Marcus & Millichap, Inc.
For the period ended Jun 30, 2025. Filed Aug 7, 2025.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's report for each of its first three quarters. The financial statements are not audited. It shows how the business has moved since the last annual report, and what management says changed.
Jun 30, 2025 · Filed Aug 7, 2025
What changed in Management’s Discussion and Analysis?
Read the current filingPrevious report: 10-Q
Period ended 2025-03-31; filed 2025-05-07.
0001578732-25-000031
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsCurrent report: 10-Q
Period ended 2025-06-30; filed 2025-08-07.
0001578732-25-000040
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsThe baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.
Compared 131 previous paragraphs and 145 current paragraphs.
86 unchanged; 35 reworded; 16 added; 9 removed; 1 previous and 8 current paragraphs rearranged.
Tables are not compared: 6 previous and 8 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.
A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.
Added paragraphs (16)
Current report
The reset of U.S. trade policy in April raised uncertainty in the financial markets. Expectations of an inflation surge, higher interest rates and a weakening economic outlook led to increased investor caution, causing activity to briefly falter. Nonetheless, key economic indicators through the second quarter continued to demonstrate generally positive momentum, with about 191,000 new jobs added in the quarter, increasing the first half of 2025 total to 597,000 new jobs. The unemployment rate remained stable, ending the second quarter at 4.1% although the labor force participation rate has receded modestly and the number of new job openings has retreated. In the June reading, retail sales showed some recovery from the softening trend of the prior two months. Other signs of economic slowing included slackening home sales, lowered consumer confidence and a modest uptick in inflation.
Current report
Although the economy remains generally sound, the lack of clarity from the U.S. presidential administration regarding tariffs and trade policy has made it increasingly difficult to predict the economic outlook. Recession risk remains modestly elevated, and inflation risk continues to be a top concern. The Federal Reserve has remained cautious in its outlook, with most predictions of a potential reduction of the overnight rate occurring in September 2025 at the earliest. The U.S. presidential administration has announced a variety of trade deals, most notably with the U.K., Japan and the European Union. However, on July 31, 2025, the administration announced sweeping tariffs effective on August 7, 2025 on most countries that had not reached a trade deal. If additional trade deals are entered into, with tariffs being lowered and stabilized, the economic outlook could strengthen.
Current report
Although space demand for apartments and office space remain positive, sectors facing increased trade and tariff risk have experienced slackening demand. Retail space absorption has been modestly negative for two consecutive quarters and industrial space demand turned negative in the second quarter. Although uncertainty surrounding trade policy has impacted retail and industrial space demand, if additional trade deals are negotiated and if tariffs are stabilized, space demand could quickly recover.
Current report
Apartment vacancy rates continued to trend lower in the second quarter, reaching 4.4% with unit absorption totaling 790,000 units in the trailing 12 months – the strongest 12-month total in more than 30 years. If the pace of construction is further slowed by tariffs on construction materials and more stringent immigration policy reducing the available construction labor force, new supply risks would continue to abate, raising the prospect of strengthening multifamily fundamentals. Office demand has likewise continued to improve, marking a fifth consecutive quarter of positive space absorption. Though vacancy rates remain elevated for the sector as a whole, select sub-segments of office properties in a variety of markets continue to draw tenant demand. Retail space demand has modestly slackened, but the vacancy rate remains below 5%. Like retail space demand, hotel demand has eased, particularly as international travel to the United States has been impacted by trade policies. In addition, elevated uncertainty and weakened consumer confidence have impacted leisure travel. Should trade deals be established and policies normalized, confidence could improve and hotel room demand could quickly revive.
Current report
Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes
Current report
On July 4, 2025, the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” was signed into law in the U.S. This bill contains a broad range of tax reform provisions. The Company is evaluating the future impact of these tax law changes. However, we do not expect the legislation to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Current report
Other revenue. Other revenue of $4.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025 was comparable to the $4.7 million for the same period in 2024.
Current report
Provision for Income Taxes
Current report
Comparison of Six Months Ended June 30, 2025 and 2024
Current report
Revenue
Current report
Real estate brokerage commissions. Revenue from real estate brokerage commissions increased to $265.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025 from $244.9 million for the same period in 2024, an increase of $20.1 million, or 8.2%. The increase was the result of total sales volume increasing by 14.4%, partially offset by a reduction of 10 basis points in the average commission rate earned during the six months ended June 30, 2025 compared to the same period in 2024. The reduction in the average commission rate is primarily the result of the increase in the average transaction size as larger transactions generally have smaller commission rates. Private Client Market revenue increased by 8.4%, and the combined Middle Market and Larger Transaction Market revenue increased by 8.3%. The overall average transaction size increased by 6.5%.
Current report
Financing fees. Revenue from financing fees increased to $44.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025 from $32.7 million for the same period in 2024, an increase of $11.7 million, or 35.7%, resulting primarily from a 52.7% increase in total financing volume, partially offset by a four basis point decrease in the average fee rate during the six months ended June 30, 2025 compared to the same period in 2024. The reduction in the average fee rate is primarily the result of the increase in the average transaction size as larger transactions generally have smaller commission rates.
Current report
Total Operating Expenses
Current report
Total operating expenses were $344.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025 compared to $315.6 million for the same period in 2024, an increase of $28.5 million, or 9.0%. The change was primarily due to an increase of $20.0 million in cost of services and an increase of $9.2 million in selling, general and administrative expenses as described below.
Current report
The benefit for income taxes was $2.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025, compared to $2.6 million for the same period in 2024. The effective income tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2025, was 12.5% compared to 14.6% for the same period in 2024. The determination of the applicable tax rate was based on the discrete method for the six months ended June 30, 2025, compared to the annual effective tax rate method for the same period in 2024 as discussed in Note 10 – “Income Taxes” in the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1, Part I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Current report
Cash flows used in financing activities were $25.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025 compared to $17.2 million for the same period in 2024. The $8.6 million increase in cash flows used in financing activities is primarily due to the $6.8 million increase in cash paid for stock repurchases in 2025 compared to the same period in 2024 along with $1.1 million in principal payments for deferred and contingent consideration in 2025 compared to no such payments in the same period in 2024.
Removed paragraphs (9)
Previous report
Overall economic performance was sound in the first quarter of 2025, with low unemployment and the addition of 456,000 new jobs. Retail sales remained active and inflation trended lower. Entering the second quarter of 2025, however, economic uncertainty increased dramatically as the U.S. reset its global trade policies with dramatic tariff increases. The resulting financial market volatility, falling consumer sentiment and general uncertainty have spurred increased caution among both consumers and businesses. Elevated caution may cause businesses and consumers to limit investment and spending as a potential trade war could weaken economic growth and spur inflation. Although most of the punitive tariffs were put on hold for 90 days, 10% tariffs on all countries aside from China, which faces 145% tariffs, has driven the net effective tariff rate to approximately 28%, the highest level since 1901. Limited insights into future trade policy has impacted decision making, increasing the risk of slowing economic growth.
Previous report
The lack of clarity of the U.S. presidential administration regarding tariffs has made it increasingly difficult to predict the economic outlook, and many economists have raised their expectations of both recession and inflation risk in 2025. Nonetheless, some signs of a pullback on tariffs have emerged, suggesting that a trade war may be averted, which could revive the outlook for economic growth.
Previous report
All four major property types saw positive space demand in the fourth quarter of 2024 and in the year ended December 31, 2024. Nearly 660,000 apartment units were filled in 2024, the second strongest annual total in the 32 years on record. Apartment demand sustained momentum in the first quarter of 2025 with nearly 147,000 net units filled, the strongest first quarter on record. Office space demand was also positive in the first quarter of 2025, marking the fourth consecutive quarter of gains. This has helped reduce the office vacancy rate by 50 basis points from its peak of 17.2% set in the second quarter of 2024 spurring speculation that a slow recovery of the office market is occurring. Industrial space demand also remained positive, but the pace of absorption was overshadowed by new completions. Following 17 consecutive quarters of positive demand, retail space absorption fell in the first quarter of 2025, pushing the average vacancy rate up by 10 basis points to 4.5%, still well below the twenty-year average of 5.6%. The retail space demand slowdown may reflect a temporary moderation of expansion plans by retailers ahead of tariff and trade war risks or it could simply reflect the limited availability of retail space.
Previous report
Other Income, Net
Previous report
Interest Expense
Previous report
Other Income, Net
Previous report
Interest Expense
Previous report
Benefit for Income Taxes
Previous report
Cash flows used in financing activities were $8.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025, which is comparable to $7.5 million for the same period in 2024.
Reworded paragraphs (35)
Previous wording
The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2025 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year ending December 31, 2025, or for any other future period. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, filed with the SEC on February 27, 2025, including the “Risk Factors” section and the consolidated financial statements and notes included therein.
Current wording
The results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2025 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year ending December 31, 2025, or for any other future period. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, filed with the SEC on February 27, 2025, including the “Risk Factors” section and the consolidated financial statements and notes included therein.
Previous wording
We are a leading national real estate services firm specializing in commercial real estate investment sales, financing services, research and advisory services. We have been the top commercial real estate investment broker in the United States based on the number of investment transactions for more than 15 years. As of March 31, 2025, we had 1,668 investment sales and financing professionals that are primarily exclusive independent contractors operating in more than 80 offices, who provide real estate brokerage and financing services to sellers and buyers of commercial real estate assets. During the three months ended March 31, 2025, we closed 1,706 investment sales, financing and other transactions with total sales volume of approximately $9.4 billion. During the year ended December 31, 2024, we closed 7,836 investment sales, financing and other transactions with total sales volume of approximately $49.6 billion.
Current wording
We are a leading national real estate services firm specializing in commercial real estate investment sales, financing services, research and advisory services. We have been the top commercial real estate investment broker in the United States based on the number of investment transactions for more than 15 years. As of June 30, 2025, we had 1,640 investment sales and financing professionals that are primarily exclusive independent contractors operating in more than 80 offices, who provide real estate brokerage and financing services to sellers and buyers of commercial real estate assets. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, we closed 2,070 and 3,776 investment sales, financing and other transactions with total sales volume of approximately $12.3 billion and $21.7 billion, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2024, we closed 7,836 investment sales, financing and other transactions with total sales volume of approximately $49.6 billion.
Previous wording
We generate revenue by collecting real estate brokerage commissions upon the sale, and financing fees upon the financing of commercial properties, by providing equity advisory services and loan sales, loan guarantees and by providing leasing, consulting and advisory services. Real estate brokerage commissions are typically based upon the value of the property and financing fees are typically based upon the size of the loan. During the three months ended March 31, 2025, approximately 85% of our revenue was generated from real estate brokerage commissions, 13% from financing fees and 2% from other real estate related services.
Current wording
We generate revenue by collecting real estate brokerage commissions upon the sale, and financing fees upon the financing of commercial properties, by providing equity advisory services and loan sales, loan guarantees and by providing leasing, consulting and advisory services. Real estate brokerage commissions are typically based upon the value of the property and financing fees are typically based upon the size of the loan. During the three months ended June 30, 2025, approximately 82% of our revenue was generated from real estate brokerage commissions, 15% from financing fees and 3% from other real estate related services.
Previous wording
We are the industry leader in serving private clients in the $1 million - $10 million private client market, which contributed approximately 63% and 67% of our real estate brokerage commissions during the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. The following table sets forth the number of transactions, sales volume and revenue by each commercial real estate market for real estate brokerage:
Current wording
We are the industry leader in serving private clients in the $1 million - $10 million private client market, which contributed approximately 66% and 63% of our real estate brokerage commissions during the three months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively, and approximately 65% of our real estate brokerage commissions during both the six months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024. The following table sets forth the number of transactions, sales volume and revenue by each commercial real estate market for real estate brokerage:
Previous wording
Within the broader economic context, commercial real estate fundamentals remain sturdy, with most property types delivering positive space absorption. Apartment demand remained robust through the first quarter of 2025, exceeding elevated construction completions and supporting modest but positive rent gains. Retail space demand was marginally negative for the quarter, but the resulting uptick in vacancy was minimal and may simply reflect a temporary market recalibration. Industrial space demand was positive for the quarter, and office space demand continued to gain momentum.
Current wording
Within the broader economic context, commercial real estate fundamentals remain sturdy, with most property types delivering positive space absorption. Apartment demand remained robust through the first half of 2025, exceeding elevated construction completions and supporting modest but positive rent gains. Retail space demand was marginally negative through the first half of 2025, but the resulting uptick in vacancy has been minimal. Industrial space demand has remained nominally positive, and office space demand has continued to gain momentum.
Previous wording
Although apartment and industrial construction remains elevated, the supply additions are concentrated in select markets and the pace of deliveries is tapering. Oversupply risks in most markets are beginning to diminish as elevated capital costs join rising tariffs on building materials and construction labor shortages to drive construction costs higher. Retail and office development was already low entering 2025, with little sign of a revival. Apartment starts have fallen by 76% from their peak in 2022 and industrial completions in 2025 are expected to fall to approximately 210 million square feet, their lowest level since 2014. As a result, receding new supply risks in 2025 should aid commercial real estate performance in the coming quarters.
Current wording
Although apartment and industrial construction remains elevated, the supply additions are concentrated in select markets and the pace of deliveries is tapering. Oversupply risks in most markets are beginning to diminish as elevated capital costs join rising tariffs on building materials and construction labor shortages to drive construction costs higher. Retail and office development was already low entering 2025, with little sign of a revival. Apartment starts have fallen by 77% from their peak in 2022, and industrial completions in 2025 are expected to fall to approximately 250 million square feet, their lowest level since 2015. As a result, receding new supply risks in 2025 should aid commercial real estate performance in the coming quarters.
Previous wording
The commercial real estate space demand outlook for 2025 remains uncertain. Core drivers including job creation, retail sales and modest gains in office attendance entering the second quarter of 2025 suggest positive momentum, but the broader economic climate could impact the trajectory either positively or negatively. If the U.S. economy enters a recession, space demand for all types of commercial real estate could be negatively impacted. However, if a trade war is averted and sentiment increases, space demand could be bolstered.
Current wording
The commercial real estate space demand outlook for 2025 remains uncertain. Core drivers including job creation, retail sales and modest gains in office attendance through the second quarter of 2025 suggest positive momentum, but the broader economic climate could impact the trajectory either positively or negatively. If the U.S. economy enters a recession, space demand for all types of commercial real estate could be negatively impacted. However, if a trade war is averted, tariffs stabilize and sentiment increases, space demand could be bolstered.
Previous wording
The commercial real estate space demand outlook remains difficult to discern amid the dramatic policy shifts enacted by the new U.S. presidential administration. Increased uncertainty, falling sentiment and risks of a recession and higher inflation could slow decision making, causing commercial real estate space demand to falter. If the trade war deescalates and policy clarity emerges, commercial real estate space demand could be reinvigorated. Nonetheless, all commercial real estate property types have entered the new cycle on sound footing, suggesting a durable performance outlook.
Current wording
The commercial real estate space demand outlook remains difficult to discern amid the dramatic policy shifts enacted by the new U.S. presidential administration. Increased uncertainty, weakened sentiment and risks of a recession and higher inflation could slow decision making, causing commercial real estate space demand to falter. If policy clarity emerges, commercial real estate space demand could be reinvigorated. Nonetheless, all commercial real estate property types have entered the new cycle on sound footing, suggesting a durable performance outlook.
Previous wording
Although interest rates had been trending lower entering 2025, the recent economic turmoil driven by aggressive trade policies has spurred increased interest rate volatility. Interest rate risks were exacerbated by President Trump’s threats to remove Jerome Powell as the head of the Federal Reserve, risking the independence of the Federal Reserve. While lender spreads had been tightening, the rising risk of inflation, policy uncertainty and financial market volatility have led to increased lender caution. Although debt capital liquidity remains strong, many lenders have increased their safety spreads, resulting in a modest increase in lending rates.
Current wording
Interest rate volatility following the rapid trade policy changes in early April has given way to range-bound movements, with the key 10-year treasury benchmark remaining near 4.5%. Interest rate risks have been exacerbated by President Trump’s threats to remove Jerome Powell as the head of the Federal Reserve, risking the independence of the Federal Reserve. While lender spreads had been tightening prior to April, the rising risk of inflation, policy uncertainty and financial market volatility have led to increased lender caution. Although debt capital liquidity remains strong, many lenders have increased their safety spreads, resulting in a modest increase in lending rates.
Previous wording
The combination of limited federal policy transparency and inflation risks posed by tariffs have caused the Federal Reserve to await further clarity before making any decisions on monetary policy. The prevailing sentiment by Wall Street is that the Federal Reserve will cut rates two or three times this year, but Chairman Powell has clearly stated that until clarity emerges, they will likely hold the overnight rate flat. Nonetheless, the Federal Reserve’s influence on longer term rates like the 10-year treasury, which more directly influence commercial real estate lending rates, is limited. Following the institution of the “Liberation Day” tariffs, international capital began to migrate out of U.S. bonds and financial assets, putting upward pressure on interest rates. Looking forward, long-term rates may be more influenced by international capital flows and treasury issuance than by the Federal Reserve.
Current wording
The combination of limited federal policy transparency and inflation risks posed by tariffs have caused the Federal Reserve to await further clarity before making any decisions on monetary policy. The prevailing sentiment by Wall Street is that the Federal Reserve will cut rates once or twice this year, but Chairman Powell has clearly stated that until clarity emerges, the Federal Reserve will likely hold the overnight rate flat. Nonetheless, the Federal Reserve’s influence on longer term rates like the 10-year treasury, which more directly influence commercial real estate lending rates, is limited. Following the institution of the “Liberation Day” tariffs, international capital began to migrate out of U.S. bonds and financial assets, putting upward pressure on interest rates. Looking forward, long-term rates may be more influenced by international capital flows and treasury issuance than by the Federal Reserve.
Previous wording
Although economic uncertainty together with financial market and interest rate volatility normally tend to increase investor caution, capital flows into commercial real estate could potentially be bolstered. As a “hard asset” with some level of resistance to inflation, recessions and financial market volatility, investment into commercial real estate could benefit from the current economic climate. The repricing of commercial real estate assets over the last three years has enhanced the yield profile, supporting positive or neutral leverage in many markets and property types. Whether capital migrates to commercial properties will likely depend on the risk perception of the broader financial market, but other hard assets have already experienced increased demand in the wake of the rapid policy shifts and financial market downturn.
Current wording
Although economic uncertainty together with financial market and interest rate volatility normally tend to increase investor caution, capital flows into commercial real estate could potentially be bolstered. As a “hard asset” with some level of resistance to inflation, recessions and financial market volatility, investment into commercial real estate could benefit from the current economic climate. The repricing of commercial real estate assets over the last three years has enhanced the yield profile, supporting positive or neutral leverage in many markets and property types. In addition, the passage of the new tax act provides some benefits and additional clarity to the commercial real estate market. Bonus depreciation rules, increased state and local tax (“SALT”) allowances, and increased deductibility of interest paid on commercial real estate could bolster investment activity. Furthermore, by making many of the new tax rules permanent, investors can rely on greater tax policy certainty, allowing them to deploy longer-term investment strategies. Whether capital migrates to commercial properties will likely depend on the risk perception of the broader financial market, but other hard assets have already experienced increased demand in the wake of the rapid policy shifts and financial market downturn.
Previous wording
In the first quarter of 2025, commercial real estate transaction activity increased by 7% compared to the same quarter last year, led by velocity gains in seniors housing, retail and industrial property sales. Apartment transactions increased by 8% on a year-over-year basis, while office and hotel property sales activity declined. The transaction uptick reflects a narrowing of the expectation gap that began in the fourth quarter last year, but recent financial market volatility and uncertainty surrounding trade and the economy as a whole could re-widen expectations. Clarity on investor expectations in the new trade and economic climate have yet to fully emerge.
Current wording
In the second quarter of 2025, commercial real estate transaction activity increased by 12% compared to the same quarter last year, led by velocity gains in office and retail property sales. Apartment transactions increased by 12% on a year-over-year basis, while industrial and seniors housing sales flattened and hotel property sales activity declined. The transaction uptick reflects the continuance of transactions initiated in the first quarter when the expectation gap had narrowed, but recent financial market volatility and uncertainty surrounding trade and the economy could re-widen expectations. Clarity on investor expectations in the new trade and economic climate have yet to fully emerge.
Previous wording
Several metrics traditionally associated with rising transaction activity velocity, including increased exclusive inventory being brought to market and rising requests for Broker Opinions of Value, suggest that transactional momentum could be sustained in the coming quarters. Nonetheless, the variety of potential headwinds facing the sector including the economy, interest rates, financial market trends, geopolitical and commercial real estate pricing clarity could ultimately suppress activity in 2025. In the current uncertain climate, defensive assets such as single-tenant net lease properties backed by high-credit tenants and medical office assets continue to receive buyer interest. Apartment properties, supported by positive long-term drivers including robust demographics of the renter-aged population and the high cost of homeownership is also a favored property segment. Another important factor influencing the investor outlook is the prospective renewal of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act which includes several tax benefits that are supportive of commercial real estate investment including accelerated depreciation, pass-through entity deductions and Opportunity Zones. Ultimately, market velocity will be dictated by a combination of the economic outlook, financial market trends, geopolitical forces, Federal Reserve action, interest rates and the buyer/seller expectation gap. If trade policy stabilizes, uncertainty abates and investor sentiment rises, we believe commercial real estate investment activity could gain additional momentum.
Current wording
Several metrics traditionally associated with rising transaction activity velocity, including increased exclusive inventory being brought to market and rising requests for Broker Opinions of Value, suggest that transactional momentum could be sustained in the coming quarters. Nonetheless, the variety of potential headwinds facing the sector including the economy, interest rates, financial market trends, geopolitical and commercial real estate pricing clarity could ultimately suppress activity in the second half of 2025. In the current uncertain climate, defensive assets such as single-tenant net lease properties backed by high-credit tenants and medical office assets continue to receive buyer interest. Apartment properties, supported by positive long-term drivers including robust demographics of the renter-aged population and the high cost of homeownership is also a favored property segment. Another important factor influencing the investor outlook is the renewal of many of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act provisions. Accelerated depreciation, pass-through entity deductions, increases in Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) allocations, increased SALT deductions and the renewal of Opportunity Zones could benefit commercial real estate investment. Ultimately, market velocity will be dictated by a combination of the economic outlook, financial market trends, geopolitical forces, Federal Reserve action, interest rates and the buyer/seller expectation gap. If trade policy stabilizes, uncertainty abates and investor sentiment rises, we believe commercial real estate investment activity could gain additional momentum.
Previous wording
We are subject to U.S. and Canadian federal taxes and individual state and local taxes based on the income generated in the jurisdictions in which we operate. Our effective tax rate fluctuates as a result of (i) changes in our annual effective tax rate applied to current pre-tax income (loss), (ii) the change in the mix of our activities in the jurisdictions in which we operate due to differing tax rates in those jurisdictions and (iii) the impact of permanent items, including compensation charges, qualified transportation fringe benefits, uncertain tax positions, meals and entertainment and tax-exempt deferred compensation plan assets. Our benefit for income taxes includes the windfall tax benefits and shortfall expenses, net, from shares issued in connection with our Amended Plan and Amended ESPP.
Current wording
We are subject to U.S. and Canadian federal taxes and individual state and local taxes based on the income generated in the jurisdictions in which we operate. Our effective tax rate fluctuates as a result of (i) a change in the second quarter of 2025 from the annual effective tax rate (“AETR”) to the discrete method, (ii) the change in the mix of our activities in the jurisdictions in which we operate due to differing tax rates in those jurisdictions and (iii) the impact of permanent items, including compensation charges, qualified transportation fringe benefits, uncertain tax positions, meals and entertainment and tax-exempt deferred compensation plan assets. Our provision (benefit) for income taxes includes the windfall tax benefits and shortfall expenses, net, from shares issued in connection with our Amended Plan and Amended ESPP. For a discussion of our determination to change from the application of the AETR method for quarterly periods to the discrete method, please see Note 10 – “Income Taxes” in the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1, Part I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Previous wording
The following is a discussion of our results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024. The tables included in the period comparisons below provide summaries of our results of operations. The period-to-period comparisons of financial results are not necessarily indicative of future results.
Current wording
The following is a discussion of our results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024. The tables included in the period comparisons below provide summaries of our results of operations. The period-to-period comparisons of financial results are not necessarily indicative of future results.
Previous wording
We regularly review a number of key metrics to evaluate our business, measure our performance, identify trends affecting our business, formulate financial projections and make strategic decisions. We also believe these metrics are relevant to investors’ and others’ assessment of our financial condition and results of operations. During the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024, we closed 1,706 and 1,564 investment sales, financing and other transactions, respectively, with total sales volume of approximately $9.4 billion and $9.7 billion, respectively. Such key metrics for real estate brokerage and financing activities (excluding other transactions) are as follows:
Current wording
We regularly review a number of key metrics to evaluate our business, measure our performance, identify trends affecting our business, formulate financial projections and make strategic decisions. We also believe these metrics are relevant to investors’ and others’ assessment of our financial condition and results of operations. During the three months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024, we closed 2,070 and 1,800 investment sales, financing and other transactions, respectively, with total sales volume of approximately $12.3 billion and $9.5 billion, respectively. Such key metrics for real estate brokerage and financing activities (excluding other transactions) are as follows:
Previous wording
(1)Operating metrics exclude certain financing fees not directly associated to transactions.
Current wording
(1)Operating metrics exclude certain financing fees not directly associated with transactions.
Previous wording
Total revenue was $145.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 compared to $129.1 million for the same period in 2024, an increase of $15.9 million, or 12.3%. Total revenue increased as a result of increases in real estate brokerage commissions and financing fees, partially offset by a reduction in other revenue, as described below. See “Factors Affecting Our Business” for additional market information.
Current wording
Total revenue was $172.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025 compared to $158.4 million for the same period in 2024, an increase of $13.9 million, or 8.8%. Total revenue increased as a result of increases in real estate brokerage commissions and financing fees, partially offset by a reduction in other revenue, as described below. See “Factors Affecting Our Business” for additional market information.
Previous wording
Real estate brokerage commissions. Revenue from real estate brokerage commissions increased to $123.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 from $109.5 million for the same period in 2024, an increase of $14.1 million, or 12.9%. The increase was the result of total sales volume increasing by 17.6%, partially offset by a reduction of seven basis points in the average commission rate earned during the three months ended March 31, 2025 compared to the same period in 2024, caused by the shift in the proportion of transactions to the Middle Market and Larger Transaction Market from the Private Client Market, as Middle Market and Larger Transaction Markets typically earn lower commission rates. Private Client Market revenue increased by 6.2%, and the combined Middle Market and Larger Transaction Market revenue increased by 29.6%.
Current wording
Real estate brokerage commissions. Revenue from real estate brokerage commissions increased to $141.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025 from $135.4 million for the same period in 2024, an increase of $6.0 million, or 4.4%. The increase was the result of total sales volume increasing by 11.8%, partially offset by a reduction of 13 basis points in the average commission rate earned during the three months ended June 30, 2025 compared to the same period in 2024. The reduction in the average commission rate is primarily the result of the increase in the average transaction size as larger transactions generally have smaller commission rates. Private Client Market revenue increased by 10.3%, while the combined Middle Market and Larger Transaction Market revenue decreased by 6.6%. The overall average transaction size increased by 3.4%.
Previous wording
Financing fees. Revenue from financing fees increased to $18.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 from $14.4 million for the same period in 2024, an increase of $3.7 million, or 25.7%, resulting primarily from a 16.1% increase in total financing volume and an eight basis point increase in the average fee rate during the three months ended March 31, 2025 compared to the same period in 2024.
Current wording
Financing fees. Revenue from financing fees increased to $26.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025 from $18.3 million for the same period in 2024, an increase of $8.0 million, or 43.5%, resulting primarily from a 86.0% increase in total financing volume, partially offset by 12 basis point decrease in the average fee rate during the three months ended June 30, 2025 compared to the same period in 2024. The reduction in the average fee rate is primarily the result of the increase in the average transaction size as larger transactions generally have smaller commission rates.
Previous wording
Total operating expenses were $162.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 compared to $149.2 million for the same period in 2024, an increase of $13.5 million, or 9.1%. The change was primarily due to an increase of $11.5 million in cost of services as described below.
Current wording
Total operating expenses were $181.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025 compared to $166.4 million for the same period in 2024, an increase of $14.9 million, or 9.0%. The change was primarily due to an increase of $8.5 million in cost of services and an increase of $6.5 million in selling, general and administrative expense as described below.
Previous wording
Depreciation and amortization expense. Depreciation and amortization expense decreased to $2.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 from $3.4 million compared to the same period in 2024, a decrease of $0.6 million, or 16.7%. The decrease primarily relates to accelerated amortization and impairment of certain intangible assets recorded in the second half of 2024 resulting from changes in estimates.
Current wording
Depreciation and amortization expense. Depreciation and amortization expense decreased to $3.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025 from $3.3 million compared to the same period in 2024, a decrease of $0.2 million, or 5.3%. The decrease primarily relates to accelerated amortization and impairment of certain intangible assets recorded in the second half of 2024 resulting from changes in estimates.
Previous wording
Other income, net decreased to $4.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 from $5.6 million for the same period in 2024. The decrease of $1.6 million was primarily driven by a decrease in interest income due to a decreased average yield on our investments and a decrease in the investment gains and loss related to the assets held in the rabbi trust during the period compared to the same period in prior year.
Current wording
Other income, net increased to $5.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025 from $4.8 million for the same period in 2024. The increase of $0.7 million was primarily driven by an increase investment gain related to the assets held in the rabbi trust, partially offset by decreased interest income due to a decreased average yield on the Company's investments during the period compared to the same period in prior year.
Previous wording
The benefit for income taxes was $9.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025, compared to $4.7 million for the same period in 2024. The effective income tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2025, was 68.2% compared to 32.2% for the same period in 2024. The net increase in the effective tax rate is primarily due to the relationship of permanent items, the change in the valuation allowance and the change in the state income tax benefit to pre-tax loss as presented in Note 10 – “Income Taxes” in the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1, Part I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Current wording
The provision for income taxes was $7.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025, compared to $2.1 million for the same period in 2024. The effective income tax rate for the three months ended June 30, 2025, was (194.5)% compared to (61.1)% for the same period in 2024. The change in the effective tax rate is primarily due to the application of the discrete method for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025 compared to the annual effective tax rate method for the three and six months ended June 30, 2024 as discussed in Note 10 – “Income Taxes” in the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1, Part I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Previous wording
Other revenue. Other revenue decreased to $3.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 from $5.2 million for the same period in 2024, a decrease of $1.9 million, or 36.8%, resulting primarily from a decrease in leasing fees.
Current wording
Other revenue. Other revenue decreased to $7.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025 from $9.9 million for the same period in 2024, a decrease of $2.0 million, or 20.0%, resulting primarily from a decrease in leasing fees.
Previous wording
Cost of services. Cost of services are variable commissions paid to our investment sales professionals and compensation-related costs in connection with our financing activities. Cost of services increased to $88.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 from $76.9 million for the same period in 2024. Cost of services as a percentage of total revenue increased by 140 basis points to 60.9% compared to the same period in 2024 primarily due to our senior investment sales and financing professionals earning a higher amount of additional commissions.
Current wording
Cost of services. Cost of services are variable commissions paid to our investment sales professionals and compensation-related costs in connection with our financing activities. Cost of services increased to $195.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025 from $174.9 million for the same period in 2024 as a result of increased revenue. Cost of services as a percentage of total revenue increased by 50 basis points to 61.4% compared to the same period in 2024 primarily due to our senior investment sales and financing professionals earning a higher amount of additional commissions.
Previous wording
Selling, general, and administrative expense. Selling, general and administrative expense for the three months ended March 31, 2025 increased to $71.6 million, from $68.9 million for the same period in 2024, an increase of $2.6 million or 3.8%. The increase was primarily due to (i) an increase in compensation related costs and (ii) increased investment in business development, marketing and other support related to the long-term talent acquisition and retention of our investment sales and financing professionals.
Current wording
Selling, general, and administrative expense. Selling, general and administrative expense for the six months ended June 30, 2025 increased to $143.1 million, from $133.9 million for the same period in 2024, an increase of $9.2 million or 6.9%. The increase was primarily due to (i) an increase in compensation related costs and (ii) increased investment in business development, marketing and other support related to the long-term talent acquisition and retention of our investment sales and financing professionals.
Previous wording
In this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we include a non-GAAP financial measure, Adjusted EBITDA. We define Adjusted EBITDA as net loss before (i) interest income and other, including net realized gains (losses) on marketable debt securities, available-for-sale and cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash, (ii) interest expense, (iii) benefit for income taxes, (iv) depreciation and amortization, and (v) stock-based compensation. We use Adjusted EBITDA in our business operations to evaluate the performance of our business, develop budgets and measure our performance against those budgets, among other things. We also believe that analysts and investors use Adjusted EBITDA as a supplemental measure to evaluate our overall operating performance. However, Adjusted EBITDA has material limitations as a supplemental metric and should not be considered in isolation, or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under U.S. GAAP. We find Adjusted EBITDA to be a useful management metric to assist in evaluating performance, because Adjusted
Current wording
In this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we include a non-GAAP financial measure, Adjusted EBITDA. We define Adjusted EBITDA as net loss before (i) interest income and other, including net realized gains (losses) on marketable debt securities, available-for-sale and cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash, (ii) interest expense, (iii) provision (benefit) for income taxes, (iv) depreciation and amortization, and (v) stock-based compensation. We use Adjusted EBITDA in our business operations to evaluate the performance of our business, develop budgets and measure our performance against those budgets, among other things. We also believe that analysts and investors use Adjusted EBITDA as a supplemental measure to evaluate our overall operating performance. However, Adjusted EBITDA has material limitations as a supplemental metric and should not be considered in isolation, or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under U.S. GAAP. We find Adjusted EBITDA to be a useful management metric to assist in evaluating performance, because Adjusted EBITDA eliminates items related to capital structure, taxes and non-cash items. In light of the foregoing limitations, we do not rely solely on Adjusted EBITDA as a performance measure and also consider our U.S. GAAP results. Adjusted EBITDA is not a measurement of our financial performance under U.S. GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to net loss, operating loss or any other measures calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Because Adjusted EBITDA is not calculated in the same manner by all companies, it may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures used by other companies. A reconciliation of the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP financial measure, net loss, to Adjusted EBITDA is as follows (in thousands):
Previous wording
Our total cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash balance decreased by $3.7 million to $149.7 million at March 31, 2025, compared to $153.4 million at December 31, 2024. The following table sets forth our summary cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024 (in thousands):
Current wording
Our total cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash balance decreased by $67.4 million to $86.0 million at June 30, 2025, compared to $153.4 million at December 31, 2024. The following table sets forth our summary cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024 (in thousands):
Previous wording
Cash flows used in operating activities were $52.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 compared to $51.0 million for the same period in 2024. The $1.8 million increase in cash flows used in operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2025 compared to the same period in 2024 relates to a number of factors that are largely offsetting. These factors include a reduction in net loss, more than offset by increased payments for bonuses and deferred compensation and commissions in the current year compared to the same period in prior year and the effect of the timing of certain cash receipts and payments.
Current wording
Cash flows used in operating activities were $31.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025 compared to $50.2 million for the same period in 2024. The $18.3 million decrease in cash flows used in operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2025 compared to the same period in 2024 primarily relates to a reduction in advances and loans in the current year compared to the same period in prior year and the effect of the timing of certain cash receipts and payments.
Previous wording
Cash flows provided by investing activities were $57.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 compared to cash flows used in investing activities of $21.6 million for the same period in 2024. The $78.8 million increase in cash flows provided by investing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2025 compared to the same period in 2024 was primarily due to a net increase of $77.6 million in proceeds from sales and maturities of securities, net of purchases of securities in 2025 compared to the same period in 2024.
Current wording
Cash flows used by investing activities were $10.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025 compared to cash flows provided by investing activities of $58.8 million for the same period in 2024. The $68.9 million increase in cash flows used by investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2025 compared to the same period in 2024 was primarily due to an increase of $69.8 million in the amount of purchases of securities, net of proceeds from sales and maturities of securities in 2025 compared to the same period in 2024.
Previous wording
We believe that our existing balances of cash, cash equivalents, cash flows expected to be generated from our operations, and proceeds from the sale of marketable debt securities, available-for-sale will be sufficient to satisfy our operating requirements for at least the next 12 months and the foreseeable future. If we need to raise additional capital through public or private debt or equity financings, strategic relationships or other arrangements, this capital might not be available to us in a timely manner, on acceptable terms, or at all. Our failure to raise sufficient capital when needed could prevent us from funding acquisitions or otherwise financing our growth or operations. As of March 31, 2025, cash, excluding restricted cash, cash equivalents, and marketable debt securities, available-for-sale, aggregated $319.5 million.
Current wording
We believe that our existing balances of cash, cash equivalents, cash flows expected to be generated from our operations, and proceeds from the maturities and possible sales of marketable debt securities, available-for-sale will be sufficient to satisfy our operating requirements for at least the next 12 months and the foreseeable future. If we need to raise additional capital through public or private debt or equity financings, strategic relationships or other arrangements, this capital might not be available to us in a timely manner, on acceptable terms, or at all. Our failure to raise sufficient capital when needed could prevent us from funding acquisitions or otherwise financing our growth or operations. As of June 30, 2025, cash, excluding restricted cash, cash equivalents, and marketable debt securities, available-for-sale, aggregated $321.8 million.
Previous wording
The Company, in connection with the Strategic Alliance with M&T Realty Capital Corporation (“MTRCC”), has agreed to provide loan opportunities that may be funded through MTRCC’s agreement with Fannie Mae, which requires MTRCC to guarantee a portion of each funded loan. On a loan-by-loan basis, the Company, at its option, can assume a portion of MTRCC’s guarantee obligation to Fannie Mae of loan opportunities presented to and closed by MTRCC. As of March 31, 2025, the Company has agreed to a maximum aggregate guarantee obligation of $326.3 million relating to loans with an unpaid balance of $2,011.9 million. The maximum guarantee obligation is not representative of the actual loss we would incur. The Company would be liable for this amount only if all of the loans for which it is providing a guarantee to MTRCC were to default and all of the collateral underlying these loans was determined to be without value at the time of settlement, and the Company has recorded an allowance for losses of $(159,000) as of March 31, 2025 related to these guarantee obligations. The Company is required to provide cash collateral to MTRCC for this obligation, and this is reflected as $0.7 million of restricted cash as of March 31, 2025, which is included in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash on the condensed consolidated balance sheet.
Current wording
The Company, in connection with the Strategic Alliance with M&T Realty Capital Corporation (“MTRCC”), has agreed to provide loan opportunities that may be funded through MTRCC’s agreement with Fannie Mae, which requires MTRCC to guarantee a portion of each funded loan. On a loan-by-loan basis, the Company, at its option, can assume a portion of MTRCC’s guarantee obligation to Fannie Mae of loan opportunities presented to and closed by MTRCC. As of June 30, 2025, the Company has agreed to a maximum aggregate guarantee obligation of $371.1 million relating to loans with an unpaid balance of $2,281.0 million. The maximum guarantee obligation is not representative of the actual loss we would incur. The Company would be liable for this amount only if all of the loans for which it is providing a guarantee to MTRCC were to default and all of the collateral underlying these loans was determined to be without value at the time of settlement, and the Company has recorded an allowance for losses of $161,000 as of June 30, 2025 related to these guarantee obligations. The Company is required to provide cash collateral to MTRCC for this obligation, and this is reflected as $0.8 million of restricted cash as of June 30, 2025, which is included in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash on the condensed consolidated balance sheets.
Previous wording
There have been no material changes in our commitments under contractual obligations, as disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024 through the date the condensed consolidated financial statements were issued, other than for the payment on April 4, 2025 of a semi-annual regular dividend of $0.25 per share on outstanding common stock declared by our Board of Directors on February 6, 2025, aggregating $10.2 million.
Current wording
There have been no material changes in our commitments under contractual obligations, as disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024 through the date the condensed consolidated financial statements were issued, other than commitments that are already disclosed in the accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
Previous wording
The annual CPI inflation rate in the U.S. peaked at 9.1% in June 2022, the highest annual inflation rate since November 1981. CPI inflation has since fallen to 2.4% as of March 2025. In 2022 through 2023, the Federal Reserve increased the federal funds rate to the 5.25%-5.5% range in an effort to combat inflation, which had an adverse impact on commercial real estate transactions. In the latter part of 2024, the Federal Reserve lowered the overnight rate by 100 basis points to the 4.25%-4.5% range, which was a positive trend for investors, but the 10-year treasury rate has remained range-bound in the low- to mid-4% range keeping the cost of debt capital elevated.
Current wording
The annual CPI inflation rate in the U.S. peaked at 9.1% in June 2022, the highest annual inflation rate since November 1981. CPI inflation fell to 2.4% as of March 2025, but has since risen to 2.7%. In 2022 through 2023, the Federal Reserve increased the federal funds rate to the 5.25%-5.5% range in an effort to combat inflation, which had an adverse impact on commercial real estate transactions. In the latter part of 2024, the Federal Reserve lowered the overnight rate by 100 basis points to the 4.25%-4.5% range, which was a positive trend for investors, but the 10-year treasury rate has remained range-bound in the low- to mid-4% range keeping the cost of debt capital elevated.
Rearranged current paragraphs (8)
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
(1)Adjusted EBITDA is not a measurement of our financial performance under U.S. GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to net loss, operating income or any other measures derived in accordance with U.S. GAAP. For a definition of Adjusted EBITDA and a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net loss, which is the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP financial measure, see “Non-GAAP Financial Measure” below.
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
Cost of services. Cost of services are variable commissions paid to our investment sales professionals and compensation-related costs in connection with our financing activities. Cost of services increased to $106.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025 from $98.1 million for the same period in 2024 as a result of increased revenue. Cost of services as a percentage of total revenue was 61.9% for the second quarters of both 2025 and 2024.
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
Selling, general, and administrative expense. Selling, general and administrative expense for the three months ended June 30, 2025 increased to $71.6 million, from $65.0 million for the same period in 2024, an increase of $6.6 million or 10.1%. The increase was primarily due to (i) an increase in compensation related costs, (ii) increased investment in business development, marketing and other support related to the long-term talent acquisition and retention of our investment sales and financing professionals and (iii) the change in valuation of deferred contingent consideration.
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
Below are key operating results for the six months ended June 30, 2025 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2024 (dollars in thousands):
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
Total revenue was $317.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025 compared to $287.5 million for the same period in 2024, an increase of $29.8 million, or 10.4%. Total revenue increased as a result of increases in real estate brokerage commissions and financing fees, partially offset by a reduction in other revenue, as described below. See “Factors Affecting Our Business” for additional market information.
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
Depreciation and amortization expense. Depreciation and amortization expense decreased to $6.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025 from $6.8 million compared to the same period in 2024, a decrease of $0.7 million, or 11.1%. The decrease primarily relates to accelerated amortization and impairment of certain intangible assets recorded in the second half of 2024 resulting from changes in estimates.
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
Other income, net decreased to $9.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025 from $10.4 million for the same period in 2024. The decrease of $0.9 million was primarily driven by a decrease in interest income due to a decreased average yield on the Company's investments during the period compared to the same period in prior year.
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
Interest expense decreased by an immaterial amount for the six months ended June 30, 2025 compared to the same period in 2024, and primarily relates to interest expense on the Company’s SARs liability.
Rearranged previous paragraphs (1)
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
EBITDA eliminates items related to capital structure, taxes and non-cash items. In light of the foregoing limitations, we do not rely solely on Adjusted EBITDA as a performance measure and also consider our U.S. GAAP results. Adjusted EBITDA is not a measurement of our financial performance under U.S. GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to net loss, operating loss or any other measures calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Because Adjusted EBITDA is not calculated in the same manner by all companies, it may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures used by other companies. A reconciliation of the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP financial measure, net loss, to Adjusted EBITDA is as follows (in thousands):