Verastem Inc
For the period ended Sep 30, 2024. Filed Nov 6, 2024.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's report for each of its first three quarters. The financial statements are not audited. It shows how the business has moved since the last annual report, and what management says changed.
Sep 30, 2024 · Filed Nov 6, 2024
What changed in Risk Factors?
Read the current filingPrevious report: 10-Q
Period ended 2024-06-30; filed 2024-08-08.
0001558370-24-011599
Item 1A. Risk FactorsCurrent report: 10-Q
Period ended 2024-09-30; filed 2024-11-06.
0001558370-24-014640
Item 1A. Risk FactorsThe baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.
Compared 12 previous paragraphs and 2 current paragraphs.
1 unchanged; 1 reworded; 0 added; 10 removed; 0 previous and 0 current paragraphs rearranged.
Tables are not compared: 0 previous and 0 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.
A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.
Removed paragraphs (10)
Previous report
The market opportunities for our product candidates can be smaller than we estimate or the approvals that we obtain may be based on a narrower definition of the patient population.
Previous report
The potential market opportunity for our product candidates is difficult to estimate precisely. For example, the number of patients suffering from each of recurrent KRAS mutant LGSOC and KRAS wt LGSOC populations we are targeting is small and has not been established with precision. Due to the rarity of our target indications, there is no comprehensive patient registry or other method of establishing with precision the actual number of patients with KRAS mutant LGSOC and KRAS wt LGSOC. As a result, we have had to rely on other available sources to derive clinical prevalence estimates for our target indications. We make estimates regarding the incidence and prevalence of target patient populations, the rate of recurrence and the median survival for particular diseases, including with respect to LGSOC, based on various third-party sources and internally generated analysis and use such estimates in making decisions regarding our drug development strategy determining indications on which to focus in preclinical or clinical trials.
Previous report
Our estimates of the patient population, pricing and revenue opportunities for our product candidates, including for KRAS mt and KRAS wt patients with LGSOC, are based on a number of internal and third-party estimates, including, without limitation, internal forecasts of potential market penetration, the median duration of treatment from initial interim clinical data and the assumed prices at which we can commercialize our product candidates. These estimates may be inaccurate or based on imprecise data. For example, if approved by the FDA, the market opportunity of our product candidates will depend on, among other things, acceptance by the medical community, patient access, drug pricing and reimbursement. The number of patients in the addressable market may turn out to be lower than we estimate, patients may not be otherwise amenable to treatment with our drugs, or new patients may become increasingly difficult to identify or gain access to, all of which may significantly harm our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.
Previous report
In addition, if any approval that we obtain is based on a narrower definition of patient populations than we had anticipated, the potential market for our product candidates will be smaller than our current estimates. A smaller patient population in our target indications would have a materially adverse effect on our ability to achieve commercialization and generate revenues.
Previous report
Interim, initial “top-line” and preliminary data or statistical analyses and projections based thereon, may not be predictive of the results from final, more mature clinical data.
Previous report
Interim, initial “top-line,” and preliminary data or statistical analyses from clinical trials, including the estimated and projected duration of therapy for RAMP 201 patients based on initial topline results with a minimum of five months follow up and the initial interim RAMP 205 trial data, may change as more mature patient data becomes available, may be more or less positive than the final data, and may be subject to audit and verification procedures that could result in material changes in the mature data. Thus, such interim and projected data should be considered carefully and with caution and may not necessarily be predictive of the results from final, more mature clinical data.
Previous report
The estimated mean and median duration of therapy of patients in our RAMP 201 trial are based on interim clinical data and estimates and projections extrapolated thereof. Such interim results and the estimated projections based thereon may not be reproduced in any current or potential future clinical trials, and thus should be considered carefully and with caution, and may not necessarily be predictive of the results from final, more mature clinical data. More mature data from the RAMP 201 trial may materially differ from and be less positive than the interim and initial topline data reported herein material adverse differences in final data, compared to preliminary or interim data, could severely and adversely affect our financial results, business and business prospects, including our estimates of the addressable market opportunity.
Previous report
The FDA and other comparable regulatory authorities could require clearance or approval of an in vitro diagnostic or companion diagnostic device as a condition of approval for any product candidates that require or would commercially benefit from such tests, including the combination of avutometinib and defactinib. If we are unable to successfully validate, develop and obtain regulatory approval for companion diagnostic tests for our product candidates that require or would commercially benefit from such tests, or experience significant delays in doing so, we may not realize the full commercial potential of these product candidates and our drug development strategy and operational results may be harmed.
Previous report
If safe and effective use of any of our product candidates depends on an in vitro diagnostic, then the FDA generally will require approval or clearance of that test, known as a companion diagnostic, at the same time that the FDA approves our product candidates. Companion diagnostics, which provide information that is essential for the safe and effective use of a corresponding therapeutic product, are subject to regulation by the FDA and other comparable regulatory authorities as medical devices and require separate regulatory authorization from therapeutic approval prior to commercialization. The development programs for some of our product candidates contemplate working with developers or obtaining access to marketed companion diagnostic tests, which are assays or tests to identify an appropriate patient population. For example, in connection with our rolling NDA submission for the combination of avutometinib and defactinib for patients with recurrent KRAS mt LGSOC, we may be required to obtain FDA approval or clearance of a companion diagnostic.
Previous report
If safe and effective use of any of our product candidates we may develop depends on a companion diagnostic, we may not receive marketing approval, or marketing approval may be delayed, if we are unable to or are delayed in developing, identifying, or obtaining regulatory approval or clearance for the companion diagnostic product for use with our product candidate. In addition., the process of obtaining or creating such companion diagnostics is time consuming and costly and we, and/or future collaborators, may encounter difficulties in developing and obtaining regulatory clearance or approval for the companion diagnostics.
Reworded paragraphs (1)
Previous wording
You should carefully review and consider the information regarding certain factors that could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results set forth under* Item 1A. Risk Factors* in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 as filed with the SEC on March 14, 2024. There have been no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, other than as set forth below.
Current wording
You should carefully review and consider the information regarding certain factors that could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results set forth under* Item 1A. Risk Factors* in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 as filed with the SEC on March 14, 2024 and in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2024, as filed with the SEC on August 8, 2024.