Sprinklr, Inc.

Previous wording

Our revenue was $205.5 million and $196.0 million for the three months ended April 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively. You should not rely on the revenue growth of any prior quarterly or annual period as an indication of our future performance. Even if our revenue continues to increase, our revenue growth rate may decline in the future as a result of a variety of factors, including the maturation of our business. Overall growth of our revenue depends on a number of factors, including our ability to:

Current wording

Our revenue was $212.0 million and $197.2 million for the three months ended July 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, and $417.5 million and $393.2 million for the six months ended July 31, 2025 and 2024. You should not rely on the revenue growth of any prior quarterly or annual period as an indication of our future performance. Even if our revenue continues to increase, our revenue growth rate may decline in the future as a result of a variety of factors, including the maturation of our business. Overall growth of our revenue depends on a number of factors, including our ability to:

Previous wording

We have incurred significant losses in the past, and we had an accumulated deficit of $627.6 million and $626.1 million as of April 30, 2025 and January 31, 2025, respectively. While we have experienced revenue growth in recent periods and periods of profitability, we are not certain whether or when we will obtain a high enough volume of sales to sustain or increase our growth or maintain profitability in the future. We expect that our costs will increase over time and we could incur future losses, as we expect to invest significant additional funds in our business. To date, we have financed our operations principally through subscription payments by customers for use of our Unified-CXM platform and equity and debt financings. We have expended and expect to continue to expend substantial financial and other resources on:

Current wording

We have incurred significant losses in the past, and we had an accumulated deficit of $756.4 million and $626.1 million as of July 31, 2025 and January 31, 2025, respectively. While we have experienced revenue growth in recent periods and periods of profitability, we are not certain whether or when we will obtain a high enough volume of sales to sustain or increase our growth or maintain profitability in the future. We expect that our costs will increase over time and we could incur future losses, as we expect to invest significant additional funds in our business. To date, we have financed our operations principally through subscription payments by customers for use of our Unified-CXM platform and equity and debt financings. We have expended and expect to continue to expend substantial financial and other resources on:

Previous wording

We currently serve our customers from third-party data centers and cloud computing providers located around the world. Some of these facilities may be located in areas prone to natural disasters and may experience events such as earthquakes, floods, fires, severe weather events, power loss, computer or telecommunication failures, service outages or losses, and similar events. They also may be subject to break-ins, sabotage, intentional acts of vandalism and similar misconduct or cybersecurity issues, including attacks enhanced or facilitated by artificial intelligence (“AI”), human error, terrorism, improper operation, unauthorized entry and data loss. Our data center operations also rely heavily on the availability of electricity, which also comes from third-party providers. If we or the third-party data center and cloud computing provider facilities that we use to deliver our services were to experience a major power outage or if the cost of electricity were to increase significantly, our operations and financial results could be harmed. If we or our third-party data centers and cloud service provider facilities were to experience a major power outage, we or they would have to rely on back-up generators, which might not work properly or might not provide an adequate supply during a major power outage. Such a power outage could result in a significant disruption of our business. In the event of significant physical damage to one of these data centers, it may take a significant period of time to achieve full resumption of our services, and our disaster recovery planning may not account for all eventualities. We also may incur significant costs for using alternative equipment or taking other actions in preparation for, or in reaction to, events that damage the data centers and equipment that we or the third parties with whom we work use. Although we carry business interruption insurance, it may not be sufficient to compensate us for the potentially significant losses, including the potential harm to the future growth of our business that may result from interruptions in our services or products.

Current wording

We currently serve our customers from third-party data centers and cloud computing providers located around the world. Some of these facilities are located in areas prone to natural disasters and may experience events such as earthquakes, floods, fires, severe weather events, power loss, computer or telecommunication failures, service outages or losses, and similar events. They also may be subject to break-ins, sabotage, intentional acts of vandalism and similar misconduct or cybersecurity issues, including attacks enhanced or facilitated by artificial intelligence (“AI”), human error, terrorism, improper operation, unauthorized entry and data loss. Our data center operations also rely heavily on the availability of electricity, which also comes from third-party providers. If we or the third-party data center and cloud computing provider facilities that we use to deliver our services were to experience a major power outage or if the cost of electricity were to increase significantly, our operations and financial results could be harmed. If we or our third-party data centers and cloud service provider facilities were to experience a major power outage, we or they would have to rely on back-up generators, which might not work properly or might not provide an adequate supply during a major power outage. Such a power outage could result in a significant disruption of our business. In the event of significant physical damage to one of these data centers, it may take a significant period of time to achieve full resumption of our services, and our disaster recovery planning may not account for all eventualities. We also may incur significant costs for using alternative equipment or taking other actions in preparation for, or in reaction to, events that damage the data centers and equipment that we or the third parties with whom we work use. Although we carry business interruption insurance, it may not be sufficient to compensate us for the potentially significant losses, including the potential harm to the future growth of our business that may result from interruptions in our services or products.

Previous wording

Our future success will depend on our ability to adapt and innovate. To attract new customers and increase revenue from our existing customers, we will need to enhance and improve our existing platform and introduce new products, features and functionality. Enhancements and new products that we develop may not be introduced in a timely or cost-effective manner, may contain errors or defects, and may have interoperability difficulties with our Unified-CXM platform or other products. Furthermore, while we generally expect that enhancements and improvements to our products will attract new customers, certain of our customer agreements restrict our ability to materially change the features and functionality of our products or may obligate us to specific configurations or requirements, including in some cases, prohibiting the use of AI or generative AI in our products, which could result in violations of those customer agreements, or increased operational difficulties and costs due to our need to deploy different version of our products to different customers, i.e., enable or disable certain features, or failure of such customers to renew their agreements (and therefore, loss in revenue from such customers) as a result of our new products, features, and functionality. We have in the past experienced, and may in the future experience, delays in our planned release dates of new products, features and functionality, and there can be no assurance that these developments will be released according to schedule. We also have invested, and may continue to invest, in the acquisition of complementary businesses and technologies that we believe will enhance our Unified-CXM platform. If we are unable to successfully develop, release, acquire or integrate new products, features and functionality, or enhance our existing platform to meet the needs of our existing or potential customers in a timely and effective manner, or if a customer is not satisfied with the quality of work performed by us or with the technical support services rendered, our customers may delay or withhold payment to us, cancel their agreements with us, elect not to renew, or make service credit claims, warranty claims or other claims against us, and we could lose future sales. The occurrence of any of these events could result in diminishing demand for our solutions, a reduction in our revenues, an increase in our provision for credit losses or in collection cycles for accounts receivable or could cause us to incur the risk or expense of litigation.

Current wording

Our future success will depend on our ability to adapt and innovate. To attract new customers and increase revenue from our existing customers, we will need to enhance and improve our existing platform and introduce new products, features and functionality. Enhancements and new products that we develop may not be introduced in a timely or cost-effective manner, may contain errors or defects, and may have interoperability difficulties with our Unified-CXM platform or other products. Furthermore, while we generally expect that enhancements and improvements to our products will attract new customers, certain of our customer agreements restrict our ability to materially change the features and functionality of our products or may obligate us to specific configurations or requirements, including in some cases, prohibiting the use of AI or generative AI in our products, which could result in violations of those customer agreements, or increased operational difficulties and costs due to our need to deploy different version of our products to different customers, i.e., enable or disable certain features, or cause such customers not to renew their agreements (and therefore, loss in revenue from such customers) as a result of our new products, features, and functionality. We have in the past experienced, and may in the future experience, delays in our planned release dates of new products, features and functionality, and there can be no assurance that these developments will be released according to schedule. We also have invested, and may continue to invest, in the acquisition of complementary businesses and technologies that we believe will enhance our Unified-CXM platform. If we are unable to successfully develop, release, acquire or integrate new products, features and functionality, or enhance our existing platform to meet the needs of our existing or potential customers in a timely and effective manner, or if a customer is not satisfied with the quality of work performed by us or with the technical support services rendered, our customers may delay or withhold payment to us, cancel their agreements with us, elect not to renew, or make service credit claims, warranty claims or other claims against us, and we could lose future sales. The occurrence of any of these events could result in diminishing demand for our solutions, a reduction in our revenues, an increase in our provision for credit losses or in collection cycles for accounts receivable or could cause us to incur the risk or expense of litigation.

Previous wording

We use AI tools in our business operations for internal and external uses. Specifically, our employees and personnel may use AI technologies to support their work and our internal business operations, including for example, to generate source code used in our products and systems. Output from generative AI may infringe on third-party intellectual property rights without us being aware. Moreover, advanced AI tools, which may produce content indistinguishable from that generated by humans, have a number of benefits, risks, and liabilities, some still unknown. Recent decisions of governmental entities and courts (such as the U.S. Copyright Office, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, and U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit) interpret U.S. copyright and patent law as limited to protecting works and inventions created by human authors and inventors, respectively. We are therefore unlikely to be able to obtain U.S. copyright or patent protection for works or inventions wholly created by a generative AI tool, and our ability to obtain U.S. copyright and patent protection for source code, text, images, inventions, or other materials, which are developed with some use of AI tools, such as generative AI, may be limited, if available at all. Likewise, the availability of intellectual property protections in other countries is similarly unclear. Additionally, our use of third-party generative AI tools to develop source code, text, images, inventions, or other materials may expose us to greater risks than utilizing contracted human developers, as third-party generative AI vendors may not provide warranties or indemnities with respect to the output generated by such generative AI tools, and generative AI tools may also provide output that appears correct but is erroneous. Furthermore, some generative AI tools may be offered under terms that do not protect the confidentiality of the prompts or inputs that users submit to such tools and may use prompts or inputs to train shared AI models, potentially resulting in third-party users receiving outputs containing information from prompts or inputs (including confidential, competitive, proprietary, or personal data) that we submitted to the tool.

Current wording

We use AI tools in our business operations for internal and external uses. Specifically, our employees and personnel use AI technologies to support their work and our internal business operations, including for example, to generate source code used in our products and systems. Output from generative AI may infringe on third-party intellectual property rights without us being aware. Moreover, advanced AI tools, which may produce content indistinguishable from that generated by humans, have a number of benefits, risks, and liabilities, some still unknown. Recent decisions of governmental entities and courts (such as the U.S. Copyright Office, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, and U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit) interpret U.S. copyright and patent law as limited to protecting works and inventions created by human authors and inventors, respectively. We are therefore unlikely to be able to obtain U.S. copyright or patent protection for works or inventions wholly created by a generative AI tool, and our ability to obtain U.S. copyright and patent protection for source code, text, images, inventions, or other materials, which are developed with some use of AI tools, such as generative AI, may be limited, if available at all. Likewise, the availability of intellectual property protections in other countries is similarly unclear. Additionally, our use of third-party generative AI tools to develop source code, text, images, inventions, or other materials may expose us to greater risks than utilizing contracted human developers, as third-party generative AI vendors may not provide warranties or indemnities with respect to the output generated by such generative AI tools, and generative AI tools may also provide output that appears correct but is erroneous. Furthermore, while we have policies in place to facilitate the use of approved tools, some unapproved generative AI tools may be used under terms that do not protect the confidentiality of the prompts or inputs that users submit to such tools and may use prompts or inputs to train shared AI models, potentially resulting in third-party users receiving outputs containing information from prompts or inputs (including confidential, competitive, proprietary, or personal data) that we submitted to the tool.

Previous wording

We also use our own proprietary AI-based features within our products, and have incorporated generative AI into our product offerings through third-party vendors, which has the potential to result in adverse effects to our financial condition, results or reputation. Generative AI features and services leverage existing and widely available technologies, such as those owned by Microsoft Azure, OpenAI or alternative large language model providers. The use of generative AI technology and processes at scale is relatively new and may lead to challenges, concerns and risks that are significant or that we may not be able to predict, especially if our use of these technologies in our products and services becomes more important to our operations over time.

Current wording

We also use our own proprietary AI-based features within our products and have incorporated generative AI into our product offerings through third-party vendors, which has the potential to result in adverse effects to our financial condition, results or reputation. Generative AI features and services leverage existing and widely available technologies, such as those owned by Microsoft Azure, OpenAI or alternative large language model providers. The use of generative AI technology and processes at scale is relatively new and may lead to challenges, concerns and risks that are significant or that we are not able to predict, especially if our use of these technologies in our products and services becomes more important to our operations over time.

Previous wording

As a result, the integration of generative AI into our products and operations may not be successful despite expending significant time and monetary resources to attempt to make it successful. Our investments in deploying such technologies may be substantial, and they may be more expensive than anticipated. If we fail to deploy generative AI as intended, our competitors may incorporate generative AI technology into their products or services more successfully than we do, which may impair our ability to effectively compete in the market. Furthermore, we make numerous statements online and in our marketing materials describing the availability of AI, as well as our use and integration of generative AI in our products. Although we endeavor to be accurate with our public statements and documentation, we may at times fail to do so or be alleged to have failed to do so. Our statements regarding our AI-supported features and use of generative AI can subject us to potential government or legal action if they are found to be deceptive, unfair or misrepresentative of our actual practices. Should any of these statements prove to be untrue or be perceived as untrue, even though circumstances beyond our reasonable control, we may face litigation, disputes, claims, investigations, inquiries or other proceedings that could adversely affect our business, reputation, results of operations and financial condition.

Current wording

As a result, the integration of generative AI into our products and operations may not be successful despite expending significant time and monetary resources to attempt to make it successful. Our investments in deploying such technologies may be substantial, and they may be more expensive than anticipated. If we fail to deploy generative AI as intended, our competitors may incorporate generative AI technology into their products or services more successfully than we do, which may impair our ability to effectively compete in the market. Furthermore, we make numerous statements online and in our marketing materials describing the availability of AI, as well as our use and integration of generative AI in our products. Although we endeavor to be accurate with our public statements and documentation, we may at times fail to do so or be alleged to have failed to do so. Our statements regarding our AI-supported features and use of generative AI can subject us to potential government or legal action if they are found to be deceptive, unfair or misrepresentative of our actual practices. Should any of these statements prove to be untrue or be perceived as untrue, even in circumstances beyond our reasonable control, such as when relying on statements provided by the AI and generative AI providers with whom we work, we may face litigation, disputes, claims, investigations, inquiries or other proceedings that could adversely affect our business, reputation, results of operations and financial condition.

Previous wording

Uncertainty in the legal regulatory regime relating to AI, as well as variation on AI regulations from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, may require significant resources to modify and maintain business practices to comply with U.S. and foreign laws, the nature of which cannot be determined at this time as they continue to rapidly evolve and solidify. Several jurisdictions around the globe, including Europe and certain U.S. states, have proposed, enacted or are considering laws or guidelines governing the development and use of AI, such as the EU’s Artificial Intelligence Act (“EU AI Act”) and Colorado’s Artificial Intelligence Act. For example, the EU AI Act imposes a number of obligations on various parties related to the development and use of certain AI-based systems, and additional jurisdictions are beginning to adopt or prepare for adoption of similar laws. These laws may be more restrictive than the EU AI Act and may render the use of such technologies challenging. While we aim to develop and use AI responsibly by attempting to identify and mitigate any issues associated with fairness, bias, transparency, or ethical or legal use of AI, we may be unsuccessful in identifying or resolving such issues. Further, use of our AI systems for unintended or improper use cases by customer users may alter the associated legal obligations upon Sprinklr, without our knowledge. We may not be able to detect, mitigate and remediate such misuse, and limitations of liability in contracts may be inadequate to address legal liability, fines, penalties and other regulatory actions resulting from such misuse. Additionally, certain privacy laws extend rights to consumers (such as the right to delete certain personal data) and regulate automated decision making, which may be incompatible with AI, particularly training AI using personal data. These obligations may make it harder for us to conduct our business using AI, develop innovative AI models and create potential for regulatory fines or penalties, require us to change our business practices, retrain our AI, prevent or limit our creation and use of AI or generative AI, or delete or require us to disgorge certain algorithms. For example, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission has required other companies to turn over or delete or disgorge valuable insights or trainings generated through the use of AI, or the AI models or algorithms themselves, where they allege the company has violated privacy and consumer protection laws.

Current wording

Uncertainty in the legal regulatory regime relating to AI, as well as variation on AI regulations from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, may require significant resources to modify and maintain business practices to comply with U.S. and foreign laws, the nature of which cannot be determined at this time as they continue to rapidly evolve and solidify. Several jurisdictions around the globe, including Europe and certain U.S. states, have proposed, enacted or are considering laws or guidelines governing the development and use of AI, such as the EU’s Artificial Intelligence Act (“EU AI Act”) and Colorado’s Artificial Intelligence Act. For example, the EU AI Act imposes a number of obligations on various parties related to the development and use of certain AI-based systems, and additional jurisdictions are beginning to adopt or prepare for adoption of similar laws. These laws may be more restrictive than the EU AI Act and may render the use of such technologies challenging. While we aim to develop and use AI responsibly by attempting to identify and mitigate any issues associated with fairness, bias, transparency, or ethical or legal use of AI, we may be unsuccessful in identifying or resolving such issues. Further, use of our AI systems for unintended or improper use cases by customer users may alter the associated legal obligations upon Sprinklr, without our knowledge. We may not be able to detect, mitigate and remediate such misuse, and limitations of liability in contracts may be inadequate to address legal liability, fines, penalties and other regulatory actions resulting from such misuse. Additionally, certain privacy laws extend rights to consumers (such as the right to delete certain personal data) and regulate automated decision making, which may be incompatible with our use of AI, particularly training AI using personal data. These obligations may make it harder for us to conduct our business using AI, develop innovative AI models and create potential for regulatory fines or penalties, require us to change our business practices, retrain our AI, prevent or limit our creation and use of AI or generative AI, or delete or require us to disgorge certain algorithms. For example, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission has required other companies to turn over or delete or disgorge valuable insights or trainings generated through the use of AI, or the AI models or algorithms themselves, where they allege the company has violated privacy and consumer protection laws.

Previous wording

During the three months ended April 30, 2025, approximately 43% of our sales were to customers outside of the Americas. As part of our growth strategy, we expect to continue to expand our international operations, which may include opening additional offices in new jurisdictions and providing our Unified-CXM platform in additional languages and on-boarding new customers outside the United States. Any new markets or countries into which we attempt to sell subscriptions to our Unified-CXM platform may not be receptive to our business development activities. We currently have sales personnel and sales and customer and product support operations in the United States and certain countries across Europe, the Asia Pacific region and the Americas. We believe that our ability to attract new customers to our Unified-CXM platform and to convince existing customers to renew or expand their use of our Unified-CXM platform is directly correlated to the level of engagement we achieve with our customers in their home countries. To the extent that we are unable to effectively engage with non-U.S. customers, we may be unable to effectively grow in international markets.

Current wording

During the six months ended July 31, 2025, approximately 45% of our sales were to customers outside of the Americas. As part of our growth strategy, we expect to continue to expand our international operations, which may include opening additional offices in new jurisdictions and providing our Unified-CXM platform in additional languages and on-boarding new customers outside the United States. Any new markets or countries into which we attempt to sell subscriptions to our Unified-CXM platform may not be receptive to our business development activities. We currently have sales personnel and sales and customer and product support operations in the United States and certain countries across Europe, the Asia Pacific region and the Americas. We believe that our ability to attract new customers to our Unified-CXM platform and to convince existing customers to renew or expand their use of our Unified-CXM platform is directly correlated to the level of engagement we achieve with our customers in their home countries. To the extent that we are unable to effectively engage with non-U.S. customers, we may be unable to effectively grow in international markets.

Previous wording

Our Class B common stock has ten votes per share, and our Class A common stock has one vote per share. The holders of our Class B common stock as of April 30, 2025 beneficially held approximately 45.0% of our outstanding capital stock, but controlled approximately 89.1% of the voting power of our outstanding capital stock. Therefore, the holders of Class B common stock have control over our management and affairs and over all matters requiring stockholder approval, including election of directors and significant corporate transactions, such as a merger or other sale of us or our assets, for the foreseeable future.

Current wording

Our Class B common stock has ten votes per share, and our Class A common stock has one vote per share. The holders of our Class B common stock as of July 31, 2025 beneficially held approximately 41.5% of our outstanding capital stock, but controlled approximately 87.6% of the voting power of our outstanding capital stock. Therefore, the holders of Class B common stock have control over our management and affairs and over all matters requiring stockholder approval, including election of directors and significant corporate transactions, such as a merger or other sale of us or our assets, for the foreseeable future.

Previous wording

As of April 30, 2025, our directors, executive officers and their respective affiliates beneficially owned, in the aggregate, approximately 98.5% of our Class B common stock, and controlled approximately 89.5% of the voting power of our outstanding capital stock. As a result, our directors, executive officers and their respective affiliates, if acting together, are able to determine or significantly influence all matters requiring stockholder approval, including the elections of directors, amendments of our organizational documents and approval of any merger, sale of assets or other major corporate transaction.

Current wording

As of July 31, 2025, our directors, executive officers and their respective affiliates beneficially owned, in the aggregate, approximately 98.5% of our Class B common stock, and controlled approximately 88.3% of the voting power of our outstanding capital stock. As a result, our directors, executive officers and their respective affiliates, if acting together, are able to determine or significantly influence all matters requiring stockholder approval, including the elections of directors, amendments of our organizational documents and approval of any merger, sale of assets or other major corporate transaction.