BAXTER INTERNATIONAL INC
For the period ended May 6, 2025. Filed Mar 25, 2025.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
What shareholders are asked to vote on at a company's meeting. It is where to find what directors and top executives are paid, and who owns the most shares.
May 6, 2025 · Filed Mar 25, 2025
Contents
Proxy Statement Highlights
To assist you in reviewing the proposals to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting, this section presents summary
detail about each non-routine voting item. For more complete information, please review the company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024 (the 2024 Form 10-K) and the complete proxy
statement.
| Election of DirectorsWhat am I voting on?You will be asked to vote for the election of the ten director nominees set forth below for a term of one year.What is the Board’s recommendation?The Board recommends a vote FOR the election of each of the director nominees.As demonstrated in the director skills matrix included on page 7, the Board believes that the ten directors standing for election possess a desirable mix of skills, backgrounds, professional and industry experience and qualifications. These directors also reflect the Board’s commitment to regular refreshment, as demonstrated by the appointment of Mr. Jeffrey A. Craig in September 2024. The Board believes that each director is individually qualified to make unique and substantial contributions to the Board, and, collectively, the directors’ diverse and complimentary skill sets, viewpoints and perspectives enable the Board to provide the company with valuable insight and effective oversight with respect to its business, overall performance and strategic direction. Baxter's directors’ unique qualifications have also better enabled the Board, as a whole, to effectively consult with management on succession planning, including in light of the ongoing CEO transition, as well as the company’s strategic and operational plans and capital allocation decisions, including with respect to the recent sale of its Kidney Care business and the company's disaster recovery efforts at its North Cove facility in response to the impacts from Hurricane Helene. See below for additional information regarding the qualifications, experiences and backgrounds of the directors and recent Board developments.Where can I find more information?Concise supporting information is presented below. | |
| See also “Corporate Governance at Baxter International Inc.—Proposal 1—Election of Directors” for additional information. |
| 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement
| 4 | Proxy Statement Highlights |
| Name1 Primary Occupation | Age | DirectorSince | IndependentY/N | Key Attributes and Skills | A | CHC | NCGPP | QRC | O |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| William A. Ampofo IIChair, Supply Chain Operations Council and Vice President, Parts & Distribution Services and Supply Chain, Boeing Global Services of Boeing Company | 51 | 2023 | Y | ✓Deep operational expertise and strong track record as a supply chain leader✓ Significant experience driving transformation and enabling strategic transactions at multinational companies | ⬛ | ⬛ | |||
| Jeffrey A. CraigChief Executive Officer andPresident of Meritor, Inc. (retired) | 64 | 2024 | Y | ✓Significant financial expertise, including as Chief Financial Officer at Meritor, Inc.✓ Meaningful leadership, risk management and operational experience | ▲ | ||||
| Patricia B. MorrisonExecutive Vice President,Customer Support Services & Chief Information Officer, Cardinal Health, Inc. (retired) | 65 | 2019 | Y | ✓Significant experience in information technology (IT) and cybersecurity at global healthcare companies✓ Meaningful human capital management experience | ⬛ | ⬛ | ⬛ | ||
| Stephen N. Oesterle, M.D.Healthcare Industry Consultant, former Senior Vice President, Medicine and Technology, Medtronic plc | 74 | 2017 | Y | ✓Significant experience in the medical products and healthcare industries (including strategic transactions)✓ Strong scientific and medical background, including as a former practicing cardiologist | ⬛ | ▲ | |||
| Stephen H. Rusckowski.Chair and Chief Executive Officer and President of Quest Diagnostics, Inc. (retired) | 67 | 2023 | Y | ✓Significant operational experience in the healthcare industry✓Strong track record as a transformational leader, including in the context of large scale separation transactions | ⬛ | ⬛ | ▲ | ||
| Nancy M. SchlichtingPresident and Chief Executive Officer, Henry Ford Health System (retired) | 70 | 2021 | Y | ✓ Significant experience in healthcare administration in senior-level executive roles with health care providers✓Meaningful human capital management experience | ▲ | ⬛ | |||
| Brent ShaferChair and Interim Chief Executive Officer of Baxter International Inc. | 67 | 2022 | N | ✓Significant experience leading global organizations, including as Chair and Chief Executive Officer of Cerner Corporation✓Strong digital health capabilities and experience transforming complex organizations | |||||
| Cathy R. SmithChief Financial Officer of Starbucks Corporation | 61 | 2017 | Y | ✓Significant financial expertise and corporate leadership experience, including in responding to cybersecurity incidents and overseeing large strategic transactions✓ Meaningful human capital management experience | ⬛ | ▲ | |||
| Amy A. WendellSenior Vice President of Strategy and Business Development,Covidien (retired) | 64 | 2019 | Y | ✓ Extensive experience in business development and strategy in the healthcare industry, including significant mergers & acquisitions and integration experience | ⬛ | ⬛ | ⬛ | ||
| David S. Wilkes, M.D.Former Dean of University ofVirginia School of Medicine,Chief Scientific Officer and Co- Founder, ImmuneWorks, Inc. | 68 | 2021 | Y | ✓Significant scientific and medical experience, including as the co-founder and chief scientific officer of a biotechnology start-up✓Extensive experience leading large, complex organizations, including as a former dean of a large medical school | ⬛ | ⬛ | |||
| Key | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▲ | Committee Chair | A | Audit Committee | QRC | Quality and Regulatory Compliance Committee |
| ⬛ | Committee Member | CHC | Compensation and Human Capital Committee | O | Operating Committee |
| NCGPP | Nominating, Corporate Governance and Public Policy Committee | ||||
- Directors standing for election on May 6, 2025. Committee assignments and ages reflected in this chart speak as of March
25, 2025.
investor.baxter.com
| Proxy Statement Highlights | 5 |
|---|
2024 Board and Governance Highlights
| Governance Practices | See pages 19 and 22 |
|---|
Strong Governance Practices: Baxter remains committed to strong corporate governance practices and
protecting stockholder rights. As a result, the Board has adopted the following practices and provisions in
related governance documents, among others:
Strong Lead Independent Director with robust and clearly defined responsibilities;
Meaningful director and officer stock ownership requirements;
Annual director elections;
Majority voting standard coupled with a resignation policy;
Nine out of ten directors are independent;
All Board committee chairs and members are independent;
Executive sessions of independent directors held at each regularly scheduled Board meeting;
Mandatory retirement age;
Regular Board refreshment, including the appointment of five new directors in the last three years;
No supermajority voting provisions;
Single class of voting stock;
Proxy access rights;
No poison pill in place;
Stockholders have the right to call special meetings (with a 15% threshold);
Stockholders have the right to act by written consent;
Use of independent experts, such as auditors and compensation consultants; and
Robust director orientation and continuing education programs.
Focus on Board Refreshment and Oversight Responsibilities: Continued Board focus on refreshment led
to the appointment of a new Lead Independent Director and changes in Board and committee composition and
responsibilities in 2024 and 2025, as described below:
In September 2024, after the retention of an independent search firm and thorough consideration of several
potential candidates, Jeffrey A. Craig, retired Chief Executive Officer and President of Meritor, Inc., was
appointed to the Board and the Audit Committee. Mr. Craig was also appointed as chair of the Audit
Committee, effective December 31, 2024, in connection with the resignation of Peter Wilver from the Board.
Brent Shafer was appointed as Chair and Interim CEO, effective February 3, 2025, in connection with the
departure of Joe Almeida, while the Board searches for a permanent CEO with the assistance of a leading
search firm.
In February 2025, the Board formed a CEO Search Working Group consisting of independent directors to
oversee the search for a permanent CEO.
Nancy Schlichting was appointed to serve as Lead Independent Director in February 2025.
Refreshed Board committee oversight in 2024 and 2025, including moving oversight of innovation strategy
and cybersecurity generally from the QRC and Audit Committees, respectively, to the full Board, consistent
with the implementation of Baxter's new operating model.
In 2025, the Board's Operating Committee was formed in connection with the ongoing CEO transition. The
Operating Committee is scheduled to sunset six months after the appointment of a permanent CEO.
Stephen Rusckowski was appointed as chair of the Operating Committee.
Refreshed the company's Corporate Governance Guidelines and each standing committee's charter in
furtherance of Baxter's commitment to strong governance and transparency.
As of March 13, 2025, average director age was 59.2 years and average director tenure was 3.8 years.
Board's and Board Committees' Annual Self-Assessment Process: In November 2024, the Board and
each of its committees conducted an annual self-assessment process in which each independent director
provided commentary on the performance and effectiveness of the Board and each committee on which he or
she serves. Outputs from this assessment process informed the Board's and each committee's continuing
refreshment efforts and changes to committee charters. For more information regarding this annual evaluation
process, see "Corporate Governance at Baxter International Inc.— Board of Directors— Annual Board and
Committee Evaluation".
Stockholder Engagement: Baxter has a robust corporate governance outreach program in place to enable it
to better understand the perspectives of its stockholders.
Since the completion of the 2024 annual meeting and through early 2025, as part of the company's annual
corporate governance outreach program, Baxter has engaged in discussions with stockholders representing
| 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement
| 6 | Proxy Statement Highlights |
approximately 30% of the company’s outstanding shares (calculated as of December 31, 2024). These
discussions followed an outreach to top Baxter investors representing over 60% of Baxter’s outstanding
shares (calculated as of December 31, 2024).
Topics discussed with stockholders included company strategy and performance (including the separation of
the Kidney Care business), the remediation efforts at the North Cove facility, management succession
planning and other corporate governance matters (including the ongoing CEO search and Board
composition), Board leadership structure, executive compensation matters (including the 2024 Say on Pay
vote and the 2024 stockholder proposal) and corporate responsibility initiatives.
Responsiveness to Stockholders: Baxter is committed to being responsive to the views of stockholders and
has worked to reflect stockholders' perspectives in its governance policies, executive compensation program
and corporate responsibility initiatives. This engagement over the years has resulted in enhancements to
Baxter's proxy disclosure, including disclosures relating to the ongoing Board refreshment efforts (which most
recently resulted in the addition of Jeffrey Craig to the Board), management succession planning as well as
various corporate responsibility related updates. It also informed the Board's position on the stockholder
proposal to be voted on at the Annual Meeting again this year. In addition, the company continues to evolve its
disclosure regarding the performance reviews of the CEO and the other named executive officers (NEOs) and
how they impacted related incentive payouts and included additional disclosures regarding the factors the CHC
Committee considers when reviewing executive pay. These responsive actions are a continuation of the
Board’sstrong track record of responsiveness.
Overboarding: The company's Corporate Governance Guidelines limit the number of public company boards
on which Baxter directors may serve. Specifically, the Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that no
director who is employed full time may serve on the boards of directors of more than two public companies
(including the Board) and no other director may serve on the boards of directors of more than four public
companies (including the Board). The Board considers the outside commitments of directors in connection with
the annual nominating process. Any waivers to the overboarding policy (including the one granted in
connection with the appointment of Mr. Shafer as Interim CEO) must be approved by the NCGPP Committee.
Changes in director circumstances need to be reviewed and approved by the NCGPP Committee in
accordance with the Corporate Governance Guidelines. See “Corporate Governance at Baxter International
Inc.—Board of Directors—Director Overboarding” for additional detail regarding the Baxter’s overboarding
policy.
investor.baxter.com
| Proxy Statement Highlights | 7 |
|---|
Board Qualifications, Experiences and Backgrounds
The matrix included below represents some of the key skills, experiences and backgrounds that the Board has
identified as particularly valuable to the oversight of the company and illustrates how the current director
nominees individually and collectively possess these key competencies and backgrounds. The matrix does not
encompass all of the skills, experience, qualifications and attributes of the director nominees (including additional
ones that may have been considered by the Board and the NCGPP Committee in this year's director nomination
process), and no specific weights are assigned to any of the skill sets in the matrix. Additionally, the fact that a
particular skill, experience, qualification or attribute for a nominee is not listed below does not mean that he or
she does not possess that particular skill, experience, qualification or attribute. The Board believes that its highly
qualified director nominees provide the Board with a complementary mix of skills, experience and perspectives
necessary for effective oversight.
| William Ampofo | Jeffrey Craig | Patricia Morrison | Stephen Oesterle | Stephen Rusckowski | Nancy Schlichting | Brent Shafer | Cathy Smith | Amy Wendell | David Wilkes | |
| Skills and Experience | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Healthcare Marketing / DeliveryRelevant expertise required to effectively assess Baxter's portfolio management and innovation strategies in light of the competitive and dynamic landscape in which Baxter operates | g | g | g | g | g | g | g | |||
| Quality, Regulatory and ComplianceCritical skills (including the development and oversight of clinical trials) needed to help Baxter launch new products consistent with Baxter's commitment to patient safety and quality | g | g | g | g | g | |||||
| Financial Expertise / Risk ManagementCritical skills necessary to help promote the company's financial performance and to help maintain appropriate internal controls | g | g | g | g | g | g | g | |||
| Manufacturing and R&DCritical knowledge to help oversee Baxter's global manufacturing and research and development operations, including in response to global supply chain challenges and evolving macroeconomic dynamics | g | g | g | g | g | g | ||||
| Cyber / ITEssential expertise to help Baxter pursue digital health opportunities in connection with its continuing focus on connected care, consistent with emerging cybersecurity and artificial intelligence practices and regulations as well as evolving market demands and privacy regulations | g | g | g | g | ||||||
| M&A / TransactionalImportant skills to help Baxter achieve its long term strategies as the company assesses potential future portfolio adjustments | g | g | g | g | g | g | g | g | ||
| InternationalInternational market knowledge and business acumen critical to Baxter's key growth strategies and priorities. Approximately 45% of Baxter's 2024 revenues from continuing operations were from outside the U.S. | g | g | g | g | g | g | g | |||
| Human Capital ManagementEssential skills to help oversee the company's talent and leadership development, employee compensation and employee engagement efforts | g | g | g | g | g | g | g | |||
| Other Sector LeadershipEnables the Board to incorporate best practices from other industries, in response to emerging trends or otherwise | g | g | g | g | g | g | g | g | ||
| Gender | M | M | F | M | M | F | M | F | F | M |
| Ethnic/Racial Diversity | g | g | ||||||||
| LGBTQ+ | g | |||||||||
- As self-identified by each director nominee.
| 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement
| 8 | Proxy Statement Highlights |
| Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation for 2024What am I voting on?You are asked to cast a non-binding advisory vote to approve Baxter’s 2024 compensation programs as described in the “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of the proxy statement.What is the Board’s recommendation?The Board recommends a vote FOR this proposal.The Board and the CHC Committee believe that Baxter’s executive compensation programs appropriately align executives’ interests with Baxter’s strategies and long-term objectives. See “—Performance Highlights” below for additional information regarding 2024 financial and compensation design highlights.Where can I find more information?Concise supporting information is presented below. | |
| See “Executive Compensation—Proposal 2—Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation for 2024” for additional information. |
investor.baxter.com
| Proxy Statement Highlights | 9 |
|---|
Performance Highlights
| FurtherInformation | |
| Financial results for 2024The company’s publicly reported financial results from continuing operations for 2024 are set forth below. Baxter’s performance in 2024 reflects its building momentum as the company continued to execute upon the strategic initiatives announced in January 2023. These amounts do not include results for the company’s Kidney Care business, which was sold in January 2025 and the results of which are reflected in the company’s discontinued operations for 2024. | See page 39 |
|---|
| Global Net Sales · GAAP Earnings per Share | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ($0.64) | NM1 | ||
| $10.6 billion · 3% versus 2023 | |||
| Adjusted Earnings per Share | |||
| $1.89 | 11% versus 2023 | ||
| 1.As used in the chart above, NM means not meaningful | |||
| Operating Cash Flow | |
| $819 million | 32% versus 2023 |
| Free Cash Flow | |
| $373 million | 52% versus 2023 |
The amounts set forth above represent Baxter’s publicly disclosed results from continuing operations for 2024.
Adjusted earnings per share (EPS) and free cash flow are non-GAAP financial measures (as defined below).
Adjusted EPS excludes the impact of special items, net of the related income tax effects. Free cash flow
represents net cash provided by operating activities less capital expenditures. See Baxter’s Periodic Report on
Form 8-K dated February 20, 2025 for a reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the applicable measure
calculated in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and for information about
why management believes that non-GAAP financial measures, when used in conjunction with the results
presented in accordance with GAAP and the company’s reconciliations to corresponding GAAP financial
measures, may enhance an investor’s overall understanding of the company’s past financial performance and
prospects for the future. Non-GAAP financial measures should be considered in addition to, and not as
substitutes for, information prepared in accordance with GAAP.
For purposes of calculating performance under the company’s 2024 annual incentive plan, net sales were
calculated at budgeted exchange rates (as of January 1, 2024) and include net sales from discontinued
operations for all of 2024. This measure is referred to herein as Adjusted Net Sales Including Discontinued
Operations and was $15.2 billion for 2024.
For purposes of calculating performance under the company’s 2024 annual incentive plan, Adjusted EPS
includes adjusted EPS from discontinued operations for all of 2024, less certain operational adjustments to the
extent that they were not included in the 2024 adjusted EPS target. This measure is referred to herein as Further
Adjusted EPS Including Discontinued Operations and was $2.79 for 2024.
| 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement
| 10 | Proxy Statement Highlights |
For purposes of calculating performance under the company’s 2024 annual incentive plan, free cash flow
includes free cash flow from discontinued operations for all of 2024, less certain income tax payments that were
disbursed in the third quarter of 2024 and were included in discontinued operations related to the company's
BPS business, which was sold in 2023, and certain operational adjustments to the extent that they were not
included in the 2024 free cash flow target. This measure is referred to herein as Adjusted Free Cash Flow
Including Discontinued Operations and was $501 million for 2024.
See “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Elements of Executive Compensation
—Annual Incentive Plan—Determination of 2024 Annual Incentive Plan Payouts” for reconciliations of Adjusted
Net Sales Including Discontinued Operations, Further Adjusted EPS Including Discontinued Operations and
Adjusted Free Cash Flow Including Discontinued Operations to the applicable measures calculated in
accordance with GAAP.
Compensation Design for 2024
The table below summarizes Baxter’s consistent compensation design for 2024 and highlights design and
payouts that are linked to Baxter’s pay-for-performance philosophy. More detail regarding plan design can be
found in the “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis”section of theproxy statement.
% of Total Target Direct 2024 Compensation
Salary
(Cash)
Long-Term
(Stock)
Annual
(Cash)
NA
Provides a base level
of competitive
compensation to
attract and retain
executive talent
Increases to align
to market only for
CFO and two other
NEOs
8%
15%
14%
78% of
Compensation
2024:
50% PSUs / 50%
RSUs
16%
69% of
Compensation
2024:
CFO:
50% PSUs/ 50% RSUs
Other NEOs:
100% RSUs
Payouts between
94% - 113% of
target, tied to
business and
individual
performance
PSU payout for
cycle ending in
2024 for the CEO
and CFO was 0%
of target
Used to motivate and
reward executives for
company and
individual
performance
Used to motivate and
reward an executive's
contributions to
achieving the
company's long-term
objectives and
increasing
stockholder value
50%
Adj. Net
Sales
25%
Adj. EPS
25%
Free Cash
Flow
0%-125%1
RSUs
PSUs 2
100% Relative Total
Shareholder Return (TSR)
CEO
Other NEOs (Average)
Results
Objective
Metric
1 Applies to members of the Executive Operating Committee (including all NEOs)
2 Applies only to the CEO and Chief Financial Officer (CFO)
investor.baxter.com
| Proxy Statement Highlights | 11 |
|---|
Pay-Per-Performance Alignment
Baxter’s short- and long-term incentive plans consist of metrics that the company believes are among the most
critical to drive sustainable financial performance. They provide a balance among focusing on organic growth,
profitability and the financial health of day-to-day operations.
| Metric | Rationale | Financial Results (as measured for incentive plan purposes and including discontinued operations) |
|---|---|---|
| Annual Incentive Plan Metrics: | ||
| •Adjusted Net Sales | •Most important metric in the annual incentive plan, as it is assigned twice the weight (50%) as the other two metrics, emphasizing the importance of growing sales as the basis of financial stability. For Messrs. Almeida and Grade, Adjusted Net Sales is measured on a company-wide basis, while for Ms. Knight and Messrs. Sonig and Toth, it is measured on a segment basis (Medical Products & Therapies, Pharmaceuticals and Kidney Care, respectively). | •Company-Wide Performance: grew 1% versus 2023, resulting in funding of 122% of target•Medical Products & Therapies: grew 6% versus 2023, resulting in funding of 115% of target•Pharmaceuticals: grew 8% versus 2023, resulting in funding of 149% of target•Kidney Care: grew 4% versus 2023, resulting in funding of 183% of target |
| •Adjusted EPS | •Assigned 25% weight in the annual incentive plan to recognize the importance of profitability as a key investor metric. For all NEOs, Adjusted EPS is measured on a company-wide basis. | •Decreased 4% versus 2023, resulting in funding of 86% of target |
| •Adjusted Free Cash Flow | •Assigned 25% weight in the annual incentive plan to recognize the importance of having cash to fund growth and pay financial obligations. For all NEOs, Adjusted Free Cash Flow is measured on a company-wide basis. | •Decreased 53% versus 2023, resulting in funding of 53% of target |
| Long-term Incentive Metrics: (each equally weighted, with a three-year performance period, taking into account Baxter's long-range plan)1 | ||
| •Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) | •Recognizes the importance of efficient use of invested capital to generate sustainable long-term value. | •ROIC during the 2022-2024 performance period was 6.5% (below threshold, resulting in 0% payout in respect of achievement against the ROIC metric) |
| •Net Sales Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) | •Recognizes the importance of sales growth over a longer period of time to reinforce stability and future growth. | •Net Sales CAGR during the 2022-2024 performance period was 2.6% (below threshold, resulting in 0% payout in respect of achievement against the net sales CAGR metric) |
| •Relative TSR | •Recognizes the importance of creating stockholder value. | •Relative TSR from the 2022-2024 performance period was the 6.3rd percent rank (below threshold, resulting in 0% payout in respect of achievement against the relative TSR metric) |
| 1 For PSUs granted in 2024, which were granted solely to the CEO and CFO, relative TSR is the sole metric. | ||
| 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement
| 12 | Proxy Statement Highlights |
Executives to Retain Significant StockWhat am I voting on?If properly presented, you will be asked to vote on a stockholder proposal that asks the Board to adopt a policy requiring NEOs to retain a significant percentage of stock acquired through equity pay programs until reaching normal retirement age (an age of at least 60) and to report to stockholders regarding the policy in the company’s next annual proxy statement.What is the Board’s recommendation?The Board of Directors recommends a vote AGAINST the stockholder proposal.Where can I find more information?Concise supporting information is presented below.
See “Stockholder Proposal—Proposal 4—Executives to Retain Significant Stock” for additional information.
Items to consider when evaluating this proposal:
Baxter’s current stock ownership guidelines already require significant stock retention by executives: Baxter’s CEO is required to achieve ownership of Baxter common stock valued at a minimum of six times annual base salary within five years of appointment. Each other executive officer is required to achieve ownership of Baxter common stock valued at a minimum of four times annual base salary within five years of becoming an executive officer.
The company’s existing stock ownership guidelines are accomplishing their intended purpose: As of December 31, 2024, each of the NEOs who is still serving as an executive officer with the company had met his or her ownership requirements or, using reasonable assumptions, was on track to achieve his or her stock ownership objective within the prescribed time frame.
The proposal fails to strike a reasonable balance between aligning the interests of stockholders and management and motivating desired management behavior: The Board believes that Baxter’s emphasis on long-term incentive grants motivates executives to drive the long-term performance of the company and aligns their long-term interests with those of stockholders. However, Baxter also recognizes the fact that executives need some flexibility to manage their own financial affairs, which may, from time to time, include the sale of Baxter stock held as a result of the vesting of these equity grants that exceed the ownership guidelines.
The proposal would put Baxter at a competitive disadvantage for attracting and retaining top executive talent and would create an unnecessary administrative burden on Baxter without commensurate value to stockholders: Requiring NEOs to hold additional shares until retirement is more stringent than current market practice and would be unnecessarily burdensome to the executives, which, as a result, may impact Baxter’s ability to attract and retain top executive talent. Further, the NEOs often change year-to-year and this proposal may place different stock retention requirements on certain executives every year, which would be difficult for Baxter to administer. Instead, the company believes its current robust stock ownership requirements, which are consistent with market practice and apply to all of Baxter’s executive and corporate officers, provide meaningful stock ownership and retention requirements at a lower administrative cost for the company.
The majority of Baxter’s stockholders voted against a similar proposal last year: Baxter’s stockholders considered, and rejected, a similar proposal in 2023 and 2024, with support for the proposal declining year over year. This indicates that Baxter’s stockholders remain generally supportive of the Board’s position on this proposal and current executive compensation structure.
investor.baxter.com
| Corporate Governance at Baxter International Inc. | 13 |
|---|
The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.