STEEL DYNAMICS INC
For the period ended Apr 25, 2025. Filed Mar 13, 2025.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
What shareholders are asked to vote on at a company's meeting. It is where to find what directors and top executives are paid, and who owns the most shares.
Apr 25, 2025 · Filed Mar 13, 2025
Contents
The Decision-Making Process
Role of the Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee has responsibility for the development, implementation, monitoring, and oversight of our executive compensation program, as well as responsibility for ensuring that our compensation plans and programs remain consistent with our compensation philosophy. The Committee is comprised of independent, non-employee members of the Board. The Committee works closely with its independent compensation consultant and leadership to examine the effectiveness of the Company’s executive compensation program throughout the year. The Compensation Committee annually evaluates and establishes the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and, with the input of our Chief Executive Officer, the compensation of our other executive officers, including our other NEOs; evaluates and establishes the compensation for the non-employee members of the Board; and reviews and approves all cash and equity-based incentive plans and awards under such plans. Further details of the Compensation Committee’s authority and responsibilities are specified in its charter available on our website at www.steeldynamics.com under “Investors — Governance — Governance Documents.”
The Compensation Committee meets throughout the year to perform its duties and responsibilities. During 2024, the Compensation Committee held five meetings. From time to time, the Compensation Committee may invite our Chief Executive Officer and Board Chair or other executive officers to attend and participate in portions of its meetings, but only Compensation Committee members are present during compensation-related decision-making.
Role of Our Chief Executive Officer
Our Chief Executive Officer supports the work of the Compensation Committee by providing necessary background information and updates on the operations of the Company and the performance of each of our executive officers. Our Chief Executive Officer recommends adjustments to the base salaries, target annual incentive compensation award opportunities, and long-term incentive awards of our executive officers, including our NEOs. He also provides the Compensation Committee with an annual performance evaluation of each executive officer.
The Compensation Committee receives a recommendation from our Chief Executive Officer as to any proposed adjustment to his own compensation, as well as a self-assessment of his performance for the year under review. However, the Compensation Committee evaluates the performance of our Chief Executive Officer based on the full Board assessment and input, and exercises its judgment as to whether, and to what extent, to adjust his compensation levels and whether to adjust the compensation levels of any of our executive officers.
| Steel Dynamics, Inc. | 2025 Proxy Statement | 49 |
|---|
Role of Compensation Consultant
The Compensation Committee has authority to engage the services of compensation consultants or other advisors, at the Company’s expense, as it deems necessary or appropriate in the discharge of its duties and responsibilities. For 2024, the Compensation Committee retained Pearl Meyer & Partners, LLC (“Pearl Meyer”), as its independent compensation consultant. Pearl Meyer was engaged to support the Compensation Committee’s efforts to provide expertise on competitive pay practices, regulatory trends, program design, and an objective assessment of any inherent risks of any programs.
Pearl Meyer reports directly to the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee may replace its compensation consultant or hire additional advisors at any time. Representatives of Pearl Meyer attend meetings of the Committee and communicate with the Committee Chair and with management as circumstances warrant. However, all decisions regarding the compensation of our executive officers were made by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee assessed the independence of Pearl Meyer considering, among other things, the enhanced independence standards and factors set forth in Exchange Act Rule 10C-1 and the applicable Nasdaq Listing Rules and concluded that Pearl Meyer meets all applicable independence criteria, and that there were no conflicts of interest with respect to the work that Pearl Meyer performed for the Compensation Committee.
Use of Competitive Data
To monitor the competitiveness of our executive officers’ compensation, the Compensation Committee uses a compensation peer group which reflects the pay of executives in comparable positions at similarly sized companies. This compensation peer group is composed of a cross-section of direct steel competitors as well as companies in related industrial or materials sectors. The Compensation Committee reviews the appropriateness of the compensation peer group annually.
For the purposes of setting 2024 compensation, the Compensation Committee conducted an in-depth assessment of potential comparators to evaluate the degree to which the current peer companies have kept pace with the Company’s size, scope, and market focus. The Compensation Committee also took into consideration the broader marketplace to consider whether appropriate and relevant additions and removals from the current peer companies were needed. For our 2024 compensation decisions, the Compensation Committee made no changes to the compensation peer group.
The Compensation Committee used the following compensation peer group as a reference during its compensation deliberations in 2024:
| | | | | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| | ■ | AGCO Corporation | ■ | Newmont Corporation |
| | ■ | Alcoa Corporation | ■ | Nucor Corporation |
| | ■ | Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. | ■ | PACCAR Inc |
| | ■ | Commercial Metals Company | ■ | Parker-Hannifan Corporation |
| | ■ | Cummins, Inc. | ■ | Reliance, Inc. |
| | ■ | Freeport-McMoRan Inc. | ■ | United States Steel Corporation |
| | ■ | Illinois Tool Works Inc. | | |
We do not believe that it is appropriate to make compensation decisions based strictly upon any type of benchmarking to a peer or other representative group of companies. However, the Compensation Committee does believe that information regarding the compensation practices at other companies is useful in at least two respects. First, the Compensation Committee recognizes that our compensation policies and practices must be competitive in the marketplace to attract and retain executive talent. Second, this information is useful in assessing the reasonableness and appropriateness of individual executive compensation components and of our overall executive compensation program. Peer group information is only one of a number of factors that the Compensation Committee considers in making its decisions with respect to the compensation of our executive officers.
| | |
| 50 | Health and Safety | Entrepreneurial Culture | Customer Commitment | Strategic Sustainable Growth | Innovation | Financial Strength |
The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.