Skip to main content
See the whole filing, with its images and exhibits
Contents

Note

B.4 Impairment of exploration and evaluation, property, plant and equipment and goodwill

Exploration and evaluation

Impairment testing

The recoverability of the carrying amount of exploration and evaluation assets is dependent on successful development and commercial

exploitation, or alternatively sale of the respective AOI.

Each AOI is reviewed half-yearly to determine whether economic quantities of hydrocarbons have been found, or whether further

exploration and evaluation work is underway or planned to support continued carry forward of capitalised costs. Where a potential

impairment is indicated for an AOI, an assessment is performed using a fair value less costs to dispose (FVLCD) method to determine its

recoverable amount. Upon approval for commercial development, exploration and evaluation assets are assessed for impairment before

they are transferred to property, plant and equipment.

Impairment calculations

If the carrying amount of an AOI exceeds its recoverable amount, the AOI is written down to its recoverable amount and an impairment

loss is recognised in the consolidated income statement.

Property, plant and equipment

Impairment testing

The carrying amounts of property, plant and equipment are assessed half-yearly to determine whether there is an indicator of impairment

or impairment reversal for those assets which have previously been impaired. Indicators of impairment and impairment reversals include

changes in reserves for oil and gas assets, expected future sales prices, or costs.

Property, plant and equipment are assessed for impairment indicators and impairments on a cash-generating unit (CGU) basis. CGUs are

determined as offshore and onshore facilities, infrastructure and associated oil and/or gas fields and new energy assets.

If there is an indicator of impairment or impairment reversal for a CGU, its recoverable amount is calculated and compared with the

CGU’s carrying value (refer to impairment calculations below).

Goodwill

For the purpose of impairment testing, goodwill acquired in a business combination is, from the acquisition date, allocated to each of the

Group’s cash-generating units (CGUs) that are expected to benefit from the combination, irrespective of whether other assets or

liabilities of the acquiree are assigned to those units. Goodwill is tested for impairment at least annually and more frequently if events or

changes in circumstances indicate that it might be impaired. Impairment of goodwill is determined by assessing the recoverable amount

of each CGU to which the goodwill relates and comparing it with its carrying value, which includes deferred taxes (refer to impairment

calculations below and Note B.5).

When part of an operation is disposed of, any goodwill associated with the disposed operation is included in the carrying amount of the

operation in determining the gain or loss on disposal.

Goodwill and property, plant and equipment impairment calculations

The recoverable amount of an asset or CGU is determined as the higher of its value in use (VIU) and FVLCD.

VIU is determined by estimating future cash flows after taking into account the risks specific to the asset and discounting to present

value using an appropriate discount rate.

FVLCD is the price that would be received to sell the asset in an orderly transaction between market participants and does not reflect the

effects of factors that may be specific to the Group. In determining FVLCD, recent market transactions are considered. If no such

transactions can be identified, an appropriate valuation model, such as discounted cash flow techniques, is applied on a post-tax basis

using an appropriate discount rate and estimates are made about the assumptions market participants would use when pricing the asset or

CGU.

If the carrying amount of an asset or CGU, including any allocated goodwill, exceeds its recoverable amount, the asset or CGU is written

down to its recoverable amount and an impairment loss is recognised in the consolidated income statement. Any impairment losses are

first allocated to reduce the carrying amount of any goodwill allocated, with the remaining impairment losses allocated to the relevant

assets.

If the recoverable amount of an asset or CGU exceeds its carrying amount, and that asset or CGU has previously been impaired, the

impairment is reversed. The carrying amount of the asset or CGU is increased to its recoverable amount, but only to the extent that the

carrying amount does not exceed the value that would have been determined, net of depreciation, if no impairment had been recognised.

Impairments of goodwill are not reversed.

For the year ended 31 December 2025

Goodwill allocation

The Group performed its annual goodwill impairment test as at 31 December 2025.

The carrying amount of goodwill allocated to each CGU, or groups of CGUs, and excess recoverable amounts are as follows:

SegmentCGUGoodwill carrying amountExcess of recoverable amount over CGU carrying amount1
US$m · US$m
AustraliaPluto-Scarborough2,4454,014
AustraliaNWS Gas442791
InternationalAtlantis522158
InternationalBeaumont New Ammonia255396
InternationalMad Dog242-
InternationalMad Dog Phase 246548
Total3,952
  1. Amounts are with reference to the total CGU value including goodwill.

Impairment and impairment reversals

As at 30 June 2025, an impairment indicator was identified on the H2OK Project following the Group’s decision to exit the project.

Based on management’s judgement, the estimated recoverable value of the project’s inventory and property, plant and equipment are

expected to be less than the carrying value. The estimated recoverable amount was based on third party valuation reports. As a result, an

impairment loss before tax of$143 million was recognised in the Corporate segment of Note A.1 for the half-year ended 30 June 2025.

No other impairment or impairment reversal was recognised in the current year.

Recoverable amounts have been determined using the FVLCD method using discounted cash flow projections, classified as Level 3

on the fair value hierarchy. The carrying amount of each CGU includes all assets allocated to the respective CGU. Refer to significant

estimates and judgements for further details.

Sensitivity analysis for CGUs with goodwill

Recoverable amount valuations are sensitive to changes in certain significant accounting estimates and judgements (refer to significant

estimates and judgements for further details). Reasonably possible changes to these key assumptions are set out below:

Post-tax discount rate – plus or minus 1% (representing a change of 100 basis points)

Commodity pricing – plus or minus 10%

The valuations of CGUs with goodwill are most sensitive to changes in forecast commodity prices and discount rates. Reasonably

possible changes in these estimates which could result in the estimated recoverable amount being equal to the carrying amount, assuming

all other variables are held constant, are as follows:

Decrease in commodity price1Increase in post-tax discount rate
CGU% change(absolute terms)
Atlantis(2.8%)0.9%
Beaumont New Ammonia(4.4%)N/A2
Mad Dog<0.0%>0.0%
  1. WTI price, which applies to Atlantis and Mad Dog, has a $5 to $6/bbl differential from Brent. Ammonia prices apply to Beaumont New Ammonia.

  2. Management considers there to be no reasonably possible change in the respective estimate which, in isolation, would result in the estimated

recoverable amount being equal to the carrying amount.

A change in any of the above assumptions would have an impact on other assumptions which when considered together may offset.

This does not incorporate decisions management may take in order to mitigate the change in assumptions. Management considers there

to be no reasonably possible changes in production volumes that would, in isolation, result in the estimated recoverable amount being

equal to the carrying amount. Analysis of key assumptions which could result in the carrying value to equal the recoverable value

provides a basis to assess the magnitude of a reasonably possible change to the carrying amounts of respective CGUs.

For the year ended 31 December 2024

Goodwill allocation

The acquisition of OCI Ammonia Holding B.V. and its Beaumont New Ammonia Project was completed on 30 September 2024 and

accounted for as a business combination (refer to Note B.5). The purchase consideration represents the fair value of assets and liabilities

acquired and goodwill arose from the business combination totalling$169 million.

The Group performed its annual goodwill impairment test as at 31 December 2024. The carrying amount of goodwill allocated to each

CGU, or groups of CGUs, and excess recoverable amounts were as follows:

SegmentCGUGoodwill carrying amountExcess of recoverable amount over CGU carrying amount1
US$m · US$m
AustraliaPluto-Scarborough22,4454,514
AustraliaNWS Gas4421,612
InternationalAtlantis52298
InternationalBeaumont New Ammonia3169—
InternationalOther goodwill288879
Total3,866
  1. Amounts are with reference to the total CGU value including goodwill.

  2. A portion of the goodwill allocated to Pluto-Scarborough was disposed of due to the sell-down to LNG Japan and JERA.

  3. Represents goodwill acquired through business combination. Refer to Note B.5 for further details.

Other goodwill of $288 million (2023:$283 million) has been allocated across a number of CGUs within the International segment.

This represents less than 1% of net assets as at 31 December 2024.

Impairment and impairment reversals

No impairment or impairment reversal was recognised for the year ended 31 December 2024.

Recoverable amounts have been determined using the FVLCD method using discounted cash flow projections, classified as Level 3

on the fair value hierarchy. The carrying amount of each CGU includes all assets allocated to the respective CGU. Refer to significant

estimates and judgements for further details.

Sensitivity analysis for CGUs with goodwill

Recoverable amount valuations are sensitive to changes in certain significant accounting estimates and judgements (refer to significant

estimates and judgements for further details). Reasonably possible changes to these key assumptions are set out below:

Post-tax discount rate – plus or minus 1% (representing a change of 100 basis points)

Commodity pricing – plus or minus 10%

Production volumes – plus or minus 4%

The valuations of CGUs with goodwill are most sensitive to changes in forecast commodity prices and discount rates. Reasonably

possible changes in these estimates which could result in the estimated recoverable amount being equal to the carrying amount, assuming

all other variables are held constant, are as follows:

Decrease in commodity price1Increase in post-tax discount rate
CGU% change(absolute terms)
Atlantis(1.5%)0.5%
  1. Brent price applies to Pluto-Scarborough and NWS Gas. WTI price (Brent –$4/bbl) applies to Atlantis.

A change in any of the above assumptions would have an impact on other assumptions which when considered together may offset.

This does not incorporate decisions management may take in order to mitigate the change in assumptions. Management considers there

to be no reasonably possible changes in production volumes or foreign exchange rates that would, in isolation, result in the estimated

recoverable amount being equal to the carrying amount. Analysis of key assumptions which could result in the carrying value to equal

the recoverable value provides a basis to assess the magnitude of a reasonably possible change to the carrying amounts of respective

CGUs.

(a) CGU determination

Identification of a CGU requires management judgement. Management has determined CGUs based on the smallest group of assets that

generate significant cash inflows that are independent from other assets or groups of assets.

(b) Allocation of goodwill

Judgement is required in the allocation of goodwill arising from business combinations to the Group’s CGUs that are expected to benefit

from the synergies of the business combination.

(c) Recoverable amount calculation key assumptions

In determining the recoverable amount of CGUs, estimates are made regarding the present value of future cash flows when determining

the FVLCD. FVLCD methodology uses assumptions reflecting market participant's current expectations of such future cash flows (to

determine a value that a willing seller and a willing buyer would accept in a market transaction). These estimates require significant

management judgement and are subject to risk and uncertainty, and hence changes in economic conditions can also affect the

assumptions used and the rates used to discount future cash flow estimates.

The basis for each estimate used to determine recoverable amounts as at 31 December 2025 and 31 December 2024 is set out below:

Resource estimates – 2P reserves and a portion of 2C resources (where applicable) for oil and gas properties. The reserves are

as disclosed in the Reserves and Resources Statement in the 31 December 2025 and 31 December 2024 Annual Reports.

Inflation rate – long-term inflation rate of 2.0% (2024:2.0%) has been applied for US based assets and 2.5% (2024:2.3%)

for Australian based assets.

Foreign exchange rates – a rate of$0.70 (2024:$0.75) US$:AU$ is based on management’s view of long-term exchange rates.

Discount rates – a post-tax discount rate of between 8.5% and 10.5% (2024: 8.5% and 9.5%) for CGUs has been applied.

The discount rate reflects an assessment of the risks specific to the asset.

Carbon pricing – a long-term price of US$80/tonne (2024 real terms) of emissions (2024: US$80/tonne (2024 real terms))

is based on management’s assumptions on carbon cost pricing and incorporates an evaluation of climate risk. This is applicable

to Australian emissions that exceed facility-specific baselines in accordance with Australian regulations, as well as global emissions

that exceed voluntary corporate net emissions targets. Woodside continues to monitor the uncertainty around climate change risks

and will revise carbon pricing assumptions accordingly. Refer to the Climate change and energy transition section within the basis

of preparation for further information.

LNG price – the majority of LNG sales contracts are linked to an oil price marker and therefore dependent on oil price assumptions.

LNG sold into spot markets is typically based on a gas-hub linked price (for example the Title Transfer Facility (TTF) or JKM) and

therefore these pricing assumptions are also of relevance in forecasting future revenues.

Brent oil prices – derived from long-term views of global supply and demand, building upon past experience of the industry and

consistent with external sources. Prices are adjusted for premiums and discounts based on the nature and quality of the product.

Brent oil price estimates have considered the risk of climate policies along with other factors such as industry investment and cost

trends. Woodside’s pricing assumptions reflect a ‘best estimate’ scenario in which global governments pursue decarbonisation goals

as well as other goals such as energy security and economic development. Further information on climate change risk is provided in

the Climate change and energy transition section within the basis of preparation. The nominal Brent oil prices (US$/bbl) used for

the year ended 31 December 2025 were:

202620272028202920302031
31 December 20251707178848587
31 December 20242828384868890
  1. Long-term oil prices are based on US$75/bbl (2024 real terms) from 2028 and prices are escalated at 2.0% onwards.

  2. Long-term oil prices are based on US$78/bbl (2024 real terms) from 2027 and prices are escalated at 2.0% onwards.

The nominal Brent oil prices (US$/bbl) used for the year ended 31 December 2024 were:

202520262027202820292030
31 December 20243808283848688
31 December 20234807677798082
  1. Long-term oil prices are based on US$78/bbl (2024 real terms) from 2027 and prices are escalated at 2.0% onwards.

  2. Long-term oil prices are based on US$70/bbl (2022 real terms) from 2026 and prices are escalated at 2.0% onwards.

Ammonia prices – derived from the long-term views of global supply and demand referenced to Woodside’s underlying global gas

price assumption and expectation of lower-carbon price adjustment, building upon past experience of the industry and consistent

with external sources. The long-term Ammonia prices applied range from $492/tonne escalating to a $567/tonne long‑term price

from 2034. Prices are real terms 2024 and escalated at 2.0%.

ContentsView on SEC.gov

The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.