KEYCORP /NEW/

Previous wording

◦Capital and liquidity requirements imposed by banking regulations require banks and BHCs to maintain more and higher quality capital and more and higher quality liquid assets.

Current wording

◦Capital and liquidity requirements imposed by banking regulators and the credit rating agencies may require banks and BHCs to maintain more and higher quality capital and more and higher quality liquid assets.

Previous wording

◦Our operations and financial performance could be adversely affected by severe weather and natural disasters exacerbated by climate change.

Current wording

◦Our operations and financial performance could be adversely affected by severe weather and natural disasters, both directly and as a result of impacts on our customers.

Previous wording

As of December 31, 2024, approximately 69%of our loan portfolio consisted of commercial and industrial loans, commercial real estate loans, including commercial mortgage and construction loans, and commercial leases. These types of loans are typically larger than single family residential real estate loans and other types of consumer loans and have a different risk profile. The deterioration of a larger loan or a group of loans in this category could cause an increase in criticized, classified, and nonperforming loans, which could result in lower earnings from these loans, additional provision for loan and lease losses, and ultimately an increase in loan losses.

Current wording

As of December 31, 2025, approximately 72%of our loan portfolio consisted of commercial and industrial loans, commercial real estate loans, including commercial mortgage and construction loans, and commercial leases. These types of loans are typically larger than single family residential real estate loans and other types of consumer loans and have a different risk profile. The deterioration of a larger loan or a group of loans in this category could cause an increase in criticized, classified, and nonperforming loans, which could result in lower earnings from these loans, additional provision for loan and lease losses, and ultimately an increase in loan losses.

Previous wording

A relatively small portion of our commercial real estate loans are construction loans. New construction and value-add or rehabilitation construction projects may not be fully leased at loan origination. These properties typically require additional leasing through the life of the loan to provide adequate cash flow to support debt service payments. If property market fundamentals deteriorate sharply, performance under existing leases could deteriorate and the execution of new leases could slow, compromising the borrower’s ability to cover debt service payments.

Current wording

A relatively small portion of our commercial real estate loans are construction loans, with most of these loans utilized to support the construction of affordable housing under the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) program. Loans made under the LIHTC program typically carry less risk due to the aligned interest of Tax Credit Investors and committed permanent loans at construction origination, which mitigates interest rate risk. New construction and value-add or rehabilitation construction projects may not be fully leased at loan origination. These properties typically require additional leasing through the life of the loan to provide adequate cash flow to support debt service payments. If property market fundamentals deteriorate sharply, performance under existing leases could deteriorate and the execution of new leases could slow, compromising the borrower’s ability to cover debt service payments.

Previous wording

During periods of economic stress, the volatility and disruption that the capital and credit markets experience may reach, and have in the past reached, extreme levels. Market disruption may severely stress or even lead to the failure of financial institutions, which can cause further credit market constriction and further liquidation of assets, driving asset prices down even more. Asset price deterioration has a negative effect on the valuation of collateral and certain assets represented on our balance sheet and reduces our ability to sell assets at prices we deem acceptable.

Current wording

During periods of macroeconomic or financial market stress, the volatility and disruption that the capital and credit markets experience may reach, and have in the past reached, extreme levels. Market disruption may severely stress or even lead to the failure of financial institutions, which can cause credit market constriction and liquidation of assets, driving down their prices. Asset price deterioration has a negative effect on the valuation of collateral and certain assets represented on our balance sheet and reduces our ability to sell assets at prices we deem acceptable.

Previous wording

The most recent recession in the U.S., resulting from the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, did not have significant lasting impact on collateral value. However, there are still risks to economic stability that could reverse recent stable trends in asset prices.

Current wording

Although the most recent U.S. economic recession resulting from the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic did not have significant lasting impact on collateral value, the nature of that recession was atypical. Most economic recessions are associated with financial market downturns and lower asset prices.

Previous wording

These risks include, but are not limited to:

Current wording

Present risks to stable asset prices include, but are not limited to:

Previous wording

•Labor-supply constraints, including as a result of potential changes to U.S. immigration policies and laws, leading to slowing job growth and rising wages along with inflation (wage-price spiral); and

Current wording

•Labor-supply constraints, including as a result of further changes to U.S. immigration policies and laws and immigration enforcement, leading to slowing job growth and rising wages along with inflation (wage-price spiral); and

Previous wording

While we have minimal direct foreign company exposure in our loan portfolios, there are correlated and contingent risks posed by geopolitical destabilization within our loan portfolio. For example, conflicts across the world, including the Russia-Ukraine war and the Israel-Hamas war, have proven to have a material impact on certain domestic commodity prices, impacting our borrowers' input costs and disrupting supply chains both domestically and abroad. These factors increase potential defaults in our loan portfolio and could ultimately increase loan losses.

Current wording

While we have minimal direct foreign company exposure in our loan portfolios, there are correlated and contingent risks posed by geopolitical destabilization within our loan portfolio. For example, conflicts across the world, including the Russia-Ukraine war and the Israel-Hamas war, and recent military action in Venezuela, have proven to or may have a material impact on certain domestic commodity prices, impacting our borrowers' input costs and disrupting supply chains both domestically and abroad. These factors increase potential defaults in our loan portfolio and could ultimately increase loan losses.

Previous wording

A worsening of economic and market conditions or downside shocks could result in adverse effects on Key and others in the financial services industry. Recent and persistent interest rate increases and a slowing economy could present a challenge for the industry, including Key, and negatively affect business and financial performance.

Current wording

A worsening of economic and financial market conditions or downside shocks could result in adverse effects on Key and others in the financial services industry. Banking conditions may deteriorate during periods of persistent or large and sudden interest rate increases and/or a slowing economy, negatively affecting business and financial performance.

Previous wording

In particular, we face the following risks, and other unforeseeable risks, in connection with a downturn in the economic and market environment or in the face of downside shocks or a recession, whether in the United States or internationally:

Current wording

In particular, we face the following risks, and other unforeseeable risks, in connection with a downturn in the macroeconomic and financial market environment or other such downside shocks, whether in the United States or internationally:

Previous wording

•A decrease in consumer and business confidence levels generally, decreasing credit usage and investment or increasing delinquencies and defaults;

Current wording

•A decrease in consumer and business confidence levels generally, decreasing credit usage and investment or increasing delinquencies and defaults and committed line draws;

Previous wording

•A decrease in the value of collateral securing loans to our borrowers or a decrease in the quality of our loan portfolio, increasing loan charge-offs and reducing Key’s net income;

Current wording

•A decrease in the value of collateral securing loans to our borrowers or a decrease in the quality of our loan portfolio, increasing loan charge-offs and reducing our net income;

Previous wording

•A decrease in our ability to liquidate financial positions at acceptable market prices;

Current wording

•An impairment in our ability to liquidate financial positions at acceptable market prices;

Previous wording

In addition, volatility and uncertainty related to inflation and the effects of inflation, which has, in recent years, led to increased costs for businesses and consumers and could cause the Federal Reserve to reinitiate a series of interest rate increases, which may amplify or contribute to some of the risks of our business by adversely affecting the creditworthiness of our borrowers, increasing our costs, or resulting in lower values for our investment securities and other fixed-rate assets. To the extent that the Federal Reserve’s policies around managing inflation fail to mitigate the volatility and uncertainty related to inflation and the effects of inflation, or to the extent conditions otherwise worsen or are exacerbated by policies enacted by the U.S. government, including the imposition of tariffs or other trade policies, we could experience adverse effects on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Current wording

In addition, volatility and uncertainty related to inflation and the effects of inflation, which has, in recent years, led to increased costs for businesses and consumers, and could cause the Federal Reserve to reinitiate a series of interest rate increases, which may amplify or contribute to some of the risks of our business by adversely affecting the creditworthiness of our borrowers, increasing our costs, or resulting in lower values for our investment securities and other fixed-rate assets. To the extent that the Federal Reserve’s policies around managing inflation fail to mitigate the volatility and uncertainty related to inflation and the effects of inflation, or to the extent conditions otherwise worsen or are exacerbated by policies enacted by the U.S. government, including the imposition of tariffs or other commercial policies, we could experience adverse effects on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Previous wording

Our earnings depend heavily upon our net interest income. Net interest income is the difference between interest income earned on interest-earning assets such as loans and securities and interest expense paid on interest-bearing liabilities such as deposits and borrowed funds. Hence, interest rate risk is inherent to our banking business and takes four primary forms: repricing risk, yield curve risk, basis risk, and option risk. Repricing risk occurs when assets and liabilities respond to interest rate changes at different paces and to a different degree. Yield curve risk arises when short- and long-term interest rates change to a different extent. We incur basis risk to the extent that the relationship between different interest rate indices changes over time. Option risk is present in assets, liabilities or other financial instruments that allow a party to change the timing of interest or principal payments.

Current wording

Our earnings depend heavily upon our net interest income. Net interest income is the difference between interest income earned on interest-earning assets such as loans and securities and interest expense paid on interest-bearing liabilities such as deposits and borrowed funds. Hence, interest rate risk is inherent to our banking business and takes four primary forms: repricing risk, yield curve risk, basis risk, and option risk. Repricing risk occurs when assets and liabilities respond to interest rate changes at different paces and to a different degree. Yield curve risk arises when short- and long-term interest rates change to a different extent. We incur basis risk to the extent that the relationship between different interest rate indices changes over time. Option risk is present in assets, liabilities or other financial instruments that allow a counterparty to change the timing of interest or principal payments.

Previous wording

Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors that are beyond our control, including general economic conditions, the competitive environment within our markets, consumer preferences for specific loan and deposit products and their payment behavior, and policies of various governmental and regulatory agencies, in particular, the Federal Reserve. Our ability to anticipate changes in these factors or to hedge the related on-and off-balance sheet exposures, and the cost of any such hedging activity, can significantly influence the success of our asset-and-liability management activities and our net interest income and net interest margin. Changes in monetary policy, including changes in interest rate controls being applied by the Federal Reserve, could influence the amount and timing of interest we receive on loans and securities, the amount and timing of interest we pay on deposits and borrowings, our ability to originate loans and obtain deposits, and the fair value of our financial assets and liabilities. When the Federal Reserve raises or reduces interest rates, the behavior of national money market rate indices, the correlation of consumer deposit rates to financial market interest rates, and the setting of benchmark rates may not follow historical relationships, which could influence net interest income and net interest margin through basis and other risks. In addition, our ability to change deposit rates in response to changes in interest rates and other market and related factors is limited by client relationship considerations.

Current wording

Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors that are beyond our control, including general economic conditions, the competitive environment within our markets, consumer preferences for specific loan and deposit products and their payment behavior, and policies of various governmental and regulatory agencies, in particular, the Federal Reserve. Our ability to anticipate changes in these factors or to hedge the related on-and off-balance sheet exposures, and the cost of any such hedging activity, can significantly influence the success of our asset-and-liability management activities and our net interest income and net interest margin. Changes in monetary policy, including changes in interest rate controls being applied by the Federal Reserve, could influence the amount and timing of interest we receive on loans and securities, the amount and timing of interest we pay on deposits and borrowings, our ability to originate loans and obtain deposits, and the fair value of our financial assets and liabilities. When the Federal Reserve raises or reduces interest rates, the behavior of national money market rate indices, the correlation of consumer deposit rates to financial market interest rates, and the evolution of benchmark rates may not follow historical relationships, which could influence net interest income and net interest margin through basis and other risks. In addition, our ability to change deposit rates in response to changes in interest rates and other market and related factors is limited by client relationships and competitive considerations.

Previous wording

Moreover, if the interest we pay on deposits and other borrowings increases at a faster rate than the interest we receive on loans and other investments, net interest income, and therefore our earnings, would be adversely affected. Conversely, earnings could also be adversely affected if the interest we receive on loans and other investments falls more quickly than the interest we pay on deposits and other borrowings. These scenarios illustrate repricing risk.

Current wording

Moreover, if the interest we pay on deposits and other borrowings increases at a faster rate than the interest we receive on loans and other investments, net interest income, and therefore our earnings, would decline. Conversely, earnings could also be adversely affected if the interest we receive on loans and other investments falls more quickly than the interest we pay on deposits and other borrowings. These scenarios illustrate repricing risk.

Previous wording

We have concentrations of loans and other business activities in geographic regions where our bank branches are located — Washington; Oregon/Alaska; Rocky Mountains; Indiana/Northwest Ohio/Michigan; Central/Southwest Ohio; East Ohio/Western Pennsylvania; Atlantic; Western New York; Eastern New York; and New England — and additional exposure to geographic regions outside of our branch footprint. Economic growth in the various regions where we operate has been uneven, and the health of the overall U.S. economy may differ from the economy of any particular geographic region. Adverse conditions in a geographic region such as inflation, unemployment, recession, natural disasters, impact of public health crises, or other factors beyond our control could impact the ability of borrowers in these regions to repay their loans, decrease the value of collateral securing loans made in these regions, or affect the ability of our customers in these regions to continue conducting business with us.

Current wording

We have concentrations of loans and other business activities in geographic regions where our bank branches are located — Washington; Oregon/Alaska; Rocky Mountains; Indiana/Northwest Ohio/Michigan; Central/Southwest Ohio; East Ohio/Western Pennsylvania; Atlantic; Western New York; Eastern New York; and New England — and additional exposure to geographic regions outside of our branch footprint. Economic growth in the various regions where we operate has been uneven, and the health of the overall U.S. economy may differ from the economy of any particular geographic region. Adverse conditions in a geographic region such as inflation, unemployment, recession, natural disasters, political instability, impact of public health crises, or other factors beyond our control could impact the ability of borrowers in these regions to repay their loans, decrease the value of collateral securing loans made in these regions, or affect the ability of our customers in these regions to continue conducting business with us.

Previous wording

Our ability to engage in routine funding transactions could be adversely affected by the actions and commercial soundness of other financial institutions. We have exposure to many different industries and counterparties in the financial services industries, and we routinely execute transactions with such counterparties, including brokers and dealers, banks, mortgage originators, hedge funds, insurance companies, and other institutional clients. Financial services institutions are interrelated as a result of trading, clearing, counterparty, or other relationships. As a result, defaults by, or even rumors or questions about, one or more financial services institutions, or the financial services industry generally, have led to, and may further lead to, market-wide liquidity problems and could lead to losses or defaults by us or other financial institutions. Disruption within the financial markets, including negative news regarding the banking industry or perceived risks of a bank’s safety and soundness, can adversely impact the market price and volatility of our common stock or deposit runoff. Online and mobile banking have made it easier for customers to withdraw their deposits. Higher withdrawals can raise funding cost, which may reduce Key’s net interest margin and net interest income. In addition, many of our transactions with other financial institutions expose us to credit risk in the event of default of a counterparty or client. Our credit risk may be affected when the collateral held by us cannot be realized or is liquidated at prices not sufficient to recover the full amount of our loan or derivatives exposure. There can be no assurance that any such losses would not adversely and materially affect our results of operations.

Current wording

Our ability to engage in routine funding transactions could be adversely affected by the actions and commercial soundness of other financial institutions. We have exposure to many different industries and counterparties in the financial services industries, and we routinely execute transactions with such counterparties, including brokers and dealers, banks, mortgage originators, hedge funds, insurance companies, and other institutional clients. Financial services institutions are interrelated as a result of trading, clearing, counterparty, or other relationships. As a result, defaults by, or even rumors or questions about, one or more financial services institutions, or the financial services industry generally, have led to, and may further lead to, market-wide liquidity problems and could lead to losses or defaults by us or other financial institutions. Banking is a confidence sensitive business, so disruption within the financial markets, including negative news, rumors, or misinformation regarding the banking industry or perceived risks of a bank’s safety and soundness, can adversely impact the market price and volatility of our common stock, cause deposit runoff or prompt the loss of important customers or counterparties. Online and mobile banking have made it easier for customers to withdraw their deposits. Higher than customary withdrawals can raise funding cost, which may reduce Key’s net interest margin and net interest income. In addition, many of our transactions with other financial institutions expose us to credit risk in the event of default of a counterparty or client. Our credit risk may be affected when the collateral held by us cannot be liquidated at prices sufficient to recover the full amount of our loan or derivatives exposure. There can be no assurance that any such losses would not adversely and materially affect our results of operations.

Previous wording

Liquidity risk refers to our ability to fund liability maturities and deposit withdrawals, meet contractual obligations, or fund asset growth and new business initiatives at a reasonable cost, in a timely manner and without adverse consequences. Our banking business is subject to four primary liquidity risks: contingency risk, mismatch risk, funding risk, and refinancing risk. Contingency risk arises from unexpected funding or liquidity needs occurring during challenging economic or financial market conditions. Mismatch risk may occur when illiquid assets are funded with less stable funding sources. Funding risk arises if funding sources become too concentrated. Refinancing risk arises when a concentrated liability maturity profile creates near-term funding stress. Despite actions that we take to manage these risks, unanticipated changes in assets, liabilities, and off-balance sheet commitments under various economic conditions (including a reduced level of wholesale funding sources), a substantial, unexpected, or prolonged change in the level or cost of liquidity could have a material adverse effect on us. If the cost effectiveness or the availability of supply in these credit markets is reduced for a prolonged period of time, our funding needs may require us to access funding and manage liquidity by other means. These alternatives may include generating client deposits, securitizing or selling loans, extending the maturity of wholesale borrowings, borrowing under certain secured borrowing arrangements, using relationships developed with a variety of fixed income investors to access new funds or renegotiate the terms of outstanding debt, and further managing loan growth and investment opportunities. These alternative means of funding may result in an increase in the overall cost of funds and may not be available under stressed conditions, which would cause us to liquidate a portion of our liquid asset portfolio to meet any funding needs.

Current wording

Liquidity risk is the danger that a bank may not be able to meet near-term cash demands, such as funding liability maturities and deposit withdrawals, meeting contractual obligations, or funding asset growth and new business initiatives at a reasonable cost, in a timely manner and without adverse consequences. Our banking business is subject to four primary liquidity risks: contingency risk, mismatch risk, funding risk, and refinancing risk. Contingency risk arises from unexpected funding or liquidity needs occurring during adverse systemic or idiosyncratic economic or financial conditions. Mismatch risk may occur when illiquid assets are funded with less stable funding sources. Funding risk arises if funding sources become too concentrated, raising the risk of higher borrowing costs. Refinancing risk arises when a concentrated liability maturity profile creates near-term funding stress. Despite actions that we take to manage these risks, unanticipated changes in assets, liabilities, and off-balance sheet commitments under various economic conditions (reduced wholesale funding capacity), or a substantial, unexpected, or prolonged change in the level or cost of liquidity could have a material adverse effect on us. If the cost effectiveness or the availability of supply in these credit markets is reduced for a prolonged period of time, our funding needs may require us to access funding and manage liquidity by other means. These alternatives may include generating client deposits, securitizing or selling loans, extending the maturity of wholesale borrowings, borrowing under certain secured borrowing arrangements, using relationships developed with a variety of fixed income investors to access new funds or renegotiate the terms of outstanding debt, and reducing loan growth and investment opportunities. These alternative means of funding would increase our overall cost of funds and they may not be available under stressed conditions, which may cause us to liquidate a portion of our liquid asset portfolio to meet any funding needs.

Previous wording

Capital and liquidity requirements imposed by banking regulations require banks and BHCs to maintain more and higher quality capital and more and higher quality liquid assets.

Current wording

Capital and liquidity requirements imposed by banking regulators and the credit rating agencies may require banks and BHCs to maintain more and higher quality capital and more and higher quality liquid assets.

Previous wording

In addition, regulatory liquidity standards require us to hold high-quality liquid assets, which has caused us to change, and may in the future cause us to change, our mix of investments, and may impact future business relationships with certain customers. Additionally, support of liquidity standards may be satisfied through the use of long-term wholesale borrowings, which tend to have a higher cost than that of traditional core deposits.

Current wording

In addition, regulatory liquidity standards require us to hold high-quality liquid assets, which has caused us to change, and may in the future cause us to change, our mix of investments in favor of lower-yielding securities, and may impact future business relationships with certain customers, both of which may reduce our profitability. Additionally, support of liquidity standards may be satisfied through the use of long-term wholesale borrowings, which tend to have a higher cost than that of traditional core deposits.

Previous wording

Further, the Federal Reserve has detailed the processes that BHCs should maintain to ensure they hold adequate capital under severely adverse conditions and have ready access to funding before engaging in any capital activities. The severity and other features of these processes, which take the form of stress tests and other measures, may evolve from year to year and are used by the Federal Reserve to, among other things, evaluate our management of capital and the adequacy of our regulatory capital and to determine the stress capital buffer that we must maintain above our minimum regulatory capital requirements. Despite recent announcements by the Federal Reserve declaring intent to increase transparency into capital stress tests and models, the results of these processes are difficult to predict due to, among other things, the Federal Reserve’s use of proprietary stress models that differ from our internal models. Consequently, the Federal Reserve may impose capital requirements in excess of our expectations which could require us, as applicable, to revise our stress-testing or capital management approaches, resubmit our capital plan or postpone, cancel, or alter our planned capital actions. The results may also lead to limits on Key’s ability to make distributions, including paying out dividends or buying back shares.

Current wording

Further, the Federal Reserve has detailed the processes that BHCs should maintain to ensure they hold adequate capital under severely adverse conditions and have ready access to funding before engaging in any capital activities. The severity and other features of these processes, which take the form of stress tests and other measures, may evolve from year to year and are used by the Federal Reserve to, among other things, evaluate our management of capital and the adequacy of our regulatory capital and to determine the stress capital buffer that we must maintain above our minimum regulatory capital requirements. Notwithstanding recent actions by the Federal Reserve to increase transparency into capital stress tests and models, the results of these processes are difficult to predict due to, among other things, the Federal Reserve’s use of proprietary stress models that differ from our internal models. Consequently, the Federal Reserve may impose capital requirements in excess of our expectations which could require us, as applicable, to revise our stress-testing or capital management approaches, resubmit our capital plan or postpone, cancel, or alter our planned capital actions. The results may also lead to limits on Key’s ability to make capital distributions, including paying out dividends or buying back shares.

Previous wording

The federal government’s actions can impact financial markets. For example, during 2024 the Federal Reserve, after an extended period of raising its monetary policy rate, began lowering interest rates in an effort to prevent a recession. These types of actions can impact financial markets and our business and cause increased financial market and interest rate volatility.

Current wording

The federal government’s actions can impact financial markets. For example, beginning in 2024 and during 2025, the Federal Reserve, after an extended period of raising its monetary policy rate, began lowering interest rates to support what it viewed as a weakening labor market. These types of actions can impact financial markets and our business and cause increased financial market and interest rate volatility.

Previous wording

Bank failures, such as those that occurred in 2023, have led the U.S. Treasury Secretary, the FDIC, and the Federal Reserve to invoke the systemic risk exception to the least-cost resolution requirement under the FDIA to guarantee uninsured deposits of the failed banks. The systemic bank exception can only be invoked for financial market risks that pose a threat to financial stability. The FDIC may impose a special assessment on IDIs to recover the loss to the failed bank resulting from the use of the systemic risk exception to protect the uninsured depositors. The potential impact of a special assessment to Key could increase noninterest expense for that quarter, as was the case during the first and second quarters of 2024.

Current wording

Bank failures, such as those that occurred in 2023, have led the U.S. Treasury Secretary, the FDIC, and the Federal Reserve to invoke the systemic risk exception to the least-cost resolution requirement under the FDIA to guarantee uninsured deposits of the failed banks. The systemic bank exception can only be invoked for financial market risks that pose a threat to financial stability. The FDIC may impose a special assessment on IDIs to recover the loss to the failed bank resulting from the use of the systemic risk exception to protect uninsured depositors. A special assessment could increase our noninterest expense for that quarter, as was the case during the fourth quarter of 2023 and first quarter of 2024.

Previous wording

The Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) system continues to be a source of funding. Changes in FHLB lending policy could adversely affect our liquidity and profitability.

Current wording

The Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) system continues to be a source of secured funding. Changes in FHLB lending policies or the haircuts they apply to our pledged collateral could adversely affect our liquidity and profitability.

Previous wording

We are a legal entity separate and distinct from our subsidiaries. With the exception of cash that we may raise from debt and equity issuances, we receive substantially all of our funding from dividends by our subsidiaries. Dividends by our subsidiaries are the principal source of funds for the dividends we pay on our common and preferred stock and interest and principal payments on our debt. Federal banking law and regulations limit the amount of dividends that KeyBank (KeyCorp’s largest subsidiary) can pay. For further information on the regulatory restrictions on the payment of dividends by KeyBank, see “Supervision and Regulation” in Item 1 of this report.

Current wording

We are a legal entity separate and distinct from our subsidiaries. With the exception of cash that we may raise from debt and equity issuances, we receive substantially all of our funding from dividends by our subsidiaries. Dividends by our subsidiaries are the principal source of funds for the dividends we pay on our common and preferred stock and interest and principal payments on KeyCorp debt and capital securities. Federal banking law and regulations limit the amount of dividends that KeyBank (KeyCorp’s largest subsidiary) can pay. For further information on the regulatory restrictions on the payment of dividends by KeyBank, see “Supervision and Regulation” in Item 1 of this report.

Previous wording

The rating agencies regularly evaluate the securities issued by KeyCorp and KeyBank. The ratings of our long-term debt and other securities are based on a number of factors, including our financial strength, ability to generate earnings, and other factors. Some of these factors are not entirely within our control, such as conditions affecting the financial services industry and the economy and changes in rating methodologies. Changes in any of these factors could impair our ability to maintain our current credit ratings. We may be unable to maintain our current ratings and our ratings may be downgraded again in the future. The impact of downgrades to KeyCorp's or KeyBank's credit ratings could adversely affect our access to liquidity and could significantly increase our cost of funds, trigger additional collateral or funding requirements, and decrease the number of investors and counterparties willing to lend to us, reducing our ability to generate income. If KeyCorp’s or KeyBank's credit ratings fell below investment grade, it could also create obligations or liabilities under the terms of existing arrangements that could increase our costs and reduce our profitability.

Current wording

The rating agencies regularly evaluate the securities issued by KeyCorp and KeyBank. The ratings of our long-term debt and other securities are based on a number of factors, including our financial strength, ability to generate earnings, and other factors. Some of these factors are not entirely within our control, such as conditions affecting the financial services industry and the economy and changes in rating methodologies. Changes in any of these factors could impair our ability to maintain our current credit ratings. We may be unable to maintain our current ratings and our ratings may be downgraded in the future. Downgrades to KeyCorp's or KeyBank's credit ratings could impair our access to liquidity and could significantly increase our cost of funds, trigger additional collateral or funding requirements, and decrease the number of investors and counterparties willing to lend to us, reducing our ability to generate income. If KeyCorp’s or KeyBank's credit ratings fell below investment grade, it could also create obligations or liabilities under the terms of existing arrangements that could increase our costs and reduce our profitability.

Previous wording

In the event of a failure, interruption, or breach of our information systems, or that of a third party that provides services to us or our customers, we may be unable to avoid impact to our customers. For example, we may experience operational disruptions or interruptions as a result of a cyber incident, including disruption caused by protective containment measures taken by us, such as taking certain first- or third-party systems off-line for a prolonged period. Such a failure, interruption, or breach could result in legal liability, remediation costs, regulatory action, or reputational harm. U.S. financial service institutions and companies have reported breaches in the security of their websites or other systems and several financial institutions, including Key, have had third parties on which they rely experience such breaches. In addition, several financial institutions, including Key, have experienced significant distributed denial-of-service attacks, some of which involved sophisticated and targeted attacks intended to disrupt, disable, or degrade services, or sabotage systems or data. Other attacks have attempted to obtain unauthorized access to confidential, proprietary, or personal information or intellectual property, to extort money through the use of “ransomware” or other extortion tactics, or to alter or destroy data or systems, often through various attack vectors and methods, including the introduction of computer viruses or malicious or destructive code (commonly referred to as “malware”), phishing, cyberattacks, account takeovers, credential stuffing, and other means. To the extent that we use third parties to provide services to our clients, we cannot control all of the risks at these third parties or third parties’ downstream service providers. Hardware, software, or applications developed by Key or received from third parties may contain exploitable vulnerabilities, bugs, or defects in design, maintenance or manufacture or other issues that could unpredictably compromise information and cybersecurity. We depend on third party service providers and their downstream service providers to implement adequate controls and safeguards to protect against and report cyber incidents. While we have a third party risk management program, because we do not control our third party service providers or their downstream service providers and our ability to monitor their cybersecurity is limited, we cannot ensure the cybersecurity measures they take will be sufficient to protect any information we share with them or prevent any disruption arising from a technology failure, cyberattack or other information or security breach. If such parties fail to deter, detect, or report cyber incidents in a timely manner, we may suffer from financial and other harm, including to our information, operations, performance, employees, and reputation. In addition, should an adverse event affecting another company’s systems occur, we may not have indemnification…

Excerpt shortened here; the source contains the full paragraph.

Current wording

In the event of a failure, interruption, or breach of our information systems, or that of a third party that provides services to us or our customers, we may be unable to avoid impact to our customers. For example, we may experience operational disruptions or interruptions as a result of a cyber incident, including disruption caused by protective containment measures taken by us, such as taking certain first- or third-party systems off-line for a prolonged period. Such a failure, interruption, or breach could result in legal liability, remediation costs, regulatory action, or reputational harm. U.S. financial service institutions and companies have reported breaches in the security of their websites or other systems and several financial institutions, including Key, have had third parties on which they rely experience such breaches. In addition, several financial institutions, including Key, have experienced significant distributed denial-of-service attacks, some of which involved sophisticated and targeted attacks intended to disrupt, disable, or degrade services, or sabotage systems or data. Other attacks have attempted to obtain unauthorized access to confidential, proprietary, or personal information or intellectual property, to extort money through the use of “ransomware” or other extortion tactics, or to alter or destroy data or systems, often through various attack vectors and methods, including the introduction of computer viruses or malicious or destructive code (commonly referred to as “malware”), phishing, cyberattacks, account takeovers, credential stuffing, and other means. To the extent that we use third parties to provide services to our clients, we cannot control all of the risks at these third parties or third parties’ downstream service providers. Hardware, software, or applications developed by Key or received from third parties may contain exploitable vulnerabilities, bugs, or defects in design, maintenance or manufacture or other issues that could lead to compromise of information and cybersecurity. We depend on third party service providers and their downstream service providers to implement adequate controls and safeguards to protect against and report cyber incidents. While we have a third party risk management program, because we do not control our third party service providers or their downstream service providers and our ability to monitor their cybersecurity is limited, we cannot ensure the cybersecurity measures they take will be sufficient to protect any information we share with them or prevent any disruption arising from a technology failure, cyberattack or other information or security breach. If such parties fail to deter, detect, or report cyber incidents in a timely manner, we may suffer from financial and other harm, including to our information, operations, performance, employees, and reputation. In addition, should an adverse event affecting another company’s systems occur, we may not have indemnification or…

Excerpt shortened here; the source contains the full paragraph.

Previous wording

We also face risks related to the increasing interdependence and interconnectivity of financial entities and technology systems. A technology failure, cyberattack or other security breach that significantly compromises the systems of one or more financial parties or service providers in the financial system could have a material impact on counterparties or market participants, including us. Such incidents could also lead to widespread technology outages, interruptions or other failures of operational, communication, or other systems globally and across companies and industries. Any third-party technology failure, cyberattack, or security breach could adversely affect our ability to effect transactions, service clients, or otherwise operate our business and could result in legal liability, remediation costs, regulatory action, or reputational harm. Additionally, the increasing use of third-party financial data aggregators and emerging technologies, including the use of automation, artificial intelligence and robotics, introduces new information security risks and exposure for us and for our third party service providers, and, additionally, such technologies may be used to identify vulnerabilities; such technologies have resulted in a substantial increase in the volume and sophistication of cyberattacks against financial and other institutions, including the use of generative artificial intelligence to conduct more sophisticated social engineering attacks. Such security attacks can originate from a wide variety of sources/malicious actors, including, but not limited to, persons who constitute an insider threat, who are involved with organized crime, or who may be linked to terrorist organizations or hostile foreign governments. Those same parties may also attempt to fraudulently induce employees, customers, or other users of our systems to disclose sensitive information in order to gain access to our data or that of our customers or clients through social engineering, phishing, mobile phone malware and SIM card swapping, and other methods. Our security systems, and those of the third-party service providers on which we rely, may not be able to protect our information systems or data from similar attacks due to the rapid evolution and creation of sophisticated cyberattacks. We are also subject to the risk that a malicious actor or our employees may intercept and/or transmit or otherwise misuse unauthorized personal, confidential, or proprietary information or intellectual property. An interception, misuse, or mishandling of personal, confidential, or proprietary information or intellectual property being sent to or received from a customer or third party could result in legal liability, remediation costs, regulatory action, and reputational harm.

Current wording

Security attacks can originate from a wide variety of sources/malicious actors, including, but not limited to, persons who constitute an insider threat, who are involved with organized crime, or who may be linked to terrorist organizations or hostile foreign governments. Those same parties may also attempt to fraudulently induce employees, customers, or other users of our systems to disclose sensitive information in order to gain access to our data or that of our customers or clients through social engineering, phishing, mobile phone malware and SIM card swapping, and other methods. Our security systems, and those of the third-party service providers on which we rely, may not be able to protect our information systems or data from similar attacks due to the rapid evolution and creation of sophisticated cyberattacks. We are also subject to the risk that a malicious actor or our employees may intercept and/or transmit or otherwise misuse unauthorized personal, confidential, or proprietary information or intellectual property. An interception, misuse, or mishandling of personal, confidential, or proprietary information or intellectual property being sent to or received from a customer or third party could result in legal liability, remediation costs, regulatory action, and reputational harm.

Previous wording

Our risk management framework seeks to maintain safety and soundness and maximize profitability. We have established policies, processes, and procedures intended to identify, measure, monitor, report, and analyze the types of risk to which we are subject, including compliance, operational, liquidity, market, credit, model, reputational, and strategic risk, among others. We cannot provide assurance that our risk management framework will effectively mitigate risk and limit losses in our business and operations. For example, our risk management framework and measures that we take to mitigate risk may not be fully effective in identifying and mitigating our risk exposure in all market environments or against all types of risks, including risks that are unidentified or unanticipated, even if the frameworks for assessing risk are properly designed and implemented. In addition, some of our methods of managing risk are based upon our use of observed historical market behavior and management’s judgment. These methods may not accurately predict future exposures, which could be significantly greater than historical measures indicate. If our risk management framework proves ineffective, we could suffer unexpected losses and our business, results of operations, and financial condition could be adversely affected.

Current wording

Our risk management framework seeks to maintain safety and soundness and maximize profitability. We have established policies, processes, and procedures intended to identify, measure, monitor, report, and analyze the types of risk to which we are subject, including compliance, operational, technology, liquidity, market, credit, model, and strategic risk, among others. We cannot provide assurance that our risk management framework will effectively mitigate risk and limit losses in our business and operations. For example, our risk management framework and measures that we take to mitigate risk may not be fully effective in identifying and mitigating our risk exposure in all market environments or against all types of risks, including risks that are unidentified or unanticipated, even if the frameworks for assessing risk are properly designed and implemented. In addition, some of our methods of managing risk are based upon our use of observed historical market behavior and management’s judgment. These methods may not accurately predict future exposures, which could be significantly greater than historical measures indicate. If our risk management framework proves ineffective, we could suffer unexpected losses and our business, results of operations, and financial condition could be adversely affected.

Previous wording

We regularly review and update our internal controls, disclosure controls and procedures, compliance monitoring activities, and corporate governance policies and procedures. We also maintain an ERM program designed to identify, measure, monitor, report, and analyze our risks. Additionally, our internal audit function provides an independent assessment and testing of Key’s internal controls, policies, and procedures. Any system of controls and any system to reduce risk exposure, however well designed, operated, and tested, is based in part on certain assumptions and can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurances that the objectives of the system are met. The systems may not work as intended or be circumvented by employees, third parties, or others outside of Key. Additionally, instruments, systems, and strategies used to hedge or otherwise manage exposure to various types of market compliance, credit, liquidity, operational, and business risks and enterprise-wide risk could be less effective than anticipated. As a result, we may not be able to effectively or fully mitigate our risk exposures in particular market environments or against particular types of risk.

Current wording

We regularly review and update our internal controls, disclosure controls and procedures, compliance monitoring activities, and corporate governance policies and procedures. We also maintain an ERM program designed to identify, measure, monitor, report, and analyze our risks. Additionally, our internal audit function provides an independent assessment and testing of Key’s internal controls, policies, and procedures. Any system of controls and any system to reduce risk exposure, however well designed, operated, and tested, is based in part on certain assumptions and can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurances that the objectives of the system are met. The systems may not work as intended or be circumvented by employees, third parties, or others outside of Key. Additionally, instruments, systems, and strategies used to mitigate or otherwise manage exposure to various types of risk could be less effective than anticipated. As a result, we may not be able to effectively or fully mitigate our risk exposures in particular market environments or against particular types of risk.

Previous wording

Our operations and financial performance could be adversely affected by severe weather and natural disasters exacerbated by climate change.

Current wording

Our operations and financial performance could be adversely affected by severe weather and natural disasters, both directly and as a result of impacts on our customers.

Previous wording

Natural disasters, including wildfires, tornadoes, severe storms, and hurricanes, have seemingly become more frequent and severe due to climate change. The timing and effects of these climate-related physical risks are difficult to accurately predict, and the potential impact of such risks on our operations, employees, communities, and customers could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, and results of operations. Given our broad regional focus, we are exposed to a wide range of climate-related physical risks across different geographical areas. Severe weather events can directly affect our operations by interrupting systems, damaging facilities, disrupting our supply chain, and hindering our ability to conduct business as usual. Additionally, these events can indirectly impact us by damaging or destroying customer businesses, impairing their ability to repay loans, or causing damage to properties pledged as collateral for loans made by Key. Although preventative measures may help to mitigate damage, such measures could be costly, and any disaster could adversely affect our ability to conduct our business as usual. Furthermore, the insurance we maintain may not be adequate to cover our losses resulting from any business interruption resulting from a natural disaster or other severe weather events. Recurring extreme weather events could also reduce the availability or increase the cost of insurance. Our failure to comply with evolving regulatory requirements related to natural disaster risk management may also result in legal and financial consequences.

Current wording

Natural disasters, including wildfires, tornadoes, severe storms, and hurricanes, have seemingly become more frequent and severe. The timing and effects of these climate-related physical risks are difficult to accurately predict, and the potential impact of such risks on our operations, employees, communities, and customers could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, and results of operations. Given our broad regional focus, we are exposed to a wide range of climate-related physical risks across different geographical areas. Severe weather events can directly affect our operations by interrupting systems, damaging facilities, disrupting our supply chain, and hindering our ability to conduct business as usual. Additionally, these events can indirectly impact us by damaging or destroying customer businesses, impairing their ability to repay loans, or causing damage to properties pledged as collateral for loans made by Key. Although preventative measures may help to mitigate damage, such measures could be costly, and any disaster could adversely affect our ability to conduct our business as usual. Furthermore, the insurance we maintain may not be adequate to cover our losses resulting from any business interruption resulting from a natural disaster or other severe weather events. Recurring extreme weather events could also reduce or eliminate the availability or increase the cost of insurance to Key and our customers. Our failure to comply with evolving regulatory requirements related to natural disaster risk management may also result in legal and financial consequences.

Previous wording

At the federal level, we are subject to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999, as amended, which requires financial institutions to, among other things, periodically disclose their privacy policies and practices relating to sharing personal information and, in some cases, enables customers to opt out of the sharing of certain non-public personal information with unaffiliated third parties. We are also subject to the rules and regulations promulgated under the authority of the Federal Trade Commission, which regulates unfair or deceptive acts or practices, including with respect to privacy and cybersecurity. A number of states have also recently enacted consumer privacy laws that impose compliance obligations with respect to personal information or issued guidance regarding the same, such as the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018, as amended by the California Privacy Rights Act (known as the “CCPA”), and the New York Department of Financial Services Cybersecurity Regulations. In addition, there has been a significant increase in privacy-related litigation in recent years with respect to how organizations collect information and technical data from their public facing websites, and federal and state courts have been creating new legal frameworks around consumer and website privacy, which also creates new risks on businesses. As new privacy-related laws and regulations, and judicially-created frameworks, are implemented in jurisdictions in which

Current wording

At the federal level, we are subject to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999, as amended, which requires financial institutions to, among other things, periodically disclose their privacy policies and practices relating to sharing personal information and, in some cases, enables customers to opt out of the sharing of certain non-public personal information with unaffiliated third parties. We are also subject to the rules and regulations promulgated under the authority of the Federal Trade Commission, which regulates unfair or deceptive acts or practices, including with respect to privacy and cybersecurity. A number of states have also recently enacted consumer privacy laws that impose compliance obligations with respect to personal information or issued guidance regarding the same, such as the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018, as amended by the California Privacy Rights Act (known as the “CCPA”), and the New York Department of Financial Services Cybersecurity Regulations. In addition, there has been a significant increase in privacy-related litigation in recent years with respect to how organizations collect information and technical data from their public facing websites, and federal and state courts have been creating new legal frameworks around consumer and website privacy, which also creates new risks on businesses. As new privacy-related laws and regulations, and judicially-created frameworks, are implemented in jurisdictions in which KeyBank operates, the time and resources needed for us to comply with such laws and regulations, as well as our potential liability for noncompliance and reporting obligations in the case of data breaches, may significantly increase. Compliance with these laws and regulations has required and may continue to require us to change our policies, procedures, and technology for information security and segregation of data, which could, among other things, make us more vulnerable to operational failures, result in increased costs as a result of continually evaluating our policies and processes and adapting to new requirements that are or become applicable to us, and subject us to monetary penalties for breach of such laws and regulations. As a result, some uncertainty remains as to the aggregate impact upon Key of significant regulations.

Previous wording

We face substantial competition in all areas of our operations from a variety of competitors, some of which are larger and may have more financial resources than us. Our competitors primarily include national and super-regional banks as well as smaller community banks within the various geographic regions in which we operate. We also face competition from many other types of financial institutions, including, without limitation, savings associations, credit unions, mortgage banking companies, finance companies, mutual funds, insurance companies, investment management firms, private credit funds, investment banking firms, broker-dealers, financial technology companies, and other local, regional, national, and global financial services firms. In addition, technology has lowered barriers to entry and made it possible for nonbanks, including large technology companies, to offer products and services traditionally provided by banks. We expect the competitive landscape of the financial services industry to become even more intense as a result of legislative, regulatory, structural, customer preference, and technological changes.

Current wording

We face substantial competition in all areas of our operations from a variety of competitors, some of which are larger and may have more financial resources than us. Our competitors primarily include national and super-regional banks as well as smaller community banks within the various geographic regions in which we operate. We also face competition from many other types of financial institutions, including, without limitation, savings associations, credit unions, mortgage banking companies, finance companies, mutual funds, insurance companies, investment management firms, private credit funds, investment banking firms, broker-dealers, financial technology companies, and other local, regional, national, and global financial services firms. In addition, technology has lowered barriers to entry and made it possible for nonbanks, including large technology companies, to offer products and services traditionally provided by banks. Furthermore, both financial institutions and their non-banking competitors face the risk that payments processing and other products and services, including deposits and other traditional banking products, could be significantly disrupted by the use of new technologies, such as cryptocurrencies and other applications using secure distributed ledgers that may not require intermediation. We expect the competitive landscape of the financial services industry to become even more intense as a result of legislative, regulatory, structural, customer preference, and technological changes.

Previous wording

Our ability to compete successfully depends on a number of factors, including: our ability to develop and execute strategic plans and initiatives; our ability to develop, maintain, and build long-term client relationships; our ability to develop and deliver competitive products and technologies expected by our customers, while maintaining safety and soundness, effective risk management practices, and high ethical standards; our ability to attract, retain, and develop an employee workforce with the required skills and expertise; and industry and economic trends. Increased competition in the financial services industry, or our failure to perform in any of these areas, could significantly weaken our competitive position, which could adversely affect our growth and profitability.

Current wording

Our ability to compete successfully depends on a number of factors, including: our ability to develop and execute strategic plans and initiatives; our ability to develop, maintain, and build long-term client relationships; our ability to develop and deliver competitive products and technologies expected by our customers, while maintaining safety and soundness, effective risk management practices, and high ethical standards; our ability to attract, retain, and develop a workforce with the required skills and expertise; and industry and economic trends. Increased competition in the financial services industry, or our failure to perform in any of these areas, could significantly weaken our competitive position, which could adversely affect our growth and profitability.

Previous wording

The continuous, widespread adoption of new technologies requires us to continually evaluate our product and service offerings to ensure they remain competitive. Our success depends, in part, on our ability to adapt our products and services, as well as our distribution of them, to evolving industry standards and consumer preferences. New technologies have altered consumer behavior by allowing consumers to complete transactions such as paying bills or transferring funds directly without the assistance of banks. New products allow consumers to maintain funds in brokerage accounts or mutual funds that would have historically been held as bank deposits. The process of eliminating banks as intermediaries, known as “disintermediation,” could result in the loss of fee income, as well as the loss of customer loans and deposits and related income generated from those products.

Current wording

The continuous, widespread adoption of new technologies requires us to continually evaluate our product and service offerings to ensure they remain competitive. Our success depends, in part, on our ability to adapt our products and services, as well as our distribution of them, to evolving industry standards and consumer preferences. New technologies have altered consumer behavior by allowing consumers to complete transactions such as paying bills or transferring funds directly without the assistance of banks. New products allow consumers to maintain funds in brokerage accounts or mutual funds that would have historically been held as bank deposits. Furthermore, both financial institutions and their non-banking competitors face the risk that payments processing and other products and services, including deposits and other traditional banking products, could be significantly disrupted by the use of new technologies, such as cryptocurrencies and other applications using secure distributed ledgers that may not require intermediation. The process of eliminating banks as intermediaries, known as “disintermediation,” could result in the loss of fee income, as well as the loss of customer loans and deposits and related income generated from those products.

Previous wording

Our success depends on our ability to attract, retain, motivate, and develop a high performing, inclusive, and collaborative workforce. Competition for talent in our business is strong and requires us to make investments to provide compensation and benefits at market levels. Rising wages, as well as inflation, may cause us to increase these investments. Such investments cause compensation and benefits to represent our greatest expense.

Current wording

Our success depends on our ability to attract, retain, motivate, and develop a high performing and collaborative workforce. Competition for talent in our business is strong and requires us to make investments to provide compensation and benefits at market levels. Rising wages, as well as inflation, may cause us to increase these investments. Such investments cause compensation and benefits to represent our greatest expense.