ZIPRECRUITER, INC.
For the period ended Jun 30, 2026. Filed Aug 5, 2026.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's report for each of its first three quarters. The financial statements are not audited. It shows how the business has moved since the last annual report, and what management says changed.
Jun 30, 2026 · Filed Aug 5, 2026
What changed in Risk Factors?
Read the current filingPrevious report: 10-Q
Period ended 2026-03-31; filed 2026-05-07.
0001617553-26-000031
Item 1A. Risk FactorsCurrent report: 10-Q
Period ended 2026-06-30; filed 2026-08-05.
0001617553-26-000046
Item 1A. Risk FactorsThe baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.
Compared 225 previous paragraphs and 225 current paragraphs.
216 unchanged; 9 reworded; 0 added; 0 removed; 0 previous and 0 current paragraphs rearranged.
Tables are not compared: 0 previous and 0 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.
A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.
Reworded paragraphs (9)
Previous wording
We have incurred net losses in the past, anticipate increasing our operating expenses in the future, and may not regain profitability.
Current wording
We have incurred net losses in the past, anticipate increasing our operating expenses in the future, and may not regain or sustain profitability.
Previous wording
While we earned net income of $49.1 million and $61.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively, we have also incurred significant net losses in subsequent periods, including a net loss of $4.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026 as well as a net loss of $33.0 million and $12.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. As of March 31, 2026, we had an accumulated deficit of $83.1 million. Additionally, we expect to make significant future expenditures related to the development and expansion of our business, including investing in our technology to improve our marketplace and investing in sales and marketing channels to enhance our brand promotion efforts. These efforts may prove more expensive than we currently anticipate, and we may not succeed in increasing our revenue sufficiently to offset these higher expenses. If our revenue declines or fails to grow at a rate faster than increases in our operating expenses, we will not be able to regain or maintain profitability in future periods. As a result, we may continue to generate losses. We cannot ensure that we will achieve profitability in the future or that we can sustain profitability.
Current wording
While we earned net income of $43.4 million and $38.7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, respectively, as well as $49.1 million and $61.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively, we have also incurred significant net losses in other periods, including a net loss of $33.0 million and $12.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. As of June 30, 2026, we had an accumulated deficit of $39.7 million. Additionally, we expect to make significant future expenditures related to the development and expansion of our business, including investing in our technology to improve our marketplace and investing in sales and marketing channels to enhance our brand promotion efforts. These efforts may prove more expensive than we currently anticipate, and we may not succeed in increasing our revenue sufficiently to offset these higher expenses. If our revenue declines or fails to grow at a rate faster than increases in our operating expenses, we will not be able to regain or maintain profitability in future periods. As a result, we may continue to generate losses. We cannot ensure that we will achieve profitability in the future or that we can sustain profitability.
Previous wording
Data security breaches and other data privacy and security incidents may also result from non-technical means, for example, through human error. Any such security compromise could result in a violation of applicable data privacy, security, breach notification and other laws, regulatory or other governmental investigations, enforcement actions, litigation (including class action litigation), and legal and financial exposure, including potential contractual liability. We may need to expend significant resources to protect against, and to address issues created by, security breaches and other privacy and security incidents. These liabilities may exceed the amounts covered by our insurance or our insurance coverage may not extend to or be adequate for liabilities actually incurred, or our insurance may not continue to be available to us on economically reasonable terms, or at all. Any such compromise could also result in damage to our reputation, a loss of confidence in our security measures, and an adverse impact our business.
Current wording
Data security breaches and other data privacy and security incidents may also result from non-technical means, for example, through human error. Any such security compromise could result in a violation of applicable data privacy, security, breach notification and other laws, regulatory or other governmental investigations, enforcement actions, litigation (including class action litigation), and legal and financial exposure, including potential contractual liability. We may need to expend significant resources to protect against, and to address issues created by, security breaches and other privacy and security incidents. These liabilities may exceed the amounts covered by our insurance or our insurance coverage may not extend to or be adequate for liabilities actually incurred, or our insurance may not continue to be available to us on economically reasonable terms, or at all. Any such compromise could also result in damage to our reputation, a loss of confidence in our security measures, and an adverse impact on our business.
Previous wording
Several U.S. and European jurisdictions currently or will soon regulate specific uses of AI Technologies. For example, New York City currently regulates the use of automated employment decision tools by employers and employment agencies; Utah regulates disclosures for the use of generative AI Technologies; Illinois regulates AI Technologies in employment decision-making process; and Texas prohibits specific AI Technologies use cases (including those developed or deployed with the intent of unlawfully discriminating against a protected class under federal or state law). Colorado is expected to soon regulate the use of high-risk AI Technologies (which includes an AI system that is a substantial factor in making a decision that has a significant effect on employment or employment opportunities), although implementation has been postponed and amendments are expected to precede implementation. California has also enacted several new AI laws that further regulate use of AI Technologies and provide consumers with additional protections around companies’ use of AI Technologies, such as requiring companies to disclose certain uses of AI Technologies and the types of data used to train such AI models. Relatedly, various state laws including the CCPA regulate the use of automated decision making technology that results in legal or similarly significant effects on individuals, and provide rights to individuals with respect to that automated decision making.
Current wording
Several U.S. and European jurisdictions currently or will soon regulate specific uses of AI Technologies. For example, New York City currently regulates the use of automated employment decision tools by employers and employment agencies; Utah regulates disclosures for the use of generative AI Technologies; Illinois regulates AI Technologies in employment decision-making process; Colorado regulates the use of automated decision-making technologies (ADMT) in consequential decisions, and Texas prohibits specific AI Technologies use cases (including those developed or deployed with the intent of unlawfully discriminating against a protected class under federal or state law). California has also enacted several new AI laws that further regulate use of AI Technologies and provide consumers with additional protections around companies’ use of AI Technologies, such as requiring companies to disclose certain uses of AI Technologies and the types of data used to train such AI models. Relatedly, various state laws including the CCPA regulate the use of automated decision making technology that results in legal or similarly significant effects on individuals, and provide rights to individuals with respect to that automated decision making.
Previous wording
In the EU, the Artificial Intelligence Act, or the EU AI Act, entered into force in August 2024. The EU AI Act seeks to create a comprehensive legal framework for the regulation of AI systems across the EU. The majority of obligations under the EU AI Act are expected to take effect in August 2026. Once fully applicable, the EU AI Act will have a material impact on the way AI is regulated in the EU, including, for certain types of AI systems, requirements around transparency, conformity assessments and monitoring, risk assessments, human oversight, security, accuracy, general purpose AI and foundation models, and fines for breach of up to 7% of worldwide annual turnover. Failure to comply with such laws or regulations could subject us to legal or regulatory liability. Further, the cost to comply with such laws or regulations could be significant and would increase our operating expenses, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Current wording
In the EU, the Artificial Intelligence Act, or the EU AI Act, entered into force in August 2024. The EU AI Act seeks to create a comprehensive legal framework for the regulation of AI systems across the EU. In July 2026, the Digital Omnibus on AI entered into force, deferring obligations for high-risk AI systems to December 2027 (for high-risk AI systems described in Annex III, including those related to recruitment) and August 2028 (for high-risk AI systems described in Annex I, including those embedded in regulated products). Transparency obligations for providers and deployers of certain AI systems, including generative and interactive AI systems and deepfakes, took effect in August 2026. Once fully applicable, the EU AI Act will have a material impact on the way AI is regulated in the EU, including, for certain types of AI systems, requirements around transparency, conformity assessments and monitoring, risk assessments, human oversight, security, accuracy, general purpose AI and foundation models, and fines for breach of up to 7% of worldwide annual turnover. Failure to comply with such laws or regulations could subject us to legal or regulatory liability. Further, the cost to comply with such laws or regulations could be significant and would increase our operating expenses, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Previous wording
From time to time, we may be subject to claims, lawsuits (including class actions), government investigations, arbitrations and other proceedings involving competition and antitrust, intellectual property, privacy (including claims that the collection or provision of certain information, including personal information, by us or by third parties with whom we interact breached laws or regulations relating to privacy or data protection), consumer protection, securities, tax, labor and employment, commercial disputes (including claims relating to our marketplace functionality), and other matters that could adversely affect our business operations and financial condition. The outcome of any legal proceeding, regardless of its merits, is inherently uncertain. Regardless of the merits, pending or future legal proceedings could result in a diversion of management’s attention and resources and reputational harm, and we may be required to incur significant expenses defending against these claims or pursuing claims against third parties to protect our rights. If we do not prevail in litigation, we could incur substantial liabilities. We may also determine in certain instances that a settlement may be a more cost-effective and efficient resolution for a dispute. Any applicable insurance policies may be inadequate or may not be available in the future on acceptable terms, or at all, and such policies may not cover all claims made against us.
Current wording
From time to time, we may be subject to claims, lawsuits (including class actions), government investigations, arbitrations and other proceedings involving competition and antitrust, intellectual property, privacy (including claims that the collection or provision of certain information, including personal information, by us or by third parties with whom we interact breached laws or regulations relating to privacy or data protection), consumer protection, securities, tax, labor and employment, commercial disputes (including claims relating to our marketplace functionality), and other matters that could adversely affect our business operations and financial condition. For example, in June 2026, a purported stockholder of the Company filed a complaint against certain current and former directors of the Company and the Company, generally alleging breaches of the directors’ fiduciary duties in connection with the Company’s share repurchase program authorized by the Company’s board of directors. The outcome of any legal proceeding, regardless of its merits, is inherently uncertain. Regardless of the merits, pending or future legal proceedings could result in a diversion of management’s attention and resources and reputational harm, and we may be required to incur significant expenses defending against these claims or pursuing claims against third parties to protect our rights. If we do not prevail in litigation, we could incur substantial liabilities. We may also determine in certain instances that a settlement may be a more cost-effective and efficient resolution for a dispute. Any applicable insurance policies may be inadequate or may not be available in the future on acceptable terms, or at all, and such policies may not cover all claims made against us.
Previous wording
We had $550.0 million of indebtedness (excluding intercompany indebtedness) and $287.7 million available under our credit facility as of March 31, 2026. Our credit facility expired on its maturity date of April 30, 2026, and we elected not to renew it. Our indebtedness could have important consequences, including:
Current wording
We had $255.4 million of indebtedness (excluding intercompany indebtedness) as of June 30, 2026. Our indebtedness could have important consequences, including:
Previous wording
In addition, the indenture governing the $550.0 million aggregate principal amount of our senior unsecured notes that we issued in January 2022 contains restrictive covenants that limit our ability to engage in activities that may be in our long-term best interest. Our failure to comply with those covenants could result in an event of default under the indenture governing the senior unsecured notes which, if not cured or waived, could result in the acceleration of substantially all of our indebtedness.
Current wording
In addition, the indenture governing the remaining $255.4 million aggregate principal amount of our outstanding senior unsecured notes that we issued in January 2022 contains restrictive covenants that limit our ability to engage in activities that may be in our long-term best interest. Our failure to comply with those covenants could result in an event of default under the indenture governing the senior unsecured notes which, if not cured or waived, could result in the acceleration of substantially all of our indebtedness.
Previous wording
Our Class B common stock has twenty votes per share and our Class A common stock has one vote per share. As of March 31, 2026, Ian Siegel, our chief executive officer and the sole holder of our outstanding Class B common stock, beneficially owned approximately 16.0% of our total outstanding common stock as a class and held approximately 79.2% of the voting power of our total outstanding common stock as a class. Because of the twenty-to-one voting ratio between our Class B and Class A common stock, the sole holder of our Class B common stock controls a substantial majority of the combined voting power of our common stock and therefore is able to control all matters submitted to our stockholders for approval until the earliest of (1) the first business day falling on or after 180 days after the date on which Mr. Siegel beneficially owns less than 4,000,000 shares of Class B common stock, (2) the date which is (a) 90 days after the date of death or disability of Mr. Siegel or (b) such later date, not to exceed a total period of 180 days after the date of death or disability of Mr. Siegel, as may be approved prior to the date that is 90 days after the date of death or disability of Mr. Siegel by a majority of our independent directors then in office, and (3) the first business day falling on or after the date on which Mr. Siegel elects to convert all then-outstanding shares of Class B common stock into shares of Class A common stock. This concentrated control limits or precludes your ability to influence corporate matters for the foreseeable future, including the election of directors, amendments of our organizational documents, and any merger, consolidation, sale of all or substantially all of our assets, or other major corporate transaction requiring stockholder approval. In addition, this may prevent or discourage unsolicited acquisition proposals or offers for our capital stock that you may feel are in your best interest as one of our stockholders.
Current wording
Our Class B common stock has twenty votes per share and our Class A common stock has one vote per share. As of June 30, 2026, Ian Siegel, our chief executive officer and the sole holder of our outstanding Class B common stock, beneficially owned approximately 15.8% of our total outstanding common stock as a class and held approximately 79.0% of the voting power of our total outstanding common stock as a class. Because of the twenty-to-one voting ratio between our Class B and Class A common stock, the sole holder of our Class B common stock controls a substantial majority of the combined voting power of our common stock and therefore is able to control all matters submitted to our stockholders for approval until the earliest of (1) the first business day falling on or after 180 days after the date on which Mr. Siegel beneficially owns less than 4,000,000 shares of Class B common stock, (2) the date which is (a) 90 days after the date of death or disability of Mr. Siegel or (b) such later date, not to exceed a total period of 180 days after the date of death or disability of Mr. Siegel, as may be approved prior to the date that is 90 days after the date of death or disability of Mr. Siegel by a majority of our independent directors then in office, and (3) the first business day falling on or after the date on which Mr. Siegel elects to convert all then-outstanding shares of Class B common stock into shares of Class A common stock. This concentrated control limits or precludes your ability to influence corporate matters for the foreseeable future, including the election of directors, amendments of our organizational documents, and any merger, consolidation, sale of all or substantially all of our assets, or other major corporate transaction requiring stockholder approval. In addition, this may prevent or discourage unsolicited acquisition proposals or offers for our capital stock that you may feel are in your best interest as one of our stockholders.