Skip to main content

Akebia Therapeutics, Inc.

For the period ended Mar 31, 2026. Filed May 7, 2026.

View on SEC.gov

About this filing

A company's report for each of its first three quarters. The financial statements are not audited. It shows how the business has moved since the last annual report, and what management says changed.

Mar 31, 2026 · Filed May 7, 2026

AKBA$0.53+32.8%Stored close · as of Nov 9, 2026

What changed in Risk Factors?

Read the current filing

The baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.

Compared 623 previous paragraphs and 650 current paragraphs.

477 unchanged; 128 reworded; 39 added; 11 removed; 7 previous and 6 current paragraphs rearranged.

Tables are not compared: 0 previous and 0 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.

A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.

Added paragraphs (39)

Current report

In addition, on November 28, 2025, or the APA Closing Date, we entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement, or the Q32 Purchase Agreement, with Q32 Bio Inc. and Q32 Bio Operations Inc., together, Q32, pursuant to which we purchased and assumed from Q32 substantially all assets and liabilities of Q32 and its affiliates related to the research, development, manufacture, and commercialization of Q32’s clinical-stage development candidate known as ADX-097 (now referred to as AKB-097, generic name ebribafusp) worldwide for the treatment, prevention or diagnosis of any disease or condition in humans. Under the terms of the APA, we (i) made an upfront payment in an amount equal to $7.0 million on the APA Closing Date, (ii) will make an additional upfront payment in an amount equal to $3.0 million on the sixth-month anniversary of the APA Closing Date, (iii) will make certain milestone payments upon the achievement of specified development and regulatory milestone events related to AKB-097 up to an aggregate amount equal to $94.5 million, including a $2.0 million development milestone payment upon the earlier of initiation of a Phase 2 clinical trial and December 31, 2026, (iv) will make certain milestone payments upon the achievement of specified commercial milestone events with respect to the net sales of AKB-097 up to an aggregate amount equal to $487.5 million, and (v) will make certain royalty payments based on the net sales of AKB-097 with royalty percentage tiers ranging from the low single digits to mid-teen percentages. The royalties will expire on a country-by-country basis on the later to occur of (a) the date of expiration of the last-to-expire valid claim of any transferred patent right that covers such product in such country, and (b) the tenth anniversary of the first commercial sale of such product.

Current report

•the development of product candidates could take longer than anticipated and require additional resources;

Current report

•entry into therapeutic modalities, such as biologics, that differ significantly from our existing small‑molecule expertise, potentially requiring the recruitment of personnel with new technical, regulatory, manufacturing, and commercialization capabilities; and

Current report

In late 2025, legislation was introduced in the U.S. Congress, the Kidney Care Access Protection Act, or KCAPA, which seeks to maintain patient access to innovative kidney care treatments, including Vafseo, by addressing reimbursement challenges following TDAPA expiration. Without such legislation, there is a risk that, in the post-TDAPA period, reduced reimbursement could limit provider adoption of Vafseo, restrict patient access and adversely impact our revenue.

Current report

In April 2026, the FDA approved FILSPARI® (sparsentan), the first therapy indicated for the treatment of FSGS. FILSPARI is a dual endothelin and angiotensin II receptor antagonist, which is being commercialized in the U.S. by Travere® Therapeutics Inc. In addition, current treatment includes glucocorticoid steroids, calcineurin inhibitors, other immunosuppressives such as rituximab, and antihypertensives such as angiotensin-converting enzymes, such as enalapril, and angiotensin II receptor blockers, such as losartan. These treatments may slow kidney failure progression in some patients with FSGS. There are a number of treatments to address FSGS in development, including DMX-200 (repagermanium), in Phase 3 development by Dimerix Limited, and other investigational treatments in Phase 3 or Phase 2 development by companies including Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., or Apellis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Sanofi, Vera Therapeutics, or Vera, and Vertex Pharmaceuticals, or Vertex. Since FSGS is heterogenous in nature, we expect a number of therapies will be needed to fully address the needs of the FSGS patient population. Additionally, a combination of therapies may also provide a beneficial impact for some patients.

Current report

We are developing AKB-097 for potential treatment of IgAN, LN and C3G. There are other complement inhibitors and medications in development or approved for treatment of these rare kidney diseases. FABHALTA® (iptacopan) is FDA-approved and marketed by Novartis for reduction of proteinuria in adults with primary IgAN. FILSPARI® (sparsentan) is FDA-approved, indicated to slow kidney function decline in adults with primary IgAN. Both FABHALTA and FILSPARI labeling includes a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy, or REMS. TARPEYO® (budesonide), an FDA-approved medicine used to reduce the loss of kidney function in adults with primary IgAN, is marketed in the U.S. by Calliditas Therapeutics AB, or Calliditas (acquired by Asahi Kasei Corporation). VANRAFIA™ (atrasentan), marketed by Novartis, is an endothelin receptor antagonist indicated to reduce proteinuria in adults with primary IgAN. In November 2025, the FDA approved VOYXACT® (sibeprenlimab-szsi) to reduce proteinuria in adults with primary IgAN. VOYXACT is a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to and blocks A PRoliferation-Inducing Ligand, or APRIL.

Current report

In November 2025, Vera was granted FDA Priority Review for their BLA for atacicept for the treatment of IgAN. Atacicept is an investigational recombinant fusion protein that binds to B-cell Activating Factor, BAFF, and APRIL cytokines. Vertex is investigating povetacicept, a dual antagonist of the BAFF and APRIL cytokines, for the treatment of IgAN, and initiated a rolling BLA filing for U.S. accelerated approval. A number of complement inhibitors are in development for the treatment of IgAN by companies including Alexion Pharmaceuticals (ULTOMIRIS, ravulizumab, C5 inhibitor, Phase 3), Apellis (EMPAVELI, pegcetacoplan, C3 inhibitor, Phase 2), and Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, or Arrowhead (ARO-C3, C3 inhibitor, in Phase 1/2).

Current report

There are two FDA-approved complement-inhibitor therapies to reduce proteinuria in C3G patients: FABHALTA® (Novartis, iptacopan, Factor B inhibitor) and EMPAVELI® (Apellis, pegcetacoplan, C3 inhibitor). Both FABHALTA and EMPAVELI labeling includes a REMS. Other complement inhibitors are in development by Kira Pharmaceuticals, with KP104 (dual C5 and Factor H inhibitor) in Phase 2 and Arrowhead with ARO-C3 (C3 inhibitor) in Phase 1/2.

Current report

There are three FDA-approved therapies for LN: BENLYSTA (belimumab, GSK), LUPKYNIS® (voclosporin, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals) and GAZYVA (obinutuzumab, Genentech/Biogen). Novartis also is developing ianalumab in Phase 3 and complement inhibitor FABHALTA (iptacopan, Factor B inhibitor) in Phase 2.

Current report

Identifying and qualifying patients to participate in clinical trials is critical to the success of our clinical trials. The timing of our clinical trials depends, in part, on the speed at which we can recruit patients to participate in our clinical trials, including for our clinical trials of praliciguat, AKB-9090 and AKB-097. AKB-097 and praliciguat are being studied for rare diseases with small patient populations and many of those patients are treated with other therapies or products. Also, there are only a limited number of specialist physicians that regularly treat patients with these rare diseases and major clinical centers that support such treatment are concentrated in a few geographic regions globally. In addition, other companies are conducting, or have announced plans for, clinical trials that are seeking, or are likely to seek, to enroll patients with these rare diseases. These patients are generally only able to enroll in a single trial at a time. The small population of patients, competition for these patients, the nature of the disease and limited trial sites may make it difficult for us to initiate and enroll enough patients to complete our clinical trials of AKB-097 and praliciguat, or other product candidates, in a timely and cost-effective manner. Patients may be unwilling to participate in our clinical trials because of concerns about investigational research studies, the time and commitment needed to participate in a study, adverse events observed with the product candidate under study, the current standard of care, competitor products and/or other investigational agents, in each case for the same indications and/or similar patient populations.

Current report

⦁ additional foreign legal and regulatory requirements;

Current report

⦁ increased protection of personal data, such as GDPR in the EU; and

Current report

Obtaining marketing approval in the U.S. and other jurisdictions for any product candidate depends upon numerous factors, many of which are subject to the substantial discretion of the regulatory authorities, including that regulatory agencies may not complete their review processes in a timely manner and/or, following completion of the review process, may not grant marketing approval or such marketing approval may be limited. For example, the FDA reviews an application to determine, among other things, whether the product is safe and whether it is effective for its intended use(s), with the latter determination being made on the basis of substantial evidence. The FDA has traditionally interpreted this evidentiary standard to require at least two adequate and well-controlled clinical investigations to establish effectiveness of a new product. In February 2026, however, the Commissioner of FDA and the Director of Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research published an editorial in the New England Journal of Medicine in which they declared that, in most cases, the new default requirement for FDA approval of a new product will be one adequate and well-controlled pivotal clinical trial plus confirmatory evidence, rather than two pivotal clinical trials. In determining whether to rely on one trial, the FDA will focus on the single trial’s quality, including magnitude of effect, appropriateness of control arms, endpoint selection, statistical power, blinding, handling of missing data, biological plausibility and alignment with intermediate biomarkers. In the event that we submit an application on the basis of one clinical trial and confirmatory evidence, the FDA could determine that such information is not sufficient to support approval of the application and the agency could require us to conduct an additional trial in support of approval.

Current report

Moreover, principal investigators for our future clinical trials may serve as scientific advisors or consultants to us and receive compensation in connection with such services. Under certain circumstances, we may be required to report some of these relationships to the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities. The FDA or a comparable foreign regulatory authority may conclude that a financial relationship between us and a principal investigator has created a conflict of interest or otherwise affected interpretation of any of our studies. The FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authority may therefore question the integrity of the data generated at the applicable clinical trial site and the utility of the clinical trial itself may be jeopardized. This could result in a delay in approval, or rejection, of our marketing applications by the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authority, as the case may be, and may ultimately lead to the denial of marketing approval of one or more of our product candidates.

Current report

In addition, we could be adversely affected by court decisions, including several significant administrative law cases decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2024. In Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, for example, the court overruled Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., which for 40 years required federal courts to defer to permissible agency interpretations of statutes that are silent or ambiguous on a particular topic. The U.S. Supreme Court stripped federal agencies of this presumptive deference and held that courts must exercise their independent judgment when deciding whether an agency such as the FDA acted within its statutory authority under the APA. Additionally, in Corner Post, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the court held that actions to challenge a federal regulation under the APA can be initiated within six years of the date of injury to the plaintiff, rather than the date the rule is finalized. The decision appears to give prospective plaintiffs a personal statute of limitations to challenge longstanding agency regulations. Another decision, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jarkesy, overturned regulatory agencies’ ability to impose civil penalties in administrative proceedings. These decisions could introduce additional uncertainty into the regulatory process and may result in additional legal challenges to actions taken by federal regulatory agencies, including the FDA and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, or CMS, that we rely on. In addition to potential changes to regulations as a result of legal challenges, these decisions may result in increased regulatory uncertainty and delays and other impacts, any of which could adversely impact our business and operations.

Current report

We may not be able to obtain orphan drug exclusivity for praliciguat or any potential future product candidates that we may develop, and even if we do, that exclusivity may not prevent the FDA or the EMA from approving other competing products.

Current report

Under the Orphan Drug Act, the FDA may designate a product candidate as an orphan drug if it is a drug or biologic intended to treat a rare disease or condition. A similar regulatory scheme governs approval of orphan products by the EMA in the EU and other jurisdictions. Generally, if a product candidate that obtains an orphan drug designation is able to maintain the designation at the time of marketing application and subsequently receives the first marketing approval for the indication for which it has such designation, the product is entitled to a period of marketing exclusivity, which precludes the FDA or the EMA from approving another marketing application for a similar product for the same therapeutic indication for that period of exclusivity. The applicable period is seven years in the U.S. and ten years in the EU. The exclusivity period in the EU can be reduced to six years if a product no longer meets the criteria for orphan drug designation, specifically, if the product is sufficiently profitable so that market exclusivity is no longer justified.

Current report

We plan to rely on orphan drug exclusivity for praliciguat and may rely on orphan drug exclusivity for potential future product candidates that we may develop. However, we cannot assure you that we will receive orphan drug designation for praliciguat or any of our potential future product candidates; and further, that we will be able to maintain orphan designation at the time of marketing approval in the U.S., EU, or other jurisdictions. For the FDA to grant orphan drug exclusivity to one of our products, at the time of marketing approval, the FDA must find that the prevalence of the disease for which the product is indicated is still fewer than 200,000 in the U.S., the approved indication matches the designation obtained during development, and that the drug is a new orphan drug, or clinically superior to an already approved drug that is considered "the same" as our drug. The FDA may conclude that the condition or disease for which orphan drug exclusivity is sought does not meet this standard. Exclusivity attaches only to the approved indication and the specific drug product. For EMA, during marketing application review, submission of updated data on the prevalence of the disease and a justification of significant benefit will be required to maintain an EU orphan designation. Even if we obtain orphan drug exclusivity for a product, that exclusivity may not effectively protect the product from competition because different products can be approved for the same condition. Orphan drug exclusivity may also be lost if the FDA or EMA determines that the request for designation was materially defective or if the manufacturer is unable to assure sufficient quantities of the product to meet the needs of the patients with the rare disease or condition.

Current report

The FDA Reauthorization Act of 2017, or the FDARA, requires that a drug sponsor demonstrate the clinical superiority of an orphan drug that is otherwise the same as a previously approved drug for the same rare disease to receive orphan drug exclusivity. FDARA reverses prior precedent holding that the Orphan Drug Act unambiguously requires that the FDA recognize the orphan exclusivity period regardless of a showing of clinical superiority.

Current report

The FDA and Congress may further reevaluate and revise the Orphan Drug Act and its regulations and policies. For example, in September 2021, the Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit held that, for the purpose of determining the scope of orphan drug exclusivity, the term “same disease or condition” means the designated “rare disease or condition” and not the “indication" or "use” for which the product is approved. Subsequently, in another case, a federal district court in Washington, D.C. followed the reasoning of the 11th Circuit decision and that decision was appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. On February 3, 2026, the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2026 was enacted into law. It overruled these court decisions and codified the FDA’s longstanding interpretation of the scope of orphan drug exclusivity to apply to “the same drug for the same approved use or indication within such [designated] rare disease or condition.” This change, which applies retroactively, expressly authorizes the FDA to approve multiple versions of the same orphan drug for different sub-indications and subpopulations, such as adult and pediatric patients or multiple variations of the same disease that are caused by different genetic variants.

Current report

In addition, foreign regulatory authorities may change their approval policies and new regulations may be enacted. For instance, the EU pharmaceutical legislation is currently undergoing a complete review process, in the context of the Pharmaceutical Strategy for Europe initiative, launched by the EC in November 2020. On December 11, 2025, the European Parliament and European Council reached a provisional political agreement on the legislation which is expected to be adopted by mid-2026. The revisions may have a significant impact on the pharmaceutical industry and our business. The new Pharma Package would, among other things, shorten marketing authorization times from 210 to 180 days, and set a baseline period of eight years of data exclusivity and one year of market exclusivity with possible extensions for new indications up to a maximum of 11 years total. Following a transition period of 24 months, these measures will likely take effect in mid-2028.

Current report

Separately, on December 23, 2025, CMS, through its Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation proposed two five-year pilot programs to implement a “reference pricing” regime for drugs paid for under Medicare for 25% of covered beneficiaries. The programs are referred to as the Global Benchmark for Efficient Drug Pricing Model for Medicare Part B drugs and the Guarding U.S. Medicare Against Rising Drug Costs for Medicare Part D drugs. Under the proposed pilot programs, a manufacturer would owe rebates to Medicare if prices for their drugs exceeded the prices paid by other economically comparable reference countries, defined in the proposed regulations as OECD countries with a GDP of $400 billion and a per capita GDP that is at least 60% of the US per capita GDP (an initial list of 19 reference countries is included in the proposed rule). These pilot programs are proposed to go into effect beginning October 1, 2026.

Current report

•our international collaborations expose us to additional risks, including differing regulatory requirements, pricing and reimbursement constraints, foreign currency fluctuations, import/export restrictions, data privacy laws, anti-corruption compliance obligations, and challenges in enforcing contractual and intellectual property rights across jurisdictions, any of which could delay development, limit commercialization or reduce revenues.

Current report

•if they experience any compliance issues;

Current report

Manufacturing biologics is complex, and we may experience manufacturing problems that result in delays in our AKB-097 development program or other product candidates.

Current report

The manufacturing of biologics is highly complex, and we may experience production issues or interruptions in supply for our AKB-097 development program or other product candidates. These challenges may include variability in raw materials, equipment performance issues, process scale-up difficulties, and the need to maintain consistent product quality across batches. In addition, risks related to product characterization and analytical testing—such as limitations in assay sensitivity or specificity, incomplete understanding of critical quality attributes, difficulties in method development, qualification or validation, and potential discrepancies between analytical methods—may impact our ability to fully characterize the product and ensure comparability. Failures or delays in analytical testing, including stability testing, impurity profiling, or potency assessment, could further delay release, regulatory submissions, or approval timelines. Collectively, these issues may result in increased costs, supply interruptions, or delays in clinical development and regulatory approval.

Current report

In addition, the development process may be met with challenges related to successful scale-up of the process to deliver the required inventory to support our clinical trials. Specifically, if we or our third-party CDMOs are unable to procure critical raw materials in a timely manner, successfully scale our manufacturing process, or provide sufficient manufacturing campaign slots to support production, we may not be able to supply the required inventory to allocate to clinical trials and/or commercial supply. Raw material shortages, contamination events, or manufacturing batch failures pose significant risks and could disrupt production and therefore limit downstream supply, ultimately delaying our development timelines and having an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, operations, and product candidates.

Current report

We face risks based on our reliance on CDMOs for AKB-097 manufacture as there is increased regulatory scrutiny on aseptic and sterile product manufacture. The manufacturing facilities for AKB-097 on which we rely may not meet the stringent regulatory requirements and this could adversely affect our development and commercialization plans for AKB-097 and other product candidates. Sterile finished good therapeutic products approved for use in clinical trials are required to be manufactured in accordance with cGMP. Such regulations strictly govern manufacturing processes and overarching quality systems to assure robust compliance and quality control of investigational products utilized in clinical trials and commercial products approved for sale. Poor production practices increase the risk of introduction of adventitious agents and/or other contaminants or process changes that may impact the stability of our biologic product candidate which may be undetectable through final product testing. As such, it is critical to implement robust facility and product controls strategies to document that our products have been manufactured and tested in accordance with cGMPs and to demonstrate that our products are safe and efficacious and support our clinical trials and ultimately the potential approval of a BLA for any product candidate.

Current report

Our CDMOs' facilities and their quality systems must ultimately pass a pre-approval inspection, or PAI, to confirm validity of the information filed in the BLA and to confirm the capability of our CDMOs to manufacture our product in compliance with the applicable regulations. If our or our CDMOs' quality systems or facilities involved with the preparation of our product candidates do not pass the PAI, FDA approval of such product candidates will not be granted.

Current report

Our CDMOs are subject to routine or for-cause inspections of the facilities that manufacture, test, and/or store our product candidates. Deficiencies identified during these inspections may require remediation potentially impacting or delaying the development or approval of AKB-097 or other product candidates and thereby delaying our clinical trials or the commercial approval of AKB-097. Additionally, remediation of deficiencies poses the risk of lost product or significant financial impact which also may result in delays to our clinical trials or commercial approval and could materially harm our business.

Current report

On April 2, 2026, President Trump issued a Proclamation invoking Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 to impose tariffs on imports of patented pharmaceuticals, biologics, and associated ingredients into the U.S. The action affects pharmaceutical manufacturers, importers, and supply chain participants. Specifically, beginning July 31, 2026 (September 29, 2026 for smaller companies not named in the Proclamation), a 100% tariff will apply to pharmaceutical articles that are subject to a valid, unexpired U.S. patent and are listed in the FDA’s Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations, including Auryxia and Vafseo, or are listed in the FDA’s Lists of Licensed Biological Products. The 100% tariff also applies to active pharmaceutical ingredients, or APIs and key starting materials for such articles. Certain categories of products are exempt from these tariffs.

Current report

A host of other U.S. tariff actions remain possible, including an additional 25% tariff on products from countries that do business with Iran.

Current report

In addition, on December 18, 2025, as part of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026, President Trump signed into law the BIOSECURE Act, which limits U.S. government procurement from and grants to biotechnology companies of concern, or BCCs. Under the BIOSECURE Act, U.S. government agencies cannot (i) buy or obtain biotechnology equipment or services provided by a BCC; (ii) enter into, extend, or renew a contract with any entity using biotechnology equipment or services provided by a BCC to perform a government contract; or (iii) expend loan or grant funds for biotechnology equipment or services provided by a BCC. The BIOSECURE Act does not name specific companies as BCCs but treats any company on the U.S. Department of Defense, or the Department of Defense, 1260H list of Chinese Military Companies as a BCC. This list currently includes BGI Group, BGI Genomics Co., Ltd., Forensic Genomics International, and MGI Tech Co., Ltd., but does not include the WuXi entities. The legislation allows for other biotechnology companies, possibly including WuXi entities, to be added to the federal funding prohibitions at a later time. The 1260H list was updated by the Department of Defense in January 2024 and January 2025. On February 13, 2026, the Department of Defense published an updated list, which included WuXi STA but then abruptly withdrew the list. The implications of this action remain unclear. If the Department of Defense adds WuXi STA and its affiliates 1260H list, it could have an adverse effect on our business.

Current report

The FDA also has the authority to grant orphan drug designation to drugs intended to treat a rare disease or condition, which is generally a disease or condition that affects fewer than 200,000 individuals in the U.S. We plan to rely on orphan drug exclusivity for praliciguat and may rely on orphan drug exclusivity for potential future product candidates that we may develop. Orphan drug status currently confers seven years of marketing exclusivity in the U.S. under the FDCA. However, we cannot assure you that we will receive orphan drug designation for praliciguat or any of our potential future product candidates.

Current report

On March 11, 2026, Teva received approval for its ANDA for a generic version of Auryxia, which has subsequently entered the market. We expect Teva's entry into the market, and the entry of any additional generic versions of Auryxia that may be approved in addition to our AG Distributor, will adversely impact our revenue. However, the impact on future Auryxia revenues will depend on many factors, including our ability to maintain contracts with dialysis organizations, the timing and number of additional generics, the amount of generic product available to supply the market and the pricing of generics and other products on the market that compete with Auryxia. Generic competition for Auryxia, Vafseo or any of our potential future products could have a material adverse effect on our sales, results of operations and financial condition.

Current report

If we fail to develop or maintain proper and effective internal control over financial reporting, our ability to produce accurate and timely financial statements could be impaired, investors may lose confidence in us and the trading price of our common stock may decline.

Current report

Effective internal control over financial reporting is necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports and effectively prevent fraud and operate successfully as a public company. Any failure to maintain internal control over financial reporting could severely inhibit our ability to accurately report our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. If our internal control over financial reporting is not effective, investors may lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, the market price of our common stock could decline, and we could be subject to sanctions or investigations by Nasdaq, the SEC or other regulatory authorities. Failure to remedy any material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting could also restrict our future access to the capital markets.

Current report

A material weakness in internal control over financial reporting has in the past and could in the future lead to deficiencies in the preparation of financial statements. Deficiencies in the preparation of financial statements could lead to litigation claims against us. The defense of any such claims may cause the diversion of management’s attention and resources, and we may be required to pay damages if any such claims or proceedings are not resolved in our favor. Any litigation, even if resolved in our favor, could cause us to incur significant legal and other expenses. Such events could also affect our ability to raise capital to fund future business initiatives.

Current report

•result in manipulation or falsification of clinical trial data through artificial intelligence-generated synthetic data or altered records, undermining regulatory submissions and scientific validity;
Removed paragraphs (11)

Previous report

⦁ additional foreign regulatory requirements;

Previous report

On September 30, 2025, the administration announced that Pfizer had agreed to base its pharmaceutical prices in the U.S. on MFN pricing. According to a White House fact sheet, the agreement “will provide every State Medicaid program in the country access to MFN drug prices” on the company’s products, and requires the company “to offer medicines at a deep discount off the list price when selling directly to American patients.” Pfizer indicated that the agreement “provides certainty from tariffs” and that the company “will also participate in a direct purchasing platform, TrumpRx.gov, that will allow American patients to purchase medicines…at a significant discount.” Thereafter, on October 10, 2025, another pharmaceutical company, AstraZeneca, announced that it too had reached an agreement with the administration to lower prices for "eligible patients with prescriptions for chronic diseases" in the U.S. and that it will participate in the TrumpRx direct-to-patient marketing website.

Previous report

In addition, the industry is awaiting the release of the Global Benchmark for Efficient Drug Pricing, or GLOBE, Model, a proposed rule by CMS that is currently pending review at the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs within the Office of Management and Budget. Once released, the GLOBE Model proposed rule will provide further insight into how the administration is seeking to advance drug pricing policy and provide an opportunity for interested parties to submit public comment as part of the rulemaking process.

Previous report

In addition, in 2024, the U.S. Congress considered legislation widely referred to as the BIOSECURE Act . If this legislation had been enacted into law, it would have prohibited, subject to limited exceptions, the direct or indirect use of U.S. federal government contract, grant, and loan funds for purchasing biotechnology equipment and services from certain Chinese biotechnology companies, possibly including WuXi entities. On October 9, 2025, the U.S. Senate passed a revised version of the BIOSECURE legislation as part of its National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2026. Instead of specifying particular Chinese entities for restrictions, the Senate bill would initially target biotechnology companies that have been identified on the so-called 1260H List by the U.S. Department of Defense as Chinese Military Companies Operating in the United States. This list currently includes BGI Group, BGI Genomics Co., Ltd., Forensic Genomics International, and MGI Tech Co., Ltd., but does not include the WuXi entities. The legislation would allow for other biotechnology companies, possibly including WuXi entities, to be added to the federal funding prohibitions at a later time. The U.S. House of Representatives has passed a version of the bill that does not contain similar biotechnology provisions, so it is not currently known whether the House or Senate language or other language or neither will become law.

Previous report

While we expect that the availability of the authorized generic version of Auryxia and any additional generic versions of Auryxia will negatively impact our net product revenue for Auryxia and our results of operations, it is difficult to estimate the impact of generics on Auryxia net product revenue, and if the impact is greater than we currently anticipate, it may materially adversely impact our business and results of operations. Generic competition for Auryxia or any of our potential future products could have a material adverse effect on our sales, results of operations and financial condition.

Previous report

We have identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024 relating to our accounting for inventory and inventory related transactions. If we are not able to remediate this material weakness, or if we experience additional material weaknesses or other deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting in the future or otherwise fail to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting, we may not be able to accurately or timely report our financial results or prevent fraud, and we may conclude that our internal control over financial reporting is not effective, which may adversely affect our business.

Previous report

Effective internal control over financial reporting is necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports and, together with adequate disclosure controls and procedures, is designed to prevent fraud. Any failure to maintain or implement required new or improved controls, or difficulties encountered in implementation could cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations. In addition, any testing by us, as and when required, conducted in connection with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, or Section 404, or any testing by our independent registered public accounting firm may reveal deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting that are deemed to be material weaknesses or that may require prospective or retroactive changes to our consolidated financial statements or identify other areas for further attention or improvement.

Previous report

As previously disclosed in our 2024 Form 10-K, we identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024. A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Our management concluded that we did not design and maintain effective controls over inventory. Specifically, we did not maintain effective review controls that operated with a sufficient level of precision to evaluate the completeness, accuracy and reasonableness of the product sales forecast, which is used in the evaluation of excess inventory, including the calculation of excess firm purchase commitments and the classification of current and non-current inventory. For further discussion of the material weakness, see Part I, Item 4, “Controls and Procedures.”

Previous report

We have taken and plan to continue to take actions to remediate this material weakness: increasing the level of precision of our review controls that support the completeness, accuracy and reasonableness of the sales forecast used to support our inventory evaluations, including the identification and consideration of contrary evidence that could detect a potential error in the sales forecast. However, we cannot provide assurance that we will be able to correct this material weakness in a timely manner or that our remediation efforts will be adequate to allow us to conclude that our internal control over financial reporting will be effective in the future. Even if this material weakness is remediated in the future, we could identify additional material weaknesses or deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting that could require correction or remediation. For example, we previously identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022 relating to our product return reserves that resulted in a revision of our financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020.

Previous report

In addition, our conclusion that we have a material weakness could give rise to increased scrutiny, review, audit and investigation over our accounting controls and procedures, which could then lead to additional areas of deficiency or errors in our financial statements.

Previous report

We will need to continue to dedicate internal resources, engage outside consultants and maintain a detailed work plan to assess and document the adequacy of internal control over financial reporting, continue steps to remediate the material weakness relating to our accounting for inventory and inventory related transactions described above and any future control deficiencies or material weaknesses, and improve control processes as appropriate, validate through testing that controls are functioning as documented and maintain a continuous reporting and improvement process for internal control over financial reporting. If we are not able to correct material weaknesses or deficiencies in internal controls in a timely manner or otherwise comply with the requirements of Section 404 in a timely manner, our ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information accurately and within applicable time periods may be adversely affected, and we could be subject to sanctions or investigations by the Securities Exchange Commission, or the SEC, the Nasdaq Stock Market or other regulatory authorities as well as stockholder litigation which, even if resolved in our favor, would require additional financial and management resources and could adversely affect the market price of our common stock. Any failure to maintain or implement required effective internal control over financial reporting, or any difficulties we encounter in their implementation, could result in additional material weaknesses, cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations or result in material misstatements in our financial statements. Furthermore, if we cannot provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, our business and results of operations could be harmed. Inferior internal controls could also cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, which could have a negative effect on the trading price of our common stock and could also affect our ability to raise capital to fund future business initiatives.
Reworded paragraphs (128)

Previous wording

Investment in pharmaceutical product development and commercialization is highly speculative because it requires upfront capital expenditures and significant research and development, or R&D, expenses. Despite the investment in assets and R&D, there is significant risk that a product candidate will fail to gain marketing approval or that an approved product will not be commercially viable. Since our inception, we have devoted most of our resources to R&D, including our preclinical and clinical development activities, commercializing Auryxia and Vafseo and providing general and administrative support for these operations. We have funded our operations principally through product sales, payments received from our collaboration and licensing partners, borrowings under term loans, sales of our common stock, including through our employee stock purchase plan, a working capital payment from Vifor (International) Ltd. (now a part of CSL Limited), or CSL Vifor, and a royalty transaction. Prior to our 2018 merger, or the Merger, with Keryx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., or Keryx, whereby Keryx became our wholly owned subsidiary, we had no products approved for commercial sale and had not generated any revenue from the sale of products. We currently have two commercial products and believe that our existing cash resources and the cash we expect to generate from product, royalty, supply and license revenues are sufficient to fund our current operating plan for the foreseeable future, including to commercialize Vafseo and Auryxia and advance our existing programs. However, we have incurred net losses each year since our inception, and although we generated net income of $0.5 million and $6.9 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025, respectively, we cannot guarantee when, if ever, we will become and remain profitable. As of September 30, 2025, we had an accumulated deficit of $1.7 billion.

Current wording

Investment in pharmaceutical product development and commercialization is highly speculative because it requires upfront capital expenditures and significant research and development, or R&D, expenses. Despite the investment in assets and R&D, there is significant risk that a product candidate will fail to gain marketing approval or that an approved product will not be commercially viable. Since our inception, we have devoted most of our resources to R&D, including our preclinical and clinical development activities, commercializing Auryxia and Vafseo and providing general and administrative support for these operations. We have funded our operations principally through product sales, payments received from our collaboration and licensing partners, borrowings under term loans, sales of our common stock, including through our employee stock purchase plan, a working capital payment from Vifor (International) Ltd. (now a part of CSL Limited), or CSL Vifor, and a royalty transaction. Prior to our 2018 merger, or the Merger, with Keryx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., or Keryx, whereby Keryx became our wholly owned subsidiary, we had no products approved for commercial sale and had not generated any revenue from the sale of products. We currently have two commercial products and believe that our existing cash resources and the cash we expect to generate from product, royalty, supply and license revenues are sufficient to fund our current operating plan for at least two years, including to commercialize Vafseo and Auryxia and advance our existing programs. However, we have incurred net losses each year since our inception, including a net loss of $9.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026, and we cannot guarantee when, if ever, we will become and remain profitable. As of March 31, 2026, we had an accumulated deficit of $1.7 billion.

Previous wording

In March 2022, we received a complete response letter, or CRL, from the United States, or U.S., Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, regarding our new drug application, or NDA, for vadadustat for the treatment of anemia associated with chronic kidney disease, or CKD. Following a Formal Dispute Resolution Request, or FDRR, to the FDA in 2022 for vadadustat, we filed a resubmission to our NDA in 2023. On March 27, 2024, the FDA approved our NDA for vadadustat under the trade name Vafseo for the treatment of anemia due to CKD in adults who have been receiving dialysis for at least three months. However, we expended significant additional resources to obtain the approval of Vafseo, the commercialization of Vafseo was delayed and Vafseo was approved for a narrower indication than we initially pursued, which had and could continue to have an adverse effect on our business.

Current wording

On March 27, 2024, the United States, or U.S., Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, approved our new drug application, or NDA, for vadadustat under the trade name Vafseo for the treatment of anemia due to chronic kidney disease, or CKD, in adults who have been receiving dialysis for at least three months. However, we expended significant additional resources to obtain the approval of Vafseo, and the commercialization of Vafseo was delayed due to the receipt of a complete response letter, or CRL, from the FDA in March 2022 regarding our NDA, and Vafseo was approved for a narrower indication than we initially pursued, which had and could continue to have an adverse effect on our business.

Previous wording

•the timing and number of additional generic versions of Auryxia that enter the market following loss of exclusivity, or LoE, for Auryxia which occurred in March 2025, the pricing of generic versions of Auryxia, the impact of the LoE on the product revenue from Auryxia, including the impact on the price of Auryxia;

Current wording

•the timing and number of additional generic versions of Auryxia that enter the market following loss of exclusivity, or LoE, for Auryxia which occurred in March 2025, the availability and pricing of generic versions of Auryxia, the impact of LoE on the product revenue from Auryxia, including the impact on the price of Auryxia;

Previous wording

Our ability to achieve and maintain profitability also depends on our ability to manage our expenses. We expect to continue to incur substantial additional operating expenses, including additional R&D expenses related to our pipeline and additional R&D and selling, general and administrative expenses for ongoing development, post-marketing requirements and commercialization of Auryxia and Vafseo and any other products, including those that may be in-licensed or acquired, which could lead to operating losses for the foreseeable future. Our prior losses have had, and expected future losses will continue to have, an adverse effect on our stockholders’ (deficit) equity and working capital.

Current wording

Our ability to achieve and maintain profitability also depends on our ability to manage our expenses. We expect to continue to incur substantial additional operating expenses, including additional R&D expenses related to our pipeline, including AKB-097, praliciguat and AKB-9090, and additional R&D and selling, general and administrative expenses for ongoing development, post-marketing requirements and commercialization of Auryxia and Vafseo and any other products, including those that may be in-licensed or acquired, which could lead to operating losses for the foreseeable future. Our prior losses have had, and expected future losses will continue to have, an adverse effect on our stockholders’ equity (deficit) and working capital.

Previous wording

•conduct and enroll patients in any clinical trials, including post-marketing studies or any other clinical trials for Auryxia, Vafseo or any other product or product candidate, including those that may be in-licensed or acquired;

Current wording

•conduct and enroll patients in any clinical trials, including clinical trials for praliciguat, AKB-097 and AKB-9090, and post-marketing studies or any other clinical trials for Auryxia, Vafseo or any other product or product candidate, including those that may be in-licensed or acquired;

Previous wording

•make royalty, milestone or other payments under our current and any future in-licensing agreements and the Vifor Termination Agreement;

Current wording

•make royalty, milestone or other payments under our current and any future in-licensing agreements, the Q32 Purchase Agreement and the Vifor Termination Agreement;

Previous wording

In addition, our ability to generate revenue would be negatively affected if dialysis organizations are unwilling to include Auryxia or Vafseo in their formulary or the size of our addressable patient population is not as significant as we estimate, the indication approved by regulatory authorities is narrower than we sought, or the patient population for treatment is narrowed by competition, physician choice, coverage or reimbursement, or payor or treatment guidelines. Even though we generate product revenue from Auryxia and Vafseo in the U.S. and royalties from Riona (ferric citrate hydrate) and Vafseo in Japan, and Vafseo in Europe and other territories where it is approved, and may generate revenue and royalties from the sale of any products that may be approved in the future, including those that may be in-licensed or acquired, we may never generate revenue and royalties that are significant enough for us to become and remain profitable, and we may need to obtain additional financing to continue to fund our operating plan.

Current wording

In addition, our ability to generate revenue would be negatively affected if dialysis organizations are unwilling to include Auryxia or Vafseo in their formulary or the size of our addressable patient population is not as significant as we estimate, the indication approved by regulatory authorities is narrower than we sought, or the patient population for treatment is narrowed by competition, physician choice, coverage or reimbursement, or payor or treatment guidelines. For example, although we initially sought approval for Vafseo for adult patients with NDD-CKD, the approved indication in the U.S. is limited to the treatment of anemia due to CKD in adults who have been receiving dialysis for at least three months. Even though we generate product revenue from Auryxia and Vafseo in the U.S. and royalties from Riona (ferric citrate hydrate) and Vafseo in Japan, and Vafseo in Europe and other territories where it is approved, and may generate revenue and royalties from the sale of any products that may be approved in the future, including those that may be in-licensed or acquired, we may never generate revenue and royalties that are significant enough for us to become and remain profitable, and we may need to obtain additional financing to continue to fund our operating plan.

Previous wording

As of September 30, 2025, our cash and cash equivalents were $166.4 million. We expect to continue to expend substantial amounts of cash for the foreseeable future as we continue to commercialize Auryxia in the U.S.; develop and commercialize Vafseo in the U.S.; and develop and commercialize any other product or product candidate, including those that may be in-licensed or acquired. These expenditures will include costs associated with R&D, manufacturing, potentially obtaining marketing approvals and marketing products approved for sale. In addition, other unanticipated costs may arise. Because the outcomes of our current and anticipated clinical trials are highly uncertain, we cannot reasonably estimate the actual amount of funding necessary to successfully complete clinical development for any current or future product candidates or to complete post-marketing studies for Auryxia and Vafseo. Our future capital requirements depend on many factors, including:

Current wording

As of March 31, 2026, our cash and cash equivalents were $162.6 million. We expect to continue to expend substantial amounts of cash for the foreseeable future as we continue to commercialize Auryxia in the U.S.; develop and commercialize Vafseo in the U.S.; and develop and commercialize any other product or product candidate, including those that may be in-licensed or acquired. These expenditures will include costs associated with R&D, manufacturing, potentially obtaining marketing approvals and marketing products approved for sale. In addition, other unanticipated costs may arise. Because the outcomes of our current and anticipated clinical trials are highly uncertain, we cannot reasonably estimate the actual amount of funding necessary to successfully complete clinical development for any current or future product candidates or to complete post-marketing studies for Vafseo. Our future capital requirements depend on many factors, including:

Previous wording

•the scope, progress, results and costs of conducting clinical trials or any post-marketing requirements or any other clinical trials for Auryxia, Vafseo and any other product or product candidate, including those that may be in-licensed or acquired;

Current wording

•the scope, progress, results and costs of conducting clinical trials or any post-marketing requirements or any other clinical trials for Auryxia, Vafseo, praliciguat, AKB-097, AKB-9090, and any other product or product candidate, including those that may be in-licensed or acquired;

Previous wording

•the timing and number of additional generic versions of Auryxia that enter the market following LoE for Auryxia which occurred in March 2025, the pricing of generic versions of Auryxia, the impact of the LoE on product revenue from Auryxia, including the impact on the price of Auryxia;

Current wording

•the timing and number of additional generic versions of Auryxia that enter the market following LoE for Auryxia which occurred in March 2025, the availability and pricing of generic versions of Auryxia, the impact of LoE on product revenue from Auryxia, including the impact on the price of Auryxia;

Previous wording

We believe our existing cash resources and the cash we expect to generate from product, royalty, supply and license revenues are sufficient to fund our current operating plan for the foreseeable future, including to commercialize Vafseo and Auryxia and advance our existing programs. However, if our operating performance deteriorates significantly from the levels expected in our long-term operating plan, including if we do not achieve our future anticipated Vafseo revenue projections, it would have an adverse effect on our liquidity and capital resources and could affect our ability to achieve or maintain profitability or continue as a going concern in the future. Our forecast of the period of time through which our financial resources will be adequate to support our operations is a forward-looking statement and involves numerous risks and uncertainties, and actual results could vary as a result of a number of factors, many of which are outside our control. We have based this estimate on assumptions that may be substantially different than actual results, and we could utilize our available capital resources sooner than we currently expect. In addition, if we fail to satisfy any of the covenants under the BlackRock Credit Agreement, and the loan is accelerated, or if certain pre-specified events occur and we are required to make principal payments to BlackRock sooner than we currently anticipate, such event could have a material adverse effect on our business. There can be no assurance that the current operating plan will be achieved in the time frame anticipated by us, or that our cash resources and cash we expect to generate will fund our operating plan for the period anticipated by us, or that additional funding will be available on terms acceptable to us, or at all.

Current wording

We believe our existing cash resources and the cash we expect to generate from product, royalty, supply and license revenues are sufficient to fund our current operating plan for at least two years, including to commercialize Vafseo and Auryxia and advance our existing programs. However, if our operating performance deteriorates significantly from the levels expected in our long-term operating plan, including if we do not achieve our future anticipated Vafseo revenue projections, it would have an adverse effect on our liquidity and capital resources and could affect our ability to achieve or maintain profitability or continue as a going concern in the future. Our forecast of the period of time through which our financial resources will be adequate to support our operations is a forward-looking statement and involves numerous risks and uncertainties, and actual results could vary as a result of a number of factors, many of which are outside our control. We have based this estimate on assumptions that may be substantially different than actual results, and we could utilize our available capital resources sooner than we currently expect. In addition, if we fail to satisfy any of the covenants under the BlackRock Credit Agreement, and the loan is accelerated, or if certain pre-specified events occur and we are required to make principal payments to BlackRock sooner than we currently anticipate, such event could have a material adverse effect on our business. There can be no assurance that the current operating plan will be achieved in the time frame anticipated by us, or that our cash resources and cash we expect to generate will fund our operating plan for the period anticipated by us, or that additional funding will be available on terms acceptable to us, or at all.

Previous wording

Any additional fundraising efforts may divert our management’s attention away from their day-to-day activities, which may adversely affect our ability to develop and commercialize Auryxia, Vafseo and any other products or product candidates, including those that may be in-licensed or acquired. Also, additional funds may not be available to us in sufficient amounts or on acceptable terms or at all. In addition, raising funds in the current economic environment may present additional challenges. For example, any sustained disruption in the capital markets from adverse macroeconomic conditions and an uncertain geopolitical environment, such as tariffs, rising inflation, increasing interest rates, slower economic growth or recession, global trade policies, global supply chain disruptions, ongoing conflicts including the Russia-Ukraine war, hostilities between Israel and Hamas, instability in the Middle East, tensions between China and Taiwan and other emerging geopolitical crises, could negatively impact our ability to raise capital, and we cannot predict the extent or duration of such macroeconomic disruptions. If we are unable to raise additional capital in sufficient amounts when needed or on terms acceptable to us, we may have to significantly delay, scale back or discontinue the development and/or commercialization of Auryxia, Vafseo and any other products or product candidates, including those that may be in-licensed or acquired. Any of these events could significantly harm our business, financial condition and prospects.

Current wording

Any additional fundraising efforts may divert our management’s attention away from their day-to-day activities, which may adversely affect our ability to develop and commercialize Auryxia, Vafseo and any other products or product candidates, including those that may be in-licensed or acquired. Also, additional funds may not be available to us in sufficient amounts or on acceptable terms or at all. In addition, raising funds in the current economic environment may present additional challenges. For example, any sustained disruption in the capital markets from adverse macroeconomic conditions and an uncertain geopolitical environment, such as tariffs, rising inflation, increasing interest rates, slower economic growth or recession, global trade policies, global supply chain disruptions, ongoing conflicts including the Russia-Ukraine war, hostilities between Israel and Hamas, instability in the Middle East, including the current conflict with Iran, tensions between China and Taiwan and other emerging geopolitical crises, could negatively impact our ability to raise capital, and we cannot predict the extent or duration of such macroeconomic disruptions. If we are unable to raise additional capital in sufficient amounts when needed or on terms acceptable to us, we may have to significantly delay, scale back or discontinue the development and/or commercialization of Auryxia, Vafseo and any other products or product candidates, including those that may be in-licensed or acquired. Any of these events could significantly harm our business, financial condition and prospects.

Previous wording

We expect to finance future cash needs through product revenue and royalty and license revenue, and we may seek to sell public or private equity, enter into new debt transactions, explore potential strategic transactions or a combination of these approaches or other strategic alternatives. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, the ownership interests of our common stockholders will be diluted, our fixed payment obligations may increase, any such securities may have rights senior to those of our common stock, and the terms may include liquidation or other preferences and anti-dilution protections that adversely affect the rights of our common stockholders. For example, from September 12, 2024 (the date our shelf registration statement on Form S-3 went effective) through December 31, 2024, we sold 14,271,631 shares of our common stock in an at-the-market offering with gross proceeds of $24.3 million, and during the nine months ended September 30, 2025, we sold 9,437,364 shares of our common stock under this program with gross proceeds of $18.7 million. In addition, on March 21, 2025, we sold 25,000,000 shares of our common stock in an underwritten public offering with net proceeds of $46.5 million, and on April 22, 2025, we sold an additional 850,000 shares of our common stock in connection with the partial exercise of the underwriters' 30-day option to purchase additional shares in such underwritten public offering with net proceeds of $1.6 million. Additional debt financing, if available, may involve agreements that would restrict our operations and potentially impair our competitiveness, such as limitations on our ability to incur additional debt, make capital expenditures, declare dividends, acquire, sell or license intellectual property rights, and other operating restrictions that could adversely impact our ability to conduct our business. If we raise additional funds through strategic transactions, we may have to relinquish valuable rights to our portfolio and future revenue streams, and enter into agreements that would restrict our operations and strategic flexibility. If we raise additional funds through strategic transactions with third parties, we may have to do so at an earlier stage than otherwise would be desirable. In connection with any such strategic transactions, we may be required to relinquish valuable rights to our product and product candidates, future revenue streams or research programs or grant licenses on terms that are not favorable to us. If we are unable to raise additional funds when needed, we may not be able to pursue planned development and commercialization activities and we may need to grant rights to develop and market product candidates that we would otherwise prefer to develop and market ourselves.

Current wording

We expect to finance future cash needs through product revenue and royalty and license revenue, and we may seek to sell public or private equity, enter into new debt transactions, explore potential strategic transactions or a combination of these approaches or other strategic alternatives. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, the ownership interests of our common stockholders will be diluted, our fixed payment obligations may increase, any such securities may have rights senior to those of our common stock, and the terms may include liquidation or other preferences and anti-dilution protections that adversely affect the rights of our common stockholders. For example, from September 12, 2024 (the date our shelf registration statement on Form S-3 went effective) through December 31, 2025, we sold 23,708,995 shares of our common stock in an at-the-market offering with gross proceeds of $43.0 million, and during the three months ended March 31, 2026, we did not sell any shares of our common stock under this program. Additional debt financing, if available, may involve agreements that would restrict our operations and potentially impair our competitiveness, such as limitations on our ability to incur additional debt, make capital expenditures, declare dividends, acquire, sell or license intellectual property rights, and other operating restrictions that could adversely impact our ability to conduct our business. If we raise additional funds through strategic transactions, we may have to relinquish valuable rights to our portfolio and future revenue streams, and enter into agreements that would restrict our operations and strategic flexibility. If we raise additional funds through strategic transactions with third parties, we may have to do so at an earlier stage than otherwise would be desirable. In connection with any such strategic transactions, we may be required to relinquish valuable rights to our product and product candidates, future revenue streams or research programs or grant licenses on terms that are not favorable to us. If we are unable to raise additional funds when needed, we may not be able to pursue planned development and commercialization activities and we may need to grant rights to develop and market product candidates that we would otherwise prefer to develop and market ourselves.

Previous wording

Although we continue to focus a substantial amount of our efforts to develop and commercialize Auryxia and Vafseo, a key element of our long-term growth strategy is to develop additional product candidates and acquire, in-license, develop and/or market additional products and product candidates.

Current wording

Although we continue to focus a substantial amount of our efforts to develop and commercialize Auryxia and Vafseo, a key element of our long-term growth strategy is to develop additional product candidates and acquire, in-license, develop and/or market additional products and product candidates. For example, on November 28, 2025, we acquired AKB-097, a clinical-stage development candidate with the potential to treat rare kidney diseases. In addition, in January 2026, we announced that the first patient was dosed in a Phase 2 clinical trial of praliciguat and, in April 2026, we announced that the first patient was dosed in a Phase 1 clinical trial of AKB-9090.

Previous wording

Research programs to identify product candidates require substantial technical, financial and human resources, regardless of whether product candidates are ultimately identified. Our R&D programs may initially show promise, yet fail to yield product candidates for clinical development or commercialization for many reasons, including the following:

Current wording

Research programs to identify product candidates require substantial technical, financial and human resources, regardless of whether product candidates are ultimately identified. Our R&D programs, including our rare kidney disease pipeline, may initially show promise, yet fail to yield product candidates for clinical development or commercialization for many reasons, including the following:

Previous wording

Because we have limited financial and managerial resources, we have focused on products, research programs and product candidates for specific indications. As a result, we have had to, and in the future may need to, forgo or delay pursuit of opportunities with other product candidates or for other indications, or may out license rights to product candidates, that later prove to have greater commercial potential. For example, as a result of receipt of the CRL and implementation of the reductions in workforce, we delayed certain research activities. Our resource allocation decisions may cause us to fail to capitalize on viable commercial products or profitable market opportunities on a timely basis, or at all. Our spending on current and future R&D programs and product candidates for specific indications may not yield any commercially viable products.

Current wording

Because we have limited financial and managerial resources, we have focused on products, research programs and product candidates for specific indications. As a result, we have had to, and in the future may need to, forgo or delay pursuit of opportunities with other product candidates or for other indications, or may out license rights to product candidates, that later prove to have greater commercial potential. Our resource allocation decisions may cause us to fail to capitalize on viable commercial products or profitable market opportunities on a timely basis, or at all. Our spending on current and future R&D programs and product candidates for specific indications may not yield any commercially viable products.

Previous wording

Because our internal research capabilities are limited, we may be dependent upon other pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, academic scientists and institutions, and other researchers to sell or license product candidates, products or technology to us. As a result, our rights to these product candidates may be limited or we may be required to make future payments to such third parties if we are successful in developing such product candidates. The success of this strategy depends partly upon our ability to identify, select, and acquire promising product candidates and products. The process of identifying, selecting, negotiating and implementing a license or acquisition of a product candidate or an approved product is lengthy and complex. Other companies, including some with substantially greater financial, marketing and sales resources, may compete with us for the license or acquisition of a product candidate or an approved product. We have limited resources to identify and execute the acquisition or in-licensing of third party products, businesses, and technologies and integrate them into our current infrastructure.

Current wording

Because our internal research capabilities are limited, we may be dependent upon other pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, academic scientists and institutions, and other researchers to sell or license product candidates, products or technology to us. As a result, our rights to these product candidates may be limited or we may be required to make future payments to such third parties if we are successful in developing such product candidates. For example, under the terms of the Q32 Purchase Agreement, we (i) will make an additional upfront payment to Q32 in an amount equal to $3.0 million on the sixth-month anniversary of the APA Closing Date, (ii) will make certain milestone payments upon the achievement of specified development and regulatory milestone events related to AKB-097 up to an aggregate amount equal to $94.5 million, including a $2.0 million development milestone payment upon the earlier of initiation of a Phase 2 clinical trial and December 31, 2026, (iii) will make certain milestone payments upon the achievement of specified commercial milestone events with respect to the net sales of AKB-097 up to an aggregate amount equal to $487.5 million, and (iv) will make certain royalty payments based on the net sales of AKB-097 with royalty percentage tiers ranging from the low single digits to mid-teen percentages. The success of this strategy depends partly upon our ability to identify, select, and acquire promising product candidates and products. The process of identifying, selecting, negotiating and implementing a license or acquisition of a product candidate or an approved product is lengthy and complex. Other companies, including some with substantially greater financial, marketing and sales resources, may compete with us for the license or acquisition of a product candidate or an approved product. We have limited resources to identify and execute the acquisition or in-licensing of third party products, businesses, and technologies and integrate them into our current infrastructure.

Previous wording

Moreover, we may devote resources to potential acquisitions or in-licensing opportunities that are never completed, or we may fail to realize the anticipated benefits of such efforts. Any product candidate that we acquire may require additional development efforts prior to commercial sale, including extensive clinical testing and approval by the FDA, the EMA, the Japanese Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, or PMDA, or other regulatory authorities, or post-approval testing or other requirements if approved. All product candidates are prone to risks of failure typical of pharmaceutical product development, including the possibility that a product candidate will not be shown to be sufficiently safe and effective for approval by regulatory authorities. In addition, we cannot provide assurance that any of our products will be manufactured in a cost effective manner, achieve market acceptance or not require substantial post-marketing clinical trials.

Current wording

Moreover, we may devote resources to potential acquisitions or in-licensing opportunities that are never completed, or we may fail to realize the anticipated benefits of such efforts, such as with respect to the acquisition of our clinical-stage development candidate AKB-097 and the in-license of our clinical-stage development candidate praliciguat. Any product candidate that we acquire may require additional development efforts prior to commercial sale, including extensive clinical testing and approval by the FDA, the EMA, the Japanese Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, or PMDA, or other regulatory authorities, or post-approval testing or other requirements if approved. All product candidates are prone to risks of failure typical of pharmaceutical product development, including the possibility that a product candidate will not be shown to be sufficiently safe and effective for approval by regulatory authorities. In addition, we cannot provide assurance that any of our products will be manufactured in a cost effective manner, achieve market acceptance or not require substantial post-marketing clinical trials.

Previous wording

As part of our business strategy, we may engage in additional strategic transactions to expand and diversify our portfolio, including through the merger, acquisition or in-license of assets, businesses, or rights to products, product candidates or technologies or through strategic alliances or collaborations, similar to the Merger and our existing and prior collaboration and license arrangements. We may not identify suitable strategic transactions, or complete such transactions in a timely manner, on favorable terms, on a cost-effective basis, or at all. Moreover, we may devote resources to potential opportunities that are never completed or we may incorrectly judge the value or worth of such opportunities. Even if we successfully execute a strategic transaction, we may not be able to realize the anticipated benefits of such transaction and may experience losses related to our investments in such transactions. Integration of an acquired company or assets into our existing business may not be successful and may disrupt ongoing operations, require the hiring of additional personnel and the implementation and integration of additional internal systems and infrastructure, and require management resources that would otherwise focus on developing our existing business. Even if we are able to achieve the long-term benefits of a strategic transaction, our expenses and short-term costs may increase materially and adversely affect our liquidity. Any of the foregoing could have a detrimental effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. For example, on June 4, 2021, we entered into a license agreement, or the Cyclerion Agreement, with Cyclerion Therapeutics Inc., or Cyclerion, pursuant to which Cyclerion granted us an exclusive global license under certain intellectual property rights to research, develop and commercialize praliciguat, an investigational oral soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator. In December 2024, we entered into an amendment to the Cyclerion Agreement and we now control all clinical and commercial manufacturing of praliciguat, which will be conducted by a third-party manufacturer. Although we have progressed preclinical studies for praliciguat, we needed to do additional work to manufacture product for clinical trials than originally anticipated before we could initiate the trials, and when the clinical trials are started, we may be unsuccessful in developing praliciguat. If any of the assumptions that we made in valuing the transaction, including the costs or timing of development of praliciguat as a result of the additional manufacturing work or otherwise, or the potential benefits of praliciguat, were incorrect, we may not recognize the anticipated benefits of the transaction and our business could be harmed.

Current wording

As part of our business strategy, we may engage in additional strategic transactions to expand and diversify our portfolio, including through the merger, acquisition or in-license of assets, businesses, or rights to products, product candidates or technologies or through strategic alliances or collaborations, similar to the Merger and our existing and prior collaboration and license arrangements. We may not identify suitable strategic transactions, or complete such transactions in a timely manner, on favorable terms, on a cost-effective basis, or at all. Moreover, we may devote resources to potential opportunities that are never completed or we may incorrectly judge the value or worth of such opportunities. Even if we successfully execute a strategic transaction, we may not be able to realize the anticipated benefits of such transaction and may experience losses related to our investments in such transactions. Integration of an acquired company or assets into our existing business may not be successful and may disrupt ongoing operations, require the hiring of additional personnel and the implementation and integration of additional internal systems and infrastructure, and require management resources that would otherwise focus on developing our existing business. Even if we are able to achieve the long-term benefits of a strategic transaction, our expenses and short-term costs may increase materially and adversely affect our liquidity. Any of the foregoing could have a detrimental effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. For example, the acquisition of AKB-097 on November 28, 2025 is expected to increase research and development expenses and require significant management attention for integration, which could divert resources from other priorities, raise short‑term costs, and adversely affect our liquidity. In addition, on June 4, 2021, we entered into a license agreement, or the Cyclerion Agreement, with Cyclerion Therapeutics Inc., or Cyclerion, pursuant to which Cyclerion granted us an exclusive global license under certain intellectual property rights to research, develop and commercialize praliciguat, an investigational oral, once-daily soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator being evaluated for the treatment of biopsy-confirmed focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, a rare kidney disease, with plans to assess its use in other rare podocytopathies in the future. In December 2024, we entered into an amendment to the Cyclerion Agreement and we now control all clinical and commercial manufacturing of praliciguat, which will be conducted by a third-party manufacturer. Although we needed to do additional work to manufacture product for clinical trials than originally anticipated before we could initiate the trial for praliciguat, on January 6, 2026, we announced that the first patient was dosed in a Phase 2 clinical trial in the U.S. However, even though the clinical trial has started, we may be unsuccessful in developing…

Excerpt shortened here; the source contains the full paragraph.

Previous wording

•increased amortization expenses or, in the case of a write-down of the value of acquired assets, impairment losses, and corresponding adjustments to the estimated useful life of the developed product rights for Auryxia;

Current wording

•increased amortization expenses or, in the case of a write-down of the value of acquired assets, impairment losses, and corresponding adjustments to the estimated useful life of the developed product rights;

Previous wording

•entry into indications or markets in which we have no or limited development or commercial experience and where competitors in such markets have stronger market positions; and

Current wording

•entry into indications or markets in which we have no or limited development or commercial experience and where competitors in such markets have stronger market positions;

Previous wording

The Term Loan Facility will accrue interest at a floating annual rate equal to the sum of (x) term Secured Overnight Financing Rate for a tenor of one month (subject to a floor of 4.25% per annum) plus (y) a margin of 6.75% per annum (subject to an overall cap of 15.00% per annum on the all-in interest rate). During the continuance of any payment event of default under the BlackRock Credit Agreement, the interest rate on such overdue sum will automatically increase by an additional 3.0% per annum, and may be subject to an additional late fee of 2.0% of such overdue sum. The Term Loan Facility does not amortize during the period commencing on the Closing Date and ending on December 31, 2026 (as extended at our option), or the

Current wording

The Term Loan Facility accrues interest at a floating annual rate equal to the sum of (x) term Secured Overnight Financing Rate for a tenor of one month (subject to a floor of 4.25% per annum) plus (y) a margin of 6.75% per annum (subject to an overall cap of 15.00% per annum on the all-in interest rate). During the continuance of any payment event of default under the BlackRock Credit Agreement, the interest rate on such overdue sum will automatically increase by an additional 3.0% per annum, and may be subject to an additional late fee of 2.0% of such overdue sum. The Term Loan Facility does not amortize during the period commencing on the Closing Date and ending on December 31, 2026 (as extended at our option), or the Interest Only Period. We are required to pay interest and, after the Interest Only Period, principal on the first calendar day of each month. In the event of certain prespecified events, the repayment schedule will be accelerated. If any of these events occur, and we are required to repay principal sooner than we anticipate, it would have an adverse effect on our business.

Previous wording

In February 2021, we entered into a royalty interest acquisition agreement, or the Royalty Agreement, with HealthCare Royalty Partners IV, L.P., or HCR, pursuant to which we sold to HCR our right to receive royalties and sales milestones for Vafseo, collectively the Royalty Interest Payments, in each case, payable to us under our Collaboration Agreement dated December 11, 2015, or the MTPC Agreement, with Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, or MTPC, subject to an annual maximum “cap” of $13.0 million, or the Annual Cap, and an aggregate maximum “cap” of $150.0 million, or the Aggregate Cap. Under the Royalty Agreement, we are required to comply with various covenants, including obligations to take certain actions, such as actions with respect to the Royalty Interest Payments, the MTPC Agreement, our agreement with MTPC for the commercial supply of Vafseo drug product, and our intellectual property. In addition, the Royalty Agreement includes customary events of default upon the occurrence of enumerated events, including failure to perform certain covenants and the occurrence of insolvency events. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, HCR would have the ability to exercise all available remedies in law and equity, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.

Current wording

In February 2021, we entered into a royalty interest acquisition agreement, or the Royalty Agreement, with HealthCare Royalty Partners IV, L.P., or HCR, pursuant to which we sold to HCR our right to receive royalties and sales milestones for Vafseo, collectively the Royalty Interest Payments, in each case, payable to us under our Collaboration Agreement dated December 11, 2015, or the TPC Agreement, with Tanabe Pharma Corporation, formerly Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, or TPC, subject to an annual maximum “cap” of $13.0 million, or the Annual Cap, and an aggregate maximum “cap” of $150.0 million, or the Aggregate Cap. Under the Royalty Agreement, we are required to comply with various covenants, including obligations to take certain actions, such as actions with respect to the Royalty Interest Payments, the TPC Agreement, our agreement with TPC for the commercial supply of Vafseo drug product, and our intellectual property. In addition, the Royalty Agreement includes customary events of default upon the occurrence of enumerated events, including failure to perform certain covenants and the occurrence of insolvency events. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, HCR would have the ability to exercise all available remedies in law and equity, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.

Previous wording

We had exclusive rights under a series of patents and patent applications to commercialize Auryxia in the U.S. that protected us from generic drug competition until March 20, 2025. Following LoE, the number of generic versions of Auryxia that enter the market, and the timing thereof, will adversely affect our revenue from Auryxia. On February 5, 2025, we entered into an Authorized Generic Distribution and Supply Agreement with Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., or AG Partner, pursuant to which, since March 20, 2025, they have been selling an authorized generic version of Auryxia. Currently, no additional generics of Auryxia have entered the market, but the FDA could approve another generic at any time. The impact of LoE on future Auryxia revenues will depend on many factors, including our ability to maintain contracts with dialysis organizations, the timing and number of additional generics and the pricing of generics and other products on the market that compete with Auryxia. If Auryxia sales decline faster than we anticipate following LoE, our results of operations and financial condition will be materially harmed.

Current wording

We had exclusive rights under a series of patents and patent applications to commercialize Auryxia in the U.S. that protected us from generic drug competition until March 20, 2025. Following LoE, the number of generic versions of Auryxia that enter the market, and the timing thereof, will adversely affect our revenue from Auryxia. On February 5, 2025, we entered into an Authorized Generic Distribution and Supply Agreement with Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., or AG Distributor, as amended in September 2025, pursuant to which, since March 20, 2025, they have been selling an authorized generic version of Auryxia. On March 11, 2026, Teva Pharmaceuticals Ltd., or Teva, received approval for its Abbreviated New Drug Application, or ANDA, for a generic version of Auryxia, which has subsequently entered the market. We expect Teva's entry into the market, and the entry of any additional generic versions of Auryxia that may be approved in addition to our AG Distributor, will adversely impact our revenue. However, the impact on future Auryxia revenues will depend on many factors, including our ability to maintain contracts with dialysis organizations, the timing and number of additional generics, the amount of generic product available to supply the market and the pricing of generics and other products on the market that compete with Auryxia.

Previous wording

Given the concentration of dialysis clinics in large networks, with DaVita, Inc., or DaVita, Fresenius Kidney Care Group LLC, or Fresenius, and U.S. Renal Care, or USRC, accounting for a vast majority of the dialysis population in the U.S., treatment is usually driven by medical protocols that are implemented across the entire network of clinics. Dialysis organizations require large data sets to adopt medical protocols. In addition, some dialysis organizations have medical protocols that require specific steps once Vafseo is prescribed that lengthens the time before the patient starts treatment, delaying initial adoption. If dialysis organizations do not add Vafseo to their medical protocols in a timely manner, or at all, or do not keep Vafseo on their medical protocols, or maintain protocols that delay treatment initiation by requiring additional steps, or if the protocols service smaller populations than the current label, our results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In the quarter ended September 30, 2025, most Vafseo revenue was driven by mid-sized dialysis organizations. If we are unable to increase sales to the large and small dialysis organizations, our results of operations will be negatively impacted.

Current wording

Given the concentration of dialysis clinics in large networks, with DaVita, Inc., or DaVita, Fresenius Kidney Care Group LLC, or Fresenius, and U.S. Renal Care, or USRC, accounting for a vast majority of the dialysis population in the U.S., treatment is usually driven by medical protocols that are implemented across the entire network of clinics. Dialysis organizations require large data sets to adopt medical protocols and often have lengthy processes to implement and operationalize the protocol and make the new therapy available for patients. In addition, some dialysis organizations have medical protocols that require specific steps once Vafseo is prescribed that lengthens the time before the patient starts treatment, delaying initial adoption. If dialysis organizations do not add Vafseo to their medical protocols in a timely manner, or at all, or do not keep Vafseo on their medical protocols, or maintain protocols that delay treatment initiation by requiring additional steps, or if the protocols service smaller populations than the current label, our results of operations could be materially adversely affected. For example, in the year ended December 2025, physicians initiating and, in some cases, maintaining, patients on therapy within the highly protocolized dialysis environment took longer than we expected. In 2025 and the quarter ended March 31, 2026, most Vafseo revenue was driven by mid-sized dialysis organizations. If we are unable to increase sales to the large dialysis organizations and other medium-sized dialysis organizations, our results of operations will be negatively impacted.

Previous wording

Oral-only phosphate binders, including Auryxia, are included in the end-stage renal disease, or ESRD, Prospective Payment System, or PPS, bundle payment, as of January 2025. In addition, dialysis organizations may choose lower cost binders over Auryxia, or binders that may have features or benefits more aligned with the dialysis organization's operational activities, which could negatively impact Auryxia revenue. We believe our revenue growth for Auryxia has been negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic since 2021 primarily as the CKD patient populations that we serve experienced both high hospitalization and mortality rates due to COVID-19, and the pandemic had an adverse impact on the phosphate binder market in which Auryxia competes. Labor shortages and costs have also adversely impacted dialysis providers. These impacts have refocused clinical efforts in addressing bone and mineral disorders like hyperphosphatemia to more acute operational issues to ensure patients receive dialysis treatments and still some patients have been rescheduled or missed treatments due to labor shortages. We believe this and potentially other factors, led to the reduction in the phosphate binder market, which has not experienced growth since early 2020. While we are unable to quantify the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on future Auryxia revenues and revenue growth, ongoing impacts from the COVID-19 pandemic continue to adversely and disproportionately impact CKD patients and the phosphate binder market. Therefore, we expect the impacts from the pandemic to continue to have a negative impact on our Auryxia revenue growth for the foreseeable future.

Current wording

Oral-only phosphate binders, including Auryxia, are included in the end-stage renal disease, or ESRD, Prospective Payment System, or PPS, bundle payment, as of January 2025. In addition, dialysis organizations may choose lower cost binders over Auryxia, or binders that may have features or benefits more aligned with the dialysis organization's operational activities, which could negatively impact Auryxia revenue. We believe our revenue growth for Auryxia has been negatively impacted since 2021 primarily as the CKD patient populations we serve experienced both high hospitalization and mortality rates due to COVID-19 and other infectious diseases, and the availability and uses of vaccines, treatments and therapies has increased. Labor shortages and increased costs have also adversely impacted dialysis providers. These impacts have refocused clinical efforts in addressing bone and mineral disorders such as hyperphosphatemia to more acute operational issues to ensure patients receive dialysis treatments. Still some patients have been rescheduled or missed treatments due to labor shortages. In addition, new CKD non-dialysis treatments could slow the progression of CKD non-dialysis patients to dialysis. We believe these factors, among others, have contributed to the continued reduction in the phosphate binder market, which has not experienced growth since early 2020. While we are unable to quantify the impact of these effects on future Auryxia revenues, ongoing impacts from market and patient population challenges could continue to adversely and disproportionately impact CKD patients and the phosphate binder market. Therefore, we expect the impacts from these factors could have a negative impact on our Auryxia revenue for the foreseeable future.

Previous wording

Market acceptance is also critical to our ability to generate significant product revenue. Any product may achieve only limited market acceptance or none at all. If Auryxia, Vafseo or any of our future products is not accepted by the market to the extent that we expect or market acceptance decreases, we may not be able to generate significant product revenue and our business would be materially harmed. For example, an unexpected number of patients initially prescribed Vafseo have discontinued treatment. If a higher than expected number of patient discontinuations persists, or increases, this could negatively impact the market acceptance of Vafseo, and could adversely affect our financial results. Market acceptance of Auryxia, Vafseo or any other approved product depends on a number of factors, including:

Current wording

Market acceptance is also critical to our ability to generate significant product revenue. Any product may achieve only limited market acceptance or none at all. If Auryxia, Vafseo or any of our future products is not accepted by the market to the extent that we expect or market acceptance decreases, we may not be able to generate significant product revenue and our business would be materially harmed. For example, an unexpected number of patients initially prescribed Vafseo have discontinued treatment. While we continue to work with dialysis organizations to improve adherence, if a higher than expected number of patient discontinuations persists, or increases, this could negatively impact the market acceptance of Vafseo, and could adversely affect our financial results. Market acceptance of Auryxia, Vafseo or any other approved product depends on a number of factors, including:

Previous wording

Additionally, training a sales force to successfully sell and market a new commercial product is expensive and time-consuming and could delay any commercial launch or market acceptance of such product. We may underestimate the size of the sales force required for a successful product launch, and we may need to expand our sales and marketing team to a greater extent than we already have, which would increase our costs more than we anticipated.

Current wording

Additionally, training a sales force to successfully sell and market a new commercial product is expensive and time consuming and could delay any commercial launch or market acceptance of such product. We may underestimate the size of the sales force required for a successful product launch, and we may need to expand our sales and marketing team, which would increase our costs more than we anticipated.

Previous wording

If we are unable to maintain our own sales and marketing capabilities, we will not be successful in commercializing Auryxia, Vafseo and any other product candidate that may be approved. Also, if we are unable to maintain our arrangements with third parties with respect to sales and marketing, if we are unsuccessful in entering into additional arrangements with third parties to sell and market our products or we are unable to do so on terms that are favorable to us, or if such third parties are unable to carry out their obligations under such arrangements, it will be difficult to successfully commercialize our product and product candidates, including Vafseo.

Current wording

If we are unable to maintain our own sales and marketing capabilities, we will not be successful in commercializing Vafseo and any other product candidate that may be approved. Also, if we are unable to maintain our arrangements with third parties with respect to sales and marketing, if we are unsuccessful in entering into additional arrangements with third parties to sell and market our products or we are unable to do so on terms that are favorable to us, or if such third parties are unable to carry out their obligations under such arrangements, it will be difficult to successfully commercialize our product and product candidates, including Vafseo.

Previous wording

As an oral drug, Auryxia was covered by Medicare under Part D until January 1, 2025, for the treatment of patients with hyperphosphatemia. In January 2011, CMS implemented the ESRD PPS, a prospective payment system for dialysis treatment. Under the ESRD PPS, CMS generally makes a single bundled payment to the dialysis facility for each dialysis treatment that covers all items and services routinely required for dialysis treatments furnished to Medicare beneficiaries in Medicare-certified ESRD facilities or at their home. As of January 2025, oral ESRD-related drugs without injectable or intravenous equivalents, including Auryxia and all other phosphate lowering medications, are included in the ESRD bundle and separate Medicare payment for these drugs are no longer available. In addition, dialysis organizations will receive a Transitional Drug Add-on Payment Adjustment, or TDAPA, payment for claims that include phosphate binders for the next two years. Vafseo, which we began selling in January 2025, is also included in the ESRD bundle and ESRD facilities will receive a TDAPA for Vafseo as a new renal dialysis drug meeting certain criteria for a period of at least two years starting on January 1, 2025. TDAPA provides separate payment based on the drug’s Average Sales Price, or ASP, that will be in addition to the base rate in order to facilitate the adoption of innovative therapies. If the TDAPA reimbursement amount for Auryxia or Vafseo is lower than anticipated, or if the TDAPA is eliminated, it would have an adverse impact on our revenue. Additionally, in the post-TDAPA period, CMS currently expects to increase the single bundled payment base rate paid to the dialysis facility for each dialysis treatment to reflect that bundled drugs will be reimbursed as part of the single bundled payment for Medicare patients. However, there can be no assurances that any increase in the single bundled payment base rate will be sufficient to adequately reimburse the dialysis facilities for Auryxia at a price that allows us to continue to sell Auryxia at a profit.

Current wording

As an oral drug, Auryxia was covered by Medicare under Part D until January 1, 2025, for the treatment of patients with hyperphosphatemia. In January 2011, CMS implemented the ESRD PPS, a prospective payment system for dialysis treatment. Under the ESRD PPS, CMS generally makes a single bundled payment to the dialysis facility for each dialysis treatment that covers all items and services routinely required for dialysis treatments furnished to Medicare beneficiaries in Medicare-certified ESRD facilities or at their home. As of January 2025, oral ESRD-related drugs without injectable or intravenous equivalents, including Auryxia and all other phosphate lowering medications, are included in the ESRD bundle and separate Part D Medicare payment for these drugs is no longer available. However, dialysis organizations will receive a Transitional Drug Add-on Payment Adjustment, or TDAPA, payment for claims that include phosphate binders through the end of 2026. Vafseo, which we began selling in January 2025, is also included in the ESRD bundle and ESRD facilities will receive a TDAPA for Vafseo as a new renal dialysis drug meeting certain criteria for a period of two years starting on January 1, 2025. TDAPA provides separate payment based on the drug’s Average Sales Price, or ASP, that will be in addition to the base rate in order to facilitate the adoption of innovative therapies. If the TDAPA reimbursement amount for Auryxia or Vafseo is lower than anticipated, or if the TDAPA is eliminated, it would have an adverse impact on our revenue. Additionally, after the TDAPA period, CMS currently expects to increase the single bundled payment base rate paid to the dialysis facility for each dialysis treatment to reflect the cost of phosphate lowering medications, including Auryxia and for Vafseo. However, the increase related to Vafseo will only last three years and neither Auryxia nor Vafseo will receive a direct additional payment outside the bundled rate after the TDAPA period. There can be no assurances that any increase in the single bundled payment base rate will be sufficient to adequately reimburse the dialysis facilities for Auryxia or Vafseo at a price that allows us to continue to sell Auryxia or Vafseo at a profit. For example, there has been increased pricing pressures for erythropoiesis stimulating agents, or ESAs, which we believe is due to competition, and which may negatively impact the price of, and the market for, Vafseo after the TDAPA period.

Previous wording

Additionally, we will be required to enter into contracts with dialysis organizations, GPOs, third party payors and/or PBMs offering rebates or discounts on our products in order to obtain favorable formulary status and we may not be able to agree upon commercially reasonable terms with such dialysis organizations, GPOs, third party payors or PBMs, or provide data sufficient to obtain favorable coverage and reimbursement for many reasons, including that we may be at a competitive disadvantage relative to companies with more extensive product lines. In addition, dialysis organizations, GPOs, third party payors, PBMs and/or other entities that purchase our products may impose restrictions on our ability to raise prices for our products over time without incurring additional costs. Three dialysis organizations, DaVita, Fresenius Medical Care Rx and USRC, in the aggregate, accounted for a significant percentage of our gross revenue from Auryxia and Vafseo during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025. If we are not able to maintain supply agreements with these, and other, dialysis organizations for the sale of Vafseo and Auryxia on favorable terms, in a timely basis or at all, our business may be materially harmed.

Current wording

Additionally, we have and will continue to enter into contracts with dialysis organizations, GPOs, third party payors and/or PBMs offering rebates or discounts on our products in order to obtain favorable formulary status and we may not be able to agree upon commercially reasonable terms with such dialysis organizations, GPOs, third party payors or PBMs, or provide data sufficient to obtain favorable coverage and reimbursement for many reasons, including that we may be at a competitive disadvantage relative to companies with more extensive product lines. In addition, dialysis organizations, GPOs, third party payors, PBMs and/or other entities that purchase our products may impose restrictions on our ability to raise prices for our products over time without incurring additional costs. Three dialysis organizations, DaVita, Fresenius Medical Care Rx and USRC, in the aggregate, accounted for a significant percentage of our gross revenue from Auryxia and Vafseo during the three months ended March 31, 2026. If we are not able to maintain supply agreements with these, and other, dialysis organizations for the sale of Vafseo and Auryxia on favorable terms, in a timely basis or at all, our business may be materially harmed.

Previous wording

Due to a variety of factors, including coverage of our products in the ESRD bundle and to support commercial availability of Vafseo in 2025, there were changes to the manner in which we distributed our products, which we implemented in January 2025. This included, for example, reducing the number of mainline wholesalers in our distribution network, distribution of products through specialty distributors, and an increased focus on direct sales through contracts with dialysis organizations. If we are not able to enter into and maintain agreements with wholesalers, specialty distributors, the dialysis organizations and other purchasers for the sale of our products on favorable terms, on a timely basis or at all, our business may be materially harmed. We recently also began to ship Vafseo directly to certain dialysis clinics, which requires additional oversight and logistics, and if implementation of this new distribution model is not successful, it could negatively impact our business. In addition, if dialysis organizations or other purchasers do not purchase as much product as we anticipate or terminate our arrangements, or if due to changes in distribution, dialysis organizations and/or specialty pharmacies are not able to meet market demand causing slower dispensing times and potentially impacting refill rates, it would adversely impact the market opportunity for our products, our product revenues and operating results.

Current wording

Due to a variety of factors, including coverage of our products in the ESRD bundle and to support commercial availability of Vafseo in 2025, there were changes to the manner in which we distributed our products, which we implemented in January 2025. This included, for example, reducing the number of mainline wholesalers in our distribution network, distribution of products through specialty distributors, and an increased focus on direct sales through contracts with dialysis organizations. If we are not able to enter into and maintain agreements with wholesalers, specialty distributors, the dialysis organizations and other purchasers for the sale of our products on favorable terms, on a timely basis or at all, our business may be materially harmed. We also began to ship Vafseo directly to certain dialysis clinics, which requires additional oversight and logistics, and if this new distribution model is not successful or requires more resources than we anticipate, it could negatively impact our business. In addition, if dialysis organizations or other purchasers do not purchase as much product as we anticipate or terminate our arrangements, or if due to changes in distribution, dialysis organizations and/or specialty pharmacies are not able to meet market demand causing slower dispensing times and potentially impacting refill rates, it would adversely impact the market opportunity for our products, our product revenues and operating results.

Previous wording

If coverage and reimbursement terms change, MTPC may not be able to, or may decide not to, continue commercialization of Vafseo in Japan. Furthermore, Vafseo was approved in Europe and Australia for the treatment of symptomatic anemia associated with CKD in adults on chronic maintenance dialysis. In Europe, reimbursement is obtained on a country-by-country basis and it is a time consuming process. In May 2023, we entered into the license agreement with Medice, pursuant to which we granted Medice an exclusive license to develop and commercialize Vafseo for the treatment of anemia in patients with CKD in the Medice Territory. Medice launched and has received pricing and reimbursement for Vafseo in certain countries in Europe and is working on launching and securing pricing and reimbursement for Vafseo in other markets across Europe. There is no guarantee of the timing or extent of reimbursement that they will receive in each country, if at all. If Medice is not able to obtain favorable pricing in the Medice Territory, or if such approvals are delayed, it will affect Medice’s sales of Vafseo in the Medice Territory, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

Current wording

However, the failure to obtain reimbursement in one jurisdiction may negatively impact the ability to obtain reimbursement in another jurisdiction. In addition, we plan to rely on partners to obtain approval by reimbursement authorities outside the U.S. Our partners may not be able to obtain such reimbursement approvals on a timely basis, if at all, and favorable pricing in certain countries depends on a number of factors, some of which are outside of our partners' control. Vafseo was approved in Japan for the treatment of adult patients with anemia due to CKD and is being marketed by TPC in Japan under the trade name Vafseo. Pricing and reimbursement strategy is a key component of TPC’s commercialization plans for Vafseo in Japan. If coverage and reimbursement terms change, TPC may not be able to, or may decide not to, continue commercialization of Vafseo in Japan. Furthermore, Vafseo was approved in Europe and Australia for the treatment of symptomatic anemia associated with CKD in adults on chronic maintenance dialysis. In Europe, reimbursement is obtained on a country-by-country basis and it is a time consuming process. In May 2023, we entered into the license agreement with Medice, pursuant to which we granted Medice an exclusive license to develop and commercialize Vafseo for the treatment of anemia in patients with CKD in the Medice Territory. Medice launched and has received pricing and reimbursement for Vafseo in certain countries in Europe and is working on launching and securing pricing and reimbursement for Vafseo in other markets across Europe. There is no guarantee of the timing or extent of reimbursement that they will receive in each country, if at all. If Medice is not able to obtain favorable pricing in the Medice Territory, or if such approvals are delayed, it will affect Medice’s sales of Vafseo in the Medice Territory, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

Previous wording

We had exclusive rights under a series of patents and patent applications to commercialize Auryxia in the U.S. that protected us from generic drug competition until March 20, 2025. Following LoE, the number of additional generic versions of Auryxia that enter the market, and the timing thereof, will affect our revenue from Auryxia. We and our licensors, Panion & BF Biotech, Inc., or Panion, and, as applicable, Dr. Hsu, entered into settlement agreements with all of the third parties who submitted Paragraph IV certification notice letters regarding Abbreviated New Drug Applications, or ANDAs, submitted to the FDA, pursuant to which we granted licenses to market a generic version of Auryxia in the U.S. beginning on March 20, 2025 (subject to FDA approval). In addition, on February 5, 2025, we entered into an Authorized Generic Distribution and Supply Agreement with our AG Partner, pursuant to which, since March 20, 2025, they have been selling an authorized generic version of Auryxia. Currently, no additional generics of Auryxia have entered the market, but the FDA could approve another generic at any time. The impact of LoE on future Auryxia revenues will depend on many factors, including our ability to maintain contracts with dialysis organizations, the timing and number of additional generics and the pricing of generics and other products on the market that compete with Auryxia. If Auryxia sales decline faster than we anticipate following LoE, our results of operations and financial condition will be materially harmed.

Current wording

We had exclusive rights under a series of patents and patent applications to commercialize Auryxia in the U.S. that protected us from generic drug competition until March 20, 2025. Following LoE, the number of additional generic versions of Auryxia that enter the market, and the timing thereof, will affect our revenue from Auryxia. We and our licensors entered into settlement agreements with all of the third parties who submitted Paragraph IV certification notice letters regarding ANDAs submitted to the FDA, pursuant to which we granted licenses to market a generic version of Auryxia in the U.S. beginning on March 20, 2025 (subject to FDA approval). In addition, on February 5, 2025, we entered into an Authorized Generic Distribution and Supply Agreement with our AG Distributor, pursuant to which, since March 20, 2025, they have been selling an authorized generic version of Auryxia. On March 11, 2026, Teva received approval for its ANDA for a generic version of Auryxia, which has subsequently entered the market. We expect Teva's entry into the market, and the entry of any additional generic versions of Auryxia that may be approved in addition to our AG Distributor, will adversely impact our revenue. However, the impact on future Auryxia revenues will depend on many factors, including our ability to maintain contracts with dialysis organizations, the timing and number of additional generics, the amount of generic product available to supply the market and the pricing of generics and other products on the market that compete with Auryxia.

Previous wording

Auryxia is competing in the hyperphosphatemia market in the U.S. with other FDA-approved phosphate binders such as Renagel® (sevelamer hydrochloride) and Renvela® (sevelamer carbonate), both marketed by Sanofi, PhosLo® and Phoslyra® (calcium acetate), marketed by Fresenius Medical Care North America, Fosrenol® (lanthanum carbonate), marketed by Shire Pharmaceuticals Group plc, and Velphoro® (sucroferric oxyhydroxide), marketed by Fresenius Medical Care North America, as well as over-the-counter calcium carbonate products such as TUMS® and metal-based options such as aluminum, lanthanum and magnesium. Most of the phosphate binders listed above are now also available in generic forms. In addition, other agents are in development, including OPKO Health Inc.’s Alpharen™ Tablets (fermagate tablets) and Unicycive’s RENAZORB™ (lanthanum dioxycarbonate), or could otherwise enter the market that may impact the market for Auryxia. In October 2023, the FDA approved XPHOZAH® (tenapanor), a phosphate absorption inhibitor that is marketed by Ardelyx and indicated to reduce serum phosphorus in adults with CKD on dialysis as add-on therapy in patients who have an inadequate response to phosphate binders or who are intolerant of any dose of phosphate binder therapy, which may adversely impact the market for Auryxia.

Current wording

Auryxia is competing in the hyperphosphatemia market in the U.S. with other FDA-approved phosphate binders such as Renagel® (sevelamer hydrochloride) and Renvela® (sevelamer carbonate), both marketed by Sanofi, PhosLo® and Phoslyra® (calcium acetate), marketed by Fresenius Medical Care North America, Fosrenol® (lanthanum carbonate), marketed by Shire Pharmaceuticals Group plc, and Velphoro® (sucroferric oxyhydroxide), marketed by Fresenius Medical Care North America, as well as over-the-counter calcium carbonate products such as TUMS® and metal-based options such as aluminum, lanthanum and magnesium. Most of the phosphate binders listed above are now also available in generic forms. In addition, other agents are in development, including OPKO Health Inc.’s Alpharen™ Tablets (fermagate tablets) and Unicycive’s RENAZORB™ (lanthanum dioxycarbonate), or could otherwise enter the market that may impact the market for Auryxia. XPHOZAH® (tenapanor), a phosphate absorption inhibitor that is marketed by Ardelyx, is indicated to reduce serum phosphorus in adults with CKD on dialysis as add-on therapy in patients who have an inadequate response to phosphate binders or who are intolerant of any dose of phosphate binder therapy, which may adversely impact the market for Auryxia.

Previous wording

In Japan, our Japanese sublicensee, Japan Tobacco International, or JT, and its subsidiary, Torii Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., or Torii, commercialize Riona. In the hyperphosphatemia market, Riona competes with Fosrenol® (lanthanum carbonate hydrate) marketed by Bayer Yakuhin Ltd., generic lanthanum carbonate hydrate products, and Phozevel® (tenapor hydrochloride) marketed by Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd. In the IDA market in Japan, Riona competes with Ferromia® (sodium ferrous citrate) marketed by Alfresa Pharma Corporation and Fero-Gradumet® (dried ferrous sulfate) marketed by Viatris Inc.

Current wording

In Japan, our Japanese sublicensees, Japan Tobacco International (succeeded by Shionogi & Co., Ltd.), or JT, and its subsidiary, Torii Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., or Torii, commercialize Riona. In the hyperphosphatemia market, Riona competes with Fosrenol® (lanthanum carbonate hydrate) marketed by Bayer Yakuhin Ltd., generic lanthanum carbonate hydrate products, and Phozevel® (tenapor hydrochloride) marketed by Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd. In the IDA market in Japan, Riona competes with Ferromia® (sodium ferrous citrate) marketed by Alfresa Pharma Corporation and Fero-Gradumet® (dried ferrous sulfate) marketed by Viatris Inc.

Previous wording

Furthermore, Auryxia’s commercial opportunities may be reduced or eliminated if our competitors develop and market products that are less expensive, more effective, safer or offer greater patient convenience than Auryxia. Other companies have product candidates in various stages of preclinical or clinical development to treat diseases and complications of the diseases for which we are marketing Auryxia.

Current wording

Furthermore, Auryxia’s commercial opportunities may be reduced or eliminated if our competitors develop and market products that are less expensive, more effective, safer or offer greater patient convenience than Auryxia. Other companies have product candidates in various stages of preclinical or clinical development to treat diseases and complications of the diseases for which we are marketing Auryxia. For example, on March 11, 2026, Teva received approval for its ANDA for a generic version of Auryxia, which has subsequently entered the market.

Previous wording

Drugs that may compete with Vafseo include Epogen® (epoetin alfa) and Aranesp® (darbepoetin alfa), both commercialized by Amgen in the U.S. and Europe, Procrit® (epoetin alfa) and Eprex® (epoetin alfa), commercialized by Johnson & Johnson in the U.S. and Europe, respectively, Mircera® (methoxy PEG-epoetin beta), commercialized by CSL Vifor in the U.S. and Roche Holding Ltd., or Roche, outside of the U.S., Evrenzo® (roxadustat) in Europe commercialized by Astellas Pharma Inc., or Astellas, Eporatio® (epoetin theta) in Europe commercialized by Teva Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Silapo® (epoetin zeta) in Europe commercialized by Stada Arzneimittel AG, Epoetin Alfa Hexal® (epoetin alfa) in Europe commercialized by Hexal AG, Binocrit® (epoetin alfa-biosimilar) in Europe commercialized by Sandoz, and NeoRecormon® (epoetin beta) in Europe commercialized by Roche.

Current wording

Holding Ltd., or Roche, outside of the U.S., Evrenzo® (roxadustat) in Europe commercialized by Astellas Pharma Inc., or Astellas, Eporatio® (epoetin theta) in Europe commercialized by Teva Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Silapo® (epoetin zeta) in Europe commercialized by Stada Arzneimittel AG, Epoetin Alfa Hexal® (epoetin alfa) in Europe commercialized by Hexal AG, Binocrit® (epoetin alfa-biosimilar) in Europe commercialized by Sandoz, and NeoRecormon® (epoetin beta) in Europe commercialized by Roche. There has been increased pricing pressures for ESAs, which we believe is due to competition, and which may negatively impact the price of, and the market for, Vafseo after the TDAPA period.

Previous wording

Furthermore, certain companies are developing potential new therapies for the treatment of renal-related diseases that could potentially reduce injectable erythropoiesis stimulating agent, or ESA, utilization and thus limit the market potential for Vafseo if they are approved and launched commercially. Other new therapies are in development for the treatment of conditions inclusive of renal anemia that may impact the market for anemia-targeted treatment. In addition, other new therapies for the treatment of patients with CKD not on dialysis, or NDD-CKD, may slow the progression of NDD-CKD patients becoming patients with dialysis dependent CKD, or DD-CKD, thereby reducing the DD-CKD patient population which may impact the market opportunity for Vafseo.

Current wording

Furthermore, certain companies are developing potential new therapies for the treatment of renal-related diseases that could potentially reduce injectable ESA utilization and thus limit the market potential for Vafseo if they are approved and launched commercially. Other new therapies are in development for the treatment of conditions inclusive of renal anemia that may impact the market for anemia-targeted treatment. In addition, other new therapies for the treatment of patients with CKD not on dialysis, or NDD-CKD, may slow the progression of NDD-CKD patients becoming patients with dialysis dependent CKD, or DD-CKD, thereby reducing the DD-CKD patient population which may impact the market opportunity for Vafseo.

Previous wording

In Japan, vadadustat is sold under the name Vafseo, which is approved for patients with CKD, including both DD-CKD and NDD-CKD, and competes with roxadustat, daprodustat and enarodustat. Roxadustat is approved for the treatment of DD-CKD patients and NDD-CKD patients. In addition, daprodustat, GSK’s product candidate, and enarodustat, JT’s product candidate, are approved in Japan for the treatment of anemia due to CKD, and molidustat, Bayer HealthCare AG's product, is approved in Japan for the treatment of renal anemia. In China, roxadustat is commercialized for the treatment of anemia due to CKD in DD-CKD patients and for the treatment of anemia due to CKD in NDD-CKD patients.

Current wording

In Japan, vadadustat is sold under the name Vafseo, which is approved for patients with CKD, including both DD-CKD and NDD-CKD, and competes with roxadustat, daprodustat and enarodustat. Roxadustat is approved for the treatment of DD-CKD patients and NDD-CKD patients. In addition, daprodustat and enarodustat are approved in Japan for the treatment of anemia due to CKD, and molidustat, Bayer HealthCare AG's product, is approved in Japan for the treatment of renal anemia. In China, roxadustat is commercialized for the treatment of anemia due to CKD in DD-CKD patients and for the treatment of anemia due to CKD in NDD-CKD patients.

Showing the first 40 of 128 pairs. Open the source sections for the rest.

Rearranged current paragraphs (6)

Current report — wording carried from elsewhere

Drugs that compete with Vafseo include Epogen® (epoetin alfa) and Aranesp® (darbepoetin alfa), both commercialized by Amgen in the U.S. and Europe, Procrit® (epoetin alfa) and Eprex® (epoetin alfa), commercialized by Johnson & Johnson in the U.S. and Europe, respectively, Mircera® (methoxy PEG-epoetin beta), commercialized by CSL Vifor in the U.S. and Roche

Current report — wording carried from elsewhere

Vafseo or our product candidates. For example, following the termination of our collaboration agreements with Otsuka in 2022, we incurred additional expenses in connection with the launch of Vafseo in Europe and other countries.

Current report — wording carried from elsewhere

In some cases, there may be a limited number of qualified replacement manufacturers, or the technical skills or equipment required to manufacture a product or product candidate may be unique or proprietary to the original manufacturer, and we may have difficulty transferring such skills or technology to another third party, or a feasible alternative may not exist. These factors would increase our reliance on our current manufacturers or require us to obtain necessary regulatory approvals and licenses in order to have another third-party manufacture Auryxia or Vafseo. If we are required to change manufacturers for any reason, we will be required to verify that the new manufacturer maintains facilities and procedures that comply with quality standards and with all applicable regulations and guidelines. The delays and costs associated with the qualification of a new manufacturer and validation of manufacturing processes would negatively affect our ability to supply clinical trials, obtain and maintain marketing approval, or commercialize or satisfy patient demand for Auryxia and Vafseo, where approved, in a timely manner, within budget, or at all.

Current report — wording carried from elsewhere

We rely on third-party manufacturers to manufacture Auryxia and Vafseo for us and comply with cGMP regulations and guidance and other stringent regulatory requirements and guidance enforced by the FDA, EMA, PMDA and other global regulatory authorities. These requirements include, among other things, quality control, cGMP compliance, global regulatory requirements, and the maintenance of records and documentation. The facilities and processes used by our third-party manufacturers to manufacture Auryxia and Vafseo may be inspected by the FDA and other regulatory authorities at any time. Although we have oversight of the manufacturing processes of our third-party manufacturers, we do not ultimately control such manufacturing processes of, and do not have full control over, our third-party manufacturers, including, without limitation, their compliance with cGMP requirements and guidance for the manufacture of certain starting materials, drug substance and finished drug product. Similarly, although we review final production, we do not have full control over the ability of our third-party manufacturers to maintain adequate quality control, quality assurance and qualified personnel. Our third-party manufacturers may also have other clients and other priorities that could affect their manufacturing line capacity or delivery schedules, which are beyond our control.

Current report — wording carried from elsewhere

President Trump also issued an Executive Order detailing new reciprocal tariff rates for individual countries that took effect on August 7, 2025. The new reciprocal rates, which are consistent with the rates reflected in the trade deals already announced, range from 10% to 41%. The new rates do not apply to Canada, China, Mexico and a few other countries.

Current report — wording carried from elsewhere

Additionally, the use of artificial intelligence based software is increasingly being used in the biopharmaceutical industry. Use of artificial intelligence based software may lead to the release of confidential proprietary information, and adversarial artificial intelligence techniques could be used to reverse-engineer proprietary algorithms, infer sensitive clinical data from anonymized datasets, or bypass existing security controls, which may impact our ability to realize the benefit of our intellectual property. The secure maintenance of this sensitive information is critical to our business and reputation.
Rearranged previous paragraphs (7)

Previous report — wording carried elsewhere

Interest Only Period. We are required to pay interest and, after the Interest Only Period, principal on the first calendar day of each month. In the event of certain prespecified events, the repayment schedule will be accelerated. If any of these events occur, and we are required to repay principal sooner than we anticipate, it would have an adverse effect on our business.

Previous report — wording carried elsewhere

However, the failure to obtain reimbursement in one jurisdiction may negatively impact the ability to obtain reimbursement in another jurisdiction. In addition, we plan to rely on partners to obtain approval by reimbursement authorities outside the U.S. Our partners may not be able to obtain such reimbursement approvals on a timely basis, if at all, and favorable pricing in certain countries depends on a number of factors, some of which are outside of our partners' control. Vafseo was approved in Japan for the treatment of adult patients with anemia due to CKD and is being marketed by MTPC in Japan under the trade name Vafseo. Pricing and reimbursement strategy is a key component of MTPC’s commercialization plans for Vafseo in Japan.

Previous report — wording carried elsewhere

With respect to the global PRO 2 TECT Phase 3 program, the incidence of TEAEs during the ESA untreated patients study (Correction) in the Vafseo-treated patients was 90.9%, and 91.6% in darbepoetin alfa-treated patients. During the study, the most common TEAEs reported in Vafseo/darbepoetin alfa-treated patients were end-stage renal disease (34.7%/ 35.2%), hypertension (17.7%/ 22.1.%), hyperkalemia (12.3.%/ 15.6%), urinary tract infection (12.9%/ 12.0%), diarrhea (13.9%/ 10.0%), peripheral oedema (12.5%/ 10.5%), fall (9.6%/ 10%) and nausea (10%/ 8.2%). Serious TEAEs were 65.3% for Vafseo-treated patients and 64.5% for darbepoetin alfa-treated patients. The incidence of TEAEs during the ESA-treated patients study (Conversion) in Vafseo-treated patients was 89.1% and 87.7% in darbepoetin alfa-treated patients. During the study, the most common TEAEs reported in Vafseo/darbepoetin alfa-treated patients were end-stage renal disease (27.5%/ 28.4%), hypertension (14.4%/ 14.8%), urinary tract infection (12.2%/ 14.5%), diarrhea (13.8.%/ 8.8.%), peripheral oedema (9.9%/ 10.1%) and pneumonia (10.0%/ 9.7%). Serious TEAEs were 58.5% for Vafseo-treated patients and 56.6% for darbepoetin alfa-treated patients.

Previous report — wording carried elsewhere

In addition, foreign regulatory authorities may change their approval policies and new regulations may be enacted. For instance, the EU pharmaceutical legislation is currently undergoing a complete review process, in the context of the Pharmaceutical Strategy for Europe initiative, launched by the European Commission in November 2020. The European Commission’s proposal for revision of several legislative instruments related to medicinal products (potentially reducing the duration of regulatory data protection, revising the eligibility for expedited pathways, etc.) was published on April 26, 2023. On April 10, 2024 the European Parliament adopted a position on the proposal requesting several amendments to the package. The proposed revisions remain to be agreed and adopted by the European Parliament and European Council and the proposals may therefore be substantially revised before adoption, which is not anticipated before early 2026. The revisions may, however, have a significant impact on the pharmaceutical industry and our business in the long term. On June 4, 2025, after almost two years of negotiations among the EU Member States, the Council of the European Union adopted its position on the proposed overhaul of the EU general pharmaceutical legislative framework, which is known as the new Pharma Package. This proposal will now be the subject of additional negotiations and technical meetings, with the objective of reaching agreement on issues such as the regulatory data protection framework and the access and supply obligations. At this point, it appears that the period of market exclusivity for innovator products may be reduced from two years to one, exclusions from patent infringement for studies and trials will likely expand, and there will be a new obligation to ensure sufficient supply of medicines.

Previous report — wording carried elsewhere

In addition, government funding of the SEC and other government agencies on which our operations may rely, including those that fund R&D activities, is subject to the political process, which is inherently fluid and unpredictable. For example, the U.S. government shut down on October 1, 2025, and as of November 7, 2025 it has not reopened. Over the last several years, the

Previous report — wording carried elsewhere

China could result in a disadvantageous research and manufacturing environment in China, particularly for U.S. based companies, including retaliatory restrictions that hinder or potentially inhibit our ability to rely on contract development and manufacturing organizations, or CDMOs, and other service providers that operate in China, including our current Vafseo manufacturers.

Previous report — wording carried elsewhere

Furthermore, we may need to adjust the size of our workforce as a result of changes to our expectations for our business, which can result in management being required to divert a disproportionate amount of its attention away from our day-to-day activities and devote a substantial amount of time to managing these growth-related activities and related expenses.