AtlasClear Holdings, Inc.
For the period ended Jun 30, 2026. Filed Sep 24, 2026.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.
FY2026 · Filed Sep 24, 2026
What changed in Risk Factors?
Read the current filingPrevious report: 10-K
Period ended 2025-06-30; filed 2025-09-29.
0001104659-25-094578
Item 1A. Risk FactorsCurrent report: 10-K
Period ended 2026-06-30; filed 2026-09-24.
0001493152-26-044008
Item 1A. Risk FactorsThe baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.
Compared 197 previous paragraphs and 190 current paragraphs.
101 unchanged; 81 reworded; 7 added; 15 removed; 0 previous and 1 current paragraphs rearranged.
Tables are not compared: 75 previous and 10 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.
A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.
Added paragraphs (7)
Current report
We may not be able to successfully consummate the acquisitions of Ark or an institutional digital asset business.
Current report
On April 24, 2026, we announced that we had entered into a letter of intent to acquire Ark and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Dawson James Securities, Inc., and on July 22, 2026, we announced that we had amended the letter of intent to acquire Ark and had entered into a letter of intent to acquire an institutional digital asset business. Each of these letters of intent is non-binding, except for certain provisions including exclusivity and confidentiality. The completion of a definitive agreement to acquire either business remains subject to a number of factors, including due diligence satisfactory to us and board approvals by both companies. Although each letter of intent provides that certain provisions are binding on the parties, they do not obligate the parties to consummate the proposed transactions. If definitive agreements are entered into, the closing of each transaction will be subject to various closing conditions, including regulatory approval. There can be no assurance that any definitive agreements will be entered into or that the proposed transactions (or either of them) will be consummated on the terms contemplated by the letters of intent, or at all.
Current report
AtlasClearing is subject to amendments of rules adopted by NSCC that require AtlasClearing to have excess net capital of at least $10.0 million as of October 26, 2023 if AtlasClearing clears for an introducing broker. As of June 30, 2026 and 2025, AtlasClearing had net capital of approximately $14.4 million and $11.2 million, respectively. The Company has entered into FINRA-approved subordinated loan agreements totaling $1,930,000. The agreements consist of (i) six legacy subordinated notes totaling $650,000 with current and former officers, directors, and related parties that bear at 5% per annum, and (ii) six subordinated loan agreements totaling $1,280,000 funded in October 2023. The October 2023 subordinated loans were renewed through amendments approved by FINRA and bear interest at 10% per annum, payable quarterly. The amended October 2023 subordinated notes mature in October 2026.
Current report
During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2026, management implemented a formal remediation plan to enhance our internal controls over accounting for complex transactions. Specifically, management (i) established formal, standardized control activities requiring pre-closing accounting evaluation for complex and equity-linked transactions, (ii) implemented protocols requiring the retention and direct engagement of qualified external third-party technical accounting advisors, and (iii) expanded technical accounting research resources and strengthened internal review protocols prior to financial statement authorization. Based on management’s assessment using the criteria set forth in the COSO (2013) framework, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting and our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2026, and that this material weakness was fully remediated.
Current report
In addition, in October 2025 the Company issued the Restated Note to Funicular and sold Units consisting of shares of Common Stock and warrants. The Restated Note is convertible into, and the warrants included in the Units are exercisable for, shares of Common Stock at conversion and exercise prices that are subject to adjustment, and the issuance of shares of Common Stock upon such conversion or exercise would result in additional dilution to our stockholders. The warrants were valued using a Black-Scholes option pricing model, and changes in the assumptions underlying that valuation may result in additional charges to our results of operations.
Current report
We are a “smaller reporting company” within the meaning of the Securities Act, and if we continue to take advantage of certain exemptions from disclosure requirements available to smaller reporting companies, this could make our securities less attractive to investors and may make it more difficult to compare our performance with other public companies.
Removed paragraphs (15)
Previous report
The extent we rely on the Second ELOC Agreement as a source of funding will depend on a number of factors including the prevailing market price of our common stock and the extent to which we are able to secure working capital from other sources. If obtaining sufficient funding from Tau were to prove unavailable or prohibitively dilutive, we will need to secure another source of funding in order to satisfy our working capital needs. Even if we sell all $12,250,000 in shares of our Common Stock under the Second ELOC Agreement to Tau, we may still need additional capital to finance our future plans and working capital needs, and we may have to raise funds through the issuance of equity or debt securities, which we may not be able to obtain on favorable terms, if at all. If we raise additional equity financing, our shareholders may experience significant dilution of their ownership interests and the per share value of our common stock could decline.
Previous report
Wilson-Davis is substantially dependent on one principal customer.
Previous report
During the year ended June 30, 2025 and six months transition period ended June 30, 2024, Wilson-Davis received 6% and 10% of its revenue, respectively, from securities liquidations of Canadian traded securities for customers of Canaccord Genuity. The termination or material reduction in the securities liquidation for customers of Canaccord Genuity would have a material adverse effect on the revenues and results of operations of Wilson-Davis.
Previous report
If the Pacsquare Assets do not successfully scale, as the Company’s business grows, or do not perform adequately, this could adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations, and could damage its reputation.
Previous report
Although AtlasClear expects that the AtlasClear Platform, source code and other technology assets it acquired, from Pacsquare would be properly implemented and integrated into the Company’s systems, we cannot assure you that the code will successfully scale, or that the AtlasClear Platform, source code, software and other technology assets would perform adequately due to among other things, errors, viruses and defects.
Previous report
Some members of our management team have no prior experience managing a public company.
Previous report
Some members of our senior management team do not have any experience managing a publicly traded company, interacting with public company investors, and complying with the increasingly complex laws pertaining to public companies. Our management team may not successfully or efficiently manage our transition to being a public company, which will subject us to significant regulatory oversight and reporting obligations under the federal securities laws and the continuous scrutiny of securities analysts, investors and regulators. These new obligations and constituents will require significant attention from our senior management and could divert their attention away from the day-to-day management of our business, which could harm our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Previous report
We are an Emerging Growth Company, making comparisons to non-Emerging Growth companies difficult or impossible.
Previous report
We are an Emerging Growth Company (“EGC”) as defined in Section 2(a) of the Securities Act, as modified by the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”), and we have taken and expect to continue to take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not EGCs including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports, registrations statements and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. Further, Section 102(b)(1) of the JOBS Act exempts EGCs from being required to comply with new or revised financial accounting standards until private companies (that is, those that have not had a Securities Act registration statement declared effective or do not have a class of securities registered under the Exchange Act) are required to comply with the new or revised financial accounting standards. This exemption may make comparison of our financial statements with other public companies that are neither EGCs nor EGCs that have opted out of using the extended transition period difficult or impossible because of the potential differences in accounting standards used.
Previous report
In connection with the preparation of our Form 10-KT for the transition period ended June 30, 2024, and our Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2025, management reassessed the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures for the periods affected. As a result of that reassessment, management determined that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of June 30, 2025, and June 30, 2024 due to the material weaknesses with respect to compiling information to prepare financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The material weaknesses are due to the analysis and full disclosure of the Merger Agreement, the impact of the Merger Agreement on and the impact of the Business Combination Agreement as it relates to the classification of complex accounting instruments, and related financial disclosures.
Previous report
The shares of Common Stock issuable pursuant to the Pacsquare Purchase Agreement and the conversion of any amounts under the notes, including the Funicular Note and the convertible notes under the securities purchase agreements, to the extent exercised, converted and issued, would impose significant dilution on our stockholders. Also in connection with the Closing, AtlasClear Holdings agreed to settle certain accrued expenses and other obligations to certain parties through the issuance shares of Common Stock and intends to, in the future, issue additional shares of Common Stock, to settle other accrued expenses and obligations.
Previous report
Pursuant to the Winston & Strawn Agreement, the Company may issue up to $2,500,000 worth of shares of Common Stock as payment for legal services, in three equal installments of $833,333 beginning on August 9, 2024. The Company has not issued any shares in connection with the Winston & Strawn Agreement and the amounts payable remain due. Additionally, pursuant to the ELOC Agreement, Tau has committed to purchase, upon the terms thereof and subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, up to $12.5 million of Common Stock of the Company, at a price per share equal to 97% of the lowest VWAP of the Common Stock during a pricing period of three consecutive trading days following Tau’s receipt of the applicable advance notice sent by the Company from time to time, over the course of 24 months from the date of the ELOC Agreement. As of June 30, 2025, the Company has issued and settled 1,566,885 shares in connection with the ELOC agreement. Each advance may be up to the greater of 100,000 shares or 50% of the average daily volume traded of the shares during the 30 trading days immediately prior to the date the Company requests each advance. All of the foregoing issuances would result in substantial dilution of our stockholders and may have a negative impact on the market price of our Common Stock.
Previous report
On September 16, 2025, September 19, 2025 and September 23, 2025, the Company entered into separate securities purchase agreements (each, a “Securities Purchase Agreement”) with certain institutional investors (each, an “Investor”) under which the Company agreed to issue and sell, in a private placement, convertible promissory notes (each, a “Note” and collectively, the “Notes”) for an aggregate principal amount of $6,000,000, for a gross purchase price of $5,000,000, reflecting a 20% original issue discount, before fees and other expenses. The Notes do not bear interest, and mature on the earlier of six months from issuance or the date that the Company completes a Qualified Financing (meaning an issuance and sale of capital stock raising gross proceeds of at least $10 million, as defined in the Notes). The Notes may be converted into equity, at each holder’s option, at the closing of a Qualified Financing, at the same per share price as the securities sold in the Qualified Financing. The Company intends to use the proceeds from the sale of the Notes for general corporate purposes and working capital. The Notes are subject to customary events of default and related remedies.
Previous report
We will remain an emerging growth company until the earliest of: (i) June 30, 2026, (ii) the last day of the fiscal year in which we have total annual gross revenue of at least $1.235 billion; (iii) the last day of the fiscal year in which we are deemed to be a “large accelerated filer” as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act, which would occur if the market value of our Common Stock held by non-affiliates exceeded $700.0 million as of the last business day of the second fiscal quarter of such year; or (iv) the date on which we have issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt securities during the prior three-year period.
Reworded paragraphs (81)
Previous wording
We have a short operating history, which makes it difficult to evaluate our business and prospects or forecast our future results. In addition, our subsidiary, AtlasClear was formed in March 2022. Prior to such time, AtlasClear had no operations or assets. Upon Closing, AtlasClear received certain intellectual property from Atlas FinTech and Atlas Financial Technologies Corp., acquired the Pacsquare Assets and completed the acquisitions of Wilson-Davis. AtlasClear expects to complete CB Merger or a similar acquisition, however, we cannot assure you that the CB Merger will be completed as anticipated. As a result of these transactions, AtlasClear expects to acquire the capabilities to provide specialized banking and clearing services to other financial services firms. Even if AtlasClear is able to consummate CB Merger, we cannot assure you that we will achieve the anticipated synergies and benefits of such transactions, that our service offerings will appeal to our target market of financial services firms, generally with annual revenues up to $1 billion, or that we will achieve our anticipated financial results. If we are not able to complete the CB Merger, or if the combined company does not achieve the anticipated operational and financial results, the value of your investment would be materially and adversely affected.
Current wording
We have a short operating history, which makes it difficult to evaluate our business and prospects or forecast our future results. In addition, our subsidiary, AtlasClear was formed in March 2022. Prior to such time, AtlasClear had no operations or assets. Upon Closing, AtlasClear received certain intellectual property from Atlas FinTech and Atlas Financial Technologies Corp., acquired the Pacsquare Assets and completed the acquisitions of AtlasClearing. AtlasClear expects to complete CB Acquisition or a similar acquisition, however, we cannot assure you that the CB Acquisition will be completed as anticipated. As a result of these transactions, AtlasClear expects to acquire the capabilities to provide specialized banking and clearing services to other financial services firms. Even if AtlasClear is able to consummate CB Acquisition, we cannot assure you that we will achieve the anticipated synergies and benefits of such transactions, that our service offerings will appeal to our target market of financial services firms, generally with annual revenues up to $1 billion, or that we will achieve our anticipated financial results. If we are not able to complete the CB Acquisition, or if the combined company does not achieve the anticipated operational and financial results, the value of your investment would be materially and adversely affected.
Previous wording
We expect to raise capital through public or private financing or other arrangements, including through the sale of common stock pursuant to the Second ELOC Agreement (as defined herein), pursuant to which we have the right from time to time to direct Tau to purchase up to an aggregate of $12.25 million of shares of our common stock over a 24-month period, upon the terms thereof and subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, at a discount to the VWAP of the common stock during the applicable pricing period. Such financing may not be available on acceptable terms, or at all, and our failure to raise capital when needed could harm our business. In particular, our ability to sell shares to Tau and obtain funds under the Second ELOC Agreement is limited by the terms and conditions in the Second ELOC Agreement, including restrictions on the amounts we may sell to Tau at any one time.
Current wording
We expect to raise capital through public or private financing or other arrangements. Such financing may not be available on acceptable terms, or at all, and our failure to raise capital when needed could harm our business.
Previous wording
The loss of our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, or other key personnel, or failure to attract and retain other highly qualified personnel, could harm our business.
Current wording
The loss of members of our senior management or other key personnel, or failure to attract and retain other highly qualified personnel, could harm our business.
Previous wording
Our future success depends in large part on the continued services of senior management and other key personnel. In particular, we are dependent on the services of our Chief Executive Officer, who is critical to the future vision and strategic direction of our business. In December 2024, we removed Robert McBey from his role as Chief Executive Officer of AtlasClear Holdings and Wilson-Davis. In addition, in December 2024, Mr. Barber resigned from his role as Chief Financial Officer of AtlasClear Holdings, and in January 2025, Mr. McBey resigned from his role as Director. Although we have since hired a Chief Executive Officer for Wilson-Davis, and we have hired a new Chief Financial Officer for AtlasClear Holdings,we have not yet hired a new Chief Executive Officer. Our senior management and other key personnel are all employed on an at-will basis, which means that their employment could be terminated by us at any time, for any reason, and without notice. Conversely, employees may voluntarily terminate their employment at any time, for any reason, and without notice, and the risk of forfeiting equity incentives and/or losing other employee benefits might not be sufficient incentive for them to remain employed with us. If we lose the services of our senior management, as was the case with Mr. McBey and Mr. Barber, or other key personnel, or if we are unable to attract, train, assimilate, and retain the highly skilled personnel that we need, our business, operating results, and financial condition could be adversely affected.
Current wording
Our future success depends in large part on the continued services of senior management and other key personnel. In particular, we are dependent on the services of John Schaible, our Executive Chairman, Craig Ridenhour, our President, and Sandip Patel, our General Counsel and Chief Financial Officer, each of whom is critical to the future vision and strategic direction of our business. Our senior management and other key personnel are all employed on an at-will basis, which means that their employment could be terminated by us at any time, for any reason, and without notice. Conversely, employees may voluntarily terminate their employment at any time, for any reason, and without notice, and the risk of forfeiting equity incentives and/or losing other employee benefits might not be sufficient incentive for them to remain employed with us. If we lose the services of our senior management, or other key personnel, or if we are unable to attract, train, assimilate, and retain the highly skilled personnel that we need, our business, operating results, and financial condition could be adversely affected.
Previous wording
Our future success depends on our continuing ability to attract, train, assimilate, and retain highly skilled personnel, including a new Chief Executive Officer. We face intense competition for qualified individuals from numerous software and other technology companies. We may not be able to retain our current key employees or attract, train, assimilate, or retain other highly skilled personnel in the future. We may incur significant costs to attract and retain highly skilled personnel, and we may lose new employees to our competitors before we realize the benefit of our investment in recruiting and training them. If we are unable to attract and retain suitably qualified individuals, including a new Chief Executive Officer, who are capable of meeting our growing technical, operational, and managerial requirements, on a timely basis or at all, our business, operating results, and financial condition may be adversely affected.
Current wording
Our future success depends on our continuing ability to attract, train, assimilate, and retain highly skilled personnel. We face intense competition for qualified individuals from numerous software and other technology companies. We may not be able to retain our current key employees or attract, train, assimilate, or retain other highly skilled personnel in the future. We may incur significant costs to attract and retain highly skilled personnel, and we may lose new employees to our competitors before we realize the benefit of our investment in recruiting and training them. If we are unable to attract and retain suitably qualified individuals who are capable of meeting our growing technical, operational, and managerial requirements, on a timely basis or at all, our business, operating results, and financial condition may be adversely affected.
Previous wording
The requirement that we repay all outstanding notes, including the Funicular Note, could adversely affect our business plan, liquidity, financial condition, and results of operations.
Current wording
The requirement that we repay all outstanding notes, including the Restated Note, could adversely affect our business plan, liquidity, financial condition, and results of operations.
Previous wording
As discussed below, the Company sold and issued promissory notes including the Funicular Note and convertible notes under the Securities Purchase Agreement(collectively, the Convertible Notes”). If not converted, we are required to repay principal amounts outstanding under the Convertible Notes, as well as interest thereon. These obligations could have important consequences on our business. In particular, they could:
Current wording
As discussed below, the Company has sold and issued promissory notes, including the Restated Note and other convertible notes issued under the Securities Purchase Agreements (as defined below) (collectively, the Convertible Notes”). If not converted, we are required to repay principal amounts outstanding under the Convertible Notes, as well as interest thereon. These obligations could have important consequences on our business. In particular, they could:
Previous wording
If the proposed CB Merger is completed, we may experience difficulties in integrating the operations of Wilson-Davis and Commercial Bancorp and in realizing the expected benefits of these transactions.
Current wording
If the proposed CB Acquisition is completed, we may experience difficulties in integrating the operations of AtlasClearing and Commercial Bancorp and in realizing the expected benefits of these transactions.
Previous wording
Our success will depend, in part, on the ability of AtlasClear to successfully complete the proposed CB Merger, or a similar acquisition, and to realize the anticipated benefits of combining the operations of Wilson-Davis and Commercial Bancorp in an efficient and effective manner. The integration process could take longer than anticipated and could result in the loss of key employees from either company, the disruption of each company’s ongoing businesses, tax costs or inefficiencies, or inconsistencies in standards, controls, information technology systems, procedures and policies, any of which could adversely affect our ability to continue relationships with Wilson-Davis’ and Commercial Bancorp’s customers, employees or other third parties, or our ability to achieve the anticipated benefits of the transactions or the Business Combination, and could harm the Company’s financial performance. If we are unable to successfully integrate the operations of Wilson-Davis and Commercial Bancorp with our business, we may incur unanticipated liabilities and be unable to realize the revenue growth, operating efficiencies, synergies and other anticipated benefits resulting from such transactions and the Business Combination, and the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.
Current wording
Our success will depend, in part, on the ability of AtlasClear to successfully complete the proposed CB Acquisition, or a similar acquisition, and to realize the anticipated benefits of combining the operations of AtlasClearing and Commercial Bancorp in an efficient and effective manner. The integration process could take longer than anticipated and could result in the loss of key employees from either company, the disruption of each company’s ongoing businesses, tax costs or inefficiencies, or inconsistencies in standards, controls, information technology systems, procedures and policies, any of which could adversely affect our ability to continue relationships with AtlasClearing’s and Commercial Bancorp’s customers, employees or other third parties, or our ability to achieve the anticipated benefits of the transactions or the Business Combination, and could harm the Company’s financial performance. If we are unable to successfully integrate the operations of AtlasClearing and Commercial Bancorp with our business, we may incur unanticipated liabilities and be unable to realize the revenue growth, operating efficiencies, synergies and other anticipated benefits resulting from such transactions and the Business Combination, and the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.
Previous wording
Commercial Bancorp may have liabilities that are not known to AtlasClear and the indemnities negotiated in the Broker-Dealer Acquisition Agreement and the Bank Acquisition Agreement may not offer adequate protection.
Current wording
Commercial Bancorp, Ark or any other business we may acquire may have liabilities that are not known to AtlasClear and the indemnities negotiated in the applicable acquisition agreement may not offer adequate protection.
Previous wording
As part of the Broker-Dealer Acquisition Agreement, AtlasClear assumed certain liabilities of Wilson-Davis and as part of the Bank Acquisition Agreement, AtlasClear expects to assume certain liabilities of Commercial Bancorp if the transaction is consummated. There may be liabilities that AtlasClear failed or was unable to discover in the course of performing due diligence investigations into these companies. AtlasClear may also have not correctly assessed the significance of certain liabilities identified in the course of its due diligence. Any such liabilities, individually or in the aggregate, could have a material adverse effect on the combined company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. As we integrate Wilson-Davis and, if acquired, Commercial Bancorp, into our operations, we may learn additional information about Wilson-Davis and Commercial Bancorp, such as unknown or contingent liabilities and issues relating to compliance with applicable laws, that could potentially have a materially adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Current wording
As part of the Broker-Dealer Acquisition Agreement, AtlasClear assumed certain liabilities of AtlasClearing and as part of the Purchase Agreement, AtlasClear expects to assume certain liabilities of Commercial Bancorp if the transaction is consummated. In addition, we expect that any definitive agreements to acquire Ark, the institutional digital asset business or any other business we may seek to acquire will require AtlasClear to assume certain liabilities of the acquired company if the transaction is consummated. There may be liabilities that AtlasClear failed or was unable to discover in the course of performing due diligence investigations into these companies. AtlasClear may also have not correctly assessed the significance of certain liabilities identified in the course of its due diligence. Any such liabilities, individually or in the aggregate, could have a material adverse effect on the combined company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. As we integrate AtlasClearing and, if acquired, Commercial Bancorp, Ark or any other business into our operations, we may learn additional information about the acquired business, such as unknown or contingent liabilities and issues relating to compliance with applicable laws, that could potentially have a materially adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Previous wording
Risk Related to Wilson-Davis’ Business and Industry
Current wording
Risk Related to AtlasClearing’s Business and Industry
Previous wording
Wilson-Davis’ liquidation of microcap securities and related activities in the over-the-counter market segment expose it to significant risk.
Current wording
AtlasClearing’s liquidation of microcap securities and related activities in the over-the-counter market segment expose it to significant risk.
Previous wording
Wilson-Davis conducts activities, including customer liquidations of restricted and control securities, in microcap securities, which are subject to higher risks than securities traded on national securities exchanges. Microcap securities generally are issued by companies with low or “micro” capitalizations, meaning the total market capitalization value of the company’s stock is less than $250 million, which includes low-priced securities, or penny stocks, that trade at below $5.00 per share and have a market capitalization of less than $50 million. Microcap securities frequently are issued by smaller reporting companies, which relaxes many of the disclosure obligations applicable to larger companies (see below). Further, trading in such microcap securities requires Wilson-Davis to meet heightened customer disclosure obligations for any retail transactions. Because of perceived risks associated with the above factors, Wilson-Davis believes it faces heightened regulatory scrutiny from the SEC and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (the “FINRA”) and other self-regulatory organizations that require particular attention to compliance measures and supervision.
Current wording
AtlasClearing conducts activities, including customer liquidations of restricted and control securities, in microcap securities, which are subject to higher risks than securities traded on national securities exchanges. Microcap securities generally are issued by companies with low or “micro” capitalizations, meaning the total market capitalization value of the company’s stock is less than $250 million, which includes low-priced securities, or penny stocks, that trade at below $5.00 per share and have a market capitalization of less than $50 million. Microcap securities frequently are issued by smaller reporting companies, which relaxes many of the disclosure obligations applicable to larger companies (see below). Further, trading in such microcap securities requires AtlasClearing to meet heightened customer disclosure obligations for any retail transactions. Because of perceived risks associated with the above factors, AtlasClearing believes it faces heightened regulatory scrutiny from the SEC and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (the “FINRA”) and other self-regulatory organizations that require particular attention to compliance measures and supervision.
Previous wording
The over-the-counter markets for the microcap securities Wilson-Davis liquidates frequently have limited trading volume and volatile trading prices.
Current wording
The over-the-counter markets for the microcap securities AtlasClearing liquidates frequently have limited trading volume and volatile trading prices.
Previous wording
The trading markets for the microcap securities Wilson-Davis liquidates frequently have limited trading volume and volatile price fluctuations, which sometimes makes it difficult to fulfill customers’ orders at requested amounts or prices. In addition, because of market conditions, Wilson-Davis may restrict the number of shares that a customer or a group of customers may liquidate in a single security to mitigate possible undue market selling pressure or to reduce potential market impact. Wilson-Davis may not be successful in detecting market conditions that warrant the above or other trading precautions to meet its compliance obligations. Any such trading limitations may impair Wilson-Davis’ competitive position and contribute to customer dissatisfaction.
Current wording
The trading markets for the microcap securities AtlasClearing liquidates frequently have limited trading volume and volatile price fluctuations, which sometimes makes it difficult to fulfill customers’ orders at requested amounts or prices. In addition, because of market conditions, AtlasClearing may restrict the number of shares that a customer or a group of customers may liquidate in a single security to mitigate possible undue market selling pressure or to reduce potential market impact. AtlasClearing may not be successful in detecting market conditions that warrant the above or other trading precautions to meet its compliance obligations. Any such trading limitations may impair AtlasClearing’s competitive position and contribute to customer dissatisfaction.
Previous wording
The penny stock rules limit Wilson-Davis’ trading practices.
Current wording
The penny stock rules limit AtlasClearing’s trading practices.
Previous wording
Wilson-Davis must comply with special penny stock rules if it sells such stock to retail customers, as distinguished from other broker-dealers. Although Wilson-Davis has a policy of limiting penny stock sales only to other broker-dealers, if Wilson-Davis sells penny stocks to retail customers, it must provide purchasers of these stocks with a standardized risk disclosure document prepared by the Commission. This document provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks involved in investing in the penny stock market. A broker must also give a purchaser, orally or in writing, bid and offer quotations and information regarding broker and salesperson compensation, make a written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser, and obtain the purchaser’s written agreement to the purchase. The penny stock rules may make it difficult for investors to sell their shares of penny stock. Because of these rules, many brokers choose not to participate in penny stock transactions and there is less trading in penny stocks. Accordingly, investors may not always be able to resell shares of penny stock publicly at times and prices that they feel are appropriate. Wilson-Davis cannot assure that any penny stock rules compliance measures that it adopts and implements will be effective.
Current wording
AtlasClearing must comply with special penny stock rules if it sells such stock to retail customers, as distinguished from other broker-dealers. Although AtlasClearing has a policy of limiting penny stock sales only to other broker-dealers, if AtlasClearing sells penny stocks to retail customers, it must provide purchasers of these stocks with a standardized risk disclosure document prepared by the Commission. This document provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks involved in investing in the penny stock market. A broker must also give a purchaser, orally or in writing, bid and offer quotations and information regarding broker and salesperson compensation, make a written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser, and obtain the purchaser’s written agreement to the purchase. The penny stock rules may make it difficult for investors to sell their shares of penny stock. Because of these rules, many brokers choose not to participate in penny stock transactions and there is less trading in penny stocks. Accordingly, investors may not always be able to resell shares of penny stock publicly at times and prices that they feel are appropriate. AtlasClearing cannot assure that any penny stock rules compliance measures that it adopts and implements will be effective.
Previous wording
Wilson-Davis needs to continue to maintain its excess net capital above the NSCC requirement of $10 million to continue to provide correspondent clearing services for introducing brokers.
Current wording
AtlasClearing needs to continue to maintain its excess net capital above the NSCC requirement of $10 million to continue to provide correspondent clearing services for introducing brokers.
Previous wording
Wilson-Davis is subject to amendments of rules adopted by NSCC that require Wilson-Davis to have excess net capital of at least $10.0 million as of October 26, 2023 if Wilson-Davis clears for an introducing broker. As of June 30, 2025 and 2024, Wilson-Davis had net capital of approximately $11.2 million and $10.4 million, respectively. Investors, including the owners of Wilson-Davis and Mr. Schaible, provided an aggregate of $1,300,000 in subordinated demand notes which were funded on October 13, 2023 and FINRA approved the demand notes. The notes were renewed to mature on October 13, 2025 and to have an interest rate of 5% per annum, payable quarterly. During the year ended June 30, 2025, Glendale, the sole introducing broker at Wilson-Davis, provided $840,000 or approximately 6.5% of Wilson-Davis revenues. During the six months transition period ended June 30, 2024, Glendale, the sole introducing broker at Wilson-Davis, provided $164,000 or approximately 3% of Wilson-Davis’ revenues. However, the growth of clearing services for introducing broker customers is expected to be a key driver to meet the Company’s future revenue goals. As a result, if we fail to meet the increased capital requirements of NSCC on an ongoing basis, we would be unable to provide clearing services for introducing brokers which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s revenues in the future.
Current wording
During the year ended June 30, 2026, Glendale, provided $1.4 million or approximately 6.6% of AtlasClearing’s revenues. During the year ended June 30, 2025, Glendale, provided $0.84 million or approximately 6.5% of AtlasClearing revenues. However, the growth of clearing services for introducing broker customers is expected to be a key driver to meet the Company’s future revenue goals. As a result, if we fail to meet the increased capital requirements of NSCC on an ongoing basis, we would be unable to provide clearing services for introducing brokers which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s revenues in the future.
Previous wording
Wilson-Davis customers liquidate securities of smaller reporting companies that have relaxed disclosure obligations.
Current wording
AtlasClearing customers liquidate securities of smaller reporting companies that have relaxed disclosure obligations.
Previous wording
The microcap securities Wilson-Davis customers principally liquidate are issued by smaller reporting companies. The disclosures smaller reporting companies are required to provide in SEC periodic reports are less than those of larger reporting companies. Specifically, smaller reporting companies are able to provide simplified executive compensation disclosures in their filings, are exempt from the provisions of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requiring that independent registered public accounting firms provide an attestation on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and have certain other reduced disclosure obligations in their SEC filings, including being permitted to provide two, rather than three, years of audited financial statements in annual reports. Reduced disclosures in smaller reporting company periodic reports may make it harder for investors to analyze results of operations and financial prospects. Wilson-Davis believes that the foregoing contributes to increased volatility and lower trading volume for the securities markets for smaller reporting companies, many of which are microcap securities.
Current wording
The microcap securities AtlasClearing customers principally liquidate are issued by smaller reporting companies. The disclosures smaller reporting companies are required to provide in SEC periodic reports are less than those of larger reporting companies. Specifically, smaller reporting companies are able to provide simplified executive compensation disclosures in their filings, are exempt from the provisions of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requiring that independent registered public accounting firms provide an attestation on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and have certain other reduced disclosure obligations in their SEC filings, including being permitted to provide two, rather than three, years of audited financial statements in annual reports. Reduced disclosures in smaller reporting company periodic reports may make it harder for investors to analyze results of operations and financial prospects. AtlasClearing believes that the foregoing contributes to increased volatility and lower trading volume for the securities markets for smaller reporting companies, many of which are microcap securities.
Previous wording
Wilson-Davis customers also liquidate securities in companies that do not file SEC reports, so there is very little, if any, reliable data publicly available about them.
Current wording
AtlasClearing customers also liquidate securities in companies that do not file SEC reports, so there is very little, if any, reliable data publicly available about them.
Previous wording
In addition to smaller reporting companies, Wilson-Davis customers also liquidate securities of companies that are not subject to SEC reporting requirements and thus do not file any periodic reports. Frequently, there is little reliable available public information about the business activities, financial condition or results of operations, management, operating risks, or other material matters about such companies. Many of such companies have only recently been organized, have inadequate financial resources or liquidity and rely on the ongoing sale of stock or borrowings to sustain operations, do not have independent directors, and have engaged in material transactions with related parties. These companies may not have financial statements that have been reviewed by independent auditors. Transactions in the securities of these companies may expose Wilson-Davis to liability.
Current wording
In addition to smaller reporting companies, AtlasClearing customers also liquidate securities of companies that are not subject to SEC reporting requirements and thus do not file any periodic reports. Frequently, there is little reliable available public information about the business activities, financial condition or results of operations, management, operating risks, or other material matters about such companies. Many of such companies have only recently been organized, have inadequate financial resources or liquidity and rely on the ongoing sale of stock or borrowings to sustain operations, do not have independent directors, and have engaged in material transactions with related parties. These companies may not have financial statements that have been reviewed by independent auditors. Transactions in the securities of these companies may expose AtlasClearing to liability.
Previous wording
Wilson-Davis is, and may in the future be, subject to significant regulatory enforcement proceedings.
Current wording
AtlasClearing is, and may in the future be, subject to significant regulatory enforcement proceedings.
Previous wording
In the ordinary course of business, securities broker-dealers such as Wilson-Davis are highly regulated and are routinely and frequently examined by the SEC, FINRA, and the securities regulatory authorities of states in which they are licensed or conduct business. Such examinations review a broad ranges of business activities for compliance with the many statutes, rules, regulations, and interpretations governing Wilson-Davis’ activities. Examinations by any of the above authorities may lead to enforcement actions that expose Wilson-Davis and its personnel to defense costs and potential fines or other sanctions. For example, Wilson-Davis has appealed to the SEC an adverse ruling by FINRA’s National Adjudicatory Council, or “NAC,” finding that Wilson-Davis had violated FINRA rules respecting short sales, failing to supervise and implement adequate anti money-laundering procedures. NAC had ordered Wilson-Davis to pay a $1,100,000 fine and disgorge $51,624. Wilson-Davis cannot predict the outcome of its appeal or when a decision will be rendered. On July 10, 2025 the National Adjudicatory Council reduced the fines to an aggregate of $490,000. The Company made a timely appeal to the SEC to hear the case. Pursuant to FINRA Rules, the Company’s timely appeal of the decision to the SEC deferred the effectiveness of the findings and sanctions. Wilson-Davis established a $100,000 contingency reserve in the year ended June 30, 2021, for this litigation contingence, but cannot assure that this amount is adequate to cover any penalty determined on appeal. The amount of the fine and disgorgement by which a final judgment exceeds the contingency reserve amount would reduce Wilson-Davis’ excess capital. In addition to the payment of defense costs and potential fines or other sanctions associated with enforcement actions, customers may assert claims against Wilson-Davis or its personnel in legal suits or arbitration proceedings.
Current wording
In the ordinary course of business, securities broker-dealers such as AtlasClearing are highly regulated and are routinely and frequently examined by the SEC, FINRA, and the securities regulatory authorities of states in which they are licensed or conduct business. Such examinations review a broad ranges of business activities for compliance with the many statutes, rules, regulations, and interpretations governing AtlasClearing’s activities. Examinations by any of the above authorities may lead to enforcement actions that expose AtlasClearing and its personnel to defense costs and potential fines or other sanctions. For example, AtlasClearing has appealed to the SEC an adverse ruling by FINRA’s National Adjudicatory Council, or “NAC,” finding that AtlasClearing had violated FINRA rules respecting short sales, failing to supervise and implement adequate anti money-laundering procedures. NAC had ordered AtlasClearing to pay a $1.265 million fine. Atlas Clearing appealed to the SEC, the SEC affirmed the findings but sent the matter back to the NAC to reconsider the appropriate sanctions. On July 10, 2025 the NAC reduced the fines to an aggregate of $490,000. The Company made a timely appeal to the SEC to hear the case. Pursuant to FINRA Rules, the Company’s timely appeal of the decision to the SEC deferred the effectiveness of the findings and sanctions. AtlasClearing established a $100,000 contingency reserve in the year ended June 30, 2021, for this litigation contingence, but cannot assure that this amount is adequate to cover any penalty determined on appeal. The amount of the fine and disgorgement by which a final judgment exceeds the contingency reserve amount would reduce AtlasClearing’s excess capital. In addition to the payment of defense costs and potential fines or other sanctions associated with enforcement actions, customers may assert claims against AtlasClearing or its personnel in legal suits or arbitration proceedings.
Previous wording
Wilson-Davis and certain of its personnel are subject to various regulatory disciplinary orders that could be the basis of future regulatory action.
Current wording
AtlasClearing and certain of its personnel are subject to various regulatory disciplinary orders that could be the basis of future regulatory action.
Previous wording
Wilson-Davis is subject to previous disciplinary orders by FINRA and the SEC which, by their terms, do not expire. FINRA and the SEC can impose special supervision and compliance measures and may increase future regulatory scrutiny. In July 2019, FINRA initiated an enforcement proceeding against Wilson-Davis, certain former principals of Wilson-Davis, and a former registered representative/trader alleging that the firm and the registered representative manipulated the market of a designated security, responsible supervisory personnel failed to establish and maintain appropriate supervisory procedures, the firm and a former principal failed to implement and maintain appropriate anti-money laundering procedures, and provided inaccurate documents to FINRA staff (the “2019 FINRA Action”). Wilson-Davis and its former principals agreed to settle the matter, without admitting or denying the allegations respecting supervision, anti-money laundering, and documentation in July 2021 by consenting to an order under which the firm was censured and paid a $500,000 monetary penalty, one former principal was suspended in all capacities for 90 days, that principal and two other former principals were suspended for two years, and the firm was required to undertake certain compliance and remediation efforts. The firm promptly paid the fine and timely completed the required compliance and remediation efforts. In connection with the resolution of some matters, Wilson-Davis engaged qualified consultants to recommend specific compliance procedures and has implemented such required compliance enhancements. Wilson-Davis believes it has fully complied with all sanctions related to the July 2019 complaint. Previously, in December 2016, FINRA filed a complaint against Wilson-Davis asserting potential violations of several securities laws and regulations, regarding supervision, anti-money-laundering, and Regulation SHO speculation prohibitions (the “2016 FINRA Action”). Wilson-Davis denied the allegations and FINRA-imposed sanctions have been stayed pending appeal.
Current wording
AtlasClearing is subject to previous disciplinary orders by FINRA and the SEC which, by their terms, do not expire. FINRA and the SEC can impose special supervision and compliance measures and may increase future regulatory scrutiny. In July 2019, FINRA initiated an enforcement proceeding against AtlasClearing, certain former principals of AtlasClearing, and a former registered representative/trader alleging that the firm and the registered representative manipulated the market of a designated security, responsible supervisory personnel failed to establish and maintain appropriate supervisory procedures, the firm and a former principal failed to implement and maintain appropriate anti-money laundering procedures, and provided inaccurate documents to FINRA staff (the “2019 FINRA Action”). AtlasClearing and its former principals agreed to settle the matter, without admitting or denying the allegations respecting supervision, anti-money laundering, and documentation in July 2021 by consenting to an order under which the firm was censured and paid a $500,000 monetary penalty, one former principal was suspended in all capacities for 90 days, that principal and two other former principals were suspended for two years, and the firm was required to undertake certain compliance and remediation efforts. The firm promptly paid the fine and timely completed the required compliance and remediation efforts. In connection with the resolution of some matters, AtlasClearing engaged qualified consultants to recommend specific compliance procedures and has implemented such required compliance enhancements. AtlasClearing believes it has fully complied with all sanctions related to the July 2019 complaint. Previously, in December 2016, FINRA filed a complaint against AtlasClearing asserting potential violations of several securities laws and regulations, regarding supervision, anti-money-laundering, and Regulation SHO speculation prohibitions (the “2016 FINRA Action”). AtlasClearing denied the allegations and FINRA-imposed sanctions have been stayed pending appeal.
Previous wording
Wilson-Davis’ procedures, policies, and practices to comply with the comprehensive anti-money laundering regulatory regime may not be sufficient to assure compliance.
Current wording
AtlasClearing’s procedures, policies, and practices to comply with the comprehensive anti-money laundering regulatory regime may not be sufficient to assure compliance.
Previous wording
Wilson-Davis is subject to comprehensive anti-money laundering (“AML”) laws, regulations, and interpretations that apply to its activities under the Bank Secrecy Act. The AML regulatory regime covers a wide range of activities, including trading activities, securities liquidations and other transactions, funds and securities transfers, the opening of customer accounts, customer interactions, and other activities.
Current wording
AtlasClearing is subject to comprehensive anti-money laundering (“AML”) laws, regulations, and interpretations that apply to its activities under the Bank Secrecy Act. The AML regulatory regime covers a wide range of activities, including trading activities, securities liquidations and other transactions, funds and securities transfers, the opening of customer accounts, customer interactions, and other activities.
Previous wording
In July 2019, FINRA censured Wilson-Davis and assessed a $500,000 fine for violations, among others, of applicable AML rules. Further, Wilson-Davis engaged an independent consultant to help develop and implement new comprehensive policies and procedures designed to comply with applicable AML requirements. Wilson-Davis has completed this process but cannot assure that its new policies and procedures will in fact be adequate to assure AML compliance in practice. This enforcement proceeding and the related implementation of new AML policies and procedures may have heightened regulatory scrutiny of Wilson-Davis. Regulatory authorities may consider Wilson-Davis’ previous discipline as warranting increased sanctions in any subsequent enforcement proceeding finding AML violations.
Current wording
In July 2019, FINRA censured AtlasClearing and assessed a $500,000 fine for violations, among others, of applicable AML rules. Further, AtlasClearing engaged an independent consultant to help develop and implement new comprehensive policies and procedures designed to comply with applicable AML requirements. AtlasClearing has completed this process but cannot assure that its new policies and procedures will in fact be adequate to assure AML compliance in practice. This enforcement proceeding and the related implementation of new AML policies and procedures may have heightened regulatory scrutiny of AtlasClearing. Regulatory authorities may consider AtlasClearing’s previous discipline as warranting increased sanctions in any subsequent enforcement proceeding finding AML violations.
Previous wording
Although Wilson-Davis expends significant time and financial resources to monitor and investigate potential AML issues, Wilson-Davis’ resources, technologies, personnel, and fraud detection tools may be insufficient to accurately detect and prevent such activities. Significant increases in fraudulent or illegal activities could negatively impact Wilson-Davis’ reputation and reduce the trading volume through the firm. Any misbehavior of or violation by Wilson-Davis’ customers may also lead to regulatory investigations into the firm. Further, although Wilson-Davis may ultimately conclude that no fraud or money laundering exists, regulatory authorities may disagree that the red flags pointed towards such a conclusion and may impose various penalties without needing to point to any evidence of fraud or money laundering. Any such penalties could significantly harm the financial condition and results of operations of Wilson-Davis.
Current wording
Although AtlasClearing expends significant time and financial resources to monitor and investigate potential AML issues, AtlasClearing’s resources, technologies, personnel, and fraud detection tools may be insufficient to accurately detect and prevent such activities. Significant increases in fraudulent or illegal activities could negatively impact AtlasClearing’s reputation and reduce the trading volume through the firm. Any misbehavior of or violation by AtlasClearing’s customers may also lead to regulatory investigations into the firm. Further, although AtlasClearing may ultimately conclude that no fraud or money laundering exists, regulatory authorities may disagree that the red flags pointed towards such a conclusion and may impose various penalties without needing to point to any evidence of fraud or money laundering. Any such penalties could significantly harm the financial condition and results of operations of AtlasClearing.
Previous wording
Wilson-Davis cannot predict the duration or severity of economic conditions that may adversely affect its results of operations.
Current wording
AtlasClearing cannot predict the duration or severity of economic conditions that may adversely affect its results of operations.
Previous wording
Wilson-Davis’ revenue and profitability had been adversely affected by general downturns in the securities markets since early 2022, resulting from rising inflation, increased interest rates, the lingering economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, the military conflict in Ukraine and Israel, Hamas’ attack on Israel and the ensuing war and other factors. Wilson-Davis cannot predict the duration or severity of downturns of the securities markets or the economic and other factors that contribute to these market conditions.
Current wording
AtlasClearing’s revenue and profitability had been adversely affected by general downturns in the securities markets since early 2022, resulting from rising inflation, increased interest rates, the lingering economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, the military conflict in Ukraine and Israel, Hamas’ attack on Israel and the ensuing war and other factors. AtlasClearing cannot predict the duration or severity of downturns of the securities markets or the economic and other factors that contribute to these market conditions.
Previous wording
General, long-term financial and economic conditions and unforeseen events may adversely affect Wilson-Davis’ financial condition and results of operations.
Current wording
General, long-term financial and economic conditions and unforeseen events may adversely affect AtlasClearing’s financial condition and results of operations.
Previous wording
In addition to the previous and current securities markets and economic challenges, previous long-term market downturns, economic depressions and unforeseen events, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, have had an adverse impact on Wilson-Davis’ business. Although Wilson-Davis has established a disaster recovery plan, there is no guarantee that it could operate without disruption in the event a disaster were to occur. The occurrence of various unforeseeable events such as natural disasters, pandemics, terrorism and acts of war, could result in fewer customer orders and, as a result, decreased commissions and revenue, resulting in a significant impact on Wilson-Davis’ ability to conduct business and adversely affecting its results of operations and financial condition.
Current wording
In addition to the previous and current securities markets and economic challenges, previous long-term market downturns, economic depressions and unforeseen events, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, have had an adverse impact on AtlasClearing’s business. Although AtlasClearing has established a disaster recovery plan, there is no guarantee that it could operate without disruption in the event a disaster were to occur. The occurrence of various unforeseeable events such as natural disasters, pandemics, terrorism and acts of war, could result in fewer customer orders and, as a result, decreased commissions and revenue, resulting in a significant impact on AtlasClearing’s ability to conduct business and adversely affecting its results of operations and financial condition.
Previous wording
Wilson-Davis may be unable to attract and retain registered representatives and other professional employees.
Current wording
AtlasClearing may be unable to attract and retain registered representatives and other professional employees.
Previous wording
There is intense competition for experienced registered representatives with a knowledge of over-the-counter markets and a large customer network. Further, many customers may be more loyal to individual representatives than to the firm itself. If Wilson-Davis is unable to attract and retain the services of registered representatives, the firm may be unable to maintain or expand its customer base or may be unable to effectively manage the volume of orders it executes and clears. Likewise, Wilson-Davis relies upon financial and compliance professionals who are not registered representatives but who perform important services to the firm. If Wilson-Davis is unable to attract and retain such professionals, it may be unable to stay compliant in an increasingly complex regulatory environment. Further, the number of young professionals entering the broker-dealer industry has declined over time and Wilson-Davis’ inability to hire young professionals, particularly in light of the average age of Wilson-Davis’ existing professionals, may adversely impact its ability to retain or expand its customer base.
Current wording
There is intense competition for experienced registered representatives with a knowledge of over-the-counter markets and a large customer network. Further, many customers may be more loyal to individual representatives than to the firm itself. If AtlasClearing is unable to attract and retain the services of registered representatives, the firm may be unable to maintain or expand its customer base or may be unable to effectively manage the volume of orders it executes and clears. Likewise, AtlasClearing relies upon financial and compliance professionals who are not registered representatives but who perform important services to the firm. If AtlasClearing is unable to attract and retain such professionals, it may be unable to stay compliant in an increasingly complex regulatory environment. Further, the number of young professionals entering the broker-dealer industry has declined over time and AtlasClearing’s inability to hire young professionals, particularly in light of the average age of AtlasClearing’s existing professionals, may adversely impact its ability to retain or expand its customer base.
Previous wording
Wilson-Davis policy is to not recommend investments to its customers. However, Wilson-Davis cannot assure you that its policy of not making recommendations to customers will be observed in all cases or that any investment recommendation rules compliance measures that Wilson-Davis adopts and implements will be effective. Breaches of Wilson-Davis’ policy could expose Wilson-Davis to regulatory enforcement and to liability from its customers.
Current wording
AtlasClearing policy is to not recommend investments to its customers. However, AtlasClearing cannot assure you that its policy of not making recommendations to customers will be observed in all cases or that any investment recommendation rules compliance measures that AtlasClearing adopts and implements will be effective. Breaches of AtlasClearing’s policy could expose AtlasClearing to regulatory enforcement and to liability from its customers.
Previous wording
Wilson-Davis faces significant competition from other brokers and clearing firms.
Current wording
AtlasClearing faces significant competition from other brokers and clearing firms.
Showing the first 40 of 81 pairs. Open the source sections for the rest.
Rearranged current paragraphs (1)
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
As a public company trading on the NYSE American, we are subject to significant requirements for enhanced financial reporting and internal controls.