Empire State Realty Trust, Inc.
For the period ended Dec 31, 2025. Filed Mar 2, 2026.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.
FY2025 · Filed Mar 2, 2026
ESRT$5.31+0.2%Stored close · as of Nov 6, 2026
What changed in Risk Factors?
Read the current filingPrevious report: 10-K
Period ended 2024-12-31; filed 2025-02-28.
0001541401-25-000003
Item 1A. RISK FACTORSCurrent report: 10-K
Period ended 2025-12-31; filed 2026-03-02.
0001541401-26-000008
Item 1A. RISK FACTORSThe baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.
Compared 139 previous paragraphs and 142 current paragraphs.
101 unchanged; 29 reworded; 12 added; 8 removed; 1 previous and 0 current paragraphs rearranged.
Tables are not compared: 0 previous and 0 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.
A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.
Added paragraphs (12)
Current report
A terrorist event in New York City, particularly at a high-profile property such as the Empire State Building, could materially disrupt our operations, reduce demand for our properties and Observatory, and negatively affect occupancy and rental rates.
Current report
We maintain property, business interruption and terrorism insurance for our properties, including aggregate terrorism coverage of up to $2.0 billion for the Empire State Building through a combination of commercial insurance, our captive insurance subsidiary and participation in the federal terrorism insurance program (currently extended through December 31, 2027). However, our policies are subject to deductibles, co-insurance and coverage limitations, and certain losses, including losses caused by war or certain public health events, may not be fully insured or insurable on commercially acceptable terms.
Current report
In addition, insurance premiums may increase, coverage may become unavailable, or policy terms may become less favorable following a terrorist event or other catastrophic incident. If we experience a loss that is uninsured or exceeds our coverage limits, we could incur significant costs, experience loss of capital or property, and continue to be obligated to repay indebtedness secured by the affected property.
Current report
While visitor levels improved from pandemic lows, attendance and revenue remain sensitive to macroeconomic conditions, international tourism patterns, competitive attractions in New York City and weather variability. Our visitor volume has not yet fully returned to pre-pandemic 2019 levels, and our visitor volume decreased in 2025 as compared to 2024. Although we have focused on revenue per visitor and domestic demand initiatives, there can be no assurance that international visitation will recover or that overall Observatory performance will improve in future periods.
Current report
We are required under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act to maintain internal control over financial reporting that meets applicable standards. In prior periods, we identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting related to information technology general controls. We implemented remediation measures to address the material weakness, which required significant management attention, time and expense. Although we believe the remediation efforts have addressed the identified material weakness, there can be no assurance that the controls we have implemented will operate effectively or that additional material weaknesses will not be identified in the future. If we fail to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting, or if additional material weaknesses are identified, we may be unable to record, process or report financial information accurately or to prepare financial statements in a timely manner. Any such failure could result in restatements, increased audit costs, regulatory scrutiny, litigation, diversion of management’s attention, loss of investor confidence and a decline in our stock price.
Current report
Investors, regulators, and other stakeholders are increasingly focused on environmental, climate, and other sustainability matters. We are subject to evolving laws, regulations, and building standards, including New York City’s Local Law 97, that may require additional capital expenditures, operational changes, or reporting obligations. Compliance costs, including costs associated with emissions reduction initiatives or energy efficiency improvements, may increase over time.
Current report
We have publicly disclosed certain sustainability goals and performance metrics. These goals are based on current assumptions regarding building performance, tenant energy usage, and utility grid emissions factors, and there can be no assurance that we will achieve them. Changes in regulatory requirements, enforcement interpretations, tenant behavior, energy consumption patterns, grid decarbonization timelines, or the availability of capital may affect our ability to meet our targets or operate within applicable emissions limits.
Current report
Sustainability-related disclosure standards and expectations continue to evolve and may differ across jurisdictions and stakeholders. Our selection and application of disclosure frameworks involve judgment, and future changes in standards or interpretation could require revisions to previously disclosed information.
Current report
Failure, or perceived failure, to comply with applicable laws or to achieve our stated sustainability objectives could result in reputational harm, increased regulatory scrutiny, or litigation, and could adversely affect our stock price or cost of capital.
Current report
The adoption of or changes in rent regulation, tenant protection and eviction laws in New York could adversely affect our residential operations and property values.
Current report
New York, where our properties are located, has enacted and may further enact, interpret or expand laws and regulations affecting residential landlords, including rent stabilization laws and the “Good Cause Eviction” law. These laws restrict, and may further restrict, the ability to increase rents, decline lease renewals, enforce contractual obligations, recover possession of units, pursue collections or charge certain fees. Although residential properties represent a small portion of our portfolio, our residential assets include rent-stabilized units and market-rate units that may be subject to Good Cause Eviction, which may limit rent increases and tenant enforcement remedies. Changes in the regulatory environment, including actions by the New York City Rent Guidelines Board, amendments to statutory thresholds or expanded enforcement efforts, could increase operating costs, constrain rent growth and adversely affect our results of operations and property values.
Current report
In connection with the formation transactions, our operating partnership entered into a tax protection agreement with certain continuing investors, including members of the Malkin family, relating to specified contributed properties (the “Protected Properties”). The agreement continues to relate to 86-90 North 6th Street (which is a "substituted basis property" for Metro Center, which was sold in December 2025), 298 Mulberry Street (which is the "substituted basis property" for 10 Bank Street, which was sold in December 2022) and 1542 Third Avenue. The agreement generally restricts certain dispositions of those properties during applicable protection periods if such transactions would cause the protected parties to recognize pre-contribution built-in gain, unless required consents are obtained or the operating partnership makes payments intended to compensate the protected parties for the resulting tax liability. The agreement also includes provisions designed to mitigate taxable gain that could arise from reductions in certain protected parties’ shares of partnership liabilities, including restrictions on the prepayment or refinancing of certain indebtedness and the potential use of guarantees or deficit restoration obligations. In addition, in connection with our sale of a 9.9% fully diluted interest to Q REIT Holding LLC in 2016, we agreed, subject to specified thresholds and conditions, to indemnify QIA for certain taxes arising from dividends attributable to capital gains from the sale of U.S. real property interests. If triggered, these obligations could restrict our ability to dispose of certain assets, refinance indebtedness, or pursue strategic transactions, and could require payments that may be material.
Removed paragraphs (8)
Previous report
A terrorist event could cause insurance premiums at certain of our properties to increase significantly. Additionally, the threat or occurrence of a terrorist event may cause people to relocate from New York City and Stamford, Connecticut to less populated, lower-profile areas. This could trigger a decrease in the demand, occupancy and rental rates for, and materially affect the value of, our properties and our cash flow. Such negative consequences may be even more likely in a high-profile property like the Empire State Building and its Observatory.
Previous report
For fiscal years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, we derived revenue of approximately $136.4 million, $129.4 million and $106.0 million, respectively, from the Observatory operations. Our revenues declined significantly in 2020, 2021 and 2022, compared to 2019, as a result of the pandemic and government mandated closures and a slow ramp-up in visitor volume after reopening in July 2020, in large part due to travel restrictions. Our visitor volume has not yet fully returned to 2019 levels. During 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 and 2024, visitor volume was 0.5 million, 0.8 million, 2.2 million, 2.6 million, and 2.6 million, respectively, compared to 3.5 million in 2019. Our change in operations of the Observatory to focus on capacity controls to maximize the customer experience, require reservations to control overcrowding and staffing costs, and our increase of per visitor pricing may cause our future Observatory results to differ from previous Observatory results. Any future health or other economic crises, geopolitical events (including global hostilities) or currency exchange rate fluctuations could negatively impact tourist trends and visitor demand for our Observatory, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flow and financial condition. We are also susceptible to reductions in visitor demand due to adverse weather. We compete against other observatories in New York City at the World Trade Center, Rockefeller Center, Hudson Yards, and One Vanderbilt, all of which may divert visitors and negatively impact our revenue.
Previous report
We are required under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act to maintain internal control over financial reporting that meets applicable standards. As of December 31, 2024, we remediated the material weakness that was identified in our internal control over financial reporting for the periods ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 related to the design of certain of our information technology general controls for information systems and applications used in the preparation of our financial statements. See Part II, ITEM 9A, “Controls and Procedures— Remediation of the Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting” for more information. We may not be successful in maintaining our effective internal control over financial reporting or in developing other internal controls. Any failure by us to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting could adversely affect our ability to record, process or report financial information accurately and to prepare financial statements in a timely manner, which could subject us to litigation or investigations requiring management resources and payment of legal and other expenses, negatively affect investor confidence in our financial statements and adversely impact our stock price.
Previous report
Increasing societal, investor and legislative pressure on companies to address sustainability matters may result in increased costs, greater litigation risks, negative impacts on our access to capital markets, and damage to our reputation. For example, policy and other responses to climate change, such as climate and energy legislation and carbon mandates, enhanced environmental reporting requirements, increasingly stringent building and energy codes, as well as technology and market changes from the transition to a low-carbon economy has and may continue to impact our business and results of operations. In addition, certain organizations have developed ratings processes for evaluating companies on their approach to sustainability matters, and such ratings are used by some investors to inform their investment and voting decisions. Unfavorable sustainability ratings may lead to negative investor sentiment toward us and to the diversion of investment to other industries, which could have a negative impact on our stock price and our access to and costs of capital.
Previous report
We publicly announced certain energy, emissions, water and waste reduction targets. These targets and objectives reflect our current plans and goals and are not guarantees that we will be able to achieve them. In addition, these efforts are impacted by our tenants’ willingness and ability to collaborate in reporting sustainability metrics and integrating measures to achieve sustainability performance goals, the ability of the New York grid to meet emissions reduction targets and timing set forth in New York State's Climate Leadership & Community Protection Act legislation, and replacement of equipment at the end of its useful life cycle. Our efforts to accomplish and accurately report on these goals and objectives present operational, regulatory, reputational, financial, legal, and other risks, any of which could have a material negative impact on us, including on our reputation and stock price. The standards for tracking, rating, and reporting on sustainability matters have not been harmonized and continue to evolve. Our selection of disclosure frameworks that seek to align with various voluntary reporting standards may change from time to time and may result in a lack of comparative data from period to period. In addition, our processes and controls may not always align with evolving standards, our interpretation of reporting standards may differ from those of others, and such standards may change over time, any of which could result in significant revisions to our goals or reported progress in achieving such goals. Our failure or perceived failure to pursue or fulfill our announced aspirations and targets or to satisfy various reporting standards within the timelines we announce, or at all, could have a negative impact on investor sentiment, ratings outcomes for evaluating our approach to sustainability matters, stock price, and cost of capital and expose us to government enforcement actions and private litigation, among other possible material adverse impacts.
Previous report
The adoption of or changes in rent control or rent stabilization regulations and eviction regulations in our markets could have an adverse effect on our operations and property values.
Previous report
New York, where our properties are located, has enacted and may continue to enact and/or expand rent control and eviction regulations (such as Good Cause Eviction), which have limited and could continue to limit our ability to raise rents, enforce residents’ or tenants’ contractual rental obligations (such as eviction moratoriums), pursue collections or charge certain fees, all of which could have an adverse impact on our operations and property values.
Previous report
In connection with the formation transactions, we entered into a tax protection agreement with certain Malkin family members, including Anthony E. Malkin and Peter L. Malkin, pursuant to which we have agreed to indemnify the Malkin Group and one additional third-party investor in Metro Center, and in connection with our sale of a 9.9% fully diluted interest in our Company to QIA in 2016, we agreed, subject to certain minimum thresholds and conditions, to indemnify QIA, in each case, against certain tax liabilities that may arise from certain property transactions. See “Financial Statements – Note 11 Related Party Transactions – Excluded Properties and Businesses” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information. If we were to trigger such tax indemnification obligations, we would be required to pay the resulting tax liability to the Malkin Group, the additional third-party investor in Metro Center and/or QIA, as applicable. These obligations may restrict our ability to engage in a strategic transaction, require us to maintain more or different debt, and/or inhibit our disposing of a property that we might judge to otherwise be in the best interest of the securityholders.
Reworded paragraphs (29)
Previous wording
Our properties are geographically concentrated in New York and Connecticut, and adverse state or local economic or regulatory developments could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
Current wording
Our properties are geographically concentrated in New York, and adverse state or local economic or regulatory developments could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
Previous wording
Our commercial portfolio is comprised of properties primarily in New York City as well as in Stamford, Connecticut. As a result, our business is dependent on the New York City economy in general and the market for office, retail and multifamily space in New York City in particular, which exposes us to greater economic and regulatory risks than if we owned a more geographically diverse portfolio. These risks include business layoffs, downsizing, industry slowdowns, and relocations of businesses as well as increases in real estate and other local taxes, and regulatory compliance costs. The current federal tax limits on the deductibility of state and local taxes as well as higher individual tax rate proposals may negatively impact demographic trends in high tax states like New York and Connecticut.
Current wording
Our commercial portfolio is comprised of properties in New York City. As a result, our business is dependent on the New York City economy in general and the market for office, retail and multifamily space in New York City in particular, which exposes us to greater economic and regulatory risks than if we owned a more geographically diverse portfolio. These risks include business layoffs, downsizing, industry slowdowns, and relocations of businesses as well as increases in real estate and other local taxes, and regulatory compliance costs. The current federal tax limits on the deductibility of state and local taxes as well as higher individual tax rate proposals may negatively impact demographic trends in high tax states like New York.
Previous wording
For the year ended December 31, 2024, three of our properties together accounted for approximately 55.5% of our portfolio’s rental revenues, with the Empire State Building individually accounting for approximately 31.9%. Our revenue and cash available for distribution would be materially and adversely affected if any of these three properties were materially damaged or a significant number of their tenants experienced financial strain leading to lease default or bankruptcy filing. Additionally, for fiscal years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, we derived revenue of approximately $136.4 million, $129.4 million and $106.0 million, respectively, from the Empire State Building’s Observatory operations. Loss of revenue from the Observatory has in the past and may in the future have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition.
Current wording
For the year ended December 31, 2025, three of our properties together accounted for approximately 55.6% of our portfolio’s rental revenues, with the Empire State Building individually accounting for approximately 32.3%. Our revenue and cash available for distribution would be materially and adversely affected if any of these three properties were materially damaged or a significant number of their tenants experienced financial strain leading to lease default or bankruptcy filing. Additionally, for fiscal years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, we derived revenue of approximately $128.3 million, $136.4 million and $129.4 million, respectively, from the Empire State Building’s Observatory operations. Loss of revenue from the Observatory has in the past and may in the future have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition.
Previous wording
Our five largest tenants represented approximately 16.5% of our total commercial portfolio’s annualized rent as of December 31, 2024.
Current wording
Our five largest tenants represented approximately 17.4% of our total commercial portfolio’s annualized rent as of December 31, 2025.
Previous wording
As of December 31, 2024, our five largest tenants together represented approximately 16.5% of our total commercial portfolio’s annualized rent, with our largest tenant leasing an aggregate of 0.5 million rentable square feet of office space at one of our office properties, representing approximately 5.4% of our total commercial portfolio rentable square feet and approximately 6.1% of our total commercial portfolio annualized rent. Our significant tenants have in the past, and may in the future, experience financial strain leading to lease default or bankruptcy. In such cases, we may not recover our upfront investments in tenant improvement allowances, concessions, and transaction costs like professional fees and commissions. Upon tenant default, we may experience delays and substantial costs in enforcing our rights and protecting our investment. Our business and financial condition could be materially adversely affected if any of our significant tenants were to suffer a downturn in their business, become insolvent, default under their leases, and/or fail to renew on favorable terms or at all.
Current wording
As of December 31, 2025, our five largest tenants together represented approximately 17.4% of our total commercial portfolio’s annualized rent, with our largest tenant leasing an aggregate of 0.4 million rentable square feet of office space at one of our office properties, representing approximately 4.9% of our total commercial portfolio rentable square feet and approximately 5.5% of our total commercial portfolio annualized rent. Our significant tenants have in the past, and may in the future, experience financial strain leading to lease default or bankruptcy. In such cases, we may not recover our upfront investments in tenant improvement allowances, concessions, and transaction costs like professional fees and commissions. Upon tenant default, we may experience delays and substantial costs in enforcing our rights and protecting our investment. Our business and financial condition could be materially adversely affected if any of our significant tenants were to suffer a downturn in their business, become insolvent, default under their leases, and/or fail to renew on favorable terms or at all.
Previous wording
Downturn in global, national and/or local economies that decreases prospects, demand, occupancy and rental rates for our office, multifamily and retail space can have an adverse impact on the value or price of our assets. For example, the COVID-19 pandemic impacted the entire U.S., including New York and Connecticut where our properties are located. Any future public health crisis or economic downturn could have significant impacts on how people live, work, and travel in ways that have affected and may in the future affect our properties. Such events can also cause delays, cost increases and/or cancellations of planned capital projects. Certain remote work practices implemented in reaction to the pandemic are still in place and have shifted employers and employees away from fully in-person work environments, and a more permanent shift of this type could have an adverse effect on the overall demand for our office space. Additionally, with increased employer flexibility to work from home, current and prospective residents may be less likely to live in dense urban centers or multifamily housing like the properties we own. These trends have impacted our results of operations since the pandemic. If these trends continue, it could impair demand and value at our properties.
Current wording
Downturn in global, national and/or local economies that decreases prospects, demand, occupancy and rental rates for our office, multifamily and retail space can have an adverse impact on the value or price of our assets. For example, the COVID-19 pandemic impacted the entire U.S., including New York where our properties are located. Any future public health crisis or economic downturn could have significant impacts on how people live, work, and travel in ways that have affected and may in the future affect our properties. Such events can also cause delays, cost increases and/or cancellations of planned capital projects. Certain remote work practices implemented in reaction to the pandemic are still in place and have shifted employers and employees away from fully in-person work environments, and a more permanent shift of this type could have an adverse effect on the overall demand for our office space. Additionally, with increased employer flexibility to work from home, current and prospective residents may be less likely to live in dense urban centers or multifamily housing like the properties we own. These trends have impacted our results of operations since the pandemic. If these trends continue, it could impair demand and value at our properties.
Previous wording
As of December 31, 2024, approximately 19.4% of our commercial portfolio’s annualized rent was comprised of retail tenants. In the past, the retail industry has faced reductions in sales revenues and increase in bankruptcies throughout the United States, due to changes in consumer behavior and shift to online shopping. This has reduced rents and demand for physical retail space at street level, which typically commanded the highest rental rates per square foot in office properties. This has also reduced rents and demand for physical retail space located above or below street level. Continued reduced demand, rental rates and occupancy rates for our retail space could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
Current wording
As of December 31, 2025, approximately 20.1% of our commercial portfolio’s annualized rent was comprised of retail tenants. In the past, the retail industry has faced reductions in sales revenues and increase in bankruptcies throughout the United States, due to changes in consumer behavior and shift to online shopping. This has reduced rents and demand for physical retail space at street level, which typically commanded the highest rental rates per square foot in office properties. This has also reduced rents and demand for physical retail space located above or below street level. Continued reduced demand, rental rates and occupancy rates for our retail space could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
Previous wording
The leasing of real estate in New York City and its surrounding metropolitan area is highly competitive in rental rates, location, services and property condition. We have seen increased competition from lessors in offering concessions, short term, amenities, indoor environmental quality and sustainability certifications. See Part I, ITEM 1, “Business— Competition” for more information. Increased competition challenges our ability to lease space and maximize our effective rents. Upon expiration of leases at our properties and with respect to our current vacant space, we may be required to make rent or other concessions to tenants, accommodate increased requests for renovations, build-to-suit remodeling and other improvements or provide additional services to our tenants. In addition, eight of our existing properties are pre-war office properties, which may require more frequent and costly maintenance to retain existing tenants or attract new tenants than newer properties. As a result, and due to the increased competition from lessors in the greater New York City area, we have made, and may have to make, significant capital or other expenditures in order to maintain the competitiveness of our properties. There can be no assurances that any such expenditure would result in higher occupancy, higher rental rates or deter existing tenants from relocating to properties owned by our competitors. If we are unable to match the competition for lack of capital or other reasons, we may fail to attract new tenants or to renew existing tenants.
Current wording
The leasing of real estate in New York City and its surrounding metropolitan area is highly competitive in rental rates, location, services and property condition. We have seen increased competition from lessors in offering concessions, short term, amenities, indoor environmental quality and sustainability certifications. See Part I, ITEM 1, “Business— Competition” for more information. Increased competition challenges our ability to lease space and maximize our effective rents. Upon expiration of leases at our properties and with respect to our current vacant space, we may be required to make rent or other concessions to tenants, accommodate increased requests for renovations, build-to-suit remodeling and other improvements or provide additional services to our tenants. In addition, nine of our properties are pre-war office properties, which may require more frequent and costly maintenance to retain existing tenants or attract new tenants than newer properties. As a result, and due to the increased competition from lessors in the greater New York City area, we have made, and may have to make, significant capital or other expenditures in order to maintain the competitiveness of our properties. There can be no assurances that any such expenditure would result in higher occupancy, higher rental rates or deter existing tenants from relocating to properties owned by our competitors. If we are unable to match the competition for lack of capital or other reasons, we may fail to attract new tenants or to renew existing tenants.
Previous wording
We may be unable to renew leases or re-lease vacant space on favorable terms or at all as leases expire.
Current wording
We may be unable to renew leases or re-lease vacant space on favorable terms or at all as leases expire or lease vacant space after redevelopment.
Previous wording
As of December 31, 2024, we had approximately 0.6 million rentable square feet of vacant space in our office and retail properties. In addition, leases representing 6.5% and 8.2% of the square footage of the office and retail properties in our commercial portfolio will expire in 2025 and 2026, respectively. We cannot be assured that leases scheduled to expire will be renewed or that our properties will be re-leased at net effective rental rates at or above the current average. If the terms of the renewal or re-leasing are less favorable than current terms, or we fail to re-lease such spaces at all, our business, results of operations, cash flow and financial condition will be negatively affected.
Current wording
As of December 31, 2025, we had approximately 0.7 million rentable square feet of vacant space in our office and retail properties, including properties that are under redevelopment. In addition, leases representing 5.1% and 7.3% of the square footage of the office and retail properties in our commercial portfolio will expire in 2026 and 2027, respectively. We cannot be assured that leases scheduled to expire will be renewed or that our properties will be re-leased at net effective rental rates at or above the current average. If the terms of the renewal or re-leasing are less favorable than current terms, or we fail to re-lease such spaces at all, our business, results of operations, cash flow and financial condition will be negatively affected.
Previous wording
Generally, our multifamily leases are for twelve months or less. If the terms of the renewal or reletting are less favorable than current terms, our business, results of operations, cash flow and financial condition will be negatively affected. Given their short-term lease structure, our multifamily rental revenues are more sensitive to market declines.
Current wording
Generally, our multifamily leases range from one to two years. If the terms of the renewal or reletting are less favorable than current terms, our business, results of operations, cash flow and financial condition will be negatively affected. Given their short-term lease structure, our multifamily rental revenues are more sensitive to market declines.
Previous wording
We license the use of the Empire State Building broadcasting mast to third-party television and radio broadcasters. During the year ended December 31, 2024, we derived approximately $15.2 million of revenue (excluding tenant reimbursement income) from such broadcasting licenses and related leases, as compared with about $21 million at its peak. Competition from other broadcasting operations has had a negative impact on revenues, and lease renewals have yielded reduced revenue, and higher operating expenses and capital expenditures. Our broadcast licensees also face a range of competition from advances in technologies and alternative methods of content delivery in their respective industries, as well as changes in consumer behavior, which may reduce the demand for over-the-air broadcast licenses. Government regulations may materially and adversely affect our broadcast revenue by reducing the demand for broadcast licenses by making more spectrum available for wireless broadband service providers.
Current wording
We license the use of the Empire State Building broadcasting mast to third-party television and radio broadcasters. During the year ended December 31, 2025, we derived approximately $15.4 million of revenue (excluding tenant reimbursement income) from such broadcasting licenses and related leases, as compared with about $21.0 million at its peak. Competition from other broadcasting operations has had a negative impact on revenues, and lease renewals have yielded reduced revenue, and higher operating expenses and capital expenditures. Our broadcast licensees also face a range of competition from advances in technologies and alternative methods of content delivery in their respective industries, as well as changes in consumer behavior, which may reduce the demand for over-the-air broadcast licenses. Government regulations may materially and adversely affect our broadcast revenue by reducing the demand for broadcast licenses by making more spectrum available for wireless broadband service providers.
Previous wording
Real estate investments are relatively difficult to sell quickly. Return of capital and realization of gains from an investment generally will occur upon disposition or refinancing. In addition, the Code imposes restrictions on the ability of a REIT to dispose of properties that are not applicable to other types of real estate companies. We may be unable to realize our investment objectives by sale, other disposition or refinancing at attractive prices within any given period of time.
Current wording
Real estate investments are relatively difficult to sell quickly. Return of capital and realization of gains from an investment generally will occur upon disposition or refinancing. In addition, the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, (the "Code") imposes restrictions on the ability of a REIT to dispose of properties that are not applicable to other types of real estate companies. We may be unable to realize our investment objectives by sale, other disposition or refinancing at attractive prices within any given period of time.
Previous wording
We may dispose of properties in transactions that are intended to qualify as “like kind exchanges” under Section 1031 of the Code. It is possible that the qualification of a transaction as a like-kind exchange could be successfully challenged and determined to be currently taxable. In such case, our taxable income and earnings and profits would increase. In some circumstances, we may be required to pay additional dividends or, in lieu of that, corporate income tax, possibly including interest and penalties. As a result, we may be required to borrow funds to pay additional dividends or taxes, and any payment of taxes could cause us to have less cash available to distribute to our shareholders. In addition, if a like-kind exchange was later determined to be taxable, we may be required to amend our tax returns for the applicable year in question, including any information reports we sent our shareholders. We could also be subject to significant indemnity obligations if the applicable property was subject to a tax protection agreement.
Current wording
We have and in the future may dispose of properties in transactions that are intended to qualify as “like kind exchanges” under Section 1031 of the Code. It is possible that the qualification of a transaction as a like-kind exchange could be successfully challenged and determined to be currently taxable. In such case, our taxable income and earnings and profits would increase. In some circumstances, we may be required to pay additional dividends or, in lieu of that, corporate income tax, possibly including interest and penalties. As a result, we may be required to borrow funds to pay additional dividends or taxes, and any payment of taxes could cause us to have less cash available to distribute to our shareholders. In addition, if a like-kind exchange was later determined to be taxable, we may be required to amend our tax returns for the applicable year in question, including any information reports we sent our shareholders. We could also be subject to significant indemnity obligations if the applicable property was subject to a tax protection agreement.
Previous wording
As of December 31, 2024, we had total debt outstanding of approximately $2.3 billion inclusive of total mortgages of approximately $704.3 million. See “Financial Statements— Note 5 Debt” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information. Our organizational documents do not limit the debt we may incur, and we may incur significant additional debt to finance future acquisition and development activities. Our current and potential levels of debt, and the limitations in our loan documents could have significant adverse consequences to our cash flow and our ability to service and refinance our debt. We may be forced to dispose of one or more of our properties, possibly on disadvantageous terms. We may default on our debt obligations, in which case the lenders may accelerate our debt obligations and foreclose on any mortgaged properties. Our default on one debt with cross-default provisions could result in a default on other debt. In addition, our revolving credit facility and related term loan bear interest at a variable rate. We may incur indebtedness in the future that also bears interest at a variable rate or may be required to refinance our debt at higher rates. If any one of these events were to occur, our results of operations, cash flow, financial condition, and ability to service debt and to make distributions could be adversely affected.
Current wording
As of December 31, 2025, we had total debt outstanding of approximately $2.4 billion inclusive of total mortgages of approximately $629.0 million. See “Financial Statements— Note 5 Debt” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information. Our organizational documents do not limit the debt we may incur, and we may incur significant additional debt to finance future acquisition and development activities. Our current and potential levels of debt, and the limitations in our loan documents could have significant adverse consequences to our cash flow and our ability to service and refinance our debt. We may be forced to dispose of one or more of our properties, possibly on disadvantageous terms. We may default on our debt obligations, in which case the lenders may accelerate our debt obligations and foreclose on any mortgaged properties. Our default on one debt with cross-default provisions could result in a default on other debt. In addition, our revolving credit facility and related term loan bear interest at a variable rate. We may incur indebtedness in the future that also bears interest at a variable rate or may be required to refinance our debt at higher rates. If any one of these events were to occur, our results of operations, cash flow, financial condition, and ability to service debt and to make distributions could be adversely affected.
Previous wording
Our properties are concentrated in the New York metropolitan area. Natural disasters and physical climate risk including earthquakes, storms, storm surges, tornados, floods, extreme temperatures, hurricanes and rising sea levels, could cause significant damage or limit access to our properties and adversely impact the areas in which we operate. These conditions could result in declining demand for our commercial and multifamily properties, compromise our ability to operate the buildings to the requirements and parameters set forth in our leases, make insurance less affordable or available, and increase the cost of energy and utilities at our properties. Also, certain of our properties could not be rebuilt to their existing height or size under current land use laws. In that event, we may have to upgrade such property to meet code requirements. Our disaster recovery and business continuity plans may not be adequate to address these risks.
Current wording
Our properties are concentrated in the New York metropolitan area. Natural disasters and physical climate risks including earthquakes, storms, storm surges, tornados, floods, extreme temperatures, hurricanes and rising sea levels could cause significant damage or limit access to our properties and adversely impact the areas in which we operate. These conditions could result in declining demand for our commercial and multifamily properties, compromise our ability to operate the buildings to the requirements and parameters set forth in our leases, make insurance less affordable or available, and increase the cost of energy and utilities at our properties. Also, certain of our properties could not be rebuilt to their existing height or size under current land use laws. In that event, we may have to upgrade such property to meet code requirements. Our disaster recovery and business continuity plans may not be adequate to address these risks.
Previous wording
Under various federal, state and/or local laws, ordinances and regulations, as a current or former owner or operator of real property, we may be liable for costs and damages resulting from the presence or release of hazardous substances, waste, or petroleum products at, on, in, under or from such property, including costs for investigation or remediation, natural resource damages, or third-party liability for personal injury or property damage. We also may be liable for the costs of remediating contamination at off-site disposal or treatment facilities when we arrange for disposal or treatment of hazardous substances at such facilities, without regard to whether we comply with environmental laws in doing so. Some of our properties have been or may be impacted by contamination arising from current or prior uses of the property or adjacent properties for commercial, industrial or other purposes. Such contamination may arise from spills of petroleum or hazardous substances or releases from tanks used to store such materials. For example, a portion of the Metro Tower site is currently used for automobile parking and was formerly leased to a fueling facility, and we have post-closing obligations related to our Westport properties sold in 2023 related to remediation of storage tank and soil contamination. See Part I, ITEM 1, "Business— Environmental Matters" for further information. The presence of contamination or the failure to remediate contamination on our properties may adversely affect our ability to attract and/or retain tenants, and our ability to develop or sell or borrow against those properties. In addition to potential liability for cleanup costs, private plaintiffs may bring claims for personal injury, property damage or for similar reasons. Environmental laws also may create liens on contaminated sites in favor of the government for damages and costs it incurs to address such contamination. Moreover, if contamination is discovered on our properties, environmental laws may impose restrictions on the manner in which that property may be used or how businesses may be operated on that property.
Current wording
Under various federal, state and/or local laws, ordinances and regulations, as a current or former owner or operator of real property, we may be liable for costs and damages resulting from the presence or release of hazardous substances, waste, or petroleum products at, on, in, under or from such property, including costs for investigation or remediation, natural resource damages, or third-party liability for personal injury or property damage. We also may be liable for the costs of remediating contamination at off-site disposal or treatment facilities when we arrange for disposal or treatment of hazardous substances at such facilities, without regard to whether we comply with environmental laws in doing so. Some of our properties have been or may be impacted by contamination arising from current or prior uses of the property or adjacent properties for commercial, industrial or other purposes. Such contamination may arise from spills of petroleum or hazardous substances or releases from tanks used to store such materials. For example, a portion of the Metro Tower site, the undeveloped parcel we own adjacent to our recently sold Metro Center asset, is currently used for automobile parking and was formerly leased to a fueling facility. See Part I, ITEM 1, "Business— Environmental Matters" for further information. The presence of contamination or the failure to remediate contamination on our properties may adversely affect our ability to attract and/or retain tenants, and our ability to develop or sell or borrow against those properties. In addition to potential liability for cleanup costs, private plaintiffs may bring claims for personal injury, property damage or for similar reasons. Environmental laws also may create liens on contaminated sites in favor of the government for damages and costs it incurs to address such contamination. Moreover, if contamination is discovered on our properties, environmental laws may impose restrictions on the manner in which that property may be used or how businesses may be operated on that property.
Previous wording
In addition, our properties are subject to various federal, state and local environmental and health and safety laws and regulations, and noncompliance could subject us or our tenants to liability. These liabilities could affect a tenant’s ability to make rental payments to us. Moreover, changes in laws could increase the potential costs of compliance or increase liability for noncompliance. We sometimes require our tenants to comply with environmental and health and safety laws and regulations and to indemnify us for any related liabilities in our leases with them. But in the event of the bankruptcy or inability of any of our tenants to satisfy such obligations, we may be required to satisfy such obligations. In addition, we may become subject to new compliance requirements and/or new costs or taxes associated with natural resource or energy usage and related emissions (such as a carbon tax), which could increase our operating costs. See "We may incur significant costs to comply with environmental laws, in particular New York City’s Local Law 97"in this section.
Current wording
In addition, our properties are subject to various federal, state and local environmental and health and safety laws and regulations, and noncompliance could subject us or our tenants to liability. These liabilities could affect a tenant’s ability to make rental payments to us. Moreover, changes in laws could increase the potential costs of compliance or increase liability for noncompliance. We sometimes require our tenants to comply with environmental and health and safety laws and regulations and to indemnify us for any related liabilities in our leases with them. But in the event of the bankruptcy or inability of any of our tenants to satisfy such obligations, we may be required to satisfy such obligations. In addition, we may become subject to new compliance requirements and/or new costs or taxes associated with natural resource or energy usage and related emissions (such as a carbon tax), which could increase our operating costs. See "We may incur significant costs to comply with environmental laws, for example New York City’s Local Law 97"in this section.
Previous wording
We may become subject to new compliance requirements and/or new costs or taxes associated with natural resource or energy or utility usage and related emissions (such as a “carbon tax”), which could increase our operating costs. In particular, as the owner of large covered commercial and multifamily buildings in New York City, we are subject to Local Law 97 passed by the New York City Council in April 2019, which for each such covered building establishes annual limits for greenhouse gas emissions, requires yearly compliance reports beginning in May 2025 for calendar year 2024 performance, and imposes penalties for emissions above such limits. While we are actively working to reduce our carbon emissions, there can be no assurance that we will be able to operate within the limits of Local Law 97, or that the costs of compliance and/or penalties will not be material. Based upon our present understanding of the law and calculations related thereto, we expect to pay no Local Law 97 fine on any covered building in our portfolio in the 2024-2029 period of enforcement.
Current wording
We may become subject to new compliance requirements and/or new costs or taxes associated with natural resource or energy or utility usage and related emissions (such as a carbon tax), which could increase our operating costs. In particular, as the owner of large covered commercial and multifamily buildings in New York City, we are subject to Local Law 97, which establishes annual greenhouse gas emissions limits for covered buildings and imposes penalties for emissions that exceed applicable thresholds. While we currently expect, based on our present understanding of the law and implementing rules and our internal projections of building emissions, to operate within the applicable limits during the 2024–2029 enforcement period, our expectations are based on assumptions regarding building performance, tenant energy usage and utility grid emissions factors. Regulatory developments, changes in enforcement guidance, changes in building operations, tenant behavior, energy consumption patterns, or utility emissions factors could cause us to exceed emissions limits or incur additional compliance costs or penalties, which could be material.
Previous wording
As of December 31, 2024, we have collective bargaining agreements that cover 429 employees, or 64% of our workforce, that service our portfolio. Our inability to negotiate acceptable renewals as existing agreements expire could result in strikes or work stoppages and disrupt our operations. In any such event for any extended period of time, we would likely engage temporary replacement workers, which would result in increased operating costs.
Current wording
As of December 31, 2025, we have collective bargaining agreements that cover 407 employees, or 63% of our workforce, that service our portfolio. Our inability to negotiate acceptable renewals as existing agreements expire has resulted and could in the future result in strikes or work stoppages that disrupt our operations. In any such event for any extended period of time, we would likely engage temporary replacement workers, which would result in increased operating costs.
Previous wording
Increasing attention to sustainability matters may impact our business.
Current wording
Stakeholder attention to sustainability matters may impact our business.
Previous wording
We rely extensively on technology, both internal and outsourced, to process transactions and manage our business, making our business increasingly at risk from cyberattacks. These threats, which continue to increase in number, intensity and sophistication, include malware, ransomware, computer viruses, phishing, unauthorized access, and other vectors used by hackers, terrorists, foreign governments, and other actors. Cyber threats and attacks on our Company have included and could in the future include internal and external attempts to gain unauthorized access to our data and computer systems to disrupt our operations or the operations of our tenants and residents, destroy property, or steal confidential information. There is no guarantee that our controls or measures to prevent or mitigate such attacks will be successful. A cyberattack could compromise the confidential information of our employees, tenants, residents, customers, and vendors, and disrupt our business operations and relationships. A security breach could require us to expend significant resources to remediate and may subject us to litigation, damages, penalties, fines, governmental investigations and enforcement actions or termination of leases. Any compromise of our security could also result in a violation of applicable privacy laws (e.g., Observatory customer data, Company employee data, or residential data at multifamily properties). These consequences could result in negative legal consequences as well as significant damage to our business and financial condition and reputation. New laws and regulations related to data privacy and security pose increasingly complex compliance challenges and costs across multiple jurisdictions, which could negatively impact our business and financial condition.
Current wording
We rely extensively on technology, both internal and outsourced, to process transactions and manage our business, making our business increasingly at risk from cyberattacks. These threats, which continue to increase in number, intensity and sophistication, include malware, ransomware, computer viruses, phishing, unauthorized access, and other vectors used by hackers, terrorists, foreign governments, and other actors. Cyber threats and attacks on our Company have included and could in the future include internal and external attempts to gain unauthorized access to our data and computer systems to disrupt our operations or the operations of our tenants and residents, destroy property, or steal confidential information. There is no guarantee that our controls or measures to prevent or mitigate such attacks will be successful. A cyberattack could compromise the confidential information of our employees, tenants, residents, customers, and vendors, and disrupt our business operations and relationships. A security breach could require us to expend significant resources to remediate and may subject us to litigation, damages, penalties, fines, governmental investigations and enforcement actions or termination of leases. Any compromise of our security could also result in a violation of applicable privacy laws (e.g., Observatory customer data, Company employee data, or residential data at multifamily properties). These consequences could result in negative legal consequences as well as significant damage to our business and financial condition and reputation. Our vendors and other parties with whom we do business face similar threats and an incident at one of these entities could adversely impact our business. These entities are typically outside our control and may have access to certain of our information with varying levels of security and cybersecurity resources. New laws and regulations related to data privacy and security pose increasingly complex compliance challenges and costs across multiple jurisdictions, which could negatively impact our business and financial condition. We have begun the use of AI capabilities in our business and operations. We may not be successful in identifying or resolving issues before they arise. There can be no assurance that we or our service providers will properly implement AI, and the failure to do so could similarly result in negative legal consequences as well as significant damage to our business and financial condition and reputation.
Previous wording
Although we believe that we will remain organized and will continue to operate so as to qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, our Board may revoke our REIT election, without stockholder approval, if the Board determines that it is no longer in our best interest to continue to qualify as a REIT or we may fail to remain so qualified. Qualifications are governed by highly technical and complex provisions of the Code for which there are only limited judicial or administrative interpretations and depend on various facts and circumstances that are not entirely within our control. In addition, legislation, new regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions may significantly change the relevant tax laws and/or the U.S. federal income tax consequences of qualifying as a REIT. If, with respect to any taxable year, we fail to maintain our qualification as a REIT and do not qualify under statutory relief provisions, we could not deduct distributions to shareholders in computing our taxable income and would have to pay U.S. federal income tax on our taxable income at regular corporate rates and thus reduce funds available for distribution and debt service, and we would not be required to make distributions until we re-qualified as a REIT which would not be permitted for the four taxable years following our disqualification, unless we gained relief under relevant statutory provisions. Refer to Part I, ITEM 1, “Business – Our Tax Status” for more information.
Current wording
Although we believe that we will remain organized and will continue to operate so as to qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, our Board may revoke our REIT election, without stockholder approval, if the Board determines that it is no longer in our best interest to continue to qualify as a REIT or we may fail to remain so qualified. Qualifications are governed by highly technical and complex provisions of the Code for which there are only limited judicial or administrative interpretations and depend on various facts and circumstances that are not entirely within our control. In addition, legislation, new regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions may significantly change the relevant tax laws and/or the U.S. federal income tax consequences of qualifying as a REIT. In addition, certain asset dispositions, financing or investment strategies may be limited by the requirements necessary to maintain our REIT qualification. If, with respect to any taxable year, we fail to maintain our qualification as a REIT and do not qualify under statutory relief provisions, we could not deduct distributions to shareholders in computing our taxable income and would have to pay U.S. federal income tax on our taxable income at regular corporate rates and thus reduce funds available for distribution and debt service, and we would not be required to make distributions until we re-qualified as a REIT which would not be permitted for the four taxable years following the taxable year of our disqualification, unless we gained relief under relevant statutory provisions. Refer to Part I, ITEM 1, “Business – Our Tax Status” for more information.
Previous wording
While we intend to continue to qualify as a “domestically controlled” REIT for purposes of the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act of 1980, we cannot assure that result, as our Class A common stock is publicly traded, QIA (a non-U.S. holder) owns approximately 17.97% of our common stock and other non-U.S. holders may now or in the future hold additional shares. If we were to fail to qualify, gains realized by a foreign investor (other than a “qualified shareholder,” a “qualified foreign pension fund” or a “qualified controlled entity”) on a sale of our common stock would be subject to FIRPTA unless (a) our common stock was traded on an established securities market and the foreign investor did not at any time during a specific testing period directly or indirectly own more than 10% of the value of our outstanding common stock, or (b) another exemption from FIRPTA were applicable.
Current wording
While we intend to continue to qualify as a “domestically controlled” REIT for purposes of the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act of 1980, we cannot assure that result, as our Class A common stock is publicly traded, QIA (a non-U.S. holder) owns approximately 17.63% of our common stock and other non-U.S. holders may now or in the future hold additional shares. If we were to fail to qualify, gains realized by a foreign investor (other than a “qualified shareholder,” a “qualified foreign pension fund” or a “qualified controlled entity”) on a sale of our common stock would be subject to FIRPTA unless (a) our common stock was traded on an established securities market and the foreign investor did not at any time during a specific testing period directly or indirectly own more than 10% of the value of our outstanding common stock, or (b) another exemption from FIRPTA were applicable.
Previous wording
Status” for more information. In order to satisfy the gross income or asset tests applicable to REITs under the Code, we may be required to forego investments that we otherwise would make or liquidate otherwise attractive investments. We intend to distribute our taxable net income to our securityholders in a manner intended to satisfy the REIT 90% distribution requirement and to avoid U.S. federal income tax and the 4% nondeductible excise tax. Refer to Part I, ITEM 1, “Business – Our Tax Status” for more information. Any failure to do so will incur substantial entity level tax and/or disqualification as a REIT with the adverse tax consequences and limits on re-qualification described above in this section. In addition, our taxable income may exceed our net income as determined by GAAP. As a result of the foregoing, we may generate less cash flow than taxable income in a particular year, and we may incur U.S. federal income tax and the 4% nondeductible excise tax on that income if we do not distribute such income to securityholders in that year. In that event, we may be required to use cash reserves, incur debt or liquidate assets at rates or times that we regard as unfavorable or make a taxable distribution of our shares in order to satisfy such REIT requirements and avoid such taxes.
Current wording
If we fail to comply with the income and asset requirements for a REIT at the end of any calendar quarter, we must correct the failure within 30 days after the end of the calendar quarter or qualify for certain other statutory relief provisions to avoid losing our REIT qualification and suffering adverse tax consequences. Refer to Part I, ITEM 1, “Business – Our Tax Status” for more information. In order to satisfy the gross income or asset tests applicable to REITs under the Code, we may be required to forego investments that we otherwise would make or liquidate otherwise attractive investments. We intend to distribute our taxable net income to our securityholders in a manner intended to satisfy the REIT 90% distribution requirement and to avoid U.S. federal income tax and the 4% nondeductible excise tax. Refer to Part I, ITEM 1, “Business – Our Tax Status” for more information. Any failure to do so will incur substantial entity level tax and/or disqualification as a REIT with the adverse tax consequences and limits on re-qualification described above in this section. In addition, our taxable income may exceed our net income as determined by GAAP. As a result of the foregoing, we may generate less cash flow than taxable income in a particular year, and we may incur U.S. federal income tax and the 4% nondeductible excise tax on that income if we do not distribute such income to securityholders in that year. In that event, we may be required to use cash reserves, incur debt or liquidate assets at rates or times that we regard as unfavorable or make a taxable distribution of our shares in order to satisfy such REIT requirements and avoid such taxes.
Previous wording
A REIT may own up to 100% of the stock of one or more TRSs. A TRS may hold assets and earn income that would not be qualifying assets or income if held or earned directly by a REIT. A corporation of which a TRS directly or indirectly owns more than 35% of the voting power or value of the stock will automatically be treated as a TRS. Overall, no more than 20% of the value of a REIT’s assets may consist of securities of one or more TRSs. TRSs are subject to U.S. federal, state and local income taxation, as applicable. The rules also impose a 100% excise tax on certain transactions between a TRS and its parent REIT that are not conducted on an arm’s-length basis.
Current wording
A REIT may own up to 100% of the stock of one or more TRSs. A TRS may hold assets and earn income that would not be qualifying assets or income if held or earned directly by a REIT. A corporation of which a TRS directly or indirectly owns more than 35% of the voting power or value of the stock will automatically be treated as a TRS. Overall, no more than 20% (25% for taxable years ending after December 31, 2025) of the value of a REIT’s assets may consist of securities of one or more TRSs. TRSs are subject to U.S. federal, state and local income taxation, as applicable. The rules also impose a 100% excise tax on certain transactions between a TRS and its parent REIT that are not conducted on an arm’s-length basis.
Previous wording
As of December 31, 2024, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Anthony E. Malkin, together with the Malkin Group, has the right to vote 40,859,706 shares of our common stock, which represents approximately 19.0% of the voting power of our outstanding common stock. Consequently, Mr. Malkin has the ability to influence the outcome of matters presented to our securityholders, including the election of our board and approval of significant corporate transactions, including business combinations, consolidations and mergers and the determination of our day-to-day corporate and management policies.
Current wording
As of December 31, 2025, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Anthony E. Malkin, together with the Malkin Group, has the right to vote 40,859,706 shares of our common stock, which represents approximately 18.7% of the voting power of our outstanding common stock. Consequently, Mr. Malkin has the ability to influence the outcome of matters presented to our securityholders, including the election of our board and approval of significant corporate transactions, including business combinations, consolidations and mergers and the determination of our day-to-day corporate and management policies.
Previous wording
As of December 31, 2024, QIA had a 10.90% fully diluted interest in us, which represented 17.97% of the outstanding Class A common stock. Pursuant to the terms of our stockholders agreement with QIA, QIA generally has the right (but not the obligation) to maintain its fully diluted economic interest in us by purchasing additional shares of our Class A common stock when we or our operating partnership issue additional common equity securities from time to time. While QIA has agreed to limit its voting power on all matters presented to our securityholders to no more than 9.9% of total number of votes entitled to be cast, QIA has also agreed to vote its shares in favor of the election of all director nominees recommended by our board. The interests of Mr. Malkin and QIA could conflict with or differ from your interests as a holder of our common stock, and these large securityholders may exercise their right as securityholders to restrict our ability to take certain actions that may otherwise be in the best interests of our securityholders. This concentration of voting power might also have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control that our securityholders may view as beneficial.
Current wording
As of December 31, 2025, QIA had a 10.76% fully diluted interest in us, which represented 17.63% of the outstanding Class A common stock. Pursuant to the terms of our stockholders agreement with QIA, QIA generally has the right (but not the obligation) to maintain its fully diluted economic interest in us by purchasing additional shares of our Class A common stock when we or our operating partnership issue additional common equity securities from time to time. While QIA has agreed to limit its voting power on all matters presented to our securityholders to no more than 9.9% of total number of votes entitled to be cast, QIA has also agreed to vote its shares in favor of the election of all director nominees recommended by our board. The interests of Mr. Malkin and QIA could conflict with or differ from your interests as a holder of our common stock, and these large securityholders may exercise their right as securityholders to restrict our ability to take certain actions that may otherwise be in the best interests of our securityholders. This concentration of voting power might also have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control that our securityholders may view as beneficial.
Previous wording
Our board may waive, in its sole discretion, or modify the ownership limit with respect to one or more persons if it is satisfied that ownership in excess of this limit will not jeopardize the Company’s status as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. For example, we have entered into such a waiver with QIA, which permits QIA to own up to 15% of the outstanding shares of our Class A common stock and an aggregate amount of Class A common stock equal to a 9.9% fully diluted economic interest in the Company (inclusive of all outstanding common OP units and LTIP units), which currently equals approximately 17.97% of our outstanding Class A common stock, all subject to a supplementary waiver which may adjust the foregoing limits to the extent QIA’s ownership percentage increases solely as a result the Company’s share buybacks.
Current wording
Our board may waive, in its sole discretion, or modify the ownership limit with respect to one or more persons if it is satisfied that ownership in excess of this limit will not jeopardize the Company’s status as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. For example, we have entered into such a waiver with QIA, which permits QIA to own up to 15% of the outstanding shares of our Class A common stock and an aggregate amount of Class A common stock equal to a 9.9% fully diluted economic interest in the Company (inclusive of all outstanding common OP units and LTIP units), which currently equals approximately 17.63% of our outstanding Class A common stock, all subject to a supplementary waiver which may adjust the foregoing limits to the extent QIA’s ownership percentage increases solely as a result the Company’s share buybacks.
Rearranged previous paragraphs (1)
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
If we fail to comply with the income and asset requirements for a REIT at the end of any calendar quarter, we must correct the failure within 30 days after the end of the calendar quarter or qualify for certain other statutory relief provisions to avoid losing our REIT qualification and suffering adverse tax consequences. Refer to Part I, ITEM 1, “Business – Our Tax