XCel Brands Inc
For the period ended Jun 17, 2025. Filed May 13, 2025.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
What shareholders are asked to vote on at a company's meeting. It is where to find what directors and top executives are paid, and who owns the most shares.
Jun 17, 2025 · Filed May 13, 2025
Use the contents to explore the available documents and sections.
Contents
Certain Risks Associated with the Reverse Split
There are risks associated with the Reverse Split, including that the Reverse Split may not result in an increase in the per share price of our common stock following the Reverse Split or in the future. The history of similar stock split combinations for companies in like circumstances is varied. There is no assurance that:
| ● | the market price per share will either exceed or remain in excess of the $1.00 minimum bid price as required by Nasdaq for continued listing, or that we will otherwise meet the requirements of Nasdaq for inclusion for trading on Nasdaq; |
| ● | the market price per share of our common stock after the Reverse Split will rise in proportion to the reduction in the number of shares of our common stock outstanding before the Reverse Split; |
| ● | the Reverse Split will result in a per share price that will attract brokers and investors; |
| ● | the Reverse Split will result in a per share price that will increase our ability to attract and retain employees; or |
| ● | the market price of our common stock will not decrease in the future. |
The market price of our common stock will also be based on the performance of our Company and other factors detailed from time to time in the reports we filed with the SEC, some of which may be out of our control, including general economic, market and industry conditions. If the Reverse Split is effected and the market price of our common stock declines, the percentage decline as an absolute number and as a percentage of our overall market capitalization may be greater than would occur in the absence of a reverse stock split.
Furthermore, the liquidity of our common stock may be negatively impacted by the Reverse Split, given the reduced number of shares that would be outstanding after the Reverse Split, particularly if the per-share market price does not increase as a result of the Reverse Split. For instance, if the Reverse Split is implemented, it may result in some stockholders owning “odd lots” (less than 100 shares) of common stock. Odd lot shares may be more difficult to sell, and brokerage commissions and other costs of transactions in odd lots may be higher than the costs of transactions in “round lots” of even multiples of 100 shares. If we effect the Reverse Split, the resulting per-share price may nevertheless fail to attract institutional investors and may not satisfy the investing guidelines of such investors and, consequently, the trading liquidity of our common stock may not improve. Accordingly, the Reverse Split may not achieve the desired result of increasing marketability of our common stock as described above under “Reasons for the Reverse Split.”
You should also keep in mind that implementation of the Reverse Split does not have an effect on the actual or intrinsic value of our business or a stockholder’s proportional ownership in our Company (subject to the treatment of fractional shares). However, should the overall value of our common stock decline after the proposed Reverse Split, then the actual or intrinsic value of the shares of our common stock held by you will also proportionately decrease as a result of the overall decline in value.
The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.