totals from the “Stock Awards” and “Change in Pension Value and Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” columns in the Summary Compensation Table. The amounts in Inclusion of Pension Service Cost and Prior Service Cost are based on the service cost for services rendered during the listed year and prior service cost, calculated as the entire cost of benefits granted (or credit for benefits reduced) in a plan amendment (or initiation) during the listed year that are attributed by the benefit formula to services rendered in periods prior to the amendment.
| Year | SummaryCompensation TableTotal for Mr. Riggs ($) | Exclusion of Changein Pension Value forMr. Riggs ($) | Exclusion ofStock Awards forMr. Riggs ($) | Inclusion of Pension ServiceCost and Prior Service Costfor Mr. Riggs ($) | Inclusion ofEquity Values forMr. Riggs ($) | CompensationActually Paid toMr. Riggs ($) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 34,228,523 | (10,839,917) | (15,760,536) | 752,500 | 23,062,125 | 31,442,695 |
(footnote (3) to SEC Pay Versus Performance Table continues on the following page)
| 72 | 2026 PROXY STATEMENT |
Table of Contents
SEC PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE
Footnotes to SEC Pay Versus Performance Table (cont’d):
footnote (3) continued
| Year | Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-PEO NEOs ($) | Average Exclusion of Change in Pension Value for Non-PEO NEOs ($) | Average Exclusion of Stock Awards for Non-PEO NEOs ($) | Average Inclusion of Pension Service Cost and Prior Service Cost for Non-PEO NEOs ($) | Average Inclusion of Equity Values for Non-PEO NEOs ($) | Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs ($) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 9,531,365 | (2,256,388) | (4,491,886) | 458,188 | 6,670,039 | 9,911,318 |
The amounts in the Inclusion of Equity Values in the tables above are derived from the amounts set forth in the following tables:
| Year | Year-End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted During Year That Remained Unvested as of Last Day of Year forMr. Riggs ($) | Change in Fair Value from Last Day of Prior Year to Last Day of Year of Unvested Equity Awards forMr. Riggs ($) | Vesting-Date Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted and Vested During Year forMr. Riggs ($) | Change in Fair Value from Last Day of Prior Year to Vesting Date of Unvested Equity Awards that Vested During Year forMr. Riggs ($) | Fair Value at Last Day of Prior Year of Equity Awards Forfeited During Year forMr. Riggs ($) | Value of Dividends or Other Earnings Paid on Stock or Option Awards Not Otherwise Included forMr. Riggs ($) | Total -Inclusion of Equity Values forMr. Riggs ($) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 16,497,551 | 922,831 | 2,414,989 | 3,001,226 | — | 225,528 | 23,062,125 |
| Year | Average Year-End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted During Year That Remained Unvested as of Last Day of Year for Non-PEO NEOs ($) | Average Change in Fair Value from Last Day of Prior Year to Last Day of Year of Unvested Equity Awards for Non-PEO NEOs ($) | Average Vesting-Date Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted and Vested During Year Non-PEO NEOs ($) | Average Change in Fair Value from Last Day of Prior Year to Vesting Date of Unvested Equity Awards that Vested During Year for Non-PEO NEOs ($) | Average Fair Value at Last Day of Prior Year of Equity Awards Forfeited During Year for Non-PEO NEOs ($) | Average Value of Dividends or Other Earnings Paid on Stock or Option Awards Not Otherwise Included for Non-PEO NEOs ($) | Total - Average Inclusion ofEquity Values for Non-PEO NEOs ($) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 4,760,555 | 266,707 | 677,450 | 900,123 | — | 65,204 | 6,670,039 |
(4)The Peer Group TSR set forth in this table utilizes a custom group of peers, which we also utilize in the stock performance graph required by Item 201(e) of SEC Regulation S-K included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025. The comparison assumes $100 was invested for the period starting December 31, 2020, through the end of the listed year in Valero and in the custom group of peer issuers used in our performance graph, respectively. Historical stock performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock performance. Our selected peer group comprises the following eleven members: ConocoPhillips; CVR Energy, Inc.; Delek US Holdings, Inc.; the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLE); EOG Resources, Inc.; HF Sinclair Corporation; Marathon Petroleum Corporation; Occidental Petroleum Corporation; PBF Energy Inc.; Phillips 66; and LyondellBassell Industries N.V. (the “Peer Group”). The returns of each component issuer of the group have been weighted according to their stock market capitalization at the beginning of each period. The Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLE) serves as a proxy for stock price performance of the energy sector and includes energy companies with which we compete for capital. We believe that the Peer Group represents a group of issuers for making head-to-head performance comparisons in a competitive operating environment that is primarily characterized by U.S.-based companies that have business models predominantly consisting of downstream refining operations, together with similarly sized energy companies that share operating similarities to us, and that are in adjacent segments of the oil and gas industry.
(5)Net income reflects net income as reported in Valero’s audited financial statements. We determined adjusted EPS to be the most important financial performance measure used to link company performance to Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO and Non-PEO NEOs in 2025, and also in 2024, 2023, and 2022 (the first year we were required to disclose such measure). We may determine a different financial performance measure to be the most important financial performance measure in future years. Adjusted EPS is not defined under GAAP and is considered a non-GAAP financial measure. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Elements of Executive Compensation—Annual Incentive Bonus” above for adjustments and a description of how 2025 adjusted EPS is calculated from our audited financial statements. Adjusted EPS amounts in this column reflect the amounts actually used by the Human Resources and Compensation Committee for compensation determinations in such year, and does not reflect any out-of-period adjustments that did not impact Valero’s EPS as reported in Valero’s audited financial statements.
(footnote (5) to SEC Pay Versus Performance Table continues on the following page)
| 2026 PROXY STATEMENT | 73 |
Table of Contents
SEC PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE
Footnotes to SEC Pay Versus Performance Table (cont’d):
footnote (5) continued
For prior years, adjustments from EPS attributable to Valero stockholders – assuming dilution consist of: for 2024, project liability adjustment and second-generation biofuel tax credit; for 2023, gain on early retirement of debt; for 2022, gain on sale of an ethanol plant, gain on early redemption and retirement of debt, adjustment for renewable volume obligations modification, adjustment for an environmental reserve associated with a non-operating site, adjustment for a pension settlement charge, adjustment for foreign withholding tax, and adjustment for asset impairment loss; and for 2021, gain on sale of a portion of our interest in the MVP joint venture, impairment charge for cancellation of the Diamond Pipeline extension, loss on early redemption and retirement of debt, adjustment for changes in certain statutory tax rates, and adjustment for change in estimated useful life of two ethanol plants. Adjusted EPS amounts for years presented prior to 2025, and a further reconciliation and discussion of how such amounts are calculated from our audited financial statements, can be found in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Elements of Executive Compensation—Annual Incentive Bonus” sections of our proxy statements filed with the SEC on March 18, 2025, March 26, 2024, March 22, 2023, and March 17, 2022, respectively.
Description of Relationship Between PEO and Non-PEO NEO Compensation Actually Paid and Valero TSR
The following graph sets forth the relationship between Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO(s), the average of Compensation Actually Paid to our non-PEO NEOs, and Valero’s cumulative TSR over the five most recently completed fiscal years.
| 74 | 2026 PROXY STATEMENT |
Table of Contents
SEC PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE
Description of Relationship Between PEO and Non-PEO NEO Compensation Actually Paid and Valero Net Income
The following graph sets forth the relationship between Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO(s), the average of Compensation Actually Paid to our non-PEO NEOs, and our Net Income during the five most recently completed fiscal years.
Tabular List of Most Important Financial Performance Measures
The following table presents the financial performance measures that Valero considers to have been the most important in linking Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO and other NEOs for 2025 to company performance. The measures in this table are not ranked.
Financial PerformanceMeasures
Adjusted EPS
Relative TSR
| 2026 PROXY STATEMENT | 75 |
Table of Contents
SEC PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE
Description of Relationship Between PEO and Non-PEO NEO Compensation Actually Paid and Valero Adjusted EPS
The following graph sets forth the relationship between Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO(s), the average of Compensation Actually Paid to our non-PEO NEOs, and our adjusted EPS during the five most recently completed fiscal years.
Description of Relationship Between Company TSR and Peer Group TSR
The following graph compares our cumulative TSR over the five most recently completed fiscal years to that of the Peer Group as discussed in footnote (4) above.
| 76 | 2026 PROXY STATEMENT |
Table of Contents
PROPOSAL NO. 2—Advisory vote to approve compensation of named executive officers
(ITEM 2 ON THE PROXY CARD)
| ☑ | The Board recommends that Valero’s stockholders vote “FOR” this proposal |
|---|
Our Board and our stockholders have determined to hold an advisory vote on executive compensation (“say-on-pay”), as required pursuant to Section 14A of the Exchange Act, every year. Accordingly, stockholders are being asked to vote to approve the 2025 compensation of our named executive officers as such compensation is disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of SEC Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables, and other narrative compensation disclosures required by Item 402. This proxy statement contains all of these required disclosures.
The Board requests that Valero’s stockholders approve the following resolution:
“RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to Valero’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables, and narrative discussion, is hereby approved.”
Voting Standard, General Effect of the Vote, and Proxies. Proxies submitted will be voted for approval of the proposal unless otherwise specified. Approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power of the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote. Because the vote on this proposal is advisory, it will not affect compensation already paid or awarded to any named executive officer and will not be binding on Valero, the Board, or the Human Resources and Compensation Committee. The Board and the Human Resources and Compensation Committee, however, will review the voting results and take into account the outcome in determining future annual compensation for the named executive officers. See “2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders—Important Voting and Meeting Information” below for additional information, including with respect to the voting standard, the general effect of the vote, and proxies.
2025 Say-on-Pay. For more information related to our 2025 say-on-pay vote see “Key Adjustments and Changes Made to Our 2025 Executive Compensation Program” and “2025 Say-on-Pay Engagement Efforts and Response” under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Executive Compensation in Summary” above.
| 2026 PROXY STATEMENT | 77 |
Table of Contents
PROPOSAL NO. 3—Ratify appointment of KPMG LLP as independent auditor
(ITEM 3 ON THE PROXY CARD)
| ☑ | The Board recommends that Valero’s stockholders vote “FOR” this proposal |
|---|
The Audit Committee determined on February 25, 2026, to engage KPMG LLP (“KPMG”) as Valero’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2026. KPMG has served as Valero’s independent registered public accounting firm since 2004.
The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation determination, retention, and oversight of the independent auditor retained to audit Valero’s financial statements. The Audit Committee is responsible for the audit fee negotiations and fee approval associated with Valero’s retention of the independent auditing firm.
The Audit Committee annually reviews and evaluates the qualifications, performance, and independence of Valero’s independent auditing firm, and reviews and evaluates the lead engagement partner of the independent auditor team. In conjunction with the mandated rotation of the audit firm’s lead engagement partner, the Audit Committee is involved in the selection of the audit firm’s new lead engagement partner. To monitor auditor independence and continued audit effectiveness, the Audit Committee periodically considers whether there should be a rotation of the independent auditing firm.
The members of the Audit Committee and the Board have determined that the continued retention of KPMG to serve as Valero’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2026, is in the best interests of Valero and its stockholders. Accordingly, the Board requests that Valero’s stockholders approve the following resolution:
“RESOLVED, that the appointment of the firm of KPMG LLP as Valero’s independent registered public accounting firm for the purpose of conducting an audit of the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Valero and its subsidiaries for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2026, is hereby approved and ratified.”
KPMG Annual Meeting Attendance. One or more representatives of KPMG are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting to respond to appropriate questions raised at the Annual Meeting or make appropriate statements at the Annual Meeting.
Voting Standard, General Effect of the Vote, and Proxies. The affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power of the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote is required for adoption of this proposal. If the appointment is not approved, the adverse vote will be considered as an indication to the Audit Committee that it should select another independent registered public accounting firm for the following year. Because of the difficulty and expense of making any substitution of public accountants so long after the beginning of the current year, it is contemplated that the appointment for 2026 will be permitted to stand unless the Audit Committee finds other good reason for making a change. See “2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders—Important Voting and Meeting Information” below for additional information, including with respect to the voting standard, the general effect of the vote, and proxies.
| 78 | 2026 PROXY STATEMENT |
The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.