SERA PROGNOSTICS, INC.

Previous wording

We have incurred net losses each year since our inception in 2008. To date, we have financed our operations primarily through private placements of our equity and debt securities, bank loans, the sale and issuance of Class A common stock in our IPO, and the sale and issuance of Class A common stock and pre-funded warrants in the February 2025 Offering. Our net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 was $17.5 million and $16.2 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2026, we had an accumulated deficit of $329.3 million. Our losses may continue to increase in the future as we continue to devote a substantial portion of our resources to efforts to increase the adoption of, and reimbursement for, the PreTRM test, make improvements to this product, and research, develop and commercialize new products and services.

Current wording

We have incurred net losses each year since our inception in 2008. To date, we have financed our operations primarily through private placements of our equity and debt securities, bank loans, the sale and issuance of Class A common stock in our IPO, and the sale and issuance of Class A common stock and pre-funded warrants in the February 2025 Offering. Our net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025 was $25.6 million and $24.0 million, respectively. As of September 30, 2026, we had an accumulated deficit of $337.3 million. Our losses may continue to increase in the future as we continue to devote a substantial portion of our resources to efforts to increase the adoption of, and reimbursement for, the PreTRM test, make improvements to this product, and research, develop and commercialize new products and services.

Previous wording

We currently receive substantially all of our revenues from the sales of the PreTRM test and expect to continue to receive substantially all of our revenue from sales of the PreTRM test and our other pipeline products and services in the future. It is possible that we will not generate sufficient revenue from the sales of any of our products and services to cover our costs, including research and development expenses related to furthering our product pipeline, and achieve or sustain profitability. A significant element of our business strategy is to increase and maintain our in-network coverage with third-party payers. However, third-party payers, such as commercial insurers and government health care programs, may decide not to reimburse for the PreTRM test or other tests we may develop, may not reimburse for uses of the PreTRM test or our other tests for the pregnant patient population, or may set the amounts of such reimbursements at prices that do not allow us to cover our expenses. Many third-party payers currently either have negative coverage determinations or otherwise do not reimburse for low-risk patient preterm birth screening tests. State Medicaid programs currently do not reimburse for our tests; third-party payers are increasingly requiring that prior authorization be obtained prior to conducting testing as a condition to reimbursing for it, which may reduce and/or delay the reimbursement amounts.

Current wording

We currently receive substantially all of our revenues from the sales of the PreTRM test and expect to continue to receive substantially all of our revenue from sales of the PreTRM test and our other pipeline products and services in the future. It is possible that we will not generate sufficient revenue from the sales of any of our products and services to cover our costs, including research and development expenses related to furthering our product pipeline, and achieve or sustain profitability. A significant element of our business strategy is to increase and maintain our in-network coverage with third-party payers. However, third-party payers, such as commercial insurers and government health care programs, may decide not to reimburse for the PreTRM test or other tests we may develop, may not reimburse for uses of the PreTRM test or our other tests for the pregnant patient population, or may set the amounts of such reimbursements at prices that do not allow us to cover our expenses. Many third-party payers currently either have negative coverage determinations or otherwise do not reimburse for low-risk patient preterm birth screening tests. Many state Medicaid programs currently do not cover our tests; third-party payers are increasingly requiring that prior authorization be obtained prior to conducting testing as a condition to reimbursing for it, which may reduce and/or delay the reimbursement amounts.

Previous wording

As there is a possibility that our Company, any collaborators and/or licensees may not successfully develop additional products, obtain required regulatory authorizations for such products, manufacture such products at an acceptable cost or with sufficient quality or successfully market and sell such products with desired margins, our expenses may continue to exceed any revenues we may receive. Our operating expenses also will increase as, or if, among other factors:

Current wording

As there is a possibility that we, any of our collaborators and/or our licensees may not successfully develop additional products, obtain required regulatory authorizations for such products, manufacture such products at an acceptable cost or with sufficient quality or successfully market and sell such products with desired margins, our expenses may continue to exceed any revenues we may receive. Our operating expenses also will increase as, or if, among other factors:

Previous wording

Inflation and rapid increases in interest rates have led to a decline in the trading value of previously issued government securities with interest rates below current market interest rates. In March 2023, following the failures of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank, the U.S. Department of Treasury, FDIC and Federal Reserve Board announced the Bank Term Funding Program, or BTFP, to provide up to $25 billion of loans to financial institutions secured by certain of such government securities held by financial institutions to mitigate the risk of potential losses on the sale of such instruments. The BTFP ceased making new loans in March 2024. While the Federal Reserve’s discount window remains available to eligible depository institutions, there can be no assurance that available liquidity facilities will be sufficient to address widespread demands for customer withdrawals or other liquidity needs of financial institutions. There is no guarantee that the U.S. Department of Treasury, FDIC and Federal Reserve Board will take similar emergency measures or provide access to uninsured funds in the future in the event of the closure of other banks or financial institutions, or that they would do so in a timely fashion.

Current wording

Inflation and rapid increases in interest rates have led to a decline in the trading value of previously issued government securities with interest rates below current market interest rates.

Previous wording

We face competition with respect to the PreTRM test and expect to face competition with respect to any product candidates that we may seek to develop or commercialize in the future. Many of the companies against which we are competing or may compete against in the future have significantly greater financial resources and expertise in research and development, manufacturing, and commercialization. Mergers and acquisitions in our industry may result in even more resources being concentrated among a smaller number of our competitors. Smaller and early-stage companies may also prove to be significant competitors, particularly through collaborative arrangements with large and established companies. These third parties compete with us in recruiting and retaining qualified scientific and management personnel and conducting clinical trials, as well as in acquiring technologies complementary to, or necessary for, our products and services.

Current wording

We face competition with respect to the PreTRM test and expect to face competition with respect to any product candidates that we may seek to develop or commercialize in the future. Many of the companies against which we are competing or may compete in the future have significantly greater financial resources and expertise in research and development, manufacturing, and commercialization. Mergers and acquisitions in our industry may result in even more resources being concentrated among a smaller number of our competitors. Smaller and early-stage companies may also prove to be significant competitors, particularly through collaborative arrangements with large and established companies. These third parties compete with us in recruiting and retaining qualified scientific and management personnel and conducting clinical trials, as well as in acquiring technologies complementary to, or necessary for, our products and services.

Previous wording

From time to time, we have made select headcount reductions to more effectively allocate costs toward a refined focus on those opportunities deemed most promising in the near-term from a product adoption and revenue generation perspective. Such headcount reductions may result in unintended consequences and costs, such as the loss of institutional knowledge and expertise, attrition beyond the intended number of employees, decreased morale among our remaining employees, and the risk that we may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the headcount reductions. In addition, while positions have been eliminated, certain functions necessary to our operations remain, and we may be unsuccessful in distributing the duties and obligations of departed employees among our remaining employees. The headcount reductions could also make it difficult for us to pursue, or prevent us from pursuing, new opportunities and initiatives due to insufficient personnel, or require us to incur additional and unanticipated costs to hire new personnel to pursue such opportunities or initiatives. If we are unable to realize the anticipated benefits from the headcount reductions, or if we experience significant adverse consequences from the headcount reductions, our business, financial condition, and results of operations may be materially adversely affected.

Current wording

From time to time, we have made select headcount reductions to more effectively allocate costs toward a refined focus on those opportunities deemed most promising in the near-term from a product adoption and revenue generation perspective. For example, in May 2026, we adopted operational changes to concentrate resources on the continued, disciplined commercialization of the PreTRM test by prioritizing resources toward payer engagement, market access, and clinical adoption, while reducing operating expenses in areas that are non-core to these commercialization activities. As part of these changes, we reduced our workforce by 14 full-time employees, or approximately 18% of our workforce. Such headcount reductions may result in unintended consequences and costs, such as the loss of institutional knowledge and expertise, attrition beyond the intended number of employees, decreased morale among our remaining employees, and the risk that we may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the headcount reductions. In addition, while positions have been eliminated, certain functions necessary to our operations remain, and we may be unsuccessful in distributing the duties and obligations of departed employees among our remaining employees. The headcount reductions could also make it difficult for us to pursue, or prevent us from pursuing, new opportunities and initiatives due to insufficient personnel, or require us to incur additional and unanticipated costs to hire new personnel to pursue such opportunities or initiatives. If we are unable to realize the anticipated benefits from the headcount reductions, or if we experience significant adverse consequences from the headcount reductions, our business, financial condition, and results of operations may be materially adversely affected.

Previous wording

Changes in U.S. federal policy that affect the geopolitical landscape could give rise to circumstances outside our control that could have negative impacts on our business operations. For example, during the prior Trump administration, increased tariffs were implemented on goods imported into the United States, particularly from China, Canada, and Mexico. In addition, during 2025, new tariffs were imposed in the United States for imports from a broad range of countries and materials. Several countries, including China and Canada, implemented or proposed retaliatory tariffs on imports from the United States, as well as other barriers to trade, and have contributed to increased trade tensions and economic uncertainty. Tariff rates have since fluctuated as a result of bilateral negotiations and legal challenges, and product-specific tariffs, including on pharmaceuticals, have also been implemented. In February 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the President lacks authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose tariffs, invalidating certain tariffs that had been imposed pursuant to that statute. As a result, certain tariffs imposed during fiscal year 2025 are no longer being collected. However, the ruling does not limit the ability of the U.S. government to impose tariffs under other statutory authorities. In response to the ruling, President Trump has announced new tariffs, including a global tariff of 10% imposed pursuant to a separate executive order and trade authority. Political tensions as a result of such trade policies could reduce trade volume, investment, technological exchange and other economic activities between major international economies, resulting in a material adverse effect on global economic conditions and the stability of global financial markets. Any changes in political, trade, regulatory, and economic conditions, including U.S. trade policies, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

Current wording

Changes in U.S. federal policy that affect the geopolitical landscape could give rise to circumstances outside our control that could have negative impacts on our business operations. For example, during the prior Trump administration, increased tariffs were implemented on goods imported into the United States, particularly from China, Canada, and Mexico. In addition, during 2025, new tariffs were imposed in the United States for imports from a broad range of countries and materials. Several countries, including China and Canada, implemented or proposed retaliatory tariffs on imports from the United States, as well as other barriers to trade, and have contributed to increased trade tensions and economic uncertainty. Tariff rates have since fluctuated as a result of bilateral negotiations and legal challenges, and product-specific tariffs, including on pharmaceuticals, have also been implemented. In February 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the President lacks authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose tariffs, invalidating certain tariffs that had been imposed pursuant to that statute. As a result, certain tariffs imposed during fiscal year

Previous wording

Obtaining coverage and reimbursement approval for a test from each third-party payer is a time-consuming and costly process that could require us to provide to each payer supporting scientific and clinical information, as well as information about patient insurance eligibility and benefits, and billing. We may not be able to provide data sufficient to satisfy third-party payers that they should cover and pay for the test. There is substantial uncertainty whether any particular payer will cover and reimburse the use of any test incorporating new technology. Even when a payer determines that a test is eligible for reimbursement, the payer may impose coverage limitations that preclude payment under certain circumstances or for certain patient populations. Moreover, eligibility for coverage does not mean that any test will be reimbursed in all cases or at a rate that allows us to make a profit or even cover our costs. Interim payments for new tests, if applicable, may also not be sufficient to cover our costs and may not be made permanent. In addition, some payers may require prior authorization before they will pay for a test. We may also have to engage in lengthy and costly appeals in order to overturn payers’ coverage and reimbursement determinations and ultimately obtain payment. Furthermore, reimbursement rates may vary, for example, according to the use of the test and the clinical setting in which it is used, and may reflect budgetary constraints and/or imperfections in Medicare, Medicaid or other data used to calculate these rates.

Current wording

Obtaining coverage and reimbursement approval for a test from each third-party payer is a time-consuming and costly process that could require us to provide to each payer supporting scientific and clinical information, as well as information about patient insurance eligibility and benefits, and billing. We may not be able to provide data sufficient to satisfy third-party payers that they should cover and pay for the test. There is substantial uncertainty whether any particular payer will cover and reimburse the use of any test incorporating new technology. Even when a payer determines that a test is eligible for reimbursement, the payer may impose coverage limitations that preclude payment under certain circumstances or for certain patient populations. Moreover, eligibility for coverage does not mean that any test will be reimbursed in all cases or at a rate that allows us to make a profit or even cover our costs. Interim payments for new tests, if applicable, may also not be sufficient to cover our costs and may not be made permanent. In addition, some payers may require prior authorization before they will pay for a test. Further, even where a state has established Medicaid coverage for our tests, we must apply to enroll, and be approved as an enrolled provider, in that state’s Medicaid program before we can bill that program for our tests, including under Medicaid managed care plans, and in some states we may be unable to enroll without significant additional actions or investments, or at all. In addition, Medicaid managed care plans and other third-party payers may require such enrollment before contracting with us as a participating provider or may otherwise delay contracting with us. These processes can be uncertain, lengthy, time-consuming and resource intensive, are largely outside of our control and may take longer than we anticipate, and any expectations we may express regarding the timing of enrollment or contracting may not be realized, which could delay or reduce payment for our tests. We may also have to engage in lengthy and costly appeals in order to overturn payers’ coverage and reimbursement determinations and ultimately obtain payment. Furthermore, reimbursement rates may vary, for example, according to the use of the test and the clinical setting in which it is used, and may reflect budgetary constraints and/or imperfections in Medicare, Medicaid or other data used to calculate these rates.

Previous wording

One type of CPT code is a Proprietary Laboratory Analysis, or PLA, code. PLA codes describe proprietary clinical laboratory analyses. The AMA has issued a unique CPT® PLA code for the PreTRM test. CMS priced this code at $750 in November 2021. Before the AMA issued a PLA code for the PreTRM test, we submitted claims for reimbursement using CPT codes existing at the time based on the guidance of external coding experts.

Current wording

One type of CPT code is a Proprietary Laboratory Analysis, or PLA, code. PLA codes describe proprietary clinical laboratory analyses. The AMA has issued a unique CPT® PLA code for the PreTRM test (0247U). CMS originally priced this code at $750 in November 2021. In October 2026, as part of its review of code prices under the Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014, or PAMA, CMS proposed crosswalking 0247U to 0503U, which had a 2026 Clinical Laboratory Fee Schedule price of $750 and a PAMA data median price of $735. If finalized by CMS, this price will be effective January 1, 2027. Before the AMA issued a PLA code for the PreTRM test, we submitted claims for reimbursement using CPT codes existing at the time based on the guidance of external coding experts.

Previous wording

Various other health care reform proposals have also emerged from federal and state governments. The Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014, or PAMA, for example, introduced a multi-year pricing program for services payable under the Clinical Laboratory Fee Schedule, or CLFS, that is designed to bring Medicare allowable amounts in line with the amounts paid by commercial insurers. The rule issued by CMS to implement PAMA required certain laboratories to report third-party payer rates and test volumes, though these reporting requirements have been delayed.

Current wording

Various other health care reform proposals have also emerged from federal and state governments. PAMA, for example, introduced a multi-year pricing program for services payable under the Clinical Laboratory Fee Schedule, or CLFS, that is designed to bring Medicare allowable amounts in line with the amounts paid by commercial insurers. The rule issued by CMS to implement PAMA required certain laboratories to report third-party payer rates and test volumes, though these reporting requirements have been delayed.

Previous wording

Similarly, the European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act, or the AI Act, the world’s first comprehensive law regulating the development and use of artificial intelligence, was entered into force on August 1, 2024, and, with some exceptions, will become fully effective from August 2, 2026. The AI Act regulates artificial intelligence systems based on risk level, has extraterritorial reach in certain circumstances, and imposes obligations on providers, manufacturers, importers, distributors, and deployers of artificial intelligence systems. The AI Act also prohibits certain uses of artificial intelligence. Likewise, in the United States, several states have passed laws that will take effect in 2026 to regulate various uses of artificial intelligence, including to make consequential decisions, and legislation specific to use of artificial intelligence in health care. In addition, various federal regulators have issued guidance and focused enforcement efforts on the use of AI in regulated sectors. If we develop or use artificial intelligence systems governed by these rapidly developing laws or regulations, we may need to meet higher standards of data quality, transparency, monitoring, and human oversight, and we may need to adhere to specific and potentially burdensome and costly ethical, accountability, and administrative requirements, with the potential for significant enforcement or litigation in the event of any perceived non-compliance.

Current wording

Similarly, the European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act, or the AI Act, the world’s first comprehensive law regulating the development and use of artificial intelligence, was entered into force on August 1, 2024, and, with some exceptions, became fully effective from August 2, 2026. The AI Act regulates artificial intelligence systems based on risk level, has extraterritorial reach in certain circumstances, and imposes obligations on providers, manufacturers, importers, distributors, and deployers of artificial intelligence systems. The AI Act also prohibits certain uses of artificial intelligence. Likewise, in the United States, several states have passed laws that have taken or will take effect in 2026 to regulate various uses of artificial intelligence, including to make consequential decisions, and legislation specific to use of artificial intelligence in health care. In addition, various federal regulators have issued guidance and focused enforcement efforts on the use of AI in regulated sectors. If we develop or use artificial intelligence systems governed by these rapidly developing laws or regulations, we may need to meet higher standards of data quality, transparency, monitoring, and human oversight, and we may need to adhere to specific and potentially burdensome and costly ethical, accountability, and administrative requirements, with the potential for significant enforcement or litigation in the event of any perceived non-compliance.

Previous wording

Our patent rights may be affected by developments or uncertainty in the patent statute, patent case law or USPTO rules and regulations. For example, the patent position of companies engaged in the development and commercialization of diagnostic tests are particularly uncertain. Changes in either the patent laws or interpretation of the patent laws in the United States or in other jurisdictions could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of patent applications and the enforcement or defense of issued patents. For instance, under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, or the America Invents Act, enacted in September 2011, the United States transitioned to a first inventor to file system in which, assuming that other requirements for patentability are met, the first inventor to file a patent application is entitled to the patent on an invention regardless of whether a third party was the first to invent the claimed invention. These changes include allowing third-party submission of prior art to the USPTO during patent prosecution and additional procedures to challenge the validity of a patent by USPTO administered post-grant proceedings, including post-grant review, inter partes review and derivation proceedings. The America Invents Act and its implementation could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of our patent applications and the enforcement or defense of our issued patents, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

Current wording

Our patent rights may be affected by developments or uncertainty in the patent statute, patent case law or USPTO rules and regulations. For example, the patent position of companies engaged in the development and commercialization of diagnostic tests is particularly uncertain. Changes in either the patent laws or interpretation of the patent laws in the United States or in other jurisdictions could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of patent applications and the enforcement or defense of issued patents. For instance, under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, or the America Invents Act, enacted in September 2011, the United States transitioned to a first inventor to file system in which, assuming that other requirements for patentability are met, the first inventor to file a patent application is entitled to the patent on an invention regardless of whether a third party was the first to invent the claimed invention. These changes include allowing third-party submission of prior art to the USPTO during patent prosecution and additional procedures to challenge the validity of a patent by USPTO administered post-grant proceedings, including post-grant review, inter partes review and derivation proceedings. The America Invents Act and its implementation could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of our patent applications and the enforcement or defense of our issued patents, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

Previous wording

Our executive officers, directors and their affiliates and our stockholders holding 5% or more of our common stock own a significant percentage of our Class A common stock and will be able to exert significant control over matters subject to stockholder approval.

Current wording

Our stockholders holding 5% or more of our common stock own a significant percentage of our Class A common stock and will be able to exert significant control over matters subject to stockholder approval.

Previous wording

Our executive officers, directors and our stockholders holding 5% or more of our common stock and their affiliates beneficially hold a significant percentage of our outstanding Class A common stock. Specifically, our largest stockholder and its affiliated entities hold approximately 15% of our outstanding shares of Class A common stock, in addition to shares of our Class B common stock and pre-funded warrants to purchase shares of our Class A common stock. These stockholders, individually or acting together, would be able to significantly influence our management and affairs and the outcome of matters submitted to our stockholders for approval, including the election of directors and any sale, merger, consolidation, or sale of all or substantially all of our assets. This concentration of ownership control may adversely affect the market price of our Class A common stock by:

Current wording

Our stockholders holding 5% or more of our common stock and their affiliates beneficially hold a significant percentage of our outstanding Class A common stock. Specifically, our largest stockholder and its affiliated entities hold approximately 14% of our outstanding shares of Class A common stock, in addition to shares of our Class B common stock and pre-funded warrants to purchase shares of our Class A common stock. These stockholders, individually or acting together, would be able to significantly influence our management and affairs and the outcome of matters submitted to our stockholders for approval, including the election of directors and any sale, merger, consolidation, or sale of all or substantially all of our assets. This concentration of ownership control may adversely affect the market price of our Class A common stock by:

Previous wording

We are also a smaller reporting company, meaning that the market value of our Class A common stock held by non-affiliates is less than $700.0 million and our annual revenue is less than $100.0 million during the most recently completed fiscal year. We may continue to be a smaller reporting company if either (1) the market value of our Class A common stock held by non-affiliates is less than $250.0 million or (2) our annual revenue is less than $100.0 million during the most recently completed fiscal year and the market value of our Class A common stock held by non-affiliates is less than $700.0 million. If we are a smaller reporting company at the time we cease to be an EGC we may continue to rely on exemptions from certain disclosure requirements that are available to smaller reporting companies. Specifically, as a smaller reporting company, we may choose to present only the two most recent fiscal years of audited financial statements in our Annual Report and, similar to EGCs, smaller reporting companies have reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation.

Current wording

We are also a smaller reporting company, meaning that the market value of our Class A common stock held by non-affiliates is less than $700.0 million or our annual revenue is less than $100.0 million during the most recently completed fiscal year. We may continue to be a smaller reporting company if either (1) the market value of our Class A common stock held by non-affiliates is less than $250.0 million or (2) our annual revenue is less than $100.0 million during the most recently completed fiscal year and the market value of our Class A common stock held by non-affiliates is less than $700.0 million. If we are a smaller reporting company at the time we cease to be an EGC we may continue to rely on exemptions from certain disclosure requirements that are available to smaller reporting companies. Specifically, as a smaller reporting company, we may choose to present only the two most recent fiscal years of audited financial statements in our Annual Report and, similar to EGCs, smaller reporting companies have reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation.

Previous wording

We have registered on Form S-8 all shares of common stock that are issuable under our existing equity compensation plan, including the 2011 Employee, Director and Consultant Equity Incentive Plan, as amended, or the 2011 Plan, which expired in 2021, the 2021 Equity Incentive Plan, or the 2021 Plan, and the 2021 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, or the 2021 ESPP, as well as the shares of common stock underlying option awards outstanding under the 2011 Plan. Additionally, the number of shares of our Class A common stock reserved for issuance under the 2021 Plan automatically increases on January 1 of each year, beginning on January 1, 2022, by 4% of the total number of shares of our capital stock outstanding on December 31 of the preceding calendar year, or a lesser number of shares determined by our board of directors or compensation committee. Furthermore, the number of shares of our Class A common stock reserved for issuance under the 2021 ESPP automatically increases on January 1 of each year, beginning on January 1, 2022, by 1% of the total number of shares of our capital stock outstanding on December 31 of the preceding calendar year, or a lesser number of shares determined by our board of directors or compensation committee. Unless our board of directors elects not to increase the number of shares available for future grant each year, our stockholders may experience additional dilution. As a consequence, these shares can be freely sold in the public market upon issuance, subject to volume limitations applicable to affiliates.

Current wording

We have registered on Form S-8 all shares of common stock that are issuable under our existing equity compensation plans, including the 2011 Employee, Director and Consultant Equity Incentive Plan, as amended, or the 2011 Plan, which expired in 2021, the 2021 Equity Incentive Plan, or the 2021 Plan, and the 2021 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, or the 2021 ESPP, as well as the shares of common stock underlying option awards outstanding under the 2011 Plan. Additionally, the number of shares of our Class A common stock reserved for issuance under the 2021 Plan automatically increases on January 1 of each year, beginning on January 1, 2022, by 4% of the total number of shares of our capital stock outstanding on December 31 of the preceding calendar year, or a lesser number of shares determined by our board of directors or compensation committee. Furthermore, the number of shares of our Class A common stock reserved for issuance under the 2021 ESPP automatically increases on January 1 of each year, beginning on January 1, 2022, by 1% of the total number of shares of our capital stock outstanding on December 31 of the preceding calendar year, or a lesser number of shares determined by our board of directors or compensation committee. Unless our board of directors elects not to increase the number of shares available for future grant each year, our stockholders may experience additional dilution. As a consequence, these shares can be freely sold in the public market upon issuance, subject to volume limitations applicable to affiliates.

Previous wording

As a public company, we are subject to certain reporting requirements of the Exchange Act. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to reasonably assure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC. We believe that any disclosure controls and procedures or internal controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by an unauthorized override of the controls. Accordingly, because of the inherent limitations in our control system, misstatements or insufficient disclosures due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. While our principal executive and principal financial officers have concluded that we had effective disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2026, we cannot provide assurance that we will not have lapses in our disclosure controls and procedures in the future, which could result in our failure to provide accurate and timely disclosure to our investors.

Current wording

control system are met. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by an unauthorized override of the controls. Accordingly, because of the inherent limitations in our control system, misstatements or insufficient disclosures due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. While our principal executive and principal financial officers have concluded that we had effective disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2026, we cannot provide assurance that we will not have lapses in our disclosure controls and procedures in the future, which could result in our failure to provide accurate and timely disclosure to our investors.