Clearway Energy Inc
For the period ended Dec 31, 2024. Filed Feb 25, 2025.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.
FY2024 · Filed Feb 25, 2025
CWEN$34.10-0.5%Stored close · as of Nov 6, 2026
What changed in Risk Factors?
Read the current filingPrevious report: 10-K
Period ended 2023-12-31; filed 2024-02-22.
0001567683-24-000007
Item 1A. Risk FactorsCurrent report: 10-K
Period ended 2024-12-31; filed 2025-02-25.
0001567683-25-000007
Item 1A. Risk FactorsThe baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.
Compared 237 previous paragraphs and 242 current paragraphs.
152 unchanged; 81 reworded; 8 added; 4 removed; 0 previous and 1 current paragraphs rearranged.
Tables are not compared: 0 previous and 0 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.
A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.
Added paragraphs (8)
Current report
•Changes in U.S. foreign trade policies may materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, operations and financial condition.
Current report
From time to time, the Company engages a range of third parties as a part of its cybersecurity risk management. While such engagements are aimed at bolstering the effectiveness of the Company’s risk management processes, they introduce inherent risks and complexities that warrant careful consideration. Any oversight or failure on the part of these third parties could compromise the security of the Company’s sensitive data, proprietary information and critical business processes, leading to potential data breaches or unauthorized access. Additionally, the reliance on external entities introduces complexities in coordinating risk management efforts, data sharing and maintaining confidentiality. Any mismanagement or inadequate coordination between the Company’s internal teams and third-party vendors could result in delays in responding to cybersecurity threats or gaps in its risk mitigation strategies. In addition, while the Company and its third-party service providers commit resources to the design, implementation and monitoring of the Company’s computer systems, there is no guarantee that these security measures will provide absolute security. Despite these security measures, the Company may not be able to anticipate, detect or prevent cyberattacks, particularly because the methodologies used by attackers change frequently or may not be recognized until launch, and because attackers are increasingly using technologies designed to circumvent controls and avoid detection.
Current report
The Company’s ability to grow through acquisitions depends, in part, on CEG’s ability to identify and present the Company with acquisition opportunities. There are a number of factors that could materially and adversely impact the extent to which suitable acquisition opportunities are made available from CEG. For example, due to factors inside or outside the Company’s control, CEG may be unable to develop or construct facilities that are ultimately compatible with the Company’s operational requirements or that otherwise result in suitable acquisition opportunities for the Company, or CEG may not be able to develop facilities that provide cash flows that would support the Company’s investment requirements due to numerous factors impacting the economics of the facilities, including negotiation of engineering, procurement and construction and offtake contracts, as well as securing long-term financing for the facilities.
Current report
Local, state and federal regulations may focus on areas such as monitoring and restricting GHG emissions, regulating methane emissions and transitioning away from reliance on fossil fuels. Alternatively, local, state and federal regulations may also target restricting the development of renewable energy capacity through restrictions on land use, interconnection and removal of government incentives for renewable energy. Significant changes to local, state and federal regulations may have material impacts on the Company’s cost of compliance with these regulations on the Company’s ability to operate its existing assets economically. In addition, the Company may be adversely affected by changes to regulations that restrict the Company’s ability to acquire or invest in new facilities. The effect on the Company of any new legislative or regulatory measures will depend on the particular provisions that are ultimately adopted. In addition, sudden changes to local, state or federal regulations may result in the Company’s inability to quickly react and respond to these changes.
Current report
Companies across all industries may face increased scrutiny from the public, stakeholders and government agencies related to their environmental, social, and governance, or ESG, practices and commitments to address climate change. For example, in March 2024, the SEC adopted new rules that would require a wide range of climate-related disclosures in SEC filings, including certain climate-related risks, climate-related metrics and GHG emissions, information about climate-related targets and goals, transition plans, if any, and extensive attestation requirements. Although the SEC issued an order in April 2024 staying implementation of the new rules pending the resolution of certain legal challenges, the outcome of these legal challenges is uncertain, including with respect to the content of any portion of the rules that may be upheld and the ultimate timing of required compliance with such rules. On February 11, 2025, however, the SEC notified the U.S. Court of Appeals of a statement issued by the SEC’s Acting Chairman regarding, among other things, the fact that the majority of current SEC Commissioners had previously voted against adopting the rules and requested that the U.S. Court of Appeals not schedule the case for argument to provide time for the SEC to deliberate and determine the appropriate next steps in the cases. Additionally, in September 2023, California passed climate-related disclosure mandates, which are broader than the SEC’s proposed rules. In the event the SEC’s climate disclosure rules go into effect or states in which the Company operates or does business adopt climate disclosure requirements, the Company could incur significant additional costs relating to the assessment and disclosure of climate-related risks.
Current report
Changes in U.S. foreign trade policies, including the imposition of additional tariffs and other trade barriers, and efforts to withdraw from or materially modify international trade agreements, may materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, operations and financial condition.
Current report
Changes in U.S. foreign trade policies could lead to the imposition of additional trade barriers and tariffs on the foreign import of certain materials and products. For example, effective February 4, 2025, the U.S. government implemented an additional tariff on goods being imported from China and announced additional tariffs for goods imported into the U.S. from Mexico and Canada beginning in March 2025. The Company cannot predict what additional changes to trade policy will be made by the presidential administration or Congress, including whether existing tariff policies will be maintained or modified, what products may be subject to such policies or whether the entry into new bilateral or multilateral trade agreements will occur, nor can the Company predict the effects that any such changes would have on its business. However, such steps, if adopted, could increase the Company’s costs and adversely impact its business and operations. In addition, changes in U.S. trade policy have resulted, and could again result, in reactions from U.S. trading partners, including adopting responsive trade policies. For example, in response to the U.S. government’s additional tariff on imports from China, on February 4, 2025, the Chinese government announced that it would implement a tariff on certain goods being imported into China from the U.S. There can be no assurance that such changes in U.S. or foreign trade policy or in laws and policies governing foreign trade, and any resulting negative sentiments towards the U.S. as a result of such changes, would not materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity.
Current report
In addition, the Company routinely enters into arrangements with third parties that provide tax equity financing to, or acquire tax credits, including ITCs or PTCs, from, the Company where tax credits and related tax benefits represent a material portion of the economic benefit of the arrangement to such other party. In certain circumstances, as is customary in the industry, the Company has guaranteed and may have to guarantee the economic benefit of such tax credits and other tax benefits to such party. A reduction in expected tax credits or tax benefits resulting from successful challenges by the IRS could result in an obligation under the Company’s contractual arrangements that could have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations and liquidity.
Removed paragraphs (4)
Previous report
The Company’s ability to grow through acquisitions depends, in part, on CEG’s ability to identify and present the Company with acquisition opportunities. CEG has not agreed to commit a specific level of dedicated resources for the pursuit of renewable power-related acquisitions. There are a number of factors which could materially and adversely impact the extent to which suitable acquisition opportunities are made available from CEG, including that the same professionals within CEG’s organization that are involved in acquisitions that are suitable for the Company have responsibilities within CEG’s broader asset management business, which may include sourcing acquisition opportunities for CEG. Limits on the availability of such individuals will likewise result in a limitation on the availability of acquisition opportunities for the Company. In making these determinations, CEG may be influenced by factors that result in a misalignment with the Company’s interests or conflict of interest.
Previous report
Local, state, federal and international regulatory bodies have increasingly focused on greenhouse gas (GHG) regulation, which could increase the cost of electricity generated by fossil fuels and reduce demand for the power the Company’s conventional assets generate and market. The EPA regulates GHG emissions from new and modified facilities that are potential major sources of criteria pollutants under the Clean Air Act and has adopted regulations that require, among other things, preconstruction and operating permits for certain large stationary sources and the monitoring and reporting of GHGs from certain oil and natural gas facilities. Further, the EPA recently announced strict new methane emissions regulations for oil and natural gas facilities, and the IRA established a charge on excess methane emissions from the same facilities. On the international level, under the Paris Agreement, the U.S. established an economy-wide target of reducing its net GHG emissions by 50-52 percent below 2005 levels by 2030 and achieving net zero GHG emissions economy-wide by no later than 2050. In December 2023, the United Nations Climate Change Conference issued a call on parties to the Paris Agreement, including the U.S., to contribute to the transitioning away from fossil fuels, reduction of methane emissions, and increase in renewable energy capacity to achieve net zero emissions by 2050. Many state and local officials have stated their intent to intensify efforts to uphold the commitments set forth in the international accord.
Previous report
Legislation or regulation that restricts carbon emissions could increase the cost of environmental compliance for the Company’s conventional assets by requiring the Company to install new equipment to reduce emissions from larger facilities and/or purchase emission allowances. Climate change and GHG legislation or regulation could also delay or otherwise negatively affect efforts to obtain and maintain permits and other regulatory approvals for the Company’s conventional assets’ existing and new facilities, impose additional monitoring and reporting requirements or adversely affect demand for the natural gas the Company gathers, transports and stores. The effect on the Company of any new legislative or regulatory measures will depend on the particular provisions that are ultimately adopted.
Previous report
Revenue earned by GenConn is established each year in a rate case; accordingly, the profitability of its assets is dependent on regulatory approval.
Reworded paragraphs (81)
Previous wording
•The Company’s ability to grow and make acquisitions through cash on hand is limited.
Current wording
•The Company’s ability to grow and make investments or acquisitions through cash on hand is limited.
Previous wording
•The Company may not be able to effectively identify or consummate any future acquisitions on favorable terms, or at all, and future acquisitions may not be accretive as a result of incorrect assumptions in the Company’s evaluation of such acquisitions, unforeseen consequences or other external events beyond the Company’s control.
Current wording
•The Company may not be able to effectively identify or consummate any future investments or acquisitions on favorable terms, or at all, and future investments or acquisitions may not be accretive as a result of incorrect assumptions in the Company’s evaluation of such investments or acquisitions, unforeseen consequences or other external events beyond the Company’s control.
Previous wording
•Counterparties to the Company’s offtake agreements may not fulfill their obligations and, as the contracts expire, the Company may not be able to replace them with agreements on similar terms in light of increasing competition in the markets in which the Company operates.
Current wording
•Counterparties to the Company’s offtake agreements may not fulfill their obligations and, as the contracts expire or terminate, the Company may not be able to replace them with agreements on similar terms, or at all.
Previous wording
•The Company’s ability to effectively consummate future acquisitions will also depend on the Company’s ability to arrange the required or desired financing for acquisitions.
Current wording
•The Company’s ability to effectively consummate future investments or acquisitions will also depend on the Company’s ability to arrange the required or desired financing for investments or acquisitions.
Previous wording
•Supplier and/or customer concentration at certain of the Company’s facilities may expose the Company to significant financial credit or performance risks.
Current wording
•Supplier concentration at certain of the Company’s facilities and the inability of suppliers to meet their obligations may expose the Company to significant financial credit or performance risks.
Previous wording
•The Company does not own all of the land on which its power generation and energy storage assets are located, which could result in disruption to its operations. The Company’s use and enjoyment of real property rights for its projects may be adversely affected by the rights of lienholders and leaseholders that are superior to those of the grantors of those real property rights to the Company.
Current wording
•The Company does not own all of the land on which its facilities are located, which could result in disruption to its operations. The Company’s use and enjoyment of real property rights for its facilities may be adversely affected by the rights of lienholders and leaseholders that are superior to those of the grantors of those real property rights to the Company.
Previous wording
•Risks that are beyond the Company’s control, including but not limited to acts of terrorism or related acts of war, natural disasters, severe weather, changes in weather patterns, flooding, pandemics (such as the COVID-19 pandemic), inflation, supply chain disruptions, hostile cyber intrusions or other catastrophic events, could have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Current wording
•Risks that are beyond the Company’s control, including but not limited to acts of terrorism or related acts of war, natural disasters, severe weather, changes in weather patterns, flooding, wildfires, pandemics, inflation, supply chain disruptions, hostile cyber intrusions or other catastrophic events, could have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Previous wording
•The Company’s costs, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows could be adversely impacted by the disruption of the fuel supplies necessary to generate power at its conventional generation facilities.
Current wording
•The Company’s costs, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows could be adversely impacted by the disruption of the fuel supplies necessary to generate power at its facilities in the Flexible Generation segment.
Previous wording
•CEG controls the Company and has the ability to designate a majority of the members of the Company’s Board.
Current wording
•CEG controls the Company and has the ability to designate a majority of the members of the Company’s Board of Directors.
Previous wording
•The Company may not be able to continue paying comparable or growing cash dividends to holders of its common stock in the future. The Company is a holding company and its only material asset is its interest in Clearway Energy LLC, and the Company is accordingly dependent upon distributions from Clearway Energy LLC and its subsidiaries to pay dividends and taxes and other expenses.
Current wording
•The Company may not be able to continue paying comparable or growing cash dividends to holders of its common stock in the future. The Company is a holding company and its primary asset is its interest in Clearway Energy LLC, and the Company is accordingly dependent upon distributions from Clearway Energy LLC and its subsidiaries to pay dividends and taxes and other expenses.
Previous wording
•The Company’s future tax liability may be greater than expected if the Company does not generate NOLs sufficient to offset taxable income, if federal, state and local tax authorities challenge certain of the Company’s tax positions and exemptions or if changes in federal, state and local tax laws occur.
Current wording
•The Company’s future tax liability may be greater than expected if the Company does not generate NOLs sufficient to offset taxable income, if federal, state and local tax authorities challenge certain of the Company’s tax positions and exemptions or if changes in federal, state and local tax laws occur. The Company may incur contractual obligations from the indemnification of third parties if tax authorities challenge the amount or availability of ITCs, PTCs or related tax benefits that the Company is obligated to provide to such third parties under such contractual arrangements.
Previous wording
Pursuant to the Company’s cash dividend policy, the Company intends to distribute a significant amount of the CAFD through regular quarterly distributions and dividends, and the Company’s ability to grow and make acquisitions through cash on hand is limited.
Current wording
Pursuant to the Company’s cash dividend policy, the Company intends to distribute a significant amount of the CAFD through regular quarterly distributions and dividends, and the Company’s ability to grow and make investments and acquisitions through cash on hand is limited.
Previous wording
The Company expects to distribute a significant amount of the CAFD each quarter and to rely primarily upon external financing sources, including the issuance of debt and equity securities and, if applicable, borrowings under the Company’s revolving credit facility to fund acquisitions and growth capital expenditures. The Company may be precluded from pursuing otherwise attractive acquisitions if the projected short-term cash flow from the acquisition or investment is not adequate to service the capital raised to fund the acquisition or investment, after giving effect to the Company’s available cash reserves. To the extent the Company issues additional equity securities in connection with any acquisitions or growth capital expenditures, the payment of dividends on these additional equity securities may increase the risk that the Company will be unable to maintain or increase its per share dividend. The incurrence of bank borrowings or other debt by Clearway Energy Operating LLC or by the Company’s project-level subsidiaries to finance the Company’s growth strategy will result in increased interest expense and the imposition of additional or more restrictive covenants, which, in turn, may impact the cash distributions the Company receives to distribute to holders of the Company’s common stock.
Current wording
The Company expects to distribute a significant amount of the CAFD each quarter and to rely primarily upon external financing sources, including the issuance of debt and equity securities and, if applicable, borrowings under the Company’s revolving credit facility to fund investments, acquisitions and growth capital expenditures. The Company may be precluded from pursuing otherwise attractive investments or acquisitions if the projected short-term cash flow from the investment or acquisition is not adequate to service the capital raised to fund the investment or acquisition, after giving effect to the Company’s available cash reserves. To the extent the Company issues additional equity securities in connection with any investments, acquisitions or growth capital expenditures, the payment of dividends on these additional equity securities may increase the risk that the Company will be unable to maintain or increase its per share dividend. The incurrence of bank borrowings or other debt by Clearway Energy Operating LLC or by the Company’s operating subsidiaries to finance the Company’s growth strategy will result in increased interest expense and the imposition of additional or more restrictive covenants, which, in turn, may impact the cash distributions the Company receives to distribute to holders of the Company’s common stock.
Previous wording
The Company may not be able to effectively identify or consummate any future acquisitions on favorable terms, or at all, and future acquisitions may not be accretive as a result of incorrect assumptions in the Company’s evaluation of such acquisitions, unforeseen consequences or other external events beyond the Company’s control.
Current wording
The Company may not be able to effectively identify or consummate any future investments or acquisitions on favorable terms, or at all, and future investments or acquisitions may not be accretive as a result of incorrect assumptions in the Company’s evaluation of such investments or acquisitions, unforeseen consequences or other external events beyond the Company’s control.
Previous wording
The Company’s business strategy includes growth through the acquisitions of additional generation assets (including through corporate acquisitions). This strategy depends on the Company’s ability to successfully identify and evaluate acquisition opportunities and consummate acquisitions on favorable terms. However, the number of acquisition opportunities is limited. In addition, the Company will compete with other companies for these limited acquisition opportunities, which may increase the Company’s cost of making acquisitions or cause the Company to refrain from making acquisitions at all. Some of the Company’s competitors for acquisitions are much larger than the Company with substantially greater resources. These companies may be able to pay more for acquisitions and may be able to identify, evaluate, bid for and purchase a greater number of assets than the Company’s financial or human resources permit. If the Company is unable to identify and consummate future acquisitions, it will impede the Company’s ability to execute its growth strategy and limit the Company’s ability to increase the amount of dividends paid to holders of the Company’s common stock.
Current wording
The Company’s business strategy includes growth through the investments in, and acquisitions of, additional generation assets (including through corporate acquisitions). This strategy depends on the Company’s ability to successfully identify and evaluate investment and acquisition opportunities and consummate investments and acquisitions on favorable terms. However, the number of investment and acquisition opportunities is limited. In addition, the Company will compete with other companies for these limited investment and acquisition opportunities, which may increase the Company’s cost of making investments or acquisitions or cause the Company to refrain from making investments or acquisitions at all. Some of the Company’s competitors for investments and acquisitions are much larger than the Company with substantially greater resources. These companies may be able to pay more for investments or acquisitions and may be able to identify, evaluate, bid for and purchase a greater number of assets than the Company’s financial or human resources permit. If the Company is unable to identify and consummate future investments or acquisitions, it will impede the Company’s ability to execute its growth strategy and limit the Company’s ability to increase the amount of dividends paid to holders of the Company’s common stock.
Previous wording
The Company’s ability to acquire future renewable facilities may depend on the viability of renewable assets generally. These assets currently are largely contingent on public policy mechanisms including ITCs, cash grants, loan guarantees, accelerated depreciation, RPS and carbon trading plans. These mechanisms have been implemented at the state and federal levels to support the development of renewable generation, demand-side and smart grid and other clean infrastructure technologies. The availability and continuation of public policy support mechanisms will drive a significant part of the economics and viability of the Company’s growth strategy and expansion into clean energy investments.
Current wording
The Company’s ability to invest in or acquire future renewable facilities may depend on the financial viability of renewable energy assets generally. The financial viability of these assets may, from time to time, be impacted by public policy mechanisms, including PTCs, ITCs, cash grants, loan guarantees, accelerated depreciation, RPS and carbon trading plans. These mechanisms have been implemented at the state and federal levels to support the development of renewable generation, demand-side and smart grid and other clean infrastructure technologies. The availability and continuation of public policy support mechanisms will drive a significant part of the economics and viability of the Company’s growth strategy and expansion into clean energy investments.
Previous wording
The acquisition of companies and assets are subject to substantial risks, including the failure to identify material problems during due diligence (for which the Company may not be indemnified post-closing) and the risk of overpaying for assets (or not making acquisitions on an accretive basis). The integration and consolidation of acquisitions requires substantial human, financial and other resources and, ultimately, the Company’s acquisitions may divert management’s attention from the Company’s existing business concerns, disrupt the Company’s ongoing business or not be successfully integrated. There can be no assurances that any future acquisitions will perform as expected or that the returns from such acquisitions will support the financing utilized to acquire them or maintain them. A failure to achieve the financial returns the Company expects when it acquires generation assets could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s ability to grow its business and make cash distributions to its stockholders. Any failure of the Company’s acquired generation assets to be accretive or difficulty in integrating such acquisition into the Company’s business could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s ability to grow its business and make cash distributions to its stockholders. As a result, the consummation of acquisitions could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and ability to pay dividends to holders of the Company’s common stock.
Current wording
The investment in, or acquisition of, companies and assets are subject to substantial risks, including the failure to identify material problems during due diligence (for which the Company may not be indemnified post-closing) and the risk of overpaying for assets (or not making investments or acquisitions on an accretive basis). The integration and consolidation of acquisitions requires substantial human, financial and other resources and, ultimately, the Company’s acquisitions may divert management’s attention from the Company’s existing business concerns, disrupt the Company’s ongoing business or not be successfully integrated. There can be no assurances that any future investments or acquisitions will perform as expected or that the returns from such investments or acquisitions will support the financing utilized to invest in, acquire or maintain them. A failure to achieve the financial returns the Company expects when it invests in or acquires generation assets could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s ability to grow its business and make cash distributions to its stockholders. Any failure of the Company’s acquired generation assets to be accretive or difficulty in integrating such acquisition into the Company’s business could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s ability to grow its business and make cash distributions to its stockholders. As a result, the consummation of acquisitions could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and ability to pay dividends to holders of the Company’s common stock.
Previous wording
Counterparties to the Company’s offtake agreements may not fulfill their obligations and, as the contracts expire, the Company may not be able to replace them with agreements on similar terms in light of increasing competition in the markets in which the Company operates.
Current wording
Counterparties to the Company’s offtake agreements may not fulfill their obligations and, as the contracts expire or terminate, the Company may not be able to replace them with agreements on similar terms, or at all.
Previous wording
The majority of the electric power the Company generates is sold under long-term offtake agreements with public utilities or industrial or commercial end-users, with a weighted average remaining duration, based on CAFD, of approximately 10 years. As of December 31, 2023, the largest customers of the Company’s power generation and energy storage assets, including assets in which the Company has less than a 100% membership interest, were SCE and PG&E, which represented 24% and 17%, respectively, of total consolidated revenues generated by the Company during the year ended December 31, 2023.
Current wording
The majority of the electric power the Company generates within the Renewables segment is sold under long-term offtake agreements with public utilities or industrial or commercial end-users, with a weighted average remaining duration, based on CAFD, of approximately 12 years. As of December 31, 2024, the largest customers of the Company’s power generation and BESS assets, including assets in which the Company has less than a 100% membership interest, were SCE and PG&E, which represented 24% and 17%, respectively, of total consolidated revenues generated by the Company during the year ended December 31, 2024.
Previous wording
The power generation industry is characterized by intense competition and the Company’s electric generation assets encounter competition from utilities, industrial companies and independent power producers, in particular with respect to uncontracted output. In recent years, there has been increasing competition among generators for offtake agreements and this has contributed to a reduction in electricity prices in certain markets characterized by excess supply above designated reserve margins. In light of these market conditions, the Company may not be able to replace an expiring or terminated agreement with an agreement on equivalent terms and conditions, including at prices that permit operation of the related facility on a profitable basis. In addition, the Company believes many of its competitors have well-established relationships with the Company’s current and potential suppliers, lenders and customers, and have extensive knowledge of its target markets. As a result, these competitors may be able to respond more quickly than the Company to evolving industry standards and changing customer requirements. The adoption of more advanced technology could reduce its competitors’ power production costs resulting in their having a lower cost structure than is achievable with the technologies currently employed by the Company and adversely affect its ability to compete for offtake agreement renewals. If the Company is unable to replace an expiring or terminated offtake agreement, the affected facility may temporarily or permanently cease operations. External events, such as a severe economic downturn or force majeure events, could also impair the ability of some counterparties to the Company’s offtake agreements and other customer agreements to pay for energy and/or other products and services received.
Current wording
The power generation industry is characterized by intense competition and the Company’s electric generation assets encounter competition from utilities, industrial companies and independent power producers, in particular with respect to uncontracted output. In recent years, increasing competition among generators for offtake agreements has contributed to variability in electricity prices in certain markets. As a result, when an existing offtake agreement expires or is terminated, the Company may not be able to secure a replacement agreement on comparable terms and conditions, and the pricing under any such replacement agreement may vary significantly from the expired or terminated agreement, potentially impacting the profitability of the related facility. In addition, the Company’s competitors may be able to respond more quickly to evolving standards or customer requirements or adopt more advanced technology that reduces their production costs, resulting in their ability to compete for, or secure favorable terms in, offtake agreement renewals. If the Company is unable to replace an expiring or terminated offtake agreement, the affected facility may temporarily or permanently cease operations. External events, such as a severe economic downturn or force majeure events, could also impair the ability of some counterparties to the Company’s offtake agreements and other customer agreements to pay for energy and/or other products and services received.
Previous wording
The Company’s ability to effectively consummate future acquisitions will also depend on the Company’s ability to arrange the required or desired financing for acquisitions.
Current wording
The Company’s ability to effectively consummate future investments or acquisitions will also depend on the Company’s ability to arrange the required or desired financing for investments or acquisitions.
Previous wording
The Company may not have sufficient availability under the Company’s credit facilities or have access to project-level financing on commercially reasonable terms when acquisition opportunities arise. An inability to obtain the required or desired financing could significantly limit the Company’s ability to consummate future acquisitions and effectuate the Company’s growth strategy. If financing is available, utilization of the Company’s credit facilities or project-level financing for all or a portion of the purchase price of an acquisition could significantly increase the Company’s interest expense, impose additional or more restrictive covenants and reduce CAFD. Similarly, the issuance of additional equity securities as consideration for acquisitions could cause significant stockholder dilution and reduce the Company’s dividends if the acquisitions are not sufficiently accretive. The Company’s ability to consummate future acquisitions may also depend on the Company’s ability to obtain any required regulatory approvals for such acquisitions.
Current wording
The Company may not have sufficient credit availability under the Company’s financing arrangements or have access to facility-level financing on commercially reasonable terms when investment or acquisition opportunities arise. An inability to obtain the required or desired financing could significantly limit the Company’s ability to consummate future investments or acquisitions and effectuate the Company’s growth strategy. If financing is available, utilization of the Company’s credit available under its financing arrangements or facility-level financing for all or a portion of the purchase price of an investment or acquisition could significantly increase the Company’s interest expense, impose additional or more restrictive covenants and reduce CAFD. Similarly, the issuance of additional equity securities as consideration for investments or acquisitions could cause significant stockholder dilution and reduce the Company’s dividends if the investments or acquisitions are not sufficiently accretive. The Company’s ability to consummate future investments or acquisitions may also depend on the Company’s ability to obtain any required regulatory approvals for such investments or acquisitions.
Previous wording
As of December 31, 2023, the Company had approximately $8.10 billion of total consolidated indebtedness, $5.97 billion of which was incurred by the Company’s non-guarantor subsidiaries. In addition, the Company’s share of its unconsolidated affiliates’ total indebtedness and letters of credit outstanding as of December 31, 2023, totaled approximately $303 million and $37 million, respectively (calculated as the Company’s unconsolidated affiliates’ total indebtedness as of such date multiplied by the Company’s percentage membership interest in such assets).
Current wording
As of December 31, 2024, the Company had approximately $7,235 million of total consolidated indebtedness, $5,110 million of which was incurred by the Company’s non-guarantor subsidiaries. In addition, the Company’s share of its unconsolidated affiliates’ total indebtedness and letters of credit outstanding as of December 31, 2024, totaled approximately $282 million and $39 million, respectively (calculated as the Company’s unconsolidated affiliates’ total indebtedness as of such date multiplied by the Company’s percentage membership interest in such assets).
Previous wording
•limiting the Company’s ability to fund operations or future acquisitions;
Current wording
•limiting the Company’s ability to fund operations or future investments or acquisitions;
Previous wording
•limiting the Company’s ability to obtain additional financing for working capital including collateral postings, capital expenditures, debt service requirements, acquisitions and general corporate or other purposes; and
Current wording
•limiting the Company’s ability to obtain additional financing for working capital including collateral postings, capital expenditures, debt service requirements, investments, acquisitions and general corporate or other purposes; and
Previous wording
The agreements governing the Company’s project-level financing contain financial and other restrictive covenants that limit the Company’s project subsidiaries’ ability to make distributions to the Company or otherwise engage in activities that may be in the Company’s long-term best interests. The project-level financing agreements generally prohibit distributions from the project entities to the Company unless certain specific conditions are met, including the satisfaction of certain financial ratios. The Company’s inability to satisfy certain financial covenants may prevent cash distributions by the particular project(s) to it and, the Company’s failure to comply with those and other covenants could result in an event of default which, if not cured or waived may entitle the related lenders to demand repayment or enforce their security interests, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, failure to comply with such covenants may entitle the related lenders to demand repayment and accelerate all such indebtedness. If the Company is unable to make distributions from the Company’s project-level subsidiaries, it would likely have a material adverse effect on the Company’s ability to pay dividends to holders of the Company’s common stock.
Current wording
The agreements governing the Company’s facility-level financing contain financial and other restrictive covenants that limit the Company’s operating subsidiaries’ ability to make distributions to the Company or otherwise engage in activities that may be in the Company’s long-term best interests. The facility-level financing agreements generally prohibit distributions from the operating subsidiaries to the Company unless certain specific conditions are met, including the satisfaction of certain financial ratios. The Company’s inability to satisfy certain financial covenants may prevent cash distributions by the particular operating subsidiary to it, and the Company’s failure to comply with those and other covenants could result in an event of default which, if not cured or waived, may entitle the related lenders to demand repayment or enforce their security interests, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, failure to comply with such covenants may entitle the related lenders to demand repayment and accelerate all such indebtedness. If the Company is unable to make distributions from the Company’s operating subsidiaries, it would likely have a material adverse effect on the Company’s ability to pay dividends to holders of the Company’s common stock.
Previous wording
Letter of credit facilities to support project-level contractual obligations generally have a limited term that may require future renewal, at which time the Company or relevant project-level subsidiary will need to satisfy applicable financial ratios and covenants. If the Company is unable to renew the Company’s letters of credit as expected or replace them with letters of credit under different facilities on favorable terms or at all, the Company may experience a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Furthermore, such inability may constitute a default under certain project-level financing arrangements, restrict the ability of the project-level subsidiary to make distributions to it and/or reduce the amount of cash available at such subsidiary to make distributions to the Company.
Current wording
Letter of credit facilities to support contractual obligations of operating subsidiaries generally have a limited term that may require future renewal, at which time the Company or relevant operating subsidiary will need to satisfy applicable financial ratios and covenants. If the Company is unable to renew the Company’s letters of credit as expected or replace them with letters of credit under different facilities on favorable terms or at all, the Company may experience a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Furthermore, such inability may constitute a default under certain facility-level financing arrangements, restrict the ability of the operating subsidiary to make distributions to it and/or reduce the amount of cash available at such subsidiary to make distributions to the Company.
Previous wording
In addition, the Company’s ability to arrange financing, either at the corporate level or at a non-recourse project-level subsidiary, and the costs of such capital, are dependent on numerous factors, including:
Current wording
In addition, the Company’s ability to arrange financing, either at the corporate level or at a non-recourse operating subsidiary, and the costs of such capital, are dependent on numerous factors, including:
Previous wording
•investor confidence in the Company, its partners, GIP and TotalEnergies, through CEG, the Company’s principal stockholder (on a combined voting basis), and the regional wholesale power markets;
Current wording
•investor confidence in the Company, its partners, GIP and TotalEnergies, through CEG, the Company’s principal stockholder (on a combined voting basis);
Previous wording
•maintenance of acceptable project credit ratings or credit quality;
Current wording
•maintenance of acceptable credit ratings or credit quality;
Previous wording
The Company may not be successful in obtaining additional capital for these or other reasons. Furthermore, the Company may be unable to refinance or replace project-level financing arrangements or other credit facilities on favorable terms or at all upon the expiration or termination thereof. The Company’s failure, or the failure of any of the Company’s projects, to obtain additional capital or enter into new or replacement financing arrangements when due may constitute a default under such existing indebtedness and may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Current wording
The Company may not be successful in obtaining additional capital for these or other reasons. Furthermore, the Company may be unable to refinance or replace facility-level financing arrangements or other credit facilities on favorable terms or at all upon the expiration or termination thereof. The Company’s failure, or the failure of any of the Company’s facilities, to obtain additional capital or enter into new or replacement financing arrangements when due may constitute a default under such existing indebtedness and may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Previous wording
If solar or wind conditions are unfavorable, the Company’s electricity generation and revenue from renewable generation facilities may be substantially below the Company’s expectations. The electricity produced and revenues generated by a solar or wind energy generation facility is highly dependent on suitable solar or wind conditions, as applicable, and associated weather conditions, which are beyond the Company’s control. Disruption in the generation of solar or wind energy could limit a facility’s ability to generate electricity at its desired level. Should a generation facility fail to perform at the required levels, or other unplanned disruptions occur, the facility may be forced to fulfill an underlying contractual obligation by purchasing electricity at higher prices. In addition, the Company’s facilities may be exposed, based on specific contractual terms, to a locational basis risk resulting from a difference in the price received for generation sold at the location where the power is generated and the price paid for generation purchased at the contracted delivery point, which could lead to potential lower revenues in circumstances where the price received is lower than the price that is paid. Furthermore, components of the Company’s systems, such as solar panels and inverters, could be damaged by severe weather, such as wildfires, hailstorms, lightning, tornadoes or freezing temperatures and other winter weather conditions. Unfavorable weather and atmospheric conditions could impair the effectiveness of the Company’s assets or reduce their output beneath their rated capacity or require shutdown of key equipment, impeding operation of the Company’s renewable assets. For example, in February 2021, the Company’s wind projects in Texas were unable to operate and experienced outages for a few days as a result of the extreme winter weather conditions. In addition, climate change may have the long-term effect of changing wind patterns at the Company’s projects. Changing wind patterns could cause changes in expected electricity generation. These events could also degrade equipment or components and the interconnection and transmission facilities’ lives or maintenance costs.
Current wording
If solar or wind conditions are unfavorable, the Company’s electricity generation and revenue from renewable generation facilities may be substantially below the Company’s expectations. The electricity produced and revenues generated by a solar or wind energy generation facility is highly dependent on suitable solar or wind conditions, as applicable, and associated weather conditions, which are beyond the Company’s control. Disruption in the generation of solar or wind energy could limit a facility’s ability to generate electricity at its desired level. Should a generation facility fail to perform at the required levels, or other unplanned disruptions occur, the facility may be forced to fulfill an underlying contractual obligation by purchasing electricity at higher prices. In addition, the Company’s facilities may be exposed, based on specific contractual terms, to a locational basis risk resulting from a difference in the price received for generation sold at the location where the power is generated and the price paid for generation purchased at the contracted delivery point, which could lead to potential lower revenues in circumstances where the price received is lower than the price that is paid. Furthermore, components of the Company’s systems, such as solar panels and inverters, could be damaged by severe weather, such as wildfires, hailstorms, lightning, tornadoes or freezing temperatures and other winter weather conditions. Unfavorable weather and atmospheric conditions could impair the effectiveness of the Company’s assets or reduce their output beneath their rated capacity or require shutdown of key equipment, impeding operation of the Company’s renewable energy assets. For example, in February 2021, many electricity generating assets, including the Company’s wind facilities in Texas, were unable to operate and experienced outages for a few days as a result of the extreme winter weather conditions. In addition, climate change may have the long-term effect of changing wind patterns at the Company’s facilities. Changing wind patterns could cause changes in expected electricity generation. These events could also degrade equipment or components and the interconnection and transmission facilities’ lives or maintenance costs.
Previous wording
If the Company makes any major modifications to its conventional power generation facilities, it may be required to install the best available control technology or to achieve the lowest achievable emission rates as such terms are defined under the new source review provisions of the Clean Air Act in the future. Any such modifications could likely result in substantial additional capital expenditures. The Company may also choose to repower, refurbish or upgrade its facilities based on its assessment that such activity will provide adequate financial returns. Such facilities require time for development and capital expenditures before commencement of commercial operations, and key assumptions underpinning a decision to make such an investment may prove incorrect, including assumptions regarding construction costs, timing, available financing and future fuel and power prices. These events could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Current wording
If the Company makes any major modifications to its facilities in the Flexible Generation segment, it may be required to install the best available control technology or to achieve the lowest achievable emission rates as such terms are defined under the new source review provisions of the Clean Air Act in the future. Any such modifications could result in substantial additional capital expenditures. The Company may also choose to repower, refurbish or upgrade its facilities based on its assessment that such activity will provide adequate financial returns. Such facilities require time for development and capital expenditures before commencement of commercial operations, and key assumptions underpinning a decision to make such an investment may prove incorrect, including assumptions regarding construction costs, timing, available financing and future fuel and power prices. These events could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Previous wording
Supplier and/or customer concentration at certain of the Company’s facilities may expose the Company to significant financial credit or performance risks.
Current wording
Supplier concentration at certain of the Company’s facilities and the inability of suppliers to meet their obligations may expose the Company to significant financial credit or performance risks.
Previous wording
The failure of any supplier to fulfill its contractual obligations to the Company or the Company’s loss of potential or existing customers could have a material adverse effect on its financial results. Consequently, the financial performance of the Company’s facilities is dependent on the credit quality of, and continued performance by, the Company’s suppliers and vendors and the Company’s ability to solicit and retain customers.
Current wording
The failure of any supplier to fulfill its contractual obligations to the Company could have a material adverse effect on its financial results. Consequently, the financial performance of the Company’s facilities is dependent on the credit quality of, and continued performance by, the Company’s suppliers and vendors.
Previous wording
As described in Item 15 — Note 5, Investments Accounted for by the Equity Method and Variable Interest Entities, the Company has limited control over the operation of certain of its assets, because the Company beneficially owns less than a majority of the membership interests in such assets. The Company may seek to acquire additional assets in which it owns less than a majority of the related membership interests in the future. In these investments, the Company will seek to exert a degree of influence with respect to the management and operation of assets in which it owns less than a majority of the membership interests by negotiating to obtain positions on management committees or to receive certain limited governance rights, such as rights to veto significant actions. However, the Company may not always succeed in such negotiations. The Company may be dependent on its co-venturers to operate such assets. The Company’s co-venturers may not have the level of experience, technical expertise, human resources management and other attributes necessary to operate these assets optimally. In addition, conflicts of interest may arise in the future between the Company and its stockholders, on the one hand, and the Company’s co-venturers, on the other hand, where the Company’s co-venturers’ business interests are inconsistent with the interests of the Company and its stockholders. Further, disagreements or disputes between the Company and its co-venturers could result in litigation, which could increase expenses and potentially limit the time and effort the Company’s officers and directors are able to devote to the business.
Current wording
As described in Item 15 — Note 5, Investments Accounted for by the Equity Method and Variable Interest Entities, the Company has limited control over the management and operation of certain of its assets, because the Company does not beneficially own all of the membership interests in such assets. The Company may seek to acquire additional assets in which it owns less than all of the related membership interests in the future. In these investments, the Company will seek to exert a degree of influence with respect to the management and operation of assets in which it owns less than all of the membership interests by negotiating to obtain positions on management committees or to receive certain limited governance rights, such as rights to veto significant actions. However, the Company may not always succeed in such negotiations. The Company may be dependent on its co-venturers to operate such assets. The Company’s co-venturers may not have the level of experience, technical expertise, human resources management and other attributes necessary to operate these assets optimally. In addition, conflicts of interest may arise in the future between the Company and its stockholders, on the one hand, and the Company’s co-venturers, on the other hand, where the Company’s co-venturers’ business interests are inconsistent with the interests of the Company and its stockholders. Further, disagreements or disputes between the Company and its co-venturers could result in litigation, which could increase expenses and potentially limit the time and effort the Company’s officers and directors are able to devote to the business.
Previous wording
The Company does not own all of the land on which its power generation and energy storage assets are located, which could result in disruption to its operations.
Current wording
The Company does not own all of the land on which its facilities are located, which could result in disruption to its operations.
Previous wording
The Company does not own all of the land on which its power generation and energy storage assets are located, and the Company is, therefore, subject to the possibility of less desirable terms and increased costs to retain necessary land use if it does not have valid leases or rights-of-way or if such rights-of-way lapse or terminate. Although the Company has obtained rights to construct and operate these assets pursuant to related lease arrangements, the rights to conduct those activities are subject to certain exceptions, including the term of the lease arrangement. The Company is also at risk of condemnation on land it owns. The loss of these rights, through the Company’s inability to renew right-of-way contracts, condemnation or otherwise, may adversely affect the Company’s ability to operate its assets.
Current wording
The Company does not own all of the land on which its facilities are located, and the Company is, therefore, subject to the possibility of less desirable terms and increased costs to retain necessary land use if it does not have valid leases or rights-of-way or if such rights-of-way lapse or terminate. Although the Company has obtained rights to construct and operate these assets pursuant to related lease arrangements, the rights to conduct those activities are subject to certain exceptions, including the term of the lease arrangement. The Company is also at risk of condemnation on land it owns. The loss of these rights, through the Company’s inability to renew right-of-way contracts, condemnation or otherwise, may adversely affect the Company’s ability to operate its assets.
Previous wording
The Company’s use and enjoyment of real property rights for its projects may be adversely affected by the rights of lienholders and leaseholders that are superior to those of the grantors of those real property rights to the Company.
Current wording
The Company’s use and enjoyment of real property rights for its facilities may be adversely affected by the rights of lienholders and leaseholders that are superior to those of the grantors of those real property rights to the Company.
Previous wording
Wind, solar and energy storage projects generally are, and are likely to be, located on land occupied by the project pursuant to long-term easements and leases. The ownership interests in the land subject to these easements and leases may be subject to mortgages securing loans or other liens (such as tax liens) and other easement and lease rights of third parties (such as leases of oil or mineral rights) that were created prior to the project’s easements and leases. As a result, the project’s rights under these easements or leases may be subject, and subordinate, to the rights of those third parties. The Company performs title searches and obtains title insurance to protect itself against these risks. Such measures may, however, be inadequate to protect the Company against all risk of loss of its rights to use the land on which the wind projects are located, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
Current wording
Generation facilities generally are, and are likely to be, located on land occupied by the facility pursuant to long-term easements and leases. The ownership interests in the land subject to these easements and leases may be subject to mortgages securing loans or other liens (such as tax liens) and other easement and lease rights of third parties (such as leases of oil or mineral rights) that were created prior to the facility’s easements and leases. As a result, the facility’s rights under these easements or leases may be subject, and subordinate, to the rights of those third parties. The Company performs title searches and obtains title insurance to protect itself against these risks. Such measures may, however, be inadequate to protect the Company against all risk of loss of its rights to use the land on which the wind facilities are located, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
Showing the first 40 of 81 pairs. Open the source sections for the rest.
Rearranged current paragraphs (1)
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
•investor confidence in the regional wholesale power markets;