Solid Power, Inc.

Current report

We rely on government contracts and grants for a portion of our revenue and to partially fund our research and development activities, and such contracts and grants are subject to a number of uncertainties, challenges, and risks.

Current report

We currently rely on government contracts and grants for a portion of our revenue and to partially fund our research and development activities. For example, the Assistance Agreement provides that DOE will provide us with funding of up to $50 million for our installation of equipment necessary for the continuous production of sulfide-based solid electrolyte material. Changes in government priorities or government funding reductions or delays could result in discontinuation of funding under, or termination of, our government contracts and grants. Further, the change in administration could increase this risk. On January 20, 2025, an executive order, titled Unleashing American Energy (the “Executive Order”), paused disbursement of funds appropriated through the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law pending further review. Because the Assistance Agreement is funded under the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, our

Current report

continued receipt of funding under the Assistance agreement could be delayed or cancelled. In addition, the Executive Order declared a policy of eliminating the “electric vehicle (EV) mandate.” The government has discretion under the terms of the Assistance Agreement to discontinue future funding as the result of insufficient progress, change in strategic direction, or lack of available funding. The government could determine that the Assistance Agreement no longer effectuates DOE priorities, interpret the terms of the Assistance Agreement to permit termination for this reason, and terminate the agreement. There can be no assurance that we will continue to receive funding under our government contracts and grants in the amounts that we expect or at all.

Current report

Further, as a government contractor or subcontractor, we must comply with laws, regulations, and contractual provisions relating to the formation, administration, and performance of government contracts and grants, which may impose added costs on our business. Although our management team and other personnel devote a substantial amount of time to compliance initiatives, we cannot guarantee that our efforts will be successful. Any failure to comply with such laws, regulations, and provisions or satisfy our obligations under such contracts and grants could lead to termination of contract; civil or criminal penalties; withholding, delay, or disallowance of payments to us; reimbursement of the government for amounts previously received; claims for damages from our partners; contract price adjustments or refunds; suspension or debarment from obtaining government contracts and grants; or non-ordinary course audits and internal investigations, any one of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, results of operations, and financial condition.

Current report

Obtaining grant funding and selling to government entities can be highly competitive, expensive, and time consuming, often requiring significant upfront time and expense without any assurance of success. Awards of contracts and grants may be subject to appeals, disputes, or litigation. Government contracts also often contain provisions and are subject to laws and regulations that provide government customers with additional rights and remedies not typically found in commercial contracts. For example, government customers may terminate existing contracts for convenience, with short notice, and without cause. Government contracts may also require work to be performed or products to be manufactured in a particular jurisdiction, include preferential pricing terms, or require us to obtain special certifications. If such certification requirements change or we fail to timely achieve or maintain compliance with applicable requirements, we may be at a competitive disadvantage and disqualified from selling our technology to government or quasi-government entities.

Current report

In addition to government contracts and grants, we benefit from certain government subsidies and economic incentives, including tax credits, rebates, and other incentives, that support the development and adoption of clean energy technology. We cannot guarantee that government grants, subsidies, and incentives will be available to us at the same or comparable levels in the future. The Executive Order indicated that the government will consider eliminating subsidies that favor EVs. Further, the reconciliation bill, commonly referred to as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (“OBBBA”) was signed into law on January 4, 2025 and eliminates certain EV incentives effective September 30, 2025. Any reduction, elimination, or discriminatory application of these grants, subsidies, or incentives, including as a result of the OBBBA, may require us to seek additional financing, which may not be obtainable on commercially attractive terms or at all; adversely impact public sector demand for our technology; and diminish the competitiveness of the battery industry generally or our technology in particular. Any change in our ability to secure these grants, subsidies, and incentives, including as a result of the OBBBA, could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, results of operations, and financial condition.

Current report

Our future growth and success are dependent upon consumers’ willingness to adopt EVs.

Current report

Our growth and future demand for our products are highly dependent upon the adoption by consumers of alternative fuel vehicles in general and EVs in particular. The market for new energy vehicles is still rapidly evolving, characterized by changing technologies, competitive pricing and factors, evolving government regulation and industry standards, and changing consumer demands and behaviors. For example, the federal government has eliminated certain subsidies that favor EVs, which could adversely impact demand for our technology. If the market for EVs in general does not develop as expected, or develops more slowly than expected, our business, prospects, results of operation, and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.

Current report

Our ability to utilize any net operating losses or tax credit carryforwards to offset taxable income may be subject to certain limitations.

Current report

Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code limits the ability of a corporation that undergoes an “ownership change” to use its pre-change net operating losses to offset future taxable income. An “ownership change” generally means a greater than 50 percentage point change (by value) in a corporation’s equity ownership by certain stockholders over a three-year period. If we have experienced an ownership change at any time since our incorporation, we may be subject to these limitations on our ability to utilize our net operating losses and other tax attributes to offset taxable income or tax liability. In addition, future changes in our stock ownership, which may be outside of our control, may trigger an ownership change.

Current report

Changes in tax law, regulations, or interpretations, including those resulting from the OBBBA, could suspend the use of net operating losses or tax credits, possibly with retroactive effect, and adversely impact our effective tax rate or cash flows. As a result, if we earn net taxable income, we could be unable or limited in our ability to use net operating losses and other tax attributes to offset such taxable income, which could result in increased future income tax liabilities. Similar provisions of state tax law may also limit our use of accumulated state tax attributes.