FIRST COMMUNITY CORP /SC/

Previous wording

Our financial performance generally, and in particular the ability of borrowers to pay interest on and repay principal of outstanding loans and the value of collateral securing those loans, as well as demand for loans and other products and services we offer and whose success we rely on to drive our growth, is highly dependent upon the business environment in the primary markets where we operate and in the U.S. as a whole. Unlike larger banks that are more geographically diversified, we are a regional bank that provides banking and financial services to customers primarily in South Carolina and Georgia. The economic conditions in these local markets may be different from, and in some instances worse than, the economic conditions in the U.S. as a whole. In 2024 and early 2025, continued regional economic uncertainty—exacerbated by persistent inflation, supply chain disruptions, and subdued consumer spending—has further increased the risks in our primary markets.

Current wording

Our financial performance generally, and in particular the ability of borrowers to pay interest on and repay principal of outstanding loans and the value of collateral securing those loans, as well as demand for loans and other products and services we offer and whose success we rely on to drive our growth, is highly dependent upon the business environment in the primary markets where we operate and in the U.S. as a whole. Unlike larger banks that are more geographically diversified, we are a regional bank that provides banking and financial services to customers primarily in South Carolina and Georgia. The economic conditions in these local markets may be different from, and in some instances worse than, the economic conditions in the U.S. as a whole. In 2025 and early 2026, continued regional economic uncertainty—exacerbated by persistent inflation, elevated interest rates, geopolitical developments, and subdued consumer spending—may further increase the risks in our primary markets.

Previous wording

In 2023 and 2024, concerns about the financial condition of certain U.S. banking institutions led to multiple bank failures, including Silicon Valley Bank, Signature Bank, First Republic Bank, and most recently, Republic First Bank in April 2024. The FDIC intervened in each case, transferring assets to acquiring institutions. While our business and depositor profile differ from these banks, financial sector volatility, particularly in times of stress, may impact our stock price and operations. The long-term regulatory and market consequences of these failures remain uncertain but could include increased FDIC assessments and further bank closures. To date, these events have not materially affected our deposit balances.

Current wording

In 2023 and 2024, concerns about the financial condition of certain U.S. banking institutions led to multiple bank failures, including Silicon Valley Bank, Signature Bank, New York, NY, First Republic Bank, Republic First Bank in April 2024, and most recently, The Santa Anna National Bank (June 27, 2025), Pulaski Savings Bank (January 17, 2025), and Metropolitan Capital Bank & Trust (January 30, 2026). The FDIC intervened in each case, including through resolution transactions (such as purchase and assumption transactions). While our business and depositor profile differ from these banks, financial sector volatility, particularly in times of stress, may impact our stock price and operations. The long-term regulatory and market consequences of these failures remain uncertain but could include increased FDIC assessments and further bank closures. As of December 31, 2025, these events have not materially affected our deposit balances.

Previous wording

There is no precise method of predicting credit losses; therefore, we face the risk that charge-offs in future periods will exceed our allowance for credit losses and that additional increases in the allowance for credit losses will be required. Additions to the allowance for credit losses would result in a decrease of our net income, and possibly our capital.

Current wording

There is no precise method of predicting credit losses; therefore, we face the risk that charge-offs in future periods will exceed our allowance for credit losses and that additional increases in the allowance for credit losses will be required. Economic uncertainty could remain elevated entering 2026, driven by persistent inflationary pressures, elevated interest rates, geopolitical conflicts, and the potential for continued volatility in global markets—despite forecasts for moderate growth in the U.S. and abroad. Additions to the allowance for credit losses would result in a decrease of our net income, and possibly our capital.

Previous wording

Our actual credit losses could exceed our allowance for credit losses. Our average loan size continues to increase and reliance on our historic allowance for credit losses may not be adequate. As of December 31, 2024, approximately 84.8% of our loan portfolio (excluding loans held for sale) is composed of construction (12.5%), commercial mortgage (65.2%) and commercial (7.1%) loans. Repayment of such loans is generally considered more subject to market risk than residential mortgage loans. Industry experience shows that a portion of loans will become delinquent, and a portion of loans will require partial or entire charge-off. Regardless of the underwriting criteria utilized, losses may be experienced as a result of various factors beyond our control, including, changes in market conditions affecting the value of loan collateral and problems affecting the credit of our borrowers. If we suffer credit losses that exceed our allowance for credit losses, our financial condition, liquidity, or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Current wording

Our actual credit losses could exceed our allowance for credit losses. Our average loan size continues to increase and reliance on our historic allowance for credit losses may not be adequate. As of December 31, 2025, approximately 84.5% of our loan portfolio (excluding loans held for sale) is composed of construction (11.6%), commercial mortgage (65.9%) and commercial and industrial (7.0%) loans. Repayment of such loans is generally considered more subject to market risk than residential mortgage loans. Industry experience shows that a portion of loans will become delinquent, and a portion of loans will require partial or entire charge-off. Regardless of the underwriting criteria utilized, losses may be experienced as a result of various factors beyond our control, including changes in market conditions affecting the value of loan collateral and problems affecting the credit of our borrowers. If we suffer credit losses that exceed our allowance for credit losses, our financial condition, liquidity, or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Previous wording

As of December 31, 2024, we had approximately $921.0 million in loans outstanding to borrowers whereby the collateral securing the loan was commercial real estate, representing approximately 75.5% of our total loans outstanding as of that date. Approximately $283.7 million, or 23.2% of our total loans, and 30.8% of our commercial real estate loans are secured by owner-occupied properties. Commercial real estate loans are generally viewed as having more risk of default than residential real estate loans. They are also typically larger than residential real estate loans and consumer loans and depend on cash flows from the owner’s business or the property to service the debt. Cash flows may be affected significantly by general economic conditions, and a downturn in the local economy or in occupancy rates in the local economy where the property is located could increase the likelihood of default. Because our loan portfolio contains a number of commercial real estate loans with relatively large balances, the deterioration of one or a few of these loans could cause a significant increase in our level of non-performing loans. An increase in non-performing loans could result in a loss of earnings from these loans, an increase in the related provision for credit losses and an increase in charge-offs, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Current wording

As of December 31, 2025, we had approximately $978.5 million in loans outstanding to borrowers whereby the collateral securing the loan was commercial real estate, representing approximately 74.63% of our total loans outstanding as of that date. Approximately $290.0 million, or 22.1% of our total loans, and 29.6% of our commercial real estate loans are secured by owner-occupied properties. Commercial real estate loans are generally viewed as having more risk of default than residential real estate loans. They are also typically larger than residential real estate loans and consumer loans and depend on cash flows from the owner’s business or the property to service the debt. Cash flows may be affected significantly by general economic conditions, and a downturn in the local economy or in occupancy rates in the local economy where the property is located could increase the likelihood of default. Because our loan portfolio contains a number of commercial real estate loans with relatively large balances, the deterioration of one or a few of these loans could cause a significant increase in our level of non-performing loans. An increase in non-performing loans could result in a loss of earnings from these loans, an increase in the related provision for credit losses and an increase in charge-offs, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Previous wording

Our commercial real estate loans have grown 3.5%, or $31.2 million, since December 31, 2023. The banking regulators give commercial real estate lending greater scrutiny, and they may require banks with higher levels of commercial real estate loans to implement more stringent underwriting, internal controls, risk management policies and portfolio stress testing, as well as possibly higher levels of allowances for credit losses and capital levels as a result of commercial real estate lending growth and exposures. We have expertise and a long history in originating and managing commercial real estate loans. We have a strong credit underwriting process, which includes management and board oversight. We perform rigorous monitoring, stress testing, and reporting of these portfolios at the management and board levels, and we continue to monitor the level of the concentration in commercial real estate loans within the Bank’s loan portfolio monthly.

Current wording

Our commercial real estate loans have grown 6.2%, or $57.5 million, since December 31, 2024. The banking regulators give commercial real estate lending greater scrutiny, and they may require banks with higher levels of commercial real estate loans to implement more stringent underwriting, internal controls, risk management policies and portfolio stress testing, as well as possibly higher levels of allowances for credit losses and capital levels as a result of commercial real estate lending growth and exposures. We have expertise and a long history in originating and managing commercial real estate loans. We have a strong credit underwriting process, which includes management and board oversight. We perform rigorous monitoring, stress testing, and reporting of these portfolios at the management and board levels, and we continue to monitor the level of the concentration in commercial real estate loans within the Bank’s loan portfolio monthly. Regulatory expectations relating to commercial real estate underwriting, portfolio management and capital may continue to evolve, which could require us to enhance our risk management practices and/or constrain future growth.

Previous wording

The 2006 “Concentrations in Commercial Real Estate Lending, Sound Risk Management Practices” (the “CRE Guidance”) provides that a bank’s commercial real estate lending exposure could receive increased supervisory scrutiny where (i) total non-owner-occupied commercial real estate loans, including loans secured by apartment buildings, investor commercial real estate, and construction and land loans, represent 300% or more of an institution’s total risk-based capital, and the outstanding balance of the commercial real estate loan portfolio has increased by 50% or more during the preceding 36 months, or (ii) construction and land development loans exceed 100% of total risk-based capital. Our total non-owner-occupied commercial real estate loans represented 305% of the Bank’s total risk-based capital at December 31, 2024, and our construction and land development loans represented 82% of the Bank’s total risk-based capital at December 31, 2024. Furthermore, our three-year growth in non-owner occupied commercial real estate loans was 46% from December 31, 2021 to December 31, 2024. We have expertise and a long history in originating and managing commercial real estate loans. We have a strong credit underwriting process, which includes management and board oversight. We perform rigorous monitoring, stress testing, and reporting of these portfolios at the management and board levels, and we continue to monitor the level of the concentration in commercial real estate loans within our loan portfolio monthly.

Current wording

The 2006 “Concentrations in Commercial Real Estate Lending, Sound Risk Management Practices” (the “CRE Guidance”) provides that a bank’s commercial real estate lending exposure could receive increased supervisory scrutiny where (i) total non-owner-occupied commercial real estate loans, including loans secured by apartment buildings, investor commercial real estate, and construction and land loans, represent 300% or more of an institution’s total risk-based capital, and the outstanding balance of the commercial real estate loan portfolio has increased by 50% or more during the preceding 36 months, or (ii) construction and land development loans exceed 100% of total risk-based capital. Our total non-owner-occupied commercial real estate loans represented 307% of the Bank’s total risk-based capital at December 31, 2025, and our construction and land development loans represented 71% of the Bank’s total risk-based capital at December 31, 2025. Furthermore, our three-year growth in non-owner occupied commercial real estate loans was 37% from December 31, 2022 to December 31, 2025. While these levels were below the CRE Guidance’s numerical screening criteria as of December 31, 2025, changes in portfolio composition, growth rates, credit performance, or regulatory expectations could result in increased supervisory scrutiny.

Previous wording

At December 31, 2024, commercial business loans comprised 7.1% of our total loan portfolio. Our commercial business loans are originated primarily based on the identified cash flow and general liquidity of the borrower and secondarily on the underlying collateral provided by the borrower and/or repayment capacity of any guarantor. The borrower’s cash flow may be unpredictable, and collateral securing these loans may fluctuate in value. Although commercial business loans are often collateralized by equipment, inventory, accounts receivable, or other business assets, the liquidation of collateral in the event of default is often an insufficient source of repayment because accounts receivable may be uncollectible and inventories may be obsolete or of limited use. In addition, business assets may depreciate over time, be difficult to appraise, and fluctuate in value based on the success of the business. Accordingly, the repayment of commercial business loans depends primarily on the cash flow and credit worthiness of the borrower and secondarily on the underlying collateral value provided by the borrower and liquidity of the guarantor. If these borrowers do not have sufficient cash flows or resources to pay these loans as they come due or the value of the underlying collateral is insufficient to fully secure these loans, we may suffer losses on these loans that exceed our allowance for credit losses.

Current wording

At December 31, 2025, commercial business loans comprised 7.0% of our total loan portfolio. Our commercial business loans are originated primarily based on the identified cash flow and general liquidity of the borrower and secondarily on the underlying collateral provided by the borrower and/or repayment capacity of any guarantor. The borrower’s cash flow may be unpredictable, and collateral securing these loans may fluctuate in value. Although commercial business loans are often collateralized by equipment, inventory, accounts receivable, or other business assets, the liquidation of collateral in the event of default is often an insufficient source of repayment because accounts receivable may be uncollectible and inventories may be obsolete or of limited use. In addition, business assets may depreciate over time, be difficult to appraise, and fluctuate in value based on the success of the business. Accordingly, the repayment of commercial business loans depends primarily on the cash flow and credit worthiness of the borrower and secondarily on the underlying collateral value provided by the borrower and liquidity of the guarantor. If these borrowers do not have sufficient cash flows or resources to pay these loans as they come due or the value of the underlying collateral is insufficient to fully secure these loans, we may suffer losses on these loans that exceed our allowance for credit losses.

Previous wording

While we generally underwrite the loans in our portfolio in accordance with our own internal underwriting guidelines and regulatory supervisory guidelines, in certain circumstances we have made loans which exceed either our internal underwriting guidelines, supervisory guidelines, or both. As of December 31, 2024, approximately $16.6 million of our loans, or 9.3% of the Bank’s regulatory capital (Tier 1 Capital plus allowance for credit losses), had loan-to-value ratios that exceeded regulatory supervisory guidelines, of which three loans totaling approximately $606 thousand had loan-to-value ratios of 100% or more. In addition, supervisory limits on commercial loan-to-value exceptions are set at 30% of the Bank’s tier 1 capital plus allowance for credit losses. At December 31, 2024, $5.5 million of our commercial loans, or 3.1% of the Bank’s regulatory capital, exceeded the supervisory loan-to-value ratio. The number of loans in our portfolio with loan-to-value ratios in excess of supervisory guidelines, our internal guidelines, or both could increase the risk of delinquencies and defaults in our portfolio, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Current wording

While we generally underwrite the loans in our portfolio in accordance with our own internal underwriting guidelines and regulatory supervisory guidelines, in certain circumstances we have made loans which exceed either our internal underwriting guidelines, supervisory guidelines, or both. As of December 31, 2025, approximately $23.1 million of our loans, or 11.9% of the Bank’s regulatory capital (Tier 1 Capital plus allowance for credit losses), had loan-to-value ratios that exceeded regulatory supervisory guidelines, of which one loan totaling approximately $350 thousand had a loan-to-value ratio of 100% or more. In addition, supervisory limits on commercial loan-to-value exceptions are set at 30% of the Bank’s tier 1 capital plus allowance for credit losses. At December 31, 2025, $11.2 million of our commercial loans, or 5.8% of the Bank’s regulatory capital, exceeded the supervisory loan-to-value ratio. The number of loans in our portfolio with loan-to-value ratios in excess of supervisory guidelines, our internal guidelines, or both could increase the risk of delinquencies and defaults in our portfolio, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Previous wording

Our investment securities portfolio is a significant component of our total earning assets. Total investment securities averaged $491.0 million in 2024, as compared to $541.1 million in 2023. This represents 27.5% and 33.2% of the average earning assets for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. At December 31, 2024, the portfolio was 26.6% of earning assets compared to 29.6% of earning assets at December 31, 2023. Turmoil in the financial markets could impair the market value of our investment portfolio, which could adversely affect our net income and possibly our capital.

Current wording

Our investment securities portfolio is a significant component of our total earning assets. Total investment securities averaged $499.7 million in 2025, as compared to $491.0 million in 2024. This represents 25.9% and 27.5% of the average earning assets for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. At December 31, 2025, the portfolio was 25.2% of earning assets compared to 26.6% of earning assets at December 31, 2024. Turmoil in the financial markets could impair the market value of our investment portfolio, which could adversely affect our net income and possibly our capital. Market volatility, increased regulatory scrutiny of financial institutions, or adverse perceptions regarding the banking industry could further constrain capital availability and liquidity, including access to wholesale funding sources.

Previous wording

On June 1, 2022, we reclassified $224.5 million in investments to held-to-maturity (HTM) from available-for-sale (AFS). These securities were transferred at fair value at the time of the transfer, which became the new cost basis for the securities held to maturity. The pretax unrealized net holding loss on the available for sale securities on the date of transfer totaled approximately $16.7 million and continued to be reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss. This net unrealized loss is being amortized to interest income over the remaining life of the securities as a yield adjustment. There were no gains or losses recognized as a result of this transfer. The remaining pretax unrealized net holding loss on these investments was $12.3 million ($9.7 million net of tax) and $14.0 million ($11.1 million net of tax) at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.

Current wording

On June 1, 2022, we reclassified $224.5 million in investments to held-to-maturity (HTM) from available-for-sale (AFS). These securities were transferred at fair value at the time of the transfer, which became the new cost basis for the securities held to maturity. The pretax unrealized net holding loss on the available for sale securities on the date of transfer totaled approximately $16.7 million and continued to be reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss. This net unrealized loss is being amortized to interest income over the remaining life of the securities as a yield adjustment. There were no gains or losses recognized as a result of this transfer. The remaining pretax unrealized net holding loss on these investments was $10.6 million ($8.4 million net of tax) and $12.3 million ($9.7 million net of tax) at December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

Previous wording

During the three months ended September 2023, we sold $39.9 million of book value U.S. Treasuries in our available-for-sale investment securities portfolio. While this sale created a one-time pre-tax loss of $1.2 million, it provided additional liquidity which was used to pay down borrowings and fund loan growth. The weighted average book yield of the securities sold was 1.75% and the projected earn back period was 1.6 years. Such measures transitioned the balance sheet to be more efficient, improved net interest margin, and positioned us for higher earnings in the future.

Current wording

During the three months ended September 2023, we sold $39.9 million of book value U.S. Treasuries in our available-for-sale investment securities portfolio. While this sale created a one-time pre-tax loss of $1.2 million, it provided additional liquidity which was used to pay down borrowings and fund loan growth. The weighted average book yield of the securities sold was 1.75% and the projected earn back period was 1.6 years. We may from time to time reposition or sell investment securities for liquidity, interest rate risk management or balance sheet objectives; however, such actions could result in realized losses and could adversely affect our earnings and capital.

Previous wording

Our HTM investments totaled $209.4 million and represented approximately 42.6% of our total investments at December 31, 2024. Our AFS investments totaled $279.6 million, or approximately 56.9% of our total investments at December 31, 2024. Investments at cost totaled $2.7 million, or approximately 0.5% of our total investments at December 31, 2024. The effective duration on our total investment securities portfolio was 3.5 at December 31, 2024.

Current wording

Our HTM investments totaled $195.1 million and represented approximately 39.6% of our total investments at December 31, 2025. Our AFS investments totaled $294.1 million, or approximately 59.8% of our total investments at December 31, 2025. Investments at cost totaled $2.9 million, or approximately 0.6% of our total investments at December 31, 2025. The effective duration on our total investment securities portfolio was approximately 3.1 at December 31, 2025.

Previous wording

Securities which have unrealized losses were not considered to be credit loss impaired at December 31, 2024 or at December 31, 2023 and we believe it is more likely than not we will be able to hold these until they mature or recover our current book value. We currently maintain adequate liquidity which supports our ability to hold these investments until they mature, or until there is a market price recovery. However, if we were to cease to have the ability and intent to hold these investments until maturity or the market prices do not recover, and we were to sell these securities at a loss, it could adversely affect our net income and our capital.

Current wording

Securities which have unrealized losses were not considered to be credit loss impaired at December 31, 2025 or at December 31, 2024 and we believe it is more likely than not we will be able to hold these until they mature or recover our current book value. We currently maintain liquidity resources and contingency funding sources that we believe support our ability to hold these investments until they mature, or until there is a market price recovery. However, if we were to cease to have the ability and intent to hold these investments until maturity or the market prices do not recover, and we were to sell these securities at a loss, it could adversely affect our net income and our capital. Likewise, recent bank failures and heightened sensitivity to liquidity risk have increased regulatory and market focus on contingency funding planning and liquidity stress testing and could increase our funding costs or reduce the availability of certain funding sources.

Previous wording

The Bank is subject to regulatory requirements specifying minimum amounts and types of capital that we must maintain and an additional capital conservation buffer. From time to time, the regulators change these regulatory capital adequacy guidelines. If we fail to meet these capital guidelines and other regulatory requirements, we or our subsidiaries may be restricted in the types of activities we may conduct and we may be prohibited from taking certain capital actions, such as paying dividends, repurchasing or redeeming capital securities, and paying certain bonuses. In particular, the capital requirements applicable under Basel III require the Bank to satisfy additional, more stringent, capital adequacy standards than it had in the past. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements could result in certain mandatory and possible additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have an adverse material effect on our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, these requirements could have a negative impact on our ability to lend, grow deposit balances, make acquisitions, make capital distributions in the form of dividends or share repurchases, or pay certain bonuses needed to attract and retain key personnel. Higher capital levels could also lower our return on equity.

Current wording

The Company and the Bank are each required by federal regulatory authorities to maintain adequate levels of capital to support their operations and to comply with evolving regulatory capital expectations, including stress testing, capital planning, and concentration risk considerations. In addition, the Bank is subject to regulatory requirements specifying minimum amounts and types of capital that we must maintain and an additional capital conservation buffer. From time to time, the regulators change these regulatory capital adequacy guidelines. If we fail to meet these capital guidelines and other regulatory requirements, we or our subsidiaries may be restricted in the types of activities we may conduct and we may be prohibited from taking certain capital actions, such as paying dividends, repurchasing or redeeming capital securities, and paying certain bonuses. In particular, the capital requirements applicable under Basel III require the Bank to satisfy minimum capital adequacy standards and related buffer requirements. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements could result in certain mandatory and possible additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have an adverse material effect on our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, these requirements could have a negative impact on our ability to lend, grow deposit balances, make acquisitions, make capital distributions in the form of dividends or share repurchases, or pay certain bonuses needed to attract and retain key personnel. Higher capital levels could also lower our return on equity.

Previous wording

In 2021 through 2022, inflation rose to levels not seen for over 40 years, reaching 7.0% and 6.5%, respectively. The annual inflation rate decreased to 3.4% in 2023 and to 2.9% in 2024; however, during the latter part of 2024 and into early 2025, the annual inflation rate averaged approximately 4.2%, although some moderation has been observed in early 2025. Nonetheless, persistently higher input costs, wage pressures, and ongoing supply chain disruptions may challenge our customers’ ability to service their debt, thereby potentially increasing our credit risk. Inflation could lead to increased costs to our customers, making it more difficult for them to repay their loans or other obligations increasing our credit risk. Sustained higher interest rates by the Federal Reserve may be needed to tame persistent inflationary price pressures, which could push down asset prices and weaken economic activity. A deterioration in economic conditions in the United States and our markets could result in an increase in loan delinquencies and non-performing assets, decreases in loan collateral values and a decrease in demand for our products and services, all of which, in turn, would adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Current wording

In 2021 through 2022, inflation rose to levels not seen for over 40 years, reaching 7.0% and 6.5% (based on CPI-U annual percent change), respectively. The annual inflation rate decreased to 3.4% in 2023 and to 2.9% in 2024, and was approximately 2.7% in 2025. Nonetheless, persistently higher input costs, wage pressures, and supply chain disruptions or other cost pressures may challenge our customers’ ability to service their debt, thereby potentially increasing our credit risk. Inflation could lead to increased costs to our customers, making it more difficult for them to repay their loans or other obligations, increasing our credit risk. Sustained higher interest rates by the Federal Reserve may be needed to tame persistent inflationary price pressures, which could push down asset prices and weaken economic activity. A deterioration in economic conditions in the United States and our markets could result in an increase in loan delinquencies and non-performing assets, decreases in loan collateral values and a decrease in demand for our products and services, all of which, in turn, would adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Previous wording

The high-profile bank failures in 2023 and 2024 involving Silicon Valley Bank, Signature Bank, First Republic Bank, and Republic First Bank caused general uncertainty and concern regarding the liquidity adequacy of the banking sector. Although we were not directly affected by these bank failures, the resulting speed and ease in which news, including social media commentary, led depositors to withdraw or attempt to withdraw their funds from these and other financial institutions, which then caused the stock prices of many financial institutions to become volatile. In 2024 and into 2025, continued concerns regarding the stability of certain regional banks and potential liquidity risks have further contributed to market volatility and investor caution. Additional bank failures could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations, either directly or through an adverse impact on certain of our customers. Further, with the risk of any additional bank failures, we may face the potential for reputational risk, deposit outflows, increased costs and competition for liquidity, and increased credit risk which, individually or in the aggregate, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.*** ***

Current wording

The high-profile bank failures in 2023 and 2024 involving Silicon Valley Bank, Signature Bank, New York, NY, First Republic Bank, and Republic First Bank caused general uncertainty and concern regarding the liquidity adequacy of the banking sector. Although we were not directly affected by these bank failures, the resulting speed and ease in which news, including social media commentary, led depositors to withdraw or attempt to withdraw their funds from these and other financial institutions, which then caused the stock prices of many financial institutions to become volatile. In 2024 and into 2025, continued concerns regarding the stability of certain regional banks and potential liquidity risks have further contributed to market volatility and investor caution. The failure of the Santa Anna National Bank and Pulaski Savings Bank in 2025, and Metropolitan Capital Bank & Trust in early 2026 has only added to this uncertainty. Additional bank failures could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations, either directly or through an adverse impact on certain of our customers. Further, with the risk of any additional bank failures, we may face the potential for reputational risk, deposit outflows, increased costs and competition for liquidity, and increased credit risk which, individually or in the aggregate, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.*** ***

Previous wording

We could experience a loss due to competition with other financial institutions or nonbank companies.

Current wording

We could experience a loss due to competition with other financial institutions or non-bank companies.

Previous wording

We face substantial competition in all areas of our operations from a variety of different competitors, both within and beyond our principal markets, many of which are larger and may have more financial resources. Such competitors primarily include national, regional, community, and internet banks within the various markets in which we operate. We also face competition from many other types of financial institutions, including, without limitation, savings and loans, credit unions, finance companies, brokerage firms, insurance companies, and other financial intermediaries. The financial services industry could become even more competitive as a result of legislative and regulatory changes and continued consolidation. In addition, as customer preferences and expectations continue to evolve, technology has lowered barriers to entry and made it possible for banks to offer products and services in more areas in which they do not have a physical location and for nonbanks, such as FinTech companies, to offer products and services traditionally provided by banks, such as automatic transfer and automatic payment systems. Banks, securities firms, and insurance companies can merge under the umbrella of a financial holding company, which can offer virtually any type of financial service, including banking, securities underwriting, insurance (both agency and underwriting), and merchant banking. Many of our competitors have fewer regulatory constraints and may have lower cost structures. Additionally, due to their size, many competitors may be able to achieve economies of scale and, as a result, may offer a broader range of products and services as well as better pricing for those products and services than we can.

Current wording

We face substantial competition in all areas of our operations from a variety of different competitors, both within and beyond our principal markets, many of which are larger and may have more financial resources. Such competitors primarily include national, regional, community, and internet banks within the various markets in which we operate. We also face competition from many other types of financial institutions, including, without limitation, savings and loans, credit unions, finance companies, brokerage firms, insurance companies, and other financial intermediaries. The financial services industry could become even more competitive as a result of legislative and regulatory changes and continued consolidation. In addition, as customer preferences and expectations continue to evolve, technology has lowered barriers to entry and made it possible for banks to offer products and services in more areas in which they do not have a physical location and for non-bank such as FinTech companies, to offer products and services traditionally provided by banks, such as automatic transfer and automatic payment systems. Banks, securities firms, and insurance companies can merge under the umbrella of a financial holding company, which can offer virtually any type of financial service, including banking, securities underwriting, insurance (both agency and underwriting), and merchant banking. Many of our competitors have fewer regulatory constraints and may have lower cost structures. Additionally, due to their size, many competitors may be able to achieve economies of scale and, as a result, may offer a broader range of products and services as well as better pricing for those products and services than we can. Likewise, rapid adoption of AI by competitors, either in financial services or FinTech, could create significant pressure on pricing, automation, or client satisfaction. If we fail to keep pace with AI-enabled analytics and customer offerings, our competitive positioning could be detrimentally impacted.

Previous wording

The financial services industry is continually undergoing rapid technological change with frequent introductions of new technology-driven products and services. The effective use of technology increases efficiency and enables financial institutions to better serve customers and to reduce costs. Our future success depends, in part, upon our ability to address the needs of our customers by using technology to provide products and services that will satisfy customer demands, as well as to create additional efficiencies in our operations. Many of our competitors have substantially greater resources to invest in technological improvements. We may not be able to effectively implement new technology-driven products and services or be successful in marketing these products and services to our customers. In addition, we depend on internal and outsourced technology to support all aspects of our business operations. Failure to successfully keep pace with technological changes could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. In 2024 and early 2025, the pace of technological change has accelerated, and the rapid evolution of cybersecurity threats, as well as the need to integrate new digital platforms, has increased the risks associated with failure to adapt.

Current wording

The financial services industry is continually undergoing rapid technological change with frequent introductions of new technology-driven products and services. The effective use of technology increases efficiency and enables financial institutions to better serve customers and to reduce costs. Our future success depends, in part, upon our ability to address the needs of our customers by using technology to provide products and services that will satisfy customer demands, as well as to create additional efficiencies in our operations. Many of our competitors have substantially greater resources to invest in technological improvements. We may not be able to effectively implement new technology-driven products and services or be successful in marketing these products and services to our customers. In addition, we depend on internal and outsourced technology to support all aspects of our business operations. Failure to successfully keep pace with technological changes could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. In 2024 and 2025, the pace of technological change has accelerated, and the rapid evolution of cybersecurity threats, as well as the need to integrate new digital platforms, has increased the risks associated with failure to adapt.

Previous wording

The development and use of AI by us or our third-party vendors poses significant risks. The evolving legal and regulatory landscape—covering intellectual property, privacy, consumer protection, employment, and more—could force costly changes and heighten non-compliance risks. AI models, especially generative ones, might produce biased, inaccurate, or harmful outputs, disclose confidential information, or infringe on intellectual property rights. Moreover, their inherent complexity limits transparency, complicating oversight and error reduction. Reliance on third-party models further exposes us to risks associated with unauthorized training data and their risk management practices. Any of these issues could lead to legal liabilities, reputational harm, and adverse impacts on our business.

Current wording

The development and use of AI by us or our third-party vendors poses significant risks. The evolving legal and regulatory landscape—covering intellectual property, privacy, consumer protection, employment, and more—could force costly changes and heighten non-compliance risks. AI models, especially generative ones, might produce biased, inaccurate, harmful, or otherwise ‘hallucinated’ outputs, disclose confidential information, or infringe on intellectual property rights. Moreover, their inherent complexity limits transparency, thus complicating oversight and error reduction. Reliance on third-party models further exposes us to risks associated with unauthorized training data and their risk management practices. Any of these issues could lead to legal liabilities, reputational harm, and adverse impacts on our business.

Previous wording

Further, if, as a result of competitive pressures, market interest rates, alternative investment opportunities that present more attractive returns to customers, general economic conditions or other events, the balance of our deposits decreases relative to our overall banking operations, we may need to rely more heavily on wholesale or other sources of external funding, or may have to increase deposit rates to maintain deposit levels in the future. Any such increased reliance on wholesale funding, or increases in funding rates in general, could have a negative impact on our net interest income and, consequently, on our results of operations and financial condition.

Current wording

If, as a result of competitive pressures, changes in market interest rates, alternative investment opportunities, general economic conditions or other factors, our deposit balances decrease or shift toward higher-cost products, we may need to rely more heavily on brokered deposits and other wholesale funding sources or raise deposit rates to maintain deposit levels. Any increase in our funding costs, reduced access to funding, or increased volatility in our funding sources could reduce our net interest income and adversely affect our liquidity, financial condition and results of operations.

Previous wording

From time to time, we may seek to acquire other financial institutions or parts of those institutions. We may also expand into new markets, like we did in York County, South Carolina, which we refer to as the Piedmont Region, in 2022, or lines of business or offer new products or services. These activities would involve a number of risks, including:

Current wording

From time to time, we may seek to acquire other financial institutions or parts of those institutions. We may also expand into new markets, like we did in York County, South Carolina, which we refer to as the Piedmont Region, in 2022, or into lines of business or offer new products or services. These activities would involve a number of risks, including:

Previous wording

We may not be able to fully achieve the strategic objectives and operating efficiencies that we anticipate in our acquisition activities. Inherent uncertainties exist in integrating the operations of an acquired business. In addition, the markets and industries in which we and our potential acquisition targets operate are highly competitive. We may lose customers or the customers of acquired entities as a result of an acquisition. We also may lose key personnel from the acquired entity as a result of an acquisition. We may not discover all known and unknown factors when examining a company for acquisition during the due diligence period. These factors could produce unintended and unexpected consequences. Undiscovered factors as a result of acquisitions, pursued by non-related third party entities, could bring civil, criminal, and financial liabilities against us, our management, and the management of those entities acquired. These factors could contribute to us not achieving the expected benefits from acquisitions within desired time frames.

Current wording

We may not be able to fully achieve the strategic objectives and operating efficiencies that we anticipate in our acquisition activities. Inherent uncertainties exist in integrating the operations of an acquired business. In addition, the markets and industries in which we and our potential acquisition targets operate are highly competitive. We may lose customers or the customers of acquired entities as a result of an acquisition. We also may lose key personnel from the acquired entity as a result of an acquisition. We may not discover all known and unknown factors when examining a company for acquisition during the due diligence period. These factors could produce unintended and unexpected consequences. Undiscovered factors arising from an acquisition could bring civil, criminal, and financial liabilities against us, our management, and the management of the acquired entity. These factors could contribute to us not achieving the expected benefits from acquisitions within desired time frames.

Previous wording

Michael C. Crapps, our president and chief executive officer, and Mr. Nissen, the Bank’s president and chief executive officer, each have extensive and long-standing ties within our primary market area and substantial experience with our operations, and each has contributed significantly to our business. If we lose the services of Mr. Crapps or Mr. Nissen, each would be difficult to replace, and our business and development could be materially and adversely affected. Our success also depends, in part, on our continued ability to attract and retain experienced loan originators, as well as other management personnel. Competition for personnel is intense, and we may not be successful in attracting or retaining qualified personnel. Our failure to compete for these personnel, or the loss of the services of several of such key personnel, could adversely affect our business strategy and materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

Current wording

Michael C. Crapps, our president and chief executive officer, and J. Ted Nissen, the Bank’s president and chief executive officer, each have extensive and long-standing ties within our primary market area and substantial experience with our operations, and each has contributed significantly to our business. If we lose the services of Mr. Crapps or Mr. Nissen, each would be difficult to replace, and our business and development could be materially and adversely affected.

Previous wording

We rely heavily on communications and information systems to conduct our business. Information security risks for financial institutions such as ours have increased in recent years in part because of the proliferation of new technologies, the use of the internet and telecommunications technologies to conduct financial transactions, and the increased sophistication and activities of organized crime, hackers, and terrorists, activists, and other external parties. As customer, public, and regulatory expectations regarding operational and information security have increased, our operating systems and infrastructure must continue to be safeguarded and monitored for potential failures, disruptions, and breakdowns. Our business, financial, accounting, and data processing systems, or other operating systems and facilities may stop operating properly or become disabled or damaged as a result of a number of factors, including events that are wholly or partially beyond our control. For example, there could be electrical or telecommunication outages, natural disasters such as earthquakes, tornadoes, and hurricanes, disease pandemics, events arising from local or larger scale political or social matters, including terrorist acts, and as described below, cyber attacks.

Current wording

We rely heavily on communications and information systems to conduct our business. Information security risks for financial institutions such as ours have increased in recent years in part because of the proliferation of new technologies, the use of the internet and telecommunications technologies to conduct financial transactions, and the increased sophistication and activities of organized crime, hackers, and state-sponsored actors, hacktivists, and other external parties. As customer, public, and regulatory expectations regarding operational and information security have increased, our operating systems and infrastructure must continue to be safeguarded and monitored for potential failures, disruptions, and breakdowns. Our business, financial, accounting, and data processing systems, or other operating systems and facilities may stop operating properly or become disabled or damaged as a result of a number of factors, including events that are wholly or partially beyond our control. For example, there could be electrical or telecommunication outages, natural disasters such as earthquakes, tornadoes, and hurricanes, public health events, events arising from local or larger scale political or social matters, including terrorist acts, and as described below, cyber attacks.

Previous wording

As noted above, our business relies on our digital technologies, computer and email systems, software, and networks to conduct its operations. Although we have information security procedures and controls in place, our technologies, systems, networks, and our customers’ devices may become the target of cyber attacks or information security breaches that could result in the unauthorized release, gathering, monitoring, misuse, loss, or destruction of our or our customers’ or other third parties’ confidential information. Third parties with whom we do business or that facilitate our business activities, including financial intermediaries, or vendors that provide service or security solutions for our operations, and other unaffiliated third parties, could also be sources of operational and information security risk to us, including from breakdowns or failures of their own systems or capacity constraints.

Current wording

As noted above, our business relies on our digital technologies, computer and email systems, software, and networks to conduct its operations. Although we have information security procedures and controls in place, our technologies, systems, networks, and our customers’ devices may become the target of cyber attacks or information security breaches that could result in the unauthorized release, gathering, monitoring, misuse, loss, or destruction of our or our customers’ or other third parties’ confidential information. Third parties with whom we do business or that facilitate our business activities, including financial intermediaries, service providers and other vendors, and other unaffiliated third parties, could also be sources of operational and information security risk to us, including from breakdowns or failures of their own systems or capacity constraints.

Previous wording

While we have disaster recovery and other policies, plans and procedures designed to prevent or limit the effect of the failure, interruption or security breach of our information systems, there can be no assurance that any such failures, interruptions or security breaches will not occur or, if they do occur, that they will be adequately addressed. Our risk and exposure to these matters remains heightened because of the evolving nature of these threats. As a result, cybersecurity and the continued development and enhancement of our controls, processes, and practices designed to protect our systems, computers, software, data, and networks from attack, damage or unauthorized access remain a focus for us. As threats continue to evolve, we may be required to expend additional resources to continue to modify or enhance our protective measures or to investigate and remediate information security vulnerabilities. Disruptions or failures in the physical infrastructure or operating systems that support our businesses and clients, or cyber attacks or security breaches of the networks, systems or devices that our clients use to access our products and services could result in client attrition, regulatory fines, penalties or intervention, reputation damage, reimbursement or other compensation costs, and/or additional compliance costs, any of which could have a material effect on our results of operations or financial condition.

Current wording

While we have disaster recovery and other policies, plans and procedures designed to prevent or limit the effect of the failure, interruption or security breach of our information systems, there can be no assurance that any such failures, interruptions or security breaches will not occur or, if they do occur, that they will be adequately addressed. Our risk and exposure to these matters remains heightened because of the evolving nature of these threats. As a result, cybersecurity and the continued development and enhancement of our controls, processes, and practices designed to protect our systems, computers, software, data, and networks from attack, damage or unauthorized access remain a focus for us. As threats continue to evolve, we may be required to expend additional resources to continue to modify or enhance our protective measures or to investigate and remediate information security vulnerabilities. Disruptions or failures in the physical infrastructure or operating systems that support our businesses and clients, or cyber attacks or security breaches of the networks, systems or devices that our clients use to access our products and services could result in client attrition, regulatory fines, penalties or intervention, remediation and notification costs, reputation damage, reimbursement or other compensation costs, and/or additional compliance costs, any of which could have a material effect on our results of operations or financial condition.

Previous wording

In the ordinary course of business, we rely on electronic communications and information systems to conduct our operations and to store sensitive data. Any failure, interruption or breach in security of these systems could result in significant disruption to our operations. Information security breaches and cybersecurity-related incidents include, but are not limited to, attempts to access information, including customer and company information, malicious code, computer viruses and denial of service attacks that could result in unauthorized access, theft, misuse, loss, release or destruction of data (including confidential customer information), account takeovers, unavailability of service or other events. These types of threats may derive from human error, fraud or malice on the part of external or internal parties or may result from accidental technological failure. Our technologies, systems, networks and software have been and continue to be subject to cybersecurity threats and attacks, which range from uncoordinated individual attempts to sophisticated and targeted measures directed at us. Any failures related to upgrades and maintenance of our technology and information systems could further increase our information and system security risk. Our increased use of cloud and other technologies also increases our risk of being subject to a cyber-attack. The risk of a security breach or disruption, particularly through cyber-attack or cyber-intrusion, has increased as the number, intensity and sophistication of attempted attacks and intrusions from around the world have increased. Our customers, employees and third parties that we do business with have been, and will continue to be, targeted by parties using fraudulent emails and other communications in attempts to misappropriate passwords, bank account information or other personal information or to introduce viruses or other malware programs to our information systems, the information systems of our merchants or third-party service providers and/or our customers’ personal devices, which are beyond our security control systems. Though we endeavor to mitigate these threats through product improvements, use of encryption and authentication technology and customer and employee education, such cyber-attacks against us, our merchants, our third-party service providers and our customers remain a serious issue.

Current wording

In the ordinary course of business, we rely on electronic communications and information systems to conduct our operations and to store sensitive data. Any failure, interruption or breach in security of these systems could result in significant disruption to our operations. Information security breaches and cybersecurity-related incidents include, but are not limited to, attempts to access information, including customer and company information, malicious code, computer viruses and denial of service attacks that could result in unauthorized access, theft, misuse, loss, release or destruction of data (including confidential customer information), account takeovers, unavailability of service or other events. These types of threats may derive from human error, fraud or malice on the part of external or internal parties or may result from accidental technological failure. Our technologies, systems, networks and software have been and continue to be subject to cybersecurity threats and attacks, which range from uncoordinated individual attempts to sophisticated and targeted measures aimed at us. Any failures related to upgrades and maintenance of our technology and information systems could further increase our information and system security risk. Our increased use of cloud and other technologies also increases our risk of being subject to a cyber-attack. The risk of a security breach or disruption, particularly through cyber-attack or cyber-intrusion, has increased as the number, intensity and sophistication of attempted attacks and intrusions from around the world have increased. Our customers, employees and third parties that we do business with have been, and will continue to be, targeted by parties using fraudulent emails and other communications in attempts to misappropriate passwords, bank account information or other personal information or to introduce viruses or other malware programs to our information systems, the information systems of our merchants or third-party service providers and/or our customers’ personal devices, which are beyond our security control systems. Though we endeavor to mitigate these threats through product improvements, use of encryption and authentication technology and customer and employee education, such cyber-attacks against us, our merchants, our third-party service providers and our customers remain a serious issue.

Previous wording

Although we make significant efforts to maintain the security and integrity of our information systems and have implemented various measures to manage the risks of a security breach or disruption, there can be no assurance that our security efforts and measures will be effective or that attempted security breaches or disruptions would not be successful or damaging. Even well protected information, networks, systems and facilities remain potentially vulnerable to attempted security breaches or disruptions because the techniques used in such attempts are constantly evolving and generally are not recognized until launched against a target, and in some cases are designed not to be detected and, in fact, may not be detected. Accordingly, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement zero risk security barriers or other preventative measures, and thus it is virtually impossible for us to entirely mitigate this risk. Furthermore, in the event of a cyber-attack, we may be delayed in identifying or responding to the attack, which could increase the negative impact of the cyber-attack on our business, financial condition and results of operations. While we maintain specific “cyber” insurance coverage, which would apply in the event of various breach scenarios, the amount of coverage may not be adequate in any particular case. Furthermore, because cyber threat scenarios are inherently difficult to predict and can take many forms, some breaches may not be covered under our cyber insurance coverage. A security breach or other significant disruption of our information systems or those related to our customers, merchants or our third-party vendors, including as a result of cyber-attacks, could (i) disrupt the proper functioning of our networks and systems and therefore our operations and/or those of our customers; (ii) result in the unauthorized access to, and destruction, loss, theft, misappropriation or release of confidential, sensitive or otherwise valuable information of ours or our customers; (iii) result in a violation of applicable privacy, data breach and other laws, subjecting us to additional regulatory scrutiny and exposing us to civil litigation, enforcement actions, governmental fines and possible financial liability; (iv) require significant management attention and resources to remedy the damages that result; or (v) harm our reputation or cause a decrease in the number of customers that choose to do business with us. The occurrence of any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Current wording

Although we make significant efforts to maintain the security and integrity of our information systems and have implemented various measures to manage the risks of a security breach or disruption, there can be no assurance that our security efforts and measures will be effective or that attempted security breaches or disruptions would not be successful or damaging. Even well protected information, networks, systems and facilities remain potentially vulnerable to attempted security breaches or disruptions because the techniques used in such attempts are constantly evolving and generally are not recognized until launched against a target, and in some cases are designed not to be detected and, in fact, may not be detected. Accordingly, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement fully effective security barriers or other preventative measures, and thus it is virtually impossible for us to entirely mitigate this risk. Furthermore, in the event of a cyber-attack, we may be delayed in identifying or responding to the attack, which could increase the negative impact of the cyber-attack on our business, financial condition and results of operations. While we maintain specific “cyber” insurance coverage, which would apply in the event of various breach scenarios, the amount of coverage may not be adequate in any particular case. Furthermore, because cyber threat scenarios are inherently difficult to predict and can take many forms, some breaches may not be covered under our cyber insurance coverage or may be subject to exclusions, deductibles or coverage limits.

Previous wording

Fraud schemes are becoming more sophisticated, often involving criminal networks and techniques such as check fraud, ATM skimming, phishing, and identity theft. Fraudsters may also exploit online banking to establish accounts for fraudulent activities. While technologies like chip cards help mitigate some risks, criminals continue to target other sources of personal data.

Current wording

Fraud schemes are becoming more sophisticated, often involving criminal networks and techniques such as check fraud, ATM skimming, social engineering and phishing attacks to obtain personal information or impersonation of our clients through the use of falsified or stolen credentials, and identity theft. Fraudsters may also use automated tools and AI-enabled techniques to increase the scale and effectiveness of social engineering and impersonation. Fraudsters may also exploit online banking to establish accounts for fraudulent activities. Further, in addition to fraud committed against us, we may suffer losses as a result of fraudulent activity committed against third parties. Increased deployment of technologies, may reduce certain aspects of fraud; however, criminals are turning to other sources to steal personally identifiable information, such as unaffiliated healthcare providers and government entities, in order to impersonate the consumer to commit fraud. Many of these data compromises are widely reported in the media. We have increased investments in fraud prevention, but losses may still occur, potentially harming our customers, reputation, and financial condition. Fraud-related costs—including regulatory scrutiny, legal liability, and business disruption—could materially impact our operations.

Previous wording

We regularly use third party vendors as part of our business and have substantial ongoing business relationships with other third parties. These types of third party relationships are subject to increasingly demanding regulatory requirements and attention by our bank regulators. Recent regulation requires us to enhance our due diligence, ongoing monitoring and control over our third party vendors and other ongoing third party business relationships. We expect that our regulators will hold us responsible for deficiencies in our oversight and control of our third party relationships and in the performance of the parties with which we have these relationships. As a result, if our regulators conclude that we have not exercised adequate oversight and control over our third party vendors or other ongoing third party business relationships or that such third parties have not performed appropriately, we could be subject to enforcement actions, including civil money penalties or other administrative or judicial penalties or fines as well as requirements for customer remediation, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Current wording

We regularly use third party vendors as part of our business and have substantial ongoing business relationships with other third parties. These types of third-party relationships are subject to increasingly demanding regulatory requirements and attention by our bank regulators. Regulatory guidance and supervisory expectations require us to enhance our due diligence, ongoing monitoring and control over our third-party vendors and other ongoing third-party business relationships. We expect that our regulators will hold us responsible for deficiencies in our oversight and control of our third-party relationships and in the performance of the parties with which we have these relationships. As a result, if our regulators conclude that we have not exercised adequate oversight and control over our third party vendors or other ongoing third party business relationships or that such third parties have not performed appropriately, we could be subject to enforcement actions, including civil money penalties or other administrative or judicial penalties or fines as well as requirements for customer remediation, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. Our reliance on third-party vendors for critical systems and services, likewise, increases our exposure to cybersecurity risks.

Previous wording

We operate in a highly regulated industry and are subject to examination, supervision, and comprehensive regulation by various regulatory agencies. We are subject to Federal Reserve regulation. The Bank is subject to extensive regulation, supervision, and examination by our primary federal regulator, the FDIC, the regulating authority that insures customer deposits; and by our state regulator, the S.C. Board. Also, as a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank (the “FHLB”), the Bank must comply with applicable regulations of the Federal Housing Finance Board and the FHLB. Regulation by these agencies is intended primarily for the protection of our depositors and the deposit insurance fund and not for the benefit of our shareholders. The Bank’s activities are also regulated under consumer protection laws applicable to our lending, deposit, and other activities. A sufficient claim against us under these laws could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. Regulatory developments in 2023 and early 2024 have led to enhanced expectations in areas such as cybersecurity, data privacy, digital asset management, and anti-money laundering. These evolving requirements are increasing our compliance costs and the complexity of our regulatory obligations.

Current wording

We operate in a highly regulated industry and are subject to examination, supervision, and comprehensive regulation by various regulatory agencies. We are subject to Federal Reserve regulation. The Bank is subject to extensive regulation, supervision, and examination by our primary federal regulator, the FDIC, the regulating authority that insures customer deposits; and by our state regulator, the S.C. Board. Also, as a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank (the “FHLB”), the Bank must comply with applicable regulations of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (“FHFA”) and the FHLB. Regulation by these agencies is intended primarily for the protection of our depositors and the deposit insurance fund and not for the benefit of our shareholders. The Bank’s activities are also regulated under consumer protection laws applicable to our lending, deposit, and other activities. A sufficient claim against us under these laws could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. Regulatory developments have led to enhanced expectations in areas such as cybersecurity, data privacy, digital asset management, and anti-money laundering. Regulators could also limit capital distributions, including dividends or share repurchases. These evolving requirements are increasing our compliance costs and the complexity of our regulatory obligations.

Previous wording

In 2025, the U.S. political landscape remains uncertain, with the Republicans holding the majority in both the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate. A unified Republican Congress has created conditions for potential shifts in policy, though partisan division may still result in challenges to enacting sweeping reforms. Under the Biden Administration, Congressional committees with jurisdiction over the banking sector pursued oversight and legislative initiatives in a variety of areas, including addressing climate-related risks, promoting diversity and equality within the banking industry and addressing other Environmental, Social, and Governance matters, improving competition in the banking sector and enhancing oversight of bank mergers and acquisitions, establishing a regulatory framework for digital assets and markets, and oversight of pandemic responses and economic recovery. The Trump Administration, alongside a unified Republican Congress, may pursue policies or changes that (i) reverse or suspend key actions implemented under the Biden Administration, (ii) promote deregulation by easing regulatory burdens on financial institutions, (iii) adopt a technology-forward approach, and (iv) take a more favorable stance on bank mergers and acquisitions, potentially streamlining the approval process to encourage consolidation within the banking sector. The prospects for the enactment of major banking reform legislation remain unclear at this time.

Current wording

The U.S. political landscape remains fluid, and changes in Congressional composition, presidential administration, and agency leaders may result in shifts in regulatory priorities and policy direction. Under the Biden Administration, Congressional committees with jurisdiction over the banking sector pursued oversight and legislative initiatives in a variety of areas, including addressing climate-related risks, promoting diversity and equality within the banking industry and addressing other Environmental, Social, and Governance matters, improving competition in the banking sector and enhancing oversight of bank mergers and acquisitions, establishing a regulatory framework for digital assets and markets, and oversight of pandemic responses and economic recovery. Subsequent changes in administration and Congressional leadership may result in efforts to reverse, suspend, or modify regulatory initiatives adopted in prior periods, promote deregulation by easing regulatory burdens on financial institutions, adopt a technology-forward regulatory approach, or take a more favorable stance on bank mergers and acquisitions. For example, in June 2025, the President signed into law S.J. Res. 13 under the Congressional Review Act, disapproving a Biden-era OCC rule relating to Bank Merger Act application review, and in July 2025, Congress enacted the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act, establishing a federal framework for payment stablecoins and prompting implementing rulemakings by financial regulators. Because of this kind of oscillation in regulation, the prospects for the enactment of major banking reform legislation remain unclear at this time.

Previous wording

Furthermore, leadership changes within federal banking agencies and financial regulators continue to shape the regulatory environment. Since the change in presidential administration in 2020, key positions across agencies—including the Comptroller of the Currency, CFPB, CFTC, SEC, and the U.S. Treasury—experienced significant turnover. While some leadership positions were filled, others remained vacant, leading to ongoing shifts in regulatory priorities and enforcement approaches. In early 2025, additional turnover and policy realignments within these agencies have further contributed to regulatory uncertainty in the financial services sector. The unified Republican government could further alter the composition of these agencies, introducing new leadership and new policies and rules that could significantly impact the banking sector. The potential impact of the unified Republican government on additional changes in agency structure, personnel, policies and priorities on the financial services sector, including the Company and the Bank, cannot be fully predicted at this time. Regulations and laws may be modified at any time, and new legislation may be enacted that will affect us. Any future changes in federal and state laws and regulations, as well as the interpretation and implementation of such laws and regulations, could affect us in substantial and unpredictable ways, including those listed above or other ways that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Current wording

Furthermore, leadership changes within federal banking agencies and financial regulators continue to shape the regulatory environment. Since changes in presidential administration, key positions across agencies—including the Comptroller of the Currency, CFPB, CFTC, SEC, and the U.S. Treasury—have experienced turnover and transition from time to time, leading to ongoing shifts in regulatory priorities and enforcement approaches. These shifts can create periods of regulatory uncertainty, including changes in supervisory emphasis, rulemaking agendas, and enforcement posture. The potential impact of changes in government leadership and agency personnel, policies and priorities on the financial services sector, including the Company and the Bank, cannot be fully predicted at this time. Regulations and laws may be modified at any time, and new legislation may be enacted that will affect us. Any future changes in federal and state laws and regulations, as well as the interpretation and implementation of such laws and regulations, could affect us in substantial and unpredictable ways, including those listed above or other ways that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Previous wording

Many aspects of the banking business involve a substantial risk of legal liability. From time to time, we are, or may become, the subject of information-gathering requests, reviews, investigations and proceedings, and other forms of regulatory inquiry, including by bank regulatory agencies, self-regulatory agencies, the SEC and law enforcement authorities. The results of such proceedings could lead to significant civil or criminal penalties, including monetary penalties, damages, adverse judgements, settlements, fines, injunctions, restrictions on the way we conduct our business or reputational harm.

Current wording

Many aspects of the banking business involve a substantial risk of legal liability. From time to time, we are, or may become, the subject of information-gathering requests, reviews, investigations and proceedings, and other forms of regulatory inquiry, including by bank regulatory agencies, self-regulatory agencies, the SEC and law enforcement authorities. The results of such proceedings could lead to significant civil or criminal penalties, including monetary penalties, damages, adverse judgments, settlements, fines, injunctions, restrictions on the way we conduct our business or reputational harm.

Previous wording

Deferred tax assets are reported as assets on our balance sheet and represent the decrease in taxes expected to be paid in the future because of net operating losses (“NOLs”) and tax credit carryforwards and because of future reversals of temporary differences in the bases of assets and liabilities as measured by enacted tax laws and their bases as reported in the financial statements. As of December 31, 2024, we had net deferred tax assets of $12.0 million. Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of sufficient future taxable income during the periods in which existing deferred tax assets are expected to become deductible for federal income tax purposes. Based on projections of future taxable income in periods in which deferred tax assets are expected to become deductible, management determined that the realization of our net deferred tax asset was more likely than not. As a result, we did not recognize a valuation allowance on our net deferred tax asset as of December 31, 2024. If it becomes more likely than not that some portion or the entire deferred tax asset will not be realized, a valuation allowance must be recognized. Our deferred tax asset may be further reduced in the future if estimates of future income or our tax planning strategies do not support the amount of the deferred tax assets. Charges to establish a valuation allowance with respect to our deferred tax asset could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Current wording

Deferred tax assets are reported as assets on our balance sheet and represent the decrease in taxes expected to be paid in the future because of net operating losses (“NOLs”) and tax credit carryforwards and because of future reversals of temporary differences in the bases of assets and liabilities as measured by enacted tax laws and their bases as reported in the financial statements. As of December 31, 2025, we had net deferred tax assets of $10.7 million. Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of sufficient future taxable income during the periods in which existing deferred tax assets are expected to become deductible for federal income tax purposes. Based on projections of future taxable income in periods in which deferred tax assets are expected to become deductible, management determined that the realization of our net deferred tax asset was more likely than not. As a result, we did not recognize a valuation allowance on our net deferred tax asset as of December 31, 2025. If it becomes more likely than not that some portion or the entire deferred tax asset will not be realized, a valuation allowance must be recognized. Our deferred tax asset may be further reduced in the future if estimates of future income or our tax planning strategies do not support the amount of the deferred tax assets. Charges to establish a valuation allowance with respect to our deferred tax asset could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Previous wording

Our ability to pay cash dividends may be limited by regulatory restrictions, by our Bank’s ability to pay cash dividends to the Company and by our need to maintain sufficient capital to support our operations. As a South Carolina-chartered bank, the Bank is subject to limitations on the amount of dividends that it is permitted to pay. Unless otherwise instructed by the S.C. Board, the Bank is generally permitted under South Carolina state banking regulations to pay cash dividends of up to 100% of net income in any calendar year without obtaining the prior approval of the S.C. Board. If our Bank is not permitted to pay cash dividends to us, it is unlikely that we would be able to pay cash dividends on our common stock. Moreover, holders of our common stock are entitled to receive dividends only when, and if declared by our board of directors. Although we have historically paid cash dividends on our common stock, we are not required to do so and our board of directors could reduce or eliminate our common stock dividend in the future.

Current wording

Our ability to pay cash dividends may be limited by regulatory restrictions, by our Bank’s ability to pay cash dividends to the Company and by our need to maintain sufficient capital to support our operations. As a South Carolina-chartered bank, the Bank is subject to limitations on the amount of dividends that it is permitted to pay. Unless otherwise instructed by the S.C. Board, the Bank is generally permitted under South Carolina state banking regulations to pay cash dividends of up to 100% of net income in any calendar year without obtaining the prior approval of the S.C. Board. In addition, the FDIC and the S.C. Board may restrict dividends if they determine payment would be unsafe or unsound or would cause the Bank to fall below applicable capital requirements. If our Bank is not permitted to pay cash dividends to us, it is unlikely that we would be able to pay cash dividends on our common stock. Moreover, holders of our common stock are entitled to receive dividends only when, and if declared by our board of directors. Although we have historically paid cash dividends on our common stock, we are not required to do so and our board of directors could reduce or eliminate our common stock dividend in the future.

Previous wording

Our stock price has been volatile in the past and several factors could cause the price to fluctuate substantially in the future. These factors include but are not limited to: actual or anticipated variations in earnings, changes in analysts’ recommendations or projections, our announcement of developments related to our businesses, operations and stock performance of other companies deemed to be peers, new technology used or services offered by traditional and non-traditional competitors, news reports of trends, irrational exuberance on the part of investors, new federal banking regulations, and other issues related to the financial services industry. Our stock price may fluctuate significantly in the future, and these fluctuations may be unrelated to our performance. General market declines or market volatility in the future, especially in the financial institutions sector, could adversely affect the price of our common stock, and the current market price may not be indicative of future market prices. Stock price volatility may make it more difficult for you to resell your common stock when you want and at prices you find attractive. Moreover, in the past, securities class action lawsuits have been instituted against some companies following periods of volatility in the market price of its securities. We could in the future be the target of similar litigation. Securities litigation could result in substantial costs and divert management’s attention and resources from our normal business.

Current wording

Our stock price has been volatile in the past and several factors could cause the price to fluctuate substantially in the future. These factors include but are not limited to: actual or anticipated variations in earnings, changes in analysts’ recommendations or projections, our announcement of developments related to our businesses, operations and stock performance of other companies deemed to be peers, new technology used or services offered by traditional and non-traditional competitors, news reports of trends, changes in investor sentiment, market speculation, new federal banking regulations, and other issues related to the financial services industry. Our stock price may fluctuate significantly in the future, and these fluctuations may be unrelated to our performance. General market declines or market volatility in the future, especially in the financial institutions sector, could adversely affect the price of our common stock, and the current market price may not be indicative of future market prices. Stock price volatility may make it more difficult for you to resell your common stock when you want and at prices you find attractive. Moreover, in the past, securities class action lawsuits have been instituted against some companies following periods of volatility in the market price of its securities. We could in the future be the target of similar litigation. Securities litigation could result in substantial costs and divert management’s attention and resources from our normal business.

Previous wording

If we determine, for any reason, that we need to raise capital, subject to applicable NASDAQ rules, our board generally has the authority, without action by or vote of the shareholders, to issue all or part of any authorized but unissued shares of stock for any corporate purpose, including issuance of equity-based incentives under or outside of our equity compensation plans. Additionally, we are not restricted from issuing additional common stock or preferred stock, including any securities that are convertible into or exchangeable for, or that represent the right to receive, common stock or preferred stock or any substantially similar securities. The market price of our common stock could decline as a result of sales by us of a large number of shares of common stock or preferred stock or similar securities in the market or from the perception that such sales could occur. If we issue preferred stock that has a preference over the common stock with respect to the payment of dividends or upon liquidation, dissolution or winding-up, or if we issue preferred stock with voting rights that dilute the voting power of the common stock, the rights of holders of the common stock or the market price of our common stock could be adversely affected. Any issuance of additional shares of stock will dilute the percentage ownership interest of our shareholders and may dilute the book value per share of our common stock. Shares we issue in connection with any such offering will increase the total number of shares and may dilute the economic and voting ownership interest of our existing shareholders.

Current wording

If we determine, for any reason, that we need to raise capital, subject to applicable NASDAQ rules, our board generally has the authority, without action by or vote of the shareholders, to issue all or part of any authorized but unissued shares of stock for any corporate purpose, including issuance of equity-based incentives under or outside of our equity compensation plans. Any issuance would also be subject to applicable banking regulatory considerations (including, as applicable, regulatory notice/approval requirements). Additionally, we are not restricted from issuing additional common stock or preferred stock, including any securities that are convertible into or exchangeable for, or that represent the right to receive, common stock or preferred stock or any substantially similar securities. The market price of our common stock could decline as a result of sales by us of a large number of shares of common stock or preferred stock or similar securities in the market or from the perception that such sales could occur. If we issue preferred stock that has a preference over the common stock with respect to the payment of dividends or upon liquidation, dissolution or winding-up, or if we issue preferred stock with voting rights that dilute the voting power of the common stock, the rights of holders of the common stock or the market price of our common stock could be adversely affected. Any issuance of additional shares of stock will dilute the percentage ownership interest of our shareholders and may dilute the book value per share of our common stock. Shares we issue in connection with any such offering will increase the total number of shares and may dilute the economic and voting ownership interest of our existing shareholders.