Park Hotels & Resorts Inc.
For the period ended Dec 31, 2025. Filed Feb 20, 2026.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.
FY2025 · Filed Feb 20, 2026
What changed in Risk Factors?
Read the current filingPrevious report: 10-K
Period ended 2024-12-31; filed 2025-02-20.
0001617406-25-000006
Item 1A. Risk FactorsCurrent report: 10-K
Period ended 2025-12-31; filed 2026-02-20.
0001617406-26-000006
Item 1A. Risk FactorsThe baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.
Compared 116 previous paragraphs and 120 current paragraphs.
96 unchanged; 19 reworded; 3 added; 1 removed; 0 previous and 2 current paragraphs rearranged.
Tables are not compared: 0 previous and 0 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.
A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.
Added paragraphs (3)
Current report
We may be deemed to be a joint employer with our third-party hotel managers under certain new non-income tax laws, rules and regulations.
Current report
We do not directly employ or manage employees at any of our hotels, and our third-party managers are responsible for hiring, supervising and managing the labor force at our hotels. Recent legislative proposals introduced in certain states and local jurisdictions have included provisions requiring that hotel owners be deemed an employer of workers at our hotels. Changes in laws or regulations relating to the employer relationship that result in a determination that we are a “joint employer” with our hotel operators could subject us to liability for employment-related and other liabilities of our hotel operators and could cause us to incur other costs that have a material adverse effect on our business (including our qualification for taxation as a REIT), financial condition and results of operations.
Removed paragraphs (1)
Previous report
In addition, we carry insurance to respond to both first-party and third-party liability losses related to terrorism under a program authorized by Congress following the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, which is set to expire in 2027. If the program is not extended or renewed upon its expiration in 2027, or if there are changes to the program that would negatively affect insurance carriers, premiums for terrorism insurance coverage will likely increase and/or the terms of such insurance may be materially amended to increase stated exclusions or to otherwise effectively decrease the scope of coverage available, perhaps to the point where it is effectively unavailable.
Reworded paragraphs (19)
Previous wording
Economic disruptions, including as a result of elevated interest rates and elevated rates of inflation or a potential economic slowdown or recession, may adversely affect our business by affecting consumer sentiment and demand for travel, which can cause fluctuations in hotel revenues or earnings at our hotels. Our labor or other costs may also rise due to inflation, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to pass cost increases on to travelers through higher rates. There can also be no assurances that we will not experience future fluctuations in hotel revenues or earnings at our hotels due to inflation and other macroeconomic factors, local economic factors and demand, a potential economic slowdown or a recession and geopolitical conflicts.
Current wording
Economic disruptions, including as a result of elevated interest rates and elevated rates of inflation or a potential economic slowdown or recession, may adversely affect our business by affecting consumer sentiment and demand for travel, which can cause fluctuations in hotel revenues or earnings at our hotels. Our labor or other costs may also rise due to inflation, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to pass cost increases on to travelers through higher rates. There can also be no assurances that we will not experience future fluctuations in hotel revenues or earnings at our hotels due to inflation and other macroeconomic factors, local economic factors and demand, a potential economic slowdown or a recession and geopolitical conflicts or trends, including trade policy, travel barriers or changes in travel preferences for U.S. destinations.
Previous wording
Additionally, the effects of the recent global COVID-19 pandemic on the hotel industry were unprecedented, and another pandemic or other unexpected event that results in a prolonged decrease in travel in the future could have similar affects, including a drastic reduction in global demand for lodging and historically low occupancy levels. These challenges may adversely impact and disrupt, our business, financial performance and condition, operating results and cash flows.
Current wording
Additionally, the effects of the global COVID-19 pandemic on the hotel industry were unprecedented, and another pandemic or other unexpected event that results in a prolonged decrease in travel in the future could have similar affects, including a drastic reduction in global demand for lodging and historically low occupancy levels. These challenges may adversely impact and disrupt, our business, financial performance and condition, operating results and cash flows.
Previous wording
A key element of our business strategy is identifying and consummating acquisitions of additional hotels and portfolios. Since our acquisition of Chesapeake Lodging Trust in 2019, we have not acquired any new hotels, and we can provide no assurances that we will be successful in identifying attractive hotels in the future or that, once identified, we will be successful in consummating future acquisitions. We also face significant competition for attractive investment opportunities, which may impact our ability to acquire certain hotels or portfolios that we deem attractive at a favorable price, pursuant to acceptable terms, or at all. Any delay or failure on our part to identify, negotiate, finance on favorable terms, consummate and integrate such acquisitions could materially increase our costs or impede our growth.
Current wording
An element of our business strategy is identifying and consummating acquisitions of additional hotels and portfolios. Since our acquisition of Chesapeake Lodging Trust in 2019, we have not acquired any new hotels, and we can provide no assurances that we will be successful in identifying attractive hotels in the future or that, once identified, we will be successful in consummating future acquisitions. We also face significant competition for attractive investment opportunities, which may impact our ability to acquire certain hotels or portfolios that we deem attractive at a favorable price, pursuant to acceptable terms, or at all. Any delay or failure on our part to identify, negotiate, finance on favorable terms, consummate and integrate such acquisitions could materially increase our costs or impede our growth.
Previous wording
We may continue to seek to sell or otherwise dispose of certain hotels as we seek to pursue growth and diversification through prudent capital allocation. However, investments in real estate are illiquid, and it may not be possible to dispose of assets in a timely manner or on favorable terms, which could adversely affect our financial condition, operating results and cash flows.
Current wording
We may continue to seek to sell or otherwise dispose of certain hotels as we seek to pursue growth and diversification through prudent capital allocation, including our expectation to sell all our Non-Core hotels. However, investments in real estate are illiquid, and it may not be possible to dispose of assets in a timely manner or on favorable terms, which could adversely affect our financial condition, operating results and cash flows.
Previous wording
Our ability to dispose of properties on advantageous terms depends on factors beyond our control, including competition from other sellers and the availability of attractive financing for potential buyers, and we cannot predict whether we will be able to sell any hotel we desire to for the price or on the terms set by us or acceptable to us, or the length of time needed to find a willing buyer and to close the sale of the hotel. Upon sales of properties or assets, we may become subject to contractual indemnity obligations, incur unusual or extraordinary distribution requirements, be required to expend funds to correct defects or make capital improvements or, as a result of required debt repayment, face a shortage of liquidity. In addition, many of our hotel management and franchise agreements generally contain restrictive covenants that limit or restrict our ability to sell a hotel free of the management or franchise encumbrance other than to permitted transferees, and as a result we may be prohibited from taking disposition actions that would otherwise be in our and our stockholders’ best interests.
Current wording
Our ability to dispose of properties on advantageous terms depends on factors beyond our control, including competition from other sellers and the availability of attractive financing for potential buyers, and we cannot predict whether we will be able to sell any hotel we desire for the price or on the terms set by us or acceptable to us, or the length of time needed to find a willing buyer and to close the sale of the hotel. Upon sales of properties or assets, we may become subject to contractual indemnity obligations, incur unusual or extraordinary distribution requirements, be required to expend funds to correct defects or make capital improvements or, as a result of required debt repayment, face a shortage of liquidity. In addition, many of our hotel management and franchise agreements generally contain restrictive covenants that limit or restrict our ability to sell a hotel free of the management or franchise encumbrance other than to permitted transferees, and as a result we may be prohibited from taking disposition actions that would otherwise be in our and our stockholders’ best interests.
Previous wording
In order for us to continue to qualify as a REIT, independent third parties must operate our hotels. We lease substantially all of our hotels to our TRS lessees. Our TRS lessees and the TRSs that own our hotels, in turn, have entered into management agreements with independent third-party managers to operate our hotels. We could be materially and adversely affected if any third-party hotel manager fails to provide quality services and amenities, fails to maintain a quality brand name or otherwise fails to manage our hotels in our best interest, and could be held financially responsible for the actions and inactions of our third-party hotel managers pursuant to our management agreements. In addition, our third-party hotel managers manage, and in some cases may own or lease, or may have invested in or may have provided credit support or operating guarantees to hotels that compete with our hotels, any of which could result in conflicts of interest. As a result, third-party managers may make decisions regarding competing lodging facilities that are not in our best interests.
Current wording
In order for us to continue to qualify as a REIT, independent third parties must operate our hotels. We lease substantially all of our hotels to our TRS lessees. Our TRS lessees and the TRSs that own our hotels, in turn, have entered into management agreements with independent third-party managers to operate our hotels. We could be materially and adversely affected if any third-party hotel manager fails to provide quality services and amenities, secure its data and systems, timely and accurately report financial results, maintain a quality brand name or otherwise fails to manage our hotels in our best interest, and could be held financially responsible for the actions and inactions of our third-party hotel managers pursuant to our management agreements. In addition, our third-party hotel managers manage, and in some cases may own or lease, or may have invested in or may have provided credit support or operating guarantees to hotels that compete with our hotels, any of which could result in conflicts of interest. As a result, third-party managers may make decisions regarding competing lodging facilities that are not in our best interests.
Previous wording
Our hotel managers are dependent on information technology networks and systems, including the internet, to access, process, transmit and store proprietary and customer information, including personally identifiable information of hotel guests, including credit card numbers.
Current wording
Our hotel managers are dependent on information technology networks and systems, including the internet, to access, process, transmit and store proprietary and customer information, including personally identifiable information of hotel guests, such as credit card numbers.
Previous wording
In addition to the information technologies and systems our hotel managers use to operate our hotels, we have our own corporate technologies and systems that are used to access, store, transmit, and manage or support a variety of business processes and employee personally identifiable information. We may be required to expend significant attention and financial resources to protect these technologies and systems against physical or cybersecurity incidents and even then, our security measures may subsequently be deemed to have been inadequate by regulators or courts given the lack of prescriptive measures in data security and cybersecurity laws as well as regulators' evolving interpretations of cybersecurity laws and standards. There can be no assurance that the security measures we have taken to protect these systems will prevent failures, inadequacies or interruptions in system services or that system security will not be compromised, including through system or user error, physical or electronic break-ins, computer viruses, or cyber-attacks. Due to the complexity and interconnectedness of our information technologies and systems, and those upon which we rely, the process of upgrading or patching our protective measures could itself create a risk of cybersecurity issues or system disruptions for the Company. Further, any adoption of artificial intelligence by us or by third parties may pose new security challenges. Any cybersecurity incident or disruption to our information technologies and systems could have a material adverse effect on our business, our financial reporting and compliance, and could subject us to or result in liability claims, litigation, monetary losses or regulatory oversight, investigations or penalties which could be significant. In addition, the cost and operational consequences of responding to cybersecurity incidents and implementing remediation measures could be significant. If our hotel managers' information networks and systems, our corporate technologies and systems, or third-party information systems on which we rely suffer severe damage, disruption or shutdown, and our business continuity plans do not effectively resolve the issues in a timely manner, we may lose revenue and profits as a result of our inability to provide services or invoice and collect payments, and we could experience delays in reporting our financial results.
Current wording
In addition to the information technologies and systems our hotel managers use to operate our hotels, we have our own corporate technologies and systems that are used to access, store, transmit, and manage or support a variety of business processes and employee personally identifiable information. We may be required to expend significant attention and financial resources to protect these technologies and systems against physical or cybersecurity incidents and even then, our security measures may subsequently be deemed to have been inadequate by regulators or courts given the lack of prescriptive measures in data security and cybersecurity laws as well as regulators’ evolving interpretations of cybersecurity laws and standards. There can be no assurance that the security measures we have taken to protect these systems will prevent failures, inadequacies or interruptions in system services or that system security will not be compromised, including through system or user error, physical or electronic break-ins, computer viruses, or cyber-attacks. Due to the complexity and interconnectedness of our information technologies and systems, and those upon which we rely, the process of upgrading or patching our protective measures could itself create a risk of cybersecurity issues or system disruptions for the Company. Further, any adoption of artificial intelligence by us or by third parties may pose new security challenges. Any actual or suspected cybersecurity incident or disruption to our information technologies and systems could have a material adverse effect on our business, our financial reporting and compliance, and could subject us to or result in liability claims, litigation, monetary losses or regulatory oversight, investigations or penalties which could be significant. In addition, the cost and operational consequences of responding to cybersecurity incidents and implementing remediation measures could be significant. If our hotel managers’ information networks and systems, our corporate technologies and systems, or third-party information systems on which we rely suffer severe damage, disruption or shutdown, and our business continuity plans do not effectively resolve the issues in a timely manner, we may lose revenue and profits as a result of our inability to provide services or invoice and collect payments, and we could experience delays in reporting our financial results.
Previous wording
In the conduct of our business, both we and our hotel managers rely on relationships with third parties, including cloud data storage and other information technology service providers, suppliers, distributors, contractors and other external business partners, for certain functions or for services in support of key portions of our operations. These third-party entities are subject to similar risks related to cybersecurity, privacy violations, business interruption, and system and employee failures and an attack against such third-party service provider or partner could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Current wording
In the conduct of our business, both we and our hotel managers rely on relationships with third parties, including cloud data storage and other information technology service providers, suppliers, distributors, contractors and other external business partners, for certain functions or for services in support of key portions of our operations. These third-party entities are subject to similar risks related to cybersecurity, privacy violations, business interruption, and system and employee failures and an attack against such third-party service provider or partner could have a material adverse effect on our business. While we may be entitled to damages if our third-party service providers fail to satisfy their cybersecurity-related obligations to us, any award may be insufficient to cover our damages, or we may be unable to recover such award.
Previous wording
Although the cybersecurity incidents that we and our third-party partners have experienced to date have not had a material effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations, such incidents could have a material adverse effect on us in the future.
Current wording
We and our third-party providers have experienced cybersecurity threats and incidents in the past and expect them to continue. These cybersecurity threats, including as a result of any previous cybersecurity incidents, have not materially affected us, including our business, results of operations or financial condition within the last three years. However, such incidents could have a material adverse effect on us in the future.
Previous wording
A significant portion of our room count is located in a concentrated number of markets that exposes us to greater risk to local economic or business conditions, changes in hotel supply in these markets, and other conditions than more geographically diversified hotel companies. As of December 31, 2024, hotels in Florida, Hawaii, Chicago, New York City, New Orleans and Boston represented approximately 63% of our room count, with our hotels in Florida and Hawaii alone representing greater than 32% of our room count and 39% of our total revenue in 2024. An economic downturn, an increase in hotel supply, a change in guest preferences for certain geographic locations or markets, strikes or other labor activity, a force majeure event, a natural disaster, changing weather patterns and other physical effects of climate change (including supply chain disruptions), a terrorist attack or similar event in any one of these markets likely would cause a decline in the hotel market and adversely affect occupancy rates, the financial performance of our hotels in these markets and our overall results of operations, which could be material, and could significantly increase our costs.
Current wording
New Orleans and Boston represented over 69% of our room count, with our hotels in Florida and Hawaii alone representing approximately 36% of our room count and over 39% of our total revenue in 2025. An economic downturn, an increase in hotel supply, a change in guest preferences for certain geographic locations or markets, strikes or other labor activity, a force majeure event, a natural disaster, changing weather patterns and other physical effects of climate change (including supply chain disruptions), a terrorist attack or similar event in any one of these markets likely would cause a decline in the hotel market and adversely affect occupancy rates, the financial performance of our hotels in these markets and our overall results of operations, which could be material, and could significantly increase our costs.
Previous wording
Because certain types of losses are uncertain, including those caused by natural disaster, the effects of climate change or other catastrophic losses, they may be uninsurable or prohibitively expensive. There are also other risks that may fall outside the general coverage terms and limits of our policies, including losses related to cybersecurity incidents, natural disaster or climate change. Market forces beyond our control could limit the scope of the insurance coverage that we can obtain or may otherwise restrict our ability to buy insurance coverage at reasonable rates. In the event of a substantial loss, the insurance coverage that we carry may not be sufficient to pay the full value of our financial obligations, our liabilities or the replacement cost of any lost investment or property. Furthermore, certain of our properties may currently qualify as legally permissible nonconforming uses and improvements, including certain of our iconic and most profitable properties, and we may not be permitted to rebuild such properties as they exist now or at all, regardless of insurance proceeds, if such properties are destroyed. Any loss of this nature, whether insured or not, could materially adversely affect our results of operations and prospects.
Current wording
Because certain types of losses are uncertain, including those caused by natural disaster, the effects of climate change or other catastrophic losses, they may be uninsurable or prohibitively expensive. There are also other risks that may fall outside the general coverage terms and limits of our policies, including losses related to cybersecurity incidents, terrorism, natural disaster or climate change. Market forces beyond our control could limit the scope of the insurance coverage that we can obtain or may otherwise restrict our ability to buy insurance coverage at reasonable rates. In the event of a substantial loss, the insurance coverage that we carry may not be sufficient to pay the full value of our financial obligations, our liabilities or the replacement cost of any lost investment or property. Furthermore, certain of our properties may currently qualify as legally permissible nonconforming uses and improvements, including certain of our iconic and most profitable properties, and we may not be permitted to rebuild such properties as they exist now or at all, regardless of insurance proceeds, if such properties are destroyed. Any loss of this nature, whether insured or not, could materially adversely affect our results of operations and prospects.
Previous wording
We depend on external sources of capital for future growth. Any disruption to our ability to access capital at times and on terms reasonably acceptable to us may affect adversely our business and results of operations.
Current wording
We depend on external sources of capital for future growth. Any disruption to our ability to access capital at times and on terms reasonably acceptable to us may adversely affect our business and results of operations.
Previous wording
We recently experienced near-term disruption as a result of negotiations between our third-party operators and unions at certain hotels, which included strikes and other labor activity. Strikes, as well as lockouts, public demonstrations or other negative actions and publicity that may occur from time to time may disrupt hotel operations at any of our hotels, negatively impact our reputation or the reputation of our brands, or harm relationships with the labor forces at our hotels. We also have incurred and may in the future incur increased legal costs and indirect labor, maintenance and operational costs as a result of contract disputes or other events. Additionally, hotels where our hotel managers have collective bargaining agreements with employees are more highly affected by labor force activities than others. The resolution of labor disputes or new or re-negotiated labor contracts could lead to increased labor costs, either by increases in wages or benefits or by changes in work rules that raise hotel operating costs. Furthermore, labor agreements may limit the ability of our hotel managers to reduce the size of hotel workforces during an economic downturn because collective bargaining agreements are negotiated between the hotel managers and labor unions. As we do not directly employ the employees at our hotels, we do not have the ability to control the outcome of these negotiations.
Current wording
In 2024, we experienced near-term disruption as a result of negotiations between our third-party operators and unions at certain hotels, which included strikes and other labor activity. Strikes, as well as lockouts, public demonstrations or other negative actions and publicity that may occur from time to time may disrupt hotel operations at any of our hotels, negatively impact our reputation or the reputation of our brands, or harm relationships with the labor forces at our hotels. We also have incurred and may in the future incur increased legal costs and indirect labor, maintenance and operational costs as a result of contract disputes or other events. Additionally, hotels where our hotel managers have collective bargaining agreements with employees are more highly affected by labor force activities than others. The resolution of labor disputes or new or re-negotiated labor contracts could lead to increased labor costs, either by increases in wages or benefits or by changes in work rules that raise hotel operating costs. Furthermore, labor agreements may limit the ability of our hotel managers to reduce the size of hotel workforces during an economic downturn because collective bargaining agreements are negotiated between the hotel managers and labor unions. As we do not directly employ the employees at our hotels, we do not have the ability to control the outcome of these negotiations.
Previous wording
Unless we purchase a fee interest in the land and improvements at our properties subject to our ground leases or extend the terms of these leases before their expiration, we will lose our right to operate these properties and we will not have any economic interest in the land or improvements at the expiration of our ground leases; therefore, we generally will not share in any increase in value of the land or improvements beyond the term of a ground lease, notwithstanding our capital outlay to purchase our interest in the hotel or fund improvements thereon, and will lose our right to use the hotel. We can provide no assurances that we will be able to renew any ground lease upon its expiration at all or on favorable terms. In addition, if we are found to be in breach of certain of our third-party ground leases, we could lose the right to use the applicable hotel. Our ability to exercise any extension options relating to our ground leases is subject to the condition that we are not in default under the terms of the ground lease at the time that we exercise such options. Additionally, if a governmental authority seizes a hotel subject to a ground lease under its eminent domain power, we may only be entitled to a portion of any compensation awarded for the seizure. If we were to lose the right to use a hotel, we would be unable to derive income from such hotel, which could adversely affect us.
Current wording
Unless we purchase a fee interest in the land and improvements at our properties subject to our ground leases or extend the terms of these leases before their expiration, we will lose our right to operate these properties and we will not have any economic interest in the land or improvements at the expiration of our ground leases; therefore, we generally will not share in any increase in value of the land or improvements beyond the term of a ground lease, notwithstanding our capital outlay to purchase our interest in the hotel or fund improvements thereon, and will lose our right to use the hotel. We can provide no assurances that we will be able to renew any ground lease upon its expiration at all or on favorable terms. In addition, if we are found to be in breach of certain of our third-party ground leases, we could lose the right to use the applicable hotel. Our ability to exercise any extension options relating to our ground leases is subject to the condition that we are not in default under the terms of the ground lease at the time that we exercise such options. We are currently in active litigation with a ground lessor who alleges breach of a ground lease(s) related to the Hilton Salt Lake City Center, DoubleTree Hotel San Diego - Mission Valley and/or DoubleTree Hotel Durango and against whom we allege, among other things, breach of the same ground lease(s). Additionally, if a governmental authority seizes a hotel subject to a ground lease under its eminent domain power, we may only be entitled to a portion of any compensation awarded for the seizure. If we were to lose the right to use a hotel, we would be unable to derive income from such hotel, which could adversely affect us.
Previous wording
The debt agreements and instruments that govern our outstanding indebtedness, including our senior unsecured credit facility and senior notes, impose significant financial and operating restrictions on us, including covenants that may restrict our ability to implement our business plan, finance future operations, respond to changing business and economic conditions, secure additional financing, and engage in opportunistic transactions, such as strategic acquisitions, mergers or asset sales or transactions with affiliates. In addition, if we fail to satisfy the covenants contained in the credit agreement that governs our senior unsecured credit facilities, our ability to borrow additional funds under the credit facilities may be restricted. Furthermore, the credit agreement and indentures that govern our senior notes contain certain affirmative covenants that require us to be in compliance with certain leverage, liquidity and other financial ratios, and the loan documents governing the mortgage-backed loans of our subsidiaries also require them to maintain certain debt service coverage ratios and minimum net worth requirements. We cannot assure you that we will be able to comply with our financial or other covenants and, if we fail to do so, we may not be able to obtain waivers from the lenders or noteholders, as applicable, and/or amend the covenants. Our failure to comply with the restrictive covenants described above, as well as other terms of our other indebtedness and/or the terms of any future indebtedness from time to time, could result in an event of default, which, if not cured or waived, could result in our being required to repay these borrowings before their due date. If we are forced to refinance these borrowings on less favorable terms or are unable to refinance these borrowings, our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected. If we are unable to refinance our debt on acceptable terms or at all, we may be forced to dispose of hotels at inopportune times or on disadvantageous terms, which could result in losses. To the extent we cannot or do not meet our future debt service obligations, we will also risk losing to foreclosure some or all of our hotels that may be pledged to secure our obligation. For example, in June 2023, we ceased making debt service payments on the $725 million SF Mortgage Loan secured by the Hilton San Francisco Hotels, which was due November 2023, and in October 2023, the Hilton San Francisco Hotels were placed into receivership. See Note 7: "Debt" in our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere within this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further details.
Current wording
The debt agreements and instruments that govern our outstanding indebtedness, including our senior unsecured credit facilities and senior notes, impose significant financial and operating restrictions on us, including covenants that may restrict our ability to implement our business plan, finance future operations, respond to changing business and economic conditions, secure additional financing, and engage in opportunistic transactions, such as strategic acquisitions, mergers or asset sales or transactions with affiliates. In addition, if we fail to satisfy the covenants contained in the credit agreement that governs our senior unsecured credit facilities, our ability to borrow additional funds under the credit facilities may be restricted. Furthermore, the credit agreement and indentures that govern our senior notes contain certain affirmative covenants that require us to be in compliance with certain leverage, liquidity and other financial ratios, and the loan documents governing the mortgage-backed loans of our subsidiaries also require them to maintain certain debt service coverage ratios and minimum net worth requirements. We cannot assure you that we will be able to comply with our financial or other covenants and, if we fail to do so, we may not be able to obtain waivers from the lenders or noteholders, as applicable, and/or amend the covenants. Our failure to comply with the restrictive covenants described above, as well as other terms of our other indebtedness and/or the terms of any future indebtedness from time to time, could result in an event of default, as happened with the Hilton San Francisco Hotels (as defined below). If the event of default is not cured or waived, it could result in our being required to repay these borrowings before their due date. If we are forced to refinance these borrowings on less favorable terms or are unable to refinance these borrowings, our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected. If we are unable to refinance our debt on acceptable terms or at all, we may be forced to dispose of hotels at inopportune times or on disadvantageous terms, which could result in losses. To the extent we cannot or do not meet our future debt service obligations, we will also risk losing to foreclosure some or all of our hotels that may be pledged to secure our obligation.
Previous wording
For tax purposes, a foreclosure of any of our hotels would be treated as a sale of the hotel for a purchase price equal to the outstanding balance of the debt secured by the mortgage. If the outstanding balance of the debt secured by the mortgage exceeds our tax basis in the hotel, we would recognize taxable gain on foreclosure, but we would not receive any cash proceeds, which could impact our ability to meet the REIT distribution requirements. In October 2023, our effective exit from the two Hilton San Francisco Hotels that secured the SF Mortgage Loan resulted in such required distribution of our REIT taxable income. See Note 7: "Debt" in our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere within this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further details. In addition, we may give full or partial recourse guarantees to lenders of mortgage debt on behalf of the entities that own our hotels. When we give a recourse guarantee on behalf of an entity that owns one of our hotels, we will be responsible to the lender for satisfaction of the debt if it is not paid by such entity or if certain loan provisions are violated. If any of our hotels are foreclosed on due to a default, our ability to pay cash distributions to our stockholders will be limited.
Current wording
For tax purposes, a foreclosure of any of our hotels would be treated as a sale of the hotel for a purchase price equal to the outstanding balance of the debt secured by the mortgage. If the outstanding balance of the debt secured by the mortgage exceeds our tax basis in the hotel, we would recognize taxable gain on foreclosure, but we would not receive any cash proceeds, which could impact our ability to meet the REIT distribution requirements. In addition, we may give full or partial recourse guarantees to lenders of mortgage debt on behalf of the entities that own our hotels. When we give a recourse guarantee on behalf of an entity that owns one of our hotels, we will be responsible to the lender for satisfaction of the debt if it is not paid by such entity or if certain loan provisions are violated. If any of our hotels are foreclosed on due to a default, our ability to pay cash distributions to our stockholders will be limited.
Previous wording
We have been taxed as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes beginning January 4, 2017. We believe we have been organized and operated, and expect to continue to be organized and operate, in a manner to qualify as a REIT. However, qualification as a REIT involves the interpretation and application of highly technical and complex Code provisions for which no or only a limited number of judicial or administrative interpretations may exist. Notwithstanding the availability of cure provisions in the Code, we could fail to meet various compliance requirements, which could jeopardize our REIT status. Our REIT status is also dependent upon the ongoing and historic qualification of subsidiary entities qualifying as REITs or TRSs, as applicable, as a result of its substantial ownership interest in those entities. Furthermore, new tax legislation, administrative guidance or court decisions, in each instance potentially with retroactive effect, could make it more difficult or impossible for us to qualify as a REIT. If we, or any of our subsidiary entities qualifying as REITs, fail to qualify as a REIT in any tax year, then:
Current wording
We have been taxed as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes beginning January 4, 2017. We believe we have been organized and operated, and expect to continue to be organized and operate, in a manner to qualify as a REIT. However, qualification as a REIT involves the interpretation and application of highly technical and complex Code provisions for which no or only a limited number of judicial or administrative interpretations may exist. Notwithstanding the availability of cure provisions in the Code, we could fail to meet various compliance requirements, which could jeopardize our REIT status. Our REIT status is also dependent upon the ongoing and historic qualification of subsidiary entities qualifying as REITs or TRSs, as applicable, as a result of its substantial ownership interest in those entities. Furthermore, new tax or other legislation, administrative guidance or court decisions, in each instance potentially with retroactive effect, could make it more difficult or impossible for us to qualify as a REIT. If we, or any of our subsidiary entities qualifying as REITs, fail to qualify as a REIT in any tax year, then:
Previous wording
Even if we qualify for taxation as a REIT, we may be subject to certain U.S. federal, state and local taxes on our income and assets, including taxes on any undistributed income, tax on income from some activities conducted as a result of a foreclosure, and property and transfer taxes. Moreover, if we have net income from “prohibited transactions,” that income will be subject to a 100% tax. In addition, we could, in certain circumstances, be required to pay an excise or penalty tax (which could be significant in amount) in order to utilize one or more relief provisions under the Code to maintain our qualification as a REIT. We are subject to U.S. federal and state income tax on the income earned by our TRSs. Finally, we have operations and assets in Puerto Rico that are subject to tax. Any of these taxes decrease cash available for distribution to our stockholders.
Current wording
Even if we qualify for taxation as a REIT, we may be subject to certain U.S. federal, state and local taxes on our income and assets, including taxes on any undistributed income, tax on income from some activities conducted as a result of a foreclosure, and property and transfer taxes. Moreover, if we have net income from “prohibited transactions,” that income will be subject to a 100% tax. In addition, we could, in certain circumstances, be required to pay an excise or penalty tax (which could be significant in amount) in order to utilize one or more relief provisions under the Code to maintain our qualification as a REIT. We are subject to U.S. federal and state income tax on the income earned by our
Rearranged current paragraphs (2)
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
A significant portion of our room count is located in a concentrated number of markets that exposes us to greater risk to local economic or business conditions, changes in hotel supply in these markets, and other conditions than more geographically diversified hotel companies. As of December 31, 2025, hotels in Florida, Hawaii, Chicago, New York City,
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
TRSs. Finally, we have operations and assets in Puerto Rico that are subject to tax. Any of these taxes decrease cash available for distribution to our stockholders.