Skip to main content

Snap Inc

For the period ended Jun 30, 2026. Filed Aug 4, 2026.

View on SEC.gov

About this filing

A company's report for each of its first three quarters. The financial statements are not audited. It shows how the business has moved since the last annual report, and what management says changed.

Jun 30, 2026 · Filed Aug 4, 2026

SNAP$5.05+1.8%Stored close · as of Nov 9, 2026

What changed in Risk Factors?

Read the current filing

Previous report: 10-Q

Period ended 2026-03-31; filed 2026-05-07.

0001564408-26-000027

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Current report: 10-Q

Period ended 2026-06-30; filed 2026-08-04.

0001564408-26-000052

Item 1A. Risk Factors

The baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.

Compared 415 previous paragraphs and 413 current paragraphs.

389 unchanged; 22 reworded; 1 added; 2 removed; 2 previous and 1 current paragraphs rearranged.

Tables are not compared: 0 previous and 0 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.

A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.

Added paragraphs (1)

Current report

In addition, we are one of several companies that have been named in various lawsuits alleging that the design and use of our platform, and those of our competitors, is addictive and harmful to users, with most of the cases focused on mental health harms and users under 18-years old. For more information on our ongoing legal proceedings, see “Part II Item 1. Legal Proceedings.” We believe we have meritorious defenses to these lawsuits, but litigation is inherently uncertain. At this early stage in the proceedings, the Company is unable to determine the probability of the outcome of these matters or the range of reasonably possible loss, if any.
Removed paragraphs (2)

Previous report

We have faced and may continue to face litigation, regulatory scrutiny, and public criticism related to the impact of our products on user well-being, particularly for younger users. These matters may relate to product design, user engagement features, or the effectiveness of our safety measures. Defending against such claims may be costly and time consuming, and could result in changes to our products, increased compliance obligations, or reputational harm. In addition, evolving laws and regulations in certain jurisdictions have restricted, and may continue to restrict or prohibit, access to our services for minors or require age verification or assurance measures, parental controls, warning labels, default settings, or other product changes that introduce friction to user access, which could reduce user growth, retention, and engagement or limit our ability to operate in certain markets. For example, we have notified regulators in the United Kingdom of our plan to test and potentially implement certain product changes that are designed to address certain regulatory concerns regarding the effectiveness of our safety measures, and may in the future from time to time make additional product changes in other jurisdictions for similar reasons to avoid potential enforcement actions. Any such product changes could decrease DAUs or user engagement in those jurisdictions, decrease our advertising and subscription revenue, increase legal risk and compliance costs for us and our third-party partners, negatively impact our reputation, and distract management, any of which could seriously harm our business.

Previous report

For example, in January 2025, the FTC referred a complaint against us to the DOJ that pertains to our deployment of our My AI feature and the allegedly resulting risk of harm to young users. The DOJ did not act on the referred complaint within the time defined by statute, thereby returning the complaint to the FTC’s jurisdiction. The FTC has not taken further action to advance the complaint, and we have no indication they will do so.
Reworded paragraphs (22)

Previous wording

We need to attract and retain a high caliber team to maintain our competitive position. We may incur significant costs and expenses in maintaining and growing our team, and may lose valuable members of our team as we compete globally, including with our competitors, for key talent. We will incur significant costs and expenses in connection with our headcount reduction and reorganization plans announced in April 2026, and such actions may negatively impact our ability to attract and retain a high caliber team. A substantial portion of our employment costs is paid in our common stock, the price of which has been volatile, and our ability to attract and retain talent may be adversely affected if our shares decline in value.

Current wording

We need to attract and retain a high caliber team to maintain our competitive position. We may incur significant costs and expenses in maintaining and growing our team, and may lose valuable members of our team as we compete globally, including with our competitors, for key talent. We have and will incur significant costs and expenses in connection with our headcount reduction and reorganization plans announced in April 2026, and such actions may negatively impact our ability to attract and retain a high caliber team. A substantial portion of our employment costs is paid in our common stock, the price of which has been volatile, and our ability to attract and retain talent may be adversely affected if our shares decline in value.

Previous wording

We had 483 million daily active users, or DAUs, on average in the quarter ended March 31, 2026. We view DAUs as a critical measure of our user engagement, and adding, maintaining, and engaging DAUs have been and will be essential to our future growth. Our DAUs and DAU growth rate have declined in the past and they may decline in the future due to various factors, including as the size of our active user base increases, as we achieve higher market penetration rates, as we face continued competition for our users and their time, or if there are performance issues with our service. In addition, as we achieve maximum market penetration rates among younger users in developed markets, future growth in DAUs will need to come from older users in those markets or from developing markets, which may not be possible or may be more difficult, expensive, or time-consuming for us to achieve. While we may experience periods when our DAUs increase due to products and services with short-term popularity, we may not always be able to attract new users, retain existing users, or maintain or increase the frequency and duration of their engagement if current or potential new users do not perceive our products to be fun, engaging, or useful. In addition, because our products typically require high bandwidth data capabilities for users to benefit from all of the features and capabilities of our application, many of our users live in countries with high-end mobile device penetration and high bandwidth capacity cellular networks with large coverage areas. We therefore do not expect to experience rapid user growth or engagement in regions with either low smartphone penetration or a lack of well-established and high bandwidth capacity cellular networks. As our DAU growth rate continues to slow or if the number of DAUs becomes stagnant, or we have a decline in DAUs, our financial performance will increasingly depend on our ability to elevate user activity or increase the monetization of our users.

Current wording

We had 493 million daily active users, or DAUs, on average in the quarter ended June 30, 2026. We view DAUs as a critical measure of our user engagement, and adding, maintaining, and engaging DAUs have been and will be essential to our future growth. Our DAUs and DAU growth rate have declined in the past and they may decline in the future due to various factors, including as the size of our active user base increases, as we achieve higher market penetration rates, as we face continued competition for our users and their time, or if there are performance issues with our service. In addition, as we achieve maximum market penetration rates among younger users in developed markets, future growth in DAUs will need to come from older users in those markets or from developing markets, which may not be possible or may be more difficult, expensive, or time-consuming for us to achieve. While we may experience periods when our DAUs increase due to products and services with short-term popularity, we may not always be able to attract new users, retain existing users, or maintain or increase the frequency and duration of their engagement if current or potential new users do not perceive our products to be fun, engaging, or useful. In addition, because our products typically require high bandwidth data capabilities for users to benefit from all of the features and capabilities of our application, many of our users live in countries with high-end mobile device penetration and high bandwidth capacity cellular networks with large coverage areas. We therefore do not expect to experience rapid user growth or engagement in regions with either low smartphone penetration or a lack of well-established and high bandwidth capacity cellular networks. As our DAU growth rate continues to slow or if the number of DAUs becomes stagnant, or we have a decline in DAUs, our financial performance will increasingly depend on our ability to elevate user activity or increase the monetization of our users.

Previous wording

Our ability to engage, retain, and increase our user base and to increase our revenue will depend heavily on our ability to successfully create new products, both independently and together with third parties. We may introduce significant changes to, or discontinue, our existing products or develop and introduce new and unproven products and services, including technologies with which we have little or no prior development or operating experience. These new products and services may fail to increase the engagement of our users, advertisers, or partners, may result in friction for our users, advertisers, or partners, may subject us to increased regulatory requirements or scrutiny, and may even result in short-term or long-term decreases in such engagement by disrupting existing user, advertiser, or partner behavior or by introducing performance and quality issues. For example, in January 2023, we made changes to our advertising platform to lay the foundation for future growth, but which have been disruptive to our customers and how some of them utilized our platform. The short- and long-term impact of any major change, or even a less significant change such as a refresh of the application or a feature change, is difficult to predict. While we believe that these decisions will benefit the aggregate user experience or improve our financial performance over the long term, we may experience disruptions or declines in our DAUs, user activity, or financial performance. Product innovation is inherently volatile, and if new or enhanced products fail to engage our users, advertisers, or partners, or if we fail to give our users meaningful reasons to return to our application, we may fail to attract or retain users or to generate sufficient revenue, operating margin, or other value to justify our investments, any of which may seriously harm our business in the short-term, long-term, or both.

Current wording

Our ability to engage, retain, and increase our user base and to increase our revenue will depend heavily on our ability to successfully create new products, both independently and together with third parties. We may introduce significant changes to, or discontinue, our existing products or develop and introduce new and unproven products and services, including technologies with which we have little or no prior development or operating experience. These new products and services may fail to increase the engagement of our users, advertisers, or partners, may result in friction for our users, advertisers, or partners, may subject us to increased regulatory requirements or scrutiny, and may even result in short-term or long-term decreases in such engagement by disrupting existing user, advertiser, or partner behavior or by introducing performance and quality issues. For example, in January 2023, we made changes to our advertising platform to lay the foundation for future growth, but which have been disruptive to our customers and how some of them utilized our platform. In addition, certain new products or features, particularly those involving public or broadly accessible communications, may also increase risks relating to harmful or objectionable content, user safety, privacy expectations, and compliance with evolving legal and regulatory requirements, which could require significant investment and adversely affect our reputation, user engagement, and business. The short- and long-term impact of any major change, or even a less significant change such as a refresh of the application or a feature change, is difficult to predict. While we believe that these decisions will benefit the aggregate user experience or improve our financial performance over the long term, we may experience disruptions or declines in our DAUs, user activity, or financial performance. Product innovation is inherently volatile, and if new or enhanced products fail to engage our users, advertisers, or partners, or if we fail to give our users meaningful reasons to return to our application, we may fail to attract or retain users or to generate sufficient revenue, operating margin, or other value to justify our investments, any of which may seriously harm our business in the short-term, long-term, or both.

Previous wording

We may not be successful in our strategy and investments for our physical products, which could seriously harm our business. We believe in computing that naturally integrates our digital experience with the physical world. We are investing in the future of augmented reality, and in 2025 we announced that we would release our next generation of Spectacles in 2026. We expect that our strategy for and investments in our physical products, including wearables and our firmware and operating system, will continue to be a complex, evolving, and a long-term initiative that will involve the development of new and emerging technologies, including reliance on and collaboration with developers and partners.

Current wording

We may not be successful in our strategy and investments for our physical products, which could seriously harm our business. We believe in computing that naturally integrates our digital experience with the physical world. We are investing in the future of augmented reality, and in June 2026, we announced SPECS, our next generation of augmented reality glasses. We expect that our strategy for and investments in our physical products, including wearables and our firmware and operating system, will continue to be a complex, evolving, and a long-term initiative that will involve the development of new and emerging technologies, including reliance on and collaboration with developers and partners. However, this ecosystem may not develop at pace with our expectations, and market acceptance and adoption of features, products, and services we build, or expect to build, is uncertain. We also regularly evaluate our product roadmaps and make strategic shifts as our understanding of the technological challenges and market landscape evolve. In addition, we have limited experience with consumer hardware products, which may allow other companies to compete more effectively than us.

Previous wording

We face significant competition in almost every aspect of our business both domestically and internationally, especially because our products and services operate across a broad list of categories, including camera, visual messaging, content, and augmented reality. Our competitors range from smaller or newer companies to larger, more established companies such as Alphabet (including Google and YouTube), Apple, ByteDance (TikTok and affiliated joint ventures), Kakao, LINE, Meta (including Facebook, Instagram, Threads, and WhatsApp), Naver (including Snow), Pinterest, Reddit, Tencent, and X (formerly Twitter). Our competitors also include platforms that offer, or will offer, a variety of products, services, content, and online advertising offerings that compete or may compete with Snapchat features or offerings. For example, Instagram, a competing application owned by Meta, has incorporated many of our features, including a “stories”

Current wording

We face significant competition in almost every aspect of our business both domestically and internationally, especially because our products and services operate across a broad list of categories, including camera, visual messaging, content, and augmented reality. Our competitors range from smaller or newer companies to larger, more established companies such as Alphabet (including Google and YouTube), Apple, ByteDance (TikTok and affiliated joint ventures),

Previous wording

feature that largely mimics our Stories feature and a map feature that is similar to our Snap Map, both of which may be directly competitive. Meta has introduced, and likely will continue to introduce, more private ephemeral products into its various platforms which mimic other aspects of Snapchat’s core use case. We also compete for users and their time, so we may lose users or their attention not only to companies that offer products and services that specifically compete with Snapchat features or offerings, but to companies with products or services that target or otherwise appeal to certain demographics, such as Discord or Roblox. Moreover, in emerging international markets, where mobile devices often lack large storage capabilities, we may compete with other applications for the limited space available on a user’s mobile device. We also face competition from traditional and online media businesses for advertising budgets. We compete broadly with the products and services of Alphabet, Apple, ByteDance, Meta, Pinterest, Reddit, and X (formerly Twitter), and with other, largely regional, social media platforms that have strong positions in particular countries. In addition, our competitors have also increasingly adopted, and may in the future adopt, subscription models and premium feature sets that compete directly with Snapchat+, Lens+, and Snapchat Platinum. If our competitors offer more attractive premium features, exclusive content, or lower-priced subscription tiers, we may struggle to convert free users to paying subscribers or retain existing subscribers, which could adversely affect our non-advertising revenue growth. As we introduce new products, as our existing products evolve, or as other companies introduce new products and services, we may become subject to additional competition.

Current wording

Kakao, LINE, Meta (including Facebook, Instagram, Threads, and WhatsApp), Naver (including Snow), Pinterest, Reddit, Tencent, and X (formerly Twitter). Our competitors also include platforms that offer, or will offer, a variety of products, services, content, and online advertising offerings that compete or may compete with Snapchat features or offerings. For example, Instagram, a competing application owned by Meta, has incorporated many of our features, including a “stories” feature that largely mimics our Stories feature and a map feature that is similar to our Snap Map, both of which may be directly competitive. Meta has introduced, and likely will continue to introduce, more private ephemeral products into its various platforms which mimic other aspects of Snapchat’s core use case. For example, Instagram has launched Instants, a disappearing-photos feature within Instagram Direct Messages, and in select markets as a standalone app, that may be directly competitive with Snapchat offerings. We also compete for users and their time, so we may lose users or their attention not only to companies that offer products and services that specifically compete with Snapchat features or offerings, but to companies with products or services that target or otherwise appeal to certain demographics, such as Discord or Roblox. Moreover, in emerging international markets, where mobile devices often lack large storage capabilities, we may compete with other applications for the limited space available on a user’s mobile device. We also face competition from traditional and online media businesses for advertising budgets. We compete broadly with the products and services of Alphabet, Apple, ByteDance, Meta, Pinterest, Reddit, and X (formerly Twitter), and with other, largely regional, social media platforms that have strong positions in particular countries. In addition, our competitors have also increasingly adopted, and may in the future adopt, subscription models and premium feature sets that compete directly with Snapchat+, Lens+, and Snapchat Platinum. If our competitors offer more attractive premium features, exclusive content, or lower-priced subscription tiers, we may struggle to convert free users to paying subscribers or retain existing subscribers, which could adversely affect our non-advertising revenue growth. As we introduce new products, as our existing products evolve, or as other companies introduce new products and services, we may become subject to additional competition.

Previous wording

We began commercial operations in 2011 and we have historically experienced net losses and negative cash flows from operations. As of March 31, 2026, we had an accumulated deficit of $14.4 billion and for the three months ended March 31, 2026, we had a net loss of $89.0 million. We expect our operating expenses to increase in the future as we expand our operations. We may incur significant losses in the future for many reasons, including due to the other risks and uncertainties described in this report. Additionally, we may encounter unforeseen expenses, operating delays, or other unknown factors that may result in losses in future periods. If our revenue does not grow at a greater rate than our expenses, our business may be seriously harmed and we may not be able to attain and sustain profitability.

Current wording

We began commercial operations in 2011 and we have historically experienced net losses and negative cash flows from operations. As of June 30, 2026, we had an accumulated deficit of $14.8 billion and for the three months ended June 30, 2026, we had a net loss of $164.0 million. We expect our operating expenses to increase in the future as we expand our operations. We may incur significant losses in the future for many reasons, including due to the other risks and uncertainties described in this report. Additionally, we may encounter unforeseen expenses, operating delays, or other unknown factors that may result in losses in future periods. If our revenue does not grow at a greater rate than our expenses, our business may be seriously harmed and we may not be able to attain and sustain profitability.

Previous wording

In the ordinary course of business, we collect, store, use, and share personal data and other sensitive information, including proprietary and confidential business data, trade secrets, third-party sensitive information, and intellectual property (collectively, sensitive information). Our efforts to protect our sensitive information, including information that our users, advertisers, and partners have shared with us, may be unsuccessful due to the actions of third parties, including traditional “black hat” hackers, nation states, nation-state supported groups, organized criminal enterprises, hacktivists, and our personnel and contractors (through theft, misuse, or other risk). We and the third parties on which we rely are subject to a variety of evolving threats, including social-engineering attacks (for example by fraudulently inducing employees, users, or advertisers to disclose information or facilitate access to our sensitive information or systems), malware, malicious code, hacking, credential stuffing, denial of service, and other threats. These attacks may use, or may be enhanced or facilitated by, artificial intelligence, including the use of image, video, or audio deepfakes, or agentic AI used to facilitate attacks or vulnerability discovery and exploitation at scale. While certain of these threats have occurred in the past, they have become more prevalent and sophisticated in our industry, and may occur in the future. Because of our prominence and value of our sensitive information, we believe that we are an attractive target for these sorts of attacks.

Current wording

In the ordinary course of business, we collect, store, use, and share personal data and other sensitive information, including proprietary and confidential business data, trade secrets, third-party sensitive information, and intellectual property (collectively, sensitive information). Our efforts to protect our sensitive information, including information that our users, advertisers, and partners have shared with us, may be unsuccessful due to the actions of third parties, including traditional “black hat” hackers, nation states, nation-state supported groups, organized criminal enterprises, hacktivists, and our personnel and contractors (through theft, misuse, or other risk). We and the third parties on which we rely are subject to a variety of evolving threats, including social-engineering attacks (for example by fraudulently inducing employees, contractors, vendors, AI agents, users, or advertisers to disclose information or facilitate access to our sensitive information or systems), malware, malicious code, hacking, credential stuffing, denial of service, and other threats. These attacks may use, or may be enhanced or facilitated by, artificial intelligence, including the use of image, video, or audio deepfakes, prompt injection or other manipulation of the inputs, instructions, or outputs of AI models, or agentic AI used to facilitate attacks or vulnerability discovery and exploitation at scale. While certain of these threats have occurred in the past, they have become more prevalent and sophisticated in our industry, and may occur in the future. Because of our prominence and value of our sensitive information, we believe that we are an attractive target for these sorts of attacks.

Previous wording

Moreover, our products and services, and the internal systems that support them and our business, rely on software, hardware, and other systems developed or maintained by our engineering teams and third parties (including open source software), and all of these have contained and will contain vulnerabilities, errors, bugs, or defects, which may or may not be detected by our teams or the respective third parties prior to our or their release, usage, or reliance on them. We also face risks from vulnerabilities, errors, bugs or defects through the use of AI to develop or maintain our software or systems and the use of AI within those software and systems, as AI models may create flawed, incomplete, or inaccurate outputs, some of which may appear correct. This may happen if the inputs that the model relied on were inaccurate, incomplete, or flawed (including if a bad actor “poisons” the AI technology with bad inputs or logic), or if the logic of the AI technology is flawed (a so-called “hallucination”). Supply chain attacks have also increased in frequency and severity, and we cannot guarantee that third parties in our supply chain have not been compromised or that their systems, networks, or code are free from exploitable vulnerabilities, errors, bugs, or defects. We take steps designed to detect and remediate vulnerabilities in our software, hardware, and information systems, and to implement patches, upgrades and fixes provided by the third parties upon which we rely, and we work with security researchers through our bug bounty program and our third party providers to help us identify vulnerabilities. However, we and our third party providers have not detected, become aware of, and remediated, and may not in the future detect, become aware of, and remediate all such vulnerabilities, or other bugs, errors, or defects, including on a timely basis, and there is no guarantee security researchers will disclose all vulnerabilities they become aware of or do so responsibly. Further, we and our third party providers have experienced, and may in the future experience, delays in developing or deploying remedial measures and patches designed to address identified vulnerabilities, bugs, errors, and defects. These could be exploited and result in a security or privacy incident, cause us to fail in our commitments to our users, advertisers, or partners, or cause a breach of or disruption of our platform, systems, networks, products, or services.

Current wording

Moreover, our products and services, and the internal systems that support them and our business, rely on software, hardware, and other systems developed or maintained by our engineering teams and third parties (including open source software), and all of these have contained and will contain vulnerabilities, errors, bugs, or defects, which may or may not be detected by our teams or the respective third parties prior to our or their release, usage, or reliance on them. We also face risks from vulnerabilities, errors, bugs or defects through the use of AI to develop or maintain our software or systems and the use of AI within those software and systems, including AI agents and AI-generated code, as AI models may create flawed, incomplete, or inaccurate outputs, some of which may appear correct. This may happen if the inputs that the model relied on were inaccurate, incomplete, or flawed (including if a bad actor “poisons” the AI technology with bad inputs or logic), or if the logic of the AI technology is flawed (a so-called “hallucination”). Supply chain attacks have also increased in frequency and severity, and we cannot guarantee that third parties in our supply chain have not been compromised or that their systems, networks, or code are free from exploitable vulnerabilities, errors, bugs, or defects. In addition, rapid advances in AI have enabled the discovery of security vulnerabilities at increased speed and scale across our industry, which may outpace our or third parties' ability to remediate them, and our development and deployment of AI models and AI agents may expose us and our users to the compromise of data, systems, or valuable intellectual property, including source code, model weights, and other proprietary assets. We take steps designed to detect and remediate vulnerabilities in our software, hardware, and information systems, and to implement patches, upgrades and fixes provided by the third parties upon which we rely, and we work with security researchers through our bug bounty program and our third party providers to help us identify vulnerabilities. However, we and our third party providers have not detected, become aware of, and remediated, and may not in the future detect, become aware of, and remediate all such vulnerabilities, or other bugs, errors, or defects, including on a timely basis, and there is no guarantee security researchers will disclose all vulnerabilities they become aware of or do so responsibly. Further, we and our third party providers have experienced, and may in the future experience, delays in developing or deploying remedial measures and patches designed to address identified vulnerabilities, bugs, errors, and defects. These could be exploited and result in a security or privacy incident, cause us to fail in our commitments to our users, advertisers, or partners, or cause a breach of or disruption of our platform, systems, networks, products, or services.

Previous wording

Legislation in certain of the countries in which we operate has imposed extensive obligations, and potential monetary fines, on entities like us that are categorized in various contexts as online service providers (including, as the case may be, social media platforms, electronic communications providers, interactive computer services, or other similar categorizations) who enable the sharing of user‑generated content, to identify, mitigate, manage, and in some cases prevent the risks of harm to users, including from illegal or harmful content (like terrorism) or behavior, child sexual exploitation and abuse, physical violence, bullying, and harassment or stalking. In addition, the privacy of teens’ personal data collected online, and use of commercial websites, applications, online services, or other interactive platforms, generally, are also becoming increasingly scrutinized. Numerous laws, regulations, and legally-binding codes focused on online safety and protection of teens’ privacy online have and may in the future require us to materially change our services and incur costs to do so. Moreover, various laws to restrict or govern the use of commercial websites, applications, online services, or other interactive platforms by teens have been proposed, passed, and implemented, including laws prohibiting certain teen age groups from accessing online services, including social media, restricting advertising to teens, requiring various levels of age assurance or verification, requiring default safeguards and imposing an express or implied duty of care, requiring warning labels or time-based access restrictions, requiring age ratings for purchases of our products and services, limiting the use and sharing of minors’ personal data, and requiring parental consent or attestation or providing for other parental controls or rights. For example, in December 2025, Australia implemented the Australia Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Act 2024, which prohibits social media accounts for minors under 16. These laws may be, or in some cases already have been, subject to legal challenges and changing interpretations, which may further complicate our efforts to comply with laws applicable to us. These new laws may result in restrictions on the use of certain of our products or services by teens, result in the inability to offer certain products and services to teens, cause significant friction when teens try to access or use our products and services, require us to implement age assurance, parental consent, parental controls, age-rating, or other age-based access restrictions that may be costly, inaccurate, or unpopular. We are also subject to an investigation by the European Commission under the European Union Digital Services Act (DSA), which includes scrutiny of Snapchat’s systemic risk assessments and related mitigation measures concerning the protection of minors. If thee measures we have implemented, or may be required to implement prove i…

Excerpt shortened here; the source contains the full paragraph.

Current wording

Legislation in certain of the countries in which we operate has imposed extensive obligations, and potential monetary fines, on entities like us that are categorized in various contexts as online service providers (including, as the case may be, social media platforms, electronic communications providers, interactive computer services, or other similar categorizations) who enable the sharing of user‑generated content, to identify, mitigate, manage, and in some cases prevent the risks of harm to users, including from illegal or harmful content (like terrorism) or behavior, child sexual exploitation and abuse, physical violence, bullying, and harassment or stalking. In addition, the privacy of teens’ personal data collected online, and use of commercial websites, applications, online services, or other interactive platforms, generally, are also becoming increasingly scrutinized. Numerous laws, regulations, and legally-binding codes focused on online safety and protection of teens’ privacy online have and may in the future require us to materially change our services and incur costs to do so. Moreover, various laws to restrict or govern the use of commercial websites, applications, online services, or other interactive platforms by teens have been proposed, passed, and implemented, including laws prohibiting certain teen age groups from accessing online services, including social media, restricting advertising to teens, requiring various levels of age assurance or verification, requiring default safeguards and imposing an express or implied duty of care, requiring warning labels or time-based access restrictions, requiring age ratings for purchases of our products and services, limiting the use and sharing of minors’ personal data, and requiring parental consent or attestation or providing for other parental controls or rights. For example, in December 2025, Australia implemented the Australia Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Act 2024, which prohibits social media accounts for minors under 16. These laws may be, or in some cases already have been, subject to legal challenges and changing interpretations, which may further complicate our efforts to comply with laws applicable to us. These new laws may result in restrictions on the use of certain of our products or services by teens, result in the inability to offer certain products and services to teens, cause significant friction when teens try to access or use our products and services, require us to implement age assurance, parental consent, parental controls, age-rating, or other age-based access restrictions that may be costly, inaccurate, or unpopular. We are also subject to an investigation by the European Commission under the DSA, which includes scrutiny of Snap’s compliance with the DSA, including systemic risk assessments and related mitigation measures concerning the protection of minors, and other compliance areas such as the reporting of illegal content. In addition, we…

Excerpt shortened here; the source contains the full paragraph.

Previous wording

We have in the past been subject to enforcement actions, investigations, proceedings, orders, or various government inquiries regarding our data privacy and security practices and processing. For example, in December 2014, the FTC resolved an investigation into some of our early practices by issuing a final order. That order requires, among other things, that we establish a robust privacy program to govern how we treat user data. During the 20-year term of the order, we must complete biennial independent privacy audits. The FTC has continued to review our practices and in January 2025, announced the referral of a complaint to the Department of Justice, or DOJ, pertaining to our deployment of our My AI feature and the allegedly resulting risk of harm to young users. The DOJ did not take action on the referred complaint within the time defined by statute for the DOJ, thereby returning the complaint to the FTC’s jurisdiction. To date, the FTC has not taken further action on the complaint, and we have no indication they will do so. Any violation of existing or future regulatory orders or consent decrees could subject us to substantial monetary fines and other penalties that could seriously harm our business. Following our designation as a very large online platform under the DSA in 2023, in March 2026, the European Commission opened formal proceedings to investigate our compliance with certain obligations under the DSA, including with respect to systemic risk assessments and related mitigation measures and protections for minors on Snapchat in the European Union. This investigation is at an early stage and we are cooperating with the European Commission, but it may result in findings that we have not complied with the DSA, the imposition of significant fines, and orders requiring us to implement additional or different measures, modify or cease certain product features or practices in the European Union, or otherwise change our business practices. Any such outcomes, or similar future investigations, could increase our compliance and operational costs, limit our ability to process personal data or offer certain features in affected markets, reduce user growth, retention, or engagement, or otherwise materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and reputation.

Current wording

We have in the past been subject to enforcement actions, investigations, proceedings, orders, or various government inquiries regarding our data privacy and security practices and processing. For example, in December 2014, the FTC resolved an investigation into some of our early practices by issuing a final order. That order requires, among other things, that we establish a robust privacy program to govern how we treat user data. During the 20-year term of the order, we must complete biennial independent privacy audits. Any violation of existing or future regulatory orders or consent decrees could subject us to substantial monetary fines and other penalties that could seriously harm our business. Following our designation as a very large online platform under the DSA in 2023, in March 2026, the European Commission opened formal proceedings to investigate our compliance with certain obligations under the DSA, including with respect to systemic risk assessments and related mitigation measures and protections for minors on Snapchat in the European Union. This investigation is at an early stage and we are cooperating with the European Commission, but it may result in findings that we have not complied with the DSA, the imposition of significant fines, and orders requiring us to implement additional or different measures, modify or cease certain product features or practices in the European Union, or otherwise change our business practices. Any such outcomes, or similar future investigations, could increase our compliance and operational costs, limit our ability to process personal data or offer certain features in affected markets, reduce user growth, retention, or engagement, or otherwise materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and reputation.

Previous wording

We are also increasingly using third party AI platforms and tools, and open source AI to operate and accelerate our business. Because the development of AI tools for business, both internally and at our third party partners, is operating at an accelerated pace, and AI requires access and connections to large volumes of data (including sensitive information), we could experience misconfigurations, errors, bug, vulnerabilities, privacy incidents, security incidents, and AI-specific risks like prompt injection, all of which could result in litigation, regulatory investigations, or enforcements, and require us to expend significant resources, all of which could seriously harm our business. There is also no guarantee that these AI platforms and tools will provide the intended benefits to our business.

Current wording

We are also increasingly using third party AI platforms and tools, and open source AI to operate and accelerate our business. These third-party AI models, tools, and components may contain vulnerabilities or be compromised before or after integration, and we have limited visibility over their development, training, and security practices, such that a security failure in any one of them could have cascading effects across our products and systems. Because the development of AI tools for business, both internally and at our third party partners, is operating at an accelerated pace, and AI requires access and connections to large volumes of data (including sensitive information), we could experience misconfigurations, errors, bug, vulnerabilities, privacy incidents, security incidents, and AI-specific risks like prompt injection, all of which could result in litigation, regulatory investigations, or enforcements, and require us to expend significant resources, all of which could seriously harm our business. There is also no guarantee that these AI platforms and tools will provide the intended benefits to our business. We may also become operationally dependent on AI-enabled or agentic workflows used in our internal operations and product development. Because these tools may require access to large volumes of data and internal systems, they may take unintended actions, create unintended data movement or execution paths, or otherwise disrupt important workflows, including in ways that are difficult to predict, monitor, or remediate. In addition, if third-party AI providers change pricing, functionality, availability, security posture, or contractual terms, or if workflows tied to individual personnel access are not effectively transitioned, we may incur significant costs and business disruption in migrating, replacing, or decommissioning related workflows.

Previous wording

In the past, we have experienced, and we expect that we will continue to experience, media, legislative, and regulatory scrutiny. Negative public perception regarding us (including regarding our privacy or security practices, products, corporate viewpoints, illicit use of our products, litigation, or employee matters, or regarding the actions of our founders, our partners, our users, or other companies in our industry) or unfavorable legislative, litigation, or regulatory actions could seriously harm our reputation and brand, and result in decreased revenue, fewer application installs (or increased application un-installs), or declining engagement or growth rates. For example, new laws may increase the minimum age at which individuals are able to access our products or require parental consent for the use of our products. In addition, parental or general public perception of our industry or Snapchat in particular could adversely affect the size, demographics, engagement, and loyalty of our user base, any of which could seriously harm our business.

Current wording

In the past, we have experienced, and we expect that we will continue to experience, media, legislative, and regulatory scrutiny. Negative public perception regarding us (including regarding our privacy or security practices, products, corporate viewpoints, illicit use of our products, litigation, or employee matters, or regarding the actions of our founders, our partners, our users, or other companies in our industry) or unfavorable legislative, litigation, or regulatory actions could seriously harm our reputation and brand, and result in decreased revenue, fewer application installs (or increased application un-installs), or declining engagement or growth rates. For example, we are currently facing several lawsuits alleging that we are liable for allowing users, including minors, to communicate with each other or criminal offenders, and that those communications sometimes result in harm. We have also received and expect to continue to receive a high degree of media coverage alleging the use of our products for illicit or objectionable ends. Parental or general public perception of our industry or Snapchat in particular could adversely affect the size, demographics, engagement, and loyalty of our user base, any of which could seriously harm our business.

Previous wording

Our products are highly technical and complex. Snapchat, our other products, or products we may introduce in the future, may contain undetected software bugs, hardware errors, and other vulnerabilities. These bugs and errors can manifest in any number of ways in our products, including through diminished performance, security, privacy, or safety vulnerabilities, malfunctions, regulatory violations, or even permanently disabled products. We have a practice of updating our products, but some errors in our products may be discovered only after a product has been released or shipped and used by users, and may in some cases be detected only under certain circumstances or after extended use. As we release Spectacles to a wider user base, we may also experience at scale new, novel, or unknown security bugs, vulnerabilities, and attacks in first and third party software, hardware, and components, which we may not be able to identify, prevent, or fix before or in a timely fashion after launch. Any errors, bugs, or vulnerabilities discovered in our products or code (particularly after release) could damage our reputation, result in a security, privacy, or safety incident (and attendant consequences), drive away users, lower revenue, and expose us to litigation claims or regulatory investigations or enforcement actions, any of which could seriously harm our business. We may also experience delays in developing and deploying remedial measures and patches designed to address identified vulnerabilities.

Current wording

Our products are highly technical and complex. Snapchat, our other products, or products we may introduce in the future, may contain undetected software bugs, hardware errors, and other vulnerabilities. These bugs and errors can manifest in any number of ways in our products, including through diminished performance, security, privacy, or safety vulnerabilities, malfunctions, regulatory violations, or even permanently disabled products. We have a practice of updating our products, but some errors in our products may be discovered only after a product has been released or shipped and used by users, and may in some cases be detected only under certain circumstances or after extended use. As we release SPECS to a wider user base, we may also experience at scale new, novel, or unknown security bugs, vulnerabilities, and attacks in first and third party software, hardware, and components, which we may not be able to identify, prevent, or fix before or in a timely fashion after launch. Any errors, bugs, or vulnerabilities discovered in our products or code (particularly after release) could damage our reputation, result in a security, privacy, or safety incident (and attendant consequences), drive away users, lower revenue, and expose us to litigation claims or regulatory investigations or enforcement actions, any of which could seriously harm our business. We may also experience delays in developing and deploying remedial measures and patches designed to address identified vulnerabilities.

Previous wording

Spectacles, as an eyewear product, is regulated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or the FDA, and other regulatory agencies around the world, and may, as a result of a defect, result in physical harm to a user or others around the user. We offer some of our customers a limited warranty for our physical products, and any such defects discovered in our products after commercial release could result in costly remedial action and a loss of sales and users, which could seriously harm our business. Moreover, certain jurisdictions in which we operate require manufacturers of connected devices to comply with legal and contractual obligations that govern the way data generated by such connected devices is shared and used. If we are unable to comply with these and other regulatory requirements affecting our products in a timely manner, or if we face technical difficulties in the implementation of some requirements, we could become subject to investigations and enforcement actions, which could require additional financial and management resources, any may result in costly sanctions against our company.

Current wording

SPECS, as an eyewear product, is regulated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or the FDA, and other regulatory agencies around the world, and may, as a result of a defect, result in physical harm to a user or others around the user. We offer some of our customers a limited warranty for our physical products, and any such defects discovered in our products after commercial release could result in costly remedial action and a loss of sales and users, which could seriously harm our business. Moreover, certain jurisdictions in which we operate require manufacturers of connected devices to comply with legal and contractual obligations that govern the way data generated by such connected devices is shared and used. If we are unable to comply with these and other regulatory requirements affecting our products in a timely manner, or if we face technical difficulties in the implementation of some requirements, we could become subject to investigations and enforcement actions, which could require additional financial and management resources, any may result in costly sanctions against our company.

Previous wording

Notwithstanding these Constitutional, statutory, and common-law protections, we have faced, currently face, and will continue to face claims relating to information that is published or made available on our products, including Snapchat, and claims relating to online and offline harms that allegedly related to users’ use of our products, including Snapchat. In particular, the nature of our business exposes us to claims related to defamation, intellectual property rights, rights of publicity and privacy, mass torts, and personal injury. For example, we do not monitor or edit the vast majority of content that is communicated through Snapchat, and such content has, and may in the future, expose us to lawsuits. Specifically, we are currently facing several lawsuits alleging that we are liable for allowing users to communicate with each other, and that those communications sometimes result in harm. In addition, other lawsuits allege that the design of our platform and those of our competitors are addictive and harmful to minor users’ mental health. Other plaintiffs have argued that we should be legally responsible for fentanyl overdoses or poisoning if communications about a drug transaction occurred on our platform, or for sexual exploitation if communications relating to that exploitation occurred on our platform. We believe we have meritorious defenses to these lawsuits, but litigation is inherently uncertain. Some of our competitors are involved in similar lawsuits and have been subject to jury verdicts of liability at the trial court level. For example, in March 2026, a jury found Meta and YouTube liable for harm caused to a minor by the design of their products, and ordered the companies to pay a combined $6 million in damages. Unfavorable outcomes could seriously harm our business. These actions, including any potential unfavorable outcomes, and our compliance with any associated court orders or settlements, may require us to change our policies, practices, or products, subject us to substantial monetary judgments, fines, penalties, or sanctions, result in increased operating costs, divert management’s attention, harm our reputation, and require us to incur significant legal and other expenses, any of which could seriously harm our business. Even if the outcome of any such litigation or claim is favorable, defending against such lawsuits is costly and can impose a significant burden on management and employees. We may also receive unfavorable preliminary, interim, or final rulings in the course of litigation.

Current wording

Notwithstanding these Constitutional, statutory, and common-law protections, we have faced, currently face, and will continue to face claims relating to information that is published or made available on our products, including Snapchat, and claims relating to online and offline harms that allegedly related to users’ use of our products, including Snapchat. In particular, the nature of our business exposes us to claims related to defamation, intellectual property rights, rights of publicity and privacy, mass torts, public nuisance, unfair and deceptive business practices, unjust enrichment, and personal injury. For example, we do not monitor or edit the vast majority of content that is communicated through Snapchat, and such content has, and may in the future, expose us to lawsuits. Specifically, we are currently facing several lawsuits alleging that we are liable for allowing users to communicate with each other, and that those communications sometimes result in harm. For example, some of those plaintiffs have argued that we should be legally responsible for fentanyl overdoses or poisoning if communications about a drug transaction occurred on our platform, or for sexual exploitation if communications relating to that exploitation occurred on our platform.

Previous wording

European Union passed a directive expanding online platform liability for copyright infringement and regulating certain uses of news content online, which member states were required to implement by June 2021. In addition, legislation in Germany may impose significant fines for failure to comply with certain content removal and disclosure obligations. Numerous other countries in Europe, the Middle East, Asia-Pacific, and Latin America are considering or have implemented similar legislation imposing penalties for failure to remove certain types of content or follow certain processes.

Current wording

This risk also exists in certain jurisdictions outside the United States where our protection from liability for certain third-party actions may be less than the protection that exists in the United States. For example, in April 2019, the European Union passed a directive expanding online platform liability for copyright infringement and regulating certain uses of news content online, which member states were required to implement by June 2021. In addition, legislation in Germany may impose significant fines for failure to comply with certain content removal and disclosure obligations. Numerous other countries in Europe, the Middle East, Asia-Pacific, and Latin America are considering or have implemented similar legislation imposing penalties for failure to remove certain types of content or follow certain processes.

Previous wording

Similarly, because we have a large number of stockholders, class action lawsuits on securities theories typically claim enormous monetary damages in the aggregate even if the alleged loss per stockholder is small. For example, in November 2021, we, and certain of our officers, were named as defendants in a securities class action lawsuit in federal court purportedly brought on behalf of purchasers of our Class A common stock. The lawsuit alleges that we and certain of our officers made false or misleading statements and omissions concerning the impact that Apple’s App Tracking Transparency, or ATT, framework would have on our business. This lawsuit was recently settled, although that settlement is subject to court approval. If the settlement is not approved, we will continue to litigate the case. In August 2025, we, and certain of our officers, were named as defendants in a federal securities class action lawsuit in federal court purportedly brought on behalf of purchasers of our Class A common stock. The lawsuit alleges that we and certain of our officers made false or misleading statements concerning an ad platform change that impacted revenue in the first half of 2025.

Current wording

Similarly, because we have a large number of stockholders, class action lawsuits on securities theories typically claim enormous monetary damages in the aggregate even if the alleged loss per stockholder is small. For example, in August 2025, we, and certain of our officers, were named as defendants in a federal securities class action lawsuit in federal court purportedly brought on behalf of purchasers of our Class A common stock. The lawsuit alleges that we and certain of our officers made false or misleading statements concerning an ad platform change that impacted revenue in the first half of 2025. This lawsuit was voluntarily dismissed but could be re-filed.

Previous wording

Under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, we review our intangible assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. Goodwill is required to be tested for impairment at least annually. As of March 31, 2026, we had recorded a total of $1.8 billion of goodwill and intangible assets, net related to our acquisitions. An adverse change in market conditions, particularly if such change has the effect of changing one of our critical assumptions or estimates, could result in a change to the estimation of fair value that could result in an impairment charge to our goodwill or intangible assets. Any such material charges may seriously harm our business.

Current wording

Under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, we review our intangible assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. Goodwill is required to be tested for impairment at least annually. As of June 30, 2026, we had recorded a total of $1.9 billion of goodwill and intangible assets, net related to our acquisitions. An adverse change in market conditions, particularly if such change has the effect of changing one of our critical assumptions or estimates, could result in a change to the estimation of fair value that could result in an impairment charge to our goodwill or intangible assets. Any such material charges may seriously harm our business.

Previous wording

The FDA and other state and foreign regulatory agencies regulate Spectacles. We may develop future products that are regulated as medical devices by the FDA or regulated by other governmental authorities around the world. Government authorities, primarily the FDA and corresponding regulatory agencies, regulate the medical device industry. Unless there is an exemption, we must obtain regulatory approval from the FDA and potentially from corresponding agencies, or other applicable governmental authorities around the world, before we can market or sell a new regulated product or make a significant modification to an existing product. Obtaining regulatory clearances to market a medical device or other regulated products can be costly and time-consuming, and we may not be able to obtain these clearances or approvals on a timely basis, or at all, for future products. Any delay in, or failure to receive or maintain, clearance or approval for any products under development could prevent us from launching new products. We could seriously harm our business and the ability to sell our products if we experience any product problems requiring reporting to governmental authorities, requiring corrective action in the field, or involving interruption in supply. Our business could be seriously harmed if we fail to comply with applicable federal, state, or foreign agency regulations, or if we are subject to enforcement actions such as fines, civil penalties, injunctions, mandatory product recalls, or failure to obtain regulatory clearances or approvals.

Current wording

The Federal Communications Commission or the FCC, FDA and other state and foreign regulatory agencies regulate SPECS. We may develop future products that are regulated as radiofrequency devices by the FCC, regulated as medical devices by the FDA or regulated by other governmental authorities around the world. Government authorities, primarily the FDA and corresponding regulatory agencies, regulate the medical device industry and other government authorities, primarily the FCC and corresponding regulatory agencies, regulate devices that emit radiofrequency radiation. Unless there is an exemption, we must obtain regulatory approval from the FCC and FDA and potentially from corresponding agencies, or other applicable governmental authorities around the world, before we can market or sell a new regulated product or make a significant modification to an existing product. Obtaining regulatory clearances to market a medical device or other regulated products can be costly and time-consuming, and we may not be able to obtain these clearances or approvals on a timely basis, or at all, for future products. Any delay in, or failure to receive or maintain, clearance or approval for any products under development could prevent us from launching new products. We could seriously harm our business and the ability to sell our products if we experience any product problems requiring reporting to governmental authorities, requiring corrective action in the field, or involving interruption in supply. Our business could be seriously harmed if we fail to comply with applicable federal, state, or foreign agency regulations, or if we are subject to enforcement actions such as fines, civil penalties, injunctions, mandatory product recalls, or failure to obtain regulatory clearances or approvals.

Previous wording

In addition, many jurisdictions and intergovernmental organizations have implemented or are in the process of implementing proposals that have changed (or are likely to change) various aspects of the existing framework under which our tax obligations are determined in many of the jurisdictions in which we do business and in which our users are located. Some jurisdictions have enacted, in some cases with retroactive effect, and others have proposed, taxes on digital services that are based on gross receipts generated from, or other metrics relating to, users or customers in those jurisdictions, regardless of profitability. In addition, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, or the OECD, has led international efforts to devise and implement a two-pillar solution to address the tax challenges arising from the digitalization of the economy. The implementation of this solution involves, among other measures, the imposition of a minimum effective tax rate on certain multinational enterprises, referred to as Pillar Two. A number of countries, including the United Kingdom, have enacted legislation to implement core elements of Pillar Two, and further implementation is ongoing. The OECD has issued (and is expected to continue to issue further) administrative guidance providing transition and safe harbor rules in relation to the implementation of Pillar Two. For example, in January 2026, the OECD published details of a proposed “side-by-side” arrangement providing for, among other things, additional safe harbors for multinational groups headquartered in certain qualifying jurisdictions. While the Pillar Two rules have not yet resulted in a material change to our income tax provision, their ongoing implementation could, subject to our eligibility to qualify for any safe harbor rules (including under the proposed “side-by-side” arrangement), impact the amount of tax we have to pay and cause us to incur additional material costs and expenditures in the future to ensure compliance with any such rules in each of the relevant jurisdictions within which we carry on our business.

Current wording

In addition, many jurisdictions and intergovernmental organizations have implemented or are in the process of implementing proposals that have changed (or are likely to change) various aspects of the existing framework under which our tax obligations are determined in many of the jurisdictions in which we do business and in which our users are located. In addition, tax authorities may seek to apply existing indirect tax regimes, including sales, use, or value-added taxes, to digital advertising, software, or platform activities in novel or expansive ways. Some jurisdictions have enacted, in some cases with retroactive effect, and others have proposed, taxes on digital services that are based on gross receipts generated from, or other metrics relating to, users or customers in those jurisdictions, regardless of profitability. In addition, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, or the OECD, has led international efforts to devise and implement a two-pillar solution to address the tax challenges arising from the digitalization of the economy. The implementation of this solution involves, among other measures, the imposition of a minimum effective tax rate on certain multinational enterprises, referred to as Pillar Two. A number of countries, including the United Kingdom, have enacted legislation to implement core elements of Pillar Two, and further implementation is ongoing. The OECD has issued (and is expected to continue to issue further) administrative guidance providing transition and safe harbor rules in relation to the implementation of Pillar Two. For example, in January 2026, the OECD published details of a “side-by-side” arrangement providing for, among other things, additional safe harbors for multinational groups headquartered in certain qualifying jurisdictions, subject to eligibility requirements and implementation by relevant jurisdictions. While the Pillar Two rules have not yet resulted in a material change to our income tax provision, their ongoing implementation could, subject to our eligibility to qualify for any safe harbor rules (including under the “side-by-side” arrangement), impact the amount of tax we have to pay and cause us to incur additional material costs and expenditures in the future to ensure compliance with any such rules in each of the relevant jurisdictions within which we carry on our business.

Previous wording

We currently collect and remit sales and use, value added and other transaction taxes in certain of the jurisdictions where we do business based on our assessment of the amount of taxes owed by us in such jurisdictions. However, in some jurisdictions in which we do business, we do not believe that we owe such taxes, and therefore we currently do not collect and remit such taxes in those jurisdictions or record contingent tax liabilities in respect of those jurisdictions. A successful assertion that we are required to pay additional taxes in connection with sales of our products and solutions, or the imposition of new laws or regulations or the interpretation of existing laws and regulations requiring the payment of additional taxes, would result in increased costs and administrative burdens for us. If we are subject to additional taxes, including digital services taxes, and determine to offset such increased costs by collecting and remitting such taxes from our customers, or otherwise passing those costs through to our customers, companies may be discouraged from purchasing our products and solutions. Any increased tax burden may decrease our ability or willingness to compete in relatively burdensome tax jurisdictions, result in substantial tax liabilities related to past or future sales or otherwise seriously harm our business.

Current wording

We currently collect and remit sales and use, value added and other transaction taxes in certain of the jurisdictions where we do business based on our assessment of the amount of taxes owed by us in such jurisdictions. However, in some jurisdictions in which we do business, we do not believe that we owe such taxes, and therefore we currently do not collect and remit such taxes in those jurisdictions or record contingent tax liabilities in respect of those jurisdictions. A successful assertion that we are required to pay additional taxes in connection with sales of our products and solutions, or the imposition of new laws or regulations or the interpretation of existing laws and regulations requiring the payment of additional taxes, would result in increased costs and administrative burdens for us. If we are subject to additional taxes, including digital services taxes, and determine to offset such increased costs by collecting and remitting such taxes from our customers, or otherwise passing those costs through to our customers, companies may be discouraged from purchasing our products and solutions. Any increased tax burden may decrease our ability or willingness to operate in relatively burdensome tax jurisdictions, result in substantial tax liabilities related to past or future sales or otherwise seriously harm our business.
Rearranged current paragraphs (1)

Current report — wording carried from elsewhere

Some of our competitors are involved in similar lawsuits and have been subject to jury verdicts of liability at the trial court level. For example, in March 2026, a jury found Meta and YouTube liable for harm caused to a minor by the design of their products, and ordered the companies to pay a combined $6 million in damages. Also, in March 2026, a jury found Meta liable for $375 million in damages in a lawsuit brought by the New Mexico attorney general under state consumer protection laws for misleading consumers about the safety of its platform and endangering children. A bench trial followed for public nuisance, abatement and injunctive relief. Unfavorable outcomes could seriously harm our business. Additionally, the actions of certain participants in our industry may encourage or affect legal proceedings against us or cause us to reconsider our litigation strategies. These actions, including any potential unfavorable outcomes, and our compliance with any associated court orders or settlements, may require us to change our policies, practices, or products, subject us to substantial monetary judgments, fines, penalties, or sanctions, result in increased operating costs, divert management’s attention, harm our reputation, and require us to incur significant legal and other expenses, any of which could seriously harm our business. Even if the outcome of any such litigation or claim is favorable, defending against such lawsuits is costly and can impose a significant burden on management and employees. We may also receive unfavorable preliminary, interim, or final rulings in the course of litigation.
Rearranged previous paragraphs (2)

Previous report — wording carried elsewhere

However, this ecosystem may not develop at pace with our expectations, and market acceptance and adoption of features, products, and services we build, or expect to build, is uncertain. We also regularly evaluate our product roadmaps and make strategic shifts as our understanding of the technological challenges and market landscape evolve. In addition, we have limited experience with consumer hardware products, which may allow other companies to compete more effectively than us.

Previous report — wording carried elsewhere

This risk also exists in certain jurisdictions outside the United States where our protection from liability for certain third-party actions may be less than the protection that exists in the United States. For example, in April 2019, the